refactor(acp): reduce bridge to automation protocol

This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-07-24 01:40:25 +08:00
parent b06bcfd21c
commit e819a586b0
406 changed files with 3880 additions and 21325 deletions

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ In the loop, a tool call's arguments are committed to the log and read by live c
1. **`assistant/message`** is appended before tool dispatch — it is the model-history source `deriveMessages()` replays, so it carries the tool-call arguments the model itself emitted.
2. **`tool/call`** is the durable AUDIT record, appended before `ctx.tools.execute()`.
3. **Live presentation reads `tool/call.arguments`**: the ACP bridge remembers them and passes them to `presentResult`; `dsh-tool-bash` derives the card title, the rawInput, the cwd, and the terminal-vs-background treatment from them.
3. **Human-facing presentation reads `tool/call.arguments`**: UI renderers pass them to `presentResult`; `dsh-tool-bash` derives the card title, the rawInput, the cwd, and the terminal-vs-background treatment from them.
An execution-only rewrite would make the UI show one command while another ran and render the result against the wrong arguments. The registry prevents that failure mode today: it structured-clones and deep-freezes `arguments`, makes the execution identity properties non-writable, and exposes no test shim or listener path that can replace them. The rewrite design must preserve that protected-identity boundary rather than weaken it.

View File

@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Stream workflow progress through tool calls
Status: proposed
## Problem
The workflow engine intentionally emits balanced `workflow/*` observation events for run, phase, narration, and child-agent progress, but no production consumer presents them. Editors therefore show one pending workflow tool card until the final result even while the engine already reports which phase is active, what the script logged, and which children started or settled. The [dynamic-workflows decision](../../implemented/feature/2026-07-05-dynamic-workflows.md) explicitly reserves ACP progress UI for this event stream.
Making `dsh-acp` listen to workflow events directly would invert the capability boundary: the generic UI bridge would depend on an optional workflow package and special-case one tool name. The tool pipeline already owns the routing facts a live update needs—agent and call id—but exposes only pure pending/final presenters, so a long-running tool has no provider-neutral way to report transient UI state between them.
## Proposal
Add a live progress channel to `dsh-tools`. The registry-owned `ToolExecution` gains `reportProgress(view): boolean`, where `view` is a detached provider-neutral generic progress snapshot containing an optional replacement title and UI-facing content blocks. Progress cannot change the call's args-derived card tag, kind, raw input, locations, terminal intent, or diff intent; it updates only the live title/content within the presentation chosen up front. While the execution is active, the method validates and snapshots the view, then dispatches a contained, agent-scoped `tools/progress` observation carrying the authoritative execution identity and snapshot. Once final-result processing begins it returns `false` and emits nothing, so a late asynchronous reporter cannot overwrite a terminal card. Observer exceptions are logged and cannot fail the tool.
`dsh-acp` consumes `tools/progress` generically. It resolves the execution's agent through its existing agent-to-session map and emits an in-progress `tool_call_update` for the same call id. Because reporting is available only inside the tool execution pipeline, the durable `tool/call` and its ACP `tool_call` always precede the first update; closing the reporter before `tools/result` ensures no progress update follows the completed/failed card. Progress is live UI state rather than model input or durable history: session replay continues to reconstruct the pending and final cards from `tool/call` and `tool/result` without replaying transient updates.
`dsh-tool-workflow` becomes the first producer. Each tool execution installs a compact event capture before calling `ctx.workflows.start()`, because a valid engine may emit progress synchronously inside `start()`. Until the call returns, the capture reduces observed events into candidate states keyed by `WorkflowRunInfo.id`; it then selects the returned `WorkflowRun.id`, discards other candidates, reports the accumulated snapshot, and routes later matching events directly. If `start()` throws, the capture is disposed and its candidates are dropped. This preserves engine swappability without adding observer correlation to `WorkflowStartRequest` or requiring progress to wait until `start()` returns.
The reducer consumes the existing start, phase, log, agent-start, agent-end, and end events, reporting a replacement snapshot with the current phase, latest log line, active child labels, and completed/failed/cancelled counts. It does not accumulate a narration transcript; settled children leave the active set and become counters. `workflow/end`, tool settlement, or plugin disposal removes the reducer entry and event capture. The six workflow events, their metadata, paired child lifecycle, run handle, cancellation channels, and observer containment remain unchanged; third-party observers can continue consuming them directly.
Update the tool execution/presentation docs, generated event and API catalogs, workflow package docs, and the workflow data-structure catalog. ACP integration coverage must exercise the real workflow tool and worker seam with a scripted model boundary; the primary ACP snapshot suite adds one workflow-progress scenario because this changes the editor-facing transcript.
## Alternatives considered
**Delete the workflow observation surface.** Rejected in [the collapse-workflow simplification](../../rejected/simplification/2026-07-12-collapse-workflow-to-foreground-core.md): the events and their balanced lifecycle are intentional, and the missing piece is a consumer.
**Teach ACP about workflows directly.** This could map `WorkflowRunInfo` to a session and card, but it would make the generic bridge depend on an optional capability and bypass the rule that tools own presentation intent. A tool-progress channel solves the same routing problem for every long-running tool.
**Persist every progress update as a session event.** That would make live narration replayable, but it would permanently enlarge logs with state whose authoritative durable outcome is already the tool call/result pair. If resumable workflow progress becomes a product requirement, it needs a workflow-journaling design rather than UI snapshots disguised as durable facts.
## Acceptance criteria
- `ToolExecution.reportProgress()` is registry-owned, agent-scoped, snapshotting, observer-contained, and returns `false` without dispatch after terminal processing starts.
- ACP routes progress to the correct call in the correct live session; concurrent workflows in different sessions cannot cross-talk, and no `tool_call_update` appears before its `tool_call` or after its terminal update.
- Workflow progress shows the current phase, latest log line, active children, and outcome counts while preserving all existing `workflow/*` events and run semantics; a seam test engine that emits start, phase, log, child, and end events synchronously inside `start()` loses none of that reducer state.
- Cancellation, worker death, tool failure, session close, and plugin disposal release reducer state; replay emits only the durable pending/final card pair.
- Unit, workflow integration, ACP integration, snapshot, typecheck, coverage, doc-sync, module-graph, build, and hygiene gates pass.
## Risks
This adds a public live-progress method and event to the tool seam, so implementations must keep the active/terminal boundary exact and detach snapshots before observers see them. The pre-start capture can briefly observe unrelated workflow runs, so it holds only compact candidate state keyed by run id and drops every non-matching candidate as soon as `start()` returns. A workflow can emit many progress changes; the bounded reducer avoids transcript growth but still sends one UI update per meaningful event after correlation. If measured clients need coalescing, it must be a defaulted validated bridge configuration rather than a hardcoded throttle. Transient progress intentionally disappears on replay, so the final tool result remains the only durable workflow card content.

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-14-sdk-developer-projects.md: aa5cf64d7dd33dea229d74c2ae45a9244ee70e3c
2026-07-14-sdk-developer-projects.zh.md: 8f7d1de5b16f38019c802f07eda701cee72deb4f
2026-07-14-sdk-developer-projects.md: 65d2bf66232993222832eb0f2f4f56cfcf7afd16
2026-07-14-sdk-developer-projects.zh.md: 8435a07d9b2545a8f41a1f96743c9c7e6d4daf3d

View File

@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ The table is the developer-visible support set for this phase. A `required` feat
| `hooks` | optional | `claude` (default) / `codex`, multiple | Each feature option creates a separate editable configuration file |
| `guard` | optional | `repeat-tool` | Provides repeated-tool-call reminders |
| `timeout-policy` | optional | `default` | Applies a uniform policy to tools that declare timeout budgets |
| `ask-user` | optional | `default` | Provides the `ask_user_question` tool; only `acp` and `tui` can select it because those two feature options provide the injected user-interaction service |
| `ask-user` | optional | `default` | Provides the `ask_user_question` tool; only `tui` can select it because ACP is an automation transport and embed provides no human-interaction service |
Both `bash` feature options apply to ACP, TUI, and embed and are not selected by the run interface. The sandbox feature option writes no active config key and therefore keeps `dsh-bash-sandbox`'s `read-only` default. Generated `cordis.yml` includes a commented example that developers can change explicitly to `workspace-write`:
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ Generated `package.json` provides the following scripts. `dev`, `build`, `start`
`dsh-sdk start` and `dsh-sdk dev` accept a module target and forward arguments after `--` unchanged to the project entrypoint. Generic argument parsing uses Node `parseArgs()` with zero schema: valued flags use `--key=value`, bare flags become `true`, and `--no-*` becomes `false`.
- TUI projects pass the selected model through `--model=<name>` and create or resume an agent according to optional `--resume=<session-id>`;
- ACP uses protocol `session/load`
- ACP clients create fresh sessions through protocol `session/new`;
- Embed uses the model written into the generated code.
Each feature-owned Cordis config entry keeps its developer-editable Cordis plugin config and explanatory comments in `cordis.yml`. When `dsh-sdk config` changes other features, it preserves unknown fields, formatting on untouched nodes, and comments. HMR is an ordinary leaf config entry: when the feature is selected, dev and start load the same watcher, and the command does not change the plugin tree implicitly.

View File

@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ create 还提供一次 `none / plugin / tool` 选择。`plugin` 固定生成 `pl
| `hooks` | optional | `claude`(默认)/ `codex`,可多选 | 各功能选项生成独立的可编辑配置文件 |
| `guard` | optional | `repeat-tool` | 提供重复工具调用提醒 |
| `timeout-policy` | optional | `default` | 对声明超时预算的工具执行统一策略 |
| `ask-user` | optional | `default` | 提供 `ask_user_question` 工具;注入的 user-interaction 服务由 acp/tui 两个功能选项提供,因此仅这两个接口可选 |
| `ask-user` | optional | `default` | 提供 `ask_user_question` 工具;只有 `tui` 可选,因为 ACP 是自动化传输,而 embed 不提供人类交互服务 |
`bash` 的两个功能选项都适用于 ACP、TUI 和 embed,不由运行接口决定。sandbox 功能选项不写任何生效的配置键,因而沿用 `dsh-bash-sandbox` 的 `read-only` 默认值;生成的 `cordis.yml` 保留注释示例,开发者可以显式改为 `workspace-write`:
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ my-agent/
`dsh-sdk start` 与 `dsh-sdk dev` 可以接收模块 target,并把 `--` 后的参数原样转发给工程入口。通用参数解析使用 Node `parseArgs()` 的零 schema 模式:带值 flag 采用 `--key=value`,bare flag 转换为 `true`,`--no-*` 转换为 `false`。
- TUI 工程通过 `--model=<name>` 传入所选 model,并根据可选的 `--resume=<session-id>` 创建或恢复 agent;
- acp 使用协议 `session/load`
- ACP 客户端通过协议 `session/new` 创建全新会话;
- embed 使用生成代码中的 model。
每个功能拥有的 Cordis 配置项在 `cordis.yml` 中保留自己的可编辑 Cordis 插件配置和说明注释;`dsh-sdk config` 修改其他功能时必须保留未知字段、未修改节点的格式和注释。HMR(热模块替换)是普通叶子配置项:选择该功能后,dev 和 start 加载同一个 watcher,命令不隐式改变插件树。

View File

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ The production corpus is `packages/*/*/src`, example sources/config, and runtime
| `ReactLoopAgent` root export | Outside-package named imports are tests; production programs against `Agent` and creates/resumes through `ctx.agents`. | Return/interface-type `Agent` and make the concrete loop class package-internal; keep the deliberate synchronous config-only `AgentLoop.create()` path. |
| `workflow-workerthread` protocol/runtime/session re-exports and named `WorkerWorkflowEngine` | Every package-name consumer uses the default engine; the workflow Agent Note already defines the worker wire protocol as private. | Keep the default plugin class/config contract; drop the duplicate named class export and keep protocol modules source-private. |
| `code-runtime-worker` protocol/bootstrap re-exports | Outside-package production/e2e consumers use `WorkerCodeRuntime` and config, not `BootstrapPort`, `PatchableStream`, or worker message/boot types. | Keep the runtime class/config contract and make its wire/bootstrap vocabulary source-private. |
| ACP translation/presenter root exports | `agentOptions`, `streamSessionEventUpdate`, `todosToPlan`, `ToolPresenter`, `nullToolPresenter`, and `TerminalRendering` have only same-file or ACP-test consumers; the sole outside-package production consumer mounts the plugin namespace. | Keep `name`, `inject`, `Config`, `AcpConfig`, and `apply`; make translation/presentation helpers source-private and test them in-package. |
| ACP `agentOptions` root export | The helper has only same-file and ACP-test consumers; the sole outside-package production consumer mounts the plugin namespace. | Keep `name`, `inject`, `Config`, `AcpConfig`, and `apply`; make `agentOptions` source-private and test it through bridge behavior. |
| `providerWording` and `completedTurnPrefix` root exports | Each has one same-package production caller; only the balanced-prefix helper has a same-package white-box test. | Make them source-private and test provider behavior. |
| `depthOf`, `SubagentDepthError`, `SENSITIVE_ENV_PATTERN`, `waitForExit`, and `exitsWithin` root exports | Production subagent backends consume the in-process runner and subprocess construction/disposal helpers, not these enforcement/test internals. | Keep depth/environment/exit behavior but make the helpers and error/regex source-private; test through spawn and disposal. |
| `PersistenceCoordinator.inits`, backend `inits` accessors, `seedCoversPrefix`, and `assertSerializable` | The accessors exist for white-box tests; `seedCoversPrefix` has no outside production importer; `assertSerializable` has no production caller and duplicates the coordinator append boundary's lossless snapshot. | Observe initialization through `session/flush`, make `seedCoversPrefix` source-private, and delete `assertSerializable`. Keep both backends, `SessionHeader`, and SQLite's version contract. |