fix(build,doc): native paths aliases; the note states browse's client half is stacked

- tsconfig.base.json still aliased the removed directory-picker-dialog and
  offered no mapping for -native: on a clean tree, package-name imports and
  source launches fell through to a missing lib/ until a build ran.
- The seam note (and the generated seam prose) no longer describe the
  browse browser half as shipped here: it lands in the stacked follow-up,
  and a -browse composition meanwhile shows the documented empty-hole
  default (ds-review-bot).

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-28-directory-picker-capability-seam.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-28-directory-picker-capability-seam.md
-2026-07-28-directory-picker-capability-seam.md: ce5a2695345e29db5739df206965720559783ce3
-2026-07-28-directory-picker-capability-seam.zh.md: 5b73c3c48493d4f178a523db19bc124eda9c7cca
+2026-07-28-directory-picker-capability-seam.md: 268caad197985d052affb17fe2a7644cd6722075
+2026-07-28-directory-picker-capability-seam.zh.md: 573bfc19bb0f5eeae3f1e851e733fd2498a986bf

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-28-directory-picker-capability-seam.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ The web GUI's "Open local folder" flow was hardwired to one interaction: `host.p
 
 A three-package capability seam in `packages/host/` — `directory-picker` (interface), `directory-picker-native`, `directory-picker-browse` (backends) — with one contract method: `capability()` returns a **discriminated union**, `{ kind: 'native', pick(signal) }` or `{ kind: 'browse', list(path?), createDirectory(path, name) }`. The gateway (`dsh-host-apiproxy`) injects `directoryPicker`, serves the matching RPCs, and answers `directory-picker-unavailable` for the other kind. The union is discriminated because the backends differ in *interaction shape* — flattening them into one method set would force every backend to fake the other's shape.
 
-**The client side is slot-composed, not advertisement-branched.** ui-workspace's two trigger surfaces each declare a `single` directory-flow hole (`conversation.hero.workspace.directoryFlow` / `sidebar.workspaces.directoryFlow`; two keys because a hole has exactly one declaring slot entry — same owner contract, same occupant). Each backend package is **dual-face**: its browser half registers the matching interaction into both holes — `-native` a renderless occupant driving `host.pickDirectory`, `-browse` the in-app browsing dialog. The hole's owner conversation (`open`/`busy`/`onPicked`/`onCancel`/`onError`) carries the whole exchange: ui-workspace keeps the trigger (menu entry rendered only while the hole is occupied) and the adoption (`createWorkspace({path})`, conflict/error dialog, Choose again), the occupant owns everything between `open` and the picked path. One `cordis.yml` row therefore swaps the host capability and the client flow together; a mismatch is impossible by construction, and mounting two flow packages fails at client load (`single` hole). The earlier `host.describe.directoryPicker` advertisement and the client's kind branching are deleted — with composition wiring both sides, a wire fact for the client to branch on had no remaining consumer. The hole registry (`ctx.slots.entries`) replaces it as the per-menu-open occupancy read.
+**The client side is slot-composed, not advertisement-branched.** ui-workspace's two trigger surfaces each declare a `single` directory-flow hole (`conversation.hero.workspace.directoryFlow` / `sidebar.workspaces.directoryFlow`; two keys because a hole has exactly one declaring slot entry — same owner contract, same occupant). Backend packages are **dual-face**: the browser half registers the matching interaction into both holes — `-native` ships here with a renderless occupant driving `host.pickDirectory`; `-browse`'s half (the in-app browsing dialog) lands in the stacked follow-up PR, until which a `-browse` composition shows no picking affordance (the documented empty-hole default). The hole's owner conversation (`open`/`busy`/`onPicked`/`onCancel`/`onError`) carries the whole exchange: ui-workspace keeps the trigger (menu entry rendered only while the hole is occupied) and the adoption (`createWorkspace({path})`, conflict/error dialog, Choose again), the occupant owns everything between `open` and the picked path. One `cordis.yml` row therefore swaps the host capability and the client flow together; a mismatch is impossible by construction, and mounting two flow packages fails at client load (`single` hole). The earlier `host.describe.directoryPicker` advertisement and the client's kind branching are deleted — with composition wiring both sides, a wire fact for the client to branch on had no remaining consumer. The hole registry (`ctx.slots.entries`) replaces it as the per-menu-open occupancy read.
 
 Placement and policy rulings folded into this decision:
 

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-28-directory-picker-capability-seam.zh.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ web GUI 的"打开本地文件夹"流程被焊死在一种交互上：`host.pick
 
 在 `packages/host/` 落一个三包能力 seam——`directory-picker`（接口）、`directory-picker-native`、`directory-picker-browse`（后端）——唯一契约方法 `capability()` 返回**可辨识联合**：`{ kind: 'native', pick(signal) }` 或 `{ kind: 'browse', list(path?), createDirectory(path, name) }`。网关（`dsh-host-apiproxy`）注入 `directoryPicker`，提供对应的 RPC，另一种 kind 的调用以 `directory-picker-unavailable` 应答。联合之所以可辨识，是因为后端差异在**交互形态**——压平成统一方法集会逼每个后端伪装另一方的形态。
 
-**client 侧靠 slot 组合，而非按广播分支。** ui-workspace 的两个触发表层各自声明一个 `single` 目录流洞（`conversation.hero.workspace.directoryFlow`／`sidebar.workspaces.directoryFlow`；之所以是两个 key，是因为一个洞只有一个声明它的 slot entry——owner 契约相同、占用者相同）。每个后端包都是**双面包**：其 browser half 把匹配的交互注册进两个洞——`-native` 是驱动 `host.pickDirectory` 的无渲染占用者，`-browse` 是应用内浏览对话框。洞的 owner 会话（`open`/`busy`/`onPicked`/`onCancel`/`onError`）承载整个交换：ui-workspace 保留触发（菜单入口仅在洞被占用时渲染）与接纳（`createWorkspace({path})`、冲突／错误对话框、重新选择），占用者持有从 `open` 到所选路径之间的一切。因此一行 `cordis.yml` 同时切换宿主能力与 client 流程；错配在构造上不可能，同时挂两个流程包会在 client 加载期失败（`single` 洞）。早先的 `host.describe.directoryPicker` 广播与客户端 kind 分支被删除——组合已经接好两侧后，供客户端分支用的 wire 事实不再有任何消费者。洞注册表（`ctx.slots.entries`）取而代之，成为每次打开菜单的占用读取。
+**client 侧靠 slot 组合，而非按广播分支。** ui-workspace 的两个触发表层各自声明一个 `single` 目录流洞（`conversation.hero.workspace.directoryFlow`／`sidebar.workspaces.directoryFlow`；之所以是两个 key，是因为一个洞只有一个声明它的 slot entry——owner 契约相同、占用者相同）。后端包是**双面包**：browser half 把匹配的交互注册进两个洞——`-native` 在本 PR 随附驱动 `host.pickDirectory` 的无渲染占用者；`-browse` 的那一半（应用内浏览对话框）在栈中的后续 PR 落地，在那之前 `-browse` 组合不显示选目录入口（文档化的空洞默认行为）。洞的 owner 会话（`open`/`busy`/`onPicked`/`onCancel`/`onError`）承载整个交换：ui-workspace 保留触发（菜单入口仅在洞被占用时渲染）与接纳（`createWorkspace({path})`、冲突／错误对话框、重新选择），占用者持有从 `open` 到所选路径之间的一切。因此一行 `cordis.yml` 同时切换宿主能力与 client 流程；错配在构造上不可能，同时挂两个流程包会在 client 加载期失败（`single` 洞）。早先的 `host.describe.directoryPicker` 广播与客户端 kind 分支被删除——组合已经接好两侧后，供客户端分支用的 wire 事实不再有任何消费者。洞注册表（`ctx.slots.entries`）取而代之，成为每次打开菜单的占用读取。
 
 并入本决策的位置与策略裁决：