Merge branch 'master' into feat/read-image-context

# Conflicts:
#	docs/module-graph.i18n.yaml
#	docs/module-graph.md
#	docs/module-graph.zh.md

.agents/notes/AGENTS.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # AGENTS.md — Agent Notes
 
-Agent Notes are effectively RFCs written by agents: durable proposals and decision records that preserve rationale, alternatives, consequences, and verification contracts. Follow the [documentation standard](../../docs/AGENTS.md) and the [Agent Note contract](README.md).
+Agent Notes are effectively RFCs written by agents: durable proposals and decision records that preserve rationale, alternatives, consequences, and required verification. Follow the [documentation standard](../../docs/AGENTS.md) and the [Agent Note rules](README.md).
 
 **Every new Agent Note triggers a supersession check.** Search the active tree for older notes covering the same decision or mechanism, classify any full or partial supersession with [`dsh-archive-agent-notes`](../skills/dsh-archive-agent-notes/SKILL.md), and archive every qualifying implemented triplet in the same PR. Keep partial supersessions active and cross-linked.
 

.agents/notes/README.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/README.md
-README.md: 3cfbb5154713046846a3bfcb2ccea62c0e4cb6c0
-README.zh.md: 4b3a1ee57ea61a8e8ba4d01cf7c719bbf8440e30
+README.md: ae8e4724d610c97d74910d7dec5c95af69e93281
+README.zh.md: d9989dd1d722185145099b706169dfce19559b52

.agents/notes/README.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 English | [中文](README.zh.md)
 
-One kind of design doc lives here. An **Agent Note** records a decision or proposal that shapes this codebase — the *why* and *what we gave up*, the parts code and docs can't carry. This file is the front door and contract: where Agent Notes live, when to write one, and [the in-file format](#the-file-format).
+One kind of design doc lives here. An **Agent Note** records a decision or proposal that affects this codebase — the *why* and *what we gave up*, the parts code and docs can't carry. This file defines where Agent Notes live, when to write one, and [the in-file format](#the-file-format).
 
 ## Layout and naming
 
@@ -43,13 +43,13 @@ Once sealed, every archived triplet is permanently frozen. Do not edit, translat
 
 ## When to write one
 
-Every non-trivial change MUST add or update at least one Agent Note in the same PR. A change is non-trivial when it alters behavior, architecture, a cross-file or cross-package contract, process or tooling, testing strategy, an on-disk, wire, or configuration format, or another decision a maintainer may reasonably revisit. A proposal for substantial future work starts in `proposed/`; a decision already made starts in `implemented/`. Pick the class folder that matches the decision (see [Classification](#classification)).
+Every non-trivial change MUST add or update at least one Agent Note in the same PR. A change is non-trivial when it alters behavior, architecture, a contract shared across files or packages, process or tooling, testing strategy, an on-disk, wire, or configuration format, or another decision a maintainer may reasonably revisit. A proposal for substantial future work starts in `proposed/`; a decision already made starts in `implemented/`. Pick the class folder that matches the decision (see [Classification](#classification)).
 
-Updating the Agent Note that already owns the decision satisfies the rule; do not create a duplicate. Only a purely mechanical or local edit with no behavioral, contractual, structural, process, or rationale change is exempt. An Agent Note is never edited into a *different decision*: supersede it with a new one, and keep both notes cross-linked unless the old note is later fully consolidated under the rule below. Editing an `implemented/` Agent Note to track where its existing decision lives is required, not forbidden; see [implemented/AGENTS.md](implemented/AGENTS.md).
+Updating the Agent Note that already owns the decision satisfies the rule; do not create a duplicate. Only a purely mechanical or local edit with no change to behavior, contracts, structure, process, or rationale is exempt. An Agent Note is never edited into a *different decision*: supersede it with a new one, and keep both notes cross-linked unless the old note is later fully consolidated under the rule below. Editing an `implemented/` Agent Note to track where its existing decision lives is required, not forbidden; see [implemented/AGENTS.md](implemented/AGENTS.md).
 
-An implemented Agent Note that is fully superseded may be consolidated into the current owning note and deleted. Before deletion, the owner must preserve every unique rationale, alternative, consequence, verification contract, and named coverage gap; repair every inbound link; and delete the Chinese counterpart and consistency record in the same change. Partial supersession does not qualify: keep both notes cross-linked and update every fact that remains current. Consolidation must not rewrite the old file into its opposite or rely on git history as the only copy of rationale.
+An implemented Agent Note that is fully superseded may be consolidated into the current owning note and deleted. Before deletion, the owner must preserve every unique rationale, alternative, consequence, required verification, and named coverage gap; repair every inbound link; and delete the Chinese counterpart and consistency record in the same change. Partial supersession does not qualify: keep both notes cross-linked and update every fact that remains current. Consolidation must not rewrite the old file into its opposite or rely on git history as the only copy of rationale.
 
-A feature-addition note may be consolidated into the later removal note only when the feature is absent from production code, configuration, schemas, durable or wire formats, migration, and compatibility behavior; no current documentation presents it as available; and no test exercises it as supported behavior. Removal rationale and tests that verify absence may remain. The removal owner preserves the original motivation, why it no longer justified the feature, alternatives to full removal, the capability given up, conditions for reintroduction, and verification of complete absence. Obsolete implementation inventories and tests that only verified the deleted behavior are not current verification contracts. Removing one transport, default, implementation, or presentation is partial supersession, as is any surviving durable data or compatibility handling.
+A feature-addition note may be consolidated into the later removal note only when the feature is absent from production code, configuration, schemas, durable or wire formats, migration, and compatibility behavior; no current documentation presents it as available; and no test exercises it as supported behavior. Removal rationale and tests that verify absence may remain. The removal owner preserves the original motivation, why it no longer justified the feature, alternatives to full removal, the capability given up, conditions for reintroduction, and verification of complete absence. Obsolete implementation inventories and tests that only verified the deleted behavior are not current verification evidence. Removing one transport, default, implementation, or presentation is partial supersession, as is any surviving durable data or compatibility handling.
 
 ## The file format
 
@@ -122,4 +122,4 @@ Moving a file between lifecycle folders means updating the `Status:` line and re
 
 ### Chinese counterparts
 
-A `.zh.md` counterpart mirrors its English sibling's structure section-for-section under the [i18n contract](../../docs/i18n/README.md); the machine-checked header tokens (`# Agent Note: ` and the `Status:` line) stay in English verbatim. The format gate skips `.zh.md` files — the pairing gate owns their consistency.
+A `.zh.md` counterpart mirrors its English sibling's structure section-for-section under the [i18n contract](../../docs/i18n/README.md); the machine-checked header tokens (`# Agent Note: ` and the `Status:` line) stay in English verbatim. The format gate skips `.zh.md` files — the pairing gate checks their consistency.

.agents/notes/README.zh.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 [English](README.md) | 中文
 
-这里存放一类设计文档。**Agent Note** 记录塑造本代码库的决策或提案：代码和文档无法承载的*为什么*以及*放弃了什么*。本文件是入口和约定：Agent Note 存放在哪里、何时需要写一份，以及[文件内格式](#the-file-format)。
+这里存放一类设计文档。**Agent Note** 记录影响本代码库的决策或提案：代码和文档无法承载的*为什么*以及*放弃了什么*。本文件规定 Agent Note 存放在哪里、何时需要写一份，以及[文件内格式](#the-file-format)。
 
 ## 布局与命名
 
@@ -49,9 +49,9 @@
 
 更新已经拥有该决策的 Agent Note 即可满足规则；不要创建重复记录。只有不涉及行为、约定、结构、流程或理由变化的纯机械性或局部编辑才可豁免。Agent Note 永远不会被编辑为一个*不同的决策*：用新 Agent Note 取代旧记录，并让两个记录保持互相链接，除非后续依据下方规则完全合并旧记录。编辑 `implemented/` Agent Note 以跟踪其现有决策的所在位置是必需的，而非禁止的；见 [implemented/AGENTS.md](implemented/AGENTS.md)。
 
-被完全取代的 implemented Agent Note 可以合并到当前持有该决策的记录中，并删除原文件。删除前，当前记录必须保存所有独有的决策依据、备选方案、影响、验证约定和明确指出的覆盖缺口；修复所有入站链接；并在同一变更中删除中文对侧文件和一致性记录。仅部分被取代的记录不符合此条件：保留两个记录并让它们互相链接，同时更新所有仍然适用的事实。合并不得将旧文件改写成与其相反的决策，也不得让 git 历史成为决策依据的唯一副本。
+被完全取代的 implemented Agent Note 可以合并到当前持有该决策的记录中，并删除原文件。删除前，当前记录必须保存所有独有的决策依据、备选方案、影响、必需的验证和明确指出的覆盖缺口；修复所有入站链接；并在同一变更中删除中文对侧文件和一致性记录。仅部分被取代的记录不符合此条件：保留两个记录并让它们互相链接，同时更新所有仍然适用的事实。合并不得将旧文件改写成与其相反的决策，也不得让 git 历史成为决策依据的唯一副本。
 
-只有当一项功能已从生产代码、配置、schema、持久化格式或协议格式、迁移和兼容行为中完全消失，当前文档不再将其描述为可用，且没有测试把它作为受支持行为来执行时，新增该功能的 Agent Note 才可合并进后续的移除记录。移除决策的依据和验证该功能已不存在的测试可以保留。移除决策的持有记录必须保留最初动机、为什么该动机已不足以证明保留该功能的合理性、完全移除之外的备选方案、放弃的能力、重新引入的条件，以及证明已彻底移除的验证。过时的实现清单和只验证已删除行为的测试不属于当前验证约定。仅移除一种传输、默认值、实现或展示属于部分取代；仍有任何持久数据或兼容处理也同样如此。
+只有当一项功能已从生产代码、配置、schema、持久化格式或协议格式、迁移和兼容行为中完全消失，当前文档不再将其描述为可用，且没有测试把它作为受支持行为来执行时，新增该功能的 Agent Note 才可合并进后续的移除记录。移除决策的依据和验证该功能已不存在的测试可以保留。移除决策的持有记录必须保留最初动机、为什么该动机已不足以证明保留该功能的合理性、完全移除之外的备选方案、放弃的能力、重新引入的条件，以及证明已彻底移除的验证。过时的实现清单和只验证已删除行为的测试不属于当前验证证据。仅移除一种传输、默认值、实现或展示属于部分取代；仍有任何持久数据或兼容处理也同样如此。
 
 <a id="the-file-format"></a>
 
@@ -126,4 +126,4 @@ Status: <status>
 
 ### 中文对侧文件
 
-`.zh.md` 对侧文件按 [i18n 约定](../../docs/i18n/README.md)逐章节镜像其英文对侧文件的结构；机器检查的头部标记（`# Agent Note: ` 和 `Status:` 行）保持英文原样不翻译。格式门禁跳过 `.zh.md` 文件——配对门禁负责它们的一致性。
+`.zh.md` 对侧文件按 [i18n 约定](../../docs/i18n/README.md)逐章节与其英文对侧文件保持相同结构；机器检查的头部标记（`# Agent Note: ` 和 `Status:` 行）保持英文原样不翻译。格式门禁跳过 `.zh.md` 文件；配对门禁检查它们的一致性。

.agents/notes/implemented/AGENTS.md

@@ -10,4 +10,4 @@ When a shipped note is unlikely to guide future work, archive its complete tripl
 
 ### This is not a license to rewrite the *decision*
 
-Update factual realization in place. A reversal of the decision or its rationale requires a new Agent Note and cross-link; a fully superseded old note may be deleted only through the consolidation rule in the [Agent Note contract](../README.md).
+Update factual realization in place. A reversal of the decision or its rationale requires a new Agent Note and cross-link; a fully superseded old note may be deleted only through the consolidation rule in the [Agent Note rules](../README.md).

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-15-llm-model-catalog-and-acp-selection.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-15-llm-model-catalog-and-acp-selection.md
-2026-07-15-llm-model-catalog-and-acp-selection.md: 77f8e379e2b07ecf4e67fa7197752543cfedd6dd
-2026-07-15-llm-model-catalog-and-acp-selection.zh.md: ce4a04a66e345834bc2b16b743be89dc7a0b9424
+2026-07-15-llm-model-catalog-and-acp-selection.md: bfd17c73b01319c10d5dc03333b3c726db5d6f33
+2026-07-15-llm-model-catalog-and-acp-selection.zh.md: aeddada5591bb2da2c0861acc368516eff148172

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-15-llm-model-catalog-and-acp-selection.md

@@ -26,17 +26,17 @@ Catalog membership is advisory. It drives selectors and diagnostics but never ch
 
 `dsh-llm-pi-ai` maps the configured provider's installed `getModels(provider)` entries into the neutral catalog. Its existing request-time catalog lookup remains authoritative and still rejects unknown models with `UNKNOWN_MODEL`. `dsh-llm-deepseek` accepts an optional `models` config containing display entries, defaulting to `deepseek-v4-flash` named `DeepSeek-V4-Flash` and `deepseek-v4-pro` named `DeepSeek-V4-Pro`. An explicit list replaces those defaults and an empty list disables discovery. The entries improve selector UX for known public or private models, while every unlisted model id continues to pass through unchanged.
 
-### Per-session selection in the front door
+### Per-session selection in the front end
 
-A selection is owned by the front door that offers it (today the TUI `/model` selector), never by `LlmService` or `AgentOptions`: those are deployment-wide or creation-wide objects, and mutating them would couple concurrent sessions. Each opaque choice carries the full provider/model pair, because the same model id may appear under multiple routes.
+A selection is owned by the front end that offers it (today the TUI `/model` selector), never by `LlmService` or `AgentOptions`: those are deployment-wide or creation-wide objects, and mutating them would couple concurrent sessions. Each opaque choice carries the full provider/model pair, because the same model id may appear under multiple routes.
 
 The ACP automation transport is not a catalog consumer. Its deployment config supplies one optional provider/model target for newly created agents, and it advertises no model selector or configuration-option interface.
 
 ### Prompt/request consistency and durability
 
-`installModelSelection` (in `dsh-agent`) installs scoped `system-prompt/assemble` and `agent/request` listeners for a front-door-owned selection. Prompt assembly snapshots the selected pair once per step, overwrites the assembled `provider` and `model` variables after downstream prompt listeners, and the request listener applies that same snapshot after downstream request listeners. A selection during asynchronous assembly therefore starts on the next step rather than splitting prompt text from routing. Other call-config fields remain untouched.
+`installModelSelection` (in `dsh-agent`) installs scoped `system-prompt/assemble` and `agent/request` listeners for a front-end-owned selection. Prompt assembly snapshots the selected pair once per step, overwrites the assembled `provider` and `model` variables after downstream prompt listeners, and the request listener applies that same snapshot after downstream request listeners. A selection during asynchronous assembly therefore starts on the next step rather than splitting prompt text from routing. Other call-config fields remain untouched.
 
-The request header remains the durable source of truth. When a selection is actually used, the existing full `request/header` snapshot records it, and a front door initializes its selection from the folded last request header before falling back to creation options. A selection that is never used by a request is intentionally in-memory only because it never became model-visible state.
+The request header remains the durable source of truth. When a selection is actually used, the existing full `request/header` snapshot records it, and a front end initializes its selection from the folded last request header before falling back to creation options. A selection that is never used by a request is intentionally in-memory only because it never became model-visible state.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-15-llm-model-catalog-and-acp-selection.zh.md

@@ -26,17 +26,17 @@ ACP 选择还必须保留提供方维度。同一个模型 ID 可能存在于多
 
 `dsh-llm-pi-ai` 将已配置提供方的安装目录 `getModels(provider)` 映射为中立目录。其现有请求时目录查询仍是权威依据，未知模型仍以 `UNKNOWN_MODEL` 失败。`dsh-llm-deepseek` 接受可选的 `models` 配置作为展示条目，默认包含名为 `DeepSeek-V4-Flash` 的 `deepseek-v4-flash` 和名为 `DeepSeek-V4-Pro` 的 `deepseek-v4-pro`。显式列表会替换这些默认值，空列表则关闭发现。这些条目改善已知公开或私有模型的选择体验，而所有未列出的模型 ID 仍会原样透传。
 
-### 前门内的会话级选择
+### 前端内的会话级选择
 
-选择由提供它的前门拥有（今天是 TUI 的 `/model` 选择器），而不由 `LlmService` 或 `AgentOptions` 拥有：它们是部署级或创建级对象，改动它们会把并发会话耦合在一起。每个不透明选项都携带完整的提供方／模型对，因为同一模型 ID 可能出现在多个路由下。
+选择由提供它的前端拥有（今天是 TUI 的 `/model` 选择器），而不由 `LlmService` 或 `AgentOptions` 拥有：它们是部署级或创建级对象，改动它们会把并发会话耦合在一起。每个不透明选项都携带完整的提供方／模型对，因为同一模型 ID 可能出现在多个路由下。
 
 ACP 自动化传输层不是目录消费方。它通过部署配置为新创建的 agent 提供一个可选的提供方／模型目标，不展示模型选择器或配置选项接口。
 
 ### 提示词／请求一致性与持久化
 
-`installModelSelection`（位于 `dsh-agent`）为前门拥有的选择安装 agent 作用域的 `system-prompt/assemble` 与 `agent/request` 监听器。提示词组装在每个步骤对所选组合做一次快照，在下游提示词监听器之后覆写组装出的 `provider` 与 `model` 变量；请求监听器在下游请求监听器之后应用同一快照。因此，发生在异步组装期间的选择会从下一个步骤生效，而不会让提示词文本与路由分裂。其他调用配置字段保持不变。
+`installModelSelection`（位于 `dsh-agent`）为前端拥有的选择安装 agent 作用域的 `system-prompt/assemble` 与 `agent/request` 监听器。提示词组装在每个步骤对所选组合做一次快照，在下游提示词监听器之后覆写组装出的 `provider` 与 `model` 变量；请求监听器在下游请求监听器之后应用同一快照。因此，发生在异步组装期间的选择会从下一个步骤生效，而不会让提示词文本与路由分裂。其他调用配置字段保持不变。
 
-请求头仍是持久化的真源。当某个选择真正被使用时，现有的完整 `request/header` 快照会记录它；前门先从折叠后的最后一个请求头初始化其选择，然后才回退到创建选项。从未被请求使用的选择有意只保留在内存中，因为它从未成为模型可见状态。
+请求头仍是持久化的真源。当某个选择真正被使用时，现有的完整 `request/header` 快照会记录它；前端先从折叠后的最后一个请求头初始化其选择，然后才回退到创建选项。从未被请求使用的选择有意只保留在内存中，因为它从未成为模型可见状态。
 
 ## 考虑过的替代方案
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md
-2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md: 7997a682c8745f7b3d0a9721acfa9355603f9b2e
-2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.zh.md: cb36b5cb725128e1c5067e5e69e52aa851668e52
+2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md: f9c95176321496e965a95b6358d6feaa8466fe89
+2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.zh.md: 7d20c5a2662c9036382b30a96bc9973c8f0349bd

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md

@@ -8,12 +8,12 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.zh.md)
 
 ## Problem
 
-We need a UI integration layer. Beyond the existing ACP/stdio baseline, more product UI shapes are coming — Web (server), Electron, and others. We call these shapes Clients, uniformly, and want the following capabilities:
+We need a UI integration layer. Beyond the existing ACP/stdio baseline, more product clients are coming — Web (server), Electron, and others. We call them Clients and want the following capabilities:
 
 - One `dsh` process supporting both `dsh web` (serve) and `dsh run` (headless) — one process, two modes (a design reservation)
-- Launching inside Electron with the same Web technology shape as `dsh web`
+- Launching inside Electron with the same Web technologies as `dsh web`
 
-That demands a stable layered responsibility model in the engineering codebase, so future client shapes plug in cleanly.
+That demands a stable layered responsibility model in the engineering codebase, so future clients plug in cleanly.
 
 At the same time the physical channels differ per consumer (browser HTTP/WebSocket, in-process fetch/SSE, IPC later), so we also need a channel-independent message model and a single contract source of truth — "adding a method" and "swapping a carrier" must not entangle each other, and every message on the wire must be type-validatable, observable, and reconcilable.
 
@@ -29,19 +29,19 @@ Directories layer as follows:
     - **Pure libraries** (`ui-slots`, `web-react`, `ui-primitives`, plus the `loader` kernel package): ordinary root-index packages, statically bundled into the shell; the first three are seeded into the module table.
     - **Static-arrival entry packages** (`connection`, `runtime`, `ui-theme`, `i18n`, `hmr`): no `dshClient` key and no browser bundle — the shell bundles their `src/client/` half and registers it with `ctx.modules`; they are governed as entries of the host-authored graph like everything else.
     - **Fetch-arrival plugin packages** (`ui-layout`, `ui-sidebar`, `ui-conversation`, `ui-trajectory`): dual-entry — the root index is the node half (an empty `apply`, existing so the host Loader governs lifecycle and the web plugin registry discovers the package.json `dshClient` declaration); the implementation lives under `src/client/`, shipped as the `./client` subpath (a tsdown closure-factory bundle). Cross-plugin consumption of `/client` is type-only; value cooperation goes through cordis services.
-- `apps/` holds the externally exported application shapes, assembled from Client / Host mixtures.
+- `apps/` holds the externally exported applications, assembled from Client / Host mixtures.
     - `apps/web` (`dsh-frontend`) is the vite application: a thin `main.ts` over the shell surface exported by `dsh-client-web`.
-    - `apps/cli` (`@deepseek-ai/dsh`) dispatches shapes: `dsh web` = Host + webserver + the built `dsh-frontend` dist; `dsh run` = [a direct core Agent/Session front door](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-front-door.md), with zero Host, HTTP, or browser layer.
-    - A future Electron shape reuses the same web client packages over an IPC fetch carrier.
+    - `apps/cli` (`@deepseek-ai/dsh`) dispatches commands: `dsh web` = Host + webserver + the built `dsh-frontend` dist; `dsh run` = [a direct core Agent/Session entry point](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md), with zero Host, HTTP, or browser layer.
+    - A future Electron application reuses the same web client packages over an IPC fetch carrier.
 
 ```
-apps/*  (application shapes: apps/web = vite app, apps/cli = bin dispatch)
+apps/*  (applications: apps/web = vite app, apps/cli = bin dispatch)
   │ consume
   ▼
 packages/host/*                      packages/client/*
   apiproxy   front layer: protocol     pure libs: ui-slots / web-react / ui-primitives
   runtime    assembly / host entity    dshClient plugins ×8 (node half = empty apply,
-  webserver  web-shape HTTP carriage                        client half = src/client/)
+  webserver  Web HTTP carriage                              client half = src/client/)
   │ ctx.plugin(...)                      ▲ import only apiproxy's /api /client subpaths
   ▼                                      │ (type-only + the client base class)
 harness core packages ──────────────────┘ (types reach the browser via import type)
@@ -51,12 +51,12 @@ Direction discipline (every rule auditable from package deps):
 
 - `runtime → apiproxy` is one-way; apiproxy depends only on type definitions.
 - Client-side packages **never import** host-side package runtime (they consume only the two browser-safe subpaths `/api` and `/client`).
-- `webserver` does not depend on `runtime`: it provides a `{ fetch }`-shaped implementation — "webserver ← runtime" is a runtime injection relationship, not a package dependency.
+- `webserver` does not depend on `runtime`: it provides an implementation of the `{ fetch }` interface — "webserver ← runtime" is a runtime injection relationship, not a package dependency.
 - Cross-package client imports use the `/client` subpath for plugin packages, and between plugin packages they are type-only — a cross-plugin value import is a build error at the tsdown purity gate (value cooperation goes through cordis services; the [client plugin loading note](2026-07-23-client-plugin-loading-model.md) owns the edge rules).
 
 TypeScript checks in **two aggregate programs** referenced by a solution root (`tsconfig.json` = solution; `tsconfig.host.json` = host side + tests, excluding `packages/client`; `tsconfig.client.json` = client packages and their tests): both sides merge the cordis `Context` interface under the same keys (`sessions`, `loader`) with different services, so one program would see both declaration merges and report a collision. Shared leaves (session/llm/tools/apiproxy…) build once and are referenced by both programs ([topology](../process/2026-07-22-tsconfig-solution-root-two-aggregates.md)).
 
-On the protocol side: TS interfaces (`packages/host/apiproxy/src/api/`, zero Node dependencies, browser-importable); wire messages unify under a **bidirectional model** — each logical message is shaped by "who initiates × request/response" (two axes, four cells, called the four quadrants below), decoupled from the physical channel; clients all inherit `AbstractApiClient` (protocol invariants live entirely in the base class, platform differences are just the `doFetch` transport aspect).
+On the protocol side: TS interfaces (`packages/host/apiproxy/src/api/`, zero Node dependencies, browser-importable); wire messages unify under a **bidirectional model** — each logical message is classified by "who initiates × request/response" (two axes, four cells, called the four quadrants below), decoupled from the physical channel; clients all inherit `AbstractApiClient` (protocol invariants live entirely in the base class, platform differences are just the `doFetch` transport aspect).
 
 #### Layer roles
 
@@ -64,22 +64,22 @@ On the protocol side: TS interfaces (`packages/host/apiproxy/src/api/`, zero Nod
 |---|---|---|---|
 | Front layer | `dsh-host-apiproxy` | TS/zod definitions (api/) + the fetch abstraction (fetch/: handler + client base class) | Keep it simple — every consumer needs it; importable from Node and browser alike; protocol content in the "Message protocol" sections below; clients must not bypass api through ctx |
 | Assembly layer | `dsh-host-runtime` | Plugin composition + ApiProxy integration + the web UI plugin mount (in-memory Loader tree over the eight dshClient packages); home of host-level configuration (defaults/persistenceRoot, future user profile) | Which plugins mount and with what defaults is decided only here; shells must not alter the assembly |
-| Carrier layer | `dsh-host-webserver` | Web-shape HTTP and upgrade: static serving + `/api/*`→handler forwarding + WebSocket upgrade route + close semantics; plugin bundle endpoint + `__DSH_BOOT__` manifest injection (fed by the web plugin registry) | Web (browser access) only; zero workspace dependencies (the registry arrives by structural injection); Electron does not reuse it |
+| Carrier layer | `dsh-host-webserver` | Web HTTP and upgrade: static serving + `/api/*`→handler forwarding + WebSocket upgrade route + close semantics; plugin bundle endpoint + `__DSH_BOOT__` manifest injection (fed by the web plugin registry) | Web (browser access) only; zero workspace dependencies (the registry arrives by structural injection); Electron does not reuse it |
 | Client libraries | `dsh-client-ui-slots` / `dsh-client-web-react` / `dsh-client-ui-primitives` | Slot registry core / ctx↔React glue / pure React atoms | Zero cordis runtime dependency in components; seeded into the loader module table by the shell |
 | Client plugins | `dsh-client-connection` / `dsh-client-runtime` / `dsh-client-ui-theme` / `dsh-client-i18n` / `dsh-client-ui-layout` / `dsh-client-ui-sidebar` / `dsh-client-ui-conversation` / `dsh-client-ui-trajectory` | Browser-side cordis plugin tree (wire consumer, core services, theme, i18n, layout, sidebar, conversation, trajectory) — see the web client architecture note | Dual entry (node half = empty apply; implementation in `src/client/`); the consumption face goes exclusively through ApiProxy |
-| Application shape | `@deepseek-ai/dsh` (apps/cli) + `dsh-frontend` (apps/web, the vite application) | Coarse bin dispatch + one assembly module per shape (web.ts / headless.ts); the vite app is a thin main over the `dsh-client-web` shell surface | Shapes dynamic-import so they never load each other; workspace knowledge like dist location stays in the app |
+| Application | `@deepseek-ai/dsh` (apps/cli) + `dsh-frontend` (apps/web, the vite application) | Coarse bin dispatch + one assembly module per application (web.ts / headless.ts); the vite app is a thin main over the `dsh-client-web` shell surface | Applications use dynamic imports so they never load each other; workspace knowledge like dist location stays in the app |
 
 #### Naming rule
 
 Packages under `packages/host/*` and `packages/client/*` **must carry the directory-group prefix in the package name**: host/runtime → `dsh-host-runtime`, client/runtime → `dsh-client-runtime`. The directory name does not repeat the group prefix (host/ already expresses it). The package-name tail therefore ≠ the directory name, so the `dsh-*` wildcard in tsconfig.base.json (which resolves by directory name) misses them — **each package in these two groups needs an explicit paths entry**, including separate entries for the client packages' `/client` subpaths so source-level resolution matches the exports map.
 
-#### How to integrate a new shape (operational checklist)
+#### How to integrate a new application (operational checklist)
 
 1. **Pick a fetch impersonation**: browser same-origin HTTP / in-process `host.handler.fetch` injection / your own transport-aspect subclass (e.g. future Electron IPC, see the "Subclass table" below).
-2. **Write an assembly module under `apps/`**: `startHost()` + a client subclass + the shape's private signal/print/exit semantics; a mixture never becomes a package — assembly is written in the app.
+2. **Write an assembly module under `apps/`**: `startHost()` + a client subclass + the application's private signal/print/exit semantics; a mixture never becomes a package — assembly is written in the app.
 3. **Import `dsh-host-webserver` only if you need HTTP carriage**, otherwise zero ports.
 
-The two existing shapes preserve the boundary: the Web shape mounts Host, carrier, and browser composition, while `dsh run` mounts a direct core runner with zero Host, HTTP, or ports. ACP-class protocol bridges do not follow the client-carrier checklist: they expose core to the external ecosystem, mount via `ctx.plugin(front-door plugin)` directly, and wear no fetch.
+The two existing applications preserve the division: the Web application mounts Host, carrier, and browser composition, while `dsh run` mounts a direct core runner with zero Host, HTTP, or ports. ACP-class protocol bridges do not follow the client-carrier checklist: they expose core to the external ecosystem and mount directly via `ctx.plugin(entry-point plugin)` without fetch.
 
 ## Message protocol
 
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ The remaining methods (`session.create`/`session.history`/`session.rename`/`sess
 
 ### Frames (server→client, named unions)
 
-Two logical streams: the mux stream (`/api/events.mux`, all-session aggregate) and the host stream (`/api/events.host`, host-level events). The browser consumes one downlink WebSocket per stream, while the in-process fetch carrier retains SSE to preserve the same shape; see the [WebSocket downlink carrier](2026-08-04-websocket-downlink-carrier.md) for the physical boundary. One example frame row:
+Two logical streams: the mux stream (`/api/events.mux`, all-session aggregate) and the host stream (`/api/events.host`, host-level events). The browser consumes one downlink WebSocket per stream, while the in-process fetch carrier retains SSE with the same event framing; see the [WebSocket downlink carrier](2026-08-04-websocket-downlink-carrier.md) for the physical boundary. One example frame row:
 
 | frame type | payload | when |
 |---|---|---|
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ All four quadrant full forms pass through `onEnvelope`; the base implementation
 | Subclass | Package | doFetch | Purpose |
 |---|---|---|---|
 | `InProcessApiClient` | apiproxy itself | the injected `{ fetch }` handler | **The isomorphic point**: `new InProcessApiClient(toFetchHandler(api))` never touches the network yet runs the real wire serialization/zod/SSE framing; carrier tests and callers can exercise the protocol without opening a port, while product `dsh run` drives core directly |
-| `WebApiClient` | dsh-client-connection | `globalThis.fetch` uplink + one same-origin WebSocket downlink per logical stream | the browser shape; physical boundary in the [WebSocket downlink carrier](2026-08-04-websocket-downlink-carrier.md) |
+| `WebApiClient` | dsh-client-connection | `globalThis.fetch` uplink + one same-origin WebSocket downlink per logical stream | the browser client; physical boundary in the [WebSocket downlink carrier](2026-08-04-websocket-downlink-carrier.md) |
 | `FixtureApiClient` | dsh-client-connection | unused (protocol-layer override) | serverless UI development (`?fixture`): overrides the `callUnary`/`openMux`/`openHost`/`respond` virtuals and is itself the fake server (frame rpcIds minted by it, semantics self-consistent) |
 | IPC bridge subclass (hypothetical example — no such shell exists) | an Electron shell | IPC serialization round trip | would swap only doFetch; contract and base class unchanged |
 
@@ -234,15 +234,15 @@ All four quadrant full forms pass through `onEnvelope`; the base implementation
 
 ## Consequences
 
-Every client shape consumes one contract: adding a unary method is a five-step mechanical change radiating from a single signature, swapping a carrier touches only a `doFetch` subclass, and every wire message is zod-validated, observable through the envelope tap, and reconcilable by rpcId. Ordinary unary calls remain bounded, while `host.pickDirectory` and `command.execute` may stay pending until the operation finishes or caller/connection cancellation arrives; this accepts that a non-cooperative user-paced operation can hang its request rather than treating valid operation duration as transport failure. The other accepted costs: two groups of packages need explicit tsconfig paths entries, and the reserved methods (fork/inject/task.list/listModels/hostInstanceId) stay dormant until a real consumer arrives.
+Every client consumes one contract: adding a unary method is a five-step mechanical change from a single signature, swapping a carrier touches only a `doFetch` subclass, and every wire message is zod-validated, observable through the envelope tap, and reconcilable by rpcId. Ordinary unary calls remain bounded, while `host.pickDirectory` and `command.execute` may stay pending until the operation finishes or caller/connection cancellation arrives; this accepts that a non-cooperative user-paced operation can hang its request rather than treating valid operation duration as transport failure. The other accepted costs: two groups of packages need explicit tsconfig paths entries, and the reserved methods (fork/inject/task.list/listModels/hostInstanceId) stay dormant until a real consumer arrives.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
 | Rejected | One-line reason |
 |---|---|
-| Packaging by "product shape" (a web family, an electron family) | What shapes share is host/client capability, not the shape itself; capability-provider layering means a new shape needs zero new packages |
+| Packaging by product (a web family, an electron family) | Products share host/client capabilities rather than an application implementation; capability-provider layering means a new application needs zero new packages |
 | A package per mixture (e.g. a standalone headless package) | A mixture has exactly one consumer (its own app); packaging it is ownerless abstraction, while assembly in the app is readable and disposable |
-| Consuming clients connecting to ctx directly (skipping the apiproxy layer) | Client shapes require wire validation, observability, and multi-client consistency. Direct headless is a local front door with no client boundary and uses the public Agent/Session seams rather than a client command plane |
+| Consuming clients connecting to ctx directly (skipping the apiproxy layer) | Clients require wire validation, observability, and multi-client consistency. Direct headless is a local entry point with no client boundary and uses the public Agent/Session seams rather than a client command plane |
 | webserver depending on runtime (saving the handler injection) | Structural-typing injection keeps webserver reusable by sidecars/tests with zero workspace deps; a package dependency would drag assembly knowledge into the carrier layer |
 | Package names without the group prefix (continuing dsh-<tail>) | `dsh-runtime`/`dsh-web-ui` lose their belonging in the flat npm namespace; the cost is one explicit paths entry per package |
 | Reusing the in-repo JSON-RPC 2.0 (dsh-jsonrpc) | Numeric error codes degrade to a single fallback code, contracts get aligned by hand in two copies, and naming drifts without a convention |

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.zh.md

@@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## Problem
 
-需要提供 UI 对接层，除已有 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）/stdio 基线外，还需要 Web（server）、Electron 等其他产品 UI 形态。我们把这些形态统一称为 Client。希望具备以下能力：
+需要提供 UI 对接层，除已有 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）/stdio 基线外，还需要 Web（server）、Electron 等其他产品客户端。我们把它们统一称为 Client。希望具备以下能力：
 - 一个 `dsh` 进程同时支持 `dsh web`（启动）和 `dsh run`（headless），一个进程两种模式（设计预留）
-- 以与 `dsh web` 同构的 Web 技术形态，在 Electron 中启动
+- 在 Electron 中使用与 `dsh web` 相同的 Web 技术启动
 
-那么当前的工程代码需要稳定的分层职责模型，便于以后接入各类 client 形态。
+那么当前的工程代码需要稳定的分层职责模型，便于以后接入各类 client。
 
 同时各消费端的物理通道不同（浏览器 HTTP／WebSocket、进程内 fetch/SSE、将来 IPC），还需要一个通道无关的消息模型和单一约定事实源，让「加一个方法」「换一种载体」互不牵连，且 wire 上的每条消息可类型校验、可观测、可对账。
 
@@ -27,19 +27,19 @@ Status: implemented
     - **纯库**（`ui-slots`、`web-react`、`ui-primitives`，外加内核包 `loader`）：普通根入口包，静态打包进壳；前三者播种进模块表。
     - **静态到达 entry 包**（`connection`、`runtime`、`ui-theme`、`i18n`、`hmr`）：无 `dshClient` 键、无浏览器 bundle——壳把它们的 `src/client/` 半边打进自己的 bundle 并向 `ctx.modules` 登记；它们与其余单元一样，作为 host 独家撰写的图里的 entry 受治理。
     - **fetch 到达插件包**（`ui-layout`、`ui-sidebar`、`ui-conversation`、`ui-trajectory`）：双入口——根入口是 node 半边（空 `apply`，其存在是为了让 host Loader 管辖生命周期、让 web 插件注册表发现 package.json 的 `dshClient` 声明）；实现住在 `src/client/` 下，经 `./client` 子路径发布（tsdown 闭包工厂 bundle）。跨插件消费 `/client` 只限类型；值层面的协作走 cordis 服务。
-- `apps/` 作为对外导出的应用形态入口，可以由 Client / Host 混合组装。
+- `apps/` 作为对外导出的应用入口，可以由 Client / Host 混合组装。
     - `apps/web`（`dsh-frontend`）是 vite 应用：`dsh-client-web` 导出的壳表面之上的一层薄 `main.ts`。
-    - `apps/cli`（`@deepseek-ai/dsh`）做形态分发：`dsh web` = Host + webserver + 构建出的 `dsh-frontend` dist；`dsh run` = [直接使用核心 Agent／Session 的前门](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-front-door.md)，不含 Host、HTTP 或浏览器层。
-    - 将来的 Electron 形态经由 IPC fetch 载体复用同一套 web client 包。
+    - `apps/cli`（`@deepseek-ai/dsh`）分发命令：`dsh web` = Host + webserver + 构建出的 `dsh-frontend` dist；`dsh run` = [直接使用核心 Agent／Session 的入口](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md)，不含 Host、HTTP 或浏览器层。
+    - 将来的 Electron 应用经由 IPC fetch 载体复用同一套 web client 包。
 
 ```
-apps/*  (application shapes: apps/web = vite app, apps/cli = bin dispatch)
+apps/*  (applications: apps/web = vite app, apps/cli = bin dispatch)
   │ consume
   ▼
 packages/host/*                      packages/client/*
   apiproxy   front layer: protocol     pure libs: ui-slots / web-react / ui-primitives
   runtime    assembly / host entity    dshClient plugins ×8 (node half = empty apply,
-  webserver  web-shape HTTP carriage                        client half = src/client/)
+  webserver  Web HTTP carriage                              client half = src/client/)
   │ ctx.plugin(...)                      ▲ import only apiproxy's /api /client subpaths
   ▼                                      │ (type-only + the client base class)
 harness core packages ──────────────────┘ (types reach the browser via import type)
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ harness core packages ──────────────────┘
 
 TypeScript 以 solution 根引用的**两个聚合 program** 检查（`tsconfig.json` = solution；`tsconfig.host.json` = host 侧 + 测试，排除 `packages/client`；`tsconfig.client.json` = client 各包及其测试）：两侧在相同键（`sessions`、`loader`）下以不同服务合并 cordis `Context` 接口，单一 program 会同时看到两份声明合并而报冲突。共享叶子包（session/llm/tools/apiproxy 等）只构建一次，由两个 program 共同引用（[拓扑](../process/2026-07-22-tsconfig-solution-root-two-aggregates.md)）。
 
-协议侧：TS interface（`packages/host/apiproxy/src/api/`，零 Node 依赖，浏览器可 import）；wire 消息统一为**双向模型**——每条逻辑消息由「谁发起 × request/response」定形（两轴四格，后文称四象限），与物理通道解耦；客户端统一继承 `AbstractApiClient`（协议不变量全在基类，平台差异只是 `doFetch` 传输切面）。
+协议侧：TS interface（`packages/host/apiproxy/src/api/`，零 Node 依赖，浏览器可 import）；wire 消息统一为**双向模型**——每条逻辑消息按「谁发起 × request/response」分类（两轴四格，后文称四象限），与物理通道解耦；客户端统一继承 `AbstractApiClient`（协议不变量全在基类，平台差异只是 `doFetch` 传输切面）。
 
 #### 分层角色
 
@@ -62,22 +62,22 @@ TypeScript 以 solution 根引用的**两个聚合 program** 检查（`tsconfig.
 |---|---|---|---|
 | 前置层 | `dsh-host-apiproxy` | TS/zod 定义 (api/)+ fetch 抽象 (fetch/：handler + 客户端基类) | 做简单、所有接入方都要；Node/浏览器皆可 import；协议内容见下文「消息协议」起各节；client 不得经 ctx 绕开 api |
 | 装配层 | `dsh-host-runtime` | 插件组合 + ApiProxy 集成 + web UI 插件挂载（覆盖八个 dshClient 包的内存 Loader 树）；host 级配置归属地（defaults/persistenceRoot，将来用户 profile） | 装什么插件、给什么默认值只在这里定；壳不得改装配 |
-| 承载层 | `dsh-host-webserver` | Web 形态 HTTP 与 upgrade：静态服务 + `/api/*`→handler 转发 + WebSocket upgrade route + close 语义；插件 bundle 端点 + `__DSH_BOOT__` manifest（元数据清单）注入（由 web 插件注册表供给） | Web（浏览器访问）专用；零 workspace 依赖（注册表经结构注入到达）；Electron 不复用它 |
+| 承载层 | `dsh-host-webserver` | Web HTTP 与 upgrade：静态服务 + `/api/*`→handler 转发 + WebSocket upgrade route + close 语义；插件 bundle 端点 + `__DSH_BOOT__` manifest（元数据清单）注入（由 web 插件注册表供给） | Web（浏览器访问）专用；零 workspace 依赖（注册表经结构注入到达）；Electron 不复用它 |
 | client 库 | `dsh-client-ui-slots` / `dsh-client-web-react` / `dsh-client-ui-primitives` | slot 注册表核心 / ctx↔React 胶合 / 纯 React 原子组件 | 组件零 cordis 运行时依赖；由壳播种进 loader 模块表 |
 | client 插件 | `dsh-client-connection` / `dsh-client-runtime` / `dsh-client-ui-theme` / `dsh-client-i18n` / `dsh-client-ui-layout` / `dsh-client-ui-sidebar` / `dsh-client-ui-conversation` / `dsh-client-ui-trajectory` | 浏览器侧 cordis 插件树（wire 消费者、核心服务、主题、i18n、布局、侧栏、对话、轨迹）——见 Web 客户端架构笔记 | 双入口（node 半边=空 apply；实现在 `src/client/`）；消费面唯一经 ApiProxy |
-| 应用态 | `@deepseek-ai/dsh`（apps/cli）+ `dsh-frontend`（apps/web，vite 应用） | bin 粗分发 + 每形态一个拼装模块（web.ts / headless.ts）；vite 应用是 `dsh-client-web` 壳表面之上的薄 main | 形态间动态 import 互不加载；dist 定位等 workspace 知识留在 app |
+| 应用 | `@deepseek-ai/dsh`（apps/cli）+ `dsh-frontend`（apps/web，vite 应用） | bin 粗分发 + 每个应用一个拼装模块（web.ts / headless.ts）；vite 应用是 `dsh-client-web` 壳表面之上的薄 main | 各应用使用动态 import，因此不会互相加载；dist 定位等 workspace 知识留在 app |
 
 #### 命名规则
 
 `packages/host/*` 与 `packages/client/*` 下的包名**必须含目录组前缀**：host/runtime → `dsh-host-runtime`、client/runtime → `dsh-client-runtime`。目录名不重复组前缀（host/ 已表达）。因此包名尾段 ≠ 目录名，tsconfig.base.json 的 `dsh-*` 通配（按目录名解析）命不中——**这两组的每包需显式 paths 条目**，且 client 各包的 `/client` 子路径要单列条目，使源码级解析与 exports map 一致。
 
-#### 怎么接入一个新形态（操作清单）
+#### 怎么接入一个新应用（操作清单）
 
 1. **选 fetch 伪造方式**：浏览器同源 HTTP / 进程内 `host.handler.fetch` 注入 / 自写传输切面子类（如将来 Electron IPC，见下文「子类表」）。
-2. **在 `apps/` 下写拼装模块**：`startHost()` + 客户端子类 + 该形态私有的信号/打印/退出语义；混合体不建包，拼装写在 app 里。
+2. **在 `apps/` 下写拼装模块**：`startHost()` + 客户端子类 + 该应用私有的信号/打印/退出语义；混合体不建包，拼装写在 app 里。
 3. **需要 HTTP 承载才 import `dsh-host-webserver`**，否则零端口。
 
-现有两种形态保持这一边界：Web 形态挂载 Host、载体与浏览器组合，而 `dsh run` 挂载直接使用核心服务的 runner，不包含 Host、HTTP 或端口。ACP 类协议桥不遵循 client 载体清单：它把 core 暴露给外部生态，直接通过 `ctx.plugin(前门插件)` 挂载，不套 fetch。
+现有两个应用保持这一区分：Web 应用挂载 Host、载体与浏览器组合，而 `dsh run` 挂载直接使用核心服务的 runner，不包含 Host、HTTP 或端口。ACP 类协议桥不遵循 client 载体清单：它把 core 暴露给外部生态，直接通过 `ctx.plugin(入口插件)` 挂载，不使用 fetch。
 
 ## 消息协议
 
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ export type ResponseValue<K> =
 | 子类 | 所在包 | doFetch | 用途 |
 |---|---|---|---|
 | `InProcessApiClient` | apiproxy 本包 | 注入的 `{ fetch }` handler | **同构点**：`new InProcessApiClient(toFetchHandler(api))` 全程不过网络但真跑 wire 序列化/zod/SSE 帧；载体测试与调用方可以在不打开端口的情况下运行这套协议，而产品 `dsh run` 直接驱动 core |
-| `WebApiClient` | dsh-client-connection | `globalThis.fetch` 上行 + 每逻辑流一条同源 WebSocket 下行 | 浏览器形态；物理边界见 [WebSocket 下行载体](2026-08-04-websocket-downlink-carrier.md) |
+| `WebApiClient` | dsh-client-connection | `globalThis.fetch` 上行 + 每逻辑流一条同源 WebSocket 下行 | 浏览器客户端；物理边界见 [WebSocket 下行载体](2026-08-04-websocket-downlink-carrier.md) |
 | `FixtureApiClient` | dsh-client-connection | 不用（协议层覆写） | 无 server 的 UI 开发（`?fixture`）：覆写 `callUnary`/`openMux`/`openHost`/`respond` 虚方法，自己就是假 server（帧 rpcId 由它 mint，语义自洽） |
 | IPC 桥子类（假想示例——尚无此形态） | Electron 壳 | IPC 序列化往返 | 只需换 doFetch，约定/基类零改 |
 
@@ -232,15 +232,15 @@ export type ResponseValue<K> =
 
 ## Consequences
 
-所有 client 形态消费同一约定：加一个 unary 方法是从单一签名辐射的五步机械改动，换载体只动一个 `doFetch` 子类，wire 上每条消息可 zod 校验、可经 envelope tap 观测、可按 rpcId 对账。普通 unary 调用仍受时限约束，而 `host.pickDirectory` 与 `command.execute` 可保持挂起，直到操作完成或调用方／连接取消到来；若由用户掌控节奏的操作不自行结束，请求可能一直挂起，这是为避免把合理的操作时长视为传输失败而接受的代价。其余接受的代价：两组包需要显式 tsconfig paths 条目；预留方法（fork/inject/task.list/listModels/hostInstanceId）在真实消费者出现前保持休眠。
+所有 client 使用同一约定：加一个 unary 方法是从单一签名出发的五步机械改动，换载体只动一个 `doFetch` 子类，wire 上每条消息可 zod 校验、可经 envelope tap 观测、可按 rpcId 对账。普通 unary 调用仍受时限约束，而 `host.pickDirectory` 与 `command.execute` 可保持挂起，直到操作完成或调用方／连接取消到来；若由用户掌控节奏的操作不自行结束，请求可能一直挂起，这是为避免把合理的操作时长视为传输失败而接受的代价。其余接受的代价：两组包需要显式 tsconfig paths 条目；预留方法（fork/inject/task.list/listModels/hostInstanceId）在真实消费者出现前保持休眠。
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
 | 放弃项 | 一句话理由 |
 |---|---|
-| 按「产品形态」分包（web 一族、electron 一族） | 形态间共享的是 host/client 两侧能力而非形态本身；能力支持方分层让新形态零新包 |
+| 按产品分包（web 一族、electron 一族） | 产品共享的是 host/client 两侧能力，而不是某个应用实现；能力支持方分层让新应用零新包 |
 | 混合体建包（如 headless 独立包） | 混合体只有一个消费者（它自己的 app），建包是无主抽象；拼装写在 app 里可读可弃 |
-| 消费型 client 直连 ctx（省 apiproxy 一层） | client 形态需要 wire 校验、观测与多 client 一致性。直接 headless 是没有 client 边界的本地前门，使用公开的 Agent／Session seam，而不是 client 命令面 |
+| 消费型 client 直连 ctx（省 apiproxy 一层） | client 需要 wire 校验、观测与多 client 一致性。直接 headless 是没有 client 边界的本地入口，使用公开的 Agent／Session seam，而不是 client 命令面 |
 | webserver 依赖 runtime（省 handler 注入） | 结构 typing 注入让 webserver 可被 sidecar/测试复用且零 workspace 依赖；包依赖会把装配知识拖进承载层 |
 | 包名不带组前缀（沿用 dsh-<尾段>） | `dsh-runtime`/`dsh-web-ui` 在扁平 npm 命名空间里失去归属信息；代价只是每包一条显式 paths |
 | 复用仓内 JSON-RPC 2.0（dsh-jsonrpc） | 数字错误码退化成单码兜底、约定双份人肉对齐、命名无 convention 自然漂移 |

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.md
-2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.md: 496499a691dbca012e5e953cbb6eb1d0bf25b635
-2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.zh.md: c4bed7b730cf37e1d90750f5c93fbccb920ced21
+2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.md: 9bf44e398da66ee286fc9bbc1496c002606d1606
+2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.zh.md: 23d9bc790c792438cb699952ee802e1ffa89de88

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.md

@@ -16,23 +16,23 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.zh.md)
 
 **Boot glue is a class pair.** `AppCLIEntry` (apps/cli) and `AppWebEntry` (the shell kernel) hold only what must exist independently of cordis: argv facts, the composed patch set, the parsed boot manifest, the module system instance, loading-page handles — everything else lives in plugins. `AppCLIEntry.run()` is three stages: layered env (ambient > cwd `.env` > `$DSH_HOME/.env`, closing the defect above) → patch composition → Loader include boot plus the activation audit. `AppWebEntry.run()` mirrors it browser-side: parse `window.__DSH_BOOT__` into a `BootManifest` (two views: npm-package rows for the module table, cordis-plugin rows for entry composition; malformed wire throws), build the module system, render the loading page, prefetch the `immediately` tier in parallel with Context/Loader setup, **await the prefetch before creating entries** (materialization is `tree.import`'s synchronous require, unprotected by fiber inject waiting; cross-package require edges such as i18n → runtime/client need every immediately-tier factory registered first — an empirically found 10–25% boot race otherwise), adopt the modules entry, create the graph rows, settle, sweep.
 
-**Config sources have one declaration place each.** Bundle yml values are engineering defaults, Settings sections are writable user preferences, CLI flags address their owning launcher rows, and env values enter through yml `!!js` expressions. Patches replace a row's config wholesale. The resolved frontend `distIndex` uses that patch channel as an assembly fact. The transport-independent provider/model default belongs to `ctx.agentDefaultModel`; the [direct headless front door](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-front-door.md) and the Web gateway consume the same state.
+**Config sources have one declaration place each.** Bundle yml values are engineering defaults, Settings sections are writable user preferences, CLI flags address their owning launcher rows, and env values enter through yml `!!js` expressions. Patches replace a row's config wholesale. The resolved frontend `distIndex` uses that patch channel as an assembly fact. The transport-independent provider/model default belongs to `ctx.agentDefaultModel`; the [direct headless entry point](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md) and the Web gateway consume the same state.
 
-**The transport splits five ways.** `dsh-host-apiproxy` is the gateway plugin (`api-gateway` row): it default-exports `ApiProxyService`, configures only `{workspaceRoot?}`, consumes the base layer's front-door-neutral `ctx.agentDefaultModel`, provides `ctx.apiProxy`, remains transport-agnostic, and registers no routes. `dsh-host-webserver` is a plain route-registration plugin: `HttpServerService` provides `ctx.httpServer` (`register(route) → disposer` with duplicate-pattern throw, `tapIndex` transforms applied in registration order, `port`), listens on activation, answers per-request failures with 400 and logging, and knows no harness concepts. The connection node half owns the `/api` binding from `ctx.apiProxy` through `toFetchHandler`. The modules node half (`ClientModuleHostService`, providing `ctx.clientModuleHost`) owns incremental package scanning, the bundle route, the index tap, and `onRebuilt`/`onGraphChanged` notification. The hmr node half owns dev reload through `fs.watchFile` membership and the `/plugins/events` SSE route.
+**The transport splits five ways.** `dsh-host-apiproxy` is the gateway plugin (`api-gateway` row): it default-exports `ApiProxyService`, configures only `{nativeOpen?}`, consumes the base layer's entry-point-neutral `ctx.agentDefaultModel`, provides `ctx.apiProxy`, remains transport-agnostic, and registers no routes. `dsh-host-webserver` is a plain route-registration plugin: `HttpServerService` provides `ctx.httpServer` (`register(route) → disposer` with duplicate-pattern throw, `tapIndex` transforms applied in registration order, `port`), listens on activation, answers per-request failures with 400 and logging, and knows no harness concepts. The connection node half owns the `/api` binding from `ctx.apiProxy` through `toFetchHandler`. The modules node half (`ClientModuleHostService`, providing `ctx.clientModuleHost`) owns incremental package scanning, the bundle route, the index tap, and `onRebuilt`/`onGraphChanged` notification. The hmr node half owns dev reload through `fs.watchFile` membership and the `/plugins/events` SSE route.
 
 **Package export discipline.** The modules package exposes exactly `.` (node half) and `./client` (the complete browser half: `ClientModuleSystem`, `parseBootManifest`, the adoption plugin face) — no bespoke subpaths; wire types re-export through the root for host-side consumers. The adoption handshake: the kernel writes the constructed instance to `window.__DSH_MODULES__` before cordis exists; the `./client` apply reads the slot (missing = loud throw) and provides `ctx.modules`.
 
 ## Consequences
 
 - Recomposing a web deployment is a yml/patch edit; the retired pieces (`mountWebPlugins`, `CLIENT_PACKAGES`, `createHostWebPluginRegistry`, `startWebServer`, the webserver's graph/SSE/api knowledge) are deleted.
-- [Headless is a direct core front door](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-front-door.md): its shipped profile contains the shared base Agent capabilities and omits Host, HTTP, Web, and browser layers. The transport split in this note is the browser surface's contract.
+- [Headless is a direct core entry point](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md): its shipped profile contains the shared base Agent capabilities and omits Host, HTTP, Web, and browser layers. The transport split in this note is the browser surface's contract.
 - A TypeScript pitfall worth remembering: a `declare module 'cordis'` augmentation in a file with **no cordis import** is demoted to a standalone module declaration and silently shatters the program-wide `Context` merge (`ctx.on`/`ctx.effect` vanish across the program). Anchor with `import type {} from 'cordis'`.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
 | Rejected | One-line reason |
 |---|---|
-| Dedicated `dsh-host-profile` receiver package | User model state belongs to the Settings-backed `ctx.agentDefaultModel`; an extra Host receiver would duplicate ownership and exclude direct front doors |
+| Dedicated `dsh-host-profile` receiver package | User model state belongs to the Settings-backed `ctx.agentDefaultModel`; an extra Host receiver would duplicate ownership and exclude direct entry points |
 | Runtime `assembly` shim plugin providing an `apiHandler` service | Existed only because `createApiProxy` lived in runtime; moving it into apiproxy made the gateway self-hosting, and `toFetchHandler` is a pure function the binding side calls |
 | Full-rescan + incremental scan coexisting | Two implementations, two semantics; the single per-package path covers the activation pass too |
 | A bespoke `./impl` export on the modules package | Non-uniform export surface; the standard `./client` carries the whole browser half |

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.zh.md

@@ -16,23 +16,23 @@ Status: implemented
 
 **boot 胶水由两个类组成。** `AppCLIEntry`（apps/cli）与 `AppWebEntry`（壳内核）只持有那些必须独立于 cordis、提前存在的东西：argv 事实、合成的 patch 集、解析出的 boot manifest（元数据清单）、模块系统实例、loading 页句柄——其余一律进插件。`AppCLIEntry.run()` 三段：分层 env（ambient > cwd `.env` > `$DSH_HOME/.env`，顺手关掉上述缺陷）→ patch 合成 → Loader include boot 加 activation audit。`AppWebEntry.run()` 在浏览器侧镜像它：把 `window.__DSH_BOOT__` 解析成 `BootManifest`（双视角：npm 包行给模块表、cordis 插件行给 entry 组合；畸形 wire 大声抛）、建模块系统、渲染 loading 页、immediately 层预取与 Context/Loader 准备并行、**create entry 之前等预取齐**（物化是 `tree.import` 的同步 require，不受 fiber inject 等待保护；i18n → runtime/client 这类跨包 require 边要求 immediately 层工厂全部注册完——否则有实测 10–25% 的 boot 竞态）、收编 modules entry、逐一创建图行、settle、sweep。
 
-**每个配置源有唯一声明位置。** 组合包 yml 值是工程默认，Settings 分节是可写的用户偏好，CLI（命令行界面）flags 面向其归属的启动器配置行，env 值则通过 yml `!!js` 表达式进入。patch 会整体替换一行的 config。解析后的前端 `distIndex` 通过同一条 patch 通道作为组装事实传递。与传输无关的提供方／模型默认值归 `ctx.agentDefaultModel` 所有；[直接 headless 前门](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-front-door.md)与 Web 网关消费同一份状态。
+**每个配置源有唯一声明位置。** 组合包 yml 值是工程默认，Settings 分节是可写的用户偏好，CLI（命令行界面）flags 面向其归属的启动器配置行，env 值则通过 yml `!!js` 表达式进入。patch 会整体替换一行的 config。解析后的前端 `distIndex` 通过同一条 patch 通道作为组装事实传递。与传输无关的提供方／模型默认值归 `ctx.agentDefaultModel` 所有；[直接 headless 入口](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md)与 Web 网关消费同一份状态。
 
-**传输五分。** `dsh-host-apiproxy` 是网关插件（`api-gateway` 行）：默认导出 `ApiProxyService`，只配置 `{workspaceRoot?}`，消费 base 层不偏向特定前门的 `ctx.agentDefaultModel`，provide `ctx.apiProxy`，保持传输无关且不注册路由。`dsh-host-webserver` 是朴素的路由注册插件：`HttpServerService` provide `ctx.httpServer`（`register(route) → disposer`、重复 pattern 即抛、`tapIndex` 按注册序应用、`port`），激活即 listen，单请求失败时答 400 并记日志，且不认识任何 harness 概念。connection node 半拥有从 `ctx.apiProxy` 经 `toFetchHandler` 绑定到 `/api` 的逻辑。modules node 半（`ClientModuleHostService`，provide `ctx.clientModuleHost`）拥有单包增量扫描、bundle 路由、index tap 与 `onRebuilt`/`onGraphChanged` 通知。HMR node 半通过 `fs.watchFile` membership 与 `/plugins/events` SSE 路由拥有开发期重载。
+**传输五分。** `dsh-host-apiproxy` 是网关插件（`api-gateway` 行）：默认导出 `ApiProxyService`，只配置 `{nativeOpen?}`，消费 base 层不偏向特定入口的 `ctx.agentDefaultModel`，provide `ctx.apiProxy`，保持传输无关且不注册路由。`dsh-host-webserver` 是朴素的路由注册插件：`HttpServerService` provide `ctx.httpServer`（`register(route) → disposer`、重复 pattern 即抛、`tapIndex` 按注册序应用、`port`），激活即 listen，单请求失败时答 400 并记日志，且不认识任何 harness 概念。connection node 半拥有从 `ctx.apiProxy` 经 `toFetchHandler` 绑定到 `/api` 的逻辑。modules node 半（`ClientModuleHostService`，provide `ctx.clientModuleHost`）拥有单包增量扫描、bundle 路由、index tap 与 `onRebuilt`/`onGraphChanged` 通知。HMR node 半通过 `fs.watchFile` membership 与 `/plugins/events` SSE 路由拥有开发期重载。
 
 **包出口纪律。** modules 包只暴露 `.`（node 半）与 `./client`（完整浏览器半：`ClientModuleSystem`、`parseBootManifest`、收编插件面）——不设专用子路径；wire 类型经根出口 re-export 给 host 侧消费方。收编握手：内核在 cordis 之前把建好的实例写入 `window.__DSH_MODULES__`；`./client` 的 apply 读取该槽位（缺少时显式抛错）并 provide `ctx.modules`。
 
 ## 后果
 
 - 重组一个 web 部署 = 改 yml/patch；退役件（`mountWebPlugins`、`CLIENT_PACKAGES`、`createHostWebPluginRegistry`、`startWebServer`、webserver 的图/SSE/api 知识）全部删除。
-- [Headless 是直接 core 前门](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-front-door.md)：其随附 profile 包含共享的 base Agent 能力，并省去 Host、HTTP、Web 与浏览器层。本笔记的传输划分是浏览器 surface 的约定。
+- [Headless 是直接 core 入口](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md)：其随附 profile 包含共享的 base Agent 能力，并省去 Host、HTTP、Web 与浏览器层。本笔记的传输划分是浏览器 surface 的约定。
 - 一个值得记住的 TypeScript 坑：`declare module 'cordis'` augmentation 所在文件若**没有任何 cordis import**，会被降级成独立 module declaration，无声打散全程序的 `Context` merge（`ctx.on`/`ctx.effect` 全程序消失）。用 `import type {} from 'cordis'` 锚定。
 
 ## 考虑过的替代方案
 
 | 弃案 | 一行理由 |
 |---|---|
-| 专门的 `dsh-host-profile` 受体包 | 用户模型状态归 Settings 支撑的 `ctx.agentDefaultModel` 所有；额外的 Host 受体会重复归属，并排除直接前门 |
+| 专门的 `dsh-host-profile` 受体包 | 用户模型状态归 Settings 支撑的 `ctx.agentDefaultModel` 所有；额外的 Host 受体会重复归属，并排除直接入口 |
 | 运行时里的 `assembly` 垫层插件（provide `apiHandler`） | 它的存在只因 `createApiProxy` 住运行时；本体迁入 apiproxy 后网关自持插件身份，且 `toFetchHandler` 是绑定方自己调的纯函数 |
 | 全量重扫与增量扫描并存 | 两条实现两份语义；单包路径足以覆盖激活初扫 |
 | modules 包特设 `./impl` 出口 | 出口面不统一；标准 `./client` 承载完整浏览器半 |

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md
-2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md: 45801505f1729ec6094900acf94b4c17ed92c3b1
-2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.zh.md: 8dd90b34d2da1d22caba13fe8c388dab4a29be0d
+2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md: 4487bd9c53595fa8b4eed588b294ceafe3ab58dc
+2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.zh.md: 6195dc809e84852c7e0f63ac101ba0ed6a46853e

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ The [background-task runtime](2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md) s
 
 `tasks/` is now a three-package capability family in the bash-trio shape:
 
-- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks` (Service Definition)** — the abstract `TaskService extends Service` owning `ctx.tasks`, the eight-method contract (`start`, `list`, `get`, `read`, `kill`, `wait`, `onTaskDone`, `attachSurface`), all vocabulary types (`TaskId`, `TaskKindMap`, `TaskStart`, `TaskHooks`, `TaskOutcome`, `TaskSnapshot`, `TaskRead`, `TaskDoneListener`), and the snapshot invariant companion. The class-level JSDoc states the semantics every Service provider owes: registrations outlive producer and surface fibers, owned access is session-fenced, settlement is first-wins with contained listeners, and `start` refuses work while no control surface is attached.
+- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks` (Service Definition)** — the abstract `TaskService extends Service` owning `ctx.tasks`, the eight-method contract (`start`, `list`, `get`, `read`, `kill`, `wait`, `onTaskDone`, `attachSurface`), all vocabulary types (`TaskId`, `TaskKindMap`, `TaskStart`, `TaskHooks`, `TaskOutcome`, `TaskSnapshot`, `TaskRead`, `TaskDoneListener`), and the snapshot invariant companion. The class-level JSDoc states the semantics every Service provider owes: registrations outlive producer and surface fibers, owned access is session-fenced, settlement is first-wins with contained listeners, and `start` refuses work while no attached control surface serves the spec's owner (surfaces and listeners are scope-layered, so one process-wide registry answers both questions per owner).
 - **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local` (Service provider)** — `LocalTaskService`, the process-local registry moved verbatim: the in-memory store, per-kind counters, waiter bookkeeping, `TASK_WAIT_TIMEOUT` deadline code, owner-cleanup effects, and force-fail teardown. The `dsh-timeout` dependency moves here with it; the Service Definition package has no provider dependencies.
 - **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks` (Consumer)** — unchanged; it injects `'tasks'` and never imports provider types.
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.zh.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 `tasks/` 如今是一个 bash 三件套形态的三包能力家族：
 
-- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks`（Service Definition）**——抽象的 `TaskService extends Service`，拥有 `ctx.tasks`、八个方法的约定（`start`、`list`、`get`、`read`、`kill`、`wait`、`onTaskDone`、`attachSurface`）、全部词汇类型（`TaskId`、`TaskKindMap`、`TaskStart`、`TaskHooks`、`TaskOutcome`、`TaskSnapshot`、`TaskRead`、`TaskDoneListener`），以及快照不变式配套插件。类级 JSDoc 陈述了每个 Service provider 都必须兑现的语义：注册的存续期长于生产方与控制接口的 fiber，有所有者的访问以会话为界，结算遵循首次结果优先且监听器错误被隔离，并且在没有附加任何控制接口时 `start` 拒绝启动工作。
+- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks`（Service Definition）**——抽象的 `TaskService extends Service`，拥有 `ctx.tasks`、八个方法的约定（`start`、`list`、`get`、`read`、`kill`、`wait`、`onTaskDone`、`attachSurface`）、全部词汇类型（`TaskId`、`TaskKindMap`、`TaskStart`、`TaskHooks`、`TaskOutcome`、`TaskSnapshot`、`TaskRead`、`TaskDoneListener`），以及快照不变式配套插件。类级 JSDoc 陈述了每个 Service provider 都必须兑现的语义：注册的存续期长于生产方与控制接口的 fiber，有所有者的访问以会话为界，结算遵循首次结果优先且监听器错误被隔离，并且当没有任何已附加的控制接口服务于 spec 的所有者时 `start` 拒绝启动工作（控制接口与监听器按 scope 分层，因此一个进程级注册表能逐所有者地回答这两个问题）。
 - **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local`（Service provider）**——`LocalTaskService`，即原样迁移的进程内注册表：内存存储、按 kind 划分的计数器、等待方簿记、`TASK_WAIT_TIMEOUT` deadline 代码、所有者清理 effect，以及强制失败的拆除。`dsh-timeout` 依赖随之迁入此包；Service Definition 包不含任何提供方依赖。
 - **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks`（Consumer）**——保持不变；它注入 `'tasks'`，从不导入提供方类型。
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-04-configuration-source-ownership.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-04-configuration-source-ownership.md
-2026-08-04-configuration-source-ownership.md: d656d329cbc5b3dfbae2561775ed1afc878cebd0
-2026-08-04-configuration-source-ownership.zh.md: 29ef3b83d18d8836b28e4c151ad44c52542b0a11
+2026-08-04-configuration-source-ownership.md: 8ec750de2efaf148fe44a58b415d7da44b87bdc6
+2026-08-04-configuration-source-ownership.zh.md: 64daa54843d55c6f4bde5a8fdece66dbbe835479

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-04-configuration-source-ownership.md

@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ The line is that these take effect with no user action, before any turn, outside
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
-**Unify credentials into the non-secret ordering, by who authored each source.** Attempted and abandoned: it reads well, but the settings seam already fixes composition *below* the user section, so "authored by deployment" is not a tier the seam can express — and moving `.credentials.yaml` above the launching environment would take away the one override CI, containers, and a per-run `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY=…` depend on. Two orderings that each say why they are shaped that way beat one that describes neither accurately.
+**Unify credentials into the non-secret ordering, by who authored each source.** Attempted and abandoned: it reads well, but the settings seam already fixes composition *below* the user section, so "authored by deployment" is not a tier the seam can express — and moving `.credentials.yaml` above the launching environment would take away the one override CI, containers, and a per-run `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY=…` depend on. Two orderings that each explain their precedence beat one that describes neither accurately.
 
 **Withhold routing and credentials from the invoking project until it is explicitly trusted.** Rejected as the product's stance: a checkout is trusted by default, with no prompt and no stored trust record. The residual is real and worth naming — cloning a repository that carries a `.env` naming another endpoint or key routes that session through it — and a later project-trust gate is where that gets addressed, not a rule that makes the common case require ceremony.
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-04-configuration-source-ownership.zh.md

@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ inherited process environment      (read-only, wins)
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
-**按「来源由谁书写」把凭据并入非机密顺序。** 尝试过并放弃：它读起来很顺，但 settings seam 已经把 composition 固定在用户 section *之下*，因此「由部署方写入」根本不是该 seam 能表达的一层；而把 `.credentials.yaml` 抬到启动环境之上，会夺走 CI、容器和一次性 `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY=…` 所依赖的那唯一一种覆盖。两条各自说清自身形状成因的顺序，好过一条两边都描述不准的顺序。
+**按「来源由谁书写」把凭据并入非机密顺序。** 尝试过并放弃：它读起来很顺，但 settings seam 已经把 composition 固定在用户 section *之下*，因此「由部署方写入」根本不是该 seam 能表达的一层；而把 `.credentials.yaml` 抬到启动环境之上，会夺走 CI、容器和一次性 `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY=…` 所依赖的那唯一一种覆盖。两条各自说明优先顺序的规则，好过一条两边都描述不准的规则。
 
 **在项目被显式信任之前，不给它路由与凭据能力。** 作为产品立场被否决：checkout 默认可信，不询问，也不存储信任记录。残留风险是真实的、值得写明——克隆一个携带 `.env`、其中指定了另一个 endpoint 或密钥的仓库，会让该会话经由它——处理它的地方是日后的 project trust 门禁，而不是一条让常见情形都要走仪式的规则。
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-05-profile-plugin-bundles.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-05-profile-plugin-bundles.md
-2026-08-05-profile-plugin-bundles.md: 8b5ab0c99282f6868fc3f70781e618af9a317c09
-2026-08-05-profile-plugin-bundles.zh.md: 2a685d68b3de9210488e26f8e6dd93dfc07f956c
+2026-08-05-profile-plugin-bundles.md: 2924b3cb445064fd47d82bcc94ec8d77ded5721b
+2026-08-05-profile-plugin-bundles.zh.md: b2287034010bcac1048bb385b2266f1bc75921da

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-05-profile-plugin-bundles.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ The `dsh` launcher hardcoded its compositions: `base.cordis.yml` + `web.cordis.y
 
 Everything becomes a **profile**: a directory `$DSH_HOME/profiles/<name>` with a `package.json` (pnpm-managed out-of-tree plugin `dependencies` plus the profile manifest `dsh.profile` with its ordered `bundles` layer list) and a user `cordis.patch.yml`. A **bundle** is an npm package declaring `"dsh": { "bundle": { "patch": "./cordis.patch.yml" } }`; the two manifest kinds live under distinct `dsh.profile` / `dsh.bundle` keys so a package.json states which role it plays. The tree composes over an empty root by applying each bundle's patch in `dsh.profile.bundles` order, then the user layer, then `--patch` overlays, then flag patches — one `applyEntryPatches` call, identical for boot, flag derivation, and `--dump-config`.
 
-The shipped bundles are `@deepseek-ai/dsh-base` (shared core rows), `@deepseek-ai/dsh-web-app` (browser Host rows and Web runtime glue), and `@deepseek-ai/dsh-headless` (a direct one-shot runner over base, without web-app). `dsh web` is the Web-flag alias for `--profile web`; `dsh run [--profile <name>] "task"` owns one-shot execution and defaults to the headless profile; generic `dsh --profile <name>` boots without a task. Patch overlays use `--patch`. `dsh plugin --profile <name> <args...>` is a thin pnpm forwarder that initializes the profile and reconciles `dsh.profile.bundles` with installed bundle declarations; a package without a bundle declaration remains a plain dependency. [Headless as a direct core front door](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-front-door.md) owns the headless composition contract.
+The shipped bundles are `@deepseek-ai/dsh-base` (shared core rows), `@deepseek-ai/dsh-web-app` (browser Host rows and Web runtime glue), and `@deepseek-ai/dsh-headless` (a direct one-shot runner over base, without web-app). `dsh web` is the Web-flag alias for `--profile web`; `dsh run [--profile <name>] "task"` owns one-shot execution and defaults to the headless profile; generic `dsh --profile <name>` boots without a task. Patch overlays use `--patch`. `dsh plugin --profile <name> <args...>` is a thin pnpm forwarder that initializes the profile and reconciles `dsh.profile.bundles` with installed bundle declarations; a package without a bundle declaration remains a plain dependency. [Headless as a direct core entry point](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md) owns the headless composition contract.
 
 The [`dsh run` command decision](../feature/2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.md) owns the one-shot grammar; this note owns the profile composition it selects.
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-05-profile-plugin-bundles.zh.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 一切都变成 **profile**：即目录 `$DSH_HOME/profiles/<name>`，其中包含一个 `package.json`（pnpm 管理的树外插件 `dependencies`，加上 profile manifest（元数据清单）`dsh.profile` 及其有序的 `bundles` 层列表）和一份用户 `cordis.patch.yml`。**组合包**（bundle）是声明了 `"dsh": { "bundle": { "patch": "./cordis.patch.yml" } }` 的 npm 包；两种 manifest 分别位于互不相同的 `dsh.profile` / `dsh.bundle` 键下，因此一份 package.json 能说明自己扮演哪种角色。配置树在空的根之上组合：按 `dsh.profile.bundles` 顺序应用每个组合包的 patch，然后是用户层，然后是 `--patch` overlay，最后是 flag patch——全部收敛为一次 `applyEntryPatches` 调用，启动、flag 派生与 `--dump-config` 使用完全相同的路径。
 
-随附的组合包是 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-base`（共享核心配置行）、`@deepseek-ai/dsh-web-app`（浏览器 Host 配置行与 Web 运行时粘合层）和 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-headless`（直接叠加在 base 上且不含 web-app 的一次性 runner）。`dsh web` 是携带 Web flag 家族的 `--profile web` 别名；`dsh run [--profile <name>] "task"` 负责一次性执行，默认使用 headless profile；通用的 `dsh --profile <name>` 启动 profile 而不携带任务。patch overlay 使用 `--patch`。`dsh plugin --profile <name> <args...>` 是一层薄薄的 pnpm 转发器，负责初始化 profile，并依据已安装包的组合包声明调和 `dsh.profile.bundles`；没有组合包声明的包保持为普通依赖。[Headless 作为直接 core 前门](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-front-door.md)负责 headless 组合约定。
+随附的组合包是 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-base`（共享核心配置行）、`@deepseek-ai/dsh-web-app`（浏览器 Host 配置行与 Web 运行时粘合层）和 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-headless`（直接叠加在 base 上且不含 web-app 的一次性 runner）。`dsh web` 是携带 Web flag 家族的 `--profile web` 别名；`dsh run [--profile <name>] "task"` 负责一次性执行，默认使用 headless profile；通用的 `dsh --profile <name>` 启动 profile 而不携带任务。patch overlay 使用 `--patch`。`dsh plugin --profile <name> <args...>` 是一层薄薄的 pnpm 转发器，负责初始化 profile，并依据已安装包的组合包声明调和 `dsh.profile.bundles`；没有组合包声明的包保持为普通依赖。[Headless 作为直接 core 入口](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md)负责 headless 组合约定。
 
 [`dsh run` 命令决策](../feature/2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.md)负责一次性语法；本 Agent Note 负责该语法所选择的 profile 组合。
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.md
+2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.md: 6d4020828cb1f2ab3de0328c8959a18a0fcfe6c4
+2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.zh.md: 892fa0f848d656609885d008ab36e3ebbe09b992

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.md

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+# Agent Note: Shared feedback and telemetry anonymous user id
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+The OpenTelemetry backend already persisted one anonymous UUID in `$DSH_HOME/.userid`. `/feedback` now needs to report both the receiving session id and a user id so an operator can correlate the acknowledgement with exported records. Duplicating or independently generating that identity would make the reported user meaningless, while importing it from `session-telemetry-otel` would make a direct command depend on an exporter backend and create a dependency cycle when feedback export is mounted by telemetry.
+
+The earlier [anonymous-user-id decision](../feature/2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.md) deliberately kept the helper inside the OTel backend until a second real consumer existed. Feedback is that consumer.
+
+## Decision
+
+`@deepseek-ai/dsh-user-id` owns `getOrCreateAnonymousUserId()` and the `$DSH_HOME/.userid` storage contract. `session-telemetry-otel` uses the returned id as OpenTelemetry Resource `user.id`; the `/feedback` success acknowledgement reports `Feedback recorded for session {sessionId}` followed by `User: {userId}` on a second line, which keeps both identifiers available through the generic command row's expandable body. Invalid feedback is rejected before resolving the id, so an empty command does not create `.userid`.
+
+The extraction preserves the existing random UUID, home resolution, process memo, exclusive-create concurrency, corruption replacement, and best-effort write semantics. It does not unify the dsh-sdk launcher's separate `telemetry.json` identity.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+| Rejected | Reason |
+|---|---|
+| Import the helper from `session-telemetry-otel` | Couples feedback to an optional exporter backend and forms a reverse dependency cycle once telemetry exports feedback |
+| Duplicate the persistence helper in feedback | Two implementations of one file contract can drift and race with different validation or failure semantics |
+| Generate a separate feedback user id | The acknowledgement could not correlate with the OTel Resource and would not satisfy the reporting purpose |
+| Move the launcher telemetry id too | The launcher feed is not a consumer of `.userid`; unifying unrelated stores remains out of scope |
+
+## Consequences
+
+- One harness home now has one anonymous id shared by feedback acknowledgements and session telemetry exports.
+- The feedback package depends only on the identity capability, not the telemetry seam or OTel SDK.
+- The new package is a justified shared seam with two consumers; its empty invariant companion explains why reading the private file is not a useful runtime relationship check.
+- The original anonymous-user-id Note remains authoritative for storage and privacy semantics, while this Note supersedes only its OTel-local ownership decision.

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+# Agent Note: 反馈与遥测共享匿名用户 id
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.md) | 中文
+
+## 问题
+
+OpenTelemetry 后端已在 `$DSH_HOME/.userid` 中持久化一个匿名 UUID。`/feedback` 需要同时报告接收反馈的会话 id 与用户 id，以便运维人员将确认文本与导出的记录相关联。复制该身份或单独生成身份会使报告的用户失去意义；从 `session-telemetry-otel` 导入身份则会让直接命令依赖导出后端，并在遥测侧挂载反馈导出时形成依赖环。
+
+早先的[匿名用户 id 决策](../feature/2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.md)刻意将辅助函数留在 OTel 后端内，直至出现第二个真实消费方。反馈就是这个消费方。
+
+## 决策
+
+`@deepseek-ai/dsh-user-id` 负责 `getOrCreateAnonymousUserId()` 和 `$DSH_HOME/.userid` 存储契约。`session-telemetry-otel` 将返回的 id 用作 OpenTelemetry Resource 的 `user.id`；`/feedback` 的成功确认先报告 `Feedback recorded for session {sessionId}`，再在第二行显示 `User: {userId}`，使两个标识符都可通过通用命令行的可展开正文查看。系统在获取 id 前拒绝无效反馈，因此空命令不会创建 `.userid`。
+
+此次抽取保留既有的随机 UUID、home 解析、进程内缓存、独占创建并发、损坏文件替换与 best-effort 写入语义。它不会统一 dsh-sdk launcher 独立的 `telemetry.json` 身份。
+
+## 考虑过的替代方案
+
+| 已否决 | 原因 |
+|---|---|
+| 从 `session-telemetry-otel` 导入辅助函数 | 使反馈耦合到可选的导出后端，并在遥测导出反馈后形成反向依赖环 |
+| 在反馈中复制持久化辅助函数 | 同一文件契约的两份实现可能发生偏差，并因校验或失败语义不同而产生竞态 |
+| 生成独立的反馈用户 id | 确认文本无法与 OTel Resource 相关联，因而不能达到报告目的 |
+| 同时移动 launcher telemetry id | launcher 回流不是 `.userid` 的消费方；统一无关存储仍不在范围内 |
+
+## 后果
+
+- 一个 harness home 只有一个匿名 id，由反馈确认与会话遥测导出共享。
+- 反馈包只依赖身份能力，不依赖遥测 seam 或 OTel SDK。
+- 新包由两个消费方使用，成为有充分依据的共享 seam；其空不变式伴生插件解释了为何读取私有文件并非有用的运行时关系检查。
+- 原始匿名用户 id Note 仍是存储与隐私语义的权威记录；本 Note 仅取代其中由 OTel 本地拥有身份的决策。

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-08-per-preset-standing-mounts.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-08-per-preset-standing-mounts.md
-2026-08-08-per-preset-standing-mounts.md: 834d645f5f293a2e137b8faf662e301f1e8bb971
-2026-08-08-per-preset-standing-mounts.zh.md: 45ce0f4e7dec28e5bf807898dc9cdbf32b8e4eb5
+2026-08-08-per-preset-standing-mounts.md: c2792454f90a88cd6fba36eed8e36104e5fffea4
+2026-08-08-per-preset-standing-mounts.zh.md: 47668c8c2c424eb188aa14bf55986d27bcfb8ee0

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-08-per-preset-standing-mounts.md

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ A preset is one composition per PROCESS, not one per session. The roster mounts
 
 Standing mounts fix the class, not the instances: the registrations a reader needs exist for the process lifetime, keyed by preset id, no agent required. What made it cheap
 
-- The stateful preset plugins (`plan-mode`, `token-meter`, `compact-basic`, `tasks-local`) already key state by `Session`/`Agent` — they predate presets. Sharing one instance is a return to their design, not a rewrite.
+- The stateful preset plugins (`plan-mode`, `token-meter`, `compact-basic`) already key state by `Session`/`Agent` — they predate presets. Sharing one instance is a return to their design, not a rewrite. `tasks-local` shared that property and has since left the preset plane entirely: producers outside its realm (`tool-bash`, `tool-pty`, a non-continuable `tool-subagent`) resolve the registry with `ctx.get`, which an entry-local realm hides from them, so it is composed on the host plane and only the model-facing `tool-tasks` row stays per preset.
 - Preset ymls are unchanged: one mount per preset = one Entry per preset, whose entry-local realms (`isolate: <name>: true`) keep two presets' same-named services apart exactly as they kept two sessions' apart.
 - A shared realm label was NOT an option: `provide()` throws on a second registration under the same realm symbol, so labels pool the REALM, never the instance — a per-session world sharing a label crashes the second mount.
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-08-per-preset-standing-mounts.zh.md

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 常驻挂载修的是这一类问题而非其中的个例：读取方需要的注册在进程生命周期内始终存在，按 preset id 索引，不需要任何 agent。让它便宜的原因：
 
-- 有状态的 preset 插件（`plan-mode`、`token-meter`、`compact-basic`、`tasks-local`）本就按 `Session`/`Agent` 分键存状态——它们早于 preset 存在。共享一份实例是回归其设计，不是改写。
+- 有状态的 preset 插件（`plan-mode`、`token-meter`、`compact-basic`）本就按 `Session`/`Agent` 分键存状态——它们早于 preset 存在。共享一份实例是回归其设计，不是改写。`tasks-local` 同样具备该性质，且此后已完全离开 preset 平面：realm 之外的生产方（`tool-bash`、`tool-pty`、非 continuable 的 `tool-subagent`）以 `ctx.get` 解析该注册表，而 entry-local realm 对它们不可见，因此它组合在宿主平面，只有面向模型的 `tool-tasks` 行仍留在各 preset 中。
 - preset 的 yml 不变：每 preset 挂一次 = 每 preset 一个 Entry，其 entry 本地 realm（`isolate: <name>: true`）让两个 preset 的同名服务互不相干，正如它从前隔开两个会话。
 - 共享 realm label **不是**选项：`provide()` 对同一 realm 符号下的第二次注册直接抛错，label 池化的是 REALM 而非实例——按会话挂载的世界里共享 label 会让第二次挂载崩溃。
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md
+2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md: 49afe2993de7302adbedcdf9e8e2347d6424ee2a
+2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.zh.md: 73c1cbe5ac777025f63f46751b1d5ccebbfe9676

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md

@@ -1,22 +1,22 @@
-# Agent Note: headless is a direct core front door
+# Agent Note: headless is a direct core entry point
 
 Status: implemented
 
-English | [中文](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-front-door.zh.md)
+English | [中文](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.zh.md)
 
 ## Problem
 
 The `headless` product contract is one local task with final assistant text on stdout, a success-sensitive exit code, empty stderr on success, and no listening port. A composition containing Workspace Host services, ApiProxy, HTTP, the Web runtime, or browser plugins contradicts that contract and makes local completion depend on an unrelated transport tree.
 
-The direct front door still needs the same deployment model state as Web-created Agents. A separate provider/model default would give one deployment two answers, while deriving completion before the Agent and Session persistence are quiescent permits stdout and the exit code to observe incomplete state.
+The direct entry point still needs the same deployment model state as Web-created Agents. A separate provider/model default would give one deployment two answers, while deriving completion before the Agent and Session persistence are quiescent permits stdout and the exit code to observe incomplete state.
 
 ## Decision
 
 The shipped `headless` profile contains `dsh-base` and `dsh-headless`. The headless bundle supplies its persona and tool mode, disables HMR, mounts the Code Mode worker explicitly, and inserts `headless-runner`. Its tree contains no `@deepseek-ai/dsh-host-*` package, ApiProxy, HTTP server, Web runtime, or browser client. Code Mode and Session persistence are one-shot Agent capabilities independent of Web presentation.
 
-`headless-runner` is a direct core front door. After Loader settlement, it reads `ctx.agentDefaultModel.currentSelection()`, creates a fresh persisted Agent through `ctx.agents.create`, installs that `ModelSelection` in the Agent scope, waits for startup quiescence, anchors the Session sequence, submits one ordinary user message, and waits for quiescence again. It awaits `ctx.sessions.flush`, folds its durable event interval for the last non-empty assistant text and final `turn/end` reason, writes the text plus one newline to stdout, and requests bounded launcher shutdown with exit 0 exactly when the reason is `completed`. A terminal `error` reason writes its durable code and message to stderr; unexpected driver failures also use stderr and exit 1.
+`headless-runner` is a direct core entry point. After Loader settlement, it reads `ctx.agentDefaultModel.currentSelection()`, creates a fresh persisted Agent through `ctx.agents.create`, installs that `ModelSelection` in the Agent scope, waits for startup quiescence, anchors the Session sequence, submits one ordinary user message, and waits for quiescence again. It awaits `ctx.sessions.flush`, folds its durable event interval for the last non-empty assistant text and final `turn/end` reason, writes the text plus one newline to stdout, and requests bounded launcher shutdown with exit 0 exactly when the reason is `completed`. A terminal `error` reason writes its durable code and message to stderr; unexpected driver failures also use stderr and exit 1.
 
-`@deepseek-ai/dsh-agent-default-model` owns the transport-independent default used for an Agent without a session-local selection. `AgentDefaultModelService` provides `ctx.agentDefaultModel` and registers the `agent-default-model` Settings section. Composition config supplies `{provider, model}`; user settings may also supply `reasoningEffort`. `currentSelection()` returns the live complete selection and `saveSelection()` writes it as a complete section, so a selection without an effort clears any stored effort. `dsh-base` supplies the composition entry. Direct and ApiProxy front doors consume this service; ApiProxy alone owns session-local precedence, model validation, and persistence of accepted Web selections.
+`@deepseek-ai/dsh-agent-default-model` owns the transport-independent default used for an Agent without a session-local selection. `AgentDefaultModelService` provides `ctx.agentDefaultModel` and registers the `agent-default-model` Settings section. Composition config supplies `{provider, model}`; user settings may also supply `reasoningEffort`. `currentSelection()` returns the live complete selection and `saveSelection()` writes it as a complete section, so a selection without an effort clears any stored effort. `dsh-base` supplies the composition entry. Direct and ApiProxy entry points consume this service; ApiProxy alone owns session-local precedence, model validation, and persistence of accepted Web selections.
 
 `loadProfile` recognizes the exact installation-owned headless tuple (`dsh-base`, `dsh-web-app`, `dsh-headless`) and normalizes it to the shipped headless template while preserving every other manifest field. Extra, missing, or reordered bundle lists are user-owned and remain untouched.
 
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Package tests use the real Session store and Agent registry around a scripted Ag
 | Alternative | Contract mismatch |
 |---|---|
 | Keep `dsh-web-app` but suppress its observation line | The process still opens a port and carries the Host, Web, and browser trees. |
-| Build a Host-only one-shot bundle around ApiProxy | ApiProxy is a client protocol gateway; a local one-shot front door has no client boundary. |
+| Build a Host-only one-shot bundle around ApiProxy | ApiProxy is a client protocol gateway; a local one-shot entry point has no client boundary. |
 | Use `InProcessApiClient` for product-level protocol coverage | Product execution would depend on an unrelated protocol solely to exercise that protocol. |
 | Give headless a separate provider/model config | Direct and Web creation would have independent defaults and persistence. |
 | Omit Code Mode and Session persistence | Both capabilities belong to one-shot Agent execution rather than Web presentation. |

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.zh.md

@@ -2,13 +2,13 @@
 
 Status: implemented
 
-[English](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-front-door.md) | 中文
+[English](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md) | 中文
 
 ## 问题
 
 `headless` 的产品约定是一个本地任务：最终 assistant 文本写入 stdout，退出状态反映成功与否，成功时 stderr 为空，并且不打开监听端口。包含 Workspace Host 服务、ApiProxy、HTTP、Web 运行时或浏览器插件的组合违背这一约定，也使本地完成状态依赖无关的传输树。
 
-直接前门仍需要与 Web 所创建 Agent 相同的部署模型状态。独立的提供方／模型默认值会让同一部署产生两种答案，而在 Agent 与会话持久化完全停稳之前推导完成状态，会让 stdout 与退出状态观察到不完整状态。
+直接入口仍需要与 Web 所创建 Agent 相同的部署模型状态。独立的提供方／模型默认值会让同一部署产生两种答案，而在 Agent 与会话持久化完全停稳之前推导完成状态，会让 stdout 与退出状态观察到不完整状态。
 
 ## 决策
 
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 `headless-runner` 是直接使用核心服务的入口。Loader 完全加载后，它读取 `ctx.agentDefaultModel.currentSelection()`，通过 `ctx.agents.create` 创建一个新的持久化 Agent，在 Agent 作用域中安装该 `ModelSelection`，等待启动工作完全停稳，锚定会话事件序号，提交一条普通用户消息，再次等待完全停稳。随后，它等待 `ctx.sessions.flush`，折叠自身持有的持久事件区间，以取得最后一条非空 assistant 文本和最终 `turn/end` 结束原因，将文本连同一个换行写入 stdout，并且仅在结束原因为 `completed` 时请求启动器以退出状态 0 有界关闭。结束原因为 `error` 时，其持久化错误码与消息写入 stderr；驱动器的意外失败也写入 stderr 并以 1 退出。
 
-`@deepseek-ai/dsh-agent-default-model` 拥有与传输无关的默认值，供没有会话级选择的 Agent 使用。`AgentDefaultModelService` 提供 `ctx.agentDefaultModel` 并注册 `agent-default-model` Settings 分节。组合配置提供 `{provider, model}`，用户设置还可以提供 `reasoningEffort`。`currentSelection()` 返回当前的完整选择，`saveSelection()` 则写入完整分节，因此不含强度的选择会清除已存强度。`dsh-base` 提供组合条目。直接前门与 ApiProxy 前门均消费该服务；只有 ApiProxy 负责会话级优先级、模型校验与已接受 Web 选择的持久化。
+`@deepseek-ai/dsh-agent-default-model` 拥有与传输无关的默认值，供没有会话级选择的 Agent 使用。`AgentDefaultModelService` 提供 `ctx.agentDefaultModel` 并注册 `agent-default-model` Settings 分节。组合配置提供 `{provider, model}`，用户设置还可以提供 `reasoningEffort`。`currentSelection()` 返回当前的完整选择，`saveSelection()` 则写入完整分节，因此不含强度的选择会清除已存强度。`dsh-base` 提供组合条目。直接入口与 ApiProxy 入口均消费该服务；只有 ApiProxy 负责会话级优先级、模型校验与已接受 Web 选择的持久化。
 
 `loadProfile` 识别安装过程拥有的精确 headless 元组（`dsh-base`、`dsh-web-app`、`dsh-headless`），将其规范化为随附的 headless 模板，并保留 manifest（元数据清单）的其他所有字段。带额外项、缺少项或顺序不同的组合包列表归用户所有，保持不变。
 
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Status: implemented
 | 替代方案 | 约定不匹配之处 |
 |---|---|
 | 保留 `dsh-web-app`，但隐藏观察行 | 进程仍会打开端口并携带 Host、Web 与浏览器插件树。 |
-| 围绕 ApiProxy 构建纯 Host 一次性组合包 | ApiProxy 是客户端协议网关，而本地一次性前门没有客户端边界。 |
+| 围绕 ApiProxy 构建纯 Host 一次性组合包 | ApiProxy 是客户端协议网关，而本地一次性入口没有客户端边界。 |
 | 使用 `InProcessApiClient` 实现产品级协议覆盖 | 产品执行会仅为测试无关协议而依赖该协议。 |
 | 为 headless 单独提供提供方／模型配置 | 直接创建与 Web 创建会拥有彼此独立的默认值和持久化。 |
 | 省略 Code Mode 与会话持久化 | 两项能力都属于一次性 Agent 执行，而不是 Web 呈现。 |

.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-20-error-cause-chain-diagnostics.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-20-error-cause-chain-diagnostics.md
-2026-07-20-error-cause-chain-diagnostics.md: 32716b5a68b3b73bded47633eca95995cdbfc586
-2026-07-20-error-cause-chain-diagnostics.zh.md: 9911c32b6d68c1f5569a1fceadb65e23c6586594
+2026-07-20-error-cause-chain-diagnostics.md: b80dd08d79a57738a6eef2f8638b0336ca80d4bf
+2026-07-20-error-cause-chain-diagnostics.zh.md: 914e983d7ea81eef8bca8fd5aa3791f2f44d4080

.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-20-error-cause-chain-diagnostics.md

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-20-error-cause-chain-diagnostics.zh.md)
 A TUI run against an unreachable DeepSeek endpoint failed with the single notice `fetch failed` and no further detail. Two independent gaps produced that dead end:
 
 1. undici's `fetch` wraps every transport failure (DNS, refused connection, TLS, proxy) in a bare `TypeError: fetch failed` whose actionable detail — `ECONNREFUSED`, `bad port`, the Happy Eyeballs AggregateError — lives on `error.cause`. Every diagnostic boundary in the harness rendered only `error.message` (or `String(error)`, which is equivalent for Errors), so the wrapper masked the diagnosis in the TUI notice, the durable `turn/end` reason, and every logger line.
-2. The readline front door (`dsh-stdio`) rendered no failure reason at all: a `turn/end` with `reason.kind === 'error'` printed nothing but the next `> ` prompt, so the same failure in `demo:repl` was pure silence.
+2. The readline entry point (`dsh-stdio`) rendered no failure reason at all: a `turn/end` with `reason.kind === 'error'` printed nothing but the next `> ` prompt, so the same failure in `demo:repl` was pure silence.
 
 ## Decision
 

.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-20-error-cause-chain-diagnostics.zh.md

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Status: implemented
 TUI 连接不可达的 DeepSeek 端点时，失败只显示一条 `fetch failed` 通知，没有任何进一步细节。两个独立缺口共同造成了这个死胡同：
 
 1. undici 的 `fetch` 把所有传输层失败（DNS、连接被拒、TLS、代理）包装成裸的 `TypeError: fetch failed`，可操作的细节——`ECONNREFUSED`、`bad port`、Happy Eyeballs 的 AggregateError——都在 `error.cause` 上。harness 里的每个诊断边界都只渲染 `error.message`（或对 Error 等价的 `String(error)`），于是包装层在 TUI 通知、持久化的 `turn/end` reason 和所有日志行里都掩盖了诊断信息。
-2. readline 前门（`dsh-stdio`）完全不渲染失败原因：`reason.kind === 'error'` 的 `turn/end` 只打印下一个 `> ` 提示符，同样的失败在 `demo:repl` 里就是纯粹的沉默。
+2. readline 入口（`dsh-stdio`）完全不渲染失败原因：`reason.kind === 'error'` 的 `turn/end` 只打印下一个 `> ` 提示符，同样的失败在 `demo:repl` 里就是纯粹的沉默。
 
 ## 决策
 

.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-same-basename-workspace-adoption.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-same-basename-workspace-adoption.md
-2026-07-31-same-basename-workspace-adoption.md: ed53804ea64df0d61db16e579c3d65af803dbb97
-2026-07-31-same-basename-workspace-adoption.zh.md: 82cfb7d90afca28f8e666742a758fda0202909f3
+2026-07-31-same-basename-workspace-adoption.md: 1192558632fdc8bd732ea59f0eca5051f49f5d2c
+2026-07-31-same-basename-workspace-adoption.zh.md: 9c1f1ffd221936e24300b223ad395e1f44552810

.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-same-basename-workspace-adoption.md

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ A Workspace is identified by its stable id and canonical directory path, while i
 
 The Host's `workspace.create({ path })` adoption route inherits that rule. The Workspace manager, picker, grouping tree, selection, rename, deletion, and Session creation continue to use `WorkspaceId`, so equal labels neither merge records nor redirect an operation. The sidebar hover card exposes each canonical path when the labels need disambiguation.
 
-Explicit naming remains stricter. `workspace.create({ name })` and `workspace.rename` continue to reject a title already registered, as described by [manual Workspace naming](../feature/2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.md). This prevents a user from deliberately introducing another ambiguous label while accepting collisions imposed by existing directory names. The path-adoption rule supersedes only the title-conflict clauses in the [Workspace product flow](../feature/2026-07-25-workspace-ui-product-flow.md) and [native directory picker](../feature/2026-07-27-native-workspace-directory-picker.md).
+Explicit naming remains stricter. `workspace.rename` continues to reject a title already registered, as described by [manual Workspace naming](../feature/2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.md). This prevents a user from deliberately introducing another ambiguous label while accepting collisions imposed by existing directory names. The path-adoption rule supersedes only the title-conflict clauses in the [Workspace product flow](../feature/2026-07-25-workspace-ui-product-flow.md) and [native directory picker](../feature/2026-07-27-native-workspace-directory-picker.md).
 
 The durable schema does not change: Workspace records already store id, path, and title independently, bootstrap can derive equal basenames, and startup validates duplicate paths rather than titles.
 
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ Workspace registry and Host API tests create two real directories under differen
 
 **Use the full path as every Workspace title.** This removes the collision but makes the primary navigation label unnecessarily long. The full path remains available in the hover detail while the concise basename stays useful.
 
-**Permit collisions from explicit rename and create-by-name operations too.** The registry supports that state, but those operations intentionally ask the user to choose a display name. Retaining their conflict response preserves the existing naming guard without blocking filesystem-selected paths.
+**Permit collisions from the explicit rename operation too.** The registry supports that state, but rename intentionally asks the user to choose a display name. Retaining its conflict response preserves the existing naming guard without blocking filesystem-selected paths.
 
 ## Consequences
 

.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-same-basename-workspace-adoption.zh.md

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Workspace 的身份由其稳定 id 和规范目录路径确定，标题则是可
 
 Host 的 `workspace.create({ path })` 接纳入口沿用该规则。Workspace 管理器、选择器、分组树、选择、重命名、删除和 Session 创建仍使用 `WorkspaceId`，因此相同标签既不会合并记录，也不会把操作指向其他记录。需要区分相同标签时，侧边栏悬停详情卡会显示各自的规范路径。
 
-显式命名仍采用更严格的规则。`workspace.create({ name })` 和 `workspace.rename` 仍会拒绝已注册的标题，具体见[手动 Workspace 命名](../feature/2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.md)。这既防止用户主动引入另一个难以区分的标签，又允许既有目录名称造成的重名。路径接纳规则仅取代 [Workspace 产品流](../feature/2026-07-25-workspace-ui-product-flow.md)和[原生目录选择器](../feature/2026-07-27-native-workspace-directory-picker.md)中的标题冲突条款。
+显式命名仍采用更严格的规则。`workspace.rename` 仍会拒绝已注册的标题，具体见[手动 Workspace 命名](../feature/2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.md)。这既防止用户主动引入另一个难以区分的标签，又允许既有目录名称造成的重名。路径接纳规则仅取代 [Workspace 产品流](../feature/2026-07-25-workspace-ui-product-flow.md)和[原生目录选择器](../feature/2026-07-27-native-workspace-directory-picker.md)中的标题冲突条款。
 
 持久化 schema 未变：Workspace 记录本就分别存储 id、path 和 title，引导初始化可以派生出相同的 basename，启动校验检查的是重复路径而非重复标题。
 
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ Workspace 注册表与 Host API 测试会在不同父目录下创建两个末级
 
 **将完整路径用作每个 Workspace 的标题。** 这会消除冲突，却使主导航标签不必要地过长。完整路径仍可在悬停详情中查看，而简洁的 basename 仍有价值。
 
-**也允许显式重命名和按名称创建操作产生重名。** 注册表支持这种状态，但这些操作本就是明确要求用户选择显示名称。保留冲突响应可维持现有命名防护，同时不阻止从文件系统选取的路径。
+**也允许显式重命名操作产生重名。** 注册表支持这种状态，但该操作本就是明确要求用户选择显示名称。保留冲突响应可维持现有命名防护，同时不阻止从文件系统选取的路径。
 
 ## 后果
 

.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-08-10-session-row-identity-covers-the-preset.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-08-10-session-row-identity-covers-the-preset.md
+2026-08-10-session-row-identity-covers-the-preset.md: 7a89dcb4e4ae292a06a1743842d2e9cf6bd96282
+2026-08-10-session-row-identity-covers-the-preset.zh.md: 7ffa3423818bcc867c942651540db1975737e073

.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-08-10-session-row-identity-covers-the-preset.md

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+# Agent Note: The session-row identity guard covers the preset
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-08-10-session-row-identity-covers-the-preset.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+`SessionManager.buildListSnapshot` memoizes list rows by value: a wire refresh mints all-new summary objects, so an entry equal to the cached one is replaced by the cached instance, and every `SessionListItem` memo downstream keeps hitting. The stated contract is "reuse the cached object when every field matches"; the comparison enumerated the fields by hand and did not enumerate `agentPreset`.
+
+A confirmed preset switch moves exactly that one field. `noteAgentPreset` upserts it and `applyMutation` merges it in — the merge deliberately does not take the mutation's `updatedAt`, so a switched row differs from its cached twin in the preset and in nothing else. The guard therefore judged the row unchanged and served the stale instance, permanently: the manager's own summaries said `minimal` while every reader of the projected snapshot went on reading `standard`.
+
+The hero chip is one of those readers, and it compares the pick against that row before sending anything. Switching back to the preset the session was created under looked to it like "already on that preset", so it dropped the stage and sent no RPC at all — the chip label moved while the composition did not. A session could be switched away from its creation-time preset once and never back.
+
+## Decision
+
+The identity guard compares `agentPreset` alongside the other summary fields, which is what "every field matches" already claimed. Nothing else changes: the memoization, the merge, and the chip's no-op check all stay as they are, because each is correct once the row it reads is.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**Have the chip re-read the host instead of the list row.** It would route around the stale row, but the row is also what the session header labels itself from, so the staleness would survive in the surface where it is most visible — and any future reader of `SessionSummary.agentPreset` would inherit the same trap.
+
+**Drop the entry-identity memoization and rebuild rows every snapshot.** It removes the whole class of missing-field bugs, at the cost the memo exists to avoid: a wire refresh mints new objects for every row, so each refresh would re-render the entire session list.
+
+**Compare summaries structurally rather than field by field.** A generic deep comparison cannot be added blind: the row carries `projectionValues`, whose reference identity is the deliberate signal that the projection store republished, and folding it into a value comparison would either re-render on every projection tick or mask a real one.
+
+## Consequences
+
+Every field a session row carries now participates in row identity, so a surface reading `SessionSummary.agentPreset` sees a switch as soon as the host confirms it — the header label included. The guard is still a hand-written enumeration, so a field added to `SessionSummary` later must be added here too; the `sessions-service` projection test names the failure mode for the next such field rather than only pinning this one.
+
+## Testing
+
+`sessions-service.spec.ts` feeds a blank row, notes a switch, and asserts the projected snapshot reports the new preset — it fails on the old guard because the row differs in nothing else. The `agent-preset-selection` web e2e switches down and back up, asserting the host honors the second switch and the `/` catalog returns with it; without this fix the second switch never reaches the host at all.
+
+## Related
+
+The same e2e covers [the catalog-invalidation fix](2026-08-10-slash-catalog-follows-preset-switch.md), which is what makes the menu follow either switch once the switch itself lands.

.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-08-10-session-row-identity-covers-the-preset.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+# Agent Note：会话行的标识判定纳入 preset
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-08-10-session-row-identity-covers-the-preset.md) | 中文
+
+## Problem
+
+`SessionManager.buildListSnapshot` 按值对列表行做记忆化：一次 wire 刷新会铸造全新的 summary 对象，因此与缓存项相等的行会被替换为缓存实例，下游每一个 `SessionListItem` memo 才能持续命中。它声明的约定是「每个字段都相同就复用缓存对象」，而那段比较是手写枚举字段的，其中没有 `agentPreset`。
+
+一次已确认的 preset 切换恰好只移动这一个字段。`noteAgentPreset` 把它 upsert 进去，`applyMutation` 合并它——该合并有意不采用 mutation 的 `updatedAt`，因此切换后的行与它的缓存孪生只在 preset 上不同，别处一致。于是标识判定认为这一行没变，永久地提供了过期实例：manager 自己的 summaries 是 `minimal`，而所有读取投影快照的一方继续读到 `standard`。
+
+hero 上的 chip 正是其中一个读取方，而且它在发出任何请求之前会拿这次选择和那一行比较。切回会话创建时的那个 preset，在它看来就是「已经是这个 preset 了」，于是丢弃 stage、根本不发 RPC——chip 的标签变了，组成没变。一个会话可以从创建时的 preset 切走一次，然后再也切不回来。
+
+## Decision
+
+标识判定把 `agentPreset` 与其余 summary 字段一起比较，这本就是「每个字段都相同」所声称的内容。其他一概不动：记忆化、合并、chip 的 no-op 检查各自都是对的——只要它们读到的那一行是对的。
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**让 chip 改为直接读宿主，而不是读列表行。** 这样能绕开过期的行，但会话头部的标签同样以这一行为准，过期状态会在最显眼的界面里留下来；而且将来任何 `SessionSummary.agentPreset` 的读取方都会继承同一个陷阱。
+
+**去掉行标识记忆化，每次快照都重建行。** 这能整类消除「漏字段」缺陷，代价却正是这个 memo 存在的理由：一次 wire 刷新会为每一行铸造新对象，于是每次刷新都要重渲染整个会话列表。
+
+**改成结构化比较，而不是逐字段枚举。** 通用的深比较不能盲目加：行上带有 `projectionValues`，它的引用标识本身就是「投影 store 重新发布了」这一有意为之的信号，把它折进值比较，要么每个投影 tick 都重渲染，要么把一次真实变化掩盖掉。
+
+## Consequences
+
+会话行携带的每个字段现在都参与行标识，因此读取 `SessionSummary.agentPreset` 的界面会在宿主确认后立刻看到切换，会话头部标签也包含在内。该判定仍是手写枚举，所以将来给 `SessionSummary` 新增字段时必须同步加进来；`sessions-service` 的投影测试为下一个这样的字段点明了失效形态，而不只是钉住这一次。
+
+## Testing
+
+`sessions-service.spec.ts` 喂入一行空会话、记录一次切换，并断言投影快照报告的是新 preset——在旧判定下它会失败，因为这一行别处都没变。`agent-preset-selection` web e2e 先向下切再向上切，断言宿主认可第二次切换、`/` 目录随之回来；没有这次修复，第二次切换根本到不了宿主。
+
+## Related
+
+同一条 e2e 也覆盖[目录失效的修复](2026-08-10-slash-catalog-follows-preset-switch.md)——正是它让菜单在切换真正落地之后跟随任一方向的切换。

.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-08-10-slash-catalog-follows-preset-switch.i18n.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
+# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
+# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-08-10-slash-catalog-follows-preset-switch.md
+2026-08-10-slash-catalog-follows-preset-switch.md: 85bd5b2134fd20c86fdeb13f3ce5b007449105b5
+2026-08-10-slash-catalog-follows-preset-switch.zh.md: 97c8f08a7b3dfec7c17fbb00bef626e28505c500

.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-08-10-slash-catalog-follows-preset-switch.md

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+# Agent Note: The slash catalog follows a blank session's preset switch
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-08-10-slash-catalog-follows-preset-switch.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+Presets moved the rows that decide what a session's `/` menu contains. The Web composition disables host-plane `skill-local`, `tool-skill`, `plan-mode`, and `command-compact`; a preset supplies them, so which commands and skills exist is a property of the session's composition rather than of the deployment.
+
+Both browser catalogs cache per session — `CommandDirectory` in `dsh-client-ui-command`, the single-flight fetch map in `dsh-client-ui-skill` — and the composer warms both at scope birth, under whatever preset the session was created with. The hero chip then lets the user recompose the still-blank session, and neither cache had an invalidation edge for that: `commands/changed` is registry-wide and `connection/reset` needs a reconnect. `agentPresets.recompose` re-parents the agent's scope onto a standing mount that may already exist, so it registers nothing and the registry-wide signal never fires for it.
+
+The menu therefore kept serving the composition the session no longer ran. Switching down left `compact`, `plan`, and every project skill listed; switching up left the narrower catalog — the four host-plane rows and the client's own `model` contribution — with no skills at all, which is what the bug report described. The catalog only healed when an unrelated registry change or a reconnect happened to invalidate it.
+
+## Decision
+
+The switch's commit point is the logged `agent-preset/selected` event. The host stream frames it as `host/session-preset-changed { sessionId, agentPreset }`, the browser runtime bridges that frame to the typed `session/preset-changed` ctx event beside the registry-invalidation bridges it already owns, and each catalog owner drops its own entry for that session: `ui-command` soft-refreshes the key (the old snapshot keeps serving the open menu until the new one lands), `ui-skill` invalidates it (aborting an in-flight prewarm, so a warm racing the switch cannot publish the stale catalog).
+
+The frame is per session and carries no catalog, only the preset id — which the manager folds into the session row, because the `agentPresets.select` echo reaches only the client that issued the switch and the row is what the session header labels itself from (and what the hero chip compares the next pick against).
+
+Deriving the frame from the logged event rather than from the RPC handler's return keeps one authority for "this session's composition changed": every connected client observes the switch, not only the tab that issued it, and a client that is not the switcher never has to infer it from a registry signal that will not come.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**Invalidate in the client's own `agentPresets.select` callback.** Smallest change, and the preset is locked after the first turn, so the hero chip is the only place a switch can originate. Rejected because the invalidation would then live in the surface that happens to issue the RPC rather than at the commit point: a second tab on the same blank session keeps a stale menu, and any future host-side recomposition has no signal at all.
+
+**Derive the client event from the existing `session/event` mux frame.** The logged event already reaches every subscribed client, so no new wire type would be needed. Rejected on face separation: narrowing `event.type` to `agent-preset/selected` requires the `SessionEventMap` augmentation, and the only ways to load it in the Client program are a project reference to `dsh-agent-presets` — which drags the host `ctx.sessions` merge into a program that publishes its own — or a cast that defeats the discriminant.
+
+**Reuse `host/commands-changed`.** It is the existing catalog-invalidation frame, but it is registry-wide, carries no session, and says nothing about skills; a client would repull every session's commands and still never refresh a skill catalog.
+
+## Consequences
+
+The wire gains one frame and the Client one typed event, and every catalog a preset decides now has one place to subscribe: a future per-session surface derived from the composition invalidates on the same signal instead of inventing another. The cost is that the frame is a second reader of a logged fact — the host stream must keep deriving it from `agent-preset/selected`, so a future switch path that recomposes without logging would go unannounced. `ui-command` stays soft (the open menu never blanks) while `ui-skill` drops its entry outright, because a skill catalog has no partial-serve mode; a menu opened inside the refetch window shows no skills for that instant rather than the wrong ones.
+
+## Testing
+
+`api-proxy-agent-preset.spec.ts` asserts the committed switch frames once with the session and its new preset; `wire-events.spec.ts` asserts the frame-to-event bridge; the `ui-command` and `ui-skill` specs assert that the event repulls the recomposed session and leaves every other session's cache serving. The `agent-preset-selection` web e2e seeds a project skill and, after the hero chip applies `minimal`, asserts the `/` menu drops `compact`, `plan`, and the skill while keeping the host-plane rows — the assembled-application evidence that the panel follows the composition.
+
+That e2e also stopped reading its staged-pick assertion off the serialized session list: the seeded session records `minimal` too, so the substring answered before the switch had landed. It now addresses the live session by id.
+
+## Related
+
+Reaching the host on a SECOND switch is a separate defect with its own cause and fix: [the session-row identity guard](2026-08-10-session-row-identity-covers-the-preset.md). Until it landed, `agent-preset-selection.e2e.ts` could only exercise the first switch — the invalidation edge here is direction-blind, but the switch it reacts to has to happen.

.agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-08-10-slash-catalog-follows-preset-switch.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+# Agent Note：斜杠目录跟随空会话的 preset 切换
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-08-10-slash-catalog-follows-preset-switch.md) | 中文
+
+## Problem
+
+preset 把决定 `/` 菜单内容的那些行搬走了。Web 组装禁用了宿主面的 `skill-local`、`tool-skill`、`plan-mode` 和 `command-compact`，改由 preset 提供，因此一个会话有哪些命令和技能，是它自身组成的属性，而不是部署的属性。
+
+浏览器侧两份目录都按会话缓存——`dsh-client-ui-command` 的 `CommandDirectory`，`dsh-client-ui-skill` 的 single-flight 拉取表——并且 composer 在 scope 出生时就按会话创建时的 preset 预热了它们。随后 hero 上的 chip 允许用户重组这个仍为空的会话，而两份缓存都没有对应的失效边：`commands/changed` 是注册表级的，`connection/reset` 需要重连。`agentPresets.recompose` 只是把 agent 的 scope 重新挂接到一个可能已经存在的常驻挂载上，不产生任何注册，注册表级信号因此永远不会为它触发。
+
+于是菜单继续提供会话已经不再运行的那套组成。向下切换后 `compact`、`plan` 和全部项目技能仍列在菜单里；向上切换后留在原地的是更窄的目录——四条宿主面行加客户端自己的 `model` 贡献——而且完全没有技能，这正是 bug 报告描述的现象。只有当某个无关的注册表变化或一次重连恰好使其失效时，目录才会自愈。
+
+## Decision
+
+这次切换的提交点是落账的 `agent-preset/selected` 事件。宿主流把它成帧为 `host/session-preset-changed { sessionId, agentPreset }`，浏览器运行时在它已经拥有的那组注册表失效桥接旁，把该帧桥接为类型化的 `session/preset-changed` ctx 事件，两份目录各自丢弃该会话的那一项：`ui-command` 软刷新该键（新快照落地前，旧快照继续服务已打开的菜单），`ui-skill` 让它失效（并中止在途的预热，使一次与切换赛跑的 warm 无法发布过期目录）。
+
+该帧按会话粒度，不携带目录，只带 preset id——manager 会把它折进会话行，因为 `agentPresets.select` 的回执只会到达发起切换的那个客户端，而会话头部标签正是以这一行为准（hero chip 比较下一次选择时读的也是它）。
+
+从落账事件而不是 RPC 处理器的返回值派生该帧，使「这个会话的组成变了」只有一个权威来源：每个已连接的客户端都能观察到这次切换，而不只是发起它的那个标签页；不是发起方的客户端也无需从一个根本不会到来的注册表信号里去推断。
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**在客户端自己的 `agentPresets.select` 回调里就地失效。** 改动最小，而且第一轮之后 preset 就锁定，hero 上的 chip 是切换唯一可能的发起处。否决理由是失效逻辑会落在恰好发起 RPC 的那个界面上，而不是提交点：同一个空会话在第二个标签页里仍是过期菜单，将来任何宿主侧的重组也完全没有信号。
+
+**从既有的 `session/event` mux 帧派生客户端事件。** 落账事件本来就会送达每个已订阅的客户端，不需要新增协议类型。因面（face）分离而否决：把 `event.type` 收窄到 `agent-preset/selected` 需要 `SessionEventMap` 增补，而在 Client 程序里加载它只有两条路——引用 `dsh-agent-presets` 工程，那会把宿主的 `ctx.sessions` 合并拖进一个自己也发布同名服务的程序；或者用一次类型断言绕过判别式。
+
+**复用 `host/commands-changed`。** 它是既有的目录失效帧，但它是注册表级的、不带会话、也与技能无关；客户端会把每个会话的命令都重拉一遍，却依然永远刷不新技能目录。
+
+## Consequences
+
+协议多了一个帧，Client 多了一个类型化事件，而每一份由 preset 决定的目录从此有了统一的订阅点：将来任何从组成派生的按会话界面，都在同一个信号上失效，而不必再发明一个。代价是该帧成为一项落账事实的第二个读者——宿主流必须持续从 `agent-preset/selected` 派生它，因此将来若出现一条不落账就重组的切换路径，它将无人宣告。`ui-command` 保持软失效（已打开的菜单不会变空），而 `ui-skill` 直接丢弃该项，因为技能目录没有「部分可服务」的状态；在重拉窗口内打开的菜单，那一瞬间显示的是没有技能，而不是错误的技能。
+
+## Testing
+
+`api-proxy-agent-preset.spec.ts` 断言已提交的切换恰好成帧一次，并带上会话与新 preset；`wire-events.spec.ts` 断言帧到事件的桥接；`ui-command` 与 `ui-skill` 的 spec 断言该事件只重拉被重组的会话，其他会话的缓存继续服务。`agent-preset-selection` web e2e 播种一个项目技能，并在 hero chip 应用 `minimal` 之后断言 `/` 菜单丢掉了 `compact`、`plan` 和该技能，同时保留宿主面的那几行——这是面板跟随组成的整装应用证据。
+
+同一条 e2e 也不再从序列化后的会话列表里读它的 staged-pick 断言：被播种的会话同样记录着 `minimal`，子串匹配在切换落地之前就会通过。现在它按 id 寻址那个活跃会话。
+
+## Related
+
+第二次切换能否到达宿主是另一个缺陷，有各自的成因与修复：[会话行的标识判定](2026-08-10-session-row-identity-covers-the-preset.md)。在它落地之前，`agent-preset-selection.e2e.ts` 只能演练第一次切换——这里的失效边对方向无感，但它所响应的那次切换必须真的发生。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-15-code-mode.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-15-code-mode.md
-2026-06-15-code-mode.md: 5ad7be9506c2356f90050b86d85aa77f602946ce
-2026-06-15-code-mode.zh.md: 1902c6ba86b6b8d3fecd06c417347a9c082f67b4
+2026-06-15-code-mode.md: 51c53c56f5755d56f49d8e5166a1ceeef0ffc202
+2026-06-15-code-mode.zh.md: dbf8d409dea152b39d215f5dd636989c3f4fa0bb

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-15-code-mode.md

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Tool presentation belongs to the registry that owns tool visibility: implementin
 
 Three decisions, each elaborated in its own section below:
 
-1. **Code Mode is a first-class presentation mode of `ToolRegistry`** (`dsh-tools`), selected by a validated `mode` config: `'native'` (the default, contributing the visible capability schemas), `'code'` (the registry contributes only its reserved `run_code` transport plus a generated SDK `.d.ts` in the system prompt), or `'both'` (native schemas and the transport + SDK). The registry shapes its canonical contribution at the source; the cooperative prompt-assembly result remains authoritative, and the logged request header records exactly that returned presentation.
+1. **Code Mode is a first-class presentation mode of `ToolRegistry`** (`dsh-tools`), selected by a validated `mode` config: `'native'` (the default, contributing the visible capability schemas), `'code'` (the registry contributes only its reserved `run_code` transport plus a generated SDK `.d.ts` in the system prompt), or `'both'` (native schemas and the transport + SDK). The registry constructs its canonical contribution at the source; the cooperative prompt-assembly result remains authoritative, and the logged request header records exactly that returned presentation.
 2. **Code execution is a capability seam** — `packages/code-runtime/` contains the Service Definition package `@deepseek-ai/dsh-code-runtime`, which owns `ctx.codeRuntime` ([capability seams](../architecture/2026-06-13-capability-seams.md); Consumer = `dsh-tools`, with core-consumes-a-seam precedent in `agent-loop` → `dsh-llm`). The runtime knows nothing about tools: it is handed a program and named async bindings, runs the program, and reports `{ value, logs, error? }`. Language and substrate are backend properties, so a future Python or container backend is another Service provider package, not a redesign.
 3. **The shipped implementation is `@deepseek-ai/dsh-code-runtime-worker`**: one fresh Node worker thread per run, executing the model's TypeScript after type-strip, with bindings bridged over the message port, an empty environment, configurable heap/output/time caps, and hard termination. Its trust posture is bash-equivalent by design — no unsafe-acknowledgement flags — because the harness already ships `dsh-bash-local`, which executes arbitrary model-written shell commands with strictly *more* ambient authority.
 
@@ -120,11 +120,11 @@ Deployments switching to `'code'` must update any native-only `toolOrder`. Assem
 
 **The worker is not a hard security boundary.** Deliberate and documented (§Trust posture): posture equals the existing bash tool, containment exceeds it, gating uses the same approval and sandbox policies. Deployments needing more need a future `isolation: 'container'` backend — tracked as the seam's designed extension, not a TODO on this design.
 
-**`stripTypeScriptTypes` is marked experimental.** It is the same engine (amaro/swc) behind Node's own native `.ts` execution, exposed as an API across this repo's whole engines range. Mitigations: the runtime's unit suite pins the behaviors relied on (position preservation, erasable-only rejection message shape loosely), the call sits behind one private function, and `amaro`/`sucrase` are drop-in replacements if the API shifts. The erasable-only subset is a model-facing contract line, and the error path is a working feedback loop, not a dead end.
+**`stripTypeScriptTypes` is marked experimental.** It is the same engine (amaro/swc) behind Node's own native `.ts` execution, exposed as an API across this repo's whole engines range. Mitigations: the runtime's unit suite checks position preservation and the required parts of the erasable-only rejection message, the call sits behind one private function, and `amaro`/`sucrase` are direct replacements if the API shifts. The erasable-only subset is a model-facing input restriction, and the error tells the model how to correct the program.
 
 **Prompt cost of the SDK, especially under `'both'`.** The `.d.ts` can rival the native schemas it complements; `'both'` carries two representations. Prefix stability + provider caching amortize per-session cost; the mode is per-deployment; the Agent Note makes no unconditional-savings claim. Measured guidance (when to prefer which mode) is explicitly post-ship learning.
 
-**Registry scope growth.** `dsh-tools` absorbs codegen, a tool, a bridge, and an event. Contained by module boundaries inside the package (`ts-types.ts`, `code-mode.ts` beside `schema.ts`/`json-schema.ts`/`presentation.ts`) and by the seam: everything substrate-shaped lives behind `ctx.codeRuntime`.
+**Registry scope growth.** `dsh-tools` absorbs codegen, a tool, a bridge, and an event. Package modules separate these responsibilities (`ts-types.ts` and `code-mode.ts` beside `schema.ts`, `json-schema.ts`, and `presentation.ts`), while `ctx.codeRuntime` owns all code-runtime-specific implementation.
 
 **Large lossless JSON values can exhaust memory.** Tool bindings snapshot lossless JSON before dispatch and return canonical JSON resolutions whole. The runtime validates both sides of the worker port and applies no per-binding byte cap; structured-clone cost and process or worker memory are the practical bounds. The combined outer-output ledger for logs, the completion value, and a failure diagnostic is the only byte-capped boundary.
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-15-code-mode.zh.md

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Cloudflare 的 [Code Mode](https://blog.cloudflare.com/code-mode/) 提出了一
 
 三项决策，各自在下方独立小节中展开：
 
-1. **Code Mode 是 `ToolRegistry`（`dsh-tools`）的一等呈现模式**，通过经校验的 `mode` 配置选择：`'native'`（默认，贡献可见能力 schema）、`'code'`（注册表仅贡献其保留的 `run_code` 传输通道加一份生成的 SDK `.d.ts` 到系统提示词中）或 `'both'`（原生 schema 加传输通道 + SDK）。注册表在源头塑造其权威贡献；协作式提示词组装的结果仍具权威性，记录在日志中的请求头精确反映该返回的呈现。
+1. **Code Mode 是 `ToolRegistry`（`dsh-tools`）的一等呈现模式**，通过经校验的 `mode` 配置选择：`'native'`（默认，贡献可见能力 schema）、`'code'`（注册表仅贡献其保留的 `run_code` 传输通道加一份生成的 SDK `.d.ts` 到系统提示词中）或 `'both'`（原生 schema 加传输通道 + SDK）。注册表在源头构建其权威贡献；协作式提示词组装的结果仍具权威性，记录在日志中的请求头精确反映该返回的呈现。
 2. **代码执行是一个能力 seam**——`packages/code-runtime/` 包含 Service Definition 包 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-code-runtime`，拥有 `ctx.codeRuntime`（[能力 seam](../architecture/2026-06-13-capability-seams.md)；Consumer = `dsh-tools`，core 消费 seam 的先例见 `agent-loop` → `dsh-llm`）。运行时对工具一无所知：它接收一段程序和命名的异步绑定，执行程序，报告 `{ value, logs, error? }`。语言和基底是后端属性，因此未来的 Python 或容器后端只是另一个 Service provider 包，而非重新设计。
 3. **交付的实现是 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-code-runtime-worker`**：每次运行 spawn 一个全新的 Node worker 线程，对模型的 TypeScript 进行 type-strip 后执行，绑定通过消息端口桥接，环境为空，堆/输出/时间上限可配置，并支持硬终止。其信任姿态在设计上等同于 bash——无需 unsafe-acknowledgement flag——因为 harness 已经交付了 `dsh-bash-local`，后者以严格*更高*的环境权限执行模型编写的任意 shell 命令。
 
@@ -120,11 +120,11 @@ SDK 指示模型编写一个所加载运行时语言的异步函数体（默认
 
 **Worker 不是硬安全边界。** 有意为之且已文档化（§信任姿态）：姿态等同于既有的 bash 工具，约束能力强于它，门禁使用相同的审批与沙箱策略。需要更强隔离的部署需要未来的 `isolation: 'container'` 后端——作为 seam 设计的扩展点跟踪，而非本设计的 TODO。
 
-**`stripTypeScriptTypes` 标记为 experimental。** 它与 Node 自身原生 `.ts` 执行背后的引擎（amaro/swc）相同，在本仓库的整个引擎范围内作为 API 暴露。缓解措施：运行时的单元测试套件固定了所依赖的行为（位置保持、可擦除限制的拒绝消息形状宽松匹配），调用位于一个私有函数之后，且 `amaro`/`sucrase` 是 API 变化时的直接替代品。仅可擦除子集是面向模型的约定线，错误路径是一个可工作的反馈循环，而非死胡同。
+**`stripTypeScriptTypes` 标记为 experimental。** 它与 Node 自身原生 `.ts` 执行背后的引擎（amaro/swc）相同，在本仓库的整个引擎范围内作为 API 暴露。缓解措施：运行时的单元测试套件会检查位置保持和可擦除限制拒绝消息中的必需部分；调用位于一个私有函数之后，且 `amaro`/`sucrase` 可在 API 变化时直接替换它。仅可擦除子集是面向模型的输入限制，错误消息会告诉模型如何修正程序。
 
 **SDK 的提示词成本，尤其在 `'both'` 下。** `.d.ts` 可能与它补充的原生 schema 体量相当；`'both'` 携带两种表示。前缀稳定性 + 提供方缓存摊销了每会话成本；mode 是每部署的；本 Agent Note 不做无条件节省的声明。何时优先使用哪种模式的量化指导明确属于上线后学习。
 
-**注册表 scope 增长。** `dsh-tools` 吸收了代码生成、一个工具、一个桥和一个事件。包内的模块边界（`ts-types.ts`、`code-mode.ts` 与 `schema.ts`/`json-schema.ts`/`presentation.ts` 并列）和 seam 共同约束了这一增长：所有基底相关的内容都在 `ctx.codeRuntime` 之后。
+**注册表 scope 增长。** `dsh-tools` 吸收了代码生成、一个工具、一个桥和一个事件。包内模块把这些职责分开（`ts-types.ts`、`code-mode.ts` 与 `schema.ts`、`json-schema.ts`、`presentation.ts` 并列），所有 code-runtime 专用实现都由 `ctx.codeRuntime` 提供。
 
 **大型无损 JSON 值可能耗尽内存。** 工具绑定会在分发前对无损 JSON 创建快照，并完整返回规范 JSON 返回值。运行时会校验 worker 端口两侧，但不对单次绑定设置字节数上限；结构化克隆成本以及进程或 worker 内存构成实际边界。只有包含日志、完成值和失败诊断的组合外层输出账本受字节数上限约束。
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md
-2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md: 28ecf985db1289ce4f80570583eac6a051cd2c0b
-2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.zh.md: 5f349ddcacebe66c346976b822c9dcc65bda8d18
+2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md: 2b9ea93c40bd4b3547cfda83c3ad0bd52c047792
+2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.zh.md: 8b647fa51511e1c4cac55c3a9ea39b7e059bc381

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.zh.md)
 
 The harness has a long-deferred seam for **subagents** — an agent delegating work to another agent. The intent was sketched in the `Agent`/`AgentLoop` interfaces ([packages/core/agent/src/types.ts](../../../../packages/core/agent/src/types.ts), [packages/core/agent-loop/src/index.ts](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/src/index.ts)): a creation option referencing a parent agent (fork = seed the child session with the parent's event log; spawn = fresh session), with the child returned as an `Agent` handle so steering and event subscription work uniformly.
 
-The distinctive requirement — the one that shapes the whole design — is that **multiple subagent implementations must coexist at runtime**. A parent may want a cheap in-process child for a scoped subtask AND an isolated out-of-process child (over ACP) in the same session. The transports:
+**Multiple subagent implementations must coexist at runtime.** A parent may want a cheap in-process child for a scoped subtask AND an isolated out-of-process child (over ACP) in the same session. The transports:
 
 - **in-process** — a child concrete `Agent` on the same `Context` (the cheapest, and nearly free given the existing agent factory);
 - **ACP** — act as an ACP *client* driving another agent process (which can be another instance of ourselves);
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ Each in-process subagent runs in its **own `Session`** (own id, `parentSession`
 
 ## Testing
 
-Registry and tool tests replace only the nondeterministic child boundary with a package-local scripted provider while exercising the real `SubagentService`, lifecycle, task integration, and model-facing tool. Provider and consumer export shapes retain their Loader regression coverage for the failure described in [postmortem 0001](../../../../docs/postmortem/0001-acp-default-export-drops-inject.md). Registry tests cover reload safety, duplicate names, and start-time capability rejection; nested-agent scenarios replay keylessly through [per-session snapshot replay](../testing/2026-06-22-subagent-snapshot-replay.md); in-process backends also have real-loop unit tests and a with-key e2e.
+Registry and tool tests replace only the nondeterministic child with a package-local scripted provider while exercising the real `SubagentService`, lifecycle, task integration, and model-facing tool. Loader regression tests still cover the provider and consumer exports for the failure described in [postmortem 0001](../../../../docs/postmortem/0001-acp-default-export-drops-inject.md). Registry tests cover reload safety, duplicate names, and start-time capability rejection; nested-agent scenarios replay keylessly through [per-session snapshot replay](../testing/2026-06-22-subagent-snapshot-replay.md); in-process backends also have real-loop unit tests and a with-key e2e.
 
 ## Consequences
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.zh.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 harness 有一个长期搁置的 seam 用于 **subagent**：一个 agent 将工作委派给另一个 agent。这一意图在 `Agent`/`AgentLoop` 接口中已有草案（[packages/core/agent/src/types.ts](../../../../packages/core/agent/src/types.ts)、[packages/core/agent-loop/src/index.ts](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/src/index.ts)）：一个创建选项引用父 agent（fork = 用父会话的事件日志初始化子会话；spawn = 全新会话），子 agent 以 `Agent` 句柄返回，使 steering（中途引导）和事件订阅可以统一工作。
 
-决定整体设计走向的核心需求是：**多种 subagent 实现必须在运行时共存**。一个父 agent 可能在同一个会话中既需要一个廉价的进程内子 agent 处理有限范围的子任务，又需要一个隔离的进程外子 agent（通过 ACP）。传输方式：
+**多种 subagent 实现必须在运行时共存。**一个父 agent 可能在同一个会话中既需要一个廉价的进程内子 agent 处理有限范围的子任务，又需要一个隔离的进程外子 agent（通过 ACP）。传输方式：
 
 - **进程内**：在同一个 `Context` 上创建一个具体的子 `Agent`（最廉价，且鉴于现有 agent 工厂几乎零成本）；
 - **ACP**：作为 ACP *客户端*驱动另一个 agent 进程（可以是自身的另一个实例）；
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ bash seam（[能力 seam](../architecture/2026-06-13-capability-seams.md)）在
 
 ## 测试
 
-注册表与工具测试仅用包内脚本化提供方替换非确定性的子进程边界，同时运行真实的 `SubagentService`、生命周期、任务集成和面向模型的工具。提供方与消费方的 export 形状仍保留 Loader 回归覆盖，以防止[事故复盘（postmortem）0001](../../../../docs/postmortem/0001-acp-default-export-drops-inject.md) 中描述的失败。注册表测试覆盖重载安全性、重名和启动时能力拒绝；嵌套 agent 场景通过[逐会话快照回放](../testing/2026-06-22-subagent-snapshot-replay.md)进行无密钥回放；进程内后端还有真实循环的单元测试和带密钥的 e2e 测试。
+注册表与工具测试仅用包内脚本化提供方替换非确定性的子 agent，同时运行真实的 `SubagentService`、生命周期、任务集成和面向模型的工具。Loader 回归测试仍覆盖提供方与消费方的 export，以防止[事故复盘（postmortem）0001](../../../../docs/postmortem/0001-acp-default-export-drops-inject.md)中描述的失败。注册表测试覆盖重载安全性、重名和启动时能力拒绝；嵌套 agent 场景通过[逐会话快照回放](../testing/2026-06-22-subagent-snapshot-replay.md)进行无密钥回放；进程内后端还有真实循环的单元测试和带密钥的 e2e 测试。
 
 ## 后果
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-24-workspace-context.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-24-workspace-context.md
-2026-06-24-workspace-context.md: 53a580aee50752b7c6daeff5caa42ba6409c8885
+2026-06-24-workspace-context.md: e7a3724847b9dc8cfad11e87b2c96a3ef442bcba
 2026-06-24-workspace-context.zh.md: 39c3f52da10b7299301d10bd8b78330cbae8e19c

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-24-workspace-context.md

@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ There is intentionally no watcher. Detection occurs at the next successful struc
 
 ## Consequences
 
-Workspace guidance is isolated per session and shared by the demo front doors, Web Host, and every tool presentation mode. Initial, nested, and changed instructions are durable and replayable. The generic session/agent context contract carries typed source data through inbox-staged and durably entered user messages without flattening entries.
+Workspace guidance is isolated per session and shared by the demo entry points, Web Host, and every tool presentation mode. Initial, nested, and changed instructions are durable and replayable. The generic session/agent context contract carries typed source data through inbox-staged and durably entered user messages without flattening entries.
 
 Repository text remains untrusted input. Lower-authority user-role framing, explicit precedence language, and delimiter escaping reduce risk but do not eliminate prompt injection. Following a candidate symlink to its target widens that surface to off-tree content, so the permission and sandbox layers that confine `ctx.fs` to trusted roots are the boundary that treats workspace files as data rather than authority (the [instruction-symlink follow note](2026-07-21-follow-instruction-symlinks.md) owns the residual risk).
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-30-hook-bridges.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-30-hook-bridges.md
-2026-06-30-hook-bridges.md: eecc1fc75c10618481231083f890e0e4b122c1ee
-2026-06-30-hook-bridges.zh.md: dcc8f496cb3bc6ea7857ce804a9159cbfcbc3f08
+2026-06-30-hook-bridges.md: 0dce552820186755e9243bc5ce1dd3361e2e739d
+2026-06-30-hook-bridges.zh.md: 2df3a47fd6219e4007e2cad8f2ffa9bef9600a87

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-30-hook-bridges.md

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-06-30-hook-bridges.zh.md)
 
 The harness's extension surface is its typed interception points ([the interception extension-points Agent Note](2026-06-30-interception-extension-points.md)): a "native hook" is just an ordinary cordis plugin subscribing to `agent/session-start`, `agent/pre-step`, `tools/pre-execute`, `tools/post-execute`, `agent/turn-stopping`, `subagent/start`, or `subagent/end`. But users arrive with **existing** Claude Code (CC) and Codex hook configs — a `hooks.json` (or a settings file's `hooks` key) full of shell-command hooks — and want those to run unmodified. This Agent Note introduces the two **bridge plugins** that translate that external shell-hook protocol onto the typed extension points, built on the shared wire-protocol library ([the hook-protocol-lib Agent Note](2026-06-30-hook-protocol-lib.md)).
 
-The framing that shapes the whole design: **a bridge is a compatibility adapter, not a power tool.** Anything a bridge does (block a tool, inject context, force continuation, observe a subagent) a native cordis plugin does more powerfully — typed returns, full `ctx`, no serialization boundary. The bridge's reason to exist is to run the explicitly supported subset of external CC/Codex command hooks. That keeps each bridge thin: parse the config, pick a matcher mode, build the per-event payload, call `runHook` + `mergeHookOutputs` from the shared lib, and map the neutral outcome to a typed Decision. The package READMEs own the exact current unsupported-event and partial-field inventory against the official protocols.
+The core rule is: **a bridge is a compatibility adapter, not a power tool.** Anything a bridge does (block a tool, inject context, force continuation, observe a subagent) a native cordis plugin does more powerfully — typed returns, full `ctx`, no serialization boundary. The bridge's reason to exist is to run the explicitly supported subset of external CC/Codex command hooks. That keeps each bridge thin: parse the config, pick a matcher mode, build the per-event payload, call `runHook` + `mergeHookOutputs` from the shared lib, and map the neutral outcome to a typed Decision. The package READMEs own the exact current unsupported-event and partial-field inventory against the official protocols.
 
 ## Decision
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-30-hook-bridges.zh.md

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 harness 的扩展面是其类型化拦截点（见[拦截扩展点 Agent Note](2026-06-30-interception-extension-points.md)）：所谓「原生钩子」不过是一个普通的 Cordis 插件，订阅 `agent/session-start`、`agent/pre-step`、`tools/pre-execute`、`tools/post-execute`、`agent/turn-stopping`、`subagent/start` 或 `subagent/end`。但用户带着**既有的** Claude Code（CC）和 Codex 钩子配置到来，一个 `hooks.json`（或 settings 文件中的 `hooks` 键）里满是 shell 命令钩子，并希望它们原样运行。本 Agent Note 引入两个**桥接插件**，将外部 shell 钩子协议翻译到类型化扩展点上，构建于共享的协议格式（wire format）库之上（见 [hook-protocol-lib Agent Note](2026-06-30-hook-protocol-lib.md)）。
 
-贯穿整个设计的定位：**桥接是兼容性适配器，不是高级工具。** 桥接能做的事（阻止工具、注入上下文、强制继续、观察 subagent），原生 Cordis 插件都能做得更强——类型化返回值、完整 `ctx`、无序列化边界。桥接存在的理由是运行外部 CC/Codex 命令钩子中被明确支持的子集。这使每个桥接保持精简：解析配置、选择匹配模式、构建每事件的 payload、调用共享库的 `runHook` + `mergeHookOutputs`，再将中性结果映射为类型化 Decision。各包的 README 维护着当前不支持的事件和部分字段的完整清单，以官方协议为参照。
+核心规则是：**桥接是兼容性适配器，不是高级工具。** 桥接能做的事（阻止工具、注入上下文、强制继续、观察 subagent），原生 Cordis 插件都能做得更强——类型化返回值、完整 `ctx`、无序列化边界。桥接存在的理由是运行外部 CC/Codex 命令钩子中被明确支持的子集。这使每个桥接保持精简：解析配置、选择匹配模式、构建每事件的 payload、调用共享库的 `runHook` + `mergeHookOutputs`，再将中性结果映射为类型化 Decision。各包的 README 维护着当前不支持的事件和部分字段的完整清单，以官方协议为参照。
 
 ## 决策
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-16-durable-per-step-time-context.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-16-durable-per-step-time-context.md
-2026-07-16-durable-per-step-time-context.md: e1a5c65894913ad93f46db8ae45e5ef5ead215f3
-2026-07-16-durable-per-step-time-context.zh.md: 129920a02dc21a91ddc92de3d920ddad24968656
+2026-07-16-durable-per-step-time-context.md: 3305d3644fa3baf7e1522311b98b4eb29d08f631
+2026-07-16-durable-per-step-time-context.zh.md: dd7e63710ae99d1a04bc0e87d49976e28af1dae5

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-16-durable-per-step-time-context.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-16-durable-per-step-time-context.zh.md)
 
 ## Problem
 
-A request-only clock can tell the model the current time, but replacing that value in the system prompt removes the evidence behind earlier time-sensitive reasoning. Multi-step turns need requests to retain the readings that shaped preceding steps. The request must remain reconstructable after restart, and automatic compaction must account for the same timing context the model receives.
+A request-only clock can tell the model the current time, but replacing that value in the system prompt removes the evidence behind earlier time-sensitive reasoning. Multi-step turns need requests to retain the readings used by preceding steps. The request must remain reconstructable after restart, and automatic compaction must account for the same timing context the model receives.
 
 A process-local refresh cache makes displayed time depend on state that cannot survive resume or be reconstructed from the durable session. Durable interval scheduling can reduce append frequency without introducing that hidden state.
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-16-durable-per-step-time-context.zh.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 问题
 
-仅存在于请求中的时钟可以告诉模型当前时间，但在系统提示词中替换这个值会移除先前对时间敏感的推理所依据的证据。在包含多个步骤的轮次中，请求需要保留影响先前步骤的读数。系统必须能在重启后重建请求，自动压缩（compaction）也必须将模型实际收到的同一份时间上下文纳入考量。
+仅存在于请求中的时钟可以告诉模型当前时间，但在系统提示词中替换这个值会移除先前对时间敏感的推理所依据的证据。在包含多个步骤的轮次中，请求需要保留先前步骤使用的读数。系统必须能在重启后重建请求，自动压缩（compaction）也必须将模型实际收到的同一份时间上下文纳入考量。
 
 进程本地刷新缓存会使显示时间依赖于一种既无法在恢复后保留、也无法从持久会话重建的状态。持久的间隔调度可以减少追加频率，而不引入这种隐藏状态。
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-16-harness-level-loop.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-16-harness-level-loop.md
-2026-07-16-harness-level-loop.md: e84a5738a55988d3b968eac829d9daaf10d7e304
-2026-07-16-harness-level-loop.zh.md: d7cda56d66d4456ac5c3c7d55bb238e85fcacbc5
+2026-07-16-harness-level-loop.md: e5dd94fbf76e27f0843666f29622969635ef2fc3
+2026-07-16-harness-level-loop.zh.md: 773b5ff1f4b07206d0d817c29774435ce24407b4

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-16-harness-level-loop.md

@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ The human UX follows the compact Codex shape in the [public OpenAI Codex TUI dis
 
 The model receives only `get_goal`, `create_goal`, and `update_goal`. It may create a goal when a direct human request clearly asks for substantial multi-round work, and it may infer that intent in any language. It must not turn routine one-turn work into a goal. Code requires a direct human message in the current live root-agent turn; semantic interpretation remains model judgment. An autonomous goal round may report `complete` or `blocked` for the exact current goal round but cannot edit, pause, resume, or replace the human objective.
 
-TUI mounts the shared command registry and complete goal stack by default and exposes `/goal` through one producer. ACP mounts the goal domain, model tools, and same-session driver but deliberately omits the human command plane. Every effective registered command is discoverable and invocable through every composed command adapter; a plugin incompatible with an application omits its command producer from that composition rather than relying on registry-level surface masks. The UI-less agent spine is opt-in so one-shot callers do not silently become multi-round operations. The headless CLI and JSON-RPC front doors do not consume the command plane; ordinary human text can still authorize model goal tools when that stack is composed.
+TUI mounts the shared command registry and complete goal stack by default and exposes `/goal` through one producer. ACP mounts the goal domain, model tools, and same-session driver but deliberately omits the human command plane. Every effective registered command is discoverable and invocable through every composed command adapter; a plugin incompatible with an application omits its command producer from that composition rather than relying on registry-level surface masks. The UI-less agent spine is opt-in so one-shot callers do not silently become multi-round operations. The headless CLI and JSON-RPC entry points do not consume the command plane; ordinary human text can still authorize model goal tools when that stack is composed.
 
 ### Fresh-agent Ralph execution
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-16-harness-level-loop.zh.md

@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ Goal Round 驱动器为每个特定的实时 agent 至多拥有一个待定预
 
 模型只接收 `get_goal`、`create_goal` 和 `update_goal`。当直接人类请求清楚要求大量多 Round 工作时，模型可以创建目标，并且可以从任何语言推断该意图。它不得把日常单 Turn 工作变成目标。代码要求当前实时根 agent Turn 中有一条人类直接发送的消息；语义解释仍是模型判断。自治目标 Round 可以为确切的当前 Goal Round 报告 `complete` 或 `blocked`，但不能编辑、暂停、恢复或替换人类目标。
 
-TUI 默认挂载共享命令注册表和完整目标栈，并通过一个生产方暴露 `/goal`。ACP（Agent Client Protocol）挂载目标领域、模型工具和同会话驱动器，但有意省略人类命令平面。每条有效已注册命令都能被每个已组合的命令适配器发现和调用；若插件与某应用不兼容，该应用组合会省略其命令生产方，而不是依赖注册表层面的表面掩码。无 UI 的 agent 主干要求显式选择加入，以免单次调用方静默变成多 Round 操作。无头 CLI（命令行界面）与 JSON-RPC 前端不消费命令平面；挂载目标栈后，普通人类文本仍可授权模型目标工具。
+TUI 默认挂载共享命令注册表和完整目标栈，并通过一个生产方暴露 `/goal`。ACP（Agent Client Protocol）挂载目标领域、模型工具和同会话驱动器，但有意省略人类命令平面。每条有效已注册命令都能被每个已组合的命令适配器发现和调用；若插件与某应用不兼容，该应用组合会省略其命令生产方，而不是依赖注册表层面的表面掩码。无 UI 的 agent 主干要求显式选择加入，以免单次调用方静默变成多 Round 操作。无头 CLI（命令行界面）与 JSON-RPC 运行入口不消费命令平面；挂载目标栈后，普通人类文本仍可授权模型目标工具。
 
 ### 全新 agent Ralph 执行
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.md
-2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.md: f27d799574e61d92123c9ca4e31c5c2a9d3229b4
-2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.zh.md: 0c23619faf00794c2c4e7b3f85ef961faddd99e0
+2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.md: fb9cd06bade7bc357baa738f0d9dd03b7f5b7936
+2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.zh.md: 55a5848c1ab1e8c2cd3b29f2d4748ea4abbe088c

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.md

@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ The package ships concise tool guidance explaining persistent state, owner isola
 
 **Include TUI sequences and BEL handling.** Rejected. The source prototype treats those paths as timing-sensitive and still records unresolved alternate-screen and interaction failures. Line-oriented PTY use proves the core value without making those unverified behaviors foundational.
 
-**Use an out-of-process daemon immediately.** Rejected for the initial in-process capability because current persistent front doors already keep a Cordis context alive. A daemon becomes justified by cross-process restoration or multi-client attachment, both deferred here.
+**Use an out-of-process daemon immediately.** Rejected for the initial in-process capability because current long-lived entry points already keep a Cordis context alive. A daemon becomes justified by cross-process restoration or multi-client attachment, both deferred here.
 
 ## Verification
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.zh.md

@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ plugins:
 
 **包含 TUI sequence 与 BEL 处理。**拒绝。源 prototype 将这些路径视为 timing-sensitive，且仍记录未解决的 alternate-screen 和交互失败。行式 PTY 已能证明核心价值，无需把未经验证的行为放进基础层。
 
-**立即采用进程外 daemon。**初始的进程内功能不采用，因为当前持久 front door 已能维持 Cordis context。跨进程恢复或多客户端 attach 会让 daemon 变得合理，但两者都已推迟。
+**立即采用进程外 daemon。**初始的进程内功能不采用，因为当前长驻的运行入口已能维持 Cordis context。跨进程恢复或多客户端 attach 会让 daemon 变得合理，但两者都已推迟。
 
 ## 验证
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-19-human-goal-command.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-19-human-goal-command.md
-2026-07-19-human-goal-command.md: 5fdd80f7423b80e84e58f7379130ee59a2e8a723
-2026-07-19-human-goal-command.zh.md: 89d29497abfc758ff8373d272aa8620ca1bcfcc2
+2026-07-19-human-goal-command.md: d68e4025a4d37d07211f15ddfc6069bc7c637124
+2026-07-19-human-goal-command.zh.md: dbda35c731ccdc7aff2d4213a3df8b78070319df

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-19-human-goal-command.md

@@ -68,5 +68,5 @@ The producer suite uses the real command registry, goal service, agent registry,
 - The portable command contract has no modal editor or confirmation interaction; inline edit and explicit clear are intentional until a general cross-surface interaction primitive exists.
 - `/goal` does not accept a per-command round cap. Deployment config owns the default, and the authorized model tool can edit a cap after direct human instruction.
 - TUI renders portable plain text rather than a continuously updated goal status widget. Reconnectable command output and adapter-specific status indicators are deferred.
-- The ACP automation server, headless CLI, and JSON-RPC front doors do not consume the command registry.
+- The ACP automation server, headless CLI, and JSON-RPC entry points do not consume the command registry.
 - The command observes and mutates state but does not certify completion or blockers. Evaluator-backed certification remains deferred to a separate policy layer with an explicit authority and isolation contract.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-19-human-goal-command.zh.md

@@ -68,5 +68,5 @@ TUI 应用包作出相反的产品选择。它默认让 `goals` 使用所有者
 - 可移植命令约定没有模态编辑器或确认交互；在出现通用跨界面交互原语之前，行内编辑与明确清除是有意选择。
 - `/goal` 不接受逐命令 Round 上限。部署配置拥有默认值；得到直接人类指示后，已授权模型工具可以编辑上限。
 - TUI 渲染可移植纯文本，而不是持续更新的目标状态组件。可重连命令输出和适配器专用状态指示器予以延期。
-- ACP 自动化服务器、无头 CLI 与 JSON-RPC 前端不消费命令注册表。
+- ACP 自动化服务器、无头 CLI 与 JSON-RPC 运行入口不消费命令注册表。
 - 该命令观察并改变状态，但不认证完成或阻塞。基于评估器的认证延期到具有明确权限与隔离约定的独立策略层。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-19-plugin-command-registration.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-19-plugin-command-registration.md
-2026-07-19-plugin-command-registration.md: c8f0f2772a41948e9eb257a16f40194518c568f9
-2026-07-19-plugin-command-registration.zh.md: a8f7a3d1e7947aeb41344a72106cee55d249010c
+2026-07-19-plugin-command-registration.md: 76feba84492bd6b245246a6f1fb1e8f68d555684
+2026-07-19-plugin-command-registration.zh.md: e89cb79ba1e15dfefa527fe7bc37c09c3449f5b4

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-19-plugin-command-registration.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ A shared mechanism must remain a UI concern rather than a model tool or agent-lo
 
 ## Decision
 
-`@deepseek-ai/dsh-commands` in `packages/interaction/commands/` is the product command registry. The TUI app bundle mounts it beside its consuming front door; the [automation-only ACP app](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md) and the executor-less, UI-less agent spine omit it. TUI injects the service, while command producers depend only on the registry and any domain they operate.
+`@deepseek-ai/dsh-commands` in `packages/interaction/commands/` is the product command registry. The TUI app bundle mounts it beside its consuming front end; the [automation-only ACP app](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md) and the executor-less, UI-less agent spine omit it. TUI injects the service, while command producers depend only on the registry and any domain they operate.
 
 ### Registry contract
 
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ TUI tests exercise all migrated built-ins, live plugin discovery, help/autocompl
 
 - **Keep adapter-local switches** — rejected because optional plugins cannot contribute discovery and behavior without editing the TUI.
 - **Represent human commands as model tools** — rejected because discovery and direct invocation are human UI behavior; routing through the model adds latency, token cost, and reinterpretation.
-- **Put the registry in the core agent spine** — rejected because UI-less front doors do not consume it, while TUI can compose it explicitly.
+- **Put the registry in the core agent spine** — rejected because UI-less entry points do not consume it, while TUI can compose it explicitly.
 - **Make `dsh-agent-loop` inject commands** — rejected because the loop does not execute or discover human commands. Agent-scoped producers declare the UI dependency in a child plugin instead.
 - **Attach adapter masks to each definition** — rejected because support is a composition fact, not command-domain state. Every composed adapter exposes a registered command; an incompatible plugin omits registration in that deployment.
 - **Send unknown slash input to the model** — rejected because typoed or unavailable direct actions must fail predictably rather than change execution planes.
@@ -68,4 +68,4 @@ TUI tests exercise all migrated built-ins, live plugin discovery, help/autocompl
 - Input metadata is limited to an unstructured text hint. Typed forms, argument schemas, and completion providers remain command-owned or require a later registry or consumer extension.
 - Generic command output is live-only and is not reconstructed after TUI restart.
 - Registry cancellation stops awaiting immediately, but external work stops only when a handler cooperates with its signal.
-- The ACP automation server, headless CLI, and JSON-RPC SDK front doors do not expose the command plane; only TUI consumes it.
+- The ACP automation server, headless CLI, and JSON-RPC SDK entry points do not expose the command plane; only TUI consumes it.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-19-plugin-command-registration.zh.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ TUI 拥有斜杠命令。如果命令名、帮助文本、自动补全、分派
 
 ## 决策
 
-位于 `packages/interaction/commands/` 的 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-commands` 是产品命令注册表。TUI 应用 bundle（组合包）把它挂载在消费该服务的入口旁；[仅面向自动化的 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）应用](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md)和无执行器、无 UI 的智能体 spine（主干）都省略该服务。TUI 注入该服务，命令生产者只依赖注册表及其操作的领域。
+位于 `packages/interaction/commands/` 的 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-commands` 是产品命令注册表。TUI 应用 bundle（组合包）把它挂载在消费该服务的前端旁；[仅面向自动化的 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）应用](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md)和无执行器、无 UI 的智能体 spine（主干）都省略该服务。TUI 注入该服务，命令生产者只依赖注册表及其操作的领域。
 
 ### 注册表约定
 
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ TUI 测试覆盖全部迁移后的内置命令、实时插件发现、帮助与
 
 - **保留适配器本地 switch**——不予采纳，因为可选插件无法贡献发现与行为，除非修改 TUI。
 - **把人类命令表示为模型工具**——不予采纳，因为发现与直接调用属于人类 UI 行为；经由模型路由会增加延迟、token 成本和重新解释。
-- **把注册表放入核心智能体主干**——不予采纳，因为无 UI 前端不消费它，而 TUI 可以显式组合它。
+- **把注册表放入核心智能体主干**——不予采纳，因为无 UI 运行入口不消费它，而 TUI 可以显式组合它。
 - **让 `dsh-agent-loop` 注入 commands**——不予采纳，因为循环不执行也不发现人类命令。智能体作用域生产者改为在子插件中声明 UI 依赖。
 - **为每个定义附加适配器掩码**——不予采纳，因为支持能力是组合事实，而不是命令领域状态。每个已组合适配器都暴露已注册命令；不兼容插件不会在该部署中注册。
 - **把未知斜杠输入发送给模型**——不予采纳，因为输入错误或不可用的直接操作必须可预测地失败，而不能改变执行平面。
@@ -68,4 +68,4 @@ TUI 测试覆盖全部迁移后的内置命令、实时插件发现、帮助与
 - 输入元数据仅限非结构化文本提示。类型化表单、参数模式和补全提供器仍由命令拥有，或需要后续注册表或消费方扩展。
 - 通用命令输出仅实时存在，TUI 重启后不会重建。
 - 注册表取消会立即停止等待，但外部工作只有在处理器配合信号时才会停止。
-- ACP 自动化服务器、无头 CLI 与 JSON-RPC SDK 前端不暴露命令平面；只有 TUI 消费它。
+- ACP 自动化服务器、无头 CLI 与 JSON-RPC SDK 运行入口不暴露命令平面；只有 TUI 消费它。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-local-instruction-overlay.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-local-instruction-overlay.md
-2026-07-21-local-instruction-overlay.md: 3c7b2141b0515b5e667be4add6ad765e26c88cd8
+2026-07-21-local-instruction-overlay.md: fb5f916d426595a80bbbaa4192e4a3975b922b8a
 2026-07-21-local-instruction-overlay.zh.md: c97ed04607f497d829da0e904c248836252c73f7

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-local-instruction-overlay.md

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ The base and local candidates in one directory must stay independent across base
 
 **Keep it opt-in through `instructionFileCandidates`.** Rejected: one directory has a single winner, so a `.local.` name added to that list shadows the base file rather than supplementing it. The packages guidance to keep opt-ins out of shipped defaults is outweighed here by strong prior art and the user-facing expectation that `.local.` files are always read.
 
-**Default at the product `cordis.yml` level instead of the plugin schema.** Rejected: it would enable `.local.` only for whichever front door remembered to opt in, splitting behavior across TUI/ACP/headless and duplicating a value that belongs beside the existing candidate default.
+**Default at the product `cordis.yml` level instead of the plugin schema.** Rejected: it would enable `.local.` only for whichever entry point remembered to opt in, splitting behavior across TUI/ACP/headless and duplicating a value that belongs beside the existing candidate default.
 
 **Reuse the bare directory as the scope key for base and local files.** Rejected: base and local files in one directory would collide in every scope-keyed map, so a change to one would suppress or overwrite the other. A distinct scope key per candidate keeps them independent without widening the persisted metadata shape.
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-24-web-session-model-selector.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-24-web-session-model-selector.md
-2026-07-24-web-session-model-selector.md: 78017b14a806f8e609a85e340094cd2a349d47e1
-2026-07-24-web-session-model-selector.zh.md: 87a342721f5e47f5bcedfafb578eb6916101d2f5
+2026-07-24-web-session-model-selector.md: e6a96ac62f69a3bd312f61cc920caa259d2dc5b0
+2026-07-24-web-session-model-selector.zh.md: 5a0245359d69ac6e59a20dc3276b9411c4b25e23

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-24-web-session-model-selector.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-24-web-session-model-selector.zh.md)
 
 ## Problem
 
-The Web conversation needs a visible, mutable session model selection sourced from the Host. Copying TUI presentation or hardcoding DeepSeek models in the browser would split model discovery and step-boundary semantics across front doors. A switch made while a response is running also needs one atomic boundary: prompt variables and request routing cannot observe different selections.
+The Web conversation needs a visible, mutable session model selection sourced from the Host. Copying TUI presentation or hardcoding DeepSeek models in the browser would split model discovery and step-boundary semantics across front ends. A switch made while a response is running also needs one atomic boundary: prompt variables and request routing cannot observe different selections.
 
 ## Decision
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-24-web-session-model-selector.zh.md

@@ -6,13 +6,13 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 问题
 
-Web 对话需要一项由 Host 提供、可见且可更改的会话模型选择。如果照搬 TUI 的呈现方式，或在浏览器中硬编码 DeepSeek 模型，就会让模型发现逻辑和步骤边界语义分散到不同前门中。响应运行期间发生的切换还需要一个原子边界：提示词变量与请求路由不能观测到不同的选择。
+Web 对话需要一项由 Host 提供、可见且可更改的会话模型选择。如果照搬 TUI 的呈现方式，或在浏览器中硬编码 DeepSeek 模型，就会让模型发现逻辑和步骤边界语义分散到不同前端中。响应运行期间发生的切换还需要一个原子边界：提示词变量与请求路由不能观测到不同的选择。
 
 ## 决策
 
 Web Host 为每个新建或恢复的 Agent 安装 `ModelSelection`。如果会话已经使用过模型，提供方／模型／推理（reasoning）选择来自最新的 `request/header`；否则来自 `ctx.agentDefaultModel`。`session.selectModel` 会赋值会话级选择，提示词组装则将它与请求路由一并捕获，因此运行中步骤发生的切换会应用于下一个组装步骤。下一个实际采用的选择通过完整的 `request/header` 快照持久化；尚未进入请求的选择则仅保存在当前进程中。
 
-会话 RPC 领域公开 `session.models` 模型目录与 `session.selectModel`。该目录从 LLM（大语言模型）注册表动态构建，并按提供方分组；每个已列出模型的精确元数据还会加入由适配器持有的推理强度 ID、名称、说明和可选默认值。各提供方的目录与精确元数据会按提供方并发加载，且彼此独立失败，因此成功加载的分组仍可与可重试的失败记录一同使用。模型是否位于目录仅供参考：`session.models.current` 独立返回，即使不在任何分组中也仍然可以路由，但提供方停止公布该模型后，Host 不会合成未列出行。两个前门对这一状态给出不同回答：TUI 把未列出的当前模型渲染为独立一行，Web 则显示未设置状态的触发器标签并要求选择替代模型。Web 是编辑目录的 surface，因此缺席的目录行代表一项待作出的选择；TUI 只从现有行中选择。显示未设置标签的 Web composer 仍可以使用当前可路由选择发送消息。精确解析决定提供方／模型组合与显式推理强度是否可用。选择操作通过 `resolveCallConfig` 拒绝不支持的推理强度 ID，并在赋值该选择前具体化适配器配置的默认值。
+会话 RPC 领域公开 `session.models` 模型目录与 `session.selectModel`。该目录从 LLM（大语言模型）注册表动态构建，并按提供方分组；每个已列出模型的精确元数据还会加入由适配器持有的推理强度 ID、名称、说明和可选默认值。各提供方的目录与精确元数据会按提供方并发加载，且彼此独立失败，因此成功加载的分组仍可与可重试的失败记录一同使用。模型是否位于目录仅供参考：`session.models.current` 独立返回，即使不在任何分组中也仍然可以路由，但提供方停止公布该模型后，Host 不会合成未列出行。两个前端对这一状态给出不同回答：TUI 把未列出的当前模型渲染为独立一行，Web 则显示未设置状态的触发器标签并要求选择替代模型。Web 是编辑目录所在的前端，因此缺席的目录行代表一项待作出的选择；TUI 只从现有行中选择。显示未设置标签的 Web composer 仍可以使用当前可路由选择发送消息。精确解析决定提供方／模型组合与显式推理强度是否可用。选择操作通过 `resolveCallConfig` 拒绝不支持的推理强度 ID，并在赋值该选择前具体化适配器配置的默认值。
 
 浏览器中的 `ModelService` 为每个实时会话持有一个 `ModelDirectory`。其快照包含当前完整的 `ModelSelection`、分组目录、提供方失败记录、操作错误，以及 `idle`、`loading`、`ready`、`selecting`、`error` 状态。挂载时会预先填充触发器标签，此后每次打开菜单都会刷新目录。目录与选择调用共用操作代次，防止较早响应覆盖较新结果；连接重置会先丢弃当前进程中的投影，再恢复 Host 选择。失败时保留先前的选择和可用分组。
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.md
-2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.md: 323c0db16cc6b9e83155a3fb873ab94e4facd3a2
-2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.zh.md: 85b2b319f03113480b3953c21940c123ba594ca8
+2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.md: 3d2125bdf67a70a1a5bca43c5d5acb09fda178b7
+2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.zh.md: 161ebd2857073d4dd9cfc2883880cd3e2d91c040

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.md

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ The group-by menu offers two modes, WorkSpace / In one list. WorkSpace mode rend
 
 ### workspace.rename
 
-`workspace.rename({ workspaceId, title })`: the title is trimmed and must be non-blank; both the same-title no-op and the duplicate check evaluate inside the Host's serialized workspace-operation chain (shared with create-by-name, so concurrent explicit naming operations cannot interleave a duplicate or an out-of-order fake success), and a conflict returns `workspace-name-conflict`. Path adoption may derive a title already present because canonical path, not title, owns identity ([decision](../bug-fix/2026-07-31-same-basename-workspace-adoption.md)). Durability goes through `setTitle`'s mutate path, and the `domain/changed` listener broadcasts the `host/workspace-changed` frame automatically. The UI is a standard modal with a client-side duplicate pre-check.
+`workspace.rename({ workspaceId, title })`: the title is trimmed and must be non-blank; both the same-title no-op and the duplicate check evaluate inside the Host's serialized workspace-operation chain (shared with path adoption and deletion, so concurrent workspace operations cannot interleave a duplicate or an out-of-order fake success), and a conflict returns `workspace-name-conflict`. Path adoption may derive a title already present because canonical path, not title, owns identity ([decision](../bug-fix/2026-07-31-same-basename-workspace-adoption.md)). Durability goes through `setTitle`'s mutate path, and the `domain/changed` listener broadcasts the `host/workspace-changed` frame automatically. The UI is a standard modal with a client-side duplicate pre-check.
 
 ### Manual order: insertSessionBefore replaces activity pinning
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.zh.md

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ group-by 菜单提供 WorkSpace / In one list 两种模式。WorkSpace 模式按
 
 ### workspace.rename
 
-`workspace.rename({ workspaceId, title })`：title trim 后非空；同名 no-op 与重名查重都在 Host 的 Workspace 操作串行链内求值（与按名称创建共链，并发的显式命名操作不能穿插出重名或乱序假成功），冲突返回 `workspace-name-conflict`。按路径收编可以派生出已有 title，因为拥有身份的是 canonical path，而不是 title（见[身份决策](../bug-fix/2026-07-31-same-basename-workspace-adoption.md)）。落盘经 `setTitle` 的 mutate 通道，`domain/changed` 监听自动广播 `host/workspace-changed` 帧。UI 为标准 Modal，client 侧另做重名预检。
+`workspace.rename({ workspaceId, title })`：title trim 后非空；同名 no-op 与重名查重都在 Host 的 Workspace 操作串行链内求值（与按路径收编和删除共链，并发的 Workspace 操作不能穿插出重名或乱序假成功），冲突返回 `workspace-name-conflict`。按路径收编可以派生出已有 title，因为拥有身份的是 canonical path，而不是 title（见[身份决策](../bug-fix/2026-07-31-same-basename-workspace-adoption.md)）。落盘经 `setTitle` 的 mutate 通道，`domain/changed` 监听自动广播 `host/workspace-changed` 帧。UI 为标准 Modal，client 侧另做重名预检。
 
 ### 手动排序:insertSessionBefore 取代活动置顶
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-25-workspace-ui-product-flow.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-25-workspace-ui-product-flow.md
-2026-07-25-workspace-ui-product-flow.md: bfdde9797433eca67e47da73468cba855f2a02b9
-2026-07-25-workspace-ui-product-flow.zh.md: 74a9dd6f70396201a78f3204bfdc7d8b5d4f5d98
+2026-07-25-workspace-ui-product-flow.md: 98e963195126df2ec8291a11b3d9fc7a2baeb0df
+2026-07-25-workspace-ui-product-flow.zh.md: 486093be0b8d10c2ae0b8083b305ecad5386351c

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-25-workspace-ui-product-flow.md

@@ -19,13 +19,12 @@ The Host provides the following GUI wiring on the Workspace entity:
 | RPC | Behavior |
 | --- | --- |
 | `workspace.list` | Returns persistent Workspaces in order and filters out Session ids that fail header validation |
-| `workspace.create({ name })` | Creates a directory and Workspace at `workspaceRoot/name`; fails on a display-name conflict |
 | `workspace.create({ path })` | Adopts an existing directory by canonical path; basename-derived display titles may repeat |
 | `workspace.delete({ workspaceId })` | Removes the Workspace registration while retaining its directory and session logs; its Sessions become Ungrouped |
 | `session.create({ workspaceId, sessionId? })` | Resolves cwd from the Workspace, idempotently creates a Session with an optional preallocated id, and attaches it |
 | `session.create({ cwd })` | Remains available to non-Workspace callers and creates an Ungrouped Session |
 
-`workspaceRoot` is an independent Host setting that falls back to the Host cwd when unset; it is unrelated to `storageRoot`, which stores Workspace domain data. The Host stream pushes Workspace and Session deltas, including `host/workspace-removed`, and the Client refreshes the `workspace.list` and `session.list` baselines separately after reconnecting. Registration-deletion ownership and safety are defined in the [Workspace registration deletion Agent Note](2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.md).
+The Host stream pushes Workspace and Session deltas, including `host/workspace-removed`, and the Client refreshes the `workspace.list` and `session.list` baselines separately after reconnecting. Registration-deletion ownership and safety are defined in the [Workspace registration deletion Agent Note](2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.md).
 
 A Workspace's `sessionIds` is an ordered candidate index. A membership projection requires both that an id appear in the index and that the corresponding canonicalized `SessionHeader.cwd` equal the Workspace path; SessionHeader does not gain a `workspaceId`. A Session whose cwd matches but whose id is absent from the index remains Ungrouped, while an indexed id is filtered out if its header is missing, its cwd is invalid, or its cwd does not match. Two Workspace indexes claiming the same Session is corrupt state and fails loudly.
 
@@ -52,7 +51,7 @@ When no Workspace exists, the page creates a frontend Workspace object named `wo
 
 Top-level New Session, the plus button on a Workspace row, and the Workspace picker all invoke the same New Session action. An explicit Workspace id becomes the target directly; when none is specified, the action uses the most recent Workspace, or the Workspace Intent if no real Workspace exists. The Workspace picker's one Add workspace action ([one-route Note](../simplification/2026-07-31-one-route-to-add-a-workspace.md); it was a pair of Use-an-existing-folder and create-by-name actions when this was decided) immediately creates a real Workspace when the user confirms a directory, then retargets the frontend Session to it; an explicitly created empty Workspace remains even if the user sends no message.
 
-A new Workspace takes its display name from the directory it was created in. Distinct canonical paths may share the same basename-derived title ([identity decision](../bug-fix/2026-07-31-same-basename-workspace-adoption.md)); explicit create-by-name and rename operations retain their duplicate-title checks. Moving Sessions across Workspaces, manual adoption from Ungrouped, and separate display-name and directory-name inputs remain outside this flow.
+A new Workspace takes its display name from the directory it was created in. Distinct canonical paths may share the same basename-derived title ([identity decision](../bug-fix/2026-07-31-same-basename-workspace-adoption.md)); the explicit rename operation retains its duplicate-title check. Moving Sessions across Workspaces, manual adoption from Ungrouped, and separate display-name and directory-name inputs remain outside this flow.
 
 ### First send and recovery
 
@@ -108,7 +107,7 @@ The Sidebar and conversation empty hero receive standardized actions through slo
 - Workspace list performs one reentrant bootstrap using only headers; an initialized empty registry does not initialize again after restart, and membership reads validate both the index and canonical cwd.
 - The initial default target is determined exactly once after both baselines are ready; Workspace groups are not reordered as a whole by hydration or Session activity, and an active Session moves only itself to the front.
 - A frontend Session under a real Workspace temporarily counts toward the sidebar total, while a Workspace Intent remains hidden; neither publication nor refresh leaves duplicate rows or counts.
-- The UI and Host admit distinct same-basename directories as separate Workspaces, while explicit create-by-name and rename operations reject duplicate titles; cwd-only Sessions, Sessions with invalid historical cwd values, and unattached Sessions remain Ungrouped.
+- The UI and Host admit distinct same-basename directories as separate Workspaces, while the explicit rename operation rejects duplicate titles; cwd-only Sessions, Sessions with invalid historical cwd values, and unattached Sessions remain Ungrouped.
 - Confirmed Workspace deletion removes only the registration, retains the current Session, directory, files, and session log, and survives reload; package tests pin unary/frame/baseline races and failure rollback.
 - Keyless runnable snapshots cover the zero state, explicit creation, and the first send; package-level tests cover bootstrap, membership validation, ordering, idempotency, failure recovery, and arbitrary frame order.
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-25-workspace-ui-product-flow.zh.md

@@ -19,13 +19,12 @@ Host 在 Workspace entity 上提供以下 GUI 接线：
 | RPC | 行为 |
 | --- | --- |
 | `workspace.list` | 返回持久有序的 Workspace，并过滤未通过 header 校验的 Session id |
-| `workspace.create({ name })` | 在 `workspaceRoot/name` 创建目录和 Workspace；显示名冲突时失败 |
 | `workspace.create({ path })` | 按 canonical path 收编已有目录；由 basename 派生的显示名可以重复 |
 | `workspace.delete({ workspaceId })` | 移除 Workspace 注册记录，同时保留目录和会话日志；相关 Session 进入 Ungrouped |
 | `session.create({ workspaceId, sessionId? })` | 从 Workspace 解析 cwd，以可选预分配 id 幂等创建 Session 并 attach |
 | `session.create({ cwd })` | 保留给非 Workspace 调用方，创建 Ungrouped Session |
 
-`workspaceRoot` 是独立 Host 配置，未配置时回退到 Host cwd；它与保存 Workspace domain 数据的 `storageRoot` 无关。Host 流推送 Workspace 与 Session 增量，包括 `host/workspace-removed`；Client 重连后分别刷新 `workspace.list` 与 `session.list` 基线。删除注册记录的所有权与安全边界由 [Workspace 注册记录删除 Agent Note](2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.md)定义。
+Host 流推送 Workspace 与 Session 增量，包括 `host/workspace-removed`；Client 重连后分别刷新 `workspace.list` 与 `session.list` 基线。删除注册记录的所有权与安全边界由 [Workspace 注册记录删除 Agent Note](2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.md)定义。
 
 Workspace 的 `sessionIds` 是有序候选索引。成员投影同时要求 id 位于索引且对应 `SessionHeader.cwd` canonical 后等于 Workspace path；SessionHeader 不增加 `workspaceId`。cwd 匹配但未入索引的 Session 保持 Ungrouped，索引命中但 header 缺失、cwd 无效或 cwd 不匹配的 id 被过滤。同一 Session 被两个 Workspace 索引占用属于损坏状态并明确报错。
 
@@ -52,7 +51,7 @@ Session 自己持有首条输入并驱动一条内部流水线：必要时以预
 
 顶部 New Session、Workspace 行内加号和 Workspace picker 最终都调用同一 New Session 动作：显式 Workspace id 直接成为目标，未指定时使用最近 Workspace，没有真实 Workspace 时使用 Workspace Intent。Workspace picker 的单一 Add workspace 动作（见[单一路径 Note](../simplification/2026-07-31-one-route-to-add-a-workspace.md)；本决策做出时是 Use an existing folder 与按名称创建两个动作）会在用户确认目录时立即创建真实 Workspace，再把前端 Session 定位到该 Workspace；即使用户不发送消息，显式创建的空 Workspace 也保留。
 
-新建 Workspace 的显示名取自其所在目录。不同 canonical path 可以拥有相同的 basename 派生显示名（见[身份决策](../bug-fix/2026-07-31-same-basename-workspace-adoption.md)）；显式的按名称创建和重命名操作仍保留显示名重名检查。跨 Workspace 移动 Session、从 Ungrouped 手动收编以及分别输入显示名和目录名仍不在此动线范围内。
+新建 Workspace 的显示名取自其所在目录。不同 canonical path 可以拥有相同的 basename 派生显示名（见[身份决策](../bug-fix/2026-07-31-same-basename-workspace-adoption.md)）；显式的重命名操作仍保留显示名重名检查。跨 Workspace 移动 Session、从 Ungrouped 手动收编以及分别输入显示名和目录名仍不在此动线范围内。
 
 ### 首次发送与恢复
 
@@ -108,7 +107,7 @@ Sidebar 与 conversation empty hero 通过 slot 获得标准化动作：`startSe
 - Workspace list 只读取 header 完成一次可重入 bootstrap；initialized 的空 registry 重启不重复初始化，成员读取同时校验索引与 canonical cwd。
 - 初始默认目标只在两份基线 ready 后确定一次；Workspace 组不因 hydration 或 Session 活跃整体重排，单个活跃 Session 只前移自身。
 - 真实 Workspace 下的前端 Session 临时计入 sidebar 数量，Workspace Intent 保持隐藏，发布与刷新都不会留下重复行或重复计数。
-- UI 与 Host 会将 canonical path 不同但 basename 相同的目录接纳为独立 Workspace，而显式的按名称创建和重命名操作会拒绝重复显示名；cwd-only Session、无效历史 cwd 和未 attach Session 保持 Ungrouped。
+- UI 与 Host 会将 canonical path 不同但 basename 相同的目录接纳为独立 Workspace，而显式的重命名操作会拒绝重复显示名；cwd-only Session、无效历史 cwd 和未 attach Session 保持 Ungrouped。
 - 经确认的 Workspace 删除只移除注册记录，保留当前 Session、目录、文件和会话日志，并在刷新后保持该状态；包级测试固定一元响应／帧／基线竞态和失败回滚行为。
 - keyless runnable snapshot 覆盖零态、显式创建和首次发送；包级测试覆盖 bootstrap、成员校验、排序、幂等、失败恢复及任意 frame 顺序。
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-code-dispatch-log-spill.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-code-dispatch-log-spill.md
-2026-07-26-code-dispatch-log-spill.md: 19d37c7ec2dbe5192e4c7e7ecd26e5b7f1467606
-2026-07-26-code-dispatch-log-spill.zh.md: 8dd270278932011db9658f9e4d5c1a1b6fe707ec
+2026-07-26-code-dispatch-log-spill.md: a4b8deee86b1f6102e48e34079a93a74dfcfa288
+2026-07-26-code-dispatch-log-spill.zh.md: 0d89329dd91d74491f3f9af0812bb9b4db9c8793

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-code-dispatch-log-spill.md

@@ -4,28 +4,28 @@ Status: implemented
 
 English | [中文](2026-07-26-code-dispatch-log-spill.zh.md)
 
-> Scope: bounding the `tool/code-dispatch` event's content with the existing spill machinery. The [host foundation note](2026-07-26-code-dispatch-ui-foundation.md) accepted the unbounded log deliberately with this spill integration as the payoff point; the [live-parallel note](2026-07-26-code-mode-live-parallel-dispatch.md) settled the event pair this shaping hooks into.
+> Scope: limiting the `tool/code-dispatch` event's content with the existing spill implementation. The [host foundation note](2026-07-26-code-dispatch-ui-foundation.md) deliberately accepted the unlimited log and deferred spill support to this change; the [live-parallel note](2026-07-26-code-mode-live-parallel-dispatch.md) defines the event pair that this listener processes.
 
 ## Problem
 
-Since the full-content dispatch logging landed, a `run_code` program that reads a large file wrote the complete rendered text into the session log — uncapped and outside spill policy, while native results were bounded to `maxInlineBytes` before logging. The asymmetry was backwards: sub-calls (built for bulk data work) were precisely the calls most likely to carry huge results, and the JSONL grew by megabytes per such turn.
+After full-content dispatch logging was added, a `run_code` program that reads a large file wrote the complete rendered text into the session log without a limit or spill policy, while native results were limited to `maxInlineBytes` before logging. This treated the most likely large results differently: sub-calls are intended for bulk data work, and each affected turn added megabytes to the JSONL.
 
 ## Decision
 
-**A log-shaping waterfall on the registry, and the spill policy as its first listener.**
+**A `tools/code-dispatch-log` waterfall on the registry, with spill policy as its first listener.**
 
-- **Extension point**: `tools/code-dispatch-log` — a scope-filtered waterfall the bridge runs (via the registry's PRIVATE `shapeDispatchLog` invoker, handed to the bridge as a capability closure in `RunCodeBridgeOptions` — the waterfall is the public contract, the invoker never widens the service surface; contained: a throwing listener falls back to the unshaped content, with total error formatting so a hostile thrown value cannot escape the containment) over each settled sub-dispatch before appending `tool/code-dispatch`. The payload (`CodeDispatchLog`) carries the outer execution, the hoisted `agent` routing key, the sub-call identity, and the default content — the RENDERED result projection a native `tool/result` would carry (the program itself received the structured `value`). Only the durable copy is shapeable; the model sees neither. Shaping runs OFF the program path as tracked side work, but bounded: past `maxParallelSubCalls` pending log tasks the ordered commit lane holds, so a slow spill backend backpressures the run instead of accumulating unbounded pending I/O; run settlement still drains every task inside the open turn.
-- **Policy**: `dsh-spill-policy` registers a second arm on the new extension point sharing the exact replacement pipeline of its model-facing arm (same `maxInlineBytes` cap, same preview + locator + within-cap invariant, same best-effort fallbacks), with the artifact labeled `dispatch` under the sub-call id. UIs and replay read the full text through the spill artifact exactly as they do for spilled native results, so the native-parity rendering story survives bounding.
-- **One deliberate asymmetry**: the model-facing arm skips `read` (the `read → spill → read again` loop); the dispatch-log arm bounds `read` sub-calls too — a log copy is not model context, so the loop cannot happen, and `read` is precisely the tool that produces huge logs.
+- **Extension point**: `tools/code-dispatch-log` is a scope-filtered waterfall that the bridge runs over each settled sub-dispatch before appending `tool/code-dispatch`. The bridge receives the registry's private `shapeDispatchLog` invoker as a capability closure in `RunCodeBridgeOptions`; the waterfall is the public contract, and the invoker does not add a service method. If a listener throws, the invoker reports any thrown value safely and uses the original settled content. The `CodeDispatchLog` payload carries the outer execution, the `agent` routing key, the sub-call identity, and the default content: the rendered result projection that a native `tool/result` would carry, while the program receives the structured `value`. A listener can replace only the durable copy, which the model never sees. The listener runs as tracked work outside the program's result path. When more than `maxParallelSubCalls` log tasks are pending, the ordered commit loop waits, so a slow spill backend limits later sub-call starts instead of accumulating unlimited pending I/O. Run settlement still waits for every task inside the open turn.
+- **Policy**: `dsh-spill-policy` registers a listener for this event and uses the same replacement code as its model-result listener: the same `maxInlineBytes` limit, preview and locator, within-limit invariant, and best-effort fallback. The spill artifact is labeled `dispatch` under the sub-call id. UIs and replay read its full text through the same path used for spilled native results, so both result kinds render with the same information.
+- **One deliberate difference**: the model-result listener skips `read` to prevent a `read → spill → read again` loop. The dispatch-log listener also replaces oversized `read` sub-call content because a log copy is not model context, so that loop cannot occur, and `read` is the tool most likely to produce a large log entry.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
-**Bound inside the bridge with a plain cap (no spill).** Rejected: truncation without a locator loses data replay/UIs may need, and re-introduces the "truncated summary" degraded render path the stack removed.
+**Apply a plain byte limit inside the bridge without spill storage.** Rejected: truncation without a locator loses data that replay or UIs may need and restores the less informative "truncated summary" rendering that earlier changes removed.
 
-**Spill inside the bridge directly (call `ctx.spillStore` from code-mode.ts).** Rejected: the registry would grow a hard dependency on the spill capability; the waterfall keeps the policy where every other spill decision lives, composable and disable-able (omitted `maxInlineBytes` still means a true no-op).
+**Spill inside the bridge directly by calling `ctx.spillStore` from `code-mode.ts`.** Rejected: the registry would require the spill capability. The waterfall keeps this policy with the other spill decisions and allows compositions to omit it; omitting `maxInlineBytes` still makes the listener a no-op.
 
-**Reuse `tools/post-execute` for nested calls instead of a new event.** Rejected: post-execute shapes the PROGRAM-facing result (nested calls deliberately skip it so programs get complete data); the durable copy needs its own decision point after the program has its value.
+**Reuse `tools/post-execute` for nested calls instead of a new event.** Rejected: post-execute can change the program-facing result, so nested calls deliberately skip it and programs receive complete data. The durable copy needs a separate listener that runs after the program has its value.
 
 ## Consequences
 
-The session log is bounded again for Code Mode turns — the README's Known Limitations entry about uncapped dispatch logging is resolved and now points here. Old logs with oversized dispatch content still replay (the event shape is unchanged; only future appends shrink). The web UI renders spilled sub-call output as the preview + locator text through the identical native path, no special casing.
+Code Mode dispatch entries in the session log now have the configured byte limit, and the README's Known Limitations entry about unlimited dispatch logging now points here. Old logs with oversized dispatch content still replay because the event fields are unchanged; only future appends contain less text. The web UI renders spilled sub-call output as preview and locator text through the same path as native results, with no special case.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-code-dispatch-log-spill.zh.md

@@ -4,28 +4,28 @@ Status: implemented
 
 [English](2026-07-26-code-dispatch-log-spill.md) | 中文
 
-> 范围：用既有的 spill 机制为 `tool/code-dispatch` 事件的内容施加边界。[宿主侧基础 Agent Note](2026-07-26-code-dispatch-ui-foundation.md)当初有意接受了不设上限的日志，并以这次 spill 集成为兑现点；[实时并行 Agent Note](2026-07-26-code-mode-live-parallel-dispatch.md)敲定了本次整形所挂接的事件对。
+> 范围：用既有的 spill 实现限制 `tool/code-dispatch` 事件的内容。[宿主侧基础 Agent Note](2026-07-26-code-dispatch-ui-foundation.md)有意接受了不设上限的日志，并把 spill 支持留到本次更改；[实时并行 Agent Note](2026-07-26-code-mode-live-parallel-dispatch.md)定义了该监听器处理的事件对。
 
 ## 问题
 
-自携带完整内容的分发日志落地以来，读取大文件的 `run_code` 程序过去会把完整的渲染文本写进会话日志，不设上限、位于 spill 策略之外；而原生结果在记录之前就已被限制在 `maxInlineBytes` 以内。这种不对称的方向完全反了：子调用（本就为批量数据工作而设计）恰恰是最可能携带巨大结果的调用，而每个这样的轮次都会让 JSONL 增长数 MB。
+加入完整内容的分发日志后，读取大文件的 `run_code` 程序会把完整的渲染文本写进会话日志，既没有上限，也不经过 spill 策略；原生结果则会在记录之前限制在 `maxInlineBytes` 以内。两类结果受到不同处理，而为批量数据工作设计的子调用最可能产生巨大结果；每个受影响的轮次都会让 JSONL 增长数 MB。
 
 ## 决策
 
-**在注册表上增设一个日志整形 waterfall（瀑布式事件），spill 策略作为其第一个监听器。**
+**在注册表上增设 `tools/code-dispatch-log` waterfall（瀑布式事件），spill 策略作为其第一个监听器。**
 
-- **扩展点**：`tools/code-dispatch-log`，一个按作用域过滤的 waterfall，由桥接层在追加 `tool/code-dispatch` 之前对每个已结算的子分发运行（经由注册表的私有 `shapeDispatchLog` 调用器——作为能力闭包经 `RunCodeBridgeOptions` 交给桥接层；waterfall 才是公开约定，调用器绝不扩大服务接口。故障被兜住：监听器抛出异常时回退到未整形的内容，并用可处理任意抛出值的错误格式化，确保恶意抛出值无法逃出兜底）。载荷（`CodeDispatchLog`）携带外层执行、提升出来的 `agent` 路由键、子调用标识与默认内容——即原生 `tool/result` 所载的渲染后结果投影（程序本身收到的是结构化 `value`）。可整形的只有持久副本；模型两者都看不到。整形作为被跟踪的旁路工作在程序路径之外运行，但有界：待处理日志任务超过 `maxParallelSubCalls` 时有序提交通道会暂停，因此慢速 spill 后端会对整个 run 施加背压，而不是无限累积待完成 I/O；run 结算仍会在开放轮次内排空全部任务。
-- **策略**：`dsh-spill-policy` 在新扩展点上注册第二个分支，与其面向模型的分支共用一模一样的替换流水线（同样的 `maxInlineBytes` 上限、同样的预览 + 定位符 + 不超上限不变式、同样的尽力而为回退），产物以 `dispatch` 为标签，记在子调用 id 名下。UI 与回放通过 spill 产物读取全文，方式与读取被 spill 的原生结果完全相同，因此与原生同等保真的渲染在施加边界之后依然成立。
-- **一处有意的不对称**：面向模型的分支跳过 `read`（避免 `read → spill → read again` 循环）；分发日志分支则连 `read` 子调用也施加边界：日志副本不是模型上下文，该循环因此不可能发生，而 `read` 恰恰是会产生巨大日志的那个工具。
+- **扩展点**：`tools/code-dispatch-log` 是一个按作用域过滤的 waterfall，桥接层会在追加 `tool/code-dispatch` 之前，对每个已结算的子分发运行它。桥接层通过 `RunCodeBridgeOptions` 接收注册表私有的 `shapeDispatchLog` 调用器；waterfall 是公开约定，该调用器不会增加服务方法。监听器抛出异常时，调用器会安全地报告任意抛出值，并使用原始的已结算内容。`CodeDispatchLog` 载荷包含外层执行、`agent` 路由键、子调用标识和默认内容；默认内容是原生 `tool/result` 会携带的渲染后结果投影，而程序收到结构化 `value`。监听器只能替换持久化副本，模型不会看到这份副本。监听器作为受跟踪任务在程序的返回路径之外运行。待处理日志任务超过 `maxParallelSubCalls` 时，有序提交循环会等待，因此慢速 spill 后端会限制后续子调用启动，而不会无限累积待完成 I/O。run 结算仍会在开放轮次内等待全部任务完成。
+- **策略**：`dsh-spill-policy` 为该事件注册监听器，并复用面向模型结果的监听器所用的替换代码：相同的 `maxInlineBytes` 上限、预览和定位符、不超上限不变式，以及尽力而为回退。spill 产物以 `dispatch` 为标签，记录在子调用 id 名下。UI 与回放通过读取被 spill 原生结果的同一路径读取全文，因此两类结果会渲染出相同的信息。
+- **一处有意差异**：面向模型结果的监听器跳过 `read`，以防出现 `read → spill → read again` 循环。分发日志监听器也会替换过大的 `read` 子调用内容，因为日志副本不是模型上下文，该循环不会发生，而 `read` 最可能产生巨大的日志条目。
 
 ## 曾考虑的替代方案
 
-**在桥接层内部用普通上限施加边界（不做 spill）。** 否决：没有定位符的截断会丢失回放与 UI 可能需要的数据，还会重新引入本堆叠 PR（Pull Request）链已经移除的「截断摘要」降级渲染路径。
+**在桥接层内部使用普通字节数上限，不存入 spill。** 否决：没有定位符的截断会丢失回放或 UI 可能需要的数据，还会恢复之前更改已经移除的、信息较少的「截断摘要」渲染。
 
-**直接在桥接层内做 spill（从 code-mode.ts 调用 `ctx.spillStore`）。** 否决：注册表会因此对 spill 能力产生硬依赖；waterfall 则把策略留在所有其他 spill 决策所在的地方，既可组合也可禁用（省略 `maxInlineBytes` 依然意味着真正的 no-op）。
+**直接在桥接层内做 spill，即从 `code-mode.ts` 调用 `ctx.spillStore`。** 否决：注册表会要求提供 spill 能力。waterfall 把该策略与其他 spill 决策放在一起，并允许组合不加载它；省略 `maxInlineBytes` 时，该监听器仍不执行任何操作。
 
-**让嵌套调用复用 `tools/post-execute`，而不是新增一个事件。** 否决：post-execute 整形的是面向程序的那份结果（嵌套调用有意跳过它，好让程序拿到完整数据）；持久副本需要一个属于自己的决策点，位于程序取得其值之后。
+**让嵌套调用复用 `tools/post-execute`，而不是新增一个事件。** 否决：post-execute 可以修改面向程序的结果，因此嵌套调用有意跳过它，让程序取得完整数据。持久化副本需要一个单独的监听器，在程序取得其值之后运行。
 
 ## 后果
 
-对 Code Mode 轮次而言，会话日志重新有了边界：README 中关于分发日志不设上限的 「已知限制」条目已经解决，现在指向本篇。携带超大分发内容的旧日志仍可回放（事件形状未变；只有今后的追加才会变小）。Web UI 经由与原生完全相同的路径，把被 spill 的子调用输出渲染为预览 + 定位符文本，没有任何特殊处理。
+会话日志中的 Code Mode 分发条目现在遵守已配置的字节数上限，README 中关于分发日志不设上限的「已知限制」条目现在指向本篇。携带超大分发内容的旧日志仍可回放，因为事件字段没有变化；只有今后的追加包含更少文本。Web UI 经由与原生结果相同的路径，把被 spill 的子调用输出渲染为预览和定位符文本，不需要特殊处理。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-28-feedback-command.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-28-feedback-command.md
-2026-07-28-feedback-command.md: 78cc9e89a5811b3f1520bae2bd971cbcf2522ede
-2026-07-28-feedback-command.zh.md: b0bba25ec3331123cb86066fc6c89186f2297cc9
+2026-07-28-feedback-command.md: 3edb29283c289d6d006891a4c19087b01fa8166f
+2026-07-28-feedback-command.zh.md: c2513d2570474cbbaf8d94f87603d8ce10d40c14

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-28-feedback-command.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ The capture surface has to be usable at the moment of annoyance, which rules out
 
 ## Decision
 
-`@deepseek-ai/dsh-command-feedback` in `packages/feedback/command-feedback/` registers one global `feedback` command over `ctx.commands`. `/feedback <text>` acknowledges; bare or whitespace-only input returns a direct usage error. The handler is synchronous, injects only `commands`, and has no configuration.
+`@deepseek-ai/dsh-command-feedback` in `packages/feedback/command-feedback/` registers one global `feedback` command over `ctx.commands`. `/feedback <text>` acknowledges with the receiving session id and the shared harness-home anonymous user id; bare or whitespace-only input returns a direct usage error. The handler is synchronous, injects only `commands`, and has no configuration. [The shared-id decision](../architecture/2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.md) records why feedback and OpenTelemetry use the same `$DSH_HOME/.userid` value.
 
 The package declares the log-only `feedback/record { text }` session event and exports `recordFeedback(session, text)` as its command-independent producer. The producer discards surrounding whitespace, rejects an empty result, and appends exactly one event. `/feedback` delegates to it, so another UI, hook, or host integration can record the same domain fact without constructing a slash command.
 
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ Surrounding whitespace is discarded, but nothing else is parsed. `/feedback /pla
 
 ## Consequences
 
-The shipped `dsh` base mounts the command unconditionally — no configuration, no dependency on the goal stack. The Web client exposes it through its command adapter. Headless mode, ACP, and JSON-RPC do not provide a command adapter, so `/feedback` is unavailable there.
+The shipped `dsh` base mounts the command unconditionally — no configuration, no dependency on the goal stack. The Web client exposes it through its command adapter. Headless mode, ACP, and JSON-RPC do not provide a command adapter, so `/feedback` is unavailable there. The first accepted feedback for a harness home can create `$DSH_HOME/.userid`; rejected empty input does not resolve or create an id.
 
 The package owns one independent append-only event with no cross-event or mutable-data relation for an invariant companion to check. The event follows the session log's existing replay, fork, persistence, and crash-tail behavior.
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-28-feedback-command.zh.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 决策
 
-位于 `packages/feedback/command-feedback/` 的 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-command-feedback` 通过 `ctx.commands` 注册一个全局 `feedback` 命令。`/feedback <text>` 给出确认；空输入或仅含空白的输入返回直接用法错误。处理器是同步的，只注入 `commands`，且没有任何配置。
+位于 `packages/feedback/command-feedback/` 的 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-command-feedback` 通过 `ctx.commands` 注册一个全局 `feedback` 命令。`/feedback <text>` 在确认文本中包含接收反馈的会话 id 与 harness home 的共享匿名用户 id；空输入或仅含空白的输入返回直接用法错误。处理器是同步的，只注入 `commands`，且没有任何配置。[共享 id 决策](../architecture/2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.md)说明了反馈与 OpenTelemetry 为何使用同一个 `$DSH_HOME/.userid` 值。
 
 本包声明仅写入日志的 `feedback/record { text }` 会话事件，并导出 `recordFeedback(session, text)`，作为不依赖命令的生产方。该生产方丢弃前后空白，拒绝空结果，并且恰好追加一个事件。`/feedback` 委托给它，因此其他 UI、钩子或 host 集成无需构造斜杠命令也能记录同一个领域事实。
 
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 后果
 
-随附的 `dsh` 基础组合无条件挂载该命令：没有配置，也不依赖 goal 栈。Web 客户端通过命令适配器暴露该命令。无头模式、ACP 和 JSON-RPC 不提供命令适配器，因此 `/feedback` 在那里不可用。
+随附的 `dsh` 基础组合无条件挂载该命令：没有配置，也不依赖 goal 栈。Web 客户端通过命令适配器暴露该命令。无头模式、ACP 和 JSON-RPC 不提供命令适配器，因此 `/feedback` 在那里不可用。对于某个 harness home，首次接受反馈时可能创建 `$DSH_HOME/.userid`；被拒绝的空输入不会获取或创建 id。
 
 本包拥有一个独立的仅追加事件，不存在跨事件关系或可变数据关系可供不变式伴生插件检查。该事件遵循会话日志现有的回放、fork、持久化和崩溃尾部行为。
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-plan-review-presentation-intent.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-plan-review-presentation-intent.md
-2026-07-30-plan-review-presentation-intent.md: f524f7ec67dff3e6d7a6bf59ac204f5c8aae13c6
-2026-07-30-plan-review-presentation-intent.zh.md: 69e0ae00fbc2a98ed45a6d2b711a17f7c947c7e6
+2026-07-30-plan-review-presentation-intent.md: 62e1c24aba7a2901a46da4e6ace9707814472974
+2026-07-30-plan-review-presentation-intent.zh.md: 8415b94cab697e0fa9c4094b938d8ceb99107c7f

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-plan-review-presentation-intent.md

@@ -12,15 +12,15 @@ Every one of those affordances is wrong for the surface. Reviewing a plan is one
 
 ## Decision
 
-A question may declare a **presentation intent**, and the Web composer renders a declared intent as its own surface. `AskUserQuestionItem` gains `intent?: AskUserQuestionIntent`, a tagged shape whose one member is `{ kind: 'plan-review', approve: string }`; `plan-mode` sets it on the review question, naming `Approve` as the label that approves.
+A question may declare a **presentation intent**, and the Web composer renders a declared intent as its own surface. `AskUserQuestionItem` gains `intent?: AskUserQuestionIntent`, a tagged union whose one member is `{ kind: 'plan-review', approve: string }`; `plan-mode` sets it on the review question, naming `Approve` as the label that approves.
 
-An intent shapes presentation only. The answer protocol is untouched: a UI honouring the intent answers with the same option labels a generic UI would send, so `exit_plan_mode` reads one answer shape regardless of which surface collected it, and a UI that does not know a tag renders the generic flow with nothing lost but the layout.
+An intent changes presentation only. The answer protocol is untouched: a UI honouring the intent answers with the same option labels a generic UI would send, so `exit_plan_mode` reads the same answer fields regardless of which surface collected them, and a UI that does not know a tag renders the generic flow with nothing lost but the layout.
 
 `approve` names the affirmative option instead of relying on option order, so no UI infers a verdict from a position. Two assertions an intent makes are beyond the types, and `UserInteractionService.ask()` rejects both as `BAD_INTENT` at the asker: an `approve` naming none of that question's own options — before any UI can answer a choice never offered — and an intent on a question with no `detail`, the thing it declares itself a review of, which would ask the user to approve something invisible. On the wire the intent is a discriminated union, so an unrecognised tag is a rejected frame rather than a silently generic render.
 
 `ui-question` renders the intent as `PlanReviewPanel`, in the waiting-approval card language: the amber strip carries `Plan review`, the plan is the scrolling markdown body, and the decision row holds three actions — `Chat about it`, `Refuse`, `Approve`. The question text becomes the card's accessible name rather than a headline, because the buttons already say what the decision is. Approve and Refuse answer with the asker's own option labels and keep the asker's descriptions as tooltips; `Chat about it` cancels the request, which returns the composer so the user can simply say what they want. All copy is bilingual under the existing `question` namespace.
 
-Routing lives inside the single composer entry (`QuestionComposer` chooses the shape) rather than in a second chain registration, and `planReviewOf` claims a request only when the card can send every answer that request allows: one question declaring the intent, the plan as its `detail`, the named approve label offered, and a binary single choice — at most one option besides approve, and not multi-select. A third option or a multi-select batch has answers two buttons cannot express, so the generic flow keeps it, and keeps anything else the card cannot render. "Presentation only" is therefore literal: an intent never costs the user a reachable answer, and the client — downstream of a wire boundary — leaves every request answerable.
+Routing lives inside the single composer entry (`QuestionComposer` chooses the presentation) rather than in a second chain registration, and `planReviewOf` claims a request only when the card can send every answer that request allows: one question declaring the intent, the plan as its `detail`, the named approve label offered, and a binary single choice — at most one option besides approve, and not multi-select. A third option or a multi-select batch has answers two buttons cannot express, so the generic flow keeps it, and keeps anything else the card cannot render. "Presentation only" is therefore literal: an intent never costs the user a reachable answer, and the client — downstream of a wire boundary — leaves every request answerable.
 
 Dismissal became its own model-facing outcome. `ASK_CANCELLED` previously reached the model as "the user cancelled ask_user_question", naming a tool it never called; `exit_plan_mode` now reports that the user dismissed the review to speak instead and to stay in plan mode and wait. Every other ask failure — an abort from turn cancel or provider teardown, where no user is coming — keeps its own message.
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-plan-review-presentation-intent.zh.md

@@ -12,15 +12,15 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 决定
 
-一个问题可以声明**呈现意图（presentation intent）**，Web 输入区把已声明的意图渲染为它自己的界面。`AskUserQuestionItem` 新增 `intent?: AskUserQuestionIntent`，一个带标签的形状，目前唯一成员是 `{ kind: 'plan-review', approve: string }`；`plan-mode` 在审阅问题上设置它，并指明 `Approve` 是表示批准的标签。
+一个问题可以声明**呈现意图（presentation intent）**，Web 输入区把已声明的意图渲染为它自己的界面。`AskUserQuestionItem` 新增 `intent?: AskUserQuestionIntent`，这是一个带标签的联合，目前唯一成员是 `{ kind: 'plan-review', approve: string }`；`plan-mode` 在审阅问题上设置它，并指明 `Approve` 是表示批准的标签。
 
-意图只塑造呈现。回答协议不变：遵循意图的 UI 回答的仍是通用 UI 会发送的那些选项标签，因此无论由哪个界面收集，`exit_plan_mode` 读到的都是同一种回答形状；而不认识某个标签的 UI 渲染通用流程，除布局之外一无所失。
+意图只改变呈现。回答协议不变：遵循意图的 UI 回答的仍是通用 UI 会发送的那些选项标签，因此无论由哪个界面收集，`exit_plan_mode` 读到的都是同一组回答字段；而不认识某个标签的 UI 渲染通用流程，除布局之外一无所失。
 
 `approve` 指名肯定选项，而不依赖选项顺序，因此没有任何 UI 会从位置推断裁决。意图作出的两项断言超出类型的表达能力，`UserInteractionService.ask()` 都以 `BAD_INTENT` 在提问方一侧拒绝：`approve` 未命中该问题自身的任一选项 —— 早于任何 UI 回答一个从未被提供过的选择；以及意图落在没有 `detail` 的问题上，而 `detail` 正是它自称在审阅的东西，那会让用户去批准一件看不见的事。在协议格式（wire format）上意图是可辨识联合，因此无法识别的标签是被拒绝的帧，而不是静默退回通用渲染。
 
 `ui-question` 把该意图渲染为 `PlanReviewPanel`，沿用等待审批卡片的语言：琥珀色条带写着 `Plan review`，计划是可滚动的 markdown 主体，决定行放三个操作 —— `Chat about it`、`Refuse`、`Approve`。问题文本成为卡片的无障碍名称而非标题，因为按钮已经说明了这次决定是什么。Approve 与 Refuse 用提问方自己的选项标签回答，并把提问方的描述保留为 tooltip；`Chat about it` 取消该请求，从而让输入区归位，用户直接说他想说的话即可。所有文案在既有 `question` 命名空间下双语。
 
-路由住在单一输入区条目内部（由 `QuestionComposer` 选择形状），而不是第二个链式注册；`planReviewOf` 仅在卡片能够发出该请求允许的每一个答案时才接管：只有一个问题且声明了意图、以 `detail` 承载计划、提供了被指名的批准标签，且是二元单选 —— 除批准外最多一个选项，且非多选。出现第三个选项或多选批次时，其答案是两个按钮无法表达的，通用流程保留它，也保留其他任何卡片渲染不了的请求。因此"只塑造呈现"是字面意义上的：意图绝不让用户失去一个可达的答案，而位于协议边界下游的客户端让每个请求都保持可回答。
+路由住在单一输入区条目内部（由 `QuestionComposer` 选择呈现），而不是第二个链式注册；`planReviewOf` 仅在卡片能够发出该请求允许的每一个答案时才接管：只有一个问题且声明了意图、以 `detail` 承载计划、提供了被指名的批准标签，且是二元单选 —— 除批准外最多一个选项，且非多选。出现第三个选项或多选批次时，其答案是两个按钮无法表达的，通用流程保留它，也保留其他任何卡片渲染不了的请求。因此"只改变呈现"是字面意义上的：意图绝不让用户失去一个可达的答案，而位于协议边界下游的客户端让每个请求都保持可回答。
 
 放弃审阅成为面向模型的独立结果。`ASK_CANCELLED` 以前传到模型的是"the user cancelled ask_user_question"，指名了一个它从未调用的工具；现在 `exit_plan_mode` 报告用户放弃审阅是为了改用说话，并要求留在 plan mode 中等待。其余每一种 ask 失败 —— 轮次取消或提供方拆卸导致的中止，那里并没有用户会来 —— 保留它们自己的消息。
 

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.md
-2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.md: f53fc9ce7eb3a5aefcb0be0a20c7403b5601e369
-2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.zh.md: 99b2dd88df94810ccfc85d099e74a6f0852153a7
+2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.md: 75b65e9fd477d19afb3a3a25e424a7f7620099a3
+2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.zh.md: 3db5b665f9cbbe6f884a9717afa758f22a419658

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Session telemetry is mounted by default ([default-mount Note](2026-07-31-web-tel
 
 ## Decision
 
-The `session-telemetry-otel` package's own module `src/user-id.ts` owns the OTel feed's user identity: `getOrCreateAnonymousUserId()` returns the bare UUID line in `$DSH_HOME/.userid` (resolved by `resolveDshHome`, `$DSH_HOME` > `~/.dsh`), minting and persisting a random UUID v4 on first use; the backend constructor carries it as the Resource's `user.id` (the OTel semconv user attribute), once per export batch. This identity belongs to the OTel feed alone; the dsh-sdk launcher telemetry keeps its own anonymous-id store (`telemetry.json`), and the two are not shared (the first cut unified both feeds through a shared util package — no shared package before a second real consumer exists, revisit when a feed-correlation need appears).
+`getOrCreateAnonymousUserId()` returns the bare UUID line in `$DSH_HOME/.userid` (resolved by `resolveDshHome`, `$DSH_HOME` > `~/.dsh`), minting and persisting a random UUID v4 on first use; the backend constructor carries it as the Resource's `user.id` (the OTel semconv user attribute), once per export batch. The original implementation lived inside `session-telemetry-otel` because no second real consumer existed. `/feedback` later became that consumer, so [the shared-id decision](../architecture/2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.md) moves ownership to `@deepseek-ai/dsh-user-id` without changing the storage, anonymity, concurrency, or loss semantics recorded here. The dsh-sdk launcher telemetry keeps its own anonymous-id store (`telemetry.json`) and remains unrelated.
 
 | Ruling | Value | Rationale |
 |---|---|---|
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ The `session-telemetry-otel` package's own module `src/user-id.ts` owns the OTel
 | Write failure | Best-effort: return the in-memory id | Telemetry is never blocked by a read-only home |
 | Report position | Resource attribute, not per-record attributes | Once per batch suffices for Resource-dimension aggregation; per-record injection would touch the seam contract and grow the wire |
 | semconv dependency | `@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions` is not imported | One string constant does not justify a dependency |
-| Home | A module inside `session-telemetry-otel`, not a shared util package | Repo rule: split a package only for a second real consumer; the sdk launcher feed keeps its own store, and no real correlation need exists |
-| Separate switch | None | Identity follows the telemetry master switch (`DSH_TELEMETRY_DISABLED`); telemetry off means nothing reports |
+| Home | `@deepseek-ai/dsh-user-id`, shared by the OTel backend and `/feedback` | The second real consumer now exists; direct feedback must not depend on an exporter backend |
+| Separate switch | None | Either consumer can create the identity; `DSH_TELEMETRY_DISABLED` stops telemetry reporting but does not disable feedback acknowledgement |
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ The `session-telemetry-otel` package's own module `src/user-id.ts` owns the OTel
 |---|---|
 | Hostname/IP-hash-derived id (the prior ruling) | Reversible means not anonymous; the random UUID is semantically clean — the user ruled to supersede |
 | user.id on every record's attributes (Claude Code's shape) | Touches the session-telemetry seam contract or injects per record, growing the wire; once per batch on the Resource already aggregates |
-| A shared util package unifying both feeds (the first cut) | The only real consumer is the OTel backend; switching the sdk launcher onto it was unification for its own sake — the user reconsidered and pulled it back, to be re-extracted when a correlation need appears |
+| A shared package before `/feedback` needed the id (the first cut) | At that time the only real consumer was the OTel backend; extraction became justified only when direct feedback needed the same correlation id |
 | Reusing telemetry.json instead of a new file | The file name/JSON format files the identity under the launcher feed's naming; the OTel feed's identity is a standalone fact |
 | AppCLIEntry reading the id and injecting via config patch | Every surface entry needs wiring; a runtime fact inside deployment config conflates the two |
 | Housing it in `@deepseek-ai/dsh-paths` | paths is pure path computation with zero IO; a persisting identity capability would pollute the package boundary |
@@ -39,6 +39,6 @@ The `session-telemetry-otel` package's own module `src/user-id.ts` owns the OTel
 ## Consequences
 
 - One `$DSH_HOME` is one stable user in the OTel feed; separate homes are separate users by construction, with no cross-home linking mechanism.
-- The OTel feed and the launcher feed each hold their own id (`.userid` vs `telemetry.json`) and cannot be correlated — the direct cost of not extracting a shared package, to be unified when a real correlation need appears.
+- The OTel feed and `/feedback` share `.userid`; the launcher feed still uses `telemetry.json` and cannot be correlated with them.
 - Deleting `.userid` resets the identity (effective next launch); on an unwritable home each process holds its own in-memory id until the home becomes writable.
 - The [default-mount Note](2026-07-31-web-telemetry-default-mount.md)'s identity follow-up is closed for the anonymous-user-id part by this decision; hostname/surface dimensions, the redaction rule, and the usage-metrics track remain open.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.zh.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ session telemetry 已默认挂载（[默认挂载 Note](2026-07-31-web-telemetry
 
 ## Decision
 
-`session-telemetry-otel` 包内模块 `src/user-id.ts` 是 OTel 回流用户身份的属主：`getOrCreateAnonymousUserId()` 返回 `$DSH_HOME/.userid`（`resolveDshHome` 解析，`$DSH_HOME` > `~/.dsh`）中的裸 UUID 行，首用生成随机 UUID v4 并落盘；backend 构造时把它作为 Resource 的 `user.id`（OTel semconv 标准用户属性）随每批导出携带一次。该身份只属于 OTel 回流；dsh-sdk launcher telemetry 保留自己的匿名 id 存储（`telemetry.json`），两者不共享（初版曾做公用 util 包统一两条回流——在有第二个真实消费者之前不抽公共包，回流关联需求出现时再议）。
+`getOrCreateAnonymousUserId()` 返回 `$DSH_HOME/.userid`（`resolveDshHome` 解析，`$DSH_HOME` > `~/.dsh`）中的裸 UUID 行，首用生成随机 UUID v4 并落盘；后端构造时把它作为 Resource 的 `user.id`（OTel semconv 标准用户属性）随每批导出携带一次。原始实现位于 `session-telemetry-otel`，因为当时不存在第二个真实消费方。`/feedback` 后来成为该消费方，因此[共享 id 决策](../architecture/2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.md)将所有权移交给 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-user-id`，但不改变本 Note 记录的存储、匿名、并发与丢失语义。dsh-sdk launcher telemetry 继续使用自己独立的匿名 id 存储（`telemetry.json`），与此身份无关。
 
 | 裁定 | 取值 | 理由 |
 |---|---|---|
@@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ session telemetry 已默认挂载（[默认挂载 Note](2026-07-31-web-telemetry
 | 写失败 | best-effort 返回内存 id | telemetry 永不因 home 只读被阻塞 |
 | 上报位置 | Resource 属性，非逐条 attributes | 每批一次即够接收端按 Resource 维度聚合；逐条注入要动 seam 约定且涨 wire 体积 |
 | semconv 依赖 | 不引 `@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions` 包 | 一个字符串常量不值一个依赖 |
-| 落点 | `session-telemetry-otel` 包内模块，非公共 util 包 | 仓规「有第二个真实消费者才拆包」；sdk launcher 回流保留自有存储，无现实关联需求 |
-| 单独开关 | 无 | 身份跟随 telemetry 整体开关（`DSH_TELEMETRY_DISABLED`）；关 telemetry 即整体不报 |
+| 落点 | `@deepseek-ai/dsh-user-id`，由 OTel 后端与 `/feedback` 共享 | 第二个真实消费方已经出现；直接反馈不能依赖导出后端 |
+| 单独开关 | 无 | 任一消费方都可创建该身份；`DSH_TELEMETRY_DISABLED` 会停止遥测上报，但不会禁用反馈确认 |
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ session telemetry 已默认挂载（[默认挂载 Note](2026-07-31-web-telemetry
 |---|---|
 | hostname/IP 哈希派生 id（此前口径） | 可反查即非匿名；随机 UUID 语义干净，用户裁决取代 |
 | user.id 放每条 record 的 attributes（Claude Code 形态） | 要动 session-telemetry seam 约定或逐条注入，wire 体积涨；Resource 每批一次已满足聚合 |
-| 公用 util 包统一两条回流（初版实现） | 唯一现实消费者是 OTel backend；sdk launcher 换用它只是为统一而统一——用户复议收回，回流关联需求出现时再抽包 |
+| 在 `/feedback` 需要该 id 之前抽取共享包（初版实现） | 当时唯一的真实消费方是 OTel 后端；只有直接反馈需要同一个关联 id 后，抽取才具备依据 |
 | 复用 telemetry.json 不新建文件 | 文件名/JSON 格式把身份挂在 launcher 链路命名下；OTel 回流身份是独立事实 |
 | AppCLIEntry 读好 id 经 config patch 注入 | 每个 surface 入口都要接线；config 里传运行时事实与部署配置混淆 |
 | 挂进 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-paths` | paths 是纯路径计算零 IO；带持久化的身份能力会污染包边界 |
@@ -39,6 +39,6 @@ session telemetry 已默认挂载（[默认挂载 Note](2026-07-31-web-telemetry
 ## Consequences
 
 - 一个 `$DSH_HOME` 在 OTel 回流中是一个稳定用户；不同 home 在构造上就是不同用户，无跨 home 关联机制。
-- OTel 回流与 launcher 回流各有各的 id（`.userid` 与 `telemetry.json`），无法互相关联——这是「不抽公共包」的直接代价，等真实关联需求出现再统一。
+- OTel 回流与 `/feedback` 共享 `.userid`；launcher 回流仍使用 `telemetry.json`，无法与前两者关联。
 - 删除 `.userid` 即重置身份（下次启动生效）；home 不可写时每进程各自持有一个内存 id 直至恢复可写。
 - [默认挂载 Note](2026-07-31-web-telemetry-default-mount.md) 的身份 follow-up 中「匿名用户 id」项由本决定关闭；hostname/surface 维度与脱敏规则、usage-metrics track 仍是待办。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-01-pwsh-tool-and-executor.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-01-pwsh-tool-and-executor.md
-2026-08-01-pwsh-tool-and-executor.md: 7206f8ffe6640f8499f8453c40ab5846b23112c6
-2026-08-01-pwsh-tool-and-executor.zh.md: c59ba8e3e6c68d48d310861325c74dc6cec8e5c3
+2026-08-01-pwsh-tool-and-executor.md: 855d8e5db8a78e7e798061724d89fde31b28e975
+2026-08-01-pwsh-tool-and-executor.zh.md: dcf5c53cd6681be07adafef92d556b400c116736

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-01-pwsh-tool-and-executor.md

@@ -6,30 +6,30 @@ English | [中文](2026-08-01-pwsh-tool-and-executor.zh.md)
 
 ## Problem
 
-The harness spoke one shell dialect on every platform: `bash`. Windows hosts could run it only through WSL or Git-Bash shims, and the shipped `dsh-bash-local` executor is POSIX-only (`bash` hardcoded, process-group semantics POSIX). The Windows roadmap — defaulting hosts to `pwsh`, later pwsh TUI/GUI rendering — had no execution foundation: there was no PowerShell implementation of the bash executor seam and no model-facing tool that taught the PowerShell dialect. The bash tool itself is also far larger than a Windows-first profile needs: background tasks, sandbox escalation, and the persistent-PTY twin are all bash-shaped surface that a minimal `pwsh` tool should not carry.
+The harness spoke one shell dialect on every platform: `bash`. Windows hosts could run it only through WSL or Git-Bash shims, and the shipped `dsh-bash-local` executor is POSIX-only (`bash` hardcoded, process-group semantics POSIX). The Windows roadmap — defaulting hosts to `pwsh`, later pwsh TUI/GUI rendering — had no execution foundation: there was no PowerShell implementation of the bash executor seam and no model-facing tool that taught the PowerShell dialect. The bash tool is also larger than a Windows-first profile strictly needs — the persistent-PTY twin in particular is bash-shaped surface the `pwsh` tool still does not carry. The original minimal profile also left out background tasks and sandbox escalation: background arrived with the [parity decision](2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.md), and the sandbox surface (denial rendering plus `sandbox_permissions` escalation) arrived with the [Windows ACL sandbox decision](2026-08-08-windows-acl-restricted-token-sandbox.md) — the minimal tool was sized for the danger-full-access Windows posture, and that premise ended when the sandbox PR re-enabled confinement and approval on Windows.
 
 ## Decision
 
 Two new packages under `packages/bash/`:
 
 - **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-pwsh-local`** — a local implementation of the `ctx.bash` executor seam over `ctx.subprocess`, mirroring `dsh-bash-local` call-for-call: `resolve()` defaults and caps from config, `run()` fuses the config-clamped timeout with the caller's signal through one deadline, `start()` returns a consuming background handle whose processes belong to the subprocess service. The command string rides as ONE argv element to `pwsh -NoLogo -NoProfile -NonInteractive -Command`, so PowerShell parses it and no shell-quoting layer exists. Executable resolution (`resolvePwshPath`) is a pure function of `(configured, env, platform)`: explicit config first, then Windows probes PowerShell 7's install, PATH entries (quotes stripped), and Windows PowerShell 5.1, else a bare `pwsh` via PATH.
-- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-pwsh`** — the model-facing tool over `ctx.bash`, PowerShell-dialect by contract, mirroring `dsh-tool-bash` call-for-call minus the sandbox surface: foreground and `run_in_background` execution through the generic task runtime, managed `DSH_*` environment through the shared [`dsh-bash-env`](../feature/2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.md) registry, and the bash marker/truncation rendering story (a clean exit produces no marker). The parity decision supersedes this note's minimal-profile tool description.
+- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-pwsh`** — the model-facing tool over `ctx.bash`, PowerShell-dialect by contract, mirroring `dsh-tool-bash` call-for-call: foreground and `run_in_background` execution through the generic task runtime, managed `DSH_*` environment through the shared [`dsh-bash-env`](../feature/2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.md) registry, the bash marker/truncation rendering story (a clean exit produces no marker), and — since the Windows ACL sandbox decision — the sandbox denial rendering and `sandbox_permissions` escalation surface, plus the Windows-specific ConstrainedLanguage and named-pipe contracts in the tool description. The parity decision supersedes this note's minimal-profile tool description.
 
 Windows vitest coverage is deliberately NOT part of this change: the repo's Windows CI lane owns build/static gates, and unit coverage runs on Linux, where both packages' suites run against a real `pwsh` (preinstalled on the GitHub-hosted runners) or self-skip when absent. The vitest `windowsUnsupportedPackages` exclusion narrows from `packages/bash/*` to the bash-requiring packages so the pwsh suites can also run natively on Windows dev machines.
 
-The roadmap beyond this decision — defaulting Windows hosts to `pwsh` (bash off), and pwsh TUI/GUI rendering — is recorded separately as [a proposal](../../proposed/feature/2026-08-01-windows-pwsh-default.md).
+The roadmap beyond this decision — defaulting Windows hosts to `pwsh` (bash off), and pwsh TUI/GUI rendering — is recorded separately as [the Windows pwsh default decision](2026-08-01-windows-pwsh-default.md).
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
 **Extend `dsh-bash-local` with a pwsh mode.** Rejected: the executor's identity is the shell it spawns; a second dialect inside one package doubles its config surface (`shell` switches) and its test matrix, and the two dialects' quirks (signal facts on Windows, quoting domains) belong to their own packages' documentation.
 
-**Extend `dsh-tool-bash` with a dialect parameter.** Rejected: the bash tool's background/sandbox surface is bash-shaped; a `pwsh` mode would either hide it (conditional schema churn) or inherit it (surface the minimal profile explicitly rejects). The minimal twin keeps the model contract honest.
+**Extend `dsh-tool-bash` with a dialect parameter.** Rejected: the model-visible contract is the dialect itself (paths, variables, exit facts differ), so a dialect parameter would either churn the schema conditionally or force one tool to teach two dialects; the separate twin keeps the model contract honest — and carries the shared surfaces (background, sandbox, rendering) by mirroring rather than by sharing an implementation.
 
 **Wire the pwsh tool into the shipped CLI compositions now.** Rejected: mounting `tool-pwsh` + `pwsh-local` in `base.cordis.yml` would change the shipped roster before the Windows-default decision lands; this change ships the capability and its wiring points (`apps/cli` dependencies, tsconfig projects) without switching any default.
 
 ## Consequences
 
 - The bash executor seam gains a second, Windows-native implementation with an identical request/spec contract, so model-facing consumers beyond `tool-pwsh` (hooks bridges, in-process plugins) can run PowerShell without dialect shims.
-- `tool-pwsh` is the model-visible Windows-first shell tool: behaviorally interchangeable with the bash tool for foreground and background work (minus sandbox), with prompt guidance that states the marker contract precisely.
+- `tool-pwsh` is the model-visible Windows-first shell tool: behaviorally interchangeable with the bash tool for foreground, background, and sandboxed work — including the same-turn `sandbox_permissions` escalation through `ctx.approval` — with prompt guidance that states the marker contract, the sandbox denial/escalation vocabulary, and the ConstrainedLanguage and named-pipe boundaries precisely.
 - Windows semantics differ where the platform differs: forced termination reports exit 1 with no signal (so `signal`/`killed` status facts are POSIX-only), and PowerShell writes CRLF, which tests normalize.
 - The CLI gains two workspace dependencies and two tsconfig projects without mounting either plugin — the composition decision stays with the Windows-default proposal.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-01-pwsh-tool-and-executor.zh.md

@@ -6,30 +6,30 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 问题
 
-harness 在每个平台只说一种 shell 方言：`bash`。Windows 主机只能通过 WSL 或 Git-Bash 垫片运行它，而交付的 `dsh-bash-local` 执行器仅限 POSIX（硬编码 `bash`，进程组语义是 POSIX 的）。Windows 路线图——让主机默认 `pwsh`，之后再做 pwsh TUI/GUI 渲染——没有执行基础：既没有 bash 执行器 seam 的 PowerShell 实现，也没有教模型 PowerShell 方言的面向模型工具。bash 工具本身也远大于 Windows 优先画像所需：后台任务、沙箱升级与持久 PTY 孪生都是 bash 形状的表面，最小化的 `pwsh` 工具不该背负。
+harness 在每个平台只说一种 shell 方言：`bash`。Windows 主机只能通过 WSL 或 Git-Bash 垫片运行它，而交付的 `dsh-bash-local` 执行器仅限 POSIX（硬编码 `bash`，进程组语义是 POSIX 的）。Windows 路线图——让主机默认 `pwsh`，之后再做 pwsh TUI/GUI 渲染——没有执行基础：既没有 bash 执行器 seam 的 PowerShell 实现，也没有教模型 PowerShell 方言的面向模型工具。bash 工具也大于 Windows 优先画像的严格所需——尤其持久 PTY 孪生是 `pwsh` 工具至今仍不背负的 bash 形状表面。最初的最小画像也没有后台任务与沙箱升级：后台随 [parity 决策](2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.md) 到来，沙箱面（拒绝渲染加 `sandbox_permissions` 升级）随 [Windows ACL sandbox 决策](2026-08-08-windows-acl-restricted-token-sandbox.md) 到来——最小工具当初按 danger-full-access 的 Windows 姿态裁剪，这一前提在 sandbox PR（Pull Request）于 Windows 上重新启用隔离与审批时终结。
 
 ## 决策
 
 在 `packages/bash/` 下新增两个包：
 
 - **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-pwsh-local`** —— `ctx.bash` 执行器 seam 的本地实现，基于 `ctx.subprocess`，逐调用镜像 `dsh-bash-local`：`resolve()` 从配置默认化并设上限，`run()` 通过一个 deadline 融合配置夹取的超时与调用方信号，`start()` 返回消费式后台句柄，其进程归属于 subprocess 服务。命令字符串作为 ONE argv 元素传给 `pwsh -NoLogo -NoProfile -NonInteractive -Command`，由 PowerShell 解析，不存在 shell 引号层。可执行文件解析（`resolvePwshPath`）是 `(configured, env, platform)` 的纯函数：先显式配置，再在 Windows 上探测 PowerShell 7 安装位置、PATH 条目（剥离引号）与 Windows PowerShell 5.1，否则经 PATH 解析裸 `pwsh`。
-- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-pwsh`** —— 基于 `ctx.bash` 的面向模型工具，约定是 PowerShell 方言，逐调用镜像 `dsh-tool-bash`、减去 sandbox 面：经通用任务运行时执行前台与 `run_in_background`，经共享 [`dsh-bash-env`](../feature/2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.md) 注册表管理 `DSH_*` 环境，以及 bash 的 marker/截断渲染故事（干净退出不产生 marker）。parity 决策取代了本 note 的最小画像工具描述。
+- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-pwsh`** —— 基于 `ctx.bash` 的面向模型工具，约定是 PowerShell 方言，逐调用镜像 `dsh-tool-bash`：经通用任务运行时执行前台与 `run_in_background`，经共享 [`dsh-bash-env`](../feature/2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.md) 注册表管理 `DSH_*` 环境，bash 的 marker/截断渲染故事（干净退出不产生 marker），以及——自 Windows ACL sandbox 决策以来——沙箱拒绝渲染与 `sandbox_permissions` 升级面，外加工具描述中的 Windows 专属 ConstrainedLanguage 与 named-pipe 约定。parity 决策取代了本 note 的最小画像工具描述。
 
 Windows vitest 覆盖率刻意不属本次改动：仓库的 Windows CI 通道负责构建/静态门禁，单元覆盖在 Linux 上运行，两个包的套件在那里以真实 `pwsh` 运行（GitHub 托管 runner 预装）或缺失时自行跳过。vitest 的 `windowsUnsupportedPackages` 排除从 `packages/bash/*` 收窄为真正需要 bash 的包，使 pwsh 套件也能在 Windows 开发机上原生运行。
 
-本决策之后的路线图——让 Windows 主机默认 `pwsh`（关闭 bash）与 pwsh TUI/GUI 渲染——另行记录为[提案](../../proposed/feature/2026-08-01-windows-pwsh-default.md)。
+本决策之后的路线图——让 Windows 主机默认 `pwsh`（关闭 bash）与 pwsh TUI/GUI 渲染——已落地为 [Windows 默认 pwsh 决策](2026-08-01-windows-pwsh-default.md)。
 
 ## 备选方案
 
 **给 `dsh-bash-local` 增加 pwsh 模式。** 否决：执行器的身份就是它 spawn 的 shell；在一个包内塞第二种方言会翻倍配置面（`shell` 开关）与测试矩阵，且两种方言的怪癖（Windows 上的信号实情、引号域）应各自归入自己包的文档。
 
-**给 `dsh-tool-bash` 增加方言参数。** 否决：bash 工具的后台/沙箱表面是 bash 形状的；`pwsh` 模式要么隐藏它（条件 schema 翻动），要么继承它（把最小画像明确拒绝的表面带进来）。最小孪生让模型约定保持诚实。
+**给 `dsh-tool-bash` 增加方言参数。** 否决：模型可见约定本身就是方言（路径、变量、退出事实都不同），因此方言参数要么让 schema 按条件翻动，要么逼一个工具教两种方言；独立的孪生让模型约定保持诚实——并以镜像而非共享实现的方式携带共享表面（后台、沙箱、渲染）。
 
 **现在就接入交付的 CLI 组合。** 否决：在 Windows 默认决策落地前把 `tool-pwsh` + `pwsh-local` 挂进 `base.cordis.yml` 会改变交付清单；本改动交付能力与接线点（`apps/cli` 依赖、tsconfig 工程），不切换任何默认。
 
 ## 后果
 
 - bash 执行器 seam 有了第二个、Windows 原生的实现，请求/规范约定一致，因此 `tool-pwsh` 之外的面向模型消费方（hooks 桥、进程内插件）无需方言垫片即可运行 PowerShell。
-- `tool-pwsh` 是模型可见的 Windows 优先 shell 工具：在前台与后台工作（减 sandbox）上与 bash 工具行为可互换，提示词指导精确陈述 marker 约定。
+- `tool-pwsh` 是模型可见的 Windows 优先 shell 工具：在前台、后台与沙箱化工作上与 bash 工具行为可互换——包括经 `ctx.approval` 的同轮次 `sandbox_permissions` 升级——提示词指导精确陈述 marker 约定、沙箱拒绝/升级词汇，以及 ConstrainedLanguage 与 named-pipe 边界。
 - Windows 语义在平台差异处不同：强制终止报告退出码 1 且无信号（因此 `signal`/`killed` 状态实情仅限 POSIX），PowerShell 输出 CRLF，测试做归一化。
 - CLI 增加两个 workspace 依赖与两个 tsconfig 工程，但不挂载任一插件——组合决策留给 Windows 默认提案。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-01-windows-pwsh-default.i18n.yaml

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
-#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-front-door.md
-2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-front-door.md: f4604329a9276448a0021bb749b09e8c1b82e3c1
-2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-front-door.zh.md: aaa1289894bf3c69b39aa863493dffdc3437ad01
+#   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-01-windows-pwsh-default.md
+2026-08-01-windows-pwsh-default.md: f0da86e52bcdd53a10b60164d7cc12261cfc5c49
+2026-08-01-windows-pwsh-default.zh.md: 41a6429eab8f86a8960ac4aa372aeacfda4661c4

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-01-windows-pwsh-default.md

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+# Agent Note: Windows defaults to pwsh
+
+Status: implemented
+
+English | [中文](2026-08-01-windows-pwsh-default.zh.md)
+
+## Problem
+
+The harness's shipped execution profile is bash-first on every platform. Windows hosts must install a bash shim (WSL or Git-Bash) or fall back to the POSIX-only `dsh-bash-local` behavior (hardcoded `bash -c` argv, process-group semantics); the model-facing bash tool teaches the bash dialect. The Windows-native foundation shipped in the [pwsh executor and tool decision](2026-08-01-pwsh-tool-and-executor.md) — a PowerShell implementation of the `ctx.bash` seam and a parity `pwsh` tool — but shipped compositions still mounted the bash stack on Windows, so a Windows host without a shim could not run the shipped shell.
+
+## Decision
+
+Windows hosts booting a shipped profile (`dsh web`, `dsh --profile headless`, one-shot tasks) get the PowerShell stack by default; POSIX hosts are unchanged.
+
+- **The platform layer is a data file, not a roster rewrite.** `@deepseek-ai/dsh-base` ships [`windows.cordis.patch.yml`](../../../../packages/bundle/base/windows.cordis.patch.yml) alongside its universal `cordis.patch.yml`: it disables `bash-sandbox`/`tool-bash` (the POSIX-only executor and its dialect tool) and inserts `pwsh-local`/`tool-pwsh`. Windows has no OS sandbox runner (landlock/bwrap/seatbelt are POSIX-only), so the layer drops the sandbox stack entirely — `sandbox`, `sandbox-policy`, and `fs-sandbox` are disabled and the unconfined `dsh-fs-local` provides `ctx.fs` — and degrades to danger-full-access: `permission`/`ui-permission` leave the roster (dsh-permission requires a confining executor — presets bundle a sandbox mode the unconfined executor cannot honor; see its constructor guard — and the client knob would advertise a boundary that does not exist), and the `approval` service is disabled — nothing in the Windows roster asks for approval, so the model is never told approval exists or that asks are auto-rejected. Keeping fs-only path rules would be theater: the unconfined shell can bypass them with one command, so the honest Windows posture is full access rather than a boundary only the fs tools pretend to enforce.
+- **The launcher injects the layer by platform.** `apps/cli/src/windows-shell.ts` resolves it from the base bundle layer's `packageDir` between the bundle layers and the user layers on `win32` hosts, in every composition path (boot, config-only HMR recomposition, config dumps). Overriding the shipped default is a composition decision: a Windows host that prefers the bash stack — or confinement — re-enables the bash rows through its profile or home `cordis.patch.yml`. Custom profiles without the base bundle are skipped (they own their shell stack); a base bundle that ships no Windows shell patch fails loud.
+- **Module resolution is restored for cold starts.** The profiles-rework CLI dropped the pwsh packages from `apps/cli`'s dependency closure, so `healProfilesModuleFallback` never linked them into `$DSH_HOME/profiles/node_modules` and a fresh Windows host could not resolve the inserted rows. `apps/cli` and `dsh-base` re-declare `dsh-pwsh-local`/`dsh-tool-pwsh`, and `dsh-base` also declares `dsh-fs-local`; the base bundle lists every row plugin as a dependency by house style.
+
+The pwsh GUI rendering shipped earlier with the [pwsh UI presentation matches bash decision](2026-08-05-pwsh-ui-bash-parity.md); the [pwsh tool bash parity decision](2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.md) ships the tool's surface. Nothing in this decision changes POSIX behavior.
+
+## Alternatives considered
+
+**Default Windows to pwsh inside `dsh-bash-local` (one executor, dialect switch).** Rejected for the same reason the executor decision rejected a mode switch: the executor's identity is the shell it spawns, and platform-gated composition is a deployment choice, not an executor config.
+
+**Ship the platform layer from `apps/cli` code instead of a bundle data file.** Rejected: the patch belongs next to the rows it replaces, in the bundle that owns them, so the shipped roster stays visible as composition data and dumps carry its provenance; the launcher contributes only the win32 gate.
+
+**Keep `permission`/`ui-permission` on Windows.** Rejected: `dsh-permission` hard-requires `ctx.bash.sandboxMode` and fails loud at load over an unconfined executor; making it tolerate an unconfined shell would advertise presets the shell cannot honor.
+
+**Keep fs path-rule confinement on Windows (`sandbox-policy` + `fs-sandbox` without OS runners).** Rejected: the shell is the model's primary tool and unconfined on Windows, so fs-only path rules are trivially bypassable and would overstate the boundary; the honest posture is full degradation to danger-full-access.
+
+**Ship a `DSH_WINDOWS_SHELL` environment escape hatch.** Rejected: decisive behavior changes belong in composition config, which already overrides the platform layer row by id; a second override channel would split the single source of truth for roster decisions.
+
+## Consequences
+
+- A Windows host running a shipped `dsh` surface gets `pwsh` as its shell tool and PowerShell as the `ctx.bash` executor without configuration; `bash` is absent from the model-visible roster there (its tool row is disabled).
+- Windows has no sandbox at all: the fs tools run unconfined (`dsh-fs-local`), the approval service is absent (nothing asks for approval, and the model is never told approval exists), and the permission switcher is gone. The model-visible posture is honest full access rather than a boundary the shell can bypass.
+- POSIX hosts are unchanged: the platform layer never applies, and the bash stack remains the universal `cordis.patch.yml` rows.
+- Windows hosts that prefer the bash stack (e.g. with WSL/Git-Bash on PATH) override the shipped default through their profile or home `cordis.patch.yml` — disabling `pwsh-local`/`tool-pwsh` and re-enabling `bash-sandbox`/`tool-bash` (both executors register the same `bash` service, so an incomplete recipe fails loud at load) — composition config is the one override channel.
+
+## Verification
+
+- Unit: `apps/cli/tests/windows-shell.spec.ts` pins the win32 default, the custom-profile skip, and the missing-patch failure with the platform injected, and composes the REAL shipped bundle layers (dsh-base + dsh-web-app resolved from the app installation) through the boot's patch algorithm to assert the win32 danger-full-access roster and the base-only-profile warning; `packages/bundle/base/tests/base.spec.ts` pins the shipped Windows patch file shape (disables, inserts, and the absent approval service).
+- Keyless: a win32 `dsh --profile <name> --dump-config` shows the pwsh rows with `windows.cordis.patch.yml` provenance and the bash rows disabled; the POSIX dump (CI Linux) is unchanged.
+- The real-composition smoke boots the web profile on win32 with the pwsh stack mounted (the exact roster this note describes).

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-01-windows-pwsh-default.zh.md

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+# Agent Note: Windows 默认改用 pwsh
+
+Status: implemented
+
+[English](2026-08-01-windows-pwsh-default.md) | 中文
+
+## 问题
+
+harness 交付的执行画像在每个平台都是 bash 优先。Windows 主机必须安装 bash 垫片（WSL 或 Git-Bash），或退回到仅 POSIX 的 `dsh-bash-local` 行为（硬编码 `bash -c` argv、进程组语义）；面向模型的 bash 工具教的是 bash 方言。Windows 原生基础已随 [pwsh 执行器与工具决策](2026-08-01-pwsh-tool-and-executor.md) 交付——`ctx.bash` seam 的 PowerShell 实现与对等的 `pwsh` 工具——但交付组合在 Windows 上仍然挂载 bash 栈，没有垫片的 Windows 主机跑不了交付的 shell。
+
+## 决策
+
+启动交付 profile（`dsh web`、`dsh --profile headless`、一次性任务）的 Windows 主机默认获得 PowerShell 栈；POSIX 主机不变。
+
+- **平台层是数据文件，不是清单重写。** `@deepseek-ai/dsh-base` 随通用 `cordis.patch.yml` 一起交付 [`windows.cordis.patch.yml`](../../../../packages/bundle/base/windows.cordis.patch.yml)：它禁用 `bash-sandbox`/`tool-bash`（仅 POSIX 的执行器及其方言工具）并插入 `pwsh-local`/`tool-pwsh`。Windows 上没有 OS 级 sandbox runner（landlock/bwrap/seatbelt 均为 POSIX 专属），因此该层整体移除 sandbox 栈——`sandbox`、`sandbox-policy`、`fs-sandbox` 被禁用，由不限权的 `dsh-fs-local` 提供 `ctx.fs`——并完全退化为 danger-full-access：`permission`/`ui-permission` 离开清单（dsh-permission 要求有限权能力的执行器——preset 捆绑的是无限制执行器无法兑现的 sandbox 模式；见其构造函数守卫——客户端旋钮会宣传一个并不存在的边界），`approval` 服务也被禁用——Windows 清单里没有任何动作需要审批，模型也不会被告知"审批存在"或"请求会被自动拒绝"。保留仅限 fs 的路径规则是摆设：不限权的 shell 一条命令即可绕过，因此诚实的 Windows 姿态是全权访问，而不是一个只有 fs 工具假装执行的边界。
+- **启动器按平台注入该层。** `apps/cli/src/windows-shell.ts` 在 `win32` 主机上从 base bundle 层的 `packageDir` 解析它，置于 bundle 层与用户层之间，覆盖所有组合路径（启动、config-only HMR 重组合、配置转储）。覆盖交付默认是组合决策：偏好 bash 栈（或偏好有限权）的 Windows 主机通过其 profile 或 home 的 `cordis.patch.yml` 重新启用 bash 行。未挂 base bundle 的自定义 profile 被跳过（它们自己拥有 shell 栈）；base bundle 缺 `windows.cordis.patch.yml` 时 fail loud。
+- **冷启动的模块解析已恢复。** profiles 重构把 pwsh 包从 `apps/cli` 的依赖闭包中删掉了，`healProfilesModuleFallback` 因此从未把它们链接进 `$DSH_HOME/profiles/node_modules`，新 Windows 主机解析不到插入的行。`apps/cli` 与 `dsh-base` 重新声明 `dsh-pwsh-local`/`dsh-tool-pwsh`，`dsh-base` 还声明 `dsh-fs-local`；按仓库惯例，base bundle 把每个行插件都列为依赖。
+
+pwsh GUI 渲染已随 [pwsh UI 呈现与 bash 对齐决策](2026-08-05-pwsh-ui-bash-parity.md) 先行交付；[pwsh 工具与 bash 对齐决策](2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.md) 交付了工具表面。本决策不改变任何 POSIX 行为。
+
+## 备选方案
+
+**在 `dsh-bash-local` 内部让 Windows 默认 pwsh（一个执行器，方言开关）。** 否决，理由与执行器决策否决模式开关相同：执行器的身份就是它 spawn 的 shell，而按平台门控的组合是部署选择，不是执行器配置。
+
+**从 `apps/cli` 代码而非 bundle 数据文件交付平台层。** 否决：patch 应放在它替换的行旁边、属于拥有这些行的 bundle，让交付清单作为组合数据保持可见、转储带有出处；启动器只贡献 win32 门控。
+
+**在 Windows 上保留 `permission`/`ui-permission`。** 否决：`dsh-permission` 硬性要求 `ctx.bash.sandboxMode`，在无限制执行器上加载即 fail loud；让它容忍无限制 shell 会宣传 shell 无法兑现的 preset。
+
+**在 Windows 上保留 fs 路径规则限制（无 OS runner 的 `sandbox-policy` + `fs-sandbox`）。** 否决：shell 是模型的主工具且在 Windows 上不限权，仅限 fs 的路径规则一行命令即可绕过，会夸大边界；诚实的姿态是完全退化到 danger-full-access。
+
+**交付 `DSH_WINDOWS_SHELL` 环境变量逃生门。** 否决：决定性的行为变更应集中在组合配置中，而组合配置已能按行 id 覆盖平台层；第二条覆盖通道会分裂清单决策的单一事实来源。
+
+## 后果
+
+- 运行交付版 `dsh` 表面的 Windows 主机无需配置即获得 `pwsh` 作为 shell 工具、PowerShell 作为 `ctx.bash` 执行器；那里的模型可见清单中没有 `bash`（其工具行被禁用）。
+- Windows 上没有任何沙箱：fs 工具不限权运行（`dsh-fs-local`）、`approval` 服务不存在（没有任何动作需要审批，模型也不会被告知审批存在）、权限切换器消失。模型可见的姿态是诚实的全权访问，而不是一个 shell 可以绕过的边界。
+- POSIX 主机不变：平台层永不生效，bash 栈仍是通用 `cordis.patch.yml` 的行。
+- 偏好 bash 栈的 Windows 主机（例如 PATH 上有 WSL/Git-Bash 时）通过其 profile 或 home 的 `cordis.patch.yml` 覆盖交付默认——禁用 `pwsh-local`/`tool-pwsh` 并重新启用 `bash-sandbox`/`tool-bash`（两个执行器注册同一个 `bash` 服务，配方不完整会在加载时 fail loud）——组合配置是唯一的覆盖通道。
+
+## 验证
+
+- 单元：`apps/cli/tests/windows-shell.spec.ts` 以平台注入固定 win32 默认、自定义 profile 跳过与缺文件失败，并通过启动所用的 patch 算法组合真实交付的 bundle 层（从应用安装解析的 dsh-base + dsh-web-app）断言 win32 danger-full-access 清单与 base-only profile 警告；`packages/bundle/base/tests/base.spec.ts` 固定交付的 Windows patch 文件形状（禁用、插入与缺席的 approval 服务）。
+- Keyless：win32 上的 `dsh --profile <name> --dump-config` 显示带 `windows.cordis.patch.yml` 出处的 pwsh 行、被禁用的 bash 行；POSIX 转储（CI Linux）不变。
+- 真实组合冒烟在 win32 上启动 web profile，pwsh 栈挂载成功（即本笔记描述的确切清单）。

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.md
-2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.md: d61dd6f21223121973520014c44e2e5846e7387a
-2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.zh.md: 120f66b1d9c713d5e3b71575186fc2194b0718a5
+2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.md: 79a09cb4c9698660faff18cf9ae016bec0bce227
+2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.zh.md: 3e01fd4447fbf047b7cbb3949e708094a6c06c09