Merge branch 'worktree/ci-native-windows-20260808' into worktree/ci-native-windows-coverage-20260808
# Conflicts: # packages/util/paths/src/index.ts
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-microkernel-event-taxonomy.md
|
||||
2026-06-11-microkernel-event-taxonomy.md: 202595fed125966a5d77920536e7f4ee88f875fe
|
||||
2026-06-11-microkernel-event-taxonomy.zh.md: 1365910157c36699bfe1fdb3a10aa0785948e0fa
|
||||
2026-06-11-microkernel-event-taxonomy.md: fe6c242acbc0b64123711a17a528f35c02d91087
|
||||
2026-06-11-microkernel-event-taxonomy.zh.md: aa3db53d640145836817f9835a30c69815f70d23
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ The product principle is "everything is a plugin": hooks, /goal, /loop, dynamic
|
||||
|
||||
Pure Cordis event taxonomy. The loop's extension seams are typed events with deliberate dispatch modes:
|
||||
|
||||
- **waterfall** (around-middleware) where plugins transform, veto, recover, or wrap: `agent/pre-step`, `agent/request`, `agent/request-error`, `tools/pre-execute`, `tools/execute`, `tools/post-execute`, `llm/stream`, `system-prompt/assemble`.
|
||||
- **waterfall** (around-middleware) where plugins transform, short-circuit, recover, or wrap: `agent/pre-step`, `agent/request`, `agent/request-error`, `tools/pre-execute`, `tools/execute`, `tools/post-execute`, `llm/stream`, `system-prompt/assemble`.
|
||||
- **serial** (awaited in listener order) for ordered checkpoints such as `agent/turn-stopping`.
|
||||
- **parallel** (awaited fan-out) where every listener must get an independent chance: the `session/flush` durability checkpoint.
|
||||
- **emit** (synchronous fire-and-forget) for notifications: inbox transitions, lifecycle, errors, and the contained immutable `tools/result` observation. Durable session events own turn and step boundaries.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
纯 Cordis 事件分类体系。agent loop(智能体循环)的扩展 seam 是带类型的事件,具有明确的分发模式:
|
||||
|
||||
- **waterfall(瀑布式事件)**(around-middleware):插件可变换、否决、恢复或包装:`agent/pre-step`、`agent/request`、`agent/request-error`、`tools/pre-execute`、`tools/execute`、`tools/post-execute`、`llm/stream`、`system-prompt/assemble`。
|
||||
- **waterfall(瀑布式事件)**(around-middleware):插件可变换、短路、恢复或包装:`agent/pre-step`、`agent/request`、`agent/request-error`、`tools/pre-execute`、`tools/execute`、`tools/post-execute`、`llm/stream`、`system-prompt/assemble`。
|
||||
- **serial**(按监听器顺序依次 await):用于 `agent/turn-stopping` 等有序检查点。
|
||||
- **parallel**(await 扇出):每个监听器都必须获得独立执行的机会:`session/flush` 持久性检查点。
|
||||
- **emit**(同步 fire-and-forget):用于通知:inbox 转换、生命周期、错误,以及受错误隔离的 `tools/result` 观测;该观测接收不可变的最终结果。轮次与步骤边界由持久会话事件拥有。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.md
|
||||
2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.md: b93c291957fab98ab9d0d04eb816bb01a15a0b51
|
||||
2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.zh.md: e0c01f31eb2664608139f95dc60025a5b33e4618
|
||||
2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.md: b8f265551c4ebbb94d32b3599959fe6cc4da974d
|
||||
2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.zh.md: 22cd35a601bc011c27a748098be11990f5ee4653
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ The [July 8 Agent Note](2026-07-08-agent-scope-contexts.md) remains the contribu
|
||||
|
||||
## Cordis model: context, fiber, effect, receiver, and waterfall
|
||||
|
||||
Five Cordis ideas are required to understand the implementation. A context selects services and registration ownership; a fiber is one live plugin or child lifecycle; an effect attaches cleanup to a fiber; an event receiver selects listeners; and a waterfall lets listeners transform or veto an operation in sequence.
|
||||
Five Cordis ideas are required to understand the implementation. A context selects services and registration ownership; a fiber is one live plugin or child lifecycle; an effect attaches cleanup to a fiber; an event receiver selects listeners; and a waterfall lets listeners transform or short-circuit an operation in sequence.
|
||||
|
||||
### A context is an ownership path through one service graph
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ Cordis filters listeners using the dispatch receiver (`this`), while harness lis
|
||||
|
||||
Product helpers therefore construct the carrier and pass the domain subject separately. This prevents listener routing from becoming an alternate object model and keeps event signatures understandable without knowledge of carrier internals.
|
||||
|
||||
A Cordis waterfall is middleware-style dispatch. Each listener receives `next()`: calling it delegates to the remaining listeners and base operation, while returning without it vetoes or replaces the downstream result. Waterfalls power prompt assembly and tool policy; ordinary emit events notify synchronously, and parallel events await all listeners without a veto result.
|
||||
A Cordis waterfall is middleware-style dispatch. Each listener receives `next()`: calling it delegates to the remaining listeners and base operation, while returning without it short-circuits or replaces the downstream result. Waterfalls power prompt assembly and tool policy; ordinary emit events notify synchronously, and parallel events await all listeners without a veto result.
|
||||
|
||||
## Scope routing: one opaque key selects one layer
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## Cordis 模型:上下文、fiber、effect、receiver 与 waterfall
|
||||
|
||||
理解实现需要五个 Cordis 概念。上下文选择服务和注册所有权;fiber 是一个活跃的插件或子生命周期;effect 将清理逻辑附加到 fiber;事件接收器选择监听器;waterfall(瀑布式事件)让监听器按顺序变换或否决一个操作。
|
||||
理解实现需要五个 Cordis 概念。上下文选择服务和注册所有权;fiber 是一个活跃的插件或子生命周期;effect 将清理逻辑附加到 fiber;事件接收器选择监听器;waterfall(瀑布式事件)让监听器按顺序变换或短路一个操作。
|
||||
|
||||
### 上下文是贯穿单个服务图的所有权路径
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ Cordis 使用 dispatch receiver(`this`)过滤监听器,而 harness 的监
|
||||
|
||||
因此,产品辅助函数构造载体并单独传递领域主体。这防止监听器路由变成另一套对象模型,并使事件签名在不了解载体内部的情况下也可理解。
|
||||
|
||||
Cordis waterfall 是中间件风格的 dispatch。每个监听器接收 `next()`:调用它则委托给剩余监听器和基础操作,不调用则否决或替换下游结果。Waterfall 驱动提示词组装和工具策略;普通 emit 事件同步通知,parallel 事件等待所有监听器但没有否决结果。
|
||||
Cordis waterfall 是中间件风格的 dispatch。每个监听器接收 `next()`:调用它则委托给剩余监听器和基础操作,不调用则短路或替换下游结果。Waterfall 驱动提示词组装和工具策略;普通 emit 事件同步通知,parallel 事件等待所有监听器但没有否决结果。
|
||||
|
||||
## 作用域路由:一个不透明键选择一层
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-08-self-referential-cordis-toolset.md
|
||||
2026-07-08-self-referential-cordis-toolset.md: 29d331008d4111ae00147f2ddd19a628135339ac
|
||||
2026-07-08-self-referential-cordis-toolset.zh.md: d61ba794781226437a5d7499c20e5cd33119fe78
|
||||
2026-07-08-self-referential-cordis-toolset.md: a2f614cc5a236e45622eae2b30f518181331cc79
|
||||
2026-07-08-self-referential-cordis-toolset.zh.md: 6c56c2bf0c8cc8d175f451290620d9386bb69a23
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -81,4 +81,4 @@ The correctness investment therefore goes where it pays for every capability at
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
The toolset is a deliberate opt-in with a fully-privileged `ctx`, so a deployment adopts it as consciously as a bash tool. Several facts follow that the tool descriptions warn the model about directly: a waterfall listener (e.g. `tools/pre-execute`) that returns without calling `next()` vetoes the chain, so a mounted listener can lobotomize the agent's own tool dispatch ([waterfall semantics](../../../../docs/cordis-primer.md#cordis-waterfall-semantics)); mount code runs inside a tool call of the current turn, so awaiting anything that resolves only after the turn deadlocks; `vmTimeoutMs` bounds synchronous evaluation only; and mounts do not survive session resume.
|
||||
The toolset is a deliberate opt-in with a fully-privileged `ctx`, so a deployment adopts it as consciously as a bash tool. Several facts follow that the tool descriptions warn the model about directly: a waterfall listener (e.g. `tools/pre-execute`) that returns without calling `next()` short-circuits the chain, so a mounted listener can stop the agent's own tool dispatch ([waterfall semantics](../../../../docs/cordis-primer.md#cordis-waterfall-semantics)); mount code runs inside a tool call of the current turn, so awaiting anything that resolves only after the turn deadlocks; `vmTimeoutMs` bounds synchronous evaluation only; and mounts do not survive session resume.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -81,4 +81,4 @@ vm 隔离了意外的全局污染,上下文门面隐藏了框架内部细节
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
该工具集是刻意的显式启用设计,具有完全特权的 `ctx`,因此部署方采用它的意识程度应与 bash 工具相当。以下几个事实由工具描述直接告知模型:一个 waterfall(瀑布式事件)监听器(如 `tools/pre-execute`)如果不调用 `next()` 就返回,会否决整条链,因此一个挂载的监听器可以瘫痪 agent 自身的工具分发([waterfall 语义](../../../../docs/cordis-primer.md#cordis-waterfall-semantics));挂载代码在当前轮次的工具调用内运行,因此 await 任何只在该轮次结束后才 resolve 的东西会导致死锁;`vmTimeoutMs` 仅约束同步执行;挂载不会在会话恢复后存活。
|
||||
该工具集是刻意的显式启用设计,具有完全特权的 `ctx`,因此部署方采用它的意识程度应与 bash 工具相当。以下几个事实由工具描述直接告知模型:一个 waterfall(瀑布式事件)监听器(如 `tools/pre-execute`)如果不调用 `next()` 就返回,会短路整条链,因此一个挂载的监听器可以阻止 agent 自身的工具分发([waterfall 语义](../../../../docs/cordis-primer.md#cordis-waterfall-semantics));挂载代码在当前轮次的工具调用内运行,因此 await 任何只在该轮次结束后才 resolve 的东西会导致死锁;`vmTimeoutMs` 仅约束同步执行;挂载不会在会话恢复后存活。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-21-serial-cross-platform-ci-reference.md
|
||||
2026-07-21-serial-cross-platform-ci-reference.md: dd41cdb51bd226b19bc6aca498c7713a3cc9a6b7
|
||||
2026-07-21-serial-cross-platform-ci-reference.zh.md: ec026df8164df0a2400200adbe81230920ce5daa
|
||||
2026-07-21-serial-cross-platform-ci-reference.md: 07dc430e6fed3fe75a006ca03523bd6e4fc969d0
|
||||
2026-07-21-serial-cross-platform-ci-reference.zh.md: 8bbb60cdead2957069de22ecaddf01c6cd9fb305
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Real-kernel sandbox proofs require specific hosted operating systems and archite
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
[CI](../../../../.github/workflows/ci.yml) gives pull-request and master-push events complementary responsibilities. Pull requests run consolidated Linux and Wine-hosted Windows jobs plus the Node compatibility and Python contracts on standard GitHub-hosted capacity; an independent native Windows job reports the complete Windows inventory without participating in the required aggregate. A push to `master` skips those jobs and runs four explicit references: `serial / linux`, `serial / macos`, and `serial / windows` on standard hosted runners, plus `serial / linux (self-hosted standby)` on the in-house `vm-backup` pool — the hot-standby drill that continuously re-proves the failover target described in the [failover runbook](2026-07-26-ci-failover-runbook.md). They intentionally duplicate their short checkout, runtime setup, and immutable install sequences instead of hiding the operating systems behind a matrix or reusable workflow. `workflow_dispatch` is reserved for runner benchmarks.
|
||||
[CI](../../../../.github/workflows/ci.yml) gives pull-request and master-push events complementary responsibilities. Pull requests run consolidated Linux and Wine-hosted Windows jobs plus the Node compatibility and Python contracts on standard GitHub-hosted capacity; an independent native Windows job reports the complete Windows inventory without participating in the required aggregate. On a push to `master`, the active reference is `serial / linux (self-hosted standby)` on the in-house `vm-backup` pool — the hot-standby drill that continuously re-proves the failover target described in the [failover runbook](2026-07-26-ci-failover-runbook.md). The standard-hosted `serial / linux`, `serial / macos`, and `serial / windows` definitions remain disabled under `TODO(hosted-serial-ci)` until their portable capacity can be restored. The separate job definitions intentionally keep their short checkout, runtime setup, and immutable install sequences visible instead of hiding operating systems behind a matrix or reusable workflow. `workflow_dispatch` is reserved for runner benchmarks.
|
||||
|
||||
Each reference job runs `pnpm run check:ci` without any shard selector. `DSH_GATE_CONCURRENCY=1` makes the top-level aggregate execute one ready gate at a time; coverage, snapshot replay, built-bin smoke, and publication validation also receive worker counts of one. The reference jobs may run beside one another, but each host's repository gates are serial and complete. Linux installs bubblewrap before replaying snapshots, and Windows enables Developer Mode before installing the symlinked workspace.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
[CI](../../../../.github/workflows/ci.yml) 为拉取请求事件与 master 推送事件赋予互补的职责。拉取请求在 GitHub 标准托管容量上运行合并后的 Linux 和由 Wine 承载的 Windows 作业,以及 Node 兼容性与 Python 约定;一个独立的原生 Windows 作业会报告完整的 Windows 清单,但不参与必需聚合流程。向 `master` 推送时会跳过这些作业,改为运行四个显式参考作业:在标准托管运行器上的 `serial / linux`、`serial / macos` 和 `serial / windows`,以及在公司自有 `vm-backup` 池上的 `serial / linux (self-hosted standby)`——后者是热备演练,持续验证[故障切换手册](2026-07-26-ci-failover-runbook.md)所描述的切换目标。这些作业有意分别重复简短的代码检出、运行时设置和依赖锁定的安装步骤,不用矩阵或可复用工作流把操作系统差异隐藏起来。`workflow_dispatch` 仅用于运行器基准测试。
|
||||
[CI](../../../../.github/workflows/ci.yml) 为拉取请求事件与 master 推送事件赋予互补的职责。拉取请求在 GitHub 标准托管容量上运行合并后的 Linux 和由 Wine 承载的 Windows 作业,以及 Node 兼容性与 Python 约定;一个独立的原生 Windows 作业会报告完整的 Windows 清单,但不参与必需聚合流程。向 `master` 推送时,当前启用的参考作业是公司自有 `vm-backup` 池上的 `serial / linux (self-hosted standby)`——该热备演练持续验证[故障切换手册](2026-07-26-ci-failover-runbook.md)所描述的切换目标。标准托管的 `serial / linux`、`serial / macos` 和 `serial / windows` 定义仍处于禁用状态,并由 `TODO(hosted-serial-ci)` 标记,直到其可移植容量恢复。各自独立的作业定义有意显式保留简短的代码检出、运行时设置和依赖锁定的安装步骤,而不是用矩阵或可复用工作流隐藏操作系统差异。`workflow_dispatch` 仅用于运行器基准测试。
|
||||
|
||||
每个参考作业均在不设置任何分片选择器的情况下运行 `pnpm run check:ci`。`DSH_GATE_CONCURRENCY=1` 使顶层聚合每次只执行一个已经就绪的门禁;覆盖率、快照回放、built-bin 冒烟测试和发布验证的 worker 数量也设为 1。各参考作业可以彼此并行,但每台主机上的仓库门禁都串行运行且完整执行。Linux 在回放快照前安装 bubblewrap,Windows 则在安装采用符号链接的工作区前启用开发人员模式。
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user