docs: tighten prose audit after master retarget

docs/rfc/implemented/feature/2026-07-05-dynamic-workflows.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ A workflow capability family at `packages/workflow/` in the bash seam shape (int
 
 ### The script contract (Claude Code-compatible)
 
-A workflow call is two parts: a `meta` JSON parameter (the identity block — `name`, `description`, optional `whenToUse`/`phases`; the field vocabulary matches Claude Code's meta block) and a `script` — a plain-JS body with top-level `await`, ending in `return <json-value>`. Meta is DATA, never code: the engine shape-validates it and evaluates no script text to obtain it (a body still opening with a CC-style `export const meta` statement is rejected with a pointed message). The body sees exactly: `agent(prompt, {label, phase, schema, model})`, `parallel(thunks)`, `pipeline(items, ...stages)` (NO cross-stage barrier; `(prev, item, index)` callbacks), `phase(title)`, `log(message)`, and `args`. CC semantics are preserved where they matter to script authors: a failed child resolves `null` (scripts `.filter(Boolean)`); an ordinary stage throw nulls the ITEM and skips its remaining stages. CC's determinism bans (`Date.now()`/`Math.random()`/argless `new Date()` throwing) are NOT enforced — they exist for CC's journaling/resume, which this cut defers — so a CC-authored BODY runs unchanged (its meta header moves into the parameter) while scripts written here may freely read the clock.
+A workflow call contains JSON `meta` and a JavaScript `script` body with top-level `await`. Metadata is validated as data and never evaluated. The body receives `agent`, `parallel`, `pipeline`, `phase`, `log`, and `args`; failed children and ordinary stage errors resolve the affected item to `null`. Claude Code's determinism restrictions are deferred with journaling, so compatible bodies may use clock and randomness after moving their meta header into the parameter.
 
 One deliberate strictness DIVERGENCE from CC: hook misuse — unknown or deferred options (`effort`/`isolation`/`agentType`), malformed arguments, schemas outside the supported subset, tripped caps, seam start failures — throws a `WorkflowError` with `fatal: true`, and the combinators RE-THROW fatal errors instead of nulling the item. Without this, a typo'd option dissolves into a `null` indistinguishable from a child failure — the accepted-then-ignored failure mode this repo bans. One addition: the tool's `args` parameter is a JSON OBJECT (a bare list is wrapped as a field) so the wire schema stays honest.
 
@@ -22,15 +22,15 @@ One deliberate strictness DIVERGENCE from CC: hook misuse — unknown or deferre
 
 ### The engine (dsh-workflow-workerthread): one worker thread per run
 
-**Trust premise (governs every engine decision below)**: workflow scripts are MODEL-WRITTEN — the same trust level as the model's existing bash access — so the engine defends against BUGGY scripts, never hostile ones. In scope: `result` never rejects, no unhandled rejections from dropped hook promises, loud rejection of values JSON cannot carry, fatal-vs-null hook discipline, cancellation that always frees the caller. Out of scope, deliberately: adversarial values (throwing/spinning accessors, proxies with hostile traps, prototype forgery, `prepareStackTrace` hijack) AND Node-API escape from the script's context — the vm context shares object machinery with its surrounding realm, so a script can reach the `Function` constructor (`globalThis.constructor.constructor`) and from it `process` and every Node builtin; the absent globals are API surface, not containment, and a worker thread is NOT a security boundary (an escapee holds process-wide privileges — Node's permission model is per-process). Worker-side code MAY run script code while reading script values, and that is accepted: a synchronous spin costs the script its OWN thread (terminated at the post-cancel grace), never the host loop, so containing error VALUES would be cost without a threat model. Genuine sandboxing (isolated-vm, a separate process) remains an engine swap behind the seam, not incremental defenses here.
+**Trust premise**: workflow scripts have the same trust as the model's bash access. The engine contains buggy scripts and guarantees settled results, JSON-safe values, and cancellation quiescence; it does not defend against hostile code. A vm context and worker thread are not security boundaries: a script can escape to Node APIs with process-wide authority. Sandboxing requires a separate-process or isolated-vm engine behind this seam.
 
-**Why node:worker_threads**: one run uses one unpooled worker because a workflow run is already heavyweight relative to thread startup. The script runs in a vm context inside the worker, keeping the script-visible surface to the hook contract instead of exposing a bare worker realm, while `agent()` bridges by message-port RPC to I/O-bound child loops on the host. This keeps `start()` from blocking the host on the script's synchronous slice, makes the post-cancel deadline end in a real `worker.terminate()`, and gives cross-thread values a serialization boundary by construction. isolated-vm was rejected for its maintenance state, required `--no-node-snapshot` consumer flag on Node ≥ 20, and node-gyp fallback.
+**Why `node:worker_threads`**: each run gets one unpooled worker. A vm context limits the documented script surface, while message-port RPC bridges `agent()` to host-side child loops. The worker prevents synchronous script work from blocking the host, provides a serialization boundary, and permits forced termination after cancellation. `isolated-vm` was rejected because of its maintenance state and deployment requirements.
 
-Host-side meta validation and body pre-parsing preserve the seam's synchronous errors, and private enum-keyed payload maps define the wire protocol. Pending async starts, published child records, one host cancellation signal, worker-death reaping, result precedence, and disposal quiescence preserve the subagent run contract across that wire; the [agent-scope runtime-design RFC](../architecture/2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.md#workflow-children-are-pending-starts-or-published-records) owns those race algorithms. Coverage uses an in-process `MessageChannel` for worker-side logic that main-process V8 coverage cannot see and separately proves the built `lib/worker.js`—a second tsdown entry sanctioned by the `"./worker"` subpath export—under plain Node in the built-bin smoke gate.
+The host validates metadata and parses the body before publication. Private enum-keyed payload maps define the wire protocol, and host-owned records preserve the subagent run contract across it. The [agent-scope runtime-design RFC](../architecture/2026-07-12-agent-scope-runtime-design.md#workflow-children-are-pending-starts-or-published-records) owns the start, cancellation, worker-death, and disposal algorithms.
 
-**Meta as data, never evaluated**: the meta block reaches the seam as a plain JSON request field (the tool's schema-validated `meta` parameter) and the engine only shape-validates it, every violation named. This is a host-isolation invariant, not a convenience: evaluating a meta literal host-side — even one contractually "pure", in an empty timed vm context — hands script-controlled getters a host stack with no timeout the moment the result is READ, defeating the exact spin isolation the worker thread buys.
+**Meta is data**: the schema-validated `meta` field reaches the seam as JSON and is only shape-validated. The host never evaluates a metadata literal, which would let script-controlled accessors run outside the worker's isolation.
 
-**Value boundary**: values leaving the script (meta, hook options, schemas, the return value) go through `materializeFromRealm` — a plain recursive walk that rejects loud everything JSON cannot carry (exotic prototypes, functions, symbols, cycles, sparse arrays, non-finite numbers, nested `undefined`), copying via `Object.defineProperty` so a `"__proto__"` key becomes a data property, never a prototype mutation; getters are read ordinarily and their RESULT crosses (a throwing read fails loud) — which is also what makes every later postMessage hop total. Values entering the realm (`args`, `agent()` results, hook promises and failures, combinator arrays) are handed over directly as worker-realm values — the script is trusted, so outer prototypes are not a leak; `args` rides the `workerData` structured clone (the caller-isolation copy) and is cloned once more so a script scribbling on it cannot mutate the session's init object. Hook failures are `WorkflowError`s built OUTSIDE the script's context: the combinators recognize fatality by `instanceof` against the engine's own class (unforgeable from the script), and the script-visible consequence — in-script `instanceof Error` is `false` for hook errors; branch on `e.name`/`e.code` — is documented in the engine README. Realm functions (stages, thunks) are called, never materialized. Thrown script values are rendered by a total renderer (stack → message → `String()`, fixed label if rendering throws), so `result` cannot reject. Caps (`maxConcurrentAgents` auto = `min(16, max(1, availableParallelism() - 2))`, `maxTotalAgents` 1000, `maxItemsPerCall` 4096) and timeouts are validated Config, not literals.
+**Value boundary**: `materializeFromRealm` copies outbound values and rejects unsupported JSON shapes, exotic prototypes, cycles, sparse arrays, and non-finite numbers. Data-property copies make `"__proto__"` safe. `args` crosses through `workerData` and is cloned again before exposure. Realm functions are invoked rather than copied, and thrown values use a total renderer so `result` cannot reject. The engine README documents cross-realm errors.
 
 ### The consumer (dsh-tool-workflow)
 
@@ -65,8 +65,8 @@ An output schema makes a schema-valid committed capture mandatory for successful
 - **`SchemaSpec` as the outputSchema type**: the author-facing DSL cannot express what arrives as data and cannot be validated against without conversion loss.
 - **A schema-object library (zod, or the repo's schemastery) for the structured-output subset**: the schema is wire data — plain JSON that crosses the vm realm boundary in `agent({schema})` and lands verbatim in the forced tool's parameters — exactly where live schema objects cannot sit; consuming raw JSON Schema at runtime would need a third-party converter on top (zod core only emits JSON Schema, not the reverse), and it would put a second schema language beside schemastery's config role.
 - **ajv for value validation**: it validates FULL JSON Schema, so the subset gate — the module's actual point, since every accepted keyword must be one the harness enforces — would remain hand-written regardless; it compiles validators through `new Function`; and it would be dsh-tools' first runtime dependency, all to replace the ~70-line value walker while the path-qualified, every-violation error reporting stays custom either way.
-- **Provider JSON mode (`response_format: {type: json_object}`) instead of the forced capture tool**: the official API guarantees valid JSON, not schema-conforming JSON (no `json_schema` type; the docs' own guidance is to validate client-side, with the schema riding in the prompt), so both walkers survive untouched and only the capture-tool mechanics could go — at the cost of tools during a structured child's run (whether `response_format` composes with tool calling is undocumented), the in-turn validation retry (`ToolArgsError` keeps recovery inside the turn; a JSON-mode empty body — a documented failure mode — ends the turn, and the only recovery is the re-prompt loop this design rejects), and a new per-adapter `LlmCallConfig` surface. The accepted upgrade path is strict TOOL schemas (provider-side constrained decoding on tool parameters) when available: the same forced tool and subset gate, with the gate narrowed to the provider's strict subset.
+- **Provider JSON mode instead of the capture tool:** it guarantees valid JSON, not schema conformance, and its interaction with tool calling is unclear. The capture tool preserves in-turn validation retries. Provider-side strict tool schemas can later narrow the accepted subset without changing this design.
 
 ## Consequences
 
-The harness gains CC-compatible script orchestration: fan-out plans live in a rerunnable artifact instead of the parent context, and `outputSchema` yields an authoritative structured child result across native and Code Mode presentation. The cost, bounded by the trust premise, is a worker thread per run (~tens-of-ms spin-up), every hook crossing a message port as RPC, and a termination-path `agentsStarted` that degrades to the host-observed count; in exchange `start()` never blocks the host, a post-cancel grace ends in a real `worker.terminate()`, and the value boundary is serialization by construction. A worker thread is still not a security boundary — scripts share the model's trust level, and actual sandboxing requires an isolated-vm/separate-process engine behind the seam. The fatal-vs-null strictness divergence from CC means a CC-authored script that relies on option typos dissolving to `null` behaves differently, preserving the repo's no-accepted-then-ignored rule. Consumers must hold the run handle for control (`cancel`/`dispose`); observers get data snapshots only, so no listener can extend a run's lifetime or corrupt another's view.
+Fan-out plans now live in rerunnable scripts, and `outputSchema` provides authoritative structured child results. Each run pays worker startup and message-port RPC costs, but host startup stays non-blocking, cancellation can terminate the worker, and serialization enforces the value boundary. Worker threads are not a security boundary. Invalid options fail rather than degrading to Claude Code's `null`; consumers retain control through the run handle while observers receive snapshots only.