The linked implemented note is the current-state authority for both one-line
todo surfaces and still specified a single in-progress item: "the in-progress
item as the collapsed one-line hint" and "N/M done · active item". Since the
cap on parallel in_progress items was lifted, both surfaces name the first
active item and count the rest in a separate non-shrinking span.
Bilingual pair updated together and re-recorded.
Both todo one-line surfaces truncate the active hint with overflow: hidden
and text-overflow: ellipsis. A "+N" appended to the first active task's name
therefore sat at the far end of the truncatable text, so a long task name or a
narrow viewport clipped exactly the part that reports the other running tasks,
leaving a parallel plan indistinguishable from a sequential one.
planSummary now returns activeContent and activeExtra as separate fields
instead of one joined activeHint, and each surface renders the count in its own
flex: none span beside the ellipsized name: .activeExtra in the collapsed plan
strip header, .extra in the todo_write row. Putting the count in front of the
name was rejected — the task name is what the reader looks for first.
The parallel-plan cases in todo-panel.spec.tsx now assert the count is a
separate element from the name, and both fail if the two are rejoined. The
assembled web snapshot re-records: the flex gap supplies the visual space, so
the transcript reads "实现 fixture 样本+1" with no space in the text nodes.
Lifting the single-in_progress cap makes a list shape reachable that the
web surfaces never received. Two sites derived their one-line summary with
todos.find(t => t.status === 'in_progress') — the collapsed TodoPanel header
and the todo_write row — which was total under the old cap and silently
dropped every active item but the first once several could match: a plan
with three running tasks collapsed to the name of one. The expanded list
was always correct, so neither PR's tests covered it.
Both sites now take planSummary in contract/todo-plan-model.ts, the
domain-shared face both the skeleton and toolviews domains may import; the
duplicated derivation was why one find could be fixed while the other
stayed wrong. The hint names the first active item and suffixes +<n> for
the rest, so the collapsed line reports how many tasks are running.
The web fixture's todo sample now runs two items in_progress, so the
assembled web transcript replays a parallel plan: the row reads
'1/4 已完成 · 实现 fixture 样本 +1' over the built bundles.
Stack the parallel-in_progress change on the web todo display (#497): the
GUI is now the surface where several active items are visible, so the two
land as a chain rather than colliding on tool-todo at merge time.
Conflicts combined rather than resolved to one side: tool-todo keeps this
branch's parallel-allowing validation AND web2-todo's additionalProperties
unknown-key rejection, in src/index.ts and both README sides; the spec
drops web2-todo's 'two in_progress' rejection case and keeps its unknown-key
case; the two headless advanced-toolchain session fixtures keep this
branch's parallel transcripts.
The required windows job moves from windows-2025 to ubuntu-latest, running
checksum-verified Windows Node under Wine at Linux-job wall clock (2m46s
warm vs 7-9min); master's serial-windows native-kernel reference is
untouched, and a new master-only wine-apt-cache job seeds the apt cache
every pull request restores. The experiment workflow folds into ci.yml,
the Agent Note moves to implemented with measured results, and the two CI
topology notes update to the shipped facts.
