Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into worktree/web-session-model-selector

This commit is contained in:
imccyu
2026-07-28 00:39:24 +08:00
1004 changed files with 30524 additions and 18348 deletions

View File

@@ -2,4 +2,6 @@
Agent Notes are effectively RFCs written by agents: durable proposals and decision records that preserve rationale, alternatives, consequences, and verification contracts. Follow the [documentation standard](../../docs/AGENTS.md) and the [Agent Note contract](README.md).
**Every new Agent Note triggers a supersession check.** Search the active tree for older notes covering the same decision or mechanism, classify any full or partial supersession with [`dsh-archive-agent-notes`](../skills/dsh-archive-agent-notes/SKILL.md), and archive every qualifying implemented triplet in the same PR. Keep partial supersessions active and cross-linked.
Files under [`archived/`](archived/AGENTS.md) are frozen historical snapshots: never edit them or treat them as current authority.

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.md: 22a56dc6d69340ca1b5f7b77edb4731066c9b2f5
2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.zh.md: 09ebce376a206591ac766067cc41497b74ed1545
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.md
2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.md: 83d47e3a7d91bbcd2ceaf7b11cf13316142eb3ed
2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.zh.md: 00dcbad3d1023ad33a22297bfe938b94bce839d4

View File

@@ -4,11 +4,13 @@ Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.zh.md)
The [per-provider request retry policy](../feature/2026-07-24-provider-retry-policies.md) extends this foundation with exact-provider configuration and an explicit unbounded mode. This note continues to own structured failure facts, the closed-step recovery boundary, normal mode's transient defaults, visible single attempts, and durable retry status.
## Problem
`dsh-llm` can report provider failures either by throwing during adapter dispatch or iteration or by ending with `finish { kind: 'error' | 'aborted' }`. The final adapter boundary tags thrown failures so `dsh-agent-loop` can distinguish them from middleware and result-processing defects, and the loop normalizes both delivery forms into `agent/request-error` after closing the failed step. The default decision is `fail`; `dsh-compact-basic` is the only shipped recovery listener, and it retries a canonical context-window overflow only after compaction proves that the durable surface shrank.
`dsh-llm` can report provider failures either by throwing during adapter dispatch or iteration or by ending with `finish { kind: 'error' | 'aborted' }`. The final adapter boundary tags thrown failures so `dsh-agent-loop` can distinguish them from middleware and result-processing defects, and the loop normalizes both delivery forms into `agent/request-error` after closing the failed step. An unhandled failure is terminal; a handling listener repairs policy-owned state, returns `{ kind: 'retry' }`, and stops waterfall delegation. The [retry-action decision](../simplification/2026-07-27-request-error-retry-action.md) owns this return contract.
That boundary is already safe for another request attempt. Raw `assistant/chunk` events carry the failed `turn` and `step`, message derivation ignores them unless a successful `assistant/message` cites them, tool calls are dispatched only after a successful terminal finish and assembly, and a retry opens a new numbered step from the durable log. The harness therefore does not need a second response lifecycle or tentative-output protocol to keep two attempts separate.
That boundary is already safe for another request attempt. Raw `assistant/chunk` events carry the failed `turn` and `step`, message derivation ignores them unless a successful `assistant/message` cites them, tool calls are dispatched only after a successful terminal finish and assembly, and a retry opens a new numbered turn from the durable log. The harness therefore does not need a second response lifecycle or tentative-output protocol to keep two attempts separate.
The prior boundary left three narrower gaps.
@@ -16,7 +18,7 @@ The prior boundary left three narrower gaps.
- Retry ownership differs by adapter. The hand-written DeepSeek adapter makes one attempt, while pi-ai profiles can enable opaque library retries. Combining hidden transport retries with an `agent/request-error` listener would multiply attempts and omit intermediate failures from the session log.
- A recovered failure has no durable status fact. The failed step and chunks remain reconstructable, but an observer cannot tell whether the agent is deliberately backing off, for how long, or why. A long silent wait looks like a stalled loop.
The goal is bounded recovery from transient failures of the same explicit provider/model request. Provider or model failover, response splicing, and semantic output repair are different problems and have no current consumer.
The default policy provides bounded recovery from transient failures of the same explicit provider/model request. Provider or model failover, response splicing, and semantic output repair are different problems and have no current consumer.
## Decision
@@ -50,31 +52,19 @@ The shared transient-code set is intentionally small: adapter mappings for `RATE
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-llm-retry` is a function plugin that listens to `agent/request-error`. It introduces no service or new loop branch; the agent-loop package changes only the data carried through its existing failed-step recovery control flow.
The `agent/request-error` seam carries the current `LlmFailure` and an immutable list of prior failures that led to another request attempt in this consecutive recovery sequence. `dsh-llm-retry` counts only prior failures whose codes are in its configured transient set, while `dsh-compact-basic` counts only prior context-overflow failures. A successful model request clears the history. Alternating transient and context-overflow failures therefore consume their owning policy budgets independently; the maximum request count is one plus the sum of the finite budgets of the loaded recovery policies.
The `agent/request-error` seam carries the current `LlmFailure`, an immutable list of prior failures that authorized retry turns in the consecutive recovery sequence, and the serving registration's immutable retry policy. The loop transports but does not interpret that policy, owns the consecutive failure history, and clears it after a successful model request. Normal `dsh-llm-retry` policy counts durable retry records scheduled by the same exact-provider policy, while `dsh-compact-basic` keeps its own context-overflow budget. Alternating transient and context-overflow failures therefore consume their owning finite budgets independently; the maximum request count is one plus the sum of the loaded finite budgets.
The plugin resolves and validates this deployment configuration at load:
```ts ignore-check
interface Config {
maxTransientRetries?: number
initialDelayMs?: number
maxDelayMs?: number
jitterRatio?: number
retryableCodes?: string[]
}
```
The defaults are two transient retries, a 500 millisecond initial delay, a 10 second delay cap, 10 percent jitter, and the five transient codes above (`RATE_LIMIT`, `SERVER`, `TIMEOUT`, `TRANSPORT`, and `EMPTY_RESPONSE`). The count and delay bounds match the conservative edge of the inspected implementations: [OpenCode uses two request retries with 500 ms/10 s bounds](https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/blob/9976269ab1accfc9f9dc98a4a688c516934de422/%70ackages/llm/src/route/executor.ts#L36-L39), [Pi separates three agent-level retries from provider retries and defaults provider retries to zero](https://github.com/earendil-works/pi/blob/3da591ab74ab9ab407e72ed882600b2c851fae21/%70ackages/coding-agent/docs/settings.md#L139-L147), and [Codex uses finite request/stream budgets plus a five-minute idle timeout](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/0fb559f0f6e231a88ac02ea002d3ecd248e2b515/codex-rs/model-provider-info/src/lib.rs#L25-L33). Ten percent follows [Codex's bounded jitter](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/0fb559f0f6e231a88ac02ea002d3ecd248e2b515/codex-rs/codex-client/src/retry.rs#L40-L47). Two retries mean at most three provider requests when no other recovery policy applies. `maxTransientRetries` is a non-negative integer, delays are positive finite numbers with `initialDelayMs <= maxDelayMs`, `jitterRatio` is in `[0, 1]`, and codes are non-empty and unique. These are Cordis config fields rather than hidden constants so deployments can choose different cost and latency budgets.
The [provider-policy decision](../feature/2026-07-24-provider-retry-policies.md) owns the current configuration shape. Provider adapters register their nested `retryPolicy`; omission uses normal defaults: two transient retries, a 500 millisecond initial delay, a 10 second delay cap, 10 percent jitter, and the five transient codes above. The count and delay bounds match the conservative edge of the inspected implementations: [OpenCode uses two request retries with 500 ms/10 s bounds](https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/blob/9976269ab1accfc9f9dc98a4a688c516934de422/%70ackages/llm/src/route/executor.ts#L36-L39), [Pi separates three agent-level retries from provider retries and defaults provider retries to zero](https://github.com/earendil-works/pi/blob/3da591ab74ab9ab407e72ed882600b2c851fae21/%70ackages/coding-agent/docs/settings.md#L139-L147), and [Codex uses finite request/stream budgets plus a five-minute idle timeout](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/0fb559f0f6e231a88ac02ea002d3ecd248e2b515/codex-rs/model-provider-info/src/lib.rs#L25-L33). Ten percent follows [Codex's bounded jitter](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/0fb559f0f6e231a88ac02ea002d3ecd248e2b515/codex-rs/codex-client/src/retry.rs#L40-L47).
For an eligible failure with budget remaining, the one-based transient retry count uses bounded exponential backoff. A valid `providerRetryAfterMs` replaces exponential backoff only when it does not exceed `maxDelayMs`; a longer provider delay causes delegation instead of an earlier retry that violates the provider instruction. Local backoff multiplies by an injected random factor in `[1 - jitterRatio, 1 + jitterRatio]` and clamps the final value to `maxDelayMs`; provider delay is not jittered.
The plugin owns a lifetime `AbortController` and tracks every active backoff callback. Each wait fuses the waterfall's turn signal with that lifetime signal. Effect cleanup first unregisters the listener, then aborts and awaits the active callbacks; a captured callback whose lifetime signal aborts returns `fail` and can neither retry nor enter the rest of its captured waterfall after disposal. This makes HMR disposal quiescent even though Cordis has already captured the listener.
The plugin owns a lifetime `AbortController` and tracks every active recovery callback, including delegated waterfall work and backoff. Effect cleanup first unregisters the listener, then aborts and awaits the active callbacks; abort wins over a late delegated retry decision, and a captured callback can neither retry nor enter the rest of its waterfall after disposal. This makes HMR disposal quiescent even though Cordis has already captured the listener.
Before sleeping, `dsh-llm-retry` appends one non-surface `llm/retry` session event containing the turn, failed step, one-based transient retry number, configured maximum, scheduled delay, and `LlmFailure`. The plugin owns the `SessionEventMap` augmentation; `dsh-session` remains generic persistence and does not absorb the optional policy's vocabulary. The event says what was scheduled, not that the next request completed; cancellation during the delay is subsequently visible on `turn/end`. The event ships only with a production renderer and replay/snapshot coverage, because its purpose is operational state rather than trace collection.
Before sleeping, `dsh-llm-retry` appends one non-surface `llm/retry` session event containing the turn, failed step, provider, policy mode, complete resolved-policy key, provider-policy retry number, mode-specific finite maximum when present, scheduled delay, and `LlmFailure`. The key sorts the code set and separates retry histories when a provider route is replaced by a behaviorally different same-mode policy. The plugin owns the `SessionEventMap` augmentation; `dsh-session` remains generic persistence and does not absorb the optional policy's vocabulary. The event says what was scheduled, not that the next request completed; cancellation during the delay is subsequently visible on `turn/end`. The event ships only with a production renderer and replay/snapshot coverage, because its purpose is operational state rather than trace collection.
The listener calls `next()` for a non-transient code, an exhausted policy budget, or an over-cap provider delay. This preserves composition with context-overflow recovery and later policy plugins. It returns `{ action: 'retry' }` only after the delay completes under both signals; turn cancellation and plugin disposal return `fail`, after which the loop's cancellation/disposal checks remain authoritative.
The listener calls `next()` for a non-transient code, an exhausted policy budget, or an over-cap provider delay. This preserves composition with context-overflow recovery and later policy plugins. For an owned failure it records and awaits the delay, then returns `{ kind: 'retry' }` without delegating. Turn cancellation and plugin disposal end the wait without returning a retry; the loop's cancellation/disposal checks remain authoritative.
The agent-spine demo bundle loads the plugin so the shared stdio/TUI, one-shot CLI, and ACP example compositions use the same bounded policy. Library consumers retain explicit plugin composition: omitting the plugin leaves `agent/request-error` at its current fail default.
The agent-spine demo bundle loads the plugin so the shared stdio/TUI, one-shot CLI, and ACP example compositions use the same provider-routed policy. Library consumers retain explicit plugin composition: omitting the plugin leaves request failures terminal.
### Make one layer own visible attempts
@@ -92,7 +82,7 @@ Boundary tests prove termination at both actual transports. The hand-written ada
### Keep attempts separate in the existing log
A failed attempt may leave `assistant/chunk` events in its closed step, but it never appends `assistant/message` and never dispatches a tool. A retry opens the next numbered step, reconstructs the request from the durable surface, and produces its own chunks. UIs may render live chunks while a step is open, then mark or clear that transient view when `llm/retry` identifies the failed step or `turn/end` records terminal failure; message derivation continues to ignore the failed chunks.
A failed attempt may leave `assistant/chunk` events in its closed step, but it never appends `assistant/message` and never dispatches a tool. A retry closes the failed turn, opens the next numbered turn, reconstructs the request from the durable surface, and produces its own chunks. UIs may render live chunks while a step is open, then mark or clear that transient view when `llm/retry` identifies the failed step or `turn/end` records failure; message derivation continues to ignore the failed chunks.
If recovery is exhausted, the final failure is stored once on `turn/end.reason` with the structured facts. If transient recovery continues, `llm/retry` is the durable home for that attempt's failure and delay. No standalone final-error event or response-id vocabulary is added.
@@ -101,7 +91,7 @@ If recovery is exhausted, the final failure is stored once on `turn/end.reason`
- Automatic provider or model failover. Requests already select one explicit provider and model, and the provider registry deliberately has one adapter owner per provider.
- Retrying or continuing after a successful terminal finish, or splicing chunks from two attempts into one assistant message.
- Repairing malformed tool arguments, refusals, content filters, or other semantic model output.
- Unbounded retries, unattended retry-until-cancelled behavior, circuit breakers, shared provider health, or cross-agent retry budgets.
- Circuit breakers, shared provider health, or cross-agent retry budgets.
- Changing `llm/stream` into a response lifecycle or adding convenience generation APIs without a production consumer.
## Alternatives considered
@@ -110,7 +100,7 @@ If recovery is exhausted, the final failure is stored once on `turn/end.reason`
- **Add response start, interrupted, discarded, failed, and committed events to `dsh-llm`** — rejected because the agent log already separates raw chunks, successful messages, and numbered attempts. A second state machine would duplicate ownership without enabling the bounded same-route retry.
- **Add logical routes, capability matrices, and failover selection** — rejected because current requests already name provider and model explicitly, one adapter owns each provider, and no current consumer requires automatic fallback or can prove semantic compatibility.
- **Put `retryable` or `failover` on `LlmFailure`** — rejected because adapters report facts while deployment policy decides action. The same 429 may be retried in an interactive bundle and rejected in a cost-capped batch.
- **Retry forever while the caller remains active** — rejected because it gives one request unbounded cost and latency. Visible status makes bounded waiting understandable; it does not make an unlimited budget safe.
- **Retry forever while the caller remains active** — the [per-provider policy](../feature/2026-07-24-provider-retry-policies.md) supersedes this rejection for explicit `always` entries while retaining bounded normal mode as the default.
- **Log retry status only through the process logger** — rejected because process logs do not reconstruct session behavior and cannot drive replayed UI state.
- **Keep only flat codes** — rejected because retry delay and provider request id are structured provider facts, and HTTP status is necessary for diagnosis when different wire failures share one stable code.
@@ -120,11 +110,11 @@ If recovery is exhausted, the final failure is stored once on `turn/end.reason`
- An adapter-thrown `Error` reaches `agent/request-error` as the exact same object while its sidecar `LlmFailure` reaches the adjacent argument; tests retain the existing identity assertion for extensible and frozen third-party errors.
- DeepSeek and pi-ai adapter tests cover representative 400, 401/403, 429, 5xx, connection, malformed/truncated stream, timeout, abort, retry-after seconds/date, request-id, and unknown-SDK-error paths without recovery policy parsing message text.
- Pi-ai pins the SDK option to zero retries and performs one observed wire attempt for a retryable provider response; separate tests make removing either boundary fail.
- `agent/request-error` carries current failure facts plus immutable prior-retried failure facts; a success clears that history, and alternating transient/context-overflow integration tests prove the two policies consume only their own finite budgets.
- `dsh-llm-retry` validates every config field at Loader startup, delegates all ineligible paths with `next()`, and makes at most `maxTransientRetries + 1` provider requests when no other policy applies.
- `agent/request-error` carries current failure facts, immutable prior-retried failure facts, and the serving registration's immutable retry policy; a success clears the history, and alternating transient/context-overflow integration tests prove the two policies consume only their own finite budgets.
- Each provider adapter validates its nested retry policy at Loader startup, and `ctx.llm` captures it with the route; normal mode delegates ineligible paths and makes at most `maxRetries + 1` provider requests when no other policy applies.
- HMR-during-backoff tests prove disposal unregisters the listener, aborts and awaits its captured callbacks, emits no retry decision after disposal, and leaves no timer or promise alive.
- Pure unit tests cover transient-code selection, exponential backoff and jitter bounds, valid and over-cap `Retry-After`, exhausted budgets, deterministic timer/random seams, and abort during backoff.
- Real agent-loop tests cover failure before chunks, partial chunks then failure, thrown and in-band failures, retry to success in a new step, exhaustion to structured `turn/end.reason`, and composition with `dsh-compact-basic` context-overflow recovery.
- Real agent-loop tests cover failure before chunks, partial chunks then failure, thrown and in-band failures, retry to success in a new turn, exhaustion to structured `turn/end.reason`, and composition with `dsh-compact-basic` context-overflow recovery.
- The partial-chunk integration test proves failed chunks remain attributed to the failed step, no assistant message or tool side effect is committed for that step, and the successful retry has distinct provenance.
- The plugin-owned `llm/retry` event is non-surface, survives JSONL and SQLite round trips, is ignored by message derivation, and drives TUI retraction plus scheduled-retry rendering. Keyless snapshots cover scheduling, cancellation, success, and exhaustion; ACP automation snapshots confirm that a discarded attempt stays off the wire while the recovered reply is emitted.
- Idle-watchdog tests prove the stable signal is rearmed only while `next()` is outstanding, disarmed during consumer think time and in `finally`, and classified separately from a total-call deadline and an earlier caller abort; adapter tests prove the signal stops the underlying request rather than merely detaching it.
@@ -132,12 +122,12 @@ If recovery is exhausted, the final failure is stored once on `turn/end.reason`
## Consequences
- Every transient recovery attempt is visible as a closed step plus `llm/retry`, and the bounded policy prevents hidden SDK retries from multiplying cost. A retry can still duplicate provider billing even when no chunk arrived; the finite attempt budget limits but cannot remove that risk.
- Every retry attempt is visible as a closed failed turn plus `llm/retry`, and adapter-level single-attempt behavior prevents hidden SDK retries from multiplying policy decisions. A retry can still duplicate provider billing even when no chunk arrived; normal mode limits that risk, while explicit always mode accepts it until cancellation or success.
- Provider SDKs may hide status or retry headers. Those adapters retain the stable facts they expose and otherwise use a coarse code rather than letting recovery policy parse fragile text.
- Durable retry events expand the session protocol and UI state machine. Shipping the event and its consumer together prevents an unused telemetry vocabulary, but later schema changes still require persistence and replay work.
- Clearing a failed step's live chunks can visibly retract output. That is preferable to presenting discarded text or partial tool JSON as committed history, and snapshots pin the transition.
- Adapter-local idle enforcement stops stalled transports without counting consumer think time. Contract tests at each transport boundary guard against SDK drift.
- Multiple recovery plugins add their finite budgets. Their classifiers remain disjoint here; an overlapping classifier would be registration-order policy and must be documented and tested by the plugins that introduce it.
- Multiple normal recovery plugins add their finite budgets. Always mode delegates first and then supplies an unbounded fallback; overlapping classifiers remain registration-order policy and must be documented and tested by the plugins that introduce them.
## Related

View File

@@ -4,11 +4,13 @@ Status: implemented
[English](2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.md) | 中文
[按提供方配置的请求重试策略](../feature/2026-07-24-provider-retry-policies.md)在此基础上增加了确切提供方配置与显式无界 mode。本说明继续负责结构化失败事实、已关闭步骤的恢复边界、normal mode 的暂时性默认值、可见的单次尝试和持久重试状态。
## 问题
`dsh-llm` 可能在适配器分发或迭代时抛出异常,也可能以 `finish { kind: 'error' | 'aborted' }` 结束,以这两种形式报告提供方失败。最终适配器边界会标记抛出的失败,使 `dsh-agent-loop` 能将其与中间件和结果处理缺陷区分开。循环关闭失败步骤后,会把两种交付形式统一规范化为 `agent/request-error`默认决策为 `fail``dsh-compact-basic` 是唯一已交付的恢复监听器它仅在压缩compaction证明持久表层已缩减后才会对规范化的上下文窗口溢出进行重试
`dsh-llm` 可能在适配器分发或迭代时抛出异常,也可能以 `finish { kind: 'error' | 'aborted' }` 结束,以这两种形式报告提供方失败。最终适配器边界会标记抛出的失败,使 `dsh-agent-loop` 能将其与中间件和结果处理缺陷区分开。循环关闭失败步骤后,会把两种交付形式统一规范化为 `agent/request-error`未被处理的失败是终态;处理失败的监听器修复策略自有状态,返回 `{ kind: 'retry' }`,并停止 waterfall 委托。[重试动作决策](../simplification/2026-07-27-request-error-retry-action.md)规定这一返回契约
该边界已能安全地再次发起请求。原始 `assistant/chunk` 事件携带失败的 `turn``step`;除非某条成功的 `assistant/message` 引用这些事件,否则消息派生会忽略它们。只有终止性 finish 成功且组装完成后,系统才会分发工具调用;重试则会从持久日志开启新的编号步骤。因此harness 无需引入第二套响应生命周期或暂定输出协议,即可分隔两次尝试。
该边界已能安全地再次发起请求。原始 `assistant/chunk` 事件携带失败的 `turn``step`;除非某条成功的 `assistant/message` 引用这些事件,否则消息派生会忽略它们。只有终止性 finish 成功且组装完成后,系统才会分发工具调用;重试则会从持久日志开启新的编号轮次。因此harness 无需引入第二套响应生命周期或暂定输出协议,即可分隔两次尝试。
此前的边界还留有三个较窄的缺口。
@@ -16,7 +18,7 @@ Status: implemented
- 重试的归属因适配器而异。手写 DeepSeek 适配器只尝试一次pi-ai profile 则可以启用库内部的不透明重试。如果把隐藏的传输重试与 `agent/request-error` 监听器结合,尝试次数会成倍增加,中间失败也不会记入会话日志。
- 恢复后的失败没有持久状态事实。失败的步骤和分片仍可重建,但观察者无法得知 agent智能体是否在有意退避、将等待多久以及等待原因。长时间的静默等待看起来与循环停滞无异。
本决策的目标是从同一个显式提供方/模型请求的暂时性失败中进行有界恢复。提供方或模型故障转移、响应拼接和语义输出修复都属于其他问题,目前没有消费方。
默认策略的目标是从同一个显式提供方/模型请求的暂时性失败中进行有界恢复。提供方或模型故障转移、响应拼接和语义输出修复都属于其他问题,目前没有消费方。
## 决策
@@ -50,31 +52,19 @@ agent loop智能体循环会保留 `RequestError` 作为该精确的错误
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-llm-retry` 是监听 `agent/request-error` 的函数插件。它不引入服务或新的循环分支agent-loop 包仅会更改通过现有失败步骤恢复控制流携带的数据。
`agent/request-error` seam 携带当前 `LlmFailure`,以及在这段连续恢复序列中导致再次请求的不可变先前失败列表。`dsh-llm-retry` 只计数 code 位于已配置暂时性集合中的先前失败`dsh-compact-basic` 则只计数先前的上下文溢出失败。模型请求成功后会清空历史。因此,暂时性失败与上下文溢出交替出现时,两种策略会独立消耗各自预算;最大请求数等于 1 加上已加载恢复策略的有限预算和。
`agent/request-error` seam 携带当前 `LlmFailure`、在连续恢复序列中授权重试轮次的不可变先前失败列表,以及实际服务注册所对应的不可变重试策略。循环只传递而不解释该策略;它拥有连续失败历史,并在模型请求成功后清除。`dsh-llm-retry` 的 normal 策略统计由同一项确切提供方策略安排的持久重试记录`dsh-compact-basic` 则维护自己的上下文溢出预算。因此,暂时性失败与上下文溢出交替出现时,会各自独立消耗其有限预算;最大请求数等于 1 加上所有已加载有限预算和。
该插件在加载时解析并验证以下部署配置:
```ts ignore-check
interface Config {
maxTransientRetries?: number
initialDelayMs?: number
maxDelayMs?: number
jitterRatio?: number
retryableCodes?: string[]
}
```
默认值为两次暂时性重试、500 毫秒初始延迟、10 秒延迟上限、10% 抖动,以及上述五个暂时性 code`RATE_LIMIT`、`SERVER`、`TIMEOUT`、`TRANSPORT` 和 `EMPTY_RESPONSE`)。计数与延迟边界参考了所调查实现中较保守的一端:[OpenCode 使用两次请求重试,延迟边界为 500 毫秒10 秒](https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/blob/9976269ab1accfc9f9dc98a4a688c516934de422/%70ackages/llm/src/route/executor.ts#L36-L39)[Pi 将三次 agent 级重试与提供方重试分开,且提供方重试默认为零](https://github.com/earendil-works/pi/blob/3da591ab74ab9ab407e72ed882600b2c851fae21/%70ackages/coding-agent/docs/settings.md#L139-L147)[Codex 使用有限请求/流预算以及五分钟空闲超时](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/0fb559f0f6e231a88ac02ea002d3ecd248e2b515/codex-rs/model-provider-info/src/lib.rs#L25-L33)。10% 抖动参考 [Codex 的有界抖动](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/0fb559f0f6e231a88ac02ea002d3ecd248e2b515/codex-rs/codex-client/src/retry.rs#L40-L47)。在没有其他恢复策略时,两次重试表示最多发起三次提供方请求。`maxTransientRetries` 是非负整数,延迟是正的有限数且满足 `initialDelayMs <= maxDelayMs``jitterRatio` 位于 `[0, 1]`code 非空且不重复。这些都是 Cordis 配置字段,而不是隐藏常量,使部署能够选择不同的成本与延迟预算。
当前配置形状由[提供方策略决策](../feature/2026-07-24-provider-retry-policies.md)规定。提供方适配器会注册嵌套的 `retryPolicy`;省略时使用 normal 默认值两次暂时性重试、500 毫秒初始延迟、10 秒延迟上限、10% 抖动,以及上述五个暂时性 code。计数与延迟边界参考了所调查实现中较保守的一端[OpenCode 使用两次请求重试,延迟边界为 500 毫秒10 秒](https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/blob/9976269ab1accfc9f9dc98a4a688c516934de422/%70ackages/llm/src/route/executor.ts#L36-L39)[Pi 将三次 agent 级重试与提供方重试分开,且提供方重试默认为零](https://github.com/earendil-works/pi/blob/3da591ab74ab9ab407e72ed882600b2c851fae21/%70ackages/coding-agent/docs/settings.md#L139-L147)[Codex 使用有限请求/流预算以及五分钟空闲超时](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/0fb559f0f6e231a88ac02ea002d3ecd248e2b515/codex-rs/model-provider-info/src/lib.rs#L25-L33)。10% 抖动参考 [Codex 的有界抖动](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/0fb559f0f6e231a88ac02ea002d3ecd248e2b515/codex-rs/codex-client/src/retry.rs#L40-L47)。
对于预算未耗尽的合格失败,从 1 开始的暂时性重试计数使用有界指数退避。有效的 `providerRetryAfterMs` 只有在不超过 `maxDelayMs` 时才会取代指数退避;提供方延迟更长时,系统会委托给下一监听器,而不会违反提供方指令提前重试。本地退避乘以 `[1 - jitterRatio, 1 + jitterRatio]` 内的注入随机因子,并将最终值限制到 `maxDelayMs`;提供方延迟不加抖动。
插件拥有一个全生命期 `AbortController`,并跟踪每个活跃的退避回调。每次等待都会融合 waterfall瀑布式事件的轮次信号与该生命期信号。effect 清理会先注销监听器,再中止并等待活跃回调;被捕获回调的生命期信号中止时,回调会返回 `fail`既不能重试,也不能在插件释放后进入其捕获 waterfall 的剩余部分。尽管 Cordis 已捕获该监听器,此设计仍能使 HMR热模块替换释放达到完全停稳。
插件拥有一个全生命期 `AbortController`,并跟踪每个活跃的恢复回调,包括委托的 waterfall瀑布式事件工作与退避。effect 清理会先注销监听器,再中止并等待活跃回调;中止会胜过较晚到达的委托重试决策,被捕获的回调在插件释放后既不能重试,也不能进入其 waterfall 的剩余部分。尽管 Cordis 已捕获该监听器,此设计仍能使 HMR热模块替换释放达到完全停稳。
休眠前,`dsh-llm-retry` 会追加一条不进入表层的 `llm/retry` 会话事件,其中包含轮次、失败步骤、从 1 开始的暂时性重试编号、已配置上限、计划延迟和 `LlmFailure`。该插件拥有 `SessionEventMap` 声明合并;`dsh-session` 继续负责通用持久化,不会吸收可选策略的词汇。事件记录已安排的内容,而不是下一个请求已完成;延迟期间取消随后会在 `turn/end` 中可见。因为该事件的目的是表示运行状态,而不是收集跟踪数据,所以它仅与生产渲染器及回放/快照覆盖一起交付。
休眠前,`dsh-llm-retry` 会追加一条不进入表层的 `llm/retry` 会话事件,其中包含轮次、失败步骤、提供方、策略 mode、完整的解析策略 key、提供方策略重试编号、该 mode 存在时的有限上限、计划延迟和 `LlmFailure`。该 key 会对 code 集排序,并在提供方路由被行为不同但 mode 相同的策略替换时分隔重试历史。该插件拥有 `SessionEventMap` 声明合并;`dsh-session` 继续负责通用持久化,不会吸收可选策略的词汇。事件记录已安排的内容,而不是下一个请求已完成;延迟期间取消随后会在 `turn/end` 中可见。因为该事件的目的是表示运行状态,而不是收集跟踪数据,所以它仅与生产渲染器及回放/快照覆盖一起交付。
对非暂时性 code、耗尽的策略预算或超出上限的提供方延迟监听器会调用 `next()`。这保留了与上下文溢出恢复及后续策略插件的组合能力。只有在两个信号下完成延迟后,它才会返回 `{ action: 'retry' }`轮次取消和插件释放会返回 `fail`,此后仍以循环的取消/释放检查为准。
对非暂时性 code、耗尽的策略预算或超出上限的提供方延迟监听器会调用 `next()`。这保留了与上下文溢出恢复及后续策略插件的组合能力。对自身处理的失败,它会记录并等待延迟,然后在不委托的情况下返回 `{ kind: 'retry' }`轮次取消和插件释放会结束等待且不返回重试动作,此后仍以循环的取消/释放检查为准。
agent-spine 演示组合包加载该插件,因此共享的 stdio/TUI、一次性 CLI命令行界面和 ACPAgent Client Protocol示例组合使用同一有界策略。库消费方仍需显式组合插件:省略该插件时,`agent/request-error` 保持现有的 fail 默认值
agent-spine 演示组合包加载该插件,因此共享的 stdio/TUI、一次性 CLI命令行界面和 ACPAgent Client Protocol示例组合使用同一套按提供方路由的策略。库消费方仍需显式组合插件:省略该插件时,请求失败保持终态
### 由单一层负责可见的尝试
@@ -92,7 +82,7 @@ agent-spine 演示组合包加载该插件,因此共享的 stdio/TUI、一次
### 在现有日志中分隔尝试
一次失败尝试可以在已关闭的步骤中留下 `assistant/chunk` 事件,但绝不会追加 `assistant/message`,也不会分发工具。重试会开启下一个编号步骤从持久表层重建请求并生成自己的分片。步骤仍处于打开状态时UI 可以渲染实时分片;当 `llm/retry` 标识失败步骤,或 `turn/end` 记录终止失败时UI 再标记或清除这份暂时视图。消息派生仍会忽略失败分片。
一次失败尝试可以在已关闭的步骤中留下 `assistant/chunk` 事件,但绝不会追加 `assistant/message`,也不会分发工具。重试会关闭失败轮次,开启下一个编号轮次从持久表层重建请求并生成自己的分片。步骤仍处于打开状态时UI 可以渲染实时分片;当 `llm/retry` 标识失败步骤,或 `turn/end` 记录失败时UI 再标记或清除这份暂时视图。消息派生仍会忽略失败分片。
如果恢复预算耗尽,最终失败会连同结构化事实在 `turn/end.reason` 中存储一次。如果暂时性恢复继续,`llm/retry` 就是该次尝试的失败与延迟的持久归属位置。本决策不增加独立的最终错误事件或响应 id 词汇。
@@ -101,7 +91,7 @@ agent-spine 演示组合包加载该插件,因此共享的 stdio/TUI、一次
- 自动提供方或模型故障转移。请求已显式选择一个提供方和模型,提供方注册表也有意规定每个提供方只由一个适配器负责。
- 在成功的终止性 finish 后重试或继续,或将两次尝试的分片拼接成一条 assistant 消息。
- 修复格式错误的工具参数、拒答、内容过滤或其他语义模型输出。
- 无界重试、无人值守地持续重试直至取消、熔断器、共享提供方健康状态或跨 agent 重试预算。
- 熔断器、共享提供方健康状态或跨 agent 重试预算。
- 在没有生产消费方的情况下,把 `llm/stream` 改造成响应生命周期或增加便利的生成 API。
## 考虑过的替代方案
@@ -110,7 +100,7 @@ agent-spine 演示组合包加载该插件,因此共享的 stdio/TUI、一次
- **向 `dsh-llm` 增加响应开始、中断、丢弃、失败和提交事件**:拒绝采用,因为 agent 日志已经分隔原始分片、成功消息和编号尝试。第二套状态机会重复归属关系,又不能支持有界的同路由重试。
- **增加逻辑路由、能力矩阵和故障转移选择**:拒绝采用,因为当前请求已经显式指定提供方和模型,每个提供方由一个适配器负责,而且没有当前消费方要求自动回退或能够证明语义兼容性。
- **把 `retryable` 或 `failover` 放在 `LlmFailure` 上**:拒绝采用,因为适配器报告事实,部署策略决定动作。同一个 429 可以在交互式组合包中重试,也可以在成本受限的批处理中被拒绝。
- **只要调用方仍处于活跃状态就无限重试**拒绝采用,因为这会让一次请求产生无界成本和延迟。可见状态能使有界等待易于理解,却不能让无限预算变得安全
- **只要调用方仍处于活跃状态就无限重试**[按提供方配置的策略](../feature/2026-07-24-provider-retry-policies.md)对显式 `always` 配置项推翻了这项拒绝,同时保留有界的 normal mode 作为默认值
- **只通过进程 logger 记录重试状态**:拒绝采用,因为进程日志无法重建会话行为,也不能驱动回放后的 UI 状态。
- **只保留扁平 code**:拒绝采用,因为重试延迟和提供方请求 id 是结构化的提供方事实,而当不同协议失败共用一个稳定 code 时,诊断还需要 HTTP 状态。
@@ -120,11 +110,11 @@ agent-spine 演示组合包加载该插件,因此共享的 stdio/TUI、一次
- 适配器抛出的 `Error` 会以完全相同的对象抵达 `agent/request-error`,其伴随的 `LlmFailure` 则抵达相邻参数;测试保留针对可扩展及冻结第三方错误的现有对象标识断言。
- DeepSeek 和 pi-ai 适配器测试覆盖具有代表性的 400、401/403、429、5xx、连接、格式错误截断流、超时、中止、Retry-After 秒数/日期、请求 id 和未知 SDK 错误路径,恢复策略无需解析消息文本。
- Pi 将 SDK 选项固定为零次重试,并针对可重试的提供方响应执行一次可观测的实际网络请求;独立测试确保移除任一边界都会失败。
- `agent/request-error` 携带当前失败事实以及不可变的先前已重试失败事实;成功会清除历史,暂时性失败/上下文溢出交替发生的集成测试证明两种策略只消耗各自的有限预算。
- `dsh-llm-retry` 在 Loader 启动时验证每个配置字段,使用 `next()` 委托所有不合格路径,而且在没有其他策略时最多发起 `maxTransientRetries + 1` 次提供方请求。
- `agent/request-error` 携带当前失败事实不可变的先前已重试失败事实,以及实际服务注册所对应的不可变重试策略;成功会清除历史,暂时性失败/上下文溢出交替发生的集成测试证明两种策略只消耗各自的有限预算。
- 每个提供方适配器都在 Loader 启动时验证其嵌套重试策略,`ctx.llm` 则将该策略与路由一同捕获normal mode 会委托不合格路径,而且在没有其他策略时最多发起 `maxRetries + 1` 次提供方请求。
- 退避期间执行 HMR 的测试证明:释放过程会注销监听器、中止并等待其捕获的回调,释放后不发出重试决策,也不留下存活的定时器或 promise。
- 纯单元测试覆盖暂时性 code 选择、指数退避和抖动边界、有效及超出上限的 `Retry-After`、耗尽的预算、确定性定时器/随机数 seam以及退避期间中止。
- 真实 agent-loop 测试覆盖分片前失败、部分分片后失败、抛出及带内失败、在新步骤中重试至成功、耗尽后写入结构化 `turn/end.reason`,以及与 `dsh-compact-basic` 上下文溢出恢复的组合。
- 真实 agent-loop 测试覆盖分片前失败、部分分片后失败、抛出及带内失败、在新轮次中重试至成功、耗尽后写入结构化 `turn/end.reason`,以及与 `dsh-compact-basic` 上下文溢出恢复的组合。
- 部分分片集成测试证明:失败分片仍归属于失败步骤,该步骤不会提交 assistant 消息或工具副作用,成功的重试具有不同的来源信息。
- 插件拥有的不进入表层的 `llm/retry` 事件可在 JSONL 和 SQLite 往返后保留,被消息派生忽略,并驱动 TUI 撤回和计划重试渲染。无密钥快照覆盖调度、取消、成功和耗尽ACP 自动化快照确认,被丢弃的尝试不会通过协议发出,而恢复后的回复会正常发出。
- 空闲看门狗测试证明:只有 `next()` 尚未完成时才会重新布防稳定信号;在消费方思考期间及 `finally` 中会解除布防;它与总调用 deadline 以及更早发生的调用方中止分开分类。适配器测试证明该信号会终止底层请求,而不只是与其脱离。
@@ -132,12 +122,12 @@ agent-spine 演示组合包加载该插件,因此共享的 stdio/TUI、一次
## 后果
- 每次暂时性恢复尝试都以一个已关闭步骤加 `llm/retry` 的形式可见,有界策略还会防止隐藏的 SDK 重试成倍增加成本。即使没有分片到达,重试仍可能造成提供方重复计费;有限的尝试预算只能限制而无法消除此风险
- 每次重试尝试都以一个已关闭失败轮次加 `llm/retry` 的形式可见,适配器级的单次尝试行为会防止隐藏的 SDK 重试成倍增加策略决策。即使没有分片到达,重试仍可能造成提供方重复计费;normal mode 会限制此风险,而显式 always mode 会接受它,直至取消或成功
- 提供方 SDK 可能隐藏状态或重试标头。适配器会保留 SDK 公开的稳定事实,否则使用粗粒度 code而不会让恢复策略解析脆弱的文本。
- 持久重试事件扩展了会话协议和 UI 状态机。事件与其消费方一同交付,可避免产生无人使用的遥测词汇;但以后更改 schema 仍需要同步完成持久化和回放工作。
- 清除失败步骤的实时分片可能会明显撤回输出。与把丢弃的文本或不完整工具 JSON 呈现为已提交历史相比,这是更好的选择;快照固定这一转换。
- 适配器局部的空闲强制机制可以终止停滞的传输,而不会计入消费方思考时间。每个传输边界的契约测试会防止 SDK 漂移。
- 多个恢复插件会叠加各自的有限预算。此处它们的分类器互不重叠;重叠的分类器会形成依赖注册顺序的策略,必须由引入它们的插件记录并测试。
- 多个 normal 恢复插件会叠加各自的有限预算。always mode 会先委托,再提供无界回退;重叠的分类器会形成依赖注册顺序的策略,必须由引入它们的插件记录并测试。
## 相关资料

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-30-bash-stdin-env-trusted-plugin-surface.md: 284cd45a66294dbc9e8207a1e00e9642d32d4e58
2026-06-30-bash-stdin-env-trusted-plugin-surface.zh.md: 9486f8c35c5060150b072fb673acca5d4167ec1a
2026-06-30-bash-stdin-env-trusted-plugin-surface.md: 556d5dd86dfcc92c4628e68c19390f0033560d25
2026-06-30-bash-stdin-env-trusted-plugin-surface.zh.md: 9d67797f86903e70e7bdcd6f80f19d17c41ac18e

View File

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Three deliberate choices:
1. **The model-facing tool omits `stdin` and `env`.** Shell syntax already covers those needs, so duplicate parameters would add surface without authority separation. The tool builds requests only from declared model arguments, signal, and owner; trusted in-process callers may set the seam fields directly. Harness-owned variables use the separate `dshEnv` channel from the [managed environment decision](../feature/2026-07-10-agent-session-identity-and-log-location.md), so ordinary `env` cannot replace them.
2. **`env` merges AFTER the credential scrub, so an explicit caller entry wins even on a credential-shaped name.** The later managed-namespace decision reserves `DSH_*`: ambient entries are removed, ordinary `env` cannot set them, and trusted `dshEnv` merges last. The complete order is `scrub(process.env, including DSH_*)``ENV_OVERRIDES` → ordinary `env``dshEnv`.
2. **`env` merges AFTER the credential scrub, so an explicit caller entry wins even on a credential-shaped name.** The later managed-namespace decision manages `DSH_*`: ambient entries are removed, and trusted `dshEnv` merges last, so an ordinary `env` entry can never displace a managed value. The complete order is `scrub(process.env, including DSH_*)``ENV_OVERRIDES` → ordinary `env``dshEnv`.
3. **`stdin`/`env` are required-absent-OK (plain optional) on the resolved spec, NOT required-but-nullable like `owner`.** `owner` is required-but-nullable because a *silently* missing owner yields an unowned, cross-session-readable task — a security footgun that a visible `undefined` guards against. `stdin`/`env` have no such hazard: a missing one means "no stdin / no extra env", which is the safe, ordinary case (every model-driven call). So they stay plain optionals, matching `signal`.

View File

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Status: implemented
1. **模型侧工具不暴露 `stdin` 和 `env`。** Shell 语法已覆盖这些需求重复参数只会增加接口面而不带来权限隔离。工具仅从声明的模型参数、signal 和 owner 构建请求;受信的进程内调用方可以直接设置 seam 字段。harness 自有变量使用[托管环境决策](../feature/2026-07-10-agent-session-identity-and-log-location.md)规定的独立 `dshEnv` 通道,因此普通 `env` 无法替换它们。
2. **`env` 在凭证擦除之后合并,因此调用方显式设置的条目即使具有凭证形态的名称也会胜出。** 后续的托管命名空间决策保留 `DSH_*`:环境条目会被移除,普通 `env` 无法设置它们,受信的 `dshEnv` 最后合并。完整顺序为 `scrub(process.env, including DSH_*)``ENV_OVERRIDES` → 普通 `env``dshEnv`
2. **`env` 在凭证擦除之后合并,因此调用方显式设置的条目即使具有凭证形态的名称也会胜出。** 后续的托管命名空间决策托管 `DSH_*`:环境条目会被移除,受信的 `dshEnv` 最后合并,因此普通 `env` 条目永远无法顶掉托管值。完整顺序为 `scrub(process.env, including DSH_*)``ENV_OVERRIDES` → 普通 `env``dshEnv`
3. **`stdin`/`env` 在已解析 spec 上是 required-absent-OK普通 optional而非像 `owner` 那样 required-but-nullable。** `owner` 之所以是 required-but-nullable是因为*静默*缺失的 owner 会产生一个无主、跨会话可读的任务——一个安全隐患,显式的 `undefined` 可以防范。`stdin`/`env` 没有这种风险:缺失意味着「无 stdin / 无额外 env」这是安全的常规情况所有模型驱动的调用都如此。因此它们保持普通 optional`signal` 一致。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-06-timeout-deadline-library.md: 11d4b8cd48dd345d2324b63e01bd726f12d846b4
2026-07-06-timeout-deadline-library.zh.md: 334914c689adf54a654c5907395c29ceeeb50891
2026-07-06-timeout-deadline-library.md: 63463a76a65743436d4e78479800c19e257a42de
2026-07-06-timeout-deadline-library.zh.md: c3d3cdf1c63813fc24c10727e42d326142f3f4de

View File

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-06-timeout-deadline-library.zh.md)
Timeout handling was drifting apart across the tool-bearing capabilities, and the divergence was not superficial — it was the same logic re-implemented three ways, each with its own subtle correctness burden.
- **bash** ([packages/bash/bash-local/src/run.ts](../../../../packages/bash/bash-local/src/run.ts)) had a full, correct timeout inside the process plumbing: a config-clamped `timeoutMs`, two independent triggers — a `killTimer` for the timeout and an `onAbort` listener for upstream cancellation — each calling one `kill()` closure that escalates SIGTERM→grace→SIGKILL on the process group, and two orthogonal outcome booleans (`timedOut`, `aborted`) latched independently.
- **bash** (then in the bash-local implementation's `run.ts`) had a full, correct timeout inside the process plumbing: a config-clamped `timeoutMs`, two independent triggers — a `killTimer` for the timeout and an `onAbort` listener for upstream cancellation — each calling one `kill()` closure that escalates SIGTERM→grace→SIGKILL on the process group, and two orthogonal outcome booleans (`timedOut`, `aborted`) latched independently. After this consolidation, the plumbing — today [packages/subprocess/subprocess-local/src/spawn.ts](../../../../packages/subprocess/subprocess-local/src/spawn.ts) — only reacts to aborts; [packages/bash/bash-local/src/index.ts](../../../../packages/bash/bash-local/src/index.ts) owns the fused deadline and the `timedOut`/`aborted` classification.
- **web_fetch** ([packages/web/web-fetch-local/src/provider.ts](../../../../packages/web/web-fetch-local/src/provider.ts)) had a correct but *hand-rolled* timeout: it constructed an `AbortController`, wired `setTimeout(() => controller.abort(new WebError(…, 'WEB_FETCH_TIMEOUT')))`, manually added and removed the upstream-signal listener, cleared the timer in a `finally`, and recovered the timeout reason from `signal.reason` in a `translateAbortOrNetwork` helper because the reader surfaces a bare `AbortError`.
- **web_search** ([packages/web/tool-web/src/search.ts](../../../../packages/web/tool-web/src/search.ts)) had **no timeout at all**: `WebSearchRequest` ([packages/web/web/src/types.ts](../../../../packages/web/web/src/types.ts)) carries no `timeoutMs` field, and each provider's `search()` only forwards `exec.signal`. (web_search stays untimed here — see Consequences.)

View File

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Status: implemented
超时处理在各个承载工具的能力之间逐渐分化,而且这种分化并非表面的:同一套逻辑被以三种方式重新实现,各自带有微妙的正确性负担。
- **bash**[packages/bash/bash-local/src/run.ts](../../../../packages/bash/bash-local/src/run.ts))在进程管道内部有一套完整、正确的超时实现:一个经配置钳位的 `timeoutMs`,两个独立触发器(用于超时的 `killTimer` 和用于上游取消的 `onAbort` 监听器),各自调用同一个 `kill()` 闭包对进程组执行 SIGTERM→宽限期→SIGKILL 升级,以及两个正交的结果布尔值(`timedOut``aborted`)独立锁存。
- **bash**当时位于 bash-local 实现的 `run.ts`)在进程管道内部有一套完整、正确的超时实现:一个经配置钳位的 `timeoutMs`,两个独立触发器(用于超时的 `killTimer` 和用于上游取消的 `onAbort` 监听器),各自调用同一个 `kill()` 闭包对进程组执行 SIGTERM→宽限期→SIGKILL 升级,以及两个正交的结果布尔值(`timedOut``aborted`)独立锁存。经此次整合之后,这套管道——今天位于 [packages/subprocess/subprocess-local/src/spawn.ts](../../../../packages/subprocess/subprocess-local/src/spawn.ts)——只响应中止;[packages/bash/bash-local/src/index.ts](../../../../packages/bash/bash-local/src/index.ts) 拥有融合的 deadline 以及 `timedOut`/`aborted` 分类。
- **web_fetch**[packages/web/web-fetch-local/src/provider.ts](../../../../packages/web/web-fetch-local/src/provider.ts))有一套正确但*手写*的超时:构造一个 `AbortController`,连接 `setTimeout(() => controller.abort(new WebError(…, 'WEB_FETCH_TIMEOUT')))`,手动添加和移除上游信号监听器,在 `finally` 中清除定时器,并在 `translateAbortOrNetwork` 辅助函数中从 `signal.reason` 恢复超时原因(因为 reader 只抛出裸 `AbortError`)。
- **web_search**[packages/web/tool-web/src/search.ts](../../../../packages/web/tool-web/src/search.ts)**完全没有超时**`WebSearchRequest`[packages/web/web/src/types.ts](../../../../packages/web/web/src/types.ts))不携带 `timeoutMs` 字段,各提供方的 `search()` 只转发 `exec.signal`web_search 在本次设计中保持无超时——见「后果」。)

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.md: b934f7fd7087006be4f7eb3659e44e78b8ede367
2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.zh.md: 3b5b60a95bef0695a446cdd3d45d299550f449f6
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.md
2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.md: 51d488db28c57426c75c9ed1cfc90892261c0224
2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.zh.md: ae33cf5c2e944e584cd3d3c6ff76d93619adf7dc

View File

@@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ The loop fires awaited serial `agent/post-step(agent, turn, step, signal)` after
### Request recovery is limited to the final model boundary
`RequestError`, `RequestErrorDecision`, and the `agent/request-error` waterfall represent failures after the final adapter has been selected. Each returned stream handle owns a private failure set that preserves the original thrown error identity across dispatch, iterator construction, and iteration without leaking nested-call provenance into an outer call. Terminal in-band `error` or `aborted` finishes enter the same path. Prompt assembly, request middleware, request logging, result processing, tools, post-step listeners, and cleanup remain ordinary failures.
`RequestError` and the `agent/request-error` waterfall represent failures after the final adapter has been selected. Each returned stream handle owns a private failure set that preserves the original thrown error identity across dispatch, iterator construction, and iteration without leaking nested-call provenance into an outer call. Terminal in-band `error` or `aborted` finishes enter the same path. Prompt assembly, request middleware, request logging, result processing, tools, step listeners, and cleanup remain ordinary failures.
The failed step closes before recovery runs. A retry opens the next numbered step and rebuilds the request from the durable log; consecutive recovery attempts reset only after a successful provider request. Both DeepSeek adapters normalize recognized provider context-limit failures to `CONTEXT_WINDOW_EXCEEDED`.
The failed step closes before recovery runs. A handling listener repairs durable state, returns `{ kind: 'retry' }`, and stops waterfall delegation. The loop then closes the failed turn and opens one retry turn from the durable log without an intervening idle notification. Retry policy and attempt counts remain plugin-owned; compact-basic clears its per-agent overflow count when the chain reaches terminal `agent/settled`. Both DeepSeek adapters normalize recognized provider context-limit failures to `CONTEXT_WINDOW_EXCEEDED`. The [retry-action decision](../simplification/2026-07-27-request-error-retry-action.md) owns the return boundary.
If cancellation lands after assistant tool calls are durable but before all calls dispatch, the loop records a synthetic `tool/call` and aborted `tool/result` pair for every undispatched call before following the normal abort path. The surface therefore never retains orphaned durable tool calls merely because cancellation won the race.
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ If cancellation lands after assistant tool calls are durable but before all call
For `pressure`, compact-basic resolves the durable provider/model target's adapter-owned capacity and exact-target policy, then applies the resulting threshold and retained-tail budgets to one unified `ctx.tokenMeter.measure()` result. Below pressure it returns without pruning. Once pressure qualifies, optional `ctx.toolResultPrune` rewrites oversized current results and compact-basic remeasures through the same meter; safe pressure skips the model call, while remaining pressure selects and summarizes from the pruned surface. The same singleton meter owns range pricing, provenance, shadowed token counts, and non-shrinking-summary rejection. Common defaults remain threshold ratio `0.8`, retained-history ratio `0.16`, summarization provider/model `''`, `maxTokens: 8192`, `compactionRetries: 1`, and `auto: true`; optional `modelPolicies` entries override them for an exact provider/model pair.
For canonical overflow, compact-basic requires no capacity metadata and bypasses scalar pressure and the normal retained-token budget. It prunes first, then chooses the maximal tool-balanced head range while leaving the newest indivisible unit and attempts one shrinking summary compaction under the same signal when a range exists. The automatic listener snapshots `session.surface.replaceGeneration` and returns `{ action: 'retry' }` whenever pruning or summarization increases it. This remains true when pruning lands before later summary work throws; cancellation still wins. A backend returning a result without replacement cannot authorize retry, while pruning-only progress can authorize a retry without a `CompactionResult`.
For canonical overflow, compact-basic requires no capacity metadata and bypasses scalar pressure and the normal retained-token budget. It prunes first, then chooses the maximal tool-balanced head range while leaving the newest indivisible unit and attempts one shrinking summary compaction under the same signal when a range exists. The automatic listener snapshots `session.surface.replaceGeneration` and returns `{ kind: 'retry' }` whenever pruning or summarization increases it. This remains true when pruning lands before later summary work throws; cancellation still wins. A backend returning a result without replacement cannot authorize retry, while pruning-only progress can authorize a retry without a `CompactionResult`.
`maxOverflowRetries` is optional and defaults to `1`; `0` disables overflow recovery without disabling pressure. `auto: false` registers neither automatic listener. Noncanonical errors, exhausted attempts, an already-aborted signal, a missing routed model, no safe range, no generation change, and recovery throws before any replacement all delegate to the next listener. With no later recovery, the loop reports the original provider error object and code. A recovery throw after generation advances authorizes retry from durable progress; cancellation or disposal remains authoritative even if recovery work completes concurrently.
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ The default summarizer resolves explicit configuration, then the latest logged r
## Testing
Unit tests cover final-adapter failure provenance and identity, closed-step retry numbering and reset, cancellation and disposal, post-step ordering, routed-envelope pressure, pressure-gated pruning, pruning-only relief, pruned-input summarization, balanced overflow reduction, durable prune progress before later failure, generation proof, caps, delegation, and auxiliary-call routing. Real-loop tests cover thrown and in-band overflow through pruning or summary compaction to a reconstructed retry request.
Unit tests cover final-adapter failure provenance and identity, closed-turn retry numbering and reset, cancellation and disposal, step-boundary ordering, routed-envelope pressure, pressure-gated pruning, pruning-only relief, pruned-input summarization, balanced overflow reduction, durable prune progress before later failure, generation proof, caps, delegation, and auxiliary-call routing. Real-loop tests cover thrown and in-band overflow through pruning or summary compaction to a reconstructed retry request.
## Alternatives considered

View File

@@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ Status: implemented
### 请求恢复只覆盖最终模型边界
`RequestError``RequestErrorDecision``agent/request-error` waterfall 表示最终适配器已经选定之后的失败。每个返回的流句柄都绑定一个私有失败集合;该集合在分发、异步迭代器构造与迭代过程中保留原始抛出错误的身份,同时防止把嵌套调用的错误来源误归到外层调用。终止性的带内 `error``aborted` finish 进入同一路径。提示词装配、请求中间件、请求日志、结果处理、工具、post-step 监听器与清理仍属于普通失败。
`RequestError``agent/request-error` waterfall 表示最终适配器已经选定之后的失败。每个返回的流句柄都绑定一个私有失败集合;该集合在分发、异步迭代器构造与迭代过程中保留原始抛出错误的身份,同时防止把嵌套调用的错误来源误归到外层调用。终止性的带内 `error``aborted` finish 进入同一路径。提示词装配、请求中间件、请求日志、结果处理、工具、step 监听器与清理仍属于普通失败。
恢复运行前,失败 step 已经关闭。重试会打开下一个编号 step并从持久日志重建请求连续恢复尝试计数只在提供方请求成功后重置。两个 DeepSeek 适配器都把识别出的提供方上下文限制错误规范化为 `CONTEXT_WINDOW_EXCEEDED`
恢复运行前,失败 step 已经关闭。负责处理的监听器修复持久状态、返回 `{ kind: 'retry' }`,并停止 waterfall 委托。循环随后关闭失败 turn并从持久日志开启一个重试 turn中间不发布空闲通知。重试策略与尝试计数由插件自己拥有compact-basic 在链路到达终态 `agent/settled` 时清除对应 agent 的溢出计数。两个 DeepSeek 适配器都把识别出的提供方上下文限制错误规范化为 `CONTEXT_WINDOW_EXCEEDED`。[重试动作决策](../simplification/2026-07-27-request-error-retry-action.md)规定这一返回边界
如果取消发生在 assistant 工具调用已经持久化之后、所有调用完成分发之前,循环会为每个尚未分发的调用记录一对合成的 `tool/call` 与 aborted `tool/result`,随后进入正常中止路径。因此,表层不会仅因取消赢得竞态而留下孤立的持久工具调用。
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Status: implemented
对于 `pressure`compact-basic 先解析持久提供方/模型目标的适配器所属容量与精确目标策略,再把得到的阈值与保留尾部预算应用到一次统一的 `ctx.tokenMeter.measure()` 结果。低于压力时直接返回,不执行剪枝。压力达到条件后,可选的 `ctx.toolResultPrune` 会改写当前表层中过大的工具结果compact-basic 再通过同一个 meter 重新计量;若压力恢复安全则跳过模型调用,否则从已剪枝表层选择范围并生成摘要。范围定价、来源、被遮蔽 token 数与非缩小摘要拒绝也由同一个单例 meter 完成。通用默认值保持为阈值比例 `0.8`、保留历史比例 `0.16`、摘要提供方/模型 `''``maxTokens: 8192``compactionRetries: 1``auto: true`;可选 `modelPolicies` 项可以按精确提供方/模型组合覆盖这些值。
对于规范化溢出compact-basic 不要求容量元数据,并绕过标量压力与普通保留 token 预算。它先执行剪枝,再在保留最新不可分割单元的同时选择最大的工具配对平衡头部范围;存在范围时,才在同一 signal 下尝试一次缩小摘要压缩。自动监听器先记录 `session.surface.replaceGeneration`,剪枝或摘要让 generation 增加时就返回 `{ action: 'retry' }`。即使剪枝先落盘而后续摘要工作抛错,这条规则仍然成立;取消依然优先。后端若只返回结果但没有替换表层,不能授权重试;只有剪枝取得进展时,即使没有 `CompactionResult` 也可以授权重试。
对于规范化溢出compact-basic 不要求容量元数据,并绕过标量压力与普通保留 token 预算。它先执行剪枝,再在保留最新不可分割单元的同时选择最大的工具配对平衡头部范围;存在范围时,才在同一 signal 下尝试一次缩小摘要压缩。自动监听器先记录 `session.surface.replaceGeneration`,剪枝或摘要让 generation 增加时就返回 `{ kind: 'retry' }`。即使剪枝先落盘而后续摘要工作抛错,这条规则仍然成立;取消依然优先。后端若只返回结果但没有替换表层,不能授权重试;只有剪枝取得进展时,即使没有 `CompactionResult` 也可以授权重试。
`maxOverflowRetries` 可选且默认为 `1``0` 只禁用溢出恢复,不会禁用压力检查。`auto: false` 不注册任何自动监听器。非规范化错误、尝试耗尽、已经中止的 signal、缺失路由模型、没有安全范围、generation 未变化以及在任何替换之前恢复抛错都会委托给下一个监听器。若没有后续恢复循环报告原始提供方错误对象与代码。generation 增加后的恢复抛错会基于持久进展授权重试;即使恢复工作并发完成,取消或销毁仍具有最终优先级。
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Status: implemented
## 测试
单元测试覆盖最终适配器失败的来源与身份、已关闭 step 的重试编号与重置、取消与销毁、post-step 顺序、已路由信封压力、压力门控剪枝、剪枝独立解除压力、从已剪枝输入生成摘要、平衡溢出缩减、后续失败前已落盘的剪枝进展、generation 证明、上限、委托与辅助调用路由。真实循环测试覆盖抛出式和带内溢出,并验证剪枝或摘要压缩后的重试请求从替换表层重建。
单元测试覆盖最终适配器失败的来源与身份、已关闭 turn 的重试编号与重置、取消与销毁、step 边界顺序、已路由信封压力、压力门控剪枝、剪枝独立解除压力、从已剪枝输入生成摘要、平衡溢出缩减、后续失败前已落盘的剪枝进展、generation 证明、上限、委托与辅助调用路由。真实循环测试覆盖抛出式和带内溢出,并验证剪枝或摘要压缩后的重试请求从替换表层重建。
## 考虑过的替代方案

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-14-provider-routed-llm-adapters.md: 98205d18d07752e0cdba86d7cba80368d45fd816
2026-07-14-provider-routed-llm-adapters.zh.md: c35225a86baf4c2d09732b5940abbc8046d365fb
2026-07-14-provider-routed-llm-adapters.md: 1bd9197667f6e49c5025c98b4a77500f78595c2b
2026-07-14-provider-routed-llm-adapters.zh.md: 4d57f2cb33ac296500a4a19771ea493621ff93f6

View File

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ A provider has exactly one adapter owner in a Cordis context. `dsh-llm-deepseek`
### Explicit pi-ai provider profiles
`dsh-llm-pi-ai` takes one non-empty list of provider profiles. Provider names must be unique within the list and present in pi-ai's `getProviders()` result. Each profile contains the provider name plus optional `apiKey`, `baseURL`, headers, reasoning level and budgets, cache retention, transport, SDK timeouts, and a Harness stream-idle timeout. Provider retry fields are deliberately absent: the adapter forces pi-ai's `maxRetries` to zero so one `stream()` call makes one visible provider attempt, while `dsh-llm-retry` owns bounded agent-level recovery. Credentials are never global: an explicit key applies only to its profile, while an absent key lets pi-ai resolve its standard environment variable, OAuth token, AWS credential chain, Google ADC, or other provider-native ambient authentication. An explicitly empty key is invalid configuration rather than an environment fallback.
`dsh-llm-pi-ai` takes one non-empty list of provider profiles. Provider names must be unique within the list and present in pi-ai's `getProviders()` result. Each profile contains the provider name plus optional `apiKey`, `baseURL`, headers, reasoning level and budgets, cache retention, transport, SDK timeouts, a Harness stream-idle timeout, and a provider-owned `retryPolicy`. The adapter forces pi-ai's `maxRetries` to zero so one `stream()` call makes one visible provider attempt, while `dsh-llm-retry` executes the resolved policy at the agent failed-step seam. Credentials are never global: an explicit key applies only to its profile, while an absent key lets pi-ai resolve its standard environment variable, OAuth token, AWS credential chain, Google ADC, or other provider-native ambient authentication. An explicitly empty key is invalid configuration rather than an environment fallback.
The plugin registers all configured provider names against one `PiAiAdapter` in one all-or-nothing call. A request uses its provider to select the matching profile and finds its model in `getModels(provider)` to obtain the catalog descriptor. An unknown provider fails at plugin load; an unknown model fails before network I/O with `UNKNOWN_MODEL`. The catalog object is never mutated. When a profile supplies `baseURL`, the adapter clones the selected descriptor and overrides only `baseUrl`, so a private endpoint can retain pi-ai's API, capabilities, compatibility flags, context limits, and reasoning map. The private endpoint must implement the selected provider's protocol, and the model id must still exist in the installed pi-ai catalog.

View File

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Status: implemented
### 显式 pi-ai 提供方配置
`dsh-llm-pi-ai` 接受一个非空的提供方配置列表。列表内的提供方名称必须唯一,并且存在于 pi-ai 的 `getProviders()` 结果中。每项配置包含提供方名称,以及可选的 `apiKey``baseURL`、headers、推理级别和预算、缓存保留设置、传输方式、SDK 超时Harness 流空闲超时。配置中有意不提供重试字段:适配器强制将 pi-ai 的 `maxRetries` 设为零,使一次 `stream()` 调用只发起一次可见的提供方请求;有界的 agent 层恢复由 `dsh-llm-retry` 负责。凭据不设全局值显式密钥仅对所属配置生效未提供密钥时pi-ai 使用标准环境变量、OAuth token、AWS 凭据链、Google ADC 或其他提供方原生环境认证。显式空密钥属于无效配置,不会回退到环境认证。
`dsh-llm-pi-ai` 接受一个非空的提供方配置列表。列表内的提供方名称必须唯一,并且存在于 pi-ai 的 `getProviders()` 结果中。每项配置包含提供方名称,以及可选的 `apiKey``baseURL`、headers、推理级别和预算、缓存保留设置、传输方式、SDK 超时Harness 流空闲超时,以及由提供方拥有的 `retryPolicy`适配器强制将 pi-ai 的 `maxRetries` 设为零,使一次 `stream()` 调用只发起一次可见的提供方请求;`dsh-llm-retry` 则在 agent 失败步骤 seam 上执行解析后的策略。凭据不设全局值显式密钥仅对所属配置生效未提供密钥时pi-ai 使用标准环境变量、OAuth token、AWS 凭据链、Google ADC 或其他提供方原生环境认证。显式空密钥属于无效配置,不会回退到环境认证。
插件通过一次全有或全无调用,将所有已配置的提供方名称注册到同一个 `PiAiAdapter`。请求按 provider 选择对应配置,并在 `getModels(provider)` 中查找模型以取得目录描述符。未知提供方会在插件加载时失败;未知模型会在网络 I/O 前以 `UNKNOWN_MODEL` 失败。适配器不会修改目录对象。当配置提供 `baseURL` 时,适配器复制选中的描述符,仅覆盖 `baseUrl`,使私有端点保留 pi-ai 的 API、能力、兼容标志、上下文限制与推理映射。私有端点必须实现所选提供方的协议模型 ID 也仍须存在于已安装的 pi-ai 目录中。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-16-explicit-turn-cancellation.md: 7ac743221084e663294954bfd048ba7ef1114f60
2026-07-16-explicit-turn-cancellation.zh.md: 3dca6339787ebef749c0d6a15609376ede994a97
2026-07-16-explicit-turn-cancellation.md: 15085a1da2cf183bace9957a4bedb3ea466aa472
2026-07-16-explicit-turn-cancellation.zh.md: e945b0fea51bdbfee38048573c643b0fb8ecb685

View File

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ The driver keeps only a cause-less pre-run marker for queued work cancelled befo
The explicit event signatures keep their positional form and place `signal` immediately before a waterfall's final `next`. Prompt submission, request configuration, step-result processing, continuation, and terminal stop join the pre-existing explicit signal seams for pre-step, session prefix, model generation, tool execution, approval, and subagent or workflow requests. Hook bridges must also supply `RunHookOptions.signal`, so a turn cancellation reaches the bash executor's process-group kill and join boundary. `SystemPrompt.assemble()` carries `signal?: AbortSignal` in `AssembleContext` because that object is an explicit request value that can also represent signal-less assembly outside a turn. Listeners may cooperate with the signal but must not retain it to control another turn.
`ctx.agents` continues to carry only the initiating Agent. Ambient Agent presence does not imply liveness, a current turn, or cancellation authority, and `agentInterruptReasonOf(signal)` reads only its explicit argument. Concurrent Agents isolate both their initiator identities and their turn signals; a child driver shadows the parent initiator while its parent request signal still travels through the subagent seam.
`ctx.agents` continues to carry only the initiating Agent. Ambient Agent presence does not imply liveness, a current turn, or cancellation authority. The cause reader is private to the loop and states the machine-private slot invariant (only `cancel()` aborts a turn controller, always with a canonical frozen cause) instead of re-validating the reason structurally; no public helper reads a cause off an arbitrary signal. Concurrent Agents isolate both their initiator identities and their turn signals; a child driver shadows the parent initiator while its parent request signal still travels through the subagent seam.
Agent disposal requests the runtime-only `{ kind: 'disposed' }` interruption on the active holder. If cancellation already won the controller reason, the reason cannot be rewritten, so terminal classification first checks lifecycle state: disposed wins, then a supported `user` or `parent` cause becomes the coarse aborted outcome, and unrelated exceptions retain the existing error path. ACP cancellation maps to `user`; in-process spawn and fork propagation map to `parent`. Remote ACP subagents retain their existing wire protocol.

View File

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ AgentLoop 为每个待启动轮次私有地持有一个 `TurnCancellation`。它
显式事件签名保留位置参数形式,并把 `signal` 放在 waterfall瀑布式事件的最后一个参数 `next` 之前。提示词提交、请求配置、步骤结果处理、继续决策和终止停止加入已有的步骤前处理、会话前缀、模型生成、工具执行、审批以及 subagent 或工作流请求的显式 signal seam。钩子桥接器也必须提供 `RunHookOptions.signal`,使轮次取消能够到达 Bash 执行器终止进程组并等待其退出的边界。`SystemPrompt.assemble()``AssembleContext` 中携带 `signal?: AbortSignal`,因为该对象是显式请求值,也可表示轮次之外不携带 signal 的组装。监听器可以配合该 signal 取消,但不得保留它来控制其他轮次。
`ctx.agents` 仍只携带发起 Agent。环境中的 Agent 并不代表存活、当前轮次或取消权限`agentInterruptReasonOf(signal)` 也只读取其显式参数。并发 Agent 会同时隔离各自的发起方身份和轮次 signal子驱动会遮蔽父发起方而父请求 signal 仍通过 subagent seam 传递。
`ctx.agents` 仍只携带发起 Agent。环境中的 Agent 并不代表存活、当前轮次或取消权限。cause 读取器是 loop 私有的,它直接陈述机器私有的 slot 不变量(只有 `cancel()` 会中止轮次控制器,且总是携带规范的冻结 cause而不是对 reason 做结构化再校验;不存在从任意 signal 读取 cause 的公开辅助函数。并发 Agent 会同时隔离各自的发起方身份和轮次 signal子驱动会遮蔽父发起方而父请求 signal 仍通过 subagent seam 传递。
Agent dispose资源释放会在活跃持有者上请求仅用于运行时的 `{ kind: 'disposed' }` 中断。若取消已经先占用控制器的中断原因,该原因便无法改写,因此终态分类会先检查生命周期状态:资源释放结果优先,之后受支持的 `user``parent` 取消原因形成粗粒度的中止结果其他异常保留现有错误路径。ACPAgent Client Protocol取消映射为 `user`;进程内 spawn 和 fork 的传播映射为 `parent`。远程 ACP subagent 保持现有协议。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.md: 6b5cd089fcf206e659c7b67b8a996bfe81d0c333
2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.zh.md: 61b25b14ca6f048b73a51788f112165745ae7106
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.md
2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.md: b2de9480d2659153dfb8a76ee07438d12e5b07c3
2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.zh.md: 1ae2654fb1e1d6913bc91c4aeb380dc533a6b258

View File

@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ The first-party tools preserve their existing Native text while returning domain
| `todo_write` | `{ todos, counts }` |
| `ask_user_question` | `{ answers: [{ id, selected, custom? }] }` |
| `exit_plan_mode` | `{ approved: true }` |
| `cordis_inspect` / `cordis_mount` / `cordis_unmount` | Inspection text or typed dynamic-mount handles |
| `cordis_inspect` / `cordis_mount` / `cordis_unmount` | Inspection text or typed temporary-Plugin handles |
| `structured_output` | `{ recorded: true }` |
| `run_code` | `{ logs: string[], result?: JsonValue }` |

View File

@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ type ToolExecutionResult =
| `todo_write` | `{ todos, counts }` |
| `ask_user_question` | `{ answers: [{ id, selected, custom? }] }` |
| `exit_plan_mode` | `{ approved: true }` |
| `cordis_inspect` `cordis_mount` `cordis_unmount` | 检查文本或类型化的动态挂载句柄 |
| `cordis_inspect` `cordis_mount` `cordis_unmount` | 检查文本或类型化的临时 Plugin 句柄 |
| `structured_output` | `{ recorded: true }` |
| `run_code` | `{ logs: string[], result?: JsonValue }` |

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md: 12128d9e57601d0b85d20d1cb4240bb08eadc3cb
2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.zh.md: 177d90f7116f7451b8e3c4ccf7d1577ff12ae701
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md
2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md: 6936fbfa04c0fdaf1a8786c0465c193e9c285243
2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.zh.md: 3af14359fa01e92f63ae3b3e51dced9a97f6419f

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# Agent Note: Unify agent delivery and coalesce injected context into user/message
# Agent Note: Unify agent delivery on send(target × wakeup) and coalesce injected context into user/message
Status: implemented
@@ -8,39 +8,45 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.zh.md)
The agent's public driving surface had grown three near-parallel verbs — `send`, `steer`, `inject` — each with its own options type, its own live event story, and its own durable event. `send` and `steer` both queued a frozen inbox record and emitted `agent/queued`; `inject` bypassed the inbox and wrote a separate `context/message` durable event. The three verbs actually vary along only two independent axes: which queue an item joins (a whole new turn versus the active turn) and whether the item makes the model run. Encoding that 2×2 as three hand-written methods hid the symmetry, made "queue a turn without waking the driver" unreachable, and left `cancel()` with no way to abort a turn while preserving queued work.
Separately, `context/message` and `user/message` had converged: the surface projected both as verbatim user-role content, and the only real difference was that injected context carried `source`/`meta` and was "not a prompt." Two event types for one projection meant every consumer branched on event type to answer "is this a human prompt?", and the goal system used the type split as a side channel (round-zero state changes were `context/message`, admitted rounds were `user/message`).
Separately, `context/message` and `user/message` had converged: the surface projected both as verbatim user-role content, and the only real difference was that injected context carried a non-user `source` and was "not a prompt." Two event types for one projection meant every consumer branched on event type to answer "is this a human prompt?", and the goal system used the type split as a side channel (round-zero state changes were `context/message`, admitted rounds were `user/message`).
## Decision
**One acceptance mechanism, four intent helpers.** The concrete loop resolves `followup`, `queue`, `steer`, and `inject` into one (`target` × `wakeup`) acceptance mechanism. `followup` is `next-turn`/wakeup, `queue` is `next-turn`/no-wakeup, `steer` is `next-step`/wakeup, and `inject` is `next-step`/no-wakeup. The public structural interface exposes that mechanism as `send(ResolvedAgentInput)` for callers that already have fully resolved routing; every field is mandatory, and the discriminated input type excludes attached contexts from injection. The [intent-named delivery decision](2026-07-24-intent-named-agent-delivery.md) owns that superseding interface choice. Internally, `wakeup` means make the model run: wake a parked driver for an ordinary item or force a continuation for running steering.
**One primitive, three preset aliases.** The `Agent` interface's `send(input, { target, wakeup })` covers the (`target` × `wakeup`) matrix. Its `UserMessageData` input owns the inseparable model-facing `content` and producer `source`; the complete `SendOptions` owns only routing policy. `followup` (`next-turn`/wakeup), `steer` (`next-step`/wakeup), and `inject` (`next-step`/no-wakeup) each accept that one input and fix the policy. `wakeup` means "make the model run": wake a parked driver for a `next-turn` item, or force a continuation for a running `next-step` item. `next-turn`/no-wakeup (queue without waking) is representable with no alias and no current caller.
**inject keeps its mechanism.** `inject` appends durable model-facing context at the current log position (deferred behind an executing tool batch), or opens a one-shot `injection` turn when idle. It bypasses the FIFOs entirely, accepts no attached contexts, and defaults its source to `{ kind: 'plugin', plugin: '' }`, never `{ kind: 'user' }`.
**inject keeps its mechanism.** The `next-step`/no-wakeup path is exactly the old `inject`: durable model-facing context appended at the current log position, deferred while prompt admission or a turn owns the next safe boundary, and appended directly outside that window. It bypasses the FIFOs entirely, while its required `UserMessageData.source` preserves the caller's explicit provenance.
**context/message is gone.** Injected context is now a `user/message` whose `source` is a non-`user` kind (plugin or goal). `PromptMessageData` gained the optional `meta` that `context/message` carried. The surface, derivation, and `SurfaceEventType` drop `context/message`; consumers that need "is this a human prompt?" read `source.kind === 'user'` instead of the event type. This keeps goal-authority's human-authority check exactly as strict as before — an injected message defaults to a plugin source and can never satisfy `source.kind === 'user'`.
**context/message is gone.** Injected context is now a `user/message`; context producers supply the appropriate non-user `source` explicitly, and typed source variants carry any domain-specific durable provenance. The surface, derivation, and `SurfaceEventType` drop `context/message`; consumers that need "is this a human prompt?" read `source.kind === 'user'` instead of the event type.
**Goal replay disambiguates by round, not type.** A goal state change is a round-zero goal-sourced `user/message` carrying `goal/change` metadata; a positive round is an admitted continuation prompt. `decodeGoalEvent` now takes a `user/message` and still fails loud on goal metadata under a non-goal source or a goal source lacking metadata.
**Goal replay disambiguates by round, not type.** A goal state change is a round-zero goal-sourced `user/message` whose source carries the complete change; a positive round is an admitted continuation prompt. `decodeGoalEvent` takes a `user/message` and fails loud when goal-state content and its typed source disagree.
**Delivery returns an id.** Each delivery method returns an opaque branded `AgentMessageId` for the accepted input. FIFO methods carry it through their inbox lifecycle events; injection bypasses those events.
**`send` returns an id.** `send` (and the aliases) return an opaque branded `AgentMessageId` for the accepted message; `send`'s previous return was `void`.
**Three inbox events replace agent/queued.** `agent/inbox/enqueue` (an item entered a FIFO), `agent/inbox/dequeue` (the driver claimed one), and `agent/inbox/discard` (`cancel()` dropped pending items) each carry an `AgentMessage` the accepted message including its returned `id`, steering/wakeup facts, source, and contexts — so a caller can correlate a queued item with its lifecycle. Injection never touches a FIFO and emits none of these. Every FIFO entry publishes an enqueue, including the loop-authored continuation-reason steer (`agent/turn-continuation` returning `{ action: 'continue', reason }`), so the ledger stays balanced with its later dequeue or discard. The `dsh-agent` invariant companion asserts FIFO conservation: a per-agent outstanding count that dequeue and discard can never drive negative.
**Three inbox events replace agent/queued.** `agent/inbox/enqueue` (an item entered a FIFO), `agent/inbox/dequeue` (the driver claimed one), and `agent/inbox/discard` (`cancel()` dropped pending items) type their `AgentMessage` payload with only the accepted message's returned `id`, content, and source. Enqueue separately carries the resolved `queued | steering` placement captured by the producer at acceptance time, so observers and reconnect mirrors never reconstruct routing from later status or session history. Injection never touches a FIFO and emits none of these. Every FIFO entry publishes an enqueue, including steering submitted by an `agent/turn-stopping` listener, so the ledger stays balanced with its later dequeue or discard. The `dsh-agent` invariant companion asserts FIFO conservation: a per-agent outstanding count that dequeue and discard can never drive negative.
**cancel gains keepInbox.** `cancel(cause?, { keepInbox? })`; when true it aborts the active turn but preserves queued and steering items (no discard event, and un-started work is not dropped).
**Admission accepts next-step input without becoming a turn.** The loop opens a private next-step acceptance window before `agent/prompt-submit`, keeps it open through the turn, and closes it before `turn/end`. Steering and injection received during admission therefore remain together in the outbox and join an allowed turn. If admission blocks or fails, a context-only caller batch takes idle injection's immediate append, while steering and context staged beside it remain available to retry; neither path writes the rejected prompt. When a later prompt is admitted, retained outbox input enters its turn before that prompt, while input accepted during the current admission remains after the prompt. Closing the window before `turn/end` preserves the rule that reentrant late steering becomes an independent queued turn. `Agent.acceptsNextStep` exposes whether a `next-step` send would currently join this window; `status` remains the broader activity signal rather than a routing predicate.
**One accepted message keeps one representation.** Durable user-role input and additional model-facing context both use `UserMessageData { content, source }` directly; public `AgentMessage` extends it with the correlation `id`, and the loop-private `PendingMessage` extends that with `wakeup`. The loop clones and freezes `UserMessageData` before publication, queueing, or immediate append, so later caller or observer mutation cannot change the accepted value. A queued message that becomes steering enters the outbox as the same `PendingMessage` object, while injected and tool-produced context enters as plain `UserMessageData`. The outbox therefore stores their union directly instead of wrapping steering beside a duplicate copy of its content and source. Provider-native assistant messages remain adapter-owned output types and do not participate in this input hierarchy.
**Idle wakeup follows acceptance.** Before publishing enqueue, a waking queued send installs quiescence ownership and schedules driver admission for a microtask that runs after the id returns. Every send in one synchronous caller stack therefore resolves placement against the same pre-admission state, while reentrant cancellation or teardown cannot retire before the scheduled admission settles. Two idle `steer()` calls remain two FIFO turns instead of the first opening an admission window that captures the second.
**cancel gains keepInbox.** `cancel(cause, { keepInbox? })`; callers choose the cause explicitly, and `keepInbox: true` aborts the active turn while preserving queued and steering items (no discard event, and un-started work is not dropped).
## Alternatives considered
- **A dedicated `MessageSource` kind `context`** for injected content. Rejected because `plugin` already means "not a human," so a fourth kind would add a parallel axis the authority checks would have to learn. Injected context defaults to a plugin source instead.
- **A typed discriminant field on `PromptMessageData`** (e.g. `origin: 'prompt' | 'context'`) to replace the event-type split. Rejected in favor of `source`, which every consumer already carries and which the goal system already keyed on; a second discriminant would duplicate that fact.
- **Keeping `agent/queued` alongside the inbox events.** Rejected as a mirror: `agent/inbox/enqueue` is the same enqueue-time signal with the accepted routing facts, and the dequeue/discard events complete the FIFO lifecycle the single event could not describe.
- **A dedicated `MessageSource` kind `context`** for injected content. Rejected because `plugin` already means "not a human," so a fourth kind would add a parallel axis the authority checks would have to learn. Plugin-produced injected context supplies its plugin source explicitly.
- **A typed discriminant field on `UserMessageData`** (e.g. `origin: 'prompt' | 'context'`) to replace the event-type split. Rejected in favor of `source`, which every consumer already carries and which the goal system already keyed on; a second discriminant would duplicate that fact.
- **Keeping `agent/queued` alongside the inbox events.** Rejected as a mirror: `agent/inbox/enqueue` is the same enqueue-time signal with the resolved placement, and the dequeue/discard events complete the FIFO lifecycle the single event could not describe.
- **Derive inbox placement from agent status or the session log.** Rejected because `running` includes admission and settlement, while reconnect baselines need the original acceptance result even when the earlier turn boundary is absent. The producer already owns the exact routing decision.
## Consequences
The concrete driver has one delivery mechanism. Four common helpers hide its (`target` × `wakeup`) matrix behind caller intent, while `send` exposes the fully resolved matrix for advanced callers. One durable message type serves prompts, injected context, and goal rounds, so the surface projection and every human prompt? check simplify to a `source` test. The goal fold's channel split moves from event type to `source.round`, and every consumer that filtered `context/message` filters `user/message` by source. The turn-enclosure and reconstruction invariants are unchanged: an idle injection still wraps a one-shot turn, now emitting `user/message` instead of `context/message`.
The delivery surface is now one primitive plus three self-documenting presets, and the (`target` × `wakeup`) matrix makes previously-unreachable combinations explicit. One durable message type serves prompts, injected context, and goal rounds, so the surface projection and every "human prompt?" check simplify to a `source` test. The `Agent` contract remains an interface, so alternate implementations and object-literal test fakes implement the same minimal structural surface. The goal fold's channel split moved from event type to `source.round`, and every consumer that filtered `context/message` now filters `user/message` by source. An idle injection appends `user/message` between turns without opening a turn or running the model.
Internally, `wakeup` is the should the model run signal, so the inbox distinguishes `hasWakingQueued` (drives the loop and idle/quiescence decisions) from `hasQueued` (anything to dequeue): a lone `queue()` item stays parked at idle and rides along the next waking follow-up, and `whenIdle`/`cancel` settle quiescence off the waking signal (a lone quiet item takes `whenIdle`'s fast path, so no waiter is left hanging). `SendOptions.meta` on a queued or steering message is carried onto the durable `user/message`/`steering/message`, matching injection; it is intentionally absent from the live `AgentMessage`, which carries only routing facts. Every enqueued id gets exactly one terminal lifecycle event: a terminal stop that drops pending steering emits `agent/inbox/discard` both at the in-turn stop point and on the post-turn drain of late steering, and disposal discards any still-pending items before the loop exits. The `agent/inbox/*` payload is frozen so a listener cannot mutate the shared correlation object mid-dispatch, and a loop-authored continuation reason is snapshotted and frozen like public steering. Injection validates its payload before opening an idle one-shot turn; `InjectOptions` omits attached contexts, while the non-waking next-step variant of `ResolvedAgentInput` requires an empty context tuple.
`wakeup` is the "should the model run" signal, so the inbox distinguishes waking queued work from anything available to dequeue: a lone `next-turn`/no-wakeup item stays parked at idle and rides along the next waking send, and `whenIdle`/`cancel` settle quiescence off the waking signal. Every FIFO exit publishes exactly one lifecycle event, while domain-specific durable facts travel in typed message sources rather than a parallel metadata channel. The direct pending-item representation keeps public lifecycle events correlated without maintaining a second steering wrapper or allowing its durable data to diverge.
## Related
- [one-send-one-turn](../simplification/2026-07-17-one-send-one-turn.md) — the one-claimed-message-per-turn rule this builds on.
- [remove-agent-steering-mirror](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md) — the precedent for collapsing a mirrored live event.
- [explicit-turn-cancellation](2026-07-16-explicit-turn-cancellation.md) — the cancel-cause signal `keepInbox` extends.
- [intent-named-agent-delivery](2026-07-24-intent-named-agent-delivery.md) — the public helpers and fully resolved acceptance interface.

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# Agent Note: 统一 agent 投递并把注入的上下文合并进 user/message
# Agent Note: agent 投递统一到 send(target × wakeup) 并把注入的上下文合并进 user/message
Status: implemented
@@ -8,39 +8,45 @@ Status: implemented
agent 的对外驱动接口逐渐长出三个近乎平行的动词——`send``steer``inject`——各自带有独立的选项类型、独立的实时事件叙事,以及独立的持久事件。`send``steer` 都会把一条冻结的 inbox 记录入队并发出 `agent/queued``inject` 则绕过 inbox写入一条独立的 `context/message` 持久事件。这三个动词实际上只沿两条独立的轴变化:一个队列项加入哪个队列(一个全新的轮次,还是当前活跃的轮次),以及这个队列项是否让模型运行。把这个 2×2 编码成三个手写方法,掩盖了其中的对称性,让“排入一个轮次但不唤醒驱动器”无法表达,也让 `cancel()` 无从在保留排队工作的前提下中止一个轮次。
另外,`context/message``user/message` 已经趋同:对外接口把二者都投影为逐字的 user 角色内容,唯一真正的区别是注入的上下文携带 `source`/`meta` 且“不是提示词”。一个投影对应两种事件类型,意味着每个消费方都要根据事件类型分支来回答“这是不是一条人类提示词?”,而 goal 系统把这种类型区分当作侧信道使用(第 0 轮的状态变更是 `context/message`,已准入的轮次是 `user/message`)。
另外,`context/message``user/message` 已经趋同:对外接口把二者都投影为逐字的 user 角色内容,唯一真正的区别是注入的上下文携带非 user `source` 且“不是提示词”。一个投影对应两种事件类型,意味着每个消费方都要根据事件类型分支来回答“这是不是一条人类提示词?”,而 goal 系统把这种类型区分当作侧信道使用(第 0 轮的状态变更是 `context/message`,已准入的轮次是 `user/message`)。
## 决策
**一种接受机制,四种意图辅助方法。** 具体循环把 `followup``queue``steer``inject` 解析到同一个(`target` × `wakeup`)接受机制中。`followup``next-turn`/wakeup`queue``next-turn`/no-wakeup`steer``next-step`/wakeup`inject``next-step`/no-wakeup。公开的结构化接口将该机制暴露为 `send(ResolvedAgentInput)`;调用方若已持有完全解析的路由信息,即可使用该方法。使用时必须提供所有字段,可辨识输入类型也不允许注入携带附加上下文。取代旧接口的选择由[按意图命名的投递决策](2026-07-24-intent-named-agent-delivery.md)负责说明。内部的 `wakeup` 表示「让模型运行:为一条普通消息唤醒处于停泊状态的驱动器,或强制运行中的 steering 继续执行
**一个原语,三个预设别名。** `Agent` 接口的 `send(input, { target, wakeup })` 覆盖 (`target` × `wakeup`) 矩阵。其 `UserMessageData` 输入持有不可分割的模型可见 `content` 与生产方 `source`;完整的 `SendOptions` 只持有路由策略。`followup``next-turn`/wakeup)、`steer``next-step`/wakeup)和 `inject``next-step`/no-wakeup)都接收这一项输入并固定策略。`wakeup` 意为“让模型运行:为一`next-turn` 队列项唤醒处于停泊状态的驱动器,或为一个运行中的 `next-step` 队列项强制继续执行。`next-turn`/no-wakeup入队但不唤醒可以表达只是没有别名也没有当前调用方
**inject 保留其机制。** `inject` 在当前日志位置追加持久面向模型上下文(在执行中的工具批处理之后延迟处理),或在空闲时开启一个一次性的 `injection` 轮次。它完全绕过 FIFO不接受附加上下文并把来源默认设为 `{ kind: 'plugin', plugin: '' }`,绝不是 `{ kind: 'user' }`
**inject 保留其机制。** `next-step`/no-wakeup 路径正是旧的 `inject`持久面向模型上下文会追加到当前日志位置;提示词准入或一个轮次占有下一个安全边界时,它会延迟处理,而在该窗口之外则直接追加。它完全绕过 FIFO 队列,而必填的 `UserMessageData.source` 会保留调用方显式提供的来源信息
**context/message 已移除。** 注入的上下文现在是一条 `user/message`,其 `source` 为非 `user` 类别plugin 或 goal`PromptMessageData` 新增了 `context/message` 原本携带的可选 `meta`。对外接口、派生逻辑和 `SurfaceEventType` 都不再包含 `context/message`;需要判断“这是不是一条人类提示词?”的消费方改为读取 `source.kind === 'user'`,而不是事件类型。这让 goal-authority 的人类授权检查与此前一样严格——注入的消息默认使用 plugin 来源,永远无法满足 `source.kind === 'user'`
**context/message 已移除。** 注入的上下文现在是一条 `user/message`;上下文生产方显式提供合适的非 `user` 类别 `source`,类型化 source 变体携带所有特定于领域的持久来源信息。对外接口、派生逻辑和 `SurfaceEventType` 都不再包含 `context/message`;需要判断“这是不是一条人类提示词?”的消费方改为读取 `source.kind === 'user'`,而不是事件类型。
**goal 回放靠轮次而非类型来区分。** 一次 goal 状态变更是一条第 0 轮、来源为 goal 的 `user/message`携带 `goal/change` 元数据;正数轮次则是一条已准入的继续执行提示词。`decodeGoalEvent` 现在接收一条 `user/message`,并仍会在非 goal 来源携带 goal 元数据、或 goal 来源缺少元数据时立即报错。
**goal 回放靠轮次而非类型来区分。** 一次 goal 状态变更是一条第 0 轮、来源为 goal 的 `user/message`其 source 携带完整变更;正数轮次则是一条已准入的继续执行提示词。`decodeGoalEvent` 接收一条 `user/message`,并 goal 状态内容与其类型化 source 不一致时立即报错。
**投递返回一个 id。** 每种投递方法都为被接受的输入返回一个不透明的 branded `AgentMessageId`。FIFO 方法通过其 inbox 生命周期事件携带这个 id注入绕过这些事件
**`send` 返回一个 id。** `send`(以及其别名)为被接受的消息返回一个不透明的 branded `AgentMessageId``send` 此前的返回值是 `void`
**三个 inbox 事件取代 agent/queued。** `agent/inbox/enqueue`(一个队列项进入某个 FIFO`agent/inbox/dequeue`(驱动器认领了一个)和 `agent/inbox/discard``cancel()` 丢弃了待处理项)都携带一条 `AgentMessage`——即被接受消息,包含其返回的 `id`steering/wakeup 事实、来源和上下文——因此调用方可以把一个排队项与其生命周期关联起来。注入从不触及 FIFO也不发出这些事件中的任何一个。每一次 FIFO 入队都会发布一个 enqueue 事件,包括由 loop 生成的携带继续原因的 steer`agent/turn-continuation` 返回 `{ action: 'continue', reason }`,因此账目会与其后的 dequeue 或 discard 保持平衡。`dsh-agent` 的不变量配套断言 FIFO 守恒:一个按 agent 计的未结算计数dequeue 和 discard 永远无法把它压到负数。
**三个 inbox 事件取代 agent/queued。** `agent/inbox/enqueue`(一个队列项进入某个 FIFO`agent/inbox/dequeue`(驱动器认领了一个)和 `agent/inbox/discard``cancel()` 丢弃了待处理项)都将各自的 `AgentMessage` 载荷类型限定为仅包含被接受消息返回的 `id`内容和来源。enqueue 还会单独携带生产方在接受消息时捕获的已解析 `queued | steering` 放置方式,因此观察方和重连镜像永远不必根据后续状态或会话历史重建路由。注入从不触及 FIFO也不发出这些事件中的任何一个。每一次 FIFO 入队都会发布一个 enqueue 事件,包括 `agent/turn-stopping` 监听器提交的 steering,因此账目会与其后的 dequeue 或 discard 保持平衡。`dsh-agent` 的不变量配套断言 FIFO 守恒:一个按 agent 计的未结算计数dequeue 和 discard 永远无法把它压到负数。
**cancel 新增 keepInbox。** `cancel(cause?, { keepInbox? })`;当其为 true 时,它中止活跃轮次,但保留排队项和 steering 项(不发出 discard 事件,尚未启动的工作也不会被丢弃)
**准入接受 next-step 输入,但不会因此成为一个轮次。** 循环会在 `agent/prompt-submit` 前打开一个私有的 next-step 接受窗口,使其贯穿整个轮次,并在 `turn/end` 前关闭。因此,在准入期间收到的 steering 和注入会一起留在 outbox 中并加入获准轮次。如果准入被阻止或失败,仅含调用方上下文的批次会采用空闲注入的立即追加行为,而 steering 及与其一同暂存的上下文仍可重试;两种路径都不会写入被拒绝的提示词。后续提示词获准时,保留在 outbox 中的输入会先于该提示词进入其轮次,而当前准入期间接受的输入则留在提示词之后。在 `turn/end` 前关闭窗口,可以保留这样的规则:可重入的晚到 steering 会成为一个独立的排队轮次。`Agent.acceptsNextStep` 会公开一次 `next-step` 发送当前是否会加入该窗口;`status` 仍是更宽泛的活动信号,而非路由判据
**一条已接受消息只保留一种表示。** 持久的用户角色输入和附加的模型可见上下文都直接使用 `UserMessageData { content, source }`;公开的 `AgentMessage` 在此基础上增加用于关联的 `id`,循环私有的 `PendingMessage` 再增加 `wakeup`。循环会在发布、入队或立即追加前克隆并冻结 `UserMessageData`,因此调用方或观察方后续的修改无法改变已接受的值。一条成为 steering 的排队消息会以同一个 `PendingMessage` 对象进入 outbox而注入和工具产生的上下文则以普通 `UserMessageData` 进入。因此outbox 直接存储这两种类型的联合,而不再把 steering 与一份重复的内容和来源副本包装在一起。提供方原生的助手消息仍是适配器拥有的输出类型,不参与这套输入层级。
**空闲唤醒在接受之后发生。** 在发布 enqueue 前,一次会唤醒驱动器的排队发送会先取得完全停稳所有权,并把驱动器准入调度到一个会在该次发送返回 id 后运行的微任务中。因此,同一同步调用栈中的每次发送都会基于同一份准入前状态解析放置方式,而可重入的取消或拆除在已调度的准入结算前无法完成退役。空闲时的两次 `steer()` 调用会保留为两个 FIFO 轮次,而不会因第一次调用打开准入窗口而把第二次吸纳进去。
**cancel 新增 keepInbox。** `cancel(cause, { keepInbox? })`;调用方显式选择 cause`keepInbox: true` 会中止活跃轮次,同时保留排队项和 steering 项(不发出 discard 事件,尚未启动的工作也不会被丢弃)。
## 考虑过的替代方案
- **为注入内容设立专门的 `MessageSource` 类别 `context`。** 不予采纳,因为 `plugin` 已经表示“不是人类”,因此第四种类别会增加一条平行的轴,让授权检查不得不去学习它。注入上下文改为默认使用 plugin 来源。
- **在 `PromptMessageData` 上设一个类型化的判别字段**(例如 `origin: 'prompt' | 'context'`)来取代事件类型的区分。不予采纳,转而采用 `source`——每个消费方都已经携带它goal 系统也已经以它为键;第二个判别字段会重复这一事实。
- **在 inbox 事件之外保留 `agent/queued`。** 作为镜像而被否决:`agent/inbox/enqueue` 是同一个入队时刻的信号,只是多带了已接受的路由事实,而 dequeue/discard 事件补全了单个事件无法描述的 FIFO 生命周期。
- **为注入内容设立专门的 `MessageSource` 类别 `context`。** 不予采纳,因为 `plugin` 已经表示“不是人类”,因此第四种类别会增加一条平行的轴,让授权检查不得不去学习它。由插件产生的注入上下文会显式提供其 plugin 来源。
- **在 `UserMessageData` 上设一个类型化的判别字段**(例如 `origin: 'prompt' | 'context'`)来取代事件类型的区分。不予采纳,转而采用 `source`——每个消费方都已经携带它goal 系统也已经以它为键;第二个判别字段会重复这一事实。
- **在 inbox 事件之外保留 `agent/queued`。** 作为镜像而被否决:`agent/inbox/enqueue` 是同一个入队时刻的信号,只是带有已解析的放置方式,而 dequeue/discard 事件补全了单个事件无法描述的 FIFO 生命周期。
- **根据 agent 状态或会话日志推导 inbox 放置方式。** 不予采纳,因为 `running` 同时涵盖准入与结算,而重连基线即使缺少此前的轮次边界,也需要最初的接受结果。生产方已经拥有精确的路由决策。
## 后果
具体驱动器只有一个投递机制。四种常用辅助方法以调用方意图封装其(`target` × `wakeup`)矩阵,而 `send` 则向高级调用方暴露完全解析后的矩阵。一种持久消息类型同时服务提示词、注入的上下文和 goal 轮次,因此对外接口的投影和每一处是否人类提示词?检查都简化为一次 `source` 判断。goal 折叠的通道区分从事件类型改到 `source.round`此前过滤 `context/message` 的每个消费方改为按来源过滤 `user/message`轮次封闭与重建的不变量保持不变:空闲状态下的一次注入仍然封装成一个一次性轮次,只是现在发出 `user/message` 而非 `context/message`
投递接口现在是一个原语加三个自解释的预设,(`target` × `wakeup`) 矩阵把此前无法表达的组合显式化。一种持久消息类型同时服务提示词、注入的上下文和 goal 轮次,因此对外接口的投影和每一处是否人类提示词?检查都简化为一次 `source` 判断。`Agent` 契约仍是接口,因此其他实现和对象字面量形式的测试替身只需实现同一个最小结构接口。goal 折叠的通道区分从事件类型改到 `source.round`此前过滤 `context/message` 的每个消费方现在改为按来源过滤 `user/message`空闲状态下的注入会在两个轮次之间追加 `user/message`,既不打开轮次,也不运行模型
在内部,`wakeup` 是“模型是否应当运行”的信号,因此 inbox 区分 `hasWakingQueued`(驱动 loop 以及空闲/静默判定)与 `hasQueued`(是否有任何可 dequeue 的项:一个孤立的 `queue()` 项会停泊在空闲状态,并随下一条会唤醒驱动器的后续消息一同带出,而 `whenIdle`/`cancel` 依据唤醒信号来结算静默(一个孤立的静默项走 `whenIdle` 的快速路径,因此不会让任何等待者悬而未决)。排队消息或 steering 消息上的 `SendOptions.meta` 会被带到持久的 `user/message`/`steering/message` 上,与注入保持一致;它有意不放在实时的 `AgentMessage` 上,后者只携带路由事实。每个已入队的 id 都恰好得到一个终止性生命周期事件:一次会丢弃待处理 steering 项的终止性停止会为它发出 `agent/inbox/discard`,既在轮次内的停止点,也在轮次结束后对迟到 steering 的清空时dispose资源释放会在 loop 退出前丢弃所有仍在等待的项。`agent/inbox/*` 的事件载荷已被冻结,因此监听器无法在分发中途修改共享的关联对象,而由 loop 生成的继续原因会像公开 steering 一样被快照并冻结。注入会在打开空闲状态的一次性轮次之前校验其载荷;`InjectOptions` 不包含附加上下文,而 `ResolvedAgentInput` 中不唤醒的下一步变体要求使用空上下文元组
`wakeup` 是“模型是否应当运行”的信号,因此 inbox 区分能唤醒的排队工作与任何可 dequeue 的项:一个孤立的 `next-turn`/no-wakeup 队列项会停泊在空闲状态,并随下一次唤醒 send 一同带出,而 `whenIdle`/`cancel` 依据唤醒信号来结算静默。每一次 FIFO 退出都恰好发布一个生命周期事件,特定于领域的持久事实则通过类型化消息 source 传递,而非通过平行的元数据通道。直接使用待处理项的表示方式,使公开生命周期事件保持可关联,既无需维护第二个 steering 包装层,也避免其持久数据发生分歧
## 相关
- [one-send-one-turn](../simplification/2026-07-17-one-send-one-turn.md)——本决策所依托的“每轮次只认领一条消息”规则。
- [remove-agent-steering-mirror](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md)——折叠镜像实时事件的先例。
- [explicit-turn-cancellation](2026-07-16-explicit-turn-cancellation.md)——`keepInbox` 所扩展的取消原因信号。
- [intent-named-agent-delivery](2026-07-24-intent-named-agent-delivery.md)——公开辅助方法以及接受完全解析输入的接口。

View File

@@ -1,52 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Name public agent delivery by intent
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-24-intent-named-agent-delivery.zh.md)
## Problem
A configurable `send(content, { target?, wakeup?, ... })` makes every caller learn the loop's routing matrix, its defaults, and the interaction between active-turn targeting and model activation. Optional routing fields also let advanced-looking calls silently become ordinary sends. Most callers have one semantic intent, while some adapters already possess exact routing facts and should not have to reverse-map them into a helper name.
Sharing helper implementations through an abstract `Agent` class also makes the public seam nominal in practice. Object-literal adapters and tests must inherit prototype methods even though the package promises a swappable structural handle. The shared base exists only to forward fixed arguments, while the concrete loop remains the sole production adapter.
## Decision
`Agent` is a structural interface with four intent-named delivery helpers:
- `followup()` queues an ordinary turn and wakes the driver.
- `queue()` queues an ordinary turn without waking an idle driver.
- `steer()` targets the running turn and requests another step; while idle it becomes a waking ordinary turn.
- `inject()` appends model-facing context without running the model.
`followup`, `queue`, and `steer` accept `SendOptions`; `inject` accepts `InjectOptions`, which omits attached contexts because injection has no inbox item to own them. `followup` names the waking next-turn operation used for both initial prompts and later independent prompts.
`Agent` also exposes `send(ResolvedAgentInput)` for callers that already hold the complete route. Every field is mandatory: content, source, contexts, metadata (possibly `undefined`), target, and wakeup. The discriminated union requires the empty context tuple for non-waking next-step injection. `ReactLoopAgent` implements this method once, and all four helpers resolve their defaults before delegating to it. The method accepts the delivery facts as one resolved input; acceptance can still lead to later dequeue, discard, or durable injection rather than eventual delivery.
The target/wakeup matrix is an explicit advanced part of the structural `Agent` interface, not the ordinary helper options and not a base-class implementation seam. With one concrete adapter, a protected subclass seam would be hypothetical; callers and tests use the same public interface.
## Alternatives considered
**Keep the resolved primitive private.** This minimizes the public method count, but forces adapters that already hold exact target/wakeup facts to reverse-map them into helper calls and removes the reusable type for that resolved state.
**Use configurable `send(content, options)` as the primitive.** Optional routing fields would let advanced-looking calls silently become ordinary sends. One mandatory discriminated input keeps the resolved route explicit and rejects attached contexts on injection.
**Name the primitive `acceptInput`, `sendInternal`, or `addMessageAdvanced`.** `acceptInput` describes the synchronous acceptance boundary but not the caller's delivery action. A public method must not describe itself as internal, and `addMessageAdvanced` is inaccurate because the input may later be discarded.
**Use `send(content, options)` as the waking-turn helper.** This reserves the shortest delivery name for one preset and forces callers with complete target/wakeup facts through a less direct primitive name. `followup` distinguishes the next-turn/wakeup intent while leaving `send` for the resolved operation.
**Bind source first through a public sender object.** A source-bound adapter can make attribution explicit for repeated producers, but it adds another public object and does not simplify one-off human input. The existing source default remains, with the standing requirement that non-human producers label their content.
## Verification
Focused agent-loop coverage exercises direct fully resolved acceptance, waking sends, quiet queues, active and idle steering, injection, source/context snapshots, cancellation, and inbox lifecycle correlation through the public methods. Type-level coverage uses structural `Agent` fakes, requires every `ResolvedAgentInput` field, requires empty contexts on its injection variant, and keeps routing fields out of `SendOptions`. The keyless Cordis inspection snapshot pins the structural interface without an abstract-class implementation.
## Consequences
Ordinary callers choose one verb instead of encoding two routing axes; advanced callers may submit the exact discriminated route. The concrete loop retains one acceptance path and one ownership boundary, while the structural interface preserves simple adapters and fakes. Adding a common delivery intent still requires an explicit public helper and mapping rather than another optional matrix combination.
The advanced method adds interface surface and requires structural fakes to implement it. In return, resolved routing has one typed representation, while helper defaults and mappings stay beside the only implementation that owns them.
## Related
- [unified delivery and coalesced user messages](2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md) owns the shared acceptance mechanism, inbox lifecycle, and durable event convergence this decision narrows at the public seam.

View File

@@ -1,52 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 按意图命名公开的 agent 投递
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-24-intent-named-agent-delivery.md) | 中文
## 问题
可配置的 `send(content, { target?, wakeup?, ... })` 会迫使每个调用方理解循环的路由矩阵、默认值,以及活跃轮次目标与模型激活之间的相互作用。可选路由字段还会让看似高级的调用悄然变成普通投递。大多数调用方只有一种语义意图,而有些适配器已经持有确切的路由信息,不应再被迫将这些信息反向映射为某个辅助方法名称。
通过抽象 `Agent` 类共享辅助方法的实现,实际上也会让公开 seam 具有名义类型约束。对象字面量适配器和测试必须继承原型方法,尽管该包承诺提供一个可替换的结构化句柄。共享基类只负责转发固定参数,而具体循环仍是唯一的生产适配器。
## 决策
`Agent` 是一个结构化接口,提供四种按意图命名的投递辅助方法:
- `followup()` 将一个普通轮次入队并唤醒驱动器。
- `queue()` 将一个普通轮次入队,但不唤醒空闲驱动器。
- `steer()` 以运行中的轮次为目标并请求另一个步骤;空闲时,它会变成一个唤醒式普通轮次。
- `inject()` 追加面向模型的上下文,但不运行模型。
`followup``queue``steer` 接收 `SendOptions``inject` 接收 `InjectOptions`,后者不包含附加上下文,因为注入没有 inbox 项来拥有它们。`followup` 为唤醒式下一轮操作命名,这项操作既用于初始提示词,也用于后续的独立提示词。
`Agent` 还公开 `send(ResolvedAgentInput)`,供已经持有完整路由的调用方使用。每个字段都必须提供:内容、来源、上下文、元数据(可以是 `undefined`)、目标和唤醒标志。对于目标为下一步且不触发唤醒的注入,可辨识联合类型要求上下文为空元组。`ReactLoopAgent` 统一实现这个方法;四个辅助方法都会先解析各自的默认值,再委托给它。调用方以一个解析后的输入向该方法提交各项投递事实;接受之后,工作仍可能在稍后出队、被丢弃或持久注入,而不是最终必然送达。
结构化 `Agent` 接口显式包含面向高级用法的 target/wakeup 矩阵;该矩阵不属于普通辅助方法的选项,也不是基类实现 seam。只有一个具体适配器时protected 子类 seam 只是假想的;调用方和测试使用同一个公开接口。
## 考虑过的替代方案
**让解析后的原语保持私有。** 这会把公开方法数量降到最低,但会迫使已经持有精确 target/wakeup 路由信息的适配器将其反向映射为辅助方法调用,也会移除表示该解析后状态的可复用类型。
**使用可配置的 `send(content, options)` 作为原语。** 可选路由字段会让看似高级的调用悄然变成普通投递。一个各字段均为必填项的可辨识输入既能让解析后的路由保持显式,也会拒绝为注入附加上下文。
**把原语命名为 `acceptInput`、`sendInternal` 或 `addMessageAdvanced`。** `acceptInput` 描述了同步接受边界,却没有描述调用方的投递操作。公开方法不应在名称中把自己称为内部方法,`addMessageAdvanced` 也不准确,因为输入可能在之后被丢弃。
**使用 `send(content, options)` 作为唤醒轮次的辅助方法。** 这会让最简短的投递名称只表示一种预设操作,并迫使持有完整 target/wakeup 信息的调用方改用一个不够直接的原语名称。`followup` 明确区分下一轮/唤醒意图,并把 `send` 留给解析后的操作。
**先通过公开的发送方对象绑定来源。** 对于重复产生消息的来源,来源绑定适配器可以明确标注归属,但它会增加一个公开对象,也不会简化一次性的人类输入。现有的来源默认值予以保留,同时继续要求非人类生产方标注其内容。
## 验证
聚焦的 agent-loop 覆盖率测试通过公开方法覆盖直接接受完全解析的输入、唤醒式投递、静默排队、活跃与空闲状态下的 steering中途引导、注入、来源与上下文快照、取消以及 inbox 生命周期关联。类型级覆盖使用结构化 `Agent` 测试替身,要求提供 `ResolvedAgentInput` 的每个字段,要求其注入变体的上下文为空,并确保 `SendOptions` 不包含路由字段。无密钥的 Cordis 检查快照固定了不采用抽象类实现的结构化接口。
## 后果
普通调用方选择一个动词即可,无需编码两条路由轴;高级调用方则可提交经过判别的精确路由。具体循环保留一条接受路径和一个归属边界,而结构化接口保留了对简单适配器和测试替身的支持。新增一种常见投递意图时,仍需要显式提供公开辅助方法及其映射,而不是再增加一种可选的矩阵组合。
这个高级方法会扩大接口范围,并要求结构化测试替身实现它。作为回报,解析后的路由只有一种类型化表示,而辅助方法的默认值和映射仍留在拥有它们的唯一实现旁边。
## 相关
- [统一投递并合并 user 消息](2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md)负责定义共享的接受机制、inbox 生命周期和持久事件趋同;本决策只收窄它们的公开 seam。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-24-separate-context-injection-from-turn-execution.md
2026-07-24-separate-context-injection-from-turn-execution.md: b74cd6bdc48e795e57d780ab31a907ffe94dd518
2026-07-24-separate-context-injection-from-turn-execution.zh.md: f2421d2fc7b8c1329dd1349a6fb088407ac5fc75

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
# Agent Note: Separate context injection from turn execution
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-24-separate-context-injection-from-turn-execution.zh.md)
## Problem
The agent API represented supplementary model-facing input in three overlapping ways: callers attached `HookContext[]` through `SendOptions.contexts`, interception and tool hooks returned `additionalContexts`, and plugins called `agent.inject()`. These paths eventually wrote context into the same model history, but carried different placement, metadata, admission, queue, and turn-lifecycle rules.
Atomic attachment to an inbox message forced the loop to preserve context through prompt admission, steering conversion, cancellation, and terminal discard. `prompt-prefix` placement then combined context and the direct prompt into one event, requiring a model-hidden envelope so transcript consumers could recover what the user actually wrote. The result made outbox entries, session projection, and UI replay responsible for a distinction that belongs to the producer.
Idle `inject()` exposed a second mismatch. Injection did not request model execution, yet the implementation opened and closed a zero-step `injection` turn solely to satisfy the turn-enclosure invariant and obtain a durability checkpoint. A turn therefore sometimes meant “run the agent loop” and sometimes meant “persist context without running it.”
`HookContext` also named its producer rather than its role. The value could come from a native plugin, a hook bridge, prompt admission, or tool post-processing; its stable meaning was additional model-facing context with provenance.
## Decision
`inject()` is the only caller-facing operation for supplementary model-facing input, and a turn means one execution of the model loop.
`SendOptions` contains only `target` and `wakeup`. A caller that owns context delivers `UserMessageData` through `inject()` and submits the direct message independently with `send()` or `steer()`.
Prompt and tool extension points still return `additionalContexts`. These values are outputs of the extension point, not attachments captured from a caller's inbox item. Prompt admission runs before `run()` opens a turn. An allowed prompt and its returned additional contexts enter the new turn as separate messages; a blocked prompt writes neither and opens no turn. Tool-produced additional contexts enter the outbox after the corresponding tool results.
Every additional context is an independent `user/message` whose `source` records provenance. There is no `context/message`, prompt-prefix placement, stable request delimiter, or prompt envelope. Transcript and UI consumers distinguish direct user messages from injected context by `source`.
## Injection lifecycle
During prompt admission or an open turn, `inject()` stages context in the loop outbox. The private next-step acceptance window opens before `agent/prompt-submit` and closes before `turn/end`, so steering and context accepted for one boundary reach the same following request while a `turn/end` listener's late steering becomes a queued prompt. The loop drains the outbox at a safe step boundary, preserving tool protocol adjacency: context accepted during an assistant tool-call batch appears only after that batch's complete ordered results.
Outside that window, `inject()` appends its `user/message` immediately. It does not increment turn numbering, emit `turn/start` or `turn/end`, change agent status, or run the model; persistence observes the append through `session/event`.
If prompt admission blocks or fails, a caller-staged context-only batch appends immediately without a turn. Steering and context staged beside it remain in the outbox for a later admitted prompt; cancellation or disposal may discard them. Hook-produced `additionalContexts` never materialize because they belong to the rejected admission decision.
The session invariant permits `user/message` between turns while continuing to require turn enclosure for execution events, steering, assistant output, tools, and package-added events by default. Persistence, recovery, resume, fork, and compaction treat a valid out-of-turn `user/message` as committed session history rather than an interrupted or discardable turn tail.
## Extension and caller semantics
`PromptDecision.content` continues to replace only the direct prompt. `PromptDecision.additionalContexts` and tool-result `additionalContexts` retain FIFO order and individual provenance, but no longer select placement. A waterfall listener that delegates with `next()` must preserve downstream prompt content and additional contexts unless it intentionally returns replacements.
Caller-driven injection and hook-produced additional context deliberately have different admission ownership. A hook's additional contexts materialize only after that hook allows the prompt or tool result. Outside a next-step acceptance window, a caller that invokes `inject(context)` and then `send(prompt)` commits context independently; callers requiring all-or-nothing behavior use a domain-specific admission wrapper.
Cross-session references use that domain composition: TUI prepares the snapshot, then either adds it to the prompt's admission decision outside an acceptance window or injects it beside steering during one. The target log contains two simple messages, so later source mutation cannot change replay and transcript consumers do not need a prompt envelope. This supersedes the attachment mechanism in the [cross-session reference decision](../feature/2026-07-21-cross-session-references.md) while retaining its snapshot and trust-boundary rules.
This decision preserves the caller-owned framing decision from [unwrapped injected content](../simplification/2026-07-20-unwrap-injected-content-envelopes.md), the one-item turn rule from [one send, one turn](../simplification/2026-07-17-one-send-one-turn.md), and narrows the [turn-enclosure decision](2026-06-15-turn-enclosure-invariant.md) so turns enclose execution rather than every session event.
## Alternatives considered
**Keep `SendOptions.contexts` as an atomic attachment.** This preserves all-or-nothing delivery when prompt admission blocks, but it keeps context inside inbox lifecycle state and requires every queue transition and observation event to carry it. The generic agent API should not encode a domain transaction that most callers can express as context injection followed by message delivery.
**Keep a distinct `context/message` session event.** A separate event makes the out-of-turn exception narrower, but user-role model input would again have two event types with identical projection. `user/message.source` already carries the distinction needed by policy, transcript, and replay consumers.
**Keep one-shot turns for idle injection.** This retains universal turn enclosure and a convenient flush boundary, but it makes turn counts and turn observers report work that never ran the model. Durability is an independent session concern and can be awaited without fabricating execution.
**Keep `prompt-prefix` as an optional placement.** Prefix baking can make the context and request appear in one provider message, but it introduces a second representation of the direct prompt and spreads placement handling across admission, steering, logging, replay, and UI code. Producers that require textual framing may include it in their own context content.
**Let hooks call `inject()` directly instead of returning additional contexts.** Direct injection would erase the extension point's admission ownership: a listener could append context before a downstream listener blocks the operation. Returning `additionalContexts` keeps the waterfall result authoritative while sharing the same post-admission outbox path.
## Verification
- `SendOptions` and steering inbox records contain no attached contexts; `agent/inbox/enqueue` reports only the message plus its resolved queued-or-steering placement.
- `UserMessageData` is the shared shape across prompt interception, tool execution, hook bridges, guards, and context producers.
- Prompt-prefix placement, prompt envelopes, and `context/message` are absent from public types, durable events, projection, and UI replay.
- Idle `inject()` appends one sourced `user/message` without a turn or model call.
- Admission-time and active-turn injection drain at safe boundaries after complete tool-result batches and before the request that consumes them.
- Blocked prompt admission opens no turn and appends neither the prompt nor hook-produced additional contexts; caller context alone falls back to an idle append, while a steering boundary remains available to retry.
- Unit, persistence/resume, invariant, host/client queue, and TUI coverage pin event order, admission ownership, and reconnect classification.
## Consequences
- One surface event is valid outside turns, so persistence scanning, crash repair, forking, compaction, and session queries distinguish execution enclosure from session history.
- Consecutive user-role messages replace one baked prompt message; provider adapters preserve that ordering.
- Outside an acceptance window, `inject()` followed by a blocked `send()` leaves context without its intended direct prompt unless the caller supplies domain-specific admission ownership.
- The public delivery contract and inbox records remain small: no context attachment, context-placement metadata, prompt envelope, or duplicate durable event type.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
# Agent Note: 将上下文注入与轮次执行分离
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-24-separate-context-injection-from-turn-execution.md) | 中文
## 问题
agent API 曾用三种相互重叠的方式表示面向模型的补充输入:调用方通过 `SendOptions.contexts` 附加 `HookContext[]`,拦截钩子和工具钩子返回 `additionalContexts`,插件则调用 `agent.inject()`。这些路径最终都把上下文写入同一份模型历史,但各自携带不同的放置、元数据、准入、队列和轮次生命周期规则。
将上下文原子附加到收件箱消息后agent loop智能体循环曾被迫让上下文跟随提示词准入、steering中途引导转换、取消和终止丢弃的完整生命周期。`prompt-prefix` 放置方式又曾把上下文与直接提示词合并为一个事件,因此 transcript文本记录消费方不得不依赖模型不可见的封套才能还原用户实际输入。这样一来outbox 条目、会话投影和 UI 回放都曾负责处理本应由生产方负责的区分。
空闲状态下的 `inject()` 还暴露了另一处语义错位。注入当时并不请求模型执行,但实现仅为了满足轮次封闭不变量并获得持久性检查点,就会打开并关闭一个零步骤的 `injection` 轮次。于是,当时的轮次有时表示「运行 agent loop」有时却表示「不运行 agent仅持久化上下文」。
`HookContext` 的名字也描述了生产方而非该值的职责。它可能来自原生插件、hook bridge、提示词准入或工具后处理其稳定含义是带来源信息的额外模型上下文。
## 决策
`inject()` 是调用方交付补充模型输入的唯一操作,而轮次表示一次模型循环执行。
`SendOptions` 只包含 `target``wakeup`。拥有上下文的调用方通过 `inject()` 交付 `UserMessageData`,再独立使用 `send()``steer()` 提交直接消息。
提示词和工具扩展点仍可返回 `additionalContexts`。这些值是扩展点的输出,而不是从调用方收件箱条目捕获的附件。提示词准入在 `run()` 打开轮次之前执行。获准的提示词及其返回的额外上下文会作为独立消息进入新轮次;提示词被阻止时,两者都不写入,也不打开轮次。工具产生的额外上下文则在对应工具结果之后进入 outbox。
每项额外上下文都是独立的 `user/message`,并由 `source` 记录来源。不再有 `context/message`、prompt-prefix 放置方式、稳定请求分隔符或提示词封套。transcript 与 UI 消费方通过 `source` 区分直接用户消息和注入上下文。
## 注入生命周期
提示词准入期间或轮次打开时,`inject()` 会将上下文暂存在 loop outbox 中。私有的 next-step 接受窗口在 `agent/prompt-submit` 前打开,并在 `turn/end` 前关闭,因此同一边界接受的 steering 和上下文会进入后续同一次请求,而 `turn/end` 监听器提交的晚到 steering 则成为排队提示词。agent loop 会在安全的步骤边界排空 outbox同时保持工具协议要求的相邻关系在助手工具调用批次期间接受的上下文只能出现在该批次所有有序结果之后。
在该窗口之外,`inject()` 会立即追加对应的 `user/message`。它不会增加轮次编号、发出 `turn/start``turn/end`、改变 agent 状态,也不会运行模型;持久化通过 `session/event` 观察这次追加。
如果提示词准入被阻止或失败调用方暂存的仅含上下文的批次会立即追加且不产生轮次。steering 及与其一同暂存的上下文会留在 outbox 中,供后续获准提示词使用;取消或 dispose资源释放可能丢弃它们。钩子产生的 `additionalContexts` 属于被拒绝的准入决策,因此永远不会落入日志。
会话不变量允许 `user/message` 位于两个轮次之间同时继续要求执行事件、steering、助手输出、工具事件以及默认的包扩展事件均受轮次边界约束。持久化、恢复、resume、fork 和压缩会把合法的轮次外 `user/message` 当作已提交会话历史,而不是中断轮次或可丢弃的日志尾部。
## 扩展点与调用方语义
`PromptDecision.content` 仍只替换直接提示词。`PromptDecision.additionalContexts` 和工具结果的 `additionalContexts` 保留 FIFO 顺序及各自来源但不再选择放置方式。waterfall瀑布式事件监听器调用 `next()` 委托时,必须保留下游返回的提示词内容和额外上下文,除非它有意返回替代值。
调用方主动注入与钩子产生的额外上下文具有不同的准入归属。钩子的额外上下文只会在该钩子允许提示词或工具结果后落入日志。在 next-step 接受窗口之外,调用方执行 `inject(context)` 后再执行 `send(prompt)` 时,会独立提交上下文;需要全有或全无语义的调用方应使用领域专用的准入包装层。
跨会话引用采用这种领域组合方式TUI 先准备快照,然后在接受窗口之外将其加入提示词准入决策,或在窗口期间将其注入到 steering 旁。目标日志包含两条简单消息因此来源会话后续变化不会改变回放transcript 消费方也不需要提示词封套。本决策取代[跨会话引用决策](../feature/2026-07-21-cross-session-references.md)中的附件机制,但保留其快照与信任边界规则。
本决策保留[移除注入内容封套](../simplification/2026-07-20-unwrap-injected-content-envelopes.md)确立的调用方自主管理框架原则,以及[一次 send、一个轮次](../simplification/2026-07-17-one-send-one-turn.md)确立的单条目轮次规则;同时收窄[轮次封闭决策](2026-06-15-turn-enclosure-invariant.md),使轮次约束执行过程,而不是约束所有会话事件。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**保留 `SendOptions.contexts` 作为原子附件。** 提示词准入阻止消息时,这种方式能保留全有或全无交付,但也会让上下文继续成为收件箱生命周期状态的一部分,并迫使每次队列转换和观察事件携带它。大多数调用方都可以通过先注入上下文、再交付消息来表达需求,通用 agent API 不应内置领域事务。
**保留独立的 `context/message` 会话事件。** 独立事件可以缩小轮次外事件的例外范围,但面向模型的 user-role 输入会再次拥有两个投影完全相同的事件类型。`user/message.source` 已能为策略、transcript 和回放消费方提供所需区分。
**为空闲注入保留一次性轮次。** 这种方式能保留通用轮次封闭和方便的刷新边界,却会让轮次计数与轮次观察方报告从未运行模型的工作。持久性是独立的会话关注点,无需伪造执行即可等待。
**保留 `prompt-prefix` 可选放置方式。** 前缀烘焙可以让上下文和请求位于同一条提供方消息中但它会引入直接提示词的第二种表示并把放置处理扩散到准入、steering、日志、回放和 UI 代码。需要文本框架的生产方可以直接把它写入自身上下文内容。
**让钩子直接调用 `inject()`,而不是返回额外上下文。** 直接注入会破坏扩展点的准入归属:下游监听器阻止操作之前,上游监听器就可能已经追加上下文。返回 `additionalContexts` 能维持 waterfall 结果的最终权威性,同时复用准入后的 outbox 路径。
## 验证
- `SendOptions` 与 steering 收件箱记录不包含附加上下文;`agent/inbox/enqueue` 只报告消息及其已解析的 queued 或 steering 放置方式。
- `UserMessageData` 是提示词拦截、工具执行、hook bridge、guard 和上下文生产方共享的形状。
- 公共类型、持久事件、投影和 UI 回放中均不存在 prompt-prefix 放置方式、提示词封套与 `context/message`
- 空闲 `inject()` 在不产生轮次或模型调用的情况下,追加一条带来源的 `user/message`
- 准入期间和活跃轮次中的注入会在完整工具结果批次之后的安全边界排空,并在消费它们的请求之前进入日志。
- 被阻止的提示词准入不会打开轮次,也不会追加提示词或钩子产生的额外上下文;仅有调用方上下文时会回退为空闲追加,而带 steering 的边界仍可重试。
- 单元测试、持久化与 resume 测试、不变量测试、宿主/客户端队列测试和 TUI 覆盖会固定事件顺序、准入归属和重连分类。
## 后果
- 一个表层事件可以合法位于轮次之外因此持久化扫描、崩溃恢复、fork、压缩和会话查询需要区分执行封闭与会话历史。
- 两条连续的 user-role 消息会取代一条烘焙后的提示词消息;提供方适配器会保留这一顺序。
- 在接受窗口之外,`inject()` 后跟一个被阻止的 `send()` 会留下缺少预期直接提示词的上下文,除非调用方提供领域专用的准入归属。
- 公共投递契约和收件箱记录保持精简:没有上下文附件、上下文放置元数据、提示词封套或重复的持久事件类型。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.md: 063494b56461593015d6de4c2b55a2d1d6a3c676
2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.zh.md: cd5d29dfbcd9356a9ea15852d5d27a3660084abf
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.md
2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.md: 09afe6d9e879ae7529d309c3b5e656be849fa543
2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.zh.md: 4d45d74c2e7c34601a5229fc0fc0780a23ec6fd5

View File

@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ Slot scope is the closed set `root | session-maybe | session`:
### The read-only queue mirror
- The MuxFrame `session/queued`: the Session holds a read-only inbox mirror (previews truncated; steering retired by source match); queue frames never enter history — pure stream state, cleared on reconnect and refilled from the new baseline; the never-instantiated window is buffered and replayed through the manager pendingBuffers.
- The MuxFrame `session/queued`: the Session holds a read-only inbox mirror (previews truncated; steering retired by source match). The host stamps the agent-loop's acceptance-time steering classification on live and replayed frames, so a reconnect baseline does not depend on replaying an earlier `turn/start`. Queue frames never enter history — pure stream state, cleared on reconnect and refilled from the new baseline; the never-instantiated window is buffered and replayed through the manager pendingBuffers.
- Queue semantics: running does not lock input; ordinary messages queue through `session.prompt {mode:'queue'}`, and commands never queue.
### Host wire smalls

View File

@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ slot scope 是闭集 `root | session-maybe | session`
### 队列只读镜像
- MuxFrame `session/queued`Session 持只读 inbox 镜像预览截断、steering 按 source 匹配退休)queue 帧不进 history纯 stream 态——重连清空、新基线重灌;未实例化窗口经 manager pendingBuffers 缓冲重放。
- MuxFrame `session/queued`Session 持只读 inbox 镜像预览截断、steering 按 source 匹配退休)。宿主会在实时和回放帧中标记 agent loop 接受消息时的 steering 分类,因此重连基线不依赖回放更早的 `turn/start`queue 帧不进 history纯 stream 态——重连清空、新基线重灌;未实例化窗口经 manager pendingBuffers 缓冲重放。
- 队列语义running 不锁输入;普通消息经 `session.prompt {mode:'queue'}` 排队,命令永不排队。
### host wire 小件

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-24-separate-context-injection-from-turn-execution.md: 652c3d410ab625d91a828f854bce302adcb0c9e0
2026-07-24-separate-context-injection-from-turn-execution.zh.md: 1064e7a869ab9ea46c0145eb010119894a03aacf
2026-07-26-subprocess-consumer-migration.md: b31f69f1251a7219e168ed7800ba16ff7d6b328c
2026-07-26-subprocess-consumer-migration.zh.md: 47e7519a72f5482f255d15d87b483e9295f6cd2c

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
# Agent Note: The subprocess seam goes Node-shaped and every eligible spawner rides it
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-26-subprocess-consumer-migration.zh.md)
## Problem
The [subprocess seam](2026-07-26-subprocess-seam.md) shipped shaped for exactly one consumer family: batch-collected stdout/stderr, batch stdin, a single escalating `kill()`. That was deliberate scope control, and its own note records "migrate the other spawn sites" as rejected-for-now. Review on the introducing PR reversed that deferral: the stacked follow-up should reshape the interface toward Node's API and move the remaining process-running places onto the service. The remaining spawners each carried a private copy of some slice of the same mechanics — lsp-local had its own detached-tree signalling (POSIX group + Windows taskkill + liveness polling), subagent-subprocess had the dispose ladder and its own scrub, mcp-client and pty-local and the SDK helper each had a third/fourth/fifth copy of the credential scrub — and none of it was swappable or centrally testable.
## Decision
The seam's vocabulary is now Node-shaped, and every spawner that can ride the service does:
- **Per-stream stdio dispositions** on `SubprocessSpawnSpec`: `'pipe'` (the raw `Readable`/`Writable`, for consumer-owned protocol framing), `'inherit'` (diagnostics to the parent's stream), and collect mode `{ maxBytes, spill? }` — the original bounded tail-keep shape, with the spill file now optional so a diagnostic tail (a language server's stderr) buffers without touching disk. stdin is `'ignore'`, `'pipe'`, or `{ data }` (write-and-close batch).
- **`SubprocessOutcome` carries exit facts only** (Node's close-event vocabulary); collected output stays readable through `handle.collected` after settlement (spill fds seal at the settle boundary), so batch and streaming callers share one access path and nothing is copied into the outcome.
- **Tree-scoped termination behind one verb**: `terminate()` owns the SIGTERM→grace→SIGKILL escalation (serves the spec's abort signal too, and is a no-op once the tree is gone) — the handle exposes no single-signal `kill(signal?)`, so a consumer cannot skip the grace window; `waitForExit()` polls tree liveness (POSIX group probe; direct-child boundary on Windows); Windows tree termination (`taskkill /T`, injectable) moved in from lsp-local, so tree semantics are platform-correct for every consumer. (The stdin-EOF-first dispose ladder initially absorbed from `subagent-subprocess` later moved back out to its one consumer — see the [ladder-ownership Agent Note](2026-07-27-dispose-ladder-to-consumer.md).)
- **One scrub definition**: `scrubbedParentEnv()`/`SENSITIVE_ENV_PATTERN` live on the seam. Spawners that cannot route the spawn itself through the service — pty-local (node-pty owns the fork) and mcp-client (the MCP SDK owns the transport spawn) — import the function, so environment policy is single-sourced even where process ownership is not; the SDK helper's `scrubEnvironment()` defaults through it as well.
Migrations landed with the reshape: **bash-local/bash-sandbox** (collect modes + batch stdin; the bash `kill()` maps to `terminate()` so `task_kill` keeps escalation semantics), **lsp-local** (piped protocol streams + a no-spill collected stderr tail; `LspConnection` takes the seam's spawn function; its private tree-op helpers deleted), **subagent-acp** (piped ndjson streams + inherited stderr; spawn failure surfaces through `done` rejection into the same startup race; disposal is the backend-owned `disposeAcpChild` ladder over the seam's verbs, with the plugin's configured graces). **`dsh-subagent-subprocess` is deleted** — the dispose ladder and scrub are the seam's; the unused isolated-config-dir helper died with it (no consumer existed).
Compositions mounting lsp-local or subagent-acp now load `dsh-subprocess-local` (the plugins inject `'subprocess'`); the acp/lsp test fixtures gained the row.
## Alternatives considered
**Keep the batch-only seam and let stream consumers stay bespoke.** The introducing note's position, rejected by review: it leaves three private copies of tree signalling and five of the scrub, and any future runner (containerized executor, remote process host) would have to pick which private copy to fork. The Node-shaped dispositions cover all three observed stream shapes without widening the outcome type or buffering piped streams.
**A single `stdio: 'pipe' | 'inherit' | 'collect'` mode for all three streams at once.** Rejected: real consumers mix modes per stream (lsp: pipe/pipe/collect; acp: pipe/pipe/inherit; bash: data/collect/collect). Per-stream dispositions are exactly Node's shape and avoid a second spawn call for the mixed cases.
**Migrate pty-local and mcp-client spawns too.** Rejected on ownership grounds, not scope: node-pty's `fork()` allocates the terminal itself, and the MCP SDK's `StdioClientTransport` spawns internally — neither call site is ours to route. They adopt the shared scrub (the part that is policy), and their READMEs say why the spawn stays put.
**Migrate the test-support launchers (acp-snapshot, loader-smoke) and the SDK package-manager runner.** Rejected: the support packages are deliberately dependency-light test infrastructure that must not depend on product seams, and the SDK wizard's `stdio: 'inherit'`-with-redirect semantics plus its out-of-composition lifecycle (no cordis context at all) make the service a poor fit; it shares the scrub instead.
## Consequences
Bought: one implementation of tree signalling, escalation, bounded collection, and the scrub, tested once in `dsh-subprocess-local`'s suites (including injected-platform Windows coverage that lsp-local's private copy never had); lsp-local and subagent-acp shed their process plumbing and their children now survive plugin reloads and die with composition teardown like bash's; a whole package (`dsh-subagent-subprocess`) is gone. The seam README's "one consumer family" limitation is retired.
Cost: the seam is wider — three stdio modes and the terminate/waitForExit/dispose lifecycle surface instead of one mode and one verb — so a future backend implements more surface; the compositions for lsp-local/subagent-acp each carry the subprocess row now; and `SubprocessOutcome` no longer carries output, a breaking shape change inside the still-unreleased stack (the PR2 layer was updated in place rather than shimmed, per the pre-release stance). pty-local/mcp-client/SDK/test-support spawns remain outside the service by ownership, with the scrub as the shared floor.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
# Agent Note: 进程 seam 转向 Node 形状,所有具备条件的 spawn 调用点一并迁入
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-26-subprocess-consumer-migration.md) | 中文
## 问题
[进程 seam](2026-07-26-subprocess-seam.md) 交付时恰好只为一个消费方家族塑形:批量收集的 stdout/stderr、批量 stdin、单一的升级式 `kill()`。那是有意的范围控制,其自身的 Agent Note 也把「迁移其余 spawn 调用点」记为暂缓否决项。引入该 seam 的 PRPull Request上的评审推翻了这一暂缓决定堆叠其上的后续变更应当把接口向 Node 的 API 方向重塑,并把其余运行进程之处迁到该服务上。其余各 spawn 调用点此前各自持有同一套机制中某个切片的私有副本——lsp-local 自带 detached 进程树信号发送POSIX 进程组 + Windows taskkill + 存活轮询subagent-subprocess 自带 dispose资源释放阶梯和自己的凭据清除mcp-client、pty-local 与 SDK helper 则各自持有凭据清除的第三、第四、第五份副本——而这一切既不可替换,也无法集中测试。
## 决策
这道 seam 的词汇如今已是 Node 形状,凡能接入该服务的 spawn 调用点均已迁入:
- **按流划分的 stdio 处置方式disposition**,位于 `SubprocessSpawnSpec` 上:`'pipe'`(原始的 `Readable`/`Writable`,供消费方自有的协议分帧使用)、`'inherit'`诊断输出直通父进程的流以及收集模式collect`{ maxBytes, spill? }`——即最初的有界尾部保留形状,只是 spill 文件改为可选,使诊断尾部(例如语言服务器的 stderr无需落盘即可缓冲。stdin 则为 `'ignore'``'pipe'``{ data }`(写完即关闭的批量形式)。
- **`SubprocessOutcome` 只承载退出事实**Node close 事件的词汇);收集到的输出在结算后仍可经 `handle.collected` 读取spill 文件描述符在结算边界封存),因此批量与流式调用方共用一条访问路径,也没有任何内容被复制进这份结果。
- **以进程树为范围的终止,集中在一个动词后面**`terminate()` 拥有 SIGTERM→宽限期→SIGKILL 升级(也承接 spec 的 abort 信号,进程树消亡后为空操作)——句柄不暴露单信号的 `kill(signal?)`,因此消费方无法跳过宽限窗口;`waitForExit()` 轮询进程树存活状态POSIX 进程组探测Windows 上以直接子进程为界。Windows 进程树终止(`taskkill /T`,可注入)自 lsp-local 迁入,因此每个消费方拿到的进程树语义在各平台上都正确。(最初从 `subagent-subprocess` 吸收的以 stdin EOF 打头的 dispose 阶梯,后来又移回其唯一消费方——见[阶梯归属 Agent Note](2026-07-27-dispose-ladder-to-consumer.md)。)
- **凭据清除只有一份定义**`scrubbedParentEnv()`/`SENSITIVE_ENV_PATTERN` 定义在 seam 上。无法把 spawn 本身路由到该服务的调用点——pty-localnode-pty 拥有 fork与 mcp-clientMCP SDK 拥有传输层的 spawn——改为导入该函数因此即便进程所有权无法统一环境策略仍是单一来源SDK helper 的 `scrubEnvironment()` 默认同样委托给它。
各项迁移随这次重塑一并落地:**bash-local/bash-sandbox**(收集模式 + 批量 stdinbash 的 `kill()` 映射到 `terminate()`,因此 `task_kill` 保有升级语义),**lsp-local**(管道化的协议流 + 无 spill 的 stderr 收集尾部;`LspConnection` 改为接收 seam 的 spawn 函数;其私有的进程树操作辅助函数已删除),**subagent-acp**(管道化的 ndjson 流 + inherit 的 stderrspawn 失败经 `done` 的 reject 汇入同一个启动竞态dispose 是后端自有的 `disposeAcpChild` 阶梯,经由 seam 的动词运行,携带插件所配置的宽限期)。**`dsh-subagent-subprocess` 已删除**——dispose 阶梯与凭据清除归 seam 所有;无人使用的隔离配置目录辅助函数随之消亡(其消费方本就不存在)。
挂载 lsp-local 或 subagent-acp 的组合如今都加载 `dsh-subprocess-local`(这两个插件注入 `'subprocess'`acp/lsp 测试 fixture测试前置数据补上了这一行组合配置。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**保持只支持批量的 seam让流式消费方继续各自为政。**这正是引入该 seam 的 Agent Note 当初的立场,评审将其否决:这样会留下三份进程树信号发送的私有副本和五份凭据清除的私有副本,而未来任何运行器(容器化执行器、远程进程宿主)都得挑选去 fork 哪一份私有副本。Node 形状的处置方式覆盖已观察到的全部三种流形状,既不拓宽结果类型,也不缓冲管道化的流。
**用单个 `stdio: 'pipe' | 'inherit' | 'collect'` 模式一次性统辖全部三条流。**否决真实消费方按流混用模式lsppipe/pipe/collectacppipe/pipe/inheritbashdata/collect/collect。按流划分的处置方式恰好就是 Node 的形状,也免去了混用场景的第二个 spawn 调用。
**把 pty-local 与 mcp-client 的 spawn 也一并迁移。**基于所有权而非范围否决node-pty 的 `fork()` 自行分配终端MCP SDK 的 `StdioClientTransport` 在内部完成 spawn——这两处调用点都不归我们路由。它们采纳共享的凭据清除那正是属于策略的部分并在各自的 README 中说明 spawn 为何留在原地。
**迁移 test-support 启动器acp-snapshot、loader-smoke与 SDK package-manager 运行器。**否决support 各包package是刻意保持轻依赖的测试基础设施不得依赖产品 seam而 SDK 向导那套附带重定向的 `stdio: 'inherit'` 语义,加上其完全脱离组合的生命周期(根本没有 cordis 上下文),使该服务并不合用;它改为共享凭据清除。
## 后果
换来的是:进程树信号发送、升级、有界收集与凭据清除各自只剩一份实现,且只在 `dsh-subprocess-local` 的测试套件中测试一次(其中包括 lsp-local 的私有副本从未有过的、以注入平台方式实现的 Windows 覆盖lsp-local 与 subagent-acp 卸下了自己的进程管道,其子进程如今像 bash 的一样,在插件重载后存活、随组合拆除而终止;一个完整的包(`dsh-subagent-subprocess`就此消失。seam README 中「只有一个消费方家族」的限制说明也随之退役。
代价是:这道 seam 变宽了stdio 模式从一种变为三种、终止动词换成 terminate/waitForExit/dispose 这组生命周期表面未来的后端因此要实现更宽的表面lsp-local/subagent-acp 的各组合如今都多出 subprocess 这一行组合配置;`SubprocessOutcome` 也不再承载输出这是仍未发布的堆叠变更内部的一次破坏性形状变更依照预发布立场PR2 那一层被就地更新,而非加 shim。pty-local/mcp-client/SDK/test-support 的 spawn 因所有权归属留在该服务之外,以凭据清除作为共享底线。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-24-intent-named-agent-delivery.md: 32b0502350063610efff746cbef779e8225055eb
2026-07-24-intent-named-agent-delivery.zh.md: ce8860b397497f4de587a9373d1cd300cf7dab29
2026-07-26-subprocess-seam.md: ad2f8522be51ba16b0df155aeb334a88f493890f
2026-07-26-subprocess-seam.zh.md: d9a0fb56b57b545dd1f94fde0cfb436d58fe00d4

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
# Agent Note: The subprocess service is its own seam under the bash executors (`dsh-subprocess` / `dsh-subprocess-local`)
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-26-subprocess-seam.zh.md)
## Problem
`dsh-bash-local` bundled two capabilities that change for different reasons: *running a bash command* (command defaulting, timeout classification, model-friendly terminal environment, the stdout/stderr merge the bash tool renders) and *running and managing a child process* (detached process groups, bounded tail-keep output with spill files, the credential scrub and `DSH_*` merge order, SIGTERM→grace→SIGKILL escalation, kill-and-join disposal). The process half — `run.ts`, roughly half the package — had no seam of its own: a future non-shell runner (a direct-argv executor, a worker supervisor) would have to re-implement or reach into bash internals, and the shared `DSH_*`/`CollectedOutput` vocabulary lived in a package whose name promises shell semantics. The bundling also tied background-process lifetime to the executor's fiber: reloading the bash executor killed every live background process, unlike the sibling [task registry](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md), whose registrations deliberately outlive producer fibers.
## Decision
A new `subprocess/` capability family owns "run and manage a process"; the bash family keeps "run a bash command" and consumes it:
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subprocess` (interface)** — the abstract `SubprocessService` owning `ctx.subprocess` with one method, `spawn(spec): SubprocessHandle`, and the shared vocabulary: the fully-explicit `SubprocessSpawnSpec` (argv, cwd, per-stream stdio dispositions, grace — no defaults; deployment-varying knobs stay with the calling seam's config, per the `dsh-bash` request/spec template and the no-hidden-defaults rule), `SubprocessHandle` with non-consuming offset-based readers, `SubprocessOutcome` with deliberately no timeout/cancel classification, and the shared scrub plus `DSH_ENV_PREFIX`/`DshEnvironment`/`CollectedOutput` types. `argv` is never shell-interpreted. (The [consumer-migration Agent Note](2026-07-26-subprocess-consumer-migration.md) later widened the stdio and termination vocabulary Node-ward.)
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subprocess-local` (implementation)** — `LocalSubprocessService` over the former `run.ts` plumbing (`spawn.ts`): detached groups, tail-keep truncation with private bounded spill files, credential scrub with the explicit-env merge after it, group kill escalation, and disposal that kills and joins every still-running managed process. It has no config; every limit arrives on the spec. The terminal `ENV_OVERRIDES` (`TERM=dumb` etc.) did NOT move — that is bash-tool presentation policy and stays in `dsh-bash-local`, merged through the ordinary env channel.
- **`dsh-bash-local` (consumer)** — `inject: ['subprocess']`; maps each resolved `BashExecSpec` onto a `SubprocessSpawnSpec` (`['bash', '-c', command]`), keeps its config, `resolve()` defaulting, fused-deadline `timedOut`/`aborted` classification, the `[stderr]`-marked background read merge with its consuming cursor, and the `onProcessDone` subclass hook. `dsh-bash-sandbox` is unchanged apart from redeclaring the inherited inject; it still wraps at the command-string level and re-enters the inherited spawn path.
- **`dsh-bash` (seam)** — re-exports the moved vocabulary from `dsh-subprocess`, so no bash consumer changes an import; `BashExecRequest`/`BashExecSpec`/`BashProcess` and the sandbox facts remain bash-owned.
Every composition that loads a bash executor now also loads `@deepseek-ai/dsh-subprocess-local` (CLI, examples, python bundled runtime, create-sdk's bash feature resources, inline test configs).
Background-process lifetime moved from the executor to the subprocess service: the executor no longer retains a live-process set, so an executor reload leaves background work running and readable, and composition teardown (the service's disposal) remains the kill-and-join boundary. One behavioral seam shifted with it: a background spawn failure can no longer be buffered as fake stderr inside the plumbing (the service rejects `done` and buffers nothing for a process that never ran), so the executor injects the `spawn failed: …` note into exactly one `readOutput()` delta.
## Alternatives considered
**Leave the process plumbing inside `dsh-bash-local` (status quo).** Rejected for the same reason the [task registry split](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md) landed: the boundary is stable and already documented in-code (`run.ts`'s module doc said "this layer reacts to an abort signal; the executor owns deadlines and classifies causes"), and keeping it private makes every future non-shell runner either fork the mechanics or depend on a bash-named package for non-bash work. The user-visible driver for this stack was exactly this split.
**Migrate the repo's other spawn sites (lsp-local, pty-local, subagent-subprocess, sdk package-manager, test-support launchers) onto `ctx.subprocess` in the same change.** Rejected as scope creep with real design risk at this PR's scale: those sites have materially different stream and lifecycle needs — node-pty ownership (pty), LSP framing over long-lived stdio with tree-kill fallbacks (lsp), stdin-EOF-first disposal ladders and no output buffering (subagent transports) — and forcing them under a handle shaped for bounded batch output would either bloat the seam or misfit the consumers. The seam shipped proven against its one real consumer family, per the shape-interfaces-around-current-consumers rule. Review then asked for exactly that follow-up as a stacked PR; the [consumer-migration Agent Note](2026-07-26-subprocess-consumer-migration.md) records the Node-ward reshape and which sites moved (and which stayed, by ownership).
**Put `run_in_background`/task semantics into the process seam instead.** Rejected: that boundary already exists — `ctx.tasks` owns ids, ownership, and notices, and the bash tool adapts a `BashProcess` into task hooks. The process seam sits *below* the bash executor, not beside the task registry.
**Move `ENV_OVERRIDES` (TERM=dumb, PAGER=cat …) into the subprocess service.** Rejected: a generic subprocess service must not impose terminal presentation policy on non-terminal consumers; the ambient scrub (credential-shaped and `DSH_*` names) is a security/identity invariant and stays, but terminal friendliness is the bash tool's choice, expressed through the spec's explicit env where a caller's own entry still wins.
## Consequences
Bought: "run and manage a process" is a swappable capability with the standard three-package shape (consumer count starts at two: `bash-local`, `bash-sandbox`); a containerized or remote process backend slots in without touching bash semantics; the shared `DSH_*`/output vocabulary has a non-shell home; and background processes survive executor reloads, matching the task registry's lifetime model. The spawn plumbing suite moved wholesale to `dsh-subprocess-local` (argv-based, plus argv-validation and service lifecycle/disposal suites); the executor suite now pins the bash-owned layers (classification, merge, spawn-failure note, service-owned lifetime) against the real service.
Cost: one more package pair and one more composition row everywhere a bash executor loads — a boot that loads an executor without the subprocess service leaves `ctx.bash` pending on `ctx.subprocess` (standard missing-service behavior). The moved-vocabulary re-exports keep `dsh-bash` imports working but mean two packages now name the same types; the subprocess seam is the owner and the bash seam documents the re-export. The spawn-failure note became single-delivery through the read path where the old plumbing retained it in the stderr buffer for repeated `readFrom(0)` reads — acceptable because the bash background read path was already a consuming cursor, and the note reaches the one reader that exists.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
# Agent Note: 进程管理器是 bash 执行器之下的独立 seam`dsh-subprocess` / `dsh-subprocess-local`
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-26-subprocess-seam.md) | 中文
## 问题
`dsh-bash-local` 原先把两项因不同原因而变化的能力捆绑在一起:*运行一条 bash 命令*命令默认值补全、超时分类、对模型友好的终端环境、bash 工具所渲染的 stdout/stderr 合并)与*运行并管理一个子进程*detached 进程组、附带 spill 文件的有界尾部保留输出、凭据清除与 `DSH_*` 合并次序、SIGTERM→宽限期→SIGKILL 升级、先终止再等待退出的 dispose资源释放。进程这一半`run.ts`约占整个包package的一半却没有属于自己的 seam未来的非 shell 运行器(直接执行 argv 的执行器、worker supervisor将不得不重新实现这套机制或者探入 bash 内部;而共享的 `DSH_*`/`CollectedOutput` 词汇则存放在一个名字承诺 shell 语义的包里。这种捆绑还把后台进程的存续期系在执行器的 fiber 上:重载 bash 执行器会杀死每一个存活的后台进程。这一点不同于兄弟的[任务注册表](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md):后者的注册存续期刻意长于生产方 fiber。
## 决策
新的 `subprocess/` 能力家族拥有「运行并管理一个进程」bash 家族保留「运行一条 bash 命令」,并成为前者的消费方:
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subprocess`(接口)**——拥有 `ctx.subprocess` 的抽象 `SubprocessService`(仅一个方法:`spawn(spec): SubprocessHandle`),以及共享词汇:完全显式的 `SubprocessSpawnSpec`argv、cwd、按流划分的 stdio 处置方式disposition、宽限期一律不设默认值随部署变化的旋钮依照 `dsh-bash` 的 request/spec 模板与无隐藏默认值规则,留在调用方 seam 的配置里)、携带基于偏移量的非消费式读取器的 `SubprocessHandle`、刻意不含超时/取消分类的 `SubprocessOutcome`,以及共享的凭据清除与 `DSH_ENV_PREFIX`/`DshEnvironment`/`CollectedOutput` 类型。`argv` 绝不经过 shell 解释。([消费方迁移 Agent Note](2026-07-26-subprocess-consumer-migration.md) 其后将 stdio 与终止词汇拓宽为 Node 形状。)
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subprocess-local`(实现)**——`LocalSubprocessService`,构建在原 `run.ts` 管道(现为 `spawn.ts`之上detached 进程组、带私有有界 spill 文件的尾部保留截断、清除之后合并显式 env 的凭据清除、进程组 kill 升级,以及会终止每个仍在运行的受管进程并等待其退出的 dispose。该实现没有任何配置每项限制都随 spec 到达。终端相关的 `ENV_OVERRIDES``TERM=dumb` 等)并未迁移:那是 bash 工具的呈现策略,留在 `dsh-bash-local` 里,经普通 env 通道合并。
- **`dsh-bash-local`(消费方)**——`inject: ['subprocess']`;把每个解析后的 `BashExecSpec` 映射为一个 `SubprocessSpawnSpec``['bash', '-c', command]`),并保留自身配置、`resolve()` 默认值补全、基于融合 deadline 的 `timedOut`/`aborted` 分类、带 `[stderr]` 标记的后台读取合并及其消费游标,以及 `onProcessDone` 子类钩子。`dsh-bash-sandbox` 除了重新声明继承来的 inject 之外没有变化;它仍在命令字符串层面做包装,并重新进入继承的 spawn 路径。
- **`dsh-bash`seam**——把迁走的词汇从 `dsh-subprocess` 重导出,因此没有任何 bash 消费方需要改动导入;`BashExecRequest`/`BashExecSpec`/`BashProcess` 与沙箱事实仍归 bash 所有。
如今,每个加载 bash 执行器的组合都同时加载 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-subprocess-local`CLI命令行界面、各示例、Python 捆绑运行时、create-sdk 的 bash 功能资源,以及各内联测试配置。
后台进程的存续期从执行器移到了管理器:执行器不再保有存活进程集合,于是重载执行器后,后台工作会继续运行且仍可读取,而组合拆除(管理器的 dispose仍是先终止再等待退出的边界。一条行为 seam 随之挪动:后台 spawn 失败不再能在管道内部被缓冲成伪造的 stderr对一个从未真正运行的进程管理器会 reject `done`,且不缓冲任何内容),因此执行器把 `spawn failed: …` 提示注入恰好一个 `readOutput()` 增量。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**把进程管道留在 `dsh-bash-local` 里(维持现状)。**否决的理由与[任务注册表拆分](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md)得以落地的理由相同:这条边界既稳定,也早已记录在代码里(`run.ts` 的模块文档曾写明「this layer reacts to an abort signal; the executor owns deadlines and classifies causes」而若继续将它保持私有未来每个非 shell 运行器就只能要么 fork 这套机制,要么为非 bash 工作去依赖一个以 bash 命名的包。这组堆叠变更对用户可见的动因正是这一拆分。
**在同一变更中把仓库其余 spawn 调用点lsp-local、pty-local、subagent-subprocess、sdk package-manager、test-support 各启动器)迁到 `ctx.subprocess` 上。**在本 PRPull Request的规模下作为带有真实设计风险的范围蔓延否决。这些调用点在流与生命周期上的需求存在实质差异node-pty 所有权pty、长生命周期 stdio 上的 LSP 分帧加进程树终止回退lsp、以 stdin EOF 打头的 dispose 阶梯和完全不缓冲输出subagent 传输层)。把它们强行纳入一个按有界批量输出塑形的句柄之下,要么会让这道 seam 膨胀,要么会让句柄与消费方错配。依照「接口围绕当前消费方塑形」的规则,该 seam 当时在其唯一真实的消费方家族上得到验证后交付。评审随后恰恰要求以堆叠 PR 的形式完成这项后续工作;[消费方迁移 Agent Note](2026-07-26-subprocess-consumer-migration.md) 记录了向 Node 形状的重塑,以及哪些调用点迁入(哪些因所有权归属而留在原地)。
**改把 `run_in_background`/任务语义放进进程 seam。**否决:那条边界已经存在。`ctx.tasks` 拥有 id、所有权与通知bash 工具则把 `BashProcess` 适配成任务钩子。进程 seam 位于 bash 执行器*之下*,而不是与任务注册表并列。
**把 `ENV_OVERRIDES`TERM=dumb、PAGER=cat 等)移入管理器。**否决:通用进程管理器不得把终端呈现策略强加给非终端消费方;对环境中凭据形态名称与 `DSH_*` 名称的清除是安全与身份不变式,予以保留,但终端友好性是 bash 工具自己的选择,经 spec 的显式 env 表达,而调用方自己的条目依旧优先。
## 后果
换来的是:「运行并管理一个进程」成为一项具备标准三包形态的可替换能力(消费方起步就有两个:`bash-local``bash-sandbox`);容器化或远程进程后端可以直接接入,而不触碰 bash 语义;共享的 `DSH_*`/输出词汇有了一个不带 shell 含义的归属后台进程也能在执行器重载后存活与任务注册表的存续期模型一致。spawn 管道测试套件整体迁至 `dsh-subprocess-local`(现以 argv 为基础,外加 argv 校验与管理器生命周期/dispose 套件);执行器测试套件如今对着真实管理器固定 bash 所有的各层分类、合并、spawn 失败提示、归管理器所有的存续期)。
代价是:多出一对包,而且凡加载 bash 执行器之处都多一行组合配置。若某次启动加载了执行器却没有加载管理器,`ctx.bash` 会因等待 `ctx.subprocess` 而保持挂起(标准的服务缺失行为)。迁移词汇的重导出让 `dsh-bash` 的导入继续可用,但也意味着两个包如今命名同一批类型;进程 seam 是所有者bash seam 则记录这层重导出。spawn 失败提示经由读取路径变为单次交付,而旧管道曾把它保留在 stderr 缓冲区里,供重复的 `readFrom(0)` 读取;这一点可以接受,因为 bash 的后台读取路径本就是消费游标,该提示能到达唯一存在的那个读取方。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-27-dispose-ladder-to-consumer.md: 97b551ff509e3b424f6bf5725939cf54acc961a7
2026-07-27-dispose-ladder-to-consumer.zh.md: b6849ad393737f2fef06e2007991583b12a04d7a

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
# Agent Note: The dispose ladder belongs to its consumer, not the subprocess seam
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-27-dispose-ladder-to-consumer.zh.md)
## Problem
`SubprocessHandle.dispose(graces)` and `SubprocessDisposeGraces` put a full teardown *policy* — stdin-EOF wait, then SIGTERM, then SIGKILL, each tier bounded by a caller-supplied window — on a seam whose other verbs are single mechanisms. Only one consumer ever called it (the ACP subagent backend); bash rides `terminate()` and service teardown, and the LSP host runs its own protocol-first shutdown. Every future backend nonetheless had to implement the ladder to satisfy the interface, and the implementation carried a `dsh-timeout` dependency solely for the ladder's tier bounds.
## Decision
The ladder moves to its one consumer. `dsh-subagent-acp` owns `disposeAcpChild(child, eofGraceMs, graceMs)`, built entirely on the seam's public verbs: close `stdin`, bound a `waitForExit` on `eofGraceMs`, then `terminate()` (whose SIGTERM→spec-grace→SIGKILL escalation already encodes the signal tiers), then a final bounded whole-tree wait that throws if survivors remain. The seam keeps `kill`/`terminate`/`waitForExit` — mechanisms, not policy — and `waitForExit(signal?)` is exactly the quiescence probe a consumer ladder needs to hold each tier on real tree exit. `dsh-subprocess-local` drops its `dsh-timeout` dependency; the seam's handle loses one method and one exported interface.
## Alternatives considered
**Keep the ladder on the handle as a convenience.** Rejected: a seam method every implementation must provide is not a convenience, it is contract surface — and this one encodes one consumer's cooperation shape (stdin-EOF-first) as if it were process vocabulary. The seam's own README already had to caveat that children quiescing on other signals need "their own tier-1", which is the admission that the ladder is policy.
**Move the ladder to a shared helper package.** Rejected: one consumer. A second out-of-process backend with the same stdin-EOF cooperation shape can lift `disposeAcpChild` to shared code when it exists; extracting now would recreate `dsh-subagent-subprocess`, the single-purpose library this stack just deleted.
## Consequences
Bought: the seam is one method and one type smaller; implementations owe four verbs and no teardown policy; `dsh-subprocess-local` loses a dependency; the ladder's tier windows live beside the config fields that tune them. Cost: a future backend wanting EOF-first teardown writes ~20 lines against the verbs (or lifts the ACP helper); the ladder's tier-tier tests moved from the seam suite to the ACP suite, and the seam suite pins the verbs the ladder composes (bounded `waitForExit` false-then-true across an escalation) instead of the composed policy.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
# Agent Note: dispose 阶梯归其消费方所有,而非 subprocess seam
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-27-dispose-ladder-to-consumer.md) | 中文
## 问题
`SubprocessHandle.dispose(graces)``SubprocessDisposeGraces` 把一整套拆卸*策略*——等待 stdin EOF、再 SIGTERM、再 SIGKILL每一层由调用方提供的时间窗约束——放在了一个其余动词均为单一机制的 seam 上。它始终只有一个调用方ACP subagent 后端bash 走 `terminate()` 与服务拆卸LSP 主机运行自己的协议优先关闭流程。然而每个未来后端都必须实现该阶梯才能满足接口,实现包也仅为阶梯的层级时限背上了 `dsh-timeout` 依赖。
## 决策
阶梯移入其唯一消费方。`dsh-subagent-acp` 拥有 `disposeAcpChild(child, eofGraceMs, graceMs)`,完全构建在 seam 的公开动词之上:关闭 `stdin`,以 `eofGraceMs` 约束一次 `waitForExit`,随后 `terminate()`(其 SIGTERM→spec 宽限期→SIGKILL 升级已编码了信号层级最后进行有界的整树等待若仍有存活进程则抛出。seam 保留 `kill``terminate``waitForExit`——机制而非策略——而 `waitForExit(signal?)` 恰是消费方阶梯在每一层确认进程树真正退出所需的停稳探针。`dsh-subprocess-local` 卸下 `dsh-timeout` 依赖seam 的句柄少了一个方法和一个导出接口。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**把阶梯作为便利方法留在句柄上。**否决:一个每个实现都必须提供的 seam 方法不是便利而是契约表面——而这一个把某一消费方的配合形状stdin EOF 打头当作进程词汇来编码。seam 自己的 README 早已不得不加注「依赖其他信号停稳的子进程需要自己的第一阶」,这本身就是承认该阶梯是策略。
**把阶梯移到共享辅助包。**否决:只有一个消费方。当第二个具有相同 stdin EOF 配合形状的进程外后端出现时,可以再把 `disposeAcpChild` 提升为共享代码;现在抽取只会重造 `dsh-subagent-subprocess`——这组堆叠变更刚刚删掉的那个单一用途库。
## 后果
买到的seam 少了一个方法和一个类型;实现只欠四个动词,不欠拆卸策略;`dsh-subprocess-local` 少了一个依赖;阶梯的层级时间窗与调节它们的配置字段住在一起。代价:未来想要 EOF 打头拆卸的后端需针对这些动词写约 20 行(或直接搬 ACP 的辅助函数);阶梯的层级测试从 seam 套件移入 ACP 套件seam 套件转而钉住阶梯所组合的动词(升级前后有界 `waitForExit` 先假后真),而非组合后的策略。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-27-tui-chat-channel-module-split.md
2026-07-27-tui-chat-channel-module-split.md: 56b345b670cd8426780bfdd8c2b2f5719461554c
2026-07-27-tui-chat-channel-module-split.zh.md: d74844a762bc519d0f499696fe343567eebfe920

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
# Agent Note: dsh-tui chat channel module split
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-27-tui-chat-channel-module-split.zh.md)
## Problem
`packages/ui/tui/src/index.ts` had grown past 2000 lines. Most of it was one `createTuiChat` factory: a ~1600-line closure holding roughly forty mutable variables and as many nested closures. Model selection, the ask-user-question queue, and session resume were tangled into that single scope, so a reader could not follow any one concern without holding the whole file in their head, and unrelated edits collided. A prior pass had grouped `src/` into `components/`, `session/`, `extension/`, but the entry file itself and the loose top-level input files (`autocomplete.ts`, `file-autocomplete.ts`, `skill-invocation.ts`, `xml-tool-output.ts`) were untouched.
## Decision
The chat channel's cohesive sub-machines are extracted from `createTuiChat` into `src/chat/`, each a factory that takes an explicit dependency bundle instead of closing over the entry scope:
- `chat/model-command.ts``createModelController`: the queued `/model` command, the model+reasoning-effort selector overlay, and the selected model's context-window resolution. Owns the context-window cache that the prompt and status views read.
- `chat/questions.ts``createQuestionQueue`: the user-interaction provider and the one-at-a-time FIFO ask-user-question overlays.
- `chat/resume.ts``createResumeController`: the `/resume` selector, per-candidate summary reads, the pre-handoff preflight, the terminal handoff, and the durable resume-hint command.
- `chat/helpers.ts` — zero-state helpers (`formatCwd`, `gitBranch`, surface/tool-call derivations, session-reference cards), the `HintEditor`, and banner-reveal constants.
- `chat/channel.ts``ChatChannelDeps` (the collaborator surface every sub-controller shares) and `ChannelNotice` (mixed in by the controllers that report outcomes). Each `*Deps` extends these, so the shared surface has one definition.
`src/` is reorganized so `chat/` holds every chat-channel concern: the sub-controllers above plus the former input files and the former `session/` files (`timing.ts`, `tokens.ts`) all move under `chat/`. `xml-tool-output.ts` moves under `components/`. The host/process boundary interfaces (`TuiRuntime`, `TuiResumeHost`) move to `src/runtime.ts`. After the split `src/` is `chat/`, `components/`, `extension/`, and the top-level `index.ts` / `config.ts` / `prompt.ts` / `runtime.ts` / `invariant.ts`; `index.ts` drops from 2067 to ~1530 lines and now constructs and wires the three controllers.
The convention for a controller's dependency bundle: stable value collaborators (`ctx`, `resolved`, `palette`, `overlayManager`, and each controller's own services) are destructured once; the channel callbacks (`appendNotice`, `requestRender`, `isDisposed`, `agentStatus`) stay on `deps` so a controller always calls the channel's current implementation. `channel.ts`'s JSDoc states this rule.
## Alternatives considered
- **Free functions taking a shared mutable context object.** Rejected: it would re-expose the same forty-field grab-bag the split set out to remove, just under a parameter name.
- **Extracting the status/timing animation controller too.** Deferred: `runningStatus` is read directly by the prompt caret animation in `updatePromptValues`, so a controller boundary there would leak its internal state back through getters — a leaky seam for little gain. It stays inline in `index.ts`.
## Consequences
Each concern is now readable and testable in isolation, and the shared dependency surface is defined once instead of copied into three interfaces. The cost: `index.ts` constructs the controllers and threads the callback bundle, and the model controller is a `let` forward-reference (`updatePromptValues` closes over it, but it is built later once `appendNotice`/`overlayManager` exist), carrying one justified `prefer-const` disable and a deferred first paint.
## Testing
Behavior is unchanged: all existing package tests and TUI snapshots pass without re-recording, which is the contract for this refactor.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
# Agent Note: dsh-tui 聊天通道模块拆分
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-27-tui-chat-channel-module-split.md) | 中文
## Problem
`packages/ui/tui/src/index.ts` 已超过 2000 行,其中绝大部分是单个 `createTuiChat` 工厂:一个约 1600 行的闭包持有约四十个可变变量以及同等数量的嵌套闭包。模型选择、ask-user-question 队列、会话恢复都缠绕在这一个作用域里,读者无法在不把整份文件装进脑子的前提下理清任何单一关注点,互不相关的改动也会彼此冲突。此前一轮已把 `src/` 归组为 `components/``session/``extension/`,但入口文件本身以及散落在顶层的输入相关文件(`autocomplete.ts``file-autocomplete.ts``skill-invocation.ts``xml-tool-output.ts`)未动。
## Decision
聊天通道内聚的子机制从 `createTuiChat` 中抽出,迁入 `src/chat/`,每个都是接收显式依赖包的工厂,而非闭包捕获入口作用域:
- `chat/model-command.ts``createModelController`:排队执行的 `/model` 命令、模型加推理力度reasoning-effort的选择浮层以及所选模型上下文窗口的解析。持有供提示行与状态视图读取的上下文窗口缓存。
- `chat/questions.ts``createQuestionQueue`user-interaction provider 以及一次仅一个的 FIFO ask-user-question 浮层。
- `chat/resume.ts``createResumeController``/resume` 选择器、逐候选摘要读取、交接前预检、终端交接,以及持久化的恢复提示命令。
- `chat/helpers.ts` — 无状态辅助函数(`formatCwd``gitBranch`、surface/工具调用派生、会话引用卡片)、`HintEditor`,以及横幅揭示常量。
- `chat/channel.ts``ChatChannelDeps`(每个子控制器共享的协作者面)与 `ChannelNotice`(由需要上报结果的控制器混入)。各 `*Deps` 继承它们,使共享面只有一处定义。
`src/` 随之重组,使 `chat/` 汇集所有聊天通道关注点:上述子控制器,加上原来的输入文件与原 `session/` 文件(`timing.ts``tokens.ts`)都迁到 `chat/` 之下。`xml-tool-output.ts` 迁到 `components/` 之下。宿主/进程边界接口(`TuiRuntime``TuiResumeHost`)迁到 `src/runtime.ts`。拆分后 `src/``chat/``components/``extension/`,以及顶层的 `index.ts` / `config.ts` / `prompt.ts` / `runtime.ts` / `invariant.ts``index.ts` 从 2067 行降至约 1530 行,现负责构造并接线这三个控制器。
控制器依赖包的约定:稳定的取值型协作者(`ctx``resolved``palette``overlayManager`,以及各控制器自有的服务)一次性解构;通道回调(`appendNotice``requestRender``isDisposed``agentStatus`)保留在 `deps` 上,使控制器始终调用通道当前的实现。`channel.ts` 的 JSDoc 陈述了此规则。
## Alternatives considered
- **接收共享可变上下文对象的自由函数。** 否决:那会把拆分本要消除的四十字段大杂烩,仅换个参数名重新暴露出来。
- **同时抽出状态/计时动画控制器。** 推迟:`runningStatus``updatePromptValues` 中的提示光标动画直接读取,在此设控制器边界会让其内部状态经 getter 反向泄漏——收益甚微的漏隙缝。它继续内联在 `index.ts` 中。
## Consequences
每个关注点现可独立阅读与测试,共享依赖面只定义一次,而非复制进三个接口。代价:`index.ts` 负责构造这些控制器并穿针引线地传入回调包;模型控制器是 `let` 前向引用(`updatePromptValues` 闭包捕获它,但它要待 `appendNotice`/`overlayManager` 就绪后才构造),因而带一处有正当理由的 `prefer-const` 禁用与一次延后的首帧绘制。
## Testing
行为不变:现有的包测试与 TUI 快照全部无需重录即通过,这正是本次重构的契约。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-20-error-cause-chain-diagnostics.md: 391e35997bb1bb050dd2ca620920961d77bb1c46
2026-07-20-error-cause-chain-diagnostics.zh.md: 90d6559a9410e8a4e5475db9560a2a177ba7a1a7
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-20-error-cause-chain-diagnostics.md
2026-07-20-error-cause-chain-diagnostics.md: 7de1f4f631cec90048ccc8eab7a6654560d84846
2026-07-20-error-cause-chain-diagnostics.zh.md: 74820e80f729343a833c926adc6187b7cc9fc372

View File

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ A TUI run against an unreachable DeepSeek endpoint failed with the single notice
- `dsh-llm` exports `errorChain(value)`: renders a thrown value with its full `cause` chain (`outer: inner: …`) and AggregateError members (`msg [m1; m2]`), with circular-cause and hostile-coercion containment. It is a diagnostic-surface renderer only; routing stays on `HarnessError.code`.
- The DeepSeek adapter wraps a pre-response transport failure in `LlmError('TRANSPORT')` naming the configured `baseURL` and chaining the original rejection as `cause`. An aborted request becomes `LlmError('ABORTED')`; because the turn signal is already aborted, the loop still classifies the turn as cancellation rather than recovery.
- Every diagnostic seam renders through `errorChain` instead of `error.message`/`String(error)`: the agent-loop's durable `turn/end` error message (`errorData`), its logger warnings, the TUI's `agent/error` notice and startup-failure line, and `dsh-stdio`'s startup-failure log lines. The per-package `renderThrown` copies in `dsh-agent-loop`, `dsh-stdio`, and `dsh-tui` are deleted in favor of the one shared renderer.
- Every diagnostic seam renders through `errorChain` instead of `error.message`/`String(error)`: the agent-loop's durable `turn/end` error message (`errorData`), its logger warnings, the TUI's `agent/error` notice and startup-failure line, and `dsh-stdio`'s startup-failure log lines. The live `agent/error` event and `SettleReason` preserve the thrown value as `unknown`; each diagnostic consumer renders it instead of the loop wrapping it into another error. The per-package `renderThrown` copies in `dsh-agent-loop`, `dsh-stdio`, and `dsh-tui` are deleted in favor of the one shared renderer.
- `dsh-stdio` renders failure `turn/end` reasons: `[turn failed <code>] <message>`, `[turn aborted] <reason>`, `[turn rejected] <reason>`, `[turn interrupted by a previous process exit]`, and the output-token-limit notice. Unknown merge-extended kinds fall through as ordinary turn ends.
`errorChain` lives in `dsh-llm` beside `HarnessError` for the same reason the base class does: it is the leaf package every consumer already imports, so sharing costs no new dependency edge.

View File

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ TUI 连接不可达的 DeepSeek 端点时,失败只显示一条 `fetch failed`
- `dsh-llm` 导出 `errorChain(value)`:渲染抛出值及其完整 `cause` 链(`outer: inner: …`)与 AggregateError 成员(`msg [m1; m2]`),并容错循环 cause 和恶意强制转换。它只是诊断表面的渲染器;路由仍然基于 `HarnessError.code`
- DeepSeek 适配器把拿到响应之前的传输失败包装成 `LlmError('TRANSPORT')`,写明配置的 `baseURL` 并把原始拒绝值链为 `cause`。被中止的请求变为 `LlmError('ABORTED')`;由于轮次信号已处于中止状态,循环仍将该轮次归类为取消而非恢复。
- 每个诊断接缝改用 `errorChain` 而非 `error.message`/`String(error)`agent-loop 的持久化 `turn/end` 错误消息(`errorData`、其日志警告、TUI 的 `agent/error` 通知与启动失败行、以及 `dsh-stdio` 的启动失败日志行。`dsh-agent-loop``dsh-stdio``dsh-tui` 里各自的 `renderThrown` 副本被删除,统一使用这一个共享渲染器。
- 每个诊断接缝改用 `errorChain` 而非 `error.message`/`String(error)`agent-loop 的持久化 `turn/end` 错误消息(`errorData`、其日志警告、TUI 的 `agent/error` 通知与启动失败行、以及 `dsh-stdio` 的启动失败日志行。实时 `agent/error` 事件与 `SettleReason``unknown` 原样保留抛出值;各诊断消费者自行渲染,而不是由循环把它包装成另一个错误。`dsh-agent-loop``dsh-stdio``dsh-tui` 里各自的 `renderThrown` 副本被删除,统一使用这一个共享渲染器。
- `dsh-stdio` 渲染失败的 `turn/end` reason`[turn failed <code>] <message>``[turn aborted] <reason>``[turn rejected] <reason>``[turn interrupted by a previous process exit]` 以及输出 token 上限通知。未知的 merge 扩展 kind 按普通 turn 结束处理。
`errorChain``HarnessError` 一样放在 `dsh-llm` 里,理由相同:它是每个消费者都已导入的叶子包,共享不增加新的依赖边。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-21-compaction-summary-prefix-cache-reuse.md: 490eb57a5891bf9cd0799c5d49d25d4e9838041f
2026-07-21-compaction-summary-prefix-cache-reuse.zh.md: 02412ff07e87e12c7e7de00b5c69e1282433f735
2026-07-21-compaction-summary-prefix-cache-reuse.md: d05d25cfa7c3984ce0ce75c38068a91a0e07dfe8
2026-07-21-compaction-summary-prefix-cache-reuse.zh.md: edf9de6fe5388d75612946bfb05c4383d1856102

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-21-compaction-summary-prefix-cache-reuse.zh.md)
## Problem
Automatic compaction fires mid-conversation, right after the loop has warmed the provider's KV cache with the last routed request (`system` + `tools` + `messagePrefix` + derived history). The default summarizer then issued a *separate* auxiliary request whose prefix shared nothing with that warm request: a bespoke summarizer `system` prompt followed by the older history flattened to a single rendered transcript string. A provider caches on the request's leading token sequence, so a first token that differs — a different system prompt — invalidates the entire cached prefix. Every compaction therefore paid full prompt-processing cost for the whole replayed history twice: once for the conversation request that tripped pressure, and again for the summarization call, defeating the cache exactly when the conversation is largest.
Automatic compaction fires mid-conversation, right after the loop has warmed the provider's KV cache with the last routed request (`system` + `tools` + derived history). The default summarizer then issued a *separate* auxiliary request whose prefix shared nothing with that warm request: a bespoke summarizer `system` prompt followed by the older history flattened to a single rendered transcript string. A provider caches on the request's leading token sequence, so a first token that differs — a different system prompt — invalidates the entire cached prefix. Every compaction therefore paid full prompt-processing cost for the whole replayed history twice: once for the conversation request that tripped pressure, and again for the summarization call, defeating the cache exactly when the conversation is largest.
## Decision
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ The summarization directive moves from the **front** of the request (a fresh `sy
### `SummarizationInput` carries the replayed prefix, not a rendered string
`summarize()` (and the internal `summarizeWithLlm`) take a `SummarizationInput``{ system?, tools?, messages }` — instead of a flat transcript string. `region.ts` builds it from `session.requestHeader()` (the durable `system`, `tools`, and `messagePrefix`) plus the shadowed region mapped through `session.deriveEventMessage`, which yields byte-identical `Message` objects to what `deriveMessages()` folded into the routed request. `summarizeWithLlm` forwards `system` and `tools` onto `GenerateOptions` and sends `[...input.messages, { role: 'user', content: COMPACTION_INSTRUCTION }]`. `tools` ride along even though the summarizer never calls one: dropping them would shorten the token sequence and break alignment with the cached request.
`summarize()` (and the internal `summarizeWithLlm`) take a `SummarizationInput``{ system?, tools?, messages }` — instead of a flat transcript string. `region.ts` builds it from `session.requestHeader()` (the durable `system` and `tools`) plus the shadowed region mapped through `session.deriveEventMessage`, which yields byte-identical `Message` objects to what `deriveMessages()` folded into the routed request. `summarizeWithLlm` forwards `system` and `tools` onto `GenerateOptions` and sends `[...input.messages, { role: 'user', content: COMPACTION_INSTRUCTION }]`. `tools` ride along even though the summarizer never calls one: dropping them would shorten the token sequence and break alignment with the cached request.
### The instruction is a trailing user message
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Auto-compaction always anchors at the surface head, so the shadowed region is th
## Alternatives considered
- **Keep the summarizer system prompt but reuse the rest** — rejected: the system slot is the very first token region a provider caches on, so a distinct summarizer system prompt invalidates the whole prefix regardless of what follows. Only moving the directive off the front recovers the cache.
- **Send only the shadowed region without the `system`/`tools`/`messagePrefix` head** — rejected: a shorter or differently-headed sequence still diverges from the cached request at the first token, so it caches no better while losing the framing the summary needs.
- **Send only the shadowed region without the `system`/`tools` head** — rejected: a differently-headed sequence still diverges from the cached request at the first token, so it caches no better while losing the framing the summary needs.
- **Omit `tools` from the summarization request** (the model never calls one) — rejected: tool schemas are part of the cached token sequence; omitting them misaligns every following token and defeats reuse.
- **A dedicated `assistant/chunk`-emitting summarization sub-session for snapshot replay** — out of scope here; the replay gap predates this change and is tracked in the [compaction-seam note](../feature/2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md).

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Status: implemented
## Problem
自动压缩compaction在对话中途触发恰好在循环用最后一个已路由请求`system` + `tools` + `messagePrefix` + 派生历史)预热了提供方的 KV 缓存之后。随后默认摘要器发出一个*独立的*辅助请求,其前缀与那个已预热请求没有任何共享部分:一个专门的摘要器 `system` 提示词,后接被拍平成单个渲染后 transcript文本记录字符串的较早历史。提供方基于请求起始的 token 序列做缓存,因此第一个 token 只要不同(即一个不同的系统提示词),整个已缓存前缀就会失效。于是每次压缩都要为整段回放的历史付出两次完整的提示词处理成本:一次用于触发压力的对话请求,另一次用于摘要调用,恰好在对话最大时让缓存失去作用。
自动压缩compaction在对话中途触发恰好在循环用最后一个已路由请求`system` + `tools` + 派生历史)预热了提供方的 KV 缓存之后。随后默认摘要器发出一个*独立的*辅助请求,其前缀与那个已预热请求没有任何共享部分:一个专门的摘要器 `system` 提示词,后接被拍平成单个渲染后 transcript文本记录字符串的较早历史。提供方基于请求起始的 token 序列做缓存,因此第一个 token 只要不同(即一个不同的系统提示词),整个已缓存前缀就会失效。于是每次压缩都要为整段回放的历史付出两次完整的提示词处理成本:一次用于触发压力的对话请求,另一次用于摘要调用,恰好在对话最大时让缓存失去作用。
## Decision
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Status: implemented
### `SummarizationInput` 携带回放的前缀,而非渲染后的字符串
`summarize()`(以及内部的 `summarizeWithLlm`)接受一个 `SummarizationInput``{ system?, tools?, messages }`)而不是一个扁平的 transcript 字符串。`region.ts``session.requestHeader()`(持久的 `system``tools``messagePrefix`)加上经 `session.deriveEventMessage` 映射的被遮蔽区域来构建它,后者产出与 `deriveMessages()` 折叠进已路由请求的内容字节级一致的 `Message` 对象。`summarizeWithLlm``system``tools` 转发到 `GenerateOptions`,并发送 `[...input.messages, { role: 'user', content: COMPACTION_INSTRUCTION }]``tools` 会一同带上,即便摘要器从不调用任何工具:丢弃它们会缩短 token 序列,破坏与已缓存请求的对齐。
`summarize()`(以及内部的 `summarizeWithLlm`)接受一个 `SummarizationInput``{ system?, tools?, messages }`)而不是一个扁平的 transcript 字符串。`region.ts``session.requestHeader()`(持久的 `system``tools`)加上经 `session.deriveEventMessage` 映射的被遮蔽区域来构建它,后者产出与 `deriveMessages()` 折叠进已路由请求的内容字节级一致的 `Message` 对象。`summarizeWithLlm``system``tools` 转发到 `GenerateOptions`,并发送 `[...input.messages, { role: 'user', content: COMPACTION_INSTRUCTION }]``tools` 会一同带上,即便摘要器从不调用任何工具:丢弃它们会缩短 token 序列,破坏与已缓存请求的对齐。
### 指令是一条尾部 user 消息
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Status: implemented
## Alternatives considered
- **保留摘要器系统提示词但复用其余部分**——否决system 槽位正是提供方最先做缓存的 token 区域,因此一个不同的摘要器系统提示词无论后面跟着什么都会使整个前缀失效。只有把指令移离前端才能恢复缓存。
- **只发送被遮蔽区域而不带 `system`/`tools`/`messagePrefix` 头部**——否决:更短或头部不同的序列在第一个 token 处仍然与已缓存请求分叉,因此缓存效果并不更好,反而丢失了摘要所需的框架。
- **只发送被遮蔽区域而不带 `system`/`tools` 头部**——否决:头部不同的序列在第一个 token 处仍然与已缓存请求分叉,因此缓存效果并不更好,反而丢失了摘要所需的框架。
- **从摘要请求中省略 `tools`**(模型从不调用任何工具)——否决:工具 schema 是已缓存 token 序列的一部分;省略它们会让后续每个 token 失去对齐,破坏复用。
- **为快照回放专门建立一个发出 `assistant/chunk` 的摘要子会话**——此处超出范围;该回放缺口早于本次改动,记录在 [compaction-seam Agent Note](../feature/2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md) 中。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-22-pi-ai-transport-truncation-classification.md: 119200a788c0b0521f385f4cf4e6adf05a0512f9
2026-07-22-pi-ai-transport-truncation-classification.zh.md: 6a1bb478a86fc6ab726968b3df5752e0ad7fc9e6

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
# Agent Note: Classify pi-ai transport truncations from flattened message text
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-22-pi-ai-transport-truncation-classification.zh.md)
## Problem
A TUI run whose model connection dropped mid-stream surfaced the single notice `terminated`, and a truncated Anthropic response surfaced `Anthropic stream ended before message_stop`. Both are transport truncations — the connection died before the provider's terminal SSE event — yet `classifyPiAiError` in `dsh-llm-pi-ai` mapped neither, falling through to the catch-all `PI_AI_ERROR`. Because `PI_AI_ERROR` is not in `llm-retry`'s `DEFAULT_RETRYABLE_CODES` (`RATE_LIMIT`, `SERVER`, `TIMEOUT`, `TRANSPORT`), a recoverable drop was treated as a permanent failure and never retried.
The detail loss is upstream and unrecoverable in the adapter: pi-ai reduces a caught error to `error.message` (`api/anthropic-messages.js`: `errorMessage = error instanceof Error ? error.message : JSON.stringify(error)`) before pushing the terminal `error` event, discarding the original `Error` and its `cause` chain. undici carries the actionable `SocketError` on `cause` but hands the fetch wrapper a bare `terminated`; pi-ai keeps only that word. pi-ai `SimpleStreamOptions` exposes no fetch/dispatcher/client hook we could use to capture the `cause` ourselves before it is flattened.
## Decision
- `classifyPiAiError` recognizes two more transport wordings and maps both to `TRANSPORT`:
- a mid-stream socket drop rendered as a bare `terminated` (undici) or `Premature close` (Node stream layer);
- a stream truncated before its terminal event, which each pi-ai provider throws with its own wording (`Anthropic stream ended before message_stop`, `… before a terminal response event`, `… ended without a terminal event`, `Stream ended without finish_reason`), matched on `stream ended before/without`.
- The classifier carries an `XXX(pi-ai upstream)` note naming the flattening site and stating the intended fix: classify on `code`/`cause` if pi-ai ever forwards the original `Error` or a hook that lets us capture the `cause`. Classification stays best-effort text matching until then.
- `llm-pi-ai/README.md` gains a Known-Limitations bullet recording that pi-ai flattens the cause chain and that harness codes are therefore classified from message text.
Classification stays on message text because that is the only signal pi-ai delivers; the `XXX` marks it as a workaround, not the desired end state.
## Alternatives considered
**Capture the `cause` via a pi-ai fetch/dispatcher/client hook.** Rejected: pi-ai 0.81.1 exposes none. `StreamOptions` offers only `onPayload`/`onResponse`; `onResponse` fires before the body stream is consumed, so it cannot observe a mid-stream drop. The Anthropic path accepts a `client` object, but constructing and injecting a provider SDK client per request to intercept transport errors reaches around the adapter seam for one diagnostic string.
**Leave both as `PI_AI_ERROR` and widen `llm-retry`'s retryable set.** Rejected: `PI_AI_ERROR` is the catch-all for genuinely unclassified failures, including non-retryable ones (a malformed provider response, an unexpected SDK bug). Making the catch-all retryable would retry failures that will never succeed; the fix is to classify the recoverable case, not to blur the bucket.
**Wrap the flattened error in an `LlmError('TRANSPORT', { cause })` in the adapter, mirroring the DeepSeek adapter.** Rejected here: the DeepSeek adapter wraps a *pre-response* `fetch` rejection whose `cause` is still intact, so chaining preserves real detail. In the pi-ai path the terminal event's `errorMessage` is already a flattened string with no `cause` to chain, so wrapping would add a layer without recovering anything; classifying the code is the only value left to add.
## Consequences
- A mid-stream transport drop and a pre-terminal stream truncation now carry `TRANSPORT`, so a composed `llm-retry` policy retries them by default instead of failing the turn.
- The notice text is unchanged (`terminated` / `Anthropic stream ended before message_stop`): the cause detail is gone before the adapter sees it, so `errorChain` has nothing more to render. Only the routed `code` improved.
- Classification remains string-matching and provider-wording-dependent: a future pi-ai release that rewords these errors would silently fall back to `PI_AI_ERROR` until the patterns are updated. The `XXX` note points at the durable fix (route on a forwarded `code`/`cause`).

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
# Agent Note: 从扁平化的消息文本中分类 pi-ai 传输层截断
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-22-pi-ai-transport-truncation-classification.md) | 中文
## Problem
一次 TUI 运行的模型连接在流式输出中途断开,只浮现出一条 `terminated` 通知,而一个被截断的 Anthropic 响应则浮现出 `Anthropic stream ended before message_stop`。两者都是传输层截断——连接在提供方的终止 SSE 事件之前就已断开——然而 `dsh-llm-pi-ai` 中的 `classifyPiAiError` 对两者都不匹配,最终落入兜底的 `PI_AI_ERROR`。由于 `PI_AI_ERROR` 不在 `llm-retry``DEFAULT_RETRYABLE_CODES``RATE_LIMIT``SERVER``TIMEOUT``TRANSPORT`)中,一次可恢复的断开被当作永久性失败处理,从未被重试。
细节丢失发生在上游且在适配器内无法恢复pi-ai 在推送终止 `error` 事件之前,把捕获到的错误缩减为 `error.message``api/anthropic-messages.js``errorMessage = error instanceof Error ? error.message : JSON.stringify(error)`),丢弃了原始的 `Error` 及其 `cause` 链。undici 把可操作的 `SocketError` 携带在 `cause` 上,却只交给 fetch 包装层一个裸的 `terminated`pi-ai 只保留了这个词。pi-ai 的 `SimpleStreamOptions` 没有暴露任何 fetch/dispatcher/client 钩子,让我们能在细节被扁平化之前自行捕获 `cause`
## Decision
- `classifyPiAiError` 识别另外两种传输层措辞,并将两者都映射为 `TRANSPORT`
- 流式输出中途的套接字断开,呈现为裸的 `terminated`undici`Premature close`Node 流层);
- 在终止事件之前被截断的流,每个 pi-ai 提供方各自抛出不同措辞(`Anthropic stream ended before message_stop``… before a terminal response event``… ended without a terminal event``Stream ended without finish_reason`),统一按 `stream ended before/without` 匹配。
- 该分类器带有一条 `XXX(pi-ai upstream)` 注记,点名扁平化发生的位置并说明期望的修复方式:如果 pi-ai 有朝一日转发原始的 `Error` 或提供一个让我们捕获 `cause` 的钩子,就改为基于 `code`/`cause` 分类。在此之前分类仍是尽力而为的文本匹配。
- `llm-pi-ai/README.md` 新增一条 Known-Limitations 条目,记录 pi-ai 会扁平化 cause 链,因此 harness code 是从消息文本中分类出来的。
分类仍然基于消息文本,因为那是 pi-ai 唯一交付的信号;`XXX` 标明它是一个权宜之计,而非期望的最终状态。
## Alternatives considered
**通过 pi-ai 的 fetch/dispatcher/client 钩子捕获 `cause`。** 否决pi-ai 0.81.1 一个都没暴露。`StreamOptions` 只提供 `onPayload`/`onResponse``onResponse` 在响应体流被消费之前触发因此无法观察到流式输出中途的断开。Anthropic 路径接受一个 `client` 对象,但为拦截传输错误而为每个请求构造并注入一个提供方 SDK client只为一个诊断字符串就越过了适配器的服务边界。
**把两者都保留为 `PI_AI_ERROR`,并放宽 `llm-retry` 的可重试集合。** 否决:`PI_AI_ERROR` 是真正未分类失败的兜底,其中包括不可重试的失败(畸形的提供方响应、意料之外的 SDK bug。让兜底可重试会重试那些永远不会成功的失败修复之道是分类出可恢复的那种情况而不是模糊这个类别。
**在适配器里把扁平化后的错误包装成 `LlmError('TRANSPORT', { cause })`,仿照 DeepSeek 适配器。** 在此否决DeepSeek 适配器包装的是拿到响应之前的 `fetch` 拒绝,其 `cause` 仍然完好,因此链式包装保留了真实细节。而在 pi-ai 路径中,终止事件的 `errorMessage` 已经是一个没有 `cause` 可链的扁平化字符串,因此包装只会加一层却恢复不了任何东西;分类出 code 是唯一还能增加的价值。
## Consequences
- 流式输出中途的传输层断开和终止前的流截断现在都携带 `TRANSPORT`,因此组合出的 `llm-retry` 策略会默认重试它们,而不是让该轮次失败。
- 通知文本不变(`terminated` / `Anthropic stream ended before message_stop`cause 细节在适配器看到之前就已丢失,因此 `errorChain` 没有更多内容可渲染。只有被路由的 `code` 得到了改善。
- 分类仍然依赖字符串匹配且依赖提供方的措辞:未来某个 pi-ai 版本若改写这些错误的措辞,就会静默回退到 `PI_AI_ERROR`,直到模式被更新。`XXX` 注记指向那个持久的修复方式(基于转发的 `code`/`cause` 路由)。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-23-tui-generic-card-markdown.md: 494ba580480fa99de54e84025a65bf4589d410f2
2026-07-23-tui-generic-card-markdown.zh.md: 214edd00f50b88a4e8901b19dcdafc7382399831

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
# Agent Note: TUI generic-card Markdown rendering
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-23-tui-generic-card-markdown.zh.md)
## Problem
Tool presenters can put Markdown in generic-card content, including fenced `console` output used for background-task acknowledgements and execution errors. Rendering that content as plain text exposes the fence markers and diverges from assistant and user content in the same transcript.
## Decision
The TUI renders generic-card result content with its shared Markdown theme before applying the card's head-and-tail line limit. Terminal and diff cards retain their specialized plain-text renderers, and generic-card raw input remains literal because it represents tool arguments rather than presenter-authored prose.
The shared theme hides fence syntax, retains the optional language label, and colors the fenced body as code. Rendering precedes truncation so collapsed-card line counts and boundaries describe the visible terminal rows rather than Markdown source rows.
## Alternatives considered
**Strip fences in the Bash presenter.** This would fix one producer while leaving generic-card Markdown from other tools unrendered and would make the presenter depend on TUI behavior.
**Render every tool card as Markdown.** Terminal output and diffs have dedicated formatting and may contain Markdown punctuation that must remain literal.
**Apply the collapsed-card limit before Markdown rendering.** Source-line truncation can split a fenced block and makes the visible line count differ from the count used by the card.
## Consequences
Generic tool cards use the same Markdown vocabulary and sanitization path as conversation content. Markdown punctuation in a generic card is interpreted rather than always displayed literally; tools that require literal terminal output use the terminal card intent.
The focused TUI test pins hidden fences, retained language labels, and body text. The keyless terminal-state snapshot covers the behavior through an assembled TUI transcript.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
# Agent Note: TUI 通用卡片的 Markdown 渲染
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-23-tui-generic-card-markdown.md) | 中文
## Problem
工具展示器可以在通用卡片generic card内容中写入 Markdown其中包括用于后台任务确认和执行错误的围栏 `console` 输出。把这些内容按纯文本渲染会暴露围栏标记,并与同一 transcript文本记录中的助手内容和用户内容显示不一致。
## Decision
TUI 先用共享的 Markdown 主题渲染通用卡片的结果内容,再应用卡片的头尾行数限制。终端卡片和 diff 卡片保留各自专门的纯文本渲染器;通用卡片的原始输入仍按字面显示,因为它代表的是工具参数,而非展示器撰写的行文。
共享主题隐藏围栏语法,保留可选的语言标签,并将围栏正文按代码配色。渲染先于截断执行,因此收起状态卡片的行数和边界描述的是可见的终端行,而非 Markdown 源文本行。
## Alternatives considered
**在 Bash 展示器中剥除围栏。**这只修复一个生产方,其他工具产生的通用卡片 Markdown 仍不会被渲染,还会让展示器依赖 TUI 的行为。
**把每种工具卡片都按 Markdown 渲染。**终端输出和 diff 有专门的格式,且可能包含必须保持字面显示的 Markdown 标点。
**在 Markdown 渲染之前应用收起状态卡片的行数限制。**按源文本行截断可能从中间截断围栏块,还会让可见行数与卡片使用的行数不一致。
## Consequences
通用工具卡片与对话内容使用同一套 Markdown 词汇和净化路径。通用卡片中的 Markdown 标点会被解释,而不再总是按字面显示;需要字面终端输出的工具使用终端卡片这一渲染意图。
聚焦的 TUI 测试固定了隐藏的围栏、保留的语言标签和正文文本。无密钥的终端状态快照通过组装后的 TUI transcript 覆盖该行为。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-24-empty-model-response-is-retryable.md: f4a6373178efd5ca1ba5882fb2aaf97dffb2526b
2026-07-24-empty-model-response-is-retryable.zh.md: 4c3afe44140c029d274f34ade97803b958c6d669
2026-07-24-empty-model-response-is-retryable.md: 3ecb106fc3a53070f66d1de351120aaf99d4d0de
2026-07-24-empty-model-response-is-retryable.zh.md: 91ce4105ebe60b71f12667ccf28ea905566353d5

View File

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ An adapter classifies a completed empty response as a provider-boundary failure,
- `dsh-llm` exports the canonical code `EMPTY_RESPONSE_CODE` (`'EMPTY_RESPONSE'`) beside `CONTEXT_WINDOW_EXCEEDED_CODE`/`QUOTA_EXCEEDED_CODE`.
- `dsh-llm-pi-ai` (`mapStopReason`): a terminal `stop` whose assistant message has no content blocks becomes a `finish {kind: 'error'}` with that code. Context-overflow detection still wins where it applies (it is checked first and is the more actionable classification).
- `dsh-llm-deepseek` (`translate`): at `[DONE]`, a `stop` (or absent) finish with no opened blocks becomes the same error finish. Reasoning-only streams count as content and stay successful.
- `dsh-llm-retry` adds `EMPTY_RESPONSE` to `DEFAULT_RETRYABLE_CODES`: the attempt produced nothing durable, so repeating it is safe; deployments can still remove it via `retryableCodes`.
- The provider-owned normal retry default includes `EMPTY_RESPONSE`: the attempt produced nothing durable, so repeating it is safe; deployments can still remove it via `retryableCodes`, and `dsh-llm-retry` executes the resolved policy.
Detection is scoped to `stop` finishes only. `max-tokens` with empty content keeps its existing meaning (pi-ai already normalizes the zero-output overflow case), `tool-calls` cannot be block-empty in practice, and error/aborted finishes already fail.

View File

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Status: implemented
- `dsh-llm``CONTEXT_WINDOW_EXCEEDED_CODE`/`QUOTA_EXCEEDED_CODE` 之外,导出规范代码 `EMPTY_RESPONSE_CODE``'EMPTY_RESPONSE'`)。
- `dsh-llm-pi-ai``mapStopReason`):当终止性 `stop` 所对应的 assistant 消息没有内容块时,它会变成一个携带该代码的 `finish {kind: 'error'}`。上下文溢出检测在其适用场景中仍然优先(它先被检查,也是更具可操作性的归类)。
- `dsh-llm-deepseek``translate`):在 `[DONE]` 处,若 `stop`(或缺失)结束且没有打开过任何块,则同样变成该错误结束。仅含 reasoning 的流算作有内容,仍视为成功。
- `dsh-llm-retry``EMPTY_RESPONSE` 加入 `DEFAULT_RETRYABLE_CODES`:这次尝试没有产生任何持久内容,因此重复它是安全的;部署方仍可通过 `retryableCodes` 将其移除。
- 提供方拥有的 normal 重试默认策略包含 `EMPTY_RESPONSE`:这次尝试没有产生任何持久内容,因此重复它是安全的;部署方仍可通过 `retryableCodes` 将其移除,而 `dsh-llm-retry` 会执行解析后的策略
检测仅限于 `stop` 结束。内容为空的 `max-tokens` 保持其既有含义pi-ai 已经把零输出的溢出场景归一化处理),`tool-calls` 在实践中不可能是空块,而 erroraborted 结束本身已经算失败。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-24-tui-turn-end-stop-reason-notices.md: 7c783ce5a347b15d682dbeca03ad5355aca7950b
2026-07-24-tui-turn-end-stop-reason-notices.zh.md: 4a983525779b96c296ac2d621ca5928e7bed61c9

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
# Agent Note: TUI presents a reason for every turn-end kind
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-24-tui-turn-end-stop-reason-notices.zh.md)
## Problem
The TUI rendered transcript notices for `error`, `aborted`, `max-tokens`, `rejected`, and `interrupted` turn ends, but a `disposed` turn end and any plugin-added `TurnEndReasonMap` kind rendered nothing. When such a turn ended — live or replayed from a persisted log — the agent stopped working with no visible reason, breaking the product expectation that every stop is explained to the user.
## Decision
The `turn/end` case in `packages/ui/tui/src/index.ts` switches on the reason's discriminant and covers every kind: `completed` stays silent because the settled assistant message and its `Completed` timing header already present that outcome; `disposed` appends `Turn stopped: the agent was disposed.`; and the merge-extensible default appends `Turn ended: <kind>.` so an unknown plugin-added outcome still names why the agent stopped. All other kinds keep their existing notices.
## Alternatives considered
**A notice for `completed` turns too.** Rejected as noise: every ordinary response would gain a redundant line, and the assistant message plus its frozen timing header already mark the completion.
**Suppressing the `disposed` turn-end notice live because `agent/disposed` also appends `Agent "<id>" was disposed.`** Rejected: the two notices state different facts (this turn was cut short vs. the agent is gone), and the turn-end notice is the only one that survives replay of a persisted log, where the live `agent/disposed` emission does not recur.
**Keeping the default branch silent (the prior behavior).** Rejected: a merge-extensible kind unknown to the TUI is exactly the case where the user has no other way to learn why the agent stopped.
## Consequences
- A turn never ends without a user-visible reason in the TUI: every non-`completed` `turn/end` kind appends a transcript notice, including unknown plugin-added kinds by name.
- Live disposal during a running turn shows two notices (the turn-end notice plus `agent/disposed`); a replayed log shows the turn-end notice alone.
- The `errors-and-help` snapshot pins the `disposed` and unknown-kind notices alongside the existing failure and interruption notices.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
# Agent Note: TUI 为每种轮次结束 kind 呈现原因
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-24-tui-turn-end-stop-reason-notices.md) | 中文
## 问题
TUI 会为 `error``aborted``max-tokens``rejected``interrupted` 这几种轮次结束渲染 transcript文本记录通知`disposed` 轮次结束和任何插件新增的 `TurnEndReasonMap` kind 不渲染任何内容。此类轮次结束时无论实时发生还是从持久化日志回放agent智能体都会在没有任何可见原因的情况下停止工作违背了「每次停止都要向用户解释」的产品预期。
## 决策
`packages/ui/tui/src/index.ts` 中的 `turn/end` 分支按 reason 的判别字段做 switch覆盖每一种 kind`completed` 保持沉默,因为已定稿的助手消息及其 `Completed` 计时头部已经呈现了这一结果;`disposed` 追加 `Turn stopped: the agent was disposed.`merge 扩展的 default 分支追加 `Turn ended: <kind>.`,让未知的插件新增结果仍能点明 agent 停止的原因。其余各 kind 保留现有通知。
## 备选方案
**为 `completed` 轮次也加一条通知。** 否决,属于噪音:每次普通响应都会平添一行冗余内容,而助手消息加上已冻结的计时头部本就标示了完成。
**因为 `agent/disposed` 也会追加 `Agent "<id>" was disposed.`,就在实时场景下抑制 `disposed` 轮次结束通知。** 否决:两条通知陈述的是不同事实(前者说明这一轮被中途截断,后者说明 agent 已不复存在),而且只有轮次结束通知在回放持久化日志时得以保留,实时发出的 `agent/disposed` 不会在回放中重现。
**让 default 分支保持沉默(沿用先前行为)。** 否决TUI 不认识的 merge 扩展 kind恰恰是用户没有其他途径得知 agent 为何停止的情形。
## 后果
- 在 TUI 中,轮次结束永远不会缺少用户可见的原因:每种非 `completed``turn/end` kind 都会追加一条 transcript 通知,未知的插件新增 kind 也会按名称列明。
- 轮次运行期间实时 dispose资源释放会显示两条通知轮次结束通知加上 `agent/disposed`);回放日志则只显示轮次结束通知。
- `errors-and-help` 快照把 `disposed` 通知和未知 kind 通知连同现有的失败与中断通知一并固定下来。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-27-question-composer-rows-do-not-shrink.md
2026-07-27-question-composer-rows-do-not-shrink.md: 2e0e9b9ca6b141a200ba53d8b6f6f0cad5f7e89d
2026-07-27-question-composer-rows-do-not-shrink.zh.md: 845d9ee883ad1c2c7abc63a01fce626be924b87f

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
# Agent Note: Question-composer option rows are scroll content, not the slack absorber
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-27-question-composer-rows-do-not-shrink.zh.md)
## Problem
The question composer card is capped against the viewport (`max-height: min(60vh, 520px)`) and scrolls its option list, so the header and the footer actions stay reachable on long question batches. When the composer seat got short — a small window, or a short viewport with the details panel open — the option rows rendered on top of each other and on top of the question title.
The cap was not the defect; the distribution of the shortfall was. `.options` is a `flex-direction: column` box whose children default to `flex-shrink: 1`, so under-allocation shrank the rows first instead of overflowing the scroll container. A row shrank to its `min-height: 42px` while `.optionCopy` kept the taller intrinsic height its wrapped copy needs (two lines for an option with a description). With `align-items: center`, the copy is then centered on a box shorter than itself and paints outside the row's border box in both directions — over the title above and the next row below. Measured on the shipped client at 900x440: 6.5px of copy outside the row box, growing to 10px at 380px tall, while `.options` reported `scrollHeight === clientHeight` and therefore never offered a scrollbar.
Only rows whose copy wraps can reproduce it. A row whose copy fits on one line has slack between its content and its 42px minimum, so shrinking it stays invisible — which is why the pre-existing e2e fixture (options `Blue`/`Green`, no descriptions) rendered correctly at every size.
## Decision
`.option` and `.custom` declare `flex-shrink: 0`.
The rows are the scroll content of a capped card; the card's overflow belongs to `.options`, which already owns `overflow-y: auto` and `min-height: 0`. Pinning the children makes the shortfall reach that scroll container instead of being absorbed by the rows, which is the behavior the cap was designed for. The alternative — letting rows shrink but keeping the copy inside them — would require clipping or ellipsizing option descriptions at exactly the sizes where the user most needs to read them.
`.header` and `.footer` already carried `flex-shrink: 0` for the same reason at the card level; the option list's children were the missing half of that rule.
## Alternatives considered
**Clip or ellipsize the copy inside a shrunk row (`overflow: hidden` on `.option`).** This removes the overlap with one declaration and no layout rethink. Rejected because it trades a visible defect for a silent one: the row keeps its 42px, and the second line of an option description simply disappears at exactly the sizes where the card is tightest. The description is decision-relevant content, not decoration.
**Drop `align-items: center` for `align-items: flex-start`.** The copy would grow downward only, so it would no longer paint over the title above. It does not fix anything: a shrunk row still overflows onto the row below, and the fix would silently change the vertical alignment of every option row at every size, including the common one.
**Remove the card's `max-height` cap so nothing is ever squeezed.** No shortfall means no distribution problem. Rejected because the cap is what keeps the header and the footer actions on screen for a long question batch; removing it reintroduces the failure the cap exists to prevent (the composer seat is a fixed-height conversation column with `overflow: hidden`, so an uncapped card loses its own submit button instead).
**Cap the wrapped copy at one line (`white-space: nowrap` plus ellipsis on `.description`).** Rows would never wrap, so they could never overflow when shrunk. Rejected for the same reason as clipping, plus it degrades the wide-viewport rendering — where there is ample room — to fix a narrow-viewport defect.
## Consequences
- A squeezed composer scrolls its option list instead of overlapping it: at 900x380 the list reports `scrollHeight` 200 against `clientHeight` 114 and offers a scrollbar, where before it reported them equal and offered none.
- Option rows keep their full wrapped copy at every viewport size. Nothing is clipped or ellipsized, and the wide-viewport rendering is unchanged (the rule only takes effect when the flex box is under-allocated).
- The card now reaches its scroll state sooner, since the shortfall is no longer partly absorbed by the rows. That is the intended behavior of the cap, and it means a short seat shows a scrollbar in cases that previously showed a silently mis-painted list.
- The scenario's recorded question is longer than it needs to be for the round trip it primarily tests. That cost is deliberate: the layout invariant is unfalsifiable without wrapping copy, and a second fixture for one CSS rule would be worse.
## Verification
The web e2e composer scenario asserts the invariant on the live composer at three squeezed seat heights (900x520 / 440 / 380): every option row's children stay inside the row's border box. Two guards keep the assertion from holding vacuously — at least one row must be wrapped (the only shape that overflows) and `.options` must actually be scrolling (proof the seat is genuinely capped). The scenario's recorded question now carries long option descriptions for exactly that reason; without wrapping copy the assertion cannot fail.
Confirmed both directions against the built client: with `flex-shrink: 0` reverted the scenario fails (`scrolls: false`, 6.5px spill), and with it restored it passes. A standalone geometry sweep over 340 viewport sizes (420-1600 x 320-960) went from 86 sizes with copy outside a row box to zero.
The assertion is replay-only: record mode must reach the fixture write rather than aborting on layout. Note that the composer ships as a client-module bundle, so `pnpm run build:web` alone does not pick up a change to `QuestionComposer.module.css` — the package build must run for the browser lane to see it.
Reproducing the shortfall requires a short viewport, not a short container. The cap is `min(60vh, 520px)`, so shrinking the conversation column below the card's own height clips the card without under-allocating it — the rows keep their full height and nothing spills. Anything demonstrating or measuring this defect outside the e2e scenario has to change the viewport.
A stale `lib/` makes the browser lane assert against an older client than the tree, and a `pnpm run build` that fails part-way leaves exactly that: the packages built before the failure are current, the rest are not. Refreshing a golden in that state records the older client's surface. Confirm the build exited zero before capturing, and note that untracked directories under `packages/` are compiled too — a leftover from another branch can fail the build for reasons the diff does not explain.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
# Agent Note: 提问 composer 的选项行是滚动内容,而非空间不足时的吸收方
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-27-question-composer-rows-do-not-shrink.md) | 中文
## 问题
提问 composer 的卡片会按视口设上限(`max-height: min(60vh, 520px)`),并让选项列表自行滚动,这样在成批提问时标题和底部操作按钮始终可达。但当 composer 的容器变矮时(窗口较小,或视口偏矮且详情面板处于展开状态),选项行会互相叠在一起,也会叠到问题标题上。
缺陷不在这个高度上限,而在高度不足时由谁来吸收。`.options` 是一个 `flex-direction: column` 的盒子,其子元素默认取 `flex-shrink: 1`,因此空间不足时首先被压缩的是各个选项行,而不是让滚动容器产生溢出。一行会被压到它的 `min-height: 42px`,而 `.optionCopy` 仍保持文案折行后所需的更大固有高度(带描述的选项会占两行)。由于 `align-items: center`,文案于是以一个比自身更矮的盒子为基准居中,并向上下两个方向画到该行边框盒之外——向上盖住标题,向下盖住下一行。在实际发布的客户端上于 900x440 处实测:文案有 6.5px 落在行盒之外,视口高度降到 380px 时增至 10px`.options` 报告的 `scrollHeight` 等于 `clientHeight`,因此始终不会给出滚动条。
只有文案会折行的选项行才能复现该问题。文案单行即可容纳的行,其内容与 42px 最小高度之间尚有余量,被压缩也看不出来——这正是既有 e2e fixture测试前置数据选项为 `Blue``Green`,无描述)在任何尺寸下都渲染正常的原因。
## 决策
`.option``.custom` 声明 `flex-shrink: 0`
在设有高度上限的卡片中,这些行是滚动内容;卡片的溢出归 `.options` 承担,它本就持有 `overflow-y: auto``min-height: 0`。把子元素固定住之后,高度不足会传导到那个滚动容器,而不再被行本身吸收,这正是该高度上限设计时想要的行为。另一种做法是允许行被压缩,但把文案约束在行内,那就必须在用户最需要阅读选项描述的尺寸上对其做裁剪或省略号处理。
`.header``.footer` 出于同样的原因,已在卡片层级带有 `flex-shrink: 0`;选项列表的子元素正是这条规则缺失的另一半。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**在被压缩的行内裁剪文案或加省略号(对 `.option` 设 `overflow: hidden`)。** 这样一条声明就能消除重叠,且不必重新考虑布局。之所以否决:它把一个可见缺陷换成了一个无声缺陷——行仍保持 42px而选项描述的第二行会在卡片最紧张的那些尺寸上直接消失。描述属于影响决策的内容不是装饰。
**把 `align-items: center` 改为 `align-items: flex-start`。** 文案就只会向下生长,因此不再向上盖住标题。但这什么也没修好:被压缩的行依然会溢出到下一行上,而且这一改动会在所有尺寸下(包括常见尺寸)无声改变每个选项行的垂直对齐。
**移除卡片的 `max-height` 上限,使其永远不会被压缩。** 没有高度不足就没有分配问题。之所以否决正是这个上限保证成批提问时标题和底部操作按钮留在屏幕内移除它会重新引入该上限本就为之存在的失败composer 所处的容器是一个固定高度、`overflow: hidden` 的会话列,因此不设上限的卡片会连自己的提交按钮一起丢掉)。
**把折行文案限制为单行(对 `.description` 设 `white-space: nowrap` 加省略号)。** 行永远不会折行,因此被压缩时也永远不会溢出。否决理由与裁剪相同,此外它还为了修一个窄视口缺陷,而牺牲了空间充裕的宽视口渲染效果。
## 后果
- 被压缩的 composer 会滚动其选项列表,而不是让它互相重叠:在 900x380 处,该列表报告 `scrollHeight` 为 200、`clientHeight` 为 114并给出滚动条此前两者相等不给滚动条。
- 选项行在任何视口尺寸下都保留完整的折行文案。不裁剪、不加省略号,宽视口下的渲染保持不变(该规则仅在 flex 盒子空间不足时才生效)。
- 由于高度不足不再被行部分吸收,卡片现在更早进入滚动状态。这正是该高度上限想要的行为,也意味着在此前只会无声画错列表的情形下,矮容器现在会显示滚动条。
- 该场景录制的问题,比它主要测试的那次往返所需的长度更长。这个代价是有意付出的:没有折行文案,该布局不变式无法被证伪,而为一条 CSS 规则再加一份 fixture 会更糟。
## 验证
Web e2e 的 composer 场景会在三个被压缩的容器高度900x520440380对活动的 composer 断言该运行时不变式:每个选项行的子元素都留在该行的边框盒之内。两道守卫防止该断言空洞地成立——必须至少有一行处于折行状态(这是唯一会溢出的形态),且 `.options` 必须确实处在滚动状态(证明容器确实触及了高度上限)。该场景录制的问题现在带有较长的选项描述,正是为此;没有折行文案,这条断言不可能失败。
在构建产物客户端上双向确认过:撤销 `flex-shrink: 0` 后该场景失败(`scrolls: false`6.5px 溢出),恢复后通过。一次覆盖 340 种视口尺寸420-1600 x 320-960的独立几何遍历从 86 种尺寸存在文案落在行盒之外,降到 0 种。
该断言仅在回放模式下执行:录制模式必须走到写入 fixture 那一步而不是在布局检查处中断。另需注意composer 以客户端模组包的形式发布,因此单跑 `pnpm run build:web` 不会带上对 `QuestionComposer.module.css` 的改动——必须执行包构建,浏览器测试通道才能看到它。
要复现这种空间不足,需要的是矮视口,而不是矮容器。高度上限为 `min(60vh, 520px)`,因此把会话列压到比卡片自身高度更矮,只会裁剪卡片,而不会让它空间不足——各行仍保持完整高度,也不会有任何溢出。凡是在 e2e 场景之外演示或测量该缺陷的手段,都必须改变视口。
`lib/` 陈旧会让浏览器测试通道对着一个比工作树更旧的客户端做断言,而中途失败的 `pnpm run build` 留下的正是这种状态:失败之前构建的那些包是新的,其余不是。在这种状态下刷新 golden记录下来的是旧客户端的界面。抓取之前先确认构建以 0 退出;另需注意 `packages/` 下的未跟踪目录同样会被编译——来自另一个分支的遗留物可能以 diff 无法解释的原因让构建失败。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-27-tool-card-single-row-fields-inline.md
2026-07-27-tool-card-single-row-fields-inline.md: e04110ed74b68afffc6ea45fc2cb52c4063268e7
2026-07-27-tool-card-single-row-fields-inline.zh.md: ac532ec6eb51d42a529e0816d1204cb2729a074a

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
# Agent Note: Tool-card single-row fields render inline
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-27-tool-card-single-row-fields-inline.zh.md)
## Problem
A tool card's title, description, cwd, and pending `$ <command>` echo are each one logical row. The bash tool sets the card title (and description) directly from the model's command and description, which for a multi-line bash script contain real newlines. These fields were escaped with `displayText`, which deliberately preserves `\n` as structural layout. A multi-line title therefore broke onto extra terminal rows that the card's line accounting did not reserve, so the title's later lines overwrote the description, the output, or the editor's steering hint — the card rendered as garbled, overlapping text. Removing the gutter bar (see the [copyable-transcript note](../simplification/2026-07-27-copyable-transcript-no-gutter-bar.md)) made the collision visible because those rows no longer sat behind a per-line prefix.
## Decision
Single-row card fields use `displayInlineText` (which escapes `\n` to the literal `\x0a`) instead of `displayText`: the card title, the terminal-card `description` and `cwd` meta rows, and the pending `$ <command>` echo. Each stays on exactly one row, so a multi-line command can no longer break rows and collide with adjacent lines. Genuinely multi-line fields — captured command output and the `contentText` result body — keep `displayText` plus `split('\n')`, because those legitimately occupy multiple rows.
## Alternatives considered
- **Strip newlines from the presenter output** (in the bash tool) — hides the model's real command shape from any consumer of the view, and pushes a UI concern into the tool. The escape belongs at the single-row render site.
- **Let the title wrap to multiple rows deliberately** — a card title is a one-line identity; a wrapped multi-line title still collides with the following meta rows unless the whole card is re-laid-out, and it bloats the transcript.
## Consequences
- Multi-line bash commands render as a single inline title (`S=/tmp\x0aecho …`); the description, output, and exit rows below stay intact. Verified live in tmux for both the pending (`◌`) and completed (`✓`) states.
- A `multilineTerminal` tool-card case in `tui.spec.ts` asserts the inline-escaped form appears for a newline-bearing title and description.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
# Agent Note: 工具卡片的单行字段以内联方式渲染
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-27-tool-card-single-row-fields-inline.md) | 中文
## Problem
工具卡片的标题、描述、cwd 以及待执行的 `$ <command>` 回显各自都是一个逻辑行。bash 工具直接用模型给出的命令与描述来设置卡片标题(和描述),而对于多行 bash 脚本,这些内容包含真实换行。这些字段此前用 `displayText` 转义,而 `displayText` 会刻意保留 `\n` 作为结构性布局。于是多行标题会换到卡片行数核算未预留的额外终端行上,标题后续的行便覆盖了描述、输出,或编辑器的 steering 提示——卡片渲染成互相重叠的乱码文本。移除 gutter bar见[可复制 transcript 的 note](../simplification/2026-07-27-copyable-transcript-no-gutter-bar.md))后,这些行不再位于逐行前缀之后,因而暴露了这一冲突。
## Decision
单行卡片字段改用 `displayInlineText`(将 `\n` 转义为字面量 `\x0a`)而非 `displayText`包括卡片标题、terminal 卡片的 `description``cwd` 元数据行,以及待执行的 `$ <command>` 回显。每个字段都严格保持在一行内,因此多行命令不再会换行并与相邻行冲突。真正多行的字段——捕获的命令输出与 `contentText` 结果正文——仍保留 `displayText``split('\n')`,因为它们本就应占据多行。
## Alternatives considered
- **在 presenter 输出中剥除换行**(在 bash 工具里)—— 会对该视图的所有消费方隐藏模型真实的命令形态,并把 UI 关注点塞进工具。转义应发生在单行渲染处。
- **让标题刻意换到多行** —— 卡片标题是一行式身份标识;除非重排整个卡片,多行标题仍会与其后的元数据行冲突,还会让 transcript 膨胀。
## Consequences
- 多行 bash 命令渲染为单行内联标题(`S=/tmp\x0aecho …`);其下的描述、输出与退出码行保持完整。已在 tmux 中对待执行(`◌`)与已完成(`✓`)两种状态实测验证。
- `tui.spec.ts` 中新增了一个 `multilineTerminal` 工具卡片用例,断言对含换行的标题与描述会出现内联转义后的形式。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-27-tui-diff-card-redundant-path-header.md
2026-07-27-tui-diff-card-redundant-path-header.md: 708e543ff079828b4929d2a50ac697a9c846608a
2026-07-27-tui-diff-card-redundant-path-header.zh.md: 863868ae707f37689bbc202267c5470d8c3163e9

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
# Agent Note: TUI diff card dropped the duplicated file path
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-27-tui-diff-card-redundant-path-header.zh.md)
## Problem
The `edit` and `write` tool cards printed the target path twice. Each tool's `presentCall`/`presentResult` returns a diff card whose title is `Edit <path>`/`Write <path>` and whose single `FileDiff` carries the same `path`. The TUI's `diffLines` unconditionally rendered `palette.bold(diff.path)` as a per-file header, so a one-file edit rendered:
```
✓ Edit src/foo.ts
src/foo.ts
- old
+ new
```
The existing snapshot fixture hid the bug: it titled the edit card `Edit renderer` (no path) and gave the result two diffs, so the title never matched a diff path and the header never looked redundant.
## Decision
`diffLines` takes a `showPath` flag; `ToolCardComponent.renderBody` suppresses the per-file header for a diff card when there is exactly one diff and the effective card title (`resultView?.title ?? callView.title`) already contains that diff's path. Multi-file diff cards keep every per-file header. An empty or blank diff path collapses under the same `String.includes` check, which is the intended noise removal.
The suppression lives in the TUI renderer, not in each tool's presenter, because the redundancy is a presentation concern shared by every current and future single-file diff card; the tools keep emitting the path in both the title and the diff so non-TUI consumers still get it.
## Alternatives considered
- Drop the path from the `edit`/`write` card titles. Rejected: the title is the scannable summary line; removing the path weakens it, and it would have to be repeated per tool.
- Always drop the per-file header. Rejected: multi-file result diffs (and any future multi-file diff card) genuinely need per-file headers.
## Consequences
The heuristic is a substring match, so a title that happens to contain a single diff's path suppresses the header even if the match is incidental; for the real producers the title is exactly `Verb <path>`, so this is correct in practice. The snapshot `edit` fixture now mirrors production: one diff whose path the title names, proving the header is dropped, while multi-file header retention is covered by the `tui.spec.ts` `edit` fixture (`a.txt`/`b.txt` under an `Edit files` title).
## Testing
`tui.spec.ts` adds a focused case asserting the path appears exactly once for a single-diff card titled `Edit src/only.ts`. The `advanced-cards-*` keyless snapshots re-recorded to show the title line immediately followed by the diff body with no repeated path header.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
# Agent Note: TUI diff 卡片重复打印文件路径
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-27-tui-diff-card-redundant-path-header.md) | 中文
## Problem
`edit``write` 工具卡片会把目标路径打印两次。两者的 `presentCall`/`presentResult` 返回的 diff 卡片,标题为 `Edit <path>`/`Write <path>`,而其唯一的 `FileDiff` 又携带相同的 `path`。TUI 的 `diffLines` 无条件地将 `palette.bold(diff.path)` 渲染为每文件的表头,因此单文件编辑会渲染成:
```
✓ Edit src/foo.ts
src/foo.ts
- old
+ new
```
既有的快照 fixture 掩盖了这个问题:它把编辑卡片标题设为 `Edit renderer`(不含路径),并让结果包含两个 diff于是标题从未与某个 diff 路径匹配,表头也就不显得冗余。
## Decision
`diffLines` 新增 `showPath` 参数;当一个 diff 卡片只有一个 diff、且生效标题`resultView?.title ?? callView.title`)已包含该 diff 的路径时,`ToolCardComponent.renderBody` 抑制每文件表头。多文件 diff 卡片保留全部每文件表头。空白或空路径同样落入这条 `String.includes` 判定之下,这正是有意去除的噪声。
抑制逻辑放在 TUI 渲染层,而非各工具的 present 方法中,因为这种冗余是所有当前及未来单文件 diff 卡片共有的展示问题;工具仍在标题和 diff 中同时给出路径,从而非 TUI 消费方依旧能拿到它。
## Alternatives considered
-`edit`/`write` 卡片标题中去掉路径。已否决:标题是可快速扫读的摘要行,去掉路径会削弱它,而且需要在每个工具里重复处理。
- 一律去掉每文件表头。已否决:多文件结果 diff以及未来任何多文件 diff 卡片)确实需要每文件表头。
## Consequences
该启发式是子串匹配,因此若标题恰好包含某个单一 diff 的路径,即便是偶然匹配也会抑制表头;对真实的产出方而言标题恰为 `Verb <path>`,故在实践中是正确的。快照 `edit` fixture 现在与生产一致:单个 diff其路径正是标题所命名从而证明表头被去除而多文件表头保留由 `tui.spec.ts``edit` fixture`Edit files` 标题下的 `a.txt`/`b.txt`)覆盖。
## Testing
`tui.spec.ts` 新增一个聚焦用例,断言标题为 `Edit src/only.ts` 的单 diff 卡片中路径恰好出现一次。`advanced-cards-*` 无密钥快照已重新录制,展示标题行紧接 diff 正文、不再有重复的路径表头。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-27-tui-step-timing-trails-tool-cards.md: 82f46b44d3b939ca89c4508eb948ed584082d9fd
2026-07-27-tui-step-timing-trails-tool-cards.zh.md: 885b232973d20013782dee7ec1e846e7a012b01e

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
# Agent Note: TUI step timing trails the step's last message
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-27-tui-step-timing-trails-tool-cards.zh.md)
## Problem
The per-step timing summary (`Model wait … · Completed …`) was a child of the assistant message component, so it rendered directly under the assistant text. When a step drove tool calls, the tool cards were appended to the chat *after* the assistant message, leaving the timing line stranded above them — one message before the step's actual last output. The summary is meant to close a step, so on any tool-calling step it appeared in the wrong place.
## Decision
The timing summary is its own `StepTimingComponent`, no longer a child of `AssistantMessageComponent`. `StreamingAssistantComponent` owns one and exposes it as `timing`, but the renderer attaches it to the chat as a sibling that follows the assistant message. Whenever a `tool/call` or `tool/result` of the open step appends a card, `trailStreamingTiming()` moves the footer back to the tail of the chat, so it always trails the step's last message. On `step/end` the footer is completed in place — already at the tail — and stays pinned while the next step's output follows. `removeStreaming` and the reasoning-toggle rebuild detach and reattach the footer together with its streaming component.
Event ordering makes this exact: within a step the loop appends `tool/call` and `tool/result` before `step/end`, so the footer is repositioned while `streaming` is still set, then frozen when the step ends.
## Alternatives considered
**Keep the timing inside the assistant message and reorder tool cards above it.** Rejected: tool cards belong after the assistant text that requested them; moving them above the assistant message to sit under the timing would misrepresent the transcript order.
**Recompute a single trailing footer for the whole turn instead of one per step.** Rejected: a multi-step turn shows each step's own completed timing, and collapsing them would drop the per-step buckets the existing timing tests pin.
**Reposition the footer from a `step/end`-only handler.** Rejected: tool cards render before `step/end`, so a footer moved only at step end would already be trailing but would not track a mid-step re-render, and the running (pre-completion) footer would still sit above the tool cards during streaming.
## Consequences
- On a tool-calling step the timing summary renders below the tool cards, both while the turn runs and after it completes; the package snapshots (`untrusted-controls`, `cordis-tools-pending`, `advanced-cards-*`, `code-mode-pending`, `dynamic-workflow-pending`, `surface-before-compaction`) and the example transcripts (`todo-plan`, `bash-terminal-card`, `code-mode`, `parallel-file-reads`, `dynamic-workflow`, `cordis-dynamic-toolchain`, `code-mode-dispatch-spill`) pin the new order.
- A unit test asserts the completed timing appears after a step's tool output; it fails on the pre-fix ordering.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
# Agent Note: TUI 步骤计时跟在该步骤最后一条消息之后
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-27-tui-step-timing-trails-tool-cards.md) | 中文
## 问题
每步的计时摘要(`Model wait … · Completed …`)原本是助手消息组件的子节点,因此直接渲染在助手文本下方。当某一步触发 tool call 时tool card工具卡片会在助手消息*之后*追加到聊天区,使计时行被搁在它们上方——落在该步骤真正的最后一条输出之前一条消息处。该摘要本意是收束一个步骤,因此在任何含 tool call 的步骤上都出现在了错误的位置。
## 决策
计时摘要现在是独立的 `StepTimingComponent`,不再是 `AssistantMessageComponent` 的子节点。`StreamingAssistantComponent` 持有一个并以 `timing` 暴露它,但渲染器把它作为紧随助手消息之后的同级节点挂到聊天区。每当当前打开步骤的 `tool/call``tool/result` 追加一张卡片,`trailStreamingTiming()` 就把该页脚移回聊天区末尾,使它始终跟在该步骤的最后一条消息之后。在 `step/end` 时该页脚就地定稿——此时已在末尾——并在后续步骤的输出接续时保持钉住。`removeStreaming` 与推理开关重建会把该页脚连同其流式组件一起摘除并重新挂上。
事件顺序让这一点精确成立:在一个步骤内,循环会先追加 `tool/call``tool/result`,再追加 `step/end`,因此页脚是在 `streaming` 仍被设置时重新定位的,随后在步骤结束时冻结。
## 备选方案
**把计时保留在助手消息内部,改为把 tool card 排到它上方。** 否决tool card 应位于请求它们的助手文本之后;把它们移到助手消息上方以贴在计时下方,会歪曲 transcript文本记录的顺序。
**为整个轮次重算一个末尾页脚,而非每步一个。** 否决:多步轮次会显示各步自己的完成计时,合并它们会丢掉现有计时测试所固定的每步分桶。
**只在 `step/end` 处理器里重新定位页脚。** 否决tool card 在 `step/end` 之前渲染,因此仅在步骤结束时移动的页脚虽已处于末尾,却无法跟踪步骤中途的重新渲染,而且流式过程中运行态(完成前)的页脚仍会落在 tool card 上方。
## 后果
- 在含 tool call 的步骤上,计时摘要渲染在 tool card 下方,轮次运行期间与完成之后皆如此;相关包快照(`untrusted-controls``cordis-tools-pending``advanced-cards-*``code-mode-pending``dynamic-workflow-pending``surface-before-compaction`)与示例 transcript`todo-plan``bash-terminal-card``code-mode``parallel-file-reads``dynamic-workflow``cordis-dynamic-toolchain``code-mode-dispatch-spill`)固定了新顺序。
- 一个单元测试断言完成计时出现在某步骤的工具输出之后;在修复前的顺序下它会失败。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md: a263b5e7d0245bd1279024a50e05b2f33edad521
2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.zh.md: df0cf9d9131978e608d47124ba0f0db0343ee12a
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md
2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md: 3c219b734e148b963fb5857de89c16f28c2bd402
2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.zh.md: b2c7e9720b596705b60a284e6ccf1448a782b7fc

View File

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ An earlier draft put the full algorithm (the retention walk, token-summing, text
Successful-call pressure cannot run at pre-step because final `agent/request` routing, provider output, tool results, buffered context, and steering do not exist there. Serial `agent/post-step(agent, turn, step, signal)` fires after those facts are durable and before `step/end`. `dsh-compact-basic` measures the canonical logged request through `ctx.tokenMeter`, so the next request sees any replacement without a speculative envelope override. Once pressure qualifies, optional `ctx.toolResultPrune` rewriting runs before summary selection; compact-basic remeasures the durable surface and skips summarization if pruning restores safe pressure.
Canonical provider context overflow takes a separate path. The failed step closes, `agent/request-error` receives the original request error and consecutive retry count, and compact-basic prunes before forcing one useful balanced reduction. It returns retry only if `session.surface.replaceGeneration` increases, including pruning-only progress when no summary range exists; the loop then opens a new numbered step and reconstructs its request from the durable log. No replacement, a recovery failure before any replacement, cancellation, an exhausted cap, or an unrelated error preserves the original provider failure. If pruning already advanced the generation before later summary work fails, recovery retries from that durable pruned surface unless cancellation or disposal wins. The complete lifecycle decision is in the [after-call recovery Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.md).
Canonical provider context overflow takes a separate path. The failed step closes and `agent/request-error` receives the original request error. Compact-basic owns its per-agent overflow count, prunes before forcing one useful balanced reduction, and returns `{ kind: 'retry' }` only if `session.surface.replaceGeneration` increases, including pruning-only progress when no summary range exists. The loop then closes the failed turn, opens a new numbered retry turn, and reconstructs its request from the durable log. No replacement, a recovery failure before any replacement, cancellation, an exhausted cap, or an unrelated error preserves the original provider failure. If pruning already advanced the generation before later summary work fails, recovery retries from that durable pruned surface unless cancellation or disposal wins. The complete lifecycle decision is in the [after-call recovery Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.md).
```
assistant/message → tool/result/context/steering

View File

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Status: implemented
成功调用的压力检查不能在步骤前运行,因为最终的 `agent/request` 路由、提供方输出、工具结果、缓冲上下文与 steering 当时尚不存在。串行的 `agent/post-step(agent, turn, step, signal)` 会在这些事实持久化后、`step/end` 之前触发。`dsh-compact-basic` 通过 `ctx.tokenMeter` 测量规范的已记录请求,因此下一个请求无需推测性覆盖信封即可看到任何替换。压力达到条件后,可选的 `ctx.toolResultPrune` 重写在摘要范围选择前运行compact-basic 重新测量持久 surface如果修剪恢复到安全压力便跳过摘要生成。
规范的提供方上下文溢出走另一条路径。失败步骤先关闭,`agent/request-error` 接收原始请求错误与连续重试次数,compact-basic 在强制执行一次有效且平衡的缩减前先修剪仅当 `session.surface.replaceGeneration` 增加时,它才返回 retry;这包括没有摘要范围时仅修剪取得的进展。随后循环开启新的编号步骤,并从持久日志重建请求。没有替换、任何替换前的恢复失败、取消、耗尽的上限或无关错误都会保留原始提供方失败。如果修剪已经推进 generation而后续摘要工作失败恢复会从该持久的已修剪 surface 重试,除非取消或资源释放胜出。完整生命周期决策见[调用后恢复 Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.md)。
规范的提供方上下文溢出走另一条路径。失败步骤先关闭,`agent/request-error` 接收原始请求错误compact-basic 自行持有按 agent 计的溢出次数,在强制执行一次有效且平衡的缩减前先修剪,且仅当 `session.surface.replaceGeneration` 增加时才返回 `{ kind: 'retry' }`;这包括没有摘要范围时仅修剪取得的进展。随后循环关闭失败轮次,开启新的编号重试轮次,并从持久日志重建请求。没有替换、任何替换前的恢复失败、取消、耗尽的上限或无关错误都会保留原始提供方失败。如果修剪已经推进 generation而后续摘要工作失败恢复会从该持久的已修剪 surface 重试,除非取消或资源释放胜出。完整生命周期决策见[调用后恢复 Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.md)。
```
assistant/message → tool/result/context/steering

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-24-workspace-context.md: 6acdb6241bcc57250e217cfc8856e8b0598d4622
2026-06-24-workspace-context.zh.md: f165d08108931df21697c7895523f10ef816297f
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-24-workspace-context.md
2026-06-24-workspace-context.md: f86e227be615c9b54e2a9013d3c7dca75d3975f0
2026-06-24-workspace-context.zh.md: 154b5260955570e2de3c88d98286c5ea6afaa3b5

View File

@@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ Repository guidance such as `AGENTS.md` belongs in a coding session's effective
Neighboring products establish useful conventions but differ in details. Codex treats `AGENTS.md` as native, Claude Code uses `CLAUDE.md` and familiar system-reminder-style user context, and opencode supports both names with one winner per directory plus lazy nested discovery. The harness needs cross-tool compatibility without loading duplicate or contradictory files from the same scope.
The lifecycle has two distinct classes of content. The initial applicable chain is stable enough to live in the request prefix and benefit from provider prefix caching. Nested files, edits, candidate switches, and removals happen after the session starts and belong in durable append-only history rather than the frozen prefix.
The lifecycle has two distinct classes of content. The initial applicable chain is injected once before the first request. Nested files, edits, candidate switches, and removals happen later and join the same durable append-only history.
## Decision
The implementation lives in `packages/context/workspace-context` as `@deepseek-ai/dsh-workspace-context`. It is a request-context extension, not a core service or a filesystem backend. The shared demo spine and Host Runtime mount it from an explicit `{ maxBytes } | false` deployment choice; `dsh web` enables a 65,536-byte budget while the Host Runtime's headless consumer disables it. The plugin consumes `agent/session-prefix`, `tools/post-execute`, and the optional `ctx.fs` capability.
The implementation lives in `packages/context/workspace-context` as `@deepseek-ai/dsh-workspace-context`. It is a request-context extension, not a core service or a filesystem backend. The shared demo spine and Host Runtime mount it from an explicit `{ maxBytes } | false` deployment choice; `dsh web` enables a 65,536-byte budget while the Host Runtime's headless consumer disables it. The plugin consumes `agent/step`, `tools/post-execute`, and the optional `ctx.fs` capability.
The plugin does not statically inject `fs`. Providerless product trees therefore boot normally and the plugin no-ops until a filesystem provider exists. All production reads go through that provider. Candidate probes resolve each path and stat the result, so a final-component symlink is followed to its target: a link to a regular file loads, while a missing path or a non-file target is a confirmed absence. Following repository-owned links across the trust boundary is a deliberate reversal of the original no-follow probe; the [instruction-symlink follow note](2026-07-21-follow-instruction-symlinks.md) owns that decision and its residual risk. The session-prefix signal and dynamic tool execution signal propagate through resolution, metadata probes, and streaming reads, so cancellation does not wait for an unrelated filesystem scan. A resolve or stat exception is classified as unavailable: it skips only that candidate and is never interpreted as the deletion of an already-loaded scope.
The plugin does not statically inject `fs`. Providerless product trees therefore boot normally and the plugin no-ops until a filesystem provider exists. All production reads go through that provider. Candidate probes resolve each path and stat the result, so a final-component symlink is followed to its target: a link to a regular file loads, while a missing path or a non-file target is a confirmed absence. Following repository-owned links across the trust boundary is a deliberate reversal of the original no-follow probe; the [instruction-symlink follow note](2026-07-21-follow-instruction-symlinks.md) owns that decision and its residual risk. The step signal and dynamic tool execution signal propagate through resolution, metadata probes, and streaming reads, so cancellation does not wait for an unrelated filesystem scan. A resolve or stat exception is classified as unavailable: it skips only that candidate and is never interpreted as the deletion of an already-loaded scope.
### File Names And Precedence
@@ -26,13 +26,13 @@ Candidate entries are same-directory file names. Empty entries, `.`/`..`, and en
The user-global file is fixed at `$DSH_HOME/AGENTS.md`, is not affected by either candidate list, and has no local overlay. `$DSH_HOME` defaults to `~/.dsh`, matching the harness-level home role of `~/.codex` or `~/.claude` rather than introducing a plugin-specific home. Tilde expansion and the default live in `dsh-paths` so future harness features share the same convention.
### Baseline Prefix
### Baseline Injection
On the first request of an agent-loop instance, the plugin contributes one user-role message through `agent/session-prefix`. It loads the user-global file first, then finds the project root by walking upward from `agent.session.header.cwd` to a configured root marker (default `.git`), then loads one candidate from each directory from the root to the cwd. A `.git` file and a `.git` directory are both valid markers, covering linked worktrees and submodules. Without a marker, the cwd itself is the root.
At the first `agent/step` of an agent-loop instance, the plugin injects one sourced user-role message before the request is derived. It loads the user-global file first, then finds the project root by walking upward from `agent.session.header.cwd` to a configured root marker (default `.git`), then loads one candidate from each directory from the root to the cwd. A `.git` file and a `.git` directory are both valid markers, covering linked worktrees and submodules. Without a marker, the cwd itself is the root.
The plugin prepends its contribution before `await next()` returns, so session-prefix contributions appear in plugin registration order. In the product spine workspace instructions are registered before a skills catalog and therefore appear first. The loop deep-freezes the composed prefix, logs it in `EpochHeader.messagePrefix`, and reuses it verbatim for that instance. It is request state, not `Session.deriveMessages()` history.
The injection becomes a durable `user/message` with a typed `workspace-instructions` source. Its `baseline: true` marker distinguishes the complete startup or resume baseline from later deltas, and its change list persists the included scopes and content digests. In the product spine workspace instructions are registered before the skills catalog, so their `agent/step` listener injects first. The loop drains both messages before deriving the first request.
A resumed agent creates a new loop instance and recomposes the baseline from current files, with the new prefix anchored by the resume request header. This permits current baseline content on resume without mutating a prefix already used by an earlier instance.
A resumed agent creates a new loop instance and injects a baseline composed from current files before its first request. This permits current baseline content on resume without mutating an earlier history event. A resume and a hot plugin remount both face a log that may already hold a baseline; they are told apart by `agent/session-start`, which a startup or resume emits before the first step while a remount attaches to an already-live session and never sees it. A remount retains the existing baseline only when its typed event remains in the current visible surface, and still rebuilds scope and provider-version tracking from current files. If compaction has shadowed that event, the remount injects a current baseline. A resume always re-composes.
The baseline is a user-role `<system-reminder>` with `Instructions from: <path>` sections and explicit authority and precedence language. This familiar model-facing frame avoids a harness-specific XML vocabulary. Project paths are root-relative and the user-global path is `~/.dsh/AGENTS.md` for the default home or `$DSH_HOME/AGENTS.md` for a configured home. A literal `</system-reminder>` inside file content is escaped. The package README owns the exact current [prompt shape](../../../../packages/context/workspace-context/README.md#prompt-shape).
@@ -42,21 +42,21 @@ After a successful first-party `read`, `write`, or `edit` call, the `tools/post-
A content edit appends `Updated instructions from: <path>`, states that the new content replaces the previous content, and includes the complete current file. If precedence changes from one candidate to another, the message also names the previous path and says it no longer applies. If no candidate remains, the plugin appends `Instructions removed: <path>` and states that the previously loaded instructions no longer apply.
Dynamic messages carry their complete system-reminder framing in `content`, and every `context/message` reaches the model verbatim as a user-role message (there is no core wrapper to opt out of). `context/message.meta` carries opaque JSON state that is persisted but never rendered to the model.
Baseline and dynamic messages carry their complete system-reminder framing in `content`, and every sourced `user/message` reaches the model verbatim (there is no core wrapper to opt out of). The typed `workspace-instructions` source carries persisted state that is never rendered to the model.
Shell commands are not discovery triggers. Local bash calls start fresh shells, and inferring reached paths from arbitrary command strings would require shell semantics the prompt plugin does not own.
### Duplicate Suppression And Change Detection
Every dynamic workspace context event stores versioned metadata with `{ action, scope, path, digest? }`, where `digest` is SHA-1 over the loaded content. The model-facing prompt has no HTML comments, hidden markers, or headings that are parsed back into state.
Every workspace context event stores versioned metadata with `{ action, scope, path, digest? }`, where `digest` is SHA-1 over the loaded content. Baselines additionally carry `baseline: true`. The model-facing prompt has no HTML comments, hidden markers, or headings that are parsed back into state.
At reconciliation time the plugin scans plugin-owned `context/message` events and derives the latest state for each visible scope. A short per-session pending map begins only after the immutable top-level `tools/result` proves an `additionalContexts` entry survived every post-execute listener, then covers the interval before the loop appends that context to the log. Each entry records the open `{ turn, step }`: an equal durable `context/message` at or after its sequence boundary confirms and removes it, while a matching `step/end` arriving first means the loop discarded its context buffer, so the plugin removes both the pending entry and its version-cache fast path. A nested Code Mode result stages its changes under the parent's opaque execution token so repeated sub-dispatches in one run do not duplicate them; the parent result rolls that provisional state back and commits only contexts retained by outer policy.
At reconciliation time the plugin scans workspace-sourced `user/message` events and derives the latest state for each visible scope. A short per-session pending map begins only after the immutable top-level `tools/result` proves an `additionalContexts` entry survived every post-execute listener, then covers the interval before the loop appends that context to the log. Each entry records the open `{ turn, step }`: an equal durable `user/message` at or after its sequence boundary confirms and removes it, while a matching `step/end` arriving first means the loop discarded its context buffer, so the plugin removes both the pending entry and its version-cache fast path. A nested Code Mode result stages its changes under the parent's opaque execution token so repeated sub-dispatches in one run do not duplicate them; the parent result rolls that provisional state back and commits only contexts retained by outer policy.
An unchanged path and digest is suppressed. A logged removal is a tombstone, so a reappearing candidate becomes a new `set`. Resume works from persisted metadata. If compaction removes an instruction event from the visible surface, that state no longer suppresses a later load, matching the fact that the model can no longer see it. Only changes actually included under the byte budget enter metadata or pending state, so an omitted file remains eligible on a later touch.
The frozen baseline keeps an in-memory path/digest map for comparison. A later successful filesystem touch appends baseline edits or removals as dynamic messages; it never rewrites the prefix. During resumed prefix composition the plugin also reconciles visible dynamic scopes, so nested changes made while the agent was offline can append an update before the first resumed request.
The initial baseline's typed changes are comparison state only while its event remains in the visible session surface. A later successful filesystem touch re-adds an unchanged baseline scope after compaction, or appends baseline edits or removals as dynamic messages; it never rewrites the original event. The in-memory scope marker and provider-version cache only select and accelerate probes, so neither can suppress context the model no longer sees. During resumed baseline preparation the plugin also reconciles visible dynamic scopes, so nested changes made while the agent was offline can append an update before the first resumed request.
There is intentionally no watcher. Detection occurs at the next successful structured filesystem touch or resumed prefix composition. A provider failure produces no removal; absence is only accepted when all configured candidates in that scope were probed successfully.
There is intentionally no watcher. Detection occurs at the next successful structured filesystem touch or resumed baseline preparation. A provider failure produces no removal; absence is only accepted when all configured candidates in that scope were probed successfully.
### Byte Budget And Bounded Reads
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ There is intentionally no watcher. Detection occurs at the next successful struc
**Use a global `ctx.systemPrompt.section()`.** Rejected because one Cordis context can host sessions with different cwd values, while repository-owned text is lower-authority context rather than top-authority provider system content.
**Inject the baseline on every `agent/pre-step`.** Rejected because repeated history injection wastes tokens, complicates duplicate state, and prevents a structurally stable provider prefix. Prefix composition gives a frozen, logged, per-instance baseline while dynamic append-only messages handle changes.
**Inject the baseline on every `agent/step`.** Rejected because repeated history injection wastes tokens and complicates duplicate state. A per-mount session guard gives one visible baseline event while it remains on the surface; dynamic append-only messages handle changes and compaction re-arming.
**Load both `AGENTS.md` and `CLAUDE.md` in one directory.** Rejected because repositories in transition commonly duplicate guidance across both files. Ordered candidates make precedence explicit and configurable.
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ There is intentionally no watcher. Detection occurs at the next successful struc
## Consequences
Workspace guidance is isolated per session and shared by the demo front doors, Web Host, and every tool presentation mode. Initial instructions benefit from stable prefix caching, while nested and changed content remains durable and replayable. The generic session/agent context contract carries JSON metadata propagated through prompt-submit and post-tool `additionalContexts` arrays without flattening entries.
Workspace guidance is isolated per session and shared by the demo front doors, Web Host, and every tool presentation mode. Initial, nested, and changed instructions are durable and replayable. The generic session/agent context contract carries typed source data through injected messages and post-tool `additionalContexts` arrays without flattening entries.
Repository text remains untrusted input. Lower-authority user-role framing, explicit precedence language, and delimiter escaping reduce risk but do not eliminate prompt injection. Following a candidate symlink to its target widens that surface to off-tree content, so the permission and sandbox layers that confine `ctx.fs` to trusted roots are the boundary that treats workspace files as data rather than authority (the [instruction-symlink follow note](2026-07-21-follow-instruction-symlinks.md) owns the residual risk).

View File

@@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ Status: implemented
相邻产品形成了值得借鉴的约定但具体做法各不相同。Codex 原生使用 `AGENTS.md`Claude Code 使用 `CLAUDE.md`,并采用熟悉的 system-reminder 风格用户上下文opencode 同时支持这两个名称每个目录只选一个胜出者并延迟发现嵌套文件。harness 需要跨工具兼容,同时避免从同一作用域加载重复或互相矛盾的文件。
生命周期中有两类截然不同的内容。初始适用文件链足够稳定,可以放入请求前缀并受益于提供方前缀缓存。嵌套文件、编辑、候选项切换和移除发生在会话启动后,进入持久的仅追加历史,而不是被冻结的前缀
生命周期中有两类截然不同的内容。初始适用文件链在第一次请求前一次性注入。嵌套文件、编辑、候选项切换和移除发生在后,进入同一份持久的仅追加历史。
## 决策
该实现在 `packages/context/workspace-context`package名为 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-workspace-context`。它是请求上下文扩展,不是核心服务或文件系统后端。共享 demo 主干与 Host Runtime 根据显式的 `{ maxBytes } | false` 部署选择挂载它;`dsh web` 启用 65,536 字节预算Host Runtime 的 headless 消费方则禁用它。该插件使用 `agent/session-prefix``tools/post-execute` 和可选的 `ctx.fs` 功能。
该实现在 `packages/context/workspace-context`package名为 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-workspace-context`。它是请求上下文扩展,不是核心服务或文件系统后端。共享 demo 主干与 Host Runtime 根据显式的 `{ maxBytes } | false` 部署选择挂载它;`dsh web` 启用 65,536 字节预算Host Runtime 的 headless 消费方则禁用它。该插件使用 `agent/step``tools/post-execute` 和可选的 `ctx.fs` 功能。
插件不会静态注入 `fs`。因此,不带提供方的产品树仍能正常启动;在文件系统提供方出现之前,插件保持无操作。所有生产读取都通过该提供方完成。候选项探测会解析每个路径并对结果执行 stat因此会跟随最终路径组件的符号链接至其目标指向普通文件的链接会被加载缺失路径或非文件目标则确认为不存在。允许仓库拥有的链接跨越信任边界是对最初不跟随探测方式的刻意反转[跟随指令符号链接记录](2026-07-21-follow-instruction-symlinks.md)负责说明该决策及其残余风险。会话前缀信号与动态工具执行信号会贯穿解析、元数据探测和流式读取,因此取消不会等待无关的文件系统扫描。解析或 stat 异常归类为不可用:它只跳过该候选项,绝不被解释为已经加载的作用域被删除。
插件不会静态注入 `fs`。因此,不带提供方的产品树仍能正常启动;在文件系统提供方出现之前,插件保持无操作。所有生产读取都通过该提供方完成。候选项探测会解析每个路径并对结果执行 stat因此会跟随最终路径组件的符号链接至其目标指向普通文件的链接会被加载缺失路径或非文件目标则确认为不存在。允许仓库拥有的链接跨越信任边界是对最初不跟随探测方式的刻意反转[跟随指令符号链接记录](2026-07-21-follow-instruction-symlinks.md)负责说明该决策及其残余风险。步骤信号与动态工具执行信号会贯穿解析、元数据探测和流式读取,因此取消不会等待无关的文件系统扫描。解析或 stat 异常归类为不可用:它只跳过该候选项,绝不被解释为已经加载的作用域被删除。
### 文件名与优先级
@@ -26,13 +26,13 @@ Status: implemented
用户全局文件固定为 `$DSH_HOME/AGENTS.md`,不受任一候选列表影响,也没有本地覆盖层。`$DSH_HOME` 默认为 `~/.dsh`,与 `~/.codex``~/.claude` 在 harness 层的 home 角色一致,而不会引入插件专用 home。波浪号展开与默认值位于 `dsh-paths` 中,以便未来的 harness 功能共享同一约定。
### 基线前缀
### 基线注入
agent loop智能体循环实例的第一次请求会让插件通过 `agent/session-prefix` 提供一条 user 角色消息。它先加载用户全局文件,再从 `agent.session.header.cwd` 向上遍历至配置的根标记(默认为 `.git`)以确定项目根目录,随后从根目录至 cwd 的每级目录各加载一个候选项。`.git` 文件与 `.git` 目录都是有效标记,因而能覆盖链接 worktree 和 submodule。找不到标记时cwd 本身就是根目录。
agent loop智能体循环实例的第一 `agent/step`,插件会在派生请求前注入一条带来源的 user 角色消息。它先加载用户全局文件,再从 `agent.session.header.cwd` 向上遍历至配置的根标记(默认为 `.git`)以确定项目根目录,随后从根目录至 cwd 的每级目录各加载一个候选项。`.git` 文件与 `.git` 目录都是有效标记,因而能覆盖链接 worktree 和 submodule。找不到标记时cwd 本身就是根目录。
插件会在 `await next()` 返回前前置其贡献,因此会话前缀贡献按插件注册顺序出现。在产品主干中,工作区指令的注册先于 skill 目录,所以它排在前面。循环会深度冻结组合后的前缀,将其记录在 `EpochHeader.messagePrefix` 中,并在该实例内逐字复用。它是请求状态,不是 `Session.deriveMessages()` 历史
该注入成为一条持久 `user/message`,并携带带类型的 `workspace-instructions` 来源。其 `baseline: true` 标记将完整的启动或恢复基线与后续增量区分开来,变更列表则持久保存已纳入的作用域和内容 digest。在产品主干中工作区指令的注册先于 skill 目录,所以其 `agent/step` 监听器先注入。循环会在派生第一次请求前 drain 这两条消息
恢复 agent 会创建新的循环实例,并使用当前文件重新组合基线;新的前缀由恢复请求 header 锚定。这样,恢复时可以使用当前基线内容,而无需修改先前实例已经使用过的前缀
恢复 agent 会创建新的循环实例,并在其第一次请求前注入由当前文件组合基线。这样,恢复时可以使用当前基线内容,而无需修改先前的历史事件。恢复与插件热重挂都会面对日志中可能已存在基线的情况;二者通过 `agent/session-start` 区分:启动或恢复会在第一步前发出该事件,而热重挂附着到一个已存活的会话、永远不会看到它。只有当基线的类型化事件仍在当前可见表层中时,热重挂才保留既有基线,同时仍会根据当前文件重建 scope 与提供方版本跟踪。如果压缩compaction已遮蔽该事件热重挂会注入当前基线。恢复则始终重新组合
基线是一条 user 角色的 `<system-reminder>`,包含 `Instructions from: <path>` 章节,以及明确的权威性与优先级说明。这种熟悉的模型可见框架避免引入 harness 专用的 XML 词汇。项目路径相对于根目录;使用默认 home 时,用户全局路径为 `~/.dsh/AGENTS.md`,使用已配置 home 时则为 `$DSH_HOME/AGENTS.md`。文件内容中的字面量 `</system-reminder>` 会被转义。包 README 负责规定当前准确的[提示词形态](../../../../packages/context/workspace-context/README.md#prompt-shape)。
@@ -42,21 +42,21 @@ agent loop智能体循环实例的第一次请求会让插件通过 `agent
内容编辑会追加 `Updated instructions from: <path>`,说明新内容取代先前内容,并包含当前的完整文件。如果优先级从一个候选项变为另一个,消息还会指出先前路径并说明它不再适用。如果没有候选项保留,插件会追加 `Instructions removed: <path>`,并说明先前加载的指令不再适用。
动态消息在 `content` 中携带完整的 system-reminder 框架;每`context/message` 都作为 user 角色消息逐字抵达模型,核心层不会再添加可选择退出的包装。`context/message.meta` 携带不透明 JSON 状态,该状态会持久化,但绝不会渲染给模型。
基线消息和动态消息`content` 中携带完整的 system-reminder 框架;每条带来源的 `user/message` 都逐字抵达模型,核心层不会再添加可选择退出的包装。带类型的 `workspace-instructions` 来源携带持久化状态,该状态绝不会渲染给模型。
shell 命令不会触发发现。本地 bash 调用会启动全新的 shell而从任意命令字符串推断已到达路径需要实现提示词插件并不拥有的 shell 语义。
### 重复抑制与变更检测
每个动态工作区上下文事件都会存储带版本的元数据,其形态为 `{ action, scope, path, digest? }``digest` 是对已加载内容计算的 SHA-1。模型可见提示词中没有 HTML 注释、隐藏标记,也没有会被解析回状态的标题。
每个工作区上下文事件都会存储带版本的元数据,其形态为 `{ action, scope, path, digest? }``digest` 是对已加载内容计算的 SHA-1。基线还会额外携带 `baseline: true`模型可见提示词中没有 HTML 注释、隐藏标记,也没有会被解析回状态的标题。
协调时,插件扫描自身拥有的 `context/message` 事件,并派生每个可见作用域的最新状态。一个简短的逐会话待处理映射只会在不可变的顶层 `tools/result` 证明某个 `additionalContexts` 条目经过所有 post-execute 监听器后仍然保留时开始记录;随后,它覆盖循环将该上下文追加到日志之前的间隔。每个条目记录开启状态的 `{ turn, step }`:如果相同的持久 `context/message` 出现在其序列边界或之后,该条目得到确认并被移除;如果匹配的 `step/end` 先到达,则说明循环丢弃了上下文缓冲区,插件会同时移除待处理条目及其版本缓存快速路径。嵌套的 Code Mode 结果会把变更暂存在父级的不透明执行 token 下,确保一次运行中的重复子分发不会产生重复项;父级结果会回滚这份临时状态,并且只提交外层策略保留的上下文。
协调时,插件扫描带工作区来源的 `user/message` 事件,并派生每个可见作用域的最新状态。一个简短的逐会话待处理映射只会在不可变的顶层 `tools/result` 证明某个 `additionalContexts` 条目经过所有 post-execute 监听器后仍然保留时开始记录;随后,它覆盖循环将该上下文追加到日志之前的间隔。每个条目记录开启状态的 `{ turn, step }`:如果相同的持久 `user/message` 出现在其序列边界或之后,该条目得到确认并被移除;如果匹配的 `step/end` 先到达,则说明循环丢弃了上下文缓冲区,插件会同时移除待处理条目及其版本缓存快速路径。嵌套的 Code Mode 结果会把变更暂存在父级的不透明执行 token 下,确保一次运行中的重复子分发不会产生重复项;父级结果会回滚这份临时状态,并且只提交外层策略保留的上下文。
路径和 digest 均未变化时会被抑制。日志中的移除操作是一条墓碑记录,因此重新出现的候选项会成为新的 `set`。恢复操作从持久化元数据继续工作。如果压缩compaction从可见表面移除某条指令事件,该状态不再抑制后续加载,这与模型已经无法看见它的事实一致。只有真正纳入字节预算的变更才会进入元数据或待处理状态,因此被省略的文件在之后的触碰中仍有资格加载。
路径和 digest 均未变化时会被抑制。日志中的移除操作是一条墓碑记录,因此重新出现的候选项会成为新的 `set`。恢复操作从持久化元数据继续工作。如果压缩从可见表面移除某条指令事件,该状态不再抑制后续加载,这与模型已经无法看见它的事实一致。只有真正纳入字节预算的变更才会进入元数据或待处理状态,因此被省略的文件在之后的触碰中仍有资格加载。
被冻结的基线会保留一个内存中的 pathdigest map 以供比较。后续成功的文件系统触碰会把基线编辑或移除操作追加为动态消息绝不重写前缀。恢复时重新组合前缀的过程中,插件还会协调可见的动态作用域,因此 agent 离线期间发生的嵌套变更可以在第一次恢复请求前追加更新。
只有当初始基线事件仍在可见会话表层中时,其类型化变更才用作比较状态。后续成功的文件系统触碰会在压缩后重新添加未变化的基线 scope把基线编辑或移除操作追加为动态消息;它绝不重写原始事件。内存中的 scope 标记和提供方版本 cache 只用于选择探测对象并加速探测,因此二者都不能抑制模型已无法看见的上下文。恢复时准备基线的过程中,插件还会协调可见的动态作用域,因此 agent 离线期间发生的嵌套变更可以在第一次恢复请求前追加更新。
系统刻意不使用文件监视器。检测发生在下一次成功的结构化文件系统触碰或恢复时的前缀组合。提供方失败不会产生移除;只有该作用域中的全部已配置候选项都成功完成探测后,系统才接受「不存在」这一结论。
系统刻意不使用文件监视器。检测发生在下一次成功的结构化文件系统触碰或恢复时的基线准备。提供方失败不会产生移除;只有该作用域中的全部已配置候选项都成功完成探测后,系统才接受「不存在」这一结论。
### 字节预算与有界读取
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ shell 命令不会触发发现。本地 bash 调用会启动全新的 shell
**使用全局 `ctx.systemPrompt.section()`。** 不予采纳,因为同一个 Cordis 上下文可以承载 cwd 不同的多个会话,而仓库所有的文本属于低权威用户上下文,不是最高权威的提供方系统内容。
**在每次 `agent/pre-step` 时注入基线。** 不予采纳,因为重复注入历史会浪费 token使重复状态复杂化,并妨碍提供方前缀保持结构稳定。前缀组合提供冻结、已记录且逐实例的基线,动态仅追加消息负责变更
**在每次 `agent/step` 时注入基线。** 不予采纳,因为重复注入历史会浪费 token,并使重复状态复杂化。逐挂载会话防护会在基线事件仍留在表面期间提供一条可见基线事件;动态仅追加消息负责处理变更和压缩后的重新启用
**在一个目录中同时加载 `AGENTS.md` 和 `CLAUDE.md`。** 不予采纳,因为正在迁移的仓库通常会在两个文件中重复指引。按顺序排列的候选项让优先级显式且可配置。
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ shell 命令不会触发发现。本地 bash 调用会启动全新的 shell
## 影响
工作区指引按会话隔离,并由 demo 前端、Web Host 与每一种工具展示模式共享。初始指令受益于稳定的前缀缓存,嵌套与变更内容则保持持久且可回放。通用的 sessionagent 上下文契约通过 prompt-submit 与工具执行后的 `additionalContexts` 数组携带 JSON 元数据,而不会把条目展平。
工作区指引按会话隔离,并由 demo 前端、Web Host 与每一种工具展示模式共享。初始嵌套与变更指令都保持持久且可回放。通用的 sessionagent 上下文契约通过注入消息与工具执行后的 `additionalContexts` 数组携带带类型的来源数据,而不会把条目展平。
仓库文本仍是不受信任的输入。低权威 user 角色框架、显式优先级说明和分隔符转义可以降低风险,但无法消除提示词注入。跟随候选符号链接到目标,会把该接口扩大至树外内容;因此,把 `ctx.fs` 限制在可信根目录内的权限与沙箱层才是真正的边界,它们让系统把工作区文件当作数据而不是权威([跟随指令符号链接记录](2026-07-21-follow-instruction-symlinks.md)负责说明残余风险)。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-30-hook-bridges.md: c207b6901155925215548676364e903f5de2f29b
2026-06-30-hook-bridges.zh.md: d396279d7ed1991536da2cea39e2aec5e50960c2
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-30-hook-bridges.md
2026-06-30-hook-bridges.md: 99c6b1941a10e198ec3028f5fe505dabfff9abbe
2026-06-30-hook-bridges.zh.md: 11ed3a5d177661271b30f1a58d034caa577b5348

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-06-30-hook-bridges.zh.md)
## Problem
The harness's extension surface is its typed interception seams ([the interception-seams Agent Note](2026-06-30-interception-seams.md)): a "native hook" is just an ordinary cordis plugin subscribing to `agent/session-start`, `agent/prompt-submit`, `tools/pre-execute`, `tools/post-execute`, `agent/turn-continuation`, `subagent/start`, `subagent/end`. But users arrive with **existing** Claude Code (CC) and Codex hook configs — a `hooks.json` (or a settings file's `hooks` key) full of shell-command hooks — and want those to run unmodified. This Agent Note introduces the two **bridge plugins** that translate that external shell-hook protocol onto the typed seams, built on the shared wire-protocol library ([the hook-protocol-lib Agent Note](2026-06-30-hook-protocol-lib.md)).
The harness's extension surface is its typed interception seams ([the interception-seams Agent Note](2026-06-30-interception-seams.md)): a "native hook" is just an ordinary cordis plugin subscribing to `agent/session-start`, `agent/prompt-submit`, `tools/pre-execute`, `tools/post-execute`, `agent/turn-stopping`, `subagent/start`, or `subagent/end`. But users arrive with **existing** Claude Code (CC) and Codex hook configs — a `hooks.json` (or a settings file's `hooks` key) full of shell-command hooks — and want those to run unmodified. This Agent Note introduces the two **bridge plugins** that translate that external shell-hook protocol onto the typed seams, built on the shared wire-protocol library ([the hook-protocol-lib Agent Note](2026-06-30-hook-protocol-lib.md)).
The framing that shapes the whole design: **a bridge is a compatibility adapter, not a power tool.** Anything a bridge does (block a tool, inject context, force continuation, observe a subagent) a native cordis plugin does more powerfully — typed returns, full `ctx`, no serialization boundary. The bridge's reason to exist is to run the explicitly supported subset of external CC/Codex command hooks. That keeps each bridge thin: parse the config, pick a matcher mode, build the per-event payload, call `runHook` + `mergeHookOutputs` from the shared lib, and map the neutral outcome onto a seam Decision. The package READMEs own the exact current unsupported-event and partial-field inventory against the official protocols.
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Each bridge maps the neutral `MergedHookOutcome` from the shared lib onto the se
| `agent/prompt-submit` | `deny``block`; context-only→delegate+fold | `block``block`; context-only→delegate+fold |
| `tools/pre-execute` | `deny``deny`; `ask``ask` | `block``deny` (no allow/ask) |
| `tools/post-execute` | `deny``block`+feedback; context-only→delegate+fold | same |
| `agent/turn-continuation` | blocking Stop → `continue` (reason = next-step steering) | same |
| `agent/turn-stopping` | blocking Stop → next-step steering | same |
| `subagent/start` (emit) | additionalContext → inject into a live in-process child; a remote child has no local injection target | unsupported by this bridge |
| `subagent/end` (emit) | observe-only | unsupported by this bridge |
@@ -35,7 +35,9 @@ The CC bridge's `ask` result is a real permission path, not a terminal bridge de
### Context source is always the plugin (the mislabel guard)
`agent.inject()` defaults a missing `MessageSource` to `{ kind: 'user' }`, so every bridge `inject()` and `HookContext` passes `{ kind: 'plugin', plugin: 'hooks-claude' | 'hooks-codex' }`. Unit coverage pins the resulting `context/message.source` as the plugin rather than the user.
Every bridge `inject()` and additional-context input explicitly passes `{ kind: 'plugin', plugin: 'hooks-claude' | 'hooks-codex' }`. Unit coverage pins the resulting `user/message.source` as the plugin rather than the user.
`UserPromptSubmit` runs during admission, before any turn opens. It therefore writes no turn-scoped `hook/invoked` / `hook/result` pair: a block leaves no transcript, while allowed additional context is durably represented by its sourced `user/message`. The Codex payload still receives the candidate next `turn_id`; rejection does not consume that number.
### Adding context is not a veto — delegate, then prepend
@@ -57,13 +59,13 @@ Hooks run in the agent's session workspace, so relative paths target the user's
- **Tool-input rewrite.** A CC/Codex `updatedInput` is logged + warned, not honored — input rewrite is a deferred consistency-design problem ([the pre-tool-input-rewrite Agent Note](../../proposed/feature/2026-06-30-pre-tool-input-rewrite.md)), because the pre-execution args are read by `tool/call` audit + `assistant/message` history + tool presentation, so an honest rewrite is a design unit, not a field.
- **Stop loop-guard** (`TODO(stop-loop-guard)`). Claude Code supplies `stop_hook_active` and overrides a hook after eight consecutive blocks; Codex supplies `stop_hook_active` but documents no equivalent cap. Both bridges always report `false`, so a Stop hook that unconditionally blocks force-continues every step — a hook author must self-limit until state tracking lands.
- **Hook `continue:false` (hard halt).** A hook can ask to halt the whole run (CC/Codex `continue:false`); the shared merge folds it into `MergedHookOutcome.stop`/`stopReason`, but no bridge acts on it (`TODO(hook-continue-false)`) — the interception seams have no "hard-halt the agent" primitive yet (a Decision blocks/steers a single point, not the run). Deferred with the loop-guard work; the halt request is recorded in the `hook/result` log, and the hook keeps its per-point effect (decision/context) meanwhile.
- **Hook `continue:false` (hard halt).** A hook can ask to halt the whole run (CC/Codex `continue:false`); the shared merge folds it into `MergedHookOutcome.stop`/`stopReason`, but no bridge acts on it (`TODO(hook-continue-false)`) — the interception seams have no "hard-halt the agent" primitive yet (a Decision blocks/steers a single point, not the run). Deferred with the loop-guard work; mid-turn requests record the halt in `hook/result`, and the hook keeps its per-point effect (decision/context) meanwhile.
- **Config discovery.** The path is explicit in `cordis.yml` and process-level (see above); the full multi-layer CC/Codex precedence walk, per-session project-local discovery, and the trust/hash model are not reimplemented (`TODO(per-session-hook-config)`).
- **Session-start / subagent-start context is best-effort (`TODO(session-start-gating)`).** Both hooks run detached from startup, so their context is injected when ready but may miss the first request or a short-lived child. Guaranteeing first-request delivery requires an awaited startup seam.
## Alternatives considered
**Concurrent per-point hook execution.** The reference engines run a point's matched hooks concurrently and fold the results. These bridges run them **serially** (`await` per hook inside the match loop) and fold with the same most-restrictive merge. Serial is deliberate: it keeps each hook's `hook/invoked`/`hook/result` pair adjacent and in a deterministic order in the session log, and the fold is order-independent for the decision (`deny > ask > allow`) so the outcome matches. The cost is latency (hook *N* waits for hook *N1*) and that per-hook timeouts are not overlapped — acceptable for the hook counts real configs use; revisit if a config ever fans out enough for the wall-clock to matter.
**Concurrent per-point hook execution.** The reference engines run a point's matched hooks concurrently and fold the results. These bridges run them **serially** (`await` per hook inside the match loop) and fold with the same most-restrictive merge. Serial is deliberate: for turn-scoped points it keeps each hook's `hook/invoked`/`hook/result` pair adjacent and in deterministic order, and the fold is order-independent for the decision (`deny > ask > allow`) so the outcome matches. The cost is latency (hook *N* waits for hook *N1*) and that per-hook timeouts are not overlapped — acceptable for the hook counts real configs use; revisit if a config ever fans out enough for the wall-clock to matter.
## Consequences

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Status: implemented
## 问题
harness 的扩展面是其类型化的拦截 seam见[拦截 seam Agent Note](2026-06-30-interception-seams.md)):所谓「原生钩子」不过是一个普通的 Cordis 插件,订阅 `agent/session-start``agent/prompt-submit``tools/pre-execute``tools/post-execute``agent/turn-continuation``subagent/start``subagent/end`。但用户带着**既有的** Claude CodeCC和 Codex 钩子配置到来,一个 `hooks.json`(或 settings 文件中的 `hooks` 键)里满是 shell 命令钩子,并希望它们原样运行。本 Agent Note 引入两个**桥接插件**,将外部 shell 钩子协议翻译到类型化 seam 上构建于共享的协议格式wire format库之上见 [hook-protocol-lib Agent Note](2026-06-30-hook-protocol-lib.md))。
harness 的扩展面是其类型化的拦截 seam见[拦截 seam Agent Note](2026-06-30-interception-seams.md)):所谓「原生钩子」不过是一个普通的 Cordis 插件,订阅 `agent/session-start``agent/prompt-submit``tools/pre-execute``tools/post-execute``agent/turn-stopping``subagent/start``subagent/end`。但用户带着**既有的** Claude CodeCC和 Codex 钩子配置到来,一个 `hooks.json`(或 settings 文件中的 `hooks` 键)里满是 shell 命令钩子,并希望它们原样运行。本 Agent Note 引入两个**桥接插件**,将外部 shell 钩子协议翻译到类型化 seam 上构建于共享的协议格式wire format库之上见 [hook-protocol-lib Agent Note](2026-06-30-hook-protocol-lib.md))。
贯穿整个设计的定位:**桥接是兼容性适配器,不是高级工具。** 桥接能做的事(阻止工具、注入上下文、强制继续、观察 subagent原生 Cordis 插件都能做得更强——类型化返回值、完整 `ctx`、无序列化边界。桥接存在的理由是运行外部 CC/Codex 命令钩子中被明确支持的子集。这使每个桥接保持精简:解析配置、选择匹配模式、构建每事件的 payload、调用共享库的 `runHook` + `mergeHookOutputs`,再将中性结果映射为 seam Decision。各包的 README 维护着当前不支持的事件和部分字段的完整清单,以官方协议为参照。
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ harness 的扩展面是其类型化的拦截 seam见[拦截 seam Agent Note](
| `agent/prompt-submit` | `deny``block`仅上下文→delegate+fold | `block``block`仅上下文→delegate+fold |
| `tools/pre-execute` | `deny``deny``ask``ask` | `block``deny`(无 allow/ask |
| `tools/post-execute` | `deny``block`+feedback仅上下文→delegate+fold | 同上 |
| `agent/turn-continuation` | 阻塞的 Stop → `continue`reason = 下一步 steering中途引导 | 同上 |
| `agent/turn-stopping` | 阻塞的 Stop → 下一步 steering中途引导 | 同上 |
| `subagent/start`emit | additionalContext → 注入到存活的进程内 subagent远程 subagent 无本地注入目标 | 本桥接不支持 |
| `subagent/end`emit | 仅观察 | 本桥接不支持 |
@@ -35,7 +35,9 @@ CC 桥接的 `ask` 结果是一条真正的权限路径,而非终态桥接决
### 上下文来源始终是插件(误标签防护)
`agent.inject()` 在缺少 `MessageSource` 时默认为 `{ kind: 'user' }`,因此每个桥接的 `inject()``HookContext`传入 `{ kind: 'plugin', plugin: 'hooks-claude' | 'hooks-codex' }`。单元测试覆盖率固定验证结果中的 `context/message.source` 为插件而非用户。
每个桥接的 `inject()` 和 additional-context 输入都显式传入 `{ kind: 'plugin', plugin: 'hooks-claude' | 'hooks-codex' }`。单元测试覆盖率固定验证结果中的 `user/message.source` 为插件而非用户。
`UserPromptSubmit` 在准入阶段运行,早于任何轮次开启。因此它不写入任何轮次范围的 `hook/invoked` / `hook/result` 对:阻止不会留下 transcript文本记录而被允许的额外上下文由其带来源的 `user/message` 持久呈现。Codex payload 仍会收到候选的下一个 `turn_id`;拒绝不会消耗该编号。
### 添加上下文不是否决——先 delegate再 prepend
@@ -57,13 +59,13 @@ Claude Code 始终导出 `CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR`,常见的未修改钩子引用 `
- **工具输入重写。** CC/Codex 的 `updatedInput` 被记录日志并发出警告,但不予执行——输入重写是一个推迟的一致性设计问题(见 [pre-tool-input-rewrite Agent Note](../../proposed/feature/2026-06-30-pre-tool-input-rewrite.md)),因为 pre-execution 参数被 `tool/call` 审计、`assistant/message` 历史和工具展示共同读取,诚实的重写是一个设计单元,而非一个字段。
- **Stop 循环防护**`TODO(stop-loop-guard)`。Claude Code 提供 `stop_hook_active` 并在连续八次阻塞后覆盖钩子Codex 提供 `stop_hook_active` 但未记录等效上限。两个桥接始终报告 `false`,因此一个无条件阻塞的 Stop 钩子会在每一步强制继续——在状态追踪落地之前,钩子作者必须自行限制。
- **钩子 `continue:false`(硬停止)。** 钩子可以请求终止整个运行CC/Codex `continue:false`);共享合并将其折叠为 `MergedHookOutcome.stop`/`stopReason`,但没有桥接对其采取行动(`TODO(hook-continue-false)`)——拦截 seam 尚无「硬停止 agent」原语Decision 阻塞/引导的是单个点,而非整个运行)。与循环防护工作一同推迟;停止请求记录在 `hook/result` 日志中,钩子在此期间保留其逐点效果(决策/上下文)。
- **钩子 `continue:false`(硬停止)。** 钩子可以请求终止整个运行CC/Codex `continue:false`);共享合并将其折叠为 `MergedHookOutcome.stop`/`stopReason`,但没有桥接对其采取行动(`TODO(hook-continue-false)`)——拦截 seam 尚无「硬停止 agent」原语Decision 阻塞/引导的是单个点,而非整个运行)。与循环防护工作一同推迟;轮中请求会将停止请求记录在 `hook/result` 中,钩子在此期间保留其逐点效果(决策/上下文)。
- **配置发现。** 路径在 `cordis.yml` 中显式指定且为进程级(见上文);完整的多层 CC/Codex 优先级遍历、按会话的项目本地发现以及信任/hash 模型未被重新实现(`TODO(per-session-hook-config)`)。
- **Session-start / subagent-start 上下文为尽力而为(`TODO(session-start-gating)`)。** 两个钩子以 detached 方式运行于启动过程之外,因此其上下文在就绪时注入,但可能错过首个请求或短命的 subagent。要保证首请求送达需要一个 awaited 的启动 seam。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**每点钩子并发执行。** 参考引擎对一个点匹配到的钩子并发运行并折叠结果。本桥接**串行**运行(匹配循环内每个钩子 `await`),并以相同的最严格合并策略折叠。串行是刻意的:它使每个钩子的 `hook/invoked`/`hook/result`在会话日志中相邻且顺序确定,而折叠对决策是顺序无关的(`deny > ask > allow`),因此结果一致。代价是延迟(钩子 *N* 等待钩子 *N1*)以及每钩子超时不重叠——对真实配置中的钩子数量可以接受;如果某配置的扇出大到影响总耗时,再重新评估。
**每点钩子并发执行。** 参考引擎对一个点匹配到的钩子并发运行并折叠结果。本桥接**串行**运行(匹配循环内每个钩子 `await`),并以相同的最严格合并策略折叠。串行是刻意的:对轮次范围的拦截点,它使每个钩子的 `hook/invoked`/`hook/result` 对相邻且顺序确定,而折叠对决策是顺序无关的(`deny > ask > allow`),因此结果一致。代价是延迟(钩子 *N* 等待钩子 *N1*)以及每钩子超时不重叠——对真实配置中的钩子数量可以接受;如果某配置的扇出大到影响总耗时,再重新评估。
## 后果

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-30-interception-seams.md: 81799f4c6e3e7a4c6b9605cd97f5728b99d11995
2026-06-30-interception-seams.zh.md: 65ae16842c632641e7ac65908162f4784dc6e1e0
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-30-interception-seams.md
2026-06-30-interception-seams.md: 4658983e1f098ecd199eecec4408e7c2f134cbf7
2026-06-30-interception-seams.zh.md: 13b7c56829412773111fcf6d75cc717c51d49c7b

View File

@@ -16,9 +16,9 @@ The canonical surface separates transformable policy, around-dispatch control, a
**Agent events** (`dsh-agent`):
- `agent/session-start(agent, source)` — emit, once before turn 1, carrying a `SessionStartSource` (`startup` for a fresh/forked create, `resume` for a reloaded persisted session; `clear`/`compact` reserved). A pure notification — it CANNOT block startup (a deliberate gap: a bridge logs/injects, it does not gate startup). A listener seeds context via `agent.inject()`.
- `agent/prompt-submit(agent, content, source, signal, next) → PromptDecision` — waterfall, fired for the turn's single claimed queued message before the `user/message` append. The explicit turn signal is placed before the final `next`; `allow` optionally rewrites the prompt `content` or attaches separately sourced `additionalContexts[]`, while `block` appends a durable `prompt/blocked` and rejects that zero-step turn.
- `agent/prompt-submit(agent, content, source, signal, next) → PromptDecision` — waterfall, fired for one claimed queued message before the loop opens a turn or appends `user/message`. The explicit admission signal is placed before the final `next`; `allow` optionally rewrites the prompt `content` or attaches separately sourced `additionalContexts[]`, while `block` discards the candidate without creating session history.
**`agent/turn-continuation`** receives and returns a `ContinuationDecision`. A `{action:'continue', reason?}` may carry model-facing content and source recorded as next-step steering in the same turn — the typed twin of the `/goal` step-end-steer pattern. It is not a `context/message`, so its type does not offer durable context metadata.
**`agent/turn-stopping`** is an awaited notification at the natural stop boundary. A listener that needs another step calls `agent.steer()` with explicitly sourced model-facing content; the loop then re-reads the outbox and either continues or closes the turn.
### The tool pipeline gives each phase one kind of authority
@@ -33,15 +33,13 @@ Every call follows `tools/pre-execute` → guards → `tools/execute` → dispat
Core dispatch and the tool body sit inside normalization boundaries, so tool, listener, invalid canonical value, renderer/projector, non-JSON presentation, and identity-shape failures resolve as JSON-safe `isError` results rather than escaping the turn. A post-execute listener can therefore inspect a thrown tool; definition-owned final content invariants also cover outer pipeline and candidate-materialization failures; and a final observer sees the execution-local canonical value beside exactly the presentation fields the session log can persist. The [canonical tool-output contract](../architecture/2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.md) owns the value/projection and durability rules.
**`TurnEndReason.rejected`** (`dsh-session`): a zero-step turn whose claimed prompt was blocked by `prompt-submit`.
### Three load-bearing loop decisions
1. **Open the turn before prompt policy.** A blocked prompt becomes a zero-step `rejected` turn, preserving enclosure and giving ACP a durable terminal event. The veto records `prompt/blocked` with the original prompt and reason, while every allowed `additionalContexts` entry is injected into the open turn. Each claimed ordinary-send item is the sole message in its turn under the [one-send-one-turn simplification](../simplification/2026-07-17-one-send-one-turn.md); a pre-start drop creates no turn.
1. **Run prompt policy before opening the turn.** A blocked prompt creates no turn or durable event. On allow, the loop stages the rewritten prompt followed by every returned `additionalContexts` entry, opens the turn, and drains that outbox before the first step. Each claimed ordinary-send item is the sole direct prompt in its turn under the [one-send-one-turn simplification](../simplification/2026-07-17-one-send-one-turn.md).
2. **Post-tool `additionalContexts` and asynchronous injections enter the active-batch FIFO and append when that batch settles.** `content`/`feedback` shape the result `execute()` returns, but each context is a separate `context/message`, and a single step or composite tool can produce many. Appending context immediately would interleave `result(c1) → context → result(c2)` or place nested context before its outer result, breaking tool-call/result adjacency. `ToolRunContext.deferContext()` therefore collects nested-dispatch context through failures, `execute()` surfaces the ordered array on `ToolExecutionResult`, and the loop accepts it into the same FIFO as `agent.inject()` calls made during execution. The FIFO appends after every recorded result when the batch settles, including before an interrupted turn closes. An accepted outer call preserves deferred contexts before decision contexts; an outer block discards deferred contexts and exposes only contexts explicitly supplied by the blocking decision.
2. **Post-tool `additionalContexts` and asynchronous injections enter the active-batch FIFO and append when that batch settles.** `content`/`feedback` shape the result `execute()` returns, but each context is a separate sourced `user/message`, and a single step or composite tool can produce many. Appending context immediately would interleave `result(c1) → context → result(c2)` or place nested context before its outer result, breaking tool-call/result adjacency. `ToolRunContext.deferContext()` therefore collects nested-dispatch context through failures, `execute()` surfaces the ordered array on `ToolExecutionResult`, and the loop accepts it into the same FIFO as `agent.inject()` calls made during execution. The FIFO appends after every recorded result when the batch settles, including before an interrupted turn closes. An accepted outer call preserves deferred contexts before decision contexts; an outer block discards deferred contexts and exposes only contexts explicitly supplied by the blocking decision.
3. **A forced `continue` `reason` is enqueued through the steering channel**, so the next step's top-of-loop drain records it as steering for the continued turn — next-*step* steering within the SAME turn, not a next-*turn* prompt (matching the existing `hasSteering` force-continue override).
3. **A stopping listener requests continuation through the steering channel**, so the next step's top-of-loop drain records it as steering for the continued turn — next-*step* steering within the SAME turn, not a next-*turn* prompt.
### Pre-tool input rewrite is a separate consistency decision
@@ -49,7 +47,7 @@ Core dispatch and the tool body sit inside normalization boundaries, so tool, li
### Boundaries
The seam package does **not** declare `hook/*` session events (the durable hook-invocation log); those belong to `dsh-hook-protocol`, because a native plugin uses typed decisions without an external hook log. The native-plugin integration test (`packages/core/agent-loop/tests/interception.spec.ts`) composes the seams through the real loop with no `hook/*` protocol. Compaction (`PreCompact`/`PostCompact`), Notification, and Codex `PermissionRequest` remain outside this decision. The [approval seam](2026-07-06-approval-seam.md) resolves `ask` decisions through `ctx.approval`, while terminal monotonic stopping is owned separately by `agent/turn-stop`.
The seam package does **not** declare `hook/*` session events (the durable hook-invocation log); those belong to `dsh-hook-protocol`, because a native plugin uses typed decisions without an external hook log. The native-plugin integration test (`packages/core/agent-loop/tests/interception.spec.ts`) composes the seams through the real loop with no `hook/*` protocol. Compaction (`PreCompact`/`PostCompact`), Notification, and Codex `PermissionRequest` remain outside this decision. The [approval seam](2026-07-06-approval-seam.md) resolves `ask` decisions through `ctx.approval`; terminal monotonic stopping is expressed by tool-result data, while `agent/turn-stopping` is the last chance to steer another step.
## Alternatives considered
@@ -58,4 +56,4 @@ The seam package does **not** declare `hook/*` session events (the durable hook-
## Consequences
The canonical interception surface is uniformly typed without giving every extension the same power: hooks return decisions, execution wrappers wrap, terminal guards only deny, and final observers only observe. The loop owns session-start, prompt-submit, post-tool context buffering, and continuation; `dsh-tools` owns identity sealing and the five-phase execution pipeline. Their contracts are documented in [architecture.md](../../../../docs/architecture.md), package READMEs, [core interception decisions](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/core.md#interception-decisions), and [tool structures](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/tools.md). The ACP bridge maps `rejected` turns to its `cancelled` codec value, while hook-driven snapshots verify the observable bridge behavior end to end.
The canonical interception surface is uniformly typed without giving every extension the same power: hooks return decisions, execution wrappers wrap, terminal guards only deny, and final observers only observe. The loop owns session-start, pre-turn prompt admission, post-tool context buffering, and stopping; `dsh-tools` owns identity sealing and the five-phase execution pipeline. Their contracts are documented in [architecture.md](../../../../docs/architecture.md), package READMEs, [core interception decisions](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/core.md#interception-decisions), and [tool structures](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/tools.md). The ACP bridge settles an admission rejection as `cancelled` after the agent becomes idle with no owned turn, while hook-driven snapshots verify the observable bridge behavior end to end.

View File

@@ -16,9 +16,9 @@ harness 需要一套钩子子系统:用户像 Claude CodeCC和 Codex 那
**Agent 事件**`dsh-agent`
- `agent/session-start(agent, source)` ——emit在第 1 轮次之前触发一次,携带 `SessionStartSource``startup` 表示全新/fork 创建,`resume` 表示重新加载的持久化会话;`clear`/`compact` 保留)。纯通知,不能阻塞启动(这是有意的空白:桥接可以记录/注入,但不管控启动)。监听器通过 `agent.inject()` 注入上下文。
- `agent/prompt-submit(agent, content, source, signal, next) → PromptDecision` ——waterfall在轮次唯一取得所有权的排队消息追加 `user/message` 之前触发。显式轮次 signal 位于最后的 `next` 之前;`allow` 可以重写提示词 `content` 或附加来源各自独立的 `additionalContexts[]`,而 `block`追加一条持久的 `prompt/blocked`,并拒绝这个零步骤轮次
- `agent/prompt-submit(agent, content, source, signal, next) → PromptDecision` ——waterfall针对一条取得所有权的排队消息触发,早于循环开启轮次或追加 `user/message`。显式准入 signal 位于最后的 `next` 之前;`allow` 可以重写提示词 `content` 或附加来源各自独立的 `additionalContexts[]`,而 `block`丢弃该候选消息,不产生会话历史
**`agent/turn-continuation`** 接收并返回一个 `ContinuationDecision``{action:'continue', reason?}` 可携带面向模型的内容和来源,记录为同一轮次内的下一步 steering中途引导)——与 `/goal` step-end-steer 模式互为类型化孪生。它不是 `context/message`,因此其类型不提供持久上下文元数据
**`agent/turn-stopping`** 是自然停止边界上的一次 awaited 通知。需要再执行一步的监听器调用 `agent.steer()`,传入来源显式的面向模型的内容(steering中途引导);循环随后重新读取 outbox继续执行或关闭轮次
### 工具流水线为每个阶段赋予一种权限
@@ -33,15 +33,13 @@ harness 需要一套钩子子系统:用户像 Claude CodeCC和 Codex 那
核心调度与工具体位于规范化边界内部,因此工具、监听器、无效规范值、渲染器/投影器、非 JSON 呈现和身份形状错误均解析为 JSON 安全的 `isError` 结果而非逃逸出轮次。post-execute 监听器因此可以检查一个抛出异常的工具;由定义拥有的最终内容不变式也会覆盖外层流水线与候选结果实体化失败;最终观测者会同时看到执行期间的规范值,以及会话日志能够持久化的确切呈现字段。[规范工具输出契约](../architecture/2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.md)定义值/投影与持久性规则。
**`TurnEndReason.rejected`**`dsh-session`):取得所有权的提示词被 `prompt-submit` 阻止的零步骤轮次。
### 三个承重的循环决策
1. **在提示词策略之前开启轮次** 被阻止的提示词成为零步骤的 `rejected` 轮次,保持封闭性并为 ACPAgent Client Protocol提供持久的终结事件。否决记录 `prompt/blocked`(含原始提示词和原因),而每个允许`additionalContexts` 条目都注入到已开启轮次。依照[一次 send 对应一个轮次的简化](../simplification/2026-07-17-one-send-one-turn.md),每个取得所有权的 ordinary-send 条目都是其轮次中唯一消息;启动前丢弃不会创建轮次
1. **在开启轮次之前运行提示词策略。** 被阻止的提示词不会创建轮次,也不产生持久事件。允许时,循环先暂存重写后的提示词,再暂存每个返回`additionalContexts` 条目,然后开启轮次并在第一个步骤之前排空该 outbox。依照[一次 send 对应一个轮次的简化](../simplification/2026-07-17-one-send-one-turn.md),每个取得所有权的 ordinary-send 条目都是其轮次中唯一的直接提示词
2. **工具执行后的 `additionalContexts` 与异步注入进入活跃批次 FIFO并在该批次结算时追加。** `content`/`feedback` 塑造 `execute()` 返回的结果,但每项上下文都是独立的 `context/message`,而单个步骤或组合工具可以产生许多上下文。立即追加上下文会产生 `result(c1) → context → result(c2)` 的交错,或把嵌套上下文放在外层结果之前,破坏工具调用/结果邻接性。因此 `ToolRunContext.deferContext()` 会在失败路径上也收集嵌套调度上下文,`execute()``ToolExecutionResult` 上暴露有序数组,循环再把它接纳到与执行期间 `agent.inject()` 调用相同的 FIFO 中。FIFO 在批次结算时,于每个已记录结果之后追加,其中也包括被中断轮次关闭之前。被接受的外层调用将 deferred contexts 保留在 decision contexts 之前;被外层阻止时则丢弃 deferred contexts只暴露阻止 decision 显式提供的上下文。
2. **工具执行后的 `additionalContexts` 与异步注入进入活跃批次 FIFO并在该批次结算时追加。** `content`/`feedback` 塑造 `execute()` 返回的结果,但每项上下文都是一条独立的带来源 `user/message`,而单个步骤或组合工具可以产生许多上下文。立即追加上下文会产生 `result(c1) → context → result(c2)` 的交错,或把嵌套上下文放在外层结果之前,破坏工具调用/结果邻接性。因此 `ToolRunContext.deferContext()` 会在失败路径上也收集嵌套调度上下文,`execute()``ToolExecutionResult` 上暴露有序数组,循环再把它接纳到与执行期间 `agent.inject()` 调用相同的 FIFO 中。FIFO 在批次结算时,于每个已记录结果之后追加,其中也包括被中断轮次关闭之前。被接受的外层调用将 deferred contexts 保留在 decision contexts 之前;被外层阻止时则丢弃 deferred contexts只暴露阻止 decision 显式提供的上下文。
3. **强制 `continue` 的 `reason` 通过 steering 通道入队**,使得下一步骤在循环顶部排空时将其记录为当前轮次的 steering——同一轮次内的下一*步骤* steering而非下一*轮次*的提示词(与现有的 `hasSteering` 强制继续覆盖一致)
3. **stopping 监听器通过 steering 通道请求继续执行**,使得下一步骤在循环顶部排空时将其记录为当前轮次的 steering——同一轮次内的下一*步骤* steering而非下一*轮次*的提示词。
### 工具执行前输入重写是一个独立的一致性决策
@@ -49,7 +47,7 @@ harness 需要一套钩子子系统:用户像 Claude CodeCC和 Codex 那
### 边界
seam 包**不**声明 `hook/*` 会话事件(持久的钩子调用日志);那些属于 `dsh-hook-protocol`,因为原生插件使用类型化 decision 而无需外部钩子日志。原生插件集成测试(`packages/core/agent-loop/tests/interception.spec.ts`)通过真实循环组合这些 seam不涉及 `hook/*` 协议。压缩compaction`PreCompact`/`PostCompact`、Notification 和 Codex `PermissionRequest` 不在本决策范围内。[审批 seam](2026-07-06-approval-seam.md) 通过 `ctx.approval` 解析 `ask` decision,而终结性的单调停止由 `agent/turn-stop` 独立负责
seam 包**不**声明 `hook/*` 会话事件(持久的钩子调用日志);那些属于 `dsh-hook-protocol`,因为原生插件使用类型化 decision 而无需外部钩子日志。原生插件集成测试(`packages/core/agent-loop/tests/interception.spec.ts`)通过真实循环组合这些 seam不涉及 `hook/*` 协议。压缩compaction`PreCompact`/`PostCompact`、Notification 和 Codex `PermissionRequest` 不在本决策范围内。[审批 seam](2026-07-06-approval-seam.md) 通过 `ctx.approval` 解析 `ask` decision终结性的单调停止由工具结果数据表达,而 `agent/turn-stopping` 是引导再执行一步的最后机会
## 曾考虑的替代方案
@@ -58,4 +56,4 @@ seam 包**不**声明 `hook/*` 会话事件(持久的钩子调用日志);
## 后果
规范拦截表面具有统一的类型化,同时不给每个扩展相同的权力:钩子返回 decision执行包装层做包装终结 guard 只能拒绝,最终观测者只能观测。循环负责 session-start、prompt-submit、工具执行后上下文缓冲和 continuation`dsh-tools` 负责身份封存与五阶段执行流水线。它们的契约记录在 [architecture.md](../../../../docs/architecture.md)、各包 README、[核心拦截 decision](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/core.md#interception-decisions) 与[工具结构](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/tools.md)中。ACP 桥接`rejected` 轮次映射为其 `cancelled` 编解码值,而钩子驱动的快照端到端验证可观测的桥接行为。
规范拦截表面具有统一的类型化,同时不给每个扩展相同的权力:钩子返回 decision执行包装层做包装终结 guard 只能拒绝,最终观测者只能观测。循环负责 session-start、轮次前的提示词准入、工具执行后上下文缓冲和 stopping`dsh-tools` 负责身份封存与五阶段执行流水线。它们的契约记录在 [architecture.md](../../../../docs/architecture.md)、各包 README、[核心拦截 decision](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/core.md#interception-decisions) 与[工具结构](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/tools.md)中。ACP 桥接在 agent 空闲且不再拥有轮次后,将准入拒绝结算为 `cancelled`,而钩子驱动的快照端到端验证可观测的桥接行为。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-06-sandbox.md: c6883873192f15ba2982436e156d8795396c0148
2026-07-06-sandbox.zh.md: d84df9b06b15dd296801073d381603f34cfd2878
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-06-sandbox.md
2026-07-06-sandbox.md: b9c410e4498a565a7414085fddfb74856592da66
2026-07-06-sandbox.zh.md: 876870a12f1205b4f2cc2c8c13b5e7ec815a1569

View File

@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ What shipped pins — the tiers in Testing hold each:
- A resumed session's overrides apply with no catch-up state; a default changed while the process was down is narrated before the session's first new request, attributed to the operator.
- Two concurrent sessions never see each other's state or notices.
- Two concurrent project sessions in one Cordis context resolve independent workspace roots; bash and fs writes succeed inside the calling session's cwd and fail against its neighbor's cwd.
- `agent-loop` is untouched — everything rides `systemPrompt.section`, `SessionEventMap` merging, `agent.inject()`, `agent/pre-step`, `agent/prompt-submit`, and capability-owned policy resolution.
- `agent-loop` is untouched — everything rides `systemPrompt.section`, `SessionEventMap` merging, `agent.inject()`, `agent/step`, `agent/prompt-submit`, and capability-owned policy resolution.
Costs and accepted limits:

View File

@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ fs/web/todo 在进程内执行,因此它们的沙箱语义是各自 seam 层
- **第二个消费方**——`subagent-acp` 可选地约束子 agent按调用策略默认无约束——子 agent 必须写入自己的持久化)。
- **更多环境**——环境一致的能力组示例(如 bash+fs 对一个容器)。
- **Windows 链**——`PLATFORM_CHAINS.win32` 保留为空(失败关闭);填充它意味着来自 AppContainer/restricted-token 家族的约束 runner从其自己的仓库按 `node-addon-landlock-run` 模板交付,加上其 profile 方言和拒绝/runner 失败签名。改为包装第三方 landstrip runner 的方案[经考虑后已驳回](../../rejected/feature/2026-07-26-evaluate-landstrip-for-windows-sandbox-rung.md)——对安全不变式而言,它还远未经过实战检验
- **Windows 链**——`PLATFORM_CHAINS.win32` 保留为空(失败关闭);填充它意味着来自 AppContainer/restricted-token 家族的约束 runner从其自己的仓库按 `node-addon-landlock-run` 模板交付,加上其 profile 方言和拒绝/runner 失败签名。改为包装第三方 landstrip runner 的方案[经考虑后已驳回](../../rejected/feature/2026-07-26-evaluate-landstrip-for-windows-sandbox-rung.md)——它所经受的实战检验还不足以承载安全不变式
## 曾考虑的替代方案
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ fs/web/todo 在进程内执行,因此它们的沙箱语义是各自 seam 层
- 恢复的会话的覆盖直接生效,无需追赶状态;进程停止期间变更的默认值在会话的首个新请求前被叙述,归因于运维人员。
- 两个并发会话永远看不到彼此的状态或通知。
- 同一个 Cordis 上下文中的两个并发项目会话解析各自独立的工作区根目录bash 和 fs 写入在调用方会话的 cwd 内成功,对其相邻会话的 cwd 则失败。
- `agent-loop` 未被触及——一切搭载 `systemPrompt.section``SessionEventMap` 合并、`agent.inject()``agent/pre-step``agent/prompt-submit` 和由能力拥有的策略解析。
- `agent-loop` 未被触及——一切搭载 `systemPrompt.section``SessionEventMap` 合并、`agent.inject()``agent/step``agent/prompt-submit` 和由能力拥有的策略解析。
代价与已接受的限制:

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-07-session-prefix.md: 75113952fc5f3df8da1580d42ed2a385b6135fe8
2026-07-07-session-prefix.zh.md: e38bf09298296203b275d6d66a62ef17be7c045d
2026-07-07-session-prefix.md: df007012165da2da9b7de4bd9ae83534e45a439d
2026-07-07-session-prefix.zh.md: d0c574706352bfaad9d6b462a7866e509976f84e

View File

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
Status: implemented
The request-only prefix seam described below was later removed by the [unified sourced-message decision](../architecture/2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md). Current producers inject durable sourced `user/message` context at `agent/step`; this record preserves the earlier design and its trade-offs.
English | [中文](2026-07-07-session-prefix.zh.md)
## Problem
@@ -12,7 +14,7 @@ The obvious third option — let a plugin edit the request's `messages` on the w
## Decision
`agent/session-prefix` is a waterfall on the agent event map ([`packages/core/agent/src/types.ts`](../../../../packages/core/agent/src/types.ts)): listeners receive a frozen empty seed and return an extension (the canonical contribution is a prepend, `[mine, ...await next()]`, which yields registration order on the wire). The loop ([`packages/core/agent-loop/src/loop.ts`](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/src/loop.ts)) fires it once per loop instance, lazily before the instance's first `agent/pre-step`; the composed list is deep-cloned, deep-frozen, cached on the instance, and placed in front of the ENTIRE derived history — directly after the provider's system slot — on every request the instance sends ([wire order](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/core.md#the-request-envelope-llmcallconfig-and-the-logged-header)).
`agent/session-prefix` is a waterfall on the agent event map ([`packages/core/agent/src/types.ts`](../../../../packages/core/agent/src/types.ts)): listeners receive a frozen empty seed and return an extension (the canonical contribution is a prepend, `[mine, ...await next()]`, which yields registration order on the wire). The loop ([agent-loop source](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/src/)) fires it once per loop instance, lazily before the instance's first `agent/pre-step`; the composed list is deep-cloned, deep-frozen, cached on the instance, and placed in front of the ENTIRE derived history — directly after the provider's system slot — on every request the instance sends ([wire order](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/core.md#the-request-envelope-llmcallconfig-and-the-logged-header)).
Three properties carry the design:

View File

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
Status: implemented
下文所述的仅请求前缀 seam 后来已被[统一带来源消息的决策](../architecture/2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md)移除。当前的生产方在 `agent/step` 时注入持久的带来源 `user/message` 上下文;本记录保留了早先的设计及其权衡。
[English](2026-07-07-session-prefix.md) | 中文
## 问题
@@ -12,7 +14,7 @@ Status: implemented
## 决策
`agent/session-prefix` 是 agent 事件映射上的一个 waterfall瀑布式事件[`packages/core/agent/src/types.ts`](../../../../packages/core/agent/src/types.ts)):监听器接收一个冻结的空种子并返回扩展(规范的贡献方式是前置插入 `[mine, ...await next()]`在协议格式上产生注册顺序。agent loop智能体循环[`packages/core/agent-loop/src/loop.ts`](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/src/loop.ts))在每个循环实例中触发一次,惰性地在实例首次 `agent/pre-step` 之前执行;组合后的列表被深拷贝、深冻结、缓存在实例上,并在该实例发出的每个请求中置于整个派生历史之前——紧接在提供方的 system 槽位之后([协议格式顺序](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/core.md#the-request-envelope-llmcallconfig-and-the-logged-header))。
`agent/session-prefix` 是 agent 事件映射上的一个 waterfall瀑布式事件[`packages/core/agent/src/types.ts`](../../../../packages/core/agent/src/types.ts)):监听器接收一个冻结的空种子并返回扩展(规范的贡献方式是前置插入 `[mine, ...await next()]`在协议格式上产生注册顺序。agent loop智能体循环[agent-loop 源码](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/src/))在每个循环实例中触发一次,惰性地在实例首次 `agent/pre-step` 之前执行;组合后的列表被深拷贝、深冻结、缓存在实例上,并在该实例发出的每个请求中置于整个派生历史之前——紧接在提供方的 system 槽位之后([协议格式顺序](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/core.md#the-request-envelope-llmcallconfig-and-the-logged-header))。
三个属性承载了这一设计:

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-08-self-referential-cordis-toolset.md: 80bffa3a2a959939f18fd1d3422607cf61895fc7
2026-07-08-self-referential-cordis-toolset.zh.md: 2ec79037045fdb040cccf31699789abdd3a12db2
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-08-self-referential-cordis-toolset.md
2026-07-08-self-referential-cordis-toolset.md: 40934fe0e2975c4e068df6ef8f31ed7921df3230
2026-07-08-self-referential-cordis-toolset.zh.md: 13662b9359aa85895ce85391ebd5a5902cc451cc

View File

@@ -12,19 +12,19 @@ First, model-written registration must be validated where it happens: a malforme
## Decision
The toolset ships as [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-cordis`](../../../../packages/cordis/tool-cordis/README.md) — a new top-level `packages/cordis/` group — and is demoed by [`examples/cordis-agent`](../../../../examples/cordis-agent/README.md). It gives the model three tools over the live cordis runtime it is running inside: inspect it, mount model-written plugins into it, dispose them again.
The toolset ships as [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-cordis`](../../../../packages/cordis/tool-cordis/README.md) and is demoed by [`examples/cordis-agent`](../../../../examples/cordis-agent/README.md). It gives the model three tools over the live Cordis runtime in the current DSH process: inspect it, mount an in-memory temporary Plugin, and unmount that Plugin to quiescence.
The vm isolates accidental global pollution, and the context façade hides framework internals. Neither restricts the authority of exposed services: a mount can call `ctx.bash` to run commands with the host executor's privileges and can reach the real filesystem and web services. This is an opt-in development tool with bash-equivalent trust, not a security boundary or product default.
The vm isolates accidental global pollution, and the context façade hides framework internals. Neither restricts the authority of exposed services: a temporary Plugin can call `ctx.bash` with the host executor's privileges and reach the real filesystem and web services. It runs in the shared DSH runtime and may affect other sessions in that process. This is an opt-in development tool with bash-equivalent trust, not a security boundary or product default.
### The three tools
| Tool | Contract |
|---|---|
| `cordis_inspect` | Read-only report over the live runtime, one Markdown section per `what` value (omit `what` for all sections). An exact `name` with `what: "api"` or `what: "events"` narrows to one source-documented target. Never mutates. |
| `cordis_mount` | Evaluates `code` (the body of an async JavaScript function) in a `node:vm` sandbox; the code must `return` a cordis plugin, which is mounted as a child of the `cordis-dynamic` group fiber and tracked under a fresh id (`dyn-1`, `dyn-2`, …). |
| `cordis_unmount` | Disposes one dynamic mount by id and returns only after disposal reaches quiescence — every registration the plugin made is unwound, not merely requested to stop. |
| `cordis_inspect` | Read-only report over the live current-process runtime, one Markdown section per `what` value (omit `what` for all sections). `plugins` lists every live fiber; `temporary` lists only the temporary Plugins created by `cordis_mount`. An exact `name` with `what: "api"` or `what: "events"` narrows to one source-documented target. |
| `cordis_mount` | Evaluates `code` now as an async JavaScript-function body in a `node:vm` sandbox and saves it nowhere. The returned Plugin is mounted under the internal `cordis-dynamic` group and tracked under a fresh process-local id (`dyn-1`, `dyn-2`, …). |
| `cordis_unmount` | Unmounts one `cordis_mount` temporary Plugin by id and returns only after every owned tool, listener, service, timer, and effect reaches quiescence. It cannot remove Loader, configured, or installed Plugins. |
`cordis_inspect` sections: `services` (every provided ctx service and the owning fiber, non-active owners flagged), `plugins` (a flat list of every loaded plugin with its lifecycle state, from `ctx.registry` — what capabilities are loaded, deliberately not the tree shape), `tools` (what the model can call), `dynamic` (the mount table: id, name, state, provided services, awaited services), `api` (live service signatures + the type shapes they reference, from the generated catalog), and `events` (harness events with dispatch mode and signature). Broad `api` and `events` reports omit full JSDoc to stay compact; an exact `name` returns one service or event with its original method/declaration JSDoc. A name is invalid with other sections, unknown targets fail, and an API target must be live. The model-facing tool descriptions carry the operational rules the model needs at call time; [the generated tool catalog](../../../../docs/tool-catalog.md) is their exhaustive rendering.
`cordis_inspect` sections are `services` (every provided ctx service and owning fiber), `plugins` (every live plugin fiber), `tools` (what the model can call), `temporary` (the `cordis_mount` subset with id, running/pending state, provided and awaited services, and lifetime), `api` (live service signatures and referenced types), and `events` (harness events with dispatch mode and signature). Temporary Plugins remain active across later turns and disappear after `cordis_unmount`, toolset unload, or DSH restart; they are never restored automatically. Broad `api` and `events` reports omit full JSDoc to stay compact; an exact `name` returns one service or event with its original method/declaration JSDoc. A name is invalid with other sections, unknown targets fail, and an API target must be live. The model-facing tool descriptions carry the operational rules needed at call time; [the generated tool catalog](../../../../docs/tool-catalog.md) is their exhaustive rendering.
### Sandbox semantics
@@ -36,9 +36,11 @@ Mount code crosses the vm boundary through three controls. Dual-realm `instanceo
The boundary normalizes unambiguous JSON-Schema forms into `ParameterSchemaSpec`, preserving `integer`, raw object openness, and required arrays. Direct DSL object nodes must declare `additionalProperties`; invalid vocabulary fails with the accepted alternatives. Parse, TypeScript, missing-return, Node-API, and duplicate-tool errors include the relevant source line or corrective contract without narrating implementation internals.
### The dynamic group and mount lifecycle
### The internal group and temporary-Plugin lifecycle
All dynamic mounts are children of one `cordis-dynamic` group beneath the tool plugin, so ordinary fiber disposal handles reload and unload. Mounting awaits settlement; startup failure disposes the fiber before returning an error. A settled pending mount remains visible with its missing injections. `cordis_unmount` awaits the mount fiber's disposal.
Every temporary Plugin is a child of one internal `cordis-dynamic` group beneath the tool plugin, so ordinary fiber disposal handles toolset reload and unload. `cordis_mount` awaits settlement; startup failure disposes the fiber before returning an error. A settled pending Plugin remains visible with its missing injections. `cordis_unmount` awaits the Plugin fiber's disposal.
Temporary Plugins exist only in process memory. They create no Plugin file, install no package, change no `cordis.yml` or personal/project configuration, do not survive restart, and have no automatic save, promote, or install path. Keeping an experiment means asking the Agent to implement a normal local, project, or repository Plugin through the regular development workflow.
### Cross-mount composition via provide/inject
@@ -52,9 +54,9 @@ Freshness is gated like every generated artifact: `pnpm run verify-cordis-api` (
### Configuration, rendering, and observability
The plugin exposes one config field, validated by schemastery and documented in [the config catalog](../../../../docs/config-catalog.md): `vmTimeoutMs` (default 5000), the millisecond bound on the synchronous portion of mount-code evaluation. Tool names, the `cordis-dynamic` group name, and the `dyn-` id prefix are structural vocabulary and stay fixed. All three tools render as `generic` cards per [the tool cookbook](../../../../docs/cookbook/adding-a-tool.md) (`cordis_inspect` a `read`, `cordis_mount` an `execute` carrying the code as `rawInput`, `cordis_unmount` a `delete`), with no `presentResult` overrides.
The plugin exposes one config field, validated by schemastery and documented in [the config catalog](../../../../docs/config-catalog.md): `vmTimeoutMs` (default 5000), the millisecond bound on the synchronous portion of code evaluation. The current model-facing names are `cordis_inspect`, `cordis_mount`, and `cordis_unmount`; the internal `cordis-dynamic` group name and `dyn-` id prefix remain structural vocabulary. All three tools render as `generic` cards per [the tool cookbook](../../../../docs/cookbook/adding-a-tool.md): inspect is `read`, mount is `execute` carrying code as `rawInput`, and unmount is `delete`. Web conversation rows preserve those generic mechanics while giving the tools the action titles `Inspect`, `Mount temporary Plugin`, and `Unmount temporary Plugin` plus one shared Cordis accent; the mount row retains the shared JavaScript expansion and syntax highlighting.
Model-visible ⟺ logged holds with no new session event type: a mount or unmount is visible only through its own `tool/call` / `tool/result` pair, which the loop logs, and the changed tool set a mount induces is logged by the full changed request header the loop emits when schemas change between steps. There is deliberately no `cordis/mount` provenance event — it would duplicate what the tool-call pair records. Dynamic mounts are process-lifetime, not session state: resuming a persisted session rehydrates the conversation but does not re-mount plugins.
Model-visible ⟺ logged holds with no new session event type: mount and unmount are visible through their logged `tool/call` / `tool/result` pairs, and any changed tool set is logged by the full changed request header emitted when schemas change between steps. Temporary Plugins are process memory, not session state: session resume rehydrates conversation history but never recreates them.
## Alternatives considered

View File

@@ -12,19 +12,19 @@ Status: implemented
## 决策
该工具集以 [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-cordis`](../../../../packages/cordis/tool-cordis/README.md) 发布——一个新的顶层 `packages/cordis/` 分组——并由 [`examples/cordis-agent`](../../../../examples/cordis-agent/README.md) 演示。它为模型提供三个工具,操作模型自身运行其中的活跃 cordis 运行时:审视它、将模型编写的插件挂载进去、再将其释放
该工具集以 [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-cordis`](../../../../packages/cordis/tool-cordis/README.md) 发布并由 [`examples/cordis-agent`](../../../../examples/cordis-agent/README.md) 演示。它为模型提供三个工具,操作当前 DSH 进程中的活跃 Cordis 运行时:审视它、挂载一个仅存于内存的临时 Plugin再将该 Plugin 卸载至完全停稳
vm 隔离了意外的全局污染,上下文门面隐藏了框架内部细节。但二者都不限制已暴露服务的权限:一个挂载可以调用 `ctx.bash` 以宿主执行器的权限运行命令,也能访问真实的文件系统和网络服务。这是一个需要显式启用的开发工具,信任等级与 bash 相当,不是安全边界,也不是产品默认配置。
vm 隔离了意外的全局污染,上下文门面隐藏了框架内部细节。但二者都不限制已暴露服务的权限:临时 Plugin 可以调用 `ctx.bash` 以宿主执行器的权限运行命令,也能访问真实的文件系统和网络服务。它运行在共享 DSH runtime 中,可能影响同一进程的其他 session。这是一个需要显式启用的开发工具,信任等级与 bash 相当,不是安全边界,也不是产品默认配置。
### 三个工具
| 工具 | 契约 |
|---|---|
| `cordis_inspect` | 活跃运行时的只读报告,每个 `what` 值对应一个 Markdown 段落(省略 `what` 则输出全部段落)。精确 `name` 搭配 `what: "api"``what: "events"` 可收窄到一个带源码文档的目标。从不产生变更。 |
| `cordis_mount` | 在 `node:vm` 沙箱中执行 `code`(一个异步 JavaScript 函数的函数体);代码必须 `return` 一个 cordis 插件,该插件作为 `cordis-dynamic` 分组 fiber 的子节点挂载,并以一个新 id`dyn-1``dyn-2`……)跟踪。 |
| `cordis_unmount` | 按 id 释放一个动态挂载,并等到释放达到完全停稳后返回——该插件所做的每一项注册都被撤销,而不仅仅是请求停止。 |
| `cordis_inspect` | 当前进程活跃运行时的只读报告,每个 `what` 值对应一个 Markdown 段落(省略 `what` 则输出全部段落)。`plugins` 列出全部存活 fiber`temporary` 只列 `cordis_mount` 创建的临时 Plugin。精确 `name` 搭配 `what: "api"``what: "events"` 可收窄到一个带源码文档的目标。 |
| `cordis_mount` | 立即`node:vm` 沙箱中 `code` 作为异步 JavaScript 函数体求值,且不保存到任何位置。返回的 Plugin 挂在内部 `cordis-dynamic` 分组下,并用新的进程内 id`dyn-1``dyn-2`……)跟踪。 |
| `cordis_unmount` | 按 id 卸载一个 `cordis_mount` 临时 Plugin并只在其自有工具、监听器、服务、定时器和其他 effect 完全停稳后返回。它不能删除 Loader、配置或已安装的 Plugin。 |
`cordis_inspect` 的段落`services`(每个已提供的 ctx 服务及所属 fiber,非活跃的所有者会被标记)、`plugins`来自 `ctx.registry` 的所有已加载插件的扁平列表及其生命周期状态——展示加载了哪些能力,刻意不展示树形结构)、`tools`(模型可调用的工具)、`dynamic`挂载表id、名称、状态、提供的服务、等待的服务)、`api`来自生成目录的活跃服务签名及其引用类型形状)和 `events`harness 事件及分发模式和签名)。宽泛的 `api``events` 报告省略完整 JSDoc 以保持紧凑;精确 `name` 返回一个服务或事件,以及其原始方法/声明 JSDoc。其他段落不能搭配 name未知目标会失败而 API 目标必须处于活跃状态。面向模型的工具描述携带了模型在调用时所需的操作规则;[生成的工具目录](../../../../docs/tool-catalog.md)是其完整呈现。
`cordis_inspect` 的段落`services`(每个已提供的 ctx 服务及所属 fiber`plugins`全部存活 Plugin fiber`tools`(模型可调用的工具)、`temporary``cordis_mount` 子集,包含 id、runningpending 状态、提供等待的服务和生命周期)、`api`(活跃服务签名及其引用类型)和 `events`harness 事件及分发模式和签名)。临时 Plugin 可跨后续 turn 保持活跃,并在 `cordis_unmount`、工具集卸载或 DSH 重启后消失;系统绝不会自动恢复它们。宽泛的 `api``events` 报告省略完整 JSDoc精确 `name` 返回一个服务或事件及其原始 JSDoc。其他段落不能搭配 name未知目标会失败而 API 目标必须处于活跃状态。[生成的工具目录](../../../../docs/tool-catalog.md)完整呈现面向模型的调用契约
### 沙箱语义
@@ -36,9 +36,11 @@ vm 隔离了意外的全局污染,上下文门面隐藏了框架内部细节
边界将无歧义的 JSON-Schema 形式规范化为 `ParameterSchemaSpec`,同时保留 `integer`、原始对象开放性和 required 数组。直接使用 DSL 的对象节点必须声明 `additionalProperties`无效词汇会报错并给出可接受的替代方案。解析错误、TypeScript 错误、缺少 return、Node API 误用和重复工具名等错误信息包含相关源码行或纠正性契约,不叙述实现内部细节。
### 动态分组与挂载生命周期
### 内部分组与临时 Plugin 生命周期
所有动态挂载都是工具插件下方 `cordis-dynamic` 分组的子节点,因此普通的 fiber 释放即可处理重载和卸载。挂载会等待 settlement启动失败时在返回错误前释放 fiber。已 settle 但处于 pending 状态的挂载仍然可见,并列出其缺失的注入。`cordis_unmount` 等待挂载 fiber 的释放完成。
每个临时 Plugin 都是工具插件下方内部 `cordis-dynamic` 分组的子节点,因此普通的 fiber 释放即可处理工具集重载和卸载。`cordis_mount` 会等待 settlement启动失败时在返回错误前释放 fiber。已 settle 但处于 pending 状态的 Plugin 仍然可见,并列出其缺失的注入。`cordis_unmount` 等待 Plugin fiber 的释放完成。
临时 Plugin 只存在于进程内存中。它不会创建 Plugin 文件、安装 package、修改 `cordis.yml` 或个人/项目配置、跨重启存续,也不存在自动保存、转正式或安装路径。若要保留实验结果,应让 Agent 通过常规开发流程实现普通的本地、项目或仓库 Plugin。
### 通过 provide/inject 实现跨挂载组合
@@ -52,9 +54,9 @@ vm 隔离了意外的全局污染,上下文门面隐藏了框架内部细节
### 配置、渲染与可观测性
该插件暴露一个配置字段,由 schemastery 校验并记录在[配置目录](../../../../docs/config-catalog.md)中:`vmTimeoutMs`(默认 5000挂载代码同步执行部分的毫秒上限。工具名、`cordis-dynamic` 分组名和 `dyn-` id 前缀是结构性词汇,保持固定。三个工具均按[工具实操手册](../../../../docs/cookbook/adding-a-tool.md)渲染为 `generic` 卡片`cordis_inspect``read``cordis_mount``execute` 并将代码作为 `rawInput` 携带,`cordis_unmount``delete`),不覆盖 `presentResult`
该插件暴露一个配置字段,由 schemastery 校验并记录在[配置目录](../../../../docs/config-catalog.md)中:`vmTimeoutMs`(默认 5000代码同步求值部分的毫秒上限。当前面向模型的名称是 `cordis_inspect``cordis_mount``cordis_unmount`;内部 `cordis-dynamic` 分组名和 `dyn-` id 前缀是结构性词汇。三个工具均按[工具实操手册](../../../../docs/cookbook/adding-a-tool.md)渲染为 `generic` 卡片inspect 为 `read`mount 为携带代码 `rawInput``execute`unmount 为 `delete`。Web 对话行保留这些通用机制,同时为各工具设置操作标题 `Inspect``Mount temporary Plugin``Unmount temporary Plugin` 以及统一的 Cordis 强调色mount 行仍使用共用的 JavaScript 展开视图和语法高亮
「模型可见 ⟺ 已记录」成立,且无需新的会话事件类型:挂载或卸载仅通过其自身`tool/call` / `tool/result` 对可见(循环会记录它们),而挂载引起的工具集变化由循环在 schema 在步骤间发生变化时发出的完整变更 request header 记录。刻意不设 `cordis/mount` 溯源事件——它只会重复工具调用对已记录的内容。动态挂载是进程生命周期的,不是会话状态:恢复一个持久化的会话会重建对话,但不会重新挂载插件
「模型可见 ⟺ 已记录」成立,且无需新的会话事件类型:mount 与 unmount 通过已记录`tool/call` / `tool/result` 对可见工具集变化由 schema 在 step 间变化时发出的完整 request header 记录。临时 Plugin 属于进程内存,而非 session 状态:恢复持久化 session 只会重建对话历史,绝不会重新创建它们
## 曾考虑的替代方案

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-10-agent-session-identity-and-log-location.md: a55bf276bff998a94f84ec1af078022e4881903c
2026-07-10-agent-session-identity-and-log-location.zh.md: 84b8b22187ccd1078ff13e39f4a345efbecfaeac
2026-07-10-agent-session-identity-and-log-location.md: 7b51ae41ac00c12a496940c891092580003646fa
2026-07-10-agent-session-identity-and-log-location.zh.md: 2574e1327f424069cdff68ef9b8de20c490077f0

View File

@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ The registry rebuilds a trusted overlay for every foreground and background bash
Session persistence remains the fact owner: JSONL does not depend on tool-bash or register shell variables itself, and hooks continue to consume `locate()` directly. Tool-bash is the translation layer from the persistence fact into a shell convention. Other plugins that need shell-visible facts depend on the registry and register their own keys; they do not modify `process.env`.
The bash seam exports `DSH_ENV_PREFIX` as the single namespace source and derives `DshEnvironmentKey` from its `typeof`. Tool-bash derives built-in names and model guidance from that constant, while executors use it for filtering and channel validation. The seam carries the managed overlay separately as `BashExecRequest.dshEnv` / `BashExecSpec.dshEnv`. Ordinary `env` remains the general in-process plugin surface used by hooks, but cannot contain managed keys; symmetrically, `dshEnv` cannot contain ordinary keys. The local executor rejects either wrong channel before spawn, removes every inherited ambient managed key, applies its ordinary scrub/terminal environment/explicit `env`, and finally merges the trusted `dshEnv` snapshot. This guarantees that a missing value means absent now rather than inherited from an outer or previous harness. The model-facing tool still ignores model-supplied `env`/`stdin` arguments.
The bash seam exports `DSH_ENV_PREFIX` as the single namespace source and derives `DshEnvironmentKey` from its `typeof`. Tool-bash derives built-in names and model guidance from that constant, while executors use it for ambient filtering. The seam carries the managed overlay separately as `BashExecRequest.dshEnv` / `BashExecSpec.dshEnv`: ordinary `env` remains the general in-process plugin surface used by hooks, while `dshEnv` is typed to managed keys. The local executor removes every inherited ambient managed key, applies its ordinary scrub/terminal environment/explicit `env`, and finally merges the trusted `dshEnv` snapshot, so an `env` entry can never displace a managed value. This guarantees that a missing value means absent now rather than inherited from an outer or previous harness. The model-facing tool still ignores model-supplied `env`/`stdin` arguments.
The bash tool description teaches only the durable convention: current harness environment facts are available through managed `$DSH_*` variables and may be inspected when needed. It does not enumerate persistence-specific keys or add a permanent system-prompt section. Tool schemas are already logged in request headers and tool output is logged as `tool/result`, so no new session event is required.
@@ -82,6 +82,6 @@ A keyless full-loop integration drives the real agent loop, JSONL persistence, t
## Consequences
Every model bash child receives current Harness home and shell identity, and agent calls additionally receive stable session identity. JSONL-backed calls get an optional target path; non-file persistence omits it honestly. The complete `DSH_*` namespace inside these children is managed by the harness: ambient values are removed, current trusted values are re-added, and ordinary callers cannot use `env` to bypass ownership checks.
Every model bash child receives current Harness home and shell identity, and agent calls additionally receive stable session identity. JSONL-backed calls get an optional target path; non-file persistence omits it honestly. The managed `DSH_*` facts inside these children come from the harness: ambient values are removed, current trusted values are re-added last, and an ordinary caller's `env` entry cannot displace them.
The namespace is discoverable but not secret. Paths can reveal configured roots, lazy targets can be absent or stale, and a command can override variables inside its own shell syntax. Consumers treat them as correlation and environment facts, verify transcript metadata when attribution matters, and rely on sandbox/filesystem policy rather than variable secrecy for authorization.

View File

@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ interface SessionPersistence {
会话持久化仍然是事实所有者JSONL 不依赖 tool-bash也不会自行注册 shell 变量;钩子继续直接使用 `locate()`。tool-bash 是把持久化事实转换为 shell 约定的转换层。其他需要向 shell 公开事实的插件依赖该注册表,并注册各自的键;它们不修改 `process.env`
bash seam 导出 `DSH_ENV_PREFIX` 作为唯一的命名空间来源,并派生 `DshEnvironmentKey`,其来源是该常量的 `typeof`。tool-bash 从该常量派生内置名称与模型指引,执行器则使用该常量进行过滤和通道校验。seam 通过 `BashExecRequest.dshEnv``BashExecSpec.dshEnv` 单独传递受管理的覆盖层普通 `env` 仍是钩子所用的通用进程内插件接口,但不能包含受管理的键;对称地,`dshEnv` 不能包含普通键。本地执行器会在 spawn 前拒绝任一错误通道,移除环境中继承的全部受管理键,依次应用普通清理、终端环境和显式 `env`,最后合并受信任的 `dshEnv` 快照。这保证了值缺失表示它当前确实不存在,而不是从外层或先前的 harness 继承而来。面向模型的工具仍忽略模型提供的 `env``stdin` 参数。
bash seam 导出 `DSH_ENV_PREFIX` 作为唯一的命名空间来源,并派生 `DshEnvironmentKey`,其来源是该常量的 `typeof`。tool-bash 从该常量派生内置名称与模型指引,执行器则使用该常量过滤环境中已有的值。seam 通过 `BashExecRequest.dshEnv``BashExecSpec.dshEnv` 单独传递受管理的覆盖层普通 `env` 仍是钩子所用的通用进程内插件接口,`dshEnv` 则以类型约束为受管理键。本地执行器移除环境中继承的全部受管理键,依次应用普通清理、终端环境和显式 `env`,最后合并受信任的 `dshEnv` 快照,因此 `env` 条目永远无法顶掉受管理的值。这保证了值缺失表示它当前确实不存在,而不是从外层或先前的 harness 继承而来。面向模型的工具仍忽略模型提供的 `env``stdin` 参数。
bash 工具说明只讲解持久约定:当前 harness 环境事实通过受管理的 `$DSH_*` 变量提供,可以在需要时查看。它不会枚举持久化专用键,也不会添加永久的系统提示词章节。工具 schema 已记录在请求 header 中,工具输出则记录为 `tool/result`,因此无需新增会话事件。
@@ -82,6 +82,6 @@ bash 工具说明只讲解持久约定:当前 harness 环境事实通过受管
## 影响
每个面向模型的 bash 子进程都会收到当前 Harness home 和 shell 标识,关联 agent 的调用还会收到稳定的会话标识。使用 JSONL 后端的调用可以获得可选的目标路径;非文件持久化会如实省略该值。这些子进程中的完整 `DSH_*` 命名空间由 harness 管理:系统移除环境中已有的受管理值、重新加入当前受信任的值,并禁止普通调用方通过 `env` 绕过所有权检查
每个面向模型的 bash 子进程都会收到当前 Harness home 和 shell 标识,关联 agent 的调用还会收到稳定的会话标识。使用 JSONL 后端的调用可以获得可选的目标路径;非文件持久化会如实省略该值。这些子进程中受管理`DSH_*` 事实来自 harness系统移除环境中已有的受管理值、在最后重新加入当前受信任的值,普通调用方 `env` 条目无法顶掉它们
该命名空间可被发现,但并非秘密。路径可能泄露配置的根目录,延迟创建的目标也可能不存在或处于陈旧状态,而且命令可以在自己的 shell 语法中覆盖变量。消费方应把这些值视为关联信息和环境事实,在归属关系重要时校验 transcript 元数据,并依靠沙箱/文件系统策略而不是变量保密性来完成授权。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.md
2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.md: 43c87bb159cfe1ab9f8d3a80c2adf25a57ae6e3b
2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.zh.md: 8afc2103447cc58b1fcbc1062b9564e8ed643477
2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.md: 4fff1742721fa13ea11f1b8ec833e5e5b7e68df8
2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.zh.md: 88e7a0bc4b8af21dc51b6a654a1c9f93760b3e81

Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More