docs: rename core-data-structures/ to subsystems/
The folder is becoming the home of one-doc-per-subsystem pages (intro + data structures + cordis services/events), so the name must describe the whole contract, not just the type-vocabulary third of it. Mechanical rename rebuilt on current master: every inbound Markdown link, generator constant, website route, type-equiv manifest path, and spec expectation moves together; the zh sides of the notes whose prose names the folder are aligned (子系统) in the same change; touched bilingual pairs re-recorded; translation-prompt snapshot re-recorded (its example embeds development.md). Historical Agent Note slugs keep their dated filenames.
This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md
|
||||
2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md: cb9d9487cd274696ae20dddab8c6888b4cf4b833
|
||||
2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.zh.md: fe5ca223975445991e7fe96376cbfccf432ad241
|
||||
2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md: 90100ea8f146e505c4fbb95760781839bd4bd34a
|
||||
2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.zh.md: bdcd8e8fe2a50033177354ce5ce043c4b5264621
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ Long-running tools are producers. `dsh-tool-bash` adapts a `BashProcess` into in
|
||||
|
||||
## Runtime contract
|
||||
|
||||
The literal types live in the [task data-structure catalog](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/tasks.md). A producer calls `ctx.tasks.start()` with a kind, label, optional owning `Agent`, optional positive `outputLimitBytes`, and a `run()` function. The runtime completes all failable preflight work before calling `run()` and invokes it once. After `run()` returns hooks, registration commits without another failable step; a producer cannot start work that lacks a collectable task id.
|
||||
The literal types live in the [task data-structure catalog](../../../../docs/subsystems/tasks.md). A producer calls `ctx.tasks.start()` with a kind, label, optional owning `Agent`, optional positive `outputLimitBytes`, and a `run()` function. The runtime completes all failable preflight work before calling `run()` and invokes it once. After `run()` returns hooks, registration commits without another failable step; a producer cannot start work that lacks a collectable task id.
|
||||
|
||||
`outputLimitBytes` is producer-owned presentation policy, not a registry buffer. The registry validates and projects it unchanged into `TaskSnapshot`; generic control surfaces apply the cap to complete model-facing output after adding their own status or notice metadata. Omitting it preserves the existing surface behavior, so the runtime does not impose a hidden default on unrelated producer families.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 运行时契约
|
||||
|
||||
字面类型见[任务数据结构目录](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/tasks.md)。生产方调用 `ctx.tasks.start()`，传入 kind、label、可选的所属 `Agent`、可选的正数 `outputLimitBytes` 与一个 `run()` 函数。运行时会在调用 `run()` 前完成所有可能失败的预检工作，并且只调用一次。`run()` 返回钩子后，注册过程不会再执行可能失败的步骤而直接提交；生产方无法启动没有可收集 task id 的工作。
|
||||
字面类型见[任务数据结构目录](../../../../docs/subsystems/tasks.md)。生产方调用 `ctx.tasks.start()`，传入 kind、label、可选的所属 `Agent`、可选的正数 `outputLimitBytes` 与一个 `run()` 函数。运行时会在调用 `run()` 前完成所有可能失败的预检工作，并且只调用一次。`run()` 返回钩子后，注册过程不会再执行可能失败的步骤而直接提交；生产方无法启动没有可收集 task id 的工作。
|
||||
|
||||
`outputLimitBytes` 是生产方拥有的呈现策略，而非注册表缓冲区。注册表校验该值，并将其原样投影到 `TaskSnapshot`；通用控制接口添加自身的状态或通知元数据后，再将该上限应用于完整的面向模型输出。省略该值时保持现有接口行为，因此运行时不会向无关的生产方类别施加隐式默认值。
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.md
|
||||
2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.md: ad9d65805c8f0c96bd811b5036310d019760627e
|
||||
2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.zh.md: 3021c7fcca00f2e929d997625c303f9a27dbf673
|
||||
2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.md: de9125bc891cc62798480e2eccb2c90cb633de3a
|
||||
2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.zh.md: cdada9cb235d57ad5cac98ebe0572013cac728ef
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ Endpoint detection is not part of this Agent Note because no endpoint-specific m
|
||||
|
||||
The landed contract:
|
||||
|
||||
- `dsh-llm` documents the mandatory `User-Agent` attribution contract for `LlmAdapter` authors (`LlmAdapter` JSDoc, package README, and the adapter-contract section of `docs/core-data-structures/llm-streaming.md`).
|
||||
- `dsh-llm` documents the mandatory `User-Agent` attribution contract for `LlmAdapter` authors (`LlmAdapter` JSDoc, package README, and the adapter-contract section of `docs/subsystems/llm-streaming.md`).
|
||||
- A shared helper (`attributionHeaders` / `userAgent`) constructs the app identity and the standard `User-Agent` value from package metadata, so adapters do not hand-copy version constants.
|
||||
- `dsh-llm-deepseek` sends the shared `User-Agent` on every request and its mock-server suite asserts the exact value.
|
||||
- `dsh-llm-pi-ai` sends the same `User-Agent` through pi-ai's `StreamOptions.headers` hook and its mock-server suite asserts the exact value.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ LLM（大语言模型）提供方请求应当标识发出请求的产品。这
|
||||
|
||||
已落地的契约：
|
||||
|
||||
- `dsh-llm` 为 `LlmAdapter` 作者文档化了强制的 `User-Agent` 归属契约（`LlmAdapter` JSDoc、包 README，以及 `docs/core-data-structures/llm-streaming.md` 的适配器契约（adapter contract）章节）。
|
||||
- `dsh-llm` 为 `LlmAdapter` 作者文档化了强制的 `User-Agent` 归属契约（`LlmAdapter` JSDoc、包 README，以及 `docs/subsystems/llm-streaming.md` 的适配器契约（adapter contract）章节）。
|
||||
- 共享辅助函数（`attributionHeaders` / `userAgent`）从包元数据构建应用身份和标准 `User-Agent` 值，适配器无需手动复制版本常量。
|
||||
- `dsh-llm-deepseek` 在每个请求上发送共享的 `User-Agent`，其 mock 服务器套件断言精确值。
|
||||
- `dsh-llm-pi-ai` 通过 pi-ai 的 `StreamOptions.headers` 钩子发送相同的 `User-Agent`，其 mock 服务器套件断言精确值。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-30-bash-stdin-env-trusted-plugin-surface.md
|
||||
2026-06-30-bash-stdin-env-trusted-plugin-surface.md: 556d5dd86dfcc92c4628e68c19390f0033560d25
|
||||
2026-06-30-bash-stdin-env-trusted-plugin-surface.zh.md: 325e3d303bdb6836c8928fdae00de59fb954ff37
|
||||
2026-06-30-bash-stdin-env-trusted-plugin-surface.md: aa0c785be84bcb8a49f8a2670afa0f6bed6277db
|
||||
2026-06-30-bash-stdin-env-trusted-plugin-surface.zh.md: 48108fdd5b8217263590fba336480f1b487e882f
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -30,4 +30,4 @@ Three deliberate choices:
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
Hook bridges pass JSON payloads and hook-specific variables through the existing bash seam, retaining its process-group, truncation, and spill behavior. The model surface remains unchanged, and the bash tool remains the sole owner of model-call request construction. The vocabulary lives in [the bash data-structure reference](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/bash.md).
|
||||
Hook bridges pass JSON payloads and hook-specific variables through the existing bash seam, retaining its process-group, truncation, and spill behavior. The model surface remains unchanged, and the bash tool remains the sole owner of model-call request construction. The vocabulary lives in [the bash data-structure reference](../../../../docs/subsystems/bash.md).
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -30,4 +30,4 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
钩子桥接层通过既有的 bash seam 传递 JSON 载荷和钩子特定变量，保留其进程组终止、截断和溢出行为。模型接口面不变，bash 工具仍是模型调用请求构建的唯一所有者。相关词汇定义见 [bash 数据结构参考](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/bash.md)。
|
||||
钩子桥接层通过既有的 bash seam 传递 JSON 载荷和钩子特定变量，保留其进程组终止、截断和溢出行为。模型接口面不变，bash 工具仍是模型调用请求构建的唯一所有者。相关词汇定义见 [bash 数据结构参考](../../../../docs/subsystems/bash.md)。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-15-agent-initiator-scope.md
|
||||
2026-07-15-agent-initiator-scope.md: 69648100e76cfc212469854188d664357fec22f1
|
||||
2026-07-15-agent-initiator-scope.zh.md: 505d198ccd2a54af1a15fc1ad6c03b27d217eca0
|
||||
2026-07-15-agent-initiator-scope.md: 2f388ae1de3dd6583686e129a03f0cd76701e18d
|
||||
2026-07-15-agent-initiator-scope.zh.md: 64f70a4d1c3368d5621edb7251d0b567505affc0
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Deep process-local infrastructure sometimes needs a trusted initiating Agent bel
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
The mandatory `ctx.agents` service uses Node `AsyncLocalStorage` to carry the initiating Agent. It stores the exact `Agent` directly rather than introducing a one-field frame; a separate private run token records nested boundary lineage only for teardown bookkeeping and carries no identity. The [core-data catalog](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/core.md#initiating-agent) identifies the carried type.
|
||||
The mandatory `ctx.agents` service uses Node `AsyncLocalStorage` to carry the initiating Agent. It stores the exact `Agent` directly rather than introducing a one-field frame; a separate private run token records nested boundary lineage only for teardown bookkeeping and carries no identity. The [core-data catalog](../../../../docs/subsystems/core.md#initiating-agent) identifies the carried type.
|
||||
|
||||
`currentInitiator()` reads optionally, `requireInitiator()` throws `no initiating agent is active`, and `withInitiator(agent, operation)` preserves the operation's exact synchronous value or Promise. `withoutInitiator(operation)` establishes a clearing boundary for work that must not inherit an Agent. Session remains derived as `agent.session`; turn, step, tool call, `signal`, model, `cwd`, sandbox, and authorization stay with their existing owners.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ harness 中存在两种有用但不同的上下文概念。Cordis `Context` 负
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
必需的 `ctx.agents` 服务使用 Node `AsyncLocalStorage` 携带发起 Agent。它直接存储同一个 `Agent`，不引入只有一个字段的帧；另一个私有运行标记只记录嵌套边界的谱系，供 teardown 记账使用，不携带身份。[核心数据目录](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/core.md#initiating-agent)标明了所携带的类型。
|
||||
必需的 `ctx.agents` 服务使用 Node `AsyncLocalStorage` 携带发起 Agent。它直接存储同一个 `Agent`，不引入只有一个字段的帧；另一个私有运行标记只记录嵌套边界的谱系，供 teardown 记账使用，不携带身份。[核心数据目录](../../../../docs/subsystems/core.md#initiating-agent)标明了所携带的类型。
|
||||
|
||||
`currentInitiator()` 用于可选读取，`requireInitiator()` 抛出 `no initiating agent is active`，`withInitiator(agent, operation)` 保留操作返回的同步值或 Promise 本身。`withoutInitiator(operation)` 会建立清空边界，供不得继承 Agent 的工作使用。会话仍通过 `agent.session` 推导；轮次、步骤、工具调用、`signal`、模型、`cwd`、沙箱和授权继续由现有归属方管理。
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-30-interception-seams.md
|
||||
2026-06-30-interception-seams.md: c318e41cfb1d64230b6151f1febad85d75b1451d
|
||||
2026-06-30-interception-seams.zh.md: 1b274fae4bc7fde326dbb0eeec54d57f73987803
|
||||
2026-06-30-interception-seams.md: 3b2c62cd4413f6d93cef247c51304a8d46753218
|
||||
2026-06-30-interception-seams.zh.md: 4e7b6a5ac9ca88919246508cf86c486b06888417
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -56,4 +56,4 @@ The seam package does **not** declare `hook/*` session events (the durable hook-
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
The canonical interception surface is uniformly typed without giving every extension the same power: hooks return decisions, execution wrappers wrap, terminal guards only deny, and final observers only observe. The loop owns session-start, pre-step claim settlement, post-tool context buffering, and stopping; `dsh-tools` owns identity sealing and the five-phase execution pipeline. Their contracts are documented in [architecture.md](../../../../docs/architecture.md), package READMEs, [core interception decisions](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/core.md#interception-decisions), and [tool structures](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/tools.md). The ACP bridge settles an initial pre-step rejection from its blocked no-step turn as `end_turn`, while hook-driven snapshots verify the observable bridge behavior end to end.
|
||||
The canonical interception surface is uniformly typed without giving every extension the same power: hooks return decisions, execution wrappers wrap, terminal guards only deny, and final observers only observe. The loop owns session-start, pre-step claim settlement, post-tool context buffering, and stopping; `dsh-tools` owns identity sealing and the five-phase execution pipeline. Their contracts are documented in [architecture.md](../../../../docs/architecture.md), package READMEs, [core interception decisions](../../../../docs/subsystems/core.md#interception-decisions), and [tool structures](../../../../docs/subsystems/tools.md). The ACP bridge settles an initial pre-step rejection from its blocked no-step turn as `end_turn`, while hook-driven snapshots verify the observable bridge behavior end to end.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -56,4 +56,4 @@ seam 包**不**声明 `hook/*` 会话事件（持久的钩子调用日志）；
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
规范拦截表面具有统一的类型化，同时不给每个扩展相同的权力：钩子返回 decision，执行包装层做包装，终结 guard 只能拒绝，最终观测者只能观测。循环负责 session-start、pre-step 领取结算、工具执行后上下文缓冲和 stopping；`dsh-tools` 负责身份封存与五阶段执行流水线。它们的契约记录在 [architecture.md](../../../../docs/architecture.md)、各包 README、[核心拦截 decision](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/core.md#interception-decisions) 与[工具结构](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/tools.md)中。ACP 桥接会把 blocked 无步骤轮次中的首次 pre-step reject 结算为 `end_turn`，而钩子驱动的快照端到端验证可观测的桥接行为。
|
||||
规范拦截表面具有统一的类型化，同时不给每个扩展相同的权力：钩子返回 decision，执行包装层做包装，终结 guard 只能拒绝，最终观测者只能观测。循环负责 session-start、pre-step 领取结算、工具执行后上下文缓冲和 stopping；`dsh-tools` 负责身份封存与五阶段执行流水线。它们的契约记录在 [architecture.md](../../../../docs/architecture.md)、各包 README、[核心拦截 decision](../../../../docs/subsystems/core.md#interception-decisions) 与[工具结构](../../../../docs/subsystems/tools.md)中。ACP 桥接会把 blocked 无步骤轮次中的首次 pre-step reject 结算为 `end_turn`，而钩子驱动的快照端到端验证可观测的桥接行为。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-05-dynamic-workflows.md
|
||||
2026-07-05-dynamic-workflows.md: bba62098c66477a3f1929f9029e81c645bfc4d41
|
||||
2026-07-05-dynamic-workflows.zh.md: 2005ca14883ae137148541273900c7f3e65769a5
|
||||
2026-07-05-dynamic-workflows.md: b0fb2349e64093beab8220ea75715b55903772e3
|
||||
2026-07-05-dynamic-workflows.zh.md: 246727649be8acc17dac1335d353e9b1591e3890
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ One deliberate strictness DIVERGENCE from CC: hook misuse — unknown or deferre
|
||||
|
||||
### The seam (dsh-workflow)
|
||||
|
||||
`ctx.workflows` is an abstract `WorkflowService` in the bash shape — one engine per context, no named-provider registry (engines are deployment swaps, not co-residents). `start(request)` throws synchronously for a script that cannot begin; a returned `WorkflowRun`'s `result` NEVER rejects (failures resolve as `stopReason: 'error' | 'cancelled'`). The `workflow/*` events are observe-only emits carrying DATA SNAPSHOTS (id + meta; `workflow/end` omits the result value), per-listener contained, mirroring `subagent/start`/`subagent/end` — control stays with the run's holder. Vocabulary details: [core-data-structures/workflow.md](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/workflow.md).
|
||||
`ctx.workflows` is an abstract `WorkflowService` in the bash shape — one engine per context, no named-provider registry (engines are deployment swaps, not co-residents). `start(request)` throws synchronously for a script that cannot begin; a returned `WorkflowRun`'s `result` NEVER rejects (failures resolve as `stopReason: 'error' | 'cancelled'`). The `workflow/*` events are observe-only emits carrying DATA SNAPSHOTS (id + meta; `workflow/end` omits the result value), per-listener contained, mirroring `subagent/start`/`subagent/end` — control stays with the run's holder. Vocabulary details: [subsystems/workflow.md](../../../../docs/subsystems/workflow.md).
|
||||
|
||||
### The engine (dsh-workflow-workerthread): one worker thread per run
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ harness 可以将一个任务委派给一个子 agent（`dsh-tool-subagent`）
|
||||
|
||||
### seam（dsh-workflow）
|
||||
|
||||
`ctx.workflows` 是 bash 形态的抽象 `WorkflowService`——每个上下文一个引擎，无命名提供方注册表（引擎是部署级替换，不是共存者）。`start(request)` 对无法启动的脚本同步抛出；返回的 `WorkflowRun` 的 `result` 永不 reject（失败时结算为 `stopReason: 'error' | 'cancelled'`）。`workflow/*` 事件是仅观察的 emit，携带数据快照（id + meta；`workflow/end` 省略 result 值），按监听器隔离，与 `subagent/start`/`subagent/end` 对称——控制权留在 run 的持有者手中。词汇详情见 [core-data-structures/workflow.md](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/workflow.md)。
|
||||
`ctx.workflows` 是 bash 形态的抽象 `WorkflowService`——每个上下文一个引擎，无命名提供方注册表（引擎是部署级替换，不是共存者）。`start(request)` 对无法启动的脚本同步抛出；返回的 `WorkflowRun` 的 `result` 永不 reject（失败时结算为 `stopReason: 'error' | 'cancelled'`）。`workflow/*` 事件是仅观察的 emit，携带数据快照（id + meta；`workflow/end` 省略 result 值），按监听器隔离，与 `subagent/start`/`subagent/end` 对称——控制权留在 run 的持有者手中。词汇详情见 [subsystems/workflow.md](../../../../docs/subsystems/workflow.md)。
|
||||
|
||||
### 引擎（dsh-workflow-workerthread）：每次运行一个 worker 线程
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-05-skill-system.md
|
||||
2026-07-05-skill-system.md: a998d70ec934aed4bf7ce32aa711abd47b508a1d
|
||||
2026-07-05-skill-system.zh.md: 4fa7c4fd657c2f41f16b30679ec95e61a75f8a0c
|
||||
2026-07-05-skill-system.md: bb7c03a64a3d0d0f700e21bc96633f1c3ea181b9
|
||||
2026-07-05-skill-system.zh.md: 8e26e52d3366505a958dd4b19461edf8bf740b00
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Local skill filesystem I/O goes through `ctx.fs` when a filesystem service is lo
|
||||
|
||||
The registry's `list()` returns every winning summary, while model and user consumers apply the invocation predicates owned by the [independent invocation-policy decision](2026-07-28-skill-invocation-policy.md). The `skill({ name })` tool loads one model-invocable skill for the current agent cwd and returns a tool result containing `<skill_content name="...">`, `<skill_resources>`, and `<skill_instructions>`. `resourceBase` supplies a directory, URL, or opaque provider-managed base for explicitly referenced scripts, references, and assets; resources load only as needed, without directory enumeration. An unresolved name reports that the skill is unknown or no longer available; invalid names and skills with `invocation.modelInvocable: false` retain distinct tool errors. The tool result is the model-visible disclosure path.
|
||||
|
||||
The data structures and catalog/tool contract are documented in [skills.md](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/skills.md), with service signatures in the generated [services catalog](../../../../docs/cordis-catalog/services.md).
|
||||
The data structures and catalog/tool contract are documented in [skills.md](../../../../docs/subsystems/skills.md), with service signatures in the generated [services catalog](../../../../docs/cordis-catalog/services.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ DeepSeek Harness 使用同一原语，使项目特定的评审、插件编写和
|
||||
|
||||
注册表的 `list()` 返回全部胜出摘要，而模型与用户消费方应用[独立调用策略决策](2026-07-28-skill-invocation-policy.md)定义的调用判定。`skill({ name })` 工具为当前 agent cwd 加载一个模型可调用的 skill，返回包含 `<skill_content name="...">`、`<skill_resources>` 和 `<skill_instructions>` 的工具结果。`resourceBase` 提供一个目录、URL 或不透明的提供方管理的基路径，用于显式引用的脚本、参考资料和资产；资源仅按需加载，不进行目录枚举。无法解析的名称报告该 skill 未知或不再可用；无效名称和 `invocation.modelInvocable` 为 `false` 的 skill 保留不同的工具错误。工具结果是面向模型的可见披露路径。
|
||||
|
||||
数据结构与目录/工具契约记录在 [skills.md](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/skills.md) 中，服务签名见生成的[服务目录](../../../../docs/cordis-catalog/services.md)。
|
||||
数据结构与目录/工具契约记录在 [skills.md](../../../../docs/subsystems/skills.md) 中，服务签名见生成的[服务目录](../../../../docs/cordis-catalog/services.md)。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-06-sandbox.md
|
||||
2026-07-06-sandbox.md: 583b388815cd9b2b9cf94ce393839169ce3ffac3
|
||||
2026-07-06-sandbox.zh.md: e435b671a42ca5c3ea4f6800bf91d6e006da35d3
|
||||
2026-07-06-sandbox.md: 06c5590454a6947030d828f087b92f44207dad6e
|
||||
2026-07-06-sandbox.zh.md: 8f575e3cd14973aaaaf9254337b985110bc99d6b
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ Costs and accepted limits:
|
||||
In-repo precedents this design copies or contrasts with:
|
||||
|
||||
- [The capability-seams Agent Note](../architecture/2026-06-13-capability-seams.md) — the interface/implementation/consumer split and the "don't split preemptively" timing rule the second consumer satisfied.
|
||||
- The `dsh-bash` request/spec split ([the bash vocabulary catalog](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/bash.md)) — the complete `sandboxPolicy` rides its per-call carrier, and the explicit-`resolve()` defaulting convention.
|
||||
- The `dsh-bash` request/spec split ([the bash vocabulary catalog](../../../../docs/subsystems/bash.md)) — the complete `sandboxPolicy` rides its per-call carrier, and the explicit-`resolve()` defaulting convention.
|
||||
- [The approval seam Agent Note](2026-07-06-approval-seam.md) — the channel escalation asks through; its answerer waterfall, audit pair, and one-package rationale are recorded there.
|
||||
- [Event-sourced sessions](../architecture/2026-06-11-event-sourced-sessions.md) and [standalone log-only events](../simplification/2026-07-28-remove-synthetic-log-only-turns.md) — the log-as-store foundation the per-session modes fold over, and the explicit durability boundary the anchoring design obeys.
|
||||
- [The interception-seams Agent Note](2026-06-30-interception-seams.md) — the `tools/pre-execute` vocabulary the escalation gate deliberately does not reuse (an escalating call has no pre-execute moment of its own).
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ fs/web/todo 在进程内执行，因此它们的沙箱语义是各自 seam 层
|
||||
本设计复制或对比的仓库内先例：
|
||||
|
||||
- [能力 seam Agent Note](../architecture/2026-06-13-capability-seams.md)——接口/实现/消费方拆分与「不要过早拆分」的时机规则（第二个消费方满足了该规则）。
|
||||
- `dsh-bash` 的 request/spec 拆分（[bash 词汇目录](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/bash.md)）——完整的 `sandboxPolicy` 搭载其按调用载体，以及显式 `resolve()` 默认约定。
|
||||
- `dsh-bash` 的 request/spec 拆分（[bash 词汇目录](../../../../docs/subsystems/bash.md)）——完整的 `sandboxPolicy` 搭载其按调用载体，以及显式 `resolve()` 默认约定。
|
||||
- [批准 seam Agent Note](2026-07-06-approval-seam.md)——升级请求通过的通道；其应答器 waterfall（瀑布式事件）、审计对和单包理由记录在那里。
|
||||
- [事件溯源会话](../architecture/2026-06-11-event-sourced-sessions.md)与[独立纯日志事件](../simplification/2026-07-28-remove-synthetic-log-only-turns.md)——按会话模式 fold 所依赖的日志即存储基础，以及锚定设计遵守的显式持久性边界。
|
||||
- [拦截 seam Agent Note](2026-06-30-interception-seams.md)——`tools/pre-execute` 词汇，升级门控刻意不复用它（升级调用没有自己的 pre-execute 时刻）。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-10-parallel-tool-call-execution.md
|
||||
2026-07-10-parallel-tool-call-execution.md: 19f5dc189821433052edfa72613980a2e94e2cae
|
||||
2026-07-10-parallel-tool-call-execution.zh.md: 69bff90c11fa132ded325ef610dabf5c609f21af
|
||||
2026-07-10-parallel-tool-call-execution.md: 7fd540539fd358b3254470f420a0cc11f2927d45
|
||||
2026-07-10-parallel-tool-call-execution.zh.md: 985557974c79d4080c4e35ccbb9740439988261a
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ The session log remains authoritative: every started call has an audit event, or
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
Each tool may provide an optional `isConcurrencySafe(args)` classifier. It is synchronous and pure: it examines only the current call's parsed arguments and performs no I/O or mutation. Only an explicit `true` opts in; a missing classifier, invalid arguments, a thrown classifier, or any other return value makes the call exclusive. The canonical type contract lives in the [tool data structures](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/tools.md).
|
||||
Each tool may provide an optional `isConcurrencySafe(args)` classifier. It is synchronous and pure: it examines only the current call's parsed arguments and performs no I/O or mutation. Only an explicit `true` opts in; a missing classifier, invalid arguments, a thrown classifier, or any other return value makes the call exclusive. The canonical type contract lives in the [tool data structures](../../../../docs/subsystems/tools.md).
|
||||
|
||||
The classifier is deliberately unary. Returning `true` is the tool's promise that this call may overlap with any sibling call that also returns `true`; the scheduler does not compare calls or prove that their resource accesses are compatible.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
每个工具都可以提供可选的 `isConcurrencySafe(args)` 分类器。该分类器必须是同步纯函数：它只检查当前调用已解析的参数，不执行 I/O 或任何变更。只有显式返回 `true` 才表示选择并行；分类器缺失、参数无效、分类器抛错或返回任何其他值，都会使该调用按独占方式执行。规范类型契约见[工具数据结构](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/tools.md)。
|
||||
每个工具都可以提供可选的 `isConcurrencySafe(args)` 分类器。该分类器必须是同步纯函数：它只检查当前调用已解析的参数，不执行 I/O 或任何变更。只有显式返回 `true` 才表示选择并行；分类器缺失、参数无效、分类器抛错或返回任何其他值，都会使该调用按独占方式执行。规范类型契约见[工具数据结构](../../../../docs/subsystems/tools.md)。
|
||||
|
||||
分类器有意设计为一元函数。返回 `true` 表示工具承诺：此调用可以与任何同样返回 `true` 的并列调用重叠执行。调度器不会比较调用，也不会证明它们的资源访问相容。
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.md
|
||||
2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.md: 96001252d6494d058a8df9974fb5a0d59e7d7112
|
||||
2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.zh.md: aa7eb2a6b4b9117f1d707b37afcdbe12b814bad2
|
||||
2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.md: 71e4fd5a30e90ac66132dbdcea16917bacc80b68
|
||||
2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.zh.md: 1dbb3d889d28669575980d3a667e4f168a5d72db
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ Language selection is a lookup on `ctx.codeRuntime.language`, resolved lazily at
|
||||
- `SDK_RENDERERS` (index.ts) maps a language to its `tools:sdk` renderer — `typescript → renderToolsSdk`, `python → renderToolsSdkPy`. The `tools:sdk` section reads the loaded runtime's language and picks the renderer; `requireCodeRuntime` rejects a `mode: code`/`both` runtime whose language is absent from the table, naming the known languages.
|
||||
- `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS` (code-mode.ts) maps a language to its two model-facing `run_code` strings (tool `description` and the `code` parameter description), so a language's SDK section and its transport schema always agree.
|
||||
|
||||
Both tables are read with `Object.hasOwn` before use so a language named `toString`/`constructor` cannot resolve an inherited `Object.prototype` member as a renderer. The two guards differ in reachability: `SDK_RENDERERS`' in-callback guard is unreachable because `requireCodeRuntime` validated the same `const` table earlier in the same callback (it carries a `/* v8 ignore */`), while `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS`' guard is the primary, publicly reachable rejection — any language absent from the flavor table hits it through `run_code`'s language-aware getters, which the public `schemas()` reaches without passing `requireCodeRuntime` first; the test reads one of those getters off the definition directly, under a language absent from both tables. A language present in `SDK_RENDERERS` but not `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS` is drift the shared `CodeSdkLanguage` `satisfies` pins reject at `typecheck`, so it is not an input either guard can see; what the guards still own is a mounted runtime reporting a language absent from both tables. Schema emission reads the runtime through `peekRuntime()` rather than `requireRuntime()`: `undefined` (no runtime mounted, reached by definition readers and `schemas()`, of which the doc-catalog harvest is the only shipped one and none of which feeds a model because assembly passes `requireCodeRuntime` first) degrades to the TypeScript flavor, whereas a mounted unknown language fails loud — this is NOT the silent fallback rejected below, which concerns emitting a wrong-language SDK for a real runtime. Adding a backend language is three parallel edits — a `CodeSdkLanguage` member and the two table entries — plus its renderer and the prose that names the well-known values instead of deriving them (the seam's `dsh-code-runtime` README pair, its `CodeRuntime.language` JSDoc, and the `docs/core-data-structures/code-runtime.md` pair; this package's own README pair and its `Config.mode` JSDoc — no gate checks any of it), with no `agent-loop` or registry-structure change.
|
||||
Both tables are read with `Object.hasOwn` before use so a language named `toString`/`constructor` cannot resolve an inherited `Object.prototype` member as a renderer. The two guards differ in reachability: `SDK_RENDERERS`' in-callback guard is unreachable because `requireCodeRuntime` validated the same `const` table earlier in the same callback (it carries a `/* v8 ignore */`), while `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS`' guard is the primary, publicly reachable rejection — any language absent from the flavor table hits it through `run_code`'s language-aware getters, which the public `schemas()` reaches without passing `requireCodeRuntime` first; the test reads one of those getters off the definition directly, under a language absent from both tables. A language present in `SDK_RENDERERS` but not `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS` is drift the shared `CodeSdkLanguage` `satisfies` pins reject at `typecheck`, so it is not an input either guard can see; what the guards still own is a mounted runtime reporting a language absent from both tables. Schema emission reads the runtime through `peekRuntime()` rather than `requireRuntime()`: `undefined` (no runtime mounted, reached by definition readers and `schemas()`, of which the doc-catalog harvest is the only shipped one and none of which feeds a model because assembly passes `requireCodeRuntime` first) degrades to the TypeScript flavor, whereas a mounted unknown language fails loud — this is NOT the silent fallback rejected below, which concerns emitting a wrong-language SDK for a real runtime. Adding a backend language is three parallel edits — a `CodeSdkLanguage` member and the two table entries — plus its renderer and the prose that names the well-known values instead of deriving them (the seam's `dsh-code-runtime` README pair, its `CodeRuntime.language` JSDoc, and the `docs/subsystems/code-runtime.md` pair; this package's own README pair and its `Config.mode` JSDoc — no gate checks any of it), with no `agent-loop` or registry-structure change.
|
||||
|
||||
`code-mode.ts` depends only on the runtime seam (`@deepseek-ai/dsh-code-runtime`), never on a concrete backend; dispatch is by `runtime.language` at run time. The tool layer therefore lands independently of the protocol and backend PRs — it needs only the seam's `language` field, which is already on master.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ The standard that cap serves is grammatical validity, and the boundary is delibe
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
Adding a backend language is three parallel edits — a `CodeSdkLanguage` member, an `SDK_RENDERERS` entry, and a `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS` entry — plus the renderer function the second points at, with no change to `agent-loop` or the registry structure. The two tables (`SDK_RENDERERS`, `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS`) must stay in step, and that invariant is checked statically rather than left to review: both are `satisfies`-checked against that one union, so a language added to one and not the other fails `typecheck`. This is the mechanical form the drift risk deserves — the runtime `Object.hasOwn` guards would catch it too, but only once a backend reporting that language ships: one PR after the drift, at the consumer's integration point rather than where it was introduced, and on this base never, since no second backend exists. The tables keep their `Record<string, …>` declared type because `CodeRuntime.language` is an unconstrained `string`; the union pins what the harness ships, the guards reject what a runtime reports. What stays outside that check is the prose that names the well-known values instead of deriving them: `dsh-code-runtime`'s README pair, its `CodeRuntime.language` JSDoc, and the `docs/core-data-structures/code-runtime.md` pair at the seam, plus this package's own README pair and its `Config.mode` JSDoc. Earlier notes name the values as the state at their own PR and are not on that list. Two separate reasons keep it ungated. Prose is not type-checked at all, wherever the union lives. And no type-level pin can stand in for it here: the interface package must not import its consumer's table, and `CodeRuntime.language` stays an unconstrained `string` by design, so moving the union into the seam would not apply it either. A unit test pinning the two key sets equal was rejected in favor of this: it would buy the same check at the cost of a test-only export of two private tables, and would run later than the compiler does. Which of the two runtime failures surfaces depends on the entry point, for a language absent from both tables: assembly reports the missing renderer, because `wireSchemas` calls `requireCodeRuntime` before projecting, while the public `schemas()` reaches `run_code`'s language-aware getters first and reports the missing flavor. The tool layer stays free of any concrete backend dependency, so it lands and is testable on master ahead of the Python protocol and backend.
|
||||
Adding a backend language is three parallel edits — a `CodeSdkLanguage` member, an `SDK_RENDERERS` entry, and a `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS` entry — plus the renderer function the second points at, with no change to `agent-loop` or the registry structure. The two tables (`SDK_RENDERERS`, `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS`) must stay in step, and that invariant is checked statically rather than left to review: both are `satisfies`-checked against that one union, so a language added to one and not the other fails `typecheck`. This is the mechanical form the drift risk deserves — the runtime `Object.hasOwn` guards would catch it too, but only once a backend reporting that language ships: one PR after the drift, at the consumer's integration point rather than where it was introduced, and on this base never, since no second backend exists. The tables keep their `Record<string, …>` declared type because `CodeRuntime.language` is an unconstrained `string`; the union pins what the harness ships, the guards reject what a runtime reports. What stays outside that check is the prose that names the well-known values instead of deriving them: `dsh-code-runtime`'s README pair, its `CodeRuntime.language` JSDoc, and the `docs/subsystems/code-runtime.md` pair at the seam, plus this package's own README pair and its `Config.mode` JSDoc. Earlier notes name the values as the state at their own PR and are not on that list. Two separate reasons keep it ungated. Prose is not type-checked at all, wherever the union lives. And no type-level pin can stand in for it here: the interface package must not import its consumer's table, and `CodeRuntime.language` stays an unconstrained `string` by design, so moving the union into the seam would not apply it either. A unit test pinning the two key sets equal was rejected in favor of this: it would buy the same check at the cost of a test-only export of two private tables, and would run later than the compiler does. Which of the two runtime failures surfaces depends on the entry point, for a language absent from both tables: assembly reports the missing renderer, because `wireSchemas` calls `requireCodeRuntime` before projecting, while the public `schemas()` reaches `run_code`'s language-aware getters first and reports the missing flavor. The tool layer stays free of any concrete backend dependency, so it lands and is testable on master ahead of the Python protocol and backend.
|
||||
|
||||
The cost is that the Python branch of both tables is unreachable on this base: `CodeRuntime.language` is set by the loaded backend, the only published backend is `dsh-code-runtime-worker` (`'typescript'`), and the registry reads the loaded runtime rather than a config field, so no assembled application can select `renderToolsSdkPy` or `PYTHON_FLAVOR`. The model-visible surface is therefore unchanged by this note's work until a backend reporting `'python'` is published, and this PR's coverage is unit-level — the renderer output plus the dispatch and rejection paths. The keyless snapshot for the Python model interface belongs to the PR that publishes that backend, because only there does a real `cordis.yml` over published plugins produce a Python assembly; a snapshot example that mounted a fixture runtime here would assert against a test double, which [docs/testing.md](../../../../docs/testing.md) rejects as a substitute for the assembled application transcript.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ Code Mode 只生成一种 SDK 形态：TypeScript。`ToolRegistry` 为 `tools:sd
|
||||
- `SDK_RENDERERS`（index.ts）把语言映射到它的 `tools:sdk` 渲染器——`typescript → renderToolsSdk`、`python → renderToolsSdkPy`。`tools:sdk` 段读取所加载运行时的语言并选出渲染器；`requireCodeRuntime` 拒绝其语言不在表中的 `mode: code`/`both` 运行时，并列出已知语言。
|
||||
- `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS`（code-mode.ts）把语言映射到它那两条面向模型的 `run_code` 字符串（工具 `description` 与 `code` 参数描述），使一种语言的 SDK 段与它的传输 schema 始终一致。
|
||||
|
||||
两张表在使用前都以 `Object.hasOwn` 读取，这样名为 `toString`/`constructor` 的语言不会把继承自 `Object.prototype` 的成员解析成渲染器。两个守卫的可达性不同：`SDK_RENDERERS` 的段内守卫不可达，因为 `requireCodeRuntime` 已在同一回调更早处校验过同一张 `const` 表（它带 `/* v8 ignore */`）；而 `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS` 的守卫是主要的、可公开到达的拒绝路径——任何缺席 flavor 表的语言都经 `run_code` 的语言感知 getter 到达它，而公共 `schemas()` 抵达那些 getter 时并未先过 `requireCodeRuntime`；测试直读 definition 上的其中一个 getter，用的是对两张表都缺席的语言。「在 `SDK_RENDERERS` 里却不在 `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS` 里」这种漂移已由共享的 `CodeSdkLanguage` `satisfies` 在 `typecheck` 处拒绝，两个守卫都看不到这种输入；它们如今负责的是所挂载运行时报告了一门两张表都缺席的语言。schema 发射通过 `peekRuntime()` 而非 `requireRuntime()` 读取运行时：`undefined`（无运行时，由直读 definition 的读者与 `schemas()` 到达，其中 doc-catalog 采集是唯一已交付的一个，而它们都不会喂给模型，因为组装路径先过 `requireCodeRuntime`）降级到 TypeScript flavor，而挂载了未知语言则 fail loud——这不是下方被否决的静默回退，那指的是为真实运行时发出错误语言的 SDK。新增一门后端语言是三处并列编辑——一个 `CodeSdkLanguage` 成员加两条表项——再加它的渲染器，以及点名已知值而非从中派生的散文（seam 侧的 `dsh-code-runtime` README 双语对、它的 `CodeRuntime.language` JSDoc 与 `docs/core-data-structures/code-runtime.md` 双语对；本包自己的 README 双语对与它的 `Config.mode` JSDoc，无任何 gate 检查其中任何一处），不动 `agent-loop`，也不动注册表结构。
|
||||
两张表在使用前都以 `Object.hasOwn` 读取，这样名为 `toString`/`constructor` 的语言不会把继承自 `Object.prototype` 的成员解析成渲染器。两个守卫的可达性不同：`SDK_RENDERERS` 的段内守卫不可达，因为 `requireCodeRuntime` 已在同一回调更早处校验过同一张 `const` 表（它带 `/* v8 ignore */`）；而 `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS` 的守卫是主要的、可公开到达的拒绝路径——任何缺席 flavor 表的语言都经 `run_code` 的语言感知 getter 到达它，而公共 `schemas()` 抵达那些 getter 时并未先过 `requireCodeRuntime`；测试直读 definition 上的其中一个 getter，用的是对两张表都缺席的语言。「在 `SDK_RENDERERS` 里却不在 `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS` 里」这种漂移已由共享的 `CodeSdkLanguage` `satisfies` 在 `typecheck` 处拒绝，两个守卫都看不到这种输入；它们如今负责的是所挂载运行时报告了一门两张表都缺席的语言。schema 发射通过 `peekRuntime()` 而非 `requireRuntime()` 读取运行时：`undefined`（无运行时，由直读 definition 的读者与 `schemas()` 到达，其中 doc-catalog 采集是唯一已交付的一个，而它们都不会喂给模型，因为组装路径先过 `requireCodeRuntime`）降级到 TypeScript flavor，而挂载了未知语言则 fail loud——这不是下方被否决的静默回退，那指的是为真实运行时发出错误语言的 SDK。新增一门后端语言是三处并列编辑——一个 `CodeSdkLanguage` 成员加两条表项——再加它的渲染器，以及点名已知值而非从中派生的散文（seam 侧的 `dsh-code-runtime` README 双语对、它的 `CodeRuntime.language` JSDoc 与 `docs/subsystems/code-runtime.md` 双语对；本包自己的 README 双语对与它的 `Config.mode` JSDoc，无任何 gate 检查其中任何一处），不动 `agent-loop`，也不动注册表结构。
|
||||
|
||||
`code-mode.ts` 只依赖运行时 seam（`@deepseek-ai/dsh-code-runtime`），绝不依赖具体后端；分发在运行时按 `runtime.language` 进行。因此工具层独立于协议和后端 PR 落地——它只需要 seam 的 `language` 字段，而该字段已在 master 上。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Code Mode 只生成一种 SDK 形态：TypeScript。`ToolRegistry` 为 `tools:sd
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
新增一门后端语言是三处并列编辑——一个 `CodeSdkLanguage` 成员、一个 `SDK_RENDERERS` 表项、一个 `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS` 表项——再加第二处所指向的渲染器函数，不动 `agent-loop`，也不动注册表结构。两张表（`SDK_RENDERERS`、`RUN_CODE_FLAVORS`）必须同步，且这条不变式由静态检查把关，而非交给 review：两张表都以 `satisfies` 对上述同一个 union 校验，因此只加其一而漏掉另一会在 `typecheck` 处失败。这正是该漂移风险应有的机械形式——运行期的 `Object.hasOwn` 守卫同样能捕获，但要等到有后端报告该语言之后：晚于漂移引入一个 PR，且触发点在消费方的集成处而非漂移引入处；在当前 base 上则永远不会触发，因为不存在第二个后端。两张表的声明类型仍是 `Record<string, …>`，因为 `CodeRuntime.language` 是不受约束的 `string`：union 钉住本仓库交付了什么，守卫拒绝运行时报告了什么。落在这条检查之外的是点名已知值而非从中派生的散文：seam 侧的 `dsh-code-runtime` README 双语对、它的 `CodeRuntime.language` JSDoc 与 `docs/core-data-structures/code-runtime.md` 双语对，再加本包自己的 README 双语对与它的 `Config.mode` JSDoc。更早的 note 点名这些值时记的是其自身 PR 当时的状态，不在此列。让它无 gate 的是两条独立理由。其一，散文根本不受类型检查，union 放在哪里都一样。其二，类型级替代在这里也不可用：接口包不得 import 其消费方的表，而 `CodeRuntime.language` 按设计保持不受约束的 `string`，即便把 union 迁进 seam 也不会作用到它。用一个断言两张表键集相等的 unit test 的方案被否决：它买到的是同一条检查，代价却是把两张私有表做测试专用导出，且运行时机晚于编译器。对两张表都缺席的语言，两种运行期失败中报出哪一条随入口而异：组装路径报缺渲染器，因为 `wireSchemas` 在投影前先调 `requireCodeRuntime`；而公共 `schemas()` 先经过 `run_code` 的语言感知 getter，报的是缺 flavor 表项。工具层不依赖任何具体后端，因此它能先于 Python 协议和后端在 master 上落地并可测。
|
||||
新增一门后端语言是三处并列编辑——一个 `CodeSdkLanguage` 成员、一个 `SDK_RENDERERS` 表项、一个 `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS` 表项——再加第二处所指向的渲染器函数，不动 `agent-loop`，也不动注册表结构。两张表（`SDK_RENDERERS`、`RUN_CODE_FLAVORS`）必须同步，且这条不变式由静态检查把关，而非交给 review：两张表都以 `satisfies` 对上述同一个 union 校验，因此只加其一而漏掉另一会在 `typecheck` 处失败。这正是该漂移风险应有的机械形式——运行期的 `Object.hasOwn` 守卫同样能捕获，但要等到有后端报告该语言之后：晚于漂移引入一个 PR，且触发点在消费方的集成处而非漂移引入处；在当前 base 上则永远不会触发，因为不存在第二个后端。两张表的声明类型仍是 `Record<string, …>`，因为 `CodeRuntime.language` 是不受约束的 `string`：union 钉住本仓库交付了什么，守卫拒绝运行时报告了什么。落在这条检查之外的是点名已知值而非从中派生的散文：seam 侧的 `dsh-code-runtime` README 双语对、它的 `CodeRuntime.language` JSDoc 与 `docs/subsystems/code-runtime.md` 双语对，再加本包自己的 README 双语对与它的 `Config.mode` JSDoc。更早的 note 点名这些值时记的是其自身 PR 当时的状态，不在此列。让它无 gate 的是两条独立理由。其一，散文根本不受类型检查，union 放在哪里都一样。其二，类型级替代在这里也不可用：接口包不得 import 其消费方的表，而 `CodeRuntime.language` 按设计保持不受约束的 `string`，即便把 union 迁进 seam 也不会作用到它。用一个断言两张表键集相等的 unit test 的方案被否决：它买到的是同一条检查，代价却是把两张私有表做测试专用导出，且运行时机晚于编译器。对两张表都缺席的语言，两种运行期失败中报出哪一条随入口而异：组装路径报缺渲染器，因为 `wireSchemas` 在投影前先调 `requireCodeRuntime`；而公共 `schemas()` 先经过 `run_code` 的语言感知 getter，报的是缺 flavor 表项。工具层不依赖任何具体后端，因此它能先于 Python 协议和后端在 master 上落地并可测。
|
||||
|
||||
代价是两张表的 Python 分支在当前 base 上不可达：`CodeRuntime.language` 由所加载的后端设定，已发布的后端只有 `dsh-code-runtime-worker`（`'typescript'`），而注册表读取的是所加载的运行时而非某个配置字段，因此没有任何一份组装好的应用能选中 `renderToolsSdkPy` 或 `PYTHON_FLAVOR`。也就是说，在报告 `'python'` 的后端发布之前，本 note 的工作不改变模型可见表面，本 PR 的覆盖因此是 unit 级——渲染器输出加分发与拒绝路径。Python 模型界面的 keyless snapshot 归属于发布该后端的那个 PR，因为只有在那里，一份基于已发布插件的真实 `cordis.yml` 才会产出 Python 组装；在此处挂载 fixture 运行时的快照示例断言的是测试替身，而 [docs/testing.md](../../../../docs/testing.md) 明确拒绝以此替代组装好的应用 transcript。
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-06-20-core-data-structures-catalog.md
|
||||
2026-06-20-core-data-structures-catalog.md: 7ee1e0ac3df7cb37fc9797702d44f409da820a94
|
||||
2026-06-20-core-data-structures-catalog.zh.md: 7cb0ae216f5c5f429c18d097862350997a8335d3
|
||||
2026-06-20-core-data-structures-catalog.md: 57433fdcb3c77976c4ba0cfe7d157f94dff331dd
|
||||
2026-06-20-core-data-structures-catalog.zh.md: 3956839c8211e294280805d9b6993e5607bfe04f
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Core-data-structures catalog and the `ts type-equiv` drift gate
|
||||
# Agent Note: Subsystems catalog and the `ts type-equiv` drift gate
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ So the work had two intertwined questions: **what belongs in such a catalog** (t
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
A new `docs/core-data-structures/` folder catalogs the vocabulary, with a new `verify-type-equiv` doc-sync gate that keeps every pasted type declaration and its JSDoc synchronized with source.
|
||||
A new `docs/subsystems/` folder catalogs the vocabulary, with a new `verify-type-equiv` doc-sync gate that keeps every pasted type declaration and its JSDoc synchronized with source.
|
||||
|
||||
### What counts as "core" — the spine-vs-seam line
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
新增的 `docs/core-data-structures/` 目录对这些词汇编目，并配有新的 `verify-type-equiv` doc-sync（文档同步门禁），使每个粘贴的类型声明及其 JSDoc 与源码保持同步。
|
||||
新增的 `docs/subsystems/` 目录对这些词汇编目，并配有新的 `verify-type-equiv` doc-sync（文档同步门禁），使每个粘贴的类型声明及其 JSDoc 与源码保持同步。
|
||||
|
||||
### 何为「核心」——主干与 seam 的分界线
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/testing/2026-06-22-fork-child-replay-seed-boundary.md
|
||||
2026-06-22-fork-child-replay-seed-boundary.md: ed3ec095bc14128f5ebc0a9188bc022ef97b1c8b
|
||||
2026-06-22-fork-child-replay-seed-boundary.zh.md: 1d938cbf6c9c32a144d58fed48e552d85aa9c625
|
||||
2026-06-22-fork-child-replay-seed-boundary.md: 27db3b768f2503121b0bc8912f9bc0fecb00a10d
|
||||
2026-06-22-fork-child-replay-seed-boundary.zh.md: f64fc55fc63e2caa4b50112407b645e6e7f12b0f
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -44,6 +44,6 @@ This closes the routing correctness gap, and two recorded fork scenarios exercis
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
- A new persisted header field across core + both backends; the core-data-structures catalog (`persistence.md`) is updated in the same change (its `SessionHeader` / `CreateSessionOptions` `type-equiv` blocks).
|
||||
- A new persisted header field across core + both backends; the subsystems catalog (`persistence.md`) is updated in the same change (its `SessionHeader` / `CreateSessionOptions` `type-equiv` blocks).
|
||||
- Existing SQLite databases at schema v2 are rejected on open (no user data pre-release).
|
||||
- Spawn replay is unchanged (`seedLength` 0). Fork replay now routes a child to its own script; covered by a regression in `llm-replay`'s tests (a child fixture whose seeded prefix carries a parent chunk — the derived child script must exclude it, proven red without the slice) and a persistence round-trip test (both backends, via the shared coordinator contract).
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -44,6 +44,6 @@ subagent 脚本由 [`deriveReplayScript`](../../../../packages/support/llm-repla
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
- core 与两个后端新增一个持久化 header 字段；核心数据结构目录（`persistence.md`）在同一变更中更新（其 `SessionHeader` / `CreateSessionOptions` 的 `type-equiv` 块）。
|
||||
- core 与两个后端新增一个持久化 header 字段；子系统目录（`persistence.md`）在同一变更中更新（其 `SessionHeader` / `CreateSessionOptions` 的 `type-equiv` 块）。
|
||||
- 既有的 schema v2 SQLite 数据库在打开时被拒绝（预发布阶段无用户数据）。
|
||||
- spawn 回放不变（`seedLength` 为 0）。fork 回放现在将子会话路由到自身的脚本；由 `llm-replay` 测试中的一个回归用例覆盖（一个子会话 fixture，其播种前缀包含父会话的分片——推导出的子会话脚本必须排除它，不做 slice 时该用例为红）以及一个持久化往返测试（两个后端，通过共享的 coordinator 契约）。
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user