Shared-surface conflicts resolve as unions: the fixture serves all five
projection keys (title/todos/permissions/plan/goal) with the /permission
and /plan command mirrors side by side, the connection specs assert the
five-key baseline and the shifted approval/question replay indices, and
the cli roster/deps, tsconfig aggregate, and README allowlist carry both
lines' rows. Plan-side content lands verbatim from master.
One end-state consolidation both branches half-did: with questions
(ui-question) and approvals (ApprovalPanel) each owning a composer
takeover, PendingCard retires outright — ChatView renders no pending
placeholder, the card component and its specs go, and both README halves
state the takeover-only contract.
gen-cordis-catalog/api, config/persistence catalogs, module graph, and doc
graphs pick up the ui-permission package, the permissions projection key,
and the /permission command; KnobState and PermissionSelect join the
type-link exemptions (owned by the permission package's own docs), and
ui-permission joins the sentence Model Experience allowlist (indirect via
the host command). The ui-conversation and dsh-permission READMEs gain
their zh halves for the approval/chip and projection/command paragraphs;
all three touched pairs re-record.
Plan mode is entered through /plan only — the select control is retired.
The conversation.input.plan seat (now right of the access-mode control)
renders a read-only Plan chip while the projection's effective target is
plan mode; its hover x executes /plan off, and the chip follows the folded
target (appears on /plan immediately, disappears on /plan off) with frames
correcting either way. While plan mode is targeted the composer textarea's
placeholder switches to the plan-task wording — InputBar reads the same
projection through the standard-kit useProjection (the TodoDock posture:
a type-only key merge, no domain service edge), and owner placeholders
still win.
Both todo one-line surfaces truncate the active hint with overflow: hidden
and text-overflow: ellipsis. A "+N" appended to the first active task's name
therefore sat at the far end of the truncatable text, so a long task name or a
narrow viewport clipped exactly the part that reports the other running tasks,
leaving a parallel plan indistinguishable from a sequential one.
planSummary now returns activeContent and activeExtra as separate fields
instead of one joined activeHint, and each surface renders the count in its own
flex: none span beside the ellipsized name: .activeExtra in the collapsed plan
strip header, .extra in the todo_write row. Putting the count in front of the
name was rejected — the task name is what the reader looks for first.
The parallel-plan cases in todo-panel.spec.tsx now assert the count is a
separate element from the name, and both fail if the two are rejoined. The
assembled web snapshot re-records: the flex gap supplies the visual space, so
the transcript reads "实现 fixture 样本+1" with no space in the text nodes.
Lifting the single-in_progress cap makes a list shape reachable that the
web surfaces never received. Two sites derived their one-line summary with
todos.find(t => t.status === 'in_progress') — the collapsed TodoPanel header
and the todo_write row — which was total under the old cap and silently
dropped every active item but the first once several could match: a plan
with three running tasks collapsed to the name of one. The expanded list
was always correct, so neither PR's tests covered it.
Both sites now take planSummary in contract/todo-plan-model.ts, the
domain-shared face both the skeleton and toolviews domains may import; the
duplicated derivation was why one find could be fixed while the other
stayed wrong. The hint names the first active item and suffixes +<n> for
the rest, so the collapsed line reports how many tasks are running.
The web fixture's todo sample now runs two items in_progress, so the
assembled web transcript replays a parallel plan: the row reads
'1/4 已完成 · 实现 fixture 样本 +1' over the built bundles.
The todo row and the todo plan strip were registered without a contract in this
package's README, which still described only the bash sample. Both sides now
carry the two registrations: TodoRow's `todo_write` toolview key with its
attempted-write summary and non-ok dot semantics, and TodoDock's
`conversation.input.dock` entry at `order: -1` with the dock-owned selection,
empty-hidden panel, collapse behavior, and the composer-takeover consequence
that hides the whole dock. README.i18n.yaml re-recorded.
