fix: address web seam review findings

This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-07-01 17:08:53 +08:00
parent 29ce2df315
commit cf71c0b215
9 changed files with 64 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ For a catalog of the **data structures** this architecture moves around — the
│ @deepseek-ai/dsh-bash-local (bash impl) │
│ @deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-bash (bash tool schemas) │
│ @deepseek-ai/dsh-web-search-exa (web search impl) │
│ @deepseek-ai/dsh-web-search-perplexity (web search impl) │
│ @deepseek-ai/dsh-web-search-deepseek (web search impl) │
│ @deepseek-ai/dsh-web-fetch-local (web fetch impl) │
│ @deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-web (web tool schemas) │
│ @deepseek-ai/dsh-subagent-* (subagent providers) │
@@ -78,7 +80,7 @@ Swappable capabilities are split into **three packages** so each part evolves in
The LLM seam has the same topology folded differently: `dsh-llm` carries the interface (`LlmAdapter`) AND the consumer surface (`ctx.llm.stream()`), with adapters as implementation packages — there the consumer is the loop itself, not a swappable schema surface. Use the full three-package split when the consumer is independently replaceable; keep interface + consumer together when they are one concern. Don't split preemptively: a capability with one conceivable implementation and one consumer stays one package until proven otherwise.
The web capability uses the same three-package split but folds two capabilities onto one seam: `dsh-web` owns the abstract `ctx.web` service, which is a provider REGISTRY (`registerSearchProvider`/`registerFetchProvider`, registration-order-independent selection, the `WebError` taxonomy) rather than a single backend. Providers register capabilities, not tools — `dsh-web-search-exa`, `dsh-web-search-perplexity`, and `dsh-web-fetch-local` each register into `ctx.web` the way an `LlmAdapter` registers into `ctx.llm`, so they are namespace plugins (`inject: ['web']`), not key-owning services. `dsh-tool-web` is the single consumer that owns the model-facing `web_search`/`web_fetch` schemas, prompt sections, and presentation; it reads only the aggregated `ctx.web.searchStatus()`/`fetchStatus()` and executes through `ctx.web.search()`/`fetch()`, so provider selection has one owner. Search and fetch are deliberately one seam (one thing to inject and configure, one selection policy, one abort/error vocabulary) despite sharing no request schema — see the [web capability seam RFC](rfc/implemented/architecture/2026-06-24-web-capability-seam.md).
The web capability uses the same three-package split but folds two capabilities onto one seam: `dsh-web` owns the abstract `ctx.web` service, which is a provider REGISTRY (`registerSearchProvider`/`registerFetchProvider`, registration-order-independent selection, the `WebError` taxonomy) rather than a single backend. Providers register capabilities, not tools — `dsh-web-search-exa`, `dsh-web-search-perplexity`, `dsh-web-search-deepseek`, and `dsh-web-fetch-local` each register into `ctx.web` the way an `LlmAdapter` registers into `ctx.llm`, so they are namespace plugins (`inject: ['web']`), not key-owning services. `dsh-tool-web` is the single consumer that owns the model-facing `web_search`/`web_fetch` schemas, prompt sections, and presentation; it reads only the aggregated `ctx.web.searchStatus()`/`fetchStatus()` and executes through `ctx.web.search()`/`fetch()`, so provider selection has one owner. Search and fetch are deliberately one seam (one thing to inject and configure, one selection policy, one abort/error vocabulary) despite sharing no request schema — see the [web capability seam RFC](rfc/implemented/architecture/2026-06-24-web-capability-seam.md).
> **"Capability" — two unrelated meanings.** (1) The *seam pattern* above ("one plugin provides a capability, another needs it") is realized by plain Cordis **services + `inject`**: a provider registers a service (`ctx.bash`, declared in `interface Context`); a consumer declares `inject: ['bash']` and its fiber stays pending until the service exists, tearing down via HMR if it later vanishes. No extra library is needed. (2) `@cordisjs/plugin-capability` is a different axis entirely — a **permission/capability-security** service (named permissions with inheritance/dependency, tested against a session via `ctx.capability.test`). It is a candidate for the deferred permissions/sandbox work (the `tools/execute` veto seam), NOT a mechanism for swapping implementations.