Both todo one-line surfaces truncate the active hint with overflow: hidden
and text-overflow: ellipsis. A "+N" appended to the first active task's name
therefore sat at the far end of the truncatable text, so a long task name or a
narrow viewport clipped exactly the part that reports the other running tasks,
leaving a parallel plan indistinguishable from a sequential one.
planSummary now returns activeContent and activeExtra as separate fields
instead of one joined activeHint, and each surface renders the count in its own
flex: none span beside the ellipsized name: .activeExtra in the collapsed plan
strip header, .extra in the todo_write row. Putting the count in front of the
name was rejected — the task name is what the reader looks for first.
The parallel-plan cases in todo-panel.spec.tsx now assert the count is a
separate element from the name, and both fail if the two are rejoined. The
assembled web snapshot re-records: the flex gap supplies the visual space, so
the transcript reads "实现 fixture 样本+1" with no space in the text nodes.
Lifting the single-in_progress cap makes a list shape reachable that the
web surfaces never received. Two sites derived their one-line summary with
todos.find(t => t.status === 'in_progress') — the collapsed TodoPanel header
and the todo_write row — which was total under the old cap and silently
dropped every active item but the first once several could match: a plan
with three running tasks collapsed to the name of one. The expanded list
was always correct, so neither PR's tests covered it.
Both sites now take planSummary in contract/todo-plan-model.ts, the
domain-shared face both the skeleton and toolviews domains may import; the
duplicated derivation was why one find could be fixed while the other
stayed wrong. The hint names the first active item and suffixes +<n> for
the rest, so the collapsed line reports how many tasks are running.
The web fixture's todo sample now runs two items in_progress, so the
assembled web transcript replays a parallel plan: the row reads
'1/4 已完成 · 实现 fixture 样本 +1' over the built bundles.
The todo row and the todo plan strip were registered without a contract in this
package's README, which still described only the bash sample. Both sides now
carry the two registrations: TodoRow's `todo_write` toolview key with its
attempted-write summary and non-ok dot semantics, and TodoDock's
`conversation.input.dock` entry at `order: -1` with the dock-owned selection,
empty-hidden panel, collapse behavior, and the composer-takeover consequence
that hides the whole dock. README.i18n.yaml re-recorded.
