LoongArch: BPF: Use move_addr() for BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC
commit52266f1015upstream. Vincent reported that running XDP synproxy program on LoongArch results in the following error: JIT doesn't support bpf-to-bpf calls With dmesg: multi-func JIT bug 1391 != 1390 The root cause is that verifier will refill the imm with the correct addresses of bpf_calls for BPF_PSEUDO_FUNC instructions and then run the last pass of JIT. So we generate different JIT code for the same instruction in two passes (one for placeholder and the other for the real address). Let's use move_addr() instead. See commit64f50f6575("LoongArch, bpf: Use 4 instructions for function address in JIT") for a similar fix. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes:69c087ba62("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper") Fixes:bb035ef0cc("LoongArch: BPF: Support mixing bpf2bpf and tailcalls") Reported-by: Vincent Li <vincent.mc.li@gmail.com> Tested-by: Vincent Li <vincent.mc.li@gmail.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/loongarch/CAK3+h2yfM9FTNiXvEQBkvtuoJrvzmN4c_NZsFXqEk4Cj1tsBNA@mail.gmail.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent
7df2696256
commit
7cf8fe2b2b
@@ -872,7 +872,10 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx, bool ext
|
||||
{
|
||||
const u64 imm64 = (u64)(insn + 1)->imm << 32 | (u32)insn->imm;
|
||||
|
||||
move_imm(ctx, dst, imm64, is32);
|
||||
if (bpf_pseudo_func(insn))
|
||||
move_addr(ctx, dst, imm64);
|
||||
else
|
||||
move_imm(ctx, dst, imm64, is32);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user