Merge branch 'worktree/agent-execution-context-rfc' into worktree/explicit-turn-signal

This commit is contained in:
Yichen Jiang
2026-07-18 21:33:17 +08:00
683 changed files with 37770 additions and 8712 deletions

View File

@@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ The canonical surface separates transformable policy, around-dispatch control, a
**Agent events** (`dsh-agent`):
- `agent/session-start(agent, source)` — emit, once before turn 1, carrying a `SessionStartSource` (`startup` for a fresh/forked create, `resume` for a reloaded persisted session; `clear`/`compact` reserved). A pure notification — it CANNOT block startup (a deliberate gap: a bridge logs/injects, it does not gate startup). A listener seeds context via `agent.inject()`.
- `agent/prompt-submit(agent, content, source, signal, next) → PromptDecision` — waterfall, fired per drained queued message inside the open turn, before the `user/message` append. `signal` belongs to that turn and `next` remains the final parameter. `allow` optionally rewrites the prompt `content` or attaches `additionalContext`; `block` drops the prompt and the loop appends a durable `prompt/blocked` in its place (see the dispatch note below).
- `agent/prompt-submit(agent, content, source, signal, next) → PromptDecision` — waterfall, fired per drained queued message inside the open turn, before the `user/message` append. `signal` belongs to that turn and `next` remains the final parameter. `allow` optionally rewrites the prompt `content` or attaches separately sourced `additionalContexts[]`; `block` drops the prompt and the loop appends a durable `prompt/blocked` in its place (see the dispatch note below).
**`agent/turn-continuation`** receives and returns a `ContinuationDecision`. A `{action:'continue', reason?}` may carry model-facing context recorded as next-step steering in the same turn — the typed twin of the `/goal` step-end-steer pattern.
**`agent/turn-continuation`** receives and returns a `ContinuationDecision`. A `{action:'continue', reason?}` may carry model-facing content and source recorded as next-step steering in the same turn — the typed twin of the `/goal` step-end-steer pattern. It is not a `context/message`, so its type does not offer a context envelope or durable context metadata.
### The tool pipeline gives each phase one kind of authority
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Every call follows `tools/pre-execute` → guards → `tools/execute` → dispat
- **`tools/pre-execute`** is the extensible waterfall gate. Its `PreToolDecision` allows, denies, or asks. Deny skips `tools/execute` and core dispatch. Ask resolves through the optional approval seam: only `allowed-once` continues through guards and dispatch; rejection, cancellation, an unavailable channel, a missing approval service, or an agent-less call becomes a normalized denial. Every outcome still reaches post-policy and final observers.
- **`ctx.tools.guard()`** installs synchronous scope-aware policy after the whole pre-execute waterfall. A guard may deny or abstain, never force-allow, so listener ordering cannot resurrect an operation that a final invariant forbids.
- **`tools/execute`** is the around-dispatch waterfall for timeout, retry, and metrics plugins. A wrapper delegates to core dispatch with `next()`, may add, replace, or remove only `exec.signal` before doing so, and receives the already-normalized result of a thrown or unknown tool; returning its own valid result short-circuits dispatch.
- **`tools/post-execute`** is the inspect/transform waterfall. Its `PostToolDecision` accepts, blocks with feedback, optionally replaces content, or attaches `additionalContext`; in-place mutation of the result is not a transform channel, because the registry rebuilds the outcome from a protected snapshot plus the returned decision.
- **`tools/post-execute`** is the inspect/transform waterfall. Its `PostToolDecision` accepts, blocks with feedback, optionally replaces content, or attaches `additionalContexts`. The returned decision is the supported transform channel; after the waterfall, the registry materializes the complete outcome once before final observation.
- **`tools/result`** is the synchronous contained notification after every transform, lossless-JSON materialization, and the outer error boundary. It receives the same frozen execution identity and an immutable snapshot of the authoritative result; observer failures are contained per listener and cannot change or reject `ToolRegistry.execute()`'s returned outcome.
Core dispatch and the tool body sit inside normalization boundaries, so tool, listener, malformed-result, non-JSON result, and identity-shape failures resolve as JSON-safe `isError` results rather than escaping the turn. A post-execute listener can therefore inspect a thrown tool, and a final observer sees exactly what the caller receives and the session log can persist.
@@ -34,9 +34,9 @@ Core dispatch and the tool body sit inside normalization boundaries, so tool, li
### Three load-bearing loop decisions
1. **Open the turn before prompt policy.** A fully blocked batch becomes a zero-step `rejected` turn, preserving enclosure and giving ACP a durable terminal event. Every veto also records `prompt/blocked` with the original prompt and reason, so mixed batches retain blocked inputs. Allowed `additionalContext` is injected into the open turn.
1. **Open the turn before prompt policy.** A fully blocked batch becomes a zero-step `rejected` turn, preserving enclosure and giving ACP a durable terminal event. Every veto also records `prompt/blocked` with the original prompt and reason, so mixed batches retain blocked inputs. Every allowed `additionalContexts` entry is injected into the open turn.
2. **Post-tool `additionalContext` is buffered and appended AFTER all `tool/result`s.** `content`/`feedback` shape the result `execute()` returns, but `additionalContext` is a SEPARATE `context/message`, and a single step can carry multiple tool calls. Appending context right after each result would interleave `result(c1) → context → result(c2)` and break tool-call/result adjacency. So `execute()` surfaces `additionalContext` on its `ToolExecutionResult`, and the loop buffers every per-call context for the step and appends them as `context/message`(s) only after every `tool/result` is appended.
2. **Post-tool `additionalContexts` are buffered and appended AFTER all `tool/result`s.** `content`/`feedback` shape the result `execute()` returns, but each context is a SEPARATE `context/message`, and a single step or composite tool can produce many. Appending context immediately would interleave `result(c1) → context → result(c2)` or place nested context before its outer result, breaking tool-call/result adjacency. `ToolRunContext.deferContext()` therefore collects nested-dispatch context through failures, `execute()` surfaces the ordered array on `ToolExecutionResult`, and the loop appends every entry only after every `tool/result` in the step. An accepted outer call preserves deferred contexts before decision contexts; an outer block discards deferred contexts and exposes only contexts explicitly supplied by the blocking decision.
3. **A forced `continue` `reason` is enqueued through the steering channel**, so the next step's top-of-loop drain records it as steering for the continued turn — next-*step* steering within the SAME turn, not a next-*turn* prompt (matching the existing `hasSteering` force-continue override).