Merge origin/master into codex/dsh-badge-plugin

This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-08-08 15:33:41 +08:00
900 changed files with 26967 additions and 3578 deletions

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md
2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md: 26e6e2468c7bea661d85c8fb994adf8b109105ee
2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.zh.md: 8f9cd1f6bc31e648a5b923e816cad75ebc1a0bd8
2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md: 8dcbe74429a620027a570124383442b969c12196
2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.zh.md: 27b63f29c2e6f35637185b47c882ae42e5d41088

View File

@@ -131,4 +131,4 @@ The lifecycle boundary makes crash state unambiguous:
- **Loop:** Tests pin pre-step after the preceding `step/end` and before the next `step/start`, actual `agent/request` routing, closed failed steps, fresh retry numbering, and complete thrown/in-band overflow → compaction → reconstructed retry composition.
- **Manual:** Maintenance serialization, marker ordering, injection retention, live/stale orphan classification, cancellation, close/flush failures, command mapping, and the queued TUI journey are pinned without a model key.
- **With-key e2e:** A real model and bash session with lowered limits triggers compaction, records a complete `compact/start…end` pair, shrinks the surface, and finishes the task.
- **Snapshot gap:** Runaway-turn compaction cannot yet replay because the summarization call records no `assistant/chunk` events or `sessionId`; interleaved summarization-call replay remains follow-up work.
- **Snapshot gap:** The summarization call is session-associated and logs `compact/summary`, but ordinary transcript replay does not derive its auxiliary response; keyless assembled coverage therefore needs an explicit replay override.

View File

@@ -131,4 +131,4 @@ compact/end → log-only. Releases the lock (carries `error` on a recoverab
- **循环测试:** 测试固定 pre-step 发生在前一个 `step/end` 之后、下一个 `step/start` 之前,使用实际 `agent/request` 路由,关闭失败步骤,分配新的重试编号,并覆盖完整的抛出/带内溢出 → 压缩 → 重建重试组合。
- **手动测试:** 无需模型密钥即可固定 maintenance 串行化、标记顺序、注入保留、活动/陈旧未匹配标记分类、取消、闭合/flush 失败、命令映射以及排队 TUI 流程。
- **带密钥 e2e:** 真实模型和 bash 会话在降低的限制下触发压缩,记录完整的 `compact/start…end` 对,缩小 surface,并完成任务。
- **快照缺口:** 失控轮次压缩尚无法回放,因为摘要调用未记录 `assistant/chunk` 事件或 `sessionId`;交错摘要调用的回放仍是后续工作。
- **快照缺口:** 摘要调用与会话关联并记录 `compact/summary`,但普通 transcript(文本记录)回放不会派生其辅助响应;因此,要实现无密钥的组装态覆盖,就必须显式提供回放 override。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-20-dsh-cli-personal-config.md
2026-07-20-dsh-cli-personal-config.md: 10f16a1cbabdd8cd383c59ad8e09787c02d0109a
2026-07-20-dsh-cli-personal-config.zh.md: 22435efbec8ea661c546ffd0c1aa9bb0ff2ebbb2
2026-07-20-dsh-cli-personal-config.md: 2a8ae4b235823b4493d2f082d37b85806f45b662
2026-07-20-dsh-cli-personal-config.zh.md: d8ff6c4fcc5da8f1db6f030e990118e30ae6fe41

View File

@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ The TUI and Web register the exact personal path through Cordis HMR after boot.
## Consequences
- `dsh` from any directory (and `pnpm run demo:tui`) can apply personal providers, models, repository Plugins, and other Loader entries with no checkout edit; verified end-to-end against a personal Anthropic proxy with Opus 4.8, including a bash tool round trip.
- Because an id-targeted patch replaces the whole `config`, a personal override restates the base fields it keeps and can drift when the base entry changes shape; the loader's entry-not-found/name-mismatch warnings and [`dsh --dump-config`](2026-07-30-dsh-dump-config.md) (which prints the composed tree those patches produce) are the diagnostics.
- Because an id-targeted patch replaces the whole `config`, a personal override restates the base fields it keeps and can drift when the base entry changes shape; the loader's entry-not-found/name-mismatch warnings and [`dsh --dump-config`](../../../../apps/cli/README.md#profiles) (which prints the composed tree those patches produce) are the diagnostics.
- Personal patches resolve ids against the booted file's own tree, so nested-include overlays (Code Mode) are not personalized; live-run parity for those leaves is deferred.
- `dsh-app-boot` depends on `js-yaml` and imports the include's `!!js` YAML dialect (`entryListSchema`) directly, and, like `apps/cli`, depends on `@deepseek-ai/dsh-paths` for `resolveDshHome`.
- Live watching belongs only to long-running TUI and Web processes. Headless automation gets deterministic startup configuration and exits without retaining a watcher.

View File

@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ TUI 和 Web 启动后通过 Cordis HMR(热模块替换)注册确切的个人
## Consequences
- 在任意目录运行 `dsh`(以及 `pnpm run demo:tui`),无需修改 checkout,即可应用个人提供方、模型、仓库插件和其他 Loader 配置项;已针对个人 Anthropic 代理与 Opus 4.8 端到端验证,包括一次 bash 工具往返。
- 由于按 id 定位的补丁替换整个 `config`,个人覆盖必须复述它保留的基础字段,并可能随基础配置项形态变化而漂移;诊断手段是 loader 的「配置项未找到/名称不匹配」警告和 [`dsh --dump-config`](2026-07-30-dsh-dump-config.md)(打印这些补丁合成出的配置树)。
- 由于按 id 定位的补丁替换整个 `config`,个人覆盖必须复述它保留的基础字段,并可能随基础配置项形态变化而漂移;诊断手段是 loader 的「配置项未找到/名称不匹配」警告和 [`dsh --dump-config`](../../../../apps/cli/README.md#profiles)(打印这些补丁合成出的配置树)。
- 个人补丁只在被启动文件自身的树里解析 id,因此嵌套 include 的 overlay(Code Mode)不会被个性化;这些叶子的实际运行等价性暂缓。
- `dsh-app-boot` 依赖 `js-yaml`,并直接导入 include 的 `!!js` YAML 方言(`entryListSchema`);与 `apps/cli` 一样依赖 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-paths` 以获取 `resolveDshHome`。
- 只有长时间运行的 TUI 和 Web 进程进行实时监视。无头自动化使用确定性的启动配置,退出时不会保留 watcher。

View File

@@ -1,40 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Docked web goal bar
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-22-docked-web-goal-bar.zh.md)
## Problem
The web UI had no goal surface at all: the goal stack shipped with model tools, the TUI/ACP adapters, and the `/goal` command, but the browser client exposed none of it — no runtime verbs, no indicator. This change introduces the client goal verbs (runtime session methods over RPC) and the first goal UI together. Placement follows the redesign's premise that goal presence belongs to the composer's context: the goal is a property of the work the user is about to prompt, so its indicator belongs in the composer-context stack; the [composer context stack decision](../bug-fix/2026-07-30-composer-context-stack-order.md) owns its position among Goal, Todo, Queue, and the composer. The mock keeps only a sparkle, a phase word ("Ongoing/Paused/Blocked Goal"), the truncated objective, and edit/clear icon actions, with resume appearing only on a paused goal.
## Decision
`GoalBar` (`packages/client/ui-goal/src/client/GoalBar.tsx`) is a props-driven, self-contained component registered second in the composer's input-dock list, after Todo and before Queue. Its standalone 752px card follows the composer's horizontal geometry, and every visible state shares one fixed 36px height so switching phases never resizes it. Loading (`goal === undefined`), absent (`goal === null`), and `phase === 'complete'` render nothing — a completed goal is history, not chrome.
Visibility drives the label and actions: active shows "Ongoing Goal" with pause/edit/clear; paused shows "Paused Goal" and swaps pause for a resume icon button; blocked shows "Blocked Goal" and carries `blockedReason.message` as the strip's `title` tooltip. Goal creation lives on the `/goal` command, not in the bar. The pencil swaps the strip for an inline edit form prefilled with the current objective: Enter or the check button saves through `GoalBarActions.onEdit(objective)`, Esc cancels, and an all-whitespace objective keeps save disabled. The form closes only when the edit succeeds; a failure preserves the draft and displays the error in the bar. Resume and clear failures are displayed there as well. Clear otherwise calls `onClear` directly with no confirmation — a clear keeps a durable tombstone, so nothing is unrecoverable. Every mutation first acquires a synchronous component-local single-flight latch because React's pending-state render cannot close the same-frame click window. A successful clear also suppresses that exact goal id immediately while the authoritative null projection catches up, so an acknowledged tombstone cannot leave a stale clear control that submits `GOAL_NOT_FOUND`; a failure releases the latch and remains retryable. An effect keyed on the goal's id resets this transient state and drops the edit form when the goal's identity changes, so neither a cleared marker nor a surviving draft can affect the replacement goal.
`GoalBarActions` lives in ui-goal's slot contract (`packages/client/ui-goal/src/client/slots.ts`) and carries exactly the rendered verbs: `onEdit`/`onPause`/`onResume`/`onClear`. Each callback asynchronously returns an explicit success/failure result so `GoalBar` owns its transitions and error display. `apply.ts` wires them to the runtime session methods; the runtime session resolves the current goal's compare-and-set ref internally, so the UI passes no ref.
The runtime session gains the goal surface the strip (and future UI) needs through the host-computed `goal` projection. The history tail seeds its whole current value, and `session/projection` frames update it when durable `agent/inbox/spliced` insertions commit goal snapshots or clear tombstones; later context admission is irrelevant to UI freshness. The four rendered mutation verbs fold transport failures into `{ ok: false }` results like every sibling session method.
The strip's background is `--dsw-alias-interactive-bg-hover` rather than the mock's literal `#F5F6F7`: the translucent hover gray resolves to that value over the white light-theme base and lifts the strip off the composer card in dark mode, where a static light token would sink. All colors are `--dsw-*` tokens.
## Testing
`packages/client/ui-goal/tests/goalbar.spec.tsx` pins the behavior through props alone: loading/absent/complete render nothing, the active strip renders label/objective and fires clear, rapid same-frame clear clicks dispatch once and a successful clear hides before projection convergence, the edit form prefills, rejects empty, saves on Enter, cancels on Esc, and resets when the goal's identity changes, the active strip fires pause, the paused strip fires resume, and the blocked strip exposes the reason tooltip. Component failure-path cases prove that a failed edit preserves its draft and that edit/resume/clear errors remain visible and retryable in the bar. The skeleton specs mount `ConversationRoot` with and without `goalActions`; the undefined case is seeded with an active goal, so the missing gate — not the missing goal — is what hides the strip. Runtime session specs pin folded-error results and projection updates. A keyless real-browser smoke boots the assembled application through `boot → RPC → runtime → GoalBar` and records an inline snapshot of the rendered label, objective, and actions.
## Alternatives considered
- **Put the strip in the session header** — rejected because the redesign's premise is that goal presence belongs to the composer's context; a header strip separates it from Todo, Queue, and the prompt it qualifies.
- **Render a "Loading goal…" placeholder for `undefined`** — rejected: the strip would flash and collapse on every session open, chrome noise for a sub-second state.
- **Include an inline create affordance when no goal is set** — rejected after implementation review: goal creation lives on the `/goal` command, matching the pattern where the model creates goals on request; the bar is a status indicator, not a creation surface.
- **Carry the full verb set (`onComplete` included) in `GoalBarActions`** — rejected as speculative generality: the interface carries only the rendered verbs (`onPause` joined it when the active strip gained its pause action).
## Consequences
- Goal presence in the web UI is a standalone composer-context strip: sparkle, phase label, truncated objective, and pause/edit/clear (resume replacing pause when paused) — the browser client's first goal surface.
- Goal mutations are single-flight within the component; a successful clear hides its exact goal immediately while projection delivery converges, preventing duplicate CAS errors without making transient UI state authoritative.
- The runtime session exposes the goal verbs over RPC with folded transport errors and consumes the host's durable whole-goal projection on open and live updates.
- Objective editing is reachable from the UI for the first time, through `goal.edit` with the runtime-owned ref; complete remains available to other surfaces (`/goal`, model tools).
- `goal === null` renders nothing; the composer carries no persistent create affordance — creation is the `/goal` command's job.

View File

@@ -1,40 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 停靠式 Web 目标条
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-22-docked-web-goal-bar.md) | 中文
## 问题
Web UI 此前没有任何目标相关的界面:目标栈已随模型工具、TUI/ACP 适配器和 `/goal` 命令交付,但浏览器客户端完全不接触它——既没有运行时动词,也没有指示器。本变更同时引入客户端目标动词(基于 RPC 的运行时会话方法)和第一个目标 UI。摆放位置遵循重新设计的前提:目标的存在感属于输入框的上下文——目标是用户即将提交的工作的属性,因此它的指示器属于 composer 上下文堆栈;[composer 上下文堆栈决策](../bug-fix/2026-07-30-composer-context-stack-order.md) 规定它在 Goal、Todo、Queue 与 composer 之间的位置。设计稿只保留一个闪光图标、一个阶段词("Ongoing/Paused/Blocked Goal")、截断后的目标内容,以及编辑/清除图标操作,恢复按钮仅在目标暂停时出现。
## 决策
`GoalBar`(`packages/client/ui-goal/src/client/GoalBar.tsx`)是一个由 props 驱动的自包含组件,在 composer 的 input-dock 列表中注册为第二个条目,位于 Todo 之后、Queue 之前。它采用独立的 752px 卡片,遵循 composer 的水平几何;所有可见状态均使用固定的 36px 高度,切换阶段不会改变尺寸。加载中(`goal === undefined`)、无目标(`goal === null`)和 `phase === 'complete'` 时不渲染任何内容:已完成的目标是历史记录,不是常驻界面元素。
可见性决定标签和操作:active 状态显示 "Ongoing Goal" 并提供暂停/编辑/清除;paused 状态显示 "Paused Goal",把暂停换成一个恢复图标按钮;blocked 状态显示 "Blocked Goal",并把 `blockedReason.message` 作为横条的 `title` 悬浮提示。创建目标的入口在 `/goal` 命令上,不在横条里。铅笔图标把横条切换为内联编辑表单,预填当前目标内容:Enter 或勾选按钮通过 `GoalBarActions.onEdit(objective)` 保存,Esc 取消,目标内容全为空白字符时保存按钮保持禁用。编辑成功后表单才会关闭;编辑失败时保留草稿,并在横条中显示错误。恢复和清除失败也显示在横条中。除此之外,清除直接调用 `onClear`,不做确认——清除会保留 durable 墓碑,没有不可恢复的损失。每次变更都会先取得一个同步的组件内 single-flight 锁,因为 React 的 pending 状态渲染无法关闭同一帧内的点击窗口。清除成功后还会立即抑制该 goal id,直到权威的 null 投影追上,因此已确认的墓碑不会留下陈旧的清除控件并再次提交 `GOAL_NOT_FOUND`;失败则释放锁,并且仍可重试。一个以目标 id 为键的 effect 会在目标身份变化时重置瞬态状态并丢弃编辑表单,因此无论已清除标记还是存留草稿,都不会影响替换目标。
`GoalBarActions` 位于 ui-goal 的槽位契约(`packages/client/ui-goal/src/client/slots.ts`),只携带实际渲染的动词:`onEdit`/`onPause`/`onResume`/`onClear`。每个回调都会异步返回显式成功/失败结果,因此 `GoalBar` 自行负责界面转换和错误显示。`apply.ts` 把它们接到运行时会话方法上;运行时会话在内部解析当前目标的 compare-and-set ref,因此 UI 不传 ref。
运行时会话通过由 host 计算的 `goal` 投影获得横条(以及未来 UI)所需的 goal 表面。历史尾页会提供完整当前值作为初始状态;持久 `agent/inbox/spliced` 插入项提交 goal 快照或 clear 墓碑时,`session/projection` 帧会更新该值,后续上下文准入与 UI 新鲜度无关。4 个实际渲染的变更动词与所有同类会话方法一样,把传输层失败折叠为 `{ ok: false }` 结果。
横条的背景色用 `--dsw-alias-interactive-bg-hover`,而不是设计稿里的字面值 `#F5F6F7`:这个半透明的悬浮灰在浅色主题的白色底上正好解析为该值,而在深色模式下能把横条从输入框卡片上衬托出来,静态的浅色 token 在深色模式下会沉进去。所有颜色都是 `--dsw-*` token。
## 测试
`packages/client/ui-goal/tests/goalbar.spec.tsx` 仅通过 props 固定这些行为:加载中/无目标/已完成时不渲染;active 横条渲染标签和目标内容并触发清除;同一帧内快速连续点击清除只会分发一次,清除成功后横条会在投影收敛前隐藏;编辑表单预填内容、拒绝空值、按 Enter 保存、按 Esc 取消,并在目标身份变化时重置;active 横条触发暂停;paused 横条触发恢复;blocked 横条暴露原因悬浮提示。组件失败路径用例证明编辑失败时保留草稿,并且编辑/恢复/清除错误持续显示在横条中且可重试。skeleton 规格测试分别挂载带与不带 `goalActions` 的 `ConversationRoot`;未定义的情形预置了一个 active 目标,因此隐藏横条的是缺失的挂载门,而不是缺失的目标。运行时会话规格测试固定折叠错误结果和投影更新。一个无密钥真实浏览器冒烟测试通过 `boot → RPC → runtime → GoalBar` 启动组装后的应用,并以内联快照记录渲染出的标签、目标内容和操作。
## 考虑过的替代方案
- **把横条放在会话头部**:不予采纳,因为重新设计的前提是目标的存在感属于输入框的上下文;头部横条会使目标与 Todo、Queue 及其限定的提示词彼此分离。
- **为 `undefined` 渲染 "Loading goal…" 占位**:不予采纳,每次打开会话横条都会闪现再坍缩,对一个不到一秒的状态来说只是界面噪音。
- **未设置目标时在横条内提供内联创建入口**:实现评审后不予采纳,创建目标的职责在 `/goal` 命令上,与模型按请求创建目标的模式一致;横条是状态指示器,不是创建入口。
- **在 `GoalBarActions` 中携带完整动词集合(含 `onComplete`)**:作为投机性泛化不予采纳,接口只携带实际渲染的动词(active 横条获得暂停操作后,`onPause` 随之加入)。
## 后果
- Web UI 中目标的存在形式是独立的 composer 上下文横条:闪光图标、阶段标签、截断的目标内容,以及暂停/编辑/清除(暂停时恢复取代暂停)——这是浏览器客户端的第一个目标界面。
- 目标变更在组件内走 single-flight;清除成功后会在投影投递收敛期间立即隐藏与其 id 完全匹配的目标,既防止重复 CAS 错误,又不会把瞬态 UI 状态视为权威。
- 运行时会话通过 RPC 暴露 goal 动词并折叠传输层错误,在打开时和 live 更新时消费 host 的持久完整 goal 投影。
- 目标内容首次可以从 UI 编辑,经由 `goal.edit`,ref 由运行时持有;完成对其他界面(`/goal`、模型工具)照常可用。
- `goal === null` 时不渲染任何内容;输入框不提供常驻的创建入口,创建是 `/goal` 命令的职责。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-session-telemetry-otel-revival.md
2026-07-23-session-telemetry-otel-revival.md: a58598d8a956d47cb0cf6aa3e659f38314bc4b17
2026-07-23-session-telemetry-otel-revival.zh.md: 0deb0b81ce262db4fa4ae26076cd59756d628d20
2026-07-23-session-telemetry-otel-revival.md: f83128e8bf62e0718e59912c16c4e449855aaa1a
2026-07-23-session-telemetry-otel-revival.zh.md: bef3bd9cbc22f363b92880864651dcaa782fc1de

View File

@@ -12,9 +12,9 @@ Every deployment that wants harness sessions in an observability stack must hand
`packages/telemetry/` revives the two reviewed packages under the SDK stance — the harness provides the capability, the deployment configures where records go and owns what leaves in them:
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-telemetry`** — the seam. `TelemetryBackend` (`emit`/`flush?`/`shutdown`), the service-registered `Telemetry` form, and `TelemetryCoordinator` owning capture: adoption with cursor read-back, the per-append firehose (project → `structuredClone` → redact → `emit`, zero I/O), the fixed first-chunk-per-(turn, step) projection, the `agent/error` relay, and dispose-time `shutdown` records.
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-telemetry`** — the seam. `TelemetryBackend` (`emit`/`flush?`/`shutdown`), the service-registered `Telemetry` form, and `TelemetryCoordinator` owning capture: live adoption with cursor read-back and the per-append firehose (project → `structuredClone` → redact → `emit`, zero I/O), buffer-free on-demand replay from the canonical log, the fixed first-chunk-per-(turn, step) projection, the live `agent/error` relay, and live dispose-time `shutdown` records.
- **The `telemetry/record` waterfall** — the delta over the branch version and the seam's redaction extension point. Every record passes it before reaching any backend; the seam ships NO rules of its own — the innermost `next()` is a pass-through, deployments mount their rules as listeners (stacking by transforming `next()`'s return value), and a throwing rule withholds the record fail-closed. Redaction applies to the exported copy only; the canonical log is never rewritten.
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-telemetry-otel`** — the reference backend: OTel JS SDK log pipeline (`LoggerProvider` → `BatchLogRecordProcessor` → OTLP/HTTP exporter), configured verbatim through `exporter`/`processor` passthroughs. `exporter.url` is required and validated at load; unmounted or unconfigured, nothing leaves the process.
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-telemetry-otel`** — the reference backend: OTel JS SDK log pipeline (`LoggerProvider` → `BatchLogRecordProcessor` → OTLP/HTTP exporter), configured verbatim through `exporter`/`processor` passthroughs. Its default `FULL` mode requires `exporter.url`; the later [feedback-gated telemetry decision](2026-08-05-feedback-gated-session-telemetry.md) adds `FEEDBACK_ONLY` and `DISABLED` delivery modes without moving the redaction or backend boundary, while [buffer-free feedback replay](../simplification/2026-08-06-buffer-free-feedback-telemetry.md) avoids a second in-memory copy of the session prefix.
The boundary axiom holds: the harness's aspect ends at `emit()`. Batching, retry, queueing, and loss policy are the reporting SDK's, configured through passthroughs — delivery is best-effort (at-most-once across a crash), which the READMEs state plainly.
@@ -34,4 +34,4 @@ The boundary axiom holds: the harness's aspect ends at `emit()`. Batching, retry
## Consequences
A deployment adds one `cordis.yml` entry with an OTLP endpoint and gets its session stream in any OTel-compatible stack; removing the entry is the opt-out, with no residual state. A rule-free deployment exports records exactly as captured — including any credentials embedded in file contents or command output — so a deployment crossing a trust boundary must mount `telemetry/record` listeners, and both READMEs state this plainly. Where rules are mounted, exported bodies can differ from canonical log bytes, so receivers must not treat telemetry as a byte-exact replica; the log remains the source of truth. Crash durability is explicitly out of scope until the outbox decision above is revisited.
A deployment adds one `cordis.yml` entry with an OTLP endpoint and gets its session stream in any OTel-compatible stack. `FULL` preserves that behavior by default, `FEEDBACK_ONLY` replays a canonical-log prefix when feedback is recorded, and `DISABLED` constructs no reporting pipeline; removing the entry remains a silent opt-out, while the disabled mode keeps the local feedback warning. A rule-free deployment exports records exactly as captured — including any credentials embedded in file contents or command output — so a deployment crossing a trust boundary must mount `telemetry/record` listeners, and both READMEs state this plainly. Where rules are mounted, exported bodies can differ from canonical log bytes, so receivers must not treat telemetry as a byte-exact replica; the log remains the source of truth. Crash durability is explicitly out of scope until the outbox decision above is revisited.

View File

@@ -12,9 +12,9 @@ Status: implemented
`packages/telemetry/` 以 SDK 立场复活这两个经过评审的包——harness 提供能力,部署方配置上报去向并对导出内容负责:
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-telemetry`** —— seam 本体。`TelemetryBackend`(`emit`/`flush?`/`shutdown`)、服务注册形态的 `Telemetry`、以及拥有捕获侧的 `TelemetryCoordinator`:带游标回读的接管、逐 append 的 firehose(投影 → `structuredClone` → 脱敏 → `emit`,零 I/O)、固定的每个(轮次、步骤)组合的首分片投影、`agent/error` 转发、以及 dispose(资源释放)时的 `shutdown` 记录。
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-telemetry`** —— seam 本体。`TelemetryBackend`(`emit`/`flush?`/`shutdown`)、服务注册形态的 `Telemetry`、以及拥有捕获侧的 `TelemetryCoordinator`:带游标回读的实时收养与逐 append 的 firehose(投影 → `structuredClone` → 脱敏 → `emit`,零 I/O)、从权威日志进行的无缓冲按需回放、固定的每个(轮次、步骤)组合首分片投影、实时 `agent/error` 转发,以及实时 dispose(资源释放)时的 `shutdown` 记录。
- **`telemetry/record` waterfall(瀑布式事件)** —— 相对分支版本的增量,也是该 seam 的脱敏扩展点。每条记录抵达任何后端前必经此处;seam 自身不带任何规则——最内层 `next()` 原样透传,部署方以监听器挂载自己的规则(通过变换 `next()` 的返回值堆叠),抛异常的规则将该记录 fail-closed 扣下。脱敏只作用于导出副本;canonical log 永不改写。
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-telemetry-otel`** —— 参考后端:OTel JS SDK 日志流水线(`LoggerProvider` → `BatchLogRecordProcessor` → OTLP/HTTP exporter),经 `exporter`/`processor` passthrough 原样配置。`exporter.url` 必填且加载时校验;未挂载或未配置时,任何数据都不会离开进程。
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-telemetry-otel`** —— 参考后端:OTel JS SDK 日志流水线(`LoggerProvider` → `BatchLogRecordProcessor` → OTLP/HTTP exporter),经 `exporter`/`processor` passthrough 原样配置。其默认 `FULL` 模式要求 `exporter.url`;后续的[反馈门控遥测决策](2026-08-05-feedback-gated-session-telemetry.md)增加了 `FEEDBACK_ONLY` 与 `DISABLED` 投递模式,但未移动脱敏或后端边界,而[无缓冲反馈回放](../simplification/2026-08-06-buffer-free-feedback-telemetry.md)避免在内存中创建会话前缀的第二份副本。
边界公理保持不变:harness 的职责止于 `emit()`。批处理、重试、排队与丢失策略属于 reporting SDK,经 passthrough 配置——投递是尽力而为(崩溃时至多一次),两份 README 对此如实陈述。
@@ -34,4 +34,4 @@ Status: implemented
## 后果
部署方在 `cordis.yml` 加一个带 OTLP endpoint 的 Cordis 配置项即可把会话流接入任何 OTel 兼容体系;删除该配置项即退出,无残留状态。未挂载规则的部署导出的记录与捕获时完全一致——包括文件内容与命令输出中内嵌的任何凭据——因此跨信任边界的部署必须挂载 `telemetry/record` 监听器,两个 README 对此如实陈述。挂载规则后,导出的 body 可能与 canonical log 字节不同,接收端不得把遥测当作字节精确副本;日志仍是真源。崩溃持久性在上述 outbox 决定重新审议前明确不在范围内。
部署方在 `cordis.yml` 加一个带 OTLP endpoint 的 Cordis 配置项即可把会话流接入任何 OTel 兼容体系。`FULL` 默认保留该行为,`FEEDBACK_ONLY` 在记录反馈时回放权威日志前缀,`DISABLED` 则不构造上报流水线;删除该配置项仍是静默退出方式,而禁用模式会保留本地反馈警告。未挂载规则的部署导出的记录与捕获时完全一致,包括文件内容与命令输出中内嵌的任何凭据。因此,跨信任边界的部署必须挂载 `telemetry/record` 监听器,两个 README 对此如实陈述。挂载规则后,导出的 body 可能与 canonical log 字节不同,接收端不得把遥测当作字节精确副本;日志仍是真源。崩溃持久性在上述 outbox 决定重新审议前明确不在范围内。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.md
2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.md: 2805ef894050d1b1cffe06fce59a4984d463f8d1
2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.zh.md: 16b32daa05b10f24eacde4cec9622b2159cdef09
2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.md: 8d047f33ab1aebd8c0de2a0a5e90e7efb1b28154
2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.zh.md: 26b7081e7b4e3688a46a2857da91ba45328532a9

View File

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ The durable-log invariant deliberately does NOT follow the flag. A log written w
## The display surfaces are part of the change
Lifting the cap makes a list shape reachable that no renderer had ever received, so this branch stacks on the [web todo display](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md) rather than landing beside it: both change `tool-todo`, and the GUI is where a parallel plan becomes visible. Two web sites derived their one-line summary with `todos.find(t => t.status === 'in_progress')` — the collapsed plan-strip header and the `todo_write` row — and under the old cap that `find` was total, since at most one item could match. With several active it silently dropped every active item but the first: a four-item plan with three running tasks collapsed to the name of one, and the row read `1/4 已完成 · <one task>` while two others were in flight. The expanded list was always correct (it maps every item), which is why neither PR's tests caught it — only the collapsed header and the row lost information. The panel redesign in [#740](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/pull/740) has since replaced the collapsed header's named hint with `·`-joined per-status counts (localized, `1 completed · 2 in progress · 1 pending`, zero-count segments omitted), which reports parallel work correctly and needs no name to truncate; the row is the one site this branch still had to fix.
Lifting the cap makes a list shape reachable that no renderer had ever received, so this branch stacks on the [web todo display](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md) rather than landing beside it: both change `tool-todo`, and the GUI is where a parallel plan becomes visible. Two web sites derived their one-line summary with `todos.find(t => t.status === 'in_progress')` — the collapsed plan-strip header and the `todo_write` row — and under the old cap that `find` was total, since at most one item could match. With several active it silently dropped every active item but the first: a four-item plan with three running tasks collapsed to the name of one, and the row read `1/4 已完成 · <one task>` while two others were in flight. The expanded list was always correct (it maps every item), which is why neither PR's tests caught it — only the collapsed header and the row lost information. The panel redesign replaced the collapsed header's named hint with `·`-joined per-status counts (localized, `1 completed · 2 in progress · 1 pending`, zero-count segments omitted), which reports parallel work correctly and needs no name to truncate; the row is the one site this branch still had to fix.
The row takes `planSummary` in `toolviews/plan-summary.ts`. It names the first active item and counts the rest, so the row reports how many tasks are running instead of implying one. Naming every active item was rejected: the row is a single line, and an unbounded join would overflow it — the count degrades predictably where a list does not. The derivation sits inside the toolviews domain rather than in `contract/`, the inter-domain face: the panel computes its own counts inline and shares nothing with the row, so a contract module would declare a sharing relationship that no longer exists.

View File

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Status: implemented
## 展示面是本次改动的一部分
解除上限使一种此前任何渲染器都不曾收到的列表形状变得可达,因此本分支 stack(栈叠)在 [web todo 展示](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)之上,而不是与之并行落地:两者都改 `tool-todo`,而 GUI 正是并行计划变得可见的地方。web 有两处用 `todos.find(t => t.status === 'in_progress')` 推导单行摘要——折叠态的计划横条表头与 `todo_write` 工具行——在旧上限下这个 `find` 是完备的,因为最多只能有一个条目匹配。一旦有多个活跃项,它会静默丢掉除第一个之外的全部活跃条目:一个四条目、三个任务在跑的计划折叠后只显示其中一个的名字,工具行读作 `1/4 已完成 · <一个任务>`,而另外两个仍在进行。展开态的列表始终正确(它遍历每个条目),这也是两个 PR 的测试都没抓到它的原因——只有折叠表头与工具行丢失了信息。其后 [#740](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/pull/740) 的面板重做已把折叠表头的具名提示换成以 `·` 连接的各状态计数(本地化后形如 `1 已完成 · 2 进行中 · 1 待处理`,计数为零的段落省略),它能正确报告并行工作,且不需要任何可被截断的名字;工具行才是本分支仍需修的那一处。
解除上限使一种此前任何渲染器都不曾收到的列表形状变得可达,因此本分支 stack(栈叠)在 [web todo 展示](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)之上,而不是与之并行落地:两者都改 `tool-todo`,而 GUI 正是并行计划变得可见的地方。web 有两处用 `todos.find(t => t.status === 'in_progress')` 推导单行摘要——折叠态的计划横条表头与 `todo_write` 工具行——在旧上限下这个 `find` 是完备的,因为最多只能有一个条目匹配。一旦有多个活跃项,它会静默丢掉除第一个之外的全部活跃条目:一个四条目、三个任务在跑的计划折叠后只显示其中一个的名字,工具行读作 `1/4 已完成 · <一个任务>`,而另外两个仍在进行。展开态的列表始终正确(它遍历每个条目),这也是两个 PR 的测试都没抓到它的原因——只有折叠表头与工具行丢失了信息。面板重做把折叠表头的具名提示换成以 `·` 连接的各状态计数(本地化后形如 `1 已完成 · 2 进行中 · 1 待处理`,计数为零的段落省略),它能正确报告并行工作,且不需要任何可被截断的名字;工具行才是本分支仍需修的那一处。
工具行改用 `toolviews/plan-summary.ts` 中的 `planSummary`。它给出第一个活跃条目,并计数其余活跃项,因此工具行报告的是有多少任务在跑,而不是暗示只有一个。列出全部活跃条目被否决了:工具行是单行,无上界的拼接会溢出——在列表做不到的地方,计数能够可预测地降级。该推导放在 toolviews 域内而非 `contract/`(域间共享面):面板自行内联计算其计数,与工具行不共享任何东西,因此放进 contract 会声明一种已不存在的共享关系。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-dsh-dump-config.md
2026-07-30-dsh-dump-config.md: bc6504541c7868bad019a1bcd9f551435109e4c6
2026-07-30-dsh-dump-config.zh.md: 5e173305a6cd03de3db4c763f26eeda6fba68ec7
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-28-feedback-command.md
2026-07-28-feedback-command.md: 770c72954d66c9e26e03c47f99c261626e6ed09b
2026-07-28-feedback-command.zh.md: c8bd57ddb5e94bfb826ec40b771547ca9625c8e3

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
# Agent Note: `/feedback` command
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-28-feedback-command.zh.md)
## Problem
A user who notices something wrong mid-session has nowhere to put that observation. Telling the model wastes a turn, changes the conversation the user was having, and buries the remark in derived history where no later reader can find it. Writing it outside the session loses the context that makes it meaningful — which session, at which point, against which work.
The capture surface has to be usable at the moment of annoyance, which rules out anything requiring the user to leave the interactive client, and it must not perturb the run in progress: no model tokens, no turn of work, no change to the request the user is waiting on.
## Decision
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-command-feedback` in `packages/feedback/command-feedback/` registers one global `feedback` command over `ctx.commands`. `/feedback <text>` acknowledges; bare or whitespace-only input returns a direct usage error. The handler is synchronous, injects only `commands`, and has no configuration.
The package declares the log-only `feedback/record { text }` session event and exports `recordFeedback(session, text)` as its command-independent producer. The producer discards surrounding whitespace, rejects an empty result, and appends exactly one event. `/feedback` delegates to it, so another UI, hook, or host integration can record the same domain fact without constructing a slash command.
`dsh-commands` still writes its `command/run` / `command/done` lifecycle pair around `/feedback`, but this command sets `recordInput: false`. Its `command/run` therefore carries the command identity and source without `args`; the feedback text exists only in `feedback/record`, while `command/done` carries the acknowledgement outcome. All three records are log-only and non-surface. Their appends start persistence's ordinary eager drain; nothing forces a flush, so acknowledgement reports that the feedback is in the log rather than already on disk.
Capture remains inert for the running agent and model. The optional OTel telemetry package later adds one infrastructure consumer: it observes `feedback/record` as a release trigger in `FEEDBACK_ONLY` mode and as the local-only warning trigger in `DISABLED` mode, without changing the feedback event or command path. See [Feedback-gated session telemetry](2026-08-05-feedback-gated-session-telemetry.md).
### Why feedback owns an event
Feedback is a domain fact, while `/feedback` is one trigger. Keeping the only payload in `feedback/record` lets later triggers use the same event and lets consumers select feedback without depending on command names or parsing command lifecycle records. Omitting `command/run.args` for this definition avoids two authoritative-looking copies of one human remark.
### Why the model never sees it
Feedback is about the session, not input to it. Injecting it as a user message would change the next model request, contradicting the requirement that recording not perturb the run, and would make the remark part of the conversation it comments on. `command/run` and `command/done` are absent from `SurfaceEventType`, so they cannot acquire a `surfaceOp` or enter derived history even by mistake.
### Verbatim text
Surrounding whitespace is discarded, but nothing else is parsed. `/feedback /plan felt slow` records `/plan felt slow`; the leading `/plan` is content, not a nested command. Control-word grammar of the kind `/goal` uses would make the corresponding literal feedback impossible to express, which is the opposite of what a capture surface is for.
### A new group
`packages/feedback/` is a new group because no existing one owns this. `goal/` is objective state, `session-title/` is titles, `core/` is the product spine. The group holds one producer package; cross-cutting consumers stay in their owning groups rather than forcing this one to grow.
## Alternatives considered
**Use `command/run` as the feedback record.** Rejected because feedback would then be coupled to one trigger and consumers would have to identify a domain fact by command name. A non-command producer could not create the same record without pretending to execute a command.
**Store the text in both `feedback/record` and `command/run.args`.** Rejected because one act would have two payload copies with no useful distinction. `recordInput: false` preserves the generic lifecycle while leaving the domain event authoritative.
**Inject feedback as a user message via `agent.inject()`.** Needs no new event type and reuses the path `/goal` mutations take. Rejected: it makes the feedback model-visible, so it enters the next request, changes the run being commented on, and consumes tokens — contradicting all three parts of the no-perturbation requirement.
**Make `/feedback` a true no-op that records nothing.** The most literal reading of "does not do anything". Rejected because it makes the command pointless: the stated requirement was that the remark reach the session log.
**Register the command inside an existing package** such as `packages/ui/commands`. Avoids a new group and its README pair. Rejected: `ctx.commands` is the registry, not a home for arbitrary command implementations, and the requester asked for a standalone package.
**Parse structure out of the text** (category prefixes, severity markers). Rejected as speculative: no consumer needs that structure, and any control-word grammar makes the corresponding literal feedback unrecordable. Verbatim text is the widest surface a future consumer can narrow; a parsed one cannot be widened after the fact.
**Add a model-facing tool instead of a slash command.** Rejected: feedback is a direct human observation. Routing it through the model spends a turn, lets the model paraphrase the user's words, and makes the record contingent on the model choosing to call the tool.
## Consequences
The shipped `dsh` base mounts the command unconditionally — no configuration, no dependency on the goal stack. The Web client exposes it through its command adapter. Headless mode, ACP, and JSON-RPC do not provide a command adapter, so `/feedback` is unavailable there.
The package owns one independent append-only event with no cross-event or mutable-data relation for an invariant companion to check. The event follows the session log's existing replay, fork, persistence, and crash-tail behavior.
Deferred: no product or model consumer; no structured fields; no amend or withdraw, since the log is append-only and this package adds no tombstone; and no explicit durability barrier, so an entry recorded immediately before a crash can be lost with any other unflushed tail. The optional telemetry consumer treats the event only as an export-policy trigger.
No keyless transcript snapshot accompanies this change, at the requester's explicit direction. Package tests, a real Loader composition test over a `cordis.yml`, and the shipped Web composition test cover registration, capture, model exclusion, and product assembly.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
# Agent Note: `/feedback` 命令
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-28-feedback-command.md) | 中文
## 问题
用户在会话中途发现问题时,没有地方记下这个观察。告诉模型会浪费一个轮次、改变用户原本进行的对话,并把这条评论埋进派生历史,使后续读者无法找到它。写到会话之外则会丢失让它有意义的上下文:属于哪个会话、处于哪个时点、针对哪项工作。
采集接口必须能在用户产生不满的那一刻使用,因此任何需要用户离开交互式客户端的方案都不可行;它还不能扰动正在进行的运行:不消耗模型 token、不产生工作轮次、不改变用户正在等待的请求。
## 决策
位于 `packages/feedback/command-feedback/` 的 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-command-feedback` 通过 `ctx.commands` 注册一个全局 `feedback` 命令。`/feedback <text>` 给出确认;空输入或仅含空白的输入返回直接用法错误。处理器是同步的,只注入 `commands`,且没有任何配置。
本包(package)声明仅写入日志的 `feedback/record { text }` 会话事件,并导出 `recordFeedback(session, text)`,作为不依赖命令的生产方。该生产方丢弃前后空白,拒绝空结果,并且恰好追加一个事件。`/feedback` 委托给它,因此其他 UI、钩子或 host 集成无需构造斜杠命令也能记录同一个领域事实。
`dsh-commands` 仍会围绕 `/feedback` 写入 `command/run` / `command/done` 生命周期配对,但该命令设置了 `recordInput: false`。因此,它的 `command/run` 携带命令标识与来源,但不携带 `args`;反馈文本只存在于 `feedback/record` 中,而 `command/done` 携带确认结果。三个记录都仅写入日志且非 surface。它们的追加会启动持久化的常规即时排空;没有任何环节强制 flush,因此确认文本报告的是反馈已进入日志,而非已经落盘。
采集对正在运行的 agent 与模型仍不产生后续动作。可选的 OTel 遥测包后续增加了一个基础设施消费方:它在 `FEEDBACK_ONLY` 模式下将 `feedback/record` 作为释放触发器,在 `DISABLED` 模式下将其作为本地警告触发器,且不改变反馈事件或命令路径。见[反馈门控的会话遥测](2026-08-05-feedback-gated-session-telemetry.md)。
### 为何反馈拥有自己的事件
反馈是领域事实,而 `/feedback` 是一种触发方式。只把载荷保存在 `feedback/record` 中,既让后续触发方式可以使用同一个事件,也让消费方无需依赖命令名或解析命令生命周期记录即可筛选反馈。在该定义中省略 `command/run.args`,可避免同一条人类评价出现两个看起来都具有权威性的副本。
### 为何模型永不看到它
反馈是关于会话的,而不是会话的输入。将其作为 user 消息注入会改变下一次模型请求,与「记录不得扰动运行」的要求相冲突,也会让该评论成为它所评论的那段对话的一部分。`command/run` 与 `command/done` 不属于 `SurfaceEventType`,因此即便出错也无法获得 `surfaceOp` 或进入派生历史。
### 原样文本
前后空白会被丢弃,但除此之外不做解析。`/feedback /plan felt slow` 记录 `/plan felt slow`;开头的 `/plan` 是内容,而非嵌套命令。若采用 `/goal` 那样的控制词语法,对应的字面反馈将无法表达,这与采集接口的目的正好相反。
### 一个新的分组
`packages/feedback/` 是新分组,因为现有分组都不拥有此职责:`goal/` 负责目标状态,`session-title/` 负责标题,`core/` 是产品主干。该分组只包含一个生产方包;跨领域的消费方留在各自所属的分组,而不是迫使这个包不断膨胀。
## 考虑过的替代方案
**使用 `command/run` 作为反馈记录。** 已否决,因为这会将反馈与一种触发方式耦合,消费方还必须通过命令名识别领域事实。非命令生产方若不伪装成执行命令,就无法创建相同记录。
**同时在 `feedback/record` 与 `command/run.args` 中存储文本。** 已否决,因为同一行为会产生两个没有实质区别的载荷副本。`recordInput: false` 保留通用生命周期,同时让领域事件保持权威性。
**通过 `agent.inject()` 将反馈作为 user 消息注入。** 无需新增事件类型,并复用 `/goal` 变更所走的路径。已否决:它会让反馈对模型可见,从而进入下一次请求、改变正被评论的那次运行并消耗 token——与「不得扰动」要求的三个方面全部冲突。
**让 `/feedback` 成为真正的空操作,什么都不记录。** 这是对「什么都不做」最字面的理解。已否决:这会使命令失去意义——明确的要求是让这条评论进入会话日志。
**在现有包中注册该命令**,例如 `packages/ui/commands`。可省去新分组及其双语 README。已否决:`ctx.commands` 是注册表,而不是任意命令实现的归属地;且请求者明确要求独立的包。
**从文本中解析结构**(类别前缀、严重程度标记)。已否决,属于投机设计:没有消费方需要该结构,而任何控制词语法都会让对应的字面反馈无法记录。原样文本是未来消费方可以收窄的最宽接口;而已被解析的接口无法事后放宽。
**改为提供面向模型的工具。** 已否决:反馈是人类的直接观察。经由模型会消耗一个轮次、让模型改写用户的原话,并使记录取决于模型是否选择调用该工具。
## 后果
随附的 `dsh` 基础组合无条件挂载该命令:没有配置,也不依赖 goal 栈。Web 客户端通过命令适配器暴露该命令。无头模式、ACP 和 JSON-RPC 不提供命令适配器,因此 `/feedback` 在那里不可用。
本包拥有一个独立的仅追加事件,不存在跨事件关系或可变数据关系可供不变式伴生插件检查。该事件遵循会话日志现有的回放、fork、持久化和崩溃尾部行为。
延期事项:没有产品或模型消费方;没有结构化字段;不支持修改或撤回,因为日志仅追加且本包不新增 tombstone;且没有显式持久化屏障,因此紧临崩溃前记录的条目可能与其他未 flush 的尾部一同丢失。可选的遥测消费方只将该事件作为导出策略触发器。
本次变更按请求者的明确指示不附带无密钥 transcript(文本记录)快照。包测试、基于真实 `cordis.yml` 的 Loader 组合测试,以及随附的 Web 组合测试覆盖注册、采集、模型排除和产品组装。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-28-tool-call-file-open-in-os.md
2026-07-28-tool-call-file-open-in-os.md: 73f5091888ab2506eab50b827e74c5120394b127
2026-07-28-tool-call-file-open-in-os.zh.md: c1bc93c472aae8be8cee3bab6cd02f556abca494
2026-07-28-tool-call-file-open-in-os.md: 499d3caa11e1f2c17d96e43b7846df72a31c0eb1
2026-07-28-tool-call-file-open-in-os.zh.md: a658a7b55d2575ad1a5d8baccb80f0a8444d6db9

View File

@@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ Chat tool rows treated the whole summary line as a click target that opened the
## Decision
File-tool path summaries (`read` / `write` / `edit` args carrying `path` or `file_path`) render as hover-underline links with a pointer cursor. Clicking the path calls `host.openPath` through `WorkspacesService.openPath`, resolving relative paths against the session cwd. File-link rows disable args expand (leading icon is inert); whole-row click, row hover fill, and the click-to-open-details gesture are removed from tool rows (including bash and todo registrations). The details panel and its inject surface remain for programmatic selection; rows no longer drive them.
File-tool path summaries (`read` / `write` / `edit` args carrying `path` or `file_path`) render as links underlined at rest with a pointer cursor. Clicking the path calls `host.openPath` through `WorkspacesService.openPath`, resolving relative paths against the session cwd. File-link rows disable args expand (leading icon is inert); whole-row click, row hover fill, and the click-to-open-details gesture are removed from tool rows (including bash and todo registrations). The details panel and its inject surface remain for programmatic selection; rows no longer drive them.
`host.openPath` is a privileged unary RPC accepted only from loopback, same-origin browser requests (same carrier guard as `host.pickDirectory`). Platform adapters open without a shell: `open` on macOS, PowerShell `Invoke-Item` on Windows, and `xdg-open` on desktop Linux. WSL is a separate host shape despite Node reporting `linux`: the adapter recognizes its environment or Microsoft kernel release, translates the Linux path with `wslpath -w`, and passes the resulting Windows/UNC path to the same PowerShell handoff. The opener's platform facts and command runner are injectable for tests. URL-only read args (`web_fetch`) are not file links.
`host.openPath` is a privileged unary RPC accepted only from loopback, same-origin browser requests (same carrier guard as `host.pickDirectory`). Platform adapters open without a shell: `open` on macOS, PowerShell `Invoke-Item` on Windows, and `xdg-open` on desktop Linux; browser-renderable documents prefer the named default browser on macOS and desktop Linux. WSL is a separate host shape despite Node reporting `linux`: the adapter recognizes its environment or Microsoft kernel release, translates the Linux path with `wslpath -w`, and passes the resulting Windows/UNC path to the same PowerShell handoff. The opener's platform facts and command runner are injectable for tests. URL-only read args (`web_fetch`) are not file links.
## Alternatives considered

View File

@@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ Status: implemented
## 决策
文件工具的路径摘要(`read`/`write`/`edit` 参数中的 `path` 或 `file_path`)渲染为悬停下划线链接并使用 pointer 光标。点击路径会经 `WorkspacesService.openPath` 调用 `host.openPath`,相对路径以会话 cwd 为基准解析。带文件链接的行关闭参数展开(左侧图标不可点);工具行(含 bash 与 todo 注册)去掉整行点击、整行悬停底色,以及点击打开 details 的手势。details 面板及其 inject 面仍保留供程序化选择;工具行不再驱动它们。
文件工具的路径摘要(`read`/`write`/`edit` 参数中的 `path` 或 `file_path`)渲染为静止状态下即带下划线的链接,并使用 pointer 光标。点击路径会经 `WorkspacesService.openPath` 调用 `host.openPath`,相对路径以会话 cwd 为基准解析。带文件链接的行关闭参数展开(左侧图标不可点);工具行(含 bash 与 todo 注册)去掉整行点击、整行悬停底色,以及点击打开 details 的手势。details 面板及其 inject 面仍保留供程序化选择;工具行不再驱动它们。
`host.openPath` 是特权一元 RPC,仅接受来自回环地址且同源的浏览器请求(与 `host.pickDirectory` 相同的载体守卫)。平台适配器不经 shell 打开:macOS 为 `open`,Windows 为 PowerShell `Invoke-Item`,桌面 Linux 为 `xdg-open`。尽管 Node 将 WSL 报告为 `linux`,WSL 仍是一种独立的宿主形态:适配器根据其环境或 Microsoft 内核 release 识别它,用 `wslpath -w` 转换 Linux 路径,并将所得 Windows/UNC 路径交给同一 PowerShell 交接。打开器的平台信息和命令运行器可在测试中注入。仅含 URL 的 read 参数(`web_fetch`)不是文件链接。
`host.openPath` 是特权一元 RPC,仅接受来自回环地址且同源的浏览器请求(与 `host.pickDirectory` 相同的载体守卫)。平台适配器不经 shell 打开:macOS 为 `open`,Windows 为 PowerShell `Invoke-Item`,桌面 Linux 为 `xdg-open`;浏览器可渲染的文档会在 macOS 与桌面 Linux 上优先使用能够确定的默认浏览器。尽管 Node 将 WSL 报告为 `linux`,WSL 仍是一种独立的宿主形态:适配器根据其环境或 Microsoft 内核 release 识别它,用 `wslpath -w` 转换 Linux 路径,并将所得 Windows/UNC 路径交给同一 PowerShell 交接。打开器的平台信息和命令运行器可在测试中注入。仅含 URL 的 read 参数(`web_fetch`)不是文件链接。
## 考虑过的替代方案

View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-29-web-message-icon-actions-and-clock.md
2026-07-29-web-message-icon-actions-and-clock.md: feced6aeb11d176d6c774242a4d1dae14f6730f8
2026-07-29-web-message-icon-actions-and-clock.zh.md: 5e33182421b423f45c84dbe1a979505f4c31b819

View File

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Web message IconActions and clocks
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-29-web-message-icon-actions-and-clock.zh.md)
## Problem
The web chat user bubble already had copy / branch / edit IconActions but no clock. Finalized assistant narration had no under-body action chrome at all, even though the Harness design shows a copy / branch / clock row after the answer settles. Streaming replies must not flash that chrome mid-token. Memoized rows also keep stable props across midnight, so a one-shot `Date.now()` would leave yesterday's messages stuck on `HH:mm`.
## Decision
**User bubbles prepend a date-aware local clock to the existing IconActions row; the last content-text assistant of each turn appends a copy / branch / clock row with `margin-top: 16px`; both seats stay visible whenever mounted and re-format at the next local midnight.**
The assistant seat is narrowed by the [completed-turn decision](../bug-fix/2026-08-05-turn-tail-actions-require-a-completed-turn.md): only a turn with a `turn/end` grants it, so a turn still producing steps hands the row to nothing. The user seat's branch control is removed outright by the [user-bubble branch removal](../simplification/2026-08-06-user-bubbles-drop-the-branch-action.md); a user row's IconActions are clock and copy.
Both seats format `node.time` through `formatMessageClock`: same calendar day → `HH:mm`, earlier this year → `M月D日 HH:mm`, other years → `YYYY年M月D日 HH:mm`. `useCalendarDay` is a component-local day tick (timeout to the next local midnight) so memoized rows re-render when the calendar day changes without a new framework hook. `MessageItem` places the label before copy (figma `388:20051`). `ChatView` derives turn-tail seqs via `assistantActionsSeqs` and withholds `time` for mid-turn content; `AssistantMarkdown` places the row after branch (figma `43:32997`) only when `streaming` is false, the event time is known, and the node has non-empty text content. Think-only nodes, mid-turn narration, and the streaming tail omit the row. Copy writes joined text blocks. Both message rows pass their event's `seq` to the same fork callback; [Web session fork actions](2026-07-27-web-session-fork-actions.md) define the real mutation contract. Clipboard write and the clock helpers live in `message-chrome.ts`. The assembled surface is pinned by `apps/web/tests/message-actions.e2e.ts` (cold-seeded history + aria golden); aria normalization collapses every clock shape to `{{clock}}`.
## Alternatives considered
**Show assistant IconActions during streaming.** Rejected: the request is to reveal the row only after output completes; mid-stream chrome would flicker and invite copying a partial answer.
**Put IconActions under every finalized assistant node (including Think-only).** Rejected: copy has nothing useful to write without text content, and repeating the chrome under every step/Think row clutters the flow; only content output owns the seat.
**Put IconActions under every content-text assistant in a multi-step turn.** Rejected: mid-turn narration (text before tools) is not the settled answer; repeating copy/branch/clock under each step clutters the flow. Only the last content assistant of the turn owns the seat.
**Hover-reveal the action row on hover-capable pointers.** Rejected: once the row exists it should stay discoverable; opacity hiding made the chrome easy to miss and required parent hover selectors that duplicated the mount gate.
**Let the IconActions decision also define session fork semantics.** Rejected: this note owns only message chrome, clocks, and mount gating; boundary selection, failure behavior, and switching semantics belong to the separate [Web session fork actions](2026-07-27-web-session-fork-actions.md), keeping presentation components from becoming a second home for session mutation.
**Publish the calendar day through a chat store or inject hook.** Rejected: the day tick is presentation-only local state with no cross-entry consumers; a component-local timeout matches the client rule that behavioral hooks may own state that does not subscribe to an external source.
## Consequences
Each turn's last settled content answer exposes copy, branch, and the event clock as soon as the row mounts; mid-turn content and Think-only nodes stay chrome-free. User and assistant clocks share the same day/year widening rules and refresh after midnight without a message mutation. Per-message paging remains a deferred footer seat in the package README. Package tests pin the three clock shapes, the midnight widen, the content-only assistant gate, the turn-tail seq gate, and the respective event `seq` values passed by the user and assistant branch buttons; the web e2e scenario pins the assembled IconActions chrome.

View File

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Web 消息 IconActions 与时钟
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-29-web-message-icon-actions-and-clock.md) | 中文
## 问题
Web 聊天的用户气泡已有复制、分支、编辑 IconActions,但没有时钟。已定稿的 assistant 叙述下方完全没有操作栏,尽管 harness 设计稿在回答结束后展示复制、分支、时钟。流式回复不得在逐 token 输出期间闪现该操作栏。经 memo 优化的行在跨午夜时仍保持稳定 props,因此一次性的 `Date.now()` 会让昨日消息一直卡在 `HH:mm`。
## 决策
**用户气泡在既有 IconActions 行的开头添加感知日期的本地时钟;每个轮次中最后一条带 text 内容的 assistant 在正文下追加带 `margin-top: 16px` 的复制、分支、时钟;两边只要挂载就保持可见,并在下一个本地午夜重新格式化。**
assistant 一侧的座位由[已完成轮次决策](../bug-fix/2026-08-05-turn-tail-actions-require-a-completed-turn.md)收紧:只有存在 `turn/end` 的轮次才授予该行,仍在产出步骤的轮次不把该行交给任何节点。user 一侧的分支控件被 [user 气泡分支移除决策](../simplification/2026-08-06-user-bubbles-drop-the-branch-action.md)直接移除;user 行的 IconActions 只有时钟与复制。
两边都通过 `formatMessageClock` 格式化 `node.time`:同一日历日 → `HH:mm`,同年更早 → `M月D日 HH:mm`,跨年 → `YYYY年M月D日 HH:mm`。`useCalendarDay` 是组件本地的日刻度(定时到下一个本地午夜),因此 memo 行在日历日变化时会重渲染,且不新增框架钩子。`MessageItem` 把标签放在复制之前(figma `388:20051`)。`ChatView` 通过 `assistantActionsSeqs` 推导轮次尾部的 seq,并不为轮次中间的内容传入 `time`;`AssistantMarkdown` 把该行放在分支之后(figma `43:32997`),且仅在 `streaming` 为 false、已知事件时间、且节点含非空 text 内容时渲染。纯 Think 节点、轮次中间的叙述与流式尾部省略该行。复制写入拼接后的 text 块。两种消息行都把自己的事件 `seq` 交给同一个 fork 回调;真实 mutation 契约由 [Web session fork 操作](2026-07-27-web-session-fork-actions.md)定义。剪贴板写入与时钟辅助函数放在 `message-chrome.ts`。组装后的界面由 `apps/web/tests/message-actions.e2e.ts`(冷 seed 历史 + aria golden)钉住;aria 归一化把每种时钟形态折叠为 `{{clock}}`。
## 曾考虑的方案
**在流式过程中展示 assistant IconActions。** 否决:需求是输出完成后才展示该行;中途 chrome 会闪烁,并诱使复制半截回答。
**给每个已定稿 assistant 节点(含纯 Think)都挂 IconActions。** 否决:没有 text 内容时复制没有可写内容,且在每一步/Think 下重复 chrome 会打乱流程;只有内容输出拥有该座位。
**给多步骤轮次中的每一条带 text 内容的 assistant 都挂 IconActions。** 否决:轮次中间的叙述(工具调用前的 text)不是已定稿答案;在每一步下重复复制、分支、时钟会打乱流程。只有该轮次中最后一条内容 assistant 拥有该座位。
**在具备 hover 能力的指针上用 hover 才揭示操作行。** 否决:行一旦存在就应保持可发现;用 opacity 隐藏容易漏看,且需要父级 hover 选择器重复挂载门控。
**由 IconActions 决策同时定义 session fork 语义。** 否决:本笔记只拥有消息 chrome、时钟与挂载门控;边界选择、失败行为和切换语义属于独立的 [Web session fork 操作](2026-07-27-web-session-fork-actions.md),避免展示组件成为 session mutation 的第二正家。
**通过 chat store 或 inject 钩子发布日历日。** 否决:日刻度只是展示层本地状态,没有跨入口消费方;组件本地 timeout 符合「行为钩子可拥有不订阅外部源的状态」这一客户端规则。
## 后果
每个轮次中最后一条已定稿的内容回答在行挂载后立刻暴露复制、分支与事件时钟;轮次中间的内容与纯 Think 节点不带 chrome。用户与 assistant 时钟共用同一套跨天、跨年加宽规则,并在午夜后无需消息变更即可刷新。逐消息分页仍是包 README 中记录的暂缓 footer 功能位。包级测试钉住三种时钟形态、午夜加宽、assistant 仅内容门控、轮次尾部 seq 门控,以及 user/assistant 分支按钮各自传递的事件 `seq`;Web e2e 场景钉住组装后的 IconActions chrome。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-deepseek-onboarding-credential-setup.md
2026-07-30-deepseek-onboarding-credential-setup.md: c732758bc567376a0be4ac348aa9129aa8126ac4
2026-07-30-deepseek-onboarding-credential-setup.zh.md: 2dc7e0ccf5f9a99ad35c859a7ecfb9f98d93d530
2026-07-30-deepseek-onboarding-credential-setup.md: 419ea0aea56e82e301189d90d5ca78495da2da71
2026-07-30-deepseek-onboarding-credential-setup.zh.md: 936402c9ed83eccc3d5e78a57247f06347522c0f

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ The [web configuration plane](../architecture/2026-07-30-web-config-plane.md) ma
## Decision
**One readiness projection owns both Models and onboarding facts.** `ui-models` keeps a single store that joins `llm.providers({})`, redacted `settings.describe({})`, and batched `credentials.describe({refs})`. The onboarding projection selects the `deepseek-official` configurable-provider entry owned by the `llm-deepseek` namespace and empty settings path, reads the effective `apiKeyEnv`, and evaluates the matching credential descriptor. A live route with the same provider id but no matching configurable-provider declaration is adapter-absent for onboarding. A configured literal `apiKey` secret sidecar is also ready, so compatibility configuration does not trigger a false prompt; a configured process-environment credential is ready and remains read-only.
**One readiness projection owns both Models and onboarding facts.** `ui-models` keeps a single store that joins `llm.providers({})`, redacted `settings.describe({})`, and batched `credentials.describe({refs})`. The onboarding projection selects the `deepseek-official` configurable-provider entry owned by the `llm-deepseek` namespace and empty settings path, reads the effective `apiKeyEnv`, and evaluates the matching credential descriptor. A live route with the same provider id but no matching configurable-provider declaration is adapter-absent for onboarding. A configured process-environment credential is ready and remains read-only.
**The settings shell contributes ordering and navigation, not provider policy.** `ui-settings` declares a root-scoped `settings.onboarding` list slot and mounts one ordered step at a time while the current surface is the empty Hero. The active registrant receives `complete()` and a private `openSection(id)` callback; completion transfers ownership to the next entry. `ui-models` registers the DeepSeek step and its Models section through `slots.inject()`, so each contribution follows its declaration lifetime without making plugin load order a contract, and independently contributed dialogs cannot stack. The product-wide welcome step that precedes it is owned separately by [the versioned welcome decision](2026-07-30-versioned-gui-welcome-onboarding.md).
@@ -30,4 +30,4 @@ The [web configuration plane](../architecture/2026-07-30-web-config-plane.md) ma
## Consequences
The ordered flow leads from the product notice to the shipped adapter's existing editor without restarting: a keyless browser test boots the real Web composition under an isolated harness home, acknowledges the notice, follows the DeepSeek page to Models, stores a generated key through that page into the home's `.env`, verifies no key reaches DOM, ARIA, or browser console output, and confirms the running page reports configured. The full keyless Web replay lane also pins that a non-configurable replay route with the same provider id does not block unrelated journeys. Pure readiness and React tests pin literal, file, process-environment, missing-provider, missing-capability, navigation, cancellation, external-invalidation, and coordinator-transfer behavior. The flow deliberately inherits the configuration plane's documented base limitations rather than adding local secret storage, redaction, or settings replacement workarounds.
The ordered flow leads from the product notice to the shipped adapter's existing editor without restarting: a keyless browser test boots the real Web composition under an isolated harness home, acknowledges the notice, follows the DeepSeek page to Models, stores a generated key through that page into the home's `.credentials.yaml`, verifies no key reaches DOM, ARIA, or browser console output, and confirms the running page reports configured. The full keyless Web replay lane also pins that a non-configurable replay route with the same provider id does not block unrelated journeys. Pure readiness and React tests pin managed-file and process-environment credentials, missing providers and capabilities, navigation, cancellation, external invalidation, and coordinator transfer. The flow deliberately inherits the configuration plane's documented base limitations rather than adding local secret storage, redaction, or settings replacement workarounds.

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Status: implemented
## 决策
**Models 与首次使用引导共享同一个就绪状态投影。**`ui-models` 维护一个 store,把 `llm.providers({})`、脱敏后的 `settings.describe({})` 和批量调用的 `credentials.describe({refs})` 联接为同一份状态。首次使用投影选取由 `llm-deepseek` namespace 与空 settings path 持有的 `deepseek-official` 可配置提供方条目,读取生效的 `apiKeyEnv`,并检查对应的凭据描述符。同 provider id 但没有匹配可配置提供方声明的存活路由,在首次使用引导中视为适配器缺失。若 `apiKey` 字面量对应的 secret 槽位标记为已设置,也会判定为就绪,兼容配置因此不会误触发页面;通过进程环境提供的凭据若已配置,同样判定为就绪并保持只读。
**Models 与首次使用引导共享同一个就绪状态投影。**`ui-models` 维护一个 store,把 `llm.providers({})`、脱敏后的 `settings.describe({})` 和批量调用的 `credentials.describe({refs})` 联接为同一份状态。首次使用投影选取由 `llm-deepseek` namespace 与空 settings path 持有的 `deepseek-official` 可配置提供方条目,读取生效的 `apiKeyEnv`,并检查对应的凭据描述符。同 provider id 但没有匹配可配置提供方声明的存活路由,在首次使用引导中视为适配器缺失。通过进程环境提供的凭据若已配置,则判定为就绪并保持只读。
**设置外壳只贡献排序与导航,不持有提供方策略。** `ui-settings` 声明一个根作用域的 `settings.onboarding` list slot,并在当前界面为空白 Hero 时,每次只挂载一个有序步骤。当前注册方会收到 `complete()` 和私有 `openSection(id)` 回调;完成当前步骤后,所有权转交给下一项。`ui-models` 通过 `slots.inject()` 注册 DeepSeek 步骤及其 Models 分区,使每项贡献都跟随自身的声明生命周期,不让插件加载顺序成为契约;独立贡献的对话框也无法堆叠。排在它之前的产品级欢迎步骤由[版本化欢迎决策](2026-07-30-versioned-gui-welcome-onboarding.md)单独持有。
@@ -30,4 +30,4 @@ Status: implemented
## 后果
有序流程从产品声明页开始,无需重启即可引导用户前往随产品提供的适配器已有的编辑器:无密钥浏览器测试在隔离的 harness 家目录下启动真实 Web 组合,确认声明后依照 DeepSeek 页面前往 Models,通过该页面把生成的密钥存入该目录的 `.env`,验证密钥未进入 DOM、ARIA 或浏览器控制台输出,并确认运行中的页面报告已配置。完整的无密钥 Web 回放也固定了同 id 的不可配置回放路由不会阻塞无关流程。纯就绪状态测试与 React 测试固化了字面量凭据、文件凭据、进程环境凭据、提供方缺失、能力缺失、导航、取消、外部失效和协调器移交行为。该流程直接继承配置平面已记录的基础限制,不会另加局部的机密存储、脱敏或设置替换变通方案。
有序流程从产品声明页开始,无需重启即可引导用户前往随产品提供的适配器已有的编辑器:无密钥浏览器测试在隔离的 harness 家目录下启动真实 Web 组合,确认声明后依照 DeepSeek 页面前往 Models,通过该页面把生成的密钥存入该目录的 `.credentials.yaml`,验证密钥未进入 DOM、ARIA 或浏览器控制台输出,并确认运行中的页面报告已配置。完整的无密钥 Web 回放也固定了同 id 的不可配置回放路由不会阻塞无关流程。纯就绪状态测试与 React 测试固化了受管文件凭据与进程环境凭据、提供方与能力缺失、导航、取消、外部失效和协调器移交。该流程直接继承配置平面已记录的基础限制,不会另加局部的机密存储、脱敏或设置替换变通方案。

View File

@@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: dsh --dump-config prints the composed config tree
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-30-dsh-dump-config.zh.md)
## Problem
The booted tree is a composition the user never sees: the shipped base, a surface overlay, and the `--config` or personal `~/.dsh/config.yaml` overlay apply as sibling patch lists where each id-targeted patch replaces the row's whole `config` and an unmatched id only warns. Debugging a misbehaving personal overlay (a restated field dropped, a row id typo, a patch applying to the wrong surface) required mentally replaying the patch algorithm across three files. There was no way to see the effective tree or to diff it against the shipped defaults.
## Decision
`dsh --dump-config` and `dsh web --dump-config` print the composed entry list — base, surface overlay, then the `--config` or personal overlay, exactly the layers that surface's boot assembles — as YAML on stdout and exit without booting. `dsh --dump-default-config` / `dsh web --dump-default-config` stop at the surface overlay, so diffing the two outputs shows precisely what the user layer changes.
The dump cannot drift from what boots because it shares the mounting code: the vendored include exports its patch algorithm as the pure `applyEntryPatches(data, patches, warn)` (the private `applyPatches` method now delegates to it) and its `!!js` YAML dialect as `entryListSchema`; `dsh-app-boot`'s `renderConfigDump()` composes labeled layers and renders through both, and `apps/cli/src/dump-config.ts` is a thin surface-selection wrapper. `!!js` expressions print verbatim and unevaluated — the dump shows composition, not one process's environment — and a patch whose target row is absent goes to stderr with its layer label, mirroring the Loader's boot-time warning. Launcher-owned boot-context values (session identity, web CLI-flag patches, the frontend dist path) are per-invocation facts outside the config tree and do not appear. The dump flags reject boot-only flags (`-p`, `--resume`, `--config-replace`) and each other, and `--dump-default-config` takes no `--config`.
Each run of same-provenance rows is preceded by a `# ==` comment naming the file that contributed the rows and the layers that patched them (`# == base.cordis.yml, patched by tui.cordis.yml`), so the output shows which section comes from which file while remaining one loadable YAML document. Composition is one flattened `applyEntryPatches` call over all layers — boot's exact call shape, so even patch-visibility corner cases (a later layer targeting a group child that a plain `config` replacement introduced, invisible to the single-pass id index) compose identically; applying one call per layer would rebuild the index between layers and print a tree boot never mounts. Provenance is derived from single-call prefix snapshots (base + layers 1..k) diffed positionally: the patch algorithm only rewrites rows in place or appends, so a top-level index identifies one row across snapshots, and a layer counts as having patched a row when adding it changed that row (config replacement, disable, group insert). Patch lists are cloned per snapshot because `applyEntryPatches` pushes `insert` rows by reference from the patch list.
`dsh-app-boot` previously duplicated the include's `!!js` YAML type for patch parsing; it now imports `entryListSchema`, so the dialect has one owner.
## Alternatives considered
**Boot the tree and dump `ctx.loader.entries()`.** Rejected: booting evaluates `!!js` expressions (leaking one machine's environment into the printed config), starts adapters and sessions as side effects, requires a TTY-independent teardown path, and is slow. The dump is for debugging composition, which is a pure function of the files.
**Reimplement the patch merge in the CLI.** Rejected: a second implementation of `applyPatches` would silently drift from the vendored include — the exact failure mode the feature exists to debug. Exporting the include's own algorithm costs one logged vendor modification and guarantees identity.
**A `/dump-config` TUI command instead of flags.** Rejected as the only form: the primary use is a piped `dsh --dump-config | diff - <(dsh --dump-default-config)` style workflow, which needs a boot-free non-TTY surface. A TUI command can be added later over the same `renderConfigDump`.
## Consequences
Config debugging becomes one command instead of mental patch replay, and support can ask for `--dump-config` output. The vendored include carries one more logged local modification (the `applyEntryPatches`/`entryListSchema` exports; behavior-preserving for mounting) to re-apply on upstream sync. Provenance tracking re-composes one prefix snapshot per layer and diffs rows by JSON stringify, so the dump does extra work proportional to layers² × rows; that cost lives only in the boot-free dump path. `renderConfigDump` is unit-tested for layer ordering, verbatim `!!js` round-tripping, provenance separators and grouping, labeled unmatched-patch warnings, and loud read/parse/shape failures; the built-bin e2e drives all four flag forms through `lib/bin.js` including the personal-overlay layer, its provenance label, and its stderr warning.

View File

@@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: dsh --dump-config 打印合成后的配置树
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-30-dsh-dump-config.md) | 中文
## Problem
启动的配置树是一份用户从未见过的合成结果:已交付的基础配置、界面覆盖层,以及 `--config` 或个人 `~/.dsh/config.yaml` 覆盖层作为同级补丁列表依次应用,其中每个按 id 定向的补丁替换目标行的整个 `config`,未匹配的 id 只产生警告。调试一个行为异常的个人覆盖层(漏掉需要重述的字段、行 id 拼错、补丁应用到了错误的界面)需要在脑中跨三个文件重放补丁算法。既没有办法看到生效的树,也没有办法把它与已交付的默认值做 diff。
## Decision
`dsh --dump-config` 和 `dsh web --dump-config` 把合成后的条目列表——基础配置、界面覆盖层、再叠 `--config` 或个人覆盖层,恰好是该界面启动时组装的那些层——以 YAML 打印到 stdout 后退出,不启动任何东西。`dsh --dump-default-config` / `dsh web --dump-default-config` 止步于界面覆盖层,因此对两份输出做 diff 就能精确看出用户层改了什么。
dump 不可能与实际启动漂移,因为它复用挂载代码:vendored include 把补丁算法导出为纯函数 `applyEntryPatches(data, patches, warn)`(私有的 `applyPatches` 方法现在委托给它),并把 `!!js` YAML 方言导出为 `entryListSchema`;`dsh-app-boot` 的 `renderConfigDump()` 通过这两者对带标签的层完成合成与渲染,`apps/cli/src/dump-config.ts` 只是选择界面的薄封装。`!!js` 表达式原样打印、不求值——dump 展示的是合成结果,不是某个进程的环境——目标行不存在的补丁会连同其层标签报到 stderr,与 Loader 启动时的警告一致。由启动器持有的启动上下文值(会话身份、web 的 CLI 标志补丁、前端 dist 路径)是每次调用的事实,位于配置树之外,不会出现。dump 标志拒绝仅用于启动的标志(`-p`、`--resume`、`--config-replace`)且两个 dump 标志互斥,`--dump-default-config` 不接受 `--config`。
每段来源相同的连续行之前都有一条 `# ==` 注释,标明贡献这些行的文件以及修补过它们的层(`# == base.cordis.yml, patched by tui.cordis.yml`),因此输出既展示每一节来自哪个文件,又仍是一份可加载的 YAML 文档。合成是对所有层展平后的一次 `applyEntryPatches` 调用——与启动的调用形状完全一致,因此即便是补丁可见性的边角情况(后一层定位到前一层通过普通 `config` 替换引入的组内子项,而单遍 id 索引看不到它)也与启动合成完全相同;若按层各调用一次,会在层与层之间重建索引,打印出一棵启动从不挂载的树。来源从单次调用的前缀快照(基础 + 第 1..k 层)按位置 diff 得出:补丁算法只会原地改写行或在末尾追加,因此顶层索引在各快照之间标识同一行;加入某层后该行发生变化(替换 config、禁用、组内插入)即视为该层修补了这一行。每个快照都会克隆补丁列表,因为 `applyEntryPatches` 会把 `insert` 行按引用从补丁列表推入结果。
`dsh-app-boot` 之前为解析补丁复制了 include 的 `!!js` YAML 类型;现在改为导入 `entryListSchema`,方言只有一个归属者。
## Alternatives considered
**启动整棵树后 dump `ctx.loader.entries()`。** 拒绝:启动会求值 `!!js` 表达式(把某台机器的环境泄漏进打印的配置)、以副作用启动适配器和会话、需要独立于 TTY 的拆卸路径,而且慢。dump 是用来调试合成的,而合成是那些文件的纯函数。
**在 CLI 里重新实现补丁合并。** 拒绝:`applyPatches` 的第二个实现会与 vendored include 悄然漂移——这恰恰是该功能要调试的失败模式。导出 include 自己的算法只花费一条记录在案的 vendor 修改,却保证了同一性。
**用 `/dump-config` TUI 命令代替标志。** 作为唯一形式被拒绝:主要用法是 `dsh --dump-config | diff - <(dsh --dump-default-config)` 这类管道工作流,需要免启动、非 TTY 的界面。之后可以在同一个 `renderConfigDump` 之上再加 TUI 命令。
## Consequences
配置调试从脑中重放补丁变成一条命令,支持工作也可以直接索要 `--dump-config` 输出。vendored include 多出一条记录在案的本地修改(导出 `applyEntryPatches`/`entryListSchema`;对挂载行为无影响),上游同步时需重新应用。来源追踪为每层重新合成一次前缀快照并按 JSON stringify 对行做 diff,因此 dump 有与层数²×行数成正比的额外开销;该开销只存在于免启动的 dump 路径。`renderConfigDump` 的单元测试覆盖层叠顺序、`!!js` 原样往返、来源分隔与分组、带标签的未匹配补丁警告,以及读取/解析/形状失败的大声报错;built-bin e2e 通过 `lib/bin.js` 驱动全部四种标志形式,包括个人覆盖层、其来源标签及其 stderr 警告。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-queued-manual-compaction.md
2026-07-30-queued-manual-compaction.md: 4b7a905712a01948146b8830dfc037185162eefc
2026-07-30-queued-manual-compaction.zh.md: 15a42de3536f2da5304e77ce3cb282029856ba6d
2026-07-30-queued-manual-compaction.md: 5100808ada4b7b284228113584e577d46ff91101
2026-07-30-queued-manual-compaction.zh.md: 29c3b921d0d59527aa1d8af1c91d085b52045377

View File

@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ Once a transaction has appended its start, every later failure makes one closing
### Reference implementation boundaries
[PR #835](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/pull/835) was used as a reference implementation for the command, reservation, tests, and snapshot shape, but was not merged. Its process-local `WeakSet` lock and locked/unlocked method splits were considered and not adopted because the durable bracket is the single reachable lock.
An unmerged reference implementation informed the command, reservation, tests, and snapshot shape. Its process-local `WeakSet` lock and locked/unlocked method splits were considered and not adopted because the durable bracket is the single reachable lock.
That reference also carried client-side replacement-anchor machinery to preserve transcript placement. The log-ordered transcript projection already consumes compaction from event order and does not consult mutable surface positions, so those anchors were considered and not adopted.

View File

@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ DSH 有意在调用摘要器前记录 `compact/start`。缓慢或崩溃的尝试
### 参考实现边界
[PR #835](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/pull/835) 用作命令、预留、测试与快照结构的参考实现,但未被合并。它的进程本地 `WeakSet` 锁与 locked/unlocked 方法拆分经过评估后未被采用,因为持久标记对是唯一可达的锁。
一个未合并的参考实现为命令、预留、测试与快照结构提供了参考。它的进程本地 `WeakSet` 锁与 locked/unlocked 方法拆分经过评估后未被采用,因为持久标记对是唯一可达的锁。
该参考实现还包含客户端侧替换锚点机制,用于保留 transcript(文本记录)位置。按日志顺序排列的 transcript 投影已经从事件顺序消费压缩,并且不会查询可变 surface 位置,因此这些锚点经过评估后未被采用。

View File

@@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Web composer stats detail and input-zone polish
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-30-web-composer-stats-and-input-polish.zh.md)
## Problem
The web composer footer showed a single joined stats string (cache/tokens/turns/steps) in its own stack row, visually detached from the input card and missing the design's duration and token-split details. The input zone itself had accumulated per-entry spacing hacks: dock strips carried their own margins, the sticky seat sat on a solid fill that clipped the transcript hard, the back-to-bottom control cleared the composer by a hardcoded offset that broke as the draft grew, and the goal and todo strips disagreed on surface color and column width.
## Decision
**The stats line renders inside the InputBar's width column through a new `footer` owner prop and expands to the design's grouped detail row; the composer stack owns one 6px rhythm; the seat fades the transcript through a fixed 36px token-bound gradient; the back-to-bottom control follows a live `--dsh-composer-height`; goal, todo, and queue share one 752px tip-fill column.**
- `'conversation.composer.dock'` entries reach the page as the `ComposerBarOwnerProps.footer` slot, rendered under the card inside the bar's `.root`, so the stats line and the card share one width constraint. `StatsLine` derives everything client-side from the snapshot: turns/steps, LLM wall time from assistant `timing` (`completedTime - stepStartTime`), tool wall time from tool-result `time - callTime` pairs, prompt/output token split with cache-read folded into input, and cache-hit percentage. Groups render pipe-separated and drop out whole when empty; `formatTokens` (517 / 12.2K / 1.2M) and `formatDuration` (45.2s / 2m42s) are exported for tests. Durations cover only in-window nodes — the README owns that limitation.
- `.composerStack` carries the Figma composition matrix's 6px gap. Goal and Todo remain standalone cards; the terminal Queue entry subtracts that gap plus the named 5px layout overlap so the later composer card paints over only the queue edge. The [composer context stack decision](../bug-fix/2026-07-30-composer-context-stack-order.md) owns the order and overlap contract.
- The sticky seat's background is a `linear-gradient` from `color-mix(bg-base 0%, transparent)` at 0px to solid `bg-base` at 36px — pixel stops, not the figma export's percentage, so a growing draft widens only the solid region; `color-mix` keeps both themes fading from their own base.
- A `useCallback` ref on the seat attaches a ResizeObserver that publishes `--dsh-composer-height` on the scroll body; ChatView's back-to-bottom slot computes `bottom` from it (152px first-paint fallback) instead of the prior hardcoded 168px.
- The textarea's 52px two-line floor applies to the hero variant only; the docked composer collapses to content height. Goal, Todo, and Queue panels use the 44px-gutter / 752px-cap column with `tip` fill and l1 border; the standalone Goal and collapsed Todo cards are 36px and 44px tall.
## Alternatives considered
**Percentage gradient stops (the figma export's 24%).** Rejected: the stop scales with seat height, so a tall draft stretches the fade band over most of the transcript; the fixed 36px band equals the design's 24% at the resting ~150px composer and stays constant as the composer grows.
**A generic "bottommost entry tucks" contract.** Rejected because Goal and Todo are independent cards even when either is the last visible dock entry. Queue owns the one intentional composer overlap, while the stack owns its shared gap and overlap values.
**Backend-supplied duration fields for the stats line.** Unnecessary: assistant `timing` and tool call/result pairs already reach the snapshot, so wall times fold client-side with no new session event or host projection.
**Keeping the stats line as a composer-stack sibling.** Rejected: as a stack row it carried its own width constraint that drifted from the card's; as the bar's `footer` both share one column and the stats participate in the seat's sticky/gradient region by construction.
## Consequences
The stats row reads turns/steps, LLM and tool durations, cache hit, and input/output tokens at a glance, at the cost that durations cover only the loaded event window (README Known Limitation). The stack's fixed order keeps standalone context cards independent and makes Queue the only panel joined to the composer; a future dock entry must choose its order relative to those roles. The fade band is a constant 36px, so any future design retune is one stop value. `chat-stats-bash-sample.spec.tsx` pins the derivation (timing/tool folds, token split), both formatters, the grouped render, and the zero-renders-during-streaming acceptance.

View File

@@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Web composer stats detail and input-zone polish
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-30-web-composer-stats-and-input-polish.md) | 中文
## Problem
Web 编辑器页脚原本以独立 stack 行显示一条拼接的统计字符串(cache/tokens/turns/steps),视觉上与输入卡脱节,且缺少设计稿中的耗时与 token 拆分细节。输入区自身也积累了逐条目的间距补丁:dock 条各带自己的 margin,sticky 座位下是硬切消息流的纯色填充,「回到底部」控件用硬编码偏移躲避编辑器、草稿一长高就失效,goal 与 todo 条的底色和列宽也互不一致。
## Decision
**统计行经由新的 `footer` owner prop 渲染进 InputBar 的宽度列内,并扩展为设计稿的分组细节行;composer stack 拥有唯一的 6px 节奏;座位以固定 36px 的 token 绑定渐变淡出消息流;「回到底部」控件跟随实时的 `--dsh-composer-height`;goal、todo 与 queue 共用一条 752px 的 tip 填充列。**
- `'conversation.composer.dock'` 条目以 `ComposerBarOwnerProps.footer` 席位到达页面,渲染在卡片下方、bar 的 `.root` 之内,统计行与卡片因此共享同一宽度约束。`StatsLine` 全部在客户端从快照推导:turns/steps、由 assistant `timing`(`completedTime - stepStartTime`)折算的 LLM 墙钟时间、由 tool-result 的 `time - callTime` 配对折算的工具墙钟时间、把 cache-read 并入输入侧的提示/输出 token 拆分,以及缓存命中率。各组以竖线分隔、无数据时整组消失;`formatTokens`(517 / 12.2K / 1.2M)与 `formatDuration`(45.2s / 2m42s)导出供测试。耗时只覆盖窗口内节点——该限制由 README 记录。
- `.composerStack` 采用 Figma 组合矩阵中的 6px 间距。Goal 与 Todo 保持为独立卡片;末端的 Queue 条目减去这段间距及具名的 5px 布局重叠量,使后渲染的 composer 卡片只覆盖 Queue 边缘。[composer 上下文堆栈决策](../bug-fix/2026-07-30-composer-context-stack-order.md) 规定顺序与重叠契约。
- sticky 座位的背景是从 0px 处的 `color-mix(bg-base 0%, transparent)` 到 36px 处纯色 `bg-base` 的 `linear-gradient`——像素节点而非 figma 导出的百分比,草稿长高只扩大纯色区域;`color-mix` 让两个主题都从各自的底色淡出。
- 座位上的 `useCallback` ref 挂 ResizeObserver,把 `--dsh-composer-height` 发布到滚动体上;ChatView 的回到底部席位据此计算 `bottom`(首帧回退 152px),替换先前硬编码的 168px。
- textarea 的 52px 两行下限只保留在 hero 变体;停靠态编辑器折叠到内容高度。Goal、Todo 与 Queue 面板统一使用 44px 边距/752px 上限的列,并采用 `tip` 填充和 l1 边框;独立的 Goal 卡片与折叠后的 Todo 卡片高度分别为 36px 和 44px。
## Alternatives considered
**百分比渐变节点(figma 导出的 24%)。** 否决:节点随座位高度缩放,长草稿会把过渡带拉伸到消息流的大半;固定 36px 过渡带等于设计稿在静息 ~150px 编辑器下的 24%,且随编辑器长高保持恒定。
**通用「最底条目贴卡」契约。** 不予采纳,因为 Goal 和 Todo 即使成为最后一个可见 dock 条目,也仍是独立卡片。Queue 拥有唯一一处有意的 composer 重叠,而 stack 拥有共享的间距和重叠量。
**由后端为统计行提供耗时字段。** 不必要:assistant `timing` 与工具 call/result 配对已经到达快照,墙钟时间可在客户端折算,无需新的会话事件或 host 投影。
**统计行保持为 composer stack 的兄弟节点。** 否决:作为 stack 行它携带独立的宽度约束、与卡片漂移;作为 bar 的 `footer`,两者共享一列,统计行也天然落在座位的 sticky/渐变区域内。
## Consequences
统计行现在一眼可读 turns/steps、LLM 与工具耗时、缓存命中和输入/输出 token,代价是耗时只覆盖已加载事件窗口(README 已知限制)。stack 的固定顺序使独立的上下文卡片彼此分离,并让 Queue 成为唯一与 composer 相接的面板;未来新增 dock 条目时,必须选择自己相对于这些角色的顺序。过渡带恒为 36px,未来设计调整只改一个节点值。`chat-stats-bash-sample.spec.tsx` 钉住推导(timing/工具折算、token 拆分)、两个格式化器、分组渲染,以及流式期间零重渲染的验收。

View File

@@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Web context injection disclosure
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-30-web-context-injection-disclosure.zh.md)
## Problem
The Web conversation rendered every logged non-user message through the generic `JsonBlock`. That presentation used a textual triangle, compact label typography, a bordered JSON panel, and unrelated spacing, so context injection did not match the Tool calls disclosure shown in the product design. Restyling the generic primitive would also change unknown events and attachment fallbacks.
## Decision
`MessageItem` routes context nodes to `ContextInjectionRow`. The row starts collapsed, names the presentation `上下文注入`, uses the existing browse glyph, and exposes the whole 24px header as one pointer and keyboard disclosure target. Its expanded body begins 4px below the header at the shared 22px content indent and renders the design's 141px scrollport with 8px radius, code-block background, 11/16 code text, and no border.
`ContextInjectionRow` serializes both logged `content` and `source` into one inline JSON value, preserving provenance alongside model-visible material. The display remains bounded by the existing 20,000-character truncation policy. It changes no session event, runtime fold, or context-producing plugin.
The package-internal `DisclosureRow` owns the header geometry, icon-to-chevron transition, controlled open state, and Enter/Space behavior shared by context and `ToolRow`. `ToolRow` remains the semantic owner of tool state, summaries, file links, and expanded tool bodies. Context does not enter the keyed toolview slot and gains no context-specific slot while all context sources share one presentation.
## Verification
Conversation component tests pin the collapsed default, browse glyph, whole-row pointer and keyboard toggles, inline JSON shape, truncation, and unchanged generic unknown-event rendering. The keyless assembled-Web history scenario injects context through the real Agent API, records the collapsed row in its ARIA golden, and measures the design's icon, header, indent, gap, scrollport, padding, radius, typography, color, and overflow in Chromium.
## Alternatives considered
**Restyle `JsonBlock` globally.** Unknown surface events and miscellaneous content blocks use that primitive for a separate generic fallback, so a global visual change would couple unrelated presentations.
**Render context as a read tool.** Reusing `ToolRow` directly would add false tool semantics, state and keyed dispatch to a logged non-user message.
**Add a keyed context-view slot.** Every current context source uses the same title and provenance body. A registration seam has no present consumer and can be added without changing the row if distinct source-owned presentations emerge.
## Consequences
Context injection matches the Tool calls visual language without changing its durable meaning. The shared disclosure header prevents the two rows from drifting, while the dedicated context body and generic `JsonBlock` remain independently evolvable. The fixed-height body trades automatic expansion for a stable transcript rhythm and requires scrolling to inspect long injected instructions.

View File

@@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Web 上下文注入展开项
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-30-web-context-injection-disclosure.md) | 中文
## 问题
Web 会话原本通过通用 `JsonBlock` 渲染每条已记录的非用户消息。这种呈现使用文本三角符号、紧凑的标签字体、有边框的 JSON 面板和另一套间距,因此上下文注入与产品设计中的 Tool calls 展开项不一致。修改通用原语的样式还会影响未知事件和附件的兜底呈现。
## 决策
`MessageItem` 将上下文节点路由至 `ContextInjectionRow`。该行初始折叠,标题为 `上下文注入`,使用现有的浏览图标,并使整个 24px 标题栏成为可通过指针和键盘操作的展开目标。其展开主体从标题栏下方 4px 处开始,与共用的 22px 内容缩进对齐,并渲染设计规定的 141px 滚动区;滚动区采用 8px 圆角、代码块背景、11/16 代码文本且无边框。
`ContextInjectionRow` 将已记录的 `content` 和 `source` 序列化为一个内联 JSON 值,在模型可见内容旁保留来源信息。显示内容继续受现有的 20,000 字符截断策略约束。该变更不修改任何会话事件、运行时折叠逻辑或上下文生成插件。
包内部的 `DisclosureRow` 负责上下文行和 `ToolRow` 共用的标题栏几何、图标至折叠箭头的过渡、受控打开状态,以及 Enter/Space 操作。`ToolRow` 仍是工具状态、摘要、文件链接和展开后工具主体的语义 owner。所有上下文来源共用同一套呈现;上下文不会进入键控 toolview slot,也不会获得上下文专用 slot。
## 验证
会话组件测试固定验证初始折叠状态、浏览图标、整行的指针与键盘切换、内联 JSON 形状、截断,以及通用未知事件渲染保持不变。无密钥的组装后 Web 历史场景通过真实 Agent API 注入上下文,在 ARIA 预期输出中记录折叠行,并在 Chromium 中测量设计规定的图标、标题栏、缩进、间隙、滚动区、内边距、圆角、字体排版、颜色和溢出行为。
## 考虑过的替代方案
**全局重新设置 `JsonBlock` 样式。** 之所以否决:未知 surface 事件和其他内容块使用该原语作为独立的通用兜底呈现,全局视觉变更会把无关的呈现耦合起来。
**将上下文渲染为 read 工具。** 之所以否决:直接复用 `ToolRow` 会为已记录的非用户消息添加错误的工具语义、状态和键控分发。
**新增键控 context-view slot。** 之所以否决:当前所有上下文来源都使用相同的标题和来源信息主体,注册 seam 暂无消费方。如果将来出现由不同来源拥有的呈现,仍可在不更改该行的情况下添加此 seam。
## 后果
上下文注入与 Tool calls 采用一致的视觉语言,同时不改变其持久保存的语义。共用的展开项标题栏可以防止这两种行逐渐偏离,而专用的上下文主体与通用 `JsonBlock` 仍可独立演进。固定高度的主体以无法随内容自动增高为代价,为 transcript(文本记录)维持稳定的排版节奏;查看较长的注入指令时必须滚动。

View File

@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Hover cards copy their primary value on activation
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-31-hover-card-click-copy.zh.md)
## Problem
Workspace and Session rows clip the two values their hover cards expose in full: the Workspace directory path and Session title. The [reachable card](../bug-fix/2026-07-30-hover-popup-pointer-grace.md) permits text selection, but selecting and copying a single known value is a needlessly precise gesture, and the card gives no confirmation that the clipboard accepted it.
## Decision
`HoverCard` accepts an optional `copyText` plus `copyLabel` and `copiedLabel`. With `copyText`, the whole card has button semantics for pointer and keyboard activation; its accessible name combines the localized action prefix with the exact value, it writes that value through the shared clipboard helper, and it replaces its content with the success label for up to one second only after the host accepts the write. The feedback retains the pre-copy card height and clears with the card. Without `copyText`, the atom retains its read/select-only behavior.
The Workspace browser chooses the payload rather than making the primitive infer it from rendered text: a Workspace card passes the full directory path, and a non-blank Session card passes the full display title. A provisional blank New Session card remains read-only because its localized label is a placeholder, not session content. The browser's locale seat supplies `Copy`/`复制` and the success state `Copied`/`已复制`.
Press and activation remain separate contracts. A pointer press inside the card keeps it mounted so text selection can begin; a completed non-collapsed selection intersecting the card suppresses pointer-click activation, while a plain click or button key activates copy. Anchor-region presses still dismiss immediately, and clipboard rejection leaves the original content visible without claiming success.
## Alternatives considered
**Copy the card's rendered `textContent`.** That would concatenate the primary value with creation time or running status, making the clipboard payload depend on presentation and localization.
**Implement clipboard state in both Workspace card bodies.** The two consumers would duplicate host fallback, keyboard behavior, timer ownership, and success rendering even though the card owns the activation surface.
**Change the common Chinese `copied` label from `复制成功` to `已复制`.** That would alter every existing copy control to satisfy one card interaction. The Workspace dictionary owns the card-specific wording instead.
## Consequences
Both non-placeholder hover-card variants gain the same click and keyboard affordance while retaining consumer-owned payload semantics and localized feedback. The generic atom adds one optional behavior path and a one-second timer; it clears copied state on close, ignores completion after close or unmount, and never reports a rejected write as success. Focused component coverage pins pointer selection precedence, activation, failure, feedback geometry and expiry, and cleanup, while the real-browser Workspace scenario verifies the English label, stable feedback height, and browser clipboard.

View File

@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 悬浮卡片激活时复制主要值
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-31-hover-card-click-copy.md) | 中文
## 问题
Workspace 与 Session 行会截断对应悬浮卡片完整展示的两个值:Workspace 目录路径和 Session 标题。这张[可抵达的卡片](../bug-fix/2026-07-30-hover-popup-pointer-grace.md)支持文本选择,但复制单个已知值仍需精确选择,操作没有必要地繁琐;卡片也不会确认剪贴板是否接受了写入。
## 决策
`HoverCard` 接收可选的 `copyText`,以及 `copyLabel` 和 `copiedLabel`。传入 `copyText` 后,整个卡片都会为指针与键盘激活提供按钮语义;其无障碍名称由本地化操作前缀和原值组成,卡片通过共享剪贴板辅助函数写入该值,并且只有宿主接受写入后,才会用成功标签替换内容最长一秒。反馈保持复制前的卡片高度,并会随卡片关闭一同清除。未传入 `copyText` 时,该原子组件维持只读且可选择文本的行为。
Workspace 浏览器选择复制载荷,不让基础组件从渲染文本中推断:Workspace 卡片传入完整目录路径,非空白 Session 卡片传入完整显示标题。临时的空白「新会话」卡片保持只读,因为其本地化标签是占位文案,并非会话内容。浏览器的 locale 席位提供 `Copy`/`复制`,成功状态则使用 `Copied`/`已复制`。
按下与激活仍是两份独立契约。卡片内发生指针按下时,卡片保持挂载,以便用户开始选择文本;文本选择完成后,若非折叠选区与卡片相交,就会阻止指针点击激活,而普通点击或按钮激活键会激活复制。锚点区域内发生指针按下时,卡片仍会立即消失;剪贴板拒绝写入时,卡片继续显示原内容,不会声称复制成功。
## 备选方案
**复制卡片渲染后的 `textContent`。** 这会把主要值与创建时间或运行状态拼接起来,使剪贴板载荷依赖表现形式和本地化结果。
**在两个 Workspace 卡片主体中分别实现剪贴板状态。** 两个消费方会重复实现宿主回退、键盘行为、计时器所有权和成功状态渲染,尽管激活表层由卡片持有。
**将通用中文 `copied` 标签从 `复制成功` 改为 `已复制`。** 这样会为了满足一种卡片交互而改变所有现有复制控件。卡片专用文案应由 Workspace 字典持有。
## 后果
两种非占位悬浮卡片都获得相同的点击与键盘操作能力,同时保留由消费方决定载荷的语义和本地化反馈。通用原子组件增加一条可选行为路径和一个一秒计时器;卡片关闭时会清除已复制状态,关闭或卸载后到达的完成结果会被忽略,写入被拒绝时绝不会报告成功。聚焦组件测试会固定指针选择文本的优先级、激活、失败、反馈尺寸与到期清除以及清理行为,真实浏览器中的 Workspace 场景则验证英文标签、反馈期间高度稳定和浏览器剪贴板。

View File

@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Card tool rows collapse through one ToolRow
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-31-web-cards-toolrow.zh.md)
## Problem
The Web client grew five card render intents over successive PRs — terminal, diff, read, search, web — each landing as a keyed toolview registrant under `packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/toolviews/`. They diverged in two ways the earlier PRs each acknowledged but deferred:
- **Chrome duplication.** `read-row`, `search-row`, `web-row`, and `file-mutation-row` each hand-drew the summary row (leading state slot, visually-hidden status, title, separator dot, path-link/summary) as their own `<div className={css.root}>` with a private `.module.css`, instead of composing the shared `ToolRow`. `read-row` carried a `jscpd:ignore` marker naming the duplication and pointing at "a separate change tracked for all rows at once" — this change.
- **Resident vs. collapsed.** Those four rows kept their card (`ReadBlock`/`SearchBlock`/`WebBlock`/`DiffBlock`) resident below the summary — always expanded — while the terminal card (via `GenericToolCard`/`BashRow`) and every text row started collapsed behind ToolRow's whole-row expand. A conversation with several read/search/web/edit calls became a wall of always-open cards, defeating the summary-surface purpose of the message flow.
## Decision
`ToolRow` owns every card kind, and every keyed card row composes it. ToolRow already took `terminal` and `diff` card material; it now also takes `read`, `search`, and `web`, rendering whichever is present in its collapsed-by-default expanded body through the matching primitive (capped at the chat `CHAT_*` bounds). A call carries at most one card kind, so the props are mutually exclusive and the body picks the first present.
The four keyed rows — `ReadRow`, `SearchRow`, `WebRow`, `FileMutationRow` — drop their hand-drawn chrome and private CSS and become thin `ToolRow` compositions, exactly like `AskQuestionRow`: derive the card model, pass it as the matching ToolRow prop, forward `filePath`/`onOpenFile` for the file tools and `output`/`errorSummary` for the cardless failure paths. Each row is now `ToolRowProps & PropsLocale<'conversation'>` and registers with `locale: NS`, because ToolRow needs the conversation `t` for its terminal/code body copy. `GenericToolCard` (the render-site fallback) does the same for read/search/web, so a card-declaring tool without its own keyed row collapses identically.
The `DetailsPanel` Output section is unchanged: the panel is the single-call reading surface, so it renders each card resident at the primitive's full height, and a capped search keeps its recovery footer there.
## Consequences
- One expand interaction across all tool rows: collapsed one-line summary, whole row toggles the card. The card is not in the DOM until expanded (`DisclosureRow` renders `children` only when open), so tests assert absent-then-present around a `[data-expandable]` click.
- Deleted: `read-row.module.css`, `search-row.module.css`, `web-row.module.css`, `file-mutation-row.module.css`, `GenericToolCard.module.css`. The rows carry no CSS of their own; ToolRow's module owns the chrome and the card-body indentation.
- The cardless failure paths (an errored mutation, an errored/nested/legacy search) no longer draw their own `.failure`/recovery `<div>`; they ride ToolRow's `output` (Output section) and `errorSummary` (collapsed summary first line), which already flatten the result text with the `error.name: error.code` fallback.
- `bash-sample` keeps its own local expand chrome deliberately (the third-party-posture exemplar that never imports the chat domain); it was already collapsed, so its behavior is unchanged.
## Alternatives considered
- **Keep the rows resident, only unify chrome.** Rejected: the user's requirement is default-collapsed, and resident cards are what made the flow unscannable.
- **A shared `CardRow` wrapper between the rows and ToolRow.** Rejected: ToolRow already is that wrapper once it takes every card kind; a second layer would be the premature extraction the package rules warn against.

View File

@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 卡片工具行通过同一个 ToolRow 折叠
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-31-web-cards-toolrow.md) | 中文
## 问题
Web 客户端在连续几个 PR 里长出五种卡片渲染意图——terminal、diff、read、search、web,每一种都作为一个键控 toolview 注册项落在 `packages/client/ui-conversation/src/client/toolviews/` 下。它们在两处出现分歧,之前每个 PR 都承认却推迟处理:
- **Chrome 重复。** `read-row`、`search-row`、`web-row`、`file-mutation-row` 各自把摘要行(行首状态槽、视觉隐藏状态、标题、分隔点、路径链接/摘要)手绘成自己的 `<div className={css.root}>`,配一份私有 `.module.css`,而不是组合共享的 `ToolRow`。`read-row` 带着一个 `jscpd:ignore` 标记,点名这处重复并指向"一处针对所有行一次性处理的独立改动"——就是本次改动。
- **常驻 vs 折叠。** 那四个行把卡片(`ReadBlock`/`SearchBlock`/`WebBlock`/`DiffBlock`)常驻在摘要下方——始终展开——而终端卡片(经 `GenericToolCard`/`BashRow`)与每个文本行都从折叠状态起步,藏在 ToolRow 的整行展开之后。一个有多个 read/search/web/edit 调用的对话就成了一堵始终打开的卡片墙,违背了消息流作为摘要面的目的。
## 决策
`ToolRow` 拥有每一种卡片,而每个键控卡片行都组合它。ToolRow 原本就接收 `terminal` 与 `diff` 卡片材料;现在还接收 `read`、`search`、`web`,在其默认折叠的展开 body 里用对应原语渲染当前存在的那一种(按 chat 的 `CHAT_*` 上限截断)。一次调用最多携带一种卡片,因此这些 prop 互斥,body 取第一个存在的。
四个键控行——`ReadRow`、`SearchRow`、`WebRow`、`FileMutationRow`——丢掉手绘 chrome 与私有 CSS,成为薄薄的 `ToolRow` 组合,与 `AskQuestionRow` 完全一样:推导卡片模型,作为对应的 ToolRow prop 传入,为文件工具转发 `filePath`/`onOpenFile`,为无卡片的失败路径转发 `output`/`errorSummary`。每个行现在是 `ToolRowProps & PropsLocale<'conversation'>` 并以 `locale: NS` 注册,因为 ToolRow 需要对话的 `t` 来渲染其终端/代码 body 文案。`GenericToolCard`(渲染点兜底)对 read/search/web 做同样的事,所以一个没有自己键控行的卡片声明工具也以同样方式折叠。
`DetailsPanel` 的 Output 区不变:面板是单次调用的阅读面,因此它以原语的完整高度常驻渲染每张卡片,被截断的搜索也把恢复脚注留在那里。
## 后果
- 所有工具行共享一套展开交互:折叠时是单行摘要,整行切换卡片。卡片在展开前不在 DOM 里(`DisclosureRow` 只在打开时渲染 `children`),因此测试围绕一次 `[data-expandable]` 点击断言"先无后有"。
- 已删除:`read-row.module.css`、`search-row.module.css`、`web-row.module.css`、`file-mutation-row.module.css`、`GenericToolCard.module.css`。这些行不再带自己的 CSS;ToolRow 的 module 拥有 chrome 与卡片 body 的缩进。
- 无卡片的失败路径(出错的改动,出错/嵌套/旧日志的搜索)不再画自己的 `.failure`/恢复 `<div>`;它们改走 ToolRow 的 `output`(Output 区)与 `errorSummary`(折叠摘要首行),后者已经用 `error.name: error.code` 兜底压平结果文本。
- `bash-sample` 有意保留自己本地的展开 chrome(第三方姿态的范例,从不引入 chat 域);它本来就是折叠的,因此行为不变。
## 考虑过的替代方案
- **保持行常驻,只统一 chrome。** 否决:用户的要求是默认折叠,而常驻卡片正是让流不可扫读的原因。
- **在行与 ToolRow 之间加一层共享的 `CardRow` 包装。** 否决:ToolRow 一旦接收每一种卡片,它本身就是那层包装;再加一层就是 package 规则警告的过早抽取。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-web-context-injection-disclosure.md
2026-07-30-web-context-injection-disclosure.md: 84c3259f3f226e501a671cc55cacf7d7d96f61fb
2026-07-30-web-context-injection-disclosure.zh.md: 4d77e06e27badb02fb73ca2ea2a739b33c5804de
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-web-workspace-file-links.md
2026-07-31-web-workspace-file-links.md: fe71a2d8caa4dc9cc732a250d7e388d1a3b44182
2026-07-31-web-workspace-file-links.zh.md: 0f8c87822087169aad9ac4283f706fd8a8748be9

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
# Agent Note: opening a produced file from the web UI
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-31-web-workspace-file-links.zh.md)
> Scope: the produced-files row a finished turn ends with, the file-path link that reads as one, and the Host opener preferring the default browser for documents a browser renders. Not in scope, by decision: serving workspace files over HTTP, and previews for a client that is not on the Host machine.
## Problem
A web session that produced a file had no way to look at it. The agent wrote `deepseek-homepage.html`, said so, and the user's only recourse was to copy an absolute path like `/private/tmp/dsh-client-hotplug.ygPvsm/workspaces/plugin-hotplug/deepseek-homepage.html` into a terminal.
Two distinct defects sat behind that. The transcript never said what a turn had produced: `ToolCallView.locations` — the follow-along vocabulary the file tools already populate — had no consumer in the client, so a reader's only account of the output was whatever the closing message happened to spell. And the affordance that did exist was invisible: `ToolRow` already renders a mutation or read row's path as a real button wired to `host.openPath`, but styled exactly like the surrounding prose and underlined only on hover, so nobody found it. The reported "I can't open what it made" was a discoverability failure sitting on top of a working capability.
## Decision
**A finished turn ends with the files it produced.** The row is its own plugin, `@deepseek-ai/dsh-client-ui-deliverables`, registered into the `conversation.chat.turnTail` hole the chat view renders between a closing message's body and its IconActions — ui-conversation owns the hole and the owner currency (nodes, closing seq, `openFile`), the plugin owns every policy. `producedForClosing` reads the paths off the mutation tools' own follow-along `locations` — a diff card, or a generic card whose `kind` is `edit` (the shape `str_replace_editor`'s insert presents) — so a turn's output is listed whether or not the closing message named it, and a new mutation tool joins by declaring what it does rather than by being added to a list. Reads, deletes, and failed calls contribute nothing; a path appears once per turn in first-seen order; accumulation resets on the turn boundary, so a turn that mutates and then ends without content text cannot spill into the next turn's row. One cordis.yml line composes the surface in or out; the unregistered hole renders nothing.
**The path link reads as a link.** Underlined at rest, not only on hover. This is the smaller half of the diff and the larger half of the fix.
**Opening stays the Host's job, and prefers the default browser.** `host.openPath` hands the path to the operating system, which yields a `file://` document in a real browser: full page capabilities, and no reachability into `/api`, because a `file://` document is not same-origin with it. Measured on the reported artifact: `localStorage` works, the theme toggle flips, the tabs switch, and `fetch` to the API fails. For documents a browser renders — `.html`, `.htm`, `.xhtml`, `.svg` — the opener resolves the default *browser* rather than the type's default application when the platform can name one, because a developer who binds `.html` to an editor would otherwise click a produced page and get source code. macOS reads the LaunchServices `https` handler and desktop Linux reads `$BROWSER`; either falls back to the default application when no browser can be named. Windows uses its registered association, and WSL first translates the path before using that same Windows handoff.
**Serving workspace files over HTTP is out of scope, and so are non-local clients.** An earlier revision served files from the harness itself — first same-origin with `/api`, then behind `CSP: sandbox`, then from a second listener whose own port gave served documents their own origin. Each step answered a real problem, and the whole line was retired once the product scope was settled: previews for a browser that is not on the Host machine are not supported. With that decided, the Host opener answers the supported case completely and the HTTP machinery answered only the unsupported one.
## Alternatives considered
- **Serving `/f/<sessionId>/<segments…>` from the harness** — built and working, including confinement by dual `realpath`, the browser-trust fence, streamed reads, and a separate listener whose port gave served documents their own origin. It is the only design that shows a preview to a client on another machine, which is exactly the case ruled out of scope. Retired for that reason, not because it failed; its cost was a second socket with its own lifecycle, a port published into the page, and a URL-shape contract shared across two packages.
- **Same-origin HTTP serving without isolation** — measurably unsafe, and recorded so nobody retries it: a document served beside `/api` drove `settings.describe` to a `200` with full data and `session.list` to 35 KB of every session's transcript, from a page that need not be agent-authored at all (a read row makes every file in a cloned repository openable).
- **`Content-Security-Policy: sandbox` over that same-origin serving** — closes the hole by taking the document's origin away, which measurably breaks the pages this feature exists to show: the reported artifact throws `SecurityError` on load, and because an uncaught exception aborts the rest of its `<script>`, every listener declared after that line — theme toggle, mobile menu, model tabs — never binds. Two of the four artifacts in the reporting user's workspace were dead pages under it, and they still rendered perfectly, so the breakage was invisible.
- **Linkifying paths in the assistant's closing message** — the shape a user asks for ("put the link at the end"), but it makes rendering depend on the model spelling a path recognizably. The tool calls already carry `locations` as structured fact, so the produced-files row consumes that instead.
- **An embedded WebView in the desktop shell** — the strongest isolation available, since the preview then runs in a container the product owns rather than in the user's browser. It belongs to the desktop shell's own design, not to this surface, and is recorded here as the direction a future preview capability should take.
## Consequences
Every existing file affordance changed at once: write, edit, read, and the generic single-file card all reach `openFile`, so the link fix and the browser preference apply to all of them without a per-row change. The keyless web lane (`apps/web/tests/produced-files.e2e.ts`) cold-seeds a recorded write turn and pins the row in the assembled application; it deliberately does not click, because the click hands a path to the Host's opener and would launch a real application on the machine running the suite. A produced file opens as a `file://` document, which cannot `fetch` its own siblings (a multi-file artifact that loads `./data.json` breaks, while `<script src>`, `<img>`, and CSS `@import` are unaffected) — the one capability HTTP serving had that this does not. A client reached over the network sees nothing when it clicks: `host.openPath` runs on the Host and is loopback-pinned by the `/api` trust fence. That is the scope decision showing through, not a defect, and it is why the row keeps the full path in its `title` for a reader who can only copy it. Markdown opens in whatever the platform hands `.md`, usually an editor rather than a renderer; rendering it inside the product is a separate, deferred surface.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
# Agent Note:从 web UI 打开产出的文件
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-31-web-workspace-file-links.md) | 中文
> 范围:完成的一轮以其产出文件收尾的那一行、读得出是链接的文件路径链接,以及 Host 打开器对浏览器可渲染文档优先选用默认浏览器。经决定不在范围内:以 HTTP 提供工作区文件,以及为不在 Host 机器上的客户端提供预览。
## 问题
一个产出了文件的 web 会话,没有办法看到那个文件。agent 写出了 `deepseek-homepage.html` 并如实告知,而用户唯一的办法是把 `/private/tmp/dsh-client-hotplug.ygPvsm/workspaces/plugin-hotplug/deepseek-homepage.html` 这样的绝对路径复制进终端。
这背后是两个不同的缺陷。转录从不说明一轮产出了什么:`ToolCallView.locations`——文件工具早已填好的跟随文件词汇——在客户端没有任何消费方,因此读者对产出的唯一交代,就是收尾消息恰好拼出来的那点内容。而已经存在的那个交互是隐形的:`ToolRow` 早已把改写行或读取行的路径渲染成一个接到 `host.openPath` 的真按钮,但它的样式与周围正文一模一样、只有悬停才有下划线,于是没人发现。所报告的“做完了打不开”,是一个可发现性失败叠在一项本就可用的能力之上。
## 决定
**完成的一轮以它产出的文件收尾。** 该行是独立插件 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-client-ui-deliverables`,注册进 chat 视图在收尾消息正文与其 IconActions 之间渲染的 `conversation.chat.turnTail` 空位——ui-conversation 拥有空位与 owner 通货(节点、收尾 seq、`openFile`),插件拥有全部策略。`producedForClosing` 从改写工具自身的跟随文件 `locations` 中读出路径——diff 卡片,或 `kind` 为 `edit` 的 generic 卡片(即 `str_replace_editor` 的 insert 所呈现的形状)——因此无论收尾消息是否点名,这一轮的产出都会被列出;新的改写工具靠声明自己做了什么加入,而不是靠被加进某张名单。read、删除与失败的调用不贡献任何条目;同一路径在一轮内按首见顺序只出现一次;累积在 turn 边界重置,因此一轮若先改写文件、随后没有正文内容就结束,不会溢进下一轮的行里。cordis.yml 中的一行即可把该交互面组合进来或去掉;未注册的空位什么也不渲染。
**路径链接读得出是链接。** 静止状态下就带下划线,而不只在悬停时。这是本次改动中更小的那一半,却是修复中更大的那一半。
**打开仍然是 Host 的职责,并且优先选用默认浏览器。** `host.openPath` 把路径交给操作系统,得到的是真实浏览器里的一份 `file://` 文档:页面能力完整,且够不到 `/api`——因为 `file://` 文档与它并不同源。在所报告的那份产物上实测:`localStorage` 可用、主题切换生效、tabs 可切换,而对 API 的 `fetch` 失败。对浏览器能渲染的文档——`.html`、`.htm`、`.xhtml`、`.svg`——平台能够确定默认浏览器时,打开器解析的是默认**浏览器**而非该类型的默认应用,因为把 `.html` 绑给编辑器的开发者,否则点开一个产出的页面得到的会是源码。macOS 读取 LaunchServices 的 `https` 处理程序,桌面 Linux 读取 `$BROWSER`;无法确定浏览器时,两者都会回退到默认应用。Windows 使用其注册的文件关联,WSL 则先转换路径,再使用同一 Windows 交接。
**以 HTTP 提供工作区文件不在范围内,非本机客户端亦然。** 更早的一版由 harness 自己提供文件——先是与 `/api` 同源,随后加上 `CSP: sandbox`,再后来交给一个以自身端口给所服务文档独立源的第二监听器。每一步都在回答一个真实问题,而整条线在产品范围定下之后被整体退役:不为“浏览器不在 Host 机器上”的场景提供预览。这一点定下之后,Host 打开器完整回答了受支持的场景,而那套 HTTP 机制回答的只是不受支持的那个。
## 考虑过的替代方案
- **由 harness 提供 `/f/<sessionId>/<segments…>`**——已经实现并可用,包含双 `realpath` 收敛、浏览器信任 fence、流式读取,以及一个以自身端口给所服务文档独立源的监听器。它是唯一能把预览呈现给另一台机器上客户端的设计,而那恰恰是被判出范围的场景。因此退役,而不是因为它失败了;它的代价是一个带自身生命周期的第二 socket、一个注入页面的端口,以及一份跨两个包共享的 URL 形状契约。
- **同源 HTTP 提供且不加隔离**——经实测不安全,记录在此以免有人重试:与 `/api` 并排提供的文档把 `settings.describe` 打到 `200` 并拿到完整数据,把 `session.list` 打到 35 KB 的全部会话转录,而这个页面根本不必由 agent 撰写(一条 read 行就让 clone 下来的仓库里任何文件变得可打开)。
- **在那套同源提供之上加 `Content-Security-Policy: sandbox`**——它以剥夺文档的源来堵住这个洞,而这经实测会破坏本功能存在的意义所在的那类页面:所报告的产物在加载时抛 `SecurityError`,又因为未捕获异常会中止其 `<script>` 的其余部分,该行之后声明的所有监听器——主题切换、移动端菜单、模型 tabs——统统不会绑定。报告者工作区里四份产物有两份在它之下是死页面,而且它们渲染得完美无缺,所以这种破坏是看不见的。
- **把路径在助手的收尾消息里链接化**——这是用户开口要的形状(“在结尾附上链接”),但它让渲染取决于模型是否把路径拼写得可识别。工具调用已经把 `locations` 作为结构化事实携带,产出文件行消费的正是它。
- **桌面端外壳中的内嵌 WebView**——可得到的最强隔离,因为那时预览跑在产品自己拥有的容器里,而不是用户的浏览器里。它属于桌面端外壳自身的设计,而非本交互面,记录在此作为未来预览能力应走的方向。
## 影响
现有的每一处文件交互都同时改变了:write、edit、read 与通用单文件卡片都汇到 `openFile`,因此链接可见性修复与浏览器优先策略无需逐行改动即适用于全部。无密钥 web 通道(`apps/web/tests/produced-files.e2e.ts`)冷播种一段录制的 write 轮次,在组装后的应用中钉住该行;它刻意不点击,因为点击会把路径交给 Host 打开器,从而在跑测试的机器上启动一个真实应用。产出的文件以 `file://` 文档打开,它无法 `fetch` 自己的同级文件(一个加载 `./data.json` 的多文件产物会坏,而 `<script src>`、`<img>` 与 CSS `@import` 不受影响)——这是 HTTP 提供曾有、而此处没有的那一项能力。经网络访问的客户端点击后看不到任何东西:`host.openPath` 在 Host 上运行,且被 `/api` 信任 fence 钉在回环。那是范围决定的显现,不是缺陷,也正因如此该行把完整路径保留在 `title` 中,供只能复制它的读者使用。markdown 会由平台交给 `.md` 的默认处理程序打开,通常是编辑器而非渲染器;在产品内渲染它是另一个被推迟的交互面。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.md
2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.md: 945d2d5243162fe8e7fb3f76cbc3bcf0b5c2fdee
2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.zh.md: f537e313a0c895927c6e2319b11b98619a70d461
2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.md: e35a903892d5d50a0d3ca12b23daa53f26d6aade
2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.zh.md: d7a68f0cab5281b25c3321e7ffff61c358b21a0a

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ The first Windows-native foundation shipped `dsh-tool-pwsh` as a deliberately mi
- **Rendering adopts the bash story verbatim**: stdout, a marked `[stderr]` section, truncation notices with spill paths, `(no output)` for an empty body, and exit markers only for non-zero exits — a clean exit produces no marker. The description and the `tool:pwsh` prompt section state this precisely ("Non-zero exits are reported as `[exit code: N]` markers"), deliberately not copying the bash prompt's "every result" phrasing, which its own renderer contradicts.
- **`run_in_background` is wired through the generic task runtime** exactly like the bash tool: preflight, owner registration, `task_output`/`task_kill` control, and the same outcome mapping. `pwsh-local`'s already-mirrored `start()` handle backs it.
- **The `DSH_*` environment is shared, not duplicated**: `BashEnvRegistry` moved out of `dsh-tool-bash` into a new tool-independent `@deepseek-ai/dsh-bash-env` package (`ctx.bashEnv` + built-ins + the session-persistence contributor), and both shell tools inject it. Contributors apply to pwsh calls exactly as they do to bash calls, resolving the bash tool's `FIXME(bash-env-ownership)`.
- **The `DSH_*` environment is shared, not duplicated**: `BashEnvRegistry` moved out of `dsh-tool-bash` into a new tool-independent `@deepseek-ai/dsh-bash-env` package (`ctx.bashEnv` + built-ins + the session-persistence contributor), and both shell tools inject it. Contributors apply to pwsh calls exactly as they do to bash calls; shared environment ownership therefore sits outside either model-facing shell tool.
- **Windows reality is pinned where bash has no analog**: every command runs under a UTF-8 output preamble so the Windows PowerShell 5.1 fallback cannot garble non-ASCII output through the UTF-8-decoding collector, and the prompts teach that Windows forced termination settles as exit 1 without a signal marker.
- **Out of scope, unchanged**: sandbox escalation (waits for a Windows-confining executor) and persistent PTY shells (backends are Linux/macOS-only; ConPTY is roadmap work). The pwsh-specific terminal card with an exit pill shipped separately in the [pwsh UI presentation matches bash](2026-08-05-pwsh-ui-bash-parity.md) decision.

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Status: implemented
- **渲染完全采用 bash 故事**:stdout、带标记的 `[stderr]` 段、带 spill 路径的截断通知、空体渲染 `(no output)`、退出 marker 仅限非零退出——干净退出不产生 marker。描述与 `tool:pwsh` prompt section 精确陈述这一点("Non-zero exits are reported as `[exit code: N]` markers"),刻意不复制 bash prompt 中与其自身渲染矛盾的 "every result" 措辞。
- **`run_in_background` 经通用任务运行时接线**,与 bash 工具完全一致:预检、owner 注册、`task_output`/`task_kill` 控制与相同的结果映射。其背后是 `pwsh-local` 早已镜像好的 `start()` 句柄。
- **`DSH_*` 环境共享而非复制**:`BashEnvRegistry` 从 `dsh-tool-bash` 迁入新的工具无关包 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-bash-env`(`ctx.bashEnv` + 内置事实 + session-persistence contributor),两个 shell 工具都注入它。contributor 对 pwsh 调用与 bash 调用一视同仁,并消化了 bash 工具的 `FIXME(bash-env-ownership)`。
- **`DSH_*` 环境共享而非复制**:`BashEnvRegistry` 从 `dsh-tool-bash` 迁入新的工具无关包 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-bash-env`(`ctx.bashEnv` + 内置事实 + session-persistence contributor),两个 shell 工具都注入它。contributor 对 pwsh 调用与 bash 调用一视同仁;因此,共享环境的所有权不属于任何一个面向模型的 shell 工具。
- **Windows 现实在 bash 无对应处钉死**:每条命令都在 UTF-8 输出 preamble 下运行,使 Windows PowerShell 5.1 兜底无法经 UTF-8 解码的 collector 破坏非 ASCII 输出;prompt 教授 Windows 强制终止以无 signal 的 exit 1 结算。
- **范围外,不变**:sandbox 升级(等待 Windows-confining 执行器)与持久 PTY shell(后端仅限 Linux/macOS;ConPTY 属路线图)。带退出 pill 的 pwsh 专属 terminal 卡已随 [pwsh UI 呈现与 bash 对齐](2026-08-05-pwsh-ui-bash-parity.md) 决策另行交付。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-04-web-context-source-and-steer-marks.md
2026-08-04-web-context-source-and-steer-marks.md: 9070ea6ed34fffecd9fd2b90275bd31155100c75
2026-08-04-web-context-source-and-steer-marks.zh.md: 9d7c7c0a34587071e281ff8b2cb77e359a1580c1
2026-08-04-web-context-source-and-steer-marks.md: ca44702cf637c4250d141396ac22d206a16acc15
2026-08-04-web-context-source-and-steer-marks.zh.md: 09cefd07e3b417b63f05ce430cfed7b30597452f

View File

@@ -14,13 +14,13 @@ The distinctions are already durable. `user/message.source` is the merge-extensi
The transcript names all three roles a non-prompt message can play — injected context, recalled session, and steering.
`TranscriptAdapter` and the history fold attach a `provenance` view to every `ContextMessageNode`, computed by `contextProvenance()` from the durable source alone. It returns a `role` (`inject`, or `recall` for a cross-session snapshot) and a `label` naming the producer. `ContextInjectionRow` titles itself from the role and shows the label beside that title in `ToolRow`'s summary geometry, so the collapsed row already answers what was added and by whom; the 141px scrollport and truncation bound are unchanged from the [disclosure decision](2026-07-30-web-context-injection-disclosure.md). What renders inside that scrollport is chosen by the independent form axis added in the [context form decision](2026-08-05-context-form-vocabulary.md).
`TranscriptAdapter` and the history fold attach a `provenance` view to every `ContextMessageNode`, computed by `contextProvenance()` from the durable source alone. It returns a `role` (`inject`, or `recall` for a cross-session snapshot) and a `label` naming the producer. `ContextInjectionRow` titles itself from the role and shows the label beside that title in `ToolRow`'s summary geometry, so the collapsed row already answers what was added and by whom; the 141px scrollport and truncation bound are unchanged from the [archived disclosure decision](../../archived/feature/2026-07-30-web-context-injection-disclosure.md). What renders inside that scrollport is chosen by the independent form axis added in the [context form decision](2026-08-05-context-form-vocabulary.md).
**The label is read out of the log, never from a client-side table of producer names.** `workspace-instructions` is named by the distinct instruction paths it reconciled, `session-reference` by the titles of the sessions it read, a plugin source by its logged plugin id, and any other source by its own `kind` — the documented default arm for a merge-extensible union. A source carrying no readable kind degrades to an unnamed injection. A new or renamed producer is therefore identifiable without a client release, no label can go stale against the code, and a resumed, forked, or foreign log projects exactly like a live session.
`recall` covers `session-reference` because that is the one shipped source that lifts another session's material into this one. No Web leaf mounts `dsh-session-reference` today — it had only a terminal host — so the arm exists for log portability rather than for a bundled producer, and it is exercised by unit coverage rather than an assembled Web scenario.
`MessageItem` captions durable and pending steering bubbles with `插话`. The runtime replays durable `agent/inbox/spliced` events and projects a user-origin `user/message` as `SteeringMessageNode` when that same message identity was claimed from `next-step`; a queued-turn claim stays a `UserMessageNode`, and a non-user next-step message stays context. This reverses one clause of [no steer entry or interjection chrome](../simplification/2026-07-31-web-ui-no-steer-entry-or-interjection-chrome.md), which removed the badge because the composer could not steer and the label named a gesture users could not perform. The composer gained a Steer gesture afterwards without amending that note; this decision supplies the product decision its reintroduction clause required, and corrects the stale facts left in it. The caption is the only steering chrome here: composer modes, the Queue dock's strict-steer action, and pending-steering lifecycle stay with their own owners.
`MessageItem` captions durable and pending steering bubbles with `插话`. The runtime replays durable `agent/inbox/spliced` events and projects a user-origin `user/message` as `SteeringMessageNode` when that same message identity was claimed from `next-step`; a queued-turn claim stays a `UserMessageNode`, and a non-user next-step message stays context. This reverses one clause of the [archived no-steer decision](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-31-web-ui-no-steer-entry-or-interjection-chrome.md), which removed the badge because the composer could not steer and the label named a gesture users could not perform. The composer gained a Steer gesture afterwards without amending that note; this decision supplies the product decision its reintroduction clause required, and corrects the stale facts left in it. The caption is the only steering chrome here: composer modes, the Queue dock's strict-steer action, and pending-steering lifecycle stay with their own owners.
## Alternatives considered

View File

@@ -14,13 +14,13 @@ Status: implemented
transcript 为非提示消息可能承担的三种角色分别命名:注入上下文、召回会话、steering。
`TranscriptAdapter` 与历史折叠为每个 `ContextMessageNode` 附加一份 `provenance` 视图,由 `contextProvenance()` 仅依据持久来源计算得出。它返回 `role`(`inject`,跨会话快照则为 `recall`)与命名生产者的 `label`。`ContextInjectionRow` 以角色作为标题,并按 `ToolRow` 摘要的几何在标题旁展示该名称,因此折叠态就已经回答了「注入了什么、由谁注入」;141px 滚动视口与截断上限沿用[展开项决策](2026-07-30-web-context-injection-disclosure.md),未作改动。视口里渲染什么,则由[上下文形态决策](2026-08-05-context-form-vocabulary.md)引入的、相互独立的形态轴决定。
`TranscriptAdapter` 与历史折叠为每个 `ContextMessageNode` 附加一份 `provenance` 视图,由 `contextProvenance()` 仅依据持久来源计算得出。它返回 `role`(`inject`,跨会话快照则为 `recall`)与命名生产者的 `label`。`ContextInjectionRow` 以角色作为标题,并按 `ToolRow` 摘要的几何在标题旁展示该名称,因此折叠态就已经回答了「注入了什么、由谁注入」;141px 滚动视口与截断上限沿用[已归档的展开项决策](../../archived/feature/2026-07-30-web-context-injection-disclosure.md),未作改动。视口里渲染什么,则由[上下文形态决策](2026-08-05-context-form-vocabulary.md)引入的、相互独立的形态轴决定。
**名称从日志中读出,绝不来自客户端维护的生产者名称表。** `workspace-instructions` 以它对账过的去重指令文件路径命名,`session-reference` 以它读取的会话标题命名,插件来源以其记录的插件 id 命名,其余来源则以自身的 `kind` 命名——这正是可合并扩展联合类型有文档记载的默认分支。没有可读 kind 的来源降级为无名注入。于是新增或重命名的生产者无需客户端发版即可辨识,任何名称都不会相对代码变味,恢复、fork 或来自外部的日志与实时会话的投影结果完全一致。
`recall` 覆盖 `session-reference`,因为它是当前唯一会把另一个会话的材料搬进本会话的已发布来源。今天没有任何 Web 叶子挂载 `dsh-session-reference`——它此前只有终端宿主——因此该分支的存在是为了日志可移植性,而不是为了某个已打包的生产方,其覆盖来自单元测试而非组装后的 Web 场景。
`MessageItem` 为持久与待处理的 steering 气泡加上 `插话` 标注。runtime 会重放持久 `agent/inbox/spliced` 事件;如果一条用户来源的消息以相同身份从 `next-step` 被领取,后续 `user/message` 就投影为 `SteeringMessageNode`。从排队轮次领取的消息仍是 `UserMessageNode`,非用户来源的 next-step 消息仍是上下文。这推翻了[取消 steer 入口与插话装饰](../simplification/2026-07-31-web-ui-no-steer-entry-or-interjection-chrome.md)中的一条结论。当时移除徽章,是因为 composer 无法 steer,标签指向了用户做不到的动作。此后 composer 获得了 Steer 手势,却没有同步修订那份 note;本决策提供了它在「重新引入」条款中要求的产品决策,并订正了其中留下的过时事实。标注是这里唯一的 steering 装饰:composer 模式、Queue dock 的严格 steer 操作、待处理 steering 的生命周期仍归各自的所有者。
`MessageItem` 为持久与待处理的 steering 气泡加上 `插话` 标注。runtime 会重放持久 `agent/inbox/spliced` 事件;如果一条用户来源的消息以相同身份从 `next-step` 被领取,后续 `user/message` 就投影为 `SteeringMessageNode`。从排队轮次领取的消息仍是 `UserMessageNode`,非用户来源的 next-step 消息仍是上下文。这推翻了[已归档的取消 steer 入口与插话装饰决策](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-31-web-ui-no-steer-entry-or-interjection-chrome.md)中的一条结论。当时移除徽章,是因为 composer 无法 steer,标签指向了用户做不到的动作。此后 composer 获得了 Steer 手势,却没有同步修订那份 note;本决策提供了它在「重新引入」条款中要求的产品决策,并订正了其中留下的过时事实。标注是这里唯一的 steering 装饰:composer 模式、Queue dock 的严格 steer 操作、待处理 steering 的生命周期仍归各自的所有者。
## Alternatives considered

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-05-feedback-gated-session-telemetry.md
2026-08-05-feedback-gated-session-telemetry.md: 7d923a7e4cf61e8d1119187564b87e4cbb2065b7
2026-08-05-feedback-gated-session-telemetry.zh.md: 2862162c0c36e5194846c7e1c7bbc24230ce90aa

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
# Agent Note: Feedback-gated session telemetry
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-08-05-feedback-gated-session-telemetry.zh.md)
## Problem
Session telemetry originally has one mounted behavior: every accepted record enters the reporting backend immediately. Deployments need two stricter policies without replacing the plugin: hold a session's telemetry unless its user records feedback, or disable reporting while still explaining what happens to feedback. The policy must preserve the existing full-export default and the telemetry seam's redaction-before-backend boundary.
## Decision
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-telemetry-otel` exposes the string-valued `TelemetryMode` enum to TypeScript callers and accepts the same three uppercase `mode` values in serialized configuration:
- `FULL` is the default and preserves immediate delivery to the configured OTel pipeline.
- `FEEDBACK_ONLY` reads the canonical session log when `feedback/record` is appended and hands over the unreleased prefix through that exact event. Records appended after that boundary remain local until another feedback event.
- `DISABLED` constructs no exporter, processor, or logger provider. A `feedback/record` listener prints that nothing is shared and the feedback remains local.
The generic telemetry coordinator owns `live` and `on-demand` capture. Live capture projects, clones, redacts, and hands each event to the backend on the session firehose. On-demand capture registers no continuous capture listeners; `captureSession(session, throughSeq)` reads the canonical log from the handoff cursor through an inclusive boundary, then projects, clones, redacts, and hands over that prefix. The cursor advances only for handed-over records. The [buffer-free replay decision](../simplification/2026-08-06-buffer-free-feedback-telemetry.md) owns why the on-demand path uses the canonical log instead of copied records.
Mode resolution is a closed, fail-before-setup check: an unknown direct-construction value fails before transport configuration is read. Only `FULL` exposes the public service's `emit()` path to the SDK pipeline. `FEEDBACK_ONLY` gives its on-demand coordinator a private backend capability; its listener passes an event to `captureSession()` only when the exact `feedback/record` object is already stored at `session.events[event.seq]`. `Session.append` commits that object before publishing `session/event`, so replay includes the feedback but cannot extend past its boundary. `DISABLED` creates neither the capability nor the SDK pipeline and does not inspect exporter configuration.
## Alternatives considered
**Open a session permanently after its first feedback.** Rejected because later work would be shared without another feedback act and the plugin would need additional open-session state. Releasing one pending prefix per feedback has the smaller state machine and the narrower sharing boundary.
**Retain capture-time redacted records until feedback.** Rejected because it duplicates an unbounded session prefix even though the canonical log already owns the events. It preserves capture-time redaction policy and operational records, but those properties do not justify the memory cost for a mode defined as uploading the session log after feedback.
**Temporarily allow public `emit()` calls during feedback replay.** Rejected because a redaction listener or another reentrant caller could enqueue an unrelated record while the flag was open. A private backend capability makes authorization structural and keeps the public service closed throughout replay.
**Use an unmounted plugin as the disabled state.** That remains the silent opt-out, but it cannot warn when feedback is recorded. The explicit disabled mode lets a deployment keep one configuration shape and communicate that the local feedback did not leave the process.
## Consequences
`FULL` remains source- and wire-compatible with the original default. `FEEDBACK_ONLY` adds no telemetry-owned per-event buffer before feedback; direct service calls and non-canonical feedback events upload nothing, and a crash before feedback uploads nothing from that prefix. Replay applies the redaction policy mounted when feedback is recorded and excludes operational records that do not exist in the canonical log. Feedback-only streams therefore carry neither `agent-error` nor `shutdown` records, and shutdown absence is not a crash signal. Each later feedback captures the suffix accumulated since the previous boundary. `DISABLED` can omit `exporter.url`, does no reporting work, and keeps feedback only in the canonical session log.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
# Agent Note:反馈门控的会话遥测
Status: implemented
[English](2026-08-05-feedback-gated-session-telemetry.md) | 中文
## 问题
会话遥测原本只有一种已挂载行为:每条已接受记录都立即进入上报后端。部署方需要两种更严格的策略,且不替换插件:只有用户记录反馈时才释放该会话的遥测,或禁用上报并仍向用户说明反馈的去向。该策略必须保留现有的全量导出默认值,以及遥测 seam 在记录抵达后端之前脱敏的边界。
## 决策
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-telemetry-otel` 向 TypeScript 调用方公开以字符串为值的 `TelemetryMode` 枚举,并在序列化配置中接受相同的三个大写 `mode` 值:
- `FULL` 是默认值,保留向已配置 OTel 流水线的即时投递。
- `FEEDBACK_ONLY` 在追加 `feedback/record` 时读取权威会话日志,并交接截至该事件的未释放前缀。该边界后追加的记录会留在本地,直到另一个反馈事件。
- `DISABLED` 不构造导出器、处理器或日志提供方。`feedback/record` 监听器会输出警告,说明什么都不会共享,且反馈仍留在本地。
通用遥测协调器拥有 `live` 与 `on-demand` 捕获。实时捕获在会话 firehose 上投影、深拷贝、脱敏每个事件,并将其交给后端。按需捕获不注册持续捕获监听器;`captureSession(session, throughSeq)` 从 handoff 游标起读取权威日志,直至含边界的指定序列号,然后投影、深拷贝、脱敏并交接该前缀。游标只为已交接记录推进。[无缓冲回放决策](../simplification/2026-08-06-buffer-free-feedback-telemetry.md)说明了按需路径为何使用权威日志而非记录副本。
模式解析采用封闭式检查,并在设置前失败:通过直接构造传入未知值时,会在读取传输配置前失败。只有 `FULL` 向 SDK 流水线开放公共服务的 `emit()` 路径。`FEEDBACK_ONLY` 向其按需协调器提供私有后端能力;其监听器向 `captureSession()` 传递事件的唯一条件,是该事件与那个 `feedback/record` 对象身份完全相同,且该对象已存储于 `session.events[event.seq]`。`Session.append` 在发布 `session/event` 前已提交该对象,因此回放包含该反馈,但不会越过其边界。`DISABLED` 既不创建该能力,也不创建 SDK 流水线,并且不检查导出器配置。
## 考虑过的替代方案
**会话在首次反馈后永久开放。** 已否决,因为后续工作会在用户未再次提交反馈的情况下被共享,而且插件需要额外的会话开放状态。每次反馈只释放一个待处理前缀,状态机更小,共享边界也更窄。
**反馈前保留捕获时已脱敏记录。** 已否决,因为权威日志已拥有这些事件,该方案仍会复制无上限的会话前缀。它能保留捕获时的脱敏策略与运维记录,但对于一个定义为「反馈后上传会话日志」的模式,这些性质不足以证明该内存成本合理。
**在反馈回放期间临时允许公开 `emit()` 调用。** 已否决,因为在标志开启期间,脱敏监听器或另一个可重入调用方可能将无关记录入队。私有后端能力使授权成为结构性保证,并确保公共服务在整个回放过程中保持关闭。
**以不挂载插件表示禁用状态。** 这仍然是静默退出方式,但无法在记录反馈时输出警告。显式禁用模式让部署方可以保持同一种配置形态,并说明本地反馈未离开进程。
## 后果
`FULL` 与原有默认值保持源码及协议兼容。`FEEDBACK_ONLY` 在反馈前不增加遥测自有的逐事件缓冲;直接服务调用与非权威反馈事件均不上传任何内容,且反馈前发生崩溃时,该前缀也不上传任何内容。回放使用记录反馈时挂载的脱敏策略,并排除权威日志中不存在的运维记录。因此,仅反馈的流既不携带 `agent-error` 记录,也不携带 `shutdown` 记录,而缺少 shutdown 不是崩溃信号。每个后续反馈都会捕获从上一个边界起累积的后缀。`DISABLED` 可省略 `exporter.url`,不执行任何上报工作,并仅在权威会话日志中保留反馈。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-05-pwsh-ui-bash-parity.md
2026-08-05-pwsh-ui-bash-parity.md: 6bbdb0e6bc69ef1af03a6a9146f83b84754cb2a6
2026-08-05-pwsh-ui-bash-parity.zh.md: 75f3a3ddec002acaa1755c81114b0f122ab80593
2026-08-05-pwsh-ui-bash-parity.md: 815b448b894e9c53b4c4a2076f6b94fdd316dd35
2026-08-05-pwsh-ui-bash-parity.zh.md: 967c5a9e1409028043dc5028fdca640ddfeb1acc

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-08-05-pwsh-ui-bash-parity.zh.md)
## Problem
The [pwsh tool bash parity decision](../../implemented/feature/2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.md) made `dsh-tool-pwsh` behaviorally interchangeable with `dsh-tool-bash` for execution, markers, and background tasks, but explicitly deferred the human-visible half: a completed pwsh foreground call presented as a generic `console`-fenced card while the bash tool's completed call presented as a terminal card with a parsed exit-status pill. The roadmap that owned this gap ([Windows defaults to pwsh](../../proposed/feature/2026-08-01-windows-pwsh-default.md)) named "pwsh TUI/GUI rendering" as stage 2 — but the TUI package was removed ([`ed30088adb`](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/commit/ed30088adb)), leaving the Web surface as the only UI the gap affects.
The [pwsh tool bash parity decision](../../implemented/feature/2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.md) made `dsh-tool-pwsh` behaviorally interchangeable with `dsh-tool-bash` for execution, markers, and background tasks, but explicitly deferred the human-visible half: a completed pwsh foreground call presented as a generic `console`-fenced card while the bash tool's completed call presented as a terminal card with a parsed exit-status pill. The roadmap that owned this gap ([Windows defaults to pwsh](../../proposed/feature/2026-08-01-windows-pwsh-default.md)) named "pwsh TUI/GUI rendering" as stage 2, but the TUI package was removed, leaving the Web surface as the only UI the gap affects.
## Decision

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Status: implemented
## Problem
[pwsh 工具与 bash 对齐决策](../../implemented/feature/2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.md) 让 `dsh-tool-pwsh` 在执行、marker 与后台任务上行为可互换,但明确推迟了面向人类的一半:完成的 pwsh 前台调用呈现为通用 `console` 围栏卡片,而 bash 工具的完成调用呈现为带解析退出状态 pill 的 terminal 卡。拥有此缺口的路线图([Windows 默认改用 pwsh](../../proposed/feature/2026-08-01-windows-pwsh-default.md))把 "pwsh TUI/GUI 渲染" 列为阶段 2——但 TUI 包已被移除([`ed30088adb`](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/commit/ed30088adb)),Web 表面成为该缺口唯一影响的 UI。
[pwsh 工具与 bash 对齐决策](../../implemented/feature/2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.md) 让 `dsh-tool-pwsh` 在执行、marker 与后台任务上行为可互换,但明确推迟了面向人类的一半:完成的 pwsh 前台调用呈现为通用 `console` 围栏卡片,而 bash 工具的完成调用呈现为带解析退出状态 pill 的 terminal 卡。拥有此缺口的路线图([Windows 默认改用 pwsh](../../proposed/feature/2026-08-01-windows-pwsh-default.md))把 "pwsh TUI/GUI 渲染" 列为阶段 2,但 TUI 包已被移除,使 Web 表面成为该缺口唯一影响的 UI。
## Decision

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-hover-card-click-copy.md
2026-07-31-hover-card-click-copy.md: c87734fe328fa2adb396d6685495faa82bc1fff2
2026-07-31-hover-card-click-copy.zh.md: 2d3bc893dd617a3e2e21431175c54bcd4b7ed598
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-06-resolved-theme-color-metadata.md
2026-08-06-resolved-theme-color-metadata.md: 2f7a6f0bde5e75aeb6769939cae54d5319aa5bae
2026-08-06-resolved-theme-color-metadata.zh.md: a6d530f841d5c744fc88831f9cb685d1ab5027b6

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
# Agent Note: Resolved theme color metadata
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-08-06-resolved-theme-color-metadata.zh.md)
## Problem
The web client can resolve its theme independently of the operating-system preference, so a single manifest `theme_color` or media-qualified static metadata can disagree with an explicit Light or Dark selection. Browser chrome around an installed or ordinary page then need not match the app surface even though the layout presenter already owns the resolved document palette.
## Decision
The ui-layout `ThemePresenter` owns one `<meta name="theme-color">` alongside its root `color-scheme`, dark-palette attribute, and inline token writes. After applying a resolved snapshot's palette and token overrides, the presenter reads the body's computed `background-color` into the metadata element and inserts that single node into the document head. Subsequent snapshots update the same node, and disposal removes it.
The rendered body background remains the color authority. The PWA manifest carries no static `theme_color` or `background_color`, and `ThemeDefinition` gains no second color field that could drift from the token palette. This also lets a registered theme's base-background token reach browser UI through the same application path as its page surface.
## Verification
The presenter unit contract covers light and dark computed colors, node reuse, and disposal. The ui-layout composition test covers initial insertion, event-driven reuse, and fiber cleanup. The Web browser settings scenario drives Light, Dark, System, operating-system changes, and reload through the shipped composition, asserting one metadata element whose content equals the computed body background with no console errors. The metadata change has no rendered accessibility-tree output, so the existing scenario golden remains unchanged.
## Alternatives considered
**Set `theme_color` in the manifest.** A manifest provides one app-wide value, so either built-in palette can disagree with it; the manifest deliberately omits the field.
**Declare light and dark metadata with `prefers-color-scheme` media queries.** Media queries follow the operating system, not an explicit in-app selection, and therefore cannot represent the resolved preference.
**Add a `themeColor` field to every `ThemeDefinition`.** A separate value gives custom themes an independent browser-chrome choice, but duplicates the base-background color and permits the page and surrounding UI to drift. A distinct field can be introduced if a supported theme needs that intentional difference.
## Consequences
Supporting browsers update surrounding UI after the client applies its initial resolved snapshot and after every theme change; browsers without `theme-color` support ignore the metadata. Because the value comes from computed presentation, the client must keep a concrete body background. The presenter creates and removes its own node, while unrelated head metadata remains untouched.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
# Agent Note: 基于解析后主题的颜色元数据
Status: implemented
[English](2026-08-06-resolved-theme-color-metadata.md) | 中文
## 问题
Web 客户端可以独立于操作系统偏好解析主题,因此 manifest(元数据清单)中单一的 `theme_color` 值或带媒体条件的静态元数据可能与显式选择的 Light 或 Dark 不一致。此时,无论是已安装页面还是普通页面,其周围的浏览器界面都未必与应用界面一致,尽管布局呈现器已经拥有解析后的 document 调色板。
## 决策
ui-layout 的 `ThemePresenter` 拥有一个 `<meta name="theme-color">`,与根元素上的 `color-scheme`、深色调色板属性和内联 token 写入并列。在应用解析后快照的调色板与 token 覆盖值之后,呈现器读取 body 计算样式中的 `background-color`,写入该元数据元素,再将该节点插入 document head。后续快照会更新同一节点,资源释放时则移除它。
渲染后的 body 背景仍是颜色真源。PWA manifest 不包含静态 `theme_color` 或 `background_color`,`ThemeDefinition` 也不新增可能与 token 调色板偏离的第二个颜色字段。这样一来,注册主题的基础背景 token 也能通过页面界面使用的同一条应用路径作用于浏览器界面。
## 验证
呈现器的单元测试契约覆盖浅色和深色模式下的计算颜色、节点复用及资源释放。ui-layout 组合测试覆盖初始插入、事件驱动的复用和 fiber 清理。Web 浏览器设置场景通过实际交付的组合依次驱动 Light、Dark、System、操作系统偏好变化和重新加载,并断言页面始终只有一个元数据元素,其内容等于计算后的 body 背景且控制台无错误。这项元数据变更不会出现在渲染后的无障碍树输出中,因此场景现有的预期输出保持不变。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**在 manifest 中设置 `theme_color`。** manifest 只能提供一个适用于整个应用的值,因此任一内置调色板都可能与之不一致;manifest 有意省略该字段。
**用 `prefers-color-scheme` 媒体查询声明浅色和深色元数据。** 媒体查询跟随操作系统,而非应用内显式选择,因此无法表示解析后的偏好。
**为每个 `ThemeDefinition` 添加 `themeColor` 字段。** 单独的值可让自定义主题独立选择浏览器界面配色,但会复制基础背景色,并允许页面与周围的浏览器界面发生偏离。如果受支持的主题需要这种有意差异,可以再引入独立字段。
## 后果
支持该元数据的浏览器会在客户端应用初始解析后快照及之后每次主题变化时更新周围界面;不支持 `theme-color` 的浏览器会忽略这项元数据。由于该值来自计算后的呈现结果,客户端必须确保 body 始终有明确的背景色。呈现器会创建并移除自己的节点,head 中无关的元数据则保持不变。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-22-docked-web-goal-bar.md
2026-07-22-docked-web-goal-bar.md: ffddef6cec8eb632cd44bb5352de246db7413c02
2026-07-22-docked-web-goal-bar.zh.md: b732f71cfc3d3f813641c2ad9c594134beb2e440
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-06-web-install-manifest.md
2026-08-06-web-install-manifest.md: d400c6e586f4b735fa8e3dcc4899c97e45ac89c1
2026-08-06-web-install-manifest.zh.md: a7fee0248261e8d0597bb773d4f390973147337b

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
# Agent Note: Web install manifest metadata
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-08-06-web-install-manifest.zh.md)
## Problem
The Web build has a document title and favicon but no manifest from which a browser can discover a stable installed identity, launch boundary, or installed presentation. Adding that metadata can also imply capabilities the app does not provide: a service worker suggests an offline contract, while a single language or palette value misrepresents a bilingual UI with resolved light and dark themes.
## Decision
The Web entry links `/manifest.webmanifest`, which Vite copies from `apps/web/public/` into the production build. The manifest names the product `DeepSeek Harness`, gives installed chrome the compact name `DSH`, and fixes `id`, `start_url`, and `scope` at `/`. It requests `display: "fullscreen"` so supporting browsers can give the installed editor-like surface the available display area while leaving ordinary tabs unchanged; browsers may apply user overrides or fall back to another display mode. Its icon entry reuses `/favicon.svg` as an SVG of size `any` and purpose `any`.
This follows code-server's fullscreen choice without copying its `window-controls-overlay` display override. DSH has no custom title bar or layout around native window controls, so such an override would supersede fullscreen without owning the required safe layout.
The manifest deliberately has no `lang`, `theme_color`, or `background_color`. The product surface is bilingual rather than owned by one manifest language, and either static color can disagree with one of the resolved app palettes. Theme metadata therefore remains outside the install manifest.
This feature adds no service worker, cache policy, or offline fallback. The manifest supplies install metadata only; browser eligibility and install affordances remain browser policy. The shipped [`dsh-frontend-static`](../../../../packages/host/frontend-static/README.md) fallback recognizes `.webmanifest` as `application/manifest+json` so the same asset is valid through the shipped HTTP composition rather than only in Vite's output directory.
## Verification
The built-Web test parses the emitted manifest and pins the complete metadata object, including the human-visible name, compact name, icon, root identity, launch boundary, and display mode, while also verifying that the production `index.html` retains the link. The `dsh-frontend-static` real Loader composition test serves a `.webmanifest` fixture and pins its `application/manifest+json` media type.
## Alternatives considered
**Add a service worker and call the app offline-capable.** Rejected because caching the shell without defining session transport, invalidation, failure behavior, and upgrade semantics would create a misleading partial offline contract.
**Declare one `lang`.** Rejected because no single language describes the bilingual product surface; omission avoids claiming that one locale owns the installed experience.
**Choose one static background and theme color.** Rejected because the app resolves light and dark palettes at runtime, so either fixed value is knowingly wrong for one supported state.
**Ship raster and maskable icon variants immediately.** Rejected until a supported installation target demonstrates a requirement the existing scalable favicon cannot meet. New variants remain an additive manifest change rather than a prerequisite for exposing the current identity.
**Assert only root and display fields in the built artifact.** Rejected because dropping or changing the product name, compact name, or icon is also a shipped install regression. The test intentionally requires an explicit edit whenever any manifest metadata changes.
## Consequences
Supporting browsers can discover a stable root-scoped installed identity and fullscreen preference without the application promising offline behavior. Deploying this build below a path prefix requires revisiting the absolute link, identity, launch, scope, and icon URLs together. Browser-specific icon requirements may add variants later, and every intentional metadata change updates the exact built-artifact contract.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
# Agent Note: Web 安装 manifest 元数据
Status: implemented
[English](2026-08-06-web-install-manifest.md) | 中文
## 问题
Web 构建产物已有文档标题和 favicon,却没有可供浏览器发现稳定安装身份、启动边界或安装后呈现方式的 manifest(元数据清单)。添加这类元数据也可能暗示应用并不具备的能力:service worker 会让人以为应用提供离线契约,而单一语言或调色板取值会错误描述这个能够解析浅色与深色主题的双语 UI。
## 决策
Web 入口链接 `/manifest.webmanifest`,Vite 会将其从 `apps/web/public/` 复制到生产构建产物。manifest 将产品命名为 `DeepSeek Harness`,为安装后的浏览器界面提供简称 `DSH`,并把 `id`、`start_url` 和 `scope` 固定为 `/`。它请求 `display: "fullscreen"`,使支持这一模式的浏览器能够把可用显示区域交给安装后的编辑器式界面,同时不改变普通标签页;浏览器可以应用用户覆盖设置,或回退到其他显示模式。其图标条目复用 `/favicon.svg`,将它作为尺寸为 `any`、用途为 `any` 的 SVG。
这一选择沿用了 code-server 的全屏方案,但没有照搬其 `window-controls-overlay` 显示覆盖项。DSH 没有自定义标题栏,也没有围绕原生窗口控件安排布局,因此使用这类覆盖项会在未落实所需安全布局的情况下取代全屏模式。
manifest 有意不包含 `lang`、`theme_color` 或 `background_color`。产品界面支持双语,并不由 manifest 中的单一语言定义;任一静态颜色值都可能与应用解析后的一套调色板不一致。因此,主题元数据仍放在安装 manifest 之外。
该功能不添加 service worker、缓存策略或离线回退。manifest 只提供安装元数据;是否具备安装资格、是否提供安装入口仍由浏览器策略决定。实际交付的 [`dsh-frontend-static`](../../../../packages/host/frontend-static/README.md) 回退将 `.webmanifest` 识别为 `application/manifest+json`,因此同一资产经实际交付的 HTTP 组合提供时同样有效,而不只在 Vite 输出目录中有效。
## 验证
Web 构建产物测试解析输出的 manifest,并固定完整的元数据对象,包括面向用户显示的名称、简称、图标、根路径身份、启动边界和显示模式,同时验证生产构建的 `index.html` 仍保留该链接。`dsh-frontend-static` 的真实 Loader 组合测试提供一个 `.webmanifest` fixture(测试前置数据),并固定其 `application/manifest+json` 媒体类型。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**添加 service worker,并宣称应用支持离线。** 不予采纳,因为只缓存应用外壳,却不定义会话传输、失效策略、失败行为和升级语义,会形成具有误导性的不完整离线契约。
**声明单一的 `lang`。** 不予采纳,因为没有任何一种语言足以描述双语产品界面;省略该字段可避免声称安装后的体验由某一种区域设置独占。
**选择一组静态背景色和主题色。** 不予采纳,因为应用会在运行时解析浅色和深色调色板,因此选择任一固定值,都是明知它与其中一种受支持状态不符。
**立即交付光栅和可遮罩图标变体。** 在某个受支持的安装目标证明现有可缩放 favicon 无法满足其要求之前,不予采纳。新变体只是对 manifest 的增量扩展,并非公开当前身份的前提。
**只断言构建产物中的根路径字段和显示字段。** 不予采纳,因为产品名称、简称或图标被删除或更改,同样属于已交付安装体验的回归。任何 manifest 元数据发生变化时,测试都有意要求显式改动。
## 后果
支持这一机制的浏览器可以发现以根路径为作用域的稳定安装身份和全屏偏好,而应用无需承诺离线行为。在路径前缀下部署该构建产物时,必须同时重新审视绝对路径的 manifest 链接,以及身份、启动、作用域和图标 URL。日后可能因浏览器特有的图标要求而新增变体;每一项有意的元数据变更都会同步更新精确的构建产物契约。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-web-cards-toolrow.md
2026-07-31-web-cards-toolrow.md: caa18563a9e66f882873e8d7e84cc3ac20702033
2026-07-31-web-cards-toolrow.zh.md: 7eb53a163f1fd22e09fcf498cb3e6b138834a2f3
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-06-web-skill-tool-row.md
2026-08-06-web-skill-tool-row.md: fcf5c3b5b61c94b0823fe54624c3dc906c520348
2026-08-06-web-skill-tool-row.zh.md: bef36df44d97af3993c9760a6b6d3add7b7c932c

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
# Agent Note: Web skill tool row
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-08-06-web-skill-tool-row.zh.md)
## Problem
The Web transcript renders `skill` calls through the generic fallback row, so a loaded instruction set looks like an unknown tool call even though Skill is a first-class product concept. The generic row also exposes the JSON argument envelope beside the result, adding noise around the one identity users need: the loaded skill name.
## Decision
`ui-skill` registers a component under the existing `conversation.chat.toolview` keyed slot with key `skill`. The component owns its row chrome from the public `ToolRowProps` contract, matching the independent registrant posture used by the Bash sample instead of importing conversation-private components.
The collapsed row uses a 14-pixel document-and-sparkle glyph and the Bash row's neutral hierarchy: tertiary glyph, secondary `Skill` title, caption separator, and tertiary skill name. Running, failed, and interrupted calls retain the transcript's shimmer, error dot and first-line summary, and warning dot semantics. A settled call expands through the whole summary row into a 260-pixel bounded `Instructions` card containing the exact durable result text; the existing trajectory `Inspect` handoff remains available below the card.
The row derives every visible value from a paired call/result slice in the current runtime window. It reads the skill name from the recorded `name` argument and the instructions from durable result content, and never joins the current skill catalog for descriptions or provider metadata. If pagination leaves the call outside the window, the result has no tool identity and remains on the generic fallback rather than extending the history wire contract. The existing ACP `skill-load` recording is seeded through the real Web persistence and composition path for a keyless interaction and accessibility snapshot.
## Alternatives considered
- Keep the generic tool row and add only a `skill` color selector in `ui-conversation`. This leaves the redundant input envelope and generic expanded body in place, and makes the conversation package own a domain-specific visual rule.
- Add a new `skill` value to the host tool render-intent union. The keyed client slot already identifies this tool when its call is in the runtime window, so a new cross-boundary presentation value adds protocol and snapshot surface without enabling another consumer.
- Export the conversation package's private `ToolRow` component for reuse. Client packages intentionally expose contracts rather than cross-package components; exporting it would couple independent feature packages to conversation implementation details.
## Consequences
`ui-skill` now depends on the public conversation toolview contract, locale and primitive packages, and React in addition to its reference-source dependencies. It owns a small copy of the disclosure-row chrome, so future global interaction changes must update this registrant alongside the Bash sample and conversation rows.
Cold replay stays deterministic when the installed skill catalog changes, and the transcript remains compact until instructions are explicitly expanded. A result-only history page intentionally uses the generic fallback; keeping this edge case generic preserves the existing history protocol and confines the feature to client presentation. The dedicated card intentionally shows the tool's complete framed output rather than extracting only `<skill_instructions>`, preserving exactly what reached the model and avoiding a second parser for the skill result format.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
# Agent Note: Web skill 工具行
Status: implemented
[English](2026-08-06-web-skill-tool-row.md) | 中文
## 问题
Web transcript(文本记录)通过通用后备行渲染 `skill` 调用,使已加载的指令集看起来像一次未知工具调用,尽管 Skill(技能)已是产品中的一等概念。通用行还会在结果旁暴露 JSON 参数的外层结构,围绕用户真正需要的唯一标识增加了噪声:已加载的 skill 名称。
## 决策
`ui-skill` 在现有的 `conversation.chat.toolview` 键控 slot 下注册 key 为 `skill` 的组件。该组件基于公开的 `ToolRowProps` 契约自行实现行 chrome,沿用 Bash 示例的独立注册方姿态,而不导入 conversation 私有组件。
收起的行使用 14 像素的文档与闪光组合图标,并沿用 Bash 行的中性色层级:图标采用三级色,`Skill` 标题采用二级色,分隔符采用 caption 色,skill 名称采用三级色。运行、失败和中断调用分别沿用 transcript 的扫光、错误状态点加首行摘要,以及警告状态点语义。已结算调用可以通过整个摘要行展开一个高度上限为 260 像素的 `Instructions` 卡片,其中原样呈现持久化结果文本;用于跳转至 trajectory 的现有 `Inspect` 入口仍保留在卡片下方。
该行的所有可见值均派生自当前 runtime 窗口中已配对的调用/结果片段。skill 名称来自已记录的 `name` 参数,指令来自持久化的结果内容;该行绝不关联当前 skill 目录来读取描述或提供方元数据。如果分页将调用留在窗口外,结果便没有工具身份,并继续使用通用后备路径,而不是扩展 history 协议契约。现有的 ACP(Agent Client Protocol)`skill-load` 记录经由真实的 Web 持久化与组合路径写入,用于无需密钥的交互和无障碍快照。
## 考虑过的替代方案
- 保留通用工具行,只添加一个 `skill` 颜色选择器,并将其放在 `ui-conversation` 中。该方案仍会保留多余的输入外层结构和通用展开体,也会让 conversation 包拥有特定领域的视觉规则。
- 在宿主工具渲染意图联合类型中添加新的 `skill` 值。键控客户端 slot 在调用位于 runtime 窗口内时已经能够识别该工具,因此新的跨边界呈现值只会增加协议和快照表层,却不会支持其他消费方。
- 导出 conversation 包的私有 `ToolRow` 组件供复用。客户端包刻意对外暴露契约而非跨包组件;导出该组件会使独立功能包耦合到 conversation 的实现细节。
## 后果
除了引用 source 的依赖外,`ui-skill` 现在还依赖公开的 conversation toolview 契约、locale 包、原语包和 React。它自行保留了一小份折叠展开行 chrome,因此未来的全局交互变更必须与 Bash 示例和 conversation 行同步更新这个注册方。
即使已安装的 skill 目录发生变化,冷回放仍保持确定性;在用户显式展开指令前,transcript 保持紧凑。仅含结果的 history 页有意使用通用后备路径;让这个边缘情况保持通用呈现,可以保留现有 history 协议,并将该功能限定在客户端呈现层。专用卡片有意显示工具完整封装的输出,而不是只提取 `<skill_instructions>`,从而原样保留模型实际收到的内容,也避免为 skill 结果格式再引入一个解析器。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-07-default-model-follows-the-picker.md
2026-08-07-default-model-follows-the-picker.md: d20f0ab8b8c8bd19f596e6ef73f0a58d96c24d38
2026-08-07-default-model-follows-the-picker.zh.md: 0d2821cb63407fe766e6fe3d36de31d9fc6f1c13

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
# Agent Note: the default model follows the picker
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-08-07-default-model-follows-the-picker.zh.md)
## Problem
The route a new session started from was frozen into the gateway's composition entry (`api-gateway` in the web-app bundle patch). Switching models in a conversation reached that conversation only: the next session went back to the shipped default, and the only way to change it was to hand-edit a `cordis.yml` row and restart. There was no user-settings tier between the composition and the per-session choice.
## Decision
`ApiProxyService` registers its `{provider, model, reasoningEffort?}` slice as the `api-gateway` settings section: the composition entry is the `base` layer and `settings.yaml` layers the user's choice over it. `workspaceRoot` stays outside the section — a launcher fact, not a preference. `reasoningEffort` is the mirror case: it lives in the section but NOT in the plugin config, because the seam merges the user layer over the composition entry per field and an absent key cannot override a present one. A composition-set effort would therefore survive every later switch to a model without one — precisely the stranding the wholesale `replace` exists to prevent. Effort is a per-model fact anyway; a deployment default for it belongs on the adapter profile, which resolves per model.
`session.selectModel` records an accepted switch as the new default. There is no separate gesture: switching models in the composer IS how the default is chosen. The write is `replace`, not `update` — switching to a model with no reasoning effort has to clear a stored one, and a merged patch would strand it for the next session to fail on. A storage failure is logged without undoing the switch, which already applies to its own session, and a deployment with no settings provider keeps the entry with the switch staying process-local.
`ApiProxyDefaults` carries `defaultTarget()` and `persistDefaultTarget()` closures instead of flat `provider`/`model` fields, so `createApiProxy` needs no knowledge of the settings seam.
`targetFor` resolves its tiers on **every** read rather than seeding a ref once: an explicit selection in this process, else the session's own latest logged `request/header`, else the live default. Both directions depend on the re-read. A session that has run a turn derives from its log forever after, so changing the default never retargets it. A session still blank starts from a default saved after it was created — which matters because New Session reuses a blank session rather than minting another, so a creation-time seed would show the superseded model in exactly the flow the feature exists for.
The stored route is not validated against the registry. A default naming a route the Models page has since removed still reaches `session.models` as `current`, matching no advertised group — which is what makes the composer seat's existing fallback prompt for a selection instead of naming a model the deployment cannot reach.
## Consequences
`ApiProxyDefaults` changed shape, updating ~40 test construction sites. `host.describe` now reports the live default rather than a captured one, which is what it always meant. `settings.yaml` gains an `api-gateway:` section the moment a user switches models; the `api-gateway` namespace is deliberately NOT added to the gateway's exposed-namespace allowlist, so the Settings page neither reads nor writes it — the model picker is its editor.
## Follow-up: blocking a session that cannot send
A default naming a route the Models page has since removed leaves the composer saying "Select model" while the input still accepts a message, which then fails inside the adapter mid-turn. Two changes close it.
The Host refuses. `session.prompt` checks whether an adapter serves the session's route and answers `model-unavailable` before opening a turn. This is the enforcement boundary: a client that disables its composer is an affordance, and the method stays callable regardless.
The composer goes inert. `session.models` reports `routable`, and ui-model pushes a block through the new `ctx.conversation.blocks` registry; the bar renders the same disabled textarea it already renders without a workspace, with the blocker's own localized reason as the placeholder — except the model seat, which a block deliberately leaves live, because choosing a model is how the user clears it. The push direction is forced — ui-model already depends on ui-conversation, so ui-conversation cannot read it back.
The gate is `routable`, NOT "the current target matches no advertised group". Catalog membership is advisory by design: a route serving a model it stopped advertising is absent from the groups yet perfectly usable, and blocking there would break a supported configuration (a narrowed `models` list over a live route). `routable` is also three-valued on the client — `null` before the first load or after a failed one never blocks, so a slow or unreachable Host cannot lock a working composer.
## Alternatives considered
- **Falling back to the composition entry when the stored route is unregistered.** Rejected: the composer would then name the shipped DeepSeek model instead of prompting, which is both a silent switch to a provider the user did not pick and the opposite of the requested behavior.
- **Validating and clearing a stale default.** Rejected: catalog membership is advisory by design (`buildModelCatalog` documents it), so an adapter may serve a model its own catalog stopped advertising; self-healing would break that deliberate case.
- **A `settings.update` merge patch.** Rejected: it cannot clear `reasoningEffort`, so a switch from a reasoning model to a plain one leaves an effort the next session fails on.
- **Persisting only from blank sessions.** Rejected: the most informative switch is the one made mid-conversation after seeing a model underperform, and that one would never be saved.
- **A separate "set as default" affordance.** Rejected for now: it adds a second gesture for what every comparable product infers from the switch itself. The cost is that a temporary switch in an old session also moves the default.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
# Agent Note: 默认模型跟随选择器
Status: implemented
[English](2026-08-07-default-model-follows-the-picker.md) | 中文
## 问题
新会话的起始路由被冻结在网关的组合条目里(web-app bundle patch 中的 `api-gateway` 行)。在一段对话里切换模型只影响这段对话:下一个会话又回到出厂默认,而要改这个默认值,唯一的办法是手工编辑一条 `cordis.yml` 行并重启。组合层与每会话选择之间没有用户设置这一层。
## 决定
`ApiProxyService` 把自己的 `{provider, model, reasoningEffort?}` 切片注册为 `api-gateway` 设置段:组合条目是 `base` 层,`settings.yaml` 把用户的选择叠加其上。`workspaceRoot` 留在段外——它是启动器事实,不是偏好。`reasoningEffort` 则是镜像的一例:它在段里、但**不在**插件配置里,因为 seam 是按字段把用户层合并到组合条目之上的,缺席的键覆盖不了存在的键。组合层设的推理等级因此会在此后每一次切到不支持推理的模型时继续存活——正是整段 `replace` 想要杜绝的那种滞留。何况推理等级本就是按模型的事实,它的部署级默认值属于适配器 profile,那里是按模型解析的。
`session.selectModel` 把被接受的切换记录为新的默认值。没有另一个单独的手势:在输入框切模型**就是**选定默认值的方式。写入用 `replace` 而非 `update`——切到一个不支持推理的模型必须清掉已存的等级,而合并补丁会把它滞留下来,让下一个会话在它上面失败。存储失败只记日志,不撤销这次切换(它对自己所在的会话已经生效);没有设置提供方的部署保留组合条目,切换只停留在进程内。
`ApiProxyDefaults` 改为携带 `defaultTarget()` 与 `persistDefaultTarget()` 两个闭包,而不是扁平的 `provider`/`model` 字段,这样 `createApiProxy` 不需要知道设置这条缝的存在。
`targetFor` 在**每一次**读取时解析各级,而不是只在创建时种一次 ref:本进程内的显式选择,其次是该会话自己最新记录的 `request/header`,最后才是活的默认值。两个方向都依赖这次重新读取。已经跑过一轮的会话此后永远从自己的日志推导,改默认值不会重定向它;而仍然空白的会话会用上它创建之后才保存的默认值——这一点很关键,因为新建会话是复用空白会话而不是再开一个,创建时种下的值恰好会在这个功能存在的意义所在的流程里显示已被取代的模型。
存下来的路由不做注册表校验。默认值指向一条模型页已经删除的路由时,它照样作为 `current` 送到 `session.models`,匹配不到任何已公布的分组——而这正是让输入框选择器已有的回退提示重新选择、而不是显示一个部署根本够不着的模型的原因。
## 影响
`ApiProxyDefaults` 形状变了,约 40 处测试构造点随之更新。`host.describe` 现在报告的是活的默认值而非捕获的快照,这本就是它一直想表达的含义。用户一旦切换模型,`settings.yaml` 就会多出一个 `api-gateway:` 段;`api-gateway` 这个 namespace 刻意**没有**加进网关的暴露名单,因此设置页既不读也不写它——模型选择器就是它的编辑器。
## 后续:让发不出消息的会话禁止输入
默认值指向一条模型页已删除的路由时,编辑器显示「选择模型」,输入框却仍接受消息,然后这一轮在适配器内部失败。两处改动关掉这个口子。
宿主拒绝。`session.prompt` 检查是否有适配器服务该会话的路由,在开启轮次之前就以 `model-unavailable` 应答。这是执行边界:客户端禁用编辑器只是提示性设计,这个方法始终可被调用。
编辑器变惰性。`session.models` 报告 `routable`,ui-model 经新的 `ctx.conversation.blocks` 注册表推送一个 block;输入栏渲染的仍是它在没有 Workspace 时就会渲染的那个禁用 textarea,只是把抬起方自己的本地化理由作为 placeholder——唯独模型 seat 被 block 刻意保留可用,因为用户正是靠选模型来解除它。推送方向是被迫的——ui-model 本就依赖 ui-conversation,因此 ui-conversation 读不回去。
闸门是 `routable`,**不是**「当前目标匹配不到任何已公布分组」。目录成员关系按设计是咨询性的:一条仍在服务、只是不再公布该模型的路由不在分组里,却完全可用,在那里阻断会破坏一种受支持的配置(对一条活着的路由收窄 `models` 列表)。`routable` 在客户端还是三值的——首次加载之前或加载失败之后的 `null` 绝不阻断,因此慢的或够不着的宿主锁不死一个本来能用的编辑器。
## 考虑过的替代方案
- **存下来的路由未注册时回落到组合条目。** 否决:那样输入框会显示出厂的 DeepSeek 模型而不是提示选择,既是静默切到用户没选的提供方,也与要求的行为正好相反。
- **校验并清空失效的默认值。** 否决:目录成员关系按设计是咨询性的(`buildModelCatalog` 有注释说明),适配器可以服务一个自己目录已不再公布的模型;自动修复会破坏这个刻意保留的情形。
- **用 `settings.update` 合并补丁。** 否决:它清不掉 `reasoningEffort`,于是从推理模型切到普通模型会留下一个等级,让下一个会话在它上面失败。
- **只在空白会话里持久化。** 否决:最有信息量的切换恰恰是对话到一半发现模型不行时做的那一次,而它永远存不下来。
- **单独做一个「设为默认」的入口。** 目前否决:同类产品都从切换本身推断的事情,它却要多一个手势。代价是在老会话里的临时切换也会移动默认值。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-web-composer-stats-and-input-polish.md
2026-07-30-web-composer-stats-and-input-polish.md: 78f286cb0edf58d0212492024b8706ffd432ee70
2026-07-30-web-composer-stats-and-input-polish.zh.md: eeba56d9f3c2ef10222e32b0809e099f60181ac8
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-08-pi-ai-per-model-reasoning-declarations.md
2026-08-08-pi-ai-per-model-reasoning-declarations.md: b6264feeb724e3693078fa3fc3e3fc16ed01aacb
2026-08-08-pi-ai-per-model-reasoning-declarations.zh.md: 1b30f7e0c42974c777a535e133a47caa217e2e5e

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
# Agent Note: Per-Model Reasoning Declarations in llm-pi-ai
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-08-08-pi-ai-per-model-reasoning-declarations.zh.md)
## Problem
Under the declared-provider catalog ([[2026-08-03-pi-ai-declared-provider-catalog]], which deliberately kept reasoning out of the configurable fields), a hand-declared pi-ai route's models materialized with `reasoning: false`, so `getSupportedThinkingLevels` short-circuited to `["off"]`: the composer offered no effort picker for them, and the route-level `reasoning` default — the only reasoning knob a profile had — made every request to such a model fail with `UNSUPPORTED_REASONING_EFFORT` before network I/O. The same route-level knob was also the wrong altitude for catalog routes: one provider's models disagree about which levels they accept (deepseek ships `[off, high, max]` beside catalog models with `xhigh`), so a single per-route level could not be set without breaking part of the route, which is why the Models page stopped writing it entirely (#1860) and left `settings.yaml` with no way to align efforts per model.
Two adjacent gaps compounded this. pi-ai decides the reasoning *wire dialect* (`compat.thinkingFormat`, `compat.supportsReasoningEffort`) by recognizing the endpoint URL, and a private gateway's URL says nothing — a DeepSeek-dialect gateway was spoken to in the OpenAI dialect with no configuration that could correct it. And the only way to touch one catalog model was the `models` list, which *replaces* the served catalog: narrowing `gpt-5`'s levels meant restating all thirty-eight openai models or silently dropping thirty-seven.
## Decision
`PiAiModelProfile` gains `reasoningEfforts`: **each key is a level selectors offer, its value the spelling dispatch sends on the wire**. The declaration translates to pi-ai's `Model.reasoning` + `thinkingLevelMap` with all seven levels decided explicitly — declared levels carry their wire value, undeclared levels are pinned `null` — so the profile author never needs pi-ai's asymmetric defaulting rule (absent means "supported" for the five base levels but "unsupported" for `xhigh`/`max`). `off` is the one three-state key: left out, no Off is offered and an explicit Off request is refused (an effortless request still goes out bare, leaving the provider its default); declared valueless, Off is offered and dispatch sends nothing (the `deepseek` dialect sends `thinking: {type: "disabled"}`); declared with a value, that value goes on the wire. `false` declares a non-reasoning model; an empty declaration is refused rather than guessed at. The spelling for "disable" is `false` rather than `{}` because schemastery materializes an absent dict as `{}` — only a `z.union([z.const(false), dict])` keeps absent, disabled, and declared distinguishable, and a bare `reasoningEfforts:` (YAML null) slips through that union unvalidated, so resolution refuses it explicitly.
`compat.thinkingFormat` and `compat.supportsReasoningEffort` become configurable at two levels — route (its models' default) and model (winning per field) — resolving model → route → installed catalog entry → pi-ai's URL guess. They exist only on `openai-completions` (pi-ai types them nowhere else): a model-level switch on another protocol fails resolution, a route-level default skips such models, and a route with no completions model at all is refused. The two `chat-template` formats stay withheld for want of `chatTemplateKwargs`. Both enums are pinned to pi-ai's types through `Record<UpstreamUnion, true>` drift gates, so a pi-ai upgrade that adds a format fails compilation until the new member is classified (verified against the published 0.84.1 tarball, whose `thinkingFormat` union adds `baseten` over the pinned 0.82.1).
`modelOverrides` reshapes individual catalog models without replacing the served set: key = catalog model id, value = a `models` entry minus `id`, materialized by handing the override to the existing entry path so capacities, efforts, compat, and request-default semantics stay identical. Unlike Pi's own config layer, which ignores unknown ids, every override that lands nowhere is refused — beside a `models` list, on a hand-declared route, naming an unknown model, or smuggling an `id` in the value (the schema passes unknown keys through, and a smuggled id would quietly rename the model).
## Alternatives considered
- **Pass `reasoning` + `thinkingLevelMap` through verbatim** (pi-ai's own radius-config shape). Rejected by the user for operator confusion: the map's `null`-marks-unsupported convention plus the asymmetric absent-key rule mean the config's meaning depends on knowledge of pi-ai internals; the chosen shape makes the key set itself the offer.
- **A bare level list** (`reasoningEfforts: [off, high]`). Cannot express wire renames, and the catalog's own maps prove renames are real: 66 of 1230 installed map entries are non-identity (`off→none`, `minimal→low`, `low→LOW`, `high→default`).
- **`{}` as the disable spelling.** Unimplementable: schemastery materializes an absent dict as `{}`, so every model without the field would have been force-disabled.
- **Folding this into the route-level `reasoning` knob.** That knob is a *default selection*, not a capability set; it stays, and a declared model's efforts now bound what it can select.
## Consequences
- The composer's effort pane works for hand-declared models with zero UI change — `resolveModelInfo` reports declared levels through the same seam catalog metadata uses (pinned by the `declared-reasoning` web scenario).
- #1860's deferred gap — a route-level effort a model cannot take failing its requests — now has an operator remedy: align the model's `reasoningEfforts` or drop the route default.
- There is deliberately no spelling for returning one map key or compat field to "whatever the catalog said": the declaration is the whole offer, so keeping a catalog value means restating it. The README documents this.
- `verify-package-invariants` is untouched: the feature adds configuration resolution, no new events or mutable runtime relations.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
# Agent Note: llm-pi-ai 的按模型推理声明
Status: implemented
[English](2026-08-08-pi-ai-per-model-reasoning-declarations.md) | 中文
## 问题
在声明式提供方 catalog([[2026-08-03-pi-ai-declared-provider-catalog]],它刻意把推理排除在可配置字段之外)之下,手工声明的 pi-ai 路由,其模型物化出来就带着 `reasoning: false`,于是 `getSupportedThinkingLevels` 短路成 `["off"]`:输入框不为它们提供档位选择器,而路由级的 `reasoning` 默认值——当时 profile 仅有的推理旋钮——让发往这类模型的每个请求都在网络 I/O 之前以 `UNSUPPORTED_REASONING_EFFORT` 失败。同一个路由级旋钮对 catalog 路由来说也放错了层级:同一提供方下各模型接受的档位并不一致(deepseek 自带 `[off, high, max]`,旁边就是带 `xhigh` 的 catalog 模型),单个路由级档位怎么设都会弄坏路由的一部分——这正是模型页彻底停写它的原因(#1860),而 `settings.yaml` 也因此没有了任何按模型对齐档位的办法。
两个相邻的缺口让问题雪上加霜。pi-ai 靠识别端点 URL 来决定推理的*协议方言*(`compat.thinkingFormat`、`compat.supportsReasoningEffort`),而私有网关的 URL 什么也说明不了——说 DeepSeek 方言的网关只会收到 OpenAI 方言的请求,且没有任何配置能更正它。另外,想动单个 catalog 模型,唯一的手段是 `models` 列表,而它会*替换*所服务的 catalog:收窄 `gpt-5` 的档位,意味着要么重述全部三十八个 openai 模型,要么静默丢掉三十七个。
## 决策
`PiAiModelProfile` 新增 `reasoningEfforts`:**每个键是选择器提供的一个档位,其值是分派在协议中发送的拼写**。该声明会转换为 pi-ai 的 `Model.reasoning` + `thinkingLevelMap`,七个档位全部显式决定——已声明的档位携带自己的协议值,未声明的档位一律固定为 `null`——因此 profile 作者永远不需要了解 pi-ai 那条不对称的默认规则(键缺席对五个基础档位意味着「支持」,对 `xhigh`/`max` 却意味着「不支持」)。`off` 是唯一的三态键:不写,选择器不提供 Off,显式请求 Off 会被拒绝(不点名档位的请求仍会不带参数地发出,提供方保留自己的默认行为);声明而不给值,则提供 Off,分派什么也不发送(`deepseek` 方言发送 `thinking: {type: "disabled"}`);声明并给值,该值就在协议中发送。`false` 声明一个不具备推理能力的模型;空声明会被拒绝,而不是去猜。「禁用」的拼写取 `false` 而非 `{}`,因为 schemastery 会把缺席的字典物化成 `{}`——只有 `z.union([z.const(false), dict])` 才能让缺席、禁用与已声明三态保持可区分;而裸写的 `reasoningEfforts:`(YAML null)会不经校验地从该 union 溜过去,因此解析对它显式拒绝。
`compat.thinkingFormat` 与 `compat.supportsReasoningEffort` 变为两级可配置——路由级(作为其模型的默认值)与模型级(逐字段胜出)——解析顺序为模型 → 路由 → 已安装 catalog 条目 → pi-ai 按 URL 得出的猜测。两者只存在于 `openai-completions` 上(pi-ai 也只在这一协议上为它们建了类型):在其他协议的模型上设模型级开关会使解析失败,路由级默认值会跳过这类模型,而完全没有 completions 模型的路由则被拒绝。两个 `chat-template` 格式因缺 `chatTemplateKwargs` 而继续保持不开放。两个枚举都经 `Record<UpstreamUnion, true>` 漂移门禁钉在 pi-ai 的类型上,因此新增格式的 pi-ai 升级会编译失败,直到新成员被归类(对照已发布的 0.84.1 tarball 验证过:其 `thinkingFormat` 联合类型相对钉住的 0.82.1 新增了 `baseten`)。
`modelOverrides` 就地重塑单个 catalog 模型而不替换所服务的集合:键 = catalog 模型 id,值 = 去掉 `id` 的 `models` 条目,物化时把覆盖交给既有的条目路径,因此容量、档位、compat 与请求默认值语义完全一致。与忽略未知 id 的 Pi 自有配置层不同,凡是落不到任何地方的覆盖都会被拒绝——与 `models` 列表并存、写在手工声明的路由上、点名未知模型,或在值里夹带 `id`(schema 会放行未知键,被夹带的 id 会悄悄把模型改名)。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
- **把 `reasoning` + `thinkingLevelMap` 原样透传**(pi-ai 自家 radius 配置的形状)。用户以运维人员困惑为由否决:map 用 `null` 标记「不支持」的约定,加上不对称的键缺席规则,意味着这份配置的含义取决于对 pi-ai 内部机制的了解;选定的形状则让键集合本身就是对外提供的全部。
- **裸档位列表**(`reasoningEfforts: [off, high]`)。表达不了协议侧改名,而 catalog 自己的 map 证明改名真实存在:1230 条已安装 map 条目里有 66 条不是恒等映射(`off→none`、`minimal→low`、`low→LOW`、`high→default`)。
- **用 `{}` 作为禁用拼写。** 无法实现:schemastery 会把缺席的字典物化成 `{}`,于是每个没写该字段的模型都会被强制禁用。
- **把这件事并进路由级的 `reasoning` 旋钮。** 那个旋钮是*默认选择*,不是能力集合;它保留下来,而已声明模型的档位如今约束着它能选什么。
## 后果
- 输入框的档位面板对手工声明的模型直接可用,UI 零改动——`resolveModelInfo` 经 catalog 元数据所走的同一 seam 报告已声明档位(由 `declared-reasoning` web 场景钉住)。
- #1860 暂缓的缺口——模型接不住的路由级档位会让发往它的请求失败——如今有了运维侧补救:对齐该模型的 `reasoningEfforts`,或去掉路由默认值。
- 刻意不提供任何把单个 map 键或 compat 字段交还给「catalog 原本怎么说」的拼写:这份声明就是对外提供的全部,要保留某个 catalog 值就得重述它。README 记载了这一点。
- `verify-package-invariants` 原封未动:该功能新增的是配置解析,没有新事件,也没有可变的运行时关系。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-08-user-explicit-skill-invocation.md
2026-08-08-user-explicit-skill-invocation.md: d925938279923282170dc99934f4fa44d8ecf2b4
2026-08-08-user-explicit-skill-invocation.zh.md: 64e23be0b42519fb9681adefcd0f05074d3aa35e

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
# Agent Note: User-explicit skill invocation at the pre-step gesture boundary
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-08-08-user-explicit-skill-invocation.zh.md)
## Problem
A `disable-model-invocation: true` skill is user-only by design: it never enters the model-facing catalog and the `skill` tool refuses to load it. Its only legitimate entry point is an explicit user gesture — yet the web client had none. `skill.list` filtered to the model-and-user intersection (hiding user-only skills from the menu), an entered `/name` line rode into the default prompt sink as plain text, and the model it reached was forbidden to load the skill — so it degraded to `read`-ing the SKILL.md file or ignoring the gesture (issue #1470). Even for ordinary skills, the decision-21 plain-text reference made user invocation a collaboration cue the model could ignore, not a guarantee.
## Decision
User-explicit invocation is a host-side pre-step injection, uniform for every user-invocable skill and every front end:
- `dsh-tool-skill` registers a second `agent/pre-step` listener (beside its catalog listener, the same seam `workspace-instructions` and the runtime-context snapshot ride): it scans the step's claimed messages for whitespace-bounded `/name` tokens — anywhere in the text, the same word-boundary shape the transcript chip decoration uses — collects first-seen-deduplicated names, loads each through `ctx.skills.get`, checks `isUserInvocable` on the loaded definition (the single lookup that produces what is injected), renders it with the shared `renderSkillContent`, and appends the injections after every other injection of the step: background first (workspace rules, runtime policy, catalog), the material the model must act on last, closest to its answer. Registration order pins the placement — the gesture listener registers before the catalog listener, so the waterfall hands it the catalog-bearing list to extend.
- Precision is closed-set matching, exactly like slash commands: `/goal` resolves against the command registry, `/name` against the workspace's user-invocable skill directory; a miss stays ordinary prose, so nothing is ever guessed. Only `source.kind === 'user'` messages are scanned — external text cannot forge a gesture. Paths (`/usr/bin`), fractions (`5/8`), and prefixed tokens (`foo/name`) all break the boundary.
- The client stays decision 21: a menu pick lands the literal `/name ` and the prompt ships it verbatim; ui-skill implements no adjudication hooks and no reference codec. `skill.list` (now the domain's only RPC) serves every user-invocable skill with `modelInvocable` so menus mark user-only entries. A name shared with a host command resolves to the command — adjudication claims the line client-side before it becomes a prompt.
- The injection is a `user`-role message carrying the `skill-invocation` source (`{ name, form: 'instructions' }`), so `user/message` logging, the context-injection transcript row (labelled with the skill name), and replay all come free; `renderSkillContent` lives in the `dsh-skill` seam, shared verbatim with the `skill` tool result, and the catalog's closing sentence tells the model to follow an injected block instead of re-loading it.
Peer-product survey (Pi, OpenCode, Claude Code, Kimi Code, Codex, DeepSeek-Reasonix — local checkouts) was unanimous that user-explicit triggering is programmatic injection with zero model participation; the final shape is closest to Codex's core-side `$name` mention scanning, which likewise frees every front end from implementing recognition.
## Alternatives considered
- **`skill.invoke` RPC (host injects, client claims)** — implemented first, in two iterations: a single mixed message (user text folded into the body), then a gesture prompt plus injection delivered through inbox primitives. Rejected after real-session testing: the mixed message polluted the injection with user prose; the two-message form depended on wake-ordering subtleties (`followup` claims the whole next-turn queue synchronously inside the first waking call, stranding any later message in the next turn — reproduced live), and the dedicated RPC duplicated a path `session.prompt` already provides while leaving TUI/ACP to reimplement recognition. The pre-step seam removes the RPC, the claim machinery, and the ordering hazard outright.
- **`agent.inject()` from the RPC handler** — the inject queue (`next-step`, wake-free) is claimed ahead of the next-turn prompt, putting the injection above the gesture in the log; and pairing it with a waking `followup` reintroduces the same ordering coupling. The pre-step listener injects inside the step assembly, where ordering is explicit.
- **A host `/skill <name>` command** (command registry, plan-mode precedent) — two-token UX, no name completion, and user-only skills stay undiscoverable in the menu; the per-cwd skill catalog also fits the static command registry poorly. Rejected.
- **Client-side expansion** (fetch body, splice into the prompt) — authorization becomes bypassable client courtesy, the log loses the invocation semantics, and Codex deleted its equivalent mechanism (custom prompts) in favor of core injection. Rejected.
- **Structured reference payload on the prompt wire** (Codex's `UserInput::Skill` analogue: the client ships `{skills: [...]}` beside the text and the boundary prefers it over scanning) — considered and deferred: the existing slash-command system is itself line-text on the wire, and closed-set directory matching already removes the guesswork; recorded as a ledger item should gesture precision ever need client intent.
- **Per-injection preamble line** (Kimi's `User activated the skill …`) — dropped in favor of the one-time catalog sentence: same context, paid once, and the injected block stays byte-identical with the tool result.
## Consequences
- Decision 21's plain-text reference is now the whole client story: the draft carries plain text, chip visuals derive from the lexicon, and the sent text is judged by the host boundary — a hand-typed gesture, a menu pick, and a TUI prompt are indistinguishable and equally deterministic.
- Every user-invocable skill invocation costs its full rendered body unconditionally — the price of determinism the peer survey showed everyone pays. Mentioning a known skill name mid-sentence loads it; that is the Codex mention semantic, accepted deliberately.
- The `skill-invocation` source rides `user/message`, so Model-visible ⟺ logged holds with no new event type, and replay/UI read metadata rather than text markers.
- Accepted residual of dropping the per-injection preamble: the no-reload framing rides only the catalog, and a workspace whose skills are all user-only never publishes a first catalog — an injection can arrive with no framing at all, and the model may redundantly try the `skill` tool once (the replacement catalog's empty arm carries the sentence; the never-published case does not). Publishing a catalog for framing alone was judged worse than that one recoverable error.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
# Agent Note: pre-step 手势边界上的用户显式 skill 调用
Status: implemented
[English](2026-08-08-user-explicit-skill-invocation.md) | 中文
## 问题
`disable-model-invocation: true` 的 skill(技能)在设计上就是仅限用户的:它绝不进入面向模型的目录,`skill` 工具也拒绝加载它。它唯一正当的入口是一次显式的用户手势——而 web 客户端此前没有这个入口。`skill.list` 过滤到模型与用户的交集(把仅限用户的 skill 挡在菜单之外),回车提交的 `/name` 一行以纯文本落入默认提示词 sink,而这行文本到达的模型又被禁止加载该 skill——于是退化为模型去 `read` 那份 SKILL.md 文件,或者干脆无视这次手势(issue #1470)。即使对普通 skill,决策 21 的纯文本引用也让用户调用只是模型可以忽略的协作线索,而不是保证。
## 决策
用户显式调用是一次宿主侧的 pre-step 注入,对每一个用户可调用的 skill 和每一种前端一致:
- `dsh-tool-skill` 注册第二个 `agent/pre-step` 监听器(与其目录监听器并列,也是 `workspace-instructions` 与运行时上下文快照搭乘的同一 seam):它在该步骤已认领的消息中扫描以空白为界的 `/name` token——文本中任意位置均可,与 transcript(文本记录)chip 装饰所用的词边界形状相同——收集按首见去重的名称,逐个经 `ctx.skills.get` 加载,在已加载定义上检查 `isUserInvocable`(产生注入内容的正是这同一次查找),用共享的 `renderSkillContent` 渲染,并把注入追加在该步骤所有其他注入之后:背景在前(工作区规则、运行时策略、目录),模型必须着手处理的材料在最后、最贴近它的回答。注册顺序钉住了这一位置——手势监听器先于目录监听器注册,因此 waterfall 会把携带目录的列表交给它来扩展。
- 精确性来自封闭集合匹配,与斜杠命令完全一致:`/goal` 对照命令注册表解析,`/name` 对照工作区的用户可调用 skill 目录解析;未命中即保持为普通行文,因此绝不猜测。只扫描 `source.kind === 'user'` 的消息——外部文本无法伪造手势。路径(`/usr/bin`)、分数(`5/8`)与带前缀的 token(`foo/name`)都会破坏该边界。
- 客户端停留在决策 21:菜单 pick 落下字面文本 `/name `,提示词将其原样发出;ui-skill 不实现任何裁决钩子,也没有引用 codec。`skill.list`(现在是该领域唯一的 RPC)提供每一个用户可调用的 skill 并携带 `modelInvocable`,供菜单标出仅限用户的条目。与宿主命令同名的名称解析为命令——裁决在客户端把该行认领走,它尚未成为提示词。
- 注入是一条携带 `skill-invocation` 来源(`{ name, form: 'instructions' }`)的 `user` 角色消息,因此 `user/message` 落账、上下文注入的 transcript 行(以 skill 名称标注)与回放全部免费获得;`renderSkillContent` 位于 `dsh-skill` seam,与 `skill` 工具结果逐字共享,目录的结尾一句会告诉模型遵循注入块而不是重新加载。
同类产品调研(Pi、OpenCode、Claude Code、Kimi Code、Codex、DeepSeek-Reasonix——本地检出)一致表明:用户显式触发都是模型零参与的程序化注入;最终形态最接近 Codex 核心侧的 `$name` mention 扫描——它同样让每一种前端免于自行实现识别。
## 考虑过的替代方案
- **`skill.invoke` RPC(宿主注入、客户端认领)**——最先实现,共两轮迭代:先是单条混合消息(用户文本折进正文),后是经 inbox 原语投递的手势提示词加注入两条消息。经真实会话测试后否决:混合消息让用户行文污染了注入;两条消息的形态依赖唤醒顺序的微妙之处(`followup` 在第一个唤醒调用内同步认领整个 next-turn 队列,把之后的消息滞留到下一轮次——已实际复现),而专设 RPC 复制了 `session.prompt` 已提供的路径,还让 TUI/ACP 不得不各自重新实现识别。pre-step seam 把 RPC、认领机制与顺序隐患一并干净移除。
- **从 RPC 处理器调用 `agent.inject()`**——inject 队列(`next-step`,不唤醒)会在 next-turn 提示词之前被认领,使注入在日志中排到手势之上;而与会唤醒的 `followup` 搭配又会重新引入同样的顺序耦合。pre-step 监听器在步骤组装内部注入,那里的顺序是显式的。
- **宿主 `/skill <name>` 命令**(命令注册表,plan 模式先例)——两 token 的 UX、没有名称补全、仅限用户的 skill 在菜单里仍不可发现;按 cwd 的 skill 目录也与静态命令注册表格格不入。否决。
- **客户端展开**(拉取正文、拼进提示词)——授权沦为可被绕过的客户端善意,日志失去调用语义,而且 Codex 已删除其等价机制(custom prompts)转向核心注入。否决。
- **提示词协议上的结构化引用载荷**(Codex `UserInput::Skill` 的类似物:客户端在文本旁附带 `{skills: [...]}`,边界优先采用它而不是扫描)——考虑过并暂缓:现有斜杠命令体系在协议上本身就是行文本,封闭集合的目录匹配已经消除了猜测;已记为台账事项,以备手势精确性某天需要客户端意图。
- **每次注入一条前导语**(Kimi 的 `User activated the skill …`)——弃用,改为一次性的目录句子:同样的上下文、只支付一次,且注入块与工具结果保持逐字节一致。
## 后果
- 决策 21 的纯文本引用如今就是客户端的全部故事:草稿承载纯文本,chip 视觉由 lexicon 派生,发出的文本由宿主边界评判——手动键入的手势、菜单 pick 与 TUI 提示词无从区分,也同等确定。
- 每一次用户可调用 skill 的调用都无条件付出其完整渲染正文的成本——这是确定性的代价,同类调研表明所有产品都在支付。在句子中间提到一个已知 skill 名称也会加载它;这就是 Codex 的 mention 语义,属于有意接受。
- `skill-invocation` 来源搭乘 `user/message`,因此「模型可见 ⟺ 已记录」在不新增事件类型的情况下继续成立,回放与 UI 读取的是元数据而非文本标记。
- 放弃逐次注入前导语后被接受的残余:no-reload framing 只搭乘目录,而 skill 全部为仅用户的工作区永远不会发布首个目录——注入可能在完全没有 framing 的情况下到达,模型可能多余地调用一次 `skill` 工具(替换目录的空臂携带该句;从未发布的情形没有)。仅为 framing 而发布目录被判定比这一次可恢复的错误更糟。