docs: reserve seam for complete capabilities
This commit is contained in:
Turtle
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-06-20-public-agent-stop-surface.md
|
||||
2026-06-20-public-agent-stop-surface.md: e9c713c7ba8c784d3d66fe8f391e1b197f7394d2
|
||||
2026-06-20-public-agent-stop-surface.zh.md: c57bb32643344c237dd68479e3ab8f8a7404a594
|
||||
2026-06-20-public-agent-stop-surface.md: ecbd00864f9e11205e544049a2e1c641ac132213
|
||||
2026-06-20-public-agent-stop-surface.zh.md: e9b0a3b8735537f2323dfe246eb7002b23c14947
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -18,9 +18,9 @@ The extra surface area made the loop carry a public verb that was mostly a teard
|
||||
|
||||
`cancel()` is the only public *stop* primitive on `Agent`. Lifecycle owners use `AgentHandle.dispose()` to stop and unregister an agent; non-owners use broad `cancel()` to abandon current and queued work or `keepInbox` to abort the active turn while retaining pending work. The implementation keeps a private turn cancellation holder, but it is not part of the plugin-facing `Agent` contract. The [Web stop decision](../bug-fix/2026-07-31-web-stop-preserves-queue.md) is the production `keepInbox` consumer.
|
||||
|
||||
`whenIdle()` is **retained** as the public quiescence-observation primitive (resolve once the agent settles out of `running`, resolve immediately when already idle, await the loop exit when disposed). It is not a stop verb; it is how a non-owner observes the stop *completing* without disposing the agent. Its live consumers are ACP and agent tests that await settlement through this public seam (`packages/acp/acp/tests`, `packages/core/agent-loop/tests`); the production ACP bridge owns its agents and tears them down through `AgentHandle.dispose()`, so `packages/acp/acp/src` itself has no `whenIdle()` call.
|
||||
`whenIdle()` is **retained** as the public quiescence-observation primitive (resolve once the agent settles out of `running`, resolve immediately when already idle, await the loop exit when disposed). It is not a stop verb; it is how a non-owner observes the stop *completing* without disposing the agent. Its live consumers are ACP and agent tests that await settlement through this public contract (`packages/acp/acp/tests`, `packages/core/agent-loop/tests`); the production ACP bridge owns its agents and tears them down through `AgentHandle.dispose()`, so `packages/acp/acp/src` itself has no `whenIdle()` call.
|
||||
|
||||
Public `abort()` is absent, and the disposer remains async and waits for the loop to stop. Tests exercise cancellation through the public typed cause and explicit signal seams rather than reaching into the holder.
|
||||
Public `abort()` is absent, and the disposer remains async and waits for the loop to stop. Tests exercise cancellation through the public typed cause and explicit signal APIs rather than reaching into the holder.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -18,9 +18,9 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
`cancel()` 是 `Agent` 上唯一的公共*停止*原语。生命周期拥有者使用 `AgentHandle.dispose()` 停止并注销 agent；非拥有者使用广义 `cancel()` 放弃当前和已排队工作，或使用 `keepInbox` 中止活动轮次并保留待处理工作。实现保留一个私有轮次取消 holder，但它不属于面向插件的 `Agent` 约定。[Web 停止决策](../bug-fix/2026-07-31-web-stop-preserves-queue.md)是生产环境中的 `keepInbox` 消费方。
|
||||
|
||||
`whenIdle()` **保留**为公开的完全停稳观测原语（agent 从 `running` 状态稳定后 resolve，已处于 idle 时立即 resolve，dispose 后等待循环退出）。它不是停止动词；它是非所有者在不 dispose agent 的前提下观测停止*完成*的方式。它的活跃消费方是 ACP 和通过此公开 seam 等待结算的 agent 测试（`packages/acp/acp/tests`、`packages/core/agent-loop/tests`）；生产环境的 ACP 桥接层拥有其 agent 并通过 `AgentHandle.dispose()` 销毁它们，因此 `packages/acp/acp/src` 本身没有 `whenIdle()` 调用。
|
||||
`whenIdle()` **保留**为公开的完全停稳观测原语（agent 从 `running` 状态稳定后 resolve，已处于 idle 时立即 resolve，dispose 后等待循环退出）。它不是停止动词；它是非所有者在不 dispose agent 的前提下观测停止*完成*的方式。它的活跃消费方是 ACP 和通过此公开约定等待结算的 agent 测试（`packages/acp/acp/tests`、`packages/core/agent-loop/tests`）；生产环境的 ACP 桥接层拥有其 agent 并通过 `AgentHandle.dispose()` 销毁它们，因此 `packages/acp/acp/src` 本身没有 `whenIdle()` 调用。
|
||||
|
||||
公共 `abort()` 已不存在，disposer 仍为异步并等待循环停止。测试通过公共类型化原因和显式 signal seam 验证取消，而不会伸入 holder 内部。
|
||||
公共 `abort()` 已不存在，disposer 仍为异步并等待循环停止。测试通过公共类型化原因和显式 signal API 验证取消，而不会伸入 holder 内部。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-06-26-fsspec-style-fs-seam.md
|
||||
2026-06-26-fsspec-style-fs-seam.md: b5c201fb192782f130d3609978d16f0fc6d4d55e
|
||||
2026-06-26-fsspec-style-fs-seam.zh.md: 2ed74af594296f2853f4d97474c4ee07ef83dbd5
|
||||
2026-06-26-fsspec-style-fs-seam.md: c11c129a55c2e9e37efc83b01a219cae8b937fbc
|
||||
2026-06-26-fsspec-style-fs-seam.zh.md: 0e73ee134563bf8208e63f37bf36415eb1bf562d
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Split the stack into four layers:
|
||||
```text
|
||||
tool dsh-tool-fs model-facing schemas + read windowing + text rendering; the EXECUTOR (reads/writes/edits via ctx.fs, dispatches the fs/* events)
|
||||
policy dsh-fs-policy observed-state + read-before-edit + write/edit freshness, contributed through the fs/* event gate (no service)
|
||||
provider seam dsh-fs ctx.fs: text IO + atomic mutation primitives (optional version guard)
|
||||
provider contract dsh-fs ctx.fs: text IO + atomic mutation primitives (optional version guard)
|
||||
provider dsh-fs-local local implementation of ctx.fs
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ type FsWriteIntent =
|
||||
|
||||
`writeText` is atomic temp-file + rename with an explicit write expectation. `createIfAbsent` creates a missing target and rejects an existing target with `FS_NOT_OBSERVED`; it is the path used when the owner has no prior read. `replaceIfVersion` replaces only when the target exists at the observed version; a missing target or version mismatch throws `FS_STALE_VERSION`.
|
||||
|
||||
`editText` is a provider-level guarded text mutation. When guarded it first verifies the target still exists at `expected.version`, then reads the current text, applies literal replacement, and writes atomically. The stale check must happen before literal matching so an edit based on an old read reports `FS_STALE_VERSION`, not `FS_EDIT_NOT_FOUND` or `FS_AMBIGUOUS_EDIT` from matching against newer content. Keeping this primitive on the provider seam preserves backend-local locking and lets a future remote backend implement native compare-and-edit without forcing the policy layer to pull the whole file through it.
|
||||
`editText` is a provider-level guarded text mutation. When guarded it first verifies the target still exists at `expected.version`, then reads the current text, applies literal replacement, and writes atomically. The stale check must happen before literal matching so an edit based on an old read reports `FS_STALE_VERSION`, not `FS_EDIT_NOT_FOUND` or `FS_AMBIGUOUS_EDIT` from matching against newer content. Keeping this primitive on the provider contract preserves backend-local locking and lets a future remote backend implement native compare-and-edit without forcing the policy layer to pull the whole file through it.
|
||||
|
||||
This is a *text-storage* seam, deliberately half a level above byte-level fsspec (`cat`/`open` hand back raw bytes). UTF-8 decoding, binary/NUL rejection, guarded full-file writes, and guarded literal text edits live in the provider so the policy layer never touches raw bytes, reimplements cross-chunk decoding, or separates stale checks from the mutation critical section. Model-facing concepts still stay out of the provider: no line windows, numbered lines, rendered footers, or observed-state store leak down.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ This Agent Note reverses two decisions from [filesystem-capability-seam](../arch
|
||||
- Text reads no longer return backend-numbered line records or `full`/`partial` views; authorization is based on version freshness, so a windowed read can authorize edit when the file is unchanged.
|
||||
- Literal edit no longer sits behind the old `applyEdit` API that mixed backend mutation with seam-owned observation policy. It remains a provider primitive as `editText`, because version guard + literal match + atomic rewrite must stay inside the provider's mutation critical section.
|
||||
|
||||
It keeps the interface/implementation/consumer discipline, consumer-never-imports-backend rule, backend-defined target/version/display metadata, atomic local writes, and the shared `FsError` taxonomy.
|
||||
It keeps the Service Definition / Service provider / Consumer discipline, consumer-never-imports-backend rule, backend-defined target/version/display metadata, atomic local writes, and the shared `FsError` taxonomy.
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -123,8 +123,8 @@ The seam was later extended with direct directory listing by [Add direct directo
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
- Adds a fourth fs package and a new plugin layer. This is intentional: it is the previously deferred policy layer, not a second abstract backend seam.
|
||||
- Adds a fourth fs package and a new plugin layer. This is intentional: it is the previously deferred policy layer, not a second abstract backend contract.
|
||||
- Direct `ctx.fs` use bypasses the policy: a direct `ctx.fs.readText` emits no `fs/observed`, so under the default policy a later `edit` rejects with `FS_NOT_OBSERVED` until the file is read through the `read` tool. The failure is explicit and documented.
|
||||
- Large-file line windowing moves from the backend to the `read` tool in `dsh-tool-fs`; text decoding and binary rejection stay in `ctx.fs.streamText`, so this is relocation of windowing only, not a second text-IO implementation.
|
||||
- Keeping `editText` in the provider seam means every backend must implement the literal replacement contract. This is intentional: the operation is not pure storage, but stale guard + literal match + atomic rewrite is the unit that must stay together for correct error attribution and concurrency behavior. The contract should stay narrow and text-only so future backends can implement it natively or by whole-file rewrite.
|
||||
- Keeping `editText` in the provider contract means every backend must implement the literal replacement contract. This is intentional: the operation is not pure storage, but stale guard + literal match + atomic rewrite is the unit that must stay together for correct error attribution and concurrency behavior. The contract should stay narrow and text-only so future backends can implement it natively or by whole-file rewrite.
|
||||
- Freshness permits full-file `write` after a windowed read. That is weaker than the old view check, but avoids making large files impossible to edit; prompt guidance still discourages blind full replaces.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
```text
|
||||
tool dsh-tool-fs model-facing schemas + read windowing + text rendering; the EXECUTOR (reads/writes/edits via ctx.fs, dispatches the fs/* events)
|
||||
policy dsh-fs-policy observed-state + read-before-edit + write/edit freshness, contributed through the fs/* event gate (no service)
|
||||
provider seam dsh-fs ctx.fs: text IO + atomic mutation primitives (optional version guard)
|
||||
provider contract dsh-fs ctx.fs: text IO + atomic mutation primitives (optional version guard)
|
||||
provider dsh-fs-local local implementation of ctx.fs
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ type FsWriteIntent =
|
||||
|
||||
`writeText` 通过临时文件 + rename 实现原子写入，并带有显式的写入期望。`createIfAbsent` 创建不存在的目标，对已存在的目标以 `FS_NOT_OBSERVED` 拒绝；这是 owner 没有先前读取时使用的路径。`replaceIfVersion` 仅在目标以观测到的版本存在时替换；目标不存在或版本不匹配时抛出 `FS_STALE_VERSION`。
|
||||
|
||||
`editText` 是提供方级别的受保护文本变更。启用守卫时，它首先验证目标仍以 `expected.version` 存在，然后读取当前文本、应用字面替换并原子写入。陈旧检查必须在字面匹配之前发生，这样基于旧读取的编辑会报告 `FS_STALE_VERSION`，而不是对更新内容进行匹配后报告 `FS_EDIT_NOT_FOUND` 或 `FS_AMBIGUOUS_EDIT`。将此原语保留在提供方 seam 上，保持了后端本地锁定的能力，也让未来的远程后端能够实现原生的 compare-and-edit，而无需策略层拉取整个文件。
|
||||
`editText` 是提供方级别的受保护文本变更。启用守卫时，它首先验证目标仍以 `expected.version` 存在，然后读取当前文本、应用字面替换并原子写入。陈旧检查必须在字面匹配之前发生，这样基于旧读取的编辑会报告 `FS_STALE_VERSION`，而不是对更新内容进行匹配后报告 `FS_EDIT_NOT_FOUND` 或 `FS_AMBIGUOUS_EDIT`。将此原语保留在提供方约定上，保持了后端本地锁定的能力，也让未来的远程后端能够实现原生的 compare-and-edit，而无需策略层拉取整个文件。
|
||||
|
||||
这是一个*文本存储* seam，刻意比字节级 fsspec（`cat`/`open` 返回原始字节）高半个层次。UTF-8 解码、二进制/NUL 拒绝、受保护的全文件写入和受保护的字面文本编辑都在提供方内完成，因此策略层从不接触原始字节、不重新实现跨分片解码、也不将陈旧检查与变更临界区分离。面向模型的概念仍然不下沉到提供方：行窗口、带行号的行、渲染的页脚、观测状态存储都不会泄漏下去。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ type FsWriteIntent =
|
||||
- 文本读取不再返回后端编号的行记录或 `full`/`partial` 视图；授权基于版本新鲜度，因此窗口化读取在文件未变时即可授权编辑。
|
||||
- 字面编辑不再位于旧的 `applyEdit` API 之后（该 API 混合了后端变更与 seam 拥有的观测策略）。它作为 `editText` 保留为提供方原语，因为版本守卫 + 字面匹配 + 原子重写必须留在提供方的变更临界区内。
|
||||
|
||||
保留的内容：接口/实现/消费方纪律、消费方不导入后端规则、后端定义的 target/version/display 元数据、原子本地写入，以及共享的 `FsError` 分类体系。
|
||||
保留的内容：Service Definition / Service provider / Consumer 纪律、消费方不导入后端规则、后端定义的 target/version/display 元数据、原子本地写入，以及共享的 `FsError` 分类体系。
|
||||
|
||||
## 验证
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -123,8 +123,8 @@ type FsWriteIntent =
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
- 新增第四个 fs 包和一个新的插件层。这是有意为之：它是此前推迟的策略层，而非第二个抽象后端 seam。
|
||||
- 新增第四个 fs 包和一个新的插件层。这是有意为之：它是此前推迟的策略层，而非第二个抽象后端约定。
|
||||
- 直接使用 `ctx.fs` 会绕过策略：直接 `ctx.fs.readText` 不发出 `fs/observed`，因此在默认策略下，后续 `edit` 会以 `FS_NOT_OBSERVED` 拒绝，直到通过 `read` 工具读取该文件。这一失败是显式且有文档记录的。
|
||||
- 大文件行窗口化从后端移至 `dsh-tool-fs` 中的 `read` 工具；文本解码和二进制拒绝留在 `ctx.fs.streamText` 中，因此这只是窗口化逻辑的迁移，而非第二套文本 IO 实现。
|
||||
- 将 `editText` 保留在提供方 seam 上意味着每个后端都必须实现字面替换约定。这是有意为之：该操作不是纯存储，但陈旧守卫 + 字面匹配 + 原子重写是必须保持在一起的单元，以确保正确的错误归因和并发行为。该约定应保持窄且仅限文本，以便未来后端可以原生实现或通过全文件重写实现。
|
||||
- 将 `editText` 保留在提供方约定上意味着每个后端都必须实现字面替换约定。这是有意为之：该操作不是纯存储，但陈旧守卫 + 字面匹配 + 原子重写是必须保持在一起的单元，以确保正确的错误归因和并发行为。该约定应保持窄且仅限文本，以便未来后端可以原生实现或通过全文件重写实现。
|
||||
- 新鲜度允许在窗口化读取后进行全文件 `write`。这比旧的视图检查更弱，但避免了大文件无法编辑的问题；提示词引导仍然不鼓励盲目的全文件替换。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-04-tighten-hook-protocol-contract.md
|
||||
2026-07-04-tighten-hook-protocol-contract.md: a67d0e8447e36516006e57051581c03877c1ba12
|
||||
2026-07-04-tighten-hook-protocol-contract.zh.md: b57a8da8d9f0f921b69d0b63ad5c655eb47f5967
|
||||
2026-07-04-tighten-hook-protocol-contract.md: 0c2397fa298ebd67d24f86d66d7d049b9da57ce9
|
||||
2026-07-04-tighten-hook-protocol-contract.zh.md: b0edd754eb5115936a03a892a2db0b67552f64f1
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-04-tighten-hook-protocol-contract.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
Four pieces of the `dsh-hook-protocol`/bridge contract missed the discipline the [subagent-observe-enrich Agent Note](../../archived/feature/2026-06-30-subagent-observe-enrich.md) records — it dropped an `agentType` lifecycle field for lacking a consumer, and these failed the same test:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **`HookDialect`'s `'native'` variant** (`packages/hooks/hook-protocol/src/types.ts`) had zero producers — the bridges stamp `'claude'` and `'codex'`; the only `'native'` constructor anywhere was the lib's own unit test. The field's own JSDoc defines `dialect` as "the bridge that ran it", and native is not a bridge: the [interception-seams Agent Note](../feature/2026-06-30-interception-seams.md) records that native hooks are not a package and that "a native plugin can already use the typed Decisions" without the durable hook log, and the flagship native-plugin worked example asserts exactly that (no `hook/*` events at all).
|
||||
1. **`HookDialect`'s `'native'` variant** (`packages/hooks/hook-protocol/src/types.ts`) had zero producers — the bridges stamp `'claude'` and `'codex'`; the only `'native'` constructor anywhere was the lib's own unit test. The field's own JSDoc defines `dialect` as "the bridge that ran it", and native is not a bridge: the [interception extension-points Agent Note](../feature/2026-06-30-interception-extension-points.md) records that native hooks are not a package and that "a native plugin can already use the typed Decisions" without the durable hook log, and the flagship native-plugin worked example asserts exactly that (no `hook/*` events at all).
|
||||
2. **`HookOutput.suppressOutput`** (same file) was parsed by the codec and discarded on every path: no bridge branch, no merge fold, no warn, no deferred-list row — uniquely among its parsed-but-unhonored siblings, each of which carries a stated deferral (`updatedInput` → a logged warn plus the [pre-tool-input-rewrite proposal](../../proposed/feature/2026-06-30-pre-tool-input-rewrite.md); `systemMessage` → a logged warn plus a README deferred row; `continue`/`stopReason` → a `TODO(hook-continue-false)` anchor plus the `'stop'` decision record). Structurally there is nothing to suppress: hook stdout never enters any transcript (context flows only via `additionalContext`; the log records only `decision`/`stderrSummary`), so a hook author setting `suppressOutput: true` got silent nothing with no warn.
|
||||
3. **`defaultTimeoutMs` was double-defaulted in both bridge configs with a floating literal** — a schema `.default(600_000)` AND a `?? 600_000` fallback (`packages/hooks/hooks-claude/src/index.ts`, `packages/hooks/hooks-codex/src/index.ts`), two homes per bridge for one protocol-level constant, so the bridges could silently drift apart on the shared default. *The proposal's original remedy — delete the knob outright — was overtaken by the no-hardcoded-tunables audit, which kept the knob as the explicit bridge-owned config (and added `stderrSummaryMaxChars` beside it); what remained to fix was the literal's home.*
|
||||
4. **The `hook/result` semantics lived in the bridges, twice, not in the lib that owns the event.** `summarize()` — the stderr truncation rule — was byte-identical in `packages/hooks/hooks-claude/src/index.ts` and `packages/hooks/hooks-codex/src/index.ts`, and so was the decision-string rule `output.decision ?? (output.continue === false ? 'stop' : 'pass')`; yet `dsh-hook-protocol` declared `hook/result`, documented `stderrSummary` as "truncated" without owning the truncation, and documented the decision values without owning the mapping. If one bridge drifted (a different cap, a different fallback), the shared durable event's semantics would fork silently.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh-hook-protocol`/bridge 约定中有四部分没有遵守 [subagent observe/enrich Agent Note](../../archived/feature/2026-06-30-subagent-observe-enrich.md)记下的准则——后者因缺少消费方而删除 `agentType` 生命周期字段，以下各项没有通过同一检验：
|
||||
|
||||
1. **`HookDialect` 的 `'native'` 变体**（`packages/hooks/hook-protocol/src/types.ts`）没有生产者——bridge 会标记 `'claude'` 和 `'codex'`；所有位置中唯一构造 `'native'` 的是该库自己的单元测试。字段自身的 JSDoc 将 `dialect` 定义为“运行它的 bridge”，而 native 不是 bridge：[拦截 seam Agent Note](../feature/2026-06-30-interception-seams.md) 记载 native 钩子不是一个包，并且“native 插件无需持久钩子日志即可使用类型化 Decision”；旗舰 native 插件实践示例恰好断言了这一点（完全没有 `hook/*` 事件）。
|
||||
1. **`HookDialect` 的 `'native'` 变体**（`packages/hooks/hook-protocol/src/types.ts`）没有生产者——bridge 会标记 `'claude'` 和 `'codex'`；所有位置中唯一构造 `'native'` 的是该库自己的单元测试。字段自身的 JSDoc 将 `dialect` 定义为“运行它的 bridge”，而 native 不是 bridge：[拦截扩展点 Agent Note](../feature/2026-06-30-interception-extension-points.md) 记载 native 钩子不是一个包，并且“native 插件无需持久钩子日志即可使用类型化 Decision”；旗舰 native 插件实践示例恰好断言了这一点（完全没有 `hook/*` 事件）。
|
||||
2. **`HookOutput.suppressOutput`**（同一文件）被 codec 解析后在所有路径上均被丢弃：没有 bridge 分支处理它、没有合并 fold、没有 warn、没有 deferred-list 行——在所有「被解析但未兑现」的同类字段中它是唯一没有明确延期声明的（`updatedInput` → 一条 warn 日志加 [pre-tool-input-rewrite 提案](../../proposed/feature/2026-06-30-pre-tool-input-rewrite.md)；`systemMessage` → 一条 warn 日志加 README deferred 行；`continue`/`stopReason` → 一个 `TODO(hook-continue-false)` 锚点加 `'stop'` decision 记录）。从结构上看根本无物可抑制：钩子 stdout 从不进入任何 transcript（文本记录）；上下文仅通过 `additionalContext` 流入，日志也只记录 `decision`/`stderrSummary`。因此，钩子作者设置 `suppressOutput: true` 得到的是无声的空操作，且无任何警告。
|
||||
3. **`defaultTimeoutMs` 在两个 bridge 配置中都以游离的字面量重复设置了默认值**——schema 的 `.default(600_000)` 加上一个 `?? 600_000` 回退（`packages/hooks/hooks-claude/src/index.ts`、`packages/hooks/hooks-codex/src/index.ts`），一个协议级常量在每个 bridge 中有两个归属地，两个 bridge 可能在共享默认值上悄然分歧。*提案最初的补救措施是彻底删除该旋钮，但被 no-hardcoded-tunables 审计所取代：审计保留了该旋钮作为 bridge 拥有的显式配置（并在旁边新增了 `stderrSummaryMaxChars`）；剩下要修的是字面量的归属地。*
|
||||
4. **`hook/result` 的语义存在于两个 bridge 中（各一份），而非拥有该事件的 lib。** `summarize()`——stderr 截断规则——在 `packages/hooks/hooks-claude/src/index.ts` 与 `packages/hooks/hooks-codex/src/index.ts` 中逐字节相同；decision 字符串规则 `output.decision ?? (output.continue === false ? 'stop' : 'pass')` 同样如此。然而 `dsh-hook-protocol` 声明了 `hook/result`、在文档中将 `stderrSummary` 描述为「已截断」却不拥有截断逻辑，记录了 decision 值却不拥有映射逻辑。如果某个 bridge 漂移（不同的上限、不同的回退），共享持久化事件的语义就会悄然分叉。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-22-plan-specific-collaboration-state.md
|
||||
2026-07-22-plan-specific-collaboration-state.md: d139f3d861244c80acfb604d17172461bbf0cd57
|
||||
2026-07-22-plan-specific-collaboration-state.zh.md: 3d51b8fc31196efca49693050258c323ff3af843
|
||||
2026-07-22-plan-specific-collaboration-state.md: bab39ccc594c35b482c8a24ab805b6c4f2d2472b
|
||||
2026-07-22-plan-specific-collaboration-state.zh.md: 9dc88884b5a63baff4d682ff04b40f6970160c70
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ The tool renders the submitted plan as a generic card titled by its first headin
|
||||
|
||||
**Let one presentation transport own plan state.** Rejected because TUI, Web, resume, fork, prompt assembly, and the exit tool need the same logged fact independently of any one transport. Presentation adapters own only their projections.
|
||||
|
||||
**Split a capability-seam trio or put the state in the agent loop.** Rejected because plan mode has no swappable backend, while existing session, prompt, tool, command, and lifecycle seams already provide every required hook.
|
||||
**Split a capability-seam trio or put the state in the agent loop.** Rejected because plan mode has no swappable backend, while existing session, prompt, tool, command, and lifecycle extension points already provide every required hook.
|
||||
|
||||
**Put flips in surface messages or store plans in files.** Rejected because the stance is a log-only fact and the tool argument already records the reviewable plan. Surface duplication spends model context, while a plan directory creates a second durable home.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Plan mode 拥有一个 plan 专用产品包：位于 `packages/plan/plan-mode/`
|
||||
|
||||
**让一种呈现传输拥有 plan 状态。** 不予采纳，因为 TUI、Web、恢复、fork、提示词组装和退出工具都需要独立于任何单一传输使用同一项已记录事实。呈现适配器只拥有各自的投影。
|
||||
|
||||
**拆成能力 seam 三包，或把状态放进 agent loop。** 不予采纳，因为 plan mode 没有可替换后端，而现有的会话、提示词、工具、命令和生命周期 seam 已经提供所需的全部钩子。
|
||||
**拆成能力 seam 三包，或把状态放进 agent loop。** 不予采纳，因为 plan mode 没有可替换后端，而现有的会话、提示词、工具、命令和生命周期扩展点已经提供所需的全部钩子。
|
||||
|
||||
**将状态切换写入表层消息，或把计划存入文件。** 不予采纳，因为协作状态是仅日志事实，工具参数已经记录了可评审的计划。重复写入表层会消耗模型上下文，而计划目录会形成第二个持久归属。
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md
|
||||
2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md: 0fe2fc27a963d21e8a24c1682359ab3bc9e7af48
|
||||
2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.zh.md: d161f22672b1c1a1db131a58b4b8da531930ab97
|
||||
2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md: 29da3025251f9826c5780493bb2725b114a40601
|
||||
2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.zh.md: bf326ce9f6fea8c55b842bc61e3d8521032ea4d1
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Protocol and lifecycle tests pin stop-reason and prompt codecs, version negotiat
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep ACP as an editor UI until Web reaches parity.** Rejected because it leaves two interactive contracts to evolve and keeps editor conventions in the automation boundary.
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep the earlier editor bridge behind disciplined seams.** Rejected even though that bridge correctly used interface services, tool-owned render intents, approval and user-interaction answerers, harness-owned execution, and a stdout-pure composition. Its terminal cards were capability-gated, display-only Zed `_meta` projections with a text fallback rather than ACP `terminal/create`, so shell execution never left the harness. The projection derived each display terminal id from the stable per-call id to prevent collisions and recovered exit code or signal from the rendered status markers because the pure result presenter received content blocks rather than a structured exit; marker round-trip tests and an explicit no-capability `console` fallback test pinned both contracts. Those boundaries were coherent but could not make editor cards, session navigation, configuration pickers, and human elicitation belong in an automation protocol.
|
||||
**Keep the earlier editor bridge behind disciplined service boundaries.** Rejected even though that bridge correctly used interface services, tool-owned render intents, approval and user-interaction answerers, harness-owned execution, and a stdout-pure composition. Its terminal cards were capability-gated, display-only Zed `_meta` projections with a text fallback rather than ACP `terminal/create`, so shell execution never left the harness. The projection derived each display terminal id from the stable per-call id to prevent collisions and recovered exit code or signal from the rendered status markers because the pure result presenter received content blocks rather than a structured exit; marker round-trip tests and an explicit no-capability `console` fallback test pinned both contracts. Those boundaries were coherent but could not make editor cards, session navigation, configuration pickers, and human elicitation belong in an automation protocol.
|
||||
|
||||
**Replace ACP with a private subagent RPC.** Rejected because ACP already supplies a typed, interoperable process protocol and is used by the out-of-process subagent backend.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ ACP 快照套件仍会启动组装后的 ACP 示例，并保留用于锁定后
|
||||
|
||||
**在 Web 达到同等能力前，继续将 ACP 作为编辑器 UI。** 不予采用，因为这会留下两套需要演进的交互约定，并使编辑器约定继续存在于自动化边界中。
|
||||
|
||||
**通过严格的 seam 保留早期编辑器桥接层。** 不予采用，尽管该桥接层正确使用了接口服务、工具自有的 render intent、审批与用户交互应答者、harness 自有执行，以及保持 stdout 纯净的组装。其终端卡片是经过能力门控、仅用于展示的 Zed `_meta` 投影，并提供文本回退，而非使用 ACP `terminal/create`，因此 shell 执行从未离开 harness。该投影从稳定的逐调用 id 派生每个展示用终端 id，以避免冲突；由于纯结果展示器接收的是内容块，而不是结构化退出信息，它会从渲染后的状态标记中恢复退出码或信号。标记往返测试和显式的无能力 `console` 回退测试锁定了这两项约定。这些边界保持一致，却无法让编辑器卡片、会话导航、配置选择器和面向人类的询问成为自动化协议应有的职责。
|
||||
**通过严格的服务边界保留早期编辑器桥接层。** 不予采用，尽管该桥接层正确使用了接口服务、工具自有的 render intent、审批与用户交互应答者、harness 自有执行，以及保持 stdout 纯净的组装。其终端卡片是经过能力门控、仅用于展示的 Zed `_meta` 投影，并提供文本回退，而非使用 ACP `terminal/create`，因此 shell 执行从未离开 harness。该投影从稳定的逐调用 id 派生每个展示用终端 id，以避免冲突；由于纯结果展示器接收的是内容块，而不是结构化退出信息，它会从渲染后的状态标记中恢复退出码或信号。标记往返测试和显式的无能力 `console` 回退测试锁定了这两项约定。这些边界保持一致，却无法让编辑器卡片、会话导航、配置选择器和面向人类的询问成为自动化协议应有的职责。
|
||||
|
||||
**用私有 subagent RPC 替换 ACP。** 不予采用，因为 ACP 已经提供类型化、可互操作的进程协议，并由跨进程 subagent 后端使用。
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-24-agent-loop-observable-state-machine.md
|
||||
2026-07-24-agent-loop-observable-state-machine.md: b1773fdf7fd3bcbea9c6b9a4a0ce37c715bce4ca
|
||||
2026-07-24-agent-loop-observable-state-machine.zh.md: ef44e9c058d165bfbbe226e9d0fca1e6f8072f53
|
||||
2026-07-24-agent-loop-observable-state-machine.md: 2c9cdd3ac090d2236e8922e06c94b5504570fead
|
||||
2026-07-24-agent-loop-observable-state-machine.zh.md: 0659fb3414de49d3ee12dc913fa62698bb2e6a79
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ The event taxonomy removes the legacy prompt preparation/submission and serial s
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep the fine-grained event sequence.** This preserves a dedicated interception point for every internal phase, including request-only prefixes, assistant-message rewriting, post-step work, in-turn request recovery, and terminal stop overrides. It also makes the loop's private sequencing a permanent public contract and lets overlapping seams express conflicting decisions. The decision accepts the lost interception points in exchange for one boundary per supported extension responsibility.
|
||||
**Keep the fine-grained event sequence.** This preserves a dedicated interception point for every internal phase, including request-only prefixes, assistant-message rewriting, post-step work, in-turn request recovery, and terminal stop overrides. It also makes the loop's private sequencing a permanent public contract and lets overlapping extension points express conflicting decisions. The decision accepts the lost interception points in exchange for one boundary per supported extension responsibility.
|
||||
|
||||
**Represent disposal as a third `AgentStatus`.** This gives retained handles a terminal status value but duplicates the registry lifecycle already expressed by `agent/disposed`. The decision keeps `AgentStatus` about live activity and makes registration lifetime a separate dimension.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ agent 生命周期、agent 整体活动状态、收件箱条目的进度以及
|
||||
- 待处理消息插入时会发出 `agent/inbox/inserted`，随后要么在原子纯删除领取后发出 `agent/inbox/claimed`，要么在普通删除后发出 `agent/inbox/discarded`。`MessageId` 关联确切消息；持久 splice 坐标保留 placement 与取消信息。inbox 事件描述插入、领取和丢弃，而不是轮次完成。
|
||||
- 已领取的轮次经过 pre-step 进入决策和零个或多个请求步骤。自动重试会关闭失败轮次并立即开启另一个轮次；`agent/settled` 只报告该重试链的终态轮次，且仍不同于 agent 整体转换到 `status === 'idle'`。
|
||||
|
||||
循环保留四个状态机扩展事件。`agent/pre-step` 对独占的已领取批次执行 reject 或 enter 决策，并在每个拟议步骤前运行。`agent/request` 是冻结调用配置所用的 waterfall；配置只能来自 `await next()`，不再通过重复的位置参数提供。`agent/request-error` 串行确定需要等待的模型请求恢复由谁负责。当轮次原本已经没有剩余工作时，`agent/turn-stopping` 运行；需要再执行一个步骤的监听器使用 `agent.steer()` 记录真实的 steering（中途引导），循环在所有监听器完成后根据这份数据作出决定。
|
||||
循环保留四个状态机扩展事件。`agent/pre-step` 对独占的已领取批次执行 reject 或 enter 决策，并在每个拟议步骤前运行。`agent/request` 是冻结调用配置所用的 waterfall；配置只能来自 `await next()`，不再通过重复的位置参数提供。`agent/request-error` 串行确定需要等待的模型请求恢复由谁负责。当轮次原本已经没有剩余工作时，`agent/turn-stopping` 运行；需要再执行一个步骤的监听器使用 `agent.steer()` 记录真实的 steering，循环在所有监听器完成后根据这份数据作出决定。
|
||||
|
||||
是否继续和终止执行由数据表达，不再由返回的控制枚举表达。工具调用和已接受的 steering 要求再执行一个步骤。携带 `concludesTurn` 的工具结果会在其所属步骤终止工具循环。循环不再暴露通用的 `ContinuationDecision` 或终止返回通道。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ agent 生命周期、agent 整体活动状态、收件箱条目的进度以及
|
||||
|
||||
## 考虑过的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
**保留细粒度事件序列。** 这样可以为每个内部阶段保留专用拦截点，包括仅用于请求的前缀、助手消息改写、步骤后处理、轮次内请求恢复以及终止覆盖。但这也会使循环的私有执行顺序成为永久的公开约定，并允许相互重叠的 seam 表达彼此冲突的决策。当前决策接受这些拦截点的缺失，以换取每项受支持的扩展职责仅对应一个边界。
|
||||
**保留细粒度事件序列。** 这样可以为每个内部阶段保留专用拦截点，包括仅用于请求的前缀、助手消息改写、步骤后处理、轮次内请求恢复以及终止覆盖。但这也会使循环的私有执行顺序成为永久的公开约定，并允许相互重叠的扩展点表达彼此冲突的决策。当前决策接受这些拦截点的缺失，以换取每项受支持的扩展职责仅对应一个边界。
|
||||
|
||||
**将 dispose 表示为第三种 `AgentStatus`。** 这样会让仍被持有的句柄得到一个终止状态值，但也会重复表达 `agent/disposed` 已经体现的注册表生命周期。当前决策让 `AgentStatus` 只表示 agent 存续期间的活动状态，并将注册生命周期作为独立维度。
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-26-merge-subagent-control-service.md
|
||||
2026-07-26-merge-subagent-control-service.md: ae7214f7c8c28f8a4b7d754839acbc938270f125
|
||||
2026-07-26-merge-subagent-control-service.zh.md: 85a7f62ce789d80dc38ca52017554aa2c2921599
|
||||
2026-07-26-merge-subagent-control-service.md: 2757ba678863a355e0f9c4bb324035ba666796be
|
||||
2026-07-26-merge-subagent-control-service.zh.md: d9fd913fb229f63548d2aae65ed62c98a7bd4de0
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ The public operation set is refined by [Intent-named subagent continuation opera
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
Continuable-child orchestration originally lived in a separate `ctx.subagentControl` service above the raw `ctx.subagents` provider seam. That split kept provider dispatch independent of Tasks and persistence, and gave model and human adapters one orchestration contract. In practice the two services described one capability family, every continuable caller needed both, and the provider-bound delegation tool had to infer policy from `provider.resume` and inspect whether the control service and `send_message` tool happened to be loaded. This made sibling plugin presence decide execution semantics and coupled starting continuable work to an optional follow-up surface.
|
||||
Continuable-child orchestration originally lived in a separate `ctx.subagentControl` service above the raw `ctx.subagents` provider contract. That split kept provider dispatch independent of Tasks and persistence, and gave model and human adapters one orchestration contract. In practice the two services described one capability family, every continuable caller needed both, and the provider-bound delegation tool had to infer policy from `provider.resume` and inspect whether the control service and `send_message` tool happened to be loaded. This made sibling plugin presence decide execution semantics and coupled starting continuable work to an optional follow-up surface.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
可继续 child 的编排最初位于原始 `ctx.subagents` 提供方 seam 之上的独立 `ctx.subagentControl` 服务中。该拆分使提供方分发与 Task 和持久化无关，并为模型与人工适配器提供统一的编排约定。实践中，两个服务属于同一组功能，每个可继续调用方都需要二者，而绑定提供方的委派工具必须根据 `provider.resume` 推断策略，并检查控制服务与 `send_message` 工具是否碰巧已加载。如此一来，配套插件是否存在会决定执行语义，并将可继续工作的启动耦合到可选的后续操作接口。
|
||||
可继续 child 的编排最初位于原始 `ctx.subagents` 提供方约定之上的独立 `ctx.subagentControl` 服务中。该拆分使提供方分发与 Task 和持久化无关，并为模型与人工适配器提供统一的编排约定。实践中，两个服务属于同一组功能，每个可继续调用方都需要二者，而绑定提供方的委派工具必须根据 `provider.resume` 推断策略，并检查控制服务与 `send_message` 工具是否碰巧已加载。如此一来，配套插件是否存在会决定执行语义，并将可继续工作的启动耦合到可选的后续操作接口。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-28-remove-synthetic-log-only-turns.md
|
||||
2026-07-28-remove-synthetic-log-only-turns.md: 61c1aa4b1599fe020e0cd96c32daea01d419e95a
|
||||
2026-07-28-remove-synthetic-log-only-turns.zh.md: 65281d8342997165b465a744bb08dd2d815e014e
|
||||
2026-07-28-remove-synthetic-log-only-turns.md: cb4925fb7897d95898b3f620c5034b3082a72a0d
|
||||
2026-07-28-remove-synthetic-log-only-turns.zh.md: 1fb572449e0a78697a9c32a0e42bb5ae7499f97c
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ The session store exposed `appendOutOfBand()` so a plugin could publish a late l
|
||||
|
||||
That rule was introduced when persistence recovery treated the last `turn/end` as the only committed boundary. The persistence scanners now preserve every valid contiguous event, and crash repair reacts only to an actually open turn. Retaining synthetic turns for title updates therefore inflated turn counts, produced execution outcomes for work that never ran the model, and let a late metadata write consume the next turn number.
|
||||
|
||||
The generic seam also duplicated domain policy. Its marker map said which plugin events were eligible, while the title capability already owned cancellation, liveness, and stale-result rules. Replacing it with another generic or title-specific append wrapper would preserve the same type indirection for two literal event types.
|
||||
The generic helper also duplicated domain policy. Its marker map said which plugin events were eligible, while the title capability already owned cancellation, liveness, and stale-result rules. Replacing it with another generic or title-specific append wrapper would preserve the same type indirection for two literal event types.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
引入该规则时，持久化恢复曾将最后一个 `turn/end` 视为唯一的已提交边界。如今，持久化扫描器会保留每个合法且连续的事件，崩溃修复也只处理确实处于开放状态的轮次。因此，为标题更新保留合成轮次会夸大轮次计数、为从未运行模型的工作产生执行结果，还会让延迟到达的元数据写入占用下一个轮次编号。
|
||||
|
||||
通用 seam 还重复了领域策略。它的标记映射说明哪些插件事件符合条件，而标题功能本就拥有取消、活跃性和陈旧结果处理规则。改用另一个通用或标题专属追加包装层，仍会为两个字面量事件类型保留同一层类型间接性。
|
||||
通用辅助函数还重复了领域策略。它的标记映射说明哪些插件事件符合条件，而标题功能本就拥有取消、活跃性和陈旧结果处理规则。改用另一个通用或标题专属追加包装层，仍会为两个字面量事件类型保留同一层类型间接性。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-31-one-route-to-add-a-workspace.md
|
||||
2026-07-31-one-route-to-add-a-workspace.md: 5d002265b5eb1178bb1dbc7bd17f8b364d9b9856
|
||||
2026-07-31-one-route-to-add-a-workspace.zh.md: 9e0940e2a59fac907f023d6433f0056b99c41a60
|
||||
2026-07-31-one-route-to-add-a-workspace.md: 93f10493848a65aee9c9e67502abfd73fe1e6d1f
|
||||
2026-07-31-one-route-to-add-a-workspace.zh.md: 83d91abb9ada3c1431a1b4ef126ea42a8406d326
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ The direct-open path carries the busy rule the menu entry states: while a pick i
|
||||
|
||||
## Wire and CLI residue
|
||||
|
||||
The host's `workspace.create` still accepts `{ name }`, and `dsh web --workspace-root` still feeds its target directory, but no product surface reaches either any more. The same is true of the client seam that carried the name to the wire: `WorkspaceCreateInput`, `WorkspacesService.create`'s `{ name }` arm, `intentName`'s name branch, and the manager's "name under workspaceRoot" contract. `apps/cli/README.md` and its Chinese counterpart still document `--workspace-root` as creating named Workspaces. The whole set is marked for deletion at the call site in `packages/host/apiproxy/src/api-proxy.ts` and left to a follow-up change: it is backend, client-seam, and CLI surface with its own reviewer and its own test fallout (the api-proxy workspace suite, the runtime workspace suite, the config catalog), and the release-blocking part of this decision is the UI.
|
||||
The host's `workspace.create` still accepts `{ name }`, and `dsh web --workspace-root` still feeds its target directory, but no product surface reaches either any more. The same is true of the client contract that carried the name to the wire: `WorkspaceCreateInput`, `WorkspacesService.create`'s `{ name }` arm, `intentName`'s name branch, and the manager's "name under workspaceRoot" contract. `apps/cli/README.md` and its Chinese counterpart still document `--workspace-root` as creating named Workspaces. The whole set is marked for deletion at the call site in `packages/host/apiproxy/src/api-proxy.ts` and left to a follow-up change: it is backend, client-contract, and CLI surface with its own reviewer and its own test fallout (the api-proxy workspace suite, the runtime workspace suite, the config catalog), and the release-blocking part of this decision is the UI.
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## Wire and CLI residue
|
||||
|
||||
Host 侧的 `workspace.create` 仍接受 `{ name }`，`dsh web --workspace-root` 也仍在为它提供目标目录，但已没有任何产品表层会走到它们。把名称送到 wire 的客户端一段同样如此：`WorkspaceCreateInput`、`WorkspacesService.create` 的 `{ name }` 分支、`intentName` 的名称分支，以及 manager 中"workspaceRoot 下的 name"这一约定。`apps/cli/README.md` 及其中文对照本也仍把 `--workspace-root` 记为"创建具名 Workspace"。这一整套都在 `packages/host/apiproxy/src/api-proxy.ts` 的调用点标记为待删除，并留给后续改动：它横跨 backend、客户端 seam 与 CLI 面，有各自的 reviewer 和各自的测试波及面（api-proxy workspace 套件、runtime workspace 套件、配置目录），而本决定中阻塞发布的部分是 UI。
|
||||
Host 侧的 `workspace.create` 仍接受 `{ name }`，`dsh web --workspace-root` 也仍在为它提供目标目录，但已没有任何产品表层会走到它们。把名称送到 wire 的客户端约定同样如此：`WorkspaceCreateInput`、`WorkspacesService.create` 的 `{ name }` 分支、`intentName` 的名称分支，以及 manager 中"workspaceRoot 下的 name"这一约定。`apps/cli/README.md` 及其中文对照本也仍把 `--workspace-root` 记为"创建具名 Workspace"。这一整套都在 `packages/host/apiproxy/src/api-proxy.ts` 的调用点标记为待删除，并留给后续改动：它横跨 backend、客户端约定与 CLI 面，有各自的 reviewer 和各自的测试波及面（api-proxy workspace 套件、runtime workspace 套件、配置目录），而本决定中阻塞发布的部分是 UI。
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-08-04-remove-tui-package.md
|
||||
2026-08-04-remove-tui-package.md: 1057243c70f6f2775a5d0c5f5eddcb72cbad699e
|
||||
2026-08-04-remove-tui-package.zh.md: 17a75921f3e8f227772133243bc0ea5b8ba927a7
|
||||
2026-08-04-remove-tui-package.md: f048a04db02b582d038ebf549999c0fda50e30d3
|
||||
2026-08-04-remove-tui-package.zh.md: be18cbd33cd4a2bb592de4e7986b2786da272d0f
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ The package also made the repository's supported application inventory misleadin
|
||||
|
||||
The `packages/ui/tui` package is deleted without a compatibility package or alias. Its source, package tests, terminal snapshots, dependency declarations, patched `pi-tui` artifact, workspace references, generated service catalog entry, and documentation are removed together. Generic host and agent-loop capabilities remain unchanged.
|
||||
|
||||
The SDK run-interface union now contains only `acp` and `embed`. `create-sdk` defaults to ACP, generated templates contain no terminal startup, resume, session-environment, or model-argument branch, and the builtin `ask-user` feature is removed because neither remaining generated interface supplies a `UserInteractionProvider`. Host applications may still mount the provider-neutral `dsh-user-interaction`, `dsh-commands`, and presentation seams directly.
|
||||
The SDK run-interface union now contains only `acp` and `embed`. `create-sdk` defaults to ACP, generated templates contain no terminal startup, resume, session-environment, or model-argument branch, and the builtin `ask-user` feature is removed because neither remaining generated interface supplies a `UserInteractionProvider`. Host applications may still mount the provider-neutral `dsh-user-interaction`, `dsh-commands`, and presentation services directly.
|
||||
|
||||
This decision supersedes the reusable-package retention in [the explicit-config `dsh` entrypoint decision](../../archived/simplification/2026-08-03-explicit-config-dsh-entrypoint.md) and the current applicability of the archived TUI implementation notes. Their historical records remain frozen, but they are not authority for the supported package or application inventory.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
删除 `packages/ui/tui` 包，不提供兼容包或别名。其源码、包测试、终端快照、依赖声明、已打补丁的 `pi-tui` 产物、workspace 引用、生成的服务目录条目和文档会一并移除。通用宿主能力与 agent loop（智能体循环）能力保持不变。
|
||||
|
||||
SDK 的运行接口联合类型现在只包含 `acp` 与 `embed`。`create-sdk` 默认使用 ACP，生成的模板不再包含终端启动、恢复、会话环境或模型参数分支；内置的 `ask-user` 功能也被移除，因为剩余两个生成接口都不提供 `UserInteractionProvider`。宿主应用仍可直接挂载提供方无关的 `dsh-user-interaction`、`dsh-commands` 和呈现 seam。
|
||||
SDK 的运行接口联合类型现在只包含 `acp` 与 `embed`。`create-sdk` 默认使用 ACP，生成的模板不再包含终端启动、恢复、会话环境或模型参数分支；内置的 `ask-user` 功能也被移除，因为剩余两个生成接口都不提供 `UserInteractionProvider`。宿主应用仍可直接挂载提供方无关的 `dsh-user-interaction`、`dsh-commands` 和呈现服务。
|
||||
|
||||
本决策取代[显式配置 `dsh` 入口决策](../../archived/simplification/2026-08-03-explicit-config-dsh-entrypoint.md)中保留可复用包的决定，也使已归档 TUI 实现记录不再适用于当前状态。这些历史记录继续保持冻结，但不再作为受支持包或应用清单的依据。
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user