refactor(acp): reduce bridge to automation protocol

This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-07-24 01:40:25 +08:00
parent b06bcfd21c
commit e819a586b0
406 changed files with 3880 additions and 21325 deletions

View File

@@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ The summary was designed for a future session picker (recency ordering via `upda
- `SessionPersistence.update()` has **zero production callers** (every `.update(` hit is `createHash().update()` or a test).
- `firstPrompt` is **never read** anywhere in production.
- `title` *is* read in the ACP bridge — but from a tool-call **presenter** (`present.title`), never from stored session metadata.
- `updatedAt` has **no consumer**: the only production caller of `list()` reads `meta.cwd` (a `SessionHeader` field) to validate a workspace on `session/load`; resume reads `createdAt`/`cwd`/`parentSession` — all header fields.
- Session titles come from durable `session/title` events, while tool-card titles come from tool presenters; neither reads mutable session metadata.
- Persistence-list consumers use immutable header identity, creation, lineage, and cwd fields. Recency and previews derive from the log rather than an `updatedAt` summary.
- Decisively: the live `Session.header` was already typed `SessionHeader`, not `SessionMeta` — the summary never existed on the live session object; it lived only in the persistence layer, written and read by nothing but its own contract test.
## Decision