review fix: restore idle after between-turn cancellation

docs/i18n/style-samples.md

@@ -28,9 +28,9 @@
 
 **dispose（资源释放）必须等待所有任务完全停稳，不能仅下发终止指令就返回**：如果清理过程只发出终止或中断信号，却不等任务停止就返回，就会留下孤儿进程。清理应采用异步方式，等待所有子任务彻底退出（先发出终止信号，再等待退出）；发出信号前应先关闭监听器与通知注册表，使延迟到达的完成事件不再触发通知。测试要证明 dispose 的确等到清理完成：执行完 `await fiber.dispose()` 后进程 PID 立即消失，不能只检查进程最终会自行消亡。
 
-> **Async state is not synchronous state** — `agent.send()` does not flip status before returning; a background task's completion races turn boundaries; `reader.close()` fires for both EOF and disposal. Never gate control flow on a status you only just requested — drive lifecycle off the events/promises that actually fire (`agent/status`, `task.done`), and observe the transition (saw `running` THEN `idle`) rather than counting actions you assume map 1:1 to turns.
+> **Async state is not synchronous state** — `agent.send()` does not flip status before returning; a background task's completion races turn boundaries; `reader.close()` fires for both EOF and disposal. Never gate control flow on a status you only just requested — drive lifecycle off the events/promises that actually fire (`agent/status`, `task.done`), and observe the transition (saw `running` THEN `idle`) instead of treating status as a per-send result: several queued sends run as consecutive turns under one `running` interval, while cancellation or disposal can discard unstarted items.
 
-**异步状态不等同于同步瞬时状态**：调用 `agent.send()` 不会在返回前同步更新状态；后台任务的完成时间与轮次边界存在竞态；`reader.close()` 既会在读到文件末尾时触发，也会在资源释放时触发。切勿把刚刚发起的状态变更当成已经生效，据此控制流程；生命周期逻辑应以实际触发的事件和已完成的 promise（`agent/status`、`task.done`）为准，并观察完整的状态变化（先 `running`，再 `idle`），不要根据操作次数推断操作与轮次一一对应。
+**异步状态不等同于同步瞬时状态**：调用 `agent.send()` 不会在返回前同步更新状态；后台任务的完成时间与轮次边界存在竞态；`reader.close()` 既会在读到文件末尾时触发，也会在资源释放时触发。切勿把刚刚发起的状态变更当成已经生效，据此控制流程；生命周期逻辑应以实际触发的事件和已完成的 promise（`agent/status`、`task.done`）为准，并观察完整的状态变化（先 `running`，再 `idle`），不要把状态当作逐次 `send()` 的结果：多次排队的 `send()` 会作为连续轮次运行，但可能共用一个 `running` 区间；取消或资源释放还可能丢弃尚未启动的队列项。
 
 ## ③ 测试政策清单