Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar:
- Jump label fixes, including a perf events fix that originally
manifested as jump label failures, but was a serialization bug at the
usage site
- Mark down_write*() helpers as __always_inline, to improve WCHAN
debuggability
- Misc cleanups and fixes
* tag 'locking-core-2024-07-15' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
locking/rwsem: Add __always_inline annotation to __down_write_common() and inlined callers
jump_label: Simplify and clarify static_key_fast_inc_cpus_locked()
jump_label: Clarify condition in static_key_fast_inc_not_disabled()
jump_label: Fix concurrency issues in static_key_slow_dec()
perf/x86: Serialize set_attr_rdpmc()
cleanup: Standardize the header guard define's name
At some point during early development, the <linux/cleanup.h> header
must have been named <linux/guard.h>, as evidenced by the header
guard name:
#ifndef __LINUX_GUARDS_H
#define __LINUX_GUARDS_H
It ended up being <linux/cleanup.h>, but the old guard name for
a file name that was never upstream never changed.
Do that now - and while at it, also use the canonical _LINUX prefix,
instead of the less common __LINUX prefix.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/171664113181.10875.8784434350512348496.tip-bot2@tip-bot2
Adds:
- DEFINE_GUARD_COND() / DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1_COND() to extend existing
guards with conditional lock primitives, eg. mutex_trylock(),
mutex_lock_interruptible().
nb. both primitives allow NULL 'locks', which cause the lock to
fail (obviously).
- extends scoped_guard() to not take the body when the the
conditional guard 'fails'. eg.
scoped_guard (mutex_intr, &task->signal_cred_guard_mutex) {
...
}
will only execute the body when the mutex is held.
- provides scoped_cond_guard(name, fail, args...); which extends
scoped_guard() to do fail when the lock-acquire fails.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231102110706.460851167%40infradead.org
recent discussion brought about the realization that it makes sense for
no_free_ptr() to have __must_check semantics in order to avoid leaking
the resource.
Additionally, add a few comments to clarify why/how things work.
All credit to Linus on how to combine __must_check and the
stmt-expression.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230816103102.GF980931@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Use __attribute__((__cleanup__(func))) to build:
- simple auto-release pointers using __free()
- 'classes' with constructor and destructor semantics for
scope-based resource management.
- lock guards based on the above classes.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230612093537.614161713%40infradead.org
