Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into worktree/acp-automation-protocol

# Conflicts:
#	packages/examples/acp-demo/README.md

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## Problem
 
-`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl` and `dsh-session-persistence-sqlite` intentionally prove the same `SessionPersistence` contract over different storage media, but their write-path orchestration was duplicated: per-session state, `session/created` adoption, backend-specific prefix reads, write-behind buffers, serialized flush chains, HMR seeding, and dispose drains. The pure seed-prefix collision and serializability guards had already moved into the seam package; the remaining orchestration was still correctness-heavy and received the same fixes twice. A code-level diff showed the two backends were byte-identical — or same-algorithm — for ALL of it: the four maps (`states`/`buffers`/`chains`/`inits`), `installWritePath`, `initFor`, `onCreated`'s four cases, `flush`, `drain`, `serialize`, `adopt`, `adoptLivePrefix`, `assertVersion`, and the `create`/`append`/`load` skeletons. Only the storage primitives (write bytes vs. INSERT rows) differed.
+`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl` and `dsh-session-persistence-sqlite` intentionally prove the same `SessionPersistence` contract over different storage media, but their write-path orchestration was duplicated: per-session state, `session/created` adoption, backend-specific prefix reads, write-behind control, per-id operation serialization, HMR seeding, and dispose drains. The pure seed-prefix collision and serializability guards had already moved into the seam package; the remaining orchestration was still correctness-heavy and received the same fixes twice. Only the storage primitives (write bytes vs. INSERT rows) differed.
 
 ## Decision
 
@@ -12,7 +12,9 @@ Extract a backend-agnostic `PersistenceCoordinator` into `dsh-session-persistenc
 
 Composition, not inheritance. The coordinator is a concrete class the backend holds, not a base class the backend extends. The Agent Note's risk — "a coordinator must not make unusual backends fight an inheritance hierarchy" — is avoided: a backend exposes only the hooks and cannot reach the coordinator's private orchestration state. A third-party backend MAY still implement the abstract service directly without the coordinator, including the non-mutating `inspect` contract used by read models.
 
-The coordinator retires each live session from its `session/disposed` notification: it waits for that exact Session object's initialization, serializes a final drain, and then removes the owned state, buffer, and init entries. Failed drains retain their buffers for backend teardown to retry. Settled per-id chain tails remove themselves only when they are still the current tail, so a completion cannot erase a newer operation for the same id. Backend teardown unregisters the write-path listeners before awaiting all admitted retirements, remaining buffers, and chains, then closes the backend.
+The coordinator holds one controller for each exact live `Session`; the controller combines initialization, pending events, and the shared flush promise. Each `session/event` starts an eager drain, and `session/flush` observes quiescence rather than initiating the ordinary write path. The [flush-controller simplification](../simplification/2026-07-23-collapse-persistence-flush-state.md) owns this lifecycle.
+
+The coordinator retires a session from `session/disposed`: it waits for the controller's initialization and current flush, serializes a final drain, and removes the controller and owned per-id state only after success. A failure leaves the controller discoverable for backend teardown to retry. Settled per-id chain tails remove themselves only when they are still current, so a completion cannot erase a newer operation for the same id. Backend teardown unregisters write-path listeners, flushes every remaining controller, awaits per-id operations, and then closes the backend.
 
 ### The hook interface (`PersistenceBackend<TornMarker>`)
 
@@ -31,7 +33,7 @@ The single design choice that keeps the seam clean: the crash-repair "where is t
 
 ## Testing
 
-The shared `runPersistenceContract` (public-API contract) keeps running for every backend and proves that `inspect` leaves interrupted logs and revisions unchanged before `load` performs recovery. `runCoordinatorContract` (`tests/coordinator-contract.ts`) holds the write-path orchestration — adoption, HMR, collision, session and backend disposal drains, and crash-tail repair — and runs once per backend through a `CoordinatorFixture` (an in-memory reference + jsonl + sqlite). Coordinator-specific tests pin retirement map cleanup, same-id chain-tail races, failed-drain retry, and close ordering. The per-backend specs retain storage mechanics only (JSONL: path safety, fsync rollback, bucket listing; SQLite: schema version, `scanRows`, transaction rollback). A through-coordinator torn-tail→load→`commitRepair` test per real backend (via a `corruptTail` fixture hook) keeps the coordinator's torn-marker repair branch covered under the 100% per-file gate — the contract crash test only produces synthetic closers, never a torn marker, so it could not reach that branch.
+The shared `runPersistenceContract` (public-API contract) runs for every backend and proves that `inspect` leaves interrupted logs and revisions unchanged before `load` performs recovery. `runCoordinatorContract` (`tests/coordinator-contract.ts`) covers adoption, HMR, collision, session and backend disposal drains, and crash-tail repair through an in-memory reference, JSONL, and SQLite. Coordinator-specific tests cover eager follow-up batches, live-controller cleanup, same-id chain-tail races, failed-drain retry, and close ordering. The per-backend specs retain storage mechanics only. A through-coordinator torn-tail repair test per real backend keeps the opaque-marker branch covered because the contract crash case produces synthetic closers without a torn marker.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
@@ -40,4 +42,4 @@ The shared `runPersistenceContract` (public-API contract) keeps running for ever
 
 ## Consequences
 
-The coordinator adds one indirection, an opaque torn marker, and detached session-retirement tasks, but centralizes correctness-heavy orchestration previously duplicated by every backend. Session disposal remains an observe-only event, so the session owner does not await persistence retirement; the coordinator contains failures, preserves uncommitted buffers, and makes backend teardown the quiescence boundary. Its hook surface stays narrow: identity, adoption, collision checks, and non-mutating inspection reuse `loadStored`; materialization stays atomic inside `appendBatch`; and listing bypasses the coordinator. Read models use `inspect` rather than `load`, so observing a persisted open turn cannot race a new live owner by committing interruption closers. New backends implement storage primitives rather than copy the event-buffer-flush lifecycle.
+The coordinator adds one indirection, an opaque torn marker, and detached session-retirement tasks, but centralizes correctness-heavy orchestration previously duplicated by every backend. Session disposal remains an observe-only event, so the session owner does not await persistence retirement; the coordinator contains failures, preserves pending events in the live controller, and makes backend teardown the quiescence boundary. Its hook surface stays narrow: identity, adoption, collision checks, and non-mutating inspection reuse `loadStored`; materialization stays atomic inside `appendBatch`; and listing bypasses the coordinator. Read models use `inspect` rather than `load`, so observing a persisted open turn cannot race a new live owner by committing interruption closers. New backends implement storage primitives rather than copy the eager write lifecycle.

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-20-extract-example-app-packages.md

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Each example is now **mostly an invocation of an app package**, splitting the wi
 
 The proposal listed `hmr` among the interactive app's baked-in front-door cluster. Validating against the code, baking `hmr` into the app package fights Cordis in two ways, so it ships as a **leaf `cordis.yml` entry** instead:
 
-1. `@cordisjs/plugin-hmr` is a Loader-only, subprocess-only dev plugin — its constructor throws without `node --expose-internals` + a live `loader` service, so it can only run in the real `demo:*`/bin subprocess, never in the in-process unit/coverage tier.
+1. `@cordisjs/plugin-hmr` is a Loader-only, subprocess-only dev plugin — it requires the live `loader` service and its internal module access, so it can only run in the real `demo:*`/bin subprocess, never in the in-process unit/coverage tier.
 2. The in-process test tier (vitest) cannot even *import* the vendored `hmr` module (its class-decorator `@Inject` form fails under Vite's transform), so a package whose `apply` statically imported it could never satisfy the per-file 100% coverage gate on its headline function.
 
 Crucially, `hmr` is not a stdout-purity footgun: a stray entry in the ACP config does not corrupt JSON-RPC frames. Every shipped app omits a stdout console logger; the app or protocol driver alone owns stdout.

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-20-routed-model-context-and-compaction-policy.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
-2026-07-20-routed-model-context-and-compaction-policy.md: f0b9288d3d864bfcc2964862b1ff294406daa345
-2026-07-20-routed-model-context-and-compaction-policy.zh.md: cda740a5671a3ef8a5bb415e5cc45ca8397c1c59
+2026-07-20-routed-model-context-and-compaction-policy.md: b637ba24d4ba5fc25c8cdd515a821ee97883a326
+2026-07-20-routed-model-context-and-compaction-policy.zh.md: 084e762ec29ddc0aecb0bf422c147b9d3122726b

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-20-routed-model-context-and-compaction-policy.md

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Neither obvious configuration owner is sufficient. Compact-basic is optional and
 
 `LlmAdapter.resolveModelContext(provider, model)` optionally returns `LlmModelContext` for one exact route. `LlmService.resolveModelContext()` selects the registered route owner, validates a positive integer `contextWindow`, and returns a detached value. The query is independent of `listModels()`: an unlisted dynamic model may have capacity metadata, and `undefined` means only that the adapter cannot describe capacity.
 
-The hand-rolled DeepSeek adapter accepts optional `contextWindow` on each configured model. Its two default model entries publish 128,000 tokens; an explicit entry without capacity and an unlisted pass-through id return `undefined`. The pi-ai adapter resolves capacity from the same catalog descriptor that authoritatively resolves the request model.
+The hand-rolled DeepSeek adapter accepts optional `contextWindow` on each configured model plus an adapter-wide `defaultContextWindow`. Exact model capacity wins; an entry without capacity and an unlisted pass-through id inherit the adapter default, or return `undefined` when it is absent. The two built-in model entries each publish an exact 128,000-token capacity. The pi-ai adapter resolves capacity from the same catalog descriptor that authoritatively resolves the request model.
 
 ### Token measurement remains model-agnostic
 
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ An adapter that lacks capacity metadata remains a valid LLM route. Manual proact
 
 ## Testing
 
-Service tests cover detached context metadata, invalid adapter output, catalog independence, and default absence. Adapter tests cover DeepSeek configured/default/unlisted behavior and pi-ai exact descriptor resolution. Compact tests cover ratio scaling, exact provider/model overrides, load-time rejection of invalid merged ratios, runtime absolute-budget validation, same-model-id provider switches, target-specific warning suppression, and capacity-independent overflow recovery. Loader fixtures reject the removed token-meter capacity setting, and examples configure capacity on adapters.
+Service tests cover detached context metadata, invalid adapter output, catalog independence, and default absence. Adapter tests cover DeepSeek exact/default/unlisted resolution, invalid capacities, and pi-ai exact descriptor resolution. Compact tests cover ratio scaling, exact provider/model overrides, load-time rejection of invalid merged ratios, runtime absolute-budget validation, same-model-id provider switches, target-specific warning suppression, and capacity-independent overflow recovery. Loader fixtures reject the removed token-meter capacity setting, and examples configure capacity on adapters.
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ Service tests cover detached context metadata, invalid adapter output, catalog i
 - Capacity has one authoritative owner at the provider seam, while compaction policy stays in the optional consuming plugin.
 - The same compact-basic instance safely handles different windows, provider switches, and identical model ids under different providers without consulting discovery metadata.
 - LLM-only and meter-only compositions remain valid; loading compact-basic adds no reverse dependency from adapters.
-- Deployments using explicit DeepSeek model lists must provide `contextWindow` for proactive pressure on those entries. Missing metadata is visible instead of silently applying a wrong global fallback.
+- DeepSeek deployments may set exact per-model capacities, or use `defaultContextWindow` for entries without capacity and unlisted pass-through ids.
 - Ratio defaults scale naturally across models, while exact-target absolute retention remains available for deployment-specific behavior.
 
 This note supersedes the global-capacity and no-model-policy parts of the [replay token meter service Agent Note](2026-07-15-replay-token-meter-service.md). Its single-fold measurement decision remains unchanged.

.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-20-routed-model-context-and-compaction-policy.zh.md

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 `LlmAdapter.resolveModelContext(provider, model)` 可以为一条精确路由返回 `LlmModelContext`。`LlmService.resolveModelContext()` 选择已注册的路由所属方，验证 `contextWindow` 为正整数，并返回分离值。该查询独立于 `listModels()`：不在目录中的动态模型也可以拥有容量元数据，而 `undefined` 只表示适配器无法描述容量。
 
-手写 DeepSeek 适配器允许每个已配置模型提供可选 `contextWindow`。两个默认模型项都公开 128,000 token；未提供容量的显式模型项与未列出的透传 id 返回 `undefined`。pi-ai 适配器从同一个目录描述符解析容量，该描述符也用于权威解析请求模型。
+手写 DeepSeek 适配器允许每个已配置模型提供可选 `contextWindow`，并支持适配器级 `defaultContextWindow`。精确模型容量优先；未提供容量的模型项与未列出的透传 id 会继承适配器默认值，若默认值也不存在则返回 `undefined`。两个内置模型项都公开精确的 128,000 token 容量。pi-ai 适配器从同一个目录描述符解析容量，该描述符也用于权威解析请求模型。
 
 ### Token 计量保持模型无关
 
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Compact-basic 拥有消费方策略。顶层字段定义默认值；`modelPolici
 
 ## 测试
 
-服务测试覆盖分离上下文元数据、无效适配器输出、目录独立性与默认缺失行为。适配器测试覆盖 DeepSeek 的配置值、默认值与未列出行为，以及 pi-ai 的精确描述符解析。压缩测试覆盖比例缩放、精确提供方/模型覆盖、加载期拒绝无效合并比例、运行时校验绝对预算、相同模型 id 的提供方切换、目标专用警告抑制与不依赖容量的溢出恢复。Loader fixture 会拒绝已经移除的 token-meter 容量设置，示例则在适配器上配置容量。
+服务测试覆盖分离上下文元数据、无效适配器输出、目录独立性与默认缺失行为。适配器测试覆盖 DeepSeek 的精确容量、默认容量、未列出模型解析及无效容量，以及 pi-ai 的精确描述符解析。压缩测试覆盖比例缩放、精确提供方/模型覆盖、加载期拒绝无效合并比例、运行时校验绝对预算、相同模型 id 的提供方切换、目标专用警告抑制与不依赖容量的溢出恢复。Loader fixture 会拒绝已经移除的 token-meter 容量设置，示例则在适配器上配置容量。
 
 ## 考虑过的替代方案
 
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ Compact-basic 拥有消费方策略。顶层字段定义默认值；`modelPolici
 - 容量在提供方 seam 上拥有唯一权威归属方，而压缩策略留在可选消费插件中。
 - 同一个 compact-basic 实例无需查询发现元数据，就能安全处理不同窗口、提供方切换，以及不同提供方下的相同模型 id。
 - 仅 LLM 与仅 meter 的组合仍然有效；加载 compact-basic 不会让适配器产生反向依赖。
-- 使用显式 DeepSeek 模型列表的部署必须为需要主动压力检查的条目提供 `contextWindow`。系统会暴露缺失元数据，而不是静默应用错误的全局回退值。
+- DeepSeek 部署可以设置精确的逐模型容量，也可以让未提供容量的模型项与未列出的透传 id 使用 `defaultContextWindow`。
 - 比例默认值会随模型自然缩放，同时仍可按精确目标使用绝对保留值，以满足部署专用行为。
 
 本记录取代[回放式 token 计量服务 Agent Note](2026-07-15-replay-token-meter-service.md) 中的全局容量与无模型策略部分，单折叠计量决策保持不变。