Merge remote-tracking branch 'github/master' into xtr/trajectory-inspection-ui
# Conflicts: # packages/client/runtime/src/client/sessions/session.ts # packages/client/ui-conversation/README.i18n.yaml # packages/client/ui-conversation/README.md # packages/client/ui-conversation/README.zh.md
This commit is contained in:
_Kerman
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-07-06-approval-seam.md: 70ccd4d486ad6e0126fa2eb638a064e9fc89bba6
|
||||
2026-07-06-approval-seam.zh.md: d218f79888957735305db14cd97cc74480297d29
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-06-approval-seam.md
|
||||
2026-07-06-approval-seam.md: efb4159d736779af28edc1ae6091de4669c92f31
|
||||
2026-07-06-approval-seam.zh.md: 9a4656f30a43473fe90cde9c56d45f48943e5d10
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ Costs and accepted limits:
|
||||
- **Who decides whether a call asks in the first place?** Policy producers: a hook returning `permissionDecision: ask`, any `tools/pre-execute` listener, or the sandbox escalation gate. The seam and the bridge only route and answer; neither injects its own judgment about what deserves a prompt.
|
||||
- **What happens when the user dismisses the prompt, or the turn aborts mid-ask?** Dismissal maps to `cancelled` with its own deny text. An already-aborted signal settles `cancelled` without dispatching; an abort during the ask discards the late answer. When both audit appends commit, either path records one pair, never two.
|
||||
- **What if the client answers with an option the harness never offered?** Any selection other than the offered `allow_once` maps to `rejected` — an unknown optionId from a non-conforming client can never grant.
|
||||
- **How do subagents' approvals route?** An agent no answerer owns delegates through the whole waterfall and fails closed — in-process subagents are deliberately unanswerable. `subagent-acp`'s child-side auto-answer is separate; routing a child's asks to the parent controller is deferred (§ Deferred).
|
||||
- **How do subagents' approvals route?** An agent no answerer owns delegates through the whole waterfall and fails closed — in-process subagents are deliberately unanswerable. A `'never'` parent seeds that override into each in-process child's log ([decision](2026-07-25-subagent-policy-inheritance.md)), so the child is told up front instead of asking into the empty waterfall. `subagent-acp`'s child-side auto-answer is separate; routing a child's asks to the parent controller is deferred (§ Deferred).
|
||||
- **What does `policy: 'never'` actually change at runtime?** The service resolves every ask for that session to `rejected` before dispatching any answerer (in-service, so no registration order can bypass it); the system prompt states the policy; switches are narrated at boundaries; each successful auto-rejection records the audit pair.
|
||||
- **What happens across a hot reload, or when an answerer unloads mid-session?** Answerers dispose with their owning fiber, so the next ask degrades to `unavailable` instead of hanging on a dead channel; remounting re-registers the answerer with no catch-up state.
|
||||
- **Where does a client get approval context?** The request carries the exact `callId` and the asker's human-readable `reason`; channel adapters may correlate richer tool-call state without duplicating arguments in the approval seam.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ ACP 桥只应答其会话映射所拥有的精确 agent 对象。它携带既有
|
||||
- **谁决定一次调用是否需要 ask？** 策略生产者：返回 `permissionDecision: ask` 的钩子、任何 `tools/pre-execute` 监听器、或沙箱升级门禁。seam 和桥只负责路由和应答；二者都不注入自己对「什么值得弹出提示」的判断。
|
||||
- **用户关闭提示或轮次在 ask 进行中中止时会发生什么？** 关闭映射为 `cancelled` 并携带自己的拒绝文本。已中止的 signal 直接结算为 `cancelled` 而不派发；ask 进行中的中止丢弃迟到的应答。当两个审计追加都提交时，任一路径都记录恰好一对事件，绝不会两对。
|
||||
- **如果客户端以 harness 从未提供的选项应答呢？** 除已提供的 `allow_once` 之外的任何选项都映射为 `rejected`——来自不合规客户端的未知 optionId 永远不能授权。
|
||||
- **subagent 的审批如何路由？** 没有应答者拥有的 agent 穿过整个 waterfall 委派并失败关闭——进程内 subagent 被刻意设计为不可应答。`subagent-acp` 的子侧自动应答是独立的；将子 agent 的 ask 路由到父控制器已延后（§ 延后）。
|
||||
- **subagent 的审批如何路由？** 没有应答者拥有的 agent 穿过整个 waterfall 委派并失败关闭——进程内 subagent 被刻意设计为不可应答。`'never'` 父级会把该覆盖项预置到每个进程内子 agent 的日志中（[决策](2026-07-25-subagent-policy-inheritance.md)），因此子 agent 一开始就会得知，而不是向空的 waterfall 发出 ask。`subagent-acp` 的子侧自动应答是独立的；将子 agent 的 ask 路由到父控制器已延后（§ 延后）。
|
||||
- **`policy: 'never'` 在运行时实际改变了什么？** 服务在派发任何应答者之前，将该会话的每次 ask 解析为 `rejected`（在服务内部，因此没有注册顺序能绕过它）；系统提示词声明该策略；切换在边界处被叙述；每次成功的自动拒绝都会记录审计对。
|
||||
- **热重载或应答者在会话中途卸载时会发生什么？** 应答者随其拥有的 fiber 一起 dispose，因此下一次 ask 降级为 `unavailable` 而非挂在死通道上；重新挂载会重新注册应答者，无需追赶状态。
|
||||
- **客户端从哪里获得审批上下文？** 请求携带精确的 `callId` 和发起方的人类可读 `reason`；通道适配器可自行关联更丰富的工具调用状态，而无需在审批 seam 中重复携带参数。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-06-sandbox.md
|
||||
2026-07-06-sandbox.md: c3c61ed4539bcbca359f84f3dcc020e0bd41ae79
|
||||
2026-07-06-sandbox.zh.md: 39bf92aa20c697d2ad5f4c0926caeff0a0b60a1d
|
||||
2026-07-06-sandbox.md: 42b78ad8341dd52c4dd146a2207a5ae909d28f1e
|
||||
2026-07-06-sandbox.zh.md: dfa3349e4d74d6f2c4944414c25fe3726d4a9b5a
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -89,10 +89,10 @@ Left open: what a durable grant's scope identity is beyond the sandbox mode —
|
||||
#### Per-session modes: the session log as the store
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
effective(session) = findLast(the session's own knob events)?.value ?? the composition-config default
|
||||
effective(session) = findLast(the session's knob events)?.value ?? the composition-config default
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The default is composition config (`cordis.yml`) — operator-owned, process-wide. A runtime switch is a session-scoped override recorded as one log-only event in that session's own log. Restart immunity (resuming a session replays its log, so overrides come back with zero catch-up machinery) and multi-session isolation both fall out by construction, and no external config store exists anywhere.
|
||||
The default is composition config (`cordis.yml`) — operator-owned, process-wide. A runtime switch is a session-scoped override recorded as one log-only event in that session's log. Restart immunity and multi-session isolation follow from replay, with no external config store. The in-process subagent driver snapshots a parent's explicit override at delegation and seeds a source-tagged event after the child's optional fork prefix, so delegation cannot fall back to a wider default ([decision](2026-07-25-subagent-policy-inheritance.md)).
|
||||
|
||||
**One event per knob, owned by its domain** — the merge-extensible `SessionEventMap` idiom every existing event family already follows (`approval/*` in `dsh-user-approval`, `hook/*` in the hooks packages):
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -89,10 +89,10 @@ Landlock launcher 源码和包工作区位于 `native/landlock-run`，与 harnes
|
||||
#### 按会话模式：会话日志即存储
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
effective(session) = findLast(the session's own knob events)?.value ?? the composition-config default
|
||||
effective(session) = findLast(the session's knob events)?.value ?? the composition-config default
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
默认值是组合配置（`cordis.yml`）——运维人员拥有，进程范围。运行时切换是会话范围的覆盖，记录为该会话自身日志中的一条仅日志事件。重启免疫（恢复会话时回放其日志，覆盖自然恢复，无需追赶机制）和多会话隔离都是构造性的自然结果，且不存在任何外部配置存储。
|
||||
默认值是组合配置（`cordis.yml`）——由运维人员拥有、作用于整个进程。运行时切换是会话范围的覆盖，以一条仅日志事件记录在该会话的日志中。重启免疫与多会话隔离由回放自然保证，且不存在任何外部配置存储。进程内 subagent 驱动器在委派时对父级的显式覆盖项获取快照，并在子 agent 可选的 fork 前缀之后预置一条带来源标记的事件，因此委派无法回退到更宽的默认值（[决策](2026-07-25-subagent-policy-inheritance.md)）。
|
||||
|
||||
**每个旋钮一种事件，由其领域拥有**——这是每个既有事件族已遵循的可合并扩展 `SessionEventMap` 惯用法（`dsh-user-approval` 中的 `approval/*`、hooks 包中的 `hook/*`）：
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-07-20-dsh-cli-personal-config.md: 9525aa811d792a918f03a52c21bc273e92fb8be7
|
||||
2026-07-20-dsh-cli-personal-config.zh.md: f21d4b1f22b3a3807b6b4155969282343f6048f5
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-20-dsh-cli-personal-config.md
|
||||
2026-07-20-dsh-cli-personal-config.md: cc965438214b68078647596af5a28fd666e7bd95
|
||||
2026-07-20-dsh-cli-personal-config.zh.md: 02f9c578061e1c25044c377c3ec8f80594275ae7
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ A developer's own preferences — which provider and model the TUI uses, persona
|
||||
|
||||
Two coupled pieces, aligned with the `apps/` assembly tier proposed by the `dsh web` PR (#443):
|
||||
|
||||
**The `dsh` CLI (`apps/cli`, npm name `@deepseek-ai/dsh`).** `apps/*` joins the workspaces as the product-assembly tier over `packages/*` libraries. The bin's dispatch reserves `web` and `-p`/`--prompt` for PR #443 (they exit with a pointer) so the two branches merge as a near-union; everything else runs the default surface: the interactive TUI, booting the shipped `examples/tui-agent/cordis.yml` (or an explicit config argument) with the invoking directory as the workspace. The committed `bin/dsh` launcher resolves the checkout through its own real path and runs the bin **from source** via the repo's tsx, so `ln -sf "$(pwd)/bin/dsh" ~/.local/bin/dsh` installs a command that always executes the current working tree. `pnpm run demo:tui` runs the same entry.
|
||||
**The `dsh` CLI (`apps/cli`, npm name `@deepseek-ai/dsh`).** `apps/*` joins the workspaces as the product-assembly tier over `packages/*` libraries. The bin's dispatch reserves `web` and `-p`/`--prompt` for PR #443 (they exit with a pointer) so the two branches merge as a near-union; everything else runs the default surface: the interactive TUI, booting the shipped `examples/tui-agent/cordis.yml` (or an explicit config argument) with the invoking directory as the workspace. The committed `bin/dsh` launcher resolves the checkout through its own real path and runs the bin **from source** through Node's native TypeScript transform plus the app-owned tsconfig-paths loader, so `ln -sf "$(pwd)/bin/dsh" ~/.local/bin/dsh` installs a command that always executes the current working tree. `pnpm run demo:tui` runs the same entry.
|
||||
|
||||
**Personal config (`dsh-app-boot`).** The personal overlay lives in the Harness home — `$DSH_HOME`, else `~/.dsh` — resolved by the shared [`resolveDshHome`](../architecture/2026-07-24-single-harness-home-resolver.md) (`@deepseek-ai/dsh-paths`), the same single root skills and AGENTS.md resolve against. The dsh TUI surface consumes its two optional files; the demo bins boot their committed trees verbatim:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
两个耦合的部分，与 `dsh web` PR（#443）提出的 `apps/` 装配层对齐：
|
||||
|
||||
**`dsh` CLI（`apps/cli`，npm 名 `@deepseek-ai/dsh`）。** `apps/*` 作为 `packages/*` 库之上的产品装配层加入 workspaces。bin 的分发把 `web` 和 `-p`/`--prompt` 保留给 PR #443（它们以指引退出），使两个分支能以接近并集的方式合并；其余一切都运行默认表面：交互式 TUI，加载随仓库提供的 `examples/tui-agent/cordis.yml`（或显式的配置参数），并以调用目录为工作区。已提交的 `bin/dsh` 启动器通过自身真实路径解析 checkout，用仓库的 tsx **从源码**运行该 bin，因此 `ln -sf "$(pwd)/bin/dsh" ~/.local/bin/dsh` 安装的命令永远执行当前工作树。`pnpm run demo:tui` 运行同一入口。
|
||||
**`dsh` CLI（`apps/cli`，npm 名 `@deepseek-ai/dsh`）。** `apps/*` 作为 `packages/*` 库之上的产品装配层加入 workspaces。bin 的分发把 `web` 和 `-p`/`--prompt` 保留给 PR #443（它们以指引退出），使两个分支能以接近并集的方式合并；其余一切都运行默认表面：交互式 TUI，加载随仓库提供的 `examples/tui-agent/cordis.yml`（或显式的配置参数），并以调用目录为工作区。已提交的 `bin/dsh` 启动器通过自身真实路径解析 checkout，通过 Node 的原生 TypeScript 转换和应用自身持有的 tsconfig-paths loader **从源码**运行该 bin，因此 `ln -sf "$(pwd)/bin/dsh" ~/.local/bin/dsh` 安装的命令永远执行当前工作树。`pnpm run demo:tui` 运行同一入口。
|
||||
|
||||
**个人配置（`dsh-app-boot`）。** 个人 overlay 存放在 Harness home——`$DSH_HOME`，否则 `~/.dsh`——由共享的 [`resolveDshHome`](../architecture/2026-07-24-single-harness-home-resolver.md)（`@deepseek-ai/dsh-paths`）解析，与 skills、AGENTS.md 解析所依据的单一根目录相同。dsh 的 TUI 表面消费其中两个可选文件；各示例 bin 仍然逐字节按已提交的配置树启动：
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-22-docked-web-goal-bar.md
|
||||
2026-07-22-docked-web-goal-bar.md: 52a7d223ce3522c5ba977b1126dcd63bd2f6366f
|
||||
2026-07-22-docked-web-goal-bar.zh.md: e4842a03ccb8a29b35c7af0c03c51b1324b6ab36
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Docked web goal bar
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-22-docked-web-goal-bar.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
The web UI had no goal surface at all: the goal stack shipped with model tools, the TUI/ACP adapters, and the `/goal` command, but the browser client exposed none of it — no runtime verbs, no indicator. This change introduces the client goal verbs (runtime session methods over RPC) and the first goal UI together. Placement follows the redesign's premise that goal presence belongs to the composer's context: the goal is a property of the work the user is about to prompt, so its indicator docks directly above the message composer as a rounded-top strip tucked under the composer card's top edge. The mock keeps only a sparkle, a phase word ("Ongoing/Paused/Blocked Goal"), the truncated objective, and edit/clear icon actions, with resume appearing only on a paused goal.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
`GoalBar` (`packages/client/ui-goal/src/client/GoalBar.tsx`) is a new props-driven, self-contained component; `ConversationRoot` mounts it immediately before the composer `InputBar`. The strip's CSS mirrors the composer's horizontal geometry (32px side padding, 776px centered cap) plus the mock's 12px inset, and a -10px bottom margin eats InputBar's 8px top padding and tucks its square bottom edge 2px under the composer card's top edge. All strip states share one fixed 38px height so switching between them never resizes it. Loading (`goal === undefined`), absent (`goal === null`), and `phase === 'complete'` render nothing — a completed goal is history, not chrome.
|
||||
|
||||
Visibility drives the label and actions: active shows "Ongoing Goal" with edit/clear; paused shows "Paused Goal" and adds a resume icon button; blocked shows "Blocked Goal" and carries `blockedReason.message` as the strip's `title` tooltip. Goal creation lives on the `/goal` command, not in the bar. The pencil swaps the strip for an inline edit form prefilled with the current objective: Enter or the check button saves through `GoalBarActions.onEdit(objective)`, Esc cancels, and an all-whitespace objective keeps save disabled. The form closes only when the edit succeeds; a failure preserves the draft and displays the error in the bar. Resume and clear failures are displayed there as well. Clear otherwise calls `onClear` directly with no confirmation — a clear keeps a durable tombstone, so nothing is unrecoverable. An effect keyed on the goal's id drops the edit form when the goal's identity changes, so a surviving draft can never be written over the goal that replaced it.
|
||||
|
||||
`GoalBarActions` lives in the contract layer (`contract/slots.ts`, next to the `ConversationInjected.goalActions` slot it feeds) and carries exactly the rendered verbs: `onEdit`/`onResume`/`onClear`. Each callback asynchronously returns an explicit success/failure result so `GoalBar` owns its transitions and error display. `apply.ts` wires them to the runtime session methods; the runtime session resolves the current goal's compare-and-set ref internally, so the UI passes no ref.
|
||||
|
||||
The runtime session gains the goal surface the strip (and future UI) needs: `fetchGoal` populates the snapshot on open, and a live `context/message` carrying `goal/change` meta triggers a coalesced refetch — concurrent triggers share the in-flight `goal.get`, while a trigger received during that read schedules one coalesced trailing read so independently ordered notifications and GET responses cannot leave stale state. Window replays never refetch, and matching the meta kind (rather than a goal key) also catches clear tombstones written by other clients. The six mutation verbs fold transport failures into `{ ok: false }` results like every sibling session method, and a get result older than a mutation response that landed mid-flight is dropped.
|
||||
|
||||
The strip's background is `--dsw-alias-interactive-bg-hover` rather than the mock's literal `#F5F6F7`: the translucent hover gray resolves to that value over the white light-theme base and lifts the strip off the composer card in dark mode, where a static light token would sink. All colors are `--dsw-*` tokens.
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing
|
||||
|
||||
`packages/client/ui-goal/tests/goalbar.spec.tsx` pins the behavior through props alone: loading/absent/complete render nothing, the active strip renders label/objective and fires clear, the edit form prefills, rejects empty, saves on Enter, cancels on Esc, and resets when the goal's identity changes, the paused strip fires resume, and the blocked strip exposes the reason tooltip. Component failure-path cases prove that a failed edit preserves its draft and that edit/resume/clear errors remain visible in the bar. The skeleton specs mount `ConversationRoot` with and without `goalActions`; the undefined case is seeded with an active goal, so the missing gate — not the missing goal — is what hides the strip. Runtime session specs pin the folded-error results, the live-only in-flight-plus-trailing refetch, and the stale-read guard. A keyless real-browser smoke boots the assembled application through `boot → RPC → runtime → GoalBar` and records an inline snapshot of the rendered label, objective, and actions.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
- **Put the strip in the session header** — rejected because the redesign's premise is that goal presence belongs to the composer's context; a header strip cannot dock into the composer card.
|
||||
- **Render a "Loading goal…" placeholder for `undefined`** — rejected: the strip would flash and collapse on every session open, chrome noise for a sub-second state.
|
||||
- **Include an inline create affordance when no goal is set** — rejected after implementation review: goal creation lives on the `/goal` command, matching the pattern where the model creates goals on request; the bar is a status indicator, not a creation surface.
|
||||
- **Carry the full verb set (`onPause`/`onComplete`) in `GoalBarActions`** — rejected as speculative generality: no consumer calls them, so the interface carries only the rendered verbs.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
- Goal presence in the web UI is a composer-docked strip: sparkle, phase label, truncated objective, and edit/clear (plus resume when paused) — the browser client's first goal surface.
|
||||
- The runtime session exposes the goal verbs over RPC with folded transport errors, and refreshes the snapshot's goal on open and on live goal-change meta (coalesced, guarded against stale reads).
|
||||
- Objective editing is reachable from the UI for the first time, through `goal.edit` with the runtime-owned ref; pause/complete remain available to other surfaces (`/goal`, model tools).
|
||||
- `goal === null` renders nothing; the composer carries no persistent create affordance — creation is the `/goal` command's job.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: 停靠式 Web 目标条
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-22-docked-web-goal-bar.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
Web UI 此前没有任何目标相关的界面：目标栈已随模型工具、TUI/ACP 适配器和 `/goal` 命令交付，但浏览器客户端完全不接触它——既没有运行时动词，也没有指示器。本变更同时引入客户端目标动词（基于 RPC 的运行时会话方法）和第一个目标 UI。摆放位置遵循重新设计的前提：目标的存在感属于输入框的上下文——目标是用户即将提交的工作的属性，因此它的指示器停靠在消息输入框正上方，呈现为一条圆角顶部的横条，收进输入框卡片顶边之下。设计稿只保留一个闪光图标、一个阶段词（"Ongoing/Paused/Blocked Goal"）、截断后的目标内容，以及编辑／清除图标操作，恢复按钮仅在目标暂停时出现。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
`GoalBar`（`packages/client/ui-goal/src/client/GoalBar.tsx`）是一个新的、由 props 驱动的自包含组件；`ConversationRoot` 将它挂载在输入框 `InputBar` 紧上方。横条的 CSS 对齐输入框的水平几何（两侧 32px 内边距、776px 居中上限），再加上设计稿的 12px 内缩，并用 -10px 的下外边距吃掉 InputBar 的 8px 上内边距，使它方形的底边收进输入框卡片顶边之下 2px。横条的所有状态共享固定的 38px 高度，状态切换不会引起尺寸变化。加载中（`goal === undefined`）、无目标（`goal === null`）和 `phase === 'complete'` 时不渲染任何内容：已完成的目标是历史记录，不是常驻界面元素。
|
||||
|
||||
可见性决定标签和操作：active 状态显示 "Ongoing Goal" 并提供编辑／清除；paused 状态显示 "Paused Goal"，并增加一个恢复图标按钮；blocked 状态显示 "Blocked Goal"，并把 `blockedReason.message` 作为横条的 `title` 悬浮提示。创建目标的入口在 `/goal` 命令上，不在横条里。铅笔图标把横条切换为内联编辑表单，预填当前目标内容：Enter 或勾选按钮通过 `GoalBarActions.onEdit(objective)` 保存，Esc 取消，目标内容全为空白字符时保存按钮保持禁用。编辑成功后表单才会关闭；编辑失败时保留草稿，并在横条中显示错误。恢复和清除失败也显示在横条中。除此之外，清除直接调用 `onClear`，不做确认——清除会保留 durable 墓碑，没有不可恢复的损失。一个以目标 id 为键的 effect 会在目标身份变化时丢弃编辑表单，因此存留的草稿绝不可能覆盖掉替换它的新目标。
|
||||
|
||||
`GoalBarActions` 位于 contract 层（`contract/slots.ts`，紧挨它所喂给的 `ConversationInjected.goalActions` 槽位），只携带实际渲染的动词：`onEdit`/`onResume`/`onClear`。每个回调都会异步返回显式成功／失败结果，因此 `GoalBar` 自行负责界面转换和错误显示。`apply.ts` 把它们接到运行时会话方法上；运行时会话在内部解析当前目标的 compare-and-set ref，因此 UI 不传 ref。
|
||||
|
||||
运行时会话获得了横条（以及未来 UI）所需的目标表面：`fetchGoal` 在打开时填充快照；携带 `goal/change` 元数据的 live `context/message` 触发合并重新拉取——并发触发器共享正在执行的 `goal.get`，读取期间收到的触发器会安排一次合并后的尾随读取，避免彼此独立排序的通知和 GET 响应留下陈旧状态。窗口重放绝不触发重新拉取，且匹配元数据 kind（而不是 goal 键）还能捕获其他客户端写入的清除墓碑。六个变更动词与所有同类会话方法一样，把传输层失败折叠为 `{ ok: false }` 结果；比在拉取途中落地的变更响应更旧的 get 结果会被丢弃。
|
||||
|
||||
横条的背景色用 `--dsw-alias-interactive-bg-hover`，而不是设计稿里的字面值 `#F5F6F7`：这个半透明的悬浮灰在浅色主题的白色底上正好解析为该值，而在深色模式下能把横条从输入框卡片上衬托出来，静态的浅色 token 在深色模式下会沉进去。所有颜色都是 `--dsw-*` token。
|
||||
|
||||
## 测试
|
||||
|
||||
`packages/client/ui-goal/tests/goalbar.spec.tsx` 仅通过 props 固定这些行为：加载中／无目标／已完成时不渲染；active 横条渲染标签和目标内容并触发清除；编辑表单预填内容、拒绝空值、按 Enter 保存、按 Esc 取消，并在目标身份变化时重置；paused 横条触发恢复；blocked 横条暴露原因悬浮提示。组件失败路径用例证明编辑失败时保留草稿，并且编辑／恢复／清除错误持续显示在横条中。skeleton 规格测试分别挂载带与不带 `goalActions` 的 `ConversationRoot`；未定义的情形预置了一个 active 目标，因此隐藏横条的是缺失的挂载门，而不是缺失的目标。运行时会话规格测试固定了折叠错误结果、仅 live 的执行中读取加尾随读取，以及陈旧读取守卫。一个无密钥真实浏览器冒烟测试通过 `boot → RPC → runtime → GoalBar` 启动组装后的应用，并以内联快照记录渲染出的标签、目标内容和操作。
|
||||
|
||||
## 考虑过的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
- **把横条放在会话头部**：不予采纳，因为重新设计的前提是目标的存在感属于输入框的上下文；放在头部的横条无法停靠进输入框卡片。
|
||||
- **为 `undefined` 渲染 "Loading goal…" 占位**：不予采纳，每次打开会话横条都会闪现再坍缩，对一个不到一秒的状态来说只是界面噪音。
|
||||
- **未设置目标时在横条内提供内联创建入口**：实现评审后不予采纳，创建目标的职责在 `/goal` 命令上，与模型按请求创建目标的模式一致；横条是状态指示器，不是创建入口。
|
||||
- **在 `GoalBarActions` 中携带完整动词集合（`onPause`/`onComplete`）**：作为投机性泛化不予采纳，没有消费方调用它们，接口只携带实际渲染的动词。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
- Web UI 中目标的存在形式是停靠在输入框上方的横条：闪光图标、阶段标签、截断的目标内容，以及编辑／清除（暂停时另有恢复）——这是浏览器客户端的第一个目标界面。
|
||||
- 运行时会话通过 RPC 暴露目标动词并折叠传输层错误，且在打开时和 live 目标变更元数据到达时刷新快照中的目标（合并拉取，带陈旧读取守卫）。
|
||||
- 目标内容首次可以从 UI 编辑，经由 `goal.edit`，ref 由运行时持有；暂停／完成对其他界面（`/goal`、模型工具）照常可用。
|
||||
- `goal === null` 时不渲染任何内容；输入框不提供常驻的创建入口，创建是 `/goal` 命令的职责。
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-25-subagent-policy-inheritance.md
|
||||
2026-07-25-subagent-policy-inheritance.md: aeff83795eedead9c75de6bbb74c1da1945092ca
|
||||
2026-07-25-subagent-policy-inheritance.zh.md: 7a09fd972f53b46655df93ddf9625455f2077460
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: In-process subagent policy inheritance — the child starts under the parent's sandbox and approval overrides
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-25-subagent-policy-inheritance.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
Sandbox and approval overrides are per-session log folds. An in-process subagent gets a new session, so a spawn child once fell back to deployment defaults and a fork child saw only switches inside its completed-turn prefix. Delegation could therefore widen a parent that had switched to `read-only`, or turn a parent's unattended `'never'` approval stance back into prompting behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
The shared in-process driver snapshots `sandboxPolicy.overrideOf(parent.session)` and `approval.overrideOf(parent.session)` before its first await. A later parent switch belongs to the parent's future; cancel-and-redelegate takes a new snapshot. Both services are optional, and only explicit session overrides are copied, never deployment defaults or one-shot grants.
|
||||
|
||||
Each captured value becomes a source-tagged `sandbox/mode` or `approval/policy` event appended during the child factory's unpublished setup. The session constructor has already fixed `Session.firstLiveSeq` at the fork-prefix length, so the inherited facts follow fork history, reach telemetry when the child is announced, and leave `SessionHeader.seedLength` at the prefix length. Existing last-event-wins folds therefore make the delegation snapshot beat stale fork history and let a later child switch beat the snapshot. A grandchild folds its parent's logged state, so the rule composes without another inheritance mechanism.
|
||||
|
||||
Ordinary session appends validate the inherited events before publication, and persistence captures the complete unpublished log when the session is announced. Any materialized child log therefore stores the inherited events with its first batch; there is no second policy store, schema field, or query index. The `source: 'delegation'` marker lets approval narration distinguish inheritance from a child-side user switch.
|
||||
|
||||
### What a blocked child experiences
|
||||
|
||||
A confined child gets the ordinary denial marker. No answerer currently owns an in-process child, so an escalation request fails closed and the child reports upward; a controller-owned parent may widen its own session and delegate again. An inherited `'never'` policy tells the child not to request escalation in its first system prompt.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
- **Generic `SessionHeader` policy fields** — rejected: they duplicate an event-sourced fact in metadata and require propagation through core session types, persistence backends, query indexes, collision identity, and every policy consumer. Unpublished setup events have the required ordering and reuse the existing durable store.
|
||||
- **Combining new policy facts with constructor history** — rejected: `Session.firstLiveSeq` classifies the complete constructor seed as replayed history, so telemetry would skip child-only facts. Unpublished setup keeps history and new facts on their existing sides of that boundary without another session option.
|
||||
- **A first-prompt listener** — rejected: it introduces listener ordering and a later timing boundary even though the creation transaction already permits log appends before publication.
|
||||
- **Copying deployment defaults** — rejected: defaults remain operator-owned and may change; an unswitched parent stamps nothing, so its child follows the current deployment.
|
||||
- **Live resolution walking `parentSession` at each call** — rejected: it breaks the "two sessions never see each other's state" isolation invariant, requires the parent session to stay loaded for the child's lifetime, and makes a mid-run parent switch retroactively change a running child. Snapshot-at-delegation is the semantic: the child keeps the policy it was handed; cancel-and-respawn picks up a tightening.
|
||||
- **Forcing `'never'` or routing asks to the root controller** — rejected as inheritance behavior. A forced value forecloses a future child answerer; parent routing needs parent-chain ownership and the spawning `callId`, and remains deferred in [the approval-seam Agent Note](2026-07-06-approval-seam.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
- Spawn, fork, and nested in-process children retain a parent's explicit sandbox and approval overrides. The focused suite proves real filesystem denial, stale-fork precedence, delegation-time capture, the live-event boundary, default omission, and context disposal.
|
||||
- The keyless headless snapshot is the assembled regression: only the parent is `read-only`, the deployment default is `workspace-write`, and the child's persisted event plus denied disk write both fail if capture is removed.
|
||||
- Each delegation adds at most two log-only events. `dsh-subagent-inprocess` has optional peer types for the two policy services; compositions without either service behave unchanged. Out-of-process children retain their own deployment policy, and a running child does not follow later parent switches.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: 进程内 subagent 策略继承——子 agent 在父级的沙箱与审批覆盖项下启动
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-25-subagent-policy-inheritance.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
沙箱与审批覆盖项都是按会话的日志折叠。进程内 subagent 会获得一个新会话，因此 spawn 子 agent（智能体）过去会回退到部署默认值，fork 子 agent 则只能看到其已完成轮次前缀中的切换。因此，委派可能放宽已经切换到 `read-only` 的父级，或让父级无人值守的 `'never'` 审批立场重新变成会发起提示的行为。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
共享的进程内驱动器在第一次 await 之前对 `sandboxPolicy.overrideOf(parent.session)` 和 `approval.overrideOf(parent.session)` 获取快照。父级后续的切换属于父级的未来；取消后重新委派会取得新快照。这两个服务均为可选，仅复制显式会话覆盖项，绝不复制部署默认值或一次性授权。
|
||||
|
||||
每个捕获值都会成为子 agent 工厂在未发布设置阶段追加的一条带来源标记的 `sandbox/mode` 或 `approval/policy` 事件。会话构造函数已将 `Session.firstLiveSeq` 固定为 fork 前缀的长度，因此继承事实会排在 fork 历史之后，在子 agent 公布时进入遥测，同时让 `SessionHeader.seedLength` 保持为此前缀的长度。因此，既有的末事件胜出折叠会让委派快照压过陈旧的 fork 历史，并让子 agent 后续的切换压过该快照。孙代 agent 会折叠其父级已记录的状态，因此无需另一套继承机制即可组合此规则。
|
||||
|
||||
普通的会话追加会在发布前校验继承事件，持久化层则在会话公布时捕获完整的未发布日志。因此，任何已物化的子 agent 日志都会在首批数据中存下继承事件；不存在第二套策略存储、schema 字段或查询索引。`source: 'delegation'` 标记让审批叙述能够区分继承与子 agent 侧的用户切换。
|
||||
|
||||
### 被拦住的子 agent 会经历什么
|
||||
|
||||
受限子 agent 会得到普通拒绝标记。目前没有应答器认领进程内子 agent，因此升级请求会失败关闭，由子 agent 向上汇报；由控制器持有的父 agent 可以放宽自己的会话后重新委派。继承的 `'never'` 策略会在第一份系统提示词中告知子 agent 不要请求升级。
|
||||
|
||||
## 考虑过的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
- **通用的 `SessionHeader` 策略字段**：不予采纳。它们会在元数据中复制一项事件溯源事实，并要求贯穿核心会话类型、持久化后端、查询索引、碰撞标识与每个策略消费方进行传播。未发布设置阶段的事件具备所需顺序，并复用现有持久化存储。
|
||||
- **将新策略事实与构造历史合并**：不予采纳。`Session.firstLiveSeq` 会把完整的构造种子归类为回放历史，因此遥测会跳过仅属于子 agent 的事实。未发布设置让历史与新事实留在该边界各自原有的一侧，无需再增加会话选项。
|
||||
- **首个提示词监听器**：不予采纳。尽管创建事务已经允许在发布前追加日志，它仍会引入监听器顺序与更晚的时序边界。
|
||||
- **复制部署默认值**：不予采纳。默认值仍由运维人员拥有且可能变化；未切换的父级不会盖章写入任何内容，因此其子 agent 跟随当前部署。
|
||||
- **每次调用时沿 `parentSession` 实时解析**：不予采纳。这会打破「两个会话永远看不到彼此状态」的隔离不变量，要求父会话在子 agent 的整个生命周期内保持加载，还会让父级在子 agent 运行途中做的切换追溯性地改变一个正在运行的子 agent。委派时快照才是本设计的语义：子 agent 保持它被交付时的策略；取消后重新 spawn 即可拿到收紧后的策略。
|
||||
- **强制使用 `'never'` 或把 ask 路由到根控制器**：不作为继承行为采纳。强制值会排除未来的子 agent 应答器；父级路由需要父链所有权与发起 spawn 的 `callId`，仍按[审批 seam Agent Note](2026-07-06-approval-seam.md) 所述延期。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
- spawn、fork 和嵌套的进程内子 agent 会保留父级显式的沙箱与审批覆盖项。聚焦测试套件证明真实文件系统拒绝、陈旧 fork 优先级、委派时捕获、实时事件边界、默认值省略与上下文释放。
|
||||
- 无密钥 headless 快照是组装后应用层面的回归测试：只有父级是 `read-only`，部署默认值是 `workspace-write`；若移除捕获，子 agent 的持久化事件与被拒的磁盘写入这两项检查都会失败。
|
||||
- 每次委派最多增加两条仅日志事件。`dsh-subagent-inprocess` 为两个策略服务提供可选 peer 类型；未组合任一服务的组合保持原有行为。进程外子 agent 仍采用自身的部署策略，正在运行的子 agent 不跟随父级后续切换。
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user