refactor(session-persistence): extract a shared write coordinator
The JSONL and SQLite backends were byte-identical (or same-algorithm) for ALL of their write-path orchestration — the four maps (states/buffers/chains/inits), installWritePath, initFor, onCreated's four adoption cases, flush, drain, serialize, adopt/adoptLivePrefix, assertVersion, and the create/append/load/ has/delete skeletons. Only the storage primitives (write bytes vs INSERT rows) differed, so every fix landed twice. Extract that orchestration into a PersistenceCoordinator in the seam package. Each backend composes one (new PersistenceCoordinator(ctx, this)), implements a small PersistenceBackend hook interface (loadStored, loadLive, appendBatch, commitRepair, deleteStored, list, optional close), and delegates its six public service methods to it. Composition, not inheritance — a backend exposes only the hooks, can't reach the coordinator's private state, and the public SessionPersistence API is unchanged so a third-party backend may still implement it directly. The crash-repair torn-tail token is OPAQUE: the coordinator computes the synthetic closers (it owns interruptedTurnClosers) but only tests `tornMarker !== undefined` and round-trips it to commitRepair, never inspecting it (JSONL = byte offset, SQLite = seq). loadStored vs loadLive stay distinct so HMR adoption is cwd-scoped (a same-id log at a different cwd is a collision, not a resume). appendBatch carries meta so lazy-materialize + first-batch commit atomically (no separate materialize hook). Tests: the duplicated orchestration tests (adoption, HMR, collision, dispose-drain, crash-tail) move into one runCoordinatorContract suite run once per backend (memory + jsonl + sqlite) via hook fixtures; per-backend specs keep only storage mechanics. A through-coordinator torn-tail test per real backend keeps the commitRepair-with-marker branch covered under the 100% gate. Net -112 lines (the dedup outweighs the new coordinator + shared suite); 100% coverage; backends shrank ~1200 lines of duplicated churn. Migrates the write-coordinator RFC proposed -> implemented.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Delete the mutable session summary entirely. `SessionSummary` and the `SessionMe
|
||||
|
||||
Anything the summary was meant to provide is **derivable from the append-only log** when a consumer actually needs it (`firstPrompt` = first `user/message`; recency = the last event's `time` or the file mtime) or already lives in the immutable header (`createdAt`, `cwd`). The one thing *not* derivable — a user-*edited* title — had no implementation and is pure YAGNI; it can return as its own log event or header field if a real feature ever needs it.
|
||||
|
||||
This is recorded as a decision because it is **durable** (it narrows a public service contract and an on-disk format across two backends), **contested** (the summary was a deliberate forward-looking design, not an accident), and **surprising** (a future reader finding `SessionHeader` where the original RFC describes `SessionMeta` would otherwise ask why the summary vanished). It also unblocks the [shared persistence write coordinator](../proposed/2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.md): with no mutable summary, the coordinator's hook interface needs no `updateSummary` hook and the JSONL-sidecar-vs-SQLite-column durability divergence disappears, so the two backends' write paths converge.
|
||||
This is recorded as a decision because it is **durable** (it narrows a public service contract and an on-disk format across two backends), **contested** (the summary was a deliberate forward-looking design, not an accident), and **surprising** (a future reader finding `SessionHeader` where the original RFC describes `SessionMeta` would otherwise ask why the summary vanished). It also unblocks the [shared persistence write coordinator](2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.md): with no mutable summary, the coordinator's hook interface needs no `updateSummary` hook and the JSONL-sidecar-vs-SQLite-column durability divergence disappears, so the two backends' write paths converge.
|
||||
|
||||
## No migration
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user