docs: fix review findings — residual ordinals, hypothetical IPC row, citation-rule amendments
Purge the residual task/phase ordinals review caught ((T2), (queue cut 1) ×3, T6, P-I, 'this cut' ×6 including battery-expansion finds in two untouched notes and a workflow JSDoc); drop the 'externally logged as Decision 21' parenthetical and rename the remaining bare decision-21 mentions; mark the gui-layering IPC bridge row as a hypothetical example; restore the GATE_NOTICE doc-typecheck clause and the py-types 'measured' provenance; say subprocess-backed in filesystem.md; add the picker note path. Amend the citations note: merged-PR evidence anchors in Agent Notes are sanctioned, and the candidate gate patterns gain the four shapes the sweep missed. All nine touched pairs re-recorded.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ const IDENTIFIER = /^[\p{XID_Start}_]\p{XID_Continue}*$/u
|
||||
* that normalize together would collapse into one declaration. Those names
|
||||
* take the subscript path, which carries their exact bytes.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* `IDENTIFIER` is equivalent to `str.isidentifier()` on Node 22.23.1 vs
|
||||
* CPython 3.9.6 tables: the equivalence holds inside the two versions' shared
|
||||
* `IDENTIFIER` matches `str.isidentifier()` (measured on Node 22.23.1 vs
|
||||
* CPython 3.9.6 tables): the equivalence holds inside the two versions' shared
|
||||
* tables, and the skew characters below are exactly where that pair diverges.
|
||||
* The predicate as a whole is deliberately stricter than `isidentifier()`,
|
||||
* which does not test NFKC stability: `'field'.isidentifier()` is True and
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user