cleanup(config): localize bootstrap policy to app boot

This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-08-07 23:37:53 +08:00
parent d0e052dd83
commit b5fbcaccf8
12 changed files with 80 additions and 134 deletions

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-04-configuration-source-ownership.md
2026-08-04-configuration-source-ownership.md: 0b11df50c8f00875a92b722e9f225dd27ed218b5
2026-08-04-configuration-source-ownership.zh.md: 648cea0167bef564195597f7b2791b5211d40267
2026-08-04-configuration-source-ownership.md: ef30a22c120af1437f348e52843e1dd45c9837ae
2026-08-04-configuration-source-ownership.zh.md: c1567c6e823a0bc8ed8d1f9ed50a11a5d204ede8

View File

@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ The launching environment wins because `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY=… dsh`, a CI secret,
**The project the harness is launched in is trusted, by default and without a prompt.** A checkout may carry its own endpoint, its own ordinary variables, and its own key; the key ranks below the managed store, so a key stored through the Models page is never displaced by one a checkout happens to contain. `EnvironmentSnapshot.getFrom(name, sources)` still searches only the layers a caller names, and omitting one is a refusal rather than a demotion — the mechanism exists for the decisions where a layer must be unreachable, not because the project is one of them today.
**Trust does not extend to changing the harness itself.** `isBootstrapOnly` rejects, at load and before anything is materialized, any `.env` that sets a variable governing how a process launches (`PATH`, `SHELL`, `NODE_OPTIONS`, `LD_PRELOAD`), what code a runtime executes before the program it was asked to run (`BASH_ENV`, `PERL5OPT`, `PYTHONSTARTUP`, `RUBYOPT`, `JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS`, the Git hook commands), where model-visible instructions load from (the whole `DSH_*` namespace, `HOME`, `XDG_*`), or how the network is reached and trusted (proxy and CA variables). Matching is case-insensitive, so `https_proxy` is not a bypass.
**Trust does not extend to changing the harness itself.** `loadLayeredEnv` rejects, at load and before anything is materialized, any `.env` that sets a variable governing how a process launches (`PATH`, `SHELL`, `NODE_OPTIONS`, `LD_PRELOAD`), what code a runtime executes before the program it was asked to run (`BASH_ENV`, `PERL5OPT`, `PYTHONSTARTUP`, `RUBYOPT`, `JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS`, the Git hook commands), where model-visible instructions load from (the whole `DSH_*` namespace, `HOME`, `XDG_*`), or how the network is reached and trusted (proxy and CA variables). Matching is case-insensitive, so `https_proxy` is not a bypass.
The line is that these take effect with no user action, before any turn, outside the permission policy and the sandbox. `DSH_PERMISSION_MODE` would switch off the approvals that make trusting a project meaningful at all, and `BASH_ENV` runs a file of the project's choosing on every single `bash -c` the bash tool issues — the project's code running under the agent's policy is the deal; the project rewriting that policy is not. Enumerating these is a losing game one variable at a time, which is why the whole `DSH_*` namespace is denied rather than an audited subset, and why the list is organised by what a variable *does* rather than by which runtime owns it. There is no opt-out: an escape hatch would have to be readable from somewhere, and anything a discovered file could set is the hole itself.

View File

@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ inherited process environment (read-only, wins)
**harness 被启动于其中的项目默认可信,且不做询问。** 一个 checkout 可以携带自己的 endpoint、自己的普通变量和自己的密钥密钥排在受管存储之下因此通过 Models 页存下的密钥绝不会被 checkout 中恰好带有的那一个顶掉。`EnvironmentSnapshot.getFrom(name, sources)` 仍然只搜索调用方点名的层,省略某层仍是拒绝而不是降级——该机制是为「某一层必须不可达」的那些决策准备的,而项目层今天不在其列。
**信任不延伸到改变 harness 本身。** `isBootstrapOnly` 会在加载时、且在物化任何内容之前,拒绝任何设置了下列变量的 `.env`:决定进程如何启动的(`PATH``SHELL``NODE_OPTIONS``LD_PRELOAD`)、决定运行时在执行被要求运行的程序之前先执行哪些代码的(`BASH_ENV``PERL5OPT``PYTHONSTARTUP``RUBYOPT``JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS`、Git 的钩子命令)、决定模型可见指令从哪里加载的(整个 `DSH_*` 命名空间、`HOME``XDG_*`以及决定网络如何抵达与信任的proxy 与 CA 变量)。匹配不区分大小写,因此 `https_proxy` 不是绕过手段。
**信任不延伸到改变 harness 本身。** `loadLayeredEnv` 会在加载时、且在物化任何内容之前,拒绝任何设置了下列变量的 `.env`:决定进程如何启动的(`PATH``SHELL``NODE_OPTIONS``LD_PRELOAD`)、决定运行时在执行被要求运行的程序之前先执行哪些代码的(`BASH_ENV``PERL5OPT``PYTHONSTARTUP``RUBYOPT``JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS`、Git 的钩子命令)、决定模型可见指令从哪里加载的(整个 `DSH_*` 命名空间、`HOME``XDG_*`以及决定网络如何抵达与信任的proxy 与 CA 变量)。匹配不区分大小写,因此 `https_proxy` 不是绕过手段。
这条界线在于:它们无需任何用户动作、在任何一轮开始之前、且在权限策略与沙箱之外就生效。`DSH_PERMISSION_MODE` 会关掉让「信任项目」根本成立的那道审批,而 `BASH_ENV` 会在 bash 工具发出的每一次 `bash -c` 上执行项目指定的文件——项目的代码在 agent 的策略下运行是约定,项目改写那份策略不是。一个变量一个变量地枚举是必输的游戏,所以整个 `DSH_*` 命名空间被拒绝而不是只拒绝一份经审查的子集,也所以这份清单是按变量*做什么*而不是按哪个运行时拥有它来组织的。不设逃生门:逃生门本身总得从某处读取,而任何被发现的文件能设置的东西,就是那个漏洞本身。