Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into agent/fix-remote-welcome-onboarding

This commit is contained in:
imccyu
2026-08-03 18:19:24 +08:00
98 changed files with 3200 additions and 416 deletions

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-27-tui-diff-card-redundant-path-header.md
2026-07-27-tui-diff-card-redundant-path-header.md: 708e543ff079828b4929d2a50ac697a9c846608a
2026-07-27-tui-diff-card-redundant-path-header.zh.md: 863868ae707f37689bbc202267c5470d8c3163e9
2026-07-27-tui-diff-card-redundant-path-header.md: 608a11892a20d020087180175eff847021dc0554
2026-07-27-tui-diff-card-redundant-path-header.zh.md: bf7f1c1eeb994f9940b5f7dfb7db72d422293bd4

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
# Agent Note: TUI diff card dropped the duplicated file path
Status: implemented
Archived: 2026-07-31
English | [中文](2026-07-27-tui-diff-card-redundant-path-header.zh.md)

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
# Agent Note: TUI diff 卡片重复打印文件路径
Status: implemented
Archived: 2026-07-31
[English](2026-07-27-tui-diff-card-redundant-path-header.md) | 中文

View File

@@ -46,6 +46,9 @@
"bug-fix/2026-07-26-intent-draft-same-tick-echo.i18n.yaml": "sha256:c623947c4fa00e6d4b51792c7972ba09582bbcb7605beb373725c0dd666f2c81",
"bug-fix/2026-07-26-intent-draft-same-tick-echo.md": "sha256:fa8b1417b2cdd3deecbf8e55bdddd73dd3a8c6e3486fd399b0b8bdf317e56373",
"bug-fix/2026-07-26-intent-draft-same-tick-echo.zh.md": "sha256:00ce72552dbaa11562fbc541343a5d33f9449edabbe6dd354eb879a7d4d530f8",
"bug-fix/2026-07-27-tui-diff-card-redundant-path-header.i18n.yaml": "sha256:8613a1cfcf4b9c7fafa78a8d8565e2a65ef0335b7b826af9b2bb32097836af55",
"bug-fix/2026-07-27-tui-diff-card-redundant-path-header.md": "sha256:1bd344aec5454d2a2d6e1e6a32eff035c4a99c3df409f2624b39fd32e23ee402",
"bug-fix/2026-07-27-tui-diff-card-redundant-path-header.zh.md": "sha256:0a1747006efb1a4b67feceb9b627a437a0f023158e90ae86e1fe8aef76485384",
"feature/2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.i18n.yaml": "sha256:006795baa43ae962a8d125cc0f1e9f134bc2ee9fb758b6e7669e3fa0126e1918",
"feature/2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.md": "sha256:6828c0af74bb3fb96206ca6b21c0e56a000b50e4744aad4bc2c05092f3a5a31b",
"feature/2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.zh.md": "sha256:ba104e841a1fb84edbd3b6c8119d50445b7785255a7a8d13bb9ac8a2cb4d2e69",

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-30-multi-select-custom-answer-composition.md
2026-07-30-multi-select-custom-answer-composition.md: 581beec89a0f0018ec2df687f5dfe1b1b5b86d22
2026-07-30-multi-select-custom-answer-composition.zh.md: 5c9cb59822aca3fbf49fbbdf522c76f963df3480

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
# Agent Note: Multi-select custom answer composition
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-30-multi-select-custom-answer-composition.zh.md)
## Problem
The user-interaction result vocabulary carries selected option labels and optional custom text in separate fields, but its original semantics made them mutually exclusive for every question. On a multi-select question, opening or typing the custom answer discarded labels the user had already selected. The TUI returned only the custom text, and the Web host rejected a client response that preserved both fields.
## Decision
For a question with `multiSelect: true`, one answer item may contain both a non-empty `selected` array and non-empty `custom` text. Web drafts preserve both values regardless of whether the user selects an option or types custom text first; the TUI retains pending custom text across option/custom mode switches and projects it with checked labels from either submit mode; and the Web host accepts the combined response after applying its existing id, label, uniqueness, batch, and non-empty-text validation.
Single-select and optionless questions keep exclusive semantics: custom text overrides any selected option. The result shape remains `{ id, selected, custom? }`, so no wire or tool-output schema changes.
## Alternatives considered
**Encode custom text as another `selected` label.** Rejected because it would erase the distinction between caller-provided option labels and human-authored text, weakening validation and forcing consumers to infer which value was custom.
**Allow `selected` and `custom` together for every question.** Rejected because a single-select question represents one answer; permitting a selected option plus custom text would make its cardinality ambiguous. The combined form is limited to questions that explicitly opt into multiple answers.
## Consequences
Multi-select UIs can represent the user's complete answer without discarding either source. Providers and consumers retain the existing DTO, while request-aware validators interpret the allowed combination from `multiSelect`. Web component and assembled-browser coverage, TUI coverage, host-response coverage, and tool-projection coverage pin the combined result. Web, TUI, and tool-projection coverage also retain labels-only answers; assembled keyless TUI coverage pins the combined terminal flow, and single-select host coverage pins the remaining exclusivity rule.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
# Agent Note: 多选题自定义答案组合
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-30-multi-select-custom-answer-composition.md) | 中文
## 问题
用户交互结果的词汇分别通过不同字段携带选中的选项标签和可选的自定义文本但最初的语义要求每个问题的这两个字段互斥。对于多选题打开自定义答案或输入文本会丢弃用户已选中的标签。TUI 只返回自定义文本,而 Web 宿主会拒绝同时保留两个字段的客户端响应。
## 决策
对于 `multiSelect: true` 的问题,一个回答项可以同时包含非空 `selected` 数组与非空 `custom` 文本。无论用户先选择选项还是先输入自定义文本Web 草稿都会保留两个值TUI 在选项与自定义模式之间切换时会保留待提交的自定义文本并在任一模式提交时将其与已勾选的标签一同投影Web 宿主则在应用现有的 id、标签、唯一性、批次和非空文本校验后接受组合响应。
单选题和无选项问题仍保持互斥语义:自定义文本会覆盖任何已选中的选项。结果形状仍为 `{ id, selected, custom? }`,因此协议或工具输出 schema 均无需变更。
## 考虑过的替代方案
**把自定义文本编码为另一个 `selected` 标签。** 不予采纳,因为这样会抹去调用方提供的选项标签与用户填写文本之间的区别,削弱校验,并迫使消费方推断哪个值属于自定义内容。
**允许所有问题同时使用 `selected` 与 `custom`。** 不予采纳,因为单选题只表示一个回答;允许选中选项与自定义文本并存会使其基数含义模糊。组合形式仅适用于显式选择多项回答的问题。
## 后果
多选 UI 可以完整表达用户的回答,不会丢弃任一来源。提供方和消费方继续使用现有 DTO而请求感知的校验器会根据 `multiSelect` 判断是否允许组合。Web 组件与组装浏览器的覆盖率、TUI 覆盖率、宿主响应覆盖率和工具投影覆盖率共同固定组合结果。Web、TUI 与工具投影覆盖率还固定了仅含标签的回答形态;组装后的无密钥 TUI 覆盖率固定终端中的组合回答流程,单选题的宿主覆盖率则固定其余的互斥规则。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-31-tui-diff-context-line-accounting.md
2026-07-31-tui-diff-context-line-accounting.md: d465568d5f6cad15ef4647be7ef936c2f5824bba
2026-07-31-tui-diff-context-line-accounting.zh.md: dd1a3eb1acf03477059d48461219700b224b2f96

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
# Agent Note: TUI diff context lines stay neutral
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-31-tui-diff-context-line-accounting.zh.md)
## Problem
Result-time filesystem diffs carry the applied change with three surrounding context lines in each `FileDiff.oldText` and `FileDiff.newText`. The TUI rendered every old-side row as removed and every new-side row as added, including the identical context present on both sides. A one-line edit therefore appeared as seven removals plus seven additions, and the footer repeated those inflated totals.
## Decision
The TUI compares each `FileDiff` whose old and new text are both available. Added and removed rows retain their green `+` and red `-` markers; equal context rows use the recessed body tone with a neutral two-space prefix. The footer sums only the rows classified as added or removed. `maxDiffEditLength` bounds the exact comparison by its combined added and removed line count; the default is 1000. Exceeding the bound renders the complete old side as removed and the complete new side as added, marks the footer approximate, and caches that result so redraws do not repeat the comparison. A tool result clears the pending-view cache before deriving the settled view, including when a presenter mutates and reuses the same view object.
When `oldText` is `null`, the renderer cannot distinguish a create from a pending overwrite or an argument fallback whose prior text is unavailable. It therefore shows every non-empty new-side row as added, without claiming those rows were absent from an existing file. Empty new content renders no synthetic added row.
This remains a consumer-side interpretation of the existing `FileDiff` contract. Filesystem tools continue to persist contextual before/after snippets, so other consumers keep their placement context and existing session logs replay with corrected TUI presentation. The TUI uses the same maintained `diff` package as `dsh-tool-fs` instead of introducing a second line-diff implementation.
## Alternatives considered
**Remove context from filesystem result metadata.** Rejected: contextual applied hunks are intentional producer output used by capable editors, and changing them would weaken every consumer while leaving old session logs misleading in the TUI.
**Extend `FileDiff` with persisted per-line tags.** Rejected: the tags can be derived deterministically from the existing before/after pair; persisting them would widen the cross-package and session-log contract solely for one renderer.
**Match equal lines by position without a diff algorithm.** Rejected: insertions and deletions shift subsequent context, so positional pairing would misclassify valid hunks.
**Run every comparison to completion.** Rejected: pending tool views can contain unrestricted model-authored old and new strings, and an unbounded Myers comparison can block the synchronous terminal renderer.
## Consequences
TUI diff cards distinguish evidence-bearing context from the mutation itself, and an exact `+A -R` footer reports the actual line delta. Replaying an existing contextual diff gains the corrected rendering without a migration. Result-time filesystem hunks are context-bounded; unrestricted pending views either complete within the configured edit-length budget or degrade to an explicitly approximate linear rendering.
The focused TUI tests cover neutral context, exact totals, an empty create, bounded fallback, result-time cache invalidation, and redraw cache reuse. The assembled `advanced-cards` terminal snapshots pin the neutral context style, semantic change colors, exact footer, and approximate fallback through collapsed and expanded card states.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
# Agent Note: TUI diff 上下文行保持中性
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-31-tui-diff-context-line-accounting.md) | 中文
## 问题
文件系统 diff 返回结果时,每个 `FileDiff.oldText``FileDiff.newText` 都会包含已应用的变更及其前后各 3 行上下文。TUI 将旧侧的每一行都渲染为删除行,将新侧的每一行都渲染为新增行,其中包括两侧相同的上下文。因此,一行编辑会显示为删除 7 行并新增 7 行,页脚还会重复这些虚高的合计值。
## 决策
TUI 会比较每个变更前后文本均可用的 `FileDiff`。新增行和删除行仍分别使用绿色 `+` 和红色 `-` 标记;相同的上下文行则使用弱化的正文色调,并带有由两个空格构成的中性前缀。页脚只汇总归类为新增或删除的行。`maxDiffEditLength` 以新增行与删除行的合计数为精确比较设置上限,默认值为 1000。超过上限时TUI 会把完整旧侧渲染为删除内容、把完整新侧渲染为新增内容,将页脚标记为近似结果,并缓存该结果,避免后续重绘重复比较。工具结果会在派生已结算视图前清除待处理视图缓存,即使 presenter 修改并复用同一个视图对象也一样。
`oldText``null` 时,渲染器无法区分文件创建、待处理覆写,以及旧文本不可用的参数回退。因此,它会把新侧的每个非空行显示并计作新增行,但不会声称这些行原先不存在于已有文件中。新内容为空时,不会渲染虚构的新增行。
该行为仍然只是消费方对现有 `FileDiff` 契约的解释。文件系统工具仍会持久化带上下文的变更前后片段,因此其他消费方仍能获得定位上下文,已有会话日志在回放时也会采用修正后的 TUI 呈现。TUI 与 `dsh-tool-fs` 共用同一个受维护的 `diff`package无需引入第二套逐行 diff 实现。
## 考虑过的替代方案
**从文件系统结果元数据中移除上下文。** 不予采纳:带上下文的已应用 hunk 是有意保留的生产方输出,供具备相应能力的编辑器使用;更改这些内容会让所有消费方丢失信息,同时旧会话日志在 TUI 中仍会产生误导。
**为 `FileDiff` 扩展持久化的逐行标签。** 不予采纳:这些标签可以根据现有的变更前后文本对确定性派生;仅为一个渲染器持久化标签,会扩大跨包契约和会话日志契约。
**不使用 diff 算法,按位置匹配相同行。** 不予采纳:插入和删除会使后续上下文发生位移,因此按位置配对会把有效 hunk 错误分类。
**让所有比较都运行至完成。** 不予采纳:待处理工具视图可能包含由模型生成且长度不受限制的新旧字符串,无界的 Myers 比较可能阻塞同步终端渲染器。
## 后果
TUI diff 卡片会区分用于佐证的上下文与变更本身,精确的 `+A -R` 页脚会报告实际的行变更量。回放已有的上下文 diff 无需迁移即可获得修正后的渲染。结果时刻的文件系统 hunk 受上下文范围限制;不受限制的待处理视图要么在配置的编辑长度预算内完成比较,要么降级为明确标注为近似结果的线性渲染。
聚焦的 TUI 测试覆盖中性上下文、精确合计值、空文件创建、有界回退、结果到达时的缓存失效和重绘缓存复用。组装后的 `advanced-cards` 终端快照在卡片折叠和展开状态下固定了中性上下文样式、变更行的语义色彩、精确结果页脚和近似回退。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-24-tui-question-dialog-multiline.md
2026-07-24-tui-question-dialog-multiline.md: fc6e9bceeee4abc46a69a23124d09fcd4f3c7224
2026-07-24-tui-question-dialog-multiline.zh.md: a56821921bad1016009687bde63eae5f4d893cdf

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
# Agent Note: TUI QuestionDialog renders options across multiple lines
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-24-tui-question-dialog-multiline.zh.md)
## Problem
`ctx.userInteraction.ask()` must keep question text, supporting `detail`, option labels, descriptions, validation, and controls readable inside configured width and height bounds. The question panel also belongs directly above the editor: placing it at the terminal edge separates the pending decision from both the transcript that prompted it and the input that follows it.
## Decision
The TUI renders a pending question as an inline modal between the transcript/status area and the editor while retaining the shared FIFO with model and plugin overlays:
- `InlineModalComponent` applies `questionDialogWidth` and `questionDialogMaxHeight` inside the normal component flow. The effective question height is additionally clamped to the current viewport after reserving the editor, so the editor remains below the question during resize.
- `renderOptionBlock` wraps each label beneath its cursor/number prefix and renders the muted description on separately wrapped, equally indented lines. The progress header, question, custom-answer hint, validation text, and final rows are width-bounded as well; the final ellipsis clamp is only a safety boundary for prefixes or other indivisible content. The explicit `↑ N lines hidden` fallback is reserved for a viewport below the configured minimum, where the whole semantic layout cannot fit.
- When question text or `detail` exceeds the header allocation, the header becomes a paged line viewport with its own `… lines A-B/N • PgUp/PgDn` status row. Page Up and Page Down traverse both line viewports: forward navigation exhausts the header/detail pages before entering oversized selected-option pages, and backward navigation reverses that order. This keeps plan-review detail reachable rather than leaving it behind the height clamp.
- The option-line budget subtracts padding, header, position, and footer rows before `windowBlocks` runs. The window obeys both `maxQuestionOptions` and the remaining row budget, keeps the selected option visible, and renders omitted options as `↑ N more` / `↓ N more` markers. If fixed chrome would leave fewer than four option rows, the compact header becomes the line pager so selected content, paging status, and both option markers still fit.
- When one selected block exceeds its allocation, it becomes a line viewport with a `lines A-B/N • PgUp/PgDn` status row. Page Up and Page Down expose every wrapped line without allowing the block to hide the option markers, validation, or controls.
Package tests pin count and height bounds, header and selected-block paging order, narrow-width wrapping, selection behavior, and placement relative to retained editor input. Semantic TUI snapshots pin the assembled terminal layout, header/detail and selected-option page transitions, and validation state.
## Alternatives considered
**Ellipsis-only horizontal truncation.** Keeping one option per row would signal lost text without making the description readable and would not address vertical bounds. The implementation wraps readable content and retains an ellipsis only as a final safety boundary.
**Wrap the combined label and description.** A composite row couples their widths, so either side can starve the other. Separate lines keep both widths predictable.
**Keep the question as a bottom-edge overlay.** A terminal-edge anchor can place the panel after the editor or cover lower chrome, depending on transcript and viewport height. The inline modal preserves ordering while the modal manager retains focus and FIFO ownership.
**Push the bounds into pi-tui.** Generic overlay slicing cannot identify option boundaries, selected content, controls, or the inline editor relationship. The owning dialog therefore applies semantic count, row, and paging rules.
**Use only the option-count cap.** `maxQuestionOptions` remains a public count bound, but it cannot contain wrapped blocks by itself. The dialog enforces the count and row bounds together.
## Consequences
- Descriptions consume additional rows, so fewer options can be visible than `maxQuestionOptions`; markers state the omitted option counts.
- Long question text and plan-review detail remain reachable inside a height-bounded panel, at the cost of sharing Page Up and Page Down with selected-option paging.
- An oversized selected block reserves one status row and requires Page Up or Page Down to read beyond the current line page.
- The inline question can displace older transcript rows from a short viewport. Below the configured minimum height, the final fallback can collapse upper rows behind an explicit hidden-line marker so the input controls and editor remain available.
- The model-facing schema, selected labels, abort/cancel behavior, and ACP elicitation path are unchanged.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
# Agent Note: TUI QuestionDialog 以多行方式渲染选项
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-24-tui-question-dialog-multiline.md) | 中文
## 问题
`ctx.userInteraction.ask()` 必须确保问题正文、`detail` 补充内容、选项标签、描述、校验信息和控件在已配置的宽度与高度边界内均可读。问题面板也直接位于编辑器上方:若将其置于终端边缘,待处理决策就会同时脱离触发该决策的 transcript文本记录和后续输入。
## 决策
TUI 将待处理问题渲染为位于 transcript状态区域与编辑器之间的内联模态框同时仍与模型浮层和插件浮层共享 FIFO
- `InlineModalComponent` 在正常组件流内应用 `questionDialogWidth``questionDialogMaxHeight`。系统在为编辑器预留空间后,还会根据当前视口限制问题的实际高度,因此调整窗口大小时,编辑器仍位于问题下方。
- `renderOptionBlock` 将每个标签换行到光标/编号前缀下方,并在另行换行且缩进相同的行上渲染弱化的描述。进度标题、问题、自定义答案提示、校验文本和末尾行也受宽度边界约束;最终的省略号截断仅作为前缀或其他不可拆分内容的安全边界。明确的 `↑ N lines hidden` 回退仅用于低于已配置最小值、无法容纳完整语义布局的视口。
- 当问题正文或 `detail` 超出头部分配的空间时,头部会成为带有独立 `… lines A-B/N • PgUp/PgDn` 状态行的分页行视口。Page Up 和 Page Down 会遍历这两个行视口:向前导航先翻完问题正文/`detail` 页面,再进入超大选中选项页面;向后导航则采用相反顺序。这样可确保计划评审的 `detail` 内容始终可达,而不会被高度边界挡住。
-`windowBlocks` 运行前,选项行预算会扣除内边距、标题行、位置行和页脚行。窗口同时遵守 `maxQuestionOptions` 和剩余行预算,保持选中项可见,并将省略的选项渲染为 `↑ N more``↓ N more` 标记。若固定界面元素会使选项行少于四行,紧凑头部会转为行分页器,从而容纳选中内容、分页状态和上下两个选项标记。
- 当一个选中块超出分配空间时,它会成为带有 `lines A-B/N • PgUp/PgDn` 状态行的行视口。Page Up 和 Page Down 可展示每一行已换行内容,同时防止该块遮住选项标记、校验信息或控件。
package测试固定数量和高度边界、头部与选中块的分页顺序、窄宽度换行、选择行为以及问题相对于保留的编辑器输入的位置。语义 TUI 快照固定组装后的终端布局、头部/详情与选中选项的分页转换,以及校验状态。
## 备选方案
**仅用省略号进行横向截断。** 保持每个选项占一行,只能提示文本有所丢失,无法使描述变得可读,也无法处理纵向边界。该实现会对可读内容换行,仅将省略号保留为最终安全边界。
**将标签与描述合并后换行。** 组合行会将两者的宽度耦合在一起,任一方都可能挤占另一方的空间。分行渲染可使二者的宽度保持可预测。
**将问题保留为终端底边浮层。** 根据 transcript 和视口高度,锚定在终端边缘的面板可能出现在编辑器之后,也可能遮盖下方界面元素。内联模态框可保留顺序,同时由模态管理器继续负责焦点和 FIFO 所有权。
**将边界处理下推至 pi-tui。** 通用浮层切片无法识别选项边界、选中内容、控件或内联编辑器关系。因此,负责该语义的对话框会应用数量、行数和分页规则。
**仅使用选项数量上限。** `maxQuestionOptions` 仍是公开的数量边界,但仅靠它无法容纳已换行的块。对话框会同时执行数量边界和行数边界。
## 后果
- 描述会占用额外行,因此可见选项数可能少于 `maxQuestionOptions`;标记会说明省略的选项数量。
- 较长的问题正文和计划评审 `detail` 在受高度约束的面板内仍然可达,代价是 Page Up 和 Page Down 需要与选中选项分页共用。
- 超出空间的选中块会预留一行状态信息;若要阅读当前页面之外的行,必须使用 Page Up 或 Page Down。
- 在较矮的视口内,内联问题可能将较早的 transcript 行挤出可见区域。低于已配置最小高度时,最终回退可能将上部行折叠到明确的隐藏行标记之后,从而让输入控件和编辑器仍然可用。
- 面向模型的 schema、选中的标签、中止取消行为以及 ACPAgent Client Protocol的 elicitation 路径均保持不变。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-web-diff-card.md
2026-07-30-web-diff-card.md: 396bdbc2843c1bbed5c6a913be436d8b9e96a81c
2026-07-30-web-diff-card.zh.md: afdeafa6e94b46b4f0fbd4a065afdac8a93ac57d
2026-07-30-web-diff-card.md: eb43e09d6173ca2270df97cecaab6da36c70a679
2026-07-30-web-diff-card.zh.md: 669cd49abc8eba8637705cd7c9f331cc51607755

View File

@@ -16,13 +16,13 @@ This is the [terminal card](2026-07-28-web-terminal-card.md) done for the `diff`
`DiffBlock` is a `ui-primitives` component that renders a file mutation as an inline diff surface, and both Web render sites for a write/edit call consume the diff render intent through it: the chat tool row's body and the details panel's Output section. `ui-conversation/src/client/contract/diff-card-model.ts` is the single place that turns the snapshot's `callView`/`resultView` pair into the component's props, so the two sites cannot disagree about a change. It returns null — the generic path — whenever neither side declares `card: 'diff'`, including a `card` value this client version does not know, and whenever a settled call's result view is generic, which is how write/edit keep their execution errors on the generic path. The result side is authoritative once the call settles: the applied hunks replace the call-time diff derived from the arguments alone. A paging window that drops the call head still renders, because the result view carries the whole change.
The component's contract follows the TUI's `diffLines` (`packages/ui/tui/src/components/transcript.ts`) so a diff reads the same shape across front ends:
The component shares the TUI's single-column framing, line-terminator rule, and distinct-path file count. Line classification differs: Web renders the complete old and new sides, while the TUI derives neutral context and exact changed rows when its bounded comparison completes and labels its whole-side fallback approximate.
- **One path header per file.** A new file opens a bold path header; a same-file second hunk (a scattered edit, or a `replace_all`) opens with a `⋯` gap instead of repeating the path. The `N file(s)` footer counts DISTINCT paths on both front ends — this PR moved the TUI footer off `diffs.length` onto the distinct-path count, so two hunks in one file read as `1 file` in both.
- **The change in the diff's own colors.** A removed line is `- ` on the error token, an added line is `+ ` on the success token, drawn verbatim with `white-space: pre` inside a horizontally scrolling box — a source line is read by its indentation, so it scrolls rather than folds. A create (`oldText: null`) has no removed side.
- **Path grouping.** A new file opens a bold path header; a same-file second hunk (a scattered edit, or a `replace_all`) opens with a `⋯` gap instead of repeating the path. The TUI keeps a path header on every hunk, but both front ends count distinct paths in the `N file(s)` footer, so two hunks in one file read as `1 file`.
- **Whole-side change colors.** Every old-side line is `- ` on the error token and every new-side line is `+ ` on the success token, drawn verbatim with `white-space: pre` inside a horizontally scrolling box — a source line is read by its indentation, so it scrolls rather than folds. A create (`oldText: null`) has no removed side.
- **Height cap with an expand control.** A diff longer than `DEFAULT_DIFF_MAX_LINES` (16) shows `ceil(max/2)` head rows plus the remaining tail rows, with a button between reporting the hidden count. The split arithmetic matches `TerminalBlock` and the TUI's collapsed card, so a long diff's head and tail slices agree across front ends.
- **Line terminator.** A side's content splits on `\n` under the terminator rule `TerminalBlock` uses: empty text is zero lines (a full deletion's `newText`, a create's absent `oldText` side), a single trailing newline terminates its last line rather than adding a phantom empty one, and an interior blank line survives. This PR applied the same rule to the TUI diff branch, so the `+A -R` footer counts agree on both front ends for the newline-terminated content real write/edit calls carry.
- **Footer and copy.** A dim `└ +A -R · N file(s)` footer summarizes the change; `+A -R` are the added/removed line counts, the same per-side counts the TUI footer draws. The copy control copies the prefixed diff text (path headers, `- `/`+ ` lines, the `⋯` gap), so a multi-file copy stays attributable.
- **Line terminator.** A side's content splits on `\n` under the terminator rule `TerminalBlock` and the TUI use: empty text is zero lines (a full deletion's `newText`, a create's absent `oldText` side), a single trailing newline terminates its last line rather than adding a phantom empty one, and an interior blank line survives.
- **Footer and copy.** A dim `└ +A -R · N file(s)` footer reports the Web card's complete new- and old-side line counts. The TUI footer instead reports exact changed rows when available and marks a bounded whole-side fallback approximate; both use the same distinct-path file count. The copy control copies the prefixed Web diff text (path headers, `- `/`+ ` lines, the `⋯` gap), so a multi-file copy stays attributable.
Geometry, radius, and fonts mirror `CodeBlock`/`TerminalBlock` so a diff card, a terminal card, and a fenced block read as one family; `white-space: pre` plus horizontal scroll is the deliberate divergence. The copy control floats in the card's top-right corner rather than on a banner row of its own, because a banner carrying only a copy button drew an empty band above the first diff line — the TUI diff card has no banner either, only the footer.

View File

@@ -16,13 +16,13 @@ Web 客户端忽略了它。write/edit 调用落到 `GenericToolCard`,其行
`DiffBlock` 是一个 `ui-primitives` 组件,把文件改动渲染为内联 diff 表面write/edit 调用的两个 Web 渲染点都通过它消费 diff 渲染意图chat 工具行的行体和详情面板的 Output 区。`ui-conversation/src/client/contract/diff-card-model.ts` 是唯一把快照的 `callView`/`resultView` 对转成组件 props 的地方,因此两个渲染点不会对一次改动产生分歧。当两侧都未声明 `card: 'diff'` 时它返回 null —— 走通用路径 —— 包括本客户端版本不认识的 `card` 值,以及已结算调用的 result view 是 generic 的情况write/edit 的执行错误正是这样留在通用路径上的)。调用结算后 result 侧是权威:已应用的 hunk 替换仅从参数推导的 call 时 diff。分页窗口丢弃了 call 头也仍能渲染,因为 result view 携带完整改动。
组件的契约遵循 TUI 的 `diffLines``packages/ui/tui/src/components/transcript.ts`),使 diff 在两个前端读起来是同一形态:
组件与 TUI 共用单栏框架、行终止符规则和去重路径计数。两者的行分类不同Web 渲染完整的变更前后两侧,而 TUI 会在有界比较完成时派生中性上下文和精确变更行,并把整侧回退标记为近似结果。
- **每个文件一个路径头。** 新文件开启一个粗体路径头;同文件的第二个 hunk分散编辑`replace_all`)以一个 `⋯` gap 开启,而非重复路径。`N file(s)` 页脚在两个前端都统计**去重后的路径数** —— 本 PR 把 TUI 页脚从 `diffs.length` 改为去重路径计数,因此同文件两个 hunk 在两端都读作 `1 file`
- **改动用 diff 自身的颜色。** 删除行是 error token 上的 `- `,新增行是 success token 上的 `+ `在横向滚动的盒子里以 `white-space: pre` 逐字绘制 —— 源码行靠缩进阅读,所以滚动而不折行。新建(`oldText: null`)没有删除侧。
- **路径分组。** 新文件开启一个粗体路径头;同文件的第二个 hunk分散编辑`replace_all`)以一个 `⋯` gap 开启,而非重复路径。TUI 在每个 hunk 上都保留路径头,但两个前端的 `N file(s)` 页脚都按去重路径计数,因此同文件两个 hunk 在两端都读作 `1 file`
- **整侧改动配色。** 旧侧每一行都以 error token 上的 `- ` 显示,新侧每一行都以 success token 上的 `+ ` 显示,并在横向滚动的盒子里以 `white-space: pre` 逐字绘制源码行靠缩进阅读,因此滚动而不折行。新建(`oldText: null`)没有删除侧。
- **高度上限带展开控件。** 长于 `DEFAULT_DIFF_MAX_LINES`16的 diff 显示 `ceil(max/2)` 个头部行加剩余尾部行,中间一个按钮报告隐藏行数。分割算术与 `TerminalBlock` 和 TUI 的折叠卡片一致,因此长 diff 的头尾切片在两个前端一致。
- **行终止符。** 每一侧的内容按 `TerminalBlock` 的终止符规则在 `\n` 上切分:空文本是零行(整文件删除的 `newText`、新建缺失的 `oldText` 侧),单个结尾换行终止其最后一行而非新增一条幻影空行,内部空行保留。本 PR 把同一规则应用到了 TUI diff 分支,因此对于真实 write/edit 调用携带的以换行结尾的内容,两个前端的 `+A -R` 页脚计数一致。
- **页脚与复制。** 暗色 `└ +A -R · N file(s)` 页脚概括改动;`+A -R` 是新增/删除行数,与 TUI 页脚绘制的每侧计数相同。复制控件复制带前缀的 diff 文本(路径头、`- `/`+ ` 行、`⋯` gap使多文件复制保持可归属。
- **行终止符。** 每一侧的内容按 `TerminalBlock` 与 TUI 共用的终止符规则在 `\n` 上切分:空文本是零行(整文件删除的 `newText`、新建缺失的 `oldText` 侧),单个结尾换行终止其最后一行而非新增一条幻影空行,内部空行保留。
- **页脚与复制。** 暗色 `└ +A -R · N file(s)` 页脚报告 Web 卡片完整新侧与旧侧的行数。TUI 页脚则在可用时报告精确变更行数,并把有界整侧回退标记为近似结果;两者使用相同的去重路径计数。复制控件复制带前缀的 Web diff 文本(路径头、`- `/`+ ` 行、`⋯` gap使多文件复制保持可辨别归属。
几何、圆角、字体镜像 `CodeBlock`/`TerminalBlock`,使 diff 卡片、terminal 卡片、代码块读起来是一家;`white-space: pre` 加横向滚动是刻意的分歧。复制控件浮在卡片右上角,而非占据自己的 banner 行,因为只放一个复制按钮的 banner 会在第一行 diff 上方画出一条空带 —— TUI 的 diff 卡片也没有 banner只有页脚。
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ chat 行把 diff 常驻渲染在路径链接摘要之下,上限 `CHAT_DIFF_MAX
**并排双栏diff。** owner 目前拒绝:它更密但不适合狭窄的 chat 行,目标是与 TUI 单栏统一形式对齐。详情面板里的双栏模式是后续的 props 改动,不是重设计。
**git 式行号槽。** `FileDiff` 契约只携带 `{ path, oldText, newText }` —— `structuredPatch` 的 hunk 起始行在 `diff.ts` 里被丢弃,所以没有行号抵达客户端。渲染行号槽需要后端契约改动(携带 `oldStart`/`newStart`)并同步升级 TUI 以保持一致;推迟,使本 PR 保持为对既有契约的纯 Web 消费。
**git 式行号槽。** `FileDiff` 契约只携带 `{ path, oldText, newText }` —— `structuredPatch` 的 hunk 起始行在 `diff.ts` 里被丢弃,所以没有行号抵达客户端。渲染行号槽需要后端契约改动(携带 `oldStart`/`newStart`)并同步升级 TUI 以保持一致;推迟,使本 PRPull Request保持为对既有契约的纯 Web 消费。
**复用 `CodeBlock`。** 因与 terminal 卡片相同的理由拒绝:`CodeBlock` 会折行,且没有每行 `+`/`-` 角色、没有路径头、没有页脚。两者共享几何与字体 token那是唯一一处一个实现对两者都正确的部分。