Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into codex/rfc-subagent-background-tasks

# Conflicts:
#	docs/architecture.md
#	docs/config-catalog.md
#	docs/cordis-catalog/events.md
#	docs/cordis-catalog/services.md
#	docs/event-producer-consumer.md
#	docs/module-graph.md
#	docs/tool-catalog.md
#	packages/bash/tool-bash/tests/integration.spec.ts
#	packages/bash/tool-bash/tests/tools.spec.ts
#	packages/core/agent-core/tests/agent-core.spec.ts
#	packages/core/agent-loop/README.md
#	packages/core/agent-loop/src/index.ts
#	packages/core/agent/README.md
#	packages/core/agent/src/index.ts
#	packages/core/agent/tests/agent.spec.ts
#	packages/subagent/subagent/README.md
#	packages/subagent/subagent/src/index.ts
#	packages/subagent/tool-subagent/README.md
#	packages/subagent/tool-subagent/src/index.ts
#	pnpm-lock.yaml
#	scripts/doc-budgets.manifest.json

docs/rfc/proposed/feature/2026-06-30-pre-tool-input-rewrite.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Status: proposed
 
 ## Problem
 
-The [interception-seams RFC](../../implemented/feature/2026-06-30-interception-seams.md) added `tools/pre-execute` returning a `PreToolDecision` (allow/deny/ask) — but deliberately NOT input rewrite (a hook changing a tool call's `arguments` before it runs). Claude Code's `PreToolUse` hook offers an `updatedInput`, so a faithful CC bridge wants the same. This RFC designs that, separately, because doing it consistently is a real problem — not a field to bolt onto the allow decision.
+The [interception-seams RFC](../../implemented/feature/2026-06-30-interception-seams.md) defines `tools/pre-execute` as an allow/deny/ask gate over an execution whose identity is already protected and whose arguments are deeply frozen. Claude Code's `PreToolUse` hook also offers `updatedInput`, so a faithful bridge needs an explicit rewrite mechanism. A rewrite cannot be a mutation escape hatch on the existing execution object: it must keep the durable history, audit record, presentation, and executed value consistent.
 
 ## The problem: three readers of pre-execution arguments
 
@@ -14,37 +14,38 @@ In the loop, a tool call's arguments are committed to the log and read by live c
 2. **`tool/call`** is the durable AUDIT record, appended before `ctx.tools.execute()`.
 3. **Live presentation reads `tool/call.arguments`**: the ACP bridge remembers them and passes them to `presentResult`; `dsh-tool-bash` derives the card title, the rawInput, the cwd, and the terminal-vs-background treatment from them.
 
-So an "input rewrite" that changes ONLY what executes would make the UI show one command while another RAN, and render result state against the wrong arguments — a real inconsistency, not a documentable gap. (The existing low-level capability to mutate `exec.arguments` in a listener has exactly this latent inconsistency; it is unadvertised precisely because of this — yet not unused: a tool-bash integration test rewrites a scripted call's arguments through it (`packages/bash/tool-bash/tests/integration.spec.ts`), so this design must either sanction that path with the consistency unit below or seal it — `readonly` arguments at the seam, with the test shim moved onto a behavior-level helper.)
+An execution-only rewrite would make the UI show one command while another ran and render the result against the wrong arguments. The registry prevents that failure mode today: it structured-clones and deep-freezes `arguments`, makes the execution identity properties non-writable, and exposes no test shim or listener path that can replace them. The rewrite design must preserve that protected-identity boundary rather than weaken it.
 
 ## Proposal
 
-A sketch, to validate against the code when built. Treat input rewrite as a consistency unit: when a `pre-execute` hook supplies `updatedInput`, the rewrite must be reflected in ALL three readers, atomically, before execution:
+A rewrite is a pre-identity consistency transaction. When a hook supplies `updatedInput`, the effective value must be chosen before the registry constructs its immutable `ToolExecution`, and it must be reflected in all three readers atomically:
 
 - The `tool/call` audit event records the REWRITTEN arguments (with the original retained in a sidecar field for the audit trail — a hook changed the call, and both the original and the effective arguments are facts worth keeping).
 - The `assistant/message` in derived history must agree with what executed — options to evaluate: rewrite the assistant message's tool-call block in place (changes what the model "sees it said"), or record a separate correction the next request carries. The CC model is that the model sees the rewrite took effect.
 - Presentation (`presentCall`/`presentResult`) reads the rewritten arguments, so the UI shows what actually ran.
 
-The shape would extend `PreToolDecision` with an allow-variant `arguments` (or a dedicated `{kind:'rewrite', arguments}`), and the loop would thread the rewrite through the three readers above rather than only into `ctx.tools.execute()`.
+Extending `PreToolDecision` at its current firing point is insufficient: both durable records already exist by then, and the execution identity is protected. The implementation must either move the relevant decision before the log commit or add a dedicated earlier rewrite decision over the pending model call. After the loop commits the effective arguments to history and audit, it constructs the ordinary immutable execution and runs the existing allow/deny/ask and tool pipeline unchanged.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
-### Why not now
+### Why not mutate the execution object?
 
-The interception-seams RFC notes input rewrite "fought the code across two review rounds" — the signal AGENTS.md names for an over-reaching change. Shipping allow/deny/ask first keeps the seam honest (no advertised contract that silently desyncs the UI), and a CC/Codex bridge that receives an `updatedInput` logs it and surfaces a faithful-but-degraded warning (like `ask`→deny) until this lands. This RFC is the home for the consistent design; `TODO(pre-tool-input-rewrite)` in the loop's pre-execute call site anchors it.
+Allowing a pre-execute listener to assign `exec.arguments` would provide only an execution rewrite, leaving model history, audit, and presentation unchanged. Keeping the identity protected makes such partial behavior unrepresentable. Until the consistency transaction exists, a CC/Codex bridge logs and warns about `updatedInput` rather than claiming it was honored; `TODO(pre-tool-input-rewrite)` at the loop dispatch site anchors the missing earlier phase.
 
 ## Acceptance criteria
 
-- A `pre-execute` rewrite is reflected in all three readers atomically before execution: the `tool/call` audit records the rewritten arguments (the original retained in a sidecar field), derived history agrees with what executed, and presentation renders the rewritten arguments.
-- The unadvertised `exec.arguments` mutation path is either sanctioned by this consistency unit or sealed (`readonly` arguments at the seam, the test shim moved onto a behavior-level helper).
+- A requested rewrite is resolved before `ToolExecution` identity is created and reflected in all three readers atomically: the `tool/call` audit records the rewritten arguments (the original retained in a sidecar field), derived history agrees with what executed, and presentation renders the rewritten arguments.
+- The effective `ToolExecution.arguments` remains deeply frozen and non-writable throughout pre-policy, guards, dispatch, post-policy, and final observation; no mutation shim is introduced.
 - The CC/Codex bridges honor `updatedInput` instead of logging the faithful-but-degraded warning.
 
 ## Risks
 
 - Rewriting the `assistant/message` tool-call block changes what the model "sees it said"; whether any provider rejects that on replay is the open question that must be settled empirically before the decision shape freezes.
-- Until this lands, the unadvertised mutation path keeps its latent UI-desync inconsistency.
+- An earlier rewrite phase changes the ordering relationship among `assistant/message`, `tool/call`, hook audit events, and execution; the design must pin that ordering without weakening turn enclosure or call/result adjacency.
 
 ## Open questions
 
 - Does rewriting the `assistant/message` tool-call block corrupt any provider's expectation on replay, or is a separate correction safer?
 - Should the original arguments be preserved on the `tool/call` event (audit) and, if so, under what field?
+- Does the rewrite decision move before the log commit or become a dedicated earlier seam, and how do existing pre-tool allow/deny hooks avoid running twice?
 - How does this interact with a future permission `ask` flow (a user approving a rewritten call)?

docs/rfc/proposed/simplification/2026-07-04-prune-dead-core-spine-surface.md

@@ -8,13 +8,13 @@ Three pieces of public spine surface share one defect class: their only possible
 
 1. **`SurfaceManager.invalidate()`** (`packages/core/session/src/surface.ts`). Its documented trigger — "the log has been replaced wholesale (e.g. after Session seed)" — is structurally unreachable: seeding happens inside the `Session` constructor, `_surface` is created lazily on first access, and the log reference is never reassigned afterward, so no constructed `SurfaceManager` ever observes a wholesale replacement. Sole caller: its own unit test. A rollback primitive protecting a scenario the implementation cannot produce.
 2. **The `runLoop`, `Inbox`, and `InboxMessage` exports** (`packages/core/agent-loop/src/index.ts`). `runLoop` has no importer outside the package — the only callers are the package's own internals (the agent constructs its loop with it), so the public re-export has zero consumers; `Inbox`/`InboxMessage` likewise reach outside code only through the package's own inbox spec (switchable to the source module). The exports contradict the package's own docs — the inbox module doc says the public surface is `Agent.send()`/`Agent.steer()` — and the [architecture dependency rule](../../../architecture.md): nothing programs against `dsh-agent-loop`; a replacement loop is a different bundle built on `dsh-agent`, not a consumer of this package's internals. `ReactLoopAgent` stays exported (cross-package tests construct it by package name).
-3. **`ToolExecutionResult.callId`** (`packages/core/tools/src/index.ts`; the *input* `ToolExecution.callId` stays). Zero readers — and no listener can even construct a result: `tools/pre-execute`/`tools/post-execute` listeners return Decisions, the registry builds every result itself and always sets `callId` to the input `exec.callId`, and the post-execute dispatch snapshots the outcome before the waterfall precisely so a listener mutating the shared result reference cannot corrupt the id. The loop independently ignores `result.callId` in favor of its own `call.id`, and two regression tests exist solely to prove the field cannot matter (the loop's ignores-result-callId test and the registry's mutation guard). A field that is by construction a copy of its input, defended by snapshot machinery, and pinned by tests proving it is ignored is pure liability surface; the ACP bridge correlates via the session event's `data.callId`, never via the execution result.
+3. **`ToolExecutionResult.callId`** (`packages/core/tools/src/index.ts`; the input `ToolExecution.callId` stays). Zero consumers read it. A `tools/execute` wrapper may construct or replace a result, but the registry rejects any `callId` that differs from the immutable execution identity and rebuilds later outcomes from protected snapshots; `tools/post-execute` receives that same execution beside the result, and the observe-only `tools/result` notification receives both as immutable values. The loop independently correlates with its model call's `call.id`, while ACP correlates through the session event's `data.callId`. The result field is therefore a compulsory copy of information already present at every extension point, plus validation and regression tests whose only job is to prove the copy cannot disagree.
 
 ## Proposal
 
-Delete the method and its test; delete the three export lines and their `packages/core/agent-loop/README.md` rows, pointing the inbox spec at the source module; drop the result field from the type, the registry's construction sites (the deny result, the dispatch result, `toolErrorResult`, and the post-execute snapshot's `callId` leg), the loop's ignore-comment, the proves-ignored regression test, and the mutation guard's `callId` assertions — the hazard they all pin disappears with the field, while the result's `additionalContext` ferry (a consumed post-execute channel) stays untouched. Update the `ToolExecutionResult` paste in [tools.md](../../../core-data-structures/tools.md) (and its `scripts/type-equiv.manifest.json` row) and the result-shape row in `packages/core/tools/README.md`; for the `invalidate()` removal, amend the [session-surface RFC](../../implemented/architecture/2026-06-18-session-surface.md)'s full-rebuild-after-wholesale-replacement sentence per [implemented/AGENTS.md](../../implemented/AGENTS.md).
+Delete the method and its test; delete the three export lines and their `packages/core/agent-loop/README.md` rows, pointing the inbox spec at the source module; drop the result field from the type, the registry's construction sites (deny, dispatch, `toolErrorResult`, post-execute snapshots), its around-wrapper mismatch validation, the loop's ignore-comment, and the tests that prove the duplicate id cannot matter. The result's consumed `additionalContext` ferry and the execution object's authoritative `callId` stay untouched. Update the `ToolExecutionResult` paste in [tools.md](../../../core-data-structures/tools.md) (and its `scripts/type-equiv.manifest.json` row) and the result-shape row in `packages/core/tools/README.md`; for the `invalidate()` removal, amend the [session-surface RFC](../../implemented/architecture/2026-06-18-session-surface.md)'s full-rebuild-after-wholesale-replacement sentence per [implemented/AGENTS.md](../../implemented/AGENTS.md).
 
-Sequencing: the in-flight surface-cache work (tool-pairing balance caching) neither uses nor touches `invalidate`, so that removal lands after or alongside it mechanically. The execute pipeline is `tools/pre-execute` → dispatch → `tools/post-execute`, and post-execute listeners receive the execution object alongside the result — nothing needs the result's own id.
+Sequencing: the surface-cache work (tool-pairing balance caching) neither uses nor touches `invalidate`, so that removal can land after or alongside it mechanically. The full execution pipeline carries the immutable execution object through pre-policy, guards, around-dispatch wrappers, post-policy, and final result observation; nothing needs the result to repeat its id.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ A future consumer that swaps a session's log in place would want a reset primiti
 ## Acceptance criteria
 
 - `invalidate()` and the result `callId` appear only in this RFC; `runLoop`/`Inbox`/`InboxMessage` remain package-internal only — no re-export from the package index and no outside-package importer; the agent-loop README lists only the consumed public surface; the inbox spec imports the source module.
-- The pre-/post-execute pipeline contract tests pass with the shrunk result type; the mutation-guard and proves-ignored tests shed their `callId` legs with the hazard they pin.
+- The complete tool-pipeline contract tests pass with the shrunk result type; the around-wrapper mismatch test, mutation-guard id assertions, and proves-ignored loop test disappear with the duplicate field.
 
 ## Risks