Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into worktree-i18n-update-workflow

# Conflicts:
#	.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.i18n.yaml
#	.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md
#	docs/i18n/README.i18n.yaml
This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-07-27 09:39:54 +08:00
827 changed files with 25749 additions and 9136 deletions

View File

@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ These Agent Notes describe shipped decisions. Follow the [root instructions](../
Keep paths, symbols, defaults, and mechanisms current in the same change that alters them. Rewrite stale facts in place; do not append change history.
When a shipped note is unlikely to guide future work, archive its complete triplet through [`dsh-archive-agent-notes`](../../skills/dsh-archive-agent-notes/SKILL.md) instead of continuing to maintain it.
### This is not a license to rewrite the *decision*
Update factual realization in place. A reversal of the decision or its rationale requires a new Agent Note and cross-link; a fully superseded old note may be deleted only through the consolidation rule in the [Agent Note contract](../README.md).

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-11-content-block-vocabulary.md: 9aad01cee6083b1f380be66869af3137a07d9f1f
2026-06-11-content-block-vocabulary.zh.md: 5720f0742a0729a3f98e4b05ab37acf97ae78db5
2026-06-11-content-block-vocabulary.md: d926c28e7e197aff28c7b1c09d085febf866832b
2026-06-11-content-block-vocabulary.zh.md: 6361f00abe109bffdb5bd3ff5652df67d6b3c8a1

View File

@@ -23,6 +23,6 @@ In-session context injection (`context/message`) and mid-turn steering (`steerin
- Reasoning has a core home without provider-specific shapes.
- Multimodal blocks return only with coordinated adapter, UI, and compaction support; see [the drop-image Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-04-drop-image-content-block.md).
- Cache hints and assistant prefill remain absent until a shipping adapter can honor them; see the [producer-less variants](../simplification/2026-07-04-prune-producerless-vocabulary-variants.md) and [inert request knobs](../simplification/2026-07-04-drop-inert-request-knobs.md) Agent Notes.
- Cache hints and assistant prefill remain absent until a shipping adapter can honor them; see the [producer-less variants](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-prune-producerless-vocabulary-variants.md) and [inert request knobs](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-drop-inert-request-knobs.md) Agent Notes.
- Every adapter pays a translation cost; the first real adapters have since validated the streaming protocol, and new adapters should continue proving their provider-specific mapping in adapter-local tests.
- IDs that cross package boundaries are branded (`CallId`, the shared agent/session `SessionId`) — nominal typing at zero runtime cost.

View File

@@ -23,6 +23,6 @@ harness 需要一套统一的内部消息语言,供 agent loop智能体循
- 推理reasoning在核心层有了归属无需依赖提供方特有的结构。
- 多模态块只有在适配器、UI 和上下文压缩context compaction三方协同支持后才会回归见 [drop-image Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-04-drop-image-content-block.md)。
- 缓存提示与 assistant prefill 在有实际适配器能兑现之前保持缺席;见[无生产者的词汇变体](../simplification/2026-07-04-prune-producerless-vocabulary-variants.md)与[无端到端可用路径的请求旋钮](../simplification/2026-07-04-drop-inert-request-knobs.md) Agent Note。
- 缓存提示与 assistant prefill 在有实际适配器能兑现之前保持缺席;见[无生产者的词汇变体](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-prune-producerless-vocabulary-variants.md)与[无端到端可用路径的请求旋钮](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-drop-inert-request-knobs.md) Agent Note。
- 每个适配器都需承担翻译成本;首批真实适配器已验证了流式输出协议,新适配器应继续在适配器本地测试中验证其提供方特有的映射。
- 跨包package边界的 ID 使用品牌类型(`CallId`、agent 与会话共享的 `SessionId`)——零运行时开销的名义类型。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-14-session-persistence.md: 52434930bb662b0c97e61f7c2f69b67c309b6317
2026-06-14-session-persistence.zh.md: 143b58d32191108d7ba24b489bd4f898b1547aab
2026-06-14-session-persistence.md: 75e13b860f621ed407849b3b4c62ff7287ab4812
2026-06-14-session-persistence.zh.md: a6bd400a053779c742940236737447d1687622de

View File

@@ -15,11 +15,11 @@ The [event-sourced model](2026-06-11-event-sourced-sessions.md) makes the append
Persistence is an abstract **capability seam** ([capability seams](2026-06-13-capability-seams.md), the `dsh-bash` template), not loop or core logic:
1. **Interface** (`dsh-session-persistence`, `ctx.sessionPersistence`) — an abstract `SessionPersistence` service: `create`/`append`/`load`/`list`. Its persisted unit IS the existing `SessionEvent` (`{ type, seq, time, data }`), reused verbatim — no conversion type.
2. **Implementation** (`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl`) — an append-only logical JSONL log per session (a `SessionHeader` line then one `SessionEvent` per line, verbatim **including `assistant/chunk`**), encoded as [checksummed Zstandard frames by default](2026-07-19-zstandard-jsonl-session-logs.md) or raw lines by configuration.
2. **Implementation** (`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl`) — an append-only logical JSONL log per session: a `SessionHeader` line followed by storage records that losslessly represent the contiguous `SessionEvent` stream. Eligible `assistant/chunk` delta runs use packed rows by default; [checksummed Zstandard frames](2026-07-19-zstandard-jsonl-session-logs.md) are the default physical encoding, with raw lines configurable.
Key choices recorded here because they are durable, contested, and surprising:
- **The canonical durable log persists every `SessionEvent` verbatim, including `assistant/chunk`.** `deriveMessages()` skips chunks, and a chunk-filtered rollout (Codex's `policy.rs`) is tempting — but `seq = log.length` and the load-validation `events[i].seq === i` require a *contiguous* log; filtering chunks out would leave holes and break both the contract and resume. A chunk-filtered projection is possible later as a derived view with its own renumbering, but it is NOT the canonical log.
- **The canonical durable log persists every `SessionEvent` losslessly, including `assistant/chunk`.** JSONL storage may encode a consecutive delta run as one packed row, but `load` reconstructs the exact event boundaries, sequence numbers, and timestamps. `deriveMessages()` skips chunks, and a chunk-filtered rollout (Codex's `policy.rs`) is tempting — but `seq = log.length` and the load-validation `events[i].seq === i` require a *contiguous* logical log; filtering chunks out would leave holes and break both the contract and resume. A chunk-filtered projection is possible later as a derived view with its own renumbering, but it is NOT the canonical log.
- **Append-only; a crashed turn is closed, never truncated.** Flushed events are never rewritten. The [semantic checkpoint policy](../bug-fix/2026-07-21-semantic-session-checkpoints.md) drains the request before model dispatch, a recorded top-level call before tool dispatch, and the complete response/result batch after a step; the loop drains the final turn boundary. Because one interrupted turn may contain substantial valid work, `load` preserves its contiguous, parseable events and appends risk-classified error results for unanswered assistant calls, a missing `step/end`, and `turn/end` with `{ kind: 'interrupted' }`. The synthetic results keep resumed provider transcripts valid. Only an incomplete final record is discarded; a parse error or sequence gap at or before the last real `turn/end` is corruption and makes the session unloadable.
- **File backend canonical, DB backend a proven drop-in.** `SessionEvent` maps 1:1 onto a row `(session_id, seq, type, time, data)``append` is INSERT (in a transaction asserting the contiguous-seq contract), `load` is SELECT … ORDER BY seq. `dsh-session-persistence-sqlite` is exactly this: a `SessionPersistence` subclass with no interface change (opencode runs this exact shape on SQLite/WAL), and it passes the same `runPersistenceContract` suite as the JSONL backend — so the contract holds both backends to identical semantics (lazy materialization, interrupted-turn close on load, contiguous-seq), expressed once over file bytes and once over rows. Its database carries a dedicated application id and monotonic schema version. A pristine file creates all tables and stamps both header values in one transaction; an unversioned file with any user-defined schema object or application identity, a foreign current-version identity, and every non-current version reject before journal-mode mutation.
- **Metadata is out-of-log.** Format version, cwd, and lineage are storage concerns, not replayable conversation state, so they live in a `SessionHeader` owned by `dsh-session` and attached to a `Session` via a new readonly `session.header` — never in `SessionEventMap`, never reaching `deriveMessages()`. `createdAt` is non-negative safe-integer Unix epoch milliseconds: live creation and persistence registration reject fractional values, JSONL validates the decoded header, and SQLite stores it in a strict `INTEGER` column. The alternative (a merge-extensible `session/meta` event as log line 0) was rejected: an in-log event would ride along with a seeded/forked session for free, but metadata is not replayable state, so the explicit out-of-log header seam is the cleaner cost. (The header was originally split into an immutable `SessionHeader` plus a mutable `SessionSummary` whose union was `SessionMeta`; the mutable summary was later removed as dead state — see [Drop the mutable session summary](../simplification/2026-06-19-drop-mutable-session-summary.md).)
@@ -33,4 +33,4 @@ Format versioning: the header carries a `version`; `load` rejects any non-curren
## Consequences
Two new packages and the metadata seam in `dsh-session` (`session.header`, the `create(id?, options?)` signature). Bought: durable resume/fork, a read/replay path, crash tolerance, and host-side session access over the existing event-sourced log, with the backend swappable behind one interface. The reusable `runPersistenceContract` suite holds every backend to the same append-only, contiguous-seq, lazy-materialization, integer-metadata, and serializability semantics. Persisting the full log also settles event fidelity: `assistant/chunk` remains verbatim. SQLite initialization either commits its complete owned schema and header identity or leaves no partial schema to strand on the next open.
Two new packages and the metadata seam in `dsh-session` (`session.header`, the `create(id?, options?)` signature). Bought: durable resume/fork, a read/replay path, crash tolerance, and host-side session access over the existing event-sourced log, with the backend swappable behind one interface. The reusable `runPersistenceContract` suite holds every backend to the same append-only, contiguous-seq, lazy-materialization, integer-metadata, and serializability semantics. Persisting the full logical log also settles event fidelity: every `assistant/chunk` survives exactly even when JSONL packs several into one storage row. SQLite initialization either commits its complete owned schema and header identity or leaves no partial schema to strand on the next open.

View File

@@ -15,11 +15,11 @@ Status: implemented
持久化是一个抽象的**能力 seam**[能力 seam](2026-06-13-capability-seams.md)`dsh-bash` 模板),而非循环或核心逻辑:
1. **接口**`dsh-session-persistence``ctx.sessionPersistence`):一个抽象的 `SessionPersistence` 服务,提供 `create`/`append`/`load`/`list`。其持久化单元就是现有的 `SessionEvent``{ type, seq, time, data }`),原样复用,无转换类型。
2. **实现**`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl`):每个会话一个仅追加的逻辑 JSONL 日志一行 `SessionHeader`之后每行一个 `SessionEvent`,逐字节保留,**包括 `assistant/chunk`**),默认编码为[带校验和的 Zstandard 帧](2026-07-19-zstandard-jsonl-session-logs.md),也可通过配置使用原始行。
2. **实现**`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl`):每个会话一个仅追加的逻辑 JSONL 日志:先是一行 `SessionHeader`随后是无损表示连续 `SessionEvent` 流的存储记录。符合条件的 `assistant/chunk` 增量连续段默认使用打包行;[带校验和的 Zstandard 帧](2026-07-19-zstandard-jsonl-session-logs.md)是默认物理编码,也可通过配置使用原始行。
以下关键选择记录于此,因为它们是持久性的、有争议的、且出人意料的:
- **规范的持久日志逐字节保留每个 `SessionEvent`,包括 `assistant/chunk`。** `deriveMessages()` 跳过分片而过滤分片的方案Codex 的 `policy.rs`)很有吸引力,但 `seq = log.length` 以及加载验证 `events[i].seq === i` 要求日志是*连续*的;过滤掉分片会留下空洞,同时破坏契约和恢复功能。基于分片过滤的投影可以作为派生视图在后续实现(带有自己的重新编号),但它不是规范日志。
- **规范的持久日志无损保留每个 `SessionEvent`,包括 `assistant/chunk`。** JSONL 存储可以将一段连续的增量事件编码为一条打包行,但 `load` 会重建精确的事件边界、序号与时间戳。`deriveMessages()` 跳过分片而过滤分片的方案Codex 的 `policy.rs`)很有吸引力,但 `seq = log.length` 以及加载验证 `events[i].seq === i` 要求*连续*的逻辑日志;过滤掉分片会留下空洞,同时破坏契约和恢复功能。基于分片过滤的投影可以作为派生视图在后续实现(带有自己的重新编号),但它不是规范日志。
- **仅追加;崩溃的轮次被关闭,而非截断。** 已刷写的事件永不被重写。[语义检查点策略](../bug-fix/2026-07-21-semantic-session-checkpoints.md)会在模型分发前排空请求、在工具分发前排空已记录的顶层调用,并在步骤结束后排空完整的响应/结果批次;循环则排空最终轮次边界。由于一个被中断的轮次可能包含大量有效工作,`load` 保留其连续、可解析的事件,并为未应答的 assistant 调用追加按风险分类的错误结果、补一个缺失的 `step/end`,以及带 `{ kind: 'interrupted' }``turn/end`。合成的结果保证恢复后的提供方 transcript文本记录仍然有效。只有不完整的最后一条记录会被丢弃在最后一个真实 `turn/end` 处或之前出现解析错误或序号间隙,属于数据损坏,会使该会话不可加载。
- **文件后端为规范实现,数据库后端为经过验证的直接替换。** `SessionEvent` 1:1 映射到一行 `(session_id, seq, type, time, data)``append` 是 INSERT在一个断言连续 seq 契约的事务中),`load` 是 SELECT … ORDER BY seq。`dsh-session-persistence-sqlite` 正是如此:一个 `SessionPersistence` 子类接口无变化opencode 在 SQLite/WAL 上运行的正是这个形状),且通过与 JSONL 后端相同的 `runPersistenceContract` 测试套件。该契约以相同的语义约束两个后端(惰性物化、加载时关闭中断轮次、连续 seq一次表达在文件字节上一次表达在数据库行上。其数据库拥有专用的 application id 与单调递增的 schema 版本。系统会在一个事务中为全新文件创建所有表并写入这两个 header 值;未版本化文件若带有任何用户定义的 schema 对象或应用标识、当前版本文件若带有外部应用标识,以及任何非当前版本文件,都会在修改日志模式之前被拒绝。
- **元数据在日志之外。** 格式版本、cwd 和谱系是存储关注点,不是可回放的对话状态,因此它们存放在 `dsh-session` 拥有的 `SessionHeader` 中,并通过新的只读属性 `session.header` 附加到 `Session` 上——永远不进入 `SessionEventMap`,永远不到达 `deriveMessages()``createdAt` 是以 Unix epoch 毫秒表示的非负安全整数运行时创建和持久化注册会拒绝小数值JSONL 会验证解码后的 headerSQLite 则将其存入严格的 `INTEGER` 列。替代方案(一个可合并扩展的 `session/meta` 事件作为日志第 0 行)被否决:日志内事件会随 seed/fork 的会话免费携带,但元数据不是可回放状态,因此显式的日志外 header seam 是更干净的代价。header 最初被拆分为不可变的 `SessionHeader` 加可变的 `SessionSummary`,二者的联合类型为 `SessionMeta`;可变 summary 后来因属于死状态而被移除——见 [移除可变会话摘要](../simplification/2026-06-19-drop-mutable-session-summary.md)。)
@@ -33,4 +33,4 @@ Status: implemented
## 后果
新增两个包package以及 `dsh-session` 中的元数据 seam`session.header``create(id?, options?)` 签名)。收益:持久恢复/fork、读取/回放路径、崩溃容忍,以及基于现有事件溯源日志的宿主侧会话访问,后端在一个接口之后可替换。可复用的 `runPersistenceContract` 测试套件以相同的仅追加、连续 seq、惰性物化、整数元数据与可序列化语义约束每个后端。持久化完整日志还确定了事件保真度`assistant/chunk` 保持逐字节不变。SQLite 初始化要么提交完整的自有 schema 与 header 标识,要么不留下任何会使下次打开受阻的部分 schema。
新增两个包package以及 `dsh-session` 中的元数据 seam`session.header``create(id?, options?)` 签名)。收益:持久恢复/fork、读取/回放路径、崩溃容忍,以及基于现有事件溯源日志的宿主侧会话访问,后端在一个接口之后可替换。可复用的 `runPersistenceContract` 测试套件以相同的仅追加、连续 seq、惰性物化、整数元数据与可序列化语义约束每个后端。持久化完整的逻辑日志还确定了事件保真度:即使 JSONL 将多个 `assistant/chunk` 打包到一条存储行中,每个事件也会精确保留。SQLite 初始化要么提交完整的自有 schema 与 header 标识,要么不留下任何会使下次打开受阻的部分 schema。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-17-filesystem-capability-seam.md: 08e8d52b314eb10e2c7ec444dd61a96d8621e032
2026-06-17-filesystem-capability-seam.zh.md: 6f4889234516ee134c9873781a874b5f1a3644ac
2026-06-17-filesystem-capability-seam.md: fee0161e5e8397ac1d1c0e2850efad840c65d971
2026-06-17-filesystem-capability-seam.zh.md: ee50b36d25315c3d8daed4502bc248977f9e6011

View File

@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ The read-before-write/edit and observed-state policy is a fourth package, `@deep
The first backend is deliberately local-only: `dsh-fs-local` implements `ctx.fs` against the host filesystem. Future sibling backends can provide sandboxed, remote, virtual, or project-scoped filesystems behind the same interface.
The first consumer is deliberately text-file-only: `dsh-tool-fs` exposes model-facing `read`, `write`, and `edit` tools for UTF-8 text files. Future consumers can add directory listing, search/glob, binary-safe operations, file watching, or higher-level project operations without changing the local backend package, as long as the needed capability exists on `ctx.fs`. Direct directory listing was later added by [Add direct directory listing to the filesystem seam](2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md).
The first consumer is deliberately text-file-only: `dsh-tool-fs` exposes model-facing `read`, `write`, and `edit` tools for UTF-8 text files. Future consumers can add directory listing, search/glob, binary-safe operations, file watching, or higher-level project operations without changing the local backend package, as long as the needed capability exists on `ctx.fs`. Direct directory listing was later added by [Add direct directory listing to the filesystem seam](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md).
Filesystem permissions and sandboxing are not implied by this split. The local backend resolves relative paths from its configured base directory, but containment policy is a separate decision: either a stricter `ctx.fs` implementation enforces it, or a permission/sandbox plugin wraps `tools/execute` and vetoes calls before they reach the consumer.
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ Literal edit is a provider primitive (`editText`), not composed in `tool-fs` fro
The policy plugin, not `ctx.fs`, gates on prior observation: an `edit` requires a prior observation by the owner (else `FS_NOT_OBSERVED`), and the recorded version is passed to `editText` as the CAS basis. With the policy plugin absent, `ctx.fs` alone is a complete unconstrained seam (unconditional write/edit); the tool is never method-coupled to the policy.
Filesystem contract failures are thrown as `FsError extends HarnessError`, and the tool registry converts them into `isError` tool results with structured `{ name, code }` metadata. `dsh-fs` owns this vocabulary rather than each tool inventing messages. The codes are `FS_NOT_FOUND`, `FS_NOT_TEXT`, `FS_STALE_VERSION`, `FS_NOT_OBSERVED`, `FS_NOT_REGULAR_FILE`, `FS_AMBIGUOUS_EDIT`, `FS_EDIT_NOT_FOUND`, and `FS_ABORTED`. (An earlier draft included `FS_PARTIAL_OBSERVATION`; freshness-based authorization has no partial/full distinction, so it was dropped. Directory-listing-specific codes were added later by [Add direct directory listing to the filesystem seam](2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md).)
Filesystem contract failures are thrown as `FsError extends HarnessError`, and the tool registry converts them into `isError` tool results with structured `{ name, code }` metadata. `dsh-fs` owns this vocabulary rather than each tool inventing messages. The codes are `FS_NOT_FOUND`, `FS_NOT_TEXT`, `FS_STALE_VERSION`, `FS_NOT_OBSERVED`, `FS_NOT_REGULAR_FILE`, `FS_AMBIGUOUS_EDIT`, `FS_EDIT_NOT_FOUND`, and `FS_ABORTED`. (An earlier draft included `FS_PARTIAL_OBSERVATION`; freshness-based authorization has no partial/full distinction, so it was dropped. Directory-listing-specific codes were added later by [Add direct directory listing to the filesystem seam](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md).)
## Tool consumer behavior

View File

@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ harness 已有一个具体的 `bash` 能力 seam`dsh-bash` / `dsh-bash-local`
第一个后端有意仅限本地:`dsh-fs-local` 基于宿主文件系统实现 `ctx.fs`。未来的兄弟后端可在同一接口之后提供沙箱、远程、虚拟或项目作用域的文件系统。
第一个消费方有意仅限文本文件:`dsh-tool-fs` 暴露面向模型的 `read``write``edit` 工具,处理 UTF-8 文本文件。未来的消费方可以添加目录列表、搜索/glob、二进制安全操作、文件监视或更高层的项目操作只要 `ctx.fs` 上存在所需能力,就无需改动本地后端包。直接目录列表后来由[为文件系统 seam 添加直接目录列举能力](2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md)添加。
第一个消费方有意仅限文本文件:`dsh-tool-fs` 暴露面向模型的 `read``write``edit` 工具,处理 UTF-8 文本文件。未来的消费方可以添加目录列表、搜索/glob、二进制安全操作、文件监视或更高层的项目操作只要 `ctx.fs` 上存在所需能力,就无需改动本地后端包。直接目录列表后来由[为文件系统 seam 添加直接目录列举能力](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md)添加。
文件系统权限和沙箱并非此拆分所隐含。本地后端从其配置的基目录解析相对路径,但隔离策略是独立的决策:要么由更严格的 `ctx.fs` 实现强制执行,要么由权限/沙箱插件包装 `tools/execute` 并在调用到达消费方之前否决。
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ harness 已有一个具体的 `bash` 能力 seam`dsh-bash` / `dsh-bash-local`
策略插件(而非 `ctx.fs`)对先前观测进行门控:`edit` 要求 owner 有先前观测(否则报 `FS_NOT_OBSERVED`),记录的版本作为 CAS 基础传给 `editText`。在策略插件缺席时,`ctx.fs` 本身是一个完整的无约束 seam无条件写入/编辑);工具从不与策略方法耦合。
文件系统契约失败以 `FsError extends HarnessError` 抛出,工具注册表将其转换为带结构化 `{ name, code }` 元数据的 `isError` 工具结果。`dsh-fs` 拥有此词汇,而非由每个工具各自发明消息。错误码包括 `FS_NOT_FOUND``FS_NOT_TEXT``FS_STALE_VERSION``FS_NOT_OBSERVED``FS_NOT_REGULAR_FILE``FS_AMBIGUOUS_EDIT``FS_EDIT_NOT_FOUND``FS_ABORTED`。(早期草案包含 `FS_PARTIAL_OBSERVATION`;基于新鲜度的授权没有 partial/full 区分,因此已删除。目录列表相关的错误码后来由[为文件系统 seam 添加直接目录列举能力](2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md)添加。)
文件系统契约失败以 `FsError extends HarnessError` 抛出,工具注册表将其转换为带结构化 `{ name, code }` 元数据的 `isError` 工具结果。`dsh-fs` 拥有此词汇,而非由每个工具各自发明消息。错误码包括 `FS_NOT_FOUND``FS_NOT_TEXT``FS_STALE_VERSION``FS_NOT_OBSERVED``FS_NOT_REGULAR_FILE``FS_AMBIGUOUS_EDIT``FS_EDIT_NOT_FOUND``FS_ABORTED`。(早期草案包含 `FS_PARTIAL_OBSERVATION`;基于新鲜度的授权没有 partial/full 区分,因此已删除。目录列表相关的错误码后来由[为文件系统 seam 添加直接目录列举能力](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md)添加。)
## 工具消费方行为

View File

@@ -1,57 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Extract example apps into packages
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-06-20-extract-example-app-packages.zh.md)
## Problem
An example folder is supposed to be *thin* — the variable wiring of a demo, not the demo's machinery. Before this change it was thick. Each example carried a hand-rolled `start.ts` boot bootstrap, an infra preamble (`timer`, and — for the stdio demos — `logger` + `hmr`), nested includes of three shared YAML fragments (`base.yml` / `base-core.yml` / `acp-agent/acp-tail.yml`), and per-example `agent-loop`/persistence/system-prompt config. The actual app — the spine of services every agent needs — was spread across the leaf and those includes.
The leaf configs also owned coupled front doors. ACP requires stdout purity and creates agents through `session/new`; terminal and Headless apps pre-create `main` but have different process I/O contracts. Prose warnings were the only guard against combining these incorrectly, while three `start.ts` files duplicated the Loader bootstrap and lifecycle code.
## Decision
Each example is now **mostly an invocation of an app package**, splitting the wiring along the existing [interface / implementation / consumer seam](2026-06-13-capability-seams.md): the **app package owns the composition**, the leaf `cordis.yml` owns only the **swappable choices** (which LLM adapter, which bash executor, model, prompt, persistence root).
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-agent-spine-demo`** ([packages/examples/agent-spine-demo](../../../../packages/examples/agent-spine-demo)) composes the providerless, executor-less, UI-less spine and forwards the loop's agent-list config. Its dependency on the concrete loop is intentional because this package composes the spine rather than extending it; swapping the loop means supplying another bundle.
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui-demo`**, **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-cli-demo`**, and **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-acp-demo`** bake in their process roles. TUI includes the full-screen UI and a pre-created `main`; Headless includes the one-shot driver and a pre-created `main`; ACP includes the bridge and no pre-created agent. All three include JSONL persistence and omit stdout loggers.
- **`start.ts` is gone.** Each app package exposes a bin; the `demo:*` scripts invoke it. Loader boot, `.env` loading, and fail-loud guards live in the shared [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-app-boot`](../../../../packages/ui/app-boot) package (unit-tested under the per-file coverage gate — see [share the app bins' boot glue](../simplification/2026-07-04-share-app-bin-boot-glue.md)); the thin self-executing entries are driven by keyless Loader-path tests.
- **Each leaf `cordis.yml` collapses** to backends, optional product tools, and one app entry carrying the app config. TUI and Headless route model/session choices onto a pre-created agent; ACP routes the initial provider/model onto its bridge.
- **`base.yml`, `base-core.yml`, and `acp-agent/acp-tail.yml` are retired** — the spine they shared now lives in `dsh-agent-spine-demo`.
`bash-local` and the LLM adapter stay **leaf choices**: the bundle ships `tool-bash` (the consumer schema), the leaf picks the executor implementation, so a sandboxed executor or replay adapter swaps in without touching the app.
### Amendment on implementation: `hmr` stays a leaf entry
The proposal listed `hmr` among the interactive app's baked-in front-door cluster. Validating against the code, baking `hmr` into the app package fights Cordis in two ways, so it ships as a **leaf `cordis.yml` entry** instead:
1. `@cordisjs/plugin-hmr` is a Loader-only, subprocess-only dev plugin — it requires the live `loader` service and its internal module access, so it can only run in the real `demo:*`/bin subprocess, never in the in-process unit/coverage tier.
2. The in-process test tier (vitest) cannot even *import* the vendored `hmr` module (its class-decorator `@Inject` form fails under Vite's transform), so a package whose `apply` statically imported it could never satisfy the per-file 100% coverage gate on its headline function.
Crucially, `hmr` is not a stdout-purity footgun: a stray entry in the ACP config does not corrupt JSON-RPC frames. Every shipped app omits a stdout console logger; the app or protocol driver alone owns stdout.
## Alternatives considered
### Why not keep the wiring in shared YAML includes?
The old `base*.yml`/`acp-tail.yml` includes already deduped the *config*, but a YAML include cannot **encapsulate** the front-door coupling — it can only describe it in a comment and trust every leaf to obey. It also cannot own a `bin`, so the boot glue stayed copied across three `start.ts` files. A package turns "the ACP app never logs to stdout" from a prose warning into a property of the artifact: there is no logger entry in the leaf to get wrong.
## Verification
- Example directories contain only their config, README, and tests: `start.ts`, the infrastructure preamble, and the shared YAML includes are gone.
- `demo:tui`, `demo:headless`, and `demo:acp` invoke the app-package bins.
- Each new package has a README and per-file 100% coverage; each app package also has a keyless real-Loader-path bin smoke that catches export-shape failures described in [postmortem 0001](../../../../docs/postmortem/0001-acp-default-export-drops-inject.md).
- The ACP replay suite boots through the app-package bin, so protocol wiring and assembled backend behavior cross the real Loader boundary.
## Consequences
- **The bare-plugin-tree pedagogy.** The spine lives behind a bundle, so seeing the whole tree means opening `dsh-agent-spine-demo`. The app package's README carries that teaching weight.
- **A layer of indirection.** "What does this demo load?" becomes a package read, not a single YAML scan.
## Related
- Supersedes [Make the shared example base providerless](../../rejected/architecture/2026-06-20-providerless-example-base.md): renaming `base.yml` to the providerless core is moot once the spine moves into `dsh-agent-spine-demo` and the `base*.yml` files are deleted.
- Builds on the [capability-seams](2026-06-13-capability-seams.md) interface/implementation/consumer split — backends and presentation stay leaf choices; the spine is the shared bundle.
- Complements [Reorganize packages into a modular hierarchy](2026-06-20-package-hierarchy.md): the new app/core packages slot into existing groups under that hierarchy (`core` for the reusable spine bundle, `ui` for the app-specific front doors).
- The later [redundant-agent removal](../simplification/2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.md) owns the final TUI/Headless split and removes the line-oriented and mock-only leaves.

View File

@@ -1,57 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 将示例应用提取为独立包
Status: implemented
[English](2026-06-20-extract-example-app-packages.md) | 中文
## 问题
示例目录本应是*精简的*——只包含演示的可变接线,而非演示的基础设施。在此次变更之前,它是臃肿的。每个示例都携带一份手写的 `start.ts` 启动引导、一段基础设施前导(`timer`,以及 stdio 演示所需的 `logger` + `hmr`(热模块替换))、三个共享 YAML 片段的嵌套引用(`base.yml` / `base-core.yml` / `acp-agent/acp-tail.yml`),还有各示例自身的 `agent-loop`/持久化/系统提示词配置。真正的应用——每个 agent智能体都需要的服务主干——散落在叶子配置和那些 include 中。
叶子配置还拥有耦合的前门。ACPAgent Client Protocol要求 stdout 纯净,并通过 `session/new` 创建 agent终端应用和 Headless 应用则预创建 `main`,但进程 I/O 契约不同。防止错误组合的唯一屏障是文档中的文字警告,而三个 `start.ts` 文件重复着 Loader 引导和生命周期代码。
## 决策
每个示例现在**主要是对一个应用包package的调用**,沿着既有的[接口 / 实现 / 消费方 seam](2026-06-13-capability-seams.md) 拆分接线:**应用包拥有组合**,叶子 `cordis.yml` 只拥有**可替换的选择**(哪个 LLM大语言模型适配器、哪个 bash 执行器、模型、提示词、持久化根目录)。
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-agent-spine-demo`**[packages/examples/agent-spine-demo](../../../../packages/examples/agent-spine-demo))组合了不含提供方、不含执行器、不含 UI 的主干,并转发 agent loop智能体循环的 agent 列表配置。它对具体 loop 的依赖是有意为之,因为该包组合的是主干而非扩展主干;替换 loop 意味着提供另一个 bundle。
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui-demo`**、**`@deepseek-ai/dsh-cli-demo`** 和 **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-acp-demo`** 各自内置其进程角色。TUI 包含全屏 UI 和预创建的 `main`Headless 包含 one-shot driver 和预创建的 `main`ACP 包含 bridge 且不预创建 agent。三者都包含 JSONL 持久化,并省略 stdout logger。
- **`start.ts` 已移除。** 每个应用包都暴露一个 bin`demo:*` 脚本调用它。Loader 引导、`.env` 加载和快速失败守卫位于共享的 [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-app-boot`](../../../../packages/ui/app-boot) 包(在逐文件覆盖率门禁下有单元测试——见[共享应用 bin 的启动胶水](../simplification/2026-07-04-share-app-bin-boot-glue.md));精简的自执行入口由 keyless 的 Loader 路径测试驱动。
- **每个叶子 `cordis.yml` 精简为**后端、可选产品工具,以及一个承载应用配置的 app 条目。TUI 和 Headless 把模型/会话选择路由到预创建的 agentACP 把初始提供方/模型路由到 bridge。
- **`base.yml``base-core.yml``acp-agent/acp-tail.yml` 已退役**——它们共享的主干现在位于 `dsh-agent-spine-demo` 中。
`bash-local` 和 LLM 适配器仍然是**叶子选择**bundle 提供 `tool-bash`(消费方 schema叶子选择执行器实现因此沙箱执行器或回放适配器无需触碰应用即可替换。
### 实现修正:`hmr` 保留为叶子条目
提案最初将 `hmr` 列入交互式应用内置的前门集群。对照代码验证后发现,将 `hmr` 内置到应用包中会在两个方面与 Cordis 冲突,因此改为作为**叶子 `cordis.yml` 条目**交付:
1. `@cordisjs/plugin-hmr` 是一个仅限 Loader、仅限子进程的开发插件——它需要活跃的 `loader` 服务及其内部模块访问权限,因此只能在真实的 `demo:*`/bin 子进程中运行,不能在进程内的单元/覆盖率测试层运行。
2. 进程内测试层vitest甚至无法*导入* vendor 的 `hmr` 模块(其 class-decorator `@Inject` 形式在 Vite 的 transform 下会失败),因此一个 `apply` 静态导入了它的包永远无法满足其主函数的逐文件 100% 覆盖率门禁。
关键在于,`hmr` 不是 stdout 纯净隐患ACP 配置中误加该条目不会破坏 JSON-RPC 帧。所有已交付应用都省略 stdout 控制台 loggerstdout 只归应用或协议 driver 所有。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
### 为什么不继续用共享 YAML include 来管理接线?
旧的 `base*.yml`/`acp-tail.yml` include 已经去重了*配置*,但 YAML include 无法**封装**前门耦合——它只能在注释中描述,并信任每个叶子遵守。它也无法拥有 `bin`,因此启动胶水一直在三个 `start.ts` 文件中重复。包将「ACP 应用绝不向 stdout 输出日志」从文字警告变成了产物的属性:叶子中不存在可以写错的 logger 条目。
## 验证
- 示例目录只包含配置、README 和测试:`start.ts`、基础设施前导和共享 YAML include 已移除。
- `demo:tui``demo:headless``demo:acp` 调用应用包的 bin。
- 每个新包都有 README 和逐文件 100% 覆盖率;每个应用包还有一个 keyless 的真实 Loader 路径 bin 冒烟测试,用于捕获[事后分析 0001](../../../../docs/postmortem/0001-acp-default-export-drops-inject.md) 中描述的导出形状故障。
- ACP 回放套件通过应用包的 bin 启动,因此协议接线与组装后的后端行为都跨越真实的 Loader 边界。
## 后果
- **裸插件树的教学性。** 主干现在隐藏在 bundle 之后,查看完整树意味着打开 `dsh-agent-spine-demo`。应用包的 README 承担了这份教学职责。
- **多了一层间接。**「这个演示加载了什么?」从扫描单个 YAML 变成了阅读一个包。
## 相关
- 取代[使共享示例基础配置与提供方无关](../../rejected/architecture/2026-06-20-providerless-example-base.md):一旦主干移入 `dsh-agent-spine-demo``base*.yml` 文件被删除,将 `base.yml` 重命名为无提供方核心便不再有意义。
- 基于[能力 seam](2026-06-13-capability-seams.md)的接口/实现/消费方拆分——后端和展示层保持为叶子选择;主干是共享 bundle。
- 与[将包重组为模块化层级结构](2026-06-20-package-hierarchy.md)互补:新的 app/core 包按该层级结构归入既有分组(`core` 放可复用的主干 bundle`ui` 放应用特有的前门)。
- 后续的[冗余 agent 移除](../simplification/2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.md)拥有最终的 TUI/Headless 拆分,并移除行式与仅 mock 的叶子。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md: 0b901fcf928b900bd3a32f911e6e54a6a98076e2
2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.zh.md: e2860e3a91c06ec5110cd671b288e35c5d117f5d
2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md: 313d687b49da0d08b0ec321bcb655b642f7a5af3
2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.zh.md: 6be129b7b16ff01d73dc94f7ce6d299ee2c10e55

View File

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ The `tasks/` package group owns background-task semantics:
Long-running tools are producers. `dsh-tool-bash` adapts a `BashProcess` into incremental output and process cancellation; `dsh-tool-subagent` adapts a child run into final output and child disposal. The execution seams remain independent of sessions and the task registry.
`TaskService` is a concrete, process-local service. TODO(task-service-backend): separate its public contract from the implementation when a second backend defines the required lifecycle; a systemd-backed runtime is one plausible driver, but this PR does not speculate about its durability, reconnect, ownership, or observation semantics.
`TaskService` is the abstract seam in `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks`; the process-local registry is `LocalTaskService` in `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local` (the [task-registry seam Agent Note](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md) records that split).
## Runtime contract
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ Separate bash and subagent output/stop tools duplicate ids, isolation, cleanup,
### An immediate abstract task-runtime backend
The current `TaskStart.run()` contract passes in-process callbacks and exact `Agent` objects. A durable backend changes identity, restart, ownership, and observation semantics, so extracting an interface before a second implementation exists would freeze the wrong boundary.
The current `TaskStart.run()` contract passes in-process callbacks and exact `Agent` objects. A durable backend changes identity, restart, ownership, and observation semantics, so at introduction time the registry stayed one concrete service rather than freezing the wrong boundary. The [task-registry seam Agent Note](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md) later separated the contract from the process-local implementation without changing these in-process semantics.
### Consumer-owned authorization or cleanup events

View File

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Status: implemented
长时间运行工具是生产方。`dsh-tool-bash``BashProcess` 适配为增量输出与进程取消;`dsh-tool-subagent` 将子运行适配为最终输出与子运行释放。执行 seam 保持独立,不依赖会话或任务注册表。
`TaskService`一个具体的进程内服务。TODO(task-service-backend)当第二个后端明确所需生命周期后将其公共契约与实现分离systemd 驱动的运行时是一种可能方案,但本 PRPull Request不臆测其持久性、重连、所有权或观察语义
`TaskService` `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks` 中的抽象 seam进程内注册表是 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local` 中的 `LocalTaskService`(该拆分记录在[任务注册表 seam Agent Note](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md)中)
## 运行时契约
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ bash seam 暴露 `resolve`、`run` 和 `start`。`start(spec)` 返回一个 `Bas
### 立即抽象任务运行时后端
当前 `TaskStart.run()` 契约传入进程内回调与确切的 `Agent` 对象。持久化后端会改变身份、重启、所有权与观察语义,因此在第二种实现出现前抽取接口,会固化错误的边界
当前 `TaskStart.run()` 契约传入进程内回调与确切的 `Agent` 对象。持久化后端会改变身份、重启、所有权与观察语义,因此在引入之时注册表保持为单一具体服务,而非固化错误的边界。[任务注册表 seam Agent Note](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md)后来在不改变这些进程内语义的前提下,将契约与进程内实现分离
### 由消费方负责授权或清理事件

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-24-web-capability-seam.md: 4f4e821fec9494fe9ea96894267707d9dd202e4d
2026-06-24-web-capability-seam.zh.md: d7c07a8ae0365c321120102a0af401d85d7e2eae
2026-06-24-web-capability-seam.md: b705236690859961ed69b307dbb59ebefcbd65ac
2026-06-24-web-capability-seam.zh.md: 9b6899c922524350d2eee62140480fd76a450baa

View File

@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Search and fetch are separate tools but one web-access seam. `ctx.web` owns prov
This keeps the model schema stable without making plugin load order, credential state, or HMR timing part of the model-facing contract. If web search is enabled but no usable search provider exists, `web_search` remains visible and execution fails with a structured `WebError` such as `WEB_PROVIDER_UNAVAILABLE` or `WEB_PROVIDER_CONFIGURED_UNAVAILABLE`. If a provider appears after `dsh-tool-web`, the next execution can use it without changing the schema. If a provider disappears mid-call, execution fails with a structured `WebError` instead of silently choosing another provider or falling through to `UNKNOWN_TOOL`.
The seam deliberately exposes no observation surface — no registry-change event and no aggregated capability-status query. Unavailability is a fact a caller observes by executing: `search()`/`fetch()` resolve the provider at call time and throw the structured `WebError` that names what failed. [The observation-surface Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-04-drop-unconsumed-web-observation-surface.md) records that judgment: derived-on-call selection and enablement-based registration leave no consumer that needs a change signal or an availability probe distinct from executing and routing the error, and a future provider-status panel reintroduces the smallest signal or query it actually consumes.
The seam deliberately exposes no observation surface — no registry-change event and no aggregated capability-status query. Unavailability is a fact a caller observes by executing: `search()`/`fetch()` resolve the provider at call time and throw the structured `WebError` that names what failed. [The observation-surface Agent Note](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-drop-unconsumed-web-observation-surface.md) records that judgment: derived-on-call selection and enablement-based registration leave no consumer that needs a change signal or an availability probe distinct from executing and routing the error, and a future provider-status panel reintroduces the smallest signal or query it actually consumes.
## Package topology

View File

@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Web 访问是一个一等能力 seam遵循[能力 seam Agent Note](2026-06-13
这使模型 schema 保持稳定,而不将插件加载顺序、凭证状态或 HMR热模块替换时序纳入面向模型的契约。如果 web 搜索已启用但不存在可用的搜索提供方,`web_search` 仍然可见,执行时以结构化的 `WebError`(如 `WEB_PROVIDER_UNAVAILABLE``WEB_PROVIDER_CONFIGURED_UNAVAILABLE`)失败。如果某个提供方在 `dsh-tool-web` 之后出现,下一次执行即可使用它而无需更改 schema。如果某个提供方在调用过程中消失执行以结构化的 `WebError` 失败,而不是静默选择另一个提供方或回退到 `UNKNOWN_TOOL`
该 seam 刻意不暴露任何观察面——没有注册表变更事件,也没有聚合的能力状态查询。不可用性是调用方通过执行观察到的事实:`search()`/`fetch()` 在调用时解析提供方,并抛出命名了失败原因的结构化 `WebError`。[观察面 Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-04-drop-unconsumed-web-observation-surface.md) 记录了这一判断:基于调用的派生选择与基于启用的注册使得没有消费方需要变更信号或独立于执行和错误路由的可用性探测;未来的提供方状态面板会重新引入它实际消费的最小信号或查询。
该 seam 刻意不暴露任何观察面——没有注册表变更事件,也没有聚合的能力状态查询。不可用性是调用方通过执行观察到的事实:`search()`/`fetch()` 在调用时解析提供方,并抛出命名了失败原因的结构化 `WebError`。[观察面 Agent Note](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-drop-unconsumed-web-observation-surface.md) 记录了这一判断:基于调用的派生选择与基于启用的注册使得没有消费方需要变更信号或独立于执行和错误路由的可用性探测;未来的提供方状态面板会重新引入它实际消费的最小信号或查询。
## 包拓扑

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-30-event-domain-semantics.md: 1f3452cce0235718c35d71577d7013f3e647648c
2026-06-30-event-domain-semantics.zh.md: ec2da7786e80fb6a0df9ff338d77a50e7b3ef569
2026-06-30-event-domain-semantics.md: 75c1cac11d1bfc9aa7fba9c523eab8c0475027e8
2026-06-30-event-domain-semantics.zh.md: a412b8735b72274252473f3218e0d57d4f814bde

View File

@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ This vocabulary is the foundation for interception decisions, the durable `hook/
- The loop no longer emits any boundary mirror; `closeStep` appends `step/end` only and `closeTurn` appends `turn/end` only. `Session.append` owns post-commit observer containment, so a throwing boundary observer cannot change the turn outcome or starve later consumers; an acceptance or internal validation failure still escapes before the boundary enters the log.
- Tests that observed boundaries via the removed emits now observe the durable `turn/start`/`turn/end`/`step/start`/`step/end` session events — the behavior they pin (boundary ordering, step counting) is unchanged; only the feed they read moved to the canonical one. The tests that exercised a *throwing turn-boundary emit listener* were deleted, because that code path no longer exists (there is no emit to throw from). Per [AGENTS.md "tests document behavior, not golden truth"](../../../../AGENTS.md), the behavior and its test moved (or died) together.
- The loop marks the step open (`stepOpen = true`) only after `append('step/start')` returns. Internal dispatch validation runs before the log push and may reject without opening a step; post-commit `session/event` observer failures are contained inside `Session.append`. The marker therefore represents exactly the committed boundary that owes a later `step/end`.
- The full realization of this is [the simplification Agent Note "Stop mirroring durable boundaries as agent events"](../simplification/2026-06-20-remove-agent-boundary-mirror-events.md): all four boundary mirrors are removed and every consumer reads boundaries off `session/event`. `agent/steering` (not a boundary mirror) stayed outside that Agent Note's scope and was removed by its own follow-up, [Remove the `agent/steering` mirror emit](../simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md) — it mirrored the durable `steering/message`.
- The full realization of this is [the simplification Agent Note "Stop mirroring durable boundaries as agent events"](../simplification/2026-06-20-remove-agent-boundary-mirror-events.md): all four boundary mirrors are removed and every consumer reads boundaries off `session/event`. `agent/steering` (not a boundary mirror) stayed outside that Agent Note's scope and was removed by its own follow-up, [Remove the `agent/steering` mirror emit](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md) — it mirrored the durable `steering/message`.
- The cordis events catalog (`docs/cordis-catalog/events.md`) is regenerated to drop the mirror events.
<!-- agent-note-format: alternatives-not-recorded (pre-format Agent Note) -->

View File

@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ harness 通过 Cordis 事件分类体系扩展 agent loop智能体循环
- 循环不再 emit 任何边界镜像;`closeStep` 仅追加 `step/end``closeTurn` 仅追加 `turn/end``Session.append` 负责 post-commit observer 隔离,因此抛出异常的边界 observer 无法改变轮次结果或饿死后续消费方;接受或内部校验失败仍会在边界进入日志之前逃逸。
- 之前通过已移除 emit 观察边界的测试,现在观察持久的 `turn/start`/`turn/end`/`step/start`/`step/end` 会话事件——它们固定的行为(边界顺序、步骤计数)不变;只是读取的源移到了规范源。那些测试*抛出异常的轮次边界 emit 监听器*的用例被删除,因为该代码路径不再存在(没有 emit 可供抛出)。按照 [AGENTS.md「测试记录行为而非黄金真相」](../../../../AGENTS.md),行为与其测试一同迁移(或一同消亡)。
- 循环仅在 `append('step/start')` 返回后才标记步骤已打开(`stepOpen = true`。内部分发校验在日志推入之前运行可能在不打开步骤的情况下拒绝post-commit `session/event` observer 的失败被隔离在 `Session.append` 内部。因此该标记精确表示已提交的、欠一个后续 `step/end` 的边界。
- 完整实现见[简化 Agent Note「停止将持久边界镜像为 agent 事件」](../simplification/2026-06-20-remove-agent-boundary-mirror-events.md):全部四个边界镜像被移除,所有消费方从 `session/event` 读取边界。`agent/steering`(不是边界镜像)不在该 Agent Note 范围内,由其后续 Agent Note [移除 `agent/steering` 镜像 emit](../simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md) 单独移除——它镜像的是持久的 `steering/message`
- 完整实现见[简化 Agent Note「停止将持久边界镜像为 agent 事件」](../simplification/2026-06-20-remove-agent-boundary-mirror-events.md):全部四个边界镜像被移除,所有消费方从 `session/event` 读取边界。`agent/steering`(不是边界镜像)不在该 Agent Note 范围内,由其后续 Agent Note [移除 `agent/steering` 镜像 emit](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md) 单独移除——它镜像的是持久的 `steering/message`
- Cordis 事件目录(`docs/cordis-catalog/events.md`)重新生成以移除镜像事件。
<!-- agent-note-format: alternatives-not-recorded (pre-format Agent Note) -->

View File

@@ -1,53 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Add direct directory listing to the filesystem seam
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.zh.md)
## Problem
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs` is the provider seam for filesystem access, with local and future non-local backends behind the same `ctx.fs` contract. Before this change it could resolve paths, stat targets, read text, stream text, write text, and edit text. That was enough for model-facing file tools, but not for non-model-facing consumers that need to enumerate directories without importing `node:fs`.
The immediate pressure came from skill loading: reading an individual `SKILL.md` can already go through `ctx.get('fs')`, but discovering which skill roots contain `<name>/SKILL.md` or `<name>.md` still needs directory enumeration. Adding directory listing only in `dsh-skill` would either keep a direct Node dependency there or invent a one-off local helper outside the filesystem provider stack.
This decision adds the provider capability without a model-facing `ls`/`list` tool or skill-discovery change. Those consumers require separate UX, prompt, and policy decisions.
## Decision
Add `FileSystem.listDir(target, signal?)` to `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs`.
`listDir` lists one directory level only. It returns direct children in stable name order and includes:
- `name`: the child basename.
- `type`: `file`, `directory`, or `other`.
- `target`: the resolved child `FsTarget`.
- `version`: cheap metadata when available.
- `size`: regular-file size when available.
It never reads file contents. Recursive traversal, globbing, pagination, search, file watching, and model-facing rendering are intentionally out of scope.
The local backend implements this through `readdir({ withFileTypes: true })`, `resolveLocalTarget`, and metadata `stat`/`realpath` probes. The result order is deterministic (`name.localeCompare`) to keep prompt/listing output stable for future consumers and improve prefix-cache reuse.
Broken or disappeared children may be represented as `type: 'other'` without `version`/`size`; they do not abort the whole listing. Permission or backend I/O failures while listing the directory or resolving/probing child metadata fail the whole listing with structured `FsError` codes:
- `FS_NOT_FOUND` for missing targets.
- `FS_NOT_DIRECTORY` for existing non-directory targets.
- `FS_PERMISSION_DENIED` for permission failures.
- `FS_IO_ERROR` for other backend I/O failures.
- `FS_ABORTED` for aborted calls.
## Alternatives considered
**Add a model-facing list tool with the seam.** Rejected because its prompt, schema, and rendering contracts are independent of the provider primitive.
**Keep directory enumeration in each consumer.** Rejected. That would bind product packages such as `dsh-skill` to Node/local filesystem behavior and bypass policy/remote/sandboxed backends.
**Make `listDir` recursive or glob-shaped.** Rejected for now. Skill-root discovery only needs direct children, and a simple direct listing is the smallest backend contract future consumers can safely compose.
**Skip children that fail metadata resolution.** Rejected. The API promises resolved child targets, so permission/IO failures while resolving a child are contract failures. Broken or disappeared children are the exception because they can still be represented without claiming a live resolved file.
## Consequences
Every filesystem backend must now implement one additional provider primitive. That is deliberate foundation work while the harness is still unreleased, but it does mean future sandboxed/remote backends need to define equivalent direct-child listing behavior.
The capability remains provider-facing. Until a consumer lands, ACP/model sessions will still need existing tools such as `bash` for directory listing. The absence of a model-facing `listdir` tool is expected, not a wiring failure.

View File

@@ -1,53 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 为文件系统 seam 添加直接目录列举能力
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md) | 中文
## 问题
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs` 是文件系统访问的提供方 seam本地后端与未来的非本地后端共享同一个 `ctx.fs` 契约。在本次变更之前它能解析路径、stat 目标、读取文本、流式读取文本、写入文本和编辑文本。这对面向模型的文件工具已经足够,但对于需要枚举目录而又不想直接导入 `node:fs` 的非模型侧消费方来说还不够。
直接的压力来自 skill技能加载读取单个 `SKILL.md` 已经可以走 `ctx.get('fs')`,但发现哪些 skill 根目录包含 `<name>/SKILL.md``<name>.md` 仍需要目录枚举。如果仅在 `dsh-skill` 中添加目录列举,要么保留对 Node 的直接依赖,要么在文件系统提供方栈之外发明一个一次性的本地辅助函数。
本决策只添加提供方能力,不涉及面向模型的 `ls`/`list` 工具或 skill 发现机制的变更。那些消费方需要独立的 UX、提示词与策略决策。
## 决策
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs` 中添加 `FileSystem.listDir(target, signal?)`
`listDir` 仅列举一层目录。它以稳定的名称顺序返回直接子项,包含以下字段:
- `name`:子项的 basename
- `type``file``directory``other`
- `target`:已解析的子项 `FsTarget`
- `version`:可用时返回的轻量元数据;
- `size`:可用时返回的常规文件大小。
它从不读取文件内容。递归遍历、glob 匹配、分页、搜索、文件监听和面向模型的渲染均有意不在范围内。
本地后端通过 `readdir({ withFileTypes: true })``resolveLocalTarget` 以及元数据 `stat`/`realpath` 探测来实现。结果顺序是确定性的(`name.localeCompare`),以保持未来消费方的提示词/列表输出稳定,并提高前缀缓存复用率。
损坏或已消失的子项可以表示为 `type: 'other'`(不带 `version`/`size`);它们不会中止整个列举。在列举目录或解析/探测子项元数据时遇到权限或后端 I/O 故障,则以结构化的 `FsError` 错误码使整个列举失败:
- `FS_NOT_FOUND`:目标不存在;
- `FS_NOT_DIRECTORY`:目标存在但不是目录;
- `FS_PERMISSION_DENIED`:权限不足;
- `FS_IO_ERROR`:其他后端 I/O 故障;
- `FS_ABORTED`:调用被中止。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**在添加 seam 的同时添加面向模型的 list 工具。** 否决。其提示词、schema 和渲染契约与提供方原语相互独立。
**让每个消费方自行枚举目录。** 否决。这会将 `dsh-skill` 等产品包绑定到 Node/本地文件系统行为上,绕过策略/远程/沙箱后端。
**让 `listDir` 支持递归或 glob 形式。** 暂时否决。skill 根发现只需要直接子项,而简单的单层列举是未来消费方可以安全组合的最小后端契约。
**跳过元数据解析失败的子项。** 否决。API 承诺返回已解析的子项 target因此解析子项时的权限/IO 故障属于契约失败。损坏或已消失的子项是例外,因为它们仍可在不声称拥有一个活跃已解析文件的前提下被表示。
## 后果
每个文件系统后端现在必须多实现一个提供方原语。这是 harness 尚未发布时有意为之的基础工作,但也意味着未来的沙箱/远程后端需要定义等价的直接子项列举行为。
该能力仍停留在提供方层面。在消费方落地之前ACPAgent Client Protocol/模型会话仍需使用 `bash` 等既有工具来列举目录。缺少面向模型的 `listdir` 工具是预期行为,而非接线错误。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md: bf0ae468c4783b73e2dbd0e1bc50b9bd2f50cb3f
2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.zh.md: 17913d2636e3ee5e5ae69f9c554935ba861d14d9
2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md: 12128d9e57601d0b85d20d1cb4240bb08eadc3cb
2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.zh.md: 177d90f7116f7451b8e3c4ccf7d1577ff12ae701

View File

@@ -41,6 +41,6 @@ Internally, `wakeup` is the “should the model run” signal, so the inbox dist
## Related
- [one-send-one-turn](../simplification/2026-07-17-one-send-one-turn.md) — the one-claimed-message-per-turn rule this builds on.
- [remove-agent-steering-mirror](../simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md) — the precedent for collapsing a mirrored live event.
- [remove-agent-steering-mirror](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md) — the precedent for collapsing a mirrored live event.
- [explicit-turn-cancellation](2026-07-16-explicit-turn-cancellation.md) — the cancel-cause signal `keepInbox` extends.
- [intent-named-agent-delivery](2026-07-24-intent-named-agent-delivery.md) — the public helpers and fully resolved acceptance interface.

View File

@@ -41,6 +41,6 @@ agent 的对外驱动接口逐渐长出三个近乎平行的动词——`send`
## 相关
- [one-send-one-turn](../simplification/2026-07-17-one-send-one-turn.md)——本决策所依托的“每轮次只认领一条消息”规则。
- [remove-agent-steering-mirror](../simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md)——折叠镜像实时事件的先例。
- [remove-agent-steering-mirror](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md)——折叠镜像实时事件的先例。
- [explicit-turn-cancellation](2026-07-16-explicit-turn-cancellation.md)——`keepInbox` 所扩展的取消原因信号。
- [intent-named-agent-delivery](2026-07-24-intent-named-agent-delivery.md)——公开辅助方法以及接受完全解析输入的接口。

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Unified session query service
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-23-unified-session-query-service.zh.md)
## Problem
Exact reads, semantic filters, relationship traces, and full-text search operate on the same live-preferred session corpus. Exposing full-text search under a second context key makes consumers and app compositions treat one capability as two services, even though the SQLite implementation is the only backend-specific part.
The interface package already owns the shared record, filter, trace, search-request, cursor, and error contracts. A provider registry or coordinator would add runtime selection semantics unsupported by any current consumer.
## Decision
`SessionQueryService` is the single abstract service registered as `ctx.sessionQuery`. It concretely implements listing, title and event reads, surface reads, filtering, and relationship tracing through its backend-independent `SessionCorpus`. Its only abstract methods are `searchSessions()` and `searchEvents()`.
`SessionQuerySqlite` extends that service and is the sole concrete backend. One mounted instance therefore exposes every operation through `ctx.sessionQuery`; its inherited exact operations use the shared corpus implementation, while its SQLite-owned lifecycle observes sources, reconciles the derived FTS index, ranks matches, and owns cursor generations. The interface package has no standalone concrete plugin, search-provider registry, or second context key.
SQLite reconciliation is one quiescent serialized state machine. It passes the caller's exact abort signal into durable snapshot listing and inspection, awaits each started backend operation itself, and checks cancellation after every await and before starting the next source or index operation. Cancellation therefore cannot release the serializer while an ignored or cooperative backend call is still cleaning up, and it cannot start a subsequent listing, inspection, reconciliation, or query after the signal is observed.
Backend configuration includes the inherited `readWindowMax` setting alongside its own index path, journal mode, page limits, and snippet limit. First-party apps that need session queries mount the SQLite backend and place its disposable index beside their configured persistence root.
This service topology supersedes the separate-key portion of the [exact query decision](../feature/2026-07-10-session-query-service.md) and [SQLite search decision](../feature/2026-07-10-sqlite-session-query-provider.md); their corpus, query, tokenizer, reconciliation, and safety decisions remain in force.
## Alternatives considered
- **Keep `ctx.sessionQuery` and `ctx.sessionSearch` separate** — rejected because both expose operations over one logical corpus, force consumers to discover two keys, and let apps accidentally mount only a partial query surface.
- **Keep a concrete base service and let the SQLite plugin register or mutate two search methods** — rejected because method availability would depend on plugin order and teardown, and the service would need a provider registration protocol for one implementation.
- **Move every query implementation into the SQLite package** — rejected because exact reads, filters, and traces require no index and are shared behavior that belongs with their provider-independent contracts.
## Consequences
Consumers inject one service and can combine exact and full-text operations without a second capability lookup. A production composition must choose a concrete backend even when one consumer currently calls only inherited exact methods; tests may use a minimal subclass when backend behavior is outside their scope.
The unified object deliberately retains two internal observation strategies: exact operations read authoritative live/persisted sources per call, while full-text operations reconcile a disposable index. Sharing the context key does not make the derived index authoritative or couple exact-read availability to an FTS query.
Queued cancellation remains prompt. Cancellation during active asynchronous source observation waits for that started operation to settle, which makes rejection a quiescence boundary and preserves single-file execution for a following search. Synchronous SQLite statements remain non-preemptible and are bracketed by signal checks.
Unit coverage pins inherited and abstract behavior on one key, SQLite coverage exercises both operation families on the concrete backend, and the real Loader path verifies that one exported plugin registers the combined service.

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 统一会话查询服务
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-23-unified-session-query-service.md) | 中文
## 问题
精确读取、语义过滤、关系追踪与全文搜索都作用于同一个实时源优先的会话语料库。将全文搜索暴露在第二个上下文键下,会让消费方与应用组合把同一项查询功能视为两个服务,尽管只有 SQLite 实现是后端特有的部分。
接口包已经拥有共享的记录、过滤、追踪、搜索请求、游标与错误契约。提供方注册表或协调器会引入运行时选择语义,而目前没有任何消费方支持这种语义。
## 决策
`SessionQueryService` 是注册为 `ctx.sessionQuery` 的唯一抽象服务。它通过后端无关的 `SessionCorpus` 具体实现列表查询、标题与事件读取、表层读取、过滤和关系追踪。仅有 `searchSessions()``searchEvents()` 两个方法为抽象方法。
`SessionQuerySqlite` 扩展该服务,并且是唯一的具体后端。因此,一个挂载实例便可通过 `ctx.sessionQuery` 暴露全部操作;其继承的精确操作使用共享的语料库实现,而由 SQLite 管理的生命周期负责观察数据源、对齐派生 FTS 索引、对匹配项排序并管理游标代际。接口包不提供独立的具体插件、搜索提供方注册表或第二个上下文键。
SQLite 的对齐过程是一个具备静止性保证的串行状态机。它将调用方的原始中止信号传给持久化快照列表与检查操作,直接等待每个已经启动的后端操作,并在每次等待后以及启动下一个数据源或索引操作前检查是否已取消。因此,即使后端忽略取消或正在配合清理,串行器也不会提前释放;观察到中止信号后,也不会再启动后续的列表、检查、对齐或查询操作。
后端配置除了自身的索引路径、日志模式、分页限制与文本片段长度上限外,还包含继承的 `readWindowMax` 设置。需要会话查询的第一方应用挂载 SQLite 后端,并将其可丢弃索引放在已配置的持久化根目录旁。
这一服务拓扑取代了[精确查询决策](../feature/2026-07-10-session-query-service.md)和 [SQLite 搜索决策](../feature/2026-07-10-sqlite-session-query-provider.md)中关于分离上下文键的部分;其中关于语料库、查询、分词器、对齐与安全性的决策仍然有效。
## 已考虑的替代方案
- **保留相互独立的 `ctx.sessionQuery``ctx.sessionSearch`**:不予采纳,因为二者都针对同一逻辑语料库提供操作,迫使消费方识别两个键,还可能让应用误挂载一组不完整的查询接口。
- **保留具体的基础服务,再由 SQLite 插件注册或修改两个搜索方法**:不予采纳,因为方法是否可用将取决于插件顺序与资源释放时机,而且该服务需要为唯一的实现定义一套提供方注册协议。
- **将所有查询实现移入 SQLite 包**:不予采纳,因为精确读取、过滤与追踪不需要索引,并且都属于应与提供方无关契约放在一起的共享行为。
## 后果
消费方只需注入一个服务,无需再次查找其他功能,便可组合精确操作与全文操作。生产环境的组合必须选择一个具体后端,即使当前某个消费方只调用继承的精确方法;如果后端行为不在测试范围内,测试可以使用最小子类。
统一后的对象有意保留两种内部观察策略:精确操作在每次调用时读取权威的实时源或持久化源,全文操作则使可丢弃索引与数据源对齐。共用上下文键不会让派生索引成为权威来源,也不会使精确读取的可用性依赖 FTS 查询。
排队阶段的取消仍会及时生效。在异步数据源观察已经开始后取消时,调用方会等待该操作完成清理后才收到拒绝;因此拒绝本身构成静止边界,并保证后续搜索仍按单一串行流程执行。同步 SQLite 语句无法在执行中被抢占,服务会在其前后检查中止信号。
单元测试在同一个键上同时固定继承实现与抽象方法的契约SQLite 测试在具体后端上覆盖两类操作,真实 Loader 路径则验证单个导出的插件能够注册组合后的服务。

View File

@@ -1,53 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Parse `dsh` argv through one Commander adapter
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-24-dsh-commander-argument-adapter.zh.md)
## Problem
The `dsh` CLI entry (`apps/cli`) parsed argv in three hand-rolled idioms that did not compose and gave no `--help`/`--version`. `bin.ts` dispatched by raw inspection — `argv[0] === 'web'`, then `argv.includes('-p') || argv.includes('--prompt')`, else TUI — which is positional-blind: a prompt flag or a config path in the wrong position could misroute the mode, and `argv.includes('-p')` could not tell a real flag from an incidental token. `headless.ts` and `web.ts` each ran their own `node:util` `parseArgs` with inline host/port validation, and `dsh-app-boot` carried `parseResumeArg`, a ~30-line bespoke scanner reimplementing flag/`=`-form/value/repeat handling for `--resume`. Usage was a single hardcoded `usage: dsh -p "task"` line; there was no version flag and no rendered help.
## Decision
Argv is parsed once, in `apps/cli/src/args.ts`, through a Commander adapter (the same parser the SDK bins — `create-sdk`, `dsh-scripts` — already standardize on). `parseDshArgs(argv, version)` returns a discriminated `DshInvocation` union of the three real modes: `{ mode: 'tui', config?, resume? }`, `{ mode: 'headless', prompt }`, or `{ mode: 'web', host?, port?, dev }`. It does **not** model help/version/errors as data: Commander owns those, printing usage or the diagnostic and exiting at the point of failure. `exitOverride()` turns each into a thrown `CommanderError` carrying the intended code (0 for help/version, 1 for a parse or domain error), which one `try/catch` in `parseDshArgs` turns into `process.exit`.
`bin.ts` calls the adapter once and switches on `mode` (closed union, `satisfies never` default), dynamic-importing only the chosen mode's module; only a valid, non-help invocation reaches the switch, so it has no help/version/error cases. Each mode module consumes already-parsed values: `runTui(config, resume)`, `runHeadless(task)`, `runWeb(host, port, dev, workspaceRoot)` — none re-reads argv. It is **one Commander program**: the default surface (no subcommand) carries option-only flags — `--config <path>`, `-p/--prompt <task>`, `--resume <id>` — and `web` is a real `program.command('web')` subcommand. The default surface takes no positional argument, which is what lets `web` be a real subcommand without a positional collision, so `dsh --help` lists `web` natively (no hand-pasted command text). The default action and the `web` action set the resolved mode, then bail via `command.error(...)` (print + exit 1) on the domain checks Commander cannot express: `--prompt` selects headless and rejects an empty task or a `--config`/`--resume` alongside it rather than silently dropping a TUI input; an empty `--resume=` id fails loud (agent-loop treats `''` as no-resume). Commander parses the default-surface options on either side of the `web` token into `program.opts()`; since `web` shares none of them, the `web` action rejects a leaked `--config`/`-p`/`--resume` (`dsh web -p x`, `dsh --config c.yml web`) rather than silently serving and dropping it. `dsh web`'s `--host`/`--port` are unvalidated pass-through overrides: the adapter assigns no default and does no validation, only `Number`-coercing the port string (the schema wants a number). The `dsh-host-webserver` schemastery `Config` (`host` a `127.0.0.1`/`0.0.0.0` literal union, `port` a natural ≤ 65535) is the single source of both the default (the shipped `apps/cli/cordis.yml` `webserver` row stands when a flag is absent) and validity — `AppCLIEntry` patches an explicit flag straight into that row, so a bad host/port fails loud at the schema on boot, not at parse. `--dev` mounts the client HMR driver and bundle watch, and `--workspace-root <path>` is a plain pass-through to `AppCLIEntry` (the parent directory for name-created workspaces). A repeated `--resume`, or a following flag captured as a `--resume`/`--prompt` value, is Commander's standard behavior (last-wins / next-token) and is left alone; a bad id fails loud downstream when the session cannot load. `--version` reads this app's `package.json`.
`dsh` takes no positional argument. `--config <path>` names an alternate cordis tree to boot instead of the shipped default; it exists only so the demo/test call sites (`demo:cordis`, `demo:code-mode`, the keyless PTY smokes) can point the shipped bin at an example tree. A bare `dsh` boots the shipped tree plus the `~/.dsh/config.yaml` personal overlay; a real user never passes `--config`.
CLI parsing lives entirely in `apps/cli`. `dsh-app-boot` holds the boot/env/config/personal-overlay helpers and no argv scanner.
## Session resume through the boot context
`dsh --resume <id>` is the one way to resume a persisted session, with no environment variable. `runTui` provides the parsed id on the boot context through `boot`'s `prepare(ctx)` hook — `ctx.provide(RESUME_SESSION_ID_KEY, id)` (a `dsh-app-boot` export, value `'resumeSessionId'`) — and the shipped tui-agent/cordis configs read it as a bare identifier: `resumeSessionId: !!js "typeof resumeSessionId === 'string' ? resumeSessionId : undefined"`. The expression is quoted because YAML otherwise parses the `?`/`:` as a mapping; the `typeof` guard tolerates a launcher that never provides the slot. The `/resume` in-place handoff (`process.execve`) rebuilds its re-exec argv from the parsed values as `dsh --resume=<id> [--config <path>]`.
## One terminal front door: `dsh`
`dsh` is the only terminal entry point; the `dsh-tui-demo` package ships the TUI app bundle plugin the shipped config mounts, and no bin of its own. `demo:cordis`, `demo:code-mode`, and both the tui-agent and cordis-agent keyless PTY smokes launch through `apps/cli/src/bin.ts` with `--config <path>`. `dsh`'s TTY guard (refuse piped stdio before booting, pointing at `dsh -p` for automation) is pinned by `apps/cli/tests/built-bin.e2e.ts`, which runs the built `lib/bin.js` under plain Node with piped stdio (`apps/cli/tests` is in the e2e vitest include). `cli-demo`, `acp-demo`, and `jsonrpc-demo` keep their own bins because each is a distinct surface (headless, ACP, JSON-RPC) `dsh` does not provide.
## Package topology
The argument surface stays inside `apps/cli`, the assembly tier, not a `packages/*` library: it is this one app's routing, not a reusable seam. `dsh-app-boot` shrinks to boot glue with no CLI-parsing responsibility. `commander@^15` is added to `apps/cli/package.json`, matching the SDK bins' pin.
## Alternatives considered
**Keep `node:util` `parseArgs` and only unify the dispatch** — rejected: `parseArgs` has no subcommand model, no rendered help, and no version flag, so `web` routing and `--help`/`--version` would stay hand-rolled. The repo already chose Commander for its other CLIs; a second parser idiom for `dsh` alone is the fragmentation this change removes.
**Keep `parseResumeArg` as a shared helper and feed it Commander's residual args** — rejected: the whole point is to retire the bespoke scanner. Commander parses `--resume` (space and `=` forms, missing-value, position-independence) natively; keeping a parallel hand-written path for the one flag would preserve the duplication the change exists to end.
**A bare `dsh <config>` positional for the alternate tree** — rejected: a root positional and a real `web` subcommand cannot coexist in one Commander program (the subcommand claims the first positional). A positional would force `web` into a reserved-first-token dispatch to a separate parser and a hand-maintained `web` line in `--help`. Only the demo/test sites ever need to name an alternate tree, so a `--config` flag serves them while leaving the default surface positional-free — `web` is then a normal subcommand in one program with native `--help`.
**Make the argument surface a `packages/*` seam** — rejected: nothing outside `dsh` consumes it, and capability seams are not split preemptively. The Commander adapter is `apps/cli`'s own concern.
**Keep `RESUME_SESSION_ID` as the resume bridge** — rejected: with `--resume` parsed into a value the bin already holds, threading it through an environment variable the config re-reads is indirection with no benefit, and it left the demo bin a second, env-only resume path. Providing the id on the boot context is the same channel `boot`'s `prepare` hook already uses for `tuiResumeHost`.
**Keep the `dsh-tui-demo` bin** — rejected: it duplicated `dsh --config <path>` exactly, and keeping it forced the demo-only `RESUME_SESSION_ID` fallback to stay alive. Its plugin is what the configs actually mount; only the front-door bin was redundant, and `dsh` is the one terminal entry point.
## Testing
`apps/cli/tests/args.spec.ts` (new; `apps/*/tests` added to the vitest include and `apps/cli/tests` to `tsconfig.host.json`) covers the adapter at the level that matters: mode routing by shape (including `web --dev` and the host/port pass-through), the exit-code behavior for the adapter's fail-loud checks (empty resume/prompt, `--prompt` mixed with a config/`--resume`, unknown option, stray positional), and `--help`/`--version`, captured through a `process.exit` spy. Host/port validity is the webserver schema's job, exercised on boot by the web smoke, not the adapter spec. Both PTY smoke groups in `examples/tui-agent/tests/tui-keyless-smoke.e2e.ts` now drive the real `apps/cli/src/bin.ts`: the `tui-agent` group boots an example tree through `--config`, and the `dsh CLI` group covers default boot, personal overlay, invalid config, the `--resume` config intake, the `process.execve` in-place resume handoff, and the source-path prompt. `examples/cordis-agent/tests/keyless-smoke.e2e.ts` likewise launches through `dsh`. `packages/ui/app-boot/tests/app-boot.spec.ts` drops its `parseResumeArg`/`replaceResumeArg` blocks; the TUI unit and snapshot fixtures use the `dsh --resume {session}` resume command.
## Consequences
`dsh` has rendered `--help`/`--version` and consistent fail-loud parse errors, and mode routing does not depend on flag position. Argv parsing lives in one place with one parser idiom shared with the SDK bins, at the cost of a `commander` dependency on `apps/cli` and Commander's parse semantics (its error strings, its `exitOverride` contract) sitting on the CLI's front door. `dsh-app-boot` owns no CLI-parsing surface; a consumer needing `--resume`-style parsing composes Commander. Session resume rides the boot context rather than an environment variable, and `dsh` is the single terminal front door — the `dsh-tui-demo` package is a plugin bundle a config mounts.

View File

@@ -1,53 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 通过单个 Commander 适配器解析 `dsh` 的 argv
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-24-dsh-commander-argument-adapter.md) | 中文
## 问题
`dsh` 的 CLI命令行界面入口`apps/cli`)以三种手写方式解析 argv这些方式无法组合也不提供 `--help`/`--version``bin.ts` 通过原始检查进行分发:先判断 `argv[0] === 'web'`,再判断 `argv.includes('-p') || argv.includes('--prompt')`,否则走 TUI。这种方式对位置不敏感位置错误的 prompt 标志或配置路径可能把模式路由错,而 `argv.includes('-p')` 无法区分真正的标志和偶然出现的 token。`headless.ts``web.ts` 各自运行自己的 `node:util` `parseArgs`,并内联校验 host/port`dsh-app-boot` 携带 `parseResumeArg`——一个约 30 行的定制扫描器,为 `--resume` 重新实现了标志、`=` 形式、取值和重复的处理。用法说明只有一行硬编码的 `usage: dsh -p "task"`;既没有版本标志,也没有渲染出的帮助信息。
## 决策
argv 只在 `apps/cli/src/args.ts` 中解析一次,并使用 Commander 适配器SDK bin `create-sdk``dsh-scripts` 已经统一采用的同一解析器)。`parseDshArgs(argv, version)` 返回仅包含三种实际模式的判别式 `DshInvocation` 联合类型:`{ mode: 'tui', config?, resume? }``{ mode: 'headless', prompt }``{ mode: 'web', host?, port?, dev }`。它**不会**将帮助、版本信息或错误建模为数据:这些情况由 Commander 处理,在触发处打印用法或诊断信息并退出。`exitOverride()` 会将每种情况转为抛出的 `CommanderError`,并携带预期退出码(帮助或版本为 0解析错误或领域错误为 1唯一一处 `try/catch` 位于 `parseDshArgs` 中,捕获错误后调用 `process.exit`
`bin.ts` 只调用适配器一次,并对 `mode` 做分支切换(封闭联合类型,默认分支为 `satisfies never`),仅动态导入所选模式对应的模块;只有合法的非帮助请求才会进入这段分支逻辑,因此其中没有帮助、版本或错误分支。每个模式模块只消费已解析好的值:`runTui(config, resume)``runHeadless(task)``runWeb(host, port, dev, workspaceRoot)`,都不会再次读取 argv。整个 CLI 由**单个 Commander 程序**实现:默认接口(不使用子命令时)只包含选项标志——`--config <path>``-p/--prompt <task>``--resume <id>`——而 `web` 是通过 `program.command('web')` 定义的真正子命令。默认接口不接受位置参数,因此 `web` 可以成为真正的子命令且不会发生位置参数冲突,`dsh --help` 也会原生列出 `web`,无需手工拼接命令文本。默认命令和 `web` 子命令的处理函数会设置解析得到的模式,随后对 Commander 无法表达的领域校验调用 `command.error(...)` 立即终止(打印信息并以退出码 1 退出):`--prompt` 选择 headless 模式;如果任务为空,或调用中还包含 `--config``--resume`,它会拒绝调用,而不会静默丢弃 TUI 输入;空的 `--resume=` id 会显式失败agent-loop 把 `''` 视为不恢复。Commander 会将 `web` token 前后的默认接口选项都解析进 `program.opts()`;由于 `web` 不与默认接口共用任何选项,`web` 子命令的处理函数会拒绝误入的 `--config`/`-p`/`--resume``dsh web -p x``dsh --config c.yml web`),而不是静默启动服务并丢弃这些选项。`dsh web``--host`/`--port` 是未经校验、直接透传的覆盖值:适配器既不设置默认值,也不执行校验,只使用 `Number` 将端口字符串转换为数字schema 要求该值为数字)。`dsh-host-webserver` 的 schemastery `Config``host``127.0.0.1`/`0.0.0.0` 字面量联合类型,`port` 是不大于 65535 的自然数)是默认值与有效性的唯一真源:未提供标志时,随产品提供的 `apps/cli/cordis.yml``webserver` 配置项保持原值;`AppCLIEntry` 将显式标志的值直接写入该配置项,因此无效的 host/port 会在启动时触发 schema 校验并显式失败,而不是在参数解析阶段失败。`--dev` 会挂载客户端 HMR热模块替换驱动并启用构建产物监视`--workspace-root <path>` 则是直接透传给 `AppCLIEntry` 的选项(按名称创建 workspace 时使用的父目录)。重复提供 `--resume`,或后续标志被捕获为 `--resume``--prompt` 的值,都是 Commander 的标准行为(最后一次取值生效/将下一 token 作为值),本适配器不作干预;无效 id 会在下游无法加载会话时显式失败。`--version` 读取本应用的 `package.json`
`dsh` 不接受位置参数。`--config <path>` 指定一份替代 Cordis 配置树,系统启动该配置树而不是随产品提供的默认配置树;该标志仅用于让演示和测试调用点(`demo:cordis``demo:code-mode`、无密钥 PTY 冒烟测试)通过随产品提供的 bin 启动一份示例树。直接运行 `dsh` 会启动随产品提供的配置树,并叠加 `~/.dsh/config.yaml` 个人覆盖;实际用户从不传入 `--config`
CLI 解析完全位于 `apps/cli` 中。`dsh-app-boot` 提供启动、环境变量、配置和个人覆盖辅助函数,不包含 argv 扫描器。
## 通过启动上下文恢复会话
`dsh --resume <id>` 是恢复持久化会话的唯一方式,无需环境变量。`runTui` 通过 `boot``prepare(ctx)` 钩子,在启动上下文中提供已解析的 id`ctx.provide(RESUME_SESSION_ID_KEY, id)``dsh-app-boot` 的一项导出,值为 `'resumeSessionId'`);随产品提供的 tui-agent/cordis 配置将该值作为裸标识符读取:`resumeSessionId: !!js "typeof resumeSessionId === 'string' ? resumeSessionId : undefined"`。这个表达式需要加引号,否则 YAML 会把 `?``:` 解析为映射;`typeof` 守卫使从未提供该槽位的启动器也能正常运行。`/resume` 原地交接(`process.execve`)根据已解析的值将重新执行时的 argv 构造成 `dsh --resume=<id> [--config <path>]`
## 唯一的终端入口:`dsh`
`dsh` 是唯一的终端入口;`dsh-tui-demo`package提供 TUI 应用组合插件,随产品提供的配置会挂载该插件,而该包不提供自己的 bin。`demo:cordis``demo:code-mode` 以及 tui-agent 和 cordis-agent 的无密钥 PTY 冒烟测试都通过 `apps/cli/src/bin.ts` 启动,并传入 `--config <path>``dsh` 的 TTY 守卫会在启动前拒绝标准输入输出接入管道的调用,并提示自动化场景使用 `dsh -p``apps/cli/tests/built-bin.e2e.ts` 锁定了这一行为:该测试将标准输入输出接入管道,并通过普通 Node 运行构建后的 `lib/bin.js`e2e Vitest 的 include 包含 `apps/cli/tests`)。`cli-demo``acp-demo``jsonrpc-demo` 保留各自的 bin因为它们分别提供 `dsh` 所没有的独立接口headless、ACPAgent Client Protocol、JSON-RPC
## 包拓扑
参数解析留在 `apps/cli`(组装层)内,而不是 `packages/*` 库中:它是这一个应用自身的路由,而非可复用的 seam。`dsh-app-boot` 收缩为纯粹的 boot 胶水代码,不再承担 CLI 解析职责。`commander@^15` 被加入 `apps/cli/package.json`,与 SDK bin 锁定的版本一致。
## 考虑过的替代方案
**保留 `node:util` `parseArgs`,只统一分发。** 已否决:`parseArgs` 没有子命令模型、没有渲染出的帮助、也没有版本标志,因此 `web` 路由和 `--help`/`--version` 仍将保持手写。本仓库其他 CLI 已经选择了 Commander单独为 `dsh` 引入第二套解析器方式,正是这次变更要消除的碎片化。
**保留 `parseResumeArg` 作为共享辅助函数,并向它喂入 Commander 的残余参数。** 已否决整件事的核心就是要退役这个定制扫描器。Commander 原生解析 `--resume`(空格和 `=` 形式、缺值、位置无关性);为这一个标志保留一条平行的手写路径,只会保留这次变更要终结的重复。
**使用裸 `dsh <config>` 位置参数指定替代配置树。** 已否决:根级位置参数与真正的 `web` 子命令无法在同一个 Commander 程序中共存(子命令会占用第一个位置参数)。位置参数会迫使系统把位于首位的 `web` 作为保留 token 分发给另一个解析器,并手工维护一行 `web` 文本,供 `--help` 显示。只有演示和测试调用点需要指定替代配置树,因此 `--config` 标志既能满足这些调用点,又能让默认接口不包含位置参数;这样,`web` 就能在单个程序中成为普通子命令,并由原生 `--help` 展示。
**把参数解析做成 `packages/*` 的 seam。** 已否决:`dsh` 之外没有任何消费方使用它,而能力 seam 不应被提前拆分。这个 Commander 适配器是 `apps/cli` 自身的事务。
**保留 `RESUME_SESSION_ID` 作为恢复通道**:不予采纳。`--resume` 已被解析成 bin 当前持有的值;若再通过环境变量传递并由配置重新读取,只会引入无益的间接层,还会使演示 bin 保留第二条仅依赖环境变量的恢复路径。在启动上下文中提供 id`boot``prepare` 钩子为 `tuiResumeHost` 提供值所采用的是同一通道。
**保留 `dsh-tui-demo` bin**:不予采纳。它与 `dsh --config <path>` 的功能完全重复;保留它还会迫使演示专用的 `RESUME_SESSION_ID` 回退路径继续存在。配置实际挂载的是该包的插件;冗余的只有作为终端入口的 bin`dsh` 是唯一的终端入口。
## 测试
`apps/cli/tests/args.spec.ts`(新增;`apps/*/tests` 加入 vitest include`apps/cli/tests` 加入 `tsconfig.host.json`)覆盖适配器的关键行为:根据参数形态进行模式路由(包括 `web --dev` 和 host/port 透传),并通过 `process.exit` spy 捕获适配器的显式报错检查(恢复 id 或提示词为空、`--prompt` 与配置或 `--resume` 混用、未知选项、多余的位置参数)以及 `--help`/`--version` 的退出码。host/port 的有效性由 webserver schema 负责,并由 web 冒烟测试在启动时验证,不属于适配器测试的覆盖范围。`examples/tui-agent/tests/tui-keyless-smoke.e2e.ts` 中的两组 PTY 冒烟测试现在都驱动真实的 `apps/cli/src/bin.ts``tui-agent` 组通过 `--config` 启动示例树,`dsh CLI` 组覆盖默认启动、个人覆盖、无效配置、配置对 `--resume` 的接收、通过 `process.execve` 原地恢复交接,以及包含源码路径的系统提示词。`examples/cordis-agent/tests/keyless-smoke.e2e.ts` 同样通过 `dsh` 启动。`packages/ui/app-boot/tests/app-boot.spec.ts` 移除其 `parseResumeArg``replaceResumeArg` 测试块TUI 单元测试和快照 fixture测试前置数据使用 `dsh --resume {session}` 恢复命令。
## 影响
`dsh` 会渲染 `--help`/`--version`并以一致方式显式报告解析错误模式路由不依赖标志位置。argv 解析集中在一处,并与 SDK bin 共用一套解析器方式,代价是 `apps/cli` 依赖 `commander`,且 Commander 的解析语义(错误字符串和 `exitOverride` 契约)成为 CLI 入口的一部分。`dsh-app-boot` 不提供任何 CLI 解析接口;需要 `--resume` 式解析的消费方通过组合 Commander 来实现。会话恢复通过启动上下文完成,而不使用环境变量;`dsh` 是唯一的终端入口;`dsh-tui-demo` 包是由配置挂载的插件组合包。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.md: 063494b56461593015d6de4c2b55a2d1d6a3c676
2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.zh.md: cd5d29dfbcd9356a9ea15852d5d27a3660084abf

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
# Agent Note: Web client Agent-scope parity model and the provisioning channel (agents/scope / blank reuse / provide)
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.zh.md)
> Scope: the client Agent scope (actx) and targeted events, the client/host materialization parity model, the blank-session bit and reuse (`connectWorkspace`), the per-session provisioning channel (`sessions.provide`), the read-only queue mirror (`session/queued`), and the host wire smalls that carry these capabilities (the summary `blank` column, the `host/session-added` frame field, and the `host/commands-changed` frame). The input state machine and the slash pipeline live in the [input machine note](2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.md); the command business surfaces live in the [command surfaces note](2026-07-25-web-command-surfaces-and-assembly.md).
## Problem
The web client had a single global session surface: slots all rendered from the root context, so plugins had no notion of "which agent/session is current"; the draft's true copy was buried inside the Session object, leaving any plugin that wanted to participate in input with nowhere to hook in. To support a command/input system, the platform layer first had to answer:
- Who owns session interaction state (menus, popups, drafts, in-flight requests), and how two sessions are structurally isolated;
- What a "new session" is before the host entity exists — whether the client must forge an independent life for it;
- How session-scope components fetch their own session data, instead of props passed down layer by layer;
- What a user-abandoned new session leaves behind on the host side, and who collects it.
Hard constraints: the host is the single source of truth; every registration goes through a `ctx.effect` disposer; the scope mechanism matches the host's Agent scope architecture; model-visible ⟺ already in the session log.
## Decision
### The parity model: client and host share one root state axis
Host-side `session.create(workspaceId)` produces Session + Agent + cwd in one piece (an atomic bundle, never split); the client side is the mirror of that birth — the instant a session row enters the list mirror, the client mints its Agent scope (actx + provide + the full input surface mounted):
- Session identity is the host's true form from birth: the sessionId arrives via the `session.create` response / the `host/session-added` frame, and every client-side address (the scope tag, slot store keys, RPC addressing) uses that same id.
- The materialization moment = the instant the user picks a Workspace (cwd settled): the client calls `session.create({workspaceId})` on the spot and receives the complete entity.
- "New Session with no workspace picked" is a **pure view state** (a navigation position) corresponding to no session/scope entity; until the pick, the composer is locked whole (no slash, no plain text).
- A "blank session" is just an ordinary materialized session whose log is still empty; to every Agent-scope plugin on the host (goal/plan/skill/…) it is indistinguishable from any session, so slash/plan are all naturally live.
### Agent scope: the actx is the sole session carrier in the client-side cordis world
The runtime's `agents/scope.ts` matches the host's `dsh-scope` at the mechanism layer (fiber + tag + filter; no value import: the host package carries the scoped-events `Events` merge, which would collide with the Context merge inside the client program):
- `createScope(ctx, key)`: a no-op plugin fiber plus `extend({[kScope]: key, [Context.filter]: …})` — the filter lives directly on the actx: untagged listeners receive globally, tagged ones receive only their own scope.
- Dispatch is the cordis primitives with thisArg = the actx itself: `actx.bail(actx, event, req)` / `actx.emit(actx, event, payload)`.
- `Session.bindScope(actx)`: paired exactly once when resolve mints the scope (rebinding throws; dropScope unbinds), mirroring the host's `Agent.loopCtx` — the Session uses it to dispatch its own scoped events. The reverse actx→Session direction is one hop through `sessions.sessionOf(actx)` (mirroring host plugins' `agent.session` usage).
Three deliberate divergences from the host dsh-scope:
- The filter lives on the actx itself rather than a separate carrier: the host wrapper layer guards the business Agent subject against drifting from the scope key (host events inject the Agent itself as the first argument), while client event payloads carry only an id — there is no subject to protect.
- Keys compare by branded `SessionId` value rather than object identity: on the host, agent.id === session id (1:1 on the same axis), agent identity directly reuses the `SessionId` brand, and a client scope's identity is its wire id.
- The client scope is an **Agent identity** scope, not a live-object scope: during a cold session the host Agent object is already disposed while the client actx stays alive (in view) — the identity axis is in strict parity while object hot/cold is deliberately unsynchronized.
id→ctx handoff is allowed in only three kinds of places (business providers never hand off):
- Slot inject factories: the ctx never enters the render layer; the identity the slot framework hands a component is the sessionId, exchanged back into objects/controllers through service maps.
- Root coordination services self-addressing: from a projection's sessionId back to the actx via `sessions.scope(id)`.
- Root untagged listeners: looking up their own store by the payload's sessionId.
### Scope lifecycle: anchored to the list mirror — birth is entering view, death is prune
Session instances share the scope's lifecycle; liveness eligibility = host-listed (one criterion, shared by mint and prune):
- Birth = a session row entering client view (the list baseline pull / the local `create()` echo / the `host/session-added` frame); a lazy first resolve mints the scope (resolution is a pure function, render-safe).
- One prune tears down three things together: the Session instance, the scope fiber (cascading through every consumer hung on the actx), and the session-keyed slot store. The staged session (= `list.current`) is the exception: removed while still on stage, it keeps a frozen read-only view, torn down only once the stage moves away.
- Reopening = lazily rebuilding the instance + `open()` pulling history (the host session log is the durable truth).
- Remaining TODO: approval/question frames never enter history and cannot be recovered across a prune (the manager-level pendingBuffers cover only the never-instantiated window).
### The blank bit: the empty session's visible projection, conversion, and reuse
A session "materialized but with no first prompt" is governed by the summary-derived bit `blank` (a derived column, not a header field; SessionHeader stays immutable):
- The host criterion: `session.events.length === 0` (zero log events = no user message yet). A live session reads `summarize()` straight from memory; a cold session is always `false` — the lazy-create contract guarantees a never-appended session never enters `persistence.list()` at all (both the JSONL and SQLite backends are verified truly lazy), so blank never touches disk.
- The wire carries it in two places: the required `SessionSummary.blank` column, and the required `blank` field on the `host/session-added` frame (always true at creation, letting other tabs enter the same blank-session state into their mirrors).
- The client mirror only lowers, never raises (monotonic), flipped from three sources, all reusing existing wire signals:
- The sender's own tab: the **successful response** to the first `prompt()` flips false (acceptance proves the user/message is already in the host log — this flip is confirmation, not optimism; `onEngaged` synchronously updates the list mirror, converting the current `New Session` row in place to an ordinary title, adding no list row). A rejected first prompt keeps the session blank: aligned with host authority, still shown as `New Session`, keeping its connectWorkspace reuse eligibility.
- Other tabs: the `host/session-status (running:true)` frame flips it — a blank session never runs, so the first running necessarily means no longer blank;
- Reconnect alignment: `session.list`'s summary.blank is authoritative, so a tab that missed frames aligns naturally on its next pull; a stale blank:true can never mark a converted session back to blank.
- List discipline: the store retains every row; the Workspace browser's grouping, flat view, search, and counts share one visible projection — every non-blank session shows, while blank sessions show only the one with `session.id === sessions.current`, its title forced to `New Session`. After a Workspace switch, the old blank entity stays in the mirror but is hidden from the list while the target Workspace's current blank shows; the user-visible surface therefore holds at most one blank row globally.
- The residue ledger takes zero GC: after a refresh, blank sessions come back with the bit intact and are reused on the next same-workspace connect, so the ordinary single-tab path keeps at most one per workspace; after a host restart, blanks leave no disk trace and simply evaporate; the extra empty shells from multi-tab races only become non-current hidden rows, digested by later reuse, with no coordination.
### connectWorkspace: the sole entry point of New Session
`workspaces.connectWorkspace(workspaceId): Promise<SessionId>` (owned by WorkspacesService — it holds both the workspace canonical path and the sessions reference):
- The reuse arm: the list mirror is searched for `blank && cwd == workspace.path` (direct equality on the host realpath canonical form); a hit returns that id directly, creating nothing.
- The create arm: on a miss, `session.create({workspaceId})` returns the new id.
- An unknown workspaceId fails loud (never silently creating somewhere else).
- The resolution guarantee (one contract for both arms): when the promise resolves, the returned id is already in the list store and `sessions.binding(id)` resolves synchronously — `SessionsService.create` projects the list synchronously after RPC success before resolving, so a draft mover can write text into the new scope's machine before open, without waiting for a notifier flush.
- The caller takes the id and does its own `sessions.open`; sending the first prompt is an ordinary `session.prompt` — the session already exists, a failure is an ordinary prompt failure, the draft text is still in the machine, and a retry is simply sending again.
- The global New Session button defaults to `recentWorkspaceId`: first comparing each Workspace's newest Session `updatedAt`, falling back to the Workspace `createdAt` when it has no Sessions, and keeping host order on ties; only with no Workspace at all does it `sessions.clear()` into the no-session view. Create actions inside a Workspace group still hit that Workspace explicitly.
- At startup the runtime subscribes to the first complete baseline: a successfully restored current session is kept in place; otherwise it automatically calls `connectWorkspace(recentWorkspaceId)` and opens the returned blank session. The policy settles only once; a later user-initiated clear is never overridden by auto-selection again, and a connect failure waits for the next baseline projection to retry.
- Re-picking the Workspace in the blank Hero also goes through `connectWorkspace`; when the target id differs from the current one, the current input machine's non-empty draft moves to the target scope first, then `sessions.open(nextId)`. The old blank entity is not deleted — it merely leaves the list by no longer being current.
### Per-session provisioning: the `sessions.provide` standard-kit channel
The sole provisioning path by which session slot components fetch their own session data. Plugins declare a fixed key map through the static descriptor `sessions.provide({hooks, props, resolve})` (a duplicate key throws at registration); `resolve(binding)` materializes values for a specific session and tears them down with the scope. Web-react's `standardKit` single loop binds the hooks compartment into `use<Name>` selector hooks (`observableHook`→uSES, anti-tearing) and passes the props compartment through as-is.
Slot scope is the closed set `root | session-maybe | session`:
- `root` receives only the global standard kit, with no session identity or provisioning.
- `session-maybe` follows the current session, but the component instance does not change key when the id appears, disappears, or changes; with no session, `sessionId`, the results of `useSession`/`useInput`, and `inputActions` may all be absent. The unkeyed root `SessionMaybeProvider` drives these updates, while `SessionMaybeProvideInfo` uses the static key map to retain the complete hook/prop shape even with no session.
- `session` guarantees that `sessionId`, every hook source, and every prop exist; each strict entry's error boundary is keyed by `sessionId`, so switching sessions recreates that entry and its session store.
`conversation` is the resident `session-maybe` shell: `ConversationRoot`, HeroShell, the Workspace picker, the composer stack, and the overlay chain's fallback frame retain their React instances across the no-session → blank-session switch; `conversation.session` carries only the strict-session header/view, while the composer and every input slot also stay strict `session`. With no session, the composer stack places the presentation-only `DisabledInputBar` directly; once a session appears, the input body is swapped for the strictly bound InputBar; the textarea may be rebuilt, while the Hero and the layout skeleton are not. The blank → engaging/active transition stays inside the same strict-session subtree, and the InputBar is never rebuilt on a phase flip.
- The runtime's first built-in entry: the `'session'` hook — `useSession` itself rides the same mechanism, no special-casing.
- Concurrent discipline: the render plane reads only from the hooks compartment (uSES consistency guarantee); props-compartment callbacks are used only in event-handler space; descriptor resolution is render-safe (idempotent caching, with prune reaping residue from abandoned renders).
- Third-party components take zero value dependencies; types are a one-line type-only import (declaration merging into `SessionStandardProps` / `SessionMaybeStandardProps`).
### The read-only queue mirror
- The MuxFrame `session/queued`: the Session holds a read-only inbox mirror (previews truncated; steering retired by source match); queue frames never enter history — pure stream state, cleared on reconnect and refilled from the new baseline; the never-instantiated window is buffered and replayed through the manager pendingBuffers.
- Queue semantics: running does not lock input; ordinary messages queue through `session.prompt {mode:'queue'}`, and commands never queue.
### Host wire smalls
- The summary `blank` column and the `host/session-added` frame's `blank` field (see the blank bit above).
- The SSE frame `host/commands-changed` (a pure invalidation signal); the client routes it into the typed events `commands/changed` and `connection/reset` (broadcast after each connection generation is established; wire-derived caches uniformly treat prior state as stale).
- `command.list/execute` and `skill.list` are uniformly single-addressed by `sessionId` (a session always has an Agent; `agentFor`'s resume semantics come ready-made); the command-surface narrative lives in the [command surfaces note](2026-07-25-web-command-surfaces-and-assembly.md).
- The `session.create` request shape: workspaceId/cwd as either-or, plus an optional caller-preallocated sessionId (a same-id same-cwd retry is idempotent; a different cwd reports `session-conflict`).
## Alternatives considered
| Rejected | One-line reason |
|---|---|
| A client-local Intent + materialize (published CAS / the pendingPrompt attach transaction / the before-create chain) | The client is forced to simulate the first half-life the host lacks, breeding a pile of state machinery — published CAS, the attach transaction, partial publication |
| Host-reserved IDs (a draft Map) | The host merely acknowledges a number; the state machine stays on the client untouched |
| A host draft Session (a Session without an Agent) | Every host surface that looks up the Agent must fork for drafts; core would need an attachAgent seam plus late-written header cwd |
| Binding an Agent before cwd (ungrouped) | Overturns the readonly header.cwd "created in" invariant, plus the launch-dir side-effect product trap |
| Passing session context down through React Context | Plugins should hold one mental model across host and client; the scope mechanism is isomorphic to the host dsh-scope |
| A `scopeTarget` carrier + fused dispatcher (mirroring the host `agentEvents`) | The host wrapper layer guards the business Agent subject against drifting from the scope key; client events have no subject to guard — the filter on the actx plus cordis primitives covers every need |
| Sessions not holding a ctx (a cordis-free object layer) | A red line born only so the filtering unit tests avoid importing cordis, at the cost of two-hop contribute callbacks plus mutable public fields; the host Agent already holds loopCtx |
| Resident Session instances (resident-instance) | The host session log is the durable truth; residency is mere identity convenience, and its misalignment with the scope lifecycle is a source of complexity |
| Components receiving wiring-callback bundles (two-layer inject→props pass-down) | The standard-kit channel lets components fetch their own; the public surface converges to hooks + stable props |
| Swapping the no-session Hero view for the entire session Conversation | Even with the outer layout unchanged, the Hero, picker, and composer subtrees would remount together, making the whole UI region jump |
| Making InputBar itself `session-maybe` | The input state machine, keyboard command surface, and actions would all have to accept absent values; replacing only the disabled input body keeps optionality at the shell boundary |
| A dedicated conversion frame | `session-status(running:true)` semantically implies conversion (a blank session never runs); adding a frame buys zero information for one more wire type |
## Consequences
- Plugins gain session context isomorphic to the host's: per-session state hangs on the actx and mounts/tears down in one piece with the scope fiber, making leaks structurally impossible; two-session isolation is structurally guaranteed by the scope filter.
- The client object layer converges to a wire mirror: session identity, lifecycle, and capability adjudication all defer to the host entity — the input system (the next layer) always faces a session with a real Agent, and providers like slash/skill uniformly address by sessionId directly.
- Blank-session governance takes zero dedicated mechanisms: state rides one derived bit, visibility rides the unified list projection (only the current blank shows, as `New Session`), reclamation rides lazy persistence's existing contract (evaporation on restart), and the ordinary ceiling rides same-Workspace reuse.
- The cost: the id→ctx handoff discipline and provide's Concurrent discipline are conventions rather than type-enforced, pinned by review and tests; fully disabled input while no workspace is picked is an experience cost the product surface accepts (the price of the single state axis).
- Known gaps: approval/question recovery across prune (TODO); model selection returns in live-mutation shape (the host `selectModel` trio is ready-made, awaiting its own branch).

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
# Agent Note: Web client Agent-scope 对等模型与供数通道agents/scope / blank 复用 / provide
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.md) | 中文
> 范围client Agent scopeactx与定向事件、client/host 实体化对等模型、空会话 blank 位与复用(`connectWorkspace`、per-session 供数通道(`sessions.provide`)、队列只读镜像(`session/queued`),以及承载这些能力的 host wire 小件summary `blank` 列、`host/session-added` 帧字段、`host/commands-changed` 帧)。输入状态机与 slash 管线见[输入状态机 note](2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.md);命令业务面见[命令业务面 note](2026-07-25-web-command-surfaces-and-assembly.md)。
## 问题
web client 只有一张全局会话面slot 全部从根 context 渲染,插件拿不到「当前是哪个 agent/session」的语境draft 真身埋在 Session 对象里,任何要参与输入的插件都无处下手。要支撑命令/输入体系,平台层必须先回答:
- 会话交互态菜单、popup、草稿、在途请求归谁持有双会话如何结构性隔离
- 「新会话」在 host 实体存在之前是什么——client 要不要为它造一段独立生命;
- session-scope 组件如何「自己拿会话数据」,而不是层层下传 props
- 用户放弃的新会话在 host 侧留下什么,谁来收。
硬约束host 是唯一真源;一切注册走 `ctx.effect` disposerscope 机制与 host 的 Agent scope 架构一致;模型可见 ⟺ 已入 session log。
## 决策
### 对等模型client 与 host 同一根状态轴
host 侧 `session.create(workspaceId)` 一体产出 Session + Agent + cwd原子大礼包不拆client 侧就是这次出生的镜像——会话行进入 list mirror 的瞬间client 为它铸 Agent scopeactx + provide + 输入面全套挂上):
- 会话身份自出生即为 host 真身sessionId 由 `session.create` 响应 / `host/session-added` 帧带来client 侧一切寻址scope tag、slot store 键、RPC 地址)用的都是同一个 id。
- 实体化时点 = 用户选定 Workspacecwd 确定的瞬间client 当场调 `session.create({workspaceId})`,拿到完整实体。
- 「New Session 且未选 workspace」是**纯视图态**(一个导航位置),不对应任何 session/scope 实体;选定之前 composer 整体锁死(无 slash、无纯文本
- 「空会话」就是一个日志还空着的普通实体化会话;对 host 上所有 Agent-scope 插件goal/plan/skill/…它与任何会话无异slash/plan 天然全活。
### Agent scopeactx 是 client 侧 cordis 世界的唯一会话载体
runtime `agents/scope.ts` 与 host `dsh-scope` 机制层一致fiber + tag + filter 过滤;不 value-importhost 包携带 scoped-events 的 `Events` merge进 client program 撞 Context merge
- `createScope(ctx, key)`no-op plugin fiber + `extend({[kScope]: key, [Context.filter]: …})`——filter 直接住 actxuntagged listener 全局可收tagged 只收本 scope。
- 派发就是 cordis 原语thisArg = actx 本身:`actx.bail(actx, event, req)` / `actx.emit(actx, event, payload)`
- `Session.bindScope(actx)`resolve 铸 scope 时单次配对(重复绑 throwdropScope unbind镜像 host `Agent.loopCtx`——Session 用它自行派发 scoped 事件。actx→Session 反向走 `sessions.sessionOf(actx)` 一跳(镜像 host 插件 `agent.session` 用法)。
与 host dsh-scope 的有意分歧三条:
- filter 住 actx 自身而非独立 carrierhost 包装层护的是「业务 Agent subject 与 scope key 不漂移」host 事件首参注入 Agent 本体client 事件 payload 只带 id、无 subject 可护。
- key 用品牌 `SessionId` 值比较而非对象身份host 里 agent.id === session id1:1 同轴agent 身份直接复用 `SessionId` 品牌client scope 的身份即 wire id。
- client 是 **Agent 身份** scope 而非活对象 scopecold 会话期 host Agent 对象已 dispose 而 client actx 存活(视野内)——身份轴严格对等、对象冷热有意不同步。
id→ctx 换乘只许三类位置(业务 provider 永不换乘):
- slot inject 工厂ctx 不进渲染层slot 框架交给组件的身份就是 sessionId经服务 map 换回对象/controller。
- root 协调服务自寻址:从投影的 sessionId 经 `sessions.scope(id)` 找回 actx。
- root untagged listener按 payload 的 sessionId 查自有 store。
### scope 生命周期:挂靠 list mirror出生即视野、死亡即 prune
Session 实例与 scope 同生命周期,存活资格 = host listed一个判据mint 与 prune 共用):
- 出生 = 会话行进入 client 视野list 基线拉取 / `create()` 本地回声 / `host/session-added`lazy 首次 resolve 铸 scoperesolution 纯函数、渲染安全)。
- prune 一次同拆三样Session 实例、scope fiber级联挂在 actx 上的一切消费者、session-keyed slot store。staged session= `list.current`例外被移除仍在台上时保留冻结只读视图stage 移走才拆。
- 重开 = lazy 重建实例 + `open()` 拉 historyhost session log 是持久真相)。
- 遗留 TODOapproval/question 帧不进 history跨 prune 不可恢复manager 级 pendingBuffers 只覆盖「从未实例化」窗口)。
### blank 位:空会话的可见投影、转正与复用
「实体化但无首讯」的会话经 summary 派生位 `blank` 治理(派生列而非 header 字段SessionHeader 保持不可变):
- host 判据:`session.events.length === 0`(零日志事件 = 尚无用户消息。live 会话 `summarize()` 内存直读cold 会话恒 `false`——lazy-create 契约保证 never-appended 会话根本不进 `persistence.list()`JSONL/SQLite 两后端均已实证真 lazyblank 从不落盘。
- wire 承载两处:`SessionSummary.blank` 必填列;`host/session-added` 帧必填 `blank` 字段(创建时恒 true供别的 tab 按同一空会话状态入镜像)。
- client 镜像只降不升(单调),三来源翻转,全部复用既有 wire 信号:
- 发送方本地:首次 `prompt()` 的**成功响应**翻 false受理即证明 user/message 已入 host 日志——此点翻转是确证而非乐观;`onEngaged` 同步更新列表镜像,当前 `New Session` 行原地转为普通标题,不新增列表行)。首讯被拒则会话保持 blank与 host 权威对齐、继续显示为 `New Session`、保持 connectWorkspace 复用资格。
- 其他端:`host/session-status (running:true)` 帧翻转——blank 会话从不 running首次 running 必然已非 blank
- 重连对齐:`session.list` 的 summary.blank 是权威,错过帧的端下次拉取自然对齐;陈旧的 blank:true 不能把已转正的会话重新标回 blank。
- 列表纪律store 保留全部行Workspace browser 的分组、平铺、搜索和计数共用同一可见投影——所有非 blank 会话都显示blank 会话只显示 `session.id === sessions.current` 的一条,并强制标题为 `New Session`。切换 Workspace 后,旧 blank 实体仍在镜像中但从列表隐藏,目标 Workspace 的 current blank 显示;因此用户可见面全局至多一条 blank 行。
- 残留账零 GC刷新后 blank 会话带位回来,下次同 workspace 复用,普通单端路径使每个 workspace 至多保留一个host 重启后 blank 无盘痕自然蒸发;多 tab 竞态多出的空壳只会成为非 current 隐藏行,后续复用消化,不做协调。
### connectWorkspaceNew Session 的唯一入口
`workspaces.connectWorkspace(workspaceId): Promise<SessionId>`(归属 WorkspacesService——它同时持有 workspace 规范 path 与 sessions 引用):
- 复用臂list mirror 中找 `blank && cwd == workspace.path`host realpath 规范 canon 直等比较),命中直接返回该 id不新建。
- 新建臂:未命中则 `session.create({workspaceId})`,返回新 id。
- 未知 workspaceId fail loud不静默创建到别处
- 解析保证两臂同契约promise resolve 时返回的 id 已在 list store 且 `sessions.binding(id)` 同步可解析——`SessionsService.create` 在 RPC 成功后同步投影列表再 resolve使 draft 搬运方可以在 open 之前往新 scope 的 machine 写文本,不等 notifier flush。
- 调用方拿 id 自行 `sessions.open`;首讯发送就是普通 `session.prompt`——会话本来就在,失败即普通 prompt 失败draft 文本还在 machine 里,重试即再次发送。
- 全局 New Session 按钮默认取 `recentWorkspaceId`:先比较各 Workspace 内 Session 的最新 `updatedAt`,无 Session 时回退 Workspace `createdAt`,同值保持 Host 顺序;只有完全没有 Workspace 时才 `sessions.clear()` 进入无 session 视图。Workspace 分组内的创建动作仍显式命中该 Workspace。
- runtime 启动时订阅首次完整基线:若已有恢复成功的 current session 则保持不动,否则自动 `connectWorkspace(recentWorkspaceId)` 并 open 返回的 blank session。该策略只结算一次之后用户主动 clear 不会再次被自动选择覆盖,连接失败则等下一次基线投影重试。
- blank Hero 中改选 Workspace 也走 `connectWorkspace`;若目标 id 与当前 id 不同,先把当前 input machine 的非空 draft 搬到目标 scope`sessions.open(nextId)`。旧 blank 实体不删除,只因不再 current 而从列表隐藏。
### per-session 供数:`sessions.provide` 标准件通道
session slot 组件「自己拿 session 数据」的唯一供数路径。插件以静态描述符 `sessions.provide({hooks, props, resolve})` 声明固定键表(重名 key 注册时 throw`resolve(binding)` 在确定 session 下物化值并随 scope 拆web-react `standardKit` 统一循环把 hooks 格绑成 `use<Name>` 选择器 hook`observableHook`→uSES防 tearing、props 格原样透传。
slot scope 是闭集 `root | session-maybe | session`
- `root` 只拿全局标准件,不接收 session 身份或供数。
- `session-maybe` 跟随 current session但组件实例不因 id 有无或切换而换 key无 session 时 `sessionId``useSession`/`useInput` 的选择结果及 `inputActions` 均可缺省。根部无 key 的 `SessionMaybeProvider` 驱动这条更新,`SessionMaybeProvideInfo` 靠静态键表在无 session 时仍保留完整 hook/prop 形状。
- `session` 保证 `sessionId`、所有 hook source 与 props 均存在;每个严格 entry 的错误边界以 `sessionId` 为 key切换 session 会重建该 entry 及其 session store。
`conversation``session-maybe` 的常驻外壳:`ConversationRoot`、HeroShell、Workspace picker、composer stack 与 overlay chain 的 fallback 外框在无 session → blank session 的切换中保持 React 实例;`conversation.session` 只承载严格 session 的 header/viewcomposer 与各输入 slot 也保持严格 `session`。无 session 时 composer stack 直接放纯展示的 `DisabledInputBar`session 出现后把输入体换成严格绑定的 InputBartextarea 允许重建Hero 与布局骨架不重建。blank → engaging/active 仍在同一严格 session subtree 内InputBar 不因 phase 翻转而重建。
- runtime 内建第一条:`'session'` hook——`useSession` 本身走同一机制,无特判。
- Concurrent 纪律:渲染平面只从 hooks 格读uSES 一致性保证props 格回调只在事件 handler 空间用;描述符解析 render-safe幂等缓存、废弃渲染残留由 prune 收尸)。
- 第三方组件值零依赖,类型一行 type-only importdeclaration merging 进 `SessionStandardProps` / `SessionMaybeStandardProps`)。
### 队列只读镜像
- MuxFrame `session/queued`Session 持只读 inbox 镜像预览截断、steering 按 source 匹配退休queue 帧不进 history纯 stream 态——重连清空、新基线重灌;未实例化窗口经 manager pendingBuffers 缓冲重放。
- 队列语义running 不锁输入;普通消息经 `session.prompt {mode:'queue'}` 排队,命令永不排队。
### host wire 小件
- summary `blank` 列与 `host/session-added``blank` 字段(见上文 blank 位)。
- SSE 帧 `host/commands-changed`纯失效信号client 路由为类型事件 `commands/changed``connection/reset`连接代建立后广播wire 派生缓存一律视旧态为 stale
- `command.list/execute``skill.list` 一律 `sessionId` 单址(会话恒有 Agent`agentFor` 的 resume 语义现成);命令面叙述见[命令业务面 note](2026-07-25-web-command-surfaces-and-assembly.md)。
- `session.create` 请求形状workspaceId/cwd 二选一 + 可选调用方预分配 sessionId同 id 同 cwd 重试幂等,异 cwd 报 `session-conflict`)。
## Alternatives considered
| 弃案 | 一行理由 |
|---|---|
| client-local Intent + materializepublished CAS / pendingPrompt attach 事务 / before-create 链) | client 被迫模拟 host 缺失的前半段生命,养出 published CAS、attach 事务、部分发布一坨状态机 |
| host 预留 IDdraft Map | host 只认了个号,状态机原封留在 client |
| host draft Session有 Session 无 Agent | 每个查 Agent 的 host 面都要为 draft 分叉core 要开 attachAgent 缝 + header cwd 后写 |
| 无 cwd 先绑 Agentungrouped | header.cwd readonly "created in" 不变性被推翻 + launch-dir 副作用产品坑 |
| React Context 层层传会话语境 | 插件在 host/client 两侧应是一个心智模型scope 机制与 host dsh-scope 同构 |
| `scopeTarget` carrier + 融合派发器(镜像 host `agentEvents` | host 包装层护的是「业务 Agent subject 与 scope key 不漂移」client 事件无 subject 可护filter 住 actx + cordis 原语覆盖全部需求 |
| Session 不持 ctx对象层 cordis-free | 只为筛选单测不引 cordis 而生的红线,代价是 contribute 两跳回调 + 可变公有字段host Agent 本就持 loopCtx |
| Session 实例常驻resident-instance | host session log 即持久真相;常驻仅为身份便利,与 scope 生命周期错位是复杂度之源 |
| 组件收 wiring 回调包inject→props 两层下传) | 标准件通道让组件自取;公共面收敛为 hooks + 稳定 props |
| Hero 无 session 视图与 session Conversation 整支互换 | 即使外层 layout 不变Hero、picker 与 composer 子树仍会一起重建,界面产生整块抖动 |
| 让 InputBar 自身变成 `session-maybe` | 输入状态机、键盘命令面与动作都被迫接受缺省值;只替换 disabled 输入体能把可选性留在外壳边界 |
| 专用「转正」帧 | `session-status(running:true)` 语义蕴含转正blank 会话从不 running加帧是 wire 多一型换零信息 |
## 后果
- 插件获得与 host 同构的会话语境per-session 状态挂 actx、随 scope fiber 一次拆装,泄漏结构性不可能;双会话隔离由 scope filter 结构性保证。
- client 对象层收敛为 wire 镜像:会话身份、生命周期、能力判别全部以 host 实体为准——输入体系(下一层)面对的永远是「有真 Agent 的会话」slash/skill 等 provider 一律以 sessionId 直接寻址。
- 空会话治理零专用机制:状态靠一个派生位,可见性靠统一列表投影(仅 current blank 以 `New Session` 展示),回收靠 lazy persistence 的既有契约(重启蒸发),常规上限靠同 Workspace 复用。
- 代价id→ctx 换乘纪律、provide 的 Concurrent 纪律都是约定而非类型强制,靠 review 与测试钉住;「未选 workspace」期间输入全禁是产品面接受的体验代价单一状态轴换来的
- 已知欠账approval/question 跨 prune 恢复TODO模型选择以 live-mutation 形状回归host `selectModel` 三件套现成,等独立分支)。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md: c7db576ff3c7a56622f90a4400bd9297c9591bef
2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.zh.md: 75ee6851127ca6d8c3fc60a66115d521d4627cdc
2026-07-25-web-command-surfaces-and-assembly.md: 5188e8c17b31157b1c03203a8d7ba2d8e6a1496b
2026-07-25-web-command-surfaces-and-assembly.zh.md: 0134cc10cf4f49b7719d6a0dacb239389776d6ed

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
# Agent Note: Web command business surfaces and assembly (ui-command / ui-skill / ui-subagent)
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-25-web-command-surfaces-and-assembly.zh.md)
> Scope: the command directory cache and three-kind dispatch (ui-command), the popup selection flow, the two skill / subagent reference sources, and fixture command routing plus assembly acceptance (the slash-flow snapshot). The carrying wire lives in the [session scope note](2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.md); triggers, the menu, and the input machine live in the [input machine note](2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.md).
## Problem
The pipeline was ready but command knowledge had no landing spot: host-side `ctx.commands` and `ctx.skills` were complete while the web channel had no command capability. The business layer had to answer:
- Command UI takes more than one shape (execute on the spot, pop a select box, backfill and keep typing arguments) — how do business packages ship with zero skeleton changes;
- When is the directory fetched: pulling on every menu open is too slow, while a resident cache needs invalidation and reconnect stories;
- Sessions are always agent-backed (Session + Agent born in the same instant) — by what address does the client command surface honor the host's per-agent effective directory;
- Assembly-level acceptance: with the layers split apart, how the user-visible main chain is pinned once they come together.
## Decision
### ui-command: a `CommandService` + a session-keyed `CommandDirectory` + a per-session `PopupSelectController`
- The `ClientSessionContext { sessionId }` projection is self-held in the ui-slash contract (types.ts): sessions are always agent-backed, so session identity is the entire projection of command capability; the wire addresses by `{sessionId}` (both `command.list` and `command.execute`; the host resolves the Agent from the session header).
- The directory is compartmented by `SessionId`, with per-key single-flight + an epoch guard (an old pull never overwrites newer state); `commands/changed` soft-invalidates every key (the old snapshot keeps serving while the repull runs in the background), `connection/reset` hard-invalidates every key and rewarms, Enter strong-waits on the current key, and a failure keeps the draft with no downgrade. Prewarming hangs on the source's `warm` hook — once over the full roster at scope birth, which covers the entire session lifecycle (session capability is constant from birth).
- `register(contribution)` registers client commands (a descriptor + `available(projection)` + a popupSelect spec); candidate synthesis = the host directory + contribution availability filtering, then the query/position pass, and a host/contribution name clash fails loud.
- The three command kinds derive from the registration surfaces; developers never declare positions: a host descriptor with `input` = **leadingInput** (backfill `/name ␣` + claim, keep typing arguments, leading position only); a client-registered popupSelect spec = **popupSelect** (the official select-box shell, business ships zero components); neither = **execute** (run on selection, zero UI).
- The dispatch decision table: the menu can trigger all three kinds; Space recognizes only leadingInput (the misfire defense: irreversible side effects keep explicit entry points only); Enter runs execute / opens the shell only on a bare token, while leadingInput tolerates trailing arguments.
- The popup from `popupFor(actx)`: search filters locally, select is single-flight, the projection is captured at open, onSelect consumes the token through the consume-token event only on success, a failure is retained for retry, and a session switch merely hides it. The popup shell is a transient layer (never in the state machine): the box holds focus, Enter/↑↓/Escape belong to it, and clicking outside the box dismisses (clicking the textarea also returns focus).
### Reference sources (seeing only projections plus their own apply closures, on the root ctx)
- **ui-skill**: `skill.list({sessionId})` addresses by session (the host resolves the project root from the session header); the directory cache is single-flight keyed by sessionId, prewarmed at birth by the `warm` hook and fully cleared by `connection/reset`. A pick produces a text outcome (the literal `/name ` text, Decision 21); `lexicon` supplies the roster from CatalogFetch's settled snapshot (`undefined` while not warm). No match hook (references never enter command adjudication). Skill references ride ordinary prompts as literal text (outside the command plane; tool-skill unchanged, with the session-prefix directory providing the cooperative association).
- **ui-subagent**: candidates are zero-RPC (the sessions.list snapshot filtered by parentId/running); a pick produces a text outcome (the literal `@name ` text); `lexicon` derives from the same snapshot (the model-side representation awaits its business workstream).
### Fixture command routing and assembly
- The connection fixture adds command routing (fixture + fake-api): the keyless rig can run the complete command flow (directory, execution, popup selection).
- The apps/cli assembly mounts all the new packages; the tsconfig path map / reference sets are filled in; catalogs/docs are regenerated with the wire and events.
### Assembly-level acceptance: the slash-flow snapshot
`apps/web/tests/slash-flow.snapshot.ts` pins the user-visible main chain (assembled keyless; package mocks are no substitute for the assembled transcript): the composer disabled with no session → creating a Workspace and entering an already-materialized blank session → picking the `/echo` leadingInput from the `/` menu → the command executes but the blank bit does not flip and the list still shows `New Session` → the first ordinary prompt's successful acceptance converts that same row; the same session-bound textarea holds across blank → active. `workspace-flow.snapshot.ts` separately pins blank-row creation/reuse, first-prompt rejection backfill, and — on a Workspace switch before the first prompt — the draft moving across input machines with the old blank row hidden.
## Alternatives considered
| Rejected | One-line reason |
|---|---|
| Inline prompt dispatch (command text riding the message into the host for parsing) | Conflates the command and message planes; command execution being independent of the message queue is existing host semantics |
| A bridge materializing skills as commands | Skills have their own directory; N registrations would be a detour; the tag form naturally avoids the command plane |
| A `skill.invoke` RPC | The host has no such operation; skill references are plain text riding prompts |
| A new ContentBlock reference type | Full-chain cost (adapters/UI/compaction); text-as-truth plus structured occurrence records suffices |
| Client packages self-reporting command directories | The host is the single source of truth; the client only reads descriptors, with `commands-changed` pushing invalidation |
| The `requires: 'none' \| 'agent'` discriminant axis (an agentless directory + dual-addressed queries) | With sessions always agent-backed, the amphibious command has no owner; the whole axis reverts to master's shape, to be reopened on real demand |
| Dedicated commandresult / commandpanel slots | Results go through notices; the popup shell is a skeleton-internal overlay; rich result cards sit in the ledger |
| An agent-type directory as the `@` source | No type registry exists; the live-session snapshot already covers it |
| A PickAction/EnterCommand class family (class-inheritance pick products) | Cross-package runtime values break client bundle purity; pure data interfaces plus closure methods are equivalent |
## Consequences
- Shipping a business command = a host registration plus one client `command.register` (popupSelect) or zero registration (execute/leadingInput derive automatically), with zero skeleton changes; the cost is that the three-kind semantics concentrate in ui-command, and a hypothetical fourth kind means changing it.
- The resident directory cache plus push invalidation buys zero-latency menus and reliable enter adjudication; the cost is three invalidation paths (the change frame, reconnect, the epoch guard) that all need tests pinning them.
- sessionId addressing puts the host's per-agent effective directory (global + scoped shadows) straight on the wire, with the client presenting it as-is.
- Known gaps: the popupSelect shell has no shipped business consumer yet (model selection and its kin return with #600's host `selectModel` in live-mutation shape, serving as the onboarding template then); the queue's second cut (per-item Inbox operations), rich result cards, and roster configurability sit in the ledger awaiting their triggers.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
# Agent Note: Web 命令业务面与装配ui-command / ui-skill / ui-subagent
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-25-web-command-surfaces-and-assembly.md) | 中文
> 范围命令目录缓存与三型判定ui-command、popup 选择流、skill / subagent 两个引用源、fixture 命令路由与装配验收slash-flow 快照)。承载 wire 见[会话作用域 note](2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.md);触发/菜单/输入机器见[输入状态机 note](2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.md)。
## 问题
管线就绪但没有命令知识的落点host 侧 `ctx.commands``ctx.skills` 完整而 web 通道无命令能力。业务层要回答:
- 命令 UI 不止一种形态(当场执行、弹选择框、回填后继续打参数)——业务包如何零骨架改动上架;
- 目录何时拉取:每次开菜单现拉太慢,常驻缓存就要有失效与重连故事;
- 会话恒 agent-backedSession+Agent 同瞬出生client 命令面以什么地址兑现 host 的 per-agent 有效目录;
- 装配级验收:拆开的各层合起来,用户可见主链如何钉住。
## 决策
### ui-command`CommandService` + session 键控 `CommandDirectory` + per-session `PopupSelectController`
- 投影 `ClientSessionContext { sessionId }` 自持于 ui-slash 契约types.ts会话恒 agent-backed会话身份即命令能力的全部投影wire 以 `{sessionId}` 寻址(`command.list` / `command.execute` 均是host 从会话 header 解析 Agent
- 目录按 `SessionId` 分格per-key single-flight + epoch guard旧拉取永不覆盖新态`commands/changed` 全 key 软失效(旧快照继续服务、后台重拉)、`connection/reset` 全 key 硬失效并预热Enter 强等当前 key、失败留草稿不降级。预热挂 source 的 `warm` 钩子——scope 出生时对全 roster 一次,即覆盖整个会话生命周期(会话能力自出生恒定)。
- `register(contribution)` 注册 client 命令descriptor + `available(projection)` + popupSelect spec候选合成 = host 目录 + contribution 可用性过滤,再过 query/positionhost/contribution 重名 fail loud。
- 命令三型按注册面派生开发者不声明位置host descriptor 带 `input` = **leadingInput**(回填 `/name ␣` + claim继续打参数仅限行首client 注册 popupSelect spec = **popupSelect**(官方选择框壳,业务零组件);两者皆无 = **execute**(选中即执行,零 UI
- 判定决策表菜单可触发三型Space 只认 leadingInput误触发防线不可逆副作用只留显式入口Enter 裸 token 才 execute/开壳、leadingInput 容忍尾随参数。
- `popupFor(actx)` 的 popupsearch 本地过滤、select single-flight、open 时捕获投影、onSelect 成功才经 consume-token 事件消 token、失败保留可重试、session 切换只隐藏。popup 壳是瞬态层不进状态机框持焦点、Enter/↑↓/Escape 归它、点框外即 dismiss点 textarea 同时归还焦点)。
### 引用源(只见投影 + 自家 apply 闭包的 root ctx
- **ui-skill**`skill.list({sessionId})` 按会话寻址host 从会话 header 解析项目根);目录缓存按 sessionId 键控 single-flight`warm` 钩子出生预热、`connection/reset` 全清。pick 产出 text outcome`/name ` 原文,决策 21`lexicon` 从 CatalogFetch 的 settled 快照给名录(未热 `undefined`)。无 match 钩子引用不进命令裁决。skill 引用以原文随普通 prompt 走命令平面之外tool-skill 不变session-prefix 目录提供协作关联)。
- **ui-subagent**:候选零 RPCsessions.list 快照按 parentId/running 过滤pick 产出 text outcome`@name ` 原文);`lexicon` 同快照派生(模型侧表示待业务立项)。
### fixture 命令路由与装配
- connection fixture 补命令路由fixture + fake-apikeyless 台架可跑完整命令流目录、执行、popup 选择)。
- apps/cli 装配挂全部新包tsconfig path map / reference 集补齐catalog/docs 随 wire 与事件再生成。
### 装配级验收slash-flow 快照
`apps/web/tests/slash-flow.snapshot.ts` 钉住用户可见主链assembled keyless包 mock 不替代装配转录):无 session 时 composer 禁用 → 创建 Workspace 并进入已实体化的 blank session → `/` 菜单选 `/echo` leadingInput → 命令执行但 blank 位不翻转、列表仍显示 `New Session` → 首条普通 prompt 成功受理后同一行转正;同一 session-bound textarea 跨 blank → active 保持。`workspace-flow.snapshot.ts` 另钉住 blank 行创建/复用、首讯拒绝回填,以及首讯前切换 Workspace 时 draft 跨 input machine 搬运且旧 blank 行隐藏。
## Alternatives considered
| 弃案 | 一行理由 |
|---|---|
| prompt 内联派发(命令文本随消息进 host 解析) | 混淆命令/消息平面;命令执行独立于消息队列是既有 host 语义 |
| skill 物化为 command 的桥 | skill 自有目录N 笔注册是绕路;标签形式天然避开命令平面 |
| `skill.invoke` RPC | host 无此操作skill 引用是随 prompt 的普通文本 |
| 新 ContentBlock 引用类型 | 全链路成本adapter/UI/compaction文本即真身 + 结构化 occurrence 记录已足够 |
| client 各包自报命令目录 | host 是唯一真源client 只读 descriptor`commands-changed` 推失效 |
| `requires: 'none' \| 'agent'` 判别轴agentless 目录 + 双址查询) | 会话恒 agent-backed 后两栖命令无 owner整轴回退 master 形状,待真需求重开 |
| 专用 commandresult / commandpanel 坑位 | 结果走 noticepopup 壳是骨架内浮层;富结果卡入台账 |
| agent-type 目录做 `@` 源 | 无类型注册表live-session 快照已覆盖 |
| PickAction/EnterCommand 类族(类继承 pick 产物) | 跨包运行时值破坏 client bundle 纯度;纯数据接口 + 闭包方法等价 |
## 后果
- 业务命令上架 = host 注册 + client 一笔 `command.register`popupSelect或零注册execute/leadingInput 自动派生),零骨架改动;代价是三型语义集中在 ui-command假想的第四型意味着改它。
- 常驻目录缓存 + 推失效换来菜单零延迟与回车裁决可靠代价是三条失效路径change 帧、重连、epoch guard都需测试钉住。
- sessionId 寻址让 host 的 per-agent 有效目录(全局 + scoped shadows直接上 wireclient 原样呈现。
- 已知欠账popupSelect 壳暂无已上架业务消费者(模型选择等 #600 的 host `selectModel` 以 live-mutation 形态回归,届时作接入样板);队列第二刀(逐项 Inbox 操作、富结果卡、roster 可配置性入台账待触发。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.md: acbd132a5fdb97a4098064aae689dfca604ad4b7
2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.zh.md: 158650a41b47f98037a1b3e610d9294694c55a8c

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
# Agent Note: Web input state machine, composer slots, and the slash pipeline (ui-conversation input / ui-slash)
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.zh.md)
> Scope: the input state machine (the occurrence table + claim watch + the submit transaction), the hub/facade and send orchestration, the three scoped bail events for cross-plugin input rewrites, `/` and `@` trigger detection and the menu pipeline (ui-slash), and the slot system around the composer. It depends on the [session scope note](2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.md)'s sctx / provide / session-maybe and blank entity model; command knowledge (the three kinds, the directory, popups) is untouched here — that is the [command surfaces note](2026-07-25-web-command-surfaces-and-assembly.md)'s territory.
## Problem
Two composers, each a law unto itself: hero (EmptyState, the controlled chain writing straight into the Session) and the in-conversation InputBar (a plain controlled textarea) — behavior, draft ownership, and send path all inconsistent. To bring the three trigger families — `/` commands, skill references, `@` references — onto the input surface, these had to be answered:
- How the three trigger families layer, and who holds knowledge of "commands" versus who stays zero-knowledge;
- How the input box expresses "command mode" — derived from the draft text or explicit state? What do backspace, enter, space, and pasting a whole line each mean;
- Submission is an asynchronous transaction (an RPC round trip) — how are stale-result backwash, session switching, and React concurrent replay defended;
- How reference chips are represented on a plain textarea, and who owns undo / clipboard / paste matching / model serialization;
- How cross-plugin input rewrites (menu backfill, reference insertion, token consumption) achieve dependency inversion;
- Which React shells must be reused across no session → blank session, and which strict-session input bodies may be replaced.
Hard constraints: components mount through slots only; presentation artifacts never enter the session log; the keyboard path is IME-safe throughout.
## Decision
### The input state machine (`InputMachine`)
A pure state machine, events in / effects out, clock injected. Four phases (plain / adjudicating / claimed / submitting). Command mode is **never derived from the draft**; the pick paths establish it explicitly at discrete moments; the claim is watched by `draft.startsWith(token)`, with a backspace break releasing automatically; the claim shape is `{token, hint?}` (hint feeds ghost text).
The event surface (`dispatch(ev)` is the single write entry; one transaction per event):
- `draft-changed {draft, editRange?}` — the textarea's full draft; editRange narrows the occurrence-shift computation, defaulting to a shared prefix/suffix scan.
- `newline {selection}` — the Ctrl+Enter line break (not via the browser's execCommand: under self-managed undo a browser write forks two histories).
- `begin-command {claim, span}` / `insert-ref {reference, span}` / `consume-token {guard}` — the machine side of the three bail events; span CAS = draftRev equality.
- `set-invalid {invalidIds}` — the style bit for owner-resolution results (not a transaction).
- `undo` / `redo` — the self-managed transaction log (a ring of 100; single-character typing merges within injected-clock windows; a successful submit clears the log).
- `paste-begin {text, selection, components?, generation?}` — the paste plus hot-snapshot synchronously matched components in one transaction (one Undo returns to before the paste); opens a PasteMatchAttempt.
- `paste-upgrade {attemptId, span, reference}` — an asynchronous match upgrade as its own transaction (Undo in two steps); the attempt stays current, and insertedRange shrinks with each upgrade.
- `invalidate-paste` — attempt-ending gestures observed at the DOM layer (caret/selection operations and the like).
- `enter {mode}` / `adjudicated` / `adjudication-failed` / `submit-settled` / `release` — the submit-transaction plane: a SubmitAttempt (seq + AbortSignal) blocks backwash; success commits and clears the draft; failure rolls back under the drift guard (the enter-time snapshot is backfilled only while the live draft still equals it; if the user has typed again, only a notice fires).
The effect surface (executed by the shell): `adjudicate` (calls SlashController.adjudicate), `begin-submit` (the claim.submit transaction), `default-sink` (ordinary messages, hub-orchestrated), `notice`.
The occurrence table and the chip's three projections:
- Each reference occupies one `U+FFFC` in the draft; a table entry is `{occurrenceId, source, ref, offset, label, clipboardText, invalid?}`; same-named chips stay independent through occurrenceId.
- Every edit updates the draft and the table in one transaction: ranges shift; a deletion/replacement intersecting a placeholder acts on the whole chip.
- The single-character placeholder makes keyboard atomicity mostly hold natively (the caret has no interior position; Backspace / arrow keys / Shift extension natively take the whole chip); a mouse click on a chip goes backdrop hit → whole-chip setSelectionRange.
- The visual projection = label: the backdrop renders the chip at the placeholder offset (the textarea glyph is invisible), with invalid taking the invalid style.
- The clipboard/persistence projection = clipboardText: copy/cut expands placeholders inside the selection; the draft-persistence mirror writes the same projection (the chat store always holds plain text; the refresh seed semantics = select-all copy → reopen → paste, with chips degrading to text across a refresh).
- The model projection = generated per chip at submit through the source's `codec.serialize` (owned by the submit attempt's signal and stale guard; a missing owner / failure / cancel means no send, never a downgrade to `/name`).
### Cross-plugin input rewrites: three scoped bail events
The contract is declared in ui-slash (the bottom of the dependency chain); producers dispatch via `sctx.bail(sctx, ...)`, and the only consuming side is the three listeners the hub hangs on the sctx when building the shell; returning `true` ⟺ the machine passed the phase and CAS guards and actually rewrote (emitting the event ≠ a successful modification; whether Space gets `preventDefault` follows the return value):
- `slash/input-begin-command` `{claim, span}` — backfill of the command claim adjudicated from a menu pick / Space (dispatched by the SlashController).
- `slash/input-insert-reference` `{reference, span}` — reference chip insertion (dispatched by the SlashController).
- `slash/input-consume-token` `{guard: span | bare-token}` — consuming the command token after business success (dispatched by the downstream command surfaces).
Calls that stay un-evented (registry registration → explicit call → await): Input's own draft/submit, asynchronous Enter adjudication, the reference serializer, the asynchronous paste matcher. `@mode bail` has entered the JSDoc parser and the cordis catalog gate (scripts/jsdoc.ts).
### The slash pipeline (ui-slash: a root `SlashService` + a per-session `SlashController`)
A trigger/menu/pick pipeline with zero knowledge of "commands":
- The service holds only the source registry (`SlashSource{trigger: '/'|'@', name, candidates, onPick, matchSpace?, matchEnter?}`; (trigger,name) unique, registration order = group order = polling order) and `sessionOf(sctx)`. Implementing a match hook IS the declaration of participation in space/enter adjudication; the pipeline polls in registration order, the first non-undefined answer wins, and no claimant means the default sink. matchSpace is synchronous (space fires mid-keystroke; hot cache only); matchEnter is asynchronous (it may await the source's own warmup, and a warmup failure rejects).
- The controller holds the single authoritative hit (span included; retained for Space after the menu closes), the per-session menu store, the candidate-fetch generation, keyboard arbitration (combobox mode: focus stays in the textarea, ↑↓/Enter/Escape are intercepted and all pass the IME composition guard, with the single exception Shift+Enter unconditionally going first), and pick orchestration (outcome → self-dispatched bail events); at each session scope's birth it runs `warm(projection)` once over the source roster — within that scope the projection holds only the stable sessionId, with no published/capability transitions; the scope disposer tears down the controller.
- Trigger-detection word boundaries (`user@host` and URL `/` never trigger) and the guard tiers (plain: `/` everywhere + `@` inline / claimed: `/` suppressed, `@` live / frozen: none) are the frozen pure core.
### hub / facade: the resident shell and the strict-session input body
- The hub (trigger/decoration registries + send orchestration) takes the slash/command services as optional `ctx.get()` dependencies: without ui-slash or the command surfaces, input still sends and receives normally — graceful degradation.
- Each materialized Session has exactly one `SessionInputShell` (the facade), created and torn down with the session scope; with no session, no input machine is built. `ConversationRoot` is itself the `session-maybe` resident shell, holding HeroShell, the Workspace picker, the composer stack, and the chain-fallback frame.
- With no session the shell renders the presentation-only `DisabledInputBar`; once `connectWorkspace` returns a blank session, only the input body is swapped for the strict-session InputBar. The textarea may be rebuilt here, while `ConversationRoot`, the Hero, and the layout skeleton hold; blank → engaging/active stays the same session-bound InputBar, with the textarea never rebuilt on a phase flip.
- ConversationRoot's Hero criterion is `sessionId === undefined || (composerPhase === 'blank' && (openState === 'open' || openState === 'loading'))`. The first submit enters engaging synchronously, and a failure keeps the composer and the error context rather than falling back to the blank Hero; the sidebar's blank bit flips false only after a prompt is successfully accepted.
- Sending unifies in the hub defaultSink: after an optimistic draft clear it goes only through `session.prompt {mode:'queue'|'steer'}`; backfill happens only when it fails and the live draft is still empty — a user who has kept typing is never overwritten. No Draft materialize or attach transaction exists.
- When the blank Hero re-picks the Workspace, the shell calls `connectWorkspace`; if the target session differs, the non-empty draft moves from the current shell to the target shell before the new id is opened, and the old blank session survives but is no longer current.
- The Notifier's two-bit contract: `dirty` (snapshot freshness, clearable by an `ensureFresh` pull) and `notifyPending` (notification debt, cleared only by a flush) are mutually independent — a pull must not swallow a push, and object-layer push subscribers (watchTransaction) depend on this guarantee.
### Plain-text references (Decision 21): text outcomes and lexicon decoration
skill/@subagent references skip the placeholder + occurrence identity chain — a pick inserts the literal `/name ` `@name ` text straight into the draft, with the chip visual purely derived:
- PickOutcome gains a `{text}` arm; the new scoped bail event `slash/input-insert-text` `{text, span}` (the same contract as the other three: draftRev CAS, returning true ⟺ an actual rewrite); facade.insertText goes through setDraft concatenation — zero machine changes.
- Sources get an optional `lexicon?(session)` hook: a synchronous hot-snapshot name roster, with `undefined` = data not warm — zero decoration, never triggering a fetch (the render path stays synchronous and side-effect-free); the controller aggregates it into the `lexicon()` public surface.
- `decorations.scanTextRefs`: a word-boundary scan of the draft (`/name`, `@name` at line start / after whitespace; `x/name` never hits) against the roster; a hit gets the `.textRef` mark (a pure range highlight on the backdrop, same as hlToken); an edit breaking the match shape simply disappears on the next scan.
- Sending is the literal text (no more `<skill>` serialization); on the bubble side MessageItem decorates both shapes (the legacy `<skill>` tag + plain-text tokens).
- The old occurrence/paste/serialize chain stays on disk in full, undeleted (additive; deletion is a separate future cut). Known limitation kept as-is: with the lexicon not warm at paste / cold start there is no decoration — it lights up only after typing `/` opens the menu once.
### Per-session provide contributions and the private keyboard surface
- ui-conversation (the hub doubling as a contributor) supplies through `sessions.provide` the `'input'` hook (machine state + the queue overlay) plus the `inputActions` prop (`setDraft`/`submit`, stable void callbacks).
- The public/private boundary: the public provide carries only React-vocabulary members; the keyboard/DOM command surface (track/arbitrate/space/undo/redo/paste/dismissPopup/bindMirror — synchronous return values, disposer semantics) is InputBar-exclusive, passed privately in-package through the InputBar entry's own inject, never leaving the plugin boundary.
### The slot system
`conversation` is itself session-maybe; its session content and the composer input slots are strict session, while the Hero Workspace picker stays root. The child slots are all declared by ui-conversation's conversation registration:
- `conversation.session` (single) — the strict-session header, view ring, and chat store; rebuilt when the session id switches.
- `conversation.composer.bar` (single) — the slot for the InputBar itself: the InputBar is a true slot entry (self-registered into its own slot) and the content of the composer chain's fallback; it is not a chain entry — the chain's single election would unmount it on a takeover, breaking textarea DOM survival.
- `conversation.input.overlay` — the floating-overlay anchor inside the input card; registrants' inject resolves each one's own per-session controller by the slot sessionId.
- `conversation.input.dock` — the stacked strip above the input (QueueDock's read-only queue list lands here), ordered by `order`.
- `conversation.composer.dock` — the stats band on the composer's top edge.
- `conversation.input.left` / `conversation.input.right` — the tool-row left and right regions.
- `conversation.input.plan` / `conversation.input.model` (single) — the tool row's two named control seats; the bar passes only `locked` (owner props), each stays empty until its owning plugin registers, no placeholder fallback.
- `conversation.hero.workspace` (root scope) — the Workspace picker shared by the no-session and blank Hero; a pick reuses or creates the target blank session through `connectWorkspace`, moving the draft where necessary before switching current.
### Testing discipline
The state machine's entire behavior is covered by pure-JS unit tests (event sequences in, asserting state and effects, zero browser DOM); the interaction matrix is projection-tested row by row. This requirement is precisely what forced the pure-core + service-shell layering.
## Alternatives considered
| Rejected | One-line reason |
|---|---|
| An ActiveCommand intermediate state / a registerMode mode registry / deriving command mode from the draft | Claims are established explicitly by the pick paths — no table, no derivation |
| Direct bindTarget/bindDraft object wiring | Reverse coupling plus root-singleton cross-session mispairing; scoped bail events preserve dependency inversion with structurally correct routing |
| A unified slash/input-apply, or eventing everything | Three independent payloads cover the cross-plugin rewrites; asynchronous paths stay registry-based explicit calls |
| contenteditable / a rich-text tree | Poor compatibility; textarea + U+FFFC + the occurrence table covers the full interaction contract |
| Dual draft persistence {text, occurrences} | The mirror writing the clipboard projection adds zero new concepts; chip degradation across refresh is acceptable |
| The native textarea undo stack | Unreliable under controlled + programmatic writes; the paste two-step undo semantics can only be self-managed |
| The InputBar receiving a 16-member wiring-callback bundle | The consumption matrix proved 11 members InputBar-exclusive and 1 a dead member; the standard-kit channel lets components fetch their own, with the keyboard surface passed privately in-package |
| Space adjudication also claiming execute-kind commands | The misfire defense: after a space the whole line is an ordinary prompt; irreversible side effects keep explicit entry points only |
| A generic tokenPattern decoration mechanism | Structured occurrence records replace pattern scanning |
| A placeholder select resident in the tool row | Named seats stay empty until registration; a placeholder clashing with the real implementation is two sources of truth |
| All references through U+FFFC chips (the pre-Decision-21 line) | Plain text + derived decoration carries zero identity state; the literal text IS the model projection, sparing undo/clipboard any special cases; the chip chain is kept for scenarios needing indivisible atomicity |
## Consequences
- One resident conversation shell carries no-session/blank/active: no session → blank guarantees only the outer frame's React identity, allowing the disabled textarea to be replaced by the strict InputBar; the same blank session → engaging/active keeps the InputBar and the textarea. EmptyState and the controlled intent chain (`sessions.updateIntent`/`updatePendingPrompt`/`workspaces.sendSession`) are deleted along with their last consumer.
- The input surface's zero knowledge of commands plus optional dependencies: pure input works without the command packages; `@` references and skill references get free reuse of the same menu/pick pipeline. The cost is that space/enter adjudication is a per-source polling protocol whose answer semantics (sync/async, the meaning of undefined) are a frozen contract.
- Transactionalized submission (attempt seq + the drift guard) makes the three defect classes — stale-result backwash, session switching, concurrent replay — structurally impossible, pinned by the matrix tests.
- Known gaps: chip fidelity across refresh (paste matching is reusable for it) has no workstream yet; the subagent reference's model representation awaits its business workstream.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
# Agent Note: Web 输入状态机、composer 坑位与 slash 管线ui-conversation input / ui-slash
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.md) | 中文
> 范围输入状态机occurrence 表 + claim 看护 + 提交事务、hub/facade 与发送编排、跨插件输入改写的三个 scoped bail 事件、`/` 与 `@` 触发检测与菜单管线ui-slash、composer 周边坑位体系。依赖[会话作用域 note](2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.md)的 sctx / provide / session-maybe 与 blank 实体模型命令知识三型、目录、popup零涉——那是[命令业务面 note](2026-07-25-web-command-surfaces-and-assembly.md)的领地。
## 问题
两个各自为政的 composerheroEmptyState受控链直写 Session与会话内 InputBar普通受控 textarea行为、draft 所有权、发送路径全不一致。要让 `/` 命令、skill 引用、`@` 引用三类触发进入输入面,必须回答:
- 三类触发如何分层,谁对"命令"有知识、谁零知识;
- 输入框如何表达"命令态"——从 draft 文本推导还是显式状态?退格、回车、空格、整行粘贴各是什么语义;
- 提交是异步事务RPC 往返——晚到结果回灌、会话切换、React concurrent 重放如何防御;
- 引用 chip 在纯 textarea 上如何表示undo/剪贴板/粘贴匹配/模型序列化各归谁;
- 跨插件的输入改写菜单回填、引用插入、token 消费)如何做到依赖倒置;
- 无 session → blank session 时哪些 React 外壳必须复用,哪些严格 session 输入体允许替换。
硬约束:组件一律经 slots 挂载;呈现物不进 session log键盘路径全程 IME 安全。
## 决策
### 输入状态机(`InputMachine`
纯状态机,事件进/效果出,注入时钟。四相 phaseplain / adjudicating / claimed / submitting。命令态**永不从 draft 推导**,由 pick 路径在离散时刻显式建立claim 由 `draft.startsWith(token)` 看护、退格破坏自动 releaseclaim 形状 `{token, hint?}`hint 供 ghost text
事件面(`dispatch(ev)` 单写入口,每个事件一个 transaction
- `draft-changed {draft, editRange?}`——textarea 全量草稿editRange 缩小 occurrence 平移计算,缺省前后缀共扫。
- `newline {selection}`——Ctrl+Enter 换行(不经浏览器 execCommand自管 undo 下浏览器写入会分叉双历史)。
- `begin-command {claim, span}` / `insert-ref {reference, span}` / `consume-token {guard}`——三个 bail 事件的机器侧span CAS = draftRev 相等。
- `set-invalid {invalidIds}`——owner resolution 结果的样式位(非 transaction
- `undo` / `redo`——自管 transaction log环形 100单字符打字按注入时钟窗合并提交成功清 log
- `paste-begin {text, selection, components?, generation?}`——粘贴 + 热快照同步匹配组件同 transactionUndo 一次回粘贴前);打开 PasteMatchAttempt。
- `paste-upgrade {attemptId, span, reference}`——异步匹配升级为独立 transactionUndo 两段attempt 保持 currentinsertedRange 随升级收缩。
- `invalidate-paste`——DOM 层观察到的 attempt 终结手势caret/selection 操作等)。
- `enter {mode}` / `adjudicated` / `adjudication-failed` / `submit-settled` / `release`——提交事务平面SubmitAttemptseq + AbortSignal防回灌成功 commit 清稿,失败带漂移守卫 rollback回车时快照仅当 live draft 仍等于它才回填;用户已再输入则只发 notice
效果面shell 执行):`adjudicate`(调 SlashController.adjudicate`begin-submit`claim.submit 事务)、`default-sink`普通消息hub 编排)、`notice`
occurrence 表与 chip 三投影:
- 每颗引用在 draft 中占一个 `U+FFFC`;表项 `{occurrenceId, source, ref, offset, label, clipboardText, invalid?}`;同名 chip 因 occurrenceId 独立。
- 一切编辑同 transaction 更新 draft 与表:区间平移;与占位符相交的删除/替换作用于整颗。
- 单字符占位使键盘原子性大半原生成立caret 无内部位Backspace/方向键/Shift 扩选原生即整颗);鼠标点 chip 由 backdrop 命中 → 整颗 setSelectionRange。
- 视觉投影 = labelbackdrop 在占位符 offset 渲染 chiptextarea 字形不可见invalid 走失效样式。
- 剪贴板/持久化投影 = clipboardTextcopy/cut 把选区内占位符展开draft 持久化 mirror 写同一投影chat store 里永远是普通文本,刷新 seed 语义 = 全选复制→重开→粘贴chip 跨刷新降级为文本)。
- 模型投影 = submit 时经 source `codec.serialize` 逐颗生成(归 submit attempt 的 signal 与 stale guardowner 缺失/失败/取消则不发送,不降级为 `/name`)。
### 跨插件输入改写:三个 scoped bail 事件
契约声明在 ui-slash依赖最底层生产者经 `sctx.bail(sctx, ...)` 派发,唯一消费侧是 hub 建 shell 时挂在 sctx 上的三个 listener返回 `true` ⟺ 机器过 phase + CAS 守卫并实际改写(发出事件 ≠ 修改成功Space 是否 `preventDefault` 以返回值为准):
- `slash/input-begin-command` `{claim, span}`——菜单 pick / Space 裁决出的命令 claim 回填SlashController 派发)。
- `slash/input-insert-reference` `{reference, span}`——引用 chip 插入SlashController 派发)。
- `slash/input-consume-token` `{guard: span | bare-token}`——业务成功后消费命令 token下游命令面派发
不事件化的调用registry 注册 → 显式调用 → awaitInput 自身的 draft/submit、Enter 异步裁决、reference serializer、异步 paste matcher。`@mode bail` 已入 JSDoc parser 与 cordis catalog 门禁scripts/jsdoc.ts
### slash 管线ui-slashroot `SlashService` + per-session `SlashController`
对"命令"零知识的触发/菜单/pick 管线:
- service 只有 source 注册表(`SlashSource{trigger: '/'|'@', name, candidates, onPick, matchSpace?, matchEnter?}`(trigger,name) 唯一、注册序 = 组序 = 轮询序)与 `sessionOf(sctx)`。实现 match 钩子即参与空格/回车裁决的声明;管线按注册序轮询,首个非 undefined 应答胜出,无人认领落 default sink。matchSpace 同步空格在击键中触发只许热缓存matchEnter 异步(可 await 源自身预热,预热失败即 reject
- controller 持有唯一权威 hit含 span菜单关闭后为 Space 保留、per-session menu store、候选 fetch generation、键盘仲裁combobox 模式:焦点始终在 textarea↑↓/Enter/Escape 拦截且全程过 IME composition 守卫,唯一例外 Shift+Enter 无条件先行、pick 编排outcome → 自派 bail 事件);每个 session scope 出生时对 source roster 做一次 `warm(projection)`projection 在该 scope 内只有稳定的 sessionId无 published/能力跃迁scope disposer 拆除 controller。
- 触发检测词边界(`user@host`、URL `/` 永不触发、守卫分档plain`/` 到处 + `@` 行内 / claimed`/` 抑制、`@` 活 / frozen全无为冻结纯核。
### hub / facade常驻外壳与严格 session 输入体
- hubtrigger/decoration 注册表 + 发送编排)对 slash/command 服务是可选 `ctx.get()` 依赖:无 ui-slash/命令面时输入正常收发,优雅降级。
- 每个实体 Session 只有一个 `SessionInputShell`facade随 session scope 创建和拆除;无 session 时不造 input machine。`ConversationRoot` 自身是 `session-maybe` 常驻外壳,持有 HeroShell、Workspace picker、composer stack 与 chain fallback 外框。
- 无 session 时外壳渲染纯展示的 `DisabledInputBar``connectWorkspace` 返回 blank session 后,仅输入体换成严格 session 的 InputBar。这里允许 textarea 重建,`ConversationRoot`、Hero 与布局骨架保持blank → engaging/active 仍是同一 session-bound InputBartextarea 不因 phase 翻转而重建。
- ConversationRoot 的 Hero 判据是 `sessionId === undefined || (composerPhase === 'blank' && (openState === 'open' || openState === 'loading'))`。首次 submit 同步进入 engaging失败也保留 composer 与错误上下文,不退回 blank Herosidebar 的 blank 位只在 prompt 成功受理后翻 false。
- 发送统一在 hub defaultSink乐观清稿后只走 `session.prompt {mode:'queue'|'steer'}`;失败且 live draft 仍为空才回填,用户已经继续输入则不覆盖。不存在 Draft materialize 或 attach 事务。
- blank Hero 改选 Workspace 时,外壳调用 `connectWorkspace`;目标 session 不同时把非空 draft 从当前 shell 搬到目标 shell再 open 新 id旧 blank session 留存但不再 current。
- Notifier 双位契约:`dirty`(快照新鲜度,`ensureFresh` 拉取可清)与 `notifyPending`(通知欠账,只有 flush 清各自独立——拉取不得吞推送对象层推订阅者watchTransaction依赖这一保证。
### 纯文本引用(决策 21text outcome 与 lexicon 装饰
skill/@subagent 引用不走占位符 + occurrence 身份链——pick 直接把 `/name ` `@name ` 原文插进 draftchip 视觉纯派生:
- PickOutcome 增 `{text}` arm新 scoped bail 事件 `slash/input-insert-text` `{text, span}`与另三个同契约draftRev CAS、返回 true ⟺ 实际改写facade.insertText 走 setDraft 拼接,机器零改动。
- source 可选 `lexicon?(session)` 钩子:同步热快照名录,`undefined` = 数据未热——零装饰、永不触发 fetch渲染路径保持同步无副作用controller 聚合为 `lexicon()` 公面。
- `decorations.scanTextRefs`:词边界扫描 draft行首/空白后的 `/name``@name``x/name` 永不命中)对照名录,命中即 `.textRef` markbackdrop 纯 range 高亮,同 hlToken编辑破坏匹配形状下次扫描自然消失。
- 发送即原文(不再 `<skill>` 序列化);气泡侧 MessageItem 双形状装饰legacy `<skill>` 标签 + 纯文本 token
- 旧 occurrence/paste/serialize 链全部保留在盘未删additive删除另成将来一刀。已知局限维持现状粘贴/冷启动时 lexicon 未热不装饰,输 `/` 开一次菜单后才亮。
### per-session 供数贡献与键盘私面
- ui-conversationhub 兼贡献者)经 `sessions.provide``'input'` hook机器状态 + queue overlay+ `inputActions` prop`setDraft`/`submit`,稳定 void 回调)。
- 公私分界:公共 provide 只放 React 语汇成员;键盘/DOM 命令面track/arbitrate/space/undo/redo/paste/dismissPopup/bindMirror——同步返回值、disposer 语义)是 InputBar 独占,走 InputBar entry 自己的 inject 包内私递,不出插件边界。
### 坑位体系
`conversation` 本身是 session-maybe其会话内容与 composer 输入坑位严格 sessionHero Workspace picker 保持 root。子坑均由 ui-conversation 的 conversation 注册声明:
- `conversation.session`single——严格 session 的 header、view ring 与 chat storesession id 切换时重建。
- `conversation.composer.bar`single——InputBar 本体的坑位InputBar 是真 slot entry自家坑自注册composer chain fallback 的内容;不做 chain entry——chain 单选举会在 takeover 时卸载它,破坏 textarea DOM 存活。
- `conversation.input.overlay`——输入卡内浮层锚点;注册者 inject 按 slot sessionId 解析各自 per-session controller。
- `conversation.input.dock`——输入上方堆叠条QueueDock 的队列只读列表落此order 定序。
- `conversation.composer.dock`——composer 上沿统计带。
- `conversation.input.left` / `conversation.input.right`——工具行左右区。
- `conversation.input.plan` / `conversation.input.model`single——工具行两具名控制位bar 只传 `locked`owner props空到 owning 插件注册为止,无占位 fallback。
- `conversation.hero.workspace`root scope——无 session / blank Hero 共用的 Workspace pickerpick 经 `connectWorkspace` 复用或创建目标 blank session必要时搬运 draft 后切 current。
### 测试纪律
状态机全部行为由纯 JS 单测覆盖(事件序列进、断言状态与效果,零浏览器 DOM交互矩阵逐行投影测试。这一要求正是纯核 + 服务壳分层的成因。
## Alternatives considered
| 弃案 | 一行理由 |
|---|---|
| ActiveCommand 中间态 / registerMode 模式注册表 / 从 draft 推导命令态 | claim 由 pick 路径显式建立——无表、无推导 |
| bindTarget/bindDraft 对象直连 | 反向耦合 + root 单例跨会话误配scoped bail 事件保依赖倒置且路由结构性正确 |
| 统一 slash/input-apply 或全事件化 | 三个独立 payload 覆盖跨插件改写;异步链路保持 registry 显式调用 |
| contenteditable / 富文本树 | 兼容性差textarea + U+FFFC + occurrence 表覆盖全部交互契约 |
| draft 双持久化 {text, occurrences} | mirror 写剪贴板投影零新概念chip 跨刷新降级可接受 |
| 原生 textarea undo 栈 | 受控 + 程序化写入下不可靠;粘贴两段 undo 语义只能自管 |
| InputBar 收 16 员 wiring 回调包 | 消费矩阵实证 11 员 InputBar 独占、1 员死成员;标准件通道让组件自取,键盘面包内私递 |
| 空格裁决也认领即执行型命令 | 误触发防线:空格后整行是普通 prompt不可逆副作用只留显式入口 |
| 通用 tokenPattern 装饰机制 | 结构化 occurrence 记录取代模式扫描 |
| 占位 select 常驻工具行 | 具名坑位空到注册为止;占位件与真实现冲突时是双真相源 |
| 引用一律走 U+FFFC chip决策 21 前旧线) | 纯文本 + 派生装饰零身份状态原文即模型投影undo/剪贴板免特判chip 链保留给需要不可分原子性的场景 |
## 后果
- 一个常驻 conversation 外壳承接 no-session/blank/active无 session → blank 只保证大框架 React identity允许 disabled textarea 替换为严格 InputBar同一 blank session → engaging/active 保持 InputBar 与 textarea。EmptyState 与受控 intent 链(`sessions.updateIntent`/`updatePendingPrompt`/`workspaces.sendSession`)随最后消费者一并删除。
- 输入面对命令零知识 + 可选依赖:无命令包时纯输入可用;`@` 引用与 skill 引用免费复用同一菜单/pick 管线。代价是空格/回车裁决是逐 source 轮询协议,其应答语义(同步/异步、undefined 含义)为冻结契约。
- 提交事务化attempt seq + 漂移守卫使晚到结果回灌、会话切换、concurrent 重放三类缺陷结构性不可能,由矩阵测试钉住。
- 已知欠账chip 跨刷新保真可复用粘贴匹配未立项subagent 引用的模型表示待业务立项。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-20-extract-example-app-packages.md: f2853db3f454d71572be003cfbf4f6dfd8377cdd
2026-06-20-extract-example-app-packages.zh.md: 58d3d95996b1dacbc12178b46524374429df71ed
2026-07-26-packed-chunk-rows-by-default.md: d6a044676604e4a4512a7a6674edb80e120b2f3c
2026-07-26-packed-chunk-rows-by-default.zh.md: 184d462d70dcc666a0b38497ead307ce6861382d

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
# Agent Note: Make packed chunk rows the default JSONL layout
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-26-packed-chunk-rows-by-default.zh.md)
## Problem
Provider streams produce many token-sized `assistant/chunk` delta events whose repeated JSON envelopes can outweigh their payloads. The session log must retain each chunk as a distinct logical event: live `session/event` delivery, sequence numbers, `sourceEventSeqs`, replay, cancellation evidence, and UI streaming all depend on those boundaries.
The JSONL storage seam can reduce that envelope cost without changing the logical log. A run of at least three consecutive same-block delta events fits in one `text-chunks`, `reasoning-chunks`, or `tool-call-chunks` storage row, and decoding reconstructs every original event, timestamp, and sequence number. A credible default must cover runtime writers, app-level config, snapshot producers, and committed fixtures together; otherwise tests avoid the layout that deployments write.
## Decision
`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl` resolves an omitted `packChunks` to `true`. The ACP demo wrapper exposes the same default, and every composition that omits the field inherits packed writes. `packChunks: false` remains an explicit write-side diagnostic mode that stores one event per line.
Reading is unconditional and layout-blind. Packed, unpacked, and mixed files load into the same contiguous `SessionEvent[]`, so the default does not require a session-format version change or an on-disk runtime migration. The option controls newly appended batches only; it never selects a reader mode.
### Logical events and physical rows
Packing stays at the `dsh-session` storage seam through `packChunkRuns()` and `decodeStorageRecord()`. The encoder recognizes exact delta-event shapes, preserves unrecognized events verbatim, and packs only runs of at least three. A packed row is storage vocabulary, not a `SessionEventMap` member: it never enters `Session.events` or fires `session/event`.
The JSONL backend packs each durable append batch. Raw `compression: 'none'` and default Zstandard framing carry the same logical storage records; selecting raw mode for reviewable fixtures does not disable packing. Repository replay readers and normalizers decode the shared row format instead of maintaining snapshot-specific codecs.
### Canonical snapshot fixtures
Every committed session-format JSONL fixture uses the canonical packed representation. `scripts/session-fixture-layout.snapshot.ts` discovers tracked `*.jsonl` files and unignored untracked additions repository-wide, selects those whose first record is a `session` header, decodes all body records, and rejects content that differs from `packChunkRuns()` output. The inventory therefore includes ACP, headless, TUI, `apps/web`, parent sessions, child sessions, and future fixture names without a maintained path list.
ACP and headless snapshot runs harvest the default JSONL backend output. TUI and web record-mode writers apply `packChunkRuns()` to their in-memory events before writing fixtures. The authored `packed-chunks` ACP scenario runs under the ordinary config and retains all three packed row kinds; its contract decodes both its independent source fixture and target fixture before asserting event-for-event equality.
Focused package tests keep unpacked and mixed-layout inputs for reader compatibility. They do not opt the default snapshot corpus out of the canonical layout.
### In-flight branch convergence
The temporary [`scripts/migrate-packed-session-fixtures.ts`](../../../../scripts/migrate-packed-session-fixtures.ts) command lets in-flight branches converge after merging current `master`: `pnpm run migrate:packed-session-fixtures` discovers the same repository-wide fixture set as the permanent gate, preserves each header line, decodes existing mixed records, writes the canonical packed body, proves decoded equality, and proves idempotence. It never calls a model or regenerates transcript and presentation outputs.
The command remains linked from the testing policy and ACP snapshot README while older branches may carry fixture edits. The [removal proposal](../../proposed/process/2026-07-26-remove-packed-session-fixture-migrator.md) deletes the CLI, package command, this transitional section, and the documentation links, then replaces the permanent gate's command-specific remediation text once a live open-PR inventory shows that every affected branch is merged, closed, or canonical. The shared canonicalizer and snapshot gate remain permanent.
### Verification contract
JSONL persistence tests prove that omission writes a packed row, explicit `false` writes one event per line, and both forms load identical events. Canonicalizer unit tests cover header preservation, unpacked conversion, non-session JSONL, already-packed idempotence, and malformed input. The keyless snapshot gate covers every committed fixture and assembled replay path; documentation gates keep config defaults and bilingual contracts aligned.
## Alternatives considered
**Flip only the backend schema default.** This leaves wrapper defaults, direct TUI/web serializers, existing fixtures, and future fixture policy inconsistent. A default is meaningful only when shipping compositions and the tests representing them share it.
**Keep snapshots unpacked for readability.** Packed rows retain every fragment and timestamp explicitly, while the shared decoder and normalizer provide logical inspection. Keeping the largest committed consumer on a different layout would make snapshot coverage avoid the shipping write path.
**Remove `packChunks` and always pack.** One writer is simpler, but one-event-per-line output remains useful for diagnostics and for focused mixed-layout compatibility tests. The explicit opt-out preserves those current consumers without weakening the default.
**Batch chunks as logical session events.** This reduces event count, but it delays or reshapes live delivery, renumbers provenance, and requires every UI and replay consumer to understand another streaming unit. Physical packing obtains the storage benefit behind the existing persistence interface.
**Keep the branch migrator permanently.** The read-only canonicalizer and snapshot gate own continuing enforcement. A mutation command has value only while in-flight branches still carry the former fixture layout, so its lifetime is explicitly bounded by the removal proposal.
## Consequences
Ordinary JSONL writes and committed fixtures use fewer physical rows while preserving the exact logical event stream. Runtime readers accept every existing layout, and operators retain a deliberate unpacked diagnostic mode. Raw files are less convenient for per-token line processing, and external tools that incorrectly treat every post-header row as a `SessionEvent` encounter storage tags more often; supported readers call `decodeStorageRecord()`.
The repository carries a large mechanical fixture diff, reviewed through decoded equality and the canonical-layout gate rather than token-by-token line inspection. It also temporarily carries one branch migration command and its links; the separate removal proposal prevents that transition aid from becoming permanent process surface.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
# Agent Note: 将打包分片行设为默认 JSONL 布局
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-26-packed-chunk-rows-by-default.md) | 中文
## 问题
提供方流会产生大量 token 大小的 `assistant/chunk` 增量事件,其重复 JSON 封装可能比载荷本身更大。会话日志必须将每个分片保留为独立的逻辑事件:实时 `session/event` 传递、序号、`sourceEventSeqs`、回放、取消证据和 UI 流式输出都依赖这些边界。
JSONL 存储 seam 可以在不改变逻辑日志的情况下减少这部分封装开销。一段至少包含 3 个连续、同属一个块的增量事件可以编码为一条 `text-chunks``reasoning-chunks``tool-call-chunks` 存储行,解码则会重建每个原始事件、时间戳和序号。一个可信的默认值必须同时覆盖运行时写入器、应用级配置、快照生成器和签入仓库的 fixture测试前置数据否则测试会绕开部署实际写入的布局。
## 决策
`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl` 会将省略的 `packChunks` 解析为 `true`。ACPAgent Client Protocol演示包装层公开相同的默认值所有省略该字段的组合都会继承打包写入。`packChunks: false` 仍是写入侧显式诊断模式,以每事件一行的形式存储。
读取始终不受选项控制且与布局无关。打包、非打包和混合文件都会加载为相同且连续的 `SessionEvent[]`,因此更改默认值不需要变更会话格式版本,也不需要对磁盘数据执行运行时迁移。该选项只控制新追加的批次,绝不会选择读取器模式。
### 逻辑事件与物理行
打包保留在 `dsh-session` 的存储 seam并通过 `packChunkRuns()``decodeStorageRecord()` 实现。编码器识别精确的增量事件形态,原样保留无法识别的事件,并且只打包至少包含 3 个事件的连续段。打包行属于存储词汇,不是 `SessionEventMap` 成员:它绝不会进入 `Session.events`,也不会触发 `session/event`
JSONL 后端会打包每个持久追加批次。原始模式 `compression: 'none'` 与默认 Zstandard 帧承载相同的逻辑存储记录;为使 fixture 便于评审而选择原始模式,不会禁用打包。仓库中的回放读取器和规范化器会解码共享行格式,而不维护快照专用编解码器。
### 规范快照 fixture
每个签入仓库的会话格式 JSONL fixture 都使用规范打包表示。`scripts/session-fixture-layout.snapshot.ts` 会在整个仓库中发现已跟踪的 `*.jsonl` 文件,以及未被忽略的新增未跟踪 JSONL 文件,选择首条记录为 `session` header 的文件,解码所有正文记录,并拒绝与 `packChunkRuns()` 输出不同的内容。因此,该清单无需维护路径列表即可覆盖 ACP、headless、TUI、`apps/web`、父会话、子会话以及未来的 fixture 名称。
ACP 和 headless 快照运行会采集默认 JSONL 后端的输出。TUI 和 web 的记录模式写入器会在写入 fixture 前,对内存事件应用 `packChunkRuns()`。人工编写的 `packed-chunks` ACP 场景在普通配置下运行,并保留全部 3 种打包行类型;其契约先解码独立的源 fixture 和目标 fixture再断言二者逐事件相等。
聚焦的包package测试保留非打包和混合布局输入以验证读取器兼容性。这些测试不会让默认快照语料库豁免规范布局要求。
### 在途分支收敛
临时命令 [`scripts/migrate-packed-session-fixtures.ts`](../../../../scripts/migrate-packed-session-fixtures.ts) 让在途分支合并当前 `master` 后可以完成收敛:`pnpm run migrate:packed-session-fixtures` 会发现与永久门禁相同的仓库级 fixture 集合,保留各文件的 header 行,解码现有混合记录,写入规范打包正文,并证明解码结果相等且操作具有幂等性。该命令绝不会调用模型,也不会重新生成 transcript文本记录与呈现输出。
只要较旧分支仍可能携带 fixture 改动,测试政策和 ACP 快照 README 就会继续链接该命令。最新的开放 PRPull Request清单确认每个受影响分支均已合并、关闭或符合规范后[移除提案](../../proposed/process/2026-07-26-remove-packed-session-fixture-migrator.md)会删除该 CLI、包命令、本过渡章节和文档链接并替换永久门禁中仅适用于该命令的修复指引。共享规范布局转换器与快照门禁保持永久存在。
### 验证契约
JSONL 持久化测试证明:省略选项时会写入打包行,显式传入 `false` 时会按每事件一行的形式写入,两种形式都会加载为完全相同的事件。规范布局转换器单元测试覆盖 header 保留、非打包转换、非会话 JSONL、已打包输入的幂等性和畸形输入。无密钥快照门禁覆盖每个签入仓库的 fixture 和组装后的回放路径;文档门禁则确保配置默认值与双语契约保持一致。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**仅翻转后端 schema 默认值。** 这会让包装层默认值、TUI/web 直接序列化器、现有 fixture 与未来 fixture 政策仍然彼此不一致。只有已交付组合及代表这些组合的测试采用相同默认值时,该默认值才有意义。
**快照继续使用非打包格式以便阅读。** 打包行仍会显式保留每个片段和时间戳,共享解码器与规范化器则提供逻辑检查。如果让规模最大的签入仓库消费方采用不同布局,快照覆盖就会绕开已交付的写入路径。
**删除 `packChunks` 并始终打包。** 只保留一个写入器更简单,但每事件一行的输出仍适用于诊断和聚焦的混合布局兼容性测试。显式停用选项在不削弱默认值的同时,保留了这些现有消费方。
**把分片批量合并为逻辑会话事件。** 这会减少事件数量,但也会延迟或重塑实时传递,改变溯源信息所引用的序号,并要求每个 UI 和回放消费方理解另一种流式单位。物理打包通过现有持久化接口获得存储收益。
**永久保留分支迁移器。** 只读的规范布局转换器与快照门禁负责持续强制执行。只有在途分支仍携带旧 fixture 布局时,会修改仓库内容的命令才有价值,因此移除提案明确限定了其生命周期。
## 后果
常规 JSONL 写入与签入仓库的 fixture 使用更少的物理行,同时精确保留逻辑事件流。运行时读取器接受所有现有布局,操作方也保留有意提供的非打包诊断模式。按 token 逐行处理原始文件较为不便;错误地将 header 后每一行都视为 `SessionEvent` 的外部工具会更频繁地遇到存储 tag受支持的读取器则会调用 `decodeStorageRecord()`
仓库会产生大规模机械 fixture diff评审应依据解码结果相等这一事实和规范布局门禁而不是逐行、逐 token 检查。仓库还会暂时保留一个分支迁移命令及其链接;单独的移除提案会防止这项过渡辅助机制成为永久的流程接口。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-21-tui-reload-command.md: 89bf2f7bb482d7f3889136c1a6ac9918ba0c4919
2026-07-21-tui-reload-command.zh.md: cfea10690af49f2cf484938a3f9f12d954766a71
2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md: 57ac176cf6d2b0a50fcbcfacd77f6a26b462b582
2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.zh.md: 252382ac39ebf1e5077fad87fcee2537ae8a9ab3

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
# Agent Note: The task registry is a capability seam (`dsh-tasks` / `dsh-tasks-local`)
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.zh.md)
## Problem
The [background-task runtime](2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md) shipped `TaskService` as one concrete package: `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks` owned both the `ctx.tasks` contract every producer and control surface programs against and the process-local implementation (the in-memory store, settlement bookkeeping, owner-cleanup effects, teardown). That bundling recouples the two rates of change the repository's [capability-seam rule](2026-06-13-capability-seams.md) separates: swapping the registry's storage or lifecycle backend would churn the same package whose types and `ctx.tasks` surface producers (`dsh-tool-bash`, `dsh-tool-pty`, `dsh-tool-subagent`), the control surface (`dsh-tool-tasks`), and `TaskKindMap` extenders import. Every other swappable capability in the harness — bash, pty, fs, skill, subagent, web, session persistence — already carries the interface / implementation / consumer split; the task registry was the remaining `core`-mode exception, guarded only by a `TODO(task-service-backend)` comment.
## Decision
`tasks/` is now a three-package capability family in the bash-trio shape:
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks` (interface)** — the abstract `TaskService extends Service` owning `ctx.tasks`, the eight-method contract (`start`, `list`, `get`, `read`, `kill`, `wait`, `onTaskDone`, `attachSurface`), all vocabulary types (`TaskId`, `TaskKindMap`, `TaskStart`, `TaskHooks`, `TaskOutcome`, `TaskSnapshot`, `TaskRead`, `TaskDoneListener`), and the snapshot invariant companion. The class-level JSDoc states the semantics every implementation owes: registrations outlive producer and surface fibers, owned access is session-fenced, settlement is first-wins with contained listeners, and `start` refuses work while no control surface is attached.
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local` (implementation)** — `LocalTaskService`, the process-local registry moved verbatim: the in-memory store, per-kind counters, waiter bookkeeping, `TASK_WAIT_TIMEOUT` deadline code, owner-cleanup effects, and force-fail teardown. The `dsh-timeout` dependency moves here with it; the seam has no implementation dependencies.
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks` (consumer)** — unchanged; it injects `'tasks'` and never imports implementation types.
Compositions load `dsh-tasks-local` where they previously loaded `dsh-tasks` (the CLI cordis.yml row, `agent-spine-demo`, test harnesses, the tool-catalog generator boot). Producer misconfiguration diagnostics ("background tasks unavailable: load …") name `dsh-tasks` — the seam that defines the absent `ctx.tasks` service — and the seam's own surfaces (its README and the direct-mount fence) point at implementations, so the producer message stays correct when another backend becomes the recommended default. Producers, `TaskKindMap` declaration merges, and the control surface keep importing `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks` only.
The seam keeps the in-process contract semantics unchanged: `TaskStart.run()` still passes callbacks and exact `Agent` objects, so a durable or cross-process backend still has design work to do before it can implement this interface (identity, restart, ownership, observation). The split moves that future work out of every consumer's dependency graph; it does not pre-design the backend.
## Alternatives considered
**Keep the concrete service until a second backend exists (status quo).** This was the original runtime note's position: extracting an interface before a second implementation risks freezing the wrong boundary. It lost because the boundary is no longer speculative — the eight service methods and their semantics have been stable across every producer integration since introduction, they are exactly the surface `dsh-tool-tasks` and the producers already program against, and the repository convention treats swappable capabilities as three packages by default. The residual risk (a durable backend needing contract changes) is unchanged by the split: those changes would land in the seam package either way, and today they would also churn every consumer's implementation dependency.
**Interface-only extraction inside one package (export an abstract class beside the concrete one).** Rejected because it separates nothing operationally: consumers still depend on the package that carries the implementation and its dependencies, and a replacement backend still cannot ship without the local one in its graph. The package boundary is the unit of independent evolution here.
**Splitting `types.ts` out but leaving the service concrete.** Rejected for the same reason — the types are not the seam; `ctx.tasks` and its method contract are. Producers need the service key and semantics, not just the shapes.
## Consequences
Bought: the task registry now matches the repository-wide seam shape; a durable, remote, or instrumented registry is a sibling package implementing eight abstract methods, and no producer, control surface, or `TaskKindMap` extender changes when one lands. The seam README states the contract; the implementation README owns the lifecycle bookkeeping facts. The registry behavior suite (owner cleanup, settlement, waits, teardown) lives with `dsh-tasks-local`; the seam keeps a stub-subclass test pinning registration under `ctx.tasks` and single-service duplication behavior, plus the probe-based invariant suite.
Cost: one more package (manifest, tsconfig, README, invariant companion), and compositions must name the implementation package. `abstract` erases at runtime and this package name used to be the mountable registry, so the seam constructor fails loudly when mounted directly — a stale composition row gets "load an implementation such as @deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local" at load time instead of a half-registered `ctx.tasks` failing far from the misconfiguration.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
# Agent Note: 任务注册表是一个能力 seam`dsh-tasks` / `dsh-tasks-local`
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md) | 中文
## 问题
[后台任务运行时](2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md)交付时把 `TaskService` 做成了单个具体包package`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks` 既拥有每个生产方和控制接口面向编程的 `ctx.tasks` 契约,也拥有进程内实现(内存存储、结算簿记、所有者清理 effect、拆除。这种捆绑重新耦合了仓库[能力 seam 规则](2026-06-13-capability-seams.md)本要分离的两种变化速率:一旦替换注册表的存储或生命周期后端,被搅动的就是同一个包,而生产方(`dsh-tool-bash``dsh-tool-pty``dsh-tool-subagent`)、控制接口(`dsh-tool-tasks`)和 `TaskKindMap` 扩展方正是从这个包导入类型与 `ctx.tasks` 接口。harness 中其余每项可替换能力——bash、pty、fs、skill技能、subagent、web、会话持久化——都已具备接口实现消费方三分任务注册表曾是仅剩的 `core` 模式例外,仅由一条 `TODO(task-service-backend)` 注释把守。
## 决策
`tasks/` 如今是一个 bash 三件套形态的三包能力家族:
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks`(接口)**——抽象的 `TaskService extends Service`,拥有 `ctx.tasks`、八个方法的契约(`start``list``get``read``kill``wait``onTaskDone``attachSurface`)、全部词汇类型(`TaskId``TaskKindMap``TaskStart``TaskHooks``TaskOutcome``TaskSnapshot``TaskRead``TaskDoneListener`),以及快照不变式配套插件。类级 JSDoc 陈述了每个实现都必须兑现的语义:注册的存续期长于生产方与控制接口的 fiber有所有者的访问以会话为界结算遵循首次结果优先且监听器错误被隔离并且在没有附加任何控制接口时 `start` 拒绝启动工作。
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local`(实现)**——`LocalTaskService`,即原样迁移的进程内注册表:内存存储、按 kind 划分的计数器、等待方簿记、`TASK_WAIT_TIMEOUT` deadline 代码、所有者清理 effect以及强制失败的拆除。`dsh-timeout` 依赖随之迁入此包seam 包不含任何实现依赖。
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks`(消费方)**——保持不变;它注入 `'tasks'`,从不导入实现类型。
各组合在原先加载 `dsh-tasks` 的位置改为加载 `dsh-tasks-local`CLI命令行界面的 cordis.yml 配置项、`agent-spine-demo`、各测试 harness以及工具目录生成器的启动流程。生产方的配置错误诊断信息「background tasks unavailable: load …」)点名 `dsh-tasks`——即定义缺失的 `ctx.tasks` 服务的 seam 包seam 自身的表面(其 README 与直接挂载防线)会指向各实现,因此当另一个后端日后成为推荐默认时,生产方的消息依旧正确。生产方、`TaskKindMap` 声明合并和控制接口仍然只导入 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks`
该 seam 保持进程内契约语义不变:`TaskStart.run()` 仍然传入回调和确切的 `Agent` 对象,因此持久化或跨进程后端在能实现此接口之前仍有设计工作要做(身份、重启、所有权、观察)。这次拆分把该项未来工作移出了每个消费方的依赖图;它并不预先设计后端。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**在第二个后端出现之前保持具体服务(维持现状)。**这正是运行时 Agent Note 当初的立场:在第二种实现出现前抽取接口,可能固化错误的边界。该方案落选,因为这条边界已不再是臆测:八个服务方法及其语义自引入以来在每一次生产方集成中都保持稳定,它们正是 `dsh-tool-tasks` 与各生产方已经面向编程的那套接口,而且仓库约定默认将可替换能力拆成三个包。剩余风险(持久化后端可能需要变更契约)不因这次拆分而改变:无论拆分与否,这类变更都会落在 seam 包里;而若维持现状,它们今天还会连带搅动每个消费方的实现依赖。
**在单个包内仅抽取接口(在具体类旁导出一个抽象类)。**否决,因为它在运作层面并未分离任何东西:消费方依然依赖携带实现及其依赖项的那个包,而替换后端若不把本地实现纳入自身依赖图,就仍然无法发布。在这里,包边界才是独立演进的单位。
**拆出 `types.ts` 但让服务保持具体。**基于同样的理由否决:类型并不是 seam`ctx.tasks` 及其方法契约才是。生产方需要的是服务键和语义,而不只是类型形状。
## 后果
换来的是:任务注册表如今与全仓库通行的 seam 形态一致;持久化、远程或带插桩的注册表将是一个实现八个抽象方法的兄弟包,这样的注册表落地时,任何生产方、控制接口或 `TaskKindMap` 扩展方都无需改动。seam 包的 README 陈述契约;生命周期簿记方面的事实归实现包的 README 所有。注册表行为测试套件(所有者清理、结算、等待、拆除)随 `dsh-tasks-local` 存放seam 包保留一个桩子类stub subclass测试固定 `ctx.tasks` 下的注册行为与单一服务的重复注册行为,外加基于探针的不变式测试套件。
代价是:多出一个包,即多一份 manifest元数据清单、tsconfig、README 与不变式配套插件;同时各组合必须点名实现包。`abstract` 在运行时会被擦除,而这个包名过去正是可挂载的具体注册表,因此 seam 的构造函数在被直接挂载时会响亮失败——一条过期的组合配置行会在加载时得到「load an implementation such as @deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local」而不是一个方法残缺的 `ctx.tasks` 在远离错误配置处才失败。

View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-20-code-mode-result-card-completeness.md: 05ff0ed41c94bef7eb41204d8dd81bbda3c06016
2026-07-20-code-mode-result-card-completeness.zh.md: a93be4cc42fca87ce4ef11b6ad3a6cbe64bef66f

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Keep the Code Mode result card complete
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-20-code-mode-result-card-completeness.zh.md)
## Problem
The outer `run_code` tool persisted complete rendered content, but its UI presenter ignored that content and rebuilt the card body from a logs-only `presentationMeta` projection. A result-only run appeared correct because an empty presenter body let consumers fall back to `tool/result.content`. Once the program emitted a log, the presenter supplied non-empty content, that fallback stopped, and the returned value disappeared from the completed card. A spill policy's final head/tail preview was vulnerable to the same split ownership whenever captured logs made the stale projection non-empty.
Nested Code calls never owned cards, so producing metadata for the outer call solely to reconstruct one incomplete card also obscured the intended one-card boundary.
## Decision
The canonical tool registry pipeline owns the final model-facing outer content. On success, the `run_code` output renderer renders captured logs followed by the return value or the explicit no-output marker. Runtime failures and pre-execution policy denials are normalized into error content by `ToolRegistry` without invoking that renderer. A post-execute block runs after successful rendering and replaces the result with error content; other post-execute policy and spill decisions may replace content before persistence.
`run_code` omits `presentResult`. The established generic result fallback keeps the pending program title and renders the raw final `tool/result.content`; that durable, replayable, post-policy projection is the card's only result-content source. The host API proxy therefore omits a separate result view instead of serializing the same content in both `event.data.content` and `view.view.content`. The redundant logs-only `presentationMeta` projection remains removed.
Nested dispatch remains unchanged. Calls marked by `exec.parent` emit `tool/code-dispatch` events (full rendered content) but no `tool/call` or `tool/result` surface cards, so one outer `run_code` invocation still produces exactly one card.
## Testing
Tool unit coverage drives logs-only, result-only, logs-plus-result, no-output, spilled-result, and failure outcomes through the canonical registry, then pins the durable content and absence of a result presenter. A host-mux regression uses a call-only presenter to prove the result frame carries raw content exactly once and no view. These cases prove stale metadata cannot replace final content without making the host duplicate that content.
The keyless ACP backend and TUI Code Mode snapshots execute one outer program that performs two nested bash calls, logs `captured output`, and returns `CODE_ONE+CODE_TWO`. The persisted ACP log pins the complete result; the TUI surface shows one completed outer card containing both lines and no nested cards.
## Alternatives considered
**Append the return value to logs metadata.** Rejected because metadata would duplicate the renderer, need a second stable formatting contract for every JSON root, and still miss post-policy content replacement or spill previews.
**Merge presenter metadata with `result.content`.** Rejected because the rendered content already contains the logs; merging would duplicate them and require brittle deduplication.
**Forward `result.content` through a generic result presenter.** Rejected because the durable event already carries that content and UI consumers already have a generic raw-content fallback. The host mux serializes a tool-owned result view beside the event, so forwarding would duplicate the rendered content in one frame merely to recreate the fallback; the default worker alone admits a 64 MiB variable-payload budget before rendering.
**Create one card per nested dispatch.** Rejected because intermediate values are intentionally execution-local and never model-facing. Multiple cards would expose an implementation trace instead of the single Code Mode operation the model and user invoked.
## Consequences
TUI and JSON-RPC/Web display the same complete content the model receives and replay persists, including post-policy spill previews, through their generic result fallback. The host API retains the pending program title without duplicating the raw result in a separate view payload. New `run_code` results no longer carry the optional logs metadata, but this requires no session-format bump: existing records remain valid because presentation reads their durable rendered content.

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 保证 Code Mode 结果卡片内容完整
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-20-code-mode-result-card-completeness.md) | 中文
## 问题
外层 `run_code` 工具会持久化完整的渲染内容,但其 UI 展示器忽略了这些内容,转而根据仅含日志的 `presentationMeta` 投影重新构建卡片正文。仅有结果的运行看似正确,是因为展示器正文为空时,消费方会回退到 `tool/result.content`。只要程序输出一条日志,展示器就会提供非空内容,回退随即停止,返回值便会从完成态卡片中消失。当已捕获的日志使陈旧投影变为非空时,输出落盘策略最终生成的头尾预览也会受到同一职责拆分的影响。
嵌套 Code 调用从不生成自己的卡片。因此,仅仅为了重建这一张不完整卡片而给外层调用生成元数据,还掩盖了每次外层调用只生成一张卡片的预期边界。
## 决策
规范的工具注册表流水线负责最终面向模型的外层内容。成功时,`run_code` 输出渲染器先渲染已捕获的日志,然后渲染返回值或显式的无输出标记。运行时失败和执行前策略拒绝由 `ToolRegistry` 归一化为错误内容过程中不会调用该渲染器。Post-execute 阻断发生在成功渲染之后,并把结果替换为错误内容;其他 post-execute 策略与输出落盘决策可以在持久化之前替换内容。
`run_code` 不提供 `presentResult`。既有的通用结果回退机制会保留待完成的程序标题,并渲染原始的最终 `tool/result.content`;这一持久、可回放且经过 post-policy 处理的投影是卡片中结果内容的唯一来源。宿主 API 代理因此不提供单独的结果视图,而不会在 `event.data.content``view.view.content` 中重复序列化同一内容。冗余的仅含日志的 `presentationMeta` 投影继续保持移除状态。
嵌套分发保持不变。带有 `exec.parent` 标记的调用会发出 `tool/code-dispatch` 事件(携带完整渲染内容),但不会生成与 `tool/call``tool/result` 对应的界面卡片,因此一次外层 `run_code` 调用仍然只会生成一张卡片。
## 测试
工具单元测试通过规范注册表覆盖仅有日志、仅有结果、日志与结果并存、无输出、结果落盘和失败的结果,然后固定持久内容以及结果展示器不存在这一事实。宿主 mux 回归测试使用仅有调用的展示器,证明结果帧恰好携带一次原始内容,且不含视图。这些案例证明陈旧元数据无法替换最终内容,同时不会让宿主重复该内容。
无密钥的 ACPAgent Client Protocol后端快照与 TUI Code Mode 快照会执行一个外层程序:程序进行两次嵌套 bash 调用,记录 `captured output`,并返回 `CODE_ONE+CODE_TWO`。ACP 持久化日志固定完整结果TUI 界面只显示一张完成态外层卡片,其中包含这两行内容,且没有嵌套卡片。
## 备选方案
**把返回值追加到日志元数据:**不予采纳。元数据会与渲染器重复,并且需要为每一种 JSON 根另行维护稳定的格式化契约post-policy 内容替换或输出落盘预览仍然会被遗漏。
**把展示元数据与 `result.content` 合并:**不予采纳。渲染内容已经包含日志;合并会造成重复,还需要依赖脆弱的去重逻辑。
**通过通用结果展示器转发 `result.content`**不予采纳。持久事件已经携带该内容UI 消费方也已有通用的原始内容回退机制。宿主 mux 会在事件旁序列化工具拥有的结果视图,因此转发仅仅是为了重建该回退机制,却会在一个帧中重复渲染内容;仅默认 worker 在渲染前允许 64 MiB 的可变载荷预算。
**为每次嵌套分发创建一张卡片:**不予采纳。中间值有意只存在于执行期间,永远不面向模型。多张卡片会暴露实现轨迹,而不是模型与用户调用的单次 Code Mode 操作。
## 影响
TUI 与 JSON-RPCWeb 通过通用结果回退机制显示与模型接收及回放持久化相同的完整内容,其中包括 post-policy 输出落盘预览。宿主 API 保留待完成的程序标题,同时不在单独的视图负载中重复原始结果。新的 `run_code` 结果不再携带可选的日志元数据,但无需提升会话格式版本:现有记录仍然有效,因为展示逻辑会读取其中持久化的渲染内容。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-21-semantic-session-checkpoints.md: 4bca02fe3893ac39621ed79a000ca8f86db4ff67
2026-07-21-semantic-session-checkpoints.zh.md: 1f187eb6448a3c9ca6784ec2bddd7295be2706d7
2026-07-21-semantic-session-checkpoints.md: 0034cde40e5b07bda1573ca39fb7d51816006140
2026-07-21-semantic-session-checkpoints.zh.md: 3351221d7eeaf1353b4adb0fa4c4dc324ec33da5

View File

@@ -26,4 +26,4 @@ Flushing every event or streaming chunk minimizes loss but turns local append an
## Consequences
Hard-crash recovery retains the complete model request, durable tool intent, and complete settled step at the nearest semantic boundary while allowing partial streaming chunks since the previous boundary to remain lossy. Default CLI, TUI, ACP, Python SDK runtime, headless persistence tests, and JSON-RPC compositions mount the policy with their persistence backend. Unit tests cover ordering, cancellation during a checkpoint, fail-closed behavior, nested dispatch, disposal, and Loader shape; a real child process killed with `SIGKILL` proves request and tool-intent recovery through JSONL, and the shared persistence contract proves both recovery classifications across backends. Keyless ACP snapshots prove both that retry-risk guidance reaches resumed history and the next model turn and that graceful cancellation persists the loop's real closing boundaries.
Hard-crash recovery retains the complete model request, durable tool intent, and complete settled step at the nearest semantic boundary while allowing partial streaming chunks since the previous boundary to remain lossy. Default CLI, TUI, ACP, Python SDK runtime, headless persistence tests, and JSON-RPC compositions mount the policy with their persistence backend. Unit tests cover ordering, cancellation during a checkpoint, fail-closed behavior, nested dispatch, disposal, and Loader shape; a real child process killed with `SIGKILL` proves request and tool-intent recovery through JSONL, and the shared persistence contract proves both recovery classifications across backends. The crash harness waits for the expected marker contents rather than path existence, so open-before-write visibility cannot trigger the kill early. Keyless ACP snapshots prove both that retry-risk guidance reaches resumed history and the next model turn and that graceful cancellation persists the loop's real closing boundaries.

View File

@@ -26,4 +26,4 @@ ACPAgent Client Protocol应用在一个有序 Cordis effect 中统一持
## 后果
发生硬崩溃时,崩溃恢复会在最近的语义边界保留完整的模型请求、持久化的工具意图与完整且已结束的步骤,但允许上一个边界之后的部分流式分片仍可能丢失。默认的 CLI命令行界面、TUI、ACP、Python SDK 运行时、headless 持久化测试与 JSON-RPC 组合都会在持久化后端旁加载该策略。单元测试覆盖顺序、检查点期间的取消、失败关闭行为、嵌套分发、dispose资源释放与 Loader 形状;一个被 `SIGKILL` 终止的真实子进程通过 JSONL 证明系统可以恢复请求与工具意图,共享持久化契约则证明各后端都支持这两种恢复分类。无密钥 ACP 快照既证明重试风险指引会进入恢复后的历史记录与下一个模型轮次,也证明取消流程正常收尾时,系统会持久化由循环实际生成的闭合边界。
发生硬崩溃时,崩溃恢复会在最近的语义边界保留完整的模型请求、持久化的工具意图与完整且已结束的步骤,但允许上一个边界之后的部分流式分片仍可能丢失。默认的 CLI命令行界面、TUI、ACP、Python SDK 运行时、headless 持久化测试与 JSON-RPC 组合都会在持久化后端旁加载该策略。单元测试覆盖顺序、检查点期间的取消、失败关闭行为、嵌套分发、dispose资源释放与 Loader 形状;一个被 `SIGKILL` 终止的真实子进程通过 JSONL 证明系统可以恢复请求与工具意图,共享持久化契约则证明各后端都支持这两种恢复分类。崩溃 harness 会等待预期的标记内容,而不是仅等待路径存在,因此文件在写入前因打开而可见时,不会导致该 harness 提前终止子进程。无密钥 ACP 快照既证明重试风险指引会进入恢复后的历史记录与下一个模型轮次,也证明取消流程正常收尾时,系统会持久化由循环实际生成的闭合边界。

View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-22-collapsed-sidebar-control-rail.md: 940fcabf126941cc0e411b01c337e45831e442aa
2026-07-22-collapsed-sidebar-control-rail.zh.md: 70ace36fafcb28aa714000262e31c8555d394854

View File

@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: A collapsed sidebar retains its control rail
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-22-collapsed-sidebar-control-rail.zh.md)
## Problem
The sidebar close action persisted a zero width preference, and the layout mapped that preference to a zero-width grid track. The only sidebar toggle and the settings entry both lived inside that clipped track, so closing the sidebar removed every visible recovery control. Reloading preserved the closed preference and reproduced the lockout.
## Decision
The layout maps a closed sidebar (persisted width `0`) to the fixed `SIDEBAR_COLLAPSED` width of 56px: a 24px icon column between the sidebar's 16px horizontal paddings. The sidebar track is fixed-width in the solver — open or collapsed it never concedes to viewport pressure (only details shrinks, then auto-closes) — and the rail retains its right border while the stored expanded width remains untouched.
`AppFrame` marks the sidebar collapsed from the persisted width preference rather than from the resolved track width, removes the resize handle while collapsed, and passes `collapsed` to the sidebar slot as owner props from the render site. Collapse and expand animate: the frame transitions `grid-template-columns` (and the remaining handle its `left`) on the deepsuite sider curve — `--ds-ease-in-out` over `--ds-transition-duration-slow`, both supplied by ui-theme's base sheet; transitions pause during drags and under `prefers-reduced-motion`.
`SidebarRoot` reads the owner `collapsed` prop and transitions as a slide + crossfade: the expanded content freezes at its width (inline style) and fades out in place over 150ms while the sliding grid column clips it — nothing reflows mid-slide. At settle the wide-only content (brand, labels, input, session tree) unmounts — dropping the sessions subscription and leaving the rendered and accessibility trees — and the control rows snap to the rail (open toggle, new session, new workspace, search, the same top-down order as their expanded rows) fading in as the slide ends. Each rail control keeps its expanded counterpart's behavior (the search icon expands the sidebar and focuses the search box after the slide), carries a tooltip, and the toggle rests as the whale mark with the panel icon on hover. The search query lives with the root and survives the round trip.
## Alternatives considered
- **Render an expand button over the center column** — rejected because it recovers only the toggle, not the persistent settings area, and splits sidebar chrome across two package owners.
- **Keep a zero-width grid track and let the rail overflow it** — rejected because the rail would overlap the center column and leave hit testing and responsive geometry disconnected from the grid.
- **Keep the complete sidebar tree mounted and hide it with clipping** — rejected because hidden controls remain in the semantic tree and continue subscribing and rendering even though only two controls belong in the collapsed state.
## Consequences
- A collapsed sidebar reserves 56px instead of yielding the entire width to the center column. Expanding restores the persisted width and drag behavior.
- The settings entry remains visible but retains its existing placeholder behavior; this change does not introduce an account or settings screen.
- Layout solver tests pin the compact width, sidebar component tests pin the visible controls, and the keyless real-bundle web smoke test pins collapse and recovery through the assembled client.

View File

@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 侧边栏折叠后保留控制栏
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-22-collapsed-sidebar-control-rail.md) | 中文
## 问题
侧边栏关闭操作会持久化宽度偏好 `0`,布局再将该偏好映射为宽度为零的网格轨道。侧边栏唯一的开关与设置入口都位于这个被裁切的轨道内,因此关闭侧边栏会移除所有可见的恢复控件。页面重新加载时仍会读取关闭偏好,从而再次陷入无法恢复的状态。
## 决策
布局将关闭的侧边栏(持久化宽度为 `0`)映射为固定的 `SIDEBAR_COLLAPSED` 宽度 56px在侧边栏两侧各 16px 的水平内边距之间放置一列 24px 的图标控件。侧边栏轨道在求解器中是定宽的——无论展开还是折叠都不向视口压力让步(只有 details 会收缩、继而自动关闭);控制栏保留右侧边框,已存储的展开宽度保持不变。
`AppFrame` 根据持久化的宽度偏好标记侧边栏是否折叠,而不是根据求解后的轨道宽度来判断;折叠时移除尺寸调整手柄,并在渲染点把 `collapsed` 作为 owner props 传给侧边栏插槽。折叠与展开带动画frame 对 `grid-template-columns`(以及余下手柄的 `left`)应用 deepsuite 侧栏曲线过渡——`--ds-ease-in-out``--ds-transition-duration-slow`,两个变量由 ui-theme 的 base 表提供;拖拽期间和 `prefers-reduced-motion` 下过渡暂停。
`SidebarRoot` 读取 owner 的 `collapsed` 属性,过渡是滑动 + 交叉淡变展开内容以内联样式冻结在原宽度、150ms 原地淡出滑动中的网格列裁切它——滑动途中不发生任何重排。settle 时宽态专属内容(品牌标识、文字标签、输入框、会话树)卸载——随之退订会话列表并离开渲染树与可访问性树——控件行落位到控制栏(打开开关、新建会话、新建工作区、搜索,自上而下与展开态各行顺序一致),随滑动结束淡入。每个控制栏控件保持与展开态对应控件一致的行为(搜索图标展开侧边栏并在滑动结束后聚焦搜索框)并带 tooltip开关静止时显示鲸鱼标悬停切换为面板图标。搜索关键词由根组件持有折叠往返后保留。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
- **在中心列上方渲染展开按钮**:不予采纳,因为这只能恢复开关,无法保留常驻设置区域,同时还会让侧边栏 UI 由两个包package分别持有。
- **保留宽度为零的网格轨道,让控制栏溢出显示**:不予采纳,因为控制栏会与中心列重叠,还会使命中测试和响应式几何关系脱离网格布局。
- **保持完整侧边栏树挂载,并通过裁切将其隐藏**:不予采纳,因为隐藏控件仍留在语义树中,而且会继续订阅和渲染,尽管折叠状态下只需要两个控件。
## 后果
- 折叠的侧边栏占用 56px而不是把全部宽度让给中心列。展开时恢复持久化宽度与拖动行为。
- 设置入口持续可见,但保留既有占位行为;本次改动不提供账户或设置页面。
- 布局求解器测试固定紧凑宽度,侧边栏组件测试固定可见控件,基于真实构建产物的无密钥 Web 冒烟测试则通过组装后的客户端固定折叠与恢复行为。

View File

@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: demo:web builds the client plugin bundles
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-23-demo-web-builds-client-bundles.zh.md)
## Problem
`dsh web` serves each web-client plugin's bundle from `GET /plugins/<id>/client.js`, resolving the path from the package's `exports["./client"]` (`lib/client.js`). Those bundles are produced only by the root `pnpm run build` (`tsc -b` then the per-package `tsdown.client.ts` configs); the Vite `build:web` step builds the frontend shell alone. `demo:web` and the README's Web UI instructions ran only `build:web`, so on a checkout without a prior full build every plugin bundle 404s, the client loader marks every plugin failed, and the boot screen shows "Failed to load plugins". The frontend shell built fine, hiding the missing artifact behind a runtime browser failure.
## Decision
`demo:web` runs `npm run build` before `npm run build:web`, so the plugin `lib/client.js` bundles exist before `dsh web` serves them. The README's Web UI section runs `pnpm run build && pnpm run build:web` for the installed `~/.dsh/source` checkout, which the installer never builds.
## Verification
After the full build, all eight `/plugins/<id>/client.js` endpoints return 200 and a headless Chromium load of `http://127.0.0.1:3080` renders the shell with no "Failed to load plugins" state.
## Alternatives considered
**Build the bundles inside `dsh web` at startup.** The app runs from source via tsx and owns no build step; folding an artifact build into the server boot crosses the source/artifact separation and slows every launch.
**Widen the tsdown root config to emit client bundles from `pnpm run build:web`.** `build:web` is the Vite frontend build; the client bundles are a separate tsdown pass over `lib/types`. Merging the two conflates the shell build with the package build and still leaves the root `build` as the only producer.
## Consequences
`demo:web` now pays the full `tsc -b && tsdown` cost on every invocation instead of only the Vite build. That is the price of a runnable web demo from a clean tree; a caller who already built can invoke `dsh web` directly.

View File

@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: demo:web 构建客户端插件的打包产物
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-23-demo-web-builds-client-bundles.md) | 中文
## Problem
`dsh web` 通过 `GET /plugins/<id>/client.js` 提供每个 web 客户端插件的打包产物,其路径由包的 `exports["./client"]``lib/client.js`)解析得到。这些打包产物只由根目录的 `pnpm run build`(先 `tsc -b`,再执行各包的 `tsdown.client.ts` 配置生成Vite 的 `build:web` 步骤只构建前端外壳。`demo:web` 与 README 的 Web UI 说明只运行了 `build:web`,因此在未预先完整构建的检出上,每个插件的打包产物都返回 404客户端 loader 将所有插件标记为失败,启动界面显示 "Failed to load plugins"。前端外壳能正常构建,把缺失的产物掩藏在浏览器运行时的失败背后。
## Decision
`demo:web``npm run build:web` 之前先运行 `npm run build`,使插件的 `lib/client.js` 打包产物在 `dsh web` 提供它们之前已经存在。README 的 Web UI 小节针对已安装的 `~/.dsh/source` 检出运行 `pnpm run build && pnpm run build:web`,因为安装器从不构建它。
## Verification
完整构建后,全部八个 `/plugins/<id>/client.js` 端点均返回 200无头 Chromium 加载 `http://127.0.0.1:3080` 能渲染出外壳,不再出现 "Failed to load plugins" 状态。
## Alternatives considered
**在 `dsh web` 启动时构建打包产物。** 该应用通过 tsx 从源码运行,本身没有构建步骤;把产物构建塞进服务器启动流程会越过源码与产物的分离,并拖慢每次启动。
**扩大 tsdown 根配置,使 `pnpm run build:web` 也产出客户端打包产物。** `build:web` 是 Vite 前端构建;客户端打包产物是对 `lib/types` 的另一趟独立 tsdown 处理。把两者合并会混淆外壳构建与包构建,而且根目录的 `build` 仍是唯一的产出者。
## Consequences
`demo:web` 现在每次调用都要付出完整的 `tsc -b && tsdown` 代价,而不再只是 Vite 构建。这是从干净的代码树运行 web 演示所要付出的代价;已经完成构建的调用方可以直接调用 `dsh web`

View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-23-thinking-row-disclosure-target.md: f698c3cb0b73bf5c65b5d4b5b3f29de3080e0af6
2026-07-23-thinking-row-disclosure-target.zh.md: 0fba5c1d8f7beec7300dcd51e118a08d57d0e74f

View File

@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Thinking rows use one disclosure target
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-23-thinking-row-disclosure-target.zh.md)
## Problem
A collapsed reasoning entry presents `Think` and its one-line reasoning summary as one visual row, but an icon-only disclosure control leaves both visible labels inert. Applying title expansion to every tool row would instead break the generic tool-row contract, where the row opens details and only the leading control expands arguments.
## Decision
`ToolRow` exposes the opt-in `expandOnRowClick` policy. `ThinkRow` enables it so the title and reasoning summary form one accessible disclosure target; pointer clicks, Enter, and Space toggle the same component-local expanded state. Tool rows that do not opt in retain row-to-details selection and leading-control argument expansion.
## Verification
The component spec pins both Think click targets and the unchanged generic tool-row handoff. The keyless browser fixture loads the real sidebar and conversation bundles, opens an authored reasoning session, clicks the summary and title, and checks the disclosure state and expanded body.
## Alternatives considered
**Expand every tool row from its title.** Generic tool rows use row clicks for details selection, so sharing this behavior would conflate two controls.
**Keep icon-only disclosure.** The smallest hit target remains disconnected from the labels that describe the hidden content.
**Render separate title and summary buttons.** Two controls for one expanded state add duplicate focus stops and ambiguous semantics.
## Consequences
Thinking rows gain a larger pointer target and keyboard disclosure semantics without changing other tool interactions. The generic row component carries one optional policy because disclosure ownership differs between reasoning and tool calls.

View File

@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: thinking 行使用单一展开目标
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-23-thinking-row-disclosure-target.md) | 中文
## 问题
折叠的推理reasoning条目在同一视觉行中呈现 `Think` 和单行推理摘要,但仅图标可展开会让两个可见标签都无法交互。若让所有工具行均可通过标题展开,又会破坏通用工具行的契约:整行负责打开详情,只有前导控件负责展开参数。
## 决策
`ToolRow` 提供显式启用的 `expandOnRowClick` 策略。`ThinkRow` 启用该策略让标题和推理摘要组成单一且无障碍的展开目标鼠标点击、Enter 和 Space 都切换同一个组件本地展开状态。未启用该策略的工具行仍由整行完成详情选择,由前导控件展开参数。
## 验证
组件测试固定两个 Think 点击目标以及未改变的通用工具行交接行为。无密钥浏览器 fixture测试前置数据加载真实的侧边栏与会话 bundle打开包含推理内容的既定会话点击摘要与标题并检查展开状态和展开后的正文。
## 考虑过的替代方案
**让每个工具行都可通过标题展开。** 通用工具行将整行点击用于详情选择,共享这一行为会混淆两个控件。
**保留仅图标展开。** 最小的点击目标仍与描述隐藏内容的标签脱节。
**把标题和摘要分别渲染为按钮。** 两个控件共享一个展开状态,会增加重复的焦点停靠点并产生含糊语义。
## 后果
thinking 行获得更大的鼠标点击目标和键盘展开语义,同时不改变其他工具交互。通用行组件承担一个可选策略,因为推理与工具调用的展开所有权不同。

View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-26-intent-draft-same-tick-echo.md: 1a4fdb48c0434bd37d7771dddb640720e1b610e6
2026-07-26-intent-draft-same-tick-echo.zh.md: 9ecdf7154f5014de242021f99d2e51959c2a3169

View File

@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Intent draft echoes in the same tick
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-26-intent-draft-same-tick-echo.zh.md)
## Problem
The hero composer ("Let's start building") is a controlled textarea whose value is the frontend Session Intent's retained prompt, read from the sessions **list** snapshot (`EmptyState` binds `intent.prompt` via `useSessions`). Typing routed through `SessionManager.updateIntent → Session.updatePendingPrompt`, which flushes the **Session's own** notifier synchronously — but the list snapshot the composer actually renders from only heard about the change through the intent watch subscription in `startIntent`, which calls `markDirty()`, a microtask-deferred flush.
A deferred echo violates the controlled-input contract documented on the Notifier (see the [web client architecture note](../architecture/2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.md)): React compares the DOM value against the still-stale snapshot during the same tick as `onChange` and rolls the textarea back. With plain typing this shows as caret jumps; with an IME it corrupts input — every composition update gets rolled back and re-applied against a stale value, so typing Pinyin "nihao" commits fragments like "nnini hni hani hao你好". The resident composer (`ConversationRoot`) was not affected: its draft lives in the chat store (sync flush) or comes from `updateSessionPrompt`, which reads the Session snapshot directly rather than the list projection.
## Decision
`SessionManager.updateIntent` calls `this.notifier.notifyNow()` after `updatePendingPrompt`, flushing the list snapshot in the same tick as the change event. This matches the Notifier's channel rule: a direct echo of a user gesture whose controlled input renders from this snapshot uses `notifyNow`; the intent watch keeps `markDirty` for every other (async) intent transition.
## Alternatives considered
**Change the intent watch callback in `startIntent` to `notifyNow`.** Wrong channel for that seam: the watch also fires on frame-driven Session changes (publication, send phases), and the architecture note bans `notifyNow` for frame-driven sources because it collapses batching.
**Have `EmptyState` read the prompt from the Session snapshot instead of the list.** Restructures the slot contract (EmptyState is deliberately bound to the standard `useSessions` feed and has no session scope yet — the frontend Session is page-local) for no gain over flushing the projection it already reads.
**Suppress the rollback in `InputBar` with local uncontrolled state.** Hides the symptom, forfeits the single-source-of-truth draft (the retained prompt must survive workspace retargeting and send/retry), and leaves every other list-snapshot-controlled input exposed.
## Consequences
Typing in the hero composer, IME composition included, echoes synchronously. `updateIntent` on a no-intent state stays a no-op with no notification. The web workspace-flow snapshot's composer helper now asserts the same-tick echo instead of waiting for it, so a regression to a deferred echo fails the keyless snapshot gate; a runtime unit test pins the same contract at the manager seam.

View File

@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Intent draft echoes in the same tick
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-26-intent-draft-same-tick-echo.md) | 中文
## Problem
hero composer「Let's start building」是一个受控controlled的 textarea它的值取自前端 Session Intent 保留下来的提示词,读自会话**列表**快照(`EmptyState` 通过 `useSessions` 绑定 `intent.prompt`)。输入经由 `SessionManager.updateIntent → Session.updatePendingPrompt`,后者会同步刷新 **Session 自身的** notifier——但 composer 实际渲染所依据的那份列表快照,只能通过 `startIntent` 中的 intent watch 订阅得知这次变更,而该订阅调用的是 `markDirty()`,即一次延迟到微任务的刷新。
延迟的回显违反了 Notifier 上所记录的受控输入契约(见 [web 客户端架构笔记](../architecture/2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.md)React 在与 `onChange` 相同的 tick 内,把 DOM 值与仍然陈旧的快照相比对,随后把 textarea 回滚。普通输入时这表现为光标跳动使用输入法IME它会损坏输入——每一次 composition 更新都会被回滚并针对陈旧的值重新应用因此输入拼音「nihao」会提交出类似「nnini hni hani hao你好」这样的片段。resident composer`ConversationRoot`)不受影响:它的草稿存放在 chat store 中(同步刷新),或来自 `updateSessionPrompt`,后者直接读取 Session 快照,而不是列表投影。
## Decision
`SessionManager.updateIntent``updatePendingPrompt` 之后调用 `this.notifier.notifyNow()`,从而在与变更事件相同的 tick 内刷新列表快照。这符合 Notifier 的通道规则:当某个用户手势的受控输入正是从该快照渲染时,对它的直接回显使用 `notifyNow`;而 intent watch 对其余所有异步的intent 状态转换仍保留 `markDirty`
## Alternatives considered
**把 `startIntent` 中的 intent watch 回调改为 `notifyNow`。** 对那个 seam 而言是错误的通道:该 watch 也会在帧驱动的 Session 变更(发布、发送阶段)时触发,而架构笔记禁止对帧驱动的来源使用 `notifyNow`,因为那会瓦解批处理。
**让 `EmptyState` 从 Session 快照而非列表读取提示词。** 这会重构槽位契约EmptyState 有意绑定到标准的 `useSessions` 数据源,且尚无 session 作用域——前端 Session 是页面本地的),相比刷新它本就读取的那份投影并无收益。
**在 `InputBar` 中用本地的非受控状态抑制回滚。** 这只是掩盖症状,放弃了单一真源的草稿(保留下来的提示词必须在工作区重定向以及发送/重试后依然存在),并让其余每一个由列表快照控制的输入都暴露在同一问题之下。
## Consequences
在 hero composer 中输入(包括输入法 composition 在内)会同步回显。在无 intent 的状态上调用 `updateIntent` 仍是一次空操作不发出任何通知。web workspace-flow 快照的 composer 辅助函数现在断言的是同一 tick 内的回显,而不是等待它,因此一旦回退成延迟回显,就会让无密钥快照门禁失败;一个运行时单元测试在 manager 这一 seam 处钉住了同一份契约。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-15-code-mode.md: 1170fa4f9fa778fa9176097317477ea336588d32
2026-06-15-code-mode.zh.md: 4362efa332d0ed24a6383a4cf75b83c0dba22e7e
2026-06-15-code-mode.md: 38d1ebdda089f1cfa1c5f3192fa2399b3a00102b
2026-06-15-code-mode.zh.md: 2ddccb005b806fee0b1f4d6f79d6473f492a117d

View File

@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ Under `'code'` and `'both'` the registry owns `run_code` as a reserved presentat
**Concurrency is serialized.** Each run owns a dispatch queue, so even `Promise.all` executes tool calls in submission order. Settlement abandons queued calls that have not started. Parallelism requires per-tool concurrency-safety metadata.
**Presentation.** `run_code`'s render intent is decided here per the [render-intent Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md): `presentCall` creates a `generic` card with `kind: 'execute'`, the program text as its title, and the same program text as `rawInput`; `run_code` intentionally declares no `presentResult`, so the TUI and host/client runtime (Web) complete that card through their generic raw-content fallback using the final durable `tool/result.content`, including captured logs plus the returned value, failure, or post-policy spill preview. This is not a `terminal` card: that card's semantics are "a shell command in a working directory", which a program is not. See the [result-card completeness note](../bug-fix/2026-07-20-code-mode-result-card-completeness.md).
**Presentation.** `run_code`'s render intent is decided here per the [render-intent Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md): `presentCall` creates a `generic` card with `kind: 'execute'`, the program text as its title, and the same program text as `rawInput`; `run_code` intentionally declares no `presentResult`, so the TUI and host/client runtime (Web) complete that card through their generic raw-content fallback using the final durable `tool/result.content`, including captured logs plus the returned value, failure, or post-policy spill preview. This is not a `terminal` card: that card's semantics are "a shell command in a working directory", which a program is not. See the [result-card completeness note](../../archived/bug-fix/2026-07-20-code-mode-result-card-completeness.md).
### Observability: `tool/code-dispatch`

View File

@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ Cloudflare 的 [Code Mode](https://blog.cloudflare.com/code-mode/) 提出了一
**并发被序列化。** 每次 run 拥有一个分发队列,因此即使 `Promise.all` 也按提交顺序执行工具调用。结算时放弃尚未开始的排队调用。并行化需要每个工具的并发安全元数据。
**呈现。** `run_code` 的 render intent 按[呈现意图 Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md)在此决定:`presentCall` 创建一个 `generic` 卡片,`kind: 'execute'`,以程序文本作为标题,并将同一程序文本作为 `rawInput``run_code` 有意不声明 `presentResult`,因此 TUI 和宿主/客户端运行时Web会通过通用原始内容回退机制使用最终持久化的 `tool/result.content` 补全该卡片,其中包括捕获的日志,以及返回值、失败信息或 post-policy 输出落盘预览。这不是 `terminal` 卡片:该卡片的语义是「工作目录中的 shell 命令」,程序不是。参见[结果卡片完整性说明](../bug-fix/2026-07-20-code-mode-result-card-completeness.md)。
**呈现。** `run_code` 的 render intent 按[呈现意图 Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md)在此决定:`presentCall` 创建一个 `generic` 卡片,`kind: 'execute'`,以程序文本作为标题,并将同一程序文本作为 `rawInput``run_code` 有意不声明 `presentResult`,因此 TUI 和宿主/客户端运行时Web会通过通用原始内容回退机制使用最终持久化的 `tool/result.content` 补全该卡片,其中包括捕获的日志,以及返回值、失败信息或 post-policy 输出落盘预览。这不是 `terminal` 卡片:该卡片的语义是「工作目录中的 shell 命令」,程序不是。参见[结果卡片完整性说明](../../archived/bug-fix/2026-07-20-code-mode-result-card-completeness.md)。
### 可观测性:`tool/code-dispatch`

View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-30-subagent-observe-enrich.md: a07cef95630689d1ca8cacd3eb7c50e691cb304a
2026-06-30-subagent-observe-enrich.zh.md: 578aae0a7273defcc1f88fb2a50c83ef454e3c16

View File

@@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Subagent lifecycle enrichment — lastAssistantMessage (observe-only)
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-06-30-subagent-observe-enrich.zh.md)
## Problem
The hooks subsystem ([interception seams Agent Note](2026-06-30-interception-seams.md)) lets a plugin observe and gate the agent at lifecycle points. Claude Code and Codex both expose **SubagentStart / SubagentStop** hooks, and CC's carry the subagent's final message. The harness already emits `subagent/start` and `subagent/end` lifecycle events ([the subagent capability-seam](2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md)), but their payloads were minimal (`provider`, `id`, and on end `stopReason`) — not enough for a hooks bridge to report WHAT a subagent produced without separately reaching for the live run.
This Agent Note enriches the end payload. It is deliberately **observe-only**: no control-flow change and no waterfall. A run-affecting subagent-stop decision (continuation, injection that changes the run) is a separate, larger redesign and stays out of scope.
## Decision
**Add `lastAssistantMessage` — the child's final output — to `SubagentRunEndInfo`.** On the settle path it is the readonly typed `SubagentResult.output`, so an observer sees what the child produced without holding the run. On an infrastructure rejection where no `SubagentResult` exists, it is absent and the event reports `stopReason: 'error'`. Providers and listeners are trusted same-process collaborators and honor the borrowed immutable payload contract.
Both events stay plain **`emit`s**. Async `SubagentService.start()` attaches result observation to the ready provider run, emits `subagent/start`, and then returns the run; an in-process listener can therefore reach the published child via `ctx.agents.get(info.id)`, while a remote provider need not have a local registry entry. A rejected provider start emits neither event. The callbacks remain observe-only and per-listener containment keeps one bad subscriber from stranding a live run or starving later listeners.
## Alternatives considered
**An `agentType` subagent-kind label** (the harness analogue of CC's `subagent_type`) on the request + both lifecycle payloads — an earlier draft shipped it; dropped in review because it is a Claude-Code concept that does not fit our own seam (nothing here interprets it, and the only consumer was a CC-dialect bridge). The CC bridge instead feeds Claude Code's own default matcher value `"general-purpose"` for its SubagentStart/Stop `agent_type` matcher, so this Agent Note ships ONE enrichment: `lastAssistantMessage`.
**A control-flow `subagent/end`** — deferred; see below.
## Why observe-only, and what is deferred
A control-flow `subagent/end` (an awaited waterfall returning a stop/continue decision, like the other interception seams) would require: reshaping `subagent/end` from emit to waterfall, restructuring `SubagentService.start` to await listeners before settling, and implementing the `resume` capability in the in-process provider so a "continue" can actually re-run the child. That belongs to the background/steering subagent redesign the [capability-seam Agent Note](2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md) already defers (the same redesign that unifies long-running-tool handling across subagents and bash). This Agent Note ships the observe-only enrichment a hooks bridge needs today; `FIXME(subagent-continuation)` / `TODO` anchors mark where the control-flow version would land if and when that redesign happens.
## Consequences
A hooks bridge (or a native plugin) can now forward the child's `lastAssistantMessage` to a SubagentStop handler by subscribing to the existing emits — no new control-flow surface. The vocabulary addition is documented in [docs/core-data-structures/subagent.md](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/subagent.md) (the events prose) and the two subagent READMEs; the catalog is regenerated. No production behavior changes — the events fire exactly as before, with one more (optional) field on the end payload — so no snapshot or e2e change is needed.

View File

@@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Subagent 生命周期丰富化——lastAssistantMessage仅观察
Status: implemented
[English](2026-06-30-subagent-observe-enrich.md) | 中文
## 问题
钩子子系统([拦截 seam Agent Note](2026-06-30-interception-seams.md))允许插件在生命周期节点观察和拦截 agent智能体。Claude Code 和 Codex 都暴露了 **SubagentStart / SubagentStop** 钩子,且 CC 的钩子携带 subagent 的最终消息。harness 已经发出 `subagent/start``subagent/end` 生命周期事件([subagent 能力 seam](2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md)),但其载荷极为精简(`provider``id`,以及 end 时的 `stopReason`),不足以让钩子桥接层在不单独访问活跃 run 的情况下报告 subagent 产出了什么。
本 Agent Note 丰富 end 载荷。它刻意限定为**仅观察**:不改变控制流,不引入 waterfall瀑布式事件。影响 run 的 subagent-stop 决策(续行、改变 run 的注入)属于另一个更大的重设计,不在本 Agent Note 范围内。
## 决策
**在 `SubagentRunEndInfo` 中添加 `lastAssistantMessage`——子 agent 的最终输出。** 在正常结束路径上,它是只读的类型化 `SubagentResult.output`,观察者无需持有 run 即可看到子 agent 产出了什么。在基础设施拒绝(不存在 `SubagentResult`)的情况下,该字段缺失,事件报告 `stopReason: 'error'`。提供方与监听方是受信任的同进程协作者,遵守借用不可变载荷的契约。
两个事件仍为普通 **`emit`**。异步的 `SubagentService.start()` 将结果观察附加到就绪的提供方 run 上,发出 `subagent/start`,然后返回该 run进程内监听方因此可以通过 `ctx.agents.get(info.id)` 访问已发布的子 agent而远程提供方无需在本地注册表中有对应条目。提供方启动被拒绝时不发出任何事件。回调保持仅观察且逐监听方隔离确保一个异常订阅者不会阻塞活跃 run 或饿死后续监听方。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**`agentType` subagent 类别标签**CC 的 `subagent_type` 在 harness 中的对应物),放在请求与两个生命周期载荷上。早期草案曾包含它;评审中移除,因为它是 Claude Code 的概念,不适合我们自己的 seam此处没有任何逻辑解释它唯一消费方是 CC 方言桥接层。CC 桥接层改为直接为其 SubagentStart/Stop 的 `agent_type` matcher 填入 Claude Code 自身的默认值 `"general-purpose"`,因此本 Agent Note 只交付**一项**丰富化:`lastAssistantMessage`
**控制流式 `subagent/end`**:推迟;见下文。
## 为何仅观察,以及推迟了什么
控制流式 `subagent/end`(一个被 await 的 waterfall返回停止/继续决策,与其他拦截 seam 一致)需要:将 `subagent/end` 从 emit 改为 waterfall、重构 `SubagentService.start` 使其在结算前 await 监听方、在进程内提供方中实现 `resume` 能力以便「继续」能真正重新运行子 agent。这属于[能力 seam Agent Note](2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md) 已推迟的后台/steering中途引导subagent 重设计(同一个重设计还将统一 subagent 与 bash 之间的长时间运行工具处理)。本 Agent Note 交付钩子桥接层当前所需的仅观察丰富化;`FIXME(subagent-continuation)` / `TODO` 锚点标记了控制流版本在重设计发生时的落点。
## 后果
钩子桥接层(或原生插件)现在可以通过订阅既有 emit 将子 agent 的 `lastAssistantMessage` 转发给 SubagentStop 处理器,无需新的控制流接口。词汇新增记录在 [docs/core-data-structures/subagent.md](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/subagent.md)(事件行文部分)与两个 subagent README 中catalog 已重新生成。生产行为无变化——事件触发方式与之前完全一致end 载荷上多了一个可选字段——因此无需更新快照或 e2e 测试。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-07-session-prefix.md: 322413f541706244a8a9a9113c0b79693fe54ccd
2026-07-07-session-prefix.zh.md: 710cfbd2656d132640d39b1d62374ef2d16be612
2026-07-07-session-prefix.md: 75113952fc5f3df8da1580d42ed2a385b6135fe8
2026-07-07-session-prefix.zh.md: e38bf09298296203b275d6d66a62ef17be7c045d

View File

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Because composition runs before the boundary snapshot, a composing listener's se
## Testing
[Interception tests](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/tests/interception.spec.ts) pin compose-once reuse without changed headers, prepend order, empty-prefix omission, immutability, composition before pre-step, and the prefix on the routed header; [cancellation tests](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/tests/cancel.spec.ts) pin discard and recomposition. Session, invariant, token-meter, and compaction tests cover header round trips, request reconstruction, and durable prefix-aware pressure accounting. Snapshot normalization preserves prefix counts, while the [pinned-header scenario](../testing/2026-07-06-pin-request-header-content-in-one-scenario.md) owns content and the default example remains prefix-free. The provider-independent seam needs no dedicated e2e; the with-key [request-cache e2e](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/tests/request-cache.e2e.ts) covers its cache economics.
[Interception tests](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/tests/interception.spec.ts) pin compose-once reuse without changed headers, prepend order, empty-prefix omission, immutability, composition before pre-step, and the prefix on the routed header; [cancellation tests](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/tests/cancel.spec.ts) pin discard and recomposition. Session, invariant, token-meter, and compaction tests cover header round trips, request reconstruction, and durable prefix-aware pressure accounting. Snapshot normalization preserves prefix counts, while the [pinned-header scenario](../../archived/testing/2026-07-06-pin-request-header-content-in-one-scenario.md) owns content and the default example remains prefix-free. The provider-independent seam needs no dedicated e2e; the with-key [request-cache e2e](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/tests/request-cache.e2e.ts) covers its cache economics.
## Alternatives considered

View File

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Status: implemented
## 测试
[拦截测试](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/tests/interception.spec.ts)固定了以下行为:没有变更 header 时的组合一次复用、前置插入顺序、空前缀省略、不可变性、组合在步骤前检查点之前完成,以及已路由 header 上的前缀;[取消测试](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/tests/cancel.spec.ts)固定了丢弃与重新组合。Session、不变式、token-meter 和压缩测试覆盖 header 往返、请求重建与持久前缀感知的压力核算。快照归一化保留前缀计数,[固定 header 场景](../testing/2026-07-06-pin-request-header-content-in-one-scenario.md)拥有内容,默认示例保持无前缀。与提供方无关的 seam 无需专门 e2e带密钥的 [request-cache e2e](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/tests/request-cache.e2e.ts) 覆盖了其缓存经济性。
[拦截测试](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/tests/interception.spec.ts)固定了以下行为:没有变更 header 时的组合一次复用、前置插入顺序、空前缀省略、不可变性、组合在步骤前检查点之前完成,以及已路由 header 上的前缀;[取消测试](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/tests/cancel.spec.ts)固定了丢弃与重新组合。Session、不变式、token-meter 和压缩测试覆盖 header 往返、请求重建与持久前缀感知的压力核算。快照归一化保留前缀计数,[固定 header 场景](../../archived/testing/2026-07-06-pin-request-header-content-in-one-scenario.md)拥有内容,默认示例保持无前缀。与提供方无关的 seam 无需专门 e2e带密钥的 [request-cache e2e](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/tests/request-cache.e2e.ts) 覆盖了其缓存经济性。
## 曾考虑的替代方案

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-10-session-query-service.md: 722f6bf6163278719c3bbb598ed2a2a9d042fb8e
2026-07-10-session-query-service.zh.md: ae6fcb78e18afe83784560c493ea93b7ee0bd68c
2026-07-10-session-query-service.md: 42d12fe2c5e34e71a6166816857b9ced52a61a95
2026-07-10-session-query-service.zh.md: 2c8d322ca6099db1c8ddbb8a02efbc8729e83dbf

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Full-text search is related but materially larger. Putting provider coordination
## Decision
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-query` owns the single abstract `ctx.sessionQuery` service over one logical corpus. It concretely implements `listSessions()`, provider-independent `filterSessions(filters)`, `listEvents(sessionId)`, `filterEvents(sessionId, filters)`, bounded `readEvent(request)`, `traceSession(sessionId)`, and `traceEvent(request)`, while concrete backends implement its two full-text methods. The [unified service decision](../architecture/2026-07-23-unified-session-query-service.md) owns that topology, the [SQLite search decision](2026-07-10-sqlite-session-query-provider.md) owns search behavior, and the [tracing decision](2026-07-13-session-query-tracing.md) owns lineage and event-relationship semantics.
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-query` owns the single abstract `ctx.sessionQuery` service over one logical corpus. It concretely implements `listSessions()`, provider-independent `filterSessions(filters)`, `listEvents(sessionId)`, `filterEvents(sessionId, filters)`, bounded `readEvent(request)`, `traceSession(sessionId)`, and `traceEvent(request)`, while concrete backends implement its two full-text methods. The [unified service decision](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-23-unified-session-query-service.md) owns that topology, the [SQLite search decision](2026-07-10-sqlite-session-query-provider.md) owns search behavior, and the [tracing decision](2026-07-13-session-query-tracing.md) owns lineage and event-relationship semantics.
The service observes the optional `ctx.sessionPersistence` binding dynamically but retains no persisted cache or invalidation listener. Each cross-corpus list asks the active backend for authoritative metadata, then overlays a fresh live-store list. Matching ids become one `SessionRecord`: the live header wins and `live`/`persisted` independently report source availability. Immutable header disagreement is `SESSION_QUERY_SOURCE_CONFLICT`.

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Status: implemented
## 决策
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-query` 拥有面向单一逻辑语料库的唯一抽象 `ctx.sessionQuery` 服务。它具体实现 `listSessions()`、提供方无关的 `filterSessions(filters)``listEvents(sessionId)``filterEvents(sessionId, filters)`、有界的 `readEvent(request)``traceSession(sessionId)``traceEvent(request)`,而具体后端实现其两个全文搜索方法。[统一服务决策](../architecture/2026-07-23-unified-session-query-service.md)拥有这一拓扑,[SQLite 搜索决策](2026-07-10-sqlite-session-query-provider.md)拥有搜索行为,[追踪决策](2026-07-13-session-query-tracing.md)拥有血缘与事件关系语义。
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-query` 拥有面向单一逻辑语料库的唯一抽象 `ctx.sessionQuery` 服务。它具体实现 `listSessions()`、提供方无关的 `filterSessions(filters)``listEvents(sessionId)``filterEvents(sessionId, filters)`、有界的 `readEvent(request)``traceSession(sessionId)``traceEvent(request)`,而具体后端实现其两个全文搜索方法。[统一服务决策](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-23-unified-session-query-service.md)拥有这一拓扑,[SQLite 搜索决策](2026-07-10-sqlite-session-query-provider.md)拥有搜索行为,[追踪决策](2026-07-13-session-query-tracing.md)拥有血缘与事件关系语义。
该服务动态观察可选的 `ctx.sessionPersistence` 绑定,但不保留持久化缓存或失效监听器。每次跨语料库列表操作向活跃后端请求权威元数据,然后叠加一份新鲜的活跃 store 列表。id 匹配的条目合并为一条 `SessionRecord`:活跃 header 优先,`live`/`persisted` 各自独立报告来源可用性。不可变 header 不一致时产生 `SESSION_QUERY_SOURCE_CONFLICT`

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-10-sqlite-session-query-provider.md: 98618a7eb572ce59c5fa5984675c9dc57b3f4289
2026-07-10-sqlite-session-query-provider.zh.md: bb3650da907cf86a853f748fa0ee40d5c2168709
2026-07-10-sqlite-session-query-provider.md: 372c21241f9ae5d7300165f016db9b36e6b52855
2026-07-10-sqlite-session-query-provider.zh.md: dc10a6e6a609809aa6f2b194f262e2642d9545bc

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Splitting those concerns across a provider coordinator and a database implementa
## Decision
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-query` declares one abstract `ctx.sessionQuery` service whose exact reads, filters, and traces are concrete and whose two full-text methods are abstract. `searchSessions(request, exec?)` returns cursor-paginated `SessionSearchHit`s grouped by each session's strongest matching event; `searchEvents(request, exec?)` returns `SessionEventSearchHit`s within one logical session. Both requests require `query`, accept `limit` and an owned branded `SessionSearchCursor`, and support an optional abort signal. Session search accepts `sessionFilters` plus event metadata filters; event search accepts event metadata filters. Results expose bounded plain-text snippets but no provider identifier or numeric relevance score. The [unified service decision](../architecture/2026-07-23-unified-session-query-service.md) owns the single-key topology.
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-query` declares one abstract `ctx.sessionQuery` service whose exact reads, filters, and traces are concrete and whose two full-text methods are abstract. `searchSessions(request, exec?)` returns cursor-paginated `SessionSearchHit`s grouped by each session's strongest matching event; `searchEvents(request, exec?)` returns `SessionEventSearchHit`s within one logical session. Both requests require `query`, accept `limit` and an owned branded `SessionSearchCursor`, and support an optional abort signal. Session search accepts `sessionFilters` plus event metadata filters; event search accepts event metadata filters. Results expose bounded plain-text snippets but no provider identifier or numeric relevance score. The [unified service decision](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-23-unified-session-query-service.md) owns the single-key topology.
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-query-sqlite` extends the interface service and is the sole concrete owner of `ctx.sessionQuery`. It depends on live `ctx.sessions`, observes optional `ctx.sessionPersistence` dynamically, and owns a dedicated derived SQLite database. There is no search-provider registry, coordinator, persistence event, or agent-loop integration.

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Status: implemented
## 决策
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-query` 声明一个抽象的 `ctx.sessionQuery` 服务,其精确读取、过滤与追踪均有具体实现,仅有两项全文方法为抽象方法。`searchSessions(request, exec?)` 返回按游标分页的 `SessionSearchHit`,并按每个会话中匹配度最强的事件分组;`searchEvents(request, exec?)` 返回一个逻辑会话内的 `SessionEventSearchHit`。两种请求都必须提供 `query`,可以接受 `limit` 和由服务拥有的品牌化 `SessionSearchCursor`,并支持可选的中止信号。会话搜索接受 `sessionFilters` 与事件元数据过滤器,事件搜索接受事件元数据过滤器。结果会公开有界的纯文本摘要片段,但不公开提供方标识符或数值相关性分数。单一键拓扑由[统一服务决策](../architecture/2026-07-23-unified-session-query-service.md)定义。
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-query` 声明一个抽象的 `ctx.sessionQuery` 服务,其精确读取、过滤与追踪均有具体实现,仅有两项全文方法为抽象方法。`searchSessions(request, exec?)` 返回按游标分页的 `SessionSearchHit`,并按每个会话中匹配度最强的事件分组;`searchEvents(request, exec?)` 返回一个逻辑会话内的 `SessionEventSearchHit`。两种请求都必须提供 `query`,可以接受 `limit` 和由服务拥有的品牌化 `SessionSearchCursor`,并支持可选的中止信号。会话搜索接受 `sessionFilters` 与事件元数据过滤器,事件搜索接受事件元数据过滤器。结果会公开有界的纯文本摘要片段,但不公开提供方标识符或数值相关性分数。单一键拓扑由[统一服务决策](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-23-unified-session-query-service.md)定义。
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-query-sqlite` 扩展接口服务,并且是 `ctx.sessionQuery` 唯一的具体所有者。它依赖实时的 `ctx.sessions`,动态观察可选的 `ctx.sessionPersistence`,并拥有一个专用的派生 SQLite 数据库。系统没有搜索提供方注册表、协调器、持久化事件或 agent loop智能体循环集成。

View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-21-dsh-system-prompt-source-path.md: 4cb89e8124840bba6633235d195e95957245137c
2026-07-21-dsh-system-prompt-source-path.zh.md: 90c23bed4a3f95155e323c63a68fe2da09543ea6

View File

@@ -1,37 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: dsh tells the agent where its own source lives
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-21-dsh-system-prompt-source-path.zh.md)
## Problem
The `dsh` CLI is the self-referential surface: its `cordis` toolset lets the agent inspect and modify the very harness runtime it runs in. But the agent had no way to learn where that source lives on disk. `dsh` is normally symlinked onto PATH and launched from an arbitrary working directory — the project under work — so neither the cwd nor `argv` reliably points at the harness checkout. Without the path, "read your own source" is guesswork.
## Decision
The `dsh` launcher (`apps/cli/src/tui.ts`) computes the harness checkout root from its own module URL — `fileURLToPath(new URL('../../..', import.meta.url))`, three hops up from `apps/cli/{src,lib}` — so it resolves to the real source location however `dsh` is launched (a PATH symlink, an arbitrary cwd). After `boot()` settles the tree, the launcher calls the new `addHarnessSourceSection(ctx, sourceRoot)` helper from `dsh-app-boot`, which registers a global `harness:source` prompt section reading `Your own source code is the checkout at <path>; you can read it there to learn how dsh works and how to extend it.` The section orders at `-99`, just after the harness identity opener (`-100`) and before the deployment persona (`0`).
The testable logic lives in `dsh-app-boot`, not in `apps/cli`, because `apps/*` are not coverage-gated and `packages/*` are. Resolving the optional `systemPrompt` service, registering the section, and returning the disposer belong where per-file 100% coverage applies; the launcher keeps only the thin glue — compute the path, call the helper — covered by the CLI's PTY e2e. When the booted tree has no `systemPrompt` service the helper is a no-op returning `undefined`.
## Scope
Only the `dsh` CLI adds this. The demo bins (`dsh-cli-demo`, `dsh-acp-demo`) boot their committed trees verbatim and gain no source section: they are not the self-modification surface, and their checkout root is not a fact the model needs.
## HMR
The section is registered against the booted `systemPrompt` service's own fiber (through `ctx.get('systemPrompt')`), so a dev HMR reload of the system-prompt plugin drops it until the next boot. Production HMR watches the config, not the built lib, so this is a dev-only wrinkle and acceptable.
## Alternatives considered
**Register the section inside the system-prompt service constructor.** It would then appear in every deployment, not just the self-referential CLI, and the source root would have to be threaded through config to reach the constructor. The path is a launcher fact, so the launcher owns injecting it.
**Keep the whole thing in `apps/cli/src/tui.ts`.** Apps are not coverage-gated, so the registration and absent-service branches would ship untested. Extracting the tested helper into `dsh-app-boot` keeps the gate meaningful; the launcher glue is exercised by the CLI's keyless PTY smoke.
**Add a cordis.yml config field for the path.** The path is not a deployment choice — it is mechanically the launcher's own location. A config field invites a stale hand-entered path and adds a knob with no legitimate variation.
**Resolve from `process.cwd()` or `process.argv[1]`.** The cwd is the user's project, and a PATH symlink makes `argv[1]` the symlink path; `import.meta.url` is the only handle on the real source location.
## Consequences
The agent's system prompt now names its own checkout, so the `cordis` toolset can read and edit harness source with no discovery step. `dsh-app-boot` gains a type-only dependency on `dsh-system-prompt` (peer + dev, matching the acp package's side-effect type import) for the `ctx.get('systemPrompt')` declaration merge; there is no runtime dependency. The section is model-visible text, pinned verbatim in an app-boot unit test and asserted end to end through the CLI's keyless PTY smoke — which boots `dsh` against the scripted config, runs a turn, and reads the path back out of the persisted `request/header` system prompt. The line sits before per-request content, so it does not perturb the KV cache across turns.

View File

@@ -1,37 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: dsh 告知 agent 其自身源码所在位置
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-21-dsh-system-prompt-source-path.md) | 中文
## Problem
`dsh` CLI 是自我引用的接口:其 `cordis` 工具包让 agent智能体得以查看并修改它自身运行其上的 harness智能体框架运行时。但 agent 此前无从得知这份源码在磁盘上的位置。`dsh` 通常以符号链接的形式挂到 PATH 上,并从任意工作目录(正在处理的项目)启动,因此无论是 cwd 还是 `argv` 都无法可靠地指向 harness 检出目录。缺了这个路径,"读取你自己的源码"便只能靠猜。
## Decision
`dsh` 启动器(`apps/cli/src/tui.ts`)从它自身的模块 URL 计算 harness 检出根目录——`fileURLToPath(new URL('../../..', import.meta.url))`,从 `apps/cli/{src,lib}` 向上三级——因此无论 `dsh` 以何种方式启动PATH 符号链接、任意 cwd它都能解析到真实的源码位置。在 `boot()` 使插件树就位之后,启动器调用来自 `dsh-app-boot` 的新辅助函数 `addHarnessSourceSection(ctx, sourceRoot)`,它注册一个全局 `harness:source` 提示词段,内容为 `Your own source code is the checkout at <path>; you can read it there to learn how dsh works and how to extend it.`。该段的 order 为 `-99`,恰在 harness 身份开场(`-100`)之后、部署 persona`0`)之前。
可测试的逻辑放在 `dsh-app-boot` 而非 `apps/cli` 中,因为 `apps/*` 不受覆盖率门禁约束,而 `packages/*` 受约束。解析可选的 `systemPrompt` 服务、注册该段、返回 dispose资源释放这些都属于按文件 100% 覆盖率生效的地方;启动器只保留那层薄薄的黏合——计算路径、调用辅助函数——由 CLI 的 PTY e2e 覆盖。当就位的插件树没有 `systemPrompt` 服务时,该辅助函数是一个返回 `undefined` 的空操作。
## Scope
只有 `dsh` CLI 会加入这一段。demo bin`dsh-cli-demo``dsh-acp-demo`)原样引导它们已提交的插件树,不会获得 source 段:它们不是自我修改的接口,其检出根目录也不是模型需要知道的事实。
## HMR
该段是针对就位后的 `systemPrompt` 服务自身的 fiber 注册的(通过 `ctx.get('systemPrompt')`),因此对 system-prompt 插件做一次开发态 HMR热模块替换重载会丢弃它直到下一次引导为止。生产环境的 HMR 监视的是配置而非构建产物 lib所以这只是一个仅限开发态的小瑕疵可以接受。
## Alternatives considered
**在 system-prompt 服务的构造函数内注册该段。** 那样它会出现在每一个部署中,而不只是自我引用的 CLI而且源码根目录还得穿过配置才能到达构造函数。这个路径是启动器的事实所以由启动器负责注入它。
**把整件事都留在 `apps/cli/src/tui.ts` 里。** apps 不受覆盖率门禁约束,因此注册逻辑与服务缺失分支会以未受测的形式发布。把受测的辅助函数抽取到 `dsh-app-boot` 让门禁保持有效;启动器的黏合部分由 CLI 的无密钥 PTY 冒烟测试演练。
**为该路径新增一个 cordis.yml 配置键。** 这个路径不是一项部署选择——它在机制上就是启动器自身的位置。配置键会招致手工填入的路径变陈旧,并新增一个没有合理变化空间的旋钮。
**从 `process.cwd()` 或 `process.argv[1]` 解析。** cwd 是用户的项目,而 PATH 符号链接会使 `argv[1]` 成为符号链接自身的路径;`import.meta.url` 是唯一能抓住真实源码位置的把手。
## Consequences
agent 的系统提示词现在会写明它自己的检出目录,因此 `cordis` 工具包无需一个发现步骤就能读取并编辑 harness 源码。`dsh-app-boot``ctx.get('systemPrompt')` 的声明合并新增了一个对 `dsh-system-prompt` 的仅类型依赖peer dependency对等依赖+ dev与 acp 包的副作用型类型 import 模式一致);不存在运行时依赖。该段是模型可见文本,在 app-boot 单元测试中逐字锁定,并通过 CLI 的无密钥 PTY 冒烟测试端到端断言——该测试以脚本化配置引导 `dsh`、运行一个轮次,再从持久化的 `request/header` 系统提示词中把路径读回来。这一行位于按请求变化的内容之前,所以它不会在多个轮次间扰动 KV Cache。

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: TUI banner brand gradient
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-21-tui-banner-brand-gradient.zh.md)
## Problem
The TUI startup banner rendered the product name `DEEPSEEK` in the palette's flat accent color, which carries no brand identity and does not resemble the wordmark on deepseek.com. The request was to make the banner match the site logo's blue gradient specifically — not to recolor the rest of the coding harness.
The banner is the one surface where that matters, and it conflicts with a load-bearing invariant: the TUI palette is deliberately theme-agnostic. It uses only standard 16-color ANSI (SGR) codes and attributes so a user's terminal scheme remaps every color; the `themeViolations()` snapshot gate rejects any RGB, extended-palette, or explicit-background cell. A smooth logo-matching gradient cannot be built from 16 palette colors, so reproducing it requires 24-bit truecolor, which the gate flags by design.
## Decision
The banner paints `DEEPSEEK` with a per-letter 24-bit truecolor foreground sweeping the deepseek.com brand gradient — `#4D6BFE``#3982FF``#2498FF` — via piecewise-linear interpolation across those three stops; `HARNESS` stays bold with the default foreground. The gradient is foreground-only, so it stays legible on any terminal background, and it is confined to the banner's product name. This is the sole sanctioned exception to the theme-agnostic palette; every other surface remains standard-ANSI and theme-adaptive.
The gradient is gated on `resolved.color && resolved.truecolor`. When truecolor is unavailable the banner falls back to the existing flat bright-blue accent, so nothing about the theme-agnostic guarantee or the recorded snapshots changes unless truecolor is explicitly in play.
`truecolor` is a validated `Config` field with no schema default. When it is unset, `apply()` auto-detects it at the process boundary from `COLORTERM` (`truecolor` or `24bit`); an explicit config value always wins. Detection reads `process.env` only in `apply()` — never in the pure `resolveTuiConfig` resolver — keeping the resolver a pure function of its input.
The gradient stops are fixed brand identity, treated like a protocol constant, so they are hardcoded in the plugin rather than exposed as a tunable. Whether truecolor is *enabled* is terminal- and deployment-varying, so that is the validated `Config` field. The banner text is UI-only and never reaches a model request, so no session event is required.
## Testing
A dedicated `banner-gradient` terminal snapshot pins the real per-letter RGB output in an xterm emulator (`fg=#4d6bfe``#2498ff`, each letter bold). The shared `checkpoint()` helper takes a `bannerGradient` flag: for that one checkpoint it asserts the theme violations are non-empty and that every violation ends in `rgb-fg` — i.e. truecolor is present but confined to the banner foreground, with no background or extended-palette leak. Every other checkpoint keeps the strict `themeViolations()` `.toEqual([])` assertion, so the fence is mechanically enforced. A `tui.spec.ts` unit test mounts with `color`+`truecolor` enabled to cover the header's gradient branch and the `gradientText`/`brandColorAt` helpers.
## Alternatives considered
**A theme-safe stepped gradient built from the 16-color palette.** Approximating the sweep with bright-blue palette variants would keep the banner fully theme-agnostic and avoid touching the gate. It was rejected by the requester: 16 fixed colors cannot reproduce the smooth logo gradient, and the request was explicitly to match the site wordmark.
**Recoloring the whole harness palette blue.** The original phrasing was "update the harness color to blue." That was narrowed to the banner only; a global blue palette would break theme-agnosticism everywhere, not just on one brand surface.
**Always emitting truecolor.** Many terminals lack 24-bit support and would render the raw or degraded codes. Gating on detection with an ANSI fallback keeps the banner correct everywhere while still showing the gradient where it works.
**Detecting truecolor inside `resolveTuiConfig`.** The resolver is a pure defaulting step and must not read `process.env`. Environment probing belongs at the process boundary in `apply()`, so `mountTui`/`createTuiChat` stay driven purely by their config input and remain fully testable with a fake terminal.
## Consequences
The banner now carries the DeepSeek brand identity on truecolor terminals while the theme-agnostic guarantee holds everywhere else — and even on the banner itself when truecolor is unavailable. The cost is one narrow, documented crack in the theme-agnostic invariant: a fixed-color surface that will not adapt to a user's terminal scheme, accepted because it is brand identity and foreground-only, so it stays legible on both light and dark backgrounds. The crack is fenced by the `banner-gradient` snapshot assertion, which confines truecolor to the banner foreground and fails if any other RGB, extended-palette, or background color ever appears.

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: TUI 启动横幅品牌渐变
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-21-tui-banner-brand-gradient.md) | 中文
## 问题
TUI 启动横幅原本用调色板的扁平强调色渲染产品名 `DEEPSEEK`,它不承载任何品牌标识,也不像 deepseek.com 上的字标。需求明确是让横幅匹配站点 logo 的蓝色渐变——而不是给整个 coding harness 重新上色。
横幅是唯一在意这件事的界面而它与一条承重不变量冲突TUI 调色板刻意做到主题无关。它只使用标准 16 色 ANSISGR代码与属性好让用户的终端配色方案能够重映射每一种颜色`themeViolations()` 快照门禁会拒绝任何 RGB、扩展调色板或显式背景色的单元格。用 16 种调色板颜色无法拼出平滑的、与 logo 一致的渐变,因此复现它需要 24 位真彩色truecolor而门禁按设计会将其标记出来。
## 决策
横幅用逐字母的 24 位真彩色前景色渲染 `DEEPSEEK`,沿 deepseek.com 品牌渐变——`#4D6BFE``#3982FF``#2498FF`——在这三个色标之间做分段线性插值;`HARNESS` 保持加粗并使用默认前景色。渐变仅作用于前景色,因此在任何终端背景上都保持可读,并且被限制在横幅的产品名内。这是主题无关调色板唯一获准的例外;其余每个界面都保持标准 ANSI 且随主题自适应。
渐变以 `resolved.color && resolved.truecolor` 为开关。当真彩色不可用时,横幅回退到既有的扁平亮蓝强调色,因此除非显式启用真彩色,主题无关保证与已录制的快照都不会改变。
`truecolor` 是一个经校验的 `Config` 字段schema 不设默认值。当它未设置时,`apply()` 会在进程边界从 `COLORTERM``truecolor``24bit`)自动探测;显式的配置值始终优先。探测只在 `apply()` 中读取 `process.env`——绝不在纯粹的 `resolveTuiConfig` 解析器中——从而让解析器保持为其输入的纯函数。
渐变色标是固定的品牌标识,被当作协议常量对待,因此硬编码在插件里,而不作为可调项暴露。是否*启用*真彩色则随终端与部署而变,所以那才是经校验的 `Config` 字段。横幅文本仅面向界面,永不进入任何模型请求,因此不需要会话事件。
## 测试
一个专门的 `banner-gradient` 终端快照在 xterm 模拟器中固定了真实的逐字母 RGB 输出(`fg=#4d6bfe``#2498ff`,每个字母加粗)。共享的 `checkpoint()` 辅助函数接受一个 `bannerGradient` 标志:仅对该 checkpoint它断言主题违规项非空且每一项都以 `rgb-fg` 结尾——即真彩色确实存在,但被限制在横幅前景色,没有背景色或扩展调色板的泄漏。其余每个 checkpoint 都保持严格的 `themeViolations()` `.toEqual([])` 断言,因此这道围栏是机械强制的。一个 `tui.spec.ts` 单元测试在同时启用 `color``truecolor` 时挂载,以覆盖 header 的渐变分支以及 `gradientText`/`brandColorAt` 辅助函数。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**用 16 色调色板拼出的主题安全阶梯渐变。** 用亮蓝的调色板变体近似这段渐变可以让横幅完全保持主题无关并避免触碰门禁。它被需求方否决了16 种固定颜色无法复现平滑的 logo 渐变,而需求明确是匹配站点字标。
**给整个 harness 调色板重新上蓝色。** 最初的说法是"把 harness 颜色改成蓝色"。它被收窄到只改横幅;全局蓝色调色板会在各处而非仅一个品牌界面上破坏主题无关性。
**始终发射真彩色。** 许多终端不支持 24 位,会渲染出原始或降级的代码。以探测为开关并配以 ANSI 回退,能让横幅在各处都正确,同时仍在支持的地方展示渐变。
**在 `resolveTuiConfig` 内探测真彩色。** 该解析器是纯粹的默认值填充步骤,绝不能读取 `process.env`。环境探测属于 `apply()` 中的进程边界,从而让 `mountTui`/`createTuiChat` 完全由其配置输入驱动,并在使用假终端时保持完全可测。
## 后果
现在横幅会在真彩色终端上承载 DeepSeek 品牌标识,而主题无关保证在其余各处依然成立——甚至当真彩色不可用时在横幅自身上也成立。代价是主题无关不变量上一道狭窄且有记录的裂缝:一个不会随用户终端配色方案自适应的固定颜色界面,之所以接受,是因为它是品牌标识且仅作用于前景色,从而在浅色与深色背景上都保持可读。这道裂缝由 `banner-gradient` 快照断言把守,它将真彩色限制在横幅前景色,一旦其他任何 RGB、扩展调色板或背景色出现就会失败。

View File

@@ -1,46 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: The banner returns, borderless
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.zh.md)
## Problem
An intermediate no-banner design removed the boxed startup banner: it deleted `HeaderComponent` and its sweep, moved the model into the footer, dropped the session id, and rendered `welcome` as the transcript's first line. The user's verdict reversed that: bring the banner back — "just remove the border". The four-row box frame was the objectionable chrome, not the identifying facts it carried (model, session id) nor the sweep-in motion.
## Decision
- `HeaderComponent` and its left-to-right sweep return, but render **borderless**: no `╭─╮`/`╰─╯` corners and no `│` side bars. Each line is a single leading space plus `truncateToWidth`-clipped content, so the sweep's width clip can never tear an escape sequence and no fixed frame is drawn. The reveal advances through about 24 frames at 15 ms each.
- The header carries the title (`DEEPSEEK HARNESS`), a `<model> • <session-id>` detail line, and — when `welcome` is set — a muted subtitle. With `welcome` unset the header is title + detail only: there is no fixed or random slogan.
- The model **also** stays in the footer's left segment, so the driving model remains glanceable after the transient banner scrolls out of view.
- `welcome` reverts to a banner subtitle; the transcript-first-line notice is removed from `rebuildTranscript`.
- The sweep animates only when `welcome` is unset. A configured `welcome` renders the whole banner immediately, keeping fixtures and snapshots frame-deterministic. The sweep starts after `ui.start()` succeeds and is cleared through the same `detachListeners` path via `stopBannerReveal`, which also resets the clip so a header disposed mid-sweep re-renders whole.
This note owns the current result of the discarded startup variants: random slogans with a per-character typewriter, a boxed whole-banner sweep, and no banner. The example composition does not set `welcome`; deployments and deterministic fixtures may still provide one. The model's persistent footer home from the no-banner variant remains.
## Alternatives considered
**Keep the box but thin it or use lighter glyphs.** Rejected: the instruction was "just remove the border"; any surrounding glyph is the frame chrome the user objected to.
**Keep a random or fixed slogan when `welcome` is unset.** Rejected because repeated flavor copy becomes wallpaper and the per-character reveal was slow while animating only one line. An unset welcome therefore produces no subtitle, and the whole banner supplies the startup motion.
**Remove the banner entirely.** Rejected because the persistent footer is a good home for the model but not for the full identifying detail, while putting `welcome` in the transcript makes presentation configuration behave like conversation content.
**Reveal the banner top-down.** Rejected because four row-sized steps read as a flicker. The horizontal width clip uses the terminal span for smooth motion and reuses the ANSI-aware truncation path.
**Drop the model from the footer now that the banner shows it again.** Rejected: the banner is transient and scrolls away with the transcript, while the footer keeps the model visible for the whole session; that persistent location is deliberately preserved.
**Leave the session id out of the banner.** Rejected: with the box gone the detail line costs one row, and the user asked for the banner "as before", which carried `model • session-id`.
## Consequences
- Boot output with `welcome` unset is animation-dependent again (the sweep); configured welcomes stay frame-deterministic, so every snapshot and scripted fixture keeps a fixed subtitle.
- The demo no longer supplies instructional welcome filler; an unset `welcome` means a subtitle-free banner, while the config remains the deterministic escape hatch for deployments and fixtures.
- The model now appears twice at boot — banner detail and footer — intended redundancy: the banner is transient, the footer persistent.
- `/clear` empties the transcript but not the header, so the banner and its configured subtitle survive `/clear`, unlike a transcript-based welcome line.
- All pi-tui terminal snapshots and the examples/tui-agent replay snapshots re-recorded (`test:snapshot:refresh`): banner rows return with no box glyphs; footer rows keep the model prefix.
- Anything that anchored on banner absence re-anchors on its presence: the PTY smoke boots on the detail line's `main-session-` id (revealed late in the sweep) and asserts `DEEPSEEK`/`HARNESS` present with no box corners.
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` pins: the borderless banner sweeps to natural completion — no box corners, title and `main-session` detail present — with at least one clipped mid-sweep frame; a configured `welcome` renders the whole banner with no clipped frame; the unset-welcome banner has no subtitle; and dispose clears the sweep interval mid-sweep. Independent color-scheme cases cover reported light/dark transitions, a same-scheme no-op, and a terminal that throws on the DSR query write; `applyColorScheme` relies on `setStatus` to rederive the editor border instead of repeating the dead assignment that had broken per-file coverage. The tui-agent and dsh-CLI PTY smokes boot on the `main-session-` detail marker and assert no box corners. Snapshots verify the full frames.

View File

@@ -1,46 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 横幅回归,无边框
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.md) | 中文
## Problem
一个中间的无横幅设计删掉了带框的启动横幅:它删除了 `HeaderComponent` 及其扫入动画,把模型移入页脚,丢弃了会话 id并把 `welcome` 渲染为 transcript 的第一行。用户的裁决把这一切反转:把横幅拿回来——"just remove the border"。令人反感的装饰是那四行盒子边框,而不是它承载的识别信息(模型、会话 id也不是扫入动效。
## Decision
- `HeaderComponent` 及其从左到右的扫入动画回归,但以**无边框**方式渲染:没有 `╭─╮`/`╰─╯` 边角,也没有 `│` 侧边。每一行都是一个前导空格加上经 `truncateToWidth` 裁剪的内容,因此扫入的宽度裁剪永远不会撕裂转义序列,也不绘制任何固定边框。扫入大约经过 24 帧完成,每帧间隔 15 ms。
- 头部承载标题(`DEEPSEEK HARNESS`)、一条 `<model> • <session-id>` 详情行,以及——当设置了 `welcome` 时——一条弱化的副标题。`welcome` 未设置时头部只有标题加详情:不含固定或随机标语。
- 模型**同时**保留在页脚的左段,因此在短暂的横幅滚出视野后,会话使用的模型仍可一瞥可见。
- `welcome` 恢复为横幅副标题transcript 第一行的通知从 `rebuildTranscript` 中移除。
- 仅当 `welcome` 未设置时才播放扫入动画。配置了 `welcome` 会立即渲染整个横幅,使 fixture 和快照保持帧确定性。扫入在 `ui.start()` 成功后启动,并经与之前相同的 `detachListeners` 路径通过 `stopBannerReveal` 清理;后者还会重置裁剪,使扫入中途被销毁的头部重新完整渲染。
本 Agent Note 统一记录几种已弃用启动方案的当前结论:带逐字打字机效果的随机标语、带边框的整幅横幅扫入动画,以及完全移除横幅。示例组装不设置 `welcome`;部署和确定性 fixture 仍可提供该值。无横幅方案为模型设置的常驻页脚位置继续保留。
## Alternatives considered
**保留盒子但做细或改用更轻的字符。** 否决:指令是 "just remove the border";任何环绕的字符都是用户所反对的边框装饰。
**在未设置 `welcome` 时保留随机或固定标语。** 否决:反复出现的氛围文案很快失去信息价值,而逐字揭示仅为一行制作动画,速度又慢。因此,未设置 `welcome` 时不显示副标题,由整个横幅提供启动动效。
**完全移除横幅。** 否决:常驻页脚很适合显示模型,却无法承载完整识别详情;把 `welcome` 放入 transcript 还会使展示配置表现成对话内容。
**自上而下揭示横幅。** 否决:按四行分成四步看起来像闪烁。横向宽度裁剪利用终端横向空间实现平滑动效,并复用 ANSI 感知的截断路径。
**既然横幅重新显示模型,就把模型从页脚移除。** 否决:横幅是短暂的,会随 transcript 滚走,而页脚在整个会话中保持模型可见;这个常驻位置被刻意保留。
**将会话 id 留在横幅之外。** 否决:盒子去掉后详情行只占一行,且用户要求横幅"和以前一样",而以前它承载 `model • session-id`
## Consequences
- `welcome` 未设置时的启动输出再次依赖动画(扫入);配置了欢迎语则保持帧确定性,因此每个快照和脚本 fixture 都保留一个固定副标题。
- demo 不再提供教学性质的欢迎填充文案;`welcome` 未设置就表示横幅没有副标题,而该配置仍是部署和 fixture 获得确定性输出的配置手段。
- 模型现在在启动时出现两次——横幅详情与页脚——这是有意的冗余:横幅短暂,页脚常驻。
- `/clear` 清空 transcript 但不清头部,因此横幅及其配置的副标题在 `/clear` 后存活,不同于基于 transcript 的欢迎行。
- 全部 pi-tui 终端快照与 examples/tui-agent 回放快照重新录制(`test:snapshot:refresh`):横幅行以无盒子字符方式回归;页脚行保留模型前缀。
- 一切锚定横幅缺失的内容改为锚定其存在PTY 冒烟测试以详情行的 `main-session-` id 为启动标记(它在扫入后段才被揭示),并断言 `DEEPSEEK`/`HARNESS` 出现且无盒子角。
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` 固定:无边框横幅扫入至自然完成——无盒子角、标题与 `main-session` 详情出现——且至少有一帧扫入中途被裁剪;配置的 `welcome` 完整渲染横幅且无裁剪帧;未设置 `welcome` 的横幅无副标题;销毁会在扫入中途清掉扫入定时器。独立的配色方案用例覆盖终端报告的浅色/深色转换、相同方案下的空操作,以及写入 DSR 查询时抛出异常的终端;`applyColorScheme` 依靠 `setStatus` 重新推导编辑器边框而不再重复那个导致逐文件覆盖率未达标的无效赋值。tui-agent 与 dsh CLI 的 PTY 冒烟测试以 `main-session-` 详情标记为启动标记并断言无盒子角。快照验证完整帧。

View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-21-tui-footer-cache-hit-rate.md: aaee8ed31ff8f20370f490d3ce27c8705cda3e16
2026-07-21-tui-footer-cache-hit-rate.zh.md: 67a7aa474d98878a5bc0bc0a76a8c2ccad004e9b

View File

@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: TUI footer shows the session cache hit rate
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-21-tui-footer-cache-hit-rate.zh.md)
## Problem
The footer summed the session's token usage as `↑<input> ↓<output>`, where `↑` is the uncached input reported by the model. `TokenUsage` counts are disjoint: billed prompt tokens are `inputTokens` (uncached) plus `cacheReadTokens` and `cacheWriteTokens`. With only the uncached number visible, a user could not tell how much of each turn's prompt the provider cache served — the signal that most directly reflects whether the reused request prefix is paying off. On a long session dominated by cache reads the `↑` figure stays small and hides that the prompt is large but cheap.
## Decision
The footer appends `cache <rate>%` after `↑<input> ↓<output>`, where the rate is the share of billed prompt tokens served from the provider cache.
- `TokenTotals` accumulates the four disjoint buckets (`input`, `output`, `cacheRead`, `cacheWrite`). `addUsage` folds one call's `TokenUsage` into the totals, treating a missing `cacheReadTokens`/`cacheWriteTokens` as zero.
- `cacheHitRate(totals)` is `round(cacheRead / (input + cacheRead + cacheWrite) * 100)`, and `undefined` before any input is billed. `FooterComponent` omits the whole ` cache N%` segment while the rate is `undefined`, so an empty session shows no meaningless zero.
- `↑` keeps meaning uncached input, not billed input: the disjoint-bucket convention holds across the footer, and the cache percent supplies the reuse signal the raw counts cannot.
- Totals are rebuilt on mount by `sessionTokens`, which sums usage over `assistant/message` events (never `assistant/chunk`, to avoid double counting), and updated live from each `assistant/message` event that carries usage.
## Alternatives considered
**Show billed input (`input + cacheRead + cacheWrite`) as `↑` instead of a separate percent.** Rejected: it would redefine `↑` away from the disjoint `inputTokens` bucket the rest of the harness reports, and it would still hide the reuse share the user actually wants; a derived percent adds the signal without overloading the count.
**Compute the rate against all tokens (`input + output + cache`).** Rejected: output tokens are never cache-served, so folding them into the denominator understates the rate for no meaning; cache hit rate is a property of the prompt.
**Drop `cacheWrite` from the denominator.** Rejected: cache writes are billed input the provider spent to populate the cache, so excluding them overstates the hit rate on a writing turn. DeepSeek reports no cache-write metric today, but the formula stays general and the write path is covered.
**Render `cache 0%` on an empty session.** Rejected: the billed input is `0`, the ratio is `0/0`, and a `0%` badge on a fresh session is a lie about a value that does not exist yet; the segment stays hidden until input is billed.
**Give the metric its own right-aligned footer element beside `tools:`.** Rejected: it derives from the adjacent token counts and reads best in the `input → output → cache` order; grouping it left also keeps the lower-priority `tools:` indicator as the element that clips first under width pressure, matching the footer's existing layout priority.
## Consequences
- The left group grew by ` cache N%`, so on a narrow footer the right-side `tools:` state clips sooner. This follows the footer's pre-existing left-priority truncation and is an accepted trade-off.
- The metric is best-effort live UI state derived from `assistant/message` usage: rebuilt from the session on mount, updated live, and never persisted.
- `packages/ui/tui/src/index.ts` stays at 100 % per-file coverage.
- The `examples/tui-agent` terminal snapshots carry the segment: a turn with cache reads renders e.g. `cache 49%`, and a first cold turn renders `cache 0%`.
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` drives the footer through the real `createTuiChat`: an empty session renders `↑0 ↓0` with no cache segment (the hidden path), a cold turn (`inputTokens` only) renders `cache 0%`, and a live warm turn carrying `cacheReadTokens` and `cacheWriteTokens` updates it to `cache 60%` while no longer showing `cache 0%`. The `examples/tui-agent` snapshot suite replays green against the recorded expected output.

View File

@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: TUI 页脚展示会话缓存命中率
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-21-tui-footer-cache-hit-rate.md) | 中文
## Problem
页脚原本把会话的 token 用量汇总为 `↑<input> ↓<output>`,其中 `↑` 是模型上报的未缓存输入。`TokenUsage` 的各项计数互不重叠:计费的输入 token 由 `inputTokens`(未缓存)加上 `cacheReadTokens``cacheWriteTokens` 构成。只暴露未缓存的那个数字,用户就无从判断每轮提示词有多少由提供方缓存承接——而这恰是最能反映复用的请求前缀是否奏效的信号。在以缓存读取为主的长会话里,`↑` 始终很小,掩盖了提示词其实很大但很便宜的事实。
## Decision
页脚在 `↑<input> ↓<output>` 之后追加 `cache <rate>%`,该比率是计费输入 token 中由提供方缓存承接的占比。
- `TokenTotals` 累加四个互不重叠的桶(`input``output``cacheRead``cacheWrite`)。`addUsage` 把单次调用的 `TokenUsage` 折入总量,缺失的 `cacheReadTokens`/`cacheWriteTokens` 视为零。
- `cacheHitRate(totals)``round(cacheRead / (input + cacheRead + cacheWrite) * 100)`,在尚无输入计费前返回 `undefined`。比率为 `undefined``FooterComponent` 整段略去 ` cache N%`,因此空会话不会显示无意义的零。
- `↑` 仍表示未缓存输入,而非计费输入:页脚全程遵守互不重叠的桶约定,缺失的复用信号由缓存百分比补足。
- 挂载时由 `sessionTokens` 重建总量,它对带 usage 的 `assistant/message` 事件求和(绝不用 `assistant/chunk`,以免重复计数);此后每条携带 usage 的 `assistant/message` 事件都会实时更新。
## Alternatives considered
**把计费输入(`input + cacheRead + cacheWrite`)作为 `↑`,不单列百分比。** 否决:这会让 `↑` 偏离 harness 其余部分上报的互不重叠 `inputTokens` 桶,且仍旧藏住用户真正想要的复用占比;派生一个百分比既补上信号,又不给计数加载额外含义。
**用全部 token`input + output + cache`)作分母计算比率。** 否决:输出 token 从不由缓存承接,把它折进分母只会无意义地拉低比率;缓存命中率是提示词的属性。
**从分母里去掉 `cacheWrite`。** 否决缓存写入是提供方为填充缓存而付费的计费输入剔除它会在写入的那一轮高估命中率。DeepSeek 目前不上报缓存写入指标,但公式保持通用,写入路径也有覆盖。
**在空会话上渲染 `cache 0%`。** 否决:此时计费输入为 `0`,比值是 `0/0`,在全新会话上打出 `0%` 是对一个尚不存在的值撒谎;在输入计费之前该段一直隐藏。
**给该指标单独一个右对齐的页脚元素,紧挨 `tools:`。** 否决:它派生自相邻的 token 计数,按 `input → output → cache` 的顺序阅读最顺;左置分组还让优先级更低的 `tools:` 指示成为宽度紧张时最先被裁剪的元素,与页脚既有的布局优先级一致。
## Consequences
- 左段增加了 ` cache N%`,因此窄终端上右侧的 `tools:` 状态更早被裁剪。这沿用页脚既有的左段优先裁剪策略,是可接受的取舍。
- 该指标是从 `assistant/message` 的 usage 派生的尽力而为实时 UI 状态:挂载时从会话重建、随后实时更新、从不持久化。
- `packages/ui/tui/src/index.ts` 保持 100% 单文件覆盖率。
- `examples/tui-agent` 终端快照带有该段:有缓存读取的一轮渲染为如 `cache 49%`,首个冷启动轮次渲染为 `cache 0%`
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` 通过真实的 `createTuiChat` 驱动页脚:空会话渲染 `↑0 ↓0` 且无缓存段(隐藏路径),冷启动一轮(仅 `inputTokens`)渲染 `cache 0%`,随后实时的热轮次携带 `cacheReadTokens``cacheWriteTokens`,把它更新为 `cache 60%` 且不再显示 `cache 0%``examples/tui-agent` 快照套件对已录制的预期输出回放通过。

View File

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: The /reload command re-reads loader configs on demand
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-21-tui-reload-command.zh.md)
## Problem
HMR's file watcher only reacts to in-place `change` events under its configured roots (the config leaf's directory in the shipped demos). Editors that replace files by rename (BSD `sed -i`, `git checkout`) produce no event, and runtimes without the HMR entry have no config reload path at all. During development that means restarting the TUI to apply a config edit the watcher missed. Widening the watch roots to the whole repo was considered and rejected in discussion: dense package sharing makes module-level HMR a remount-most-of-the-tree operation with unpredictable externals boundaries.
## Decision
`dsh-tui` gains an **experimental, dev-only** `/reload` slash command: it walks `ctx.loader.entries()` and calls `refresh()` on every file-backed subtree (`Include`), i.e. the exact code path the HMR watcher's config-change branch drives, invoked manually and watcher-independent. Unchanged files are no-ops (content comparison in `Include.read`); invalid files warn and keep the running tree (the hot-reload-resilience contract); include `patches` — including the dsh CLI's personal overlay — re-apply on every re-read.
The TUI reaches the Loader **structurally** (`ctx.loader` via a local type, not `inject`): tests and embedders run the TUI without a Loader, where `/reload` degrades to a warning notice instead of failing the mount. Module-source hot reload stays watcher-owned; `/reload` refreshes configs only.
## Alternatives considered
**Widening the HMR watch roots to `packages/`/`apps/`.** Rejected for now: plugin-source changes reload every dependent plugin's fiber, and the repo's dense shared packages (`dsh-session`, `dsh-llm`, `dsh-tools`) make that a teardown of the spine and the UI mid-session — a restart in disguise with partial-reload hazards. A manual config-scope command captures the safe, predictable subset.
**Declaring `loader` in `inject`.** Rejected: it would make the Loader a hard dependency of the TUI, breaking every Loader-less composition (unit harness, embedders) for a dev convenience.
**A `cordis_reload` model-facing tool in dsh-tool-cordis.** Rejected: this is an operator action for the human at the terminal, not a capability the model should trigger; the cordis toolset's mount/unmount surface already covers the model's runtime-modification story.
## Consequences
- `/reload` appears in the help line, autocomplete (marked EXPERIMENTAL (dev)), and the two help-rendering snapshots (re-recorded).
- The command reports tree count and completion as transcript notices; per-file failures surface only in loader logs, which the TUI does not display — acceptable for a dev-only surface, noted in the completion message.
- A re-entrancy guard serializes reloads: `/reload` while one is in flight is refused with a warning, keeping the loader's unmutexed tree-update pass single-writer; the guard releases on completion or failure.
- `/reload` runs only while the agent is idle: a reload can dispose and re-mount entries, which under an active turn could tear tools or the adapter out from under in-flight calls. The check is advisory (a send can race in after it) but removes the common footgun.
- If `refresh()`'s never-reject contract ever changes, the command reports the failure instead of leaving an unhandled rejection.
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` pins: `/reload` refreshes every file-backed subtree and skips plain entries (structural fake Loader), reports completion, refuses re-entry while a gated refresh is in flight and runs again after release, releases the guard on the failure arm, refuses a running agent and runs again at idle, reports a rejecting refresh, and degrades to a warning without a Loader — including mounted as a real plugin fiber, where a throwing service lookup would escape. Verified live in tmux against the real tree: probe edit → reload applies; invalid edit → reload keeps the running tree.

View File

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: /reload 命令按需重读 loader 配置
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-21-tui-reload-command.md) | 中文
## Problem
HMR 的文件监听器只对其配置根目录(示例中即配置叶子所在目录)下的就地 `change` 事件起反应。以重命名方式替换文件的编辑器BSD `sed -i``git checkout`)不产生事件,而没有挂载 HMR 配置项的运行时则完全没有配置重载路径。开发时这意味着监听器漏掉一次配置编辑就得重启 TUI。曾考虑把监听根目录扩大到整个仓库讨论后否决包之间的密集共享使模块级 HMR 变成「重挂大半棵树」的操作externals 边界也不可预测。
## Decision
`dsh-tui` 增加一个**实验性、仅供开发**的 `/reload` 斜杠命令:遍历 `ctx.loader.entries()`,对每个文件后端的子树(`Include`)调用 `refresh()`——即 HMR 监听器配置变更分支所走的同一条代码路径,改为手动触发、不依赖监听器。未变化的文件是无操作(`Include.read` 做内容比较无效文件记录警告并保留运行中的树热重载韧性契约include 的 `patches`——包括 dsh CLI 的个人 overlay——在每次重读时重新应用。
TUI 以**结构方式**访问 Loader通过局部类型访问 `ctx.loader`,而非 `inject`):测试和嵌入方在没有 Loader 的情况下运行 TUI此时 `/reload` 退化为一条警告通知而不是挂载失败。模块源码热重载仍由监听器负责;`/reload` 只刷新配置。
## Alternatives considered
**把 HMR 监听根目录扩大到 `packages/`/`apps/`。** 暂缓否决:插件源码变更会重载每个依赖插件的 fiber而仓库中密集共享的包`dsh-session``dsh-llm``dsh-tools`)使其等同于会话中途拆掉主干和 UI——伪装成热重载的重启还带部分重载的隐患。手动的、只覆盖配置范围的命令抓住了安全、可预测的那个子集。
**在 `inject` 中声明 `loader`。** 否决:那会让 Loader 成为 TUI 的硬依赖,为了一个开发便利破坏所有无 Loader 的组合(单元测试 harness、嵌入方
**在 dsh-tool-cordis 里做一个面向模型的 `cordis_reload` 工具。** 否决这是终端前人类操作者的动作不是模型应当触发的能力cordis 工具集的 mount/unmount 表面已经覆盖模型的运行时修改需求。
## Consequences
- `/reload` 出现在帮助行、自动补全(标注 EXPERIMENTAL (dev))和两个渲染帮助的快照中(已重新录制)。
- 命令以 transcript 通知报告树数量与完成;单文件失败只出现在 loader 日志里TUI 不显示——对仅供开发的表面可以接受,完成消息中已注明。
- 重入保护串行化重载:前一次进行中时 `/reload` 会被拒绝并提示警告,使 loader 无互斥的树更新过程保持单写者;保护在完成或失败时释放。
- `/reload` 只在 agent 空闲时运行:重载可能卸载并重新挂载配置项,在活跃轮次下这会把工具或适配器从进行中的调用脚下抽掉。检查是建议性的(检查后仍可能有 send 竞争进来),但消除了常见的坑。
-`refresh()` 的永不 reject 契约将来改变,命令会报告失败而不是留下未处理的 rejection。
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` 固定:`/reload` 刷新每个文件后端子树并跳过普通配置项(结构化的假 Loader、报告完成、在门控的刷新进行中拒绝重入并在释放后可再次运行、失败分支同样释放保护、拒绝运行中的 agent 并在空闲后可再次运行、报告 reject 的 refresh、无 Loader 时退化为警告——包括作为真实插件 fiber 挂载的情形,在那里会抛出的服务查找会泄露出去。已在 tmux 中对真实配置树实机验证:探针编辑 → reload 生效;无效编辑 → reload 保留运行中的树。

View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-21-tui-steering-queue-badge.md: b29a4667e778e65b0678f946fcaa34b79c4d7da0
2026-07-21-tui-steering-queue-badge.zh.md: 4bfce461e11bce1773d6e0b15aabecf6a6a6144c

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: TUI status line badges queued steering messages
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-21-tui-steering-queue-badge.zh.md)
## Problem
While a turn runs, an editor submission calls `agent.steer()` and joins the steering queue behind the running turn ([front-door Agent Note](2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.md)). The running status line ended only with the `Enter sends steering, Esc cancels` hint, so pressing Enter gave no feedback that the message landed or how many were waiting to reach the model. A user steering several times could not tell the queue from a dropped keystroke.
## Decision
The agent's inbox is the authoritative steering queue but is not observable from the TUI, so the badge is a live count reconstructed from the public `agent/queued` and `steering/message` events rather than a projection of the queue itself.
- The running status line composes through `formatTurnStatus`, which inserts a `${queued} queued · ` badge before the `Enter sends steering, Esc cancels` hint when `queued > 0` and shows the plain hint at zero; the phase label and elapsed timing before it are the [verbose status line](2026-07-21-tui-verbose-status-line.md)'s.
- `createTuiChat` owns a `pendingSteering` counter: `+1` on each `agent/queued` for this agent whose `info.steering` is set, `-1` (floored at zero) on each `steering/message` session event as the loop drains one, and reset to zero whenever the agent leaves `running`.
- The count refreshes onto the live `Loader` through `setMessage`; the refresh is a no-op while idle because the loader exists only during a running turn.
- The reset lives in the `agent/status` transition, not in `setStatus`, because `setStatus` also runs on mid-turn palette changes and must not clear a live count.
## Alternatives considered
**Derive the count from the session log alone** (enqueued minus drained, recomputed on replay). Rejected: a cancellation clears the inbox without logging a drain, so the log cannot distinguish a drained message from a discarded one; the reset-on-non-running anchor is simpler and self-correcting each turn.
**Reset inside `setStatus`.** Rejected: `setStatus` re-runs on `applyColorScheme` mid-turn, which would wrongly zero a live count; the status transition is the only place a turn actually ends.
**Drop the decrement clamp.** Rejected: loop-authored steering (e.g. continuation reasons) logs `steering/message` with no matching user-queued increment, which would drive the count negative; the zero floor keeps the badge a lower bound rather than a lie.
**Make the wording or a threshold configurable.** Rejected: the no-hardcoded-tunables rule targets deployment-varying behavior, not brand copy; the `welcome`/hint strings are already fixed presentation.
## Consequences
- The badge is best-effort live UI state, not a logged surface: it is rebuilt from events and reset each turn, never persisted, so a resumed running turn starts its badge from zero.
- A cancellation mid-queue clears the badge cleanly through the non-running reset, and a drain past zero is a no-op — neither can strand a stale count.
- A loop continuation that keeps the agent `running` while re-enqueuing undrained late steering can transiently over-count until the next idle reset; the badge is advisory, so the window is acceptable.
- `packages/ui/tui/src/index.ts` stays at 100 % per-file coverage.
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` drives the running status frame through the real `createTuiChat`: the plain hint at zero, a foreign-agent queue ignored, the increment to `2 queued`, a non-steering queue left untouched, the decrement as each message drains, the clamp on a drain past zero, and the reset when the turn ends. Verified live in tmux — the badge showed `3 queued` after three `agent.steer()` calls, then `1 queued` as two drained.

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: TUI 状态行标示排队中的 steering 消息
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-21-tui-steering-queue-badge.md) | 中文
## Problem
轮次运行期间,编辑器提交会调用 `agent.steer()`,在运行中的轮次后面加入 steering中途引导队列[前门 Agent Note](2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.md))。运行时的状态行只以 `Enter sends steering, Esc cancels` 提示收尾,因此按下 Enter 后没有任何反馈表明消息已入队、也看不出有多少条正在等待送达模型。连续 steering 多次的用户无法把队列和被吞掉的按键区分开。
## Decision
agent智能体的收件箱inbox才是权威的 steering 队列,但 TUI 无法观测它,因此徽标是从公开的 `agent/queued``steering/message` 事件重建出的实时计数,而非对队列本身的投影。
- 运行时的状态行经 `formatTurnStatus` 组装:`queued > 0` 时在 `Enter sends steering, Esc cancels` 提示前插入 `${queued} queued · ` 徽标,为零时是纯提示文本;其前的阶段标签与耗时归[详细状态行](2026-07-21-tui-verbose-status-line.md)所有。
- `createTuiChat` 持有一个 `pendingSteering` 计数器:每收到一个针对本 agent 且 `info.steering` 为真的 `agent/queued``+1`agent loop智能体循环每排空一条时随对应的 `steering/message` 会话事件 `-1`下限为零agent 一旦离开 `running` 状态即重置为零。
- 计数通过 `setMessage` 刷新到实时的 `Loader` 上;空闲时刷新是空操作,因为 loader 只在运行中的轮次期间存在。
- 重置放在 `agent/status` 状态切换里,而非 `setStatus` 中,因为 `setStatus` 在轮次中途的颜色方案变化时也会运行,绝不能清掉一个实时计数。
## Alternatives considered
**仅从会话日志推导计数**(入队数减去排空数,回放时重算)。否决:取消会清空 inbox 而不记录排空,因此日志无法区分一条消息是被排空还是被丢弃;「离开运行态即重置」这个锚点更简单,且每轮自我校正。
**在 `setStatus` 内重置。** 否决:`setStatus` 会在轮次中途的 `applyColorScheme` 时重新运行,会错误地把实时计数清零;状态切换才是轮次真正结束的唯一位置。
**去掉递减的下限钳制。** 否决agent loop 自行产生的 steering如 continuation 续跑原因)会记录 `steering/message`,却没有对应的用户入队递增,这会把计数压到负数;零下限让徽标成为下界,而非谎报。
**把措辞或某个阈值做成配置。** 否决:「插件里不许硬编码可调参数」规则针对的是随部署变化的行为,不是品牌文案;`welcome`/提示字符串本就是固定的展示文案。
## Consequences
- 徽标是尽力而为的实时 UI 状态不写入日志它由事件重建、每轮重置、从不持久化因此恢复resume出的运行中轮次徽标从零开始。
- 队列中途取消会经由「离开运行态即重置」干净地清掉徽标,排空到零以下则是空操作——两者都不会残留一个陈旧计数。
- 如果 agent loop 续跑时让 agent 保持 `running`、同时把未排空的迟到 steering 重新入队,则可能短暂多计,直到下一次空闲重置;徽标只作参考,因此这个窗口可以接受。
- `packages/ui/tui/src/index.ts` 保持 100% 的单文件覆盖率。
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` 通过真实的 `createTuiChat` 驱动运行时状态帧:为零时的纯提示、忽略他方 agent 的入队、递增到 `2 queued`、非 steering 的入队保持不变、每条消息排空时的递减、排空到零以下时的钳制、以及轮次结束时的重置。已在 tmux 中实机验证——三次 `agent.steer()` 调用后徽标显示 `3 queued`,随后两条排空时显示 `1 queued`

View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-21-tui-verbose-status-line.md: 71584ee91a911cc8652512ec26b00dae8c818f36
2026-07-21-tui-verbose-status-line.zh.md: bda3c5e8394f7707916c6fc76045b1a6f38fa95b

View File

@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: The running status line shows the turn phase and elapsed time
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-21-tui-verbose-status-line.zh.md)
## Problem
While a turn ran, the [full-screen TUI](2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.md) showed a single static "Working" spinner. It conveyed neither how long the current step had taken nor what the agent was doing — waiting on the model, thinking, streaming a response, or running tools — so a slow or stalled turn was indistinguishable from a fast one.
## Decision
- While a turn runs, the status line above the editor shows a derived phase label with elapsed time, keeping the trailing `— Enter sends steering, Esc cancels` hint. The four phases and their labels are `waiting` → "Waiting for the first token", `thinking` → "Thinking", `responding` → "Responding", and `executing` → "Executing tools".
- The phase is presentation state the TUI derives from live session events, not a session event or agent status of its own. `step/start` enters `waiting`; an `assistant/chunk` reasoning delta or reasoning block-start enters `thinking`; a text delta or text block-start enters `responding`; a `tool/call` enters `executing`. The event map is merge-extensible, so every other event kind falls through a default and leaves the phase unchanged.
- The label reports two clocks — `<phase> <phase-elapsed> · total <step-elapsed>` — except `waiting`, which shows only the step total. The phase clock resets on a genuine phase change or a new step; the step clock resets on `step/start`. Durations format as `8s` below a minute and `1m05s` at or above one. Tool time between `step/end` and the next `step/start` accrues to the finishing step's total.
- A single `RunningStatus` controller — the loader, the phase, the two baselines, and a refresh timer — exists only while a turn runs. A one-second `setInterval` refreshes the elapsed time; a phase event refreshes it immediately. `clearStatus` clears the interval, stops the loader, and drops the controller, so any transition to idle or disposed leaves no live timer, matching the [borderless banner](2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.md)'s timer hygiene. A mid-turn palette rebuild (`setStatus` re-derives the editor border on a terminal color-scheme change) carries the phase and both baselines across, so a running status never snaps back to `waiting`.
## Alternatives considered
**Emit the phase as a session event or agent status.** Rejected: the phase is a presentation detail the TUI reconstructs from events already logged. A durable, model-visible phase would demand a new session event under the model-visible ⟺ logged rule, for no model benefit.
**Reuse pi-tui's `Loader` animation timer to refresh the elapsed text.** Not available: the vendored `Loader` animates only its spinner glyph, and its dist is not ours to change. The TUI owns a separate one-second interval, cleared on teardown.
**Infer the phase from tool-drain or streaming-component state.** Rejected: the `step/start`, `assistant/chunk`, and `tool/call` lifecycle events are cleaner signals, already handled in the same live listener, and avoid coupling the status line to other components.
**Show only elapsed time, or only the phase.** Rejected: both are wanted — the per-phase time answers what the agent is doing, the per-step total answers how long the step has taken.
## Consequences
- The status line reads, for example, `Thinking 4s · total 8s — Enter sends steering, Esc cancels`, so the agent's current activity and step duration are legible and a stall is visible.
- Phase detection is best-effort presentation: an unhandled future chunk or event kind leaves the last phase in place and never throws.
- Exactly one `setInterval` runs per active turn, cleared with the controller on every idle or disposed transition and on shutdown.
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` pins each phase label against its triggering event (`step/start`, reasoning and text deltas and block-starts, `tool/call`), that a new step reopens the wait window, that the elapsed time advances on the controller's own timer past one second, that a step beyond a minute renders `1m…`, that a mid-turn color-scheme change preserves the phase and elapsed time, and that a live event arriving before the turn runs moves no status. Verified live in tmux.

View File

@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 运行状态行展示轮次阶段与已用时长
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-21-tui-verbose-status-line.md) | 中文
## 问题
在轮次运行期间,[全屏 TUI](2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.md) 只显示一个静态的 "Working" loader 动画。它既不表明当前步骤已耗时多久,也不表明 agent智能体正在做什么——等待模型、思考、流式输出回复还是运行工具——因此运行缓慢或卡住的轮次与运行很快的轮次无从区分。
## 决策
- 轮次运行期间,编辑器上方的状态行显示一个派生的阶段标签及已用时长,并保留末尾的 `— Enter sends steering, Esc cancels` 提示。四个阶段及其标签为 `waiting` → "Waiting for the first token"、`thinking` → "Thinking"、`responding` → "Responding"、`executing` → "Executing tools"。
- 阶段是 TUI 从实时会话事件派生出的呈现状态,而非它自有的会话事件或 agent 状态。`step/start` 进入 `waiting``assistant/chunk` 的 reasoning 分片或 reasoning 块开始(`block-start`)进入 `thinking`text 分片或 text 块开始进入 `responding``tool/call` 进入 `executing`。该事件映射可合并扩展,因此其余任何事件类型都落入默认分支,保持阶段不变。
- 标签汇报两个时钟——`<phase> <phase-elapsed> · total <step-elapsed>`——但 `waiting` 只显示步骤总时长。阶段时钟在真正发生阶段切换或进入新步骤时重置;步骤时钟在 `step/start` 时重置。时长在不足一分钟时格式化为 `8s`,达到或超过一分钟时格式化为 `1m05s``step/end` 与下一个 `step/start` 之间的工具时间计入结束步骤的总时长。
- 单一的 `RunningStatus` 控制器——loader、阶段、两个基准时刻以及一个刷新定时器——仅在轮次运行期间存在。一个每秒触发的 `setInterval` 刷新已用时长;阶段事件则立即刷新。`clearStatus` 清除该 interval、停止 loader 并丢弃控制器,因此任何向 idle 或 disposed 的转变都不会遗留活动定时器,与[无边框横幅](2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.md)的定时器清理保持一致。轮次进行中的调色板重建(终端颜色方案变化时 `setStatus` 会重新派生编辑器边框)会将阶段与两个基准时刻一并沿用过来,因此运行中的状态绝不会退回 `waiting`
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**将阶段作为会话事件或 agent 状态发出。** 已否决:阶段是 TUI 从已记录事件重建出的呈现细节。一个持久、模型可见的阶段会依据 model-visible ⟺ logged 规则要求新增一个会话事件,而对模型没有任何好处。
**复用 pi-tui 的 `Loader` 动画定时器来刷新已用时长文本。** 不可行:`Loader` 是 vendored 依赖,只驱动其加载动画字形,其 dist 不归我们改动。TUI 自持一个独立的每秒 interval并在拆卸时清除。
**从工具耗尽或流式组件状态推断阶段。** 已否决:`step/start``assistant/chunk``tool/call` 这些生命周期事件是更干净的信号,已在同一个实时监听器中处理,且避免让状态行与其他组件耦合。
**只显示已用时长,或只显示阶段。** 已否决:两者都需要——按阶段的时长回答 agent 在做什么,按步骤的总时长回答该步骤已耗时多久。
## 后果
- 状态行例如显示 `Thinking 4s · total 8s — Enter sends steering, Esc cancels`,从而 agent 的当前活动与步骤时长一目了然,卡顿也随之可见。
- 阶段检测是尽力而为的呈现:未处理的未来分片或事件类型会保持上一个阶段不变,绝不抛错。
- 每个活动轮次恰好运行一个 `setInterval`,在每次向 idle 或 disposed 的转变以及关停时随控制器一并清除。
## 测试
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` 针对触发事件锁定每个阶段标签(`step/start`、reasoning 与 text 的分片及块开始、`tool/call`),并锁定新步骤会重新开启等待窗口、已用时长在控制器自有定时器上超过一秒后递增、超过一分钟的步骤渲染为 `1m…`、轮次进行中的颜色方案变化会保留阶段与已用时长,以及轮次开始前到达的实时事件不移动任何状态。已在 tmux 中实机验证。

View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-23-trajectory-step-cell.md: 414c3aac856fb5e60f0e4cf42f8e7b410cdf3413
2026-07-23-trajectory-step-cell.zh.md: aa76b422f165ebf6918b3781fdfe38797a34ba51

View File

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Trajectory step cell and turn list chrome
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-23-trajectory-step-cell.zh.md)
## Problem
The trajectory tab needs a reusable step row and turn-list chrome that can show expanded assistant blocks, own-duration times, Message token columns, and in-flight work. Without folding session event times into conversation nodes and expanding blocks into cells, the UI cannot match the product chrome.
## Decision
[`@deepseek-ai/dsh-client-ui-trajectory`](../../../../packages/client/ui-trajectory/README.md) owns the presentational trajectory list chrome:
- [`TrajectoryCell`](../../../../packages/client/ui-trajectory/src/client/TrajectoryCell.tsx) — 38px step row with kinds User / Message / Tool (no Think, Call, or Result rows). Reasoning blocks are skipped (no block-level clock). Each `tool-call` + paired `tool-result` folds into one Tool row (`name ·` truncated args) whose Time is `result.time callTime` when both are known. Message rows carry Input/Output/Think token columns from `assistant.usage`. Own-duration Time uses `+Ns` / `+N.1s`, or `—` when absent. Selected state draws a 2px inset `--dsw-alias-brand-primary-new-colorprimary-new-color` ring (`selected` prop) and is not wired to chat selection.
- [`TrajectoryTurn`](../../../../packages/client/ui-trajectory/src/client/TrajectoryTurn.tsx) / header / group header — sticky Turn bar paints full-bleed `ghost-active-fill`; title/columns and the Message/Step body sit in a centered `max-width: 880px` lane. Cell trailing columns share the Turn header geometry (`320 = 4×71 + 3×12`); cells use pad 20/8.
- [`deriveTrajectoryLayout`](../../../../packages/client/ui-trajectory/src/client/layout.ts) expands assistant `blocks[]` into cells, pairs tool-calls with `tool-result` by `callId` into Tool, folds `partial` and `runningCalls` (deduped), hangs usage on Message only (including the empty fallback when there is no text block), and builds group descriptions as wall-span + tool histogram (`1.5s bash×6`). `user/message` has no wire turn, so each User row is enclosed in the next assistant/steering turn, else the in-flight `partial` turn, else `lastAssistantTurn + 1` (or `1`). Context nodes emit no cell but still advance the Message duration cursor.
[`ConversationNode`](../../../../packages/client/runtime/src/client/sessions/conversation.ts) carries `time` from `SessionEvent.time`; `ToolResultNode.callTime` and `RunningToolCall.time` come from the paired `tool/call`. Duration rules: User `+0s`; Message = assistant.time previous surface time (including skipped context); Tool = result.time callTime when both known; in-flight Tool = `—`. Group header duration is earliest→latest absolute time in the group (wall span; Tool contributes start and start+duration).
## Alternatives considered
**Keep a Think cell for reasoning blocks.** Rejected: a single `assistant/message.time` cannot yield Think own-duration without chunk-level clocks; omit the row rather than show `—`.
**Keep separate Call and Result rows.** Rejected: Result had no own duration to show; one Tool row carries the call→result interval.
**Cumulative elapsed from session/turn start.** Rejected; the Time column is each row's own duration.
**Hang usage on the first expanded row.** Rejected; usage attaches to Message only.
**Show in-flight tool durations via Date.now().** Deferred; in-flight Time stays `—`.
## Consequences
The Trajectory tab can render expanded finalized and in-flight rows with own-duration times once fold emits `time`. Behavior-shaped coverage lives in `packages/client/ui-trajectory/tests/{cell,layout,views}.spec.tsx`. Chat selection deep-links and finer block-level clocks remain deferred.

View File

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Trajectory 步骤单元格与轮次列表 chrome
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-23-trajectory-step-cell.md) | 中文
## Problem
trajectory 标签页需要可复用的步骤行与轮次列表 chrome以展示展开后的 assistant 块、自身耗时、Message token 列以及进行中的工作。若不将会话事件时间折叠进会话节点并将块展开为单元格UI 就无法对齐产品 chrome。
## Decision
[`@deepseek-ai/dsh-client-ui-trajectory`](../../../../packages/client/ui-trajectory/README.md) 拥有展示型 trajectory 列表 chrome
- [`TrajectoryCell`](../../../../packages/client/ui-trajectory/src/client/TrajectoryCell.tsx) — 高 38px 的步骤行,类型为 User / Message / Tool无 Think、Call、Result 行。reasoning 块跳过(无块级时钟)。每对 `tool-call` + `tool-result` 折成一行 Tool`name ·` 加截断参数Time 在两端皆知时为 `result.time callTime`。Message 行携带来自 `assistant.usage` 的 Input/Output/Think token 列。自身耗时 Time 使用 `+Ns` / `+N.1s`,缺失时为 `—`。选中态绘制 2px 内嵌的 `--dsw-alias-brand-primary-new-colorprimary-new-color` 环(`selected` prop且未接线到 chat 选中。
- [`TrajectoryTurn`](../../../../packages/client/ui-trajectory/src/client/TrajectoryTurn.tsx) / header / group header — 粘性 Turn 条背景通栏铺 `ghost-active-fill`;标题/列标与 Message/Step 主体落在居中的 `max-width: 880px` 内容道。单元格右侧列与 Turn 标头共用几何(`320 = 4×71 + 3×12`cell pad 20/8。
- [`deriveTrajectoryLayout`](../../../../packages/client/ui-trajectory/src/client/layout.ts) 将 assistant `blocks[]` 展开为单元格,按 `callId` 将 tool-call 与 tool-result 配对为 Tool折叠 `partial``runningCalls`(去重),仅将用量挂在 Message 上(含无 text 块时的空回退行),并以墙钟跨度 + 工具直方图构建分组描述(`1.5s bash×6`)。`user/message` 无线上 turn故每条 User 行归入下一 assistant/steering 的 turn否则归入进行中的 `partial` turn否则为 `lastAssistantTurn + 1`(或 `1`。context 节点不产出单元格,但仍推进 Message 耗时游标。
[`ConversationNode`](../../../../packages/client/runtime/src/client/sessions/conversation.ts) 携带来自 `SessionEvent.time``time``ToolResultNode.callTime``RunningToolCall.time` 来自配对的 `tool/call`。耗时规则User 为 `+0s`Message = assistant.time 上一表面时间(含跳过的 contextTool = 在两者皆知时 result.time callTime进行中 Tool = `—`。分组标头耗时为组内最早→最晚绝对时间墙钟跨度Tool 贡献起点与起点+自身耗时)。
## Alternatives considered
**为 reasoning 块保留 Think 单元格。** 否决:单条 `assistant/message.time` 无法给出 Think 自身耗时(除非上 chunk 级时钟);与其显示 `—`,不如省略该行。
**保留分开的 Call 与 Result 行。** 否决Result 没有可展示的自身耗时;一行 Tool 承载 call→result 区间。
**自会话/轮次起点累计耗时。** 否决Time 列是每行自身的耗时。
**将用量挂在展开后的第一行。** 否决;用量仅附着于 Message。
**用 Date.now() 显示进行中工具的耗时。** 延后;进行中的 Time 保持为 `—`
## Consequences
一旦 fold 发出 `time`Trajectory 标签页即可渲染带自身耗时的已定稿与进行中展开行。行为导向的覆盖位于 `packages/client/ui-trajectory/tests/{cell,layout,views}.spec.tsx`。chat 选中深链与更细的块级时钟仍延后。

View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-24-new-session-clears-to-empty-state.md: 1605f44a05d0f59b61fe95cb5b03a0f9f5c3d4ab
2026-07-24-new-session-clears-to-empty-state.zh.md: 1f78d99babc33d30ee1300bfa6bf048a78e7132e

View File

@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: New Session clears onto the empty-state launch
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-24-new-session-clears-to-empty-state.zh.md)
## Problem
Sidebar "New Session" created and opened a blank session immediately, so the center column showed `ConversationRoot` with an empty transcript and the resident composer. The Figma NEW SESSION screen (`EmptyState` + shared `InputBar` hero) only rendered when `sessions.current` was already undefined, so the launch page was unreachable from the primary creation control.
## Decision
`SessionsService.clear()` wipes the persisted selection and `list.current`. Top-level sidebar creation entries (`onCreate()` with no cwd — New Session and New Workspace) call `clear()` so `AppFrame` renders `conversation.empty`. The empty state's first send still runs `conversation.startSession` (create → open → send) and reuses the same `InputBar` component as the resident composer (`variant="hero"`). Per-project "+" (`onCreate(cwd)`) keeps create-then-open until the empty-state picker can accept a seeded cwd.
## Alternatives considered
**Keep create-then-open for New Session and add a second empty chrome inside ConversationRoot when the transcript is empty.** Rejected: that duplicates the launch InputBar and breaks the empty→content ruling that one InputBar moves position rather than swapping components.
**Route New Session through a dedicated route or slot outside selection.** Rejected for this pass: `conversation.empty` already owns the launch UI; clearing `current` is the existing empty branch.
## Consequences
New Session no longer mints a host session until the first send. Reloading after clear stays on the empty state. Project-scoped "+" still creates immediately. `EmptyState` stacks the Figma hero (Input_Bottom 75:8208) as fish + title, a Menu-backed workspace chip above the card, then shared `InputBar` (`variant="hero"`, max-width 800, r20 card matching the composer — not a taller r24 hero), with a soft ellipse glow (figma 313:14109) centered behind the picker + card and width-locked to the card (`1051/776` asset ratio) so it scales with it. The chip uses the soft interactive hover fill + 12px radius from 75:8208 and opens MenuDropdown (figma 122:9481; `--dsw-specific-menu` + `--dsw-shadow-lv3`): basename rows with folder icons and a trailing check, then a separator and "New Workspace" whose submenu (figma 419:16920) offers "Use a existing folder" and "Create new". Use a existing folder opens the path Dialog (figma 451:18655 copy — "Enter an existing folder path" / Open Folder) over a full-viewport mask (`--dsw-alias-bg-mask-1` + `--dsw-mask-blur`) and sets the chip cwd. Create new opens the same Dialog chrome to name a folder under `host.describe().cwd`; success runs `sessions.createWorkspace` → host `session.create` (mkdir recursive) → `sessions.open`, so a default session lands in the new workspace. `InputBar` paints the bottom chrome (attach / Plan / Read-only / model) with local native `<select>` state only — host plan, access, and model seams remain unwired.

Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More