docs: make bilingual pairing universal

.agents/notes/README.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
-README.md: 6dec68bef44350895d30058b994ddacb63c70822
-README.zh.md: a9d8e6c74c757271841b3f9ad208fe5e6350d645
+README.md: d2f6d216b151673d818337c67a78dbe908786c8b
+README.zh.md: 4c7f785ba7478f35cade742409d87746ddcdf8ec

.agents/notes/README.md

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Every non-trivial change MUST add or update at least one Agent Note in the same
 
 Updating the Agent Note that already owns the decision satisfies the rule; do not create a duplicate. Only a purely mechanical or local edit with no behavioral, contractual, structural, process, or rationale change is exempt. An Agent Note is never edited into a *different decision*: supersede it with a new one, and keep both notes cross-linked unless the old note is later fully consolidated under the rule below. Editing an `implemented/` Agent Note to track where its existing decision lives is required, not forbidden; see [implemented/AGENTS.md](implemented/AGENTS.md).
 
-An implemented Agent Note that is fully superseded may be consolidated into the current owning note and deleted. Before deletion, the owner must preserve every unique rationale, alternative, consequence, verification contract, and named coverage gap; repair every inbound link; and delete any Chinese counterpart, consistency record, and `required` entry in [the translation-pairing manifest](../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) in the same change. Partial supersession does not qualify: keep both notes cross-linked and update every fact that remains current. Consolidation must not rewrite the old file into its opposite or rely on git history as the only copy of rationale.
+An implemented Agent Note that is fully superseded may be consolidated into the current owning note and deleted. Before deletion, the owner must preserve every unique rationale, alternative, consequence, verification contract, and named coverage gap; repair every inbound link; and delete the Chinese counterpart and consistency record in the same change. Partial supersession does not qualify: keep both notes cross-linked and update every fact that remains current. Consolidation must not rewrite the old file into its opposite or rely on git history as the only copy of rationale.
 
 A feature-addition note may be consolidated into the later removal note only when the feature is absent from production code, configuration, schemas, durable or wire formats, migration, and compatibility behavior; no current documentation presents it as available; and no test exercises it as supported behavior. Removal rationale and tests that verify absence may remain. The removal owner preserves the original motivation, why it no longer justified the feature, alternatives to full removal, the capability given up, conditions for reintroduction, and verification of complete absence. Obsolete implementation inventories and tests that only verified the deleted behavior are not current verification contracts. Removing one transport, default, implementation, or presentation is partial supersession, as is any surviving durable data or compatibility handling.
 

.agents/notes/README.zh.md

@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
 
 更新已经拥有该决策的 Agent Note 即可满足规则；不要创建重复记录。只有不涉及行为、契约、结构、流程或理由变化的纯机械性或局部编辑才可豁免。Agent Note 永远不会被编辑为一个*不同的决策*：用新 Agent Note 取代旧记录，并让两个记录保持互相链接，除非后续依据下方规则完全合并旧记录。编辑 `implemented/` Agent Note 以跟踪其现有决策的所在位置是必需的，而非禁止的；见 [implemented/AGENTS.md](implemented/AGENTS.md)。
 
-被完全取代的 implemented Agent Note 可以合并到当前持有该决策的记录中，并删除原文件。删除前，当前记录必须保存所有独有的决策依据、备选方案、影响、验证契约和明确指出的覆盖缺口；修复所有入站链接；并在同一变更中删除中文对侧文件、一致性记录，以及[翻译配对 manifest（元数据清单）](../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json)中对应的 `required` 条目。仅部分被取代的记录不符合此条件：保留两个记录并让它们互相链接，同时更新所有仍然适用的事实。合并不得将旧文件改写成与其相反的决策，也不得让 git 历史成为决策依据的唯一副本。
+被完全取代的 implemented Agent Note 可以合并到当前持有该决策的记录中，并删除原文件。删除前，当前记录必须保存所有独有的决策依据、备选方案、影响、验证契约和明确指出的覆盖缺口；修复所有入站链接；并在同一变更中删除中文对侧文件和一致性记录。仅部分被取代的记录不符合此条件：保留两个记录并让它们互相链接，同时更新所有仍然适用的事实。合并不得将旧文件改写成与其相反的决策，也不得让 git 历史成为决策依据的唯一副本。
 
 只有当一项功能已从生产代码、配置、schema、持久化格式或协议格式、迁移和兼容行为中完全消失，当前文档不再将其描述为可用，且没有测试把它作为受支持行为来执行时，新增该功能的 Agent Note 才可合并进后续的移除记录。移除决策的依据和验证该功能已不存在的测试可以保留。移除决策的持有记录必须保留最初动机、为什么该动机已不足以证明保留该功能的合理性、完全移除之外的备选方案、放弃的能力、重新引入的条件，以及证明已彻底移除的验证。过时的实现清单和只验证已删除行为的测试不属于当前验证契约。仅移除一种传输、默认值、实现或展示属于部分取代；仍有任何持久数据或兼容处理也同样如此。
 

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
-2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md: 45a587586b1387d7c351f9c268bd038fcd549ed5
-2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md: 4875e48b43f2324ae117bb7aec1bf81dce3bc2bb
+2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md: 3732e6812a3f1f40242aa5a83a0bf1d1bc4d6139
+2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md: a870e063230a34b807eed2f4ffc1c6067cb3aedc

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md

@@ -6,14 +6,14 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md)
 
 ## Problem
 
-This repo's README and docs tree are read by people and agents inside and outside the company, in both English and Chinese. Maintaining a second language by hand, with no mechanism, is how translations rot: one side moves on, the other silently lies, and no gate notices. The repo's standing answer to invariants of this kind is to encode them as a mechanical check (see [quality gates](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md) and [doc-sync enforcement](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)), so the bilingual policy ships with one.
+This repo's documentation corpus is read by people and agents inside and outside the company, in both English and Chinese. Maintaining a second language by hand, with no mechanism, is how translations rot: one side moves on, the other silently lies, and no gate notices. The repo's standing answer to invariants of this kind is to encode them as a mechanical check (see [quality gates](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md) and [doc-sync enforcement](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)), so the bilingual policy ships with one.
 
 ## Decision
 
 - **Paired sibling files with equal authority.** A documentation pair is three sibling files: English `foo.md`, Chinese `foo.zh.md`, and a consistency record `foo.i18n.yaml`. Neither language is canonical — a document may be authored and reviewed Chinese-first and translated to English afterwards, or the reverse; what binds the pair is that both sides must say the same thing, and pairs merge whole (both languages plus the record, never one alone). Policy: [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../../docs/i18n/README.md); translation rules: [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../../docs/i18n/translation-rules.md); terminology source of truth: [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../../docs/i18n/terminology.md).
 - **A sidecar record of both blob hashes makes consistency checkable.** `foo.i18n.yaml` holds the full git blob hash of each side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. An edit to either side without re-confirming the pair is then mechanically detectable as a pure content comparison — no history lookup — and the hashes are computable for files edited in the same PR, which a commit-hash record is not. Re-recording (`verify-translation-pairing --write`) produces a reviewable yaml diff: confirming consistency is an explicit, visible act in the PR.
-- **`verify-translation-pairing` joins `doc-sync`.** The gate ([scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)) enforces: sources selected explicitly, by document class, or by the manifest's `requiredSince` cutoff have complete pairs; every existing pair is complete (all three files) and consistent (both hashes match, switcher links both ways, structural signatures identical); and excluded generated, instruction, or bilingual-by-construction files stay unpaired. The `requiredClasses` set in [scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) closes a translated class for all present and future files instead of relying on an enumerated snapshot. Source-oriented code gates consume a `.zh.md` fence sequence as a derivative only when its unsuffixed sibling has the same tracked fences in the same order with byte-identical bodies; an incomplete, reordered, reclassified, or changed sequence stays independent, so the owning code gate or pairing gate reports the mismatch.
-- **The enforcement frontier advances in coherent review batches, then closes by class.** Explicit `required` entries admit related files while their back-catalog is still being reviewed; after that catalog is complete, its `non-readme` or `readme` class enters `requiredClasses` and can no longer grow a backlog. Both classes are closed. README discovery covers every case-insensitive README basename outside vendored, dependency, and ignored build-output trees, including future top-level directories. A site-published pair uses `pairedPages()` so the root locale projects `.zh.md` and `/en/` projects `.md`; creating a counterpart alone does not publish it.
+- **`verify-translation-pairing` joins `doc-sync`.** The gate ([scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)) enforces: every discovered, non-excluded source has a complete pair; every existing pair is complete (all three files) and consistent (both hashes match, switcher links both ways, structural signatures identical); and excluded generated, instruction, or bilingual-by-construction files stay unpaired. [scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) contains only explicit exclusions, so no requirement can bypass discovery and receive a weaker check. Source-oriented code gates consume a `.zh.md` fence sequence as a derivative only when its unsuffixed sibling has the same tracked fences in the same order with byte-identical bodies; an incomplete, reordered, reclassified, or changed sequence stays independent, so the owning code gate or pairing gate reports the mismatch.
+- **One corpus-wide requirement.** Every document in scope requires a complete pair from creation; the policy has no per-file rollout state, date cutoff, or README-specific class. README discovery covers every case-insensitive README basename outside vendored, dependency, and ignored build-output trees, including future top-level directories. A site-published pair uses `pairedPages()` so the root locale projects `.zh.md` and `/en/` projects `.md`; creating a counterpart alone does not publish it.
 - **Pairing records are metadata, not Cordis Loader configuration.** Cordis configuration discovery accepts actual `.cordis.yml` and `.cordis.yaml` files while excluding `*.i18n.yaml`, even when the document name contains `cordis`. This preserves validation of executable Loader entries without parsing translation hashes as configuration.
 - **Translation is agent work with human review.** The committed workflow is [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md), following the same pattern as [dsh-code-review](../../../skills/dsh-code-review/SKILL.md): the skill carries the workflow and defers to the docs as sources of truth. The skill directs the orchestrating agent to delegate translation writing to a subagent.
 
@@ -40,5 +40,5 @@ Paired sibling files with locale suffixes are the dominant Chinese big-tech conv
 - Every pair adds a third file to the tree. The record is machine-written (`--write`), so the cost is directory noise, not maintenance effort; in exchange, "who confirmed these consistent, and when" is answerable from git blame on the yaml.
 - When the two sides disagree, no mechanical rule picks a winner — the PR review does. That is the price of equal authority, accepted deliberately: the alternative (a canonical language) forbids Chinese-first authoring.
 - Generated docs (`cordis-catalog/`, `tool-catalog/`, `module-graph.md`) are excluded for now; the planned follow-up is to teach their generators to emit Chinese alongside English, at which point they leave the exclusion list.
-- Explicit `required` entries and the date cutoff preserve the reviewed rollout history, while the two closed classes make every current and future in-scope document mandatory. No document class can grow a new backlog.
+- The exclusions-only manifest makes every current and future in-scope document mandatory through the same path. There is no explicit requirement, cutoff, or class entry that can fall outside discovery while appearing enforced.
 - The recorded hashes double as the update tool (`git cat-file -p <hash>` recovers either side's last-confirmed text for a minimal diff-based update), so re-translation of whole files is never forced by the mechanism.

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.zh.md

@@ -6,14 +6,14 @@ Status: implemented
 
 ## 问题
 
-本仓库的 README 与 docs 目录树会被公司内外的人和 agent（智能体）以中英两种语言阅读。在没有机制的情况下纯靠手工维护第二语言，正是译文腐烂的根源：一侧持续演进，另一侧默默失实，而没有门禁会注意到。对于这类不变式，本仓库一贯的做法是将其编码为机械检查（见[质量门禁](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md)与 [doc-sync 强制](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)），因此双语政策随附一道门禁一起交付。
+本仓库的文档语料会被公司内外的人和 agent（智能体）以中英两种语言阅读。在没有机制的情况下纯靠手工维护第二语言，正是译文腐烂的根源：一侧持续演进，另一侧默默失实，而没有门禁会注意到。对于这类不变式，本仓库一贯的做法是将其编码为机械检查（见[质量门禁](2026-06-11-quality-gates.md)与 [doc-sync 强制](2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md)），因此双语政策随附一道门禁一起交付。
 
 ## 决策
 
 - **配对兄弟文件，两种语言同权。** 一对文档由三个兄弟文件组成：英文 `foo.md`、中文 `foo.zh.md`，以及一份一致性记录 `foo.i18n.yaml`。没有哪种语言是正典：一篇文档可以先用中文撰写和评审、之后再译成英文，反之亦可；约束配对的是：两侧必须表达相同的内容，且配对整体合并（两种语言加记录，绝不单独落一侧）。政策见 [docs/i18n/README.md](../../../../docs/i18n/README.md)；翻译规则见 [docs/i18n/translation-rules.md](../../../../docs/i18n/translation-rules.md)；术语真源见 [docs/i18n/terminology.md](../../../../docs/i18n/terminology.md)。
 - **伴随记录保存两侧 blob hash，使一致性可检查。** `foo.i18n.yaml` 保存两侧文件在上一次确认一致时各自的完整 git blob hash。此后修改了任一侧而未重新确认配对，都能被机械检测出来（纯内容比较，无需查询历史），而且同一个 PR（Pull Request）内改动的文件也能计算出 hash，commit hash 式的记录做不到这一点。重新记录（`verify-translation-pairing --write`）会产生一份可评审的 yaml diff：确认一致在 PR 中是一个显式、可见的动作。
-- **`verify-translation-pairing` 加入 `doc-sync`。** 门禁（[scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)）强制执行以下规则：通过显式指定、文档类别或 manifest（元数据清单）的 `requiredSince` 分界日期选中的源文档必须有完整配对；任何已存在的配对必须完整（三个文件齐全）且一致（两个 hash 匹配、切换行双向互链、结构签名一致）；被排除的生成文档、指令文档或本身即双语的文档不得配对。[scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) 中的 `requiredClasses` 集合会将已完成翻译的类别纳入强制范围，对其当前及今后所有文件强制执行契约，而不再依赖一份枚举式快照。只有当 `.zh.md` 围栏序列与其无后缀兄弟文件拥有顺序相同、正文按字节一致的同一组受跟踪围栏时，面向源码的代码门禁才会将其作为派生内容消费；不完整、顺序变更、重分类或已改动的序列仍会独立受检，因此由其所属的代码门禁或配对门禁报告不匹配。
-- **执行红线按连贯的评审批次推进，再以类别为单位完成强制覆盖。** 在存量文档仍处于评审阶段时，显式 `required` 条目会纳入相关文件；存量文档全部完成后，其 `non-readme` 或 `readme` 类别进入 `requiredClasses`，不再产生新的 backlog。这两个类别均已纳入强制范围。README 发现会覆盖 vendor 源码、依赖目录与被忽略的构建产物目录之外所有文件名不区分大小写匹配 README 的文件，包括今后新增的顶层目录。发布到文档站的配对使用 `pairedPages()`，由根 locale 投影 `.zh.md`，由 `/en/` 投影 `.md`；仅创建对侧文件并不会发布它。
+- **`verify-translation-pairing` 加入 `doc-sync`。** 门禁（[scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-translation-pairing.ts)）强制执行以下规则：每个已发现且未排除的源文档都有完整配对；每个现有配对都完整（三个文件齐全）且一致（两个 hash 匹配、切换行双向互链、结构签名一致）；被排除的生成文档、指令文档或本身即双语的文档不得配对。[scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json) 只包含显式排除项，因此任何要求都无法绕过发现流程而接受较弱的检查。只有当 `.zh.md` 围栏序列与其无后缀兄弟文件拥有顺序相同、正文按字节一致的同一组受跟踪围栏时，面向源码的代码门禁才会将其作为派生内容消费；不完整、顺序变更、重分类或已改动的序列仍会独立受检，因此由其所属的代码门禁或配对门禁报告不匹配。
+- **全语料统一要求。** 范围内的每篇文档从创建起就必须有完整配对；政策没有逐文件推进状态、日期分界或 README 专用类别。README 发现会覆盖 vendor 源码、依赖目录与被忽略的构建产物目录之外所有文件名不区分大小写匹配 README 的文件，包括今后新增的顶层目录。发布到文档站的配对使用 `pairedPages()`，由根 locale 投影 `.zh.md`，由 `/en/` 投影 `.md`；仅创建对侧文件并不会发布它。
 - **配对记录是元数据，而不是 Cordis Loader 配置。** Cordis 配置发现会接受实际的 `.cordis.yml` 和 `.cordis.yaml` 文件，同时排除 `*.i18n.yaml`，即使文档名中包含 `cordis` 也不例外。这样既能继续校验可执行的 Loader 配置项，又不会把翻译 hash 当作配置来解析。
 - **翻译是 agent 的工作，由人评审。** 仓库内置的工作流是 [.agents/skills/dsh-translate-docs](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md)，与 [dsh-code-review](../../../skills/dsh-code-review/SKILL.md) 模式相同：skill（技能）承载工作流，并将文档作为真源。该 skill 要求编排 agent 把翻译写作委派给 subagent。
 
@@ -40,5 +40,5 @@ Status: implemented
 - 每个配对给目录树多添一个文件。记录由机器写入（`--write`），代价是目录噪音而非维护负担；换来的是「谁在何时确认过这对文档一致」可以从 yaml 的 git blame 直接回答。
 - 两侧说法冲突时，没有机械规则裁决谁赢，由 PR 评审裁决。这是同权的代价，且是有意接受的：另一个选项（正典语言）会禁止中文先行撰写。
 - 生成文档（`cordis-catalog/`、`tool-catalog/`、`module-graph.md`）暂被排除；计划中的后续工作是让生成器在输出英文的同时输出中文，届时将这些文件移出排除清单。
-- 显式 `required` 条目与日期分界保留已经评审的推进历史，而两个已纳入强制范围的类别会将当前及今后所有范围内的文档列为必选项。任何文档类别都不能新增 backlog（待翻清单）。
+- 只含排除项的 manifest 通过同一路径，要求当前及今后纳入范围的每篇文档都必须配对。不存在显式要求、分界或类别条目可以落在发现范围之外，却看似已经强制执行。
 - 记录的 hash 兼作更新工具（`git cat-file -p <hash>` 能还原任一侧上次确认的文本，用于基于 diff 的最小更新），因此这套机制从不强迫整篇重译。

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-04-doc-tiers-and-budgets.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
-2026-07-04-doc-tiers-and-budgets.md: 7acdba8bfd96d183c418b3935d7b8e7f237d3607
-2026-07-04-doc-tiers-and-budgets.zh.md: 0f07a92740d31dd13cb523d73ac8a3699d666d30
+2026-07-04-doc-tiers-and-budgets.md: a52c40a9a147fd39fdec4c61079822f1b1115227
+2026-07-04-doc-tiers-and-budgets.zh.md: d03c2046c9963e4d62d2a7221d4563f60d3f4953

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-04-doc-tiers-and-budgets.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Standing docs accumulated repeated rules, retold incidents, duplicated package m
 
 - **A tier taxonomy with one home per fact.** [docs/AGENTS.md](../../../../docs/AGENTS.md) is the documentation standard: it assigns every Markdown tier a single job (standing orders, system map, type catalog, decision records, incident stories, how-tos, per-package contracts, generated catalogs, workflows), forbids restating a fact outside its home tier (link instead), and carries the slop checklist used when writing or reviewing any doc.
 - **A narrow, hard budget gate.** [scripts/verify-doc-budgets.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-doc-budgets.ts) joins `doc-sync`: every doc listed in [scripts/doc-budgets.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/doc-budgets.manifest.json) must stay under its word ceiling (`wc -w` semantics, whole file), and a budgeted file that is missing fails the gate so a rename cannot silently orphan its budget. Scope is deliberately only the accretion-prone standing docs — the root and subtree `AGENTS.md` files, `architecture.md`, `packages/README.md`, and the standing policy docs they evict content into (`docs/testing.md`, `docs/defensive-patterns.md`). Reference docs, Agent Notes, and package READMEs are unbudgeted: length is legitimate there when every row is a fact, and review plus the slop checklist govern them.
-- **Ceilings are an enforcement frontier that ratchets.** A ceiling sits at least 5% above the doc's current size — working headroom, so routine wording edits pass while real growth still trips the gate — and ratchets down, keeping that margin, as the doc is brought to its target budget (root `AGENTS.md` ≤ 1,500 words; `architecture.md` ≤ 1,800; subtree `AGENTS.md` ≤ 600; `packages/README.md` ≤ 600) — the same rollout mechanism as the [translation-pairing `required` list](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md). When the gate goes red the fix is to relocate or condense per the taxonomy; raising a ceiling is permitted only with explicit justification in the PR description, the manifest diff being the reviewable act.
+- **Ceilings are an enforcement frontier that ratchets.** A ceiling sits at least 5% above the doc's current size — working headroom, so routine wording edits pass while real growth still trips the gate — and ratchets down, keeping that margin, as the doc is brought to its target budget (root `AGENTS.md` ≤ 1,500 words; `architecture.md` ≤ 1,800; subtree `AGENTS.md` ≤ 600; `packages/README.md` ≤ 600). When the gate goes red the fix is to relocate or condense per the taxonomy; raising a ceiling is permitted only with explicit justification in the PR description, the manifest diff being the reviewable act.
 - **A thin workflow skill, contracts in docs.** [.agents/skills/dsh-doc-standards](../../../skills/dsh-doc-standards/SKILL.md) carries the placement/audit/red-gate workflow and defers to the standard as its source of truth, the same split as [dsh-translate-docs](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md) over the i18n contract.
 
 ## Alternatives considered

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-04-doc-tiers-and-budgets.zh.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 - **每项事实只归属一处的层级分类。**[docs/AGENTS.md](../../../../docs/AGENTS.md) 是文档标准：它为每种 Markdown 层级分配单一职责（常设指令、系统图、类型目录、决策记录、事件故事、操作指南、各包契约、生成式目录、工作流），禁止在事实归属层级之外重复陈述（应改为链接），并包含编写或评审任何文档时使用的赘余检查清单。
 - **范围窄且严格的预算门禁。**[scripts/verify-doc-budgets.ts](../../../../scripts/verify-doc-budgets.ts) 接入 `doc-sync`：[scripts/doc-budgets.manifest.json](../../../../scripts/doc-budgets.manifest.json) 列出的每份文档都必须低于其字数上限（采用 `wc -w` 语义，统计整个文件）；预算内文件缺失也会使门禁失败，使重命名无法悄然遗落其预算。范围刻意只涵盖容易膨胀的常设文档——根目录和子树中的 `AGENTS.md` 文件、`architecture.md`、`packages/README.md`，以及它们将内容移入的常设策略文档（`docs/testing.md`、`docs/defensive-patterns.md`）。参考文档、Agent Note 和包 README 不设预算：只要每一行都是事实，长度在这些位置就是合理的；评审和赘余检查清单负责约束它们。
-- **上限是只进不退的执行红线。** 上限设定为文档当前字数的至少 105%（留出工作余量，使日常措辞调整能通过，而真正的膨胀仍会触发门禁），并随着文档被精简到目标预算而同步下调、保持该余量（根 `AGENTS.md` ≤ 1,500 词；`architecture.md` ≤ 1,800；子树 `AGENTS.md` ≤ 600；`packages/README.md` ≤ 600）。推进机制与[翻译配对的 `required` 清单](2026-07-02-bilingual-docs-and-pairing-gate.md)相同。门禁变红时，修复方式是按分类体系迁移或压缩内容；只有在 PR（Pull Request）描述中给出明确理由时才允许提高上限，manifest（元数据清单）的 diff 本身即为可评审的动作。
+- **上限是只进不退的执行红线。** 上限设定为文档当前字数的至少 105%（留出工作余量，使日常措辞调整能通过，而真正的膨胀仍会触发门禁），并随着文档被精简到目标预算而同步下调、保持该余量（根 `AGENTS.md` ≤ 1,500 词；`architecture.md` ≤ 1,800；子树 `AGENTS.md` ≤ 600；`packages/README.md` ≤ 600）。门禁变红时，修复方式是按分类体系迁移或压缩内容；只有在 PR（Pull Request）描述中给出明确理由时才允许提高上限，manifest（元数据清单）的 diff 本身即为可评审的动作。
 - **精简的工作流 skill（技能），契约归文档。**[.agents/skills/dsh-doc-standards](../../../skills/dsh-doc-standards/SKILL.md) 承载放置/审计/红灯门禁工作流，并以文档标准为真源，与 [dsh-translate-docs](../../../skills/dsh-translate-docs/SKILL.md) 和 i18n 契约之间的分工相同。
 
 ## 曾考虑的替代方案

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-19-require-agent-notes-for-non-trivial-changes.i18n.yaml

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
 # side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
 # after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
 #   pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
-2026-07-19-require-agent-notes-for-non-trivial-changes.md: 32d7408b3d56e6571a14a8191e9b4b0fe901f5a3
-2026-07-19-require-agent-notes-for-non-trivial-changes.zh.md: 713845706e650b4b4acd591368d9bcff137a38b7
+2026-07-19-require-agent-notes-for-non-trivial-changes.md: 162ae61affb4c1b0ad526fa0da41f84ebbb02089
+2026-07-19-require-agent-notes-for-non-trivial-changes.zh.md: cd015ba62f1f2b1e9e5e6c36d1cde5bd35cba84c

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-19-require-agent-notes-for-non-trivial-changes.md

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Every non-trivial change adds or updates at least one Agent Note in the same PR.
 
 Updating the note that already owns a decision satisfies the rule; a new note is required only when no note owns it. Purely mechanical or local edits with no behavioral, contractual, structural, process, or rationale change are exempt. The [Agent Notes README](../../README.md#when-to-write-one) owns this boundary, while root `AGENTS.md` carries the standing order.
 
-A fully superseded implemented note may be consolidated into the current owning note and deleted only after that owner preserves every unique rationale, alternative, consequence, verification contract, and named coverage gap. The same change repairs inbound links and removes any Chinese counterpart, consistency record, and `required` entry in `scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json`. Partial supersession keeps both notes cross-linked and current; consolidation neither rewrites an old decision into its opposite nor leaves git history as the only copy of rationale.
+A fully superseded implemented note may be consolidated into the current owning note and deleted only after that owner preserves every unique rationale, alternative, consequence, verification contract, and named coverage gap. The same change repairs inbound links and removes the Chinese counterpart and consistency record. Partial supersession keeps both notes cross-linked and current; consolidation neither rewrites an old decision into its opposite nor leaves git history as the only copy of rationale.
 
 When a later decision removes an earlier feature completely, the removal note becomes the current owner only after the feature is absent from production code, configuration, schemas, durable or wire formats, migration, and compatibility behavior; no current documentation presents it as available; and no test exercises it as supported behavior. Removal rationale and tests that verify absence may remain. The removal owner preserves the feature's original motivation, why that motivation no longer justified the surface, alternatives to full removal, the capability given up, conditions for reintroduction, and verification of complete absence. Implementation inventories and tests that only described the deleted behavior are obsolete rather than current verification contracts. A removal limited to one transport, default, implementation, or presentation remains partial supersession.
 
@@ -42,5 +42,5 @@ Review enforces the semantic boundary. No automated gate attempts to classify a
 - Contributors maintain an existing owning note instead of creating duplicate records.
 - Fully superseded records can collapse into one current owner without losing their unique rationale or verification contract.
 - Features that were later removed can have one current owner without carrying obsolete implementation and test inventories forward.
-- Partial supersession remains explicit and cross-linked, while deletion requires link, bilingual-pair, and required-manifest cleanup in the same change.
+- Partial supersession remains explicit and cross-linked, while deletion requires link and bilingual-pair cleanup in the same change.
 - Mechanical edits remain lightweight, and the gate topology and runtime remain unchanged.

.agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-07-19-require-agent-notes-for-non-trivial-changes.zh.md

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Status: implemented
 
 更新已经持有该决策的 Agent Note 即满足规则；仅当没有 Agent Note 持有该决策时才新增记录。完全机械或局部、且不改变行为、契约、结构、流程或决策依据的编辑可豁免。[Agent Notes README](../../README.md#when-to-write-one) 持有这条边界，根目录 `AGENTS.md` 则携带常驻指令。
 
-只有在当前持有该决策的记录保存了所有独有的决策依据、备选方案、影响、验证契约和明确指出的覆盖缺口后，才可将被完全取代的 implemented Agent Note 合并到该记录中并删除。同一变更还要修复入站链接，并删除中文对侧文件、一致性记录，以及 `scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json` 中对应的 `required` 条目。仅部分被取代时，两个记录仍需互相链接并保持与现状一致；合并既不将旧决策改写成与其相反的决策，也不让 git 历史成为决策依据的唯一副本。
+只有在当前持有该决策的记录保存了所有独有的决策依据、备选方案、影响、验证契约和明确指出的覆盖缺口后，才可将被完全取代的 implemented Agent Note 合并到该记录中并删除。同一变更还要修复入站链接，并删除中文对侧文件和一致性记录。仅部分被取代时，两个记录仍需互相链接并保持与现状一致；合并既不将旧决策改写成与其相反的决策，也不让 git 历史成为决策依据的唯一副本。
 
 后续决策完全移除较早的功能时，只有该功能已从生产代码、配置、schema、持久化格式或协议格式、迁移和兼容行为中消失，当前文档不再将其描述为可用，且没有测试把它作为受支持行为来执行，移除记录才会成为当前持有记录。移除决策的依据和验证该功能已不存在的测试可以保留。它必须保留该功能的最初动机、为什么该动机已不足以证明继续保留该功能、完全移除之外的备选方案、放弃的能力、重新引入的条件，以及证明已彻底移除的验证。只描述已删除行为的实现清单和测试已经过时，不属于当前验证契约。仅移除一种传输、默认值、实现或展示仍属于部分取代。
 
@@ -42,5 +42,5 @@ Status: implemented
 - 贡献者维护现有的决策持有记录，而不是创建重复记录。
 - 被完全取代的记录可以归并到一个当前持有记录中，同时不丢失其独有的决策依据或验证契约。
 - 后来被移除的功能可以只有一个当前持有记录，而无需继续保留过时的实现与测试清单。
-- 仅部分被取代的情况仍需明确记录并互相链接；删除记录则必须在同一变更中清理链接、双语配对和 `scripts/translation-pairing.manifest.json` 的 `required` 条目。
+- 仅部分被取代的情况仍需明确记录并互相链接；删除记录则必须在同一变更中清理链接和双语配对。
 - 机械编辑仍保持轻量，门禁拓扑和运行时间也保持不变。