fix inbox lifecycle downstream contracts

This commit is contained in:
_Kerman
2026-07-31 22:00:39 +08:00
parent 8e88b17c9f
commit afedf18ccf
219 changed files with 5660 additions and 4556 deletions

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-29-addressable-queue-operations.md
2026-07-29-addressable-queue-operations.md: 7a08b889c958e583dc430d33a1855fe3725f3d48
2026-07-29-addressable-queue-operations.zh.md: 701b028c7494fd7cb608d05a5d170c9075b155d7
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-29-addressable-queue-operations.md: 258e4e4e50a4c6386a2e8c28402fe32cb8870e1a
2026-07-29-addressable-queue-operations.zh.md: b4370d87892df2e0477c0897b45b4c7a1030978e

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
# Agent Note: Address pending queue occurrences for edit and removal
Status: implemented
Archived: 2026-07-31
English | [中文](2026-07-29-addressable-queue-operations.zh.md)

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
# Agent Noteagent 决策记录):为待处理队列项提供编辑与移除操作
# Agent Note: 为待处理队列项提供编辑与移除操作
Status: implemented
Archived: 2026-07-31
[English](2026-07-29-addressable-queue-operations.md) | 中文

View File

@@ -124,6 +124,9 @@
"feature/2026-07-27-user-message-icon-actions.i18n.yaml": "sha256:b33e480f19ec58c8c60417a6c03999953d463ca54606a5ac80ec528edf57c49b",
"feature/2026-07-27-user-message-icon-actions.md": "sha256:b6332e67c6dad0a3fcdb597cec9e4dc32b44ad33665f39c1a50501cf38d3f5ad",
"feature/2026-07-27-user-message-icon-actions.zh.md": "sha256:0fc824eac66a18063f7098e1c395c09b580d5a30b96f2b856608c084212c2ac2",
"feature/2026-07-29-addressable-queue-operations.i18n.yaml": "sha256:0a067b38dd3c02ac41148ed03a7a6fa4c3dee88d5a4b9bad325ff76ebc03c443",
"feature/2026-07-29-addressable-queue-operations.md": "sha256:f4d38d6cc49ad23cda2a287ba7ea5ce0e5fdb0edd41f33e68633f439654ca9fa",
"feature/2026-07-29-addressable-queue-operations.zh.md": "sha256:9aedd7e241cf46ec7a78ae999a7fb105d73da4baf57c9ecf7ae745ee9b98182b",
"process/2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.i18n.yaml": "sha256:33b6d5874427bd7a2bd82e7e2f4f482b12448b2464aef15a9c57975edb48554d",
"process/2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md": "sha256:aa2fe83d519fc30d48dff19e596e83c8922aacc9e063e14fe2cc35b769b9100e",
"process/2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.zh.md": "sha256:698017bd35f030fdea3eac51df9e43138c48140f504739d687b7251d13fced2b",

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md
2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md: 4bc4303f636ea7ff268d0b3f2d0a65dfba954883
2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.zh.md: 02c3bcafa246d52da0ef3b8f0dfd956091eedfb6
2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md: d771baf8854d02d2945ecf05db93672ff1de5645
2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.zh.md: 7fd65cb433071fdaaa65b65e965da0757b02f31f

View File

@@ -14,11 +14,11 @@ Separately, `context/message` and `user/message` had converged: the surface proj
**One primitive, three preset aliases.** The `Agent` interface's `send(message, target, wakeup)` covers the (`target` × `wakeup`) matrix. Its complete `UserMessage` owns identity, role, model-facing `content`, and producer `source`; the remaining arguments own only routing policy. `followup` (`next-turn`/wakeup), `steer` (`next-step`/wakeup), and `inject` (`next-step`/no-wakeup) each accept that one message and fix the policy. `wakeup` reserves a driver when the agent is idle; an already active driver receives no second reservation and can claim the input only if it reaches a later pre-step boundary. `next-turn`/no-wakeup (queue without waking) is representable with no alias and no current caller.
**inject is a non-waking next-step delivery.** It always appends the complete message to the next-step inbox. The driver claims it at a later pre-step and records it only when the final decision returns it in the entering batch; idle injection remains pending until another delivery wakes the driver. Its required `UserMessage.source` preserves the caller's explicit provenance.
**inject is a non-waking next-step delivery.** It always appends the complete message to the next-step inbox and records that insertion in a durable `agent/inbox/spliced` event. The driver claims it at a later pre-step and records it as model-visible `user/message` only when the final decision returns it in the entering batch; idle injection remains pending until another delivery wakes the driver. Its required `UserMessage.source` preserves the caller's explicit provenance.
**context/message is gone.** Injected context is now a `user/message`; context producers supply the appropriate non-user `source` explicitly, and typed source variants carry any domain-specific durable provenance. The surface, derivation, and `SurfaceEventType` drop `context/message`; consumers that need "is this a human prompt?" read `source.kind === 'user'` instead of the event type.
**context/message is gone.** Injected context uses one `UserMessage` value in the inbox and becomes a `user/message` event if admitted; context producers supply the appropriate non-user `source` explicitly, and typed source variants carry any domain-specific durable provenance. The surface, derivation, and `SurfaceEventType` drop `context/message`; consumers that need "is this a human prompt?" read `source.kind === 'user'` instead of the event type.
**Goal replay disambiguates by round, not type.** A goal state change is a round-zero goal-sourced `user/message` whose source carries the complete change; a positive round is an admitted continuation prompt. `decodeGoalEvent` takes a `user/message` and fails loud when goal-state content and its typed source disagree.
**Goal replay disambiguates by round, not type.** A goal state change commits as a round-zero goal-sourced message in a durable inbox insertion; a positive round advances only from an admitted continuation `user/message`. If the state-change message is later admitted, replay checks that its id, content, and typed source match the insertion without applying the change again.
**`send` does not return identity.** Callers already own the complete message and its opaque `MessageId`; creation and freezing are owned by the [identified immutable message decision](2026-07-28-identified-immutable-message-values.md), not by routing.
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Separately, `context/message` and `user/message` had converged: the surface proj
## Consequences
The delivery surface is now one primitive plus three self-documenting presets, and the (`target` × `wakeup`) matrix makes previously-unreachable combinations explicit. One durable message type serves prompts, injected context, and goal rounds, so the surface projection and every "human prompt?" check simplify to a `source` test. The `Agent` contract remains an interface, so alternate implementations and object-literal test fakes implement the same minimal structural surface. The goal fold's channel split moved from event type to `source.round`, and every consumer that filtered `context/message` now filters `user/message` by source. An idle injection remains pending without opening a turn or running the model, then becomes `user/message` when a later waking delivery's pre-step returns it in the entering batch.
The delivery surface is now one primitive plus three self-documenting presets, and the (`target` × `wakeup`) matrix makes previously-unreachable combinations explicit. One identified message value serves prompts, injected context, and goal rounds, so every "human prompt?" check simplifies to a `source` test. The `Agent` contract remains an interface, so alternate implementations and object-literal test fakes implement the same minimal structural surface. Goal mutations fold from durable inbox insertions, while positive rounds fold from admitted `user/message` events. An idle injection remains pending without opening a turn or running the model, then becomes `user/message` when a later waking delivery's pre-step returns it in the entering batch.
`wakeup` is the "should the model run" signal, so the inbox distinguishes waking queued work from anything available to claim: a lone `next-turn`/no-wakeup item stays parked at idle and rides along the next waking send, and `whenIdle`/`cancel` settle quiescence off the waking signal. Every insertion and exit publishes its matching live notification, while domain-specific durable facts travel in typed message sources rather than a parallel metadata channel. The direct pending-message representation keeps durable splices and live events correlated without maintaining a second steering wrapper or allowing its data to diverge. The later [claimed pre-step inbox lifecycle](2026-07-31-claimed-pre-step-inbox-lifecycle.md) decision keeps live queue mutations addressed by `MessageId` and separates single-message lifecycle notifications from the durable whole-queue splice projection.

View File

@@ -14,11 +14,11 @@ agent 的对外驱动接口逐渐长出三个近乎平行的动词——`send`
**一个原语,三个预设别名。** `Agent` 接口的 `send(message, target, wakeup)` 覆盖 (`target` × `wakeup`) 矩阵。完整的 `UserMessage` 持有标识、角色、模型可见 `content` 与生产方 `source`;其余参数只持有路由策略。`followup``next-turn`/wakeup`steer``next-step`/wakeup`inject``next-step`/no-wakeup都接收这一条消息并固定策略。`wakeup` 会在 agent 空闲时保留一个驱动器;已经活跃的驱动器不会获得第二次保留,只有在抵达后续 pre-step 边界时才能领取该输入。`next-turn`/no-wakeup入队但不唤醒可以表达只是没有别名也没有当前调用方。
**inject 是不会唤醒的 next-step 投递。** 它始终把完整消息追加到 next-step inbox。驱动器会在后续 pre-step 领取它,并且只有最终决策把它放入进入步骤的批次时才会记录;空闲注入会保持待处理,直到其他投递唤醒驱动器。必填的 `UserMessage.source` 会保留调用方显式提供的来源信息。
**inject 是不会唤醒的 next-step 投递。** 它始终把完整消息追加到 next-step inbox,并在持久 `agent/inbox/spliced` 事件中记录该插入。驱动器会在后续 pre-step 领取它,并且只有最终决策把它放入进入步骤的批次时才会将其记录为模型可见的 `user/message`;空闲注入会保持待处理,直到其他投递唤醒驱动器。必填的 `UserMessage.source` 会保留调用方显式提供的来源信息。
**context/message 已移除。** 注入的上下文现在是一条 `user/message`;上下文生产方显式提供合适的非 `user` 类别 `source`,类型化 source 变体携带所有特定于领域的持久来源信息。对外接口、派生逻辑和 `SurfaceEventType` 都不再包含 `context/message`;需要判断“这是不是一条人类提示词?”的消费方改为读取 `source.kind === 'user'`,而不是事件类型。
**context/message 已移除。** 注入的上下文在 inbox 中使用同一个 `UserMessage` 值,并在获准时成为 `user/message` 事件;上下文生产方显式提供合适的非 `user` 类别 `source`,类型化 source 变体携带所有特定于领域的持久来源信息。对外接口、派生逻辑和 `SurfaceEventType` 都不再包含 `context/message`;需要判断“这是不是一条人类提示词?”的消费方改为读取 `source.kind === 'user'`,而不是事件类型。
**goal 回放靠轮次而非类型来区分。** 一次 goal 状态变更是一条第 0 轮、来源为 goal 的 `user/message`,其 source 携带完整变更;正数轮次则是一条已准入的继续执行提示词。`decodeGoalEvent` 接收一条 `user/message`,并在 goal 状态内容与其类型化 source 不一致时立即报错
**goal 回放靠 Round 而非类型来区分。** 一次 goal 状态变更会作为 Round 为 0、来源为 goal 的消息,在持久 inbox 插入项中提交;正数 Round 只从已准入的继续执行 `user/message` 推进。如果状态变更消息随后获准,回放会检查其 id、内容和类型化 source 是否与插入项一致,而不会再次应用变更
**`send` 不返回标识。** 调用方已经持有完整消息及其不透明的 `MessageId`;消息的创建与冻结由[带标识的不可变消息值决策](2026-07-28-identified-immutable-message-values.md)负责,而不是由路由负责。
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ agent 的对外驱动接口逐渐长出三个近乎平行的动词——`send`
## 后果
投递接口现在是一个原语加三个自解释的预设,(`target` × `wakeup`) 矩阵把此前无法表达的组合显式化。一种持久消息类型同时服务提示词、注入的上下文和 goal 轮次,因此对外接口的投影和每一处“是否人类提示词?”检查都简化为一次 `source` 判断。`Agent` 契约仍是接口因此其他实现和对象字面量形式的测试替身只需实现同一个最小结构接口。goal 折叠的通道区分从事件类型改到了 `source.round`;此前过滤 `context/message` 的每个消费方现在改为按来源过滤 `user/message`。空闲注入会保持待处理,不打开轮次也不运行模型;后续会唤醒的投递在 pre-step 将其放入进入步骤的批次时,它才成为 `user/message`
投递接口现在是一个原语加三个自解释的预设,(`target` × `wakeup`) 矩阵把此前无法表达的组合显式化。同一个带标识消息值同时服务提示词、注入的上下文和 Goal Round因此每一处“是否人类提示词?”检查都简化为一次 `source` 判断。`Agent` 契约仍是接口因此其他实现和对象字面量形式的测试替身只需实现同一个最小结构接口。goal 变更从持久 inbox 插入项折叠,而正数 Round 从已准入的 `user/message` 事件折叠。空闲注入会保持待处理,不打开轮次也不运行模型;后续会唤醒的投递在 pre-step 将其放入进入步骤的批次时,它才成为 `user/message`
`wakeup` 是“模型是否应当运行”的信号,因此 inbox 会区分能唤醒的排队工作与任何可领取的项:一个孤立的 `next-turn`/no-wakeup 队列项会停泊在空闲状态,并随下一次唤醒 send 一同带出,而 `whenIdle`/`cancel` 依据唤醒信号来结算完全停稳。每次插入与退出都会发布对应的实时通知,特定于领域的持久事实则通过类型化消息 source 传递,而非通过平行的元数据通道。直接使用待处理消息的表示方式,使持久 splice 与实时事件保持可关联,既无需维护第二个 steering 包装层,也避免数据发生分歧。后续的[已领取 pre-step inbox 生命周期](2026-07-31-claimed-pre-step-inbox-lifecycle.md)决策保留通过 `MessageId` 寻址的实时队列变更,并把单消息生命周期通知与持久的整体队列 splice 投影分离。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-24-separate-context-injection-from-turn-execution.md
2026-07-24-separate-context-injection-from-turn-execution.md: ef85a33c7479b59a079c42cd42711a650ebc904e
2026-07-24-separate-context-injection-from-turn-execution.zh.md: ebcf5af6defdc56085bfd647f5134414cd22519b
2026-07-24-separate-context-injection-from-turn-execution.md: a1ae505a54f55d201559d62765abe423694aef6e
2026-07-24-separate-context-injection-from-turn-execution.zh.md: 8a24442b9922a125e86b5478cc3d0d810d027505

View File

@@ -22,11 +22,11 @@ A caller that owns context delivers an identified, frozen `UserMessage` through
An entering pre-step returns the complete `PreStepDecision.messages` batch for the request being finalized. Tool extension points still return `additionalContexts`, which enter the next-step inbox only after the corresponding tool results. These values are extension-point outputs, not attachments captured from a caller's inbox item.
Every additional context is an independent `user/message` whose `source` records provenance. There is no `context/message`, prompt-prefix placement, stable request delimiter, or prompt envelope. Transcript and UI consumers distinguish direct user messages from injected context by `source`.
Every additional context is an independent `UserMessage` whose `source` records provenance. Inbox insertion is durable immediately; admission later records the same value as `user/message`. There is no `context/message`, prompt-prefix placement, stable request delimiter, or prompt envelope. Transcript and UI consumers distinguish direct user messages from injected context by `source`.
## Injection lifecycle
`inject()` always inserts context into the non-waking `next-step` inbox. A collecting or running driver claims it at the nearest later pre-step boundary. An idle driver leaves it pending until `followup()` or `steer()` supplies waking work; cancellation or disposal may discard it first.
`inject()` always inserts context into the non-waking `next-step` inbox and commits that queue mutation as `agent/inbox/spliced`. A collecting or running driver claims it at the nearest later pre-step boundary. An idle driver leaves it pending until `followup()` or `steer()` supplies waking work; cancellation or disposal may discard it first without erasing the durable queue history.
The loop claims the current next-step batch before running `agent/pre-step`, so an injection that arrives after that claim may miss the request already being finalized. The next boundary claims it instead. An enter decision appends its returned messages inside the owning turn before the request consumes them. Context produced during an assistant tool-call batch therefore appears after that batch's complete ordered results.
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ This decision preserves the caller-owned framing decision from [unwrapped inject
**Keep a distinct `context/message` session event.** User-role model input would again have two event types with identical projection. `user/message.source` already carries the distinction needed by policy, transcript, and replay consumers.
**Keep one-shot turns for idle injection.** This gives idle context an immediate durability boundary, but it makes turn counts and turn observers report work that never ran the model. Non-waking context instead remains pending until real waking work supplies a request.
**Keep one-shot turns for idle injection.** Durable inbox insertion already records idle context without opening a turn. A synthetic turn would make turn counts and observers report work that never ran the model; non-waking context remains pending until real waking work supplies a request.
**Keep `prompt-prefix` as an optional placement.** Prefix baking can make the context and request appear in one provider message, but it introduces a second representation of the direct prompt and spreads placement handling across admission, steering, logging, replay, and UI code. Producers that require textual framing may include it in their own context content.
@@ -61,14 +61,14 @@ This decision preserves the caller-owned framing decision from [unwrapped inject
- Delivery inputs and steering inbox records contain no attached contexts; `agent/inbox/inserted` reports only the inserted message, while the durable splice retains its target list.
- `UserMessage` is the shared identified, frozen shape across prompt interception, tool execution, hook bridges, guards, and context producers.
- Prompt-prefix placement, prompt envelopes, and `context/message` are absent from public types, durable events, projection, and UI replay.
- Idle `inject()` queues one non-waking next-step item and appends nothing until a later waking delivery starts pre-step processing.
- Idle `inject()` immediately appends one durable inbox insertion but no model-visible `user/message`; a later waking delivery may start pre-step processing.
- Collecting and active-turn injection is claimed at the nearest later pre-step boundary, after complete tool-result batches and before the request that consumes it.
- Rejected or failed pre-step drops its claimed batch; input inserted after the claim remains pending.
- Unit, persistence/resume, invariant, and TUI coverage pin event order, claim ownership, and durable replay.
## Consequences
- Idle injection is not model-visible until a later pre-step enters it and may be lost to cancellation or disposal.
- Idle injection is not model-visible until a later pre-step enters it and may be discarded by cancellation or disposal, while its durable inbox lifecycle remains recorded.
- Consecutive user-role messages replace one baked prompt message; provider adapters preserve that ordering.
- Exact-current-request context must be returned from `agent/pre-step`; ordinary injection provides only nearest-later-boundary delivery.
- The public delivery contract and inbox records remain small: no context attachment, context-placement metadata, prompt envelope, or duplicate durable event type.

View File

@@ -22,11 +22,11 @@ agent API 曾用三种相互重叠的方式表示面向模型的补充输入:
返回 enter 的 pre-step 会为正在最终确定的请求返回完整的 `PreStepDecision.messages` 批次。工具扩展点仍可返回 `additionalContexts`,这些上下文只会在对应工具结果之后进入 next-step inbox。这些值是扩展点的输出而不是从调用方 inbox 条目捕获的附件。
每项额外上下文都是独立的 `user/message`,并由 `source` 记录来源。不再有 `context/message`、prompt-prefix 放置方式、稳定请求分隔符或提示词封套。transcript 与 UI 消费方通过 `source` 区分直接用户消息和注入上下文。
每项额外上下文都是独立的 `UserMessage`,并由 `source` 记录来源。inbox 插入会立即持久化;后续准入会将同一个值记录为 `user/message`不再有 `context/message`、prompt-prefix 放置方式、稳定请求分隔符或提示词封套。transcript 与 UI 消费方通过 `source` 区分直接用户消息和注入上下文。
## 注入生命周期
`inject()` 始终把上下文插入不会唤醒的 `next-step` inbox。collecting 或 running 驱动器会在最近的后续 pre-step 边界领取它。idle 驱动器会让它保持待处理,直至 `followup()``steer()` 提供可唤醒工作;在此之前,取消或 dispose资源释放可能将其丢弃。
`inject()` 始终把上下文插入不会唤醒的 `next-step` inbox,并以 `agent/inbox/spliced` 提交该队列变更。collecting 或 running 驱动器会在最近的后续 pre-step 边界领取它。idle 驱动器会让它保持待处理,直至 `followup()``steer()` 提供可唤醒工作;在此之前,取消或 dispose资源释放可能将其丢弃,但不会抹除持久队列历史
循环会先领取当前 next-step 批次,再运行 `agent/pre-step`因此领取后到达的注入可能赶不上正在最终确定的请求而由下一次边界领取。enter decision 返回的消息会在所属轮次内、消费它们的请求之前追加。在助手工具调用批次期间产生的上下文因此只会出现在该批次全部有序结果之后。
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ enter 分支的 `PreStepDecision.messages` 是拟议步骤的完整批次。wate
**保留独立的 `context/message` 会话事件。** 面向模型的 user-role 输入会再次拥有两个投影完全相同的事件类型。`user/message.source` 已能为策略、transcript 和回放消费方提供所需区分。
**为空闲注入保留一次性轮次。** 这种方式会为空闲上下文提供即时持久边界,却让轮次计数与轮次观察方报告从未运行模型的工作不会唤醒的上下文改为保持待处理,直至真实的可唤醒工作提供请求。
**为空闲注入保留一次性轮次。** 持久 inbox 插入已经能在不打开轮次的情况下记录空闲上下文。合成轮次会让轮次计数与观察方报告从未运行模型的工作不会唤醒的上下文保持待处理,直至真实的可唤醒工作提供请求。
**保留 `prompt-prefix` 可选放置方式。** 前缀烘焙可以让上下文和请求位于同一条提供方消息中但它会引入直接提示词的第二种表示并把放置处理扩散到准入、steering、日志、回放和 UI 代码。需要文本框架的生产方可以直接把它写入自身上下文内容。
@@ -61,14 +61,14 @@ enter 分支的 `PreStepDecision.messages` 是拟议步骤的完整批次。wate
- 投递输入与 steering inbox 记录不包含附加上下文;`agent/inbox/inserted` 只报告插入消息,目标列表由持久 splice 保留。
- `UserMessage` 是提示词拦截、工具执行、hook bridge、guard 和上下文生产方共享的带标识且冻结的形状。
- 公共类型、持久事件、投影和 UI 回放中均不存在 prompt-prefix 放置方式、提示词封套与 `context/message`
- idle 状态下的 `inject()`将一条不会唤醒的 next-step 消息排队;后续可唤醒投递开始 pre-step 处理前,日志不会追加任何内容
- idle 状态下的 `inject()`立即追加一条持久 inbox 插入记录,但不会追加模型可见的 `user/message`;后续可唤醒投递可能开始 pre-step 处理。
- collecting 和活跃轮次中的注入会在最近的后续 pre-step 边界领取,并位于完整工具结果批次之后、消费它的请求之前。
- pre-step reject 或失败会丢弃其已领取批次;领取后插入的 inbox 工作继续保持待处理。
- 单元测试、持久化与 resume 测试、不变量测试和 TUI 覆盖会固定事件顺序、领取归属和持久回放。
## 后果
- idle 注入要到后续 pre-step 让它进入步骤后才会对模型可见,并可能取消或 dispose 而丢失
- idle 注入要到后续 pre-step 让它进入步骤后才会对模型可见,并可能取消或 dispose 丢弃,而其持久 inbox 生命周期仍会保留记录
- 两条连续的 user-role 消息会取代一条烘焙后的提示词消息;提供方适配器会保留这一顺序。
- 必须影响当前请求的上下文要从 `agent/pre-step` 返回;普通注入只保证由最近的后续边界交付。
- 公共投递契约和收件箱记录保持精简:没有上下文附件、上下文放置元数据、提示词封套或重复的持久事件类型。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-16-harness-level-loop.md: 15b5ce7e20b7afc429f6ff7b8a4d2d69150c22a0
2026-07-16-harness-level-loop.zh.md: a3fabe40d36c45c715f613ce8def35faa427d3bd
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-16-harness-level-loop.md
2026-07-16-harness-level-loop.md: cf449affe77bf18feabbd163cd778f1496870995
2026-07-16-harness-level-loop.zh.md: 6d1da72e885d65b54dceb235f18dbd3090e844a2

View File

@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ The detailed contracts live in the [goal-domain](2026-07-19-persisted-same-sessi
### Durable goal state and live authority
One session has at most one current goal. Every non-clear mutation appends a full, versioned, model-visible goal snapshot through `Agent.inject()`; clear appends a revisioned tombstone. The session log is the only durable source of truth, so normal persistence, resume, compaction semantics, and `SessionStore.fork()` carry the goal without a second database or an artificial cancellation record.
One session has at most one current goal. Every mutation commits through the durable `agent/inbox/spliced` insertion produced by `Agent.inject()`, carrying a full versioned snapshot or revisioned clear tombstone. Its queued context becomes model-visible only if later admitted, and discarding it does not roll back the goal. The session log is the only durable source of truth, so normal persistence, resume, and `SessionStore.fork()` carry the goal without a second database or an artificial cancellation record.
Durable phases are only `active`, `paused`, `blocked`, and `complete`. A blocked goal carries a required `GoalBlockReason` with a stable lower-kebab-case `code` and a non-empty human-readable `message`; usage limits, round exhaustion, model failures, and policy rejection are reason codes rather than extra lifecycle phases. Separate activation is `armed` or `disarmed` and is never persisted. Creation and explicit resume arm a goal; stop transitions, session start, fork replay, driver replacement, and driver teardown leave it disarmed.
@@ -58,9 +58,9 @@ Forked sessions inherit the durable goal prefix because that is the natural repl
### Same-session continuation
The goal-round driver owns at most one pending reservation per exact live agent. It admits a reservation only when the goal is active and armed, the agent is idle, no competing human work exists, pending mutations are durable, the exact goal id/revision/round still matches, and downstream prompt policy accepts it. The prompt-submit fence checks those facts both before and after asynchronous listeners, preventing an edit, pause, human message, or unload race from admitting obsolete work.
The goal-round driver owns at most one pending reservation per exact live agent. It admits a reservation only when the goal is active and armed, the agent is idle, no competing human work exists, pending mutation insertions have passed their durability checkpoint, the exact goal id/revision/round still matches, and downstream pre-step policy accepts it. Its `agent/pre-step` fence checks those facts both before and after downstream listeners, preventing an edit, pause, human message, or unload race from admitting obsolete work.
Only the durable goal-sourced `user/message` charges a round. Stale reservations become rejected zero-step turns without consuming the cap. A concurrent goal revision wins over settlement from an older round.
Only an admitted positive-round goal-sourced `user/message` charges a round. A stale reservation is rejected before a turn opens without consuming the cap. A concurrent goal revision wins over settlement from an older round.
Normal turn completion schedules another round only while the goal remains active, armed, and below its cap. Cancellation pauses. Rate limiting or quota exhaustion blocks with code `usage-limited`; cap exhaustion blocks with `round-limit`; queue failure uses `queue-failed`; turn errors, max-token stops, policy rejection, and unknown terminal results use their corresponding blocker codes. An independently composed request-recovery plugin may retry transient provider failures within that same turn; the goal driver never invents another round after an abnormal terminal outcome. A human can later authorize resume through ordinary language or `/goal resume`.

View File

@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ Status: implemented
### 持久目标状态与实时权限
一个会话至多有一个当前目标。每次非清除变更都通过 `Agent.inject()` 追加一份完整、带版本且模型可见的目标快照;清除会追加带修订号的墓碑。会话日志是唯一持久事实来源,因此普通持久化、恢复、压缩语义`SessionStore.fork()` 会携带目标,无需第二个数据库或人为取消记录。
一个会话至多有一个当前 goal。每次变更都通过 `Agent.inject()` 产生的持久 `agent/inbox/spliced` 插入项提交,并携带带版本的完整快照或带修订号的 clear 墓碑。其排队上下文只有在后续获准时才对模型可见,丢弃它不会回滚 goal。会话日志是唯一持久源,因此普通持久化、恢复与 `SessionStore.fork()` 会携带 goal,无需第二个数据库或人为取消记录。
持久阶段只有 `active``paused``blocked``complete`。阻塞目标必须携带 `GoalBlockReason`,其中包含稳定的小写 kebab-case `code` 与非空的人类可读 `message`用量限制、Round 耗尽、模型失败与策略拒绝都是原因代码,而不是额外生命周期阶段。独立激活态是 `armed``disarmed`且永不持久化。创建与显式恢复会激活目标停止转换、会话启动、fork 重放、驱动器替换和驱动器拆卸都会让目标保持未激活。
@@ -58,9 +58,9 @@ fork 会话会继承持久目标前缀因为这是自然的重放结果。for
### 同会话续行
目标回合驱动器为每个准确实时 agent 至多拥有一个待定预留。只有目标处于活跃且已激活状态、agent 空闲、不存在竞争性人类工作、待定变更已经持久、准确目标 id/修订号/Round 仍匹配,并且下游提示词策略接受时,它才会接纳预留。prompt-submit 围栏在异步监听器前后检查这些事实,防止编辑、暂停、人类消息或卸载竞争接纳过时工作。
Goal Round 驱动器为每个准确实时 agent 至多拥有一个待定预留。只有 goal 处于活跃且已激活状态、agent 空闲、不存在竞争性人类工作、待定变更插入项已经通过持久性检查点、准确 goal idrevisionRound 仍匹配,并且下游 pre-step 策略接受时,它才会接纳预留。`agent/pre-step` 围栏会在下游监听器前后检查这些事实,防止编辑、暂停、人类消息或卸载竞争接纳陈旧工作。
只有持久的目标来源 `user/message` 会计入一个 Round。过时预留会成为未消耗上限的零 Step 拒绝 Turn。并发目标修订会胜过旧 Round 的结算。
只有已准入、Round 为正数且来源为 goal 的 `user/message` 会计入一个 Round。陈旧预留会在轮次打开前被拒绝,不会消耗上限。并发 goal revision 会胜过旧 Round 的结算。
普通 Turn 完成后,只有目标仍活跃、已激活且低于上限时才会安排另一个 Round。取消会暂停。速率限制或配额耗尽以代码 `usage-limited` 阻塞;上限耗尽使用 `round-limit`;队列失败使用 `queue-failed`Turn 错误、max-token 停止、策略拒绝与未知终止结果使用各自对应的阻塞代码。独立组合的请求恢复插件可以在同一个 Turn 内重试暂时性 provider 失败;目标驱动器绝不会在异常终止结果后凭空发起另一个 Round。人类随后可以通过普通语言或 `/goal resume` 授权恢复。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-19-human-goal-command.md: ce5c37fd28f9432d8c9a8797cac32c632617e317
2026-07-19-human-goal-command.zh.md: d5ce36bd75a6f1070ee1eaeb1ac6ee97778c246b
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-19-human-goal-command.md
2026-07-19-human-goal-command.md: 1847985b49c9728df7068d866ee698a5ee8d27e6
2026-07-19-human-goal-command.zh.md: 9a515a7b9d40b2849a2554118fb4f493c4fa5633

View File

@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Status output omits branded ids and compare-and-set revisions because those are
Expected `GoalError` failures become one stable, branded-id-free `CommandResult.error`, so domain diagnostics do not leak compare-and-set internals into the human surface and invalid operations never enter model history. The current status supplies the actionable state-specific recovery. Other exceptions remain adapter-visible command failures; treating programmer faults as ordinary domain errors would hide defects. The command handler performs only synchronous domain mutations, so request cancellation is decided by the command registry before the mutation begins and there is no escaped asynchronous side effect to unwind.
Generic slash input, status text, and errors are not persisted. Successful goal mutations use the existing `Agent.inject()` path, producing the raw model-visible goal snapshot or clear tombstone that persistence already owns. The command therefore changes no session format and introduces no second audit record that could disagree with the domain event.
Generic slash input, status text, and errors are not persisted. Successful goal mutations use the existing `Agent.inject()` path: the durable inbox insertion commits the raw goal snapshot or clear tombstone, while later admission independently makes that queued context model-visible. The command therefore changes no session format and introduces no second audit record that could disagree with the domain event.
### App composition

View File

@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Status: implemented
预期的 `GoalError` 失败会变为一个稳定且不含品牌化 id 的 `CommandResult.error`,使领域诊断不会向人类表面泄露比较并交换内部细节,非法操作也绝不会进入模型历史。当前状态负责提供针对具体状态且可执行的恢复路径。其他异常仍是适配器可见的命令失败;若把程序缺陷当成普通领域错误,就会隐藏问题。命令处理器只执行同步领域变更,因此请求取消会在变更开始前由命令注册表决定,不存在需要回滚的外逸异步副作用。
通用斜杠输入、状态文本与错误不会持久化。成功的目标变更使用现有 `Agent.inject()` 路径,产出持久化本就拥有的原始模型可见目标快照或清除墓碑。因此该命令不会改变会话格式,也不会引入可能与领域事件不一致的第二份审计记录。
通用斜杠输入、状态文本与错误不会持久化。成功的 goal 变更使用现有 `Agent.inject()` 路径:持久 inbox 插入项提交原始 goal 快照或 clear 墓碑,后续准入则单独使已排队的上下文对模型可见。因此该命令不会改变会话格式,也不会引入可能与领域事件不一致的第二份审计记录。
### 应用组合

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-19-persisted-same-session-goal-domain.md: 00600b2c49646ebd3b692154ef945eb79a33b032
2026-07-19-persisted-same-session-goal-domain.zh.md: 6a554438d0d70a5b4ccbf7b6ee77853af9c9ce69
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-19-persisted-same-session-goal-domain.md
2026-07-19-persisted-same-session-goal-domain.md: 7b09676e023b909da8c5a54ae0efa901b1d201e8
2026-07-19-persisted-same-session-goal-domain.zh.md: 1bb9aab9d810719d0d0cee3a15d1cc2bc8354db7

View File

@@ -18,11 +18,11 @@ The durable phases are `active`, `paused`, `blocked`, and `complete`. A blocked
### Durable record and replay
Every non-clear mutation uses `Agent.inject()` to append a model-visible `context/message` containing a versioned full snapshot; the session projects that content verbatim. Clear appends a revisioned tombstone. The context source is `{ kind: 'goal', goalId, revision, round: 0 }`; metadata and rendered `<goal_state>...</goal_state>` content must agree exactly. This descriptive delimiter follows the repository's existing `<workspace_context>` convention and [Anthropic's published guidance to structure mixed prompt content with consistent descriptive XML tags](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/prompt-engineering/claude-prompting-best-practices#structure-prompts-with-xml-tags). That is public model-experience prior art, not evidence about any provider's proprietary training corpus. The session log is the only durable source of truth, so persistence and fork inherit goal records without another database or header field.
Every mutation uses `Agent.inject()` to insert one round-zero goal-sourced message containing a versioned full snapshot or, for clear, a revisioned tombstone. The mutation commits in the durable `agent/inbox/spliced` insertion even if its context remains queued and never reaches the model; later removal or discard does not roll it back. If the same message is admitted as `user/message`, replay verifies its id, source, metadata, and rendered `<goal_state>...</goal_state>` content against the insertion without applying the mutation again. This descriptive delimiter follows the repository's existing `<workspace_context>` convention and [Anthropic's published guidance to structure mixed prompt content with consistent descriptive XML tags](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/prompt-engineering/claude-prompting-best-practices#structure-prompts-with-xml-tags). That is public model-experience prior art, not evidence about any provider's proprietary training corpus. The session log is the only durable source of truth, so persistence and fork inherit goal records without another database or header field.
The replay fold validates JSON shape, source attribution, rendered content, fresh ids, revision continuity, lifecycle transitions, counters, and monotonic per-goal timestamps. Goal rounds are positive sequential `user/message` source numbers for the current active revision and cannot exceed `maxGoalRounds`; ordinary session turns do not affect the counter. A malformed current-format record fails replay rather than being ignored or repaired.
The replay fold derives mutations only from inbox insertions and validates JSON shape, source attribution, rendered content, message-id consistency on later admission, fresh ids, revision continuity, lifecycle transitions, counters, and monotonic per-goal timestamps. Goal rounds advance only from positive sequential admitted `user/message` source numbers for the current active revision and cannot exceed `maxGoalRounds`; ordinary session turns do not affect the counter. A malformed current-format record fails replay rather than being ignored or repaired.
When `Agent.inject()` defers a mutation inside an active tool batch, the service overlays the accepted payload in process memory so a later mutation can use its new revision. Reconciliation removes only an exact matching payload when the FIFO append becomes visible; reentrant append observers project each mutation exactly once. Incremental replay advances its cursor after each valid event and remains positioned at the first corrupt event, so later reads report the same durable fault. The durable log remains authoritative after restart.
The service reconciles an injected mutation with its synchronous inbox insertion by message id, so reentrant insertion observers apply each accepted change exactly once and a later admission only checks consistency. Incremental replay advances its cursor after each valid event and remains positioned at the first corrupt event, so later reads report the same durable fault. The durable log remains authoritative after restart.
### Lifecycle and live activation
@@ -36,12 +36,12 @@ The service accepts only the exact live `Agent` object registered under its id.
## Testing
Unit coverage pins creation defaults, exact-live-agent checks, compare-and-set rejection, every lifecycle transition, blocker reason validation and retention, cap enforcement on resume, clear/replacement, seeded replay and `SessionStore.fork()` inheritance, session-start and lifecycle-owner disarming, active-goal rearming, FIFO deferred mutation reconciliation, reentrant append observation, rejected-injection rollback, stable corrupt-event replay, service/listener disposal, listener containment, backward-clock clamping, strict record decoding, lifecycle continuity, source/content agreement, and sequential round attribution. A keyless Loader/stdio process test mounts the service and a lifecycle consumer through test-only `cordis.yml`, then reads the persisted JSONL externally to verify the model-visible snapshot and absence of an unrequested goal round. The package source is held to the repository's per-file 100% coverage gate.
Unit coverage pins creation defaults, exact-live-agent checks, compare-and-set rejection, every lifecycle transition, blocker reason validation and retention, cap enforcement on resume, clear/replacement, seeded replay and `SessionStore.fork()` inheritance, session-start and lifecycle-owner disarming, active-goal rearming, durable insertion folding, reentrant insertion observation, admission consistency, discarded-context persistence, rejected-injection rollback, stable corrupt-event replay, service/listener disposal, listener containment, backward-clock clamping, strict record decoding, lifecycle continuity, and sequential round attribution. A keyless Loader/stdio process test mounts the service and a lifecycle consumer through test-only `cordis.yml`, then reads the persisted JSONL externally to verify the goal record and absence of an unrequested goal round. The package source is held to the repository's per-file 100% coverage gate.
## Alternatives considered
- **Store goals in a separate database or session header** — rejected because the session log already supplies ordering, persistence, fork prefixes, and reconstructability; a second store introduces atomicity and lineage questions.
- **Use hidden log-only events** — rejected because durable state that changes future model behavior must be model-visible and reconstructable under the repository's logging invariant.
- **Use goal-only log events without queued context** — rejected because durable state that changes future model behavior must have a reconstructable path into model input. The inbox insertion supplies durable commit while retaining that model-facing path.
- **Persist activation and restart automatically** — rejected because opening or resuming a session must wait for human input; durable phase records status, not fresh authority to spend resources.
- **Count all session turns as goal rounds** — rejected because one session can contain human clarification, inspection, and unrelated work; only goal-attributed continuation turns consume this budget.
- **Add goal state or a generic loop abstraction to `dsh-agent-loop`** — rejected because state and continuation policy can compose through existing plugins, `Agent` verbs, and events without privileging the shipped loop implementation.
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ Unit coverage pins creation defaults, exact-live-agent checks, compare-and-set r
- Goal history survives persistence, resume, compaction of unrelated nodes, and session fork as ordinary session data.
- Resume and fork expose the same durable phase while remaining operationally inert until an explicit resume mutation arms activation.
- Full snapshots simplify inspection and strict replay but repeat the objective and state fields in model history until compaction shadows them.
- Full snapshots simplify inspection and strict replay; when admitted, they repeat the objective and state fields in model history until compaction shadows them.
- Revision and lifecycle validation reject tampered, partially written, or producer-inconsistent goal records early.
- Round caps bound continuation count only; policy consumers map round, token, currency, time, and provider limits to blocked reasons when they stop work.

View File

@@ -18,11 +18,11 @@ Status: implemented
### 持久记录与回放
每次非清除变更都通过 `Agent.inject()` 追加一条模型可见的 `context/message`,其中包含带版本的完整快照;会话会将其内容原样投射给模型。清除操作追加带修订号的墓碑。上下文来源为 `{ kind: 'goal', goalId, revision, round: 0 }`;元数据必须与渲染后的 `<goal_state>...</goal_state>` 内容完全一致。这个描述性分隔符沿用了仓库已有的 `<workspace_context>` 约定,也符合 [Anthropic 关于用一致且描述明确的 XML 标签组织混合提示词内容的公开指南](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/prompt-engineering/claude-prompting-best-practices#structure-prompts-with-xml-tags)。这是公开的模型体验先例,并非对任何提供方专有训练语料的推断。会话日志是唯一的持久事实来源,因此持久化和 fork 会继承目标记录,而无需另设数据库或头字段。
每次变更都使用 `Agent.inject()` 插入一条 Round 为 0、来源为 goal 的消息其中包含带版本的完整快照clear 则包含带修订号的墓碑。变更会在持久 `agent/inbox/spliced` 插入项中提交,即使其上下文仍在队列中且从未抵达模型也是如此;后续移除或丢弃不会回滚变更。如果同一消息获准成为 `user/message`,回放会对照插入项验证其 id、来源、元数据和渲染后的 `<goal_state>...</goal_state>` 内容,而不会再次应用变更。这个描述性分隔符沿用了仓库已有的 `<workspace_context>` 约定,也符合 [Anthropic 关于用一致且描述明确的 XML 标签组织混合提示词内容的公开指南](https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/prompt-engineering/claude-prompting-best-practices#structure-prompts-with-xml-tags)。这是公开的模型体验先例,并非对任何提供方专有训练语料的推断。会话日志是唯一的持久源,因此持久化和 fork 会继承 goal 记录,而无需另设数据库或头字段。
回放折叠校验 JSON 形状、来源归属、渲染内容、新 id、修订连续性、生命周期转换、计数器以及单个目标内单调递增的时间戳。目标回合是当前活跃修订上带正数且连续编号的 `user/message` 来源,且不能超过 `maxGoalRounds`;普通会话轮次不会影响该计数器。当前格式的畸形记录会使回放失败,而不会被忽略或修复。
回放折叠只从 inbox 插入项派生变更,并校验 JSON 形状、来源归属、渲染内容、后续准入时消息 id 的一致性、新 id、修订连续性、生命周期转换、计数器以及单个 goal 内单调递增的时间戳。只有当前活跃修订上带正数且连续编号、已准入`user/message` 来源才会推进 Goal Round,且不能超过 `maxGoalRounds`;普通会话轮次不会影响该计数器。当前格式的畸形记录会使回放失败,而不会被忽略或修复。
`Agent.inject()` 在活跃工具批次中延迟变更时服务会在进程内叠加已接受的载荷使后续变更可以使用新的修订号。FIFO 追加可见后,协调过程只移除完全匹配的载荷;重入的追加观察器对每次变更只投影一次。增量回放会在每个有效事件后推进游标,并停留在首个损坏事件处,因此后续读取会报告同一个持久故障。重启后仍以持久日志为准。
服务按消息 id 对账注入的变更与其同步 inbox 插入项,因此重入插入观察器对每项已接受变更只应用一次,后续准入只校验一致性。增量回放会在每个有效事件后推进游标,并停留在首个损坏事件处,因此后续读取会报告同一个持久故障。重启后仍以持久日志为准。
### 生命周期与实时激活态
@@ -36,12 +36,12 @@ Status: implemented
## 测试
单元测试固定创建默认值、精确实时 agent 校验、比较并交换拒绝、所有生命周期转换、阻塞原因校验与保留、恢复时的上限执行、清除与替换、种子回放和 `SessionStore.fork()` 继承、会话启动与生命周期所有者解除激活、活跃目标重新激活、FIFO 延迟变更协调、重入追加观察、注入拒绝回滚、损坏事件的稳定回放、服务与监听器销毁、监听器隔离、挂钟后退钳制、严格记录解码、生命周期连续性、来源与内容一致性,以及连续目标回合归属。无密钥 Loader/stdio 进程测试通过测试专用 `cordis.yml` 挂载服务与生命周期消费,再从外部读取持久 JSONL以验证模型可见快照以及不存在未经请求的目标回合。包源码受仓库逐文件 100% 覆盖率门禁约束。
单元测试固定创建默认值、精确实时 agent 校验、比较并交换拒绝、所有生命周期转换、阻塞原因校验与保留、恢复时的上限执行、清除与替换、种子回放和 `SessionStore.fork()` 继承、会话启动与生命周期所有者解除激活、活跃目标重新激活、持久插入折叠、重入插入观察、准入一致性、丢弃上下文后的持久性、注入拒绝回滚、损坏事件的稳定回放、服务与监听器销毁、监听器隔离、挂钟后退钳制、严格记录解码、生命周期连续性,以及连续 Goal Round 归属。无密钥 Loader/stdio 进程测试通过测试专用 `cordis.yml` 挂载服务与生命周期消费,再从外部读取持久 JSONL以验证 goal 记录以及不存在未经请求的 Goal Round。包源码受仓库逐文件 100% 覆盖率门禁约束。
## 考虑过的替代方案
- **把目标存入独立数据库或会话头**——不予采纳因为会话日志已经提供顺序、持久化、fork 前缀与可重建性;第二份存储会引入原子性和谱系问题。
- **使用模型不可见的纯日志事件**——不予采纳,因为会改变后续模型行为的持久状态必须满足仓库日志不变量,保持模型可见且可重建
- **使用不带排队上下文、仅供 goal 使用的日志事件**——不予采纳,因为会改变后续模型行为的持久状态必须拥有可重建的模型输入路径。inbox 插入在提供持久提交的同时保留了这条面向模型的路径
- **持久化激活态并自动重启**——不予采纳,因为打开或恢复会话时必须等待人类输入;持久阶段记录状态,而不是再次消耗资源的授权。
- **把所有会话轮次都计为目标回合**——不予采纳,因为同一会话可以包含人类澄清、检查和无关工作;只有归属于目标的继续执行轮次才消耗该预算。
- **向 `dsh-agent-loop` 添加目标状态或通用循环抽象**——不予采纳,因为状态与继续执行策略可以通过现有插件、`Agent` 动词和事件组合,而无需赋予默认循环实现特权。
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ Status: implemented
- 目标历史作为普通会话数据,在持久化、恢复、无关节点压缩和会话 fork 后继续保留。
- 恢复与 fork 会暴露同一持久阶段,但在显式恢复变更激活目标前不会执行任何操作。
- 完整快照便于检查和严格回放,但在压缩隐藏它们之前,会在模型历史中重复目标描述与状态字段。
- 完整快照便于检查和严格回放;获准后,它们会在模型历史中重复目标描述与状态字段,直到压缩将其遮蔽
- 修订号与生命周期校验会尽早拒绝遭篡改、部分写入或生产者不一致的目标记录。
- 回合上限只约束继续执行次数当回合、token、费用、时间或提供方限制停止工作时策略消费者会把它们映射为不同的阻塞原因。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-22-docked-web-goal-bar.md
2026-07-22-docked-web-goal-bar.md: f014da61d2fa0bf25121c040dae99354ab15de9d
2026-07-22-docked-web-goal-bar.zh.md: f62c6efbb2d330fb7d5ab74138eb781f1a1bc06c
2026-07-22-docked-web-goal-bar.md: 4f160d590f02ea5237ffb39bdac10aa26f95ddb8
2026-07-22-docked-web-goal-bar.zh.md: a226bc130ab49df389e24f869b2f640e2c1cff4e

View File

@@ -16,13 +16,13 @@ Visibility drives the label and actions: active shows "Ongoing Goal" with pause/
`GoalBarActions` lives in ui-goal's slot contract (`packages/client/ui-goal/src/client/slots.ts`) and carries exactly the rendered verbs: `onEdit`/`onPause`/`onResume`/`onClear`. Each callback asynchronously returns an explicit success/failure result so `GoalBar` owns its transitions and error display. `apply.ts` wires them to the runtime session methods; the runtime session resolves the current goal's compare-and-set ref internally, so the UI passes no ref.
The runtime session gains the goal surface the strip (and future UI) needs: `fetchGoal` populates the snapshot on open, and a live `context/message` carrying `goal/change` meta triggers a coalesced refetch — concurrent triggers share the in-flight `goal.get`, while a trigger received during that read schedules one coalesced trailing read so independently ordered notifications and GET responses cannot leave stale state. Window replays never refetch, and matching the meta kind (rather than a goal key) also catches clear tombstones written by other clients. The six mutation verbs fold transport failures into `{ ok: false }` results like every sibling session method, and a get result older than a mutation response that landed mid-flight is dropped.
The runtime session gains the goal surface the strip (and future UI) needs through the host-computed `goal` projection. The history tail seeds its whole current value, and `session/projection` frames update it when durable `agent/inbox/spliced` insertions commit goal snapshots or clear tombstones; later context admission is irrelevant to UI freshness. The four rendered mutation verbs fold transport failures into `{ ok: false }` results like every sibling session method.
The strip's background is `--dsw-alias-interactive-bg-hover` rather than the mock's literal `#F5F6F7`: the translucent hover gray resolves to that value over the white light-theme base and lifts the strip off the composer card in dark mode, where a static light token would sink. All colors are `--dsw-*` tokens.
## Testing
`packages/client/ui-goal/tests/goalbar.spec.tsx` pins the behavior through props alone: loading/absent/complete render nothing, the active strip renders label/objective and fires clear, the edit form prefills, rejects empty, saves on Enter, cancels on Esc, and resets when the goal's identity changes, the active strip fires pause, the paused strip fires resume, and the blocked strip exposes the reason tooltip. Component failure-path cases prove that a failed edit preserves its draft and that edit/resume/clear errors remain visible in the bar. The skeleton specs mount `ConversationRoot` with and without `goalActions`; the undefined case is seeded with an active goal, so the missing gate — not the missing goal — is what hides the strip. Runtime session specs pin the folded-error results, the live-only in-flight-plus-trailing refetch, and the stale-read guard. A keyless real-browser smoke boots the assembled application through `boot → RPC → runtime → GoalBar` and records an inline snapshot of the rendered label, objective, and actions.
`packages/client/ui-goal/tests/goalbar.spec.tsx` pins the behavior through props alone: loading/absent/complete render nothing, the active strip renders label/objective and fires clear, the edit form prefills, rejects empty, saves on Enter, cancels on Esc, and resets when the goal's identity changes, the active strip fires pause, the paused strip fires resume, and the blocked strip exposes the reason tooltip. Component failure-path cases prove that a failed edit preserves its draft and that edit/resume/clear errors remain visible in the bar. The skeleton specs mount `ConversationRoot` with and without `goalActions`; the undefined case is seeded with an active goal, so the missing gate — not the missing goal — is what hides the strip. Runtime session specs pin folded-error results and projection updates. A keyless real-browser smoke boots the assembled application through `boot → RPC → runtime → GoalBar` and records an inline snapshot of the rendered label, objective, and actions.
## Alternatives considered
@@ -34,6 +34,6 @@ The strip's background is `--dsw-alias-interactive-bg-hover` rather than the moc
## Consequences
- Goal presence in the web UI is a standalone composer-context strip: sparkle, phase label, truncated objective, and pause/edit/clear (resume replacing pause when paused) — the browser client's first goal surface.
- The runtime session exposes the goal verbs over RPC with folded transport errors, and refreshes the snapshot's goal on open and on live goal-change meta (coalesced, guarded against stale reads).
- The runtime session exposes the goal verbs over RPC with folded transport errors and consumes the host's durable whole-goal projection on open and live updates.
- Objective editing is reachable from the UI for the first time, through `goal.edit` with the runtime-owned ref; complete remains available to other surfaces (`/goal`, model tools).
- `goal === null` renders nothing; the composer carries no persistent create affordance — creation is the `/goal` command's job.

View File

@@ -16,13 +16,13 @@ Web UI 此前没有任何目标相关的界面目标栈已随模型工具、T
`GoalBarActions` 位于 ui-goal 的槽位契约(`packages/client/ui-goal/src/client/slots.ts`),只携带实际渲染的动词:`onEdit`/`onPause`/`onResume`/`onClear`。每个回调都会异步返回显式成功/失败结果,因此 `GoalBar` 自行负责界面转换和错误显示。`apply.ts` 把它们接到运行时会话方法上;运行时会话在内部解析当前目标的 compare-and-set ref因此 UI 不传 ref。
运行时会话获得横条(以及未来 UI所需的目标表面:`fetchGoal` 在打开时填充快照;携带 `goal/change` 元数据的 live `context/message` 触发合并重新拉取——并发触发器共享正在执行的 `goal.get`,读取期间收到的触发器会安排一次合并后的尾随读取,避免彼此独立排序的通知和 GET 响应留下陈旧状态。窗口重放绝不触发重新拉取,且匹配元数据 kind而不是 goal 键)还能捕获其他客户端写入的清除墓碑。六个变更动词与所有同类会话方法一样,把传输层失败折叠为 `{ ok: false }` 结果;比在拉取途中落地的变更响应更旧的 get 结果会被丢弃
运行时会话通过由 host 计算的 `goal` 投影获得横条(以及未来 UI所需的 goal 表面。历史尾页会提供完整当前值作为初始状态;持久 `agent/inbox/spliced` 插入项提交 goal 快照或 clear 墓碑时,`session/projection` 帧会更新该值,后续上下文准入与 UI 新鲜度无关。4 个实际渲染的变更动词与所有同类会话方法一样,把传输层失败折叠为 `{ ok: false }` 结果。
横条的背景色用 `--dsw-alias-interactive-bg-hover`,而不是设计稿里的字面值 `#F5F6F7`:这个半透明的悬浮灰在浅色主题的白色底上正好解析为该值,而在深色模式下能把横条从输入框卡片上衬托出来,静态的浅色 token 在深色模式下会沉进去。所有颜色都是 `--dsw-*` token。
## 测试
`packages/client/ui-goal/tests/goalbar.spec.tsx` 仅通过 props 固定这些行为加载中无目标已完成时不渲染active 横条渲染标签和目标内容并触发清除;编辑表单预填内容、拒绝空值、按 Enter 保存、按 Esc 取消并在目标身份变化时重置active 横条触发暂停paused 横条触发恢复blocked 横条暴露原因悬浮提示。组件失败路径用例证明编辑失败时保留草稿并且编辑恢复清除错误持续显示在横条中。skeleton 规格测试分别挂载带与不带 `goalActions``ConversationRoot`;未定义的情形预置了一个 active 目标,因此隐藏横条的是缺失的挂载门,而不是缺失的目标。运行时会话规格测试固定折叠错误结果、仅 live 的执行中读取加尾随读取,以及陈旧读取守卫。一个无密钥真实浏览器冒烟测试通过 `boot → RPC → runtime → GoalBar` 启动组装后的应用,并以内联快照记录渲染出的标签、目标内容和操作。
`packages/client/ui-goal/tests/goalbar.spec.tsx` 仅通过 props 固定这些行为加载中无目标已完成时不渲染active 横条渲染标签和目标内容并触发清除;编辑表单预填内容、拒绝空值、按 Enter 保存、按 Esc 取消并在目标身份变化时重置active 横条触发暂停paused 横条触发恢复blocked 横条暴露原因悬浮提示。组件失败路径用例证明编辑失败时保留草稿并且编辑恢复清除错误持续显示在横条中。skeleton 规格测试分别挂载带与不带 `goalActions``ConversationRoot`;未定义的情形预置了一个 active 目标,因此隐藏横条的是缺失的挂载门,而不是缺失的目标。运行时会话规格测试固定折叠错误结果和投影更新。一个无密钥真实浏览器冒烟测试通过 `boot → RPC → runtime → GoalBar` 启动组装后的应用,并以内联快照记录渲染出的标签、目标内容和操作。
## 考虑过的替代方案
@@ -34,6 +34,6 @@ Web UI 此前没有任何目标相关的界面目标栈已随模型工具、T
## 后果
- Web UI 中目标的存在形式是独立的 composer 上下文横条:闪光图标、阶段标签、截断的目标内容,以及暂停/编辑/清除(暂停时恢复取代暂停)——这是浏览器客户端的第一个目标界面。
- 运行时会话通过 RPC 暴露目标动词并折叠传输层错误,在打开时和 live 目标变更元数据到达时刷新快照中的目标(合并拉取,带陈旧读取守卫)
- 运行时会话通过 RPC 暴露 goal 动词并折叠传输层错误,在打开时和 live 更新时消费 host 的持久完整 goal 投影
- 目标内容首次可以从 UI 编辑,经由 `goal.edit`ref 由运行时持有;完成对其他界面(`/goal`、模型工具)照常可用。
- `goal === null` 时不渲染任何内容;输入框不提供常驻的创建入口,创建是 `/goal` 命令的职责。