The question composer card is capped against the viewport and scrolls its
option list. `.options` is a flex column whose children defaulted to
`flex-shrink: 1`, so a short seat shrank the rows before overflowing the
scroll container: a row collapsed to its 42px minimum while `.optionCopy`
kept the taller height its wrapped copy needs, and `align-items: center`
then painted that copy outside the row's border box — over the question
title above and the next row below. Measured 6.5px of spill at 900x440 on
the shipped client, 10px at 380px tall, with `.options` reporting
scrollHeight === clientHeight and therefore offering no scrollbar.
`.option` and `.custom` now declare `flex-shrink: 0`, so the shortfall
reaches the scroll container that already owns `overflow-y: auto` — the
behavior the cap was designed for. Only rows whose copy wraps could
reproduce this, which is why the recorded scenario now asks a question
with long option descriptions; the web e2e asserts at three squeezed seat
heights that every row's children stay inside its border box, guarded
against holding vacuously by requiring a wrapped row and a scrolling list.
The live-link E2E intentionally creates a project without a lockfile. Prevent ambient CI=true from making Yarn 4's first install immutable, while preserving the CI environment for every other behavior under test.
The paragraph claimed later child output reaches only the scrollback. Output
after a settle still reaches the scrollback and whichever send is active when
it arrives — appendOutput writes both (session.ts:302-307), and settleActive
clears `active` rather than suppressing delivery. Only the settled operation
stops receiving it, which is what the timing bound protects.
master already stabilized the raw-mode SIGINT scenario in 65e0ffe03 and
3be090f1d with wider scenario-owned bounds and deliberately delayed child
readiness, so the merge takes master's test implementation. What this branch
keeps is the contract that explains why those bounds are required: the note
paragraph on the settle boundary in PtySendOperation.append, and the
waitForOutput comment recording that raising its deadline alone cannot
recover output the send never collected.
The darwin-parity job failed intermittently on the SIGINT test with the
operation buffer holding only the echoed command line, never RAW_READY. The
harness sets idleSilenceMs to 250, so when a cold python3 start stays silent
past that bound the send settles as inferred_idle; PtySendOperation.append then
drops all later output, and the marker reaches only the scrollback.
Give the harness per-test idleSilenceMs/timeoutMs overrides and let this
scenario raise both above interpreter startup latency, so the readiness marker
lands inside the send it belongs to. waitForOutput's own deadline and the test
timeout grow to match the new bounds.
The product timings are unchanged; the pty Agent Note records why a test that
waits on an operation must outlast the child's startup.
