Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into feature/subagent-policy-inheritance

# Conflicts:
#	.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-06-sandbox.i18n.yaml
#	docs/cordis-catalog/services.md
#	docs/persistence-catalog.md
#	examples/acp-agent/tests/snapshots/cordis-inspect-jsdoc/session.jsonl
#	packages/core/session/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/subagent/subagent-inprocess/README.i18n.yaml
#	packages/ui/user-approval/src/index.ts
This commit is contained in:
kingwl
2026-07-28 11:19:46 +08:00
1141 changed files with 36230 additions and 16667 deletions

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-11-dev-invariants-over-deep-readonly.md: 8f0e79f15af82ce3125b1f6f767d4ea727aa6d29
2026-06-11-dev-invariants-over-deep-readonly.zh.md: 2f787bbd55b5a9a91bc5342351756e45cb0515d3
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-11-dev-invariants-over-deep-readonly.md
2026-06-11-dev-invariants-over-deep-readonly.md: f1a741927cf63b43b1aaf558efc148ff80d2d881
2026-06-11-dev-invariants-over-deep-readonly.zh.md: 67439c674f5a77112fc0619c774f7897cf49e835

View File

@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ When the session companion attaches to an existing or seeded session, it replays
### Pervasive deep-readonly types
[The rejected immutable-public-surfaces proposal](../../rejected/architecture/2026-06-11-immutable-public-surfaces.md) would apply a recursive readonly type across public log and message surfaces. That provides editor feedback but not a runtime guarantee: TypeScript types are erased and plugin code can cast through them. It also pushes readonly types into consumers where mutation is intentional. Runtime ownership at the `Session` boundary protects every caller without that type propagation.
A rejected companion proposal would apply a recursive `DeepReadonly<T>` type across public log and message surfaces, flipping session read paths (`events`, `session/event` listeners, `deriveMessages()`) to deep-readonly while keeping in-flight waterfalls mutable. That provides editor feedback but not a runtime guarantee: TypeScript types are erased and plugin code can cast through them. It also pushes readonly types into consumers where mutation is intentional. Runtime ownership at the `Session` boundary protects every caller without that type propagation.
### Development-only freezing

View File

@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ TypeScript readonly 类型不是充分的运行时边界。它们在程序运行
### 全面的 deep-readonly 类型
[被否决的不可变公共表面提案](../../rejected/architecture/2026-06-11-immutable-public-surfaces.md)会在公共日志和消息表面上应用递归 readonly 类型。这能提供编辑器反馈但无法提供运行时保证TypeScript 类型在运行时被擦除,插件代码可以通过类型转换绕过。它还会将 readonly 类型推入有意进行修改的消费方。在 `Session` 边界处的运行时所有权保护所有调用方,无需这种类型传播。
一个被否决的姊妹提案会在公共日志和消息表面上应用递归 `DeepReadonly<T>` 类型,将会话读取路径(`events``session/event` 监听器、`deriveMessages()`)翻转为深只读,同时保持进行中的 waterfall 可变。这能提供编辑器反馈但无法提供运行时保证TypeScript 类型在运行时被擦除,插件代码可以通过类型转换绕过。它还会将 readonly 类型推入有意进行修改的消费方。在 `Session` 边界处的运行时所有权保护所有调用方,无需这种类型传播。
### 仅在开发模式冻结

View File

@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Tool schemas are part of the system-prompt assembly
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-06-11-tool-schemas-in-prompt-assembly.zh.md)
## Problem
On the wire, tool schemas travel in a dedicated `tools` field of the model request, not in prompt text. Architecturally, though, "what the model is told it can do" is one coherent concern: prompt sections and the tool list are assembled from the same plugin contributions and consumed at the same moment.
## Decision
`PromptAssembly { sections, tools }`: the system-prompt service collects ordered text sections AND tool schemas (the tool registry auto-contributes a provider). The loop consumes one assembly per step; adapters map `sections` to the provider's system slot and `tools` to the wire `tools` field. The `system-prompt/assemble` waterfall is therefore a single interception point for everything the model is told up front — tool filtering (ToolSearch / progressive disclosure) is an assembly rewrite, same as prompt edits.
## Alternatives considered
**The loop queries the tool registry separately from the prompt service** — splits one coherent concern across two seams, and every interception that wants to shape "what the model is told" (tool filtering, plan mode) would need two listeners on two surfaces instead of one assembly rewrite.
## Consequences
- One waterfall governs the model's standing context; plugins like plan mode can swap prompt text and visible tools in one listener.
- The assembly interface is merge-extensible for future slots (no untyped `extras` bag — extension is declaration merging).
- Slight conceptual surprise (schemas in a "prompt" service) is documented here and in the package README.

View File

@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 工具 schema 是系统提示词组装的一部分
Status: implemented
[English](2026-06-11-tool-schemas-in-prompt-assembly.md) | 中文
## 问题
在协议格式wire format层面工具 schema 通过模型请求中专用的 `tools` 字段传输,而非嵌入提示词文本。然而从架构角度看,「模型被告知它能做什么」是一个统一的关注点:提示词段落与工具列表由相同的插件贡献组装,并在同一时刻被消费。
## 决策
`PromptAssembly { sections, tools }`:系统提示词服务同时收集有序的文本段落和工具 schema工具注册表自动贡献一个提供方。agent loop智能体循环每个步骤消费一份 assembly适配器将 `sections` 映射到提供方的 system 槽位,将 `tools` 映射到协议格式的 `tools` 字段。因此 `system-prompt/assemble` waterfall瀑布式事件是模型预先获知的所有信息的唯一拦截点工具过滤ToolSearch / 渐进式披露)是一次 assembly 重写,与提示词编辑无异。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**循环从工具注册表和提示词服务分别查询**:将一个统一的关注点拆到两个 seam 上任何想影响「模型被告知什么」的拦截工具过滤、plan 模式)都需要在两个接口上各挂一个监听器,而非一次 assembly 重写即可完成。
## 后果
- 一条 waterfall 统管模型的常驻上下文plan 模式等插件可以在一个监听器中同时替换提示词文本和可见工具。
- assembly 接口通过声明合并实现可扩展(没有无类型的 `extras` 包——扩展即声明合并),为未来的槽位预留空间。
- 将 schema 放在「提示词」服务中略有概念上的意外感,已在本文及包 README 中加以说明。

View File

@@ -1,78 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Reorganize packages into a modular hierarchy
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-06-20-package-hierarchy.zh.md)
The [redundant-agent removal](../simplification/2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.md) deletes the original `support/ui-stdio` surface instead of relocating it, and the [automation-only ACP decision](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md) places ACP under `packages/acp/acp` instead of the human-UI group. The uniform depth-two hierarchy remains the decision owned here.
## Problem
`packages/` was flat: 18 packages all sat at `packages/<name>/`, so a package's location said nothing about whether it was core product API, a swappable capability seam, a provider adapter, a product integration, or example/test support. The package README carried a `FIXME(package-hierarchy)` and `scripts/publint-all.ts` a `TODO(package-inventory)` flagging exactly this. Core packages, provider integrations, capability seams, example UI support, and snapshot-only replay support all looked equally foundational.
This was not just cosmetic. Because every top-level package looked like part of the same public surface, future removal was harder, and publish/lint/doc scripts had to encode intent through comments or hand-maintained static lists rather than reading it off the layout.
## Decision
Packages are grouped by modular role at a uniform `packages/<group>/<pkg>/` depth. Group directories are pure containers (no `package.json`); every package keeps its `@deepseek-ai/dsh-<pkg>` name — this is repo structure and maintenance policy, not package renaming.
```text
packages/
core/ (product API spine)
session/
system-prompt/
tools/
agent/
agent-loop/
llm/ (product — capability family)
llm/
llm-deepseek/
llm-pi-ai/
bash/ (product — capability family)
bash/
bash-local/
tool-bash/
session-persistence/ (product — capability family)
session-persistence/
session-persistence-jsonl/
session-persistence-sqlite/
acp/ (product automation integration)
acp/
ui/ (human interaction and presentation)
support/ (dev/test/example infrastructure)
invariants/
ui-stdio/
llm-replay/
```
### Placement decisions
- **Same-name nesting for capability families.** A family's interface package sits at `packages/<group>/<group>/` (`llm/llm`, `bash/bash`, `session-persistence/session-persistence`), with implementations and consumers as flat siblings. There is no extra `adapters/`/`impls/` sub-tier — every package is exactly depth 2, which keeps the workspace glob a clean `packages/*/*` and lets one `@deepseek-ai/dsh-*` tsconfig wildcard resolve every package (unique dir names make first-on-disk-wins unambiguous).
- **`session` stays in `core/`; persistence is its own family.** The session log is core product API. Its storage backends form a parallel capability family (`session-persistence/`) mirroring `llm/` and `bash/`, rather than nesting under `core/session/`.
- **`agent-loop` is in `core/`.** It is the one concrete implementation of the `agent` seam, but it ships as the harness's default product loop, so it lives with the core spine. Plugins still depend on the `agent` vocabulary, never on `agent-loop`, so the loop stays swappable.
- **Product automation and human UI are separate groups.** `acp` is a product transport under `acp/`, while commands, approvals, interaction, and presentation adapters live under `ui/`. Dev-only invariants and replay infrastructure remain under `support/`.
### Deduplicating the package lists
The package list had been enumerated in five places. The uniform depth-2 layout lets most of them be derived instead:
- `tsconfig.base.json` maps every package through a single `@deepseek-ai/dsh-*` `paths` wildcard listing one candidate per group, in place of per-package entries. The aggregate configs (`tsconfig.host.json`, `tsconfig.client.json`) reuse that source map and carry the explicit project references that keep package/vendor typecheck boundaries intact. (One subtlety this introduced: a path candidate contains `/*/`, which a naive regex comment-stripper mistakes for a block comment — `scripts/doc-typecheck.ts` reads the JSONC config through TypeScript's parser rather than stripping comments by hand for exactly this reason.)
- `scripts/publint-all.ts` derives its list by reading the hierarchy (`packages/<group>/<pkg>`), resolving the `TODO(package-inventory)`.
- The aggregates' project `references` stay explicit lists — TypeScript project references have no wildcard form. Generating these from a manifest is left to a follow-up (see [discover package inventories](../../proposed/process/2026-06-20-discover-package-inventory.md)).
### Guardrails added
Two doc-sync/hygiene gates keep the structure and its references honest, so the manual checks this restructure required do not have to be repeated by hand:
- `scripts/verify-package-paths.ts` flags a `packages/<path>` reference (in Markdown or a `.ts` comment/string) that does not resolve **and** names a real package in a segment — i.e. a stale path to a moved package. A path naming a package that exists nowhere (a forward-looking proposal) is left alone, so the gate applies uniformly across proposed/implemented/rejected.
- `scripts/check-workspace-constraints.ts` asserts the `packages/<group>/<pkg>` shape: group dirs carry no `package.json`, and no package sits flat at the root or nests deeper. Group names stay open — a new group may be added without editing the gate; only the depth-2 shape is fixed.
## Alternatives considered
- **A third tier (`adapters/` / `impls/` under each family)** — rejected: uniform depth 2 keeps the workspace glob a clean `packages/*/*` and lets one `@deepseek-ai/dsh-*` tsconfig wildcard resolve every package.
- **Nesting persistence under `core/session/`** — rejected: the storage backends form a parallel capability family mirroring `llm/` and `bash/`, while the session log itself stays core product API.
- **`ui-stdio` under `ui/`** — rejected: it was example-coupled dev support, not a product surface.
## Consequences
The restructure churned imports, workspace globs, doc links, build references, and package paths in one coordinated move. That churn is acceptable pre-release (per the AGENTS.md foundation-over-blast-radius stance) because it stops the flat layout from fossilizing support packages as product contracts, and it is a one-time cost: the wildcard `paths`, the glob-derived publint list, and the shape gate mean a new package needs no further structural edits.

View File

@@ -1,78 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 将包重组为模块化层级结构
Status: implemented
[English](2026-06-20-package-hierarchy.md) | 中文
[冗余 agent 移除](../simplification/2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.md)直接删除最初的 `support/ui-stdio` 接口,而不是将其迁移;[仅面向自动化的 ACP 决策](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md)把 ACP 放在 `packages/acp/acp` 下,而不是面向人类的 UI 组。这里拥有的决策仍是统一的二层目录深度。
## 问题
`packages/` 原先是扁平的18 个包package全部位于 `packages/<name>/`,从路径上完全看不出一个包属于核心产品 API、可替换的能力 seam、提供方适配器、产品集成还是示例/测试支撑。包的 README 带着 `FIXME(package-hierarchy)``scripts/publint-all.ts` 带着 `TODO(package-inventory)`,标记的正是这个问题。核心包、提供方集成、能力 seam、示例 UI 支撑和仅用于快照的回放支撑看起来同样基础。
这不仅仅是外观问题。由于每个顶层包看起来都属于同一个公开接口,未来移除更加困难,而 publish/lint/doc 脚本不得不通过注释或手工维护的静态列表来编码意图,而不是从布局中直接读取。
## 决策
按模块角色将包分组,统一放在 `packages/<group>/<pkg>/` 深度。分组目录是纯容器(没有 `package.json`);每个包保留其 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-<pkg>` 名称——这是仓库结构与维护策略的调整,不是包的重命名。
```text
packages/
core/ (product API spine)
session/
system-prompt/
tools/
agent/
agent-loop/
llm/ (product — capability family)
llm/
llm-deepseek/
llm-pi-ai/
bash/ (product — capability family)
bash/
bash-local/
tool-bash/
session-persistence/ (product — capability family)
session-persistence/
session-persistence-jsonl/
session-persistence-sqlite/
acp/ (product automation integration)
acp/
ui/ (human interaction and presentation)
support/ (dev/test/example infrastructure)
invariants/
ui-stdio/
llm-replay/
```
### 放置决策
- **能力族使用同名嵌套。** 一个族的接口包位于 `packages/<group>/<group>/``llm/llm``bash/bash``session-persistence/session-persistence`),实现和消费方作为扁平兄弟并列。不设额外的 `adapters/`/`impls/` 子层——每个包恰好在深度 2这使 workspace glob 保持简洁的 `packages/*/*`,并让一条 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-*` tsconfig 通配符即可解析所有包(唯一的目录名使 first-on-disk-wins 无歧义)。
- **`session` 留在 `core/`;持久化独立成族。** 会话日志是核心产品 API。其存储后端构成一个平行的能力族`session-persistence/`),与 `llm/``bash/` 对称,而非嵌套在 `core/session/` 下。
- **`agent-loop``core/` 中。** 它是 `agent` seam 唯一的具体实现,但作为 harness 的默认产品循环交付,因此与核心主干同处。插件仍然依赖 `agent` 的词汇,从不依赖 `agent-loop`,所以循环仍可替换。
- **产品自动化与面向人类的 UI 是两个独立分组。** `acp` 是位于 `acp/` 下的产品传输层,而命令、审批、交互和展示适配器位于 `ui/` 下。仅开发用的 invariants 与回放基础设施仍留在 `support/` 中。
### 去重包列表
包列表此前在五个地方重复枚举。统一的深度 2 布局使大部分可以被推导:
- `tsconfig.base.json` 通过一条 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-*` `paths` 通配符(每个分组列一个候选)映射所有包,取代了逐包条目。聚合配置(`tsconfig.host.json``tsconfig.client.json`)复用该源映射,并携带显式 project references 以保持包/vendor 类型检查边界完整。(这里引入了一个细节:路径候选中包含 `/*/`,朴素的正则注释剥离器会将其误认为块注释——`scripts/doc-typecheck.ts` 正是因此通过 TypeScript 解析器读取 JSONC 配置,而非手动剥离注释。)
- `scripts/publint-all.ts` 通过读取层级结构(`packages/<group>/<pkg>`)推导列表,解决了 `TODO(package-inventory)`
- 聚合配置的 project `references` 仍为显式列表——TypeScript project references 没有通配符形式。从 manifest元数据清单生成这些引用留作后续工作见[通过发现机制获取包清单](../../proposed/process/2026-06-20-discover-package-inventory.md))。
### 新增的护栏
两道 doc-sync/hygiene 门禁确保结构及其引用保持正确,使本次重组所需的手动检查无需日后重复:
- `scripts/verify-package-paths.ts` 标记 Markdown 或 `.ts` 注释/字符串中的 `packages/<path>` 引用,如果该引用无法解析**且**某个路径段命名了一个真实存在的包,即指向已移动包的陈旧路径。如果路径命名的包在任何地方都不存在(前瞻性提案),则不予标记,因此该门禁在 proposed/implemented/rejected 中统一适用。
- `scripts/check-workspace-constraints.ts` 断言 `packages/<group>/<pkg>` 形状:分组目录不带 `package.json`,且没有包扁平地位于根层或嵌套更深。分组名称保持开放——添加新分组无需修改门禁;只有深度 2 的形状是固定的。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
- **第三层(每个族下设 `adapters/`/`impls/`**:否决。统一深度 2 使 workspace glob 保持简洁的 `packages/*/*`,并让一条 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-*` tsconfig 通配符即可解析所有包。
- **将持久化嵌套在 `core/session/` 下**:否决。存储后端构成一个平行的能力族,与 `llm/``bash/` 对称,而会话日志本身属于核心产品 API。
- **`ui-stdio` 放在 `ui/` 下**:否决。它曾是与示例耦合的开发支撑,不是产品接口。
## 后果
本次重组在一次协调的变更中搅动了 import、workspace glob、文档链接、构建引用和包路径。这种变动在发布前是可接受的依据 AGENTS.md 中「基础优先于爆炸半径」的立场),因为它阻止了扁平布局将支撑包固化为产品契约,且这是一次性成本:通配符 `paths`、glob 推导的 publint 列表和形状门禁意味着新增一个包无需额外的结构性编辑。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.md: 22a56dc6d69340ca1b5f7b77edb4731066c9b2f5
2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.zh.md: 09ebce376a206591ac766067cc41497b74ed1545
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.md
2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.md: 83d47e3a7d91bbcd2ceaf7b11cf13316142eb3ed
2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.zh.md: 00dcbad3d1023ad33a22297bfe938b94bce839d4

View File

@@ -4,11 +4,13 @@ Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.zh.md)
The [per-provider request retry policy](../feature/2026-07-24-provider-retry-policies.md) extends this foundation with exact-provider configuration and an explicit unbounded mode. This note continues to own structured failure facts, the closed-step recovery boundary, normal mode's transient defaults, visible single attempts, and durable retry status.
## Problem
`dsh-llm` can report provider failures either by throwing during adapter dispatch or iteration or by ending with `finish { kind: 'error' | 'aborted' }`. The final adapter boundary tags thrown failures so `dsh-agent-loop` can distinguish them from middleware and result-processing defects, and the loop normalizes both delivery forms into `agent/request-error` after closing the failed step. The default decision is `fail`; `dsh-compact-basic` is the only shipped recovery listener, and it retries a canonical context-window overflow only after compaction proves that the durable surface shrank.
`dsh-llm` can report provider failures either by throwing during adapter dispatch or iteration or by ending with `finish { kind: 'error' | 'aborted' }`. The final adapter boundary tags thrown failures so `dsh-agent-loop` can distinguish them from middleware and result-processing defects, and the loop normalizes both delivery forms into `agent/request-error` after closing the failed step. An unhandled failure is terminal; a handling listener repairs policy-owned state, returns `{ kind: 'retry' }`, and stops waterfall delegation. The [retry-action decision](../simplification/2026-07-27-request-error-retry-action.md) owns this return contract.
That boundary is already safe for another request attempt. Raw `assistant/chunk` events carry the failed `turn` and `step`, message derivation ignores them unless a successful `assistant/message` cites them, tool calls are dispatched only after a successful terminal finish and assembly, and a retry opens a new numbered step from the durable log. The harness therefore does not need a second response lifecycle or tentative-output protocol to keep two attempts separate.
That boundary is already safe for another request attempt. Raw `assistant/chunk` events carry the failed `turn` and `step`, message derivation ignores them unless a successful `assistant/message` cites them, tool calls are dispatched only after a successful terminal finish and assembly, and a retry opens a new numbered turn from the durable log. The harness therefore does not need a second response lifecycle or tentative-output protocol to keep two attempts separate.
The prior boundary left three narrower gaps.
@@ -16,7 +18,7 @@ The prior boundary left three narrower gaps.
- Retry ownership differs by adapter. The hand-written DeepSeek adapter makes one attempt, while pi-ai profiles can enable opaque library retries. Combining hidden transport retries with an `agent/request-error` listener would multiply attempts and omit intermediate failures from the session log.
- A recovered failure has no durable status fact. The failed step and chunks remain reconstructable, but an observer cannot tell whether the agent is deliberately backing off, for how long, or why. A long silent wait looks like a stalled loop.
The goal is bounded recovery from transient failures of the same explicit provider/model request. Provider or model failover, response splicing, and semantic output repair are different problems and have no current consumer.
The default policy provides bounded recovery from transient failures of the same explicit provider/model request. Provider or model failover, response splicing, and semantic output repair are different problems and have no current consumer.
## Decision
@@ -50,31 +52,19 @@ The shared transient-code set is intentionally small: adapter mappings for `RATE
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-llm-retry` is a function plugin that listens to `agent/request-error`. It introduces no service or new loop branch; the agent-loop package changes only the data carried through its existing failed-step recovery control flow.
The `agent/request-error` seam carries the current `LlmFailure` and an immutable list of prior failures that led to another request attempt in this consecutive recovery sequence. `dsh-llm-retry` counts only prior failures whose codes are in its configured transient set, while `dsh-compact-basic` counts only prior context-overflow failures. A successful model request clears the history. Alternating transient and context-overflow failures therefore consume their owning policy budgets independently; the maximum request count is one plus the sum of the finite budgets of the loaded recovery policies.
The `agent/request-error` seam carries the current `LlmFailure`, an immutable list of prior failures that authorized retry turns in the consecutive recovery sequence, and the serving registration's immutable retry policy. The loop transports but does not interpret that policy, owns the consecutive failure history, and clears it after a successful model request. Normal `dsh-llm-retry` policy counts durable retry records scheduled by the same exact-provider policy, while `dsh-compact-basic` keeps its own context-overflow budget. Alternating transient and context-overflow failures therefore consume their owning finite budgets independently; the maximum request count is one plus the sum of the loaded finite budgets.
The plugin resolves and validates this deployment configuration at load:
```ts ignore-check
interface Config {
maxTransientRetries?: number
initialDelayMs?: number
maxDelayMs?: number
jitterRatio?: number
retryableCodes?: string[]
}
```
The defaults are two transient retries, a 500 millisecond initial delay, a 10 second delay cap, 10 percent jitter, and the five transient codes above (`RATE_LIMIT`, `SERVER`, `TIMEOUT`, `TRANSPORT`, and `EMPTY_RESPONSE`). The count and delay bounds match the conservative edge of the inspected implementations: [OpenCode uses two request retries with 500 ms/10 s bounds](https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/blob/9976269ab1accfc9f9dc98a4a688c516934de422/%70ackages/llm/src/route/executor.ts#L36-L39), [Pi separates three agent-level retries from provider retries and defaults provider retries to zero](https://github.com/earendil-works/pi/blob/3da591ab74ab9ab407e72ed882600b2c851fae21/%70ackages/coding-agent/docs/settings.md#L139-L147), and [Codex uses finite request/stream budgets plus a five-minute idle timeout](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/0fb559f0f6e231a88ac02ea002d3ecd248e2b515/codex-rs/model-provider-info/src/lib.rs#L25-L33). Ten percent follows [Codex's bounded jitter](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/0fb559f0f6e231a88ac02ea002d3ecd248e2b515/codex-rs/codex-client/src/retry.rs#L40-L47). Two retries mean at most three provider requests when no other recovery policy applies. `maxTransientRetries` is a non-negative integer, delays are positive finite numbers with `initialDelayMs <= maxDelayMs`, `jitterRatio` is in `[0, 1]`, and codes are non-empty and unique. These are Cordis config fields rather than hidden constants so deployments can choose different cost and latency budgets.
The [provider-policy decision](../feature/2026-07-24-provider-retry-policies.md) owns the current configuration shape. Provider adapters register their nested `retryPolicy`; omission uses normal defaults: two transient retries, a 500 millisecond initial delay, a 10 second delay cap, 10 percent jitter, and the five transient codes above. The count and delay bounds match the conservative edge of the inspected implementations: [OpenCode uses two request retries with 500 ms/10 s bounds](https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/blob/9976269ab1accfc9f9dc98a4a688c516934de422/%70ackages/llm/src/route/executor.ts#L36-L39), [Pi separates three agent-level retries from provider retries and defaults provider retries to zero](https://github.com/earendil-works/pi/blob/3da591ab74ab9ab407e72ed882600b2c851fae21/%70ackages/coding-agent/docs/settings.md#L139-L147), and [Codex uses finite request/stream budgets plus a five-minute idle timeout](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/0fb559f0f6e231a88ac02ea002d3ecd248e2b515/codex-rs/model-provider-info/src/lib.rs#L25-L33). Ten percent follows [Codex's bounded jitter](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/0fb559f0f6e231a88ac02ea002d3ecd248e2b515/codex-rs/codex-client/src/retry.rs#L40-L47).
For an eligible failure with budget remaining, the one-based transient retry count uses bounded exponential backoff. A valid `providerRetryAfterMs` replaces exponential backoff only when it does not exceed `maxDelayMs`; a longer provider delay causes delegation instead of an earlier retry that violates the provider instruction. Local backoff multiplies by an injected random factor in `[1 - jitterRatio, 1 + jitterRatio]` and clamps the final value to `maxDelayMs`; provider delay is not jittered.
The plugin owns a lifetime `AbortController` and tracks every active backoff callback. Each wait fuses the waterfall's turn signal with that lifetime signal. Effect cleanup first unregisters the listener, then aborts and awaits the active callbacks; a captured callback whose lifetime signal aborts returns `fail` and can neither retry nor enter the rest of its captured waterfall after disposal. This makes HMR disposal quiescent even though Cordis has already captured the listener.
The plugin owns a lifetime `AbortController` and tracks every active recovery callback, including delegated waterfall work and backoff. Effect cleanup first unregisters the listener, then aborts and awaits the active callbacks; abort wins over a late delegated retry decision, and a captured callback can neither retry nor enter the rest of its waterfall after disposal. This makes HMR disposal quiescent even though Cordis has already captured the listener.
Before sleeping, `dsh-llm-retry` appends one non-surface `llm/retry` session event containing the turn, failed step, one-based transient retry number, configured maximum, scheduled delay, and `LlmFailure`. The plugin owns the `SessionEventMap` augmentation; `dsh-session` remains generic persistence and does not absorb the optional policy's vocabulary. The event says what was scheduled, not that the next request completed; cancellation during the delay is subsequently visible on `turn/end`. The event ships only with a production renderer and replay/snapshot coverage, because its purpose is operational state rather than trace collection.
Before sleeping, `dsh-llm-retry` appends one non-surface `llm/retry` session event containing the turn, failed step, provider, policy mode, complete resolved-policy key, provider-policy retry number, mode-specific finite maximum when present, scheduled delay, and `LlmFailure`. The key sorts the code set and separates retry histories when a provider route is replaced by a behaviorally different same-mode policy. The plugin owns the `SessionEventMap` augmentation; `dsh-session` remains generic persistence and does not absorb the optional policy's vocabulary. The event says what was scheduled, not that the next request completed; cancellation during the delay is subsequently visible on `turn/end`. The event ships only with a production renderer and replay/snapshot coverage, because its purpose is operational state rather than trace collection.
The listener calls `next()` for a non-transient code, an exhausted policy budget, or an over-cap provider delay. This preserves composition with context-overflow recovery and later policy plugins. It returns `{ action: 'retry' }` only after the delay completes under both signals; turn cancellation and plugin disposal return `fail`, after which the loop's cancellation/disposal checks remain authoritative.
The listener calls `next()` for a non-transient code, an exhausted policy budget, or an over-cap provider delay. This preserves composition with context-overflow recovery and later policy plugins. For an owned failure it records and awaits the delay, then returns `{ kind: 'retry' }` without delegating. Turn cancellation and plugin disposal end the wait without returning a retry; the loop's cancellation/disposal checks remain authoritative.
The agent-spine demo bundle loads the plugin so the shared stdio/TUI, one-shot CLI, and ACP example compositions use the same bounded policy. Library consumers retain explicit plugin composition: omitting the plugin leaves `agent/request-error` at its current fail default.
The agent-spine demo bundle loads the plugin so the shared stdio/TUI, one-shot CLI, and ACP example compositions use the same provider-routed policy. Library consumers retain explicit plugin composition: omitting the plugin leaves request failures terminal.
### Make one layer own visible attempts
@@ -92,7 +82,7 @@ Boundary tests prove termination at both actual transports. The hand-written ada
### Keep attempts separate in the existing log
A failed attempt may leave `assistant/chunk` events in its closed step, but it never appends `assistant/message` and never dispatches a tool. A retry opens the next numbered step, reconstructs the request from the durable surface, and produces its own chunks. UIs may render live chunks while a step is open, then mark or clear that transient view when `llm/retry` identifies the failed step or `turn/end` records terminal failure; message derivation continues to ignore the failed chunks.
A failed attempt may leave `assistant/chunk` events in its closed step, but it never appends `assistant/message` and never dispatches a tool. A retry closes the failed turn, opens the next numbered turn, reconstructs the request from the durable surface, and produces its own chunks. UIs may render live chunks while a step is open, then mark or clear that transient view when `llm/retry` identifies the failed step or `turn/end` records failure; message derivation continues to ignore the failed chunks.
If recovery is exhausted, the final failure is stored once on `turn/end.reason` with the structured facts. If transient recovery continues, `llm/retry` is the durable home for that attempt's failure and delay. No standalone final-error event or response-id vocabulary is added.
@@ -101,7 +91,7 @@ If recovery is exhausted, the final failure is stored once on `turn/end.reason`
- Automatic provider or model failover. Requests already select one explicit provider and model, and the provider registry deliberately has one adapter owner per provider.
- Retrying or continuing after a successful terminal finish, or splicing chunks from two attempts into one assistant message.
- Repairing malformed tool arguments, refusals, content filters, or other semantic model output.
- Unbounded retries, unattended retry-until-cancelled behavior, circuit breakers, shared provider health, or cross-agent retry budgets.
- Circuit breakers, shared provider health, or cross-agent retry budgets.
- Changing `llm/stream` into a response lifecycle or adding convenience generation APIs without a production consumer.
## Alternatives considered
@@ -110,7 +100,7 @@ If recovery is exhausted, the final failure is stored once on `turn/end.reason`
- **Add response start, interrupted, discarded, failed, and committed events to `dsh-llm`** — rejected because the agent log already separates raw chunks, successful messages, and numbered attempts. A second state machine would duplicate ownership without enabling the bounded same-route retry.
- **Add logical routes, capability matrices, and failover selection** — rejected because current requests already name provider and model explicitly, one adapter owns each provider, and no current consumer requires automatic fallback or can prove semantic compatibility.
- **Put `retryable` or `failover` on `LlmFailure`** — rejected because adapters report facts while deployment policy decides action. The same 429 may be retried in an interactive bundle and rejected in a cost-capped batch.
- **Retry forever while the caller remains active** — rejected because it gives one request unbounded cost and latency. Visible status makes bounded waiting understandable; it does not make an unlimited budget safe.
- **Retry forever while the caller remains active** — the [per-provider policy](../feature/2026-07-24-provider-retry-policies.md) supersedes this rejection for explicit `always` entries while retaining bounded normal mode as the default.
- **Log retry status only through the process logger** — rejected because process logs do not reconstruct session behavior and cannot drive replayed UI state.
- **Keep only flat codes** — rejected because retry delay and provider request id are structured provider facts, and HTTP status is necessary for diagnosis when different wire failures share one stable code.
@@ -120,11 +110,11 @@ If recovery is exhausted, the final failure is stored once on `turn/end.reason`
- An adapter-thrown `Error` reaches `agent/request-error` as the exact same object while its sidecar `LlmFailure` reaches the adjacent argument; tests retain the existing identity assertion for extensible and frozen third-party errors.
- DeepSeek and pi-ai adapter tests cover representative 400, 401/403, 429, 5xx, connection, malformed/truncated stream, timeout, abort, retry-after seconds/date, request-id, and unknown-SDK-error paths without recovery policy parsing message text.
- Pi-ai pins the SDK option to zero retries and performs one observed wire attempt for a retryable provider response; separate tests make removing either boundary fail.
- `agent/request-error` carries current failure facts plus immutable prior-retried failure facts; a success clears that history, and alternating transient/context-overflow integration tests prove the two policies consume only their own finite budgets.
- `dsh-llm-retry` validates every config field at Loader startup, delegates all ineligible paths with `next()`, and makes at most `maxTransientRetries + 1` provider requests when no other policy applies.
- `agent/request-error` carries current failure facts, immutable prior-retried failure facts, and the serving registration's immutable retry policy; a success clears the history, and alternating transient/context-overflow integration tests prove the two policies consume only their own finite budgets.
- Each provider adapter validates its nested retry policy at Loader startup, and `ctx.llm` captures it with the route; normal mode delegates ineligible paths and makes at most `maxRetries + 1` provider requests when no other policy applies.
- HMR-during-backoff tests prove disposal unregisters the listener, aborts and awaits its captured callbacks, emits no retry decision after disposal, and leaves no timer or promise alive.
- Pure unit tests cover transient-code selection, exponential backoff and jitter bounds, valid and over-cap `Retry-After`, exhausted budgets, deterministic timer/random seams, and abort during backoff.
- Real agent-loop tests cover failure before chunks, partial chunks then failure, thrown and in-band failures, retry to success in a new step, exhaustion to structured `turn/end.reason`, and composition with `dsh-compact-basic` context-overflow recovery.
- Real agent-loop tests cover failure before chunks, partial chunks then failure, thrown and in-band failures, retry to success in a new turn, exhaustion to structured `turn/end.reason`, and composition with `dsh-compact-basic` context-overflow recovery.
- The partial-chunk integration test proves failed chunks remain attributed to the failed step, no assistant message or tool side effect is committed for that step, and the successful retry has distinct provenance.
- The plugin-owned `llm/retry` event is non-surface, survives JSONL and SQLite round trips, is ignored by message derivation, and drives TUI retraction plus scheduled-retry rendering. Keyless snapshots cover scheduling, cancellation, success, and exhaustion; ACP automation snapshots confirm that a discarded attempt stays off the wire while the recovered reply is emitted.
- Idle-watchdog tests prove the stable signal is rearmed only while `next()` is outstanding, disarmed during consumer think time and in `finally`, and classified separately from a total-call deadline and an earlier caller abort; adapter tests prove the signal stops the underlying request rather than merely detaching it.
@@ -132,12 +122,12 @@ If recovery is exhausted, the final failure is stored once on `turn/end.reason`
## Consequences
- Every transient recovery attempt is visible as a closed step plus `llm/retry`, and the bounded policy prevents hidden SDK retries from multiplying cost. A retry can still duplicate provider billing even when no chunk arrived; the finite attempt budget limits but cannot remove that risk.
- Every retry attempt is visible as a closed failed turn plus `llm/retry`, and adapter-level single-attempt behavior prevents hidden SDK retries from multiplying policy decisions. A retry can still duplicate provider billing even when no chunk arrived; normal mode limits that risk, while explicit always mode accepts it until cancellation or success.
- Provider SDKs may hide status or retry headers. Those adapters retain the stable facts they expose and otherwise use a coarse code rather than letting recovery policy parse fragile text.
- Durable retry events expand the session protocol and UI state machine. Shipping the event and its consumer together prevents an unused telemetry vocabulary, but later schema changes still require persistence and replay work.
- Clearing a failed step's live chunks can visibly retract output. That is preferable to presenting discarded text or partial tool JSON as committed history, and snapshots pin the transition.
- Adapter-local idle enforcement stops stalled transports without counting consumer think time. Contract tests at each transport boundary guard against SDK drift.
- Multiple recovery plugins add their finite budgets. Their classifiers remain disjoint here; an overlapping classifier would be registration-order policy and must be documented and tested by the plugins that introduce it.
- Multiple normal recovery plugins add their finite budgets. Always mode delegates first and then supplies an unbounded fallback; overlapping classifiers remain registration-order policy and must be documented and tested by the plugins that introduce them.
## Related

View File

@@ -4,11 +4,13 @@ Status: implemented
[English](2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.md) | 中文
[按提供方配置的请求重试策略](../feature/2026-07-24-provider-retry-policies.md)在此基础上增加了确切提供方配置与显式无界 mode。本说明继续负责结构化失败事实、已关闭步骤的恢复边界、normal mode 的暂时性默认值、可见的单次尝试和持久重试状态。
## 问题
`dsh-llm` 可能在适配器分发或迭代时抛出异常,也可能以 `finish { kind: 'error' | 'aborted' }` 结束,以这两种形式报告提供方失败。最终适配器边界会标记抛出的失败,使 `dsh-agent-loop` 能将其与中间件和结果处理缺陷区分开。循环关闭失败步骤后,会把两种交付形式统一规范化为 `agent/request-error`默认决策为 `fail``dsh-compact-basic` 是唯一已交付的恢复监听器它仅在压缩compaction证明持久表层已缩减后才会对规范化的上下文窗口溢出进行重试
`dsh-llm` 可能在适配器分发或迭代时抛出异常,也可能以 `finish { kind: 'error' | 'aborted' }` 结束,以这两种形式报告提供方失败。最终适配器边界会标记抛出的失败,使 `dsh-agent-loop` 能将其与中间件和结果处理缺陷区分开。循环关闭失败步骤后,会把两种交付形式统一规范化为 `agent/request-error`未被处理的失败是终态;处理失败的监听器修复策略自有状态,返回 `{ kind: 'retry' }`,并停止 waterfall 委托。[重试动作决策](../simplification/2026-07-27-request-error-retry-action.md)规定这一返回契约
该边界已能安全地再次发起请求。原始 `assistant/chunk` 事件携带失败的 `turn``step`;除非某条成功的 `assistant/message` 引用这些事件,否则消息派生会忽略它们。只有终止性 finish 成功且组装完成后,系统才会分发工具调用;重试则会从持久日志开启新的编号步骤。因此harness 无需引入第二套响应生命周期或暂定输出协议,即可分隔两次尝试。
该边界已能安全地再次发起请求。原始 `assistant/chunk` 事件携带失败的 `turn``step`;除非某条成功的 `assistant/message` 引用这些事件,否则消息派生会忽略它们。只有终止性 finish 成功且组装完成后,系统才会分发工具调用;重试则会从持久日志开启新的编号轮次。因此harness 无需引入第二套响应生命周期或暂定输出协议,即可分隔两次尝试。
此前的边界还留有三个较窄的缺口。
@@ -16,7 +18,7 @@ Status: implemented
- 重试的归属因适配器而异。手写 DeepSeek 适配器只尝试一次pi-ai profile 则可以启用库内部的不透明重试。如果把隐藏的传输重试与 `agent/request-error` 监听器结合,尝试次数会成倍增加,中间失败也不会记入会话日志。
- 恢复后的失败没有持久状态事实。失败的步骤和分片仍可重建,但观察者无法得知 agent智能体是否在有意退避、将等待多久以及等待原因。长时间的静默等待看起来与循环停滞无异。
本决策的目标是从同一个显式提供方/模型请求的暂时性失败中进行有界恢复。提供方或模型故障转移、响应拼接和语义输出修复都属于其他问题,目前没有消费方。
默认策略的目标是从同一个显式提供方/模型请求的暂时性失败中进行有界恢复。提供方或模型故障转移、响应拼接和语义输出修复都属于其他问题,目前没有消费方。
## 决策
@@ -50,31 +52,19 @@ agent loop智能体循环会保留 `RequestError` 作为该精确的错误
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-llm-retry` 是监听 `agent/request-error` 的函数插件。它不引入服务或新的循环分支agent-loop 包仅会更改通过现有失败步骤恢复控制流携带的数据。
`agent/request-error` seam 携带当前 `LlmFailure`,以及在这段连续恢复序列中导致再次请求的不可变先前失败列表。`dsh-llm-retry` 只计数 code 位于已配置暂时性集合中的先前失败`dsh-compact-basic` 则只计数先前的上下文溢出失败。模型请求成功后会清空历史。因此,暂时性失败与上下文溢出交替出现时,两种策略会独立消耗各自预算;最大请求数等于 1 加上已加载恢复策略的有限预算和。
`agent/request-error` seam 携带当前 `LlmFailure`、在连续恢复序列中授权重试轮次的不可变先前失败列表,以及实际服务注册所对应的不可变重试策略。循环只传递而不解释该策略;它拥有连续失败历史,并在模型请求成功后清除。`dsh-llm-retry` 的 normal 策略统计由同一项确切提供方策略安排的持久重试记录`dsh-compact-basic` 则维护自己的上下文溢出预算。因此,暂时性失败与上下文溢出交替出现时,会各自独立消耗其有限预算;最大请求数等于 1 加上所有已加载有限预算和。
该插件在加载时解析并验证以下部署配置:
```ts ignore-check
interface Config {
maxTransientRetries?: number
initialDelayMs?: number
maxDelayMs?: number
jitterRatio?: number
retryableCodes?: string[]
}
```
默认值为两次暂时性重试、500 毫秒初始延迟、10 秒延迟上限、10% 抖动,以及上述五个暂时性 code`RATE_LIMIT`、`SERVER`、`TIMEOUT`、`TRANSPORT` 和 `EMPTY_RESPONSE`)。计数与延迟边界参考了所调查实现中较保守的一端:[OpenCode 使用两次请求重试,延迟边界为 500 毫秒10 秒](https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/blob/9976269ab1accfc9f9dc98a4a688c516934de422/%70ackages/llm/src/route/executor.ts#L36-L39)[Pi 将三次 agent 级重试与提供方重试分开,且提供方重试默认为零](https://github.com/earendil-works/pi/blob/3da591ab74ab9ab407e72ed882600b2c851fae21/%70ackages/coding-agent/docs/settings.md#L139-L147)[Codex 使用有限请求/流预算以及五分钟空闲超时](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/0fb559f0f6e231a88ac02ea002d3ecd248e2b515/codex-rs/model-provider-info/src/lib.rs#L25-L33)。10% 抖动参考 [Codex 的有界抖动](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/0fb559f0f6e231a88ac02ea002d3ecd248e2b515/codex-rs/codex-client/src/retry.rs#L40-L47)。在没有其他恢复策略时,两次重试表示最多发起三次提供方请求。`maxTransientRetries` 是非负整数,延迟是正的有限数且满足 `initialDelayMs <= maxDelayMs``jitterRatio` 位于 `[0, 1]`code 非空且不重复。这些都是 Cordis 配置字段,而不是隐藏常量,使部署能够选择不同的成本与延迟预算。
当前配置形状由[提供方策略决策](../feature/2026-07-24-provider-retry-policies.md)规定。提供方适配器会注册嵌套的 `retryPolicy`;省略时使用 normal 默认值两次暂时性重试、500 毫秒初始延迟、10 秒延迟上限、10% 抖动,以及上述五个暂时性 code。计数与延迟边界参考了所调查实现中较保守的一端[OpenCode 使用两次请求重试,延迟边界为 500 毫秒10 秒](https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/blob/9976269ab1accfc9f9dc98a4a688c516934de422/%70ackages/llm/src/route/executor.ts#L36-L39)[Pi 将三次 agent 级重试与提供方重试分开,且提供方重试默认为零](https://github.com/earendil-works/pi/blob/3da591ab74ab9ab407e72ed882600b2c851fae21/%70ackages/coding-agent/docs/settings.md#L139-L147)[Codex 使用有限请求/流预算以及五分钟空闲超时](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/0fb559f0f6e231a88ac02ea002d3ecd248e2b515/codex-rs/model-provider-info/src/lib.rs#L25-L33)。10% 抖动参考 [Codex 的有界抖动](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/0fb559f0f6e231a88ac02ea002d3ecd248e2b515/codex-rs/codex-client/src/retry.rs#L40-L47)。
对于预算未耗尽的合格失败,从 1 开始的暂时性重试计数使用有界指数退避。有效的 `providerRetryAfterMs` 只有在不超过 `maxDelayMs` 时才会取代指数退避;提供方延迟更长时,系统会委托给下一监听器,而不会违反提供方指令提前重试。本地退避乘以 `[1 - jitterRatio, 1 + jitterRatio]` 内的注入随机因子,并将最终值限制到 `maxDelayMs`;提供方延迟不加抖动。
插件拥有一个全生命期 `AbortController`,并跟踪每个活跃的退避回调。每次等待都会融合 waterfall瀑布式事件的轮次信号与该生命期信号。effect 清理会先注销监听器,再中止并等待活跃回调;被捕获回调的生命期信号中止时,回调会返回 `fail`既不能重试,也不能在插件释放后进入其捕获 waterfall 的剩余部分。尽管 Cordis 已捕获该监听器,此设计仍能使 HMR热模块替换释放达到完全停稳。
插件拥有一个全生命期 `AbortController`,并跟踪每个活跃的恢复回调,包括委托的 waterfall瀑布式事件工作与退避。effect 清理会先注销监听器,再中止并等待活跃回调;中止会胜过较晚到达的委托重试决策,被捕获的回调在插件释放后既不能重试,也不能进入其 waterfall 的剩余部分。尽管 Cordis 已捕获该监听器,此设计仍能使 HMR热模块替换释放达到完全停稳。
休眠前,`dsh-llm-retry` 会追加一条不进入表层的 `llm/retry` 会话事件,其中包含轮次、失败步骤、从 1 开始的暂时性重试编号、已配置上限、计划延迟和 `LlmFailure`。该插件拥有 `SessionEventMap` 声明合并;`dsh-session` 继续负责通用持久化,不会吸收可选策略的词汇。事件记录已安排的内容,而不是下一个请求已完成;延迟期间取消随后会在 `turn/end` 中可见。因为该事件的目的是表示运行状态,而不是收集跟踪数据,所以它仅与生产渲染器及回放/快照覆盖一起交付。
休眠前,`dsh-llm-retry` 会追加一条不进入表层的 `llm/retry` 会话事件,其中包含轮次、失败步骤、提供方、策略 mode、完整的解析策略 key、提供方策略重试编号、该 mode 存在时的有限上限、计划延迟和 `LlmFailure`。该 key 会对 code 集排序,并在提供方路由被行为不同但 mode 相同的策略替换时分隔重试历史。该插件拥有 `SessionEventMap` 声明合并;`dsh-session` 继续负责通用持久化,不会吸收可选策略的词汇。事件记录已安排的内容,而不是下一个请求已完成;延迟期间取消随后会在 `turn/end` 中可见。因为该事件的目的是表示运行状态,而不是收集跟踪数据,所以它仅与生产渲染器及回放/快照覆盖一起交付。
对非暂时性 code、耗尽的策略预算或超出上限的提供方延迟监听器会调用 `next()`。这保留了与上下文溢出恢复及后续策略插件的组合能力。只有在两个信号下完成延迟后,它才会返回 `{ action: 'retry' }`轮次取消和插件释放会返回 `fail`,此后仍以循环的取消/释放检查为准。
对非暂时性 code、耗尽的策略预算或超出上限的提供方延迟监听器会调用 `next()`。这保留了与上下文溢出恢复及后续策略插件的组合能力。对自身处理的失败,它会记录并等待延迟,然后在不委托的情况下返回 `{ kind: 'retry' }`轮次取消和插件释放会结束等待且不返回重试动作,此后仍以循环的取消/释放检查为准。
agent-spine 演示组合包加载该插件,因此共享的 stdio/TUI、一次性 CLI命令行界面和 ACPAgent Client Protocol示例组合使用同一有界策略。库消费方仍需显式组合插件:省略该插件时,`agent/request-error` 保持现有的 fail 默认值
agent-spine 演示组合包加载该插件,因此共享的 stdio/TUI、一次性 CLI命令行界面和 ACPAgent Client Protocol示例组合使用同一套按提供方路由的策略。库消费方仍需显式组合插件:省略该插件时,请求失败保持终态
### 由单一层负责可见的尝试
@@ -92,7 +82,7 @@ agent-spine 演示组合包加载该插件,因此共享的 stdio/TUI、一次
### 在现有日志中分隔尝试
一次失败尝试可以在已关闭的步骤中留下 `assistant/chunk` 事件,但绝不会追加 `assistant/message`,也不会分发工具。重试会开启下一个编号步骤从持久表层重建请求并生成自己的分片。步骤仍处于打开状态时UI 可以渲染实时分片;当 `llm/retry` 标识失败步骤,或 `turn/end` 记录终止失败时UI 再标记或清除这份暂时视图。消息派生仍会忽略失败分片。
一次失败尝试可以在已关闭的步骤中留下 `assistant/chunk` 事件,但绝不会追加 `assistant/message`,也不会分发工具。重试会关闭失败轮次,开启下一个编号轮次从持久表层重建请求并生成自己的分片。步骤仍处于打开状态时UI 可以渲染实时分片;当 `llm/retry` 标识失败步骤,或 `turn/end` 记录失败时UI 再标记或清除这份暂时视图。消息派生仍会忽略失败分片。
如果恢复预算耗尽,最终失败会连同结构化事实在 `turn/end.reason` 中存储一次。如果暂时性恢复继续,`llm/retry` 就是该次尝试的失败与延迟的持久归属位置。本决策不增加独立的最终错误事件或响应 id 词汇。
@@ -101,7 +91,7 @@ agent-spine 演示组合包加载该插件,因此共享的 stdio/TUI、一次
- 自动提供方或模型故障转移。请求已显式选择一个提供方和模型,提供方注册表也有意规定每个提供方只由一个适配器负责。
- 在成功的终止性 finish 后重试或继续,或将两次尝试的分片拼接成一条 assistant 消息。
- 修复格式错误的工具参数、拒答、内容过滤或其他语义模型输出。
- 无界重试、无人值守地持续重试直至取消、熔断器、共享提供方健康状态或跨 agent 重试预算。
- 熔断器、共享提供方健康状态或跨 agent 重试预算。
- 在没有生产消费方的情况下,把 `llm/stream` 改造成响应生命周期或增加便利的生成 API。
## 考虑过的替代方案
@@ -110,7 +100,7 @@ agent-spine 演示组合包加载该插件,因此共享的 stdio/TUI、一次
- **向 `dsh-llm` 增加响应开始、中断、丢弃、失败和提交事件**:拒绝采用,因为 agent 日志已经分隔原始分片、成功消息和编号尝试。第二套状态机会重复归属关系,又不能支持有界的同路由重试。
- **增加逻辑路由、能力矩阵和故障转移选择**:拒绝采用,因为当前请求已经显式指定提供方和模型,每个提供方由一个适配器负责,而且没有当前消费方要求自动回退或能够证明语义兼容性。
- **把 `retryable` 或 `failover` 放在 `LlmFailure` 上**:拒绝采用,因为适配器报告事实,部署策略决定动作。同一个 429 可以在交互式组合包中重试,也可以在成本受限的批处理中被拒绝。
- **只要调用方仍处于活跃状态就无限重试**拒绝采用,因为这会让一次请求产生无界成本和延迟。可见状态能使有界等待易于理解,却不能让无限预算变得安全
- **只要调用方仍处于活跃状态就无限重试**[按提供方配置的策略](../feature/2026-07-24-provider-retry-policies.md)对显式 `always` 配置项推翻了这项拒绝,同时保留有界的 normal mode 作为默认值
- **只通过进程 logger 记录重试状态**:拒绝采用,因为进程日志无法重建会话行为,也不能驱动回放后的 UI 状态。
- **只保留扁平 code**:拒绝采用,因为重试延迟和提供方请求 id 是结构化的提供方事实,而当不同协议失败共用一个稳定 code 时,诊断还需要 HTTP 状态。
@@ -120,11 +110,11 @@ agent-spine 演示组合包加载该插件,因此共享的 stdio/TUI、一次
- 适配器抛出的 `Error` 会以完全相同的对象抵达 `agent/request-error`,其伴随的 `LlmFailure` 则抵达相邻参数;测试保留针对可扩展及冻结第三方错误的现有对象标识断言。
- DeepSeek 和 pi-ai 适配器测试覆盖具有代表性的 400、401/403、429、5xx、连接、格式错误截断流、超时、中止、Retry-After 秒数/日期、请求 id 和未知 SDK 错误路径,恢复策略无需解析消息文本。
- Pi 将 SDK 选项固定为零次重试,并针对可重试的提供方响应执行一次可观测的实际网络请求;独立测试确保移除任一边界都会失败。
- `agent/request-error` 携带当前失败事实以及不可变的先前已重试失败事实;成功会清除历史,暂时性失败/上下文溢出交替发生的集成测试证明两种策略只消耗各自的有限预算。
- `dsh-llm-retry` 在 Loader 启动时验证每个配置字段,使用 `next()` 委托所有不合格路径,而且在没有其他策略时最多发起 `maxTransientRetries + 1` 次提供方请求。
- `agent/request-error` 携带当前失败事实不可变的先前已重试失败事实,以及实际服务注册所对应的不可变重试策略;成功会清除历史,暂时性失败/上下文溢出交替发生的集成测试证明两种策略只消耗各自的有限预算。
- 每个提供方适配器都在 Loader 启动时验证其嵌套重试策略,`ctx.llm` 则将该策略与路由一同捕获normal mode 会委托不合格路径,而且在没有其他策略时最多发起 `maxRetries + 1` 次提供方请求。
- 退避期间执行 HMR 的测试证明:释放过程会注销监听器、中止并等待其捕获的回调,释放后不发出重试决策,也不留下存活的定时器或 promise。
- 纯单元测试覆盖暂时性 code 选择、指数退避和抖动边界、有效及超出上限的 `Retry-After`、耗尽的预算、确定性定时器/随机数 seam以及退避期间中止。
- 真实 agent-loop 测试覆盖分片前失败、部分分片后失败、抛出及带内失败、在新步骤中重试至成功、耗尽后写入结构化 `turn/end.reason`,以及与 `dsh-compact-basic` 上下文溢出恢复的组合。
- 真实 agent-loop 测试覆盖分片前失败、部分分片后失败、抛出及带内失败、在新轮次中重试至成功、耗尽后写入结构化 `turn/end.reason`,以及与 `dsh-compact-basic` 上下文溢出恢复的组合。
- 部分分片集成测试证明:失败分片仍归属于失败步骤,该步骤不会提交 assistant 消息或工具副作用,成功的重试具有不同的来源信息。
- 插件拥有的不进入表层的 `llm/retry` 事件可在 JSONL 和 SQLite 往返后保留,被消息派生忽略,并驱动 TUI 撤回和计划重试渲染。无密钥快照覆盖调度、取消、成功和耗尽ACP 自动化快照确认,被丢弃的尝试不会通过协议发出,而恢复后的回复会正常发出。
- 空闲看门狗测试证明:只有 `next()` 尚未完成时才会重新布防稳定信号;在消费方思考期间及 `finally` 中会解除布防;它与总调用 deadline 以及更早发生的调用方中止分开分类。适配器测试证明该信号会终止底层请求,而不只是与其脱离。
@@ -132,12 +122,12 @@ agent-spine 演示组合包加载该插件,因此共享的 stdio/TUI、一次
## 后果
- 每次暂时性恢复尝试都以一个已关闭步骤加 `llm/retry` 的形式可见,有界策略还会防止隐藏的 SDK 重试成倍增加成本。即使没有分片到达,重试仍可能造成提供方重复计费;有限的尝试预算只能限制而无法消除此风险
- 每次重试尝试都以一个已关闭失败轮次加 `llm/retry` 的形式可见,适配器级的单次尝试行为会防止隐藏的 SDK 重试成倍增加策略决策。即使没有分片到达,重试仍可能造成提供方重复计费;normal mode 会限制此风险,而显式 always mode 会接受它,直至取消或成功
- 提供方 SDK 可能隐藏状态或重试标头。适配器会保留 SDK 公开的稳定事实,否则使用粗粒度 code而不会让恢复策略解析脆弱的文本。
- 持久重试事件扩展了会话协议和 UI 状态机。事件与其消费方一同交付,可避免产生无人使用的遥测词汇;但以后更改 schema 仍需要同步完成持久化和回放工作。
- 清除失败步骤的实时分片可能会明显撤回输出。与把丢弃的文本或不完整工具 JSON 呈现为已提交历史相比,这是更好的选择;快照固定这一转换。
- 适配器局部的空闲强制机制可以终止停滞的传输,而不会计入消费方思考时间。每个传输边界的契约测试会防止 SDK 漂移。
- 多个恢复插件会叠加各自的有限预算。此处它们的分类器互不重叠;重叠的分类器会形成依赖注册顺序的策略,必须由引入它们的插件记录并测试。
- 多个 normal 恢复插件会叠加各自的有限预算。always mode 会先委托,再提供无界回退;重叠的分类器会形成依赖注册顺序的策略,必须由引入它们的插件记录并测试。
## 相关资料

View File

@@ -1,57 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Result-time applied-hunk diffs for file mutations
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-02-result-time-applied-hunk-diffs.zh.md)
## Problem
The [tagged render-intent union](2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md) gives `dsh-tool-fs` write/edit a `card:'diff'` at call time, derived purely from the tool's args: write ⇒ `{oldText:null, newText:content}` (the whole new file), edit ⇒ `{oldText:old_string, newText:new_string}` (the bare replaced snippet). A UI can render that as an inline diff, but it is a **context-free** diff — the bare `old_string``new_string` with no surrounding lines, and a `replace_all` that touched five scattered sites still renders as one snippet pair.
Driving `claude-agent-acp`'s own ACP bridge shows what a full editor diff looks like: after the mutation applies, it emits a SECOND `tool_call_update` whose diff is the **applied hunk with ±3 context lines** (and one hunk per changed site for `replace_all`), reconstructed from the tool's `structuredPatch`. That result-time hunk is what makes Zed show the change *in place* in the file rather than as a floating snippet. Our tools stopped at the call-time snippet; the completed result carried only the plain "updated successfully" text, no diff.
The obstacle is a seam boundary: `presentResult(args, result)` is a **pure function of `args` + the model-facing `result` (`{content, isError}`)** — it runs on live streaming AND on session-log replay, so it must be replay-deterministic and cannot do I/O. It never sees the file's before/after content, and `FsEditOutcome`/`FsWriteOutcome` carried only a replacement count + version, not the text. So there was no way to compute — or even carry — an applied hunk to the presenter.
## Decision
Add a **persisted, tool-private presentation channel** so a tool's `execute` can attach a result-time render payload that survives replay, and use it to carry the applied-hunk diff.
### 1. A replayable presentation projection on canonical tool output (core)
The original implementation let `execute` return `{ content, meta }`. The [canonical tool-output contract](2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.md) supersedes that authoring shape: every tool now returns one schema-declared JSON value, `output.render(args, value)` derives model-facing blocks, and optional `output.presentationMeta(args, value)` derives replayable UI data.
`presentationMeta` is tool-owned `JsonValue` that the core persists without interpreting its fields. `Session.append` validates it with the rest of the event, and replay passes the stored payload back to `presentResult`; presentations therefore reproduce without I/O or recomputation. The canonical value itself remains execution-local and is not added to the session format.
This remains the general shape ("a tool projects durable result presentation"), not an fs-specific one—any tool can use it.
### 2. The tool computes the hunk; the backend returns before/after (fs)
Per the [capability-seam split](2026-06-13-capability-seams.md), the storage backend returns only **storage facts** and the model-facing tool owns **presentation**:
- `dsh-fs` widens `FsEditOutcome` with `{ before: string; after: string }` and `FsWriteOutcome` with `{ before: string | null; after: string }` (`before: null` ⇒ a create, or an existing-but-undiffable binary/non-UTF-8 file). The local backend already holds both texts at write time; it returns them as raw LF-normalized text, with **no diff/UI concept** entering the seam.
- `dsh-tool-fs` returns canonical before/after mutation facts and projects contextual hunks as `meta: { diffs: FileDiff[] }`. Successful mutations complete with a diff view: creates or unchanged overwrites fall back to an args-derived whole-file diff, while edits use applied hunks. Failed mutations carry no diff metadata and render their error normally.
### 3. UI transports render a `diff` result view
`ToolResultView` includes `DiffResultView { card:'diff'; title?; diffs: FileDiff[] }`. TUI and JSON-RPC/Web consumers switch on the same tagged view and replace the pending call's context-free snippet with the applied result hunk. The [automation-only ACP bridge](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md) does not carry tool presentation.
## Alternatives considered
**Hand-rolling or vendoring the diff algorithm.** Contextual hunks have established edge cases, so `dsh-tool-fs` uses the typed [`diff`](https://www.npmjs.com/package/diff) package and normalizes `structuredPatch` output in one module. The repository's vendoring policy applies to its framework source, not every leaf utility.
## Consequences
`tool/result` events carry a tool-private `meta` payload—part of the on-disk vocabulary, runtime-gated to JSON by `Session.append`—and any tool can project durable result presentation without another core change. The diff card reproduces on session reload and snapshot replay for free: it is read back from the log, never recomputed. The costs: an overwrite holds both the prior and new text in memory to compute a UI-only hunk (`TODO(overwrite-diff-bound)`), and `dsh-tool-fs` carries a small, well-known runtime dependency.
## Non-goals
- **Live incremental diff streaming.** The hunk is computed once, after the mutation completes; there is no per-keystroke diff.
- **Diffing a binary/non-UTF-8 overwrite.** `before` is `null` for such a file (it has no text diff basis); the write still succeeds and the result renders a whole-file diff (`oldText: null`) rather than a contextual hunk.
- **Rename/move diffs.** Only content diffs of a single resolved path.
- **Bounding the overwrite diff basis.** An overwrite reads the whole prior file into memory to compute the contextual hunk (on top of the new content already held), so a very large text overwrite allocates both texts for a UI-only diff. A future refinement can bound the pre-read and fall back to a whole-file / no contextual diff above a size threshold; tracked as `TODO(overwrite-diff-bound)` at the read site.
## Related
- Completes the one remaining representation difference named as a non-goal in [Tagged render-intent union](2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md) — that Agent Note's Non-goals section is updated to record that applied-hunk diffs shipped here.
- Builds on the [filesystem capability seam](2026-06-17-filesystem-capability-seam.md) (the before/after are storage facts the backend returns) and [event-sourced sessions](2026-06-11-event-sourced-sessions.md) (the `meta` payload persists on the `tool/result` event, so replay reproduces the card).
- The `meta` channel is deliberately generic: a future tool (a structured search, a data-table result) can attach its own durable result presentation without another core change.

View File

@@ -1,57 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 结果时刻的 applied-hunk diff 用于文件变更
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-02-result-time-applied-hunk-diffs.md) | 中文
## 问题
[带标签的 render-intent 联合类型](2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md)为 `dsh-tool-fs` 的 write/edit 在调用时刻提供 `card:'diff'`纯粹从工具参数推导write ⇒ `{oldText:null, newText:content}`整个新文件edit ⇒ `{oldText:old_string, newText:new_string}`裸替换片段。UI 可以将其渲染为行内 diff但这是一个**无上下文**的 diff裸的 `old_string``new_string` 没有周围行,而一次触及五个分散位置的 `replace_all` 仍然渲染为一对片段。
在对接 `claude-agent-acp` 自身的 ACPAgent Client Protocol bridge 时可以看到完整编辑器 diff 的样子:变更应用后,它发出第二个 `tool_call_update`,其 diff 是**带 ±3 行上下文的 applied hunk**`replace_all` 的每个变更位置各一个 hunk由工具的 `structuredPatch` 重建。这个结果时刻的 hunk 正是让 Zed 在文件中*原位*显示变更而非浮动片段的关键。我们的工具止步于调用时刻的片段完成后的结果只携带纯文本「updated successfully」没有 diff。
障碍在于一个 seam 边界:`presentResult(args, result)`**`args` + 面向模型的 `result``{content, isError}`)的纯函数**——它在实时流式输出和会话日志回放中都会运行,因此必须具备回放确定性且不能做 I/O。它看不到文件的前后内容`FsEditOutcome`/`FsWriteOutcome` 只携带替换计数和版本号没有文本。因此无法计算——甚至无法携带——applied hunk 给 presenter。
## 决策
添加一个**持久化的、工具私有的展示通道**,使工具的 `execute` 能附加一个结果时刻的渲染载荷并在回放中存活,并用它来携带 applied-hunk diff。
### 1. 规范工具输出上的可回放展示投影core
原始实现允许 `execute` 返回 `{ content, meta }`。[规范工具输出契约](2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.md)取代了这种编写形态:每个工具如今返回一个由 schema 声明的 JSON 值,`output.render(args, value)` 从中派生面向模型的内容块,可选的 `output.presentationMeta(args, value)` 则派生可回放的 UI 数据。
`presentationMeta` 是工具自有的 `JsonValue`core 会持久化它,但不解释其中的字段。`Session.append` 将它与事件的其余部分一并校验,回放再把存储的载荷传回 `presentResult`;因此展示无需 I/O 或重新计算即可复现。规范值本身只存在于执行期间,不会加入会话格式。
这仍是通用形态(「工具投影持久化的结果展示」),而非 fs 特有;任何工具都可以使用。
### 2. 工具计算 hunk后端返回 before/afterfs
按照 [capability-seam 拆分](2026-06-13-capability-seams.md),存储后端只返回**存储事实**,面向模型的工具拥有**展示**
- `dsh-fs``FsEditOutcome` 扩展为包含 `{ before: string; after: string }`,将 `FsWriteOutcome` 扩展为包含 `{ before: string | null; after: string }``before: null` 表示创建,或已存在但不可 diff 的二进制/非 UTF-8 文件)。本地后端在写入时已持有两份文本;它以原始 LF 规范化文本返回,**不让任何 diff/UI 概念进入 seam**。
- `dsh-tool-fs` 返回规范的变更前/后事实,并将上下文 hunk 投影为 `meta: { diffs: FileDiff[] }`。成功的变更以 diff 视图完成:创建或无变化的覆写回退到由参数推导的整文件 diff而编辑使用 applied hunk。失败的变更不携带 diff 元数据,正常渲染其错误信息。
### 3. UI 传输层渲染 `diff` 结果视图
`ToolResultView` 包含 `DiffResultView { card:'diff'; title?; diffs: FileDiff[] }`。TUI 与 JSON-RPC/Web 消费方在同一个带标签的视图上做 switch用 applied 结果 hunk 替换待定调用的无上下文片段。[仅面向自动化的 ACP 桥接层](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md)不承载工具展示。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**手写或 vendor diff 算法。** 上下文 hunk 有已知的边界情况,因此 `dsh-tool-fs` 使用带类型的 [`diff`](https://www.npmjs.com/package/diff) 包,并在一个模块中规范化 `structuredPatch` 输出。仓库的 vendor 策略适用于框架源码,而非每个叶子工具库。
## 后果
`tool/result` 事件携带工具私有的 `meta` 载荷;它属于磁盘格式词汇的一部分,由 `Session.append` 在运行时限制为 JSON。任何工具都可以投影持久化的结果展示无需再改 core。diff 卡片在会话重载和快照回放时免费复现:它从日志中读回,从不重新计算。代价:覆写操作在内存中同时持有旧文本和新文本以计算仅用于 UI 的 hunk`TODO(overwrite-diff-bound)`),且 `dsh-tool-fs` 引入了一个小型、知名的运行时依赖。
## 非目标
- **实时增量 diff 流式输出。** hunk 在变更完成后一次性计算;没有逐键 diff。
- **对二进制/非 UTF-8 覆写做 diff。** 此类文件的 `before``null`(没有文本 diff 基础);写入仍然成功,结果渲染整文件 diff`oldText: null`)而非上下文 hunk。
- **重命名/移动 diff。** 仅限单个已解析路径的内容 diff。
- **限制覆写 diff 基础的大小。** 覆写操作将整个旧文件读入内存以计算上下文 hunk加上已持有的新内容因此非常大的文本覆写会为仅 UI 用途的 diff 分配两份文本。未来的改进可以设定预读上限,超过阈值时回退到整文件/无上下文 diff在读取位置以 `TODO(overwrite-diff-bound)` 跟踪。
## 相关
- 补全了[带标签的 render-intent 联合类型](2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md)中作为非目标列出的最后一项表示差异——该 Agent Note 的「非目标」一节已更新,记录 applied-hunk diff 在此处交付。
- 基于[文件系统 capability seam](2026-06-17-filesystem-capability-seam.md)before/after 是后端返回的存储事实)和[事件溯源会话](2026-06-11-event-sourced-sessions.md)`meta` 载荷持久化在 `tool/result` 事件上,因此回放可复现卡片)。
- `meta` 通道有意设计为通用的:未来的工具(结构化搜索、数据表结果)可以附加自己的持久化结果展示而无需再改 core。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md: 84423e9000526848a111591c1bb2ab92067bbe50
2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.zh.md: 43873c622fc8483b4a7033d17b4b4fab1342a56b
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md
2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md: d82141f519bff66df000f1316093aacd38b8e42b
2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.zh.md: 71fe81ba8f87cb707512cf7880126c006321c799

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ A tool declares how its calls render in a UI (an editor's tool-call card) throug
- Which combinations are *valid* is unwritten: a `terminal` call that also sets `content` means "description above the card"; a generic call that sets `terminal` is meaningless but representable. The type permits nonsense.
- There is no way to express the one file-tool affordance an editor most wants — a **diff card** (`{path, oldText, newText}`, which Zed renders as an inline diff / new-file preview). `ToolCallPresentation.content` is the *LLM* `ContentBlock[]` vocabulary (text/image), so a tool literally cannot ask for a diff.
The existing `FIXME(tool-presentation)` in `packages/core/tools/src/index.ts` named the fix: "redesign the type so a tool declares its render INTENT once (e.g. a tagged union over card kinds) rather than a bag of optional fields the bridge stitches together." The rejected Agent Note [Collapse tool-owned UI presentation](../../rejected/simplification/2026-06-20-generic-tool-rendering.md) deferred it explicitly: rich rendering "should return later as a tagged render-intent union after there are at least two real tools and two real consumers to validate the vocabulary." That bar is met by multiple producer families plus the TUI and host/client-runtime (Web) consumers.
The existing `FIXME(tool-presentation)` in `packages/core/tools/src/index.ts` named the fix: "redesign the type so a tool declares its render INTENT once (e.g. a tagged union over card kinds) rather than a bag of optional fields the bridge stitches together." An earlier rejected collapse-tool-owned-presentation proposal deferred it explicitly: rich rendering "should return later as a tagged render-intent union after there are at least two real tools and two real consumers to validate the vocabulary." That bar is met by multiple producer families plus the TUI and host/client-runtime (Web) consumers.
## Decision
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ The terminal intent is display-only. The harness still executes the command thro
## Alternatives considered
- **Delete tool-owned presentation entirely** — [the rejected collapse proposal](../../rejected/simplification/2026-06-20-generic-tool-rendering.md); its own verdict deferred to exactly this union once two real tools and two real consumers existed, and that bar is now met.
- **Delete tool-owned presentation entirely** — the rejected collapse proposal this note supersedes; its own verdict deferred to exactly this union once two real tools and two real consumers existed, and that bar is now met.
- **Let a UI execute terminal intents** — rejected because it would bypass the harness's bash policy and ownership contracts and fork command execution across backends. A terminal card describes harness-owned execution; it never authorizes client-side execution.
- **A merge-extensible union** (the `ContentBlockMap` pattern) — rejected: a new render intent needs new bridge code to render it anyway, so a plugin-added variant the bridge silently drops would be worse than the compile error the closed union raises at the bridge's `assertNever` switch.
- **Keeping the optional-field bag** — the status quo the Problem dissects: invalid states representable, undocumented field interactions, and no way to ask for a diff card at all.
@@ -77,6 +77,6 @@ A new render intent is a compile-breaking change at the bridge switch — delibe
## Related
- Supersedes the deferral in [Collapse tool-owned UI presentation](../../rejected/simplification/2026-06-20-generic-tool-rendering.md) (rejected — "wait for two real tools and two real consumers, then a tagged render-intent union"). That bar is now met; this is that union.
- Extended by [Result-time applied-hunk diffs](2026-07-02-result-time-applied-hunk-diffs.md), which adds a persisted `meta` channel so write/edit emit a result-time `DiffResultView` — the applied change (a contextual hunk with context lines / one per `replace_all` site, or a whole-file diff for a create) — on top of this union's call-time diff card.
- Supersedes the deferral in the earlier rejected collapse-tool-owned-presentation proposal (rejected — "wait for two real tools and two real consumers, then a tagged render-intent union"). That bar is now met; this is that union.
- Extended by [Result-time applied-hunk diffs](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-02-result-time-applied-hunk-diffs.md) (archived), which added a persisted `meta` channel — the value/presentation split and the persisted `presentationMeta` channel are now owned by [the canonical tool output contract](2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.md) so write/edit emit a result-time `DiffResultView` — the applied change (a contextual hunk with context lines / one per `replace_all` site, or a whole-file diff for a create) — on top of this union's call-time diff card.
- Folds `ToolTerminal` into the tagged `terminal` views used by current UI transports.

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Status: implemented
- 哪些组合是*合法的*没有文档说明:一个设置了 `content``terminal` 调用意味着「卡片上方的描述」;一个设置了 `terminal` 的 generic 调用毫无意义但类型上可表达。类型允许无意义的状态存在。
- 无法表达编辑器最需要的文件工具能力:**diff 卡片**`{path, oldText, newText}`Zed 将其渲染为内联 diff / 新文件预览)。`ToolCallPresentation.content` 使用的是 *LLM大语言模型*`ContentBlock[]` 词汇text/image工具根本无法请求 diff 展示。
`packages/core/tools/src/index.ts` 中已有的 `FIXME(tool-presentation)` 指出了修复方向:「重新设计类型,让工具一次性声明其渲染意图(例如按卡片种类的带标签联合类型),而非一堆由 bridge 拼接的可选字段。」被否决的 Agent Note [折叠工具拥有的 UI 呈现](../../rejected/simplification/2026-06-20-generic-tool-rendering.md)明确推迟了此事:富渲染「应当在至少有两个真实工具和两个真实消费方验证词汇之后,以带标签 render-intent 联合类型的形式回归。」该条件已由多个生产者族,加上 TUI 与宿主/客户端运行时Web这些消费方满足。
`packages/core/tools/src/index.ts` 中已有的 `FIXME(tool-presentation)` 指出了修复方向:「重新设计类型,让工具一次性声明其渲染意图(例如按卡片种类的带标签联合类型),而非一堆由 bridge 拼接的可选字段。」一个早先被否决的折叠工具自有呈现提案明确推迟了此事:富渲染「应当在至少有两个真实工具和两个真实消费方验证词汇之后,以带标签 render-intent 联合类型的形式回归。」该条件已由多个生产者族,加上 TUI 与宿主/客户端运行时Web这些消费方满足。
## 决策
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ terminal 意图只用于展示。harness 仍通过自身的 bash 服务执行命
## 曾考虑的替代方案
- **完全删除工具自有的展示**:即[被否决的 collapse 提案](../../rejected/simplification/2026-06-20-generic-tool-rendering.md);其自身的结论正是推迟到两个真实工具和两个真实消费方存在后再做此联合类型,该条件现已满足。
- **完全删除工具自有的展示**:即本 Agent Note 所取代的那个被否决的 collapse 提案;其自身的结论正是推迟到两个真实工具和两个真实消费方存在后再做此联合类型,该条件现已满足。
- **让 UI 执行 terminal 意图**:否决。这样会绕过 harness 的 bash 策略与归属契约并把命令执行分裂到不同后端。terminal 卡片描述的是 harness 拥有的执行,绝不授权客户端侧执行。
- **可合并扩展的联合类型**`ContentBlockMap` 模式):否决。新的渲染意图无论如何需要新的 bridge 代码来渲染,因此一个被 bridge 静默丢弃的插件添加变体,比封闭联合类型在 bridge 的 `assertNever` switch 处引发的编译错误更糟糕。
- **保留可选字段集合**:即「问题」一节所剖析的现状:无效状态可表达、字段交互无文档、且完全无法请求 diff 卡片。
@@ -77,6 +77,6 @@ terminal 意图只用于展示。harness 仍通过自身的 bash 服务执行命
## 相关
- 取代[折叠工具拥有的 UI 呈现](../../rejected/simplification/2026-06-20-generic-tool-rendering.md)(已否决——「等两个真实工具和两个真实消费方,然后做带标签 render-intent 联合类型」)中的推迟决定。该条件现已满足;本 Agent Note 即为那个联合类型。
- 被[结果时已应用 hunk 差异](2026-07-02-result-time-applied-hunk-diffs.md)扩展:后者添加了一个持久化的 `meta` 通道,使 write/edit 在结果时输出 `DiffResultView`(应用后的变更:带上下文行的 contextual hunk / 每个 `replace_all` 位点一个,或创建时的整文件 diff,叠加在本联合类型的调用时 diff 卡片之上
- 取代早先被否决的折叠工具自有呈现提案(已否决——「等两个真实工具和两个真实消费方,然后做带标签 render-intent 联合类型」)中的推迟决定。该条件现已满足;本 Agent Note 即为那个联合类型。
- 被[结果时已应用 hunk 差异](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-02-result-time-applied-hunk-diffs.md)(已归档)扩展:后者添加了一个持久化的 `meta` 通道,使 write/edit 在结果时输出 `DiffResultView`(应用后的变更:带上下文行的 contextual hunk / 每个 `replace_all` 位点一个,或创建时的整文件 diff——值/呈现拆分与持久化的 `presentationMeta` 通道现由[规范工具输出契约](2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.md)拥有
-`ToolTerminal` 折入当前 UI 传输层使用的带标签 `terminal` 视图。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.md: b934f7fd7087006be4f7eb3659e44e78b8ede367
2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.zh.md: 3b5b60a95bef0695a446cdd3d45d299550f449f6
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.md
2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.md: 51d488db28c57426c75c9ed1cfc90892261c0224
2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.zh.md: ae33cf5c2e944e584cd3d3c6ff76d93619adf7dc

View File

@@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ The loop fires awaited serial `agent/post-step(agent, turn, step, signal)` after
### Request recovery is limited to the final model boundary
`RequestError`, `RequestErrorDecision`, and the `agent/request-error` waterfall represent failures after the final adapter has been selected. Each returned stream handle owns a private failure set that preserves the original thrown error identity across dispatch, iterator construction, and iteration without leaking nested-call provenance into an outer call. Terminal in-band `error` or `aborted` finishes enter the same path. Prompt assembly, request middleware, request logging, result processing, tools, post-step listeners, and cleanup remain ordinary failures.
`RequestError` and the `agent/request-error` waterfall represent failures after the final adapter has been selected. Each returned stream handle owns a private failure set that preserves the original thrown error identity across dispatch, iterator construction, and iteration without leaking nested-call provenance into an outer call. Terminal in-band `error` or `aborted` finishes enter the same path. Prompt assembly, request middleware, request logging, result processing, tools, step listeners, and cleanup remain ordinary failures.
The failed step closes before recovery runs. A retry opens the next numbered step and rebuilds the request from the durable log; consecutive recovery attempts reset only after a successful provider request. Both DeepSeek adapters normalize recognized provider context-limit failures to `CONTEXT_WINDOW_EXCEEDED`.
The failed step closes before recovery runs. A handling listener repairs durable state, returns `{ kind: 'retry' }`, and stops waterfall delegation. The loop then closes the failed turn and opens one retry turn from the durable log without an intervening idle notification. Retry policy and attempt counts remain plugin-owned; compact-basic clears its per-agent overflow count when the chain reaches terminal `agent/settled`. Both DeepSeek adapters normalize recognized provider context-limit failures to `CONTEXT_WINDOW_EXCEEDED`. The [retry-action decision](../simplification/2026-07-27-request-error-retry-action.md) owns the return boundary.
If cancellation lands after assistant tool calls are durable but before all calls dispatch, the loop records a synthetic `tool/call` and aborted `tool/result` pair for every undispatched call before following the normal abort path. The surface therefore never retains orphaned durable tool calls merely because cancellation won the race.
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ If cancellation lands after assistant tool calls are durable but before all call
For `pressure`, compact-basic resolves the durable provider/model target's adapter-owned capacity and exact-target policy, then applies the resulting threshold and retained-tail budgets to one unified `ctx.tokenMeter.measure()` result. Below pressure it returns without pruning. Once pressure qualifies, optional `ctx.toolResultPrune` rewrites oversized current results and compact-basic remeasures through the same meter; safe pressure skips the model call, while remaining pressure selects and summarizes from the pruned surface. The same singleton meter owns range pricing, provenance, shadowed token counts, and non-shrinking-summary rejection. Common defaults remain threshold ratio `0.8`, retained-history ratio `0.16`, summarization provider/model `''`, `maxTokens: 8192`, `compactionRetries: 1`, and `auto: true`; optional `modelPolicies` entries override them for an exact provider/model pair.
For canonical overflow, compact-basic requires no capacity metadata and bypasses scalar pressure and the normal retained-token budget. It prunes first, then chooses the maximal tool-balanced head range while leaving the newest indivisible unit and attempts one shrinking summary compaction under the same signal when a range exists. The automatic listener snapshots `session.surface.replaceGeneration` and returns `{ action: 'retry' }` whenever pruning or summarization increases it. This remains true when pruning lands before later summary work throws; cancellation still wins. A backend returning a result without replacement cannot authorize retry, while pruning-only progress can authorize a retry without a `CompactionResult`.
For canonical overflow, compact-basic requires no capacity metadata and bypasses scalar pressure and the normal retained-token budget. It prunes first, then chooses the maximal tool-balanced head range while leaving the newest indivisible unit and attempts one shrinking summary compaction under the same signal when a range exists. The automatic listener snapshots `session.surface.replaceGeneration` and returns `{ kind: 'retry' }` whenever pruning or summarization increases it. This remains true when pruning lands before later summary work throws; cancellation still wins. A backend returning a result without replacement cannot authorize retry, while pruning-only progress can authorize a retry without a `CompactionResult`.
`maxOverflowRetries` is optional and defaults to `1`; `0` disables overflow recovery without disabling pressure. `auto: false` registers neither automatic listener. Noncanonical errors, exhausted attempts, an already-aborted signal, a missing routed model, no safe range, no generation change, and recovery throws before any replacement all delegate to the next listener. With no later recovery, the loop reports the original provider error object and code. A recovery throw after generation advances authorizes retry from durable progress; cancellation or disposal remains authoritative even if recovery work completes concurrently.
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ The default summarizer resolves explicit configuration, then the latest logged r
## Testing
Unit tests cover final-adapter failure provenance and identity, closed-step retry numbering and reset, cancellation and disposal, post-step ordering, routed-envelope pressure, pressure-gated pruning, pruning-only relief, pruned-input summarization, balanced overflow reduction, durable prune progress before later failure, generation proof, caps, delegation, and auxiliary-call routing. Real-loop tests cover thrown and in-band overflow through pruning or summary compaction to a reconstructed retry request.
Unit tests cover final-adapter failure provenance and identity, closed-turn retry numbering and reset, cancellation and disposal, step-boundary ordering, routed-envelope pressure, pressure-gated pruning, pruning-only relief, pruned-input summarization, balanced overflow reduction, durable prune progress before later failure, generation proof, caps, delegation, and auxiliary-call routing. Real-loop tests cover thrown and in-band overflow through pruning or summary compaction to a reconstructed retry request.
## Alternatives considered

View File

@@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ Status: implemented
### 请求恢复只覆盖最终模型边界
`RequestError``RequestErrorDecision``agent/request-error` waterfall 表示最终适配器已经选定之后的失败。每个返回的流句柄都绑定一个私有失败集合;该集合在分发、异步迭代器构造与迭代过程中保留原始抛出错误的身份,同时防止把嵌套调用的错误来源误归到外层调用。终止性的带内 `error``aborted` finish 进入同一路径。提示词装配、请求中间件、请求日志、结果处理、工具、post-step 监听器与清理仍属于普通失败。
`RequestError``agent/request-error` waterfall 表示最终适配器已经选定之后的失败。每个返回的流句柄都绑定一个私有失败集合;该集合在分发、异步迭代器构造与迭代过程中保留原始抛出错误的身份,同时防止把嵌套调用的错误来源误归到外层调用。终止性的带内 `error``aborted` finish 进入同一路径。提示词装配、请求中间件、请求日志、结果处理、工具、step 监听器与清理仍属于普通失败。
恢复运行前,失败 step 已经关闭。重试会打开下一个编号 step并从持久日志重建请求连续恢复尝试计数只在提供方请求成功后重置。两个 DeepSeek 适配器都把识别出的提供方上下文限制错误规范化为 `CONTEXT_WINDOW_EXCEEDED`
恢复运行前,失败 step 已经关闭。负责处理的监听器修复持久状态、返回 `{ kind: 'retry' }`,并停止 waterfall 委托。循环随后关闭失败 turn并从持久日志开启一个重试 turn中间不发布空闲通知。重试策略与尝试计数由插件自己拥有compact-basic 在链路到达终态 `agent/settled` 时清除对应 agent 的溢出计数。两个 DeepSeek 适配器都把识别出的提供方上下文限制错误规范化为 `CONTEXT_WINDOW_EXCEEDED`。[重试动作决策](../simplification/2026-07-27-request-error-retry-action.md)规定这一返回边界
如果取消发生在 assistant 工具调用已经持久化之后、所有调用完成分发之前,循环会为每个尚未分发的调用记录一对合成的 `tool/call` 与 aborted `tool/result`,随后进入正常中止路径。因此,表层不会仅因取消赢得竞态而留下孤立的持久工具调用。
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Status: implemented
对于 `pressure`compact-basic 先解析持久提供方/模型目标的适配器所属容量与精确目标策略,再把得到的阈值与保留尾部预算应用到一次统一的 `ctx.tokenMeter.measure()` 结果。低于压力时直接返回,不执行剪枝。压力达到条件后,可选的 `ctx.toolResultPrune` 会改写当前表层中过大的工具结果compact-basic 再通过同一个 meter 重新计量;若压力恢复安全则跳过模型调用,否则从已剪枝表层选择范围并生成摘要。范围定价、来源、被遮蔽 token 数与非缩小摘要拒绝也由同一个单例 meter 完成。通用默认值保持为阈值比例 `0.8`、保留历史比例 `0.16`、摘要提供方/模型 `''``maxTokens: 8192``compactionRetries: 1``auto: true`;可选 `modelPolicies` 项可以按精确提供方/模型组合覆盖这些值。
对于规范化溢出compact-basic 不要求容量元数据,并绕过标量压力与普通保留 token 预算。它先执行剪枝,再在保留最新不可分割单元的同时选择最大的工具配对平衡头部范围;存在范围时,才在同一 signal 下尝试一次缩小摘要压缩。自动监听器先记录 `session.surface.replaceGeneration`,剪枝或摘要让 generation 增加时就返回 `{ action: 'retry' }`。即使剪枝先落盘而后续摘要工作抛错,这条规则仍然成立;取消依然优先。后端若只返回结果但没有替换表层,不能授权重试;只有剪枝取得进展时,即使没有 `CompactionResult` 也可以授权重试。
对于规范化溢出compact-basic 不要求容量元数据,并绕过标量压力与普通保留 token 预算。它先执行剪枝,再在保留最新不可分割单元的同时选择最大的工具配对平衡头部范围;存在范围时,才在同一 signal 下尝试一次缩小摘要压缩。自动监听器先记录 `session.surface.replaceGeneration`,剪枝或摘要让 generation 增加时就返回 `{ kind: 'retry' }`。即使剪枝先落盘而后续摘要工作抛错,这条规则仍然成立;取消依然优先。后端若只返回结果但没有替换表层,不能授权重试;只有剪枝取得进展时,即使没有 `CompactionResult` 也可以授权重试。
`maxOverflowRetries` 可选且默认为 `1``0` 只禁用溢出恢复,不会禁用压力检查。`auto: false` 不注册任何自动监听器。非规范化错误、尝试耗尽、已经中止的 signal、缺失路由模型、没有安全范围、generation 未变化以及在任何替换之前恢复抛错都会委托给下一个监听器。若没有后续恢复循环报告原始提供方错误对象与代码。generation 增加后的恢复抛错会基于持久进展授权重试;即使恢复工作并发完成,取消或销毁仍具有最终优先级。
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Status: implemented
## 测试
单元测试覆盖最终适配器失败的来源与身份、已关闭 step 的重试编号与重置、取消与销毁、post-step 顺序、已路由信封压力、压力门控剪枝、剪枝独立解除压力、从已剪枝输入生成摘要、平衡溢出缩减、后续失败前已落盘的剪枝进展、generation 证明、上限、委托与辅助调用路由。真实循环测试覆盖抛出式和带内溢出,并验证剪枝或摘要压缩后的重试请求从替换表层重建。
单元测试覆盖最终适配器失败的来源与身份、已关闭 turn 的重试编号与重置、取消与销毁、step 边界顺序、已路由信封压力、压力门控剪枝、剪枝独立解除压力、从已剪枝输入生成摘要、平衡溢出缩减、后续失败前已落盘的剪枝进展、generation 证明、上限、委托与辅助调用路由。真实循环测试覆盖抛出式和带内溢出,并验证剪枝或摘要压缩后的重试请求从替换表层重建。
## 考虑过的替代方案

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-14-provider-routed-llm-adapters.md: 98205d18d07752e0cdba86d7cba80368d45fd816
2026-07-14-provider-routed-llm-adapters.zh.md: c35225a86baf4c2d09732b5940abbc8046d365fb
2026-07-14-provider-routed-llm-adapters.md: 1bd9197667f6e49c5025c98b4a77500f78595c2b
2026-07-14-provider-routed-llm-adapters.zh.md: 4d57f2cb33ac296500a4a19771ea493621ff93f6

View File

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ A provider has exactly one adapter owner in a Cordis context. `dsh-llm-deepseek`
### Explicit pi-ai provider profiles
`dsh-llm-pi-ai` takes one non-empty list of provider profiles. Provider names must be unique within the list and present in pi-ai's `getProviders()` result. Each profile contains the provider name plus optional `apiKey`, `baseURL`, headers, reasoning level and budgets, cache retention, transport, SDK timeouts, and a Harness stream-idle timeout. Provider retry fields are deliberately absent: the adapter forces pi-ai's `maxRetries` to zero so one `stream()` call makes one visible provider attempt, while `dsh-llm-retry` owns bounded agent-level recovery. Credentials are never global: an explicit key applies only to its profile, while an absent key lets pi-ai resolve its standard environment variable, OAuth token, AWS credential chain, Google ADC, or other provider-native ambient authentication. An explicitly empty key is invalid configuration rather than an environment fallback.
`dsh-llm-pi-ai` takes one non-empty list of provider profiles. Provider names must be unique within the list and present in pi-ai's `getProviders()` result. Each profile contains the provider name plus optional `apiKey`, `baseURL`, headers, reasoning level and budgets, cache retention, transport, SDK timeouts, a Harness stream-idle timeout, and a provider-owned `retryPolicy`. The adapter forces pi-ai's `maxRetries` to zero so one `stream()` call makes one visible provider attempt, while `dsh-llm-retry` executes the resolved policy at the agent failed-step seam. Credentials are never global: an explicit key applies only to its profile, while an absent key lets pi-ai resolve its standard environment variable, OAuth token, AWS credential chain, Google ADC, or other provider-native ambient authentication. An explicitly empty key is invalid configuration rather than an environment fallback.
The plugin registers all configured provider names against one `PiAiAdapter` in one all-or-nothing call. A request uses its provider to select the matching profile and finds its model in `getModels(provider)` to obtain the catalog descriptor. An unknown provider fails at plugin load; an unknown model fails before network I/O with `UNKNOWN_MODEL`. The catalog object is never mutated. When a profile supplies `baseURL`, the adapter clones the selected descriptor and overrides only `baseUrl`, so a private endpoint can retain pi-ai's API, capabilities, compatibility flags, context limits, and reasoning map. The private endpoint must implement the selected provider's protocol, and the model id must still exist in the installed pi-ai catalog.

View File

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Status: implemented
### 显式 pi-ai 提供方配置
`dsh-llm-pi-ai` 接受一个非空的提供方配置列表。列表内的提供方名称必须唯一,并且存在于 pi-ai 的 `getProviders()` 结果中。每项配置包含提供方名称,以及可选的 `apiKey``baseURL`、headers、推理级别和预算、缓存保留设置、传输方式、SDK 超时Harness 流空闲超时。配置中有意不提供重试字段:适配器强制将 pi-ai 的 `maxRetries` 设为零,使一次 `stream()` 调用只发起一次可见的提供方请求;有界的 agent 层恢复由 `dsh-llm-retry` 负责。凭据不设全局值显式密钥仅对所属配置生效未提供密钥时pi-ai 使用标准环境变量、OAuth token、AWS 凭据链、Google ADC 或其他提供方原生环境认证。显式空密钥属于无效配置,不会回退到环境认证。
`dsh-llm-pi-ai` 接受一个非空的提供方配置列表。列表内的提供方名称必须唯一,并且存在于 pi-ai 的 `getProviders()` 结果中。每项配置包含提供方名称,以及可选的 `apiKey``baseURL`、headers、推理级别和预算、缓存保留设置、传输方式、SDK 超时Harness 流空闲超时,以及由提供方拥有的 `retryPolicy`适配器强制将 pi-ai 的 `maxRetries` 设为零,使一次 `stream()` 调用只发起一次可见的提供方请求;`dsh-llm-retry` 则在 agent 失败步骤 seam 上执行解析后的策略。凭据不设全局值显式密钥仅对所属配置生效未提供密钥时pi-ai 使用标准环境变量、OAuth token、AWS 凭据链、Google ADC 或其他提供方原生环境认证。显式空密钥属于无效配置,不会回退到环境认证。
插件通过一次全有或全无调用,将所有已配置的提供方名称注册到同一个 `PiAiAdapter`。请求按 provider 选择对应配置,并在 `getModels(provider)` 中查找模型以取得目录描述符。未知提供方会在插件加载时失败;未知模型会在网络 I/O 前以 `UNKNOWN_MODEL` 失败。适配器不会修改目录对象。当配置提供 `baseURL` 时,适配器复制选中的描述符,仅覆盖 `baseUrl`,使私有端点保留 pi-ai 的 API、能力、兼容标志、上下文限制与推理映射。私有端点必须实现所选提供方的协议模型 ID 也仍须存在于已安装的 pi-ai 目录中。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-15-llm-model-catalog-and-acp-selection.md: adbd8671f0ea5cd2e0c049c32616453882329396
2026-07-15-llm-model-catalog-and-acp-selection.zh.md: dfcb581e43149281cd18b28f1411ea98944983ad
2026-07-15-llm-model-catalog-and-acp-selection.md: 9edc723b0dfafeaf395eb9325373835138ddbc41
2026-07-15-llm-model-catalog-and-acp-selection.zh.md: 677d9e2a200d488fa9fc27fc2a922dc8f1f871d1

View File

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ ACP selection must also preserve the provider dimension. The same model id may a
Catalog membership is advisory. It drives selectors and diagnostics but never changes `stream()` routing and never rejects an otherwise valid request. Provider ownership remains exclusive and lifecycle-bound; model ids remain request-time adapter input.
`dsh-llm-pi-ai` maps the configured provider's installed `getModels(provider)` entries into the neutral catalog. Its existing request-time catalog lookup remains authoritative and still rejects unknown models with `UNKNOWN_MODEL`. `dsh-llm-deepseek` accepts an optional `models` config containing display entries, defaulting to `deepseek-v4-flash` and `deepseek-v4-pro`. An explicit list replaces those defaults and an empty list disables discovery. The entries improve selector UX for known public or private models, while every unlisted model id continues to pass through unchanged.
`dsh-llm-pi-ai` maps the configured provider's installed `getModels(provider)` entries into the neutral catalog. Its existing request-time catalog lookup remains authoritative and still rejects unknown models with `UNKNOWN_MODEL`. `dsh-llm-deepseek` accepts an optional `models` config containing display entries, defaulting to `deepseek-v4-flash` named `DeepSeek-V4-Flash` and `deepseek-v4-pro` named `DeepSeek-V4-Pro`. An explicit list replaces those defaults and an empty list disables discovery. The entries improve selector UX for known public or private models, while every unlisted model id continues to pass through unchanged.
### Per-session selection in the front door

View File

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ ACP 选择还必须保留提供方维度。同一个模型 ID 可能存在于多
目录成员关系仅提供建议。它驱动选择器与诊断,但不会改变 `stream()` 路由,也不会拒绝原本有效的请求。提供方所有权仍然具有排他性并绑定生命周期;模型 ID 仍是请求时传给适配器的输入。
`dsh-llm-pi-ai` 将已配置提供方的安装目录 `getModels(provider)` 映射为中立目录。其现有请求时目录查询仍是权威依据,未知模型仍以 `UNKNOWN_MODEL` 失败。`dsh-llm-deepseek` 接受可选的 `models` 配置作为展示条目,默认包含 `deepseek-v4-flash` `deepseek-v4-pro`。显式列表会替换这些默认值,空列表则关闭发现。这些条目改善已知公开或私有模型的选择体验,而所有未列出的模型 ID 仍会原样透传。
`dsh-llm-pi-ai` 将已配置提供方的安装目录 `getModels(provider)` 映射为中立目录。其现有请求时目录查询仍是权威依据,未知模型仍以 `UNKNOWN_MODEL` 失败。`dsh-llm-deepseek` 接受可选的 `models` 配置作为展示条目,默认包含名为 `DeepSeek-V4-Flash``deepseek-v4-flash` 和名为 `DeepSeek-V4-Pro` `deepseek-v4-pro`。显式列表会替换这些默认值,空列表则关闭发现。这些条目改善已知公开或私有模型的选择体验,而所有未列出的模型 ID 仍会原样透传。
### 前门内的会话级选择

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-16-explicit-turn-cancellation.md: 7ac743221084e663294954bfd048ba7ef1114f60
2026-07-16-explicit-turn-cancellation.zh.md: 3dca6339787ebef749c0d6a15609376ede994a97
2026-07-16-explicit-turn-cancellation.md: 15085a1da2cf183bace9957a4bedb3ea466aa472
2026-07-16-explicit-turn-cancellation.zh.md: e945b0fea51bdbfee38048573c643b0fb8ecb685

View File

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ The driver keeps only a cause-less pre-run marker for queued work cancelled befo
The explicit event signatures keep their positional form and place `signal` immediately before a waterfall's final `next`. Prompt submission, request configuration, step-result processing, continuation, and terminal stop join the pre-existing explicit signal seams for pre-step, session prefix, model generation, tool execution, approval, and subagent or workflow requests. Hook bridges must also supply `RunHookOptions.signal`, so a turn cancellation reaches the bash executor's process-group kill and join boundary. `SystemPrompt.assemble()` carries `signal?: AbortSignal` in `AssembleContext` because that object is an explicit request value that can also represent signal-less assembly outside a turn. Listeners may cooperate with the signal but must not retain it to control another turn.
`ctx.agents` continues to carry only the initiating Agent. Ambient Agent presence does not imply liveness, a current turn, or cancellation authority, and `agentInterruptReasonOf(signal)` reads only its explicit argument. Concurrent Agents isolate both their initiator identities and their turn signals; a child driver shadows the parent initiator while its parent request signal still travels through the subagent seam.
`ctx.agents` continues to carry only the initiating Agent. Ambient Agent presence does not imply liveness, a current turn, or cancellation authority. The cause reader is private to the loop and states the machine-private slot invariant (only `cancel()` aborts a turn controller, always with a canonical frozen cause) instead of re-validating the reason structurally; no public helper reads a cause off an arbitrary signal. Concurrent Agents isolate both their initiator identities and their turn signals; a child driver shadows the parent initiator while its parent request signal still travels through the subagent seam.
Agent disposal requests the runtime-only `{ kind: 'disposed' }` interruption on the active holder. If cancellation already won the controller reason, the reason cannot be rewritten, so terminal classification first checks lifecycle state: disposed wins, then a supported `user` or `parent` cause becomes the coarse aborted outcome, and unrelated exceptions retain the existing error path. ACP cancellation maps to `user`; in-process spawn and fork propagation map to `parent`. Remote ACP subagents retain their existing wire protocol.

View File

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ AgentLoop 为每个待启动轮次私有地持有一个 `TurnCancellation`。它
显式事件签名保留位置参数形式,并把 `signal` 放在 waterfall瀑布式事件的最后一个参数 `next` 之前。提示词提交、请求配置、步骤结果处理、继续决策和终止停止加入已有的步骤前处理、会话前缀、模型生成、工具执行、审批以及 subagent 或工作流请求的显式 signal seam。钩子桥接器也必须提供 `RunHookOptions.signal`,使轮次取消能够到达 Bash 执行器终止进程组并等待其退出的边界。`SystemPrompt.assemble()``AssembleContext` 中携带 `signal?: AbortSignal`,因为该对象是显式请求值,也可表示轮次之外不携带 signal 的组装。监听器可以配合该 signal 取消,但不得保留它来控制其他轮次。
`ctx.agents` 仍只携带发起 Agent。环境中的 Agent 并不代表存活、当前轮次或取消权限`agentInterruptReasonOf(signal)` 也只读取其显式参数。并发 Agent 会同时隔离各自的发起方身份和轮次 signal子驱动会遮蔽父发起方而父请求 signal 仍通过 subagent seam 传递。
`ctx.agents` 仍只携带发起 Agent。环境中的 Agent 并不代表存活、当前轮次或取消权限。cause 读取器是 loop 私有的,它直接陈述机器私有的 slot 不变量(只有 `cancel()` 会中止轮次控制器,且总是携带规范的冻结 cause而不是对 reason 做结构化再校验;不存在从任意 signal 读取 cause 的公开辅助函数。并发 Agent 会同时隔离各自的发起方身份和轮次 signal子驱动会遮蔽父发起方而父请求 signal 仍通过 subagent seam 传递。
Agent dispose资源释放会在活跃持有者上请求仅用于运行时的 `{ kind: 'disposed' }` 中断。若取消已经先占用控制器的中断原因,该原因便无法改写,因此终态分类会先检查生命周期状态:资源释放结果优先,之后受支持的 `user``parent` 取消原因形成粗粒度的中止结果其他异常保留现有错误路径。ACPAgent Client Protocol取消映射为 `user`;进程内 spawn 和 fork 的传播映射为 `parent`。远程 ACP subagent 保持现有协议。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.md: eeae5fb3ad8eb3e9842b497ee51258375760bc93
2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.zh.md: c6f4b10c2a4c2d210c6bd7a7fa1ac470cab7c0a7
2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.md: cfc2a7e62358e6282148b2d024ef3b162a903642
2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.zh.md: b5b082c25f664cfcb0ddd3fcc6c4cd3d58472218

View File

@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ Both ends run cordis. The host is a cordis plugin tree; the browser runs a secon
## The client cordis tree and the loading chain
The loading chain — the two package kinds (plain vs dshClient plugin), the module-system/plugin-governor split, the two-phase boot over the host-authored entry graph with revisions, and hot reload — is owned by the [client plugin loading RFC](2026-07-23-client-plugin-loading-model.md). The load-bearing facts for this document: the browser boots the same vendored `@cordisjs/plugin-loader` as the host with a client module system (`ctx.modules`, `packages/client/modules`) filling its `internal` seam; every unit with product behavior is an entry in the host-authored `__DSH_BOOT__` graph — all nine plugin packages (infrastructure included) carry the `dshClient` declaration and arrive as fetched `./client` tsdown closure bundles, `immediately` rows differing only in boot phase-one prefetch, while plain packages (react family, cordis, the not-yet-promoted libraries) stay shell-bundled, seeded, and invisible to the graph; bundles execute `window.__ModuleLoader__.load({ id, factory })` and their `require` is answered from the lazy CJS module table (seed words + registered factories, materialized and memoized on first require — cross-plugin value imports are a build error, cooperation goes through cordis services); plugin CSS is inlined in the bundle and injected as `<style data-plugin="<id>">` at materialization (CSS Modules hashing + ownership tag = isolation, removal on reload); hot reload is live in dev graphs — the webserver stat-polls the bundles it serves and broadcasts `rebuilt` SSE frames, and the `client-hmr` plugin swaps one fiber per frame. The settled flip (`loader.await()` + an all-ACTIVE sweep) still switches the shell from the loading page to the real UI in one pass — settled means every entry is created and every fiber reached ACTIVE, with FAILED/PENDING fibers listed loud; there is no partial-availability mode (progressive rendering is deferred work).
The loading chain — the two package kinds (plain vs dshClient plugin), the module-system/plugin-governor split, the two-phase boot over the host-authored entry graph with revisions, and hot reload — is owned by the [client plugin loading RFC](2026-07-23-client-plugin-loading-model.md). The load-bearing facts for this document: the browser boots the same vendored `@cordisjs/plugin-loader` as the host with a client module system (`ctx.modules`, `packages/client/modules`) filling its `internal` seam; every unit with product behavior is an entry in the host-authored `__DSH_BOOT__` graph — every production plugin package (infrastructure included) carries the `dshClient` declaration and arrives as a fetched `./client` tsdown closure bundle, `immediately` rows differing only in boot phase-one prefetch, while plain packages (react family, cordis, the not-yet-promoted libraries) stay shell-bundled, seeded, and invisible to the graph; bundles execute `window.__ModuleLoader__.load({ id, factory })` and their `require` is answered from the lazy CJS module table (seed words + registered factories, materialized and memoized on first require — cross-plugin value imports are a build error, cooperation goes through cordis services); plugin CSS is inlined in the bundle and injected as `<style data-plugin="<id>">` at materialization (CSS Modules hashing + ownership tag = isolation, removal on reload); hot reload is live in dev graphs — the webserver stat-polls the bundles it serves and broadcasts `rebuilt` SSE frames, and the `client-hmr` plugin swaps one fiber per frame. The settled flip (`loader.await()` + an all-ACTIVE sweep) still switches the shell from the loading page to the real UI in one pass — settled means every entry is created and every fiber reached ACTIVE, with FAILED/PENDING fibers listed loud; there is no partial-availability mode (progressive rendering is deferred work).
Type universes stay split at the aggregate level — `tsconfig.host.json` is the host program and `tsconfig.client.json` the client program, both referenced by the solution root `tsconfig.json` — because both sides merge cordis `Context` under the same keys (`sessions`, `loader`) with different services; client packages consume the wire vocabulary through pure type subpaths (`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session/types` and kin) so no host augmentation rides into the client program.

View File

@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ Status: implemented
## client cordis 树与装载链
装载链——两类包(普通包 vs dshClient 插件)、模块系统/插件治理器之分、host 独家撰写的带修订号 entry 图之上的双层 boot、热重载——归 [client 插件装载 RFC](2026-07-23-client-plugin-loading-model.md) 所有。本篇赖以立足的事实:浏览器启动与 host 相同的 vendored `@cordisjs/plugin-loader`,由 client 模块系统(`ctx.modules``packages/client/modules`)填上其 `internal` seam凡带产品行为的单元都是 host 独家撰写的 `__DSH_BOOT__` 图里的 entry——全部九个插件包(含基础设施)都携带 `dshClient` 声明、以 fetch 到达的 `./client` tsdown 闭包 bundle 供给,`immediately` 行的差别仅在 boot 第一层预取而普通包react 家族、cordis、尚未升格的库保持打进壳、已播种、对图不可见bundle 执行 `window.__ModuleLoader__.load({ id, factory })`,其 `require` 由 lazy CJS 模块表应答(种子词条 + 已登记工厂,首次 require 时物化并记忆化——跨插件值 import 是构建错误,协作走 cordis 服务);插件 CSS 内联在 bundle 里、物化时注入为 `<style data-plugin="<id>">`CSS Modules 哈希 + 归属标记 = 隔离,重载时移除);热重载已在 dev 图落地——webserver 对自己供给的 bundle 做 stat 轮询并广播 `rebuilt` SSE 帧,`client-hmr` 插件每帧换掉一个 fiber。settled 翻转(`loader.await()` + 一次全 ACTIVE 扫描)依旧让壳从 loading 页一次切换到真 UI——settled 意味着每个 entry 已创建、每个 fiber 都到达 ACTIVEFAILED/PENDING 的 fiber 被大声列出;不存在部分可用模式(渐进渲染为后置工作)。
装载链——两类包(普通包 vs dshClient 插件)、模块系统/插件治理器之分、host 独家撰写的带修订号 entry 图之上的双层 boot、热重载——归 [client 插件装载 RFC](2026-07-23-client-plugin-loading-model.md) 所有。本篇赖以立足的事实:浏览器启动与 host 相同的 vendored `@cordisjs/plugin-loader`,由 client 模块系统(`ctx.modules``packages/client/modules`)填上其 `internal` seam凡带产品行为的单元都是 host 独家撰写的 `__DSH_BOOT__` 图里的 entry——每个生产插件包(含基础设施)都携带 `dshClient` 声明、以 fetch 到达的 `./client` tsdown 闭包 bundle 供给,`immediately` 行的差别仅在 boot 第一层预取而普通包react 家族、cordis、尚未升格的库保持打进壳、已播种、对图不可见bundle 执行 `window.__ModuleLoader__.load({ id, factory })`,其 `require` 由 lazy CJS 模块表应答(种子词条 + 已登记工厂,首次 require 时物化并记忆化——跨插件值 import 是构建错误,协作走 cordis 服务);插件 CSS 内联在 bundle 里、物化时注入为 `<style data-plugin="<id>">`CSS Modules 哈希 + 归属标记 = 隔离,重载时移除);热重载已在 dev 图落地——webserver 对自己供给的 bundle 做 stat 轮询并广播 `rebuilt` SSE 帧,`client-hmr` 插件每帧换掉一个 fiber。settled 翻转(`loader.await()` + 一次全 ACTIVE 扫描)依旧让壳从 loading 页一次切换到真 UI——settled 意味着每个 entry 已创建、每个 fiber 都到达 ACTIVEFAILED/PENDING 的 fiber 被大声列出;不存在部分可用模式(渐进渲染为后置工作)。
类型宇宙在聚合层拆分——`tsconfig.host.json` 是 host program、`tsconfig.client.json` 是 client program二者由 solution 根 `tsconfig.json` 引用,因为两侧都在相同键(`sessions``loader`)上对 cordis `Context` 做声明合并且服务不同client 包经纯类型子路径(`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session/types`消费协议词汇host 侧的声明合并不会搭车进入 client program。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.md: 6b5cd089fcf206e659c7b67b8a996bfe81d0c333
2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.zh.md: 61b25b14ca6f048b73a51788f112165745ae7106
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.md
2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.md: b2de9480d2659153dfb8a76ee07438d12e5b07c3
2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.zh.md: 1ae2654fb1e1d6913bc91c4aeb380dc533a6b258

View File

@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ The first-party tools preserve their existing Native text while returning domain
| `todo_write` | `{ todos, counts }` |
| `ask_user_question` | `{ answers: [{ id, selected, custom? }] }` |
| `exit_plan_mode` | `{ approved: true }` |
| `cordis_inspect` / `cordis_mount` / `cordis_unmount` | Inspection text or typed dynamic-mount handles |
| `cordis_inspect` / `cordis_mount` / `cordis_unmount` | Inspection text or typed temporary-Plugin handles |
| `structured_output` | `{ recorded: true }` |
| `run_code` | `{ logs: string[], result?: JsonValue }` |

View File

@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ type ToolExecutionResult =
| `todo_write` | `{ todos, counts }` |
| `ask_user_question` | `{ answers: [{ id, selected, custom? }] }` |
| `exit_plan_mode` | `{ approved: true }` |
| `cordis_inspect` `cordis_mount` `cordis_unmount` | 检查文本或类型化的动态挂载句柄 |
| `cordis_inspect` `cordis_mount` `cordis_unmount` | 检查文本或类型化的临时 Plugin 句柄 |
| `structured_output` | `{ recorded: true }` |
| `run_code` | `{ logs: string[], result?: JsonValue }` |

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-20-routed-model-context-and-compaction-policy.md: b00c744e4ac79983a1f492d710e7b1542278c4f4
2026-07-20-routed-model-context-and-compaction-policy.zh.md: 88e26aa7a99e8deb434d9a8fd80784be410a999a
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-20-routed-model-context-and-compaction-policy.md
2026-07-20-routed-model-context-and-compaction-policy.md: 6a2626d4eea3e30533199320b6b0ed5b05e7fd28
2026-07-20-routed-model-context-and-compaction-policy.zh.md: 2881b2d4205359b715303622268ee9218dd75831

View File

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Neither obvious configuration owner is sufficient. Compact-basic is optional and
`LlmAdapter.resolveModel(provider, model, signal?)` returns aggregate metadata for one exact route, with optional `LlmModelContext` under its `context` field. `LlmService.resolveModelInfo()` selects the registered route owner, validates a positive integer `contextWindow`, and returns detached metadata. The query is independent of `listModels()`: an unlisted dynamic model may have capacity metadata, and an absent `context` means only that the adapter cannot describe capacity.
The hand-rolled DeepSeek adapter accepts optional `contextWindow` on each configured model plus an adapter-wide `defaultContextWindow`. Exact model capacity wins; an entry without capacity and an unlisted pass-through id inherit the adapter default, or omit `context` when it is absent. The two built-in model entries each publish an exact 128,000-token capacity. The pi-ai adapter resolves capacity from the same catalog descriptor that authoritatively resolves the request model.
The hand-rolled DeepSeek adapter accepts optional `contextWindow` on each configured model plus an adapter-wide `defaultContextWindow`. Exact model capacity wins; an entry without capacity and an unlisted pass-through id inherit the adapter default, or omit `context` when it is absent. The two built-in model entries each publish an exact 256,000-token capacity. The pi-ai adapter resolves capacity from the same catalog descriptor that authoritatively resolves the request model.
### Token measurement remains model-agnostic

View File

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Status: implemented
`LlmAdapter.resolveModel(provider, model, signal?)` 返回一条精确路由的聚合元数据,其中可选的 `LlmModelContext` 位于 `context` 字段下。`LlmService.resolveModelInfo()` 选择已注册的路由所属方,验证 `contextWindow` 为正整数,并返回分离的元数据。该查询独立于 `listModels()`:不在目录中的动态模型也可以拥有容量元数据,而缺少 `context` 只表示适配器无法描述容量。
手写 DeepSeek 适配器允许每个已配置模型提供可选 `contextWindow`,并支持适配器级 `defaultContextWindow`。精确模型容量优先;未提供容量的模型项与未列出的透传 id 会继承适配器默认值,若默认值也不存在则省略 `context`。两个内置模型项都公开精确的 128,000 token 容量。pi-ai 适配器从同一个目录描述符解析容量,该描述符也用于权威解析请求模型。
手写 DeepSeek 适配器允许每个已配置模型提供可选 `contextWindow`,并支持适配器级 `defaultContextWindow`。精确模型容量优先;未提供容量的模型项与未列出的透传 id 会继承适配器默认值,若默认值也不存在则省略 `context`。两个内置模型项都公开精确的 256,000 token 容量。pi-ai 适配器从同一个目录描述符解析容量,该描述符也用于权威解析请求模型。
### Token 计量保持模型无关

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md: 12128d9e57601d0b85d20d1cb4240bb08eadc3cb
2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.zh.md: 177d90f7116f7451b8e3c4ccf7d1577ff12ae701
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md
2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md: 6936fbfa04c0fdaf1a8786c0465c193e9c285243
2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.zh.md: 3af14359fa01e92f63ae3b3e51dced9a97f6419f

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# Agent Note: Unify agent delivery and coalesce injected context into user/message
# Agent Note: Unify agent delivery on send(target × wakeup) and coalesce injected context into user/message
Status: implemented
@@ -8,39 +8,45 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.zh.md)
The agent's public driving surface had grown three near-parallel verbs — `send`, `steer`, `inject` — each with its own options type, its own live event story, and its own durable event. `send` and `steer` both queued a frozen inbox record and emitted `agent/queued`; `inject` bypassed the inbox and wrote a separate `context/message` durable event. The three verbs actually vary along only two independent axes: which queue an item joins (a whole new turn versus the active turn) and whether the item makes the model run. Encoding that 2×2 as three hand-written methods hid the symmetry, made "queue a turn without waking the driver" unreachable, and left `cancel()` with no way to abort a turn while preserving queued work.
Separately, `context/message` and `user/message` had converged: the surface projected both as verbatim user-role content, and the only real difference was that injected context carried `source`/`meta` and was "not a prompt." Two event types for one projection meant every consumer branched on event type to answer "is this a human prompt?", and the goal system used the type split as a side channel (round-zero state changes were `context/message`, admitted rounds were `user/message`).
Separately, `context/message` and `user/message` had converged: the surface projected both as verbatim user-role content, and the only real difference was that injected context carried a non-user `source` and was "not a prompt." Two event types for one projection meant every consumer branched on event type to answer "is this a human prompt?", and the goal system used the type split as a side channel (round-zero state changes were `context/message`, admitted rounds were `user/message`).
## Decision
**One acceptance mechanism, four intent helpers.** The concrete loop resolves `followup`, `queue`, `steer`, and `inject` into one (`target` × `wakeup`) acceptance mechanism. `followup` is `next-turn`/wakeup, `queue` is `next-turn`/no-wakeup, `steer` is `next-step`/wakeup, and `inject` is `next-step`/no-wakeup. The public structural interface exposes that mechanism as `send(ResolvedAgentInput)` for callers that already have fully resolved routing; every field is mandatory, and the discriminated input type excludes attached contexts from injection. The [intent-named delivery decision](2026-07-24-intent-named-agent-delivery.md) owns that superseding interface choice. Internally, `wakeup` means make the model run: wake a parked driver for an ordinary item or force a continuation for running steering.
**One primitive, three preset aliases.** The `Agent` interface's `send(input, { target, wakeup })` covers the (`target` × `wakeup`) matrix. Its `UserMessageData` input owns the inseparable model-facing `content` and producer `source`; the complete `SendOptions` owns only routing policy. `followup` (`next-turn`/wakeup), `steer` (`next-step`/wakeup), and `inject` (`next-step`/no-wakeup) each accept that one input and fix the policy. `wakeup` means "make the model run": wake a parked driver for a `next-turn` item, or force a continuation for a running `next-step` item. `next-turn`/no-wakeup (queue without waking) is representable with no alias and no current caller.
**inject keeps its mechanism.** `inject` appends durable model-facing context at the current log position (deferred behind an executing tool batch), or opens a one-shot `injection` turn when idle. It bypasses the FIFOs entirely, accepts no attached contexts, and defaults its source to `{ kind: 'plugin', plugin: '' }`, never `{ kind: 'user' }`.
**inject keeps its mechanism.** The `next-step`/no-wakeup path is exactly the old `inject`: durable model-facing context appended at the current log position, deferred while prompt admission or a turn owns the next safe boundary, and appended directly outside that window. It bypasses the FIFOs entirely, while its required `UserMessageData.source` preserves the caller's explicit provenance.
**context/message is gone.** Injected context is now a `user/message` whose `source` is a non-`user` kind (plugin or goal). `PromptMessageData` gained the optional `meta` that `context/message` carried. The surface, derivation, and `SurfaceEventType` drop `context/message`; consumers that need "is this a human prompt?" read `source.kind === 'user'` instead of the event type. This keeps goal-authority's human-authority check exactly as strict as before — an injected message defaults to a plugin source and can never satisfy `source.kind === 'user'`.
**context/message is gone.** Injected context is now a `user/message`; context producers supply the appropriate non-user `source` explicitly, and typed source variants carry any domain-specific durable provenance. The surface, derivation, and `SurfaceEventType` drop `context/message`; consumers that need "is this a human prompt?" read `source.kind === 'user'` instead of the event type.
**Goal replay disambiguates by round, not type.** A goal state change is a round-zero goal-sourced `user/message` carrying `goal/change` metadata; a positive round is an admitted continuation prompt. `decodeGoalEvent` now takes a `user/message` and still fails loud on goal metadata under a non-goal source or a goal source lacking metadata.
**Goal replay disambiguates by round, not type.** A goal state change is a round-zero goal-sourced `user/message` whose source carries the complete change; a positive round is an admitted continuation prompt. `decodeGoalEvent` takes a `user/message` and fails loud when goal-state content and its typed source disagree.
**Delivery returns an id.** Each delivery method returns an opaque branded `AgentMessageId` for the accepted input. FIFO methods carry it through their inbox lifecycle events; injection bypasses those events.
**`send` returns an id.** `send` (and the aliases) return an opaque branded `AgentMessageId` for the accepted message; `send`'s previous return was `void`.
**Three inbox events replace agent/queued.** `agent/inbox/enqueue` (an item entered a FIFO), `agent/inbox/dequeue` (the driver claimed one), and `agent/inbox/discard` (`cancel()` dropped pending items) each carry an `AgentMessage` the accepted message including its returned `id`, steering/wakeup facts, source, and contexts — so a caller can correlate a queued item with its lifecycle. Injection never touches a FIFO and emits none of these. Every FIFO entry publishes an enqueue, including the loop-authored continuation-reason steer (`agent/turn-continuation` returning `{ action: 'continue', reason }`), so the ledger stays balanced with its later dequeue or discard. The `dsh-agent` invariant companion asserts FIFO conservation: a per-agent outstanding count that dequeue and discard can never drive negative.
**Three inbox events replace agent/queued.** `agent/inbox/enqueue` (an item entered a FIFO), `agent/inbox/dequeue` (the driver claimed one), and `agent/inbox/discard` (`cancel()` dropped pending items) type their `AgentMessage` payload with only the accepted message's returned `id`, content, and source. Enqueue separately carries the resolved `queued | steering` placement captured by the producer at acceptance time, so observers and reconnect mirrors never reconstruct routing from later status or session history. Injection never touches a FIFO and emits none of these. Every FIFO entry publishes an enqueue, including steering submitted by an `agent/turn-stopping` listener, so the ledger stays balanced with its later dequeue or discard. The `dsh-agent` invariant companion asserts FIFO conservation: a per-agent outstanding count that dequeue and discard can never drive negative.
**cancel gains keepInbox.** `cancel(cause?, { keepInbox? })`; when true it aborts the active turn but preserves queued and steering items (no discard event, and un-started work is not dropped).
**Admission accepts next-step input without becoming a turn.** The loop opens a private next-step acceptance window before `agent/prompt-submit`, keeps it open through the turn, and closes it before `turn/end`. Steering and injection received during admission therefore remain together in the outbox and join an allowed turn. If admission blocks or fails, a context-only caller batch takes idle injection's immediate append, while steering and context staged beside it remain available to retry; neither path writes the rejected prompt. When a later prompt is admitted, retained outbox input enters its turn before that prompt, while input accepted during the current admission remains after the prompt. Closing the window before `turn/end` preserves the rule that reentrant late steering becomes an independent queued turn. `Agent.acceptsNextStep` exposes whether a `next-step` send would currently join this window; `status` remains the broader activity signal rather than a routing predicate.
**One accepted message keeps one representation.** Durable user-role input and additional model-facing context both use `UserMessageData { content, source }` directly; public `AgentMessage` extends it with the correlation `id`, and the loop-private `PendingMessage` extends that with `wakeup`. The loop clones and freezes `UserMessageData` before publication, queueing, or immediate append, so later caller or observer mutation cannot change the accepted value. A queued message that becomes steering enters the outbox as the same `PendingMessage` object, while injected and tool-produced context enters as plain `UserMessageData`. The outbox therefore stores their union directly instead of wrapping steering beside a duplicate copy of its content and source. Provider-native assistant messages remain adapter-owned output types and do not participate in this input hierarchy.
**Idle wakeup follows acceptance.** Before publishing enqueue, a waking queued send installs quiescence ownership and schedules driver admission for a microtask that runs after the id returns. Every send in one synchronous caller stack therefore resolves placement against the same pre-admission state, while reentrant cancellation or teardown cannot retire before the scheduled admission settles. Two idle `steer()` calls remain two FIFO turns instead of the first opening an admission window that captures the second.
**cancel gains keepInbox.** `cancel(cause, { keepInbox? })`; callers choose the cause explicitly, and `keepInbox: true` aborts the active turn while preserving queued and steering items (no discard event, and un-started work is not dropped).
## Alternatives considered
- **A dedicated `MessageSource` kind `context`** for injected content. Rejected because `plugin` already means "not a human," so a fourth kind would add a parallel axis the authority checks would have to learn. Injected context defaults to a plugin source instead.
- **A typed discriminant field on `PromptMessageData`** (e.g. `origin: 'prompt' | 'context'`) to replace the event-type split. Rejected in favor of `source`, which every consumer already carries and which the goal system already keyed on; a second discriminant would duplicate that fact.
- **Keeping `agent/queued` alongside the inbox events.** Rejected as a mirror: `agent/inbox/enqueue` is the same enqueue-time signal with the accepted routing facts, and the dequeue/discard events complete the FIFO lifecycle the single event could not describe.
- **A dedicated `MessageSource` kind `context`** for injected content. Rejected because `plugin` already means "not a human," so a fourth kind would add a parallel axis the authority checks would have to learn. Plugin-produced injected context supplies its plugin source explicitly.
- **A typed discriminant field on `UserMessageData`** (e.g. `origin: 'prompt' | 'context'`) to replace the event-type split. Rejected in favor of `source`, which every consumer already carries and which the goal system already keyed on; a second discriminant would duplicate that fact.
- **Keeping `agent/queued` alongside the inbox events.** Rejected as a mirror: `agent/inbox/enqueue` is the same enqueue-time signal with the resolved placement, and the dequeue/discard events complete the FIFO lifecycle the single event could not describe.
- **Derive inbox placement from agent status or the session log.** Rejected because `running` includes admission and settlement, while reconnect baselines need the original acceptance result even when the earlier turn boundary is absent. The producer already owns the exact routing decision.
## Consequences
The concrete driver has one delivery mechanism. Four common helpers hide its (`target` × `wakeup`) matrix behind caller intent, while `send` exposes the fully resolved matrix for advanced callers. One durable message type serves prompts, injected context, and goal rounds, so the surface projection and every human prompt? check simplify to a `source` test. The goal fold's channel split moves from event type to `source.round`, and every consumer that filtered `context/message` filters `user/message` by source. The turn-enclosure and reconstruction invariants are unchanged: an idle injection still wraps a one-shot turn, now emitting `user/message` instead of `context/message`.
The delivery surface is now one primitive plus three self-documenting presets, and the (`target` × `wakeup`) matrix makes previously-unreachable combinations explicit. One durable message type serves prompts, injected context, and goal rounds, so the surface projection and every "human prompt?" check simplify to a `source` test. The `Agent` contract remains an interface, so alternate implementations and object-literal test fakes implement the same minimal structural surface. The goal fold's channel split moved from event type to `source.round`, and every consumer that filtered `context/message` now filters `user/message` by source. An idle injection appends `user/message` between turns without opening a turn or running the model.
Internally, `wakeup` is the should the model run signal, so the inbox distinguishes `hasWakingQueued` (drives the loop and idle/quiescence decisions) from `hasQueued` (anything to dequeue): a lone `queue()` item stays parked at idle and rides along the next waking follow-up, and `whenIdle`/`cancel` settle quiescence off the waking signal (a lone quiet item takes `whenIdle`'s fast path, so no waiter is left hanging). `SendOptions.meta` on a queued or steering message is carried onto the durable `user/message`/`steering/message`, matching injection; it is intentionally absent from the live `AgentMessage`, which carries only routing facts. Every enqueued id gets exactly one terminal lifecycle event: a terminal stop that drops pending steering emits `agent/inbox/discard` both at the in-turn stop point and on the post-turn drain of late steering, and disposal discards any still-pending items before the loop exits. The `agent/inbox/*` payload is frozen so a listener cannot mutate the shared correlation object mid-dispatch, and a loop-authored continuation reason is snapshotted and frozen like public steering. Injection validates its payload before opening an idle one-shot turn; `InjectOptions` omits attached contexts, while the non-waking next-step variant of `ResolvedAgentInput` requires an empty context tuple.
`wakeup` is the "should the model run" signal, so the inbox distinguishes waking queued work from anything available to dequeue: a lone `next-turn`/no-wakeup item stays parked at idle and rides along the next waking send, and `whenIdle`/`cancel` settle quiescence off the waking signal. Every FIFO exit publishes exactly one lifecycle event, while domain-specific durable facts travel in typed message sources rather than a parallel metadata channel. The direct pending-item representation keeps public lifecycle events correlated without maintaining a second steering wrapper or allowing its durable data to diverge.
## Related
- [one-send-one-turn](../simplification/2026-07-17-one-send-one-turn.md) — the one-claimed-message-per-turn rule this builds on.
- [remove-agent-steering-mirror](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md) — the precedent for collapsing a mirrored live event.
- [explicit-turn-cancellation](2026-07-16-explicit-turn-cancellation.md) — the cancel-cause signal `keepInbox` extends.
- [intent-named-agent-delivery](2026-07-24-intent-named-agent-delivery.md) — the public helpers and fully resolved acceptance interface.

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# Agent Note: 统一 agent 投递并把注入的上下文合并进 user/message
# Agent Note: agent 投递统一到 send(target × wakeup) 并把注入的上下文合并进 user/message
Status: implemented
@@ -8,39 +8,45 @@ Status: implemented
agent 的对外驱动接口逐渐长出三个近乎平行的动词——`send``steer``inject`——各自带有独立的选项类型、独立的实时事件叙事,以及独立的持久事件。`send``steer` 都会把一条冻结的 inbox 记录入队并发出 `agent/queued``inject` 则绕过 inbox写入一条独立的 `context/message` 持久事件。这三个动词实际上只沿两条独立的轴变化:一个队列项加入哪个队列(一个全新的轮次,还是当前活跃的轮次),以及这个队列项是否让模型运行。把这个 2×2 编码成三个手写方法,掩盖了其中的对称性,让“排入一个轮次但不唤醒驱动器”无法表达,也让 `cancel()` 无从在保留排队工作的前提下中止一个轮次。
另外,`context/message``user/message` 已经趋同:对外接口把二者都投影为逐字的 user 角色内容,唯一真正的区别是注入的上下文携带 `source`/`meta` 且“不是提示词”。一个投影对应两种事件类型,意味着每个消费方都要根据事件类型分支来回答“这是不是一条人类提示词?”,而 goal 系统把这种类型区分当作侧信道使用(第 0 轮的状态变更是 `context/message`,已准入的轮次是 `user/message`)。
另外,`context/message``user/message` 已经趋同:对外接口把二者都投影为逐字的 user 角色内容,唯一真正的区别是注入的上下文携带非 user `source` 且“不是提示词”。一个投影对应两种事件类型,意味着每个消费方都要根据事件类型分支来回答“这是不是一条人类提示词?”,而 goal 系统把这种类型区分当作侧信道使用(第 0 轮的状态变更是 `context/message`,已准入的轮次是 `user/message`)。
## 决策
**一种接受机制,四种意图辅助方法。** 具体循环把 `followup``queue``steer``inject` 解析到同一个(`target` × `wakeup`)接受机制中。`followup``next-turn`/wakeup`queue``next-turn`/no-wakeup`steer``next-step`/wakeup`inject``next-step`/no-wakeup。公开的结构化接口将该机制暴露为 `send(ResolvedAgentInput)`;调用方若已持有完全解析的路由信息,即可使用该方法。使用时必须提供所有字段,可辨识输入类型也不允许注入携带附加上下文。取代旧接口的选择由[按意图命名的投递决策](2026-07-24-intent-named-agent-delivery.md)负责说明。内部的 `wakeup` 表示「让模型运行:为一条普通消息唤醒处于停泊状态的驱动器,或强制运行中的 steering 继续执行
**一个原语,三个预设别名。** `Agent` 接口的 `send(input, { target, wakeup })` 覆盖 (`target` × `wakeup`) 矩阵。其 `UserMessageData` 输入持有不可分割的模型可见 `content` 与生产方 `source`;完整的 `SendOptions` 只持有路由策略。`followup``next-turn`/wakeup)、`steer``next-step`/wakeup)和 `inject``next-step`/no-wakeup)都接收这一项输入并固定策略。`wakeup` 意为“让模型运行:为一`next-turn` 队列项唤醒处于停泊状态的驱动器,或为一个运行中的 `next-step` 队列项强制继续执行。`next-turn`/no-wakeup入队但不唤醒可以表达只是没有别名也没有当前调用方
**inject 保留其机制。** `inject` 在当前日志位置追加持久面向模型上下文(在执行中的工具批处理之后延迟处理),或在空闲时开启一个一次性的 `injection` 轮次。它完全绕过 FIFO不接受附加上下文并把来源默认设为 `{ kind: 'plugin', plugin: '' }`,绝不是 `{ kind: 'user' }`
**inject 保留其机制。** `next-step`/no-wakeup 路径正是旧的 `inject`持久面向模型上下文会追加到当前日志位置;提示词准入或一个轮次占有下一个安全边界时,它会延迟处理,而在该窗口之外则直接追加。它完全绕过 FIFO 队列,而必填的 `UserMessageData.source` 会保留调用方显式提供的来源信息
**context/message 已移除。** 注入的上下文现在是一条 `user/message`,其 `source` 为非 `user` 类别plugin 或 goal`PromptMessageData` 新增了 `context/message` 原本携带的可选 `meta`。对外接口、派生逻辑和 `SurfaceEventType` 都不再包含 `context/message`;需要判断“这是不是一条人类提示词?”的消费方改为读取 `source.kind === 'user'`,而不是事件类型。这让 goal-authority 的人类授权检查与此前一样严格——注入的消息默认使用 plugin 来源,永远无法满足 `source.kind === 'user'`
**context/message 已移除。** 注入的上下文现在是一条 `user/message`;上下文生产方显式提供合适的非 `user` 类别 `source`,类型化 source 变体携带所有特定于领域的持久来源信息。对外接口、派生逻辑和 `SurfaceEventType` 都不再包含 `context/message`;需要判断“这是不是一条人类提示词?”的消费方改为读取 `source.kind === 'user'`,而不是事件类型。
**goal 回放靠轮次而非类型来区分。** 一次 goal 状态变更是一条第 0 轮、来源为 goal 的 `user/message`携带 `goal/change` 元数据;正数轮次则是一条已准入的继续执行提示词。`decodeGoalEvent` 现在接收一条 `user/message`,并仍会在非 goal 来源携带 goal 元数据、或 goal 来源缺少元数据时立即报错。
**goal 回放靠轮次而非类型来区分。** 一次 goal 状态变更是一条第 0 轮、来源为 goal 的 `user/message`其 source 携带完整变更;正数轮次则是一条已准入的继续执行提示词。`decodeGoalEvent` 接收一条 `user/message`,并 goal 状态内容与其类型化 source 不一致时立即报错。
**投递返回一个 id。** 每种投递方法都为被接受的输入返回一个不透明的 branded `AgentMessageId`。FIFO 方法通过其 inbox 生命周期事件携带这个 id注入绕过这些事件
**`send` 返回一个 id。** `send`(以及其别名)为被接受的消息返回一个不透明的 branded `AgentMessageId``send` 此前的返回值是 `void`
**三个 inbox 事件取代 agent/queued。** `agent/inbox/enqueue`(一个队列项进入某个 FIFO`agent/inbox/dequeue`(驱动器认领了一个)和 `agent/inbox/discard``cancel()` 丢弃了待处理项)都携带一条 `AgentMessage`——即被接受消息,包含其返回的 `id`steering/wakeup 事实、来源和上下文——因此调用方可以把一个排队项与其生命周期关联起来。注入从不触及 FIFO也不发出这些事件中的任何一个。每一次 FIFO 入队都会发布一个 enqueue 事件,包括由 loop 生成的携带继续原因的 steer`agent/turn-continuation` 返回 `{ action: 'continue', reason }`,因此账目会与其后的 dequeue 或 discard 保持平衡。`dsh-agent` 的不变量配套断言 FIFO 守恒:一个按 agent 计的未结算计数dequeue 和 discard 永远无法把它压到负数。
**三个 inbox 事件取代 agent/queued。** `agent/inbox/enqueue`(一个队列项进入某个 FIFO`agent/inbox/dequeue`(驱动器认领了一个)和 `agent/inbox/discard``cancel()` 丢弃了待处理项)都将各自的 `AgentMessage` 载荷类型限定为仅包含被接受消息返回的 `id`内容和来源。enqueue 还会单独携带生产方在接受消息时捕获的已解析 `queued | steering` 放置方式,因此观察方和重连镜像永远不必根据后续状态或会话历史重建路由。注入从不触及 FIFO也不发出这些事件中的任何一个。每一次 FIFO 入队都会发布一个 enqueue 事件,包括 `agent/turn-stopping` 监听器提交的 steering,因此账目会与其后的 dequeue 或 discard 保持平衡。`dsh-agent` 的不变量配套断言 FIFO 守恒:一个按 agent 计的未结算计数dequeue 和 discard 永远无法把它压到负数。
**cancel 新增 keepInbox。** `cancel(cause?, { keepInbox? })`;当其为 true 时,它中止活跃轮次,但保留排队项和 steering 项(不发出 discard 事件,尚未启动的工作也不会被丢弃)
**准入接受 next-step 输入,但不会因此成为一个轮次。** 循环会在 `agent/prompt-submit` 前打开一个私有的 next-step 接受窗口,使其贯穿整个轮次,并在 `turn/end` 前关闭。因此,在准入期间收到的 steering 和注入会一起留在 outbox 中并加入获准轮次。如果准入被阻止或失败,仅含调用方上下文的批次会采用空闲注入的立即追加行为,而 steering 及与其一同暂存的上下文仍可重试;两种路径都不会写入被拒绝的提示词。后续提示词获准时,保留在 outbox 中的输入会先于该提示词进入其轮次,而当前准入期间接受的输入则留在提示词之后。在 `turn/end` 前关闭窗口,可以保留这样的规则:可重入的晚到 steering 会成为一个独立的排队轮次。`Agent.acceptsNextStep` 会公开一次 `next-step` 发送当前是否会加入该窗口;`status` 仍是更宽泛的活动信号,而非路由判据
**一条已接受消息只保留一种表示。** 持久的用户角色输入和附加的模型可见上下文都直接使用 `UserMessageData { content, source }`;公开的 `AgentMessage` 在此基础上增加用于关联的 `id`,循环私有的 `PendingMessage` 再增加 `wakeup`。循环会在发布、入队或立即追加前克隆并冻结 `UserMessageData`,因此调用方或观察方后续的修改无法改变已接受的值。一条成为 steering 的排队消息会以同一个 `PendingMessage` 对象进入 outbox而注入和工具产生的上下文则以普通 `UserMessageData` 进入。因此outbox 直接存储这两种类型的联合,而不再把 steering 与一份重复的内容和来源副本包装在一起。提供方原生的助手消息仍是适配器拥有的输出类型,不参与这套输入层级。
**空闲唤醒在接受之后发生。** 在发布 enqueue 前,一次会唤醒驱动器的排队发送会先取得完全停稳所有权,并把驱动器准入调度到一个会在该次发送返回 id 后运行的微任务中。因此,同一同步调用栈中的每次发送都会基于同一份准入前状态解析放置方式,而可重入的取消或拆除在已调度的准入结算前无法完成退役。空闲时的两次 `steer()` 调用会保留为两个 FIFO 轮次,而不会因第一次调用打开准入窗口而把第二次吸纳进去。
**cancel 新增 keepInbox。** `cancel(cause, { keepInbox? })`;调用方显式选择 cause`keepInbox: true` 会中止活跃轮次,同时保留排队项和 steering 项(不发出 discard 事件,尚未启动的工作也不会被丢弃)。
## 考虑过的替代方案
- **为注入内容设立专门的 `MessageSource` 类别 `context`。** 不予采纳,因为 `plugin` 已经表示“不是人类”,因此第四种类别会增加一条平行的轴,让授权检查不得不去学习它。注入上下文改为默认使用 plugin 来源。
- **在 `PromptMessageData` 上设一个类型化的判别字段**(例如 `origin: 'prompt' | 'context'`)来取代事件类型的区分。不予采纳,转而采用 `source`——每个消费方都已经携带它goal 系统也已经以它为键;第二个判别字段会重复这一事实。
- **在 inbox 事件之外保留 `agent/queued`。** 作为镜像而被否决:`agent/inbox/enqueue` 是同一个入队时刻的信号,只是多带了已接受的路由事实,而 dequeue/discard 事件补全了单个事件无法描述的 FIFO 生命周期。
- **为注入内容设立专门的 `MessageSource` 类别 `context`。** 不予采纳,因为 `plugin` 已经表示“不是人类”,因此第四种类别会增加一条平行的轴,让授权检查不得不去学习它。由插件产生的注入上下文会显式提供其 plugin 来源。
- **在 `UserMessageData` 上设一个类型化的判别字段**(例如 `origin: 'prompt' | 'context'`)来取代事件类型的区分。不予采纳,转而采用 `source`——每个消费方都已经携带它goal 系统也已经以它为键;第二个判别字段会重复这一事实。
- **在 inbox 事件之外保留 `agent/queued`。** 作为镜像而被否决:`agent/inbox/enqueue` 是同一个入队时刻的信号,只是带有已解析的放置方式,而 dequeue/discard 事件补全了单个事件无法描述的 FIFO 生命周期。
- **根据 agent 状态或会话日志推导 inbox 放置方式。** 不予采纳,因为 `running` 同时涵盖准入与结算,而重连基线即使缺少此前的轮次边界,也需要最初的接受结果。生产方已经拥有精确的路由决策。
## 后果
具体驱动器只有一个投递机制。四种常用辅助方法以调用方意图封装其(`target` × `wakeup`)矩阵,而 `send` 则向高级调用方暴露完全解析后的矩阵。一种持久消息类型同时服务提示词、注入的上下文和 goal 轮次,因此对外接口的投影和每一处是否人类提示词?检查都简化为一次 `source` 判断。goal 折叠的通道区分从事件类型改到 `source.round`此前过滤 `context/message` 的每个消费方改为按来源过滤 `user/message`轮次封闭与重建的不变量保持不变:空闲状态下的一次注入仍然封装成一个一次性轮次,只是现在发出 `user/message` 而非 `context/message`
投递接口现在是一个原语加三个自解释的预设,(`target` × `wakeup`) 矩阵把此前无法表达的组合显式化。一种持久消息类型同时服务提示词、注入的上下文和 goal 轮次,因此对外接口的投影和每一处是否人类提示词?检查都简化为一次 `source` 判断。`Agent` 契约仍是接口,因此其他实现和对象字面量形式的测试替身只需实现同一个最小结构接口。goal 折叠的通道区分从事件类型改到 `source.round`此前过滤 `context/message` 的每个消费方现在改为按来源过滤 `user/message`空闲状态下的注入会在两个轮次之间追加 `user/message`,既不打开轮次,也不运行模型
在内部,`wakeup` 是“模型是否应当运行”的信号,因此 inbox 区分 `hasWakingQueued`(驱动 loop 以及空闲/静默判定)与 `hasQueued`(是否有任何可 dequeue 的项:一个孤立的 `queue()` 项会停泊在空闲状态,并随下一条会唤醒驱动器的后续消息一同带出,而 `whenIdle`/`cancel` 依据唤醒信号来结算静默(一个孤立的静默项走 `whenIdle` 的快速路径,因此不会让任何等待者悬而未决)。排队消息或 steering 消息上的 `SendOptions.meta` 会被带到持久的 `user/message`/`steering/message` 上,与注入保持一致;它有意不放在实时的 `AgentMessage` 上,后者只携带路由事实。每个已入队的 id 都恰好得到一个终止性生命周期事件:一次会丢弃待处理 steering 项的终止性停止会为它发出 `agent/inbox/discard`,既在轮次内的停止点,也在轮次结束后对迟到 steering 的清空时dispose资源释放会在 loop 退出前丢弃所有仍在等待的项。`agent/inbox/*` 的事件载荷已被冻结,因此监听器无法在分发中途修改共享的关联对象,而由 loop 生成的继续原因会像公开 steering 一样被快照并冻结。注入会在打开空闲状态的一次性轮次之前校验其载荷;`InjectOptions` 不包含附加上下文,而 `ResolvedAgentInput` 中不唤醒的下一步变体要求使用空上下文元组
`wakeup` 是“模型是否应当运行”的信号,因此 inbox 区分能唤醒的排队工作与任何可 dequeue 的项:一个孤立的 `next-turn`/no-wakeup 队列项会停泊在空闲状态,并随下一次唤醒 send 一同带出,而 `whenIdle`/`cancel` 依据唤醒信号来结算静默。每一次 FIFO 退出都恰好发布一个生命周期事件,特定于领域的持久事实则通过类型化消息 source 传递,而非通过平行的元数据通道。直接使用待处理项的表示方式,使公开生命周期事件保持可关联,既无需维护第二个 steering 包装层,也避免其持久数据发生分歧
## 相关
- [one-send-one-turn](../simplification/2026-07-17-one-send-one-turn.md)——本决策所依托的“每轮次只认领一条消息”规则。
- [remove-agent-steering-mirror](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md)——折叠镜像实时事件的先例。
- [explicit-turn-cancellation](2026-07-16-explicit-turn-cancellation.md)——`keepInbox` 所扩展的取消原因信号。
- [intent-named-agent-delivery](2026-07-24-intent-named-agent-delivery.md)——公开辅助方法以及接受完全解析输入的接口。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-23-client-plugin-loading-model.md: 3513e026785fc366455bb32bf788a3a098275bb1
2026-07-23-client-plugin-loading-model.zh.md: f31a1b076a5d93db44c67463730b38283d44ff7f
2026-07-23-client-plugin-loading-model.md: 4028f50bf5cf8a05063df3bf5e2b4b7f45a3c02e
2026-07-23-client-plugin-loading-model.zh.md: 7dc96b47c950af07adb71ba7fe131d53e5c0e51d

View File

@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ The first-generation client loader (`createClientLoader`) hand-wrote both layers
What makes a package a plugin? One rule: **a package is a plugin package once its consumption is cordis dependency injection; until then it is a plain package.** How code reaches the page is not part of the taxonomy — arrival follows from the kind instead of defining it.
- **Plain packages** are the absolute base the module system itself needs, plus libraries not yet converted to DI: the react family, cordis, `@deepseek-ai/dsh-client-modules` (the module system itself — it can never be a plugin, because modules precede all modules), the web shell kernel, and — for now — ui-slots, web-react, ui-primitives. Plain packages are shell-bundled, seeded into the module table, and invisible to the host graph.
- **Plugin packages** are everything else. Each one carries a `dshClient` manifest declaration (`{ platform, inject, immediately? }`) and one uniform shape: the shared tsdown preset emits `lib/client.js`, and `exports["./client"]` points at that bundle. Each is a governed entry of the host-authored graph. Nine exist today: connection, runtime, ui-theme, i18n, hmr (dev graphs only), ui-layout, ui-sidebar, ui-conversation, ui-trajectory.
- **Plugin packages** are everything else. Each one carries a `dshClient` manifest declaration (`{ platform, inject, immediately? }`) and one uniform shape: the shared tsdown preset emits `lib/client.js`, and `exports["./client"]` points at that bundle. Each is a governed entry of the host-authored graph. The current set is connection, runtime, ui-theme, i18n, hmr (dev graphs only), ui-layout, ui-sidebar, ui-conversation, ui-model-selector, ui-question, and ui-trajectory.
The manifest owns the package's loading contract: its `inject` dependency edges, plus the optional `immediately` prefetch mark (absent means lazy). The composing app owns only the roster and the `--dev` switch.
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Four edge rules govern imports across the two kinds. None of them depends on any
- **Plugin ↔ plugin value imports are a build error.** This holds regardless of either side's `immediately` declaration — the rule must not depend on a mark someone can flip. Cooperation goes through cordis inject/services. `import type` is exempt; the type chain is untouched. This rule is why `scopeOf` is a `SessionsService` method and why `transportError` lives in `dsh-host-apiproxy`'s wire layer (its `RpcResult` home, inline-safe).
- **Plugin → plain package value imports are externals**, judged against the platform list. That list is one constant in the shell (`platform.ts`: react family, cordis, ui-slots, web-react, ui-primitives), imported by both the tsdown preset (for the external judgement) and `seed.ts` (for the table warm-up). One constant, two consumers — the hand-sync drift class stays dead.
- **The purity gate covers all nine plugin packages.** Its three branches: platform imports become externals; INLINE_SAFE wire layers are inlined; any other workspace leak is a build error. The uniform bundle shape is what makes this coverage total — every plugin builds through the same preset, so no package can sit outside the gate.
- **The purity gate covers every plugin package.** Its three branches: platform imports become externals; INLINE_SAFE wire layers are inlined; any other workspace leak is a build error. The uniform bundle shape is what makes this coverage total — every plugin builds through the same preset, so no package can sit outside the gate.
- **The shell is self-sufficient.** The kernel (boot + loading page) value-imports no plugin package; its status stores are hand-rolled. The fail-loud presentation must not depend on the system whose failure it reports.
### One module system, one plugin governor
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ On the browser side, the driver reloads one plugin per frame, serialized:
6. `entry.refresh()` — re-imports, materializing the fresh factory. CSS re-injects here, under the same stable tag ids.
7. `fiber.await()` — rethrows loud.
All nine plugins share this one semantics; an `immediately` row reloads exactly like a lazy one. Dependency cascade costs zero client code: a fiber's activation epoch strings its service providers' uids, so replacing a provider's fiber re-loads every dependent through cordis itself. Reloading connection or runtime cascades the whole UI — correct, if heavy.
Every plugin shares this one semantics; an `immediately` row reloads exactly like a lazy one. Dependency cascade costs zero client code: a fiber's activation epoch strings its service providers' uids, so replacing a provider's fiber re-loads every dependent through cordis itself. Reloading connection or runtime cascades the whole UI — correct, if heavy.
The support boundary, stated honestly. Reload is coarse by design: fresh fiber, fresh components, React state lost, data layer untouched — react-refresh-grade state preservation conflicts with "re-executing the bundle re-runs the factory" and is deliberately out. Plain packages (react family, shell kernel, not-yet-promoted libraries) are not entries: changing them means a shell rebuild and a full page reload. No rollback in v1: an import failure leaves the entry fiberless and the next rebuilt frame retries from scratch; an apply failure leaves a FAILED fiber for the status projection; both log loudly. Self-reload works — the in-flight reload finishes in the old bundle's closure and the new apply opens a fresh SSE channel — but frames arriving in the gap are lost, and the next rebuild renotifies. One known dev-only race: a rebuilt frame overlapping a still-in-flight boot arrival shares that arrival's task and may materialize the pre-rebuild bytes; the next frame self-heals.

View File

@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ host 侧cordis 插件装载站在 Node 的模块机制之上——require cac
什么让一个包成为插件?只有一条规则:**一个包的消费方式一旦是 cordis 依赖注入,它就是插件包;在此之前它是普通包。**代码怎么到达页面不属于分类体系——到达方式由包的类别推得,而不是反过来定义类别。
- **普通包**是模块系统自身所需的绝对基座,加上尚未转成 DI 的库react 家族、cordis、`@deepseek-ai/dsh-client-modules`模块系统本身——它永远不可能是插件因为模块先于一切模块、web 壳内核以及——暂时——ui-slots、web-react、ui-primitives。普通包打进壳 bundle、播种进模块表、对 host 图不可见。
- **插件包**是其余一切。每个都携带 `dshClient` manifest元数据清单声明`{ platform, inject, immediately? }`)和同一种统一形态:共享 tsdown 预设产出 `lib/client.js``exports["./client"]` 指向该 bundle。每个都是 host 独家撰写的图里受治理的 entry。现有九个connection、runtime、ui-theme、i18n、hmr仅进 dev 图、ui-layout、ui-sidebar、ui-conversation、ui-trajectory。
- **插件包**是其余一切。每个都携带 `dshClient` manifest元数据清单声明`{ platform, inject, immediately? }`)和同一种统一形态:共享 tsdown 预设产出 `lib/client.js``exports["./client"]` 指向该 bundle。每个都是 host 独家撰写的图里受治理的 entry。当前包括connection、runtime、ui-theme、i18n、hmr仅进 dev 图、ui-layout、ui-sidebar、ui-conversation、ui-model-selector、ui-question、ui-trajectory。
manifest 拥有包的装载契约:它的 `inject` 依赖边,加可选的 `immediately` 预取标记(缺省即 lazy。负责组合的 app 只拥有名册与 `--dev` 开关。
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ manifest 拥有包的装载契约:它的 `inject` 依赖边,加可选的 `im
- **插件 ↔ 插件的值 import 是构建错误。**与两侧的 `immediately` 声明无关——规则不得依赖一个人人可翻转的标记。协作走 cordis inject/服务。`import type` 豁免;类型链分毫未动。这条规则正是 `scopeOf``SessionsService` 方法、`transportError` 住在 `dsh-host-apiproxy` wire 层(它的 `RpcResult` 老家,内联安全)的原因。
- **插件 → 普通包的值 import 外置为 external**,按平台清单判定。清单是壳里的一个常量(`platform.ts`react 家族、cordis、ui-slots、web-react、ui-primitivestsdown 预设external 判定)与 `seed.ts`(模块表预热)都 import 它。一个常量、两个消费方——人肉同步这一漂移缺陷类死透。
- **纯度门禁覆盖全部九个插件包。**它的三条分支:平台 import 外置为 externalINLINE_SAFE wire 层内联;其余任何 workspace 泄漏即构建错误。正是统一的 bundle 形态让这一覆盖不留死角——每个插件都经同一预设构建,没有包能坐在门禁之外。
- **纯度门禁覆盖个插件包。**它的三条分支:平台 import 外置为 externalINLINE_SAFE wire 层内联;其余任何 workspace 泄漏即构建错误。正是统一的 bundle 形态让这一覆盖不留死角——每个插件都经同一预设构建,没有包能坐在门禁之外。
- **壳自足。**内核boot + loading 页)对任何插件包零值 import其状态 store 为手写。大声失败的呈现不得依赖它所报告失败的那个系统。
### 一套模块系统,一个插件治理器
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ vendored Loader 经其 `internal` seam 消费模块系统——唯一调用点
6. `entry.refresh()`——重新 import物化新工厂。CSS 在这里重新注入,沿用同一批稳定标签 id。
7. `fiber.await()`——让失败大声重抛。
个插件共享同一套语义;`immediately` 行的重载与 lazy 行分毫不差。依赖级联不花一行 client 代码fiber 的激活纪元串接着它各服务提供方的 uid因此换掉提供方的 fiber每个依赖方都会经 cordis 本身重新装载。重载 connection 或 runtime 会级联整个 UI——正确虽然重。
个插件共享同一套语义;`immediately` 行的重载与 lazy 行分毫不差。依赖级联不花一行 client 代码fiber 的激活纪元串接着它各服务提供方的 uid因此换掉提供方的 fiber每个依赖方都会经 cordis 本身重新装载。重载 connection 或 runtime 会级联整个 UI——正确虽然重。
支持边界,如实陈述。重载粒度刻意做粗:全新 fiber、全新组件、React 状态丢失、数据层不动——react-refresh 级的状态保留与「重执行 bundle 即重跑工厂」相冲突属刻意不做。普通包react 家族、壳内核、尚未升格的库)不是 entry改它们意味着壳重建加整页刷新。v1 不做回滚import 失败让 entry 失去 fiber下一个 rebuilt 帧从头重试apply 失败留下 FAILED fiber 交给状态投影;两者都大声记录。自我重载可行——在途的重载在旧 bundle 的闭包里跑完,新的 apply 再开一条新 SSE 通道——但空窗期到达的帧会丢失,下次重建会再次通知。一处已知的仅限 dev 竞态rebuilt 帧与仍在途的 boot 到达重叠时共享那次到达的任务,可能物化重建前的字节;下一帧自愈。

View File

@@ -1,52 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Name public agent delivery by intent
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-24-intent-named-agent-delivery.zh.md)
## Problem
A configurable `send(content, { target?, wakeup?, ... })` makes every caller learn the loop's routing matrix, its defaults, and the interaction between active-turn targeting and model activation. Optional routing fields also let advanced-looking calls silently become ordinary sends. Most callers have one semantic intent, while some adapters already possess exact routing facts and should not have to reverse-map them into a helper name.
Sharing helper implementations through an abstract `Agent` class also makes the public seam nominal in practice. Object-literal adapters and tests must inherit prototype methods even though the package promises a swappable structural handle. The shared base exists only to forward fixed arguments, while the concrete loop remains the sole production adapter.
## Decision
`Agent` is a structural interface with four intent-named delivery helpers:
- `followup()` queues an ordinary turn and wakes the driver.
- `queue()` queues an ordinary turn without waking an idle driver.
- `steer()` targets the running turn and requests another step; while idle it becomes a waking ordinary turn.
- `inject()` appends model-facing context without running the model.
`followup`, `queue`, and `steer` accept `SendOptions`; `inject` accepts `InjectOptions`, which omits attached contexts because injection has no inbox item to own them. `followup` names the waking next-turn operation used for both initial prompts and later independent prompts.
`Agent` also exposes `send(ResolvedAgentInput)` for callers that already hold the complete route. Every field is mandatory: content, source, contexts, metadata (possibly `undefined`), target, and wakeup. The discriminated union requires the empty context tuple for non-waking next-step injection. `ReactLoopAgent` implements this method once, and all four helpers resolve their defaults before delegating to it. The method accepts the delivery facts as one resolved input; acceptance can still lead to later dequeue, discard, or durable injection rather than eventual delivery.
The target/wakeup matrix is an explicit advanced part of the structural `Agent` interface, not the ordinary helper options and not a base-class implementation seam. With one concrete adapter, a protected subclass seam would be hypothetical; callers and tests use the same public interface.
## Alternatives considered
**Keep the resolved primitive private.** This minimizes the public method count, but forces adapters that already hold exact target/wakeup facts to reverse-map them into helper calls and removes the reusable type for that resolved state.
**Use configurable `send(content, options)` as the primitive.** Optional routing fields would let advanced-looking calls silently become ordinary sends. One mandatory discriminated input keeps the resolved route explicit and rejects attached contexts on injection.
**Name the primitive `acceptInput`, `sendInternal`, or `addMessageAdvanced`.** `acceptInput` describes the synchronous acceptance boundary but not the caller's delivery action. A public method must not describe itself as internal, and `addMessageAdvanced` is inaccurate because the input may later be discarded.
**Use `send(content, options)` as the waking-turn helper.** This reserves the shortest delivery name for one preset and forces callers with complete target/wakeup facts through a less direct primitive name. `followup` distinguishes the next-turn/wakeup intent while leaving `send` for the resolved operation.
**Bind source first through a public sender object.** A source-bound adapter can make attribution explicit for repeated producers, but it adds another public object and does not simplify one-off human input. The existing source default remains, with the standing requirement that non-human producers label their content.
## Verification
Focused agent-loop coverage exercises direct fully resolved acceptance, waking sends, quiet queues, active and idle steering, injection, source/context snapshots, cancellation, and inbox lifecycle correlation through the public methods. Type-level coverage uses structural `Agent` fakes, requires every `ResolvedAgentInput` field, requires empty contexts on its injection variant, and keeps routing fields out of `SendOptions`. The keyless Cordis inspection snapshot pins the structural interface without an abstract-class implementation.
## Consequences
Ordinary callers choose one verb instead of encoding two routing axes; advanced callers may submit the exact discriminated route. The concrete loop retains one acceptance path and one ownership boundary, while the structural interface preserves simple adapters and fakes. Adding a common delivery intent still requires an explicit public helper and mapping rather than another optional matrix combination.
The advanced method adds interface surface and requires structural fakes to implement it. In return, resolved routing has one typed representation, while helper defaults and mappings stay beside the only implementation that owns them.
## Related
- [unified delivery and coalesced user messages](2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md) owns the shared acceptance mechanism, inbox lifecycle, and durable event convergence this decision narrows at the public seam.

View File

@@ -1,52 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 按意图命名公开的 agent 投递
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-24-intent-named-agent-delivery.md) | 中文
## 问题
可配置的 `send(content, { target?, wakeup?, ... })` 会迫使每个调用方理解循环的路由矩阵、默认值,以及活跃轮次目标与模型激活之间的相互作用。可选路由字段还会让看似高级的调用悄然变成普通投递。大多数调用方只有一种语义意图,而有些适配器已经持有确切的路由信息,不应再被迫将这些信息反向映射为某个辅助方法名称。
通过抽象 `Agent` 类共享辅助方法的实现,实际上也会让公开 seam 具有名义类型约束。对象字面量适配器和测试必须继承原型方法,尽管该包承诺提供一个可替换的结构化句柄。共享基类只负责转发固定参数,而具体循环仍是唯一的生产适配器。
## 决策
`Agent` 是一个结构化接口,提供四种按意图命名的投递辅助方法:
- `followup()` 将一个普通轮次入队并唤醒驱动器。
- `queue()` 将一个普通轮次入队,但不唤醒空闲驱动器。
- `steer()` 以运行中的轮次为目标并请求另一个步骤;空闲时,它会变成一个唤醒式普通轮次。
- `inject()` 追加面向模型的上下文,但不运行模型。
`followup``queue``steer` 接收 `SendOptions``inject` 接收 `InjectOptions`,后者不包含附加上下文,因为注入没有 inbox 项来拥有它们。`followup` 为唤醒式下一轮操作命名,这项操作既用于初始提示词,也用于后续的独立提示词。
`Agent` 还公开 `send(ResolvedAgentInput)`,供已经持有完整路由的调用方使用。每个字段都必须提供:内容、来源、上下文、元数据(可以是 `undefined`)、目标和唤醒标志。对于目标为下一步且不触发唤醒的注入,可辨识联合类型要求上下文为空元组。`ReactLoopAgent` 统一实现这个方法;四个辅助方法都会先解析各自的默认值,再委托给它。调用方以一个解析后的输入向该方法提交各项投递事实;接受之后,工作仍可能在稍后出队、被丢弃或持久注入,而不是最终必然送达。
结构化 `Agent` 接口显式包含面向高级用法的 target/wakeup 矩阵;该矩阵不属于普通辅助方法的选项,也不是基类实现 seam。只有一个具体适配器时protected 子类 seam 只是假想的;调用方和测试使用同一个公开接口。
## 考虑过的替代方案
**让解析后的原语保持私有。** 这会把公开方法数量降到最低,但会迫使已经持有精确 target/wakeup 路由信息的适配器将其反向映射为辅助方法调用,也会移除表示该解析后状态的可复用类型。
**使用可配置的 `send(content, options)` 作为原语。** 可选路由字段会让看似高级的调用悄然变成普通投递。一个各字段均为必填项的可辨识输入既能让解析后的路由保持显式,也会拒绝为注入附加上下文。
**把原语命名为 `acceptInput`、`sendInternal` 或 `addMessageAdvanced`。** `acceptInput` 描述了同步接受边界,却没有描述调用方的投递操作。公开方法不应在名称中把自己称为内部方法,`addMessageAdvanced` 也不准确,因为输入可能在之后被丢弃。
**使用 `send(content, options)` 作为唤醒轮次的辅助方法。** 这会让最简短的投递名称只表示一种预设操作,并迫使持有完整 target/wakeup 信息的调用方改用一个不够直接的原语名称。`followup` 明确区分下一轮/唤醒意图,并把 `send` 留给解析后的操作。
**先通过公开的发送方对象绑定来源。** 对于重复产生消息的来源,来源绑定适配器可以明确标注归属,但它会增加一个公开对象,也不会简化一次性的人类输入。现有的来源默认值予以保留,同时继续要求非人类生产方标注其内容。
## 验证
聚焦的 agent-loop 覆盖率测试通过公开方法覆盖直接接受完全解析的输入、唤醒式投递、静默排队、活跃与空闲状态下的 steering中途引导、注入、来源与上下文快照、取消以及 inbox 生命周期关联。类型级覆盖使用结构化 `Agent` 测试替身,要求提供 `ResolvedAgentInput` 的每个字段,要求其注入变体的上下文为空,并确保 `SendOptions` 不包含路由字段。无密钥的 Cordis 检查快照固定了不采用抽象类实现的结构化接口。
## 后果
普通调用方选择一个动词即可,无需编码两条路由轴;高级调用方则可提交经过判别的精确路由。具体循环保留一条接受路径和一个归属边界,而结构化接口保留了对简单适配器和测试替身的支持。新增一种常见投递意图时,仍需要显式提供公开辅助方法及其映射,而不是再增加一种可选的矩阵组合。
这个高级方法会扩大接口范围,并要求结构化测试替身实现它。作为回报,解析后的路由只有一种类型化表示,而辅助方法的默认值和映射仍留在拥有它们的唯一实现旁边。
## 相关
- [统一投递并合并 user 消息](2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md)负责定义共享的接受机制、inbox 生命周期和持久事件趋同;本决策只收窄它们的公开 seam。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-24-separate-context-injection-from-turn-execution.md
2026-07-24-separate-context-injection-from-turn-execution.md: b74cd6bdc48e795e57d780ab31a907ffe94dd518
2026-07-24-separate-context-injection-from-turn-execution.zh.md: f2421d2fc7b8c1329dd1349a6fb088407ac5fc75

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
# Agent Note: Separate context injection from turn execution
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-24-separate-context-injection-from-turn-execution.zh.md)
## Problem
The agent API represented supplementary model-facing input in three overlapping ways: callers attached `HookContext[]` through `SendOptions.contexts`, interception and tool hooks returned `additionalContexts`, and plugins called `agent.inject()`. These paths eventually wrote context into the same model history, but carried different placement, metadata, admission, queue, and turn-lifecycle rules.
Atomic attachment to an inbox message forced the loop to preserve context through prompt admission, steering conversion, cancellation, and terminal discard. `prompt-prefix` placement then combined context and the direct prompt into one event, requiring a model-hidden envelope so transcript consumers could recover what the user actually wrote. The result made outbox entries, session projection, and UI replay responsible for a distinction that belongs to the producer.
Idle `inject()` exposed a second mismatch. Injection did not request model execution, yet the implementation opened and closed a zero-step `injection` turn solely to satisfy the turn-enclosure invariant and obtain a durability checkpoint. A turn therefore sometimes meant “run the agent loop” and sometimes meant “persist context without running it.”
`HookContext` also named its producer rather than its role. The value could come from a native plugin, a hook bridge, prompt admission, or tool post-processing; its stable meaning was additional model-facing context with provenance.
## Decision
`inject()` is the only caller-facing operation for supplementary model-facing input, and a turn means one execution of the model loop.
`SendOptions` contains only `target` and `wakeup`. A caller that owns context delivers `UserMessageData` through `inject()` and submits the direct message independently with `send()` or `steer()`.
Prompt and tool extension points still return `additionalContexts`. These values are outputs of the extension point, not attachments captured from a caller's inbox item. Prompt admission runs before `run()` opens a turn. An allowed prompt and its returned additional contexts enter the new turn as separate messages; a blocked prompt writes neither and opens no turn. Tool-produced additional contexts enter the outbox after the corresponding tool results.
Every additional context is an independent `user/message` whose `source` records provenance. There is no `context/message`, prompt-prefix placement, stable request delimiter, or prompt envelope. Transcript and UI consumers distinguish direct user messages from injected context by `source`.
## Injection lifecycle
During prompt admission or an open turn, `inject()` stages context in the loop outbox. The private next-step acceptance window opens before `agent/prompt-submit` and closes before `turn/end`, so steering and context accepted for one boundary reach the same following request while a `turn/end` listener's late steering becomes a queued prompt. The loop drains the outbox at a safe step boundary, preserving tool protocol adjacency: context accepted during an assistant tool-call batch appears only after that batch's complete ordered results.
Outside that window, `inject()` appends its `user/message` immediately. It does not increment turn numbering, emit `turn/start` or `turn/end`, change agent status, or run the model; persistence observes the append through `session/event`.
If prompt admission blocks or fails, a caller-staged context-only batch appends immediately without a turn. Steering and context staged beside it remain in the outbox for a later admitted prompt; cancellation or disposal may discard them. Hook-produced `additionalContexts` never materialize because they belong to the rejected admission decision.
The session invariant permits `user/message` between turns while continuing to require turn enclosure for execution events, steering, assistant output, tools, and package-added events by default. Persistence, recovery, resume, fork, and compaction treat a valid out-of-turn `user/message` as committed session history rather than an interrupted or discardable turn tail.
## Extension and caller semantics
`PromptDecision.content` continues to replace only the direct prompt. `PromptDecision.additionalContexts` and tool-result `additionalContexts` retain FIFO order and individual provenance, but no longer select placement. A waterfall listener that delegates with `next()` must preserve downstream prompt content and additional contexts unless it intentionally returns replacements.
Caller-driven injection and hook-produced additional context deliberately have different admission ownership. A hook's additional contexts materialize only after that hook allows the prompt or tool result. Outside a next-step acceptance window, a caller that invokes `inject(context)` and then `send(prompt)` commits context independently; callers requiring all-or-nothing behavior use a domain-specific admission wrapper.
Cross-session references use that domain composition: TUI prepares the snapshot, then either adds it to the prompt's admission decision outside an acceptance window or injects it beside steering during one. The target log contains two simple messages, so later source mutation cannot change replay and transcript consumers do not need a prompt envelope. This supersedes the attachment mechanism in the [cross-session reference decision](../feature/2026-07-21-cross-session-references.md) while retaining its snapshot and trust-boundary rules.
This decision preserves the caller-owned framing decision from [unwrapped injected content](../simplification/2026-07-20-unwrap-injected-content-envelopes.md), the one-item turn rule from [one send, one turn](../simplification/2026-07-17-one-send-one-turn.md), and narrows the [turn-enclosure decision](2026-06-15-turn-enclosure-invariant.md) so turns enclose execution rather than every session event.
## Alternatives considered
**Keep `SendOptions.contexts` as an atomic attachment.** This preserves all-or-nothing delivery when prompt admission blocks, but it keeps context inside inbox lifecycle state and requires every queue transition and observation event to carry it. The generic agent API should not encode a domain transaction that most callers can express as context injection followed by message delivery.
**Keep a distinct `context/message` session event.** A separate event makes the out-of-turn exception narrower, but user-role model input would again have two event types with identical projection. `user/message.source` already carries the distinction needed by policy, transcript, and replay consumers.
**Keep one-shot turns for idle injection.** This retains universal turn enclosure and a convenient flush boundary, but it makes turn counts and turn observers report work that never ran the model. Durability is an independent session concern and can be awaited without fabricating execution.
**Keep `prompt-prefix` as an optional placement.** Prefix baking can make the context and request appear in one provider message, but it introduces a second representation of the direct prompt and spreads placement handling across admission, steering, logging, replay, and UI code. Producers that require textual framing may include it in their own context content.
**Let hooks call `inject()` directly instead of returning additional contexts.** Direct injection would erase the extension point's admission ownership: a listener could append context before a downstream listener blocks the operation. Returning `additionalContexts` keeps the waterfall result authoritative while sharing the same post-admission outbox path.
## Verification
- `SendOptions` and steering inbox records contain no attached contexts; `agent/inbox/enqueue` reports only the message plus its resolved queued-or-steering placement.
- `UserMessageData` is the shared shape across prompt interception, tool execution, hook bridges, guards, and context producers.
- Prompt-prefix placement, prompt envelopes, and `context/message` are absent from public types, durable events, projection, and UI replay.
- Idle `inject()` appends one sourced `user/message` without a turn or model call.
- Admission-time and active-turn injection drain at safe boundaries after complete tool-result batches and before the request that consumes them.
- Blocked prompt admission opens no turn and appends neither the prompt nor hook-produced additional contexts; caller context alone falls back to an idle append, while a steering boundary remains available to retry.
- Unit, persistence/resume, invariant, host/client queue, and TUI coverage pin event order, admission ownership, and reconnect classification.
## Consequences
- One surface event is valid outside turns, so persistence scanning, crash repair, forking, compaction, and session queries distinguish execution enclosure from session history.
- Consecutive user-role messages replace one baked prompt message; provider adapters preserve that ordering.
- Outside an acceptance window, `inject()` followed by a blocked `send()` leaves context without its intended direct prompt unless the caller supplies domain-specific admission ownership.
- The public delivery contract and inbox records remain small: no context attachment, context-placement metadata, prompt envelope, or duplicate durable event type.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
# Agent Note: 将上下文注入与轮次执行分离
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-24-separate-context-injection-from-turn-execution.md) | 中文
## 问题
agent API 曾用三种相互重叠的方式表示面向模型的补充输入:调用方通过 `SendOptions.contexts` 附加 `HookContext[]`,拦截钩子和工具钩子返回 `additionalContexts`,插件则调用 `agent.inject()`。这些路径最终都把上下文写入同一份模型历史,但各自携带不同的放置、元数据、准入、队列和轮次生命周期规则。
将上下文原子附加到收件箱消息后agent loop智能体循环曾被迫让上下文跟随提示词准入、steering中途引导转换、取消和终止丢弃的完整生命周期。`prompt-prefix` 放置方式又曾把上下文与直接提示词合并为一个事件,因此 transcript文本记录消费方不得不依赖模型不可见的封套才能还原用户实际输入。这样一来outbox 条目、会话投影和 UI 回放都曾负责处理本应由生产方负责的区分。
空闲状态下的 `inject()` 还暴露了另一处语义错位。注入当时并不请求模型执行,但实现仅为了满足轮次封闭不变量并获得持久性检查点,就会打开并关闭一个零步骤的 `injection` 轮次。于是,当时的轮次有时表示「运行 agent loop」有时却表示「不运行 agent仅持久化上下文」。
`HookContext` 的名字也描述了生产方而非该值的职责。它可能来自原生插件、hook bridge、提示词准入或工具后处理其稳定含义是带来源信息的额外模型上下文。
## 决策
`inject()` 是调用方交付补充模型输入的唯一操作,而轮次表示一次模型循环执行。
`SendOptions` 只包含 `target``wakeup`。拥有上下文的调用方通过 `inject()` 交付 `UserMessageData`,再独立使用 `send()``steer()` 提交直接消息。
提示词和工具扩展点仍可返回 `additionalContexts`。这些值是扩展点的输出,而不是从调用方收件箱条目捕获的附件。提示词准入在 `run()` 打开轮次之前执行。获准的提示词及其返回的额外上下文会作为独立消息进入新轮次;提示词被阻止时,两者都不写入,也不打开轮次。工具产生的额外上下文则在对应工具结果之后进入 outbox。
每项额外上下文都是独立的 `user/message`,并由 `source` 记录来源。不再有 `context/message`、prompt-prefix 放置方式、稳定请求分隔符或提示词封套。transcript 与 UI 消费方通过 `source` 区分直接用户消息和注入上下文。
## 注入生命周期
提示词准入期间或轮次打开时,`inject()` 会将上下文暂存在 loop outbox 中。私有的 next-step 接受窗口在 `agent/prompt-submit` 前打开,并在 `turn/end` 前关闭,因此同一边界接受的 steering 和上下文会进入后续同一次请求,而 `turn/end` 监听器提交的晚到 steering 则成为排队提示词。agent loop 会在安全的步骤边界排空 outbox同时保持工具协议要求的相邻关系在助手工具调用批次期间接受的上下文只能出现在该批次所有有序结果之后。
在该窗口之外,`inject()` 会立即追加对应的 `user/message`。它不会增加轮次编号、发出 `turn/start``turn/end`、改变 agent 状态,也不会运行模型;持久化通过 `session/event` 观察这次追加。
如果提示词准入被阻止或失败调用方暂存的仅含上下文的批次会立即追加且不产生轮次。steering 及与其一同暂存的上下文会留在 outbox 中,供后续获准提示词使用;取消或 dispose资源释放可能丢弃它们。钩子产生的 `additionalContexts` 属于被拒绝的准入决策,因此永远不会落入日志。
会话不变量允许 `user/message` 位于两个轮次之间同时继续要求执行事件、steering、助手输出、工具事件以及默认的包扩展事件均受轮次边界约束。持久化、恢复、resume、fork 和压缩会把合法的轮次外 `user/message` 当作已提交会话历史,而不是中断轮次或可丢弃的日志尾部。
## 扩展点与调用方语义
`PromptDecision.content` 仍只替换直接提示词。`PromptDecision.additionalContexts` 和工具结果的 `additionalContexts` 保留 FIFO 顺序及各自来源但不再选择放置方式。waterfall瀑布式事件监听器调用 `next()` 委托时,必须保留下游返回的提示词内容和额外上下文,除非它有意返回替代值。
调用方主动注入与钩子产生的额外上下文具有不同的准入归属。钩子的额外上下文只会在该钩子允许提示词或工具结果后落入日志。在 next-step 接受窗口之外,调用方执行 `inject(context)` 后再执行 `send(prompt)` 时,会独立提交上下文;需要全有或全无语义的调用方应使用领域专用的准入包装层。
跨会话引用采用这种领域组合方式TUI 先准备快照,然后在接受窗口之外将其加入提示词准入决策,或在窗口期间将其注入到 steering 旁。目标日志包含两条简单消息因此来源会话后续变化不会改变回放transcript 消费方也不需要提示词封套。本决策取代[跨会话引用决策](../feature/2026-07-21-cross-session-references.md)中的附件机制,但保留其快照与信任边界规则。
本决策保留[移除注入内容封套](../simplification/2026-07-20-unwrap-injected-content-envelopes.md)确立的调用方自主管理框架原则,以及[一次 send、一个轮次](../simplification/2026-07-17-one-send-one-turn.md)确立的单条目轮次规则;同时收窄[轮次封闭决策](2026-06-15-turn-enclosure-invariant.md),使轮次约束执行过程,而不是约束所有会话事件。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**保留 `SendOptions.contexts` 作为原子附件。** 提示词准入阻止消息时,这种方式能保留全有或全无交付,但也会让上下文继续成为收件箱生命周期状态的一部分,并迫使每次队列转换和观察事件携带它。大多数调用方都可以通过先注入上下文、再交付消息来表达需求,通用 agent API 不应内置领域事务。
**保留独立的 `context/message` 会话事件。** 独立事件可以缩小轮次外事件的例外范围,但面向模型的 user-role 输入会再次拥有两个投影完全相同的事件类型。`user/message.source` 已能为策略、transcript 和回放消费方提供所需区分。
**为空闲注入保留一次性轮次。** 这种方式能保留通用轮次封闭和方便的刷新边界,却会让轮次计数与轮次观察方报告从未运行模型的工作。持久性是独立的会话关注点,无需伪造执行即可等待。
**保留 `prompt-prefix` 可选放置方式。** 前缀烘焙可以让上下文和请求位于同一条提供方消息中但它会引入直接提示词的第二种表示并把放置处理扩散到准入、steering、日志、回放和 UI 代码。需要文本框架的生产方可以直接把它写入自身上下文内容。
**让钩子直接调用 `inject()`,而不是返回额外上下文。** 直接注入会破坏扩展点的准入归属:下游监听器阻止操作之前,上游监听器就可能已经追加上下文。返回 `additionalContexts` 能维持 waterfall 结果的最终权威性,同时复用准入后的 outbox 路径。
## 验证
- `SendOptions` 与 steering 收件箱记录不包含附加上下文;`agent/inbox/enqueue` 只报告消息及其已解析的 queued 或 steering 放置方式。
- `UserMessageData` 是提示词拦截、工具执行、hook bridge、guard 和上下文生产方共享的形状。
- 公共类型、持久事件、投影和 UI 回放中均不存在 prompt-prefix 放置方式、提示词封套与 `context/message`
- 空闲 `inject()` 在不产生轮次或模型调用的情况下,追加一条带来源的 `user/message`
- 准入期间和活跃轮次中的注入会在完整工具结果批次之后的安全边界排空,并在消费它们的请求之前进入日志。
- 被阻止的提示词准入不会打开轮次,也不会追加提示词或钩子产生的额外上下文;仅有调用方上下文时会回退为空闲追加,而带 steering 的边界仍可重试。
- 单元测试、持久化与 resume 测试、不变量测试、宿主/客户端队列测试和 TUI 覆盖会固定事件顺序、准入归属和重连分类。
## 后果
- 一个表层事件可以合法位于轮次之外因此持久化扫描、崩溃恢复、fork、压缩和会话查询需要区分执行封闭与会话历史。
- 两条连续的 user-role 消息会取代一条烘焙后的提示词消息;提供方适配器会保留这一顺序。
- 在接受窗口之外,`inject()` 后跟一个被阻止的 `send()` 会留下缺少预期直接提示词的上下文,除非调用方提供领域专用的准入归属。
- 公共投递契约和收件箱记录保持精简:没有上下文附件、上下文放置元数据、提示词封套或重复的持久事件类型。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.md: 377ebd2b3cf9ff1dff81dd3546bb262e0ebde88a
2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.zh.md: 403e95fb3088d2164d50710d2a69de5526807764
2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.md: 99e5d0d95f320464a6f12857e9d6e90e3587c777
2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.zh.md: 89c1a578f0ad0841eea7512538e3de8095b82c4d

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-24-web-config-tree-boot-and-transport-layering.zh.md)
## Decision
**Composition is one flat config tree.** `apps/cli/cordis.yml` holds every row — the host runtime (32 rows), the `api-gateway` row, the `webserver` row, and the ten `dshClient` rows (the browser roster; the modules row is simultaneously a host row). No spine bundle: every plugin is one row and every config field is yml-editable. `--dev` appends the `dsh-client-hmr` row in code before the settle sweep — prod and dev differ by exactly that row. Row order carries no load semantics; activation is service-availability driven, and the boot compensates with a fail-loud triple: `assertEntriesLoaded` (import failures), `installFailLoud` (late apply rejections), and an all-ACTIVE sweep (PENDING fibers — cordis inject waiting has no timeout).
**Composition is one flat config tree.** `apps/cli/cordis.yml` holds every row — the host runtime (32 rows), the `api-gateway` row, the `webserver` row, and the `dshClient` rows (the browser roster; the modules row is simultaneously a host row). No spine bundle: every plugin is one row and every config field is yml-editable. `--dev` appends the `dsh-client-hmr` row in code before the settle sweep — prod and dev differ by exactly that row. Row order carries no load semantics; activation is service-availability driven, and the boot compensates with a fail-loud triple: `assertEntriesLoaded` (import failures), `installFailLoud` (late apply rejections), and an all-ACTIVE sweep (PENDING fibers — cordis inject waiting has no timeout).
**Boot glue is a class pair.** `AppCLIEntry` (apps/cli) and `AppWebEntry` (the shell kernel) hold only what must exist independently of cordis: argv facts, the composed patch set, the parsed boot manifest, the module system instance, loading-page handles — everything else lives in plugins. `AppCLIEntry.run()` is three stages: layered env (ambient > cwd `.env` > `$DSH_HOME/.env`, closing the defect above) → patch composition → Loader include boot plus the triple. `AppWebEntry.run()` mirrors it browser-side: parse `window.__DSH_BOOT__` into a `BootManifest` (two views: npm-package rows for the module table, cordis-plugin rows for entry composition; malformed wire throws), build the module system, render the loading page, prefetch the `immediately` tier in parallel with Context/Loader setup, **await the prefetch before creating entries** (materialization is `tree.import`'s synchronous require, unprotected by fiber inject waiting; cross-package require edges such as i18n → runtime/client need every immediately-tier factory registered first — an empirically found 1025% boot race otherwise), adopt the modules entry, create the graph rows, settle, sweep.

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Status: implemented
## 决策
**组合是一棵平铺 config tree。** `apps/cli/cordis.yml` 持有全部行——host runtime32 行)、`api-gateway` 行、`webserver` 行、十个 `dshClient` 行(浏览器 rostermodules 行同时是 host 行)。不做 spine bundle每插件一行、每个 config 字段 yml 可改。`--dev` 在 settle sweep 之前由代码追加 `dsh-client-hmr` 行——prod 与 dev 的全部差异就是这一行。行序无装载语义激活由服务可用性驱动boot 以 fail-loud 三件套补偿:`assertEntriesLoaded`import 失败)、`installFailLoud`(迟到的 apply 拒绝、all-ACTIVE sweepPENDING fiber——cordis inject 等待没有超时)。
**组合是一棵平铺 config tree。** `apps/cli/cordis.yml` 持有全部行——host runtime32 行)、`api-gateway` 行、`webserver` 行、`dshClient` 行(浏览器 rostermodules 行同时是 host 行)。不做 spine bundle每插件一行、每个 config 字段 yml 可改。`--dev` 在 settle sweep 之前由代码追加 `dsh-client-hmr` 行——prod 与 dev 的全部差异就是这一行。行序无装载语义激活由服务可用性驱动boot 以 fail-loud 三件套补偿:`assertEntriesLoaded`import 失败)、`installFailLoud`(迟到的 apply 拒绝、all-ACTIVE sweepPENDING fiber——cordis inject 等待没有超时)。
**boot 胶水是一对 class。** `AppCLIEntry`apps/cli`AppWebEntry`(壳内核)只持有独立于 cordis 必须提前存在的东西argv 事实、合成的 patch 集、解析出的 boot manifest、模块系统实例、loading 页句柄——其余一律进插件。`AppCLIEntry.run()` 三段:分层 envambient > cwd `.env` > `$DSH_HOME/.env`,顺手关掉上述缺陷)→ patch 合成 → Loader include boot 加三件套。`AppWebEntry.run()` 在浏览器侧镜像它:把 `window.__DSH_BOOT__` 解析成 `BootManifest`双视角npm 包行给模块表、cordis 插件行给 entry 组合;畸形 wire 大声抛)、建模块系统、渲染 loading 页、immediately 层预取与 Context/Loader 准备并行、**create entry 之前等预取齐**(物化是 `tree.import` 的同步 require不受 fiber inject 等待保护i18n → runtime/client 这类跨包 require 边要求 immediately 层工厂全部注册完——否则有实测 1025% 的 boot 竞态)、收编 modules entry、逐图行 create、settle、sweep。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.md: 063494b56461593015d6de4c2b55a2d1d6a3c676
2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.zh.md: cd5d29dfbcd9356a9ea15852d5d27a3660084abf
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.md
2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.md: 09afe6d9e879ae7529d309c3b5e656be849fa543
2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.zh.md: 4d45d74c2e7c34601a5229fc0fc0780a23ec6fd5

View File

@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ Slot scope is the closed set `root | session-maybe | session`:
### The read-only queue mirror
- The MuxFrame `session/queued`: the Session holds a read-only inbox mirror (previews truncated; steering retired by source match); queue frames never enter history — pure stream state, cleared on reconnect and refilled from the new baseline; the never-instantiated window is buffered and replayed through the manager pendingBuffers.
- The MuxFrame `session/queued`: the Session holds a read-only inbox mirror (previews truncated; steering retired by source match). The host stamps the agent-loop's acceptance-time steering classification on live and replayed frames, so a reconnect baseline does not depend on replaying an earlier `turn/start`. Queue frames never enter history — pure stream state, cleared on reconnect and refilled from the new baseline; the never-instantiated window is buffered and replayed through the manager pendingBuffers.
- Queue semantics: running does not lock input; ordinary messages queue through `session.prompt {mode:'queue'}`, and commands never queue.
### Host wire smalls

View File

@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ slot scope 是闭集 `root | session-maybe | session`
### 队列只读镜像
- MuxFrame `session/queued`Session 持只读 inbox 镜像预览截断、steering 按 source 匹配退休)queue 帧不进 history纯 stream 态——重连清空、新基线重灌;未实例化窗口经 manager pendingBuffers 缓冲重放。
- MuxFrame `session/queued`Session 持只读 inbox 镜像预览截断、steering 按 source 匹配退休)。宿主会在实时和回放帧中标记 agent loop 接受消息时的 steering 分类,因此重连基线不依赖回放更早的 `turn/start`queue 帧不进 history纯 stream 态——重连清空、新基线重灌;未实例化窗口经 manager pendingBuffers 缓冲重放。
- 队列语义running 不锁输入;普通消息经 `session.prompt {mode:'queue'}` 排队,命令永不排队。
### host wire 小件

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-27-tui-chat-channel-module-split.md
2026-07-27-tui-chat-channel-module-split.md: 56b345b670cd8426780bfdd8c2b2f5719461554c
2026-07-27-tui-chat-channel-module-split.zh.md: d74844a762bc519d0f499696fe343567eebfe920

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
# Agent Note: dsh-tui chat channel module split
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-27-tui-chat-channel-module-split.zh.md)
## Problem
`packages/ui/tui/src/index.ts` had grown past 2000 lines. Most of it was one `createTuiChat` factory: a ~1600-line closure holding roughly forty mutable variables and as many nested closures. Model selection, the ask-user-question queue, and session resume were tangled into that single scope, so a reader could not follow any one concern without holding the whole file in their head, and unrelated edits collided. A prior pass had grouped `src/` into `components/`, `session/`, `extension/`, but the entry file itself and the loose top-level input files (`autocomplete.ts`, `file-autocomplete.ts`, `skill-invocation.ts`, `xml-tool-output.ts`) were untouched.
## Decision
The chat channel's cohesive sub-machines are extracted from `createTuiChat` into `src/chat/`, each a factory that takes an explicit dependency bundle instead of closing over the entry scope:
- `chat/model-command.ts``createModelController`: the queued `/model` command, the model+reasoning-effort selector overlay, and the selected model's context-window resolution. Owns the context-window cache that the prompt and status views read.
- `chat/questions.ts``createQuestionQueue`: the user-interaction provider and the one-at-a-time FIFO ask-user-question overlays.
- `chat/resume.ts``createResumeController`: the `/resume` selector, per-candidate summary reads, the pre-handoff preflight, the terminal handoff, and the durable resume-hint command.
- `chat/helpers.ts` — zero-state helpers (`formatCwd`, `gitBranch`, surface/tool-call derivations, session-reference cards), the `HintEditor`, and banner-reveal constants.
- `chat/channel.ts``ChatChannelDeps` (the collaborator surface every sub-controller shares) and `ChannelNotice` (mixed in by the controllers that report outcomes). Each `*Deps` extends these, so the shared surface has one definition.
`src/` is reorganized so `chat/` holds every chat-channel concern: the sub-controllers above plus the former input files and the former `session/` files (`timing.ts`, `tokens.ts`) all move under `chat/`. `xml-tool-output.ts` moves under `components/`. The host/process boundary interfaces (`TuiRuntime`, `TuiResumeHost`) move to `src/runtime.ts`. After the split `src/` is `chat/`, `components/`, `extension/`, and the top-level `index.ts` / `config.ts` / `prompt.ts` / `runtime.ts` / `invariant.ts`; `index.ts` drops from 2067 to ~1530 lines and now constructs and wires the three controllers.
The convention for a controller's dependency bundle: stable value collaborators (`ctx`, `resolved`, `palette`, `overlayManager`, and each controller's own services) are destructured once; the channel callbacks (`appendNotice`, `requestRender`, `isDisposed`, `agentStatus`) stay on `deps` so a controller always calls the channel's current implementation. `channel.ts`'s JSDoc states this rule.
## Alternatives considered
- **Free functions taking a shared mutable context object.** Rejected: it would re-expose the same forty-field grab-bag the split set out to remove, just under a parameter name.
- **Extracting the status/timing animation controller too.** Deferred: `runningStatus` is read directly by the prompt caret animation in `updatePromptValues`, so a controller boundary there would leak its internal state back through getters — a leaky seam for little gain. It stays inline in `index.ts`.
## Consequences
Each concern is now readable and testable in isolation, and the shared dependency surface is defined once instead of copied into three interfaces. The cost: `index.ts` constructs the controllers and threads the callback bundle, and the model controller is a `let` forward-reference (`updatePromptValues` closes over it, but it is built later once `appendNotice`/`overlayManager` exist), carrying one justified `prefer-const` disable and a deferred first paint.
## Testing
Behavior is unchanged: all existing package tests and TUI snapshots pass without re-recording, which is the contract for this refactor.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
# Agent Note: dsh-tui 聊天通道模块拆分
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-27-tui-chat-channel-module-split.md) | 中文
## Problem
`packages/ui/tui/src/index.ts` 已超过 2000 行,其中绝大部分是单个 `createTuiChat` 工厂:一个约 1600 行的闭包持有约四十个可变变量以及同等数量的嵌套闭包。模型选择、ask-user-question 队列、会话恢复都缠绕在这一个作用域里,读者无法在不把整份文件装进脑子的前提下理清任何单一关注点,互不相关的改动也会彼此冲突。此前一轮已把 `src/` 归组为 `components/``session/``extension/`,但入口文件本身以及散落在顶层的输入相关文件(`autocomplete.ts``file-autocomplete.ts``skill-invocation.ts``xml-tool-output.ts`)未动。
## Decision
聊天通道内聚的子机制从 `createTuiChat` 中抽出,迁入 `src/chat/`,每个都是接收显式依赖包的工厂,而非闭包捕获入口作用域:
- `chat/model-command.ts``createModelController`:排队执行的 `/model` 命令、模型加推理力度reasoning-effort的选择浮层以及所选模型上下文窗口的解析。持有供提示行与状态视图读取的上下文窗口缓存。
- `chat/questions.ts``createQuestionQueue`user-interaction provider 以及一次仅一个的 FIFO ask-user-question 浮层。
- `chat/resume.ts``createResumeController``/resume` 选择器、逐候选摘要读取、交接前预检、终端交接,以及持久化的恢复提示命令。
- `chat/helpers.ts` — 无状态辅助函数(`formatCwd``gitBranch`、surface/工具调用派生、会话引用卡片)、`HintEditor`,以及横幅揭示常量。
- `chat/channel.ts``ChatChannelDeps`(每个子控制器共享的协作者面)与 `ChannelNotice`(由需要上报结果的控制器混入)。各 `*Deps` 继承它们,使共享面只有一处定义。
`src/` 随之重组,使 `chat/` 汇集所有聊天通道关注点:上述子控制器,加上原来的输入文件与原 `session/` 文件(`timing.ts``tokens.ts`)都迁到 `chat/` 之下。`xml-tool-output.ts` 迁到 `components/` 之下。宿主/进程边界接口(`TuiRuntime``TuiResumeHost`)迁到 `src/runtime.ts`。拆分后 `src/``chat/``components/``extension/`,以及顶层的 `index.ts` / `config.ts` / `prompt.ts` / `runtime.ts` / `invariant.ts``index.ts` 从 2067 行降至约 1530 行,现负责构造并接线这三个控制器。
控制器依赖包的约定:稳定的取值型协作者(`ctx``resolved``palette``overlayManager`,以及各控制器自有的服务)一次性解构;通道回调(`appendNotice``requestRender``isDisposed``agentStatus`)保留在 `deps` 上,使控制器始终调用通道当前的实现。`channel.ts` 的 JSDoc 陈述了此规则。
## Alternatives considered
- **接收共享可变上下文对象的自由函数。** 否决:那会把拆分本要消除的四十字段大杂烩,仅换个参数名重新暴露出来。
- **同时抽出状态/计时动画控制器。** 推迟:`runningStatus``updatePromptValues` 中的提示光标动画直接读取,在此设控制器边界会让其内部状态经 getter 反向泄漏——收益甚微的漏隙缝。它继续内联在 `index.ts` 中。
## Consequences
每个关注点现可独立阅读与测试,共享依赖面只定义一次,而非复制进三个接口。代价:`index.ts` 负责构造这些控制器并穿针引线地传入回调包;模型控制器是 `let` 前向引用(`updatePromptValues` 闭包捕获它,但它要待 `appendNotice`/`overlayManager` 就绪后才构造),因而带一处有正当理由的 `prefer-const` 禁用与一次延后的首帧绘制。
## Testing
行为不变:现有的包测试与 TUI 快照全部无需重录即通过,这正是本次重构的契约。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-20-error-cause-chain-diagnostics.md: 391e35997bb1bb050dd2ca620920961d77bb1c46
2026-07-20-error-cause-chain-diagnostics.zh.md: 90d6559a9410e8a4e5475db9560a2a177ba7a1a7
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-20-error-cause-chain-diagnostics.md
2026-07-20-error-cause-chain-diagnostics.md: 7de1f4f631cec90048ccc8eab7a6654560d84846
2026-07-20-error-cause-chain-diagnostics.zh.md: 74820e80f729343a833c926adc6187b7cc9fc372

View File

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ A TUI run against an unreachable DeepSeek endpoint failed with the single notice
- `dsh-llm` exports `errorChain(value)`: renders a thrown value with its full `cause` chain (`outer: inner: …`) and AggregateError members (`msg [m1; m2]`), with circular-cause and hostile-coercion containment. It is a diagnostic-surface renderer only; routing stays on `HarnessError.code`.
- The DeepSeek adapter wraps a pre-response transport failure in `LlmError('TRANSPORT')` naming the configured `baseURL` and chaining the original rejection as `cause`. An aborted request becomes `LlmError('ABORTED')`; because the turn signal is already aborted, the loop still classifies the turn as cancellation rather than recovery.
- Every diagnostic seam renders through `errorChain` instead of `error.message`/`String(error)`: the agent-loop's durable `turn/end` error message (`errorData`), its logger warnings, the TUI's `agent/error` notice and startup-failure line, and `dsh-stdio`'s startup-failure log lines. The per-package `renderThrown` copies in `dsh-agent-loop`, `dsh-stdio`, and `dsh-tui` are deleted in favor of the one shared renderer.
- Every diagnostic seam renders through `errorChain` instead of `error.message`/`String(error)`: the agent-loop's durable `turn/end` error message (`errorData`), its logger warnings, the TUI's `agent/error` notice and startup-failure line, and `dsh-stdio`'s startup-failure log lines. The live `agent/error` event and `SettleReason` preserve the thrown value as `unknown`; each diagnostic consumer renders it instead of the loop wrapping it into another error. The per-package `renderThrown` copies in `dsh-agent-loop`, `dsh-stdio`, and `dsh-tui` are deleted in favor of the one shared renderer.
- `dsh-stdio` renders failure `turn/end` reasons: `[turn failed <code>] <message>`, `[turn aborted] <reason>`, `[turn rejected] <reason>`, `[turn interrupted by a previous process exit]`, and the output-token-limit notice. Unknown merge-extended kinds fall through as ordinary turn ends.
`errorChain` lives in `dsh-llm` beside `HarnessError` for the same reason the base class does: it is the leaf package every consumer already imports, so sharing costs no new dependency edge.

View File

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ TUI 连接不可达的 DeepSeek 端点时,失败只显示一条 `fetch failed`
- `dsh-llm` 导出 `errorChain(value)`:渲染抛出值及其完整 `cause` 链(`outer: inner: …`)与 AggregateError 成员(`msg [m1; m2]`),并容错循环 cause 和恶意强制转换。它只是诊断表面的渲染器;路由仍然基于 `HarnessError.code`
- DeepSeek 适配器把拿到响应之前的传输失败包装成 `LlmError('TRANSPORT')`,写明配置的 `baseURL` 并把原始拒绝值链为 `cause`。被中止的请求变为 `LlmError('ABORTED')`;由于轮次信号已处于中止状态,循环仍将该轮次归类为取消而非恢复。
- 每个诊断接缝改用 `errorChain` 而非 `error.message`/`String(error)`agent-loop 的持久化 `turn/end` 错误消息(`errorData`、其日志警告、TUI 的 `agent/error` 通知与启动失败行、以及 `dsh-stdio` 的启动失败日志行。`dsh-agent-loop``dsh-stdio``dsh-tui` 里各自的 `renderThrown` 副本被删除,统一使用这一个共享渲染器。
- 每个诊断接缝改用 `errorChain` 而非 `error.message`/`String(error)`agent-loop 的持久化 `turn/end` 错误消息(`errorData`、其日志警告、TUI 的 `agent/error` 通知与启动失败行、以及 `dsh-stdio` 的启动失败日志行。实时 `agent/error` 事件与 `SettleReason``unknown` 原样保留抛出值;各诊断消费者自行渲染,而不是由循环把它包装成另一个错误。`dsh-agent-loop``dsh-stdio``dsh-tui` 里各自的 `renderThrown` 副本被删除,统一使用这一个共享渲染器。
- `dsh-stdio` 渲染失败的 `turn/end` reason`[turn failed <code>] <message>``[turn aborted] <reason>``[turn rejected] <reason>``[turn interrupted by a previous process exit]` 以及输出 token 上限通知。未知的 merge 扩展 kind 按普通 turn 结束处理。
`errorChain``HarnessError` 一样放在 `dsh-llm` 里,理由相同:它是每个消费者都已导入的叶子包,共享不增加新的依赖边。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-21-compaction-summary-prefix-cache-reuse.md: 490eb57a5891bf9cd0799c5d49d25d4e9838041f
2026-07-21-compaction-summary-prefix-cache-reuse.zh.md: 02412ff07e87e12c7e7de00b5c69e1282433f735
2026-07-21-compaction-summary-prefix-cache-reuse.md: d05d25cfa7c3984ce0ce75c38068a91a0e07dfe8
2026-07-21-compaction-summary-prefix-cache-reuse.zh.md: edf9de6fe5388d75612946bfb05c4383d1856102

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-21-compaction-summary-prefix-cache-reuse.zh.md)
## Problem
Automatic compaction fires mid-conversation, right after the loop has warmed the provider's KV cache with the last routed request (`system` + `tools` + `messagePrefix` + derived history). The default summarizer then issued a *separate* auxiliary request whose prefix shared nothing with that warm request: a bespoke summarizer `system` prompt followed by the older history flattened to a single rendered transcript string. A provider caches on the request's leading token sequence, so a first token that differs — a different system prompt — invalidates the entire cached prefix. Every compaction therefore paid full prompt-processing cost for the whole replayed history twice: once for the conversation request that tripped pressure, and again for the summarization call, defeating the cache exactly when the conversation is largest.
Automatic compaction fires mid-conversation, right after the loop has warmed the provider's KV cache with the last routed request (`system` + `tools` + derived history). The default summarizer then issued a *separate* auxiliary request whose prefix shared nothing with that warm request: a bespoke summarizer `system` prompt followed by the older history flattened to a single rendered transcript string. A provider caches on the request's leading token sequence, so a first token that differs — a different system prompt — invalidates the entire cached prefix. Every compaction therefore paid full prompt-processing cost for the whole replayed history twice: once for the conversation request that tripped pressure, and again for the summarization call, defeating the cache exactly when the conversation is largest.
## Decision
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ The summarization directive moves from the **front** of the request (a fresh `sy
### `SummarizationInput` carries the replayed prefix, not a rendered string
`summarize()` (and the internal `summarizeWithLlm`) take a `SummarizationInput``{ system?, tools?, messages }` — instead of a flat transcript string. `region.ts` builds it from `session.requestHeader()` (the durable `system`, `tools`, and `messagePrefix`) plus the shadowed region mapped through `session.deriveEventMessage`, which yields byte-identical `Message` objects to what `deriveMessages()` folded into the routed request. `summarizeWithLlm` forwards `system` and `tools` onto `GenerateOptions` and sends `[...input.messages, { role: 'user', content: COMPACTION_INSTRUCTION }]`. `tools` ride along even though the summarizer never calls one: dropping them would shorten the token sequence and break alignment with the cached request.
`summarize()` (and the internal `summarizeWithLlm`) take a `SummarizationInput``{ system?, tools?, messages }` — instead of a flat transcript string. `region.ts` builds it from `session.requestHeader()` (the durable `system` and `tools`) plus the shadowed region mapped through `session.deriveEventMessage`, which yields byte-identical `Message` objects to what `deriveMessages()` folded into the routed request. `summarizeWithLlm` forwards `system` and `tools` onto `GenerateOptions` and sends `[...input.messages, { role: 'user', content: COMPACTION_INSTRUCTION }]`. `tools` ride along even though the summarizer never calls one: dropping them would shorten the token sequence and break alignment with the cached request.
### The instruction is a trailing user message
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Auto-compaction always anchors at the surface head, so the shadowed region is th
## Alternatives considered
- **Keep the summarizer system prompt but reuse the rest** — rejected: the system slot is the very first token region a provider caches on, so a distinct summarizer system prompt invalidates the whole prefix regardless of what follows. Only moving the directive off the front recovers the cache.
- **Send only the shadowed region without the `system`/`tools`/`messagePrefix` head** — rejected: a shorter or differently-headed sequence still diverges from the cached request at the first token, so it caches no better while losing the framing the summary needs.
- **Send only the shadowed region without the `system`/`tools` head** — rejected: a differently-headed sequence still diverges from the cached request at the first token, so it caches no better while losing the framing the summary needs.
- **Omit `tools` from the summarization request** (the model never calls one) — rejected: tool schemas are part of the cached token sequence; omitting them misaligns every following token and defeats reuse.
- **A dedicated `assistant/chunk`-emitting summarization sub-session for snapshot replay** — out of scope here; the replay gap predates this change and is tracked in the [compaction-seam note](../feature/2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md).

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Status: implemented
## Problem
自动压缩compaction在对话中途触发恰好在循环用最后一个已路由请求`system` + `tools` + `messagePrefix` + 派生历史)预热了提供方的 KV 缓存之后。随后默认摘要器发出一个*独立的*辅助请求,其前缀与那个已预热请求没有任何共享部分:一个专门的摘要器 `system` 提示词,后接被拍平成单个渲染后 transcript文本记录字符串的较早历史。提供方基于请求起始的 token 序列做缓存,因此第一个 token 只要不同(即一个不同的系统提示词),整个已缓存前缀就会失效。于是每次压缩都要为整段回放的历史付出两次完整的提示词处理成本:一次用于触发压力的对话请求,另一次用于摘要调用,恰好在对话最大时让缓存失去作用。
自动压缩compaction在对话中途触发恰好在循环用最后一个已路由请求`system` + `tools` + 派生历史)预热了提供方的 KV 缓存之后。随后默认摘要器发出一个*独立的*辅助请求,其前缀与那个已预热请求没有任何共享部分:一个专门的摘要器 `system` 提示词,后接被拍平成单个渲染后 transcript文本记录字符串的较早历史。提供方基于请求起始的 token 序列做缓存,因此第一个 token 只要不同(即一个不同的系统提示词),整个已缓存前缀就会失效。于是每次压缩都要为整段回放的历史付出两次完整的提示词处理成本:一次用于触发压力的对话请求,另一次用于摘要调用,恰好在对话最大时让缓存失去作用。
## Decision
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Status: implemented
### `SummarizationInput` 携带回放的前缀,而非渲染后的字符串
`summarize()`(以及内部的 `summarizeWithLlm`)接受一个 `SummarizationInput``{ system?, tools?, messages }`)而不是一个扁平的 transcript 字符串。`region.ts``session.requestHeader()`(持久的 `system``tools``messagePrefix`)加上经 `session.deriveEventMessage` 映射的被遮蔽区域来构建它,后者产出与 `deriveMessages()` 折叠进已路由请求的内容字节级一致的 `Message` 对象。`summarizeWithLlm``system``tools` 转发到 `GenerateOptions`,并发送 `[...input.messages, { role: 'user', content: COMPACTION_INSTRUCTION }]``tools` 会一同带上,即便摘要器从不调用任何工具:丢弃它们会缩短 token 序列,破坏与已缓存请求的对齐。
`summarize()`(以及内部的 `summarizeWithLlm`)接受一个 `SummarizationInput``{ system?, tools?, messages }`)而不是一个扁平的 transcript 字符串。`region.ts``session.requestHeader()`(持久的 `system``tools`)加上经 `session.deriveEventMessage` 映射的被遮蔽区域来构建它,后者产出与 `deriveMessages()` 折叠进已路由请求的内容字节级一致的 `Message` 对象。`summarizeWithLlm``system``tools` 转发到 `GenerateOptions`,并发送 `[...input.messages, { role: 'user', content: COMPACTION_INSTRUCTION }]``tools` 会一同带上,即便摘要器从不调用任何工具:丢弃它们会缩短 token 序列,破坏与已缓存请求的对齐。
### 指令是一条尾部 user 消息
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Status: implemented
## Alternatives considered
- **保留摘要器系统提示词但复用其余部分**——否决system 槽位正是提供方最先做缓存的 token 区域,因此一个不同的摘要器系统提示词无论后面跟着什么都会使整个前缀失效。只有把指令移离前端才能恢复缓存。
- **只发送被遮蔽区域而不带 `system`/`tools`/`messagePrefix` 头部**——否决:更短或头部不同的序列在第一个 token 处仍然与已缓存请求分叉,因此缓存效果并不更好,反而丢失了摘要所需的框架。
- **只发送被遮蔽区域而不带 `system`/`tools` 头部**——否决:头部不同的序列在第一个 token 处仍然与已缓存请求分叉,因此缓存效果并不更好,反而丢失了摘要所需的框架。
- **从摘要请求中省略 `tools`**(模型从不调用任何工具)——否决:工具 schema 是已缓存 token 序列的一部分;省略它们会让后续每个 token 失去对齐,破坏复用。
- **为快照回放专门建立一个发出 `assistant/chunk` 的摘要子会话**——此处超出范围;该回放缺口早于本次改动,记录在 [compaction-seam Agent Note](../feature/2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md) 中。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-21-semantic-session-checkpoints.md: 0034cde40e5b07bda1573ca39fb7d51816006140
2026-07-21-semantic-session-checkpoints.zh.md: 3351221d7eeaf1353b4adb0fa4c4dc324ec33da5
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-21-semantic-session-checkpoints.md
2026-07-21-semantic-session-checkpoints.md: 927a4c5d6d2aad5dea460ea29f97c1686e9d5398
2026-07-21-semantic-session-checkpoints.zh.md: 6454b496aa8c03c172d6a4bc969e43e8dbca2430

View File

@@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ Persistence buffered every synchronous `session/event` until the loop's final tu
## Decision
`dsh-session-checkpoint-policy` owns semantic durability barriers as a zero-config plugin beside a persistence backend. It wraps `llm/stream` lazily and flushes the live session after `request/header` is logged but before the adapter stream is constructed. It wraps top-level `tools/execute` after ordered pre-execute policy and flushes the recorded `tool/call` before the tool body; nested dispatches reuse the outer model-visible call. It flushes at `agent/post-step` after the assistant message and ordered results are recorded. The loop's existing final `turn/end` checkpoint remains the closing boundary.
`dsh-session-checkpoint-policy` owns semantic durability barriers as a zero-config plugin beside a persistence backend. At `agent/step`, it flushes pending prompt input or the preceding response/result batch before the next request is derived. It wraps `llm/stream` lazily and flushes the live session after `request/header` is logged but before the adapter stream is constructed. It wraps top-level `tools/execute` after ordered pre-execute policy and flushes the recorded `tool/call` before the tool body; nested dispatches reuse the outer model-visible call. The loop's final `turn/end` checkpoint remains the closing boundary and settles before another queued turn or idle observation.
Persistence and checkpoint scheduling remain separate Cordis plugins. A backend makes requested `session/flush` boundaries durable but does not choose them; loading it without this policy is valid and retains the loop's coarser checkpoints. First-party persisted apps and runtimes explicitly mount both, while a specialized deployment may intentionally omit or replace the policy. Registration order governs whether events appended by other `agent/post-step` listeners join this checkpoint; the loop-owned assistant message and ordered results always precede the event.
Persistence and checkpoint scheduling remain separate Cordis plugins. A backend makes requested `session/flush` boundaries durable but does not choose them; loading it without this policy is valid and retains the loop's coarser checkpoints. First-party persisted apps and runtimes explicitly mount both, while a specialized deployment may intentionally omit or replace the policy. Registration order governs whether events appended by other `agent/step` listeners precede this checkpoint; prompt input and the preceding loop-owned assistant message and ordered results are already in the log.
Checkpoint failure and cancellation are fail-closed at effect boundaries. A rejected request checkpoint prevents adapter dispatch; a rejected tool checkpoint becomes an error result without invoking the tool body. If cancellation lands while the tool checkpoint is pending, the policy rechecks the signal and returns the canonical `ABORTED_BEFORE_DISPATCH` result. A rejected post-step checkpoint stops continuation before another model request. Persistence serialization continues to belong to the coordinator, so concurrent tool checkpoints cannot duplicate event sequences.
Checkpoint failure and cancellation are fail-closed at effect boundaries. A rejected request checkpoint prevents adapter dispatch; a rejected tool checkpoint becomes an error result without invoking the tool body. If cancellation lands while the tool checkpoint is pending, the policy rechecks the signal and returns the canonical `ABORTED_BEFORE_DISPATCH` result. A rejected between-step checkpoint closes the turn before another model request. A rejected final turn checkpoint is reported live and does not prevent later queued work. Persistence serialization continues to belong to the coordinator, so concurrent tool checkpoints cannot duplicate event sequences.
The ACP app owns its bridge, checkpoint policy, and persistence backend in one ordered Cordis effect. Cordis unloads sibling plugin effects concurrently, so independent mounts would let persistence detach while bridge teardown was still closing an interrupted turn. The composite lifecycle unloads the bridge first, waits for its agents to quiesce and flush the real `step/end` and `turn/end`, then removes checkpoint scheduling and persistence.
@@ -26,4 +26,4 @@ Flushing every event or streaming chunk minimizes loss but turns local append an
## Consequences
Hard-crash recovery retains the complete model request, durable tool intent, and complete settled step at the nearest semantic boundary while allowing partial streaming chunks since the previous boundary to remain lossy. Default CLI, TUI, ACP, Python SDK runtime, headless persistence tests, and JSON-RPC compositions mount the policy with their persistence backend. Unit tests cover ordering, cancellation during a checkpoint, fail-closed behavior, nested dispatch, disposal, and Loader shape; a real child process killed with `SIGKILL` proves request and tool-intent recovery through JSONL, and the shared persistence contract proves both recovery classifications across backends. The crash harness waits for the expected marker contents rather than path existence, so open-before-write visibility cannot trigger the kill early. Keyless ACP snapshots prove both that retry-risk guidance reaches resumed history and the next model turn and that graceful cancellation persists the loop's real closing boundaries.
Hard-crash recovery retains the complete model request, durable tool intent, and complete settled step at the nearest semantic boundary while allowing partial streaming chunks since the previous boundary to remain lossy. Default CLI, TUI, ACP, Python SDK runtime, headless persistence tests, and JSON-RPC compositions mount the policy with their persistence backend. Unit tests cover ordering, cancellation during a checkpoint, fail-closed behavior, nested dispatch, disposal, Loader shape, and final-checkpoint ordering and failure containment; a real child process killed with `SIGKILL` proves request and tool-intent recovery through JSONL, and the shared persistence contract proves both recovery classifications across backends. The crash harness waits for the expected marker contents rather than path existence, so open-before-write visibility cannot trigger the kill early. Keyless ACP and SDK snapshots prove that retry-risk guidance reaches resumed history and the next model turn, graceful cancellation persists the loop's real closing boundaries, and SDK shutdown observes the complete persisted turn.

View File

@@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ Status: implemented
## 决策
`dsh-session-checkpoint-policy` 以零配置插件的形式与持久化后端共同加载,并负责语义持久性屏障。该插件惰性包装 `llm/stream`,在记录 `request/header` 之后、构造适配器流之前,刷新活动会话。该插件还在有序的执行前策略之后包装顶层 `tools/execute`,在进入工具主体前刷新已记录的 `tool/call`;嵌套分发则复用外层模型可见调用。它还会在 `agent/post-step` 时刷新会话,此时模型消息与按序结果都已记录。现有的最终 `turn/end` 检查点仍是轮次的收尾边界。
`dsh-session-checkpoint-policy` 以零配置插件的形式与持久化后端共同加载,并负责语义持久性屏障。`agent/step` 时,该插件会在推导下一个请求前刷新待持久化的提示词输入或前一批响应/结果。该插件惰性包装 `llm/stream`,在记录 `request/header` 之后、构造适配器流之前,刷新活动会话。该插件还在有序的执行前策略之后包装顶层 `tools/execute`,在进入工具主体前刷新已记录的 `tool/call`;嵌套分发则复用外层模型可见调用。循环的最终 `turn/end` 检查点仍是轮次的收尾边界,并会在处理另一个已排队轮次或观察到空闲状态之前完成
持久化与检查点调度仍是相互独立的 Cordis 插件。后端使请求的 `session/flush` 边界持久化,但不选择边界;只加载后端而不加载本策略仍是有效组合,并保留循环提供的较粗检查点。第一方持久化应用与运行时会显式加载两者,专用部署则可以有意省略或替换本策略。注册顺序决定其他 `agent/post-step` 监听器追加的事件是否会纳入本检查点;循环自身记录的助手消息与有序结果始终先于该事件
持久化与检查点调度仍是相互独立的 Cordis 插件。后端使请求的 `session/flush` 边界持久化,但不选择边界;只加载后端而不加载本策略仍是有效组合,并保留循环提供的较粗检查点。第一方持久化应用与运行时会显式加载两者,专用部署则可以有意省略或替换本策略。注册顺序决定其他 `agent/step` 监听器追加的事件是否先于本检查点;提示词输入以及前一批由循环自身记录的助手消息与有序结果都已在日志中
检查点失败与取消在副作用边界上采取失败关闭策略。请求检查点被拒绝时,系统不会分发给适配器;工具检查点被拒绝时,系统会返回错误结果,不调用工具主体。如果在工具检查点等待期间收到取消,策略会重新检查信号,并返回标准的 `ABORTED_BEFORE_DISPATCH` 结果。步骤检查点被拒绝时,系统会在发起下一个模型请求前停止继续执行。持久化写入的串行化仍由协调器负责,因此并发的工具检查点不会产生重复的事件序号。
检查点失败与取消在副作用边界上采取失败关闭策略。请求检查点被拒绝时,系统不会分发给适配器;工具检查点被拒绝时,系统会返回错误结果,不调用工具主体。如果在工具检查点等待期间收到取消,策略会重新检查信号,并返回标准的 `ABORTED_BEFORE_DISPATCH` 结果。步骤检查点被拒绝时,系统会在发起下一个模型请求前结束该轮次。轮次的最终检查点被拒绝时,系统会实时报告该失败,但不会阻止后续排队工作。持久化写入的串行化仍由协调器负责,因此并发的工具检查点不会产生重复的事件序号。
ACPAgent Client Protocol应用在一个有序 Cordis effect 中统一持有其桥接层、检查点策略与持久化后端。Cordis 会并发卸载同级插件的 effect如果分别加载桥接层仍在为被中断的轮次收尾时持久化后端就可能已经卸载。组合生命周期会先卸载桥接层等待其各 agent 达到静止,并刷新真实的 `step/end``turn/end`,再移除检查点调度与持久化。
@@ -26,4 +26,4 @@ ACPAgent Client Protocol应用在一个有序 Cordis effect 中统一持
## 后果
发生硬崩溃时,崩溃恢复会在最近的语义边界保留完整的模型请求、持久化的工具意图与完整且已结束的步骤,但允许上一个边界之后的部分流式分片仍可能丢失。默认的 CLI命令行界面、TUI、ACP、Python SDK 运行时、headless 持久化测试与 JSON-RPC 组合都会在持久化后端旁加载该策略。单元测试覆盖顺序、检查点期间的取消、失败关闭行为、嵌套分发、dispose资源释放与 Loader 形状;一个被 `SIGKILL` 终止的真实子进程通过 JSONL 证明系统可以恢复请求与工具意图,共享持久化契约则证明各后端都支持这两种恢复分类。崩溃 harness 会等待预期的标记内容,而不是仅等待路径存在,因此文件在写入前因打开而可见时,不会导致该 harness 提前终止子进程。无密钥 ACP 快照证明重试风险指引会进入恢复后的历史记录与下一个模型轮次,也证明取消流程正常收尾时系统会持久化由循环实际生成的闭合边界。
发生硬崩溃时,崩溃恢复会在最近的语义边界保留完整的模型请求、持久化的工具意图与完整且已结束的步骤,但允许上一个边界之后的部分流式分片仍可能丢失。默认的 CLI命令行界面、TUI、ACP、Python SDK 运行时、headless 持久化测试与 JSON-RPC 组合都会在持久化后端旁加载该策略。单元测试覆盖顺序、检查点期间的取消、失败关闭行为、嵌套分发、dispose资源释放与 Loader 形状,以及最终检查点的顺序与故障隔离;一个被 `SIGKILL` 终止的真实子进程通过 JSONL 证明系统可以恢复请求与工具意图,共享持久化契约则证明各后端都支持这两种恢复分类。崩溃 harness 会等待预期的标记内容,而不是仅等待路径存在,因此文件在写入前因打开而可见时,不会导致该 harness 提前终止子进程。无密钥 ACP 与 SDK 快照证明重试风险指引会进入恢复后的历史记录与下一个模型轮次,取消流程正常收尾时系统会持久化由循环实际生成的闭合边界,且 SDK 关闭流程会观察到已完整持久化的轮次

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-22-pi-ai-transport-truncation-classification.md: 119200a788c0b0521f385f4cf4e6adf05a0512f9
2026-07-22-pi-ai-transport-truncation-classification.zh.md: 6a1bb478a86fc6ab726968b3df5752e0ad7fc9e6

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
# Agent Note: Classify pi-ai transport truncations from flattened message text
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-22-pi-ai-transport-truncation-classification.zh.md)
## Problem
A TUI run whose model connection dropped mid-stream surfaced the single notice `terminated`, and a truncated Anthropic response surfaced `Anthropic stream ended before message_stop`. Both are transport truncations — the connection died before the provider's terminal SSE event — yet `classifyPiAiError` in `dsh-llm-pi-ai` mapped neither, falling through to the catch-all `PI_AI_ERROR`. Because `PI_AI_ERROR` is not in `llm-retry`'s `DEFAULT_RETRYABLE_CODES` (`RATE_LIMIT`, `SERVER`, `TIMEOUT`, `TRANSPORT`), a recoverable drop was treated as a permanent failure and never retried.
The detail loss is upstream and unrecoverable in the adapter: pi-ai reduces a caught error to `error.message` (`api/anthropic-messages.js`: `errorMessage = error instanceof Error ? error.message : JSON.stringify(error)`) before pushing the terminal `error` event, discarding the original `Error` and its `cause` chain. undici carries the actionable `SocketError` on `cause` but hands the fetch wrapper a bare `terminated`; pi-ai keeps only that word. pi-ai `SimpleStreamOptions` exposes no fetch/dispatcher/client hook we could use to capture the `cause` ourselves before it is flattened.
## Decision
- `classifyPiAiError` recognizes two more transport wordings and maps both to `TRANSPORT`:
- a mid-stream socket drop rendered as a bare `terminated` (undici) or `Premature close` (Node stream layer);
- a stream truncated before its terminal event, which each pi-ai provider throws with its own wording (`Anthropic stream ended before message_stop`, `… before a terminal response event`, `… ended without a terminal event`, `Stream ended without finish_reason`), matched on `stream ended before/without`.
- The classifier carries an `XXX(pi-ai upstream)` note naming the flattening site and stating the intended fix: classify on `code`/`cause` if pi-ai ever forwards the original `Error` or a hook that lets us capture the `cause`. Classification stays best-effort text matching until then.
- `llm-pi-ai/README.md` gains a Known-Limitations bullet recording that pi-ai flattens the cause chain and that harness codes are therefore classified from message text.
Classification stays on message text because that is the only signal pi-ai delivers; the `XXX` marks it as a workaround, not the desired end state.
## Alternatives considered
**Capture the `cause` via a pi-ai fetch/dispatcher/client hook.** Rejected: pi-ai 0.81.1 exposes none. `StreamOptions` offers only `onPayload`/`onResponse`; `onResponse` fires before the body stream is consumed, so it cannot observe a mid-stream drop. The Anthropic path accepts a `client` object, but constructing and injecting a provider SDK client per request to intercept transport errors reaches around the adapter seam for one diagnostic string.
**Leave both as `PI_AI_ERROR` and widen `llm-retry`'s retryable set.** Rejected: `PI_AI_ERROR` is the catch-all for genuinely unclassified failures, including non-retryable ones (a malformed provider response, an unexpected SDK bug). Making the catch-all retryable would retry failures that will never succeed; the fix is to classify the recoverable case, not to blur the bucket.
**Wrap the flattened error in an `LlmError('TRANSPORT', { cause })` in the adapter, mirroring the DeepSeek adapter.** Rejected here: the DeepSeek adapter wraps a *pre-response* `fetch` rejection whose `cause` is still intact, so chaining preserves real detail. In the pi-ai path the terminal event's `errorMessage` is already a flattened string with no `cause` to chain, so wrapping would add a layer without recovering anything; classifying the code is the only value left to add.
## Consequences
- A mid-stream transport drop and a pre-terminal stream truncation now carry `TRANSPORT`, so a composed `llm-retry` policy retries them by default instead of failing the turn.
- The notice text is unchanged (`terminated` / `Anthropic stream ended before message_stop`): the cause detail is gone before the adapter sees it, so `errorChain` has nothing more to render. Only the routed `code` improved.
- Classification remains string-matching and provider-wording-dependent: a future pi-ai release that rewords these errors would silently fall back to `PI_AI_ERROR` until the patterns are updated. The `XXX` note points at the durable fix (route on a forwarded `code`/`cause`).

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
# Agent Note: 从扁平化的消息文本中分类 pi-ai 传输层截断
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-22-pi-ai-transport-truncation-classification.md) | 中文
## Problem
一次 TUI 运行的模型连接在流式输出中途断开,只浮现出一条 `terminated` 通知,而一个被截断的 Anthropic 响应则浮现出 `Anthropic stream ended before message_stop`。两者都是传输层截断——连接在提供方的终止 SSE 事件之前就已断开——然而 `dsh-llm-pi-ai` 中的 `classifyPiAiError` 对两者都不匹配,最终落入兜底的 `PI_AI_ERROR`。由于 `PI_AI_ERROR` 不在 `llm-retry``DEFAULT_RETRYABLE_CODES``RATE_LIMIT``SERVER``TIMEOUT``TRANSPORT`)中,一次可恢复的断开被当作永久性失败处理,从未被重试。
细节丢失发生在上游且在适配器内无法恢复pi-ai 在推送终止 `error` 事件之前,把捕获到的错误缩减为 `error.message``api/anthropic-messages.js``errorMessage = error instanceof Error ? error.message : JSON.stringify(error)`),丢弃了原始的 `Error` 及其 `cause` 链。undici 把可操作的 `SocketError` 携带在 `cause` 上,却只交给 fetch 包装层一个裸的 `terminated`pi-ai 只保留了这个词。pi-ai 的 `SimpleStreamOptions` 没有暴露任何 fetch/dispatcher/client 钩子,让我们能在细节被扁平化之前自行捕获 `cause`
## Decision
- `classifyPiAiError` 识别另外两种传输层措辞,并将两者都映射为 `TRANSPORT`
- 流式输出中途的套接字断开,呈现为裸的 `terminated`undici`Premature close`Node 流层);
- 在终止事件之前被截断的流,每个 pi-ai 提供方各自抛出不同措辞(`Anthropic stream ended before message_stop``… before a terminal response event``… ended without a terminal event``Stream ended without finish_reason`),统一按 `stream ended before/without` 匹配。
- 该分类器带有一条 `XXX(pi-ai upstream)` 注记,点名扁平化发生的位置并说明期望的修复方式:如果 pi-ai 有朝一日转发原始的 `Error` 或提供一个让我们捕获 `cause` 的钩子,就改为基于 `code`/`cause` 分类。在此之前分类仍是尽力而为的文本匹配。
- `llm-pi-ai/README.md` 新增一条 Known-Limitations 条目,记录 pi-ai 会扁平化 cause 链,因此 harness code 是从消息文本中分类出来的。
分类仍然基于消息文本,因为那是 pi-ai 唯一交付的信号;`XXX` 标明它是一个权宜之计,而非期望的最终状态。
## Alternatives considered
**通过 pi-ai 的 fetch/dispatcher/client 钩子捕获 `cause`。** 否决pi-ai 0.81.1 一个都没暴露。`StreamOptions` 只提供 `onPayload`/`onResponse``onResponse` 在响应体流被消费之前触发因此无法观察到流式输出中途的断开。Anthropic 路径接受一个 `client` 对象,但为拦截传输错误而为每个请求构造并注入一个提供方 SDK client只为一个诊断字符串就越过了适配器的服务边界。
**把两者都保留为 `PI_AI_ERROR`,并放宽 `llm-retry` 的可重试集合。** 否决:`PI_AI_ERROR` 是真正未分类失败的兜底,其中包括不可重试的失败(畸形的提供方响应、意料之外的 SDK bug。让兜底可重试会重试那些永远不会成功的失败修复之道是分类出可恢复的那种情况而不是模糊这个类别。
**在适配器里把扁平化后的错误包装成 `LlmError('TRANSPORT', { cause })`,仿照 DeepSeek 适配器。** 在此否决DeepSeek 适配器包装的是拿到响应之前的 `fetch` 拒绝,其 `cause` 仍然完好,因此链式包装保留了真实细节。而在 pi-ai 路径中,终止事件的 `errorMessage` 已经是一个没有 `cause` 可链的扁平化字符串,因此包装只会加一层却恢复不了任何东西;分类出 code 是唯一还能增加的价值。
## Consequences
- 流式输出中途的传输层断开和终止前的流截断现在都携带 `TRANSPORT`,因此组合出的 `llm-retry` 策略会默认重试它们,而不是让该轮次失败。
- 通知文本不变(`terminated` / `Anthropic stream ended before message_stop`cause 细节在适配器看到之前就已丢失,因此 `errorChain` 没有更多内容可渲染。只有被路由的 `code` 得到了改善。
- 分类仍然依赖字符串匹配且依赖提供方的措辞:未来某个 pi-ai 版本若改写这些错误的措辞,就会静默回退到 `PI_AI_ERROR`,直到模式被更新。`XXX` 注记指向那个持久的修复方式(基于转发的 `code`/`cause` 路由)。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-23-tui-generic-card-markdown.md: 494ba580480fa99de54e84025a65bf4589d410f2
2026-07-23-tui-generic-card-markdown.zh.md: 214edd00f50b88a4e8901b19dcdafc7382399831

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
# Agent Note: TUI generic-card Markdown rendering
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-23-tui-generic-card-markdown.zh.md)
## Problem
Tool presenters can put Markdown in generic-card content, including fenced `console` output used for background-task acknowledgements and execution errors. Rendering that content as plain text exposes the fence markers and diverges from assistant and user content in the same transcript.
## Decision
The TUI renders generic-card result content with its shared Markdown theme before applying the card's head-and-tail line limit. Terminal and diff cards retain their specialized plain-text renderers, and generic-card raw input remains literal because it represents tool arguments rather than presenter-authored prose.
The shared theme hides fence syntax, retains the optional language label, and colors the fenced body as code. Rendering precedes truncation so collapsed-card line counts and boundaries describe the visible terminal rows rather than Markdown source rows.
## Alternatives considered
**Strip fences in the Bash presenter.** This would fix one producer while leaving generic-card Markdown from other tools unrendered and would make the presenter depend on TUI behavior.
**Render every tool card as Markdown.** Terminal output and diffs have dedicated formatting and may contain Markdown punctuation that must remain literal.
**Apply the collapsed-card limit before Markdown rendering.** Source-line truncation can split a fenced block and makes the visible line count differ from the count used by the card.
## Consequences
Generic tool cards use the same Markdown vocabulary and sanitization path as conversation content. Markdown punctuation in a generic card is interpreted rather than always displayed literally; tools that require literal terminal output use the terminal card intent.
The focused TUI test pins hidden fences, retained language labels, and body text. The keyless terminal-state snapshot covers the behavior through an assembled TUI transcript.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
# Agent Note: TUI 通用卡片的 Markdown 渲染
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-23-tui-generic-card-markdown.md) | 中文
## Problem
工具展示器可以在通用卡片generic card内容中写入 Markdown其中包括用于后台任务确认和执行错误的围栏 `console` 输出。把这些内容按纯文本渲染会暴露围栏标记,并与同一 transcript文本记录中的助手内容和用户内容显示不一致。
## Decision
TUI 先用共享的 Markdown 主题渲染通用卡片的结果内容,再应用卡片的头尾行数限制。终端卡片和 diff 卡片保留各自专门的纯文本渲染器;通用卡片的原始输入仍按字面显示,因为它代表的是工具参数,而非展示器撰写的行文。
共享主题隐藏围栏语法,保留可选的语言标签,并将围栏正文按代码配色。渲染先于截断执行,因此收起状态卡片的行数和边界描述的是可见的终端行,而非 Markdown 源文本行。
## Alternatives considered
**在 Bash 展示器中剥除围栏。**这只修复一个生产方,其他工具产生的通用卡片 Markdown 仍不会被渲染,还会让展示器依赖 TUI 的行为。
**把每种工具卡片都按 Markdown 渲染。**终端输出和 diff 有专门的格式,且可能包含必须保持字面显示的 Markdown 标点。
**在 Markdown 渲染之前应用收起状态卡片的行数限制。**按源文本行截断可能从中间截断围栏块,还会让可见行数与卡片使用的行数不一致。
## Consequences
通用工具卡片与对话内容使用同一套 Markdown 词汇和净化路径。通用卡片中的 Markdown 标点会被解释,而不再总是按字面显示;需要字面终端输出的工具使用终端卡片这一渲染意图。
聚焦的 TUI 测试固定了隐藏的围栏、保留的语言标签和正文文本。无密钥的终端状态快照通过组装后的 TUI transcript 覆盖该行为。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-24-empty-model-response-is-retryable.md: f4a6373178efd5ca1ba5882fb2aaf97dffb2526b
2026-07-24-empty-model-response-is-retryable.zh.md: 4c3afe44140c029d274f34ade97803b958c6d669
2026-07-24-empty-model-response-is-retryable.md: 3ecb106fc3a53070f66d1de351120aaf99d4d0de
2026-07-24-empty-model-response-is-retryable.zh.md: 91ce4105ebe60b71f12667ccf28ea905566353d5

View File

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ An adapter classifies a completed empty response as a provider-boundary failure,
- `dsh-llm` exports the canonical code `EMPTY_RESPONSE_CODE` (`'EMPTY_RESPONSE'`) beside `CONTEXT_WINDOW_EXCEEDED_CODE`/`QUOTA_EXCEEDED_CODE`.
- `dsh-llm-pi-ai` (`mapStopReason`): a terminal `stop` whose assistant message has no content blocks becomes a `finish {kind: 'error'}` with that code. Context-overflow detection still wins where it applies (it is checked first and is the more actionable classification).
- `dsh-llm-deepseek` (`translate`): at `[DONE]`, a `stop` (or absent) finish with no opened blocks becomes the same error finish. Reasoning-only streams count as content and stay successful.
- `dsh-llm-retry` adds `EMPTY_RESPONSE` to `DEFAULT_RETRYABLE_CODES`: the attempt produced nothing durable, so repeating it is safe; deployments can still remove it via `retryableCodes`.
- The provider-owned normal retry default includes `EMPTY_RESPONSE`: the attempt produced nothing durable, so repeating it is safe; deployments can still remove it via `retryableCodes`, and `dsh-llm-retry` executes the resolved policy.
Detection is scoped to `stop` finishes only. `max-tokens` with empty content keeps its existing meaning (pi-ai already normalizes the zero-output overflow case), `tool-calls` cannot be block-empty in practice, and error/aborted finishes already fail.

View File

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Status: implemented
- `dsh-llm``CONTEXT_WINDOW_EXCEEDED_CODE`/`QUOTA_EXCEEDED_CODE` 之外,导出规范代码 `EMPTY_RESPONSE_CODE``'EMPTY_RESPONSE'`)。
- `dsh-llm-pi-ai``mapStopReason`):当终止性 `stop` 所对应的 assistant 消息没有内容块时,它会变成一个携带该代码的 `finish {kind: 'error'}`。上下文溢出检测在其适用场景中仍然优先(它先被检查,也是更具可操作性的归类)。
- `dsh-llm-deepseek``translate`):在 `[DONE]` 处,若 `stop`(或缺失)结束且没有打开过任何块,则同样变成该错误结束。仅含 reasoning 的流算作有内容,仍视为成功。
- `dsh-llm-retry``EMPTY_RESPONSE` 加入 `DEFAULT_RETRYABLE_CODES`:这次尝试没有产生任何持久内容,因此重复它是安全的;部署方仍可通过 `retryableCodes` 将其移除。
- 提供方拥有的 normal 重试默认策略包含 `EMPTY_RESPONSE`:这次尝试没有产生任何持久内容,因此重复它是安全的;部署方仍可通过 `retryableCodes` 将其移除,而 `dsh-llm-retry` 会执行解析后的策略
检测仅限于 `stop` 结束。内容为空的 `max-tokens` 保持其既有含义pi-ai 已经把零输出的溢出场景归一化处理),`tool-calls` 在实践中不可能是空块,而 erroraborted 结束本身已经算失败。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-11-tool-schemas-in-prompt-assembly.md: 3643ac3d61be08f629ef0cd0424fef5cb9696c3a
2026-06-11-tool-schemas-in-prompt-assembly.zh.md: 10389fd7c63755e5b00b3c508fd303a541287f2c
2026-07-24-tui-turn-end-stop-reason-notices.md: 7c783ce5a347b15d682dbeca03ad5355aca7950b
2026-07-24-tui-turn-end-stop-reason-notices.zh.md: 4a983525779b96c296ac2d621ca5928e7bed61c9

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
# Agent Note: TUI presents a reason for every turn-end kind
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-24-tui-turn-end-stop-reason-notices.zh.md)
## Problem
The TUI rendered transcript notices for `error`, `aborted`, `max-tokens`, `rejected`, and `interrupted` turn ends, but a `disposed` turn end and any plugin-added `TurnEndReasonMap` kind rendered nothing. When such a turn ended — live or replayed from a persisted log — the agent stopped working with no visible reason, breaking the product expectation that every stop is explained to the user.
## Decision
The `turn/end` case in `packages/ui/tui/src/index.ts` switches on the reason's discriminant and covers every kind: `completed` stays silent because the settled assistant message and its `Completed` timing header already present that outcome; `disposed` appends `Turn stopped: the agent was disposed.`; and the merge-extensible default appends `Turn ended: <kind>.` so an unknown plugin-added outcome still names why the agent stopped. All other kinds keep their existing notices.
## Alternatives considered
**A notice for `completed` turns too.** Rejected as noise: every ordinary response would gain a redundant line, and the assistant message plus its frozen timing header already mark the completion.
**Suppressing the `disposed` turn-end notice live because `agent/disposed` also appends `Agent "<id>" was disposed.`** Rejected: the two notices state different facts (this turn was cut short vs. the agent is gone), and the turn-end notice is the only one that survives replay of a persisted log, where the live `agent/disposed` emission does not recur.
**Keeping the default branch silent (the prior behavior).** Rejected: a merge-extensible kind unknown to the TUI is exactly the case where the user has no other way to learn why the agent stopped.
## Consequences
- A turn never ends without a user-visible reason in the TUI: every non-`completed` `turn/end` kind appends a transcript notice, including unknown plugin-added kinds by name.
- Live disposal during a running turn shows two notices (the turn-end notice plus `agent/disposed`); a replayed log shows the turn-end notice alone.
- The `errors-and-help` snapshot pins the `disposed` and unknown-kind notices alongside the existing failure and interruption notices.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
# Agent Note: TUI 为每种轮次结束 kind 呈现原因
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-24-tui-turn-end-stop-reason-notices.md) | 中文
## 问题
TUI 会为 `error``aborted``max-tokens``rejected``interrupted` 这几种轮次结束渲染 transcript文本记录通知`disposed` 轮次结束和任何插件新增的 `TurnEndReasonMap` kind 不渲染任何内容。此类轮次结束时无论实时发生还是从持久化日志回放agent智能体都会在没有任何可见原因的情况下停止工作违背了「每次停止都要向用户解释」的产品预期。
## 决策
`packages/ui/tui/src/index.ts` 中的 `turn/end` 分支按 reason 的判别字段做 switch覆盖每一种 kind`completed` 保持沉默,因为已定稿的助手消息及其 `Completed` 计时头部已经呈现了这一结果;`disposed` 追加 `Turn stopped: the agent was disposed.`merge 扩展的 default 分支追加 `Turn ended: <kind>.`,让未知的插件新增结果仍能点明 agent 停止的原因。其余各 kind 保留现有通知。
## 备选方案
**为 `completed` 轮次也加一条通知。** 否决,属于噪音:每次普通响应都会平添一行冗余内容,而助手消息加上已冻结的计时头部本就标示了完成。
**因为 `agent/disposed` 也会追加 `Agent "<id>" was disposed.`,就在实时场景下抑制 `disposed` 轮次结束通知。** 否决:两条通知陈述的是不同事实(前者说明这一轮被中途截断,后者说明 agent 已不复存在),而且只有轮次结束通知在回放持久化日志时得以保留,实时发出的 `agent/disposed` 不会在回放中重现。
**让 default 分支保持沉默(沿用先前行为)。** 否决TUI 不认识的 merge 扩展 kind恰恰是用户没有其他途径得知 agent 为何停止的情形。
## 后果
- 在 TUI 中,轮次结束永远不会缺少用户可见的原因:每种非 `completed``turn/end` kind 都会追加一条 transcript 通知,未知的插件新增 kind 也会按名称列明。
- 轮次运行期间实时 dispose资源释放会显示两条通知轮次结束通知加上 `agent/disposed`);回放日志则只显示轮次结束通知。
- `errors-and-help` 快照把 `disposed` 通知和未知 kind 通知连同现有的失败与中断通知一并固定下来。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-27-question-composer-rows-do-not-shrink.md
2026-07-27-question-composer-rows-do-not-shrink.md: 2e0e9b9ca6b141a200ba53d8b6f6f0cad5f7e89d
2026-07-27-question-composer-rows-do-not-shrink.zh.md: 845d9ee883ad1c2c7abc63a01fce626be924b87f

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
# Agent Note: Question-composer option rows are scroll content, not the slack absorber
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-27-question-composer-rows-do-not-shrink.zh.md)
## Problem
The question composer card is capped against the viewport (`max-height: min(60vh, 520px)`) and scrolls its option list, so the header and the footer actions stay reachable on long question batches. When the composer seat got short — a small window, or a short viewport with the details panel open — the option rows rendered on top of each other and on top of the question title.
The cap was not the defect; the distribution of the shortfall was. `.options` is a `flex-direction: column` box whose children default to `flex-shrink: 1`, so under-allocation shrank the rows first instead of overflowing the scroll container. A row shrank to its `min-height: 42px` while `.optionCopy` kept the taller intrinsic height its wrapped copy needs (two lines for an option with a description). With `align-items: center`, the copy is then centered on a box shorter than itself and paints outside the row's border box in both directions — over the title above and the next row below. Measured on the shipped client at 900x440: 6.5px of copy outside the row box, growing to 10px at 380px tall, while `.options` reported `scrollHeight === clientHeight` and therefore never offered a scrollbar.
Only rows whose copy wraps can reproduce it. A row whose copy fits on one line has slack between its content and its 42px minimum, so shrinking it stays invisible — which is why the pre-existing e2e fixture (options `Blue`/`Green`, no descriptions) rendered correctly at every size.
## Decision
`.option` and `.custom` declare `flex-shrink: 0`.
The rows are the scroll content of a capped card; the card's overflow belongs to `.options`, which already owns `overflow-y: auto` and `min-height: 0`. Pinning the children makes the shortfall reach that scroll container instead of being absorbed by the rows, which is the behavior the cap was designed for. The alternative — letting rows shrink but keeping the copy inside them — would require clipping or ellipsizing option descriptions at exactly the sizes where the user most needs to read them.
`.header` and `.footer` already carried `flex-shrink: 0` for the same reason at the card level; the option list's children were the missing half of that rule.
## Alternatives considered
**Clip or ellipsize the copy inside a shrunk row (`overflow: hidden` on `.option`).** This removes the overlap with one declaration and no layout rethink. Rejected because it trades a visible defect for a silent one: the row keeps its 42px, and the second line of an option description simply disappears at exactly the sizes where the card is tightest. The description is decision-relevant content, not decoration.
**Drop `align-items: center` for `align-items: flex-start`.** The copy would grow downward only, so it would no longer paint over the title above. It does not fix anything: a shrunk row still overflows onto the row below, and the fix would silently change the vertical alignment of every option row at every size, including the common one.
**Remove the card's `max-height` cap so nothing is ever squeezed.** No shortfall means no distribution problem. Rejected because the cap is what keeps the header and the footer actions on screen for a long question batch; removing it reintroduces the failure the cap exists to prevent (the composer seat is a fixed-height conversation column with `overflow: hidden`, so an uncapped card loses its own submit button instead).
**Cap the wrapped copy at one line (`white-space: nowrap` plus ellipsis on `.description`).** Rows would never wrap, so they could never overflow when shrunk. Rejected for the same reason as clipping, plus it degrades the wide-viewport rendering — where there is ample room — to fix a narrow-viewport defect.
## Consequences
- A squeezed composer scrolls its option list instead of overlapping it: at 900x380 the list reports `scrollHeight` 200 against `clientHeight` 114 and offers a scrollbar, where before it reported them equal and offered none.
- Option rows keep their full wrapped copy at every viewport size. Nothing is clipped or ellipsized, and the wide-viewport rendering is unchanged (the rule only takes effect when the flex box is under-allocated).
- The card now reaches its scroll state sooner, since the shortfall is no longer partly absorbed by the rows. That is the intended behavior of the cap, and it means a short seat shows a scrollbar in cases that previously showed a silently mis-painted list.
- The scenario's recorded question is longer than it needs to be for the round trip it primarily tests. That cost is deliberate: the layout invariant is unfalsifiable without wrapping copy, and a second fixture for one CSS rule would be worse.
## Verification
The web e2e composer scenario asserts the invariant on the live composer at three squeezed seat heights (900x520 / 440 / 380): every option row's children stay inside the row's border box. Two guards keep the assertion from holding vacuously — at least one row must be wrapped (the only shape that overflows) and `.options` must actually be scrolling (proof the seat is genuinely capped). The scenario's recorded question now carries long option descriptions for exactly that reason; without wrapping copy the assertion cannot fail.
Confirmed both directions against the built client: with `flex-shrink: 0` reverted the scenario fails (`scrolls: false`, 6.5px spill), and with it restored it passes. A standalone geometry sweep over 340 viewport sizes (420-1600 x 320-960) went from 86 sizes with copy outside a row box to zero.
The assertion is replay-only: record mode must reach the fixture write rather than aborting on layout. Note that the composer ships as a client-module bundle, so `pnpm run build:web` alone does not pick up a change to `QuestionComposer.module.css` — the package build must run for the browser lane to see it.
Reproducing the shortfall requires a short viewport, not a short container. The cap is `min(60vh, 520px)`, so shrinking the conversation column below the card's own height clips the card without under-allocating it — the rows keep their full height and nothing spills. Anything demonstrating or measuring this defect outside the e2e scenario has to change the viewport.
A stale `lib/` makes the browser lane assert against an older client than the tree, and a `pnpm run build` that fails part-way leaves exactly that: the packages built before the failure are current, the rest are not. Refreshing a golden in that state records the older client's surface. Confirm the build exited zero before capturing, and note that untracked directories under `packages/` are compiled too — a leftover from another branch can fail the build for reasons the diff does not explain.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
# Agent Note: 提问 composer 的选项行是滚动内容,而非空间不足时的吸收方
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-27-question-composer-rows-do-not-shrink.md) | 中文
## 问题
提问 composer 的卡片会按视口设上限(`max-height: min(60vh, 520px)`),并让选项列表自行滚动,这样在成批提问时标题和底部操作按钮始终可达。但当 composer 的容器变矮时(窗口较小,或视口偏矮且详情面板处于展开状态),选项行会互相叠在一起,也会叠到问题标题上。
缺陷不在这个高度上限,而在高度不足时由谁来吸收。`.options` 是一个 `flex-direction: column` 的盒子,其子元素默认取 `flex-shrink: 1`,因此空间不足时首先被压缩的是各个选项行,而不是让滚动容器产生溢出。一行会被压到它的 `min-height: 42px`,而 `.optionCopy` 仍保持文案折行后所需的更大固有高度(带描述的选项会占两行)。由于 `align-items: center`,文案于是以一个比自身更矮的盒子为基准居中,并向上下两个方向画到该行边框盒之外——向上盖住标题,向下盖住下一行。在实际发布的客户端上于 900x440 处实测:文案有 6.5px 落在行盒之外,视口高度降到 380px 时增至 10px`.options` 报告的 `scrollHeight` 等于 `clientHeight`,因此始终不会给出滚动条。
只有文案会折行的选项行才能复现该问题。文案单行即可容纳的行,其内容与 42px 最小高度之间尚有余量,被压缩也看不出来——这正是既有 e2e fixture测试前置数据选项为 `Blue``Green`,无描述)在任何尺寸下都渲染正常的原因。
## 决策
`.option``.custom` 声明 `flex-shrink: 0`
在设有高度上限的卡片中,这些行是滚动内容;卡片的溢出归 `.options` 承担,它本就持有 `overflow-y: auto``min-height: 0`。把子元素固定住之后,高度不足会传导到那个滚动容器,而不再被行本身吸收,这正是该高度上限设计时想要的行为。另一种做法是允许行被压缩,但把文案约束在行内,那就必须在用户最需要阅读选项描述的尺寸上对其做裁剪或省略号处理。
`.header``.footer` 出于同样的原因,已在卡片层级带有 `flex-shrink: 0`;选项列表的子元素正是这条规则缺失的另一半。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**在被压缩的行内裁剪文案或加省略号(对 `.option` 设 `overflow: hidden`)。** 这样一条声明就能消除重叠,且不必重新考虑布局。之所以否决:它把一个可见缺陷换成了一个无声缺陷——行仍保持 42px而选项描述的第二行会在卡片最紧张的那些尺寸上直接消失。描述属于影响决策的内容不是装饰。
**把 `align-items: center` 改为 `align-items: flex-start`。** 文案就只会向下生长,因此不再向上盖住标题。但这什么也没修好:被压缩的行依然会溢出到下一行上,而且这一改动会在所有尺寸下(包括常见尺寸)无声改变每个选项行的垂直对齐。
**移除卡片的 `max-height` 上限,使其永远不会被压缩。** 没有高度不足就没有分配问题。之所以否决正是这个上限保证成批提问时标题和底部操作按钮留在屏幕内移除它会重新引入该上限本就为之存在的失败composer 所处的容器是一个固定高度、`overflow: hidden` 的会话列,因此不设上限的卡片会连自己的提交按钮一起丢掉)。
**把折行文案限制为单行(对 `.description` 设 `white-space: nowrap` 加省略号)。** 行永远不会折行,因此被压缩时也永远不会溢出。否决理由与裁剪相同,此外它还为了修一个窄视口缺陷,而牺牲了空间充裕的宽视口渲染效果。
## 后果
- 被压缩的 composer 会滚动其选项列表,而不是让它互相重叠:在 900x380 处,该列表报告 `scrollHeight` 为 200、`clientHeight` 为 114并给出滚动条此前两者相等不给滚动条。
- 选项行在任何视口尺寸下都保留完整的折行文案。不裁剪、不加省略号,宽视口下的渲染保持不变(该规则仅在 flex 盒子空间不足时才生效)。
- 由于高度不足不再被行部分吸收,卡片现在更早进入滚动状态。这正是该高度上限想要的行为,也意味着在此前只会无声画错列表的情形下,矮容器现在会显示滚动条。
- 该场景录制的问题,比它主要测试的那次往返所需的长度更长。这个代价是有意付出的:没有折行文案,该布局不变式无法被证伪,而为一条 CSS 规则再加一份 fixture 会更糟。
## 验证
Web e2e 的 composer 场景会在三个被压缩的容器高度900x520440380对活动的 composer 断言该运行时不变式:每个选项行的子元素都留在该行的边框盒之内。两道守卫防止该断言空洞地成立——必须至少有一行处于折行状态(这是唯一会溢出的形态),且 `.options` 必须确实处在滚动状态(证明容器确实触及了高度上限)。该场景录制的问题现在带有较长的选项描述,正是为此;没有折行文案,这条断言不可能失败。
在构建产物客户端上双向确认过:撤销 `flex-shrink: 0` 后该场景失败(`scrolls: false`6.5px 溢出),恢复后通过。一次覆盖 340 种视口尺寸420-1600 x 320-960的独立几何遍历从 86 种尺寸存在文案落在行盒之外,降到 0 种。
该断言仅在回放模式下执行:录制模式必须走到写入 fixture 那一步而不是在布局检查处中断。另需注意composer 以客户端模组包的形式发布,因此单跑 `pnpm run build:web` 不会带上对 `QuestionComposer.module.css` 的改动——必须执行包构建,浏览器测试通道才能看到它。
要复现这种空间不足,需要的是矮视口,而不是矮容器。高度上限为 `min(60vh, 520px)`,因此把会话列压到比卡片自身高度更矮,只会裁剪卡片,而不会让它空间不足——各行仍保持完整高度,也不会有任何溢出。凡是在 e2e 场景之外演示或测量该缺陷的手段,都必须改变视口。
`lib/` 陈旧会让浏览器测试通道对着一个比工作树更旧的客户端做断言,而中途失败的 `pnpm run build` 留下的正是这种状态:失败之前构建的那些包是新的,其余不是。在这种状态下刷新 golden记录下来的是旧客户端的界面。抓取之前先确认构建以 0 退出;另需注意 `packages/` 下的未跟踪目录同样会被编译——来自另一个分支的遗留物可能以 diff 无法解释的原因让构建失败。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-27-stable-snapshot-refresh-volatiles.md
2026-07-27-stable-snapshot-refresh-volatiles.md: e2e951cd9f78b319a701a3e60afba48786633f03
2026-07-27-stable-snapshot-refresh-volatiles.zh.md: 55302b509e28520f90f6cd820e4962be014318cc

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
# Agent Note: Stable snapshot refresh volatiles
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-27-stable-snapshot-refresh-volatiles.zh.md)
## Problem
ACP snapshot comparison normalizes generated UUIDs, cwd aliases, spill locators, embedded event times, and omitted-byte counts, but refresh write-back persisted the fresh raw values. A behaviorally unchanged refresh therefore rewrote fixtures with new randomness or host-specific path spellings even though the comparison contract considered both logs equal.
## Decision
Refresh write-back uses `normalizeSessionLog` as its sole volatile-value authority. It normalizes the original harvested records with the fresh run's ids, cwd, and every cwd alias, while normalizing fixture records with the fixture header context; literal replacements affect only the raw values being written. After existing record alignment, it recursively compares fresh and existing leaves through those normalized records: normalized-equivalent leaves retain the existing raw value, while normalized-distinct leaves retain the fresh semantic value.
Before reuse, the complete logical-record layout must align, apart from the existing packed-chunk and inserted-title equivalences. Normalized-equivalent changed strings form a log-wide bijection: one fresh string maps to exactly one existing string and vice versa, so repeated IDs remain correlated across records. An unexplained record mismatch or conflicting mapping disables normalized string reuse for that log.
Object fields align by key. Array elements align only when all corresponding arrays have the same length; otherwise the fresh array wins. Strings remain atomic leaves. Existing packed-chunk timing alignment and inserted-title handling remain separate because they align logical events rather than values inside one record.
## Alternatives considered
**Use deterministic UUIDs and spill filenames in snapshot deployments.** Replacing production randomness would weaken the security shape under test or require test-only behavior in storage and approval implementations.
**Commit normalized fixtures.** Tokenized session logs would stop being raw replay inputs and would cause a broad fixture migration unrelated to the write-back defect.
**Preserve a whole record when its normalized form is unchanged.** This is simpler but churns a random field whenever another field in the same record changes semantically. Leaf-level preservation keeps those decisions independent.
## Consequences
Repeated refreshes no longer rewrite aligned fixture values solely because the normalizer classifies them as volatile, and new volatile categories added to the normalizer automatically inherit the write-back behavior. Structural ambiguity remains conservative: unmatched records, conflicting string mappings, resized arrays, and strings containing both semantic and volatile changes use fresh values rather than risk reusing misaligned data.
Focused unit coverage pins recursive object/array behavior, correlated IDs, ambiguous-layout fallback, conflicting mappings, fresh cwd aliases, volatile strings, and fresh semantic fields. Keyless refresh coverage proves approval UUIDs, cwd aliases, spill paths, and event-read volatility leave their committed fixtures byte-identical.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
# Agent Note: 稳定快照刷新中的易变值
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-27-stable-snapshot-refresh-volatiles.md) | 中文
## 问题
ACPAgent Client Protocol快照比较会归一化生成的 UUID、cwd 别名、spill locator、嵌入的事件时间和省略字节数但刷新写回会持久化本次生成的原始值。因此即使比较契约将两份日志视为相等一次行为未发生变化的刷新仍会用新的随机值或宿主特有的路径写法改写 fixture测试前置数据
## 决策
刷新写回以 `normalizeSessionLog` 作为易变值的唯一判定依据。系统使用本次运行的 id、cwd 及全部 cwd 别名归一化原始收集记录,并使用 fixture header 上下文归一化 fixture 记录;字面量替换只影响要写入的原始值。现有记录完成对齐后,系统基于这些归一化记录,递归比较本次生成记录与现有记录的叶节点:归一化后等价的叶节点保留现有原始值,归一化后不同的叶节点则保留本次生成的语义值。
复用前必须确保完整逻辑记录布局对齐,现有的打包分片与插入标题等价情形除外。归一化后等价但发生变化的字符串在整份日志范围内形成双射:一个本次生成的字符串只映射到一个现有字符串,反向亦然,因此跨记录重复出现的 ID 仍保持关联。出现无法解释的记录不匹配或映射冲突时,该日志会停用规范化字符串复用。
对象字段按键对齐。只有所有对应数组长度相同时,才对齐其元素;否则以本次生成的数组为准。字符串始终作为不可拆分的叶节点。现有的打包分片计时对齐与插入标题处理仍保持独立,因为它们对齐的是逻辑事件,而非单条记录内的值。
## 考虑过的替代方案
**在快照部署中使用确定性的 UUID 和 spill 文件名。** 替换生产环境使用的随机性会削弱测试所要验证的安全属性,或者要求存储与审批实现引入仅用于测试的行为。
**提交归一化后的 fixture。** token 化的会话日志将不再是原始回放输入,并会引发与写回缺陷无关的大范围 fixture 迁移。
**当整条记录的归一化形式未变时保留整条记录。** 这种做法更简单,但同一记录中的另一个字段发生语义变化时,也会改写其中的随机字段。按叶节点保留可使这些决策彼此独立。
## 后果
重复刷新不再仅仅因为规范化器将已对齐的 fixture 值归类为易变值,就改写这些值;以后加入规范化器的新易变值类别也会自动继承该写回行为。结构有歧义时仍采取保守策略:记录无法匹配、字符串映射冲突、数组尺寸发生变化,或字符串同时包含语义变化与易变变化时,均使用本次生成的值,避免冒险复用未对齐的数据。
聚焦的单元测试固定了递归处理对象与数组的行为、关联 ID、有歧义布局时的回退、映射冲突、本次运行的 cwd 别名、易变字符串以及本次生成的语义字段。无密钥刷新测试证明,审批 UUID、cwd 别名、spill 路径和事件读取中的易变值不会改变已提交 fixture 的任何字节。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-27-tool-card-single-row-fields-inline.md
2026-07-27-tool-card-single-row-fields-inline.md: e04110ed74b68afffc6ea45fc2cb52c4063268e7
2026-07-27-tool-card-single-row-fields-inline.zh.md: ac532ec6eb51d42a529e0816d1204cb2729a074a

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
# Agent Note: Tool-card single-row fields render inline
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-27-tool-card-single-row-fields-inline.zh.md)
## Problem
A tool card's title, description, cwd, and pending `$ <command>` echo are each one logical row. The bash tool sets the card title (and description) directly from the model's command and description, which for a multi-line bash script contain real newlines. These fields were escaped with `displayText`, which deliberately preserves `\n` as structural layout. A multi-line title therefore broke onto extra terminal rows that the card's line accounting did not reserve, so the title's later lines overwrote the description, the output, or the editor's steering hint — the card rendered as garbled, overlapping text. Removing the gutter bar (see the [copyable-transcript note](../simplification/2026-07-27-copyable-transcript-no-gutter-bar.md)) made the collision visible because those rows no longer sat behind a per-line prefix.
## Decision
Single-row card fields use `displayInlineText` (which escapes `\n` to the literal `\x0a`) instead of `displayText`: the card title, the terminal-card `description` and `cwd` meta rows, and the pending `$ <command>` echo. Each stays on exactly one row, so a multi-line command can no longer break rows and collide with adjacent lines. Genuinely multi-line fields — captured command output and the `contentText` result body — keep `displayText` plus `split('\n')`, because those legitimately occupy multiple rows.
## Alternatives considered
- **Strip newlines from the presenter output** (in the bash tool) — hides the model's real command shape from any consumer of the view, and pushes a UI concern into the tool. The escape belongs at the single-row render site.
- **Let the title wrap to multiple rows deliberately** — a card title is a one-line identity; a wrapped multi-line title still collides with the following meta rows unless the whole card is re-laid-out, and it bloats the transcript.
## Consequences
- Multi-line bash commands render as a single inline title (`S=/tmp\x0aecho …`); the description, output, and exit rows below stay intact. Verified live in tmux for both the pending (`◌`) and completed (`✓`) states.
- A `multilineTerminal` tool-card case in `tui.spec.ts` asserts the inline-escaped form appears for a newline-bearing title and description.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
# Agent Note: 工具卡片的单行字段以内联方式渲染
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-27-tool-card-single-row-fields-inline.md) | 中文
## Problem
工具卡片的标题、描述、cwd 以及待执行的 `$ <command>` 回显各自都是一个逻辑行。bash 工具直接用模型给出的命令与描述来设置卡片标题(和描述),而对于多行 bash 脚本,这些内容包含真实换行。这些字段此前用 `displayText` 转义,而 `displayText` 会刻意保留 `\n` 作为结构性布局。于是多行标题会换到卡片行数核算未预留的额外终端行上,标题后续的行便覆盖了描述、输出,或编辑器的 steering 提示——卡片渲染成互相重叠的乱码文本。移除 gutter bar见[可复制 transcript 的 note](../simplification/2026-07-27-copyable-transcript-no-gutter-bar.md))后,这些行不再位于逐行前缀之后,因而暴露了这一冲突。
## Decision
单行卡片字段改用 `displayInlineText`(将 `\n` 转义为字面量 `\x0a`)而非 `displayText`包括卡片标题、terminal 卡片的 `description``cwd` 元数据行,以及待执行的 `$ <command>` 回显。每个字段都严格保持在一行内,因此多行命令不再会换行并与相邻行冲突。真正多行的字段——捕获的命令输出与 `contentText` 结果正文——仍保留 `displayText``split('\n')`,因为它们本就应占据多行。
## Alternatives considered
- **在 presenter 输出中剥除换行**(在 bash 工具里)—— 会对该视图的所有消费方隐藏模型真实的命令形态,并把 UI 关注点塞进工具。转义应发生在单行渲染处。
- **让标题刻意换到多行** —— 卡片标题是一行式身份标识;除非重排整个卡片,多行标题仍会与其后的元数据行冲突,还会让 transcript 膨胀。
## Consequences
- 多行 bash 命令渲染为单行内联标题(`S=/tmp\x0aecho …`);其下的描述、输出与退出码行保持完整。已在 tmux 中对待执行(`◌`)与已完成(`✓`)两种状态实测验证。
- `tui.spec.ts` 中新增了一个 `multilineTerminal` 工具卡片用例,断言对含换行的标题与描述会出现内联转义后的形式。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-07-27-tui-diff-card-redundant-path-header.md
2026-07-27-tui-diff-card-redundant-path-header.md: 708e543ff079828b4929d2a50ac697a9c846608a
2026-07-27-tui-diff-card-redundant-path-header.zh.md: 863868ae707f37689bbc202267c5470d8c3163e9

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
# Agent Note: TUI diff card dropped the duplicated file path
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-27-tui-diff-card-redundant-path-header.zh.md)
## Problem
The `edit` and `write` tool cards printed the target path twice. Each tool's `presentCall`/`presentResult` returns a diff card whose title is `Edit <path>`/`Write <path>` and whose single `FileDiff` carries the same `path`. The TUI's `diffLines` unconditionally rendered `palette.bold(diff.path)` as a per-file header, so a one-file edit rendered:
```
✓ Edit src/foo.ts
src/foo.ts
- old
+ new
```
The existing snapshot fixture hid the bug: it titled the edit card `Edit renderer` (no path) and gave the result two diffs, so the title never matched a diff path and the header never looked redundant.
## Decision
`diffLines` takes a `showPath` flag; `ToolCardComponent.renderBody` suppresses the per-file header for a diff card when there is exactly one diff and the effective card title (`resultView?.title ?? callView.title`) already contains that diff's path. Multi-file diff cards keep every per-file header. An empty or blank diff path collapses under the same `String.includes` check, which is the intended noise removal.
The suppression lives in the TUI renderer, not in each tool's presenter, because the redundancy is a presentation concern shared by every current and future single-file diff card; the tools keep emitting the path in both the title and the diff so non-TUI consumers still get it.
## Alternatives considered
- Drop the path from the `edit`/`write` card titles. Rejected: the title is the scannable summary line; removing the path weakens it, and it would have to be repeated per tool.
- Always drop the per-file header. Rejected: multi-file result diffs (and any future multi-file diff card) genuinely need per-file headers.
## Consequences
The heuristic is a substring match, so a title that happens to contain a single diff's path suppresses the header even if the match is incidental; for the real producers the title is exactly `Verb <path>`, so this is correct in practice. The snapshot `edit` fixture now mirrors production: one diff whose path the title names, proving the header is dropped, while multi-file header retention is covered by the `tui.spec.ts` `edit` fixture (`a.txt`/`b.txt` under an `Edit files` title).
## Testing
`tui.spec.ts` adds a focused case asserting the path appears exactly once for a single-diff card titled `Edit src/only.ts`. The `advanced-cards-*` keyless snapshots re-recorded to show the title line immediately followed by the diff body with no repeated path header.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
# Agent Note: TUI diff 卡片重复打印文件路径
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-27-tui-diff-card-redundant-path-header.md) | 中文
## Problem
`edit``write` 工具卡片会把目标路径打印两次。两者的 `presentCall`/`presentResult` 返回的 diff 卡片,标题为 `Edit <path>`/`Write <path>`,而其唯一的 `FileDiff` 又携带相同的 `path`。TUI 的 `diffLines` 无条件地将 `palette.bold(diff.path)` 渲染为每文件的表头,因此单文件编辑会渲染成:
```
✓ Edit src/foo.ts
src/foo.ts
- old
+ new
```
既有的快照 fixture 掩盖了这个问题:它把编辑卡片标题设为 `Edit renderer`(不含路径),并让结果包含两个 diff于是标题从未与某个 diff 路径匹配,表头也就不显得冗余。
## Decision
`diffLines` 新增 `showPath` 参数;当一个 diff 卡片只有一个 diff、且生效标题`resultView?.title ?? callView.title`)已包含该 diff 的路径时,`ToolCardComponent.renderBody` 抑制每文件表头。多文件 diff 卡片保留全部每文件表头。空白或空路径同样落入这条 `String.includes` 判定之下,这正是有意去除的噪声。
抑制逻辑放在 TUI 渲染层,而非各工具的 present 方法中,因为这种冗余是所有当前及未来单文件 diff 卡片共有的展示问题;工具仍在标题和 diff 中同时给出路径,从而非 TUI 消费方依旧能拿到它。
## Alternatives considered
-`edit`/`write` 卡片标题中去掉路径。已否决:标题是可快速扫读的摘要行,去掉路径会削弱它,而且需要在每个工具里重复处理。
- 一律去掉每文件表头。已否决:多文件结果 diff以及未来任何多文件 diff 卡片)确实需要每文件表头。
## Consequences
该启发式是子串匹配,因此若标题恰好包含某个单一 diff 的路径,即便是偶然匹配也会抑制表头;对真实的产出方而言标题恰为 `Verb <path>`,故在实践中是正确的。快照 `edit` fixture 现在与生产一致:单个 diff其路径正是标题所命名从而证明表头被去除而多文件表头保留由 `tui.spec.ts``edit` fixture`Edit files` 标题下的 `a.txt`/`b.txt`)覆盖。
## Testing
`tui.spec.ts` 新增一个聚焦用例,断言标题为 `Edit src/only.ts` 的单 diff 卡片中路径恰好出现一次。`advanced-cards-*` 无密钥快照已重新录制,展示标题行紧接 diff 正文、不再有重复的路径表头。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-02-result-time-applied-hunk-diffs.md: 55e1612aacd9070ede2f0079c73c30975e1bd5cf
2026-07-02-result-time-applied-hunk-diffs.zh.md: 6fe0032a507af2915bdf79a43578082785411479
2026-07-27-tui-step-timing-trails-tool-cards.md: 82f46b44d3b939ca89c4508eb948ed584082d9fd
2026-07-27-tui-step-timing-trails-tool-cards.zh.md: 885b232973d20013782dee7ec1e846e7a012b01e

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
# Agent Note: TUI step timing trails the step's last message
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-27-tui-step-timing-trails-tool-cards.zh.md)
## Problem
The per-step timing summary (`Model wait … · Completed …`) was a child of the assistant message component, so it rendered directly under the assistant text. When a step drove tool calls, the tool cards were appended to the chat *after* the assistant message, leaving the timing line stranded above them — one message before the step's actual last output. The summary is meant to close a step, so on any tool-calling step it appeared in the wrong place.
## Decision
The timing summary is its own `StepTimingComponent`, no longer a child of `AssistantMessageComponent`. `StreamingAssistantComponent` owns one and exposes it as `timing`, but the renderer attaches it to the chat as a sibling that follows the assistant message. Whenever a `tool/call` or `tool/result` of the open step appends a card, `trailStreamingTiming()` moves the footer back to the tail of the chat, so it always trails the step's last message. On `step/end` the footer is completed in place — already at the tail — and stays pinned while the next step's output follows. `removeStreaming` and the reasoning-toggle rebuild detach and reattach the footer together with its streaming component.
Event ordering makes this exact: within a step the loop appends `tool/call` and `tool/result` before `step/end`, so the footer is repositioned while `streaming` is still set, then frozen when the step ends.
## Alternatives considered
**Keep the timing inside the assistant message and reorder tool cards above it.** Rejected: tool cards belong after the assistant text that requested them; moving them above the assistant message to sit under the timing would misrepresent the transcript order.
**Recompute a single trailing footer for the whole turn instead of one per step.** Rejected: a multi-step turn shows each step's own completed timing, and collapsing them would drop the per-step buckets the existing timing tests pin.
**Reposition the footer from a `step/end`-only handler.** Rejected: tool cards render before `step/end`, so a footer moved only at step end would already be trailing but would not track a mid-step re-render, and the running (pre-completion) footer would still sit above the tool cards during streaming.
## Consequences
- On a tool-calling step the timing summary renders below the tool cards, both while the turn runs and after it completes; the package snapshots (`untrusted-controls`, `cordis-tools-pending`, `advanced-cards-*`, `code-mode-pending`, `dynamic-workflow-pending`, `surface-before-compaction`) and the example transcripts (`todo-plan`, `bash-terminal-card`, `code-mode`, `parallel-file-reads`, `dynamic-workflow`, `cordis-dynamic-toolchain`, `code-mode-dispatch-spill`) pin the new order.
- A unit test asserts the completed timing appears after a step's tool output; it fails on the pre-fix ordering.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
# Agent Note: TUI 步骤计时跟在该步骤最后一条消息之后
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-27-tui-step-timing-trails-tool-cards.md) | 中文
## 问题
每步的计时摘要(`Model wait … · Completed …`)原本是助手消息组件的子节点,因此直接渲染在助手文本下方。当某一步触发 tool call 时tool card工具卡片会在助手消息*之后*追加到聊天区,使计时行被搁在它们上方——落在该步骤真正的最后一条输出之前一条消息处。该摘要本意是收束一个步骤,因此在任何含 tool call 的步骤上都出现在了错误的位置。
## 决策
计时摘要现在是独立的 `StepTimingComponent`,不再是 `AssistantMessageComponent` 的子节点。`StreamingAssistantComponent` 持有一个并以 `timing` 暴露它,但渲染器把它作为紧随助手消息之后的同级节点挂到聊天区。每当当前打开步骤的 `tool/call``tool/result` 追加一张卡片,`trailStreamingTiming()` 就把该页脚移回聊天区末尾,使它始终跟在该步骤的最后一条消息之后。在 `step/end` 时该页脚就地定稿——此时已在末尾——并在后续步骤的输出接续时保持钉住。`removeStreaming` 与推理开关重建会把该页脚连同其流式组件一起摘除并重新挂上。
事件顺序让这一点精确成立:在一个步骤内,循环会先追加 `tool/call``tool/result`,再追加 `step/end`,因此页脚是在 `streaming` 仍被设置时重新定位的,随后在步骤结束时冻结。
## 备选方案
**把计时保留在助手消息内部,改为把 tool card 排到它上方。** 否决tool card 应位于请求它们的助手文本之后;把它们移到助手消息上方以贴在计时下方,会歪曲 transcript文本记录的顺序。
**为整个轮次重算一个末尾页脚,而非每步一个。** 否决:多步轮次会显示各步自己的完成计时,合并它们会丢掉现有计时测试所固定的每步分桶。
**只在 `step/end` 处理器里重新定位页脚。** 否决tool card 在 `step/end` 之前渲染,因此仅在步骤结束时移动的页脚虽已处于末尾,却无法跟踪步骤中途的重新渲染,而且流式过程中运行态(完成前)的页脚仍会落在 tool card 上方。
## 后果
- 在含 tool call 的步骤上,计时摘要渲染在 tool card 下方,轮次运行期间与完成之后皆如此;相关包快照(`untrusted-controls``cordis-tools-pending``advanced-cards-*``code-mode-pending``dynamic-workflow-pending``surface-before-compaction`)与示例 transcript`todo-plan``bash-terminal-card``code-mode``parallel-file-reads``dynamic-workflow``cordis-dynamic-toolchain``code-mode-dispatch-spill`)固定了新顺序。
- 一个单元测试断言完成计时出现在某步骤的工具输出之后;在修复前的顺序下它会失败。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-15-code-mode.md: 38d1ebdda089f1cfa1c5f3192fa2399b3a00102b
2026-06-15-code-mode.zh.md: 2ddccb005b806fee0b1f4d6f79d6473f492a117d
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-15-code-mode.md
2026-06-15-code-mode.md: b6a24ecd9700e32912b8112b59cbd8b6ab131eb5
2026-06-15-code-mode.zh.md: 4d0a4cf8fa31cf9d9954e5bd95f823dfc0668444

View File

@@ -130,4 +130,4 @@ Deployments switching to `'code'` must update any native-only `toolOrder`. Assem
**Serialized-only sub-dispatch.** `Promise.all` gains no wall-clock parallelism yet, only fewer round-trips; models may over-expect. The instructions state it; lifting it is tied to the same concurrency-safety metadata the native parallel-dispatch TODO needs.
**Budget metering reads the event loop, not a flag.** Busy-time polling (`eventLoopUtilization()`) is coarser than an exact CPU meter — a budget expires up to one poll interval late — and its correctness claim ("a pending dispatch cannot pause it") is load-bearing against a hostile program. Both sides are unit-tested (hot loop with a pending decoy dispatch dies at `computeMs`; idle-on-slow-binding survives to `maxWallMs`), and the poll interval is an internal constant, not config — nothing a deployment could mis-tune into a bypass.
**Budget metering reads the event loop, not a flag.** Busy-time polling (`eventLoopUtilization()`) is coarser than an exact CPU meter — a budget expires up to one poll interval late — and its correctness claim ("a pending dispatch cannot pause it") is load-bearing against a hostile program. Both sides are unit-tested (hot loop with a pending decoy dispatch dies at `computeMs`; idle-on-slow-binding survives to `maxWallMs`), and the poll interval is an internal constant, not config — nothing a deployment could mis-tune into a bypass. `maxWallMs` is config, and it reaches `setTimeout`, which clamps a delay above `MAX_TIMER_DELAY_MS` (2^31-1 ms) to 1 ms; a positivity check alone therefore accepts a 25-day ceiling that expires on the first tick and times out every run. The worker runtime range-checks the field at load for that reason. `computeMs` needs no upper bound because it is compared against measured utilization instead of being handed to a timer.

View File

@@ -130,4 +130,4 @@ SDK 指示模型编写一个异步的可擦除 TypeScript 函数体,通过 `aw
**仅序列化的子分发。** `Promise.all` 尚未获得挂钟并行性,仅减少往返次数;模型可能过度期望。说明中已声明;解除此限制与原生并行分发 TODO 所需的并发安全元数据绑定。
**预算计量读取事件循环,而非 flag。** 忙碌时间轮询(`eventLoopUtilization()`)比精确 CPU 计量更粗糙——预算到期最多延迟一个轮询间隔——且其正确性声明「pending 的分发不能暂停它」)对恶意程序是承重的。两侧都有单元测试(带 pending 诱饵分发的热循环在 `computeMs` 处死亡;在慢绑定上空闲的程序存活到 `maxWallMs`),轮询间隔是内部常量而非配置——部署无法将其误调为绕过手段。
**预算计量读取事件循环,而非 flag。** 忙碌时间轮询(`eventLoopUtilization()`)比精确 CPU 计量更粗糙——预算到期最多延迟一个轮询间隔——且其正确性声明「pending 的分发不能暂停它」)对恶意程序是承重的。两侧都有单元测试(带 pending 诱饵分发的热循环在 `computeMs` 处死亡;在慢绑定上空闲的程序存活到 `maxWallMs`),轮询间隔是内部常量而非配置——部署无法将其误调为绕过手段。`maxWallMs` 是配置项,且会传入 `setTimeout`,后者会把超过 `MAX_TIMER_DELAY_MS`2^31-1 ms的延迟夹到 1 ms因此仅有正数校验会放行一个 25 天的上限,它在第一个 tick 就到期使每次运行都超时。worker 运行时正因如此在加载时对该字段做范围校验。`computeMs` 不需要上界,因为它对照的是实测占用率,而不是交给定时器。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md: a263b5e7d0245bd1279024a50e05b2f33edad521
2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.zh.md: df0cf9d9131978e608d47124ba0f0db0343ee12a
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md
2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md: 3c219b734e148b963fb5857de89c16f28c2bd402
2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.zh.md: b2c7e9720b596705b60a284e6ccf1448a782b7fc

View File

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ An earlier draft put the full algorithm (the retention walk, token-summing, text
Successful-call pressure cannot run at pre-step because final `agent/request` routing, provider output, tool results, buffered context, and steering do not exist there. Serial `agent/post-step(agent, turn, step, signal)` fires after those facts are durable and before `step/end`. `dsh-compact-basic` measures the canonical logged request through `ctx.tokenMeter`, so the next request sees any replacement without a speculative envelope override. Once pressure qualifies, optional `ctx.toolResultPrune` rewriting runs before summary selection; compact-basic remeasures the durable surface and skips summarization if pruning restores safe pressure.
Canonical provider context overflow takes a separate path. The failed step closes, `agent/request-error` receives the original request error and consecutive retry count, and compact-basic prunes before forcing one useful balanced reduction. It returns retry only if `session.surface.replaceGeneration` increases, including pruning-only progress when no summary range exists; the loop then opens a new numbered step and reconstructs its request from the durable log. No replacement, a recovery failure before any replacement, cancellation, an exhausted cap, or an unrelated error preserves the original provider failure. If pruning already advanced the generation before later summary work fails, recovery retries from that durable pruned surface unless cancellation or disposal wins. The complete lifecycle decision is in the [after-call recovery Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.md).
Canonical provider context overflow takes a separate path. The failed step closes and `agent/request-error` receives the original request error. Compact-basic owns its per-agent overflow count, prunes before forcing one useful balanced reduction, and returns `{ kind: 'retry' }` only if `session.surface.replaceGeneration` increases, including pruning-only progress when no summary range exists. The loop then closes the failed turn, opens a new numbered retry turn, and reconstructs its request from the durable log. No replacement, a recovery failure before any replacement, cancellation, an exhausted cap, or an unrelated error preserves the original provider failure. If pruning already advanced the generation before later summary work fails, recovery retries from that durable pruned surface unless cancellation or disposal wins. The complete lifecycle decision is in the [after-call recovery Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.md).
```
assistant/message → tool/result/context/steering

View File

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Status: implemented
成功调用的压力检查不能在步骤前运行,因为最终的 `agent/request` 路由、提供方输出、工具结果、缓冲上下文与 steering 当时尚不存在。串行的 `agent/post-step(agent, turn, step, signal)` 会在这些事实持久化后、`step/end` 之前触发。`dsh-compact-basic` 通过 `ctx.tokenMeter` 测量规范的已记录请求,因此下一个请求无需推测性覆盖信封即可看到任何替换。压力达到条件后,可选的 `ctx.toolResultPrune` 重写在摘要范围选择前运行compact-basic 重新测量持久 surface如果修剪恢复到安全压力便跳过摘要生成。
规范的提供方上下文溢出走另一条路径。失败步骤先关闭,`agent/request-error` 接收原始请求错误与连续重试次数,compact-basic 在强制执行一次有效且平衡的缩减前先修剪仅当 `session.surface.replaceGeneration` 增加时,它才返回 retry;这包括没有摘要范围时仅修剪取得的进展。随后循环开启新的编号步骤,并从持久日志重建请求。没有替换、任何替换前的恢复失败、取消、耗尽的上限或无关错误都会保留原始提供方失败。如果修剪已经推进 generation而后续摘要工作失败恢复会从该持久的已修剪 surface 重试,除非取消或资源释放胜出。完整生命周期决策见[调用后恢复 Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.md)。
规范的提供方上下文溢出走另一条路径。失败步骤先关闭,`agent/request-error` 接收原始请求错误compact-basic 自行持有按 agent 计的溢出次数,在强制执行一次有效且平衡的缩减前先修剪,且仅当 `session.surface.replaceGeneration` 增加时才返回 `{ kind: 'retry' }`;这包括没有摘要范围时仅修剪取得的进展。随后循环关闭失败轮次,开启新的编号重试轮次,并从持久日志重建请求。没有替换、任何替换前的恢复失败、取消、耗尽的上限或无关错误都会保留原始提供方失败。如果修剪已经推进 generation而后续摘要工作失败恢复会从该持久的已修剪 surface 重试,除非取消或资源释放胜出。完整生命周期决策见[调用后恢复 Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-10-after-call-compaction-pressure-and-overflow-recovery.md)。
```
assistant/message → tool/result/context/steering

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-24-workspace-context.md: 6acdb6241bcc57250e217cfc8856e8b0598d4622
2026-06-24-workspace-context.zh.md: f165d08108931df21697c7895523f10ef816297f
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-24-workspace-context.md
2026-06-24-workspace-context.md: f86e227be615c9b54e2a9013d3c7dca75d3975f0
2026-06-24-workspace-context.zh.md: 154b5260955570e2de3c88d98286c5ea6afaa3b5

View File

@@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ Repository guidance such as `AGENTS.md` belongs in a coding session's effective
Neighboring products establish useful conventions but differ in details. Codex treats `AGENTS.md` as native, Claude Code uses `CLAUDE.md` and familiar system-reminder-style user context, and opencode supports both names with one winner per directory plus lazy nested discovery. The harness needs cross-tool compatibility without loading duplicate or contradictory files from the same scope.
The lifecycle has two distinct classes of content. The initial applicable chain is stable enough to live in the request prefix and benefit from provider prefix caching. Nested files, edits, candidate switches, and removals happen after the session starts and belong in durable append-only history rather than the frozen prefix.
The lifecycle has two distinct classes of content. The initial applicable chain is injected once before the first request. Nested files, edits, candidate switches, and removals happen later and join the same durable append-only history.
## Decision
The implementation lives in `packages/context/workspace-context` as `@deepseek-ai/dsh-workspace-context`. It is a request-context extension, not a core service or a filesystem backend. The shared demo spine and Host Runtime mount it from an explicit `{ maxBytes } | false` deployment choice; `dsh web` enables a 65,536-byte budget while the Host Runtime's headless consumer disables it. The plugin consumes `agent/session-prefix`, `tools/post-execute`, and the optional `ctx.fs` capability.
The implementation lives in `packages/context/workspace-context` as `@deepseek-ai/dsh-workspace-context`. It is a request-context extension, not a core service or a filesystem backend. The shared demo spine and Host Runtime mount it from an explicit `{ maxBytes } | false` deployment choice; `dsh web` enables a 65,536-byte budget while the Host Runtime's headless consumer disables it. The plugin consumes `agent/step`, `tools/post-execute`, and the optional `ctx.fs` capability.
The plugin does not statically inject `fs`. Providerless product trees therefore boot normally and the plugin no-ops until a filesystem provider exists. All production reads go through that provider. Candidate probes resolve each path and stat the result, so a final-component symlink is followed to its target: a link to a regular file loads, while a missing path or a non-file target is a confirmed absence. Following repository-owned links across the trust boundary is a deliberate reversal of the original no-follow probe; the [instruction-symlink follow note](2026-07-21-follow-instruction-symlinks.md) owns that decision and its residual risk. The session-prefix signal and dynamic tool execution signal propagate through resolution, metadata probes, and streaming reads, so cancellation does not wait for an unrelated filesystem scan. A resolve or stat exception is classified as unavailable: it skips only that candidate and is never interpreted as the deletion of an already-loaded scope.
The plugin does not statically inject `fs`. Providerless product trees therefore boot normally and the plugin no-ops until a filesystem provider exists. All production reads go through that provider. Candidate probes resolve each path and stat the result, so a final-component symlink is followed to its target: a link to a regular file loads, while a missing path or a non-file target is a confirmed absence. Following repository-owned links across the trust boundary is a deliberate reversal of the original no-follow probe; the [instruction-symlink follow note](2026-07-21-follow-instruction-symlinks.md) owns that decision and its residual risk. The step signal and dynamic tool execution signal propagate through resolution, metadata probes, and streaming reads, so cancellation does not wait for an unrelated filesystem scan. A resolve or stat exception is classified as unavailable: it skips only that candidate and is never interpreted as the deletion of an already-loaded scope.
### File Names And Precedence
@@ -26,13 +26,13 @@ Candidate entries are same-directory file names. Empty entries, `.`/`..`, and en
The user-global file is fixed at `$DSH_HOME/AGENTS.md`, is not affected by either candidate list, and has no local overlay. `$DSH_HOME` defaults to `~/.dsh`, matching the harness-level home role of `~/.codex` or `~/.claude` rather than introducing a plugin-specific home. Tilde expansion and the default live in `dsh-paths` so future harness features share the same convention.
### Baseline Prefix
### Baseline Injection
On the first request of an agent-loop instance, the plugin contributes one user-role message through `agent/session-prefix`. It loads the user-global file first, then finds the project root by walking upward from `agent.session.header.cwd` to a configured root marker (default `.git`), then loads one candidate from each directory from the root to the cwd. A `.git` file and a `.git` directory are both valid markers, covering linked worktrees and submodules. Without a marker, the cwd itself is the root.
At the first `agent/step` of an agent-loop instance, the plugin injects one sourced user-role message before the request is derived. It loads the user-global file first, then finds the project root by walking upward from `agent.session.header.cwd` to a configured root marker (default `.git`), then loads one candidate from each directory from the root to the cwd. A `.git` file and a `.git` directory are both valid markers, covering linked worktrees and submodules. Without a marker, the cwd itself is the root.
The plugin prepends its contribution before `await next()` returns, so session-prefix contributions appear in plugin registration order. In the product spine workspace instructions are registered before a skills catalog and therefore appear first. The loop deep-freezes the composed prefix, logs it in `EpochHeader.messagePrefix`, and reuses it verbatim for that instance. It is request state, not `Session.deriveMessages()` history.
The injection becomes a durable `user/message` with a typed `workspace-instructions` source. Its `baseline: true` marker distinguishes the complete startup or resume baseline from later deltas, and its change list persists the included scopes and content digests. In the product spine workspace instructions are registered before the skills catalog, so their `agent/step` listener injects first. The loop drains both messages before deriving the first request.
A resumed agent creates a new loop instance and recomposes the baseline from current files, with the new prefix anchored by the resume request header. This permits current baseline content on resume without mutating a prefix already used by an earlier instance.
A resumed agent creates a new loop instance and injects a baseline composed from current files before its first request. This permits current baseline content on resume without mutating an earlier history event. A resume and a hot plugin remount both face a log that may already hold a baseline; they are told apart by `agent/session-start`, which a startup or resume emits before the first step while a remount attaches to an already-live session and never sees it. A remount retains the existing baseline only when its typed event remains in the current visible surface, and still rebuilds scope and provider-version tracking from current files. If compaction has shadowed that event, the remount injects a current baseline. A resume always re-composes.
The baseline is a user-role `<system-reminder>` with `Instructions from: <path>` sections and explicit authority and precedence language. This familiar model-facing frame avoids a harness-specific XML vocabulary. Project paths are root-relative and the user-global path is `~/.dsh/AGENTS.md` for the default home or `$DSH_HOME/AGENTS.md` for a configured home. A literal `</system-reminder>` inside file content is escaped. The package README owns the exact current [prompt shape](../../../../packages/context/workspace-context/README.md#prompt-shape).
@@ -42,21 +42,21 @@ After a successful first-party `read`, `write`, or `edit` call, the `tools/post-
A content edit appends `Updated instructions from: <path>`, states that the new content replaces the previous content, and includes the complete current file. If precedence changes from one candidate to another, the message also names the previous path and says it no longer applies. If no candidate remains, the plugin appends `Instructions removed: <path>` and states that the previously loaded instructions no longer apply.
Dynamic messages carry their complete system-reminder framing in `content`, and every `context/message` reaches the model verbatim as a user-role message (there is no core wrapper to opt out of). `context/message.meta` carries opaque JSON state that is persisted but never rendered to the model.
Baseline and dynamic messages carry their complete system-reminder framing in `content`, and every sourced `user/message` reaches the model verbatim (there is no core wrapper to opt out of). The typed `workspace-instructions` source carries persisted state that is never rendered to the model.
Shell commands are not discovery triggers. Local bash calls start fresh shells, and inferring reached paths from arbitrary command strings would require shell semantics the prompt plugin does not own.
### Duplicate Suppression And Change Detection
Every dynamic workspace context event stores versioned metadata with `{ action, scope, path, digest? }`, where `digest` is SHA-1 over the loaded content. The model-facing prompt has no HTML comments, hidden markers, or headings that are parsed back into state.
Every workspace context event stores versioned metadata with `{ action, scope, path, digest? }`, where `digest` is SHA-1 over the loaded content. Baselines additionally carry `baseline: true`. The model-facing prompt has no HTML comments, hidden markers, or headings that are parsed back into state.
At reconciliation time the plugin scans plugin-owned `context/message` events and derives the latest state for each visible scope. A short per-session pending map begins only after the immutable top-level `tools/result` proves an `additionalContexts` entry survived every post-execute listener, then covers the interval before the loop appends that context to the log. Each entry records the open `{ turn, step }`: an equal durable `context/message` at or after its sequence boundary confirms and removes it, while a matching `step/end` arriving first means the loop discarded its context buffer, so the plugin removes both the pending entry and its version-cache fast path. A nested Code Mode result stages its changes under the parent's opaque execution token so repeated sub-dispatches in one run do not duplicate them; the parent result rolls that provisional state back and commits only contexts retained by outer policy.
At reconciliation time the plugin scans workspace-sourced `user/message` events and derives the latest state for each visible scope. A short per-session pending map begins only after the immutable top-level `tools/result` proves an `additionalContexts` entry survived every post-execute listener, then covers the interval before the loop appends that context to the log. Each entry records the open `{ turn, step }`: an equal durable `user/message` at or after its sequence boundary confirms and removes it, while a matching `step/end` arriving first means the loop discarded its context buffer, so the plugin removes both the pending entry and its version-cache fast path. A nested Code Mode result stages its changes under the parent's opaque execution token so repeated sub-dispatches in one run do not duplicate them; the parent result rolls that provisional state back and commits only contexts retained by outer policy.
An unchanged path and digest is suppressed. A logged removal is a tombstone, so a reappearing candidate becomes a new `set`. Resume works from persisted metadata. If compaction removes an instruction event from the visible surface, that state no longer suppresses a later load, matching the fact that the model can no longer see it. Only changes actually included under the byte budget enter metadata or pending state, so an omitted file remains eligible on a later touch.
The frozen baseline keeps an in-memory path/digest map for comparison. A later successful filesystem touch appends baseline edits or removals as dynamic messages; it never rewrites the prefix. During resumed prefix composition the plugin also reconciles visible dynamic scopes, so nested changes made while the agent was offline can append an update before the first resumed request.
The initial baseline's typed changes are comparison state only while its event remains in the visible session surface. A later successful filesystem touch re-adds an unchanged baseline scope after compaction, or appends baseline edits or removals as dynamic messages; it never rewrites the original event. The in-memory scope marker and provider-version cache only select and accelerate probes, so neither can suppress context the model no longer sees. During resumed baseline preparation the plugin also reconciles visible dynamic scopes, so nested changes made while the agent was offline can append an update before the first resumed request.
There is intentionally no watcher. Detection occurs at the next successful structured filesystem touch or resumed prefix composition. A provider failure produces no removal; absence is only accepted when all configured candidates in that scope were probed successfully.
There is intentionally no watcher. Detection occurs at the next successful structured filesystem touch or resumed baseline preparation. A provider failure produces no removal; absence is only accepted when all configured candidates in that scope were probed successfully.
### Byte Budget And Bounded Reads
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ There is intentionally no watcher. Detection occurs at the next successful struc
**Use a global `ctx.systemPrompt.section()`.** Rejected because one Cordis context can host sessions with different cwd values, while repository-owned text is lower-authority context rather than top-authority provider system content.
**Inject the baseline on every `agent/pre-step`.** Rejected because repeated history injection wastes tokens, complicates duplicate state, and prevents a structurally stable provider prefix. Prefix composition gives a frozen, logged, per-instance baseline while dynamic append-only messages handle changes.
**Inject the baseline on every `agent/step`.** Rejected because repeated history injection wastes tokens and complicates duplicate state. A per-mount session guard gives one visible baseline event while it remains on the surface; dynamic append-only messages handle changes and compaction re-arming.
**Load both `AGENTS.md` and `CLAUDE.md` in one directory.** Rejected because repositories in transition commonly duplicate guidance across both files. Ordered candidates make precedence explicit and configurable.
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ There is intentionally no watcher. Detection occurs at the next successful struc
## Consequences
Workspace guidance is isolated per session and shared by the demo front doors, Web Host, and every tool presentation mode. Initial instructions benefit from stable prefix caching, while nested and changed content remains durable and replayable. The generic session/agent context contract carries JSON metadata propagated through prompt-submit and post-tool `additionalContexts` arrays without flattening entries.
Workspace guidance is isolated per session and shared by the demo front doors, Web Host, and every tool presentation mode. Initial, nested, and changed instructions are durable and replayable. The generic session/agent context contract carries typed source data through injected messages and post-tool `additionalContexts` arrays without flattening entries.
Repository text remains untrusted input. Lower-authority user-role framing, explicit precedence language, and delimiter escaping reduce risk but do not eliminate prompt injection. Following a candidate symlink to its target widens that surface to off-tree content, so the permission and sandbox layers that confine `ctx.fs` to trusted roots are the boundary that treats workspace files as data rather than authority (the [instruction-symlink follow note](2026-07-21-follow-instruction-symlinks.md) owns the residual risk).

Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More