Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into worktree/drop-create-by-name
# Conflicts: # .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-25-session-list-browsing-and-manual-order.i18n.yaml # .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-25-workspace-ui-product-flow.i18n.yaml # .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-25-workspace-ui-product-flow.zh.md # .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-31-one-route-to-add-a-workspace.i18n.yaml # .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-31-one-route-to-add-a-workspace.md # .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-31-one-route-to-add-a-workspace.zh.md # apps/cli/reference/README.i18n.yaml # docs/config-catalog.md # packages/host/apiproxy/README.i18n.yaml # packages/host/apiproxy/README.md # packages/host/apiproxy/README.zh.md # packages/host/apiproxy/src/api-proxy.ts # packages/host/apiproxy/src/index.ts # packages/host/apiproxy/tests/api-proxy-approval.spec.ts # packages/host/apiproxy/tests/api-proxy-blank.spec.ts # packages/host/apiproxy/tests/api-proxy-cold.spec.ts # packages/host/apiproxy/tests/api-proxy-commands.spec.ts # packages/host/apiproxy/tests/api-proxy-config.spec.ts # packages/host/apiproxy/tests/api-proxy-models.spec.ts # packages/host/apiproxy/tests/api-proxy-projections.spec.ts # packages/host/apiproxy/tests/api-proxy-question.spec.ts # packages/host/apiproxy/tests/api-proxy-rename.spec.ts # packages/host/apiproxy/tests/api-proxy-search.spec.ts # packages/host/apiproxy/tests/api-proxy-subagents.spec.ts # packages/host/apiproxy/tests/api-proxy-view.spec.ts # packages/host/apiproxy/tests/api-proxy-workspace.spec.ts # packages/todo/tool-todo/tests/projection.spec.ts # scripts/hero-composer-dom-continuity.mjs
This commit is contained in:
creatixchu
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-06-19-drop-mutable-session-summary.md
|
||||
2026-06-19-drop-mutable-session-summary.md: f87378a1c3737950eb536be8e3f6776586eb8a01
|
||||
2026-06-19-drop-mutable-session-summary.zh.md: 41dab3fa0b487b057d33335a21cee92cf211560f
|
||||
2026-06-19-drop-mutable-session-summary.md: fdbfb1b4f7423fda152a5c63c02484ebe71e27dc
|
||||
2026-06-19-drop-mutable-session-summary.zh.md: 1b99c00f49b5149583b6f0b9387f580ee892d7a1
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Delete the mutable session summary entirely. `SessionSummary` and the `SessionMe
|
||||
|
||||
Anything the summary was meant to provide is **derivable from the append-only log** when a consumer actually needs it (`firstPrompt` = first `user/message`; recency = the last event's `time` or the file mtime) or already lives in the immutable header (`createdAt`, `cwd`). The one thing *not* derivable — a user-*edited* title — had no implementation and is pure YAGNI; it can return as its own log event or header field if a real feature ever needs it.
|
||||
|
||||
This is recorded as a decision because it is **durable** (it narrows a public service contract and an on-disk format across two backends), **contested** (the summary was a deliberate forward-looking design, not an accident), and **surprising** (a future reader finding `SessionHeader` where the original Agent Note describes `SessionMeta` would otherwise ask why the summary vanished). It also unblocks the [shared persistence write coordinator](../architecture/2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.md): with no mutable summary, the coordinator's hook interface needs no `updateSummary` hook and the JSONL-sidecar-vs-SQLite-column durability divergence disappears, so the two backends' write paths converge.
|
||||
The removal narrows a public service contract and an on-disk format across two backends; the summary was a deliberate forward-looking design, not an accident; and `SessionHeader` now stands where the original Agent Note described `SessionMeta`, which is why the summary vanished. It also unblocks the [shared persistence write coordinator](../architecture/2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.md): with no mutable summary, the coordinator's hook interface needs no `updateSummary` hook and the JSONL-sidecar-vs-SQLite-column durability divergence disappears, so the two backends' write paths converge.
|
||||
|
||||
## No migration
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
- `firstPrompt` 在生产代码中**从未被读取**。
|
||||
- 会话标题来自持久的 `session/title` 事件，工具卡片标题来自工具 presenter；二者都不读取可变的会话元数据。
|
||||
- 持久化列表的消费方使用不可变 header 中的标识、创建时间、谱系和 cwd 字段。近期排序和预览派生自日志，而非某个 `updatedAt` 摘要。
|
||||
- 决定性的一点：活跃的 `Session.header` 类型本来就是 `SessionHeader` 而非 `SessionMeta`——摘要从未存在于活跃会话对象上；它只存在于持久化层，除了自身的契约测试外无人写入、无人读取。
|
||||
- 决定性的一点：活跃的 `Session.header` 类型本来就是 `SessionHeader` 而非 `SessionMeta`——摘要从未存在于活跃会话对象上；它只存在于持久化层，除了自身的约定测试外无人写入、无人读取。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
摘要原本要提供的一切，在消费方真正需要时都**可从仅追加日志中派生**（`firstPrompt` = 第一条 `user/message`；近期度 = 最后一个事件的 `time` 或文件 mtime），或者已经存在于不可变 header 中（`createdAt`、`cwd`）。唯一*不可*派生的是用户*手动编辑*的标题，但它从未实现，纯属 YAGNI；如果未来真有功能需要，它可以作为独立的日志事件或 header 字段回归。
|
||||
|
||||
这被记录为一项决策，因为它具有**持久性**（它同时收窄两个后端的公开服务契约和磁盘格式）、**争议性**（summary 是有意为未来设计的结果，而非意外），也具有**反直觉性**（未来读者在原 Agent Note 描述 `SessionMeta` 的位置发现 `SessionHeader` 时，若无此记录便会追问 summary 为何消失）。它还为[共享持久化写入协调器](../architecture/2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.md)扫清障碍：不再有可变 summary 后，协调器的钩子接口不需要 `updateSummary` 钩子，JSONL sidecar 与 SQLite 列之间的持久性分歧也随之消失，使两个后端的写入路径趋于一致。
|
||||
这次移除同时收窄两个后端的公开服务约定和磁盘格式；summary 是有意为未来设计的结果，而非意外；如今原 Agent Note 描述 `SessionMeta` 之处已是 `SessionHeader`，这就是 summary 消失的原因。它还为[共享持久化写入协调器](../architecture/2026-06-18-shared-persistence-write-coordinator.md)扫清障碍：不再有可变 summary 后，协调器的钩子接口不需要 `updateSummary` 钩子，JSONL sidecar 与 SQLite 列之间的持久性分歧也随之消失，使两个后端的写入路径趋于一致。
|
||||
|
||||
## 无需迁移
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -30,6 +30,6 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
未来的会话选择器现在必须从日志派生预览/排序信息（或重新引入一个类型化字段），而不能直接读取现成的摘要行。这是正确的代价：为一个尚不存在的功能维护缓存，是每个后端都要承担维护成本、每个契约测试都要承担断言成本的无谓负担。这一原则——**通过的测试固定的是当前行为，不一定是正确行为；行为可能是过去妥协的产物**——现已作为独立约定记录在[根 AGENTS.md](../../../../AGENTS.md) 中，本次变更即为其实例。
|
||||
未来的会话选择器现在必须从日志派生预览/排序信息（或重新引入一个类型化字段），而不能直接读取现成的摘要行。这是正确的代价：为一个尚不存在的功能维护缓存，是每个后端都要承担维护成本、每个约定测试都要承担断言成本的无谓负担。这一原则——**通过的测试固定的是当前行为，不一定是正确行为；行为可能是过去妥协的产物**——现已作为独立约定记录在[根 AGENTS.md](../../../../AGENTS.md) 中，本次变更即为其实例。
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- agent-note-format: alternatives-not-recorded (pre-format Agent Note) -->
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-06-20-collapse-trace-only-session-events.md
|
||||
2026-06-20-collapse-trace-only-session-events.md: c77062c3cd44286b43c175702c35b36f9cc31da6
|
||||
2026-06-20-collapse-trace-only-session-events.zh.md: bc7e33f2d5dce370b846b1451fca6a652660dc92
|
||||
2026-06-20-collapse-trace-only-session-events.md: a7a4ab3a2e4c008b59bc4cb1023e699c6fd8a76b
|
||||
2026-06-20-collapse-trace-only-session-events.zh.md: ecb267e77f6a35aba8f73200c9d3061a821c2965
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ These events make the canonical transcript look more useful as telemetry than it
|
||||
Standalone trace-only events are removed exactly where their information is preserved without a parallel record:
|
||||
|
||||
- Successful-step usage folds into the matching `assistant/message` (`assistant/message { turn, step, content, usage? }`), so the assembled model output and its accounting travel together.
|
||||
- A failed or aborted step that has usage but no assistant content carries the usage on an empty-content `assistant/message` (the implementation note below carries the no-information-loss proof) — no persisted usage chunk goes unrepresented.
|
||||
- A failed or aborted step that has usage but no assistant content carries the usage on an empty-content `assistant/message { content: [], usage }` — no persisted usage chunk goes unrepresented. The no-information-loss case is the max-tokens path: a step cut off with usage but empty content (e.g. only a dropped tool call) previously emitted a standalone `usage`. To keep the empty-content event from injecting a spurious content-less assistant turn into the provider transcript, `deriveMessages()` skips empty-content `assistant/message` events; a regression test asserts usage stays represented AND derived history stays uncorrupted.
|
||||
- The step number from the standalone `error` event folds into `turn/end.reason` for `kind: 'error'` (`{ kind: 'error', step, message, code? }`) — `turn/end` is the durable turn outcome ACP and resume already consume.
|
||||
- `agent/error` and logging stay for live diagnostics; there is no second session-log error record after `turn/end`.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -31,14 +31,10 @@ The user conversation log contains what is needed to render, resume, audit, and
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
A consumer can no longer filter the canonical log for standalone `usage` or step-level `error` rows. It must read those facts from the assistant/failure events that carry them. That is a reasonable simplification only if the implementing PR proves the same facts remain present; otherwise the standalone events should stay.
|
||||
A consumer can no longer filter the canonical log for standalone `usage` or step-level `error` rows. It must read those facts from the assistant/failure events that carry them. That is a reasonable simplification because the same facts remain present, as the Verification section proves.
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation note
|
||||
|
||||
Shipped as proposed, with one scope refinement (per AGENTS.md "Agent Notes are proposals, not golden truth"):
|
||||
|
||||
- **Empty-content `assistant/message` hosts usage with no data loss.** The proof the proposal demanded (no persisted usage chunk becomes unrepresented) lands on the max-tokens path: a step cut off with usage but empty content (e.g. only a dropped tool call) previously emitted a standalone `usage`. It now records an empty-content `assistant/message { content: [], usage }`. To keep that from injecting a spurious content-less assistant turn into the provider transcript, `deriveMessages()` skips empty-content `assistant/message` events. A regression test asserts usage stays represented AND derived history is uncorrupted.
|
||||
|
||||
**Format version.** This changes persisted events, but the pre-release session format remains pinned at `0` and rejects any other version without migration. `dsh-session` owns the constant used by writers and load validation. Monotonic format versions begin at the first release.
|
||||
|
||||
Usage is now observed on `assistant/message.usage`; an operational error's step on `turn/end.reason` for `kind: 'error'`. `agent/error` + logging are unchanged for live diagnostics.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
仅在信息已被保留、无需并行记录的情况下，移除独立的、仅用于追踪的事件：
|
||||
|
||||
- 成功步骤的 usage 折叠进匹配的 `assistant/message`（`assistant/message { turn, step, content, usage? }`），使组装好的模型输出与其计费信息一同传递。
|
||||
- 失败或中止的步骤如果有 usage 但没有 assistant 内容，则将 usage 放在一个空内容的 `assistant/message` 上（下方实现说明给出了无信息丢失的证明）——不会有已持久化的 usage 分片无处安放。
|
||||
- 失败或中止的步骤如果有 usage 但没有 assistant 内容，则将 usage 放在一个空内容的 `assistant/message { content: [], usage }` 上——不会有已持久化的 usage 分片无处安放。无信息丢失的情形是 max-tokens 路径：一个被截断的步骤有 usage 但内容为空（例如只有一个被丢弃的工具调用），以前会发出独立的 `usage`。为防止空内容事件向提供方 transcript 注入一个多余的无内容 assistant 轮次，`deriveMessages()` 跳过空内容的 `assistant/message` 事件；回归测试断言 usage 仍有记录，且派生历史未被破坏。
|
||||
- 独立 `error` 事件中的步骤编号折叠进 `turn/end.reason`（当 `kind: 'error'` 时：`{ kind: 'error', step, message, code? }`）——`turn/end` 是 ACP 和恢复机制已经消费的持久轮次结果。
|
||||
- `agent/error` 与日志保留用于实时诊断；`turn/end` 之后不再有第二条会话日志错误记录。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -31,14 +31,10 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
消费方不能再从规范日志中筛选独立的 `usage` 或步骤级 `error` 行，而必须从承载这些信息的助手消息或失败事件中读取这些事实。只有在实现 PR（Pull Request）证明相同事实仍然存在的前提下，这才是合理的简化；否则独立事件应予保留。
|
||||
消费方不能再从规范日志中筛选独立的 `usage` 或步骤级 `error` 行，而必须从承载这些信息的助手消息或失败事件中读取这些事实。由于相同事实仍然存在——「验证」一节给出了证明——这是合理的简化。
|
||||
|
||||
## 实现说明
|
||||
|
||||
按提案落地，但有一处范围细化（遵循 AGENTS.md 所述「Agent Note 是提案，而非绝对真理」）：
|
||||
|
||||
- **空内容 `assistant/message` 承载 usage，无数据丢失。** 提案要求的证明（不会有已持久化的 usage 分片无处安放）落在 max-tokens 路径上：一个被截断的步骤有 usage 但内容为空（例如只有一个被丢弃的工具调用），以前会发出独立的 `usage`。现在它记录一个空内容的 `assistant/message { content: [], usage }`。为防止这向提供方 transcript 注入一个多余的无内容 assistant 轮次，`deriveMessages()` 跳过空内容的 `assistant/message` 事件。回归测试断言 usage 仍有记录，且派生历史未被破坏。
|
||||
|
||||
**格式版本。** 此变更影响已持久化的事件，但预发布会话格式仍固定为 `0`，拒绝任何其他版本且不做迁移。`dsh-session` 拥有写入方和加载校验使用的常量。单调递增的格式版本从首次正式发布开始。
|
||||
|
||||
Usage 现在通过 `assistant/message.usage` 观测；运行时错误的步骤编号通过 `turn/end.reason`（当 `kind: 'error'` 时）观测。`agent/error` 与日志用于实时诊断，保持不变。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-06-20-public-agent-stop-surface.md
|
||||
2026-06-20-public-agent-stop-surface.md: e9c713c7ba8c784d3d66fe8f391e1b197f7394d2
|
||||
2026-06-20-public-agent-stop-surface.zh.md: 5c1eb0ec8245c60613d6d4d7c1d105b5243bc938
|
||||
2026-06-20-public-agent-stop-surface.md: cd18299475373fba0e9a324d601e868bd1925370
|
||||
2026-06-20-public-agent-stop-surface.zh.md: 9824dbc1f03edea29edeabec50ed2b7c7bbe750e
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4,13 +4,11 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-06-20-public-agent-stop-surface.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
> **Implementation note:** Only `abort()` was removed. `whenIdle()` remains because it is the public quiescence signal and safely handles waiter settlement and replacement-turn races; consumers should not reconstruct that behavior from status transitions.
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
The public `Agent` handle exposed two overlapping ways to stop in-flight work: step-only `abort()` and queue-aware `cancel()`. The former preserved queued input while the latter originally only exposed its broad default, which clears queued and steering work while aborting the active turn. `cancel(cause, { keepInbox: true })` now covers the production Web stop policy without exposing the private turn holder; ACP retains broad cancellation, while lifecycle owners tear down agents through `AgentHandle.dispose()`. No production caller needs a bare step-only abort.
|
||||
|
||||
The behavioral distinction is real, but no shipping code needs a separate narrower verb. AgentLoop owns one private cancellation holder for the whole turn. `cancel(cause, options?)` carries an explicit typed `user` or `parent` cause; its broad default drops pending input, while `keepInbox` preserves pending work for later turns. Disposal remains a separate lifecycle interruption. The complete ownership and propagation contract lives in the [explicit turn cancellation RFC](../architecture/2026-07-16-explicit-turn-cancellation.md).
|
||||
The behavioral distinction is real, but no shipping code needs a separate narrower verb. AgentLoop owns one private cancellation holder for the whole turn. `cancel(cause, options?)` carries an explicit typed `user` or `parent` cause; its broad default drops pending input, while `keepInbox` preserves pending work for later turns. Disposal remains a separate lifecycle interruption. The complete ownership and propagation contract lives in the [explicit turn cancellation note](../architecture/2026-07-16-explicit-turn-cancellation.md).
|
||||
|
||||
The extra surface area made the loop carry a public verb that was mostly a teardown internal. An options-bearing `cancel()` expresses caller policy without exposing a second holder-shaped operation.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -18,13 +16,13 @@ The extra surface area made the loop carry a public verb that was mostly a teard
|
||||
|
||||
`cancel()` is the only public *stop* primitive on `Agent`. Lifecycle owners use `AgentHandle.dispose()` to stop and unregister an agent; non-owners use broad `cancel()` to abandon current and queued work or `keepInbox` to abort the active turn while retaining pending work. The implementation keeps a private turn cancellation holder, but it is not part of the plugin-facing `Agent` contract. The [Web stop decision](../bug-fix/2026-07-31-web-stop-preserves-queue.md) is the production `keepInbox` consumer.
|
||||
|
||||
`whenIdle()` is **retained** as the public quiescence-observation primitive (resolve once the agent settles out of `running`, resolve immediately when already idle, await the loop exit when disposed). It is not a stop verb; it is how a non-owner observes the stop *completing* without disposing the agent. Its live consumers are ACP and agent tests that await settlement through this public seam (`packages/acp/acp/tests`, `packages/core/agent-loop/tests`); the production ACP bridge owns its agents and tears them down through `AgentHandle.dispose()`, so `packages/acp/acp/src` itself has no `whenIdle()` call.
|
||||
`whenIdle()` is **retained** as the public quiescence-observation primitive (resolve once the agent settles out of `running`, resolve immediately when already idle, await the loop exit when disposed). It is not a stop verb; it is how a non-owner observes the stop *completing* without disposing the agent. Its live consumers are ACP and agent tests that await settlement through this public contract (`packages/acp/acp/tests`, `packages/core/agent-loop/tests`); the production ACP bridge owns its agents and tears them down through `AgentHandle.dispose()`, so `packages/acp/acp/src` itself has no `whenIdle()` call.
|
||||
|
||||
Public `abort()` is absent, and the disposer remains async and waits for the loop to stop. Tests exercise cancellation through the public typed cause and explicit signal seams rather than reaching into the holder.
|
||||
Public `abort()` is absent, and the disposer remains async and waits for the loop to stop. Tests exercise cancellation through the public typed cause and explicit signal APIs rather than reaching into the holder.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**Removing `whenIdle()` too** — the original proposal's shape, reversed on validating the premise against the code (the implementation note above carries the full record): it is a load-bearing quiescence primitive, and pushing consumers onto hand-observed `running`→`idle` transitions is exactly the brittle path the defensive patterns warn against.
|
||||
**Removing `whenIdle()` too** — the original proposal's shape, reversed on validating the premise against the code: it is a load-bearing quiescence primitive that safely handles waiter settlement and replacement-turn races, and pushing consumers onto hand-observed `running`→`idle` transitions is exactly the brittle path the defensive patterns warn against.
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4,27 +4,25 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-06-20-public-agent-stop-surface.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
> **实现说明：** 仅移除了 `abort()`。`whenIdle()` 予以保留，因为它是公开的完全停稳信号，能安全处理等待者结算与替换轮次竞态；消费方不应从状态转换中自行重建该行为。
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
公共 `Agent` handle 暴露了两种相互重叠的在途工作停止方式：仅针对步骤的 `abort()` 和感知队列的 `cancel()`。前者保留已排队输入，后者原本只暴露广义默认行为，该行为会清除已排队和 steering（中途引导）工作，同时中止活动轮次。`cancel(cause, { keepInbox: true })` 现在无需暴露私有轮次 holder 即可覆盖生产环境的 Web 停止策略；ACP 保留广义取消，生命周期拥有者则通过 `AgentHandle.dispose()` 拆除 agent（智能体）。没有生产调用方需要一个裸的、仅针对步骤的 abort。
|
||||
|
||||
行为差异确实存在，但已发布代码不需要独立的更窄动词。AgentLoop 为整个轮次拥有一个私有取消 holder。`cancel(cause, options?)` 携带显式且类型化的 `user` 或 `parent` 原因；其广义默认行为丢弃待处理输入，`keepInbox` 则为后续轮次保留待处理工作。资源释放仍是单独的生命周期中断。完整的归属与传播契约位于[显式轮次取消 Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-16-explicit-turn-cancellation.md)。
|
||||
行为差异确实存在，但已发布代码不需要独立的更窄动词。AgentLoop 为整个轮次拥有一个私有取消 holder。`cancel(cause, options?)` 携带显式且类型化的 `user` 或 `parent` 原因；其广义默认行为丢弃待处理输入，`keepInbox` 则为后续轮次保留待处理工作。资源释放仍是单独的生命周期中断。完整的归属与传播约定位于[显式轮次取消 Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-16-explicit-turn-cancellation.md)。
|
||||
|
||||
多余的公开接口使循环承载了一个本质上属于内部拆卸的公开动词。带选项的 `cancel()` 可以表达调用方策略，而无需暴露第二个 holder 形态的操作。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
`cancel()` 是 `Agent` 上唯一的公共*停止*原语。生命周期拥有者使用 `AgentHandle.dispose()` 停止并注销 agent；非拥有者使用广义 `cancel()` 放弃当前和已排队工作，或使用 `keepInbox` 中止活动轮次并保留待处理工作。实现保留一个私有轮次取消 holder，但它不属于面向插件的 `Agent` 契约。[Web 停止决策](../bug-fix/2026-07-31-web-stop-preserves-queue.md)是生产环境中的 `keepInbox` 消费方。
|
||||
`cancel()` 是 `Agent` 上唯一的公共*停止*原语。生命周期拥有者使用 `AgentHandle.dispose()` 停止并注销 agent；非拥有者使用广义 `cancel()` 放弃当前和已排队工作，或使用 `keepInbox` 中止活动轮次并保留待处理工作。实现保留一个私有轮次取消 holder，但它不属于面向插件的 `Agent` 约定。[Web 停止决策](../bug-fix/2026-07-31-web-stop-preserves-queue.md)是生产环境中的 `keepInbox` 消费方。
|
||||
|
||||
`whenIdle()` **保留**为公开的完全停稳观测原语（agent 从 `running` 状态稳定后 resolve，已处于 idle 时立即 resolve，dispose 后等待循环退出）。它不是停止动词；它是非所有者在不 dispose agent 的前提下观测停止*完成*的方式。它的活跃消费方是 ACP 和通过此公开 seam 等待结算的 agent 测试（`packages/acp/acp/tests`、`packages/core/agent-loop/tests`）；生产环境的 ACP 桥接层拥有其 agent 并通过 `AgentHandle.dispose()` 销毁它们，因此 `packages/acp/acp/src` 本身没有 `whenIdle()` 调用。
|
||||
`whenIdle()` **保留**为公开的完全停稳观测原语（agent 从 `running` 状态稳定后 resolve，已处于 idle 时立即 resolve，dispose 后等待循环退出）。它不是停止动词；它是非所有者在不 dispose agent 的前提下观测停止*完成*的方式。它的活跃消费方是 ACP 和通过此公开约定等待结算的 agent 测试（`packages/acp/acp/tests`、`packages/core/agent-loop/tests`）；生产环境的 ACP 桥接层拥有其 agent 并通过 `AgentHandle.dispose()` 销毁它们，因此 `packages/acp/acp/src` 本身没有 `whenIdle()` 调用。
|
||||
|
||||
公共 `abort()` 已不存在，disposer 仍为异步并等待循环停止。测试通过公共类型化原因和显式 signal seam 验证取消，而不会伸入 holder 内部。
|
||||
公共 `abort()` 已不存在，disposer 仍为异步并等待循环停止。测试通过公共类型化原因和显式 signal API 验证取消，而不会伸入 holder 内部。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
**同时移除 `whenIdle()`**：最初提案的形态，在对照代码验证前提后被推翻（上方的实现说明记录了完整过程）：它是承重的完全停稳原语，迫使消费方手动观测 `running`→`idle` 转换正是防御性模式所警告的脆弱路径。
|
||||
**同时移除 `whenIdle()`**：最初提案的形态，在对照代码验证前提后被推翻：它是承重的完全停稳原语，能安全处理等待者结算与替换轮次竞态，迫使消费方手动观测 `running`→`idle` 转换正是防御性模式所警告的脆弱路径。
|
||||
|
||||
## 验证
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -32,8 +30,8 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
插件可以通过 `keepInbox` 在保留已排队提示词的同时中止活动轮次，但不能只中止某一个模型／工具步骤而让该轮次继续运行。仅步骤用例需要具名消费方和更窄契约；暴露私有循环机制仍缺乏正当理由。
|
||||
插件可以通过 `keepInbox` 在保留已排队提示词的同时中止活动轮次，但不能只中止某一个模型／工具步骤而让该轮次继续运行。仅步骤用例需要具名消费方和更窄约定；暴露私有循环机制仍缺乏正当理由。
|
||||
|
||||
## 相关
|
||||
|
||||
本 Agent Note 只移除冗余的停止动词。轮次中途 steering 仍是一条有意保留的消息路径；完全停稳观察仍通过 `whenIdle()` 完成。最终交付接口包括 `followup()`、`steer()` 和 `inject()`；停止与观察仍通过 `cancel()` 和 `whenIdle()` 完成。
|
||||
本 Agent Note 只移除冗余的停止动词。轮次中途 steering 仍是一条有意保留的消息路径；完全停稳观察仍通过 `whenIdle()` 完成。最终的消息投递接口包括 `followup()`、`steer()` 和 `inject()`；停止与观察仍通过 `cancel()` 和 `whenIdle()` 完成。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-06-20-remove-agent-boundary-mirror-events.md
|
||||
2026-06-20-remove-agent-boundary-mirror-events.md: 24ac1e32667eb325044f4df583cde509421af3de
|
||||
2026-06-20-remove-agent-boundary-mirror-events.zh.md: 633c349a3e3a1efc4089fa9ae639aa457dd3d619
|
||||
2026-06-20-remove-agent-boundary-mirror-events.md: cb3cb83e7e37fae52b59bb8566284aa80708e23a
|
||||
2026-06-20-remove-agent-boundary-mirror-events.zh.md: aa7ebec9ff8870f9237afbe137bf94bd2c7b61a9
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4,15 +4,6 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-06-20-remove-agent-boundary-mirror-events.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Shipped in AMENDED, narrowed form: the four turn/step BOUNDARY mirrors are
|
||||
removed; `agent/steering` and `agent/stream-chunk` were RETAINED here (they
|
||||
are not durable-boundary mirrors — see "Scope: what is and isn't removed").
|
||||
The original proposal bundled `agent/steering` into the removal; keeping it
|
||||
out kept this Agent Note's scope to boundaries. Each retained event was later
|
||||
removed by its own decision — see
|
||||
[Stop mirroring the token stream as an agent event](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-02-remove-stream-chunk-mirror.md)
|
||||
and [Remove the `agent/steering` mirror emit](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md). -->
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
The loop records the canonical transcript in `SessionEvent` and also emitted a parallel set of live `agent/*` boundary mirror events: `agent/turn-start`, `agent/turn-end`, `agent/step-start`, and `agent/step-end`. The mirrors made consumers choose between two sources of truth for the SAME durable fact. ACP already chose the session log for prompt settlement and committed output because it is the one durable, replayable record; consuming a live mirror would require reconciling its timing with the boundary already stored in that log. The stdio UI was the only production consumer that still rendered turn boundaries from the mirror events; it already rendered tool calls and results from `session/event`.
|
||||
@@ -25,7 +16,7 @@ Make `session/event` the single live boundary/transcript stream. Consumers that
|
||||
|
||||
The four durable-boundary mirrors — `agent/turn-start`, `agent/turn-end`, `agent/step-start`, `agent/step-end` — are removed from the agent event taxonomy. A UI that wants the agent handle at a boundary retains the live target object from `agent/created`/`agent/disposed` and compares its session directly; `dsh-ui-stdio` uses this to label the app-owned agent's `[main turn N]` header while other sessions render their durable id. The canonical record remains the event-sourced session log.
|
||||
|
||||
The step mirrors (which had no consumer at all) were removed first, in [the event-domain-semantics Agent Note](../architecture/2026-06-30-event-domain-semantics.md); that Agent Note KEPT the turn mirrors on the stated justification that the stdio UI needed the `Agent` handle at the turn boundary. This Agent Note finishes the job: `dsh-ui-stdio` is a disposable test REPL whose rendering can change freely, so "ui-stdio needs it" is not a reason to keep a mirror — it reads `session/event` and retains only its live target object.
|
||||
The step mirrors (which had no consumer at all) were removed first, in [the event-domain-semantics Agent Note](../architecture/2026-06-30-event-domain-semantics.md); that Agent Note KEPT the turn mirrors on the stated justification that the stdio UI needed the `Agent` handle at the turn boundary. This decision finishes the job: `dsh-ui-stdio` is a disposable test REPL whose rendering can change freely, so "ui-stdio needs it" is not a reason to keep a mirror — it reads `session/event` and retains only its live target object.
|
||||
|
||||
## Scope: what is and isn't removed
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -33,7 +24,7 @@ Removed (durable-boundary mirrors — the session log is authoritative for each)
|
||||
|
||||
RETAINED — NOT durable-boundary mirrors, so out of scope for this decision:
|
||||
|
||||
- `agent/steering` — not a boundary, so out of scope for THIS decision (the original proposal bundled it into the removal; that would have been scope creep here). It mirrors the durable `steering/message` control record rather than a boundary, and was removed by its own follow-up: [Remove the `agent/steering` mirror emit](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md).
|
||||
- `agent/steering` — not a boundary, so out of scope for THIS decision. It mirrors the durable `steering/message` control record rather than a boundary, and was removed by its own follow-up: [Remove the `agent/steering` mirror emit](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md).
|
||||
- `agent/stream-chunk` — the live token stream. Out of scope for THIS decision (a mirror of the durable `assistant/chunk`, not a boundary), it was removed by its own follow-up: [Stop mirroring the token stream as an agent event](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-02-remove-stream-chunk-mirror.md).
|
||||
- `agent/created`, `agent/disposed`, `agent/status`, `agent/error`, `agent/queued` — lifecycle/control events that are not transcript data. `agent/queued` in particular is an inbox acknowledgement that fires before any durable event exists (cancelled queued work may never enter the log), so it is deliberately live-only.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4,15 +4,6 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-06-20-remove-agent-boundary-mirror-events.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- 以修订、收窄后的形式落地：
|
||||
移除了四个轮次/步骤边界镜像；此处保留了 `agent/steering` 和
|
||||
`agent/stream-chunk`（它们不是持久边界镜像——参见
|
||||
「范围：移除什么、不移除什么」）。原始提案将 `agent/steering` 与其他项一并
|
||||
移除；把它排除在外，使本 Agent Note 的范围保持在边界上。后来每个保留事件
|
||||
都由各自的决策移除——参见
|
||||
[停止将 token 流镜像为 agent 事件](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-02-remove-stream-chunk-mirror.md)
|
||||
和[移除 `agent/steering` 镜像 emit](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md)。 -->
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
循环在 `SessionEvent` 中记录规范 transcript（文本记录），同时还发出一组并行的实时 `agent/*` 边界镜像事件：`agent/turn-start`、`agent/turn-end`、`agent/step-start` 和 `agent/step-end`。这些镜像迫使消费方在同一持久事实的两个真源之间做选择。ACP（Agent Client Protocol）已经为提示词结算和已提交输出选择会话日志，因为它是唯一持久、可重放的记录；消费实时镜像需要把它的时序与日志中已经存储的边界进行调和。stdio UI 是唯一仍从镜像事件渲染轮次边界的生产环境消费方；它已经从 `session/event` 渲染工具调用和结果。
|
||||
@@ -25,7 +16,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
四个持久边界镜像——`agent/turn-start`、`agent/turn-end`、`agent/step-start`、`agent/step-end`——已从 agent（智能体）事件分类体系中移除。希望在边界处取得 agent handle 的 UI 会保留来自 `agent/created`/`agent/disposed` 的实时目标对象，并直接比较其会话；`dsh-ui-stdio` 据此为应用拥有的 agent 标记 `[main turn N]` 头部，其他会话则渲染其持久 id。规范记录仍是事件溯源会话日志。
|
||||
|
||||
步骤镜像（完全没有消费方）最先在[事件域语义 Agent Note](../architecture/2026-06-30-event-domain-semantics.md) 中移除；该 Agent Note 当时以 stdio UI 需要在轮次边界取得 `Agent` handle 为由，保留了轮次镜像。本 Agent Note 完成余下工作：`dsh-ui-stdio` 是可随时丢弃的测试 REPL，其渲染可以自由变化，因此「ui-stdio 需要它」并不是保留镜像的理由——它读取 `session/event`，只保留自己的实时目标对象。
|
||||
步骤镜像（完全没有消费方）最先在[事件域语义 Agent Note](../architecture/2026-06-30-event-domain-semantics.md) 中移除；该 Agent Note 当时以 stdio UI 需要在轮次边界取得 `Agent` handle 为由，保留了轮次镜像。本决策完成余下工作：`dsh-ui-stdio` 是可随时丢弃的测试 REPL，其渲染可以自由变化，因此「ui-stdio 需要它」并不是保留镜像的理由——它读取 `session/event`，只保留自己的实时目标对象。
|
||||
|
||||
## 范围：移除什么、不移除什么
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -33,7 +24,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
保留——不是持久边界镜像，因此不在本决策范围内：
|
||||
|
||||
- `agent/steering`——不是边界，因此不在本决策范围内（原始提案将其一并移除；在此会造成范围蔓延）。它镜像持久的 `steering/message` 控制记录，而非边界，后来由自己的后续决策移除：[移除 `agent/steering` 镜像 emit](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md)。
|
||||
- `agent/steering`——不是边界，因此不在本决策范围内。它镜像持久的 `steering/message` 控制记录，而非边界，后来由自己的后续决策移除：[移除 `agent/steering` 镜像 emit](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md)。
|
||||
- `agent/stream-chunk`——实时 token 流。不在本决策范围内（它镜像持久的 `assistant/chunk`，而非边界），后来由自己的后续决策移除：[停止将 token 流镜像为 agent 事件](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-02-remove-stream-chunk-mirror.md)。
|
||||
- `agent/created`、`agent/disposed`、`agent/status`、`agent/error`、`agent/queued`——不属于 transcript 数据的生命周期/控制事件。尤其是 `agent/queued`，它是在任何持久事件存在之前触发的收件箱确认（取消的排队工作可能永远不会进入日志），所以有意只保留为实时事件。
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-06-20-unify-agent-and-session-id.md
|
||||
2026-06-20-unify-agent-and-session-id.md: c55152f4f13fe0acb530503e84f465799007cff7
|
||||
2026-06-20-unify-agent-and-session-id.zh.md: 92774a3a1b2ff90ccc6163967b4281552a253575
|
||||
2026-06-20-unify-agent-and-session-id.md: 4084912f95aa2354e815a1b4c05cd7f90bd3c315
|
||||
2026-06-20-unify-agent-and-session-id.zh.md: 3daa09d2169e8a407bf1c4c47dd9dbe987bde99c
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ The config-driven path keeps `agents[].id` as a stable configuration label, not
|
||||
- ACP, stdio, hooks, bash ownership, persistence, and lineage use the shared `SessionId` directly. The ACP subagent backend mints its lifecycle id in the parent namespace because a child server's returned session id is only server-local; the ACP bridge verifies exact `Agent` ownership from the forward session map; and JSON-RPC forwards only lifecycle events whose service-snapshotted `local` flag is true, obtains the delegating parent from the scoped event carrier, and keeps no child identity or lineage cache.
|
||||
- The config-driven resume-or-create policy is explicit and covered across a durable restart.
|
||||
- A production listener search kept `agent/created`/`agent/disposed` and their publication semantics.
|
||||
- Typecheck, coverage, snapshots, doc-sync, module-graph verification, build, and hygiene pass.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ agent 的注册表 id 等于其会话 id。`CreateAgentOptions` 接受一个 `se
|
||||
- ACP、stdio、钩子、bash 归属、持久化和 lineage 直接使用共享 `SessionId`。ACP subagent 后端在父命名空间中铸造其生命周期 id，因为子服务器返回的会话 id 仅在服务器本地有效；ACP bridge 根据正向会话 map 验证精确的 `Agent` 归属；JSON-RPC 只转发生命周期事件中由服务快照保存的 `local` 标记为 true 的事件，从带范围的事件 carrier 取得委托父项，并且不保留子 identity 或 lineage cache。
|
||||
- 配置驱动的恢复或创建策略是显式的，并在持久化重启场景下得到覆盖。
|
||||
- 生产监听器搜索确认保留 `agent/created`/`agent/disposed` 及其发布语义。
|
||||
- 类型检查、覆盖率、快照、doc-sync（文档同步门禁）、module-graph 校验、构建与 hygiene 全部通过。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-06-26-fsspec-style-fs-seam.md
|
||||
2026-06-26-fsspec-style-fs-seam.md: b5c201fb192782f130d3609978d16f0fc6d4d55e
|
||||
2026-06-26-fsspec-style-fs-seam.zh.md: 8346ba76d099a458236e200f304c4921553584d3
|
||||
2026-06-26-fsspec-style-fs-seam.md: 76e5493400525f01e78f47e73dc543d0499b6045
|
||||
2026-06-26-fsspec-style-fs-seam.zh.md: cc7519a8a928888973b2fcc4a3350f9e43a54979
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ That makes every future backend reimplement model-facing read semantics and obse
|
||||
|
||||
This also creates a real UX dead-end: a windowed read records `view: partial`, and partial views cannot authorize `edit`. A model that reads lines 100-150 of a large file therefore cannot edit line 120 unless it first gets a `full` read, which may be impossible for a file past the read cap. Literal edit only needs freshness: the bytes being matched must still be from the version the model read.
|
||||
|
||||
The old Agent Note already deferred a separate `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs-policy` package. This Agent Note builds that layer and keeps `ctx.fs` close to fsspec-style storage primitives (`info`/`cat`/`open`), without turning it into full fsspec.
|
||||
The old Agent Note already deferred a separate `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs-policy` package. This decision builds that layer and keeps `ctx.fs` close to fsspec-style storage primitives (`info`/`cat`/`open`), without turning it into full fsspec.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Split the stack into four layers:
|
||||
```text
|
||||
tool dsh-tool-fs model-facing schemas + read windowing + text rendering; the EXECUTOR (reads/writes/edits via ctx.fs, dispatches the fs/* events)
|
||||
policy dsh-fs-policy observed-state + read-before-edit + write/edit freshness, contributed through the fs/* event gate (no service)
|
||||
provider seam dsh-fs ctx.fs: text IO + atomic mutation primitives (optional version guard)
|
||||
provider contract dsh-fs ctx.fs: text IO + atomic mutation primitives (optional version guard)
|
||||
provider dsh-fs-local local implementation of ctx.fs
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ type FsWriteIntent =
|
||||
|
||||
`writeText` is atomic temp-file + rename with an explicit write expectation. `createIfAbsent` creates a missing target and rejects an existing target with `FS_NOT_OBSERVED`; it is the path used when the owner has no prior read. `replaceIfVersion` replaces only when the target exists at the observed version; a missing target or version mismatch throws `FS_STALE_VERSION`.
|
||||
|
||||
`editText` is a provider-level guarded text mutation. When guarded it first verifies the target still exists at `expected.version`, then reads the current text, applies literal replacement, and writes atomically. The stale check must happen before literal matching so an edit based on an old read reports `FS_STALE_VERSION`, not `FS_EDIT_NOT_FOUND` or `FS_AMBIGUOUS_EDIT` from matching against newer content. Keeping this primitive on the provider seam preserves backend-local locking and lets a future remote backend implement native compare-and-edit without forcing the policy layer to pull the whole file through it.
|
||||
`editText` is a provider-level guarded text mutation. When guarded it first verifies the target still exists at `expected.version`, then reads the current text, applies literal replacement, and writes atomically. The stale check must happen before literal matching so an edit based on an old read reports `FS_STALE_VERSION`, not `FS_EDIT_NOT_FOUND` or `FS_AMBIGUOUS_EDIT` from matching against newer content. Keeping this primitive on the provider contract preserves backend-local locking and lets a future remote backend implement native compare-and-edit without forcing the policy layer to pull the whole file through it.
|
||||
|
||||
This is a *text-storage* seam, deliberately half a level above byte-level fsspec (`cat`/`open` hand back raw bytes). UTF-8 decoding, binary/NUL rejection, guarded full-file writes, and guarded literal text edits live in the provider so the policy layer never touches raw bytes, reimplements cross-chunk decoding, or separates stale checks from the mutation critical section. Model-facing concepts still stay out of the provider: no line windows, numbered lines, rendered footers, or observed-state store leak down.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ Deleted from `dsh-fs`: `readPage`, `FsExpectation`, `FsView`, `FsStateSource`, `
|
||||
|
||||
## Policy Contract
|
||||
|
||||
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs-policy` is a plugin, not a service: it registers no `ctx.*` key and injects nothing. It owns the write/edit freshness policy and observed-state that do not belong on the `FileSystem` provider base class (where a sandboxed/remote backend would otherwise inherit model-facing observation policy it has no business carrying). It contributes that policy through the `fs/*` event gate the executor dispatches. (This Agent Note originally proposed a concrete `ctx.fileContext` service with `read`/`write`/`edit` methods; [the event-gate Agent Note](../architecture/2026-06-26-file-context-as-event-gate.md) refined it into the plugin described here so the tool is never method-coupled to the policy.)
|
||||
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs-policy` is a plugin, not a service: it registers no `ctx.*` key and injects nothing. It owns the write/edit freshness policy and observed-state that do not belong on the `FileSystem` provider base class (where a sandboxed/remote backend would otherwise inherit model-facing observation policy it has no business carrying). It contributes that policy through the `fs/*` event gate the executor dispatches.
|
||||
|
||||
Observed state lives here as `WeakMap<owner, Map<targetKey, FsVersion>>`. An entry exists iff the owner has read, written, OR edited that target (every success emits `fs/observed`), so its presence *is* the prior-observation record — there is no separate `hasRead` flag. The owner is derived structurally from the opaque event actor (`{ agent?: { session? } }`), a shape that lives in `dsh-fs-policy`, not `dsh-fs`.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ This Agent Note reverses two decisions from [filesystem-capability-seam](../arch
|
||||
- Text reads no longer return backend-numbered line records or `full`/`partial` views; authorization is based on version freshness, so a windowed read can authorize edit when the file is unchanged.
|
||||
- Literal edit no longer sits behind the old `applyEdit` API that mixed backend mutation with seam-owned observation policy. It remains a provider primitive as `editText`, because version guard + literal match + atomic rewrite must stay inside the provider's mutation critical section.
|
||||
|
||||
It keeps the interface/implementation/consumer discipline, consumer-never-imports-backend rule, backend-defined target/version/display metadata, atomic local writes, and the shared `FsError` taxonomy.
|
||||
It keeps the Service Definition / Service provider / Consumer discipline, consumer-never-imports-backend rule, backend-defined target/version/display metadata, atomic local writes, and the shared `FsError` taxonomy.
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ It keeps the interface/implementation/consumer discipline, consumer-never-import
|
||||
|
||||
## Later extension
|
||||
|
||||
The seam was later extended with direct directory listing by [Add direct directory listing to the filesystem seam](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md). That follow-up is tracked separately so this Agent Note's acceptance criteria continue to describe the fsspec-style refit that originally shipped.
|
||||
The seam was later extended with direct directory listing by [Add direct directory listing to the filesystem seam](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md). That follow-up is recorded separately so this note continues to describe the fsspec-style refit that originally shipped.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -123,8 +123,8 @@ The seam was later extended with direct directory listing by [Add direct directo
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
- Adds a fourth fs package and a new plugin layer. This is intentional: it is the previously deferred policy layer, not a second abstract backend seam.
|
||||
- Adds a fourth fs package and a new plugin layer. This is intentional: it is the previously deferred policy layer, not a second abstract backend contract.
|
||||
- Direct `ctx.fs` use bypasses the policy: a direct `ctx.fs.readText` emits no `fs/observed`, so under the default policy a later `edit` rejects with `FS_NOT_OBSERVED` until the file is read through the `read` tool. The failure is explicit and documented.
|
||||
- Large-file line windowing moves from the backend to the `read` tool in `dsh-tool-fs`; text decoding and binary rejection stay in `ctx.fs.streamText`, so this is relocation of windowing only, not a second text-IO implementation.
|
||||
- Keeping `editText` in the provider seam means every backend must implement the literal replacement contract. This is intentional: the operation is not pure storage, but stale guard + literal match + atomic rewrite is the unit that must stay together for correct error attribution and concurrency behavior. The contract should stay narrow and text-only so future backends can implement it natively or by whole-file rewrite.
|
||||
- Keeping `editText` in the provider contract means every backend must implement the literal replacement contract. This is intentional: the operation is not pure storage, but stale guard + literal match + atomic rewrite is the unit that must stay together for correct error attribution and concurrency behavior. The contract should stay narrow and text-only so future backends can implement it natively or by whole-file rewrite.
|
||||
- Freshness permits full-file `write` after a windowed read. That is weaker than the old view check, but avoids making large files impossible to edit; prompt guidance still discourages blind full replaces.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
这还造成了一个真实的用户体验死胡同：窗口化读取记录 `view: partial`，而 partial 视图无法授权 `edit`。一个模型读取了大文件的第 100-150 行，如果想编辑第 120 行，就必须先获取一次 `full` 读取，而对于超过读取上限的文件这可能做不到。字面编辑实际上只需要新鲜度：被匹配的字节仍然来自模型所读取的那个版本即可。
|
||||
|
||||
旧 Agent Note 已经推迟了独立的 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs-policy` 包。本 Agent Note 构建该层，使 `ctx.fs` 保持接近 fsspec 风格的存储原语（`info`/`cat`/`open`），但不把它变成完整的 fsspec。
|
||||
旧 Agent Note 已经推迟了独立的 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs-policy` 包。本决策构建该层，使 `ctx.fs` 保持接近 fsspec 风格的存储原语（`info`/`cat`/`open`），但不把它变成完整的 fsspec。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -24,15 +24,15 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
```text
|
||||
tool dsh-tool-fs model-facing schemas + read windowing + text rendering; the EXECUTOR (reads/writes/edits via ctx.fs, dispatches the fs/* events)
|
||||
policy dsh-fs-policy observed-state + read-before-edit + write/edit freshness, contributed through the fs/* event gate (no service)
|
||||
provider seam dsh-fs ctx.fs: text IO + atomic mutation primitives (optional version guard)
|
||||
provider contract dsh-fs ctx.fs: text IO + atomic mutation primitives (optional version guard)
|
||||
provider dsh-fs-local local implementation of ctx.fs
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh-tool-fs` 保持相同的面向模型的 `read`/`write`/`edit` schema。它是执行器：注入 `fs`（不是策略服务）并直接访问 `ctx.fs`，拥有读取窗口化逻辑，并分发 `fs/*` 事件以便 `dsh-fs-policy` 进行门控和记录。
|
||||
|
||||
本 Agent Note 决定了四层拆分、提供方契约和新鲜度策略。随后，[事件门禁 Agent Note](../architecture/2026-06-26-file-context-as-event-gate.md) 细化了工具↔策略耦合：`dsh-fs-policy` 是通过 `fs/*` 事件参与的门禁插件，而非 `ctx.fileContext` 方法服务，因此工具不会在方法层与其耦合；读取窗口和 fs I/O 位于 `dsh-tool-fs`。本文描述已经落地的事件门禁形状；提供方的版本守卫可选（省略即无条件裸提供方）。
|
||||
本 Agent Note 决定了四层拆分、提供方约定和新鲜度策略。随后，[事件门禁 Agent Note](../architecture/2026-06-26-file-context-as-event-gate.md) 细化了工具↔策略耦合：`dsh-fs-policy` 是通过 `fs/*` 事件参与的门禁插件，而非 `ctx.fileContext` 方法服务，因此工具不会在方法层与其耦合；读取窗口和 fs I/O 位于 `dsh-tool-fs`。本文描述已经落地的事件门禁形状；提供方的版本守卫可选（省略即无条件裸提供方）。
|
||||
|
||||
## 提供方契约
|
||||
## 提供方约定
|
||||
|
||||
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs` 收缩为提供方文本 IO 加受保护的文本变更：
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -61,15 +61,15 @@ type FsWriteIntent =
|
||||
|
||||
`writeText` 通过临时文件 + rename 实现原子写入，并带有显式的写入期望。`createIfAbsent` 创建不存在的目标，对已存在的目标以 `FS_NOT_OBSERVED` 拒绝；这是 owner 没有先前读取时使用的路径。`replaceIfVersion` 仅在目标以观测到的版本存在时替换；目标不存在或版本不匹配时抛出 `FS_STALE_VERSION`。
|
||||
|
||||
`editText` 是提供方级别的受保护文本变更。启用守卫时，它首先验证目标仍以 `expected.version` 存在，然后读取当前文本、应用字面替换并原子写入。陈旧检查必须在字面匹配之前发生，这样基于旧读取的编辑会报告 `FS_STALE_VERSION`，而不是对更新内容进行匹配后报告 `FS_EDIT_NOT_FOUND` 或 `FS_AMBIGUOUS_EDIT`。将此原语保留在提供方 seam 上，保持了后端本地锁定的能力，也让未来的远程后端能够实现原生的 compare-and-edit，而无需策略层拉取整个文件。
|
||||
`editText` 是提供方级别的受保护文本变更。启用守卫时，它首先验证目标仍以 `expected.version` 存在，然后读取当前文本、应用字面替换并原子写入。陈旧检查必须在字面匹配之前发生，这样基于旧读取的编辑会报告 `FS_STALE_VERSION`，而不是对更新内容进行匹配后报告 `FS_EDIT_NOT_FOUND` 或 `FS_AMBIGUOUS_EDIT`。将此原语保留在提供方约定上，保持了后端本地锁定的能力，也让未来的远程后端能够实现原生的 compare-and-edit，而无需策略层拉取整个文件。
|
||||
|
||||
这是一个*文本存储* seam，刻意比字节级 fsspec（`cat`/`open` 返回原始字节）高半个层次。UTF-8 解码、二进制/NUL 拒绝、受保护的全文件写入和受保护的字面文本编辑都在提供方内完成，因此策略层从不接触原始字节、不重新实现跨分片解码、也不将陈旧检查与变更临界区分离。面向模型的概念仍然不下沉到提供方：行窗口、带行号的行、渲染的页脚、观测状态存储都不会泄漏下去。
|
||||
|
||||
从 `dsh-fs` 删除：`readPage`、`FsExpectation`、`FsView`、`FsStateSource`、`FsReadRequest`、`FsTextLine`、行/窗口常量、`formatReadBody` 和 observed-state `WeakMap`。`applyEdit` 由更窄的提供方原语 `editText` 取代，其契约是带版本守卫的字面文本变更，而非策略层读取授权。`FS_PARTIAL_OBSERVATION` 错误码也从 `FsErrorCode` 分类体系中移除：新鲜度授权没有部分/完整之分，因此没有任何路径会抛出它。`FsTargetKey` 和 `FsVersion` 按现有[品牌化 id Agent Note](../architecture/2026-06-20-branded-ids.md) 成为品牌化不透明 id。
|
||||
从 `dsh-fs` 删除：`readPage`、`FsExpectation`、`FsView`、`FsStateSource`、`FsReadRequest`、`FsTextLine`、行/窗口常量、`formatReadBody` 和 observed-state `WeakMap`。`applyEdit` 由更窄的提供方原语 `editText` 取代，其约定是带版本守卫的字面文本变更，而非策略层读取授权。`FS_PARTIAL_OBSERVATION` 错误码也从 `FsErrorCode` 分类体系中移除：新鲜度授权没有部分/完整之分，因此没有任何路径会抛出它。`FsTargetKey` 和 `FsVersion` 按现有[品牌化 id Agent Note](../architecture/2026-06-20-branded-ids.md) 成为品牌化不透明 id。
|
||||
|
||||
## 策略契约
|
||||
## 策略约定
|
||||
|
||||
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs-policy` 是插件，而非服务：它不注册任何 `ctx.*` 键，也不注入任何内容。它拥有不应位于 `FileSystem` 提供方基类上的写入/编辑新鲜度策略和 observed state（否则沙箱/远程后端会继承不该由其承载的面向模型观察策略）。它通过执行器分派的 `fs/*` 事件门禁贡献该策略。（本 Agent Note 最初提议带有 `read`/`write`/`edit` 方法的具体 `ctx.fileContext` 服务；[事件门禁 Agent Note](../architecture/2026-06-26-file-context-as-event-gate.md) 将其细化为本文所述插件，使工具永远不会在方法层与策略耦合。）
|
||||
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs-policy` 是插件，而非服务：它不注册任何 `ctx.*` 键，也不注入任何内容。它拥有不应位于 `FileSystem` 提供方基类上的写入/编辑新鲜度策略和 observed state（否则沙箱/远程后端会继承不该由其承载的面向模型观察策略）。它通过执行器分派的 `fs/*` 事件门禁贡献该策略。
|
||||
|
||||
观测状态以 `WeakMap<owner, Map<targetKey, FsVersion>>` 的形式存放于此。当且仅当 owner 读取、写入或编辑过该目标时，条目才存在（每次成功都会发出 `fs/observed`），因此条目的存在*本身就是*先前观测的记录——没有单独的 `hasRead` 标志。owner 从不透明的事件 actor（`{ agent?: { session? } }`）结构化派生，该形状定义在 `dsh-fs-policy` 中而非 `dsh-fs` 中。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ type FsWriteIntent =
|
||||
|
||||
该插件不做任何文件系统 I/O：「你是否观测过此文件？」是一次 `WeakMap` 查找，而「你读取的版本是否仍然是当前版本？」在 `ctx.fs.editText`/`writeText` 内部、与执行变更相同的原子锁中决定——插件只提供 `vObserved` 作为基础。
|
||||
|
||||
## 工具契约
|
||||
## 工具约定
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh-tool-fs` 保持相同的 schema 和提示词表面。`read` 仍然暴露 `file_path`、`offset` 和 `limit`；`write` 和 `edit` 不变。它是执行器：验证模型参数，通过 `ctx.fs` 直接读取/写入/编辑，拥有行窗口化和结果渲染（`N: text`、页脚、`<path>/<content>` 封装），并分发 `fs/*` 事件。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -105,15 +105,15 @@ type FsWriteIntent =
|
||||
- 文本读取不再返回后端编号的行记录或 `full`/`partial` 视图；授权基于版本新鲜度，因此窗口化读取在文件未变时即可授权编辑。
|
||||
- 字面编辑不再位于旧的 `applyEdit` API 之后（该 API 混合了后端变更与 seam 拥有的观测策略）。它作为 `editText` 保留为提供方原语，因为版本守卫 + 字面匹配 + 原子重写必须留在提供方的变更临界区内。
|
||||
|
||||
保留的内容：接口/实现/消费方纪律、消费方不导入后端规则、后端定义的 target/version/display 元数据、原子本地写入，以及共享的 `FsError` 分类体系。
|
||||
保留的内容：Service Definition / Service provider / Consumer 纪律、消费方不导入后端规则、后端定义的 target/version/display 元数据、原子本地写入，以及共享的 `FsError` 分类体系。
|
||||
|
||||
## 验证
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh-fs` 精确暴露 `resolve`/`stat`/`readText`/`streamText`/`writeText`/`editText`（`stat` 返回 `FsInfo | undefined`，`writeText` 接受 `FsWriteIntent`），已删除的类型/原语不再存在；`dsh-fs-local` 不包含行、视图或 `formatReadBody` 逻辑；面向模型的 schema 保持逐字节不变。测试固定了以下行为：窗口化读取授权对未变文件的后续编辑；基于陈旧读取的编辑在尝试字面匹配之前报告 `FS_STALE_VERSION`；版本 CAS 行为得以保留；观测契约成立（`read` 工具的读取记录观测状态；直接 `ctx.fs` 读取不记录）；`dsh-fs-policy` 具有 HMR（热模块替换）/dispose（资源释放）测试覆盖。
|
||||
`dsh-fs` 精确暴露 `resolve`/`stat`/`readText`/`streamText`/`writeText`/`editText`（`stat` 返回 `FsInfo | undefined`，`writeText` 接受 `FsWriteIntent`），已删除的类型/原语不再存在；`dsh-fs-local` 不包含行、视图或 `formatReadBody` 逻辑；面向模型的 schema 保持逐字节不变。测试固定了以下行为：窗口化读取授权对未变文件的后续编辑；基于陈旧读取的编辑在尝试字面匹配之前报告 `FS_STALE_VERSION`；版本 CAS 行为得以保留；观测约定成立（`read` 工具的读取记录观测状态；直接 `ctx.fs` 读取不记录）；`dsh-fs-policy` 具有 HMR（热模块替换）/dispose（资源释放）测试覆盖。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后续扩展
|
||||
|
||||
后来，[为文件系统 seam 添加直接目录列表](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md)进一步扩展了该 seam。该后续工作单独跟踪，使本 Agent Note 的验收标准继续描述最初落地的 fsspec 风格改造。
|
||||
后来，[为文件系统 seam 添加直接目录列表](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md)进一步扩展了该 seam。该后续工作单独记录，使本文继续描述最初落地的 fsspec 风格改造。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -123,8 +123,8 @@ type FsWriteIntent =
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
- 新增第四个 fs 包和一个新的插件层。这是有意为之：它是此前推迟的策略层，而非第二个抽象后端 seam。
|
||||
- 新增第四个 fs 包和一个新的插件层。这是有意为之：它是此前推迟的策略层，而非第二个抽象后端约定。
|
||||
- 直接使用 `ctx.fs` 会绕过策略：直接 `ctx.fs.readText` 不发出 `fs/observed`，因此在默认策略下，后续 `edit` 会以 `FS_NOT_OBSERVED` 拒绝，直到通过 `read` 工具读取该文件。这一失败是显式且有文档记录的。
|
||||
- 大文件行窗口化从后端移至 `dsh-tool-fs` 中的 `read` 工具；文本解码和二进制拒绝留在 `ctx.fs.streamText` 中，因此这只是窗口化逻辑的迁移，而非第二套文本 IO 实现。
|
||||
- 将 `editText` 保留在提供方 seam 上意味着每个后端都必须实现字面替换契约。这是有意为之：该操作不是纯存储，但陈旧守卫 + 字面匹配 + 原子重写是必须保持在一起的单元，以确保正确的错误归因和并发行为。该契约应保持窄且仅限文本，以便未来后端可以原生实现或通过全文件重写实现。
|
||||
- 将 `editText` 保留在提供方约定上意味着每个后端都必须实现字面替换约定。这是有意为之：该操作不是纯存储，但陈旧守卫 + 字面匹配 + 原子重写是必须保持在一起的单元，以确保正确的错误归因和并发行为。该约定应保持窄且仅限文本，以便未来后端可以原生实现或通过全文件重写实现。
|
||||
- 新鲜度允许在窗口化读取后进行全文件 `write`。这比旧的视图检查更弱，但避免了大文件无法编辑的问题；提示词引导仍然不鼓励盲目的全文件替换。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-04-drop-image-content-block.md
|
||||
2026-07-04-drop-image-content-block.md: cdedf4bd5dfe60c72cea185d88b83d3b93928ff0
|
||||
2026-07-04-drop-image-content-block.zh.md: 4caf717a360c1a3d536415a84e57fd9fff32c710
|
||||
2026-07-04-drop-image-content-block.md: 5d0357270973ac20234d8ce72c403f27ce2ad0e0
|
||||
2026-07-04-drop-image-content-block.zh.md: f781c775e49c06f9b3f4c54d13cc3a1519c15daf
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Remove `ImageBlock`, its map entry, and image-specific branches from adapters an
|
||||
|
||||
`ContentBlockMap` can reintroduce images when adapters and compaction support them. ACP may remain a text-only automation protocol. Keeping a core type whose only implementation is rejection would advertise an unusable surface; absence gives producers an immediate compile-time failure instead.
|
||||
|
||||
The recorded fallback, had review landed on keeping the slot: keep `ImageBlock` but replace every silent skip with a loud rejection, and document that policy in the vocabulary — the silent drop was the one state with no defender. Review landed on removal; the fallback stands as the documented alternative should the slot ever return ahead of a full feature.
|
||||
The documented fallback, should the slot ever return ahead of a full feature: keep `ImageBlock` but replace every silent skip with a loud rejection, and document that policy in the vocabulary — the silent drop was the one state with no defender.
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
当适配器和压缩支持 image 时，`ContentBlockMap` 可以重新引入 image 内容块。ACP 可以继续作为纯文本的自动化协议。保留一个唯一实现就是拒绝的核心类型，等于宣告一个不可用的对外服务接口；移除后，生产者会立即得到编译期错误。
|
||||
|
||||
评审中记录的回退方案（假如评审决定保留该槽位）：保留 `ImageBlock`，但将所有静默跳过替换为显式拒绝，并在词汇文档中记录该策略——静默丢弃是唯一没有辩护者的状态。评审最终决定移除；此回退方案作为文档化的替代方案保留，以备该槽位在完整功能就绪之前回归。
|
||||
文档化的回退方案（以备该槽位在完整功能就绪之前回归）：保留 `ImageBlock`，但将所有静默跳过替换为显式拒绝，并在词汇文档中记录该策略——静默丢弃是唯一没有辩护者的状态。
|
||||
|
||||
## 验证
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-04-tighten-hook-protocol-contract.md
|
||||
2026-07-04-tighten-hook-protocol-contract.md: a67d0e8447e36516006e57051581c03877c1ba12
|
||||
2026-07-04-tighten-hook-protocol-contract.zh.md: 638455d89923d0636483c8e8f39fb0613daa1376
|
||||
2026-07-04-tighten-hook-protocol-contract.md: eecec255d930d2896fc1ea3dee85bb2efa582a19
|
||||
2026-07-04-tighten-hook-protocol-contract.zh.md: 0b913a8783eab8e05d78b8c3ecc712fe4b1d947c
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-04-tighten-hook-protocol-contract.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
Four pieces of the `dsh-hook-protocol`/bridge contract missed the discipline the [subagent-observe-enrich Agent Note](../../archived/feature/2026-06-30-subagent-observe-enrich.md) records — it dropped an `agentType` lifecycle field for lacking a consumer, and these failed the same test:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **`HookDialect`'s `'native'` variant** (`packages/hooks/hook-protocol/src/types.ts`) had zero producers — the bridges stamp `'claude'` and `'codex'`; the only `'native'` constructor anywhere was the lib's own unit test. The field's own JSDoc defines `dialect` as "the bridge that ran it", and native is not a bridge: the [interception-seams Agent Note](../feature/2026-06-30-interception-seams.md) records that native hooks are not a package and that "a native plugin can already use the typed Decisions" without the durable hook log, and the flagship native-plugin worked example asserts exactly that (no `hook/*` events at all).
|
||||
1. **`HookDialect`'s `'native'` variant** (`packages/hooks/hook-protocol/src/types.ts`) had zero producers — the bridges stamp `'claude'` and `'codex'`; the only `'native'` constructor anywhere was the lib's own unit test. The field's own JSDoc defines `dialect` as "the bridge that ran it", and native is not a bridge: the [interception extension-points Agent Note](../feature/2026-06-30-interception-extension-points.md) records that native hooks are not a package and that "a native plugin can already use the typed Decisions" without the durable hook log, and the flagship native-plugin worked example asserts exactly that (no `hook/*` events at all).
|
||||
2. **`HookOutput.suppressOutput`** (same file) was parsed by the codec and discarded on every path: no bridge branch, no merge fold, no warn, no deferred-list row — uniquely among its parsed-but-unhonored siblings, each of which carries a stated deferral (`updatedInput` → a logged warn plus the [pre-tool-input-rewrite proposal](../../proposed/feature/2026-06-30-pre-tool-input-rewrite.md); `systemMessage` → a logged warn plus a README deferred row; `continue`/`stopReason` → a `TODO(hook-continue-false)` anchor plus the `'stop'` decision record). Structurally there is nothing to suppress: hook stdout never enters any transcript (context flows only via `additionalContext`; the log records only `decision`/`stderrSummary`), so a hook author setting `suppressOutput: true` got silent nothing with no warn.
|
||||
3. **`defaultTimeoutMs` was double-defaulted in both bridge configs with a floating literal** — a schema `.default(600_000)` AND a `?? 600_000` fallback (`packages/hooks/hooks-claude/src/index.ts`, `packages/hooks/hooks-codex/src/index.ts`), two homes per bridge for one protocol-level constant, so the bridges could silently drift apart on the shared default. *The proposal's original remedy — delete the knob outright — was overtaken by the no-hardcoded-tunables audit, which kept the knob as the explicit bridge-owned config (and added `stderrSummaryMaxChars` beside it); what remained to fix was the literal's home.*
|
||||
3. **`defaultTimeoutMs` was double-defaulted in both bridge configs with a floating literal** — a schema `.default(600_000)` AND a `?? 600_000` fallback (`packages/hooks/hooks-claude/src/index.ts`, `packages/hooks/hooks-codex/src/index.ts`), two homes per bridge for one protocol-level constant, so the bridges could silently drift apart on the shared default. *The knob stays as explicit bridge-owned config per the no-hardcoded-tunables rule (with `stderrSummaryMaxChars` beside it); the fix is the literal's home.*
|
||||
4. **The `hook/result` semantics lived in the bridges, twice, not in the lib that owns the event.** `summarize()` — the stderr truncation rule — was byte-identical in `packages/hooks/hooks-claude/src/index.ts` and `packages/hooks/hooks-codex/src/index.ts`, and so was the decision-string rule `output.decision ?? (output.continue === false ? 'stop' : 'pass')`; yet `dsh-hook-protocol` declared `hook/result`, documented `stderrSummary` as "truncated" without owning the truncation, and documented the decision values without owning the mapping. If one bridge drifted (a different cap, a different fallback), the shared durable event's semantics would fork silently.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: 收紧 hook-protocol 契约——dialect、被丢弃的字段、双重默认值与 lib 拥有的 `hook/result` 语义
|
||||
# Agent Note: 收紧 hook-protocol 约定——dialect、被丢弃的字段、双重默认值与 lib 拥有的 `hook/result` 语义
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh-hook-protocol`/bridge 契约中有四部分没有遵守 [subagent observe/enrich Agent Note](../../archived/feature/2026-06-30-subagent-observe-enrich.md)记下的准则——后者因缺少消费方而删除 `agentType` 生命周期字段，以下各项没有通过同一检验：
|
||||
`dsh-hook-protocol`/bridge 约定中有四部分没有遵守 [subagent observe/enrich Agent Note](../../archived/feature/2026-06-30-subagent-observe-enrich.md)记下的准则——后者因缺少消费方而删除 `agentType` 生命周期字段，以下各项没有通过同一检验：
|
||||
|
||||
1. **`HookDialect` 的 `'native'` 变体**（`packages/hooks/hook-protocol/src/types.ts`）没有生产者——bridge 会标记 `'claude'` 和 `'codex'`；所有位置中唯一构造 `'native'` 的是该库自己的单元测试。字段自身的 JSDoc 将 `dialect` 定义为“运行它的 bridge”，而 native 不是 bridge：[拦截 seam Agent Note](../feature/2026-06-30-interception-seams.md) 记载 native 钩子不是一个包，并且“native 插件无需持久钩子日志即可使用类型化 Decision”；旗舰 native 插件实践示例恰好断言了这一点（完全没有 `hook/*` 事件）。
|
||||
1. **`HookDialect` 的 `'native'` 变体**（`packages/hooks/hook-protocol/src/types.ts`）没有生产者——bridge 会标记 `'claude'` 和 `'codex'`；所有位置中唯一构造 `'native'` 的是该库自己的单元测试。字段自身的 JSDoc 将 `dialect` 定义为“运行它的 bridge”，而 native 不是 bridge：[拦截扩展点 Agent Note](../feature/2026-06-30-interception-extension-points.md) 记载 native 钩子不是一个包，并且“native 插件无需持久钩子日志即可使用类型化 Decision”；旗舰 native 插件实践示例恰好断言了这一点（完全没有 `hook/*` 事件）。
|
||||
2. **`HookOutput.suppressOutput`**（同一文件）被 codec 解析后在所有路径上均被丢弃：没有 bridge 分支处理它、没有合并 fold、没有 warn、没有 deferred-list 行——在所有「被解析但未兑现」的同类字段中它是唯一没有明确延期声明的（`updatedInput` → 一条 warn 日志加 [pre-tool-input-rewrite 提案](../../proposed/feature/2026-06-30-pre-tool-input-rewrite.md)；`systemMessage` → 一条 warn 日志加 README deferred 行；`continue`/`stopReason` → 一个 `TODO(hook-continue-false)` 锚点加 `'stop'` decision 记录）。从结构上看根本无物可抑制：钩子 stdout 从不进入任何 transcript（文本记录）；上下文仅通过 `additionalContext` 流入，日志也只记录 `decision`/`stderrSummary`。因此，钩子作者设置 `suppressOutput: true` 得到的是无声的空操作，且无任何警告。
|
||||
3. **`defaultTimeoutMs` 在两个 bridge 配置中都以游离的字面量重复设置了默认值**——schema 的 `.default(600_000)` 加上一个 `?? 600_000` 回退（`packages/hooks/hooks-claude/src/index.ts`、`packages/hooks/hooks-codex/src/index.ts`），一个协议级常量在每个 bridge 中有两个归属地，两个 bridge 可能在共享默认值上悄然分歧。*提案最初的补救措施是彻底删除该旋钮，但被 no-hardcoded-tunables 审计所取代：审计保留了该旋钮作为 bridge 拥有的显式配置（并在旁边新增了 `stderrSummaryMaxChars`）；剩下要修的是字面量的归属地。*
|
||||
3. **`defaultTimeoutMs` 在两个 bridge 配置中都以游离的字面量重复设置了默认值**——schema 的 `.default(600_000)` 加上一个 `?? 600_000` 回退（`packages/hooks/hooks-claude/src/index.ts`、`packages/hooks/hooks-codex/src/index.ts`），一个协议级常量在每个 bridge 中有两个归属地，两个 bridge 可能在共享默认值上悄然分歧。*按 no-hardcoded-tunables 规则，该旋钮保留为 bridge 拥有的显式配置（旁边有 `stderrSummaryMaxChars`）；要修的是字面量的归属地。*
|
||||
4. **`hook/result` 的语义存在于两个 bridge 中（各一份），而非拥有该事件的 lib。** `summarize()`——stderr 截断规则——在 `packages/hooks/hooks-claude/src/index.ts` 与 `packages/hooks/hooks-codex/src/index.ts` 中逐字节相同；decision 字符串规则 `output.decision ?? (output.continue === false ? 'stop' : 'pass')` 同样如此。然而 `dsh-hook-protocol` 声明了 `hook/result`、在文档中将 `stderrSummary` 描述为「已截断」却不拥有截断逻辑，记录了 decision 值却不拥有映射逻辑。如果某个 bridge 漂移（不同的上限、不同的回退），共享持久化事件的语义就会悄然分叉。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-12-simplify-session-log-representation.md
|
||||
2026-07-12-simplify-session-log-representation.md: a40f4013a97a9c940012dbb37d59beb2faf8fb22
|
||||
2026-07-12-simplify-session-log-representation.zh.md: 30808a4eff83b32bd0c47cc6e6cb211f2222b363
|
||||
2026-07-12-simplify-session-log-representation.md: 3efb531d3c0822d7444d1270eac4da2617c12447
|
||||
2026-07-12-simplify-session-log-representation.zh.md: 5e9b453fd9905bf858dc5cb0cc09bf5c558ea0e6
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ The session log maintains two representations that cost more machinery than thei
|
||||
|
||||
The request-header subsystem implements a custom system/tool delta codec and transmission-decision layer even though its contract says deltas are an encoding optimization, not a reconstructability requirement. Retaining the initial/resume full snapshot at each loop-instance boundary, then writing a canonical full `request/header` whenever that instance's assembled header changes, preserves replay while deleting `SystemDelta`, `ToolsDelta`, round-trip fallback, and the durable `request/header-delta` variant. Codec-only vocabulary disappears with the codec, not because its individual arms were invalid.
|
||||
|
||||
The implementation retains append and replacement `sourceEventSeqs`, crash-repair provenance, and all `SessionStartSource` variants because those fields have an audit/interception role that zero current readers does not overturn.
|
||||
The implementation retains append and replacement `sourceEventSeqs`, the `tool/call` seq cited by crash-repaired results, and all `SessionStartSource` variants because those fields have an audit/interception role that zero current readers does not overturn.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
`SurfaceManager` 同时在数组、seq map 和可变 `prev`/`next` 链接中存储相同顺序。生产代码从不读取任一链接：compact 的工具配对 balance 根据按 surface 顺序缓存的每个切点 balance 作答。替换已经使用 `indexOf`，因此链接并未使其主导操作成为常数时间。使用线性替换查找的 seq 数组具有相同的渐近替换成本，却只有一种表示需要验证。
|
||||
|
||||
请求头子系统实现了一套自定义的系统/工具增量编解码器和传输决策层，尽管其契约声明增量只是编码优化，而非可重建性要求。在每个 agent loop（智能体循环）实例边界保留初始/恢复的完整快照，然后在该实例的组装头发生变化时写入一条规范的完整 `request/header`，即可保留回放能力，同时删除 `SystemDelta`、`ToolsDelta`、往返回退逻辑以及持久化的 `request/header-delta` 变体。编解码器专属的词汇随编解码器一起消失，并非因为其各分支本身无效。
|
||||
请求头子系统实现了一套自定义的系统/工具增量编解码器和传输决策层，尽管其约定声明增量只是编码优化，而非可重建性要求。在每个 agent loop（智能体循环）实例边界保留初始/恢复的完整快照，然后在该实例的组装头发生变化时写入一条规范的完整 `request/header`，即可保留回放能力，同时删除 `SystemDelta`、`ToolsDelta`、往返回退逻辑以及持久化的 `request/header-delta` 变体。编解码器专属的词汇随编解码器一起消失，并非因为其各分支本身无效。
|
||||
|
||||
实现保留追加与替换操作的 `sourceEventSeqs`、崩溃修复的溯源信息，以及所有 `SessionStartSource` 变体，因为这些字段承担审计/拦截职责，当前没有读取方并不能推翻这一点。
|
||||
实现保留追加与替换操作的 `sourceEventSeqs`、崩溃修复结果引用的 `tool/call` seq，以及所有 `SessionStartSource` 变体，因为这些字段承担审计/拦截职责，当前没有读取方并不能推翻这一点。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-17-one-send-one-turn.md
|
||||
2026-07-17-one-send-one-turn.md: 834eb2b3aace0a0aa5f86f483e7b7d7aabbe467e
|
||||
2026-07-17-one-send-one-turn.zh.md: d22893b912462cffffb0d6ecd81811e9cb5c523d
|
||||
2026-07-17-one-send-one-turn.md: 71ea5d23c303a2e5de472ceabf9868364d916ab9
|
||||
2026-07-17-one-send-one-turn.zh.md: ac0af03c61c4fb5583f2f08e28e957994954e094
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ This grouping changes behavior, not just the number of model calls. One ordinary
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
The rule is simple: each successful `send()` creates one independent FIFO queue item. If that item runs, it is the only ordinary message in its turn. An item can be dropped before it starts, so the precise guarantee is at most one turn rather than exactly one; two sends are never silently combined.
|
||||
Each successful `send()` creates one independent FIFO queue item. If that item runs, it is the only ordinary message in its turn. An item can be dropped before it starts, so the precise guarantee is at most one turn rather than exactly one; two sends are never silently combined.
|
||||
|
||||
Before inserting a message, `send()` checks the agent state and accepts an already identified, deeply frozen value. The durable splice and `agent/inbox/inserted { message }` retain its `MessageId`; the pending message remains addressable through `Inbox.replace()` and `Inbox.remove()` until the driver claims or discards it. The [claimed pre-step inbox decision](../architecture/2026-07-31-claimed-pre-step-inbox-lifecycle.md) owns the current lifecycle.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -14,13 +14,13 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
规则很简单：一次成功的 `send()` 创建一个独立的 FIFO 队列项。该队列项如果运行，就是所在轮次中唯一的普通消息。队列项可能在启动前被丢弃，因此精确保证是最多一个轮次，而不是必定一个轮次；两次 send 绝不会被悄悄合并。
|
||||
一次成功的 `send()` 创建一个独立的 FIFO 队列项。该队列项如果运行，就是所在轮次中唯一的普通消息。队列项可能在启动前被丢弃，因此精确保证是最多一个轮次，而不是必定一个轮次；两次 send 绝不会被悄悄合并。
|
||||
|
||||
消息插入之前，`send()` 会检查 agent 状态，并接受已有标识且经过深度冻结的值。持久 splice 与 `agent/inbox/inserted { message }` 会保留其 `MessageId`；在驱动器领取或丢弃该消息之前，可以通过 `Inbox.replace()` 与 `Inbox.remove()` 寻址。当前生命周期由[已领取 pre-step inbox 决策](../architecture/2026-07-31-claimed-pre-step-inbox-lifecycle.md)规定。
|
||||
消息插入之前，`send()` 会检查 agent 状态，并接受已有标识且经过深度冻结的值。持久化 splice 与 `agent/inbox/inserted { message }` 会保留其 `MessageId`；在驱动器领取或丢弃该消息之前，可以通过 `Inbox.replace()` 与 `Inbox.remove()` 寻址。当前生命周期由[已领取 pre-step inbox 决策](../architecture/2026-07-31-claimed-pre-step-inbox-lifecycle.md)规定。
|
||||
|
||||
如果消息 A、B 都进入处理，B 的轮次只能在 A 记录 `turn/end` 且 A 的持久性检查点处理结束后开始。因此，B 的请求能看到 A 在同一会话日志中留下的已关闭结果。检查点错误会照常报告，但处理结束只表示解除这道顺序屏障，不表示失败的写入已经持久化。面向整个 agent 的 `cancel()`、dispose（资源释放）或 `turn/start` 之前的失败也可能丢弃尚未启动的队列项，而不打开一个空轮次。
|
||||
|
||||
轮次边界上，循环会先打开轮次，再在待处理 next-step 输入之后领取一条 follow-up。`agent/pre-step` 要么拒绝提案，要么返回进入步骤的完整批次。被拒绝的 follow-up 保持已删除，并关闭一个 blocked 的无步骤轮次，不写入模型可见历史。实现中不存在混合普通 follow-up 分支。
|
||||
轮次边界上，循环会先打开轮次，再在待处理 next-step 输入之后领取一条 follow-up。`agent/pre-step` 要么拒绝提案，要么返回进入步骤的完整批次。被拒绝的 follow-up 保持已删除，并关闭一个受阻的无步骤轮次，不写入模型可见历史。实现中不存在混合普通 follow-up 分支。
|
||||
|
||||
上述不合批规则只适用于普通 follow-up 输入。`steer()` 会把输入放入 next-step inbox 并唤醒驱动器。在轮次期间，循环可以在后续步骤边界领取它；agent 空闲时，这个会唤醒的 next-step 批次会启动一个新轮次。批次被领取后才到达的输入会等待后续边界，而取消或 dispose 可以将其丢弃。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -28,18 +28,18 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
**保留普通 send 的自动批处理，以减少模型调用。** 当消息进入队列的速度超过驱动器的处理速度时，这种做法可以提高吞吐量，但会让轮次边界取决于调度，并让后一条消息在前一轮关闭且到达检查点之前运行。本决策保留可预测的边界，并接受额外调用。未来若要加入批处理功能，必须提供调用方可见的显式契约，并有测量结果作为依据。
|
||||
**保留普通 send 的自动批处理，以减少模型调用。** 当消息进入队列的速度超过驱动器的处理速度时，这种做法可以提高吞吐量，但会让轮次边界取决于调度，并让后一条消息在前一轮关闭且到达检查点之前运行。本决策保留可预测的边界，并接受额外调用。未来若要加入批处理功能，必须提供调用方可见的显式约定，并有测量结果作为依据。
|
||||
|
||||
## 验证
|
||||
|
||||
- 单元测试和基于属性的测试从同一调用栈、相邻微任务、不同生产方和重入回调提交 send；每条消息都会得到一个按 FIFO 排序的独立轮次。
|
||||
- stdio 构建产物测试提交两行输入，并观察到两个模型请求和两个轮次边界。
|
||||
- 延迟和拒绝第一个轮次的检查点，都能让下一个轮次保持等待，并证明其请求可以看到前一条助手结果。
|
||||
- 失败路径测试覆盖 pre-step reject、监听器失败、广义取消、dispose 和 `turn/start` 之前的失败；首次 pre-step 的各种退出都会关闭边界平衡的无步骤轮次，消息不会合并，之后仍需处理的工作也能继续清空。
|
||||
- 失败路径测试覆盖 pre-step 拒绝、监听器失败、面向整个 agent 的取消、dispose 和 `turn/start` 之前的失败；首次 pre-step 的各种退出都会关闭边界平衡的无步骤轮次，消息不会合并，之后仍需处理的工作也能继续清空。
|
||||
- 其他测试分别覆盖轮次打开时、轮次失败后和空闲时的 `steer()`，以及待处理的 `inject()`、面向整个 agent 的状态和 `whenIdle()`。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
普通轮次的边界可预测：消息 A、B 始终分开，B 只能在 A 关闭并到达检查点后运行。调用方仍然拿不到逐次 send 的完成句柄；待处理消息可通过其 `MessageId` 移除，广义取消可以丢弃整个尚未启动的队尾，而状态与完全停稳仍是面向整个 agent 的观察。
|
||||
普通轮次的边界可预测：消息 A、B 始终分开，B 只能在 A 关闭并到达检查点后运行。调用方仍然拿不到逐次 send 的完成句柄；待处理消息可通过其 `MessageId` 移除，面向整个 agent 的取消可以丢弃整个尚未启动的队尾，而状态与完全停稳仍是面向整个 agent 的观察。
|
||||
|
||||
代价是模型请求和检查点都会增加。繁忙队列可能需要更长时间才能清空；如果生产方持续提交消息，队列也可能增长。只有建立显式且经过测量的契约后，才能重新引入普通 send 批处理。
|
||||
代价是模型请求和检查点都会增加。繁忙队列可能需要更长时间才能清空；如果生产方持续提交消息，队列也可能增长。只有建立显式且经过测量的约定后，才能重新引入普通 send 批处理。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.md
|
||||
2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.md: 1c7ff4b5337341ea7678c1455dd7bbd3365df6ba
|
||||
2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.zh.md: 67445d25f6a0534c92c50568da898a5bffc73a52
|
||||
2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.md: 256e626f4ff41016d0227eef7cc3e4e51e15058b
|
||||
2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.zh.md: 013135eff5d1dbbc570561e70c751ff4de289989
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -19,18 +19,18 @@ The stdio and Echo agents are removed without compatibility packages, modes, com
|
||||
The remaining application roles are explicit:
|
||||
|
||||
- `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui` owns terminal-interactive execution. It rejects non-TTY streams before Loader boot; `apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml` plus the `tui.cordis.yml` overlay own the complete coding composition, with PTY plus terminal-snapshot coverage in `apps/cli/tests/`.
|
||||
- [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-cli-demo`](../../../../packages/examples/cli-demo/README.md) owns non-interactive execution, including pipes. `examples/headless-agent` owns the real-model one-shot composition, replay snapshots, generic real-agent suites, and test-only keyless Loader fixtures.
|
||||
- [`dsh run`](../../../../apps/cli/README.md) owns non-interactive execution. Its `headless` profile is the product composition; `examples/headless-agent` owns replay snapshots, generic real-agent suites, and an unexported keyless Loader driver.
|
||||
- [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-acp-demo`](../../../../packages/examples/acp-demo/README.md) and `@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc` own their framed protocol integrations.
|
||||
|
||||
The SDK project model and create/config workflows replace the `stdio` run-interface option with `tui`; generated TUI projects compose `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui` and create or resume one exact session. Repository-facing demo documentation requires a DeepSeek API key and leads with the real Headless or TUI agents.
|
||||
|
||||
Keyless validation is test-owned. The Headless Loader smoke uses a fixture adapter to exercise a real tool round trip, the CLI built-bin suite pins output, persistence, failure, and signal semantics, and package-specific Loader tests keep deterministic adapters beside their scenarios. None is exposed as a runnable mock agent.
|
||||
Keyless validation is test-owned. The Headless Loader smoke uses a fixture adapter to exercise a real tool round trip, the `dsh` built-bin suite pins the published one-shot entry and output, the product Headless snapshot pins persistence, and the Headless PTY shutdown e2e pins signal escalation. Package-specific Loader tests keep deterministic adapters beside their scenarios. None is exposed as a runnable mock agent.
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification
|
||||
|
||||
TUI and Headless Loader coverage run the real app packages in source and built modes. PTY-driven subprocess coverage is reserved for the TUI lifecycle; other entry-point smokes use the one-shot pipe protocol. Headless proves its task/result and tool-call contracts. Generated graphs and repository searches reject stale package, command, leaf, SDK-interface, `createStdioChat`, and `StdioRuntime` references.
|
||||
|
||||
The built `dsh` bin rejects a piped TUI launch before Loader boot and points at its one-shot `-p` mode; `apps/cli/tests/built-bin.e2e.ts` pins that path, while `cli-demo`'s built-bin suite runs text, JSON, and structurally parsed `stream-json` output under plain Node, persists fresh sessions, and rejects invalid arguments and missing config without contaminating stdout. Code Mode has programmatic TUI snapshots and an ACP overlay demo. Time-context integration uses the real Headless composition for two ordered turns, while its package tests own finer elapsed-time behavior.
|
||||
The built `dsh` bin rejects a piped TUI launch before Loader boot and points at `dsh run`; `apps/cli/tests/built-bin.e2e.ts` pins the product one-shot entry under plain Node, including output and invalid arguments. `examples/headless-agent/tests/headless.snapshot.ts` pins product persistence, while `apps/cli/tests/headless-shutdown.e2e.ts` owns bounded signal escalation. The headless example's test-only JSONL driver preserves assembled canonical-event snapshots without creating a second CLI contract. Code Mode has programmatic TUI snapshots and an ACP overlay demo. Time-context integration uses the explicit Headless test composition for two ordered turns, while its package tests own finer elapsed-time behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -19,23 +19,23 @@ DeepSeek Harness 在 TUI 和 Headless coding agent 之外，还提供了两个
|
||||
保留的应用角色均有明确归属：
|
||||
|
||||
- `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui` 负责终端交互式执行。它会在 Loader 启动前拒绝非 TTY 流；`apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml` 与 `tui.cordis.yml` overlay 拥有完整 coding 组装，PTY 与终端快照覆盖则位于 `apps/cli/tests/`。
|
||||
- [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-cli-demo`](../../../../packages/examples/cli-demo/README.md) 负责非交互式执行，包括管道方式。`examples/headless-agent` 拥有真实模型的单次任务组装、回放快照、通用真实 agent 测试套件，以及仅供测试使用的无密钥 Loader fixture。
|
||||
- [`dsh run`](../../../../apps/cli/README.md) 负责非交互式执行。其 `headless` profile 是产品组装；`examples/headless-agent` 负责回放快照、通用真实 agent 测试套件和未导出的无密钥 Loader driver。
|
||||
- [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-acp-demo`](../../../../packages/examples/acp-demo/README.md) 和 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc` 负责各自的分帧协议集成。
|
||||
|
||||
SDK 工程模型与 create/config 工作流将 `stdio` 运行接口选项替换为 `tui`；生成的 TUI 工程组合 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui`，并创建或恢复一个确切会话。仓库中的演示文档要求 DeepSeek API key，并优先引导到真实的 Headless 或 TUI agent。
|
||||
|
||||
无密钥验证由测试负责。Headless Loader 冒烟测试使用 fixture 适配器验证真实工具往返；CLI built-bin 测试套件固定输出、持久化、失败和信号语义；各包专属的 Loader 测试则将确定性适配器放在对应场景旁。其中任何一项都不会作为可运行的 mock agent 对外暴露。
|
||||
无密钥验证由测试负责。Headless Loader 冒烟测试使用 fixture 适配器验证真实工具往返；`dsh` built-bin 测试套件固定已发布的一次性入口和输出；产品 Headless 快照固定持久化；Headless PTY 关闭 e2e 固定信号升级。各包专属的 Loader 测试则将确定性适配器放在对应场景旁。其中任何一项都不会作为可运行的 mock agent 对外暴露。
|
||||
|
||||
## 验证
|
||||
|
||||
TUI 与 Headless 的 Loader 覆盖以源码和构建产物两种模式运行真实 app 包。由 PTY 驱动的子进程覆盖仅用于 TUI 生命周期；其他入口冒烟测试使用单次管道协议。Headless 验证任务/结果契约和工具调用契约。生成图谱与仓库搜索会拒绝陈旧的包、命令、叶节点、SDK 接口、`createStdioChat` 和 `StdioRuntime` 引用。
|
||||
TUI 与 Headless 的 Loader 覆盖以源码和构建产物两种模式运行真实 app 包。由 PTY 驱动的子进程覆盖仅用于 TUI 生命周期；其他入口冒烟测试使用单次管道协议。Headless 验证任务/结果约定和工具调用约定。生成图谱与仓库搜索会拒绝陈旧的包、命令、叶节点、SDK 接口、`createStdioChat` 和 `StdioRuntime` 引用。
|
||||
|
||||
构建后的 `dsh` 可执行文件会在 Loader 启动前拒绝通过管道启动 TUI，并指向其单次 `-p` 模式；`apps/cli/tests/built-bin.e2e.ts` 固定了该执行路径，而 `cli-demo` 的 built-bin 套件在普通 Node 下运行文本、JSON 和经过结构化解析的 `stream-json` 输出，持久化新建会话，并在不污染 stdout 的情况下拒绝无效参数和缺失配置。Code Mode 由程序化 TUI 快照与 ACP overlay demo 覆盖。时间上下文集成通过真实 Headless 组装执行两个有序轮次，而更细粒度的耗时行为由时间上下文的包级测试负责。
|
||||
构建后的 `dsh` 可执行文件会在 Loader 启动前拒绝通过管道启动 TUI，并指向 `dsh run`；`apps/cli/tests/built-bin.e2e.ts` 在普通 Node 下固定产品的一次性入口，包括输出和无效参数。`examples/headless-agent/tests/headless.snapshot.ts` 固定产品持久化，`apps/cli/tests/headless-shutdown.e2e.ts` 则负责有界信号升级。headless 示例仅供测试的 JSONL driver 保留组装后的规范事件快照，而不会创建第二套 CLI（命令行界面）约定。Code Mode 由程序化 TUI 快照与 ACP overlay demo 覆盖。时间上下文集成通过显式的 Headless 测试组装执行两个有序轮次，而更细粒度的耗时行为由时间上下文的包级测试负责。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
- **仅为 pipe 保留面向行 agent**：不予采纳，因为 Headless 已提供有界任务契约、格式纯净的 stdout、持久完成边界和进程退出状态。
|
||||
- **将 readline helper 作为包保留、折叠或提升**：不予采纳，因为它只有一个 app 消费方，并不存在可独立替换的契约。将它折叠进 stdio app 虽然移除了没有正当理由的支撑包边界，却仍保留了重复产品；将来要重新引入这个包，独立的面向行 UI 必须先有真正的第二个消费方。
|
||||
- **仅为 pipe 保留面向行 agent**：不予采纳，因为 Headless 已提供有界任务约定、格式纯净的 stdout、持久完成边界和进程退出状态。
|
||||
- **将 readline helper 作为包保留、折叠或提升**：不予采纳，因为它只有一个 app 消费方，并不存在可独立替换的约定。将它折叠进 stdio app 虽然移除了没有正当理由的支撑包边界，却仍保留了重复产品；将来要重新引入这个包，独立的面向行 UI 必须先有真正的第二个消费方。
|
||||
- **保留 Echo 作为无密钥快速上手路径**：不予采纳，因为首次产品体验应使用真实模型和受支持的 coding agent，而不是带专用工具的脚本化适配器。
|
||||
- **只为 CI 演示命令保留 Echo**：不予采纳，因为由测试持有的 Headless fixture 可以覆盖相同的 Loader 和构建产物边界，无需保留 mock 产品叶节点。
|
||||
- **移除所有 stdio 或 mock 机制**：不予采纳，因为分帧协议、进程 I/O 和确定性测试适配器是独立基础设施，并不是被移除的 agent。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-20-unwrap-injected-content-envelopes.md
|
||||
2026-07-20-unwrap-injected-content-envelopes.md: aff458d76027bf5518497328ee1bd852869793b9
|
||||
2026-07-20-unwrap-injected-content-envelopes.zh.md: 59cbd823da3305185a05c79207fbd7b702a11fba
|
||||
2026-07-20-unwrap-injected-content-envelopes.zh.md: 727ce5e490b6115ad0b3ce383059aabcffd4c7b0
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
- **保留 `<context>` 封套，只对 steering（中途引导）去封套** —— 会为一个没有模型会读的框架位保留 `ContextEnvelope`/`envelope` 机制，并保留主要生产方本就退出的那种不一致。
|
||||
- **仅对插件来源的内容保留 envelope 字段** —— 会按 `source.kind` 把一条投影拆成两条，却没有观察到任何收益；插件引导 agent 时（钩子桥接器的轮次续行原因）同样希望指令被遵从，而不是被贴标签。
|
||||
- **把去封套的逻辑移入适配器** —— 规范投影就是模型可见契约（「模型可见 ⟺ 已记录」）；让各适配器在框架上各行其是，会使派生的 transcript 依赖于适配器。调用方确实想要的框架应放进调用方自己的内容里，而不是适配器。
|
||||
- **把去封套的逻辑移入适配器** —— 规范投影就是模型可见约定（「模型可见 ⟺ 已记录」）；让各适配器在框架上各行其是，会使派生的 transcript 依赖于适配器。调用方确实想要的框架应放进调用方自己的内容里，而不是适配器。
|
||||
|
||||
## 结果
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-22-plan-specific-collaboration-state.md
|
||||
2026-07-22-plan-specific-collaboration-state.md: d139f3d861244c80acfb604d17172461bbf0cd57
|
||||
2026-07-22-plan-specific-collaboration-state.zh.md: a11ed1f270f58fc49a41be0e475889f84fa7cd40
|
||||
2026-07-22-plan-specific-collaboration-state.md: bab39ccc594c35b482c8a24ab805b6c4f2d2472b
|
||||
2026-07-22-plan-specific-collaboration-state.zh.md: 9dc88884b5a63baff4d682ff04b40f6970160c70
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ The tool renders the submitted plan as a generic card titled by its first headin
|
||||
|
||||
**Let one presentation transport own plan state.** Rejected because TUI, Web, resume, fork, prompt assembly, and the exit tool need the same logged fact independently of any one transport. Presentation adapters own only their projections.
|
||||
|
||||
**Split a capability-seam trio or put the state in the agent loop.** Rejected because plan mode has no swappable backend, while existing session, prompt, tool, command, and lifecycle seams already provide every required hook.
|
||||
**Split a capability-seam trio or put the state in the agent loop.** Rejected because plan mode has no swappable backend, while existing session, prompt, tool, command, and lifecycle extension points already provide every required hook.
|
||||
|
||||
**Put flips in surface messages or store plans in files.** Rejected because the stance is a log-only fact and the tool argument already records the reviewable plan. Surface duplication spends model context, while a plan directory creates a second durable home.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ Plan mode 拥有一个 plan 专用产品包：位于 `packages/plan/plan-mode/`
|
||||
|
||||
沙箱模式与审批策略仍是彼此独立的强制约束轴。Plan mode 既不读取也不写入二者；此次简化也没有为这些概念引入共享基类型、注册表或预设抽象。
|
||||
|
||||
### 边界与模型契约
|
||||
### 边界与模型约定
|
||||
|
||||
`plan/mode` 仅记录到日志且不进入表层，因此恢复、fork 和压缩都能恢复该状态，无需实时镜像。spawn 出的 agent 初始处于未激活状态，因为创建时没有 plan 选项。待生效的用户选择会在初始或续步 pre-step、或请求恢复重试时，于受影响的请求组装前写入日志；持久追加失败会让意图保持待定，留到后续边界处理。
|
||||
`plan/mode` 仅记录到日志且不进入表层，因此恢复、fork 和压缩（compaction）都能恢复该状态，无需实时镜像。spawn 出的 agent（智能体）初始处于未激活状态，因为创建时没有 plan 选项。待生效的用户选择会在初始或续步 pre-step 时，或在请求恢复重试时，于受影响的请求组装前写入日志；持久追加失败会让意图保持待定，留到后续边界处理。
|
||||
|
||||
激活状态在提示词顺序 50 处贡献部署提供的区段。未激活状态不贡献区段，但 `exit_plan_mode` 在两种状态下都保持注册，因此状态转换会改变已记录的请求头，却不改变原生工具 schema 或 Code Mode SDK。用户发起的转换只会在上一条请求头描述相反状态时追加一条来源为插件的通知；第一次请求前的选择或最终状态未变化的选择不会追加通知，经批准的工具退出则依赖其工具结果，不再追加第二条通知。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -49,13 +49,13 @@ Plan mode 拥有一个 plan 专用产品包：位于 `packages/plan/plan-mode/`
|
||||
|
||||
**让一种呈现传输拥有 plan 状态。** 不予采纳，因为 TUI、Web、恢复、fork、提示词组装和退出工具都需要独立于任何单一传输使用同一项已记录事实。呈现适配器只拥有各自的投影。
|
||||
|
||||
**拆成能力 seam 三包，或把状态放进 agent loop。** 不予采纳，因为 plan mode 没有可替换后端，而现有的会话、提示词、工具、命令和生命周期 seam 已经提供所需的全部钩子。
|
||||
**拆成能力 seam 三包，或把状态放进 agent loop。** 不予采纳，因为 plan mode 没有可替换后端，而现有的会话、提示词、工具、命令和生命周期扩展点已经提供所需的全部钩子。
|
||||
|
||||
**将状态切换写入表层消息，或把计划存入文件。** 不予采纳，因为协作状态是仅日志事实，工具参数已经记录了可评审的计划。重复写入表层会消耗模型上下文，而计划目录会形成第二个持久归属。
|
||||
|
||||
**按 plan 专用名称允许列表或全局策略栈筛选工具。** 不予采纳，因为可变性是每个工具自身的属性，包括未来工具和 MCP 工具，而不应由每个 plan 部署维护一份列表。只有出现具体消费方后，effects 元数据才能建立共享策略；在此之前，plan mode 是引导机制，不是安全边界。
|
||||
|
||||
**通过审批 seam 或普通文本完成评审。** 不予采纳，因为计划评审不是权限决策，需要原样的计划产物和纠正性自由文本，而且必须以已记录的工具调用作为结构化转换。用户交互 seam 提供了这项契约。
|
||||
**通过审批 seam 或普通文本完成评审。** 不予采纳，因为计划评审不是权限决策，需要原样的计划产物和纠正性自由文本，而且必须以已记录的工具调用作为结构化转换。用户交互 seam 提供了这项约定。
|
||||
|
||||
## 验证
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md
|
||||
2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md: 0fe2fc27a963d21e8a24c1682359ab3bc9e7af48
|
||||
2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.zh.md: bd21696c40811adeb8b8883ef57c30f9321f4ea4
|
||||
2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md: 56c433acf59d3a0c4b5c8b6605e422d3c4efede2
|
||||
2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.zh.md: bf326ce9f6fea8c55b842bc61e3d8521032ea4d1
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Protocol and lifecycle tests pin stop-reason and prompt codecs, version negotiat
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep ACP as an editor UI until Web reaches parity.** Rejected because it leaves two interactive contracts to evolve and keeps editor conventions in the automation boundary.
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep the earlier editor bridge behind disciplined seams.** Rejected even though that bridge correctly used interface services, tool-owned render intents, approval and user-interaction answerers, harness-owned execution, and a stdout-pure composition. Its terminal cards were capability-gated, display-only Zed `_meta` projections with a text fallback rather than ACP `terminal/create`, so shell execution never left the harness. The projection derived each display terminal id from the stable per-call id to prevent collisions and recovered exit code or signal from the rendered status markers because the pure result presenter received content blocks rather than a structured exit; marker round-trip tests and an explicit no-capability `console` fallback test pinned both contracts. Those boundaries were coherent but could not make editor cards, session navigation, configuration pickers, and human elicitation belong in an automation protocol.
|
||||
**Keep the earlier editor bridge behind disciplined service boundaries.** Rejected even though that bridge correctly used interface services, tool-owned render intents, approval and user-interaction answerers, harness-owned execution, and a stdout-pure composition. Its terminal cards were capability-gated, display-only Zed `_meta` projections with a text fallback rather than ACP `terminal/create`, so shell execution never left the harness. The projection derived each display terminal id from the stable per-call id to prevent collisions and recovered exit code or signal from the rendered status markers because the pure result presenter received content blocks rather than a structured exit; marker round-trip tests and an explicit no-capability `console` fallback test pinned both contracts. Those boundaries were coherent but could not make editor cards, session navigation, configuration pickers, and human elicitation belong in an automation protocol.
|
||||
|
||||
**Replace ACP with a private subagent RPC.** Rejected because ACP already supplies a typed, interoperable process protocol and is used by the out-of-process subagent backend.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ Protocol and lifecycle tests pin stop-reason and prompt codecs, version negotiat
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
ACP has a narrow contract suitable for agents and automation, while TUI and Web own human interaction and presentation. The package has fewer injected services, dependencies, protocol branches, and lifecycle states, and it no longer claims compatibility as a general editor front door.
|
||||
ACP has a narrow contract suitable for agents and automation, while TUI and Web own human interaction and presentation. The package has fewer injected services, dependencies, protocol branches, and lifecycle states, and it no longer claims compatibility as a general editor entry point.
|
||||
|
||||
Automation clients receive complete committed text rather than token deltas or structured tool UI. They inspect durable logs or another API when they need reasoning, tool traces, titles, or richer state. Fresh-session-only operation also means callers that need durable browsing or resume use a host API rather than ACP.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -34,9 +34,9 @@ ACP 快照套件仍会启动组装后的 ACP 示例，并保留用于锁定后
|
||||
|
||||
## 考虑过的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
**在 Web 达到同等能力前，继续将 ACP 作为编辑器 UI。** 不予采用，因为这会留下两套需要演进的交互契约，并使编辑器约定继续存在于自动化边界中。
|
||||
**在 Web 达到同等能力前，继续将 ACP 作为编辑器 UI。** 不予采用，因为这会留下两套需要演进的交互约定，并使编辑器约定继续存在于自动化边界中。
|
||||
|
||||
**通过严格的 seam 保留早期编辑器桥接层。** 不予采用，尽管该桥接层正确使用了接口服务、工具自有的 render intent、审批与用户交互应答者、harness 自有执行，以及保持 stdout 纯净的组装。其终端卡片是经过能力门控、仅用于展示的 Zed `_meta` 投影，并提供文本回退，而非使用 ACP `terminal/create`，因此 shell 执行从未离开 harness。该投影从稳定的逐调用 id 派生每个展示用终端 id，以避免冲突；由于纯结果展示器接收的是内容块，而不是结构化退出信息，它会从渲染后的状态标记中恢复退出码或信号。标记往返测试和显式的无能力 `console` 回退测试锁定了这两项契约。这些边界保持一致，却无法让编辑器卡片、会话导航、配置选择器和面向人类的询问成为自动化协议应有的职责。
|
||||
**通过严格的服务边界保留早期编辑器桥接层。** 不予采用，尽管该桥接层正确使用了接口服务、工具自有的 render intent、审批与用户交互应答者、harness 自有执行，以及保持 stdout 纯净的组装。其终端卡片是经过能力门控、仅用于展示的 Zed `_meta` 投影，并提供文本回退，而非使用 ACP `terminal/create`，因此 shell 执行从未离开 harness。该投影从稳定的逐调用 id 派生每个展示用终端 id，以避免冲突；由于纯结果展示器接收的是内容块，而不是结构化退出信息，它会从渲染后的状态标记中恢复退出码或信号。标记往返测试和显式的无能力 `console` 回退测试锁定了这两项约定。这些边界保持一致，却无法让编辑器卡片、会话导航、配置选择器和面向人类的询问成为自动化协议应有的职责。
|
||||
|
||||
**用私有 subagent RPC 替换 ACP。** 不予采用，因为 ACP 已经提供类型化、可互操作的进程协议，并由跨进程 subagent 后端使用。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ ACP 快照套件仍会启动组装后的 ACP 示例，并保留用于锁定后
|
||||
|
||||
## 结果
|
||||
|
||||
ACP 具有适合 agent 与自动化的精简契约，而 TUI 和 Web 拥有面向人类的交互与展示。该包注入的服务、依赖、协议分支和生命周期状态更少，也不再将自身定位为通用编辑器入口。
|
||||
ACP 具有适合 agent 与自动化的精简约定，而 TUI 和 Web 拥有面向人类的交互与展示。该包注入的服务、依赖、协议分支和生命周期状态更少，也不再将自身定位为通用编辑器入口。
|
||||
|
||||
自动化客户端收到完整的已提交文本，而不是 token 增量或结构化工具 UI。当它们需要推理、工具跟踪信息、标题或更丰富的状态时，需要查看持久日志或其他 API。只支持全新会话也意味着，需要浏览持久会话或恢复会话的调用方必须使用 host API，而不是 ACP。
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-23-collapse-persistence-flush-state.md
|
||||
2026-07-23-collapse-persistence-flush-state.md: a9b0f6847712f47d46adb6b01c57563033738964
|
||||
2026-07-23-collapse-persistence-flush-state.zh.md: e665d164fb66b2bce97a4f6ded88f2ee07324e61
|
||||
2026-07-23-collapse-persistence-flush-state.md: 2801079e5b322d076eced3a0113e7958d9b4c3b9
|
||||
2026-07-23-collapse-persistence-flush-state.zh.md: 2f7ed68984694ff8555aaef12f732a42d9305805
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4,15 +4,17 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-23-collapse-persistence-flush-state.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
The [bounded write-batching decision](../architecture/2026-08-08-bounded-session-persistence-write-batching.md) supersedes this note's immediate scheduling cadence. The single-controller ownership, failure retention, per-id serialization, retirement, and quiescent-disposal decisions remain current.
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
The persistence coordinator represented one live session's write lifecycle with separate buffer, initialization, and retirement containers plus the per-id operation chain. Those structures mirrored the same fact: whether that exact `Session` still had initialization or events that must settle before its state could be released. The checkpoint-only drain also kept every event volatile until another plugin requested `session/flush`, even though the backend could begin durability work without blocking the synchronous producer.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
Each live `Session` has one controller containing `pending`, `init`, and the optional current `flush` promise. A `session/event` listener copies the frozen event into `pending` and immediately schedules `ensureFlush()`. Calls during an active write reuse the same promise. The drain snapshots one stable pending prefix and removes it only after `appendBatch` commits; events admitted during the write remain after that prefix and schedule one follow-up batch.
|
||||
Each live `Session` has one lifecycle entry containing initialization and one package-private write controller. The controller owns `pending`, the fixed batching timer, the optional active write, automatic-retry pause, and the shared flush barrier. A `session/event` listener copies the frozen event into `pending`; the first event starts a fixed deadline, and later events join without resetting it. A write takes one stable pending prefix; events admitted while it runs remain pending for a separately bounded follow-up batch.
|
||||
|
||||
`session/flush` is an observation barrier. It waits for initialization and repeatedly awaits or starts the controller's flush until neither a current promise nor pending events remain. An eager failure is logged without rejecting the synchronous event producer, retains the complete batch, and is retried by the next explicit flush, retirement attempt, or backend teardown. Explicit flush and teardown still surface the failure if that retry rejects.
|
||||
`session/flush` is an immediate quiescence barrier. It waits for initialization, cancels the batching timer, joins any active attempt, and drains pending events, including events admitted while the barrier runs. A background failure is logged without rejecting the synchronous event producer, restores the complete ordered batch, and pauses automatic retry. A new event starts a fresh fixed window; explicit flush, retirement, or backend teardown retries immediately and surfaces a repeated failure.
|
||||
|
||||
Initialization now enters the existing per-id operation chain once and calls the unserialized core operations while it owns that turn. The chain remains separate from the live controller because detached public `create`/`append`/`load` calls can race without a `Session` object and still require identity-level serialization.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -22,17 +24,17 @@ The live-controller map is also the retirement registry. Successful retirement d
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep checkpoint-only write-behind.** This can form larger batches, but makes durability depend on a separately mounted checkpoint policy and maximizes the crash-loss window between checkpoints. Eager scheduling still coalesces synchronous bursts and events arriving during an active write.
|
||||
**Keep checkpoint-only write-behind.** This can form larger batches, but makes durability depend on a separately mounted checkpoint policy and maximizes the crash-loss window between checkpoints. Bounded background scheduling still coalesces bursts and persists progress between mandatory barriers.
|
||||
|
||||
**Use one coordinator-wide flush promise.** The attachment pattern works for one file, but a global promise would serialize unrelated sessions. One controller per live session preserves independent backend progress while the per-id chain protects same-identity operations.
|
||||
|
||||
**Latch the first eager error permanently.** This makes every later flush deterministic, but prevents the existing teardown retry from recovering a transient storage failure. Retaining the batch without latching the error preserves both observability and retry.
|
||||
**Latch the first background error permanently.** This makes every later flush deterministic, but prevents the existing teardown retry from recovering a transient storage failure. Retaining the batch without latching the error preserves both observability and retry.
|
||||
|
||||
**Reject every live load.** This is safe but removes established balanced live snapshots used by persistence consumers and tests. Snapshot-before-flush gives the call a stable linearization point: successful flush proves exactly that snapshot is durable, while the live path never invokes crash repair.
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification
|
||||
|
||||
- A focused coordinator test gates the first append, admits another event during that write, and observes an automatic second durable batch without calling `session/flush`.
|
||||
- Focused controller tests use a fake clock to prove the non-resetting fixed window, gate the first append, admit another event during that write, and observe an automatic second durable batch without calling `session/flush`.
|
||||
- The shared coordinator contract still covers live adoption, collisions, crash repair, and session/backend disposal over the in-memory, JSONL, and SQLite backends.
|
||||
- Failure and teardown tests keep rejected batches pending, retry them before close, and prove an in-flight controller delays backend close.
|
||||
- The shared backend contract persists an open live turn, proves `load` rejects without writing synthetic closers, completes and retires the owner, then reloads the exact completed turn.
|
||||
@@ -42,6 +44,6 @@ The live-controller map is also the retirement registry. Successful retirement d
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
The coordinator has three long-lived containers: persisted identity state, live-session controllers, and per-id operation chains. Eager writes reduce the ordinary crash-loss window and remove separate buffer, initialization, and retirement registries. They can produce more backend batches than checkpoint-only draining; same-tick bursts and events admitted during one write still coalesce.
|
||||
The live-session entry keeps initialization beside one controller for pending events, its timer, active write, retry pause, and flush barrier. Separate coordinator containers retain persisted identity state, prepared cold Sessions, retiring identity waiters, and per-id operation chains because those lifecycles also exist without one writable live Session. Bounded writes reduce the ordinary crash-loss window and produce fewer backend batches than immediate scheduling, while mandatory barriers remain unchanged.
|
||||
|
||||
`session/flush` no longer chooses when ordinary persistence begins. It remains the ordering and error-observation boundary used by the loop and checkpoint policy, so a successful checkpoint still means every event admitted before its completion is durable.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,47 +1,49 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: 将实时持久化归并到单个刷新控制器
|
||||
# Agent Note: 将实时持久化归并到单个刷写控制器
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-23-collapse-persistence-flush-state.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
[有界写入批处理决策](../architecture/2026-08-08-bounded-session-persistence-write-batching.md)取代了本 Agent Note 中的即时调度节奏。单控制器归属、失败保留、按 id 串行化、退役和完全停稳的资源释放决策仍然有效。
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
持久化协调器使用彼此独立的缓冲区、初始化容器和退役容器，以及按 id 划分的操作链，表示一个活跃会话的写入生命周期。这些结构反映的是同一个事实：该 `Session` 是否仍有初始化操作或事件必须完成，之后才能释放其状态。仅由检查点触发的排空还会让每个事件都停留在易失状态，直至另一个插件请求 `session/flush`，尽管后端可以在不阻塞同步生产方的情况下开始持久化工作。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
每个活跃的 `Session` 都有一个控制器，其中包含 `pending`、`init` 和可选的当前 `flush` promise。`session/event` 监听器将冻结的事件复制到 `pending`，并立即调度 `ensureFlush()`。活跃写入期间的调用复用同一个 promise。排空操作会对待处理事件中一个稳定的前缀生成快照，并且只在 `appendBatch` 提交后移除该前缀；写入期间接纳的事件保留在该前缀之后，并调度一个后续批次。
|
||||
每个活跃的 `Session` 都有一个生命周期条目，其中包含初始化和一个包私有写入控制器。该控制器负责 `pending`、固定批处理计时器、可选的活跃写入、自动重试暂停和共享刷写屏障。`session/event` 监听器将冻结的事件复制到 `pending`；第一个事件设定固定截止时间，后续事件加入但不会重置。一次写入会取出一个稳定的待处理前缀；写入期间接纳的事件仍留在待处理队列中，并形成另一个独立有界的后续批次。
|
||||
|
||||
`session/flush` 是观测屏障。它等待初始化完成，并反复等待或启动控制器的刷新，直至当前 promise 和待处理事件均不存在。即时写入失败会被记录，但不会拒绝同步事件生产方；完整批次会保留下来，由下一次显式刷新、退役尝试或后端资源销毁重试。若该次重试仍失败，显式刷新和资源销毁仍会向调用方暴露失败。
|
||||
`session/flush` 是即时完全停稳屏障。它等待初始化完成、取消批处理计时器、等待任何活跃尝试完成，并排空待处理事件，包括屏障运行期间接纳的事件。后台写入失败会被记录，但不会拒绝同步事件生产方；系统会恢复完整且顺序不变的批次，并暂停自动重试。新事件会开启新的固定窗口；显式刷写、退役或后端资源销毁会立即重试，并在失败再次发生时向调用方暴露失败。
|
||||
|
||||
初始化只进入现有的按 id 操作链一次，并在占有该轮执行权时调用未串行化的核心操作。该操作链与活跃控制器保持分离，因为公共 `create`、`append`、`load` 调用即使没有 `Session` 对象仍可能发生竞态，依然需要按标识串行执行。
|
||||
|
||||
崩溃修复仅适用于冷态标识。对于活跃标识，`load(id)` 会在等待刷新完成前，先对内存中的权威事件生成快照，再将这些事件与 `SessionState.meta`（即持久化写入实际使用的标头）一同返回；若轮次仍打开，则在不读取或修复存储的情况下拒绝该次加载。冷态加载会先在按 id 操作链内同步占用对应标识，再等待读取已存储前缀或执行修复写入；在这项占用解除前，`session/created` 发布边界会拒绝同 id 活跃会话的发布并将其回滚。HMR（热模块替换）接管仍由 `loadStored` 与协调器的 cwd 检查独立处理，会截断撕裂的存储，但不会闭合权威的活跃轮次。
|
||||
崩溃修复仅适用于冷态标识。对于活跃标识，`load(id)` 会在等待刷写完成前，先对内存中的权威事件生成快照，再将这些事件与 `SessionState.meta`（即持久化写入实际使用的标头）一同返回；若轮次仍打开，则在不读取或修复存储的情况下拒绝该次加载。冷态加载会先在按 id 操作链内同步占用对应标识，再等待读取已存储前缀或执行修复写入；在这项占用解除前，`session/created` 发布边界会拒绝同 id 活跃会话的发布并将其回滚。HMR（热模块替换）接管仍由 `loadStored` 与协调器的 cwd 检查独立处理，会截断撕裂的存储，但不会闭合权威的活跃轮次。
|
||||
|
||||
活跃控制器映射同时也是退役注册表。退役成功时，系统排空并移除其控制器；退役失败时，控制器保留在映射中。后端资源销毁会停止接纳事件，刷新所有仍存在的控制器，等待其余按 id 操作完成，然后关闭后端。无需另设退役集合来重新发现未完成的工作。
|
||||
活跃控制器映射同时也是退役注册表。退役成功时，系统排空并移除其控制器；退役失败时，控制器保留在映射中。后端资源销毁会停止接纳事件，刷写所有仍存在的控制器，等待其余按 id 操作完成，然后关闭后端。无需另设退役集合来重新发现未完成的工作。
|
||||
|
||||
## 备选方案
|
||||
|
||||
**保留仅由检查点触发的延后写入。** 这种方式可以形成更大的批次，但会让持久性依赖另行挂载的检查点策略，并使检查点之间因崩溃而丢失数据的窗口达到最大。即时调度仍会合并同步突发事件，以及活跃写入期间到达的事件。
|
||||
**保留仅由检查点触发的延后写入。** 这种方式可以形成更大的批次，但会让持久性依赖另行挂载的检查点策略，并使检查点之间因崩溃而丢失数据的窗口达到最大。有界后台调度仍会合并突发事件，并在强制屏障之间持久化进度。
|
||||
|
||||
**在整个协调器范围内使用一个刷新 promise。** 这种挂接方式适用于单个文件，但全局 promise 会串行化互不相关的会话。每个活跃会话各有一个控制器，既能让不同会话的后端操作独立推进，又由按 id 操作链保护同一标识的操作。
|
||||
**在整个协调器范围内使用一个刷写 promise。** 这种挂接方式适用于单个文件，但全局 promise 会串行化互不相关的会话。每个活跃会话各有一个控制器，既能让不同会话的后端操作独立推进，又由按 id 操作链保护同一标识的操作。
|
||||
|
||||
**永久锁存首次即时写入错误。** 这会让后续每次刷新都得到确定的结果，却会阻止现有的资源销毁重试从暂时性存储故障中恢复。保留批次但不锁存错误，可以同时保留可观测性和重试能力。
|
||||
**永久锁存首次后台写入错误。** 这会让后续每次刷写都得到确定的结果，却会阻止现有的资源销毁重试从暂时性存储故障中恢复。保留批次但不锁存错误，可以同时保留可观测性和重试能力。
|
||||
|
||||
**拒绝对所有活跃会话的加载。** 这样做很安全，但会让持久化消费方和测试无法再使用既有的闭合活跃会话快照。先生成快照再刷新，为调用提供了稳定的线性化点：刷新成功即可证明正是该快照已持久化，而活跃路径绝不调用崩溃修复。
|
||||
**拒绝对所有活跃会话的加载。** 这样做很安全，但会让持久化消费方和测试无法再使用既有的闭合活跃会话快照。先生成快照再刷写，为调用提供了稳定的线性化点：刷写成功即可证明正是该快照已持久化，而活跃路径绝不调用崩溃修复。
|
||||
|
||||
## 验证
|
||||
|
||||
- 一个针对协调器的测试会阻塞第一次追加，在该次写入期间接纳另一个事件，并在不调用 `session/flush` 的情况下观测到自动执行的第二个持久批次。
|
||||
- 共享协调器契约仍覆盖内存、JSONL 和 SQLite 后端上的活跃会话接管、冲突、崩溃修复，以及会话和后端的资源释放。
|
||||
- 针对控制器的测试使用假时钟证明固定窗口不会重置，随后阻塞第一次追加，在该次写入期间接纳另一个事件，并在不调用 `session/flush` 的情况下观测到自动执行的第二个持久批次。
|
||||
- 共享协调器约定仍覆盖内存、JSONL 和 SQLite 后端上的活跃会话接管、冲突、崩溃修复，以及会话和后端的资源释放。
|
||||
- 失败和资源销毁测试会让写入失败的批次保持待处理，在关闭前重试这些批次，并证明尚在执行的控制器会延迟后端关闭。
|
||||
- 共享后端契约会持久化一个仍打开的活跃轮次，证明 `load` 会拒绝且不会写入合成闭合事件，随后完成该轮次并让其所有者退役，最后重新加载完全相同的已完成轮次。
|
||||
- 共享后端约定会持久化一个仍打开的活跃轮次，证明 `load` 会拒绝且不会写入合成闭合事件，随后完成该轮次并让其所有者退役，最后重新加载完全相同的已完成轮次。
|
||||
- AgentLoop 回归测试让 `resume()` 与一个仍打开的活跃轮次发生竞态，并证明原有的 agent（智能体）仍能完成该轮次并将其持久化，其间不会注入 `interrupted` 边界。
|
||||
- 一个受控后端会阻塞 `loadStored`，在修复操作持有标识占用期间尝试发布同 id 会话，并证明回滚不会留下残留控制器，之后可以成功恢复一个闭合会话。
|
||||
- 无所有者认领契约会为活跃 `Session` 设置不同的 `createdAt`，并证明活跃加载和之后的冷态加载均返回最初存储的标头。
|
||||
- 无所有者认领约定会为活跃 `Session` 设置不同的 `createdAt`，并证明活跃加载和之后的冷态加载均返回最初存储的标头。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
协调器有三个长生命周期容器：持久化的标识状态、活跃会话控制器和按 id 操作链。即时写入缩短了通常情况下因崩溃而丢失数据的窗口，并移除了彼此独立的缓冲区、初始化注册表和退役注册表。与仅由检查点触发的排空相比，这种方式可能产生更多后端批次；同一轮事件循环内的突发事件和一次写入期间接纳的事件仍会合并。
|
||||
活跃会话条目把初始化与一个控制器放在一起；该控制器负责待处理事件、计时器、活跃写入、重试暂停和刷写屏障。协调器仍以独立容器保存已持久化的标识状态、准备好的冷态 Session、标识退役等待方和按 id 操作链，因为即使不存在可写的活跃 Session，这些生命周期仍然存在。有界写入缩短了通常情况下因崩溃而丢失数据的窗口，相比即时调度产生更少的后端批次，同时不改变强制屏障。
|
||||
|
||||
`session/flush` 不再决定普通持久化何时开始。它仍是循环和检查点策略使用的顺序与错误观测边界，因此检查点成功仍表示在其完成前接纳的每个事件都已持久化。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-24-agent-loop-observable-state-machine.md
|
||||
2026-07-24-agent-loop-observable-state-machine.md: b1773fdf7fd3bcbea9c6b9a4a0ce37c715bce4ca
|
||||
2026-07-24-agent-loop-observable-state-machine.zh.md: a4ed98117b965b445ec0888c55a1b1b27887532a
|
||||
2026-07-24-agent-loop-observable-state-machine.md: 2c9cdd3ac090d2236e8922e06c94b5504570fead
|
||||
2026-07-24-agent-loop-observable-state-machine.zh.md: 0659fb3414de49d3ee12dc913fa62698bb2e6a79
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ The event taxonomy removes the legacy prompt preparation/submission and serial s
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep the fine-grained event sequence.** This preserves a dedicated interception point for every internal phase, including request-only prefixes, assistant-message rewriting, post-step work, in-turn request recovery, and terminal stop overrides. It also makes the loop's private sequencing a permanent public contract and lets overlapping seams express conflicting decisions. The decision accepts the lost interception points in exchange for one boundary per supported extension responsibility.
|
||||
**Keep the fine-grained event sequence.** This preserves a dedicated interception point for every internal phase, including request-only prefixes, assistant-message rewriting, post-step work, in-turn request recovery, and terminal stop overrides. It also makes the loop's private sequencing a permanent public contract and lets overlapping extension points express conflicting decisions. The decision accepts the lost interception points in exchange for one boundary per supported extension responsibility.
|
||||
|
||||
**Represent disposal as a third `AgentStatus`.** This gives retained handles a terminal status value but duplicates the registry lifecycle already expressed by `agent/disposed`. The decision keeps `AgentStatus` about live activity and makes registration lifetime a separate dimension.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ agent 生命周期、agent 整体活动状态、收件箱条目的进度以及
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
公开契约暴露四个正交的状态维度：
|
||||
公开约定暴露四个正交的状态维度：
|
||||
|
||||
- 注册生命周期是从 `agent/created` 到 `agent/disposed` 的区间。dispose（资源释放）是注册表的终止边界，而不是一种 `AgentStatus`。
|
||||
- agent 整体活动状态为 `AgentStatus = 'idle' | 'running'`。连续多个轮次可以共用同一个 `running` 区间。
|
||||
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ agent 生命周期、agent 整体活动状态、收件箱条目的进度以及
|
||||
|
||||
## 考虑过的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
**保留细粒度事件序列。** 这样可以为每个内部阶段保留专用拦截点，包括仅用于请求的前缀、助手消息改写、步骤后处理、轮次内请求恢复以及终止覆盖。但这也会使循环的私有执行顺序成为永久的公开契约，并允许相互重叠的 seam 表达彼此冲突的决策。当前决策接受这些拦截点的缺失，以换取每项受支持的扩展职责仅对应一个边界。
|
||||
**保留细粒度事件序列。** 这样可以为每个内部阶段保留专用拦截点，包括仅用于请求的前缀、助手消息改写、步骤后处理、轮次内请求恢复以及终止覆盖。但这也会使循环的私有执行顺序成为永久的公开约定，并允许相互重叠的扩展点表达彼此冲突的决策。当前决策接受这些拦截点的缺失，以换取每项受支持的扩展职责仅对应一个边界。
|
||||
|
||||
**将 dispose 表示为第三种 `AgentStatus`。** 这样会让仍被持有的句柄得到一个终止状态值，但也会重复表达 `agent/disposed` 已经体现的注册表生命周期。当前决策让 `AgentStatus` 只表示 agent 存续期间的活动状态，并将注册生命周期作为独立维度。
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Replace the hand-rolled SSE parser in llm-deepseek with eventsource-parser
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-26-eventsource-parser-for-deepseek-sse.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
`packages/llm/llm-deepseek/src/sse.ts` hand-implemented Server-Sent Events parsing: a streaming `TextDecoder`, event-block splitting on `\r?\n\r?\n`, `data:` payload extraction and joining, comment/field skipping, the `[DONE]` sentinel, a `STREAM_CLOSED` error on EOF without it, and a flush of a final unterminated event block. The file was ~67 lines with ~108 lines of dedicated tests (`tests/sse.spec.ts`) re-proving SSE spec behavior — UTF-8 split across chunks, CRLF handling, multi-`data:` joining, no-space-after-colon — that a maintained parser already guarantees. Its only consumer is `adapter.ts` (`yield* translate(parseSse(response.body))`).
|
||||
|
||||
This is exactly the surface `eventsource-parser` owns: the de-facto standard SSE parser (it underlies the Vercel AI SDK and the MCP SDK), zero-dependency, actively maintained, and already present in this repo's lockfile transitively via `@modelcontextprotocol/sdk` — so adopting it directly adds no new supply-chain surface in practice.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
`sse.ts` delegates SSE framing to `EventSourceParserStream` from `eventsource-parser/stream`: `parseSse` pipes the response body through `new TextDecoderStream()` then `new EventSourceParserStream()` and keeps only the DeepSeek protocol shim — yield each event's `data`, terminate on `[DONE]`, and throw `LlmError('STREAM_CLOSED')` when the stream ends without the sentinel. All required builtins (`TextDecoderStream`, `pipeThrough`, async-iterable `ReadableStream`) exist at the Node ^22.19 engine floor. The spec-conformance tests are gone; `tests/sse.spec.ts` pins only the `[DONE]`/`STREAM_CLOSED`/EOF contract. `eventsource-parser` is `llm-deepseek`'s second runtime dependency after schemastery. The [twin-adapters note](../architecture/2026-06-13-twin-llm-adapters.md) and the `dsh-llm` JSDoc that branded this adapter "hand-rolled fetch + SSE parsing" now describe it as direct fetch with library-framed SSE.
|
||||
|
||||
The library also strips a leading BOM (the hand-rolled parser would fail to match `data:` after one) and offers `maxBufferSize` hardening the hand-rolled parser lacked.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
- **Keep the hand-rolled parser.** Defensible under the [twin-adapters decision](../architecture/2026-06-13-twin-llm-adapters.md): the adapter is deliberately the hand-rolled design-verification twin of the pi-ai adapter. But that note's load-bearing distinction is owning the fetch/translate internals versus delegating to a full provider SDK; a ~700-byte SSE micro-parser is transport plumbing, not the design under verification. The twin-adapters note now states that reading explicitly.
|
||||
- **`createParser({onEvent})` callback API instead of the stream.** Works fed by a manual `TextDecoder` loop, but the `pipeThrough` composition deletes more of the hand-rolled code.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
- The remaining shim only encodes the DeepSeek `[DONE]`/`STREAM_CLOSED` protocol; SSE framing edge cases are eventsource-parser's contract and are no longer re-proven here.
|
||||
- One deliberate robustness deviation is dropped: the hand-rolled parser flushed a final event block that lacked its terminating blank line, so a trailing `data: [DONE]` without `\n\n` still yielded DONE. eventsource-parser is spec-strict and only dispatches on the blank line, so that shape is now `STREAM_CLOSED`. Real providers and `dsh-llm-mock-server` always terminate events properly — the flush was a robustness nicety, not an observed provider shape — and `tests/sse.spec.ts` pins the new truncation verdict for that tail.
|
||||
- The documented "hand-rolled" identity of the twin adapter narrows to the fetch/translate internals; the twin-adapters note was updated in the same change rather than leaving the claim stale.
|
||||
@@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: 用 eventsource-parser 替换 llm-deepseek 中手写的 SSE 解析器
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-26-eventsource-parser-for-deepseek-sse.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
`packages/llm/llm-deepseek/src/sse.ts` 曾手写实现 SSE（Server-Sent Events）解析：一个流式 `TextDecoder`、按 `\r?\n\r?\n` 切分事件块、提取并拼接 `data:` 载荷、跳过注释与其他字段、`[DONE]` 哨兵、在未见哨兵即 EOF 时抛出 `STREAM_CLOSED` 错误，以及对最后一个未终结事件块的 flush。该文件约 67 行，另有约 108 行专属测试（`tests/sse.spec.ts`）重复验证 SSE 规范行为——UTF-8 字符被切分到多个分片、CRLF 处理、多条 `data:` 拼接、冒号后无空格——而这些行为，持续维护的解析器早已有保证。它唯一的消费方是 `adapter.ts`（`yield* translate(parseSse(response.body))`）。
|
||||
|
||||
这恰好是 `eventsource-parser` 负责的接口面：事实标准的 SSE 解析器（Vercel AI SDK 和 MCP SDK 都构建在它之上），零依赖，持续维护，并且已通过 `@modelcontextprotocol/sdk` 作为传递依赖出现在本仓库的 lockfile 中——因此直接采用它实际上不增加新的供应链接触面。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
`sse.ts` 将 SSE 分帧委托给 `eventsource-parser/stream` 的 `EventSourceParserStream`：`parseSse` 把响应 body 依次管道接入 `new TextDecoderStream()` 和 `new EventSourceParserStream()`，只保留 DeepSeek 协议垫层——逐个产出事件的 `data`，遇到 `[DONE]` 终止，流在未见哨兵时结束则抛出 `LlmError('STREAM_CLOSED')`。所需的全部内置能力（`TextDecoderStream`、`pipeThrough`、可异步迭代的 `ReadableStream`）在 Node ^22.19 引擎下限即已存在。规范符合性测试已删除；`tests/sse.spec.ts` 只固定 `[DONE]`/`STREAM_CLOSED`/EOF 契约。`eventsource-parser` 是 `llm-deepseek` 继 schemastery 之后的第二个运行时依赖。曾把该适配器标为「手写 fetch + SSE 解析」的[孪生适配器 Agent Note](../architecture/2026-06-13-twin-llm-adapters.md)与 `dsh-llm` JSDoc，现在将其描述为直接 fetch 加库分帧的 SSE。
|
||||
|
||||
该库还会剥离开头的 BOM（手写解析器在 BOM 之后会无法匹配 `data:`），并提供手写解析器缺少的 `maxBufferSize` 加固能力。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
- **保留手写解析器。** 依据[孪生适配器决策](../architecture/2026-06-13-twin-llm-adapters.md)，这一选择有辩护余地：该适配器有意作为 pi-ai 适配器的手写设计验证孪生体。但那份 Agent Note 起支撑作用的区分在于「自行持有 fetch/translate 内部实现」与「委托给完整的提供方 SDK」；一个约 700 字节的 SSE 微型解析器属于传输层管道，不是被验证的设计本身。孪生适配器 Agent Note 现已明确写出这一解读。
|
||||
- **改用 `createParser({onEvent})` 回调 API 而非流。** 配合手动的 `TextDecoder` 循环可以工作，但 `pipeThrough` 组合方式能删除更多手写代码。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
- 剩下的垫层只编码 DeepSeek 的 `[DONE]`/`STREAM_CLOSED` 协议；SSE 分帧边界情形属于 eventsource-parser 的契约，不再在这里重复验证。
|
||||
- 放弃了一处有意为之的健壮性偏离：手写解析器会 flush 缺少终结空行的最后一个事件块，因此末尾的 `data: [DONE]` 即使没有 `\n\n` 也仍产出 DONE。eventsource-parser 严格遵循规范，只在空行处分发事件，所以这种形态现在是 `STREAM_CLOSED`。真实提供方和 `dsh-llm-mock-server` 总是正确终结事件——该 flush 只是健壮性上的锦上添花，并非实际观测到的提供方形态——`tests/sse.spec.ts` 固定了对该尾部的新截断判定。
|
||||
- 孪生适配器有文档记录的「手写」身份收窄到 fetch/translate 内部实现；孪生适配器 Agent Note 在同一次变更中更新，而不是让声明陈旧下去。
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-26-merge-subagent-control-service.md
|
||||
2026-07-26-merge-subagent-control-service.md: ae7214f7c8c28f8a4b7d754839acbc938270f125
|
||||
2026-07-26-merge-subagent-control-service.zh.md: dc05e03c5d38df0317291aee2ffc1395dab8e362
|
||||
2026-07-26-merge-subagent-control-service.md: 2757ba678863a355e0f9c4bb324035ba666796be
|
||||
2026-07-26-merge-subagent-control-service.zh.md: d9fd913fb229f63548d2aae65ed62c98a7bd4de0
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ The public operation set is refined by [Intent-named subagent continuation opera
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
Continuable-child orchestration originally lived in a separate `ctx.subagentControl` service above the raw `ctx.subagents` provider seam. That split kept provider dispatch independent of Tasks and persistence, and gave model and human adapters one orchestration contract. In practice the two services described one capability family, every continuable caller needed both, and the provider-bound delegation tool had to infer policy from `provider.resume` and inspect whether the control service and `send_message` tool happened to be loaded. This made sibling plugin presence decide execution semantics and coupled starting continuable work to an optional follow-up surface.
|
||||
Continuable-child orchestration originally lived in a separate `ctx.subagentControl` service above the raw `ctx.subagents` provider contract. That split kept provider dispatch independent of Tasks and persistence, and gave model and human adapters one orchestration contract. In practice the two services described one capability family, every continuable caller needed both, and the provider-bound delegation tool had to infer policy from `provider.resume` and inspect whether the control service and `send_message` tool happened to be loaded. This made sibling plugin presence decide execution semantics and coupled starting continuable work to an optional follow-up surface.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
可继续 child 的编排最初位于原始 `ctx.subagents` 提供方 seam 之上的独立 `ctx.subagentControl` 服务中。该拆分使提供方分发与 Task 和持久化无关，并为模型与人工适配器提供统一的编排契约。实践中，两个服务属于同一组功能，每个可继续调用方都需要二者，而绑定提供方的委派工具必须根据 `provider.resume` 推断策略，并检查控制服务与 `send_message` 工具是否碰巧已加载。如此一来，配套插件是否存在会决定执行语义，并将可继续工作的启动耦合到可选的后续操作接口。
|
||||
可继续 child 的编排最初位于原始 `ctx.subagents` 提供方约定之上的独立 `ctx.subagentControl` 服务中。该拆分使提供方分发与 Task 和持久化无关，并为模型与人工适配器提供统一的编排约定。实践中，两个服务属于同一组功能，每个可继续调用方都需要二者，而绑定提供方的委派工具必须根据 `provider.resume` 推断策略，并检查控制服务与 `send_message` 工具是否碰巧已加载。如此一来，配套插件是否存在会决定执行语义，并将可继续工作的启动耦合到可选的后续操作接口。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
继续执行的实现仍是内部管理器，不会扩展提供方注册表的核心状态。`SubagentService` 通过 `ctx.inject(['tasks', 'agents'], ...)` 创建该管理器，因此注入的 Cordis child fiber 拥有自身的 Task 完成监听器和拆卸 effect。加载提供方注册表不要求 Task 或持久化。只有 Task 和 Agent 可用时，该管理器才会存在；每项继续执行操作都在需要持久性时解析会话持久化服务。dispose（资源释放）该 fiber 会先取消并结算活跃的继续执行，再释放其关联。
|
||||
|
||||
`startContinuable` 与底层 `start` 保持分离，因为二者的所有权与时序契约不同：前者分配持久化 child id、创建 Task，并同步返回两个 id，而启动过程继续在 Task 内运行；底层 `start` 则等待提供方发布，并移交一个由持有方负责的 run。若通过标志或返回值联合类型将该方法并入 `start`，会扩大底层契约，改动反而多于保留现有的显式入口。
|
||||
`startContinuable` 与底层 `start` 保持分离，因为二者的所有权与时序约定不同：前者分配持久化 child id、创建 Task，并同步返回两个 id，而启动过程继续在 Task 内运行；底层 `start` 则等待提供方发布，并移交一个由持有方负责的 run。若通过标志或返回值联合类型将该方法并入 `start`，会扩大底层约定，改动反而多于保留现有的显式入口。
|
||||
|
||||
每个 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-subagent` 实例都会选择 `backgroundMode: 'one-shot' | 'continuable'`，默认值为 `one-shot`。这项配置表示策略；`provider.resume` 只用于检查所配置的可继续模式是否受提供方支持。因此，可恢复的提供方仍可执行一次性后台工作。`send_message` 工具是独立适配器：加载或省略该工具既不会启用也不会禁用 `startContinuable`。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
**注册继续执行访问入口，或检查后续操作工具。** 注册表可以告诉委派工具继续执行接口是否存在，但启动具备持久性的工作不需要任何后续操作适配器。这样的注册表会把 UI 组合编码进执行策略，并以另一个名称重新建立插件间依赖关系。
|
||||
|
||||
**将底层启动与可继续启动合并为一个方法。** `start` 上的标志会使该方法返回已发布的一次性 run，或立即返回 Task 和 child 标识，从而削弱简单的所有权边界。保留 `startContinuable` 改动更小，也能明确保留两项契约。
|
||||
**将底层启动与可继续启动合并为一个方法。** `start` 上的标志会使该方法返回已发布的一次性 run，或立即返回 Task 和 child 标识，从而削弱简单的所有权边界。保留 `startContinuable` 改动更小，也能明确保留两项约定。
|
||||
|
||||
## 影响
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-26-turndown-for-tool-web-html-markdown.md
|
||||
2026-07-26-turndown-for-tool-web-html-markdown.md: 0e387021e3d3be3011cc0d64d37864b30aec4fdf
|
||||
2026-07-26-turndown-for-tool-web-html-markdown.zh.md: 6c9b9a22dbb556cdf4eef210705e2a7e265447c4
|
||||
@@ -1,37 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Replace tool-web's regex HTML-to-markdown converter with turndown
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-26-turndown-for-tool-web-html-markdown.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh-tool-web`'s `src/html.ts` (~86 lines, ~40 lines of dedicated tests; deleted by this change) converted fetched HTML to markdown with regexes: strip script/style/noscript/comments, convert `<a>`/`<h1-6>`/`<li>`, decode numeric entities plus a 12-entry named-entity table, collapse whitespace. The module's own JSDoc said "A richer converter can replace it without changing the seam or tool schema", and the README's Known Limitations documented it as "a minimal regex converter, not an HTML parser — tables, images, and nested formatting are lost." The [web capability seam note](../architecture/2026-06-24-web-capability-seam.md) assigns HTML→markdown to this package as presentation, so the swap point was exactly here. The converter's output is model-visible on every fetched HTML page; no keyless snapshot exercised `web_fetch`, so no expected outputs pinned it.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
`packages/web/tool-web/src/fetch.ts` owns a module-level [`turndown`](https://github.com/mixmark-io/turndown) instance (`headingStyle: 'atx'`, `codeBlockStyle: 'fenced'`, `bulletListMarker: '-'` — fixed model-facing presentation, not deployment tunables) with `@joplin/turndown-plugin-gfm`'s composite `gfm` plugin for tables/strikethrough and `remove(['script', 'style', 'noscript'])` replacing the old wholesale drops. `formatFetchOutput` limits both the source prefix converted synchronously and the complete rendered output with `fetchMaxOutputChars` (default 200,000), so a custom provider cannot make conversion work unbounded before the output cap applies. The HTML arm then guards conversion twice: a conservative linear lexical pass treats comment contents conservatively, skips raw-text bodies, honors quoted tag text, and passes a body through raw when its stack crosses 512 levels; a try/catch also falls back to raw HTML when turndown rejects markup the guard cannot model. The GFM cell rule is overridden to ignore `colspan`, which Markdown cannot represent, rather than letting an untrusted numeric attribute synthesize arbitrary empty cells. `html.ts` and its conversion tests are deleted; the source/output bounds, fallback, and status-header/truncation-footer formatting are tested in `tests/tool-web.spec.ts`, and the README's Known Limitations trades the regex-converter caveat for the bounded degradation cases. The gfm plugin ships no types; `src/turndown-plugin-gfm.d.ts` declares the one imported export over `@types/turndown` (a devDependency).
|
||||
|
||||
The dependency-weight question the proposal flagged resolves in favor of the swap: `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-web` is in the single-file-executable closure ([single-exe note](../architecture/2026-07-10-single-file-executable-sdk-runtime-distribution.md)), and the exe's asset globs would pack ~7.9 MB of the three packages as published — but ~6 MB of that is `@mixmark-io/domino`'s test corpus (`test/**`), with runtime `lib/` at ~550 KB against a ~174 MB artifact, under 0.5% either way.
|
||||
|
||||
## Snapshot coverage
|
||||
|
||||
The previously-missing keyless `web_fetch` snapshot ships with the change as the acp-agent scenario `web-fetch`: `examples/acp-agent/web.cordis.yml` composes the web seam, the real `dsh-web-fetch-local` provider, `tool-web` with `search: false`, and `web-fetch-fixture-server.mjs` — a loopback HTTP fixture on a fixed port (the fetched URL is part of the recorded transcript) serving deterministic HTML with named entities, a GFM table, and nested formatting. Recording and keyless replay both drive the real HTTP fetch and conversion; the pinned tool result is the turndown output, and the scenario pins the `web` header class (the `web_fetch` schema and guidance).
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
- **`@mozilla/readability` + a DOM.** Solves a different problem (content extraction, not conversion) and drags a heavier DOM dependency; the seam only asks for markdown rendering of whatever the fetch returned.
|
||||
- **Keep the regex converter.** It was an explicit v1 placeholder per its own JSDoc; keeping it meant model-visible quality (tables, images, nested formatting) stayed lost for the cost of maintaining bespoke entity tables.
|
||||
- **The minimal `entities`-only variant.** The proposal's fallback position: replace only the entity-decoding third of `html.ts` with the zero-dependency `entities` package, deleting less but avoiding the dependency-weight question. Not taken because the closure math above made the weight immaterial while the full swap deletes the whole hand-rolled converter and its documented quality gaps.
|
||||
- **`turndown-plugin-gfm` (the original) instead of `@joplin/turndown-plugin-gfm`.** The original is unmaintained (last publish 2018); the Joplin fork is current against turndown 7 and actively released.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
- **Bought**: standards-based model-visible markdown — ordinary tables, images, strikethrough, nested emphasis, fenced code blocks, and the complete named-entity set — plus the deletion of the bespoke converter and its entity tables.
|
||||
- **Paid**: two runtime dependencies (`turndown` → `@mixmark-io/domino`) enter tool-web and therefore the exe closure (~550 KB of runtime code as measured above); overlong input is converted only through a bounded prefix, pathological nesting falls back to raw HTML, and spanning table cells are flattened because GFM has no corresponding syntax.
|
||||
- Model-visible output changed on every fetched HTML page; nothing pinned the old output, and the new snapshot pins the new one.
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing
|
||||
|
||||
- `packages/web/tool-web/tests/tool-web.spec.ts` covers the turndown conversion surface (entities, links, tables, nesting, script/style/noscript removal), ignored table spans, source-prefix and complete-output bounds, fast raw-HTML passthrough for deep or deceptively closed nesting, linear handling of malformed tags, the residual converter-throw fallback, and exact and tiny output budgets; per-file coverage on the package src is 100%.
|
||||
- The `web-fetch` acp-agent snapshot pins the assembled behavior keylessly end to end (real Loader composition, real HTTP fetch, real conversion).
|
||||
@@ -1,37 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: 用 turndown 替换 tool-web 的正则 HTML 转 markdown 转换器
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-26-turndown-for-tool-web-html-markdown.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh-tool-web` 的 `src/html.ts`（约 86 行，另有约 40 行专属测试；已由本变更删除）曾用正则表达式把抓取到的 HTML 转成 markdown：剥离 script、style、noscript 标签与注释，转换 `<a>`/`<h1-6>`/`<li>`，解码数字实体外加一张 12 项的命名实体表，并折叠空白。该模块自身的 JSDoc 写明「A richer converter can replace it without changing the seam or tool schema」，README 的 Known Limitations 章节也把它记载为「a minimal regex converter, not an HTML parser — tables, images, and nested formatting are lost」。[web 能力 seam 决策记录](../architecture/2026-06-24-web-capability-seam.md)把 HTML 转 markdown 作为呈现职责划归本包，因此替换点恰好就在这里。每个抓取到的 HTML 页面上，该转换器的输出都对模型可见；此前没有任何无密钥快照执行到 `web_fetch`，因此没有预期输出固定它的行为。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
`packages/web/tool-web/src/fetch.ts` 持有一个模块级 [`turndown`](https://github.com/mixmark-io/turndown) 实例（`headingStyle: 'atx'`、`codeBlockStyle: 'fenced'`、`bulletListMarker: '-'`——固定的面向模型呈现方式，不是部署可调项），配合 `@joplin/turndown-plugin-gfm` 的组合 `gfm` 插件提供表格／删除线支持，并用 `remove(['script', 'style', 'noscript'])` 替代旧实现的整体剥离。`formatFetchOutput` 通过 `fetchMaxOutputChars`（默认 200,000）同时限制同步转换的源前缀和完整渲染输出，因此自定义提供方无法在输出上限生效前造成无界的转换工作。随后，HTML 分支对转换做双重防护：保守的线性词法扫描会保守处理注释内容，跳过原始文本元素的内容，正确处理标签内的引号文本，并在栈深超过 512 层时将主体作为原始 HTML 直接透传；当 turndown 拒绝守卫无法建模的标记时，try/catch 同样回退为原始 HTML。GFM 单元格规则被覆写为忽略 `colspan`；Markdown 无法表示它，这也避免了不受信任的数值属性凭空合成任意数量的空单元格。`html.ts` 及其转换测试已删除；源／输出上限、回退以及状态头／截断页脚格式化均在 `tests/tool-web.spec.ts` 中有测试覆盖，README 的 Known Limitations 用有界降级情形替换了正则转换器警示。gfm 插件不带类型声明；`src/turndown-plugin-gfm.d.ts` 基于 `@types/turndown`（devDependency）声明了唯一被导入的导出。
|
||||
|
||||
提案标记的依赖体积问题的裁决结果支持替换：`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-web` 在单文件可执行文件闭包内（[single-exe 决策记录](../architecture/2026-07-10-single-file-executable-sdk-runtime-distribution.md)），可执行文件的资产 glob 会把这三个包按发布原样打入约 7.9 MB——但其中约 6 MB 是 `@mixmark-io/domino` 的测试语料（`test/**`），运行时 `lib/` 仅约 550 KB，相对约 174 MB 的产物，两种口径都不到 0.5%。
|
||||
|
||||
## 快照覆盖
|
||||
|
||||
此前缺失的无密钥 `web_fetch` 快照随本变更以 acp-agent 场景 `web-fetch` 落地：`examples/acp-agent/web.cordis.yml` 组合了 web seam、真实的 `dsh-web-fetch-local` 提供方、`search: false` 的 `tool-web`，以及 `web-fetch-fixture-server.mjs`——一个固定端口（抓取的 URL 是录制 transcript（文本记录）的一部分）上的回环 HTTP fixture（测试前置数据），提供包含命名实体、GFM 表格与嵌套格式的确定性 HTML。录制与无密钥回放都驱动真实的 HTTP 抓取与转换；固定住的工具结果就是 turndown 的输出，该场景同时固定 `web` header 类（`web_fetch` 的 schema 与指引）。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
- **`@mozilla/readability` 加一个 DOM。** 它解决的是另一个问题（内容提取，而非格式转换），还会拖入更重的 DOM 依赖；这个 seam 只要求把抓取返回的内容渲染成 markdown。
|
||||
- **保留正则转换器。** 按其自身 JSDoc 的说法，它本来就是明确的 v1 占位实现；保留它意味着模型可见的质量（表格、图片、嵌套格式）继续缺失，代价还是维护一套自制实体表。
|
||||
- **仅引入 `entities` 的最小变体。** 提案中的退守方案：只用零依赖的 `entities` 包替换 `html.ts` 中的实体解码部分，删得更少但完全避开依赖体积问题。未采纳：上述闭包测算表明体积无关紧要，而完整替换能删掉整个手写转换器及其记录在案的质量缺口。
|
||||
- **用原版 `turndown-plugin-gfm` 而非 `@joplin/turndown-plugin-gfm`。** 原版已无人维护（最后发布于 2018 年）；Joplin 分叉与 turndown 7 保持同步并持续发布。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
- **收益**：基于标准的模型可见 markdown——普通表格、图片、删除线、嵌套强调、围栏代码块以及完整的命名实体集——并删除了自制转换器及其实体表。
|
||||
- **代价**：两个运行时依赖（`turndown` → `@mixmark-io/domino`）进入 tool-web 进而进入可执行文件闭包（如上实测约 550 KB 运行时代码）；超长输入只转换有界前缀，病态嵌套回退为原始 HTML，跨列表格单元格会被展平，因为 GFM 没有对应语法。
|
||||
- 每个抓取到的 HTML 页面上模型可见的输出都已变化；旧输出本无任何固定，新快照固定了新输出。
|
||||
|
||||
## 测试
|
||||
|
||||
- `packages/web/tool-web/tests/tool-web.spec.ts` 覆盖 turndown 转换面（实体、链接、表格、嵌套、script/style/noscript 移除）、被忽略的表格跨列、源前缀与完整输出上限、深层或带欺骗性闭合嵌套的快速原始 HTML 透传、畸形标签的线性处理、残余的转换器抛错回退，以及恰好达到上限和极小的输出预算；该包 src 的逐文件覆盖率为 100%。
|
||||
- acp-agent 的 `web-fetch` 快照无密钥地端到端固定组装后的行为（真实 Loader 组合、真实 HTTP 抓取、真实转换）。
|
||||
@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-27-intent-named-subagent-continuation-operations.md
|
||||
2026-07-27-intent-named-subagent-continuation-operations.md: e74d62b7582e92f8e5ce68327a677259c8453d24
|
||||
2026-07-27-intent-named-subagent-continuation-operations.zh.md: dae4dd37fa9950f0b8d1ba6ec5c46b99977a7201
|
||||
2026-07-27-intent-named-subagent-continuation-operations.zh.md: ae7b370441d8e0ee045f4d0fcf851d28d055b295
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
`SubagentService` 分离四种执行意图：`start(name, request)` 返回普通的、由持有方负责的 one-shot run；`startContinuable(spec)` 建立持久化 child，并返回其 id 与已接受的初始 `MessageId`；`followup(parent, childId, content, { source, signal })` 发送后续 parent 内容；`reportFrom(child, content, { delivery, signal })` 将选定的 child 内容发送给其直接 parent。`followup` 与 `Agent.followup()` 一致，而 `SubagentRun.steer()` 仍是范围更窄的能力，仅向已确认仍在运行的 run 提供 steering。面向模型的工具保留稳定的 `send_message` 与 `report` 名称，并将路由委托给对应的意图方法。
|
||||
`SubagentService` 分离四种执行意图：`start(name, request)` 返回普通的、由持有方负责的 one-shot run；`startContinuable(spec)` 建立持久化 child，并返回其 id 与已接受的初始 `MessageId`；`followup(parent, childId, content, { source, signal })` 发送后续 parent 内容；`reportFrom(child, content, { delivery, signal })` 将选定的 child 内容发送给其直接 parent。`followup` 与 `Agent.followup()` 一致，而 `SubagentRun.steer()` 仍是范围更窄的能力，仅向已确认仍在运行的 run 提供 steering（中途引导）。面向模型的工具保留稳定的 `send_message` 与 `report` 名称，并将路由委托给对应的意图方法。
|
||||
|
||||
调用方请求与提供方请求相互分离。`SubagentStartRequest` 包含调用方提供的 one-shot 数据；`ResolvedSubagentStartRequest` 会在调用 `SubagentProvider.start()` 前加入由服务解析的描述符。创建可继续 child 时，管理器将 `ContinuableCreateRequest` 传给可选的 `SubagentProvider.prepareContinuable()`，且只接收分离的创建数据。`SubagentService.resume()` 与提供方恢复分发均不存在：继续执行管理器加载描述符、对 parent 进行鉴权，并负责 Agent 实体化、提示词投递、冷恢复与 teardown。
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-28-local-json-tree-renderer.md
|
||||
2026-07-28-local-json-tree-renderer.md: 5e8e6d6968319ada53e65a48e9e03b297dc0141c
|
||||
2026-07-28-local-json-tree-renderer.zh.md: f3a9faa5f9de264d0b7eadac631f7f4afff166b2
|
||||
2026-07-28-local-json-tree-renderer.zh.md: 1d491af9a76f1be1c89859e26c058d9460580095
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -13,19 +13,19 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
`dsh-client-ui-primitives` 中的 `JsonTree` 自行负责递归呈现。
|
||||
|
||||
- 每个渲染行都直接接收自身的值和属性路径。递归时，对象键和数组索引会附加到路径末尾，因此复制操作无需再从 DOM 渲染文本中反向还原应用数据。
|
||||
- 可展开行在本地渲染紧凑预览，仅在展开时挂载子行。`expandTopLevel` 可选择固定展开的括号框架或可折叠根节点，而不改变组件的公开契约。
|
||||
- 可展开行在本地渲染紧凑预览，仅在展开时挂载子行。`expandTopLevel` 可选择固定展开的括号框架或可折叠根节点，而不改变组件的公开约定。
|
||||
- 树中所有可见节点仅保留一个可通过 Tab 键聚焦的展开控件。使用指针激活控件后，该控件会成为 Tab 键焦点位置；上、下方向键循环移动焦点，左、右方向键折叠或展开当前焦点所在节点。
|
||||
- `react-json-view-lite` 不在 `dsh-client-ui-primitives` 的依赖项中，也没有 pnpm 补丁。针对性组件测试锁定预览、展开、键盘焦点和数组复制路径。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
**保留发布文件补丁。** 不予采纳：应用专用的渲染逻辑和数组标识契约仍会隐藏在生成的第三方文件中；每次更新依赖，都必须评审一个没有配套源码映射的 fork。
|
||||
**保留发布文件补丁。** 不予采纳：应用专用的渲染逻辑和数组标识约定仍会隐藏在生成的第三方文件中；每次更新依赖，都必须评审一个没有配套源码映射的 fork。
|
||||
|
||||
**直接使用不提供预览的上游渲染器。** 不予采纳：`{…}` 和 `[…]` 会丢失轨迹检查器扫读时所需的紧凑载荷上下文。
|
||||
|
||||
**渲染后注入预览和行元数据。** 不予采纳：Effect 或 MutationObserver 仍会依赖同一套私有 DOM 结构，同时使 React 和命令式变更机制分别负责同一行的不同部分。
|
||||
|
||||
**采用更大型的 JSON 查看器。** 不予采纳：编辑、搜索与主题系统不在当前只读契约范围内；扩大依赖范围也无法去除检查器专用的复制和布局代码。
|
||||
**采用更大型的 JSON 查看器。** 不予采纳：编辑、搜索与主题系统不在当前只读约定范围内；扩大依赖范围也无法去除检查器专用的复制和布局代码。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-28-remove-synthetic-log-only-turns.md
|
||||
2026-07-28-remove-synthetic-log-only-turns.md: 720aa6bbe246ea960a61f6d6f67d36d1f85af08a
|
||||
2026-07-28-remove-synthetic-log-only-turns.zh.md: 587165a58ae322192b9ed1a9b3312f61e0b21ce6
|
||||
2026-07-28-remove-synthetic-log-only-turns.md: cb4925fb7897d95898b3f620c5034b3082a72a0d
|
||||
2026-07-28-remove-synthetic-log-only-turns.zh.md: 1fb572449e0a78697a9c32a0e42bb5ae7499f97c
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ The session store exposed `appendOutOfBand()` so a plugin could publish a late l
|
||||
|
||||
That rule was introduced when persistence recovery treated the last `turn/end` as the only committed boundary. The persistence scanners now preserve every valid contiguous event, and crash repair reacts only to an actually open turn. Retaining synthetic turns for title updates therefore inflated turn counts, produced execution outcomes for work that never ran the model, and let a late metadata write consume the next turn number.
|
||||
|
||||
The generic seam also duplicated domain policy. Its marker map said which plugin events were eligible, while the title capability already owned cancellation, liveness, and stale-result rules. Replacing it with another generic or title-specific append wrapper would preserve the same type indirection for two literal event types.
|
||||
The generic helper also duplicated domain policy. Its marker map said which plugin events were eligible, while the title capability already owned cancellation, liveness, and stale-result rules. Replacing it with another generic or title-specific append wrapper would preserve the same type indirection for two literal event types.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ The generic seam also duplicated domain policy. Its marker map said which plugin
|
||||
|
||||
Core session invariants continue to enforce core-owned execution relations: turn and step numbering, enclosure of steering, assistant, tool, todo, and request-header events, and same-step tool call/result pairing. Core permits merge-extensible events between turns because only their declaring plugin knows whether they are execution-scoped or standalone. Plugin invariant companions remain responsible for their own event relations.
|
||||
|
||||
The title service appends `session/title` directly after its existing service, revision, cancellation, and live-session checks. The bundled model helper appends its literal `session/title-llm-request` record before dispatch. Persistence observes both through the eager `session/event` path and drains them at ordinary checkpoints and lifecycle teardown; neither append forces a flush merely because it is between turns. A fallback, auxiliary request record, or accepted provider title may therefore appear after `turn/end` and before the next `turn/start`. Manual compaction uses the same between-turn capability for a `compact/* { turn: null }` bracket, but explicitly flushes the closed attempt because `/compact` promises durability before releasing queued prompt admission.
|
||||
The title service appends `session/title` directly after its existing service, revision, cancellation, and live-session checks. The bundled model helper appends its literal `session/title-llm-request` record before dispatch. Persistence admits both through the bounded `session/event` path and drains them at ordinary checkpoints and lifecycle teardown; neither append forces a flush merely because it is between turns. A fallback, auxiliary request record, or accepted provider title may therefore appear after `turn/end` and before the next `turn/start`. Manual compaction uses the same between-turn capability for a `compact/* { turn: null }` bracket, but explicitly flushes the closed attempt because `/compact` promises durability before releasing queued prompt admission.
|
||||
|
||||
A session fork may end at any stable event position outside an open turn, not only at `turn/end`. This preserves standalone title and other plugin-owned log-only records in a default fork while still rejecting a prefix cut through active execution.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -40,4 +40,4 @@ Core invariant tests accept an unknown plugin event between turns while continui
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
Turn counts and outcomes again describe model-loop executions only. Standalone events and manual compaction brackets consume session seqs without consuming a turn number, start eager persistence like every other append, and require owners to request an explicit durability barrier only when their operation promises one. Generic plugin mistakes no longer fail under a core default enclosure rule, so each plugin that needs an execution relation must state and test that relation itself. The title capability keeps revision ordering and lifecycle persistence with less core state, and manual compaction gains durable control with no synthetic-turn or turn-number collision.
|
||||
Turn counts and outcomes again describe model-loop executions only. Standalone events and manual compaction brackets consume session seqs without consuming a turn number, enter bounded persistence like every other append, and require owners to request an explicit durability barrier only when their operation promises one. Generic plugin mistakes no longer fail under a core default enclosure rule, so each plugin that needs an execution relation must state and test that relation itself. The title capability keeps revision ordering and lifecycle persistence with less core state, and manual compaction gains durable control with no synthetic-turn or turn-number collision.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -10,15 +10,15 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
引入该规则时，持久化恢复曾将最后一个 `turn/end` 视为唯一的已提交边界。如今，持久化扫描器会保留每个合法且连续的事件，崩溃修复也只处理确实处于开放状态的轮次。因此，为标题更新保留合成轮次会夸大轮次计数、为从未运行模型的工作产生执行结果，还会让延迟到达的元数据写入占用下一个轮次编号。
|
||||
|
||||
通用 seam 还重复了领域策略。它的标记映射说明哪些插件事件符合条件，而标题功能本就拥有取消、活跃性和陈旧结果处理规则。改用另一个通用或标题专属追加包装层，仍会为两个字面量事件类型保留同一层类型间接性。
|
||||
通用辅助函数还重复了领域策略。它的标记映射说明哪些插件事件符合条件，而标题功能本就拥有取消、活跃性和陈旧结果处理规则。改用另一个通用或标题专属追加包装层，仍会为两个字面量事件类型保留同一层类型间接性。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
`SessionStore.appendOutOfBand()`、`OutOfBandSessionEventMap` 和 `OutOfBandSessionEventType` 均不再存在。拥有纯日志事件的插件通过 `Session` 追加该事件；当操作承诺持久性时，插件会显式等待 `ctx.sessions.flush(session)`。系统不会仅为获得该检查点而打开轮次。
|
||||
|
||||
核心会话不变量继续强制核心所属的执行关系：轮次与步骤编号、steering、助手、工具、待办和请求头事件的封闭，以及同一步骤内的工具调用／结果配对。核心允许可合并扩展事件位于轮次之间，因为只有声明它们的插件知道这些事件受执行作用域约束，还是可以独立存在。插件的不变量配套组件仍负责其自身的事件关系。
|
||||
核心会话不变量继续强制核心所属的执行关系：轮次与步骤编号、steering（中途引导）、助手、工具、待办和请求头事件的封闭，以及同一步骤内的工具调用／结果配对。核心允许可合并扩展事件位于轮次之间，因为只有声明它们的插件知道这些事件受执行作用域约束，还是可以独立存在。插件的不变量配套组件仍负责其自身的事件关系。
|
||||
|
||||
标题服务会在完成既有的服务状态、修订、取消和实时会话检查后，直接追加 `session/title`。随附模型辅助函数会在发起调用前追加其字面量 `session/title-llm-request` 记录。持久化通过尽快处理的 `session/event` 路径观察两者，并在常规检查点与生命周期 teardown 时排空；二者都不会仅因为位于轮次之间就强制 flush。因此，回退标题、辅助请求记录或已接受的提供方标题可以出现在 `turn/end` 之后、下一个 `turn/start` 之前。手动压缩（compaction）利用同一项轮次间能力记录 `compact/* { turn: null }` 标记对，但会显式 flush 已闭合的尝试，因为 `/compact` 承诺在释放排队提示词接纳预留前完成持久化。
|
||||
标题服务会在完成既有的服务状态、修订、取消和活跃会话检查后，直接追加 `session/title`。随附模型辅助函数会在发起调用前追加其字面量 `session/title-llm-request` 记录。持久化通过有界 `session/event` 路径接纳两者，并在常规检查点与生命周期 teardown 时排空；二者都不会仅因为位于轮次之间就强制 flush。因此，回退标题、辅助请求记录或已接受的提供方标题可以出现在 `turn/end` 之后、下一个 `turn/start` 之前。手动压缩（compaction）利用同一项轮次间能力记录 `compact/* { turn: null }` 标记对，但会显式 flush 已闭合的尝试，因为 `/compact` 承诺在放行排队中的提示词前完成持久化。
|
||||
|
||||
会话 fork 可以结束于开放轮次之外的任意稳定事件位置，而不限于 `turn/end`。这样，默认 fork 会保留独立标题和其他插件所属的纯日志记录，同时仍拒绝在活跃执行过程中截断前缀。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -36,8 +36,8 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 验证
|
||||
|
||||
核心不变量测试会接受轮次之间的未知插件事件，同时继续拒绝位于该处的内置执行事件。钩子、plan-mode、Code Mode 分发和审批的不变量配套组件会在没有开放轮次时拒绝其执行作用域事件；压缩配套组件则另外接受轮次之间平衡的 `turn: null` 手动标记对，并要求数字 owner 匹配一个开放轮次。会话标题服务测试会在并发刷新、会话脱离拒绝和最新修订接受场景下，固定一个直接追加的回退事件。JSONL 和 SQLite 往返测试会通过持久化生命周期排空保留追加在 `turn/end` 之后的标题；fork 测试会保留独立纯日志尾部，同时拒绝位于开放轮次内的边界。一个无密钥、经完整组装的 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）快照会将模型生成的标题延迟到 `turn/end` 之后，并固定一个不含合成轮次的独立提供方标题。生成的 API 和类型等价性目录不含任何已移除符号。
|
||||
核心不变量测试会接受轮次之间的未知插件事件，同时继续拒绝位于该处的内置执行事件。钩子、plan-mode、Code Mode 分发和审批的不变量配套组件会在没有开放轮次时拒绝其执行作用域事件；压缩配套组件则另外接受轮次之间平衡的 `turn: null` 手动标记对，并要求数字 owner 匹配一个开放轮次。会话标题服务测试会在并发刷新、拒绝已脱离会话和接受最新修订的场景下，固定一个直接追加的回退事件。JSONL 和 SQLite 往返测试会通过持久化生命周期排空保留追加在 `turn/end` 之后的标题；fork 测试会保留独立纯日志尾部，同时拒绝位于开放轮次内的边界。一个无密钥、经完整组装的 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）快照会将模型生成的标题延迟到 `turn/end` 之后，并固定一个不含合成轮次的独立提供方标题。生成的 API 和类型等价性目录不含任何已移除符号。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
轮次计数和结果重新只描述模型循环执行。独立事件和手动压缩标记对会占用会话 seq，但不占用轮次编号；它们像其他追加一样启动尽快持久化，并且仅当操作承诺持久性时，才要求事件所有方请求显式持久性屏障。通用插件错误不再因核心默认的封闭规则而失败，因此每个需要执行关系的插件都必须自行声明并测试该关系。标题功能保留修订排序和生命周期持久化，同时减少了核心状态；手动压缩则获得持久控制，不产生合成轮次或轮次编号冲突。
|
||||
轮次计数和结果重新只描述模型循环执行。独立事件和手动压缩标记对会占用会话 seq，但不占用轮次编号；它们像其他追加一样进入有界持久化，并且仅当操作承诺持久性时，才要求事件所有方请求显式持久性屏障。通用插件错误不再因核心默认的封闭规则而失败，因此每个需要执行关系的插件都必须自行声明并测试该关系。标题功能保留修订排序和生命周期持久化，同时减少了核心状态；手动压缩则获得持久控制，不产生合成轮次或轮次编号冲突。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-29-shared-base-config-overlays.md
|
||||
2026-07-29-shared-base-config-overlays.md: 9fae9775e0b37acc99ce2eb5fc630e6f4f52bf1d
|
||||
2026-07-29-shared-base-config-overlays.zh.md: 20cc3e522c369315a1fafc84778fced0260581d0
|
||||
2026-07-29-shared-base-config-overlays.md: b2ca5cc8d3a160dd09550827d5f8148c14048ea4
|
||||
2026-07-29-shared-base-config-overlays.zh.md: adec7c793839e84edb14173d71735d264cf2ec28
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Precedence is list order, last write winning per row: base, then the surface ove
|
||||
|
||||
A patch replaces its target row's whole `config` rather than merging, which shapes the split: a row whose value differs per surface lives in the overlays, never in the base, so no row is patched by three layers at once. Session identity therefore cannot ride a config key at all — it moved to `dsh-agent-loop`'s `CONFIGURED_AGENT_IDENTITIES_KEY`, as the launcher-owned identity record documented.
|
||||
|
||||
`examples/tui-agent`, `examples/cordis-agent`, `examples/code-mode`, and `packages/examples/tui-demo` are deleted. The TUI tests move to `apps/cli/tests/`, the cordis-toolset e2e to `packages/cordis/tool-cordis/tests/`, and the supported Code Mode demo remains the ACP overlay at `examples/acp-agent/code-mode.cordis.yml`.
|
||||
`examples/tui-agent`, `examples/cordis-agent`, `examples/code-mode`, and `packages/examples/tui-demo` are deleted. The TUI tests move to `apps/cli/tests/`, the cordis-toolset e2e to `packages/self-modification/tool-cordis/tests/`, and the supported Code Mode demo remains the ACP overlay at `examples/acp-agent/code-mode.cordis.yml`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -48,6 +48,6 @@ A patch whose `id` matches no row stays a no-op rather than an error. That is de
|
||||
|
||||
Composition is checked by booting each tree through the real Loader and inspecting settled entries, not by reading YAML; both surfaces settle with zero unloaded rows, and Web starts its `httpServer` with sandboxed Bash and filesystem providers. Code Mode remains covered by the ACP overlay and programmatic TUI snapshots rather than a separate shipped TUI application.
|
||||
|
||||
All eight terminal snapshot scenarios replay byte-identically after moving, and the 14-case PTY smoke passes, including two cases that assert a personal overlay reaches an **inserted** row — the behavior the vendored `plugin-include` fix enables ([`vendor/README.md`](../../../../vendor/README.md) local modification 8, covered by `packages/ui/app-boot/tests/config-reload.spec.ts`).
|
||||
All eight terminal snapshot scenarios replay byte-identically after moving, and the 14-case PTY smoke passes, including two cases that assert a personal overlay reaches an **inserted** row — the behavior the vendored `plugin-include` fix enables ([`vendor/README.md`](../../../../vendor/README.md) local modification 8, covered by `packages/boot/app-boot/tests/config-reload.spec.ts`).
|
||||
|
||||
Flattening surfaced three latent defects, each fixed here: the TUI captured the optional `sessionQuery` service once at construction and so could permanently disable `/resume` when it won the mount race; the shipped session-store root silently reverted to a project-local `./.sessions`; and `--config-replace` was dropped by the resume handoff.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh` 交付了两棵完整的配置树，其中 43 个配置项完全相同。`apps/cli/cordis.yml` 以 74 个平铺配置项组合 web surface，而 TUI 启动的是 `examples/tui-agent/cordis.yml`——其中单独一行 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui-demo` 挂载了十二个插件，并把它们的配置重新声明为自己那份二十个键、仅作透传的 `Config`。
|
||||
`dsh` 交付了两棵完整的配置树，其中有 43 个共享配置项。`apps/cli/cordis.yml` 以 74 个平铺配置项组合 web surface，而 TUI 启动的是 `examples/tui-agent/cordis.yml`——其中单独一行 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui-demo` 挂载了十二个插件，并把它们的配置重新声明为自己那份二十个键、仅作透传的 `Config`。
|
||||
|
||||
这两份文件都名不副实。`examples/tui-agent` 并不是示例：`apps/cli/src/tui.ts` 把它硬编码为产品的默认配置；它还拥有 TUI 的 PTY 冒烟测试、八个终端快照场景，以及被 `cordis-agent` 叶节点 import 的 PTY harness。`dsh-tui-demo` 也不是 demo——它就是应用本身，由交付的二进制从 `packages/examples/` 中挂载。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -20,11 +20,11 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
优先级即列表顺序，逐配置项后写者胜：base，然后是 surface overlay，接着是 `--config` overlay 或个人 `~/.dsh/config.yaml`，最后是启动器自身的 flag 与 profile patch。
|
||||
|
||||
`--config <path>` 现在应用一个 overlay 来**取代**个人 overlay，因此 demo 或测试用的树绝不会继承用户的 provider 与 model。`--config-replace <path>` 则把某个文件作为整棵树启动，同时绕过 base、surface overlay 与个人 overlay；这正是旧 `--config` 的行为，所以像 `examples/web-cordis` 这样的树改用了新 flag。两个 flag 都会在 `/resume` 的 execve 交接中保留，否则 resume 会静默更换 agent。
|
||||
`--config <path>` 现在应用一个 overlay 来**取代**个人 overlay，因此 demo 或测试用的树绝不会继承用户的提供方与 model。`--config-replace <path>` 则把某个文件作为整棵树启动，同时绕过 base、surface overlay 与个人 overlay；这正是旧 `--config` 的行为，所以像 `examples/web-cordis` 这样的树改用了新 flag。两个 flag 都会在 `/resume` 的 execve 交接中保留，否则恢复时会静默更换 agent（智能体）。
|
||||
|
||||
patch 会整体替换目标配置项的 `config` 而不合并，这决定了拆分方式：取值因 surface 而异的配置项住在 overlay 中，绝不住在 base 里，从而没有任何配置项会被三层同时 patch。因此会话身份根本不能经由配置键传递——它迁移到了 `dsh-agent-loop` 的 `CONFIGURED_AGENT_IDENTITIES_KEY`，正如启动器持有身份的记录所述。
|
||||
|
||||
`examples/tui-agent`、`examples/cordis-agent`、`examples/code-mode` 与 `packages/examples/tui-demo` 均被删除。TUI 测试迁往 `apps/cli/tests/`，cordis 工具集的 e2e 迁入 `packages/cordis/tool-cordis/tests/`，受支持的 Code Mode demo 则保留为 `examples/acp-agent/code-mode.cordis.yml` 中的 ACP overlay。
|
||||
`examples/tui-agent`、`examples/cordis-agent`、`examples/code-mode` 与 `packages/examples/tui-demo` 均被删除。TUI 测试迁往 `apps/cli/tests/`，cordis 工具集的 e2e 迁入 `packages/self-modification/tool-cordis/tests/`，受支持的 Code Mode demo 则保留为 `examples/acp-agent/code-mode.cordis.yml` 中的 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）overlay。
|
||||
|
||||
## 备选方案
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -38,16 +38,16 @@ patch 会整体替换目标配置项的 `config` 而不合并，这决定了拆
|
||||
|
||||
## 影响
|
||||
|
||||
指名 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui-demo`、或 patch `tui-agent` 配置项的 overlay 与 `--config` 树将不再可解析。overlay 现在要 patch 拥有对应键的那一行：模型路由在 `agent-loop`，人设在 `system-prompt`，呈现设置在 `tui`。
|
||||
指名 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui-demo` 或 patch `tui-agent` 配置项的 overlay 或 `--config` 树将不再可解析。overlay 现在要 patch 拥有对应键的那一行：模型路由在 `agent-loop`，人设在 `system-prompt`，呈现设置在 `tui`。
|
||||
|
||||
若某个 patch 的 `id` 不匹配任何配置项，Loader 仍只告警而不报错。这是有意为之：同一份个人 overlay 会跨 surface 共用，而 `insert` 配置项按设计本就不匹配任何目标，因此仅在 `web` 下存在的配置项不能让 TUI 启动失败。
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh web` 新增 `--config`，作为一份额外 overlay 传入 `AppCLIEntry`。Web 保留沙箱化 Bash 与文件系统提供方，以及审批、权限预设、目录选择和浏览器权限界面；覆盖层会禁用共享的本地提供方，因为补丁可以禁用条目但不能删除条目。TUI 查询索引使用进程唯一的临时数据库，因为 SQLite 后端要求单写入者所有权。该索引是每个进程重新构建的可丢弃派生数据；`/resume` 直接列出底层语料，不依赖索引复用。`AppCLIEntry` 在为自身 patch 合并恢复配置项默认值时会同时读取 base 与其 surface overlay，因为 flag 覆盖必须保留同一配置项上 overlay 的其他字段。
|
||||
`dsh web` 新增 `--config`，作为一份额外 overlay 传入 `AppCLIEntry`。Web 保留沙箱化 Bash 与文件系统提供方，以及审批、权限预设、目录选择和浏览器权限界面；覆盖层会禁用共享的本地提供方，因为补丁可以禁用条目但不能删除条目。TUI 查询索引使用每个进程独有的临时数据库，因为 SQLite 后端要求单写入者所有权。该索引是每个进程重新构建的可丢弃派生数据；`/resume` 直接列出底层语料，不依赖索引复用。`AppCLIEntry` 在为自身 patch 合并恢复配置项默认值时会同时读取 base 与其 surface overlay，因为 flag 覆盖必须保留同一配置项上 overlay 的其他字段。
|
||||
|
||||
## 验证
|
||||
|
||||
组合的正确性通过用真实 Loader 启动每棵树并检查已就绪的条目来核对，而不是靠阅读 YAML：两个界面都能稳定完成且没有未加载项；Web 会以沙箱化 Bash 与文件系统提供方启动 `httpServer`。Code Mode 继续由 ACP overlay 与程序化 TUI 快照覆盖，而不再维护独立交付的 TUI 应用。
|
||||
组合的正确性通过用真实 Loader 启动每棵树并检查已就绪的条目来核对，而不是靠阅读 YAML：两个界面都能完全就绪，且没有未加载项；Web 会以沙箱化 Bash 与文件系统提供方启动 `httpServer`。Code Mode 继续由 ACP overlay 与程序化 TUI 快照覆盖，而不再维护独立交付的 TUI 应用。
|
||||
|
||||
全部八个终端快照场景在迁移后逐字节重放一致，14 个用例的 PTY 冒烟测试全部通过，其中两个用例断言个人 overlay 能触达一个 **insert 进来的**配置项——这正是 vendored `plugin-include` 修复所启用的行为（[`vendor/README.md`](../../../../vendor/README.md) 本地修改第 8 条，由 `packages/ui/app-boot/tests/config-reload.spec.ts` 覆盖）。
|
||||
全部八个终端快照场景在迁移后逐字节重放一致，14 个用例的 PTY 冒烟测试全部通过，其中两个用例断言个人 overlay 能触达一个 **insert 进来的**配置项——这正是 vendored `plugin-include` 修复所启用的行为（[`vendor/README.md`](../../../../vendor/README.md) 本地修改第 8 条，由 `packages/boot/app-boot/tests/config-reload.spec.ts` 覆盖）。
|
||||
|
||||
平铺过程暴露出三处潜伏缺陷，均在此一并修复：TUI 曾在构造时一次性捕获可选的 `sessionQuery` 服务，因此在挂载竞争中胜出时会永久禁用 `/resume`；交付的会话存储根目录曾静默退回项目本地的 `./.sessions`；`--config-replace` 曾在 resume 交接中被丢弃。
|
||||
平铺过程暴露出三处潜伏缺陷，均在此一并修复：TUI 曾在构造时一次性捕获可选的 `sessionQuery` 服务，因此在挂载竞争中胜出时会永久禁用 `/resume`；交付的会话存储根目录曾静默退回项目本地的 `./.sessions`；`--config-replace` 曾在恢复交接中被丢弃。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-30-private-agent-send.md
|
||||
2026-07-30-private-agent-send.md: 43353c309f98eab1bff91b8fbe0c9cfaa2bbc69b
|
||||
2026-07-30-private-agent-send.zh.md: 49f7c999ec60c7305bdca570a4d59039c7c1923b
|
||||
2026-07-30-private-agent-send.zh.md: a475c39fc378bca609f747795e185d25accf4489
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
公开的 `Agent.send()` 方法暴露了实体循环的路由矩阵，但生产调用方只使用语义明确的 `followup()`、`steer()` 和 `inject()` 操作。第四种组合，即 `next-turn` 配合 `wakeup: false`，除测试外没有消费方。将这项潜在能力保留为公开接口，还会迫使其他 `Agent` 实现和测试替身接受实现层的路由策略。
|
||||
公开的 `Agent.send()` 方法暴露了具体循环实现的路由矩阵，但生产调用方只使用语义明确的 `followup()`、`steer()` 和 `inject()` 操作。第四种组合，即 `next-turn` 配合 `wakeup: false`，除测试外没有消费方。将这项潜在能力保留为公开接口，还会迫使其他 `Agent` 实现和测试替身接受实现层的路由策略。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
`Agent` 将 `followup()`、`steer()` 和 `inject()` 作为完整的交付契约公开。`ReactLoopAgent` 保留私有的 `send()` 辅助方法，供这三个方法共用路由机制；`dsh-agent` 不再导出 `SendTarget` 和 `SendOptions`。
|
||||
`Agent` 将 `followup()`、`steer()` 和 `inject()` 作为完整的交付约定公开。`ReactLoopAgent` 保留私有的 `send()` 辅助方法，供这三个方法共用路由机制；`dsh-agent` 不再导出 `SendTarget` 和 `SendOptions`。
|
||||
|
||||
公开接口无法在不唤醒驱动器的情况下让一个轮次入队。`followup()` 始终请求执行，`steer()` 请求最近的步骤，`inject()` 则提供面向模型的上下文而不请求执行。本决策部分取代[统一交付决策](../architecture/2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md)中关于公开接口的内容，同时保留其内部路由与统一的 `user/message` 表示。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -22,6 +22,6 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
插件从三种语义操作中选择，不再自行构造路由选项。其他驱动器和结构型测试替身只需实现更小的契约，Cordis API 目录也不再列出 `send`、`SendTarget` 或 `SendOptions`。
|
||||
插件从三种语义操作中选择，不再自行构造路由选项。其他驱动器和结构型测试替身只需实现更小的约定，Cordis API 目录也不再列出 `send`、`SendTarget` 或 `SendOptions`。
|
||||
|
||||
只有出现明确的消费方并定义显式的生命周期语义后，才能恢复已移除的无唤醒排队能力。`cancel({ keepInbox: true })` 仍会保留已通过受支持交付路径进入待处理状态的工作。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Sidebar resize without a visible pill
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-30-sidebar-resize-without-visible-pill.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
The AppFrame exposed identical floating pills on both column borders. The left pill added unnecessary visual weight beside primary navigation, but the sidebar's resize interaction remains useful.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
AppFrame keeps the sidebar's 8px resize hit strip, `col-resize` cursor, pointer capture, animation-frame throttling, and width updates, but does not generate the sidebar handle's pill pseudo-element. The details boundary retains both its hit strip and floating pill.
|
||||
|
||||
The layout component test continues to pin sidebar dragging and both handles' collapse lifecycle. A keyless browser scenario reads the generated pseudo-elements from the shipped composition and drags the invisible sidebar boundary to prove the interaction remains live.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**Remove the sidebar drag interaction with the pill.** Rejected because the requested change is visual; removing a working geometry control would unnecessarily narrow the interaction.
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep the pill but reduce its emphasis.** A smaller or lower-contrast pill still leaves an unwanted object on the sidebar boundary.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
The sidebar boundary is visually quiet while pointer resizing remains available from the boundary and retains the resize cursor. Unlike the details control, that interaction has no visible pill.
|
||||
@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: 侧边栏缩放不显示胶囊
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-30-sidebar-resize-without-visible-pill.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
AppFrame 在两个栏位边界都显示相同的浮动胶囊。左侧胶囊在主导航旁增加了不必要的视觉负担，但侧边栏的缩放交互仍有用。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
AppFrame 保留侧边栏宽 8px 的缩放命中条带、`col-resize` 光标、指针捕获、动画帧节流和宽度更新，但不再生成侧边栏手柄的胶囊形伪元素。详情栏边界同时保留命中条带和浮动胶囊。
|
||||
|
||||
布局组件测试继续固定侧边栏拖动行为，以及两个手柄随面板折叠时的生命周期。一个无密钥浏览器场景读取实际交付组合所生成的伪元素，并拖动不可见的侧边栏边界，证明该交互仍然有效。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
**随胶囊一并移除侧边栏拖动交互。** 不予采纳，因为本次要求只改视觉表现；移除正常工作的几何控制会不必要地缩减交互方式。
|
||||
|
||||
**保留胶囊，但降低其视觉强调。** 更小或对比度更低的胶囊仍会在侧边栏边界留下一个不需要的物体。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
侧边栏边界在视觉上保持简洁，同时仍可在边界处通过指针调整宽度，并保留缩放光标。与详情栏控件不同，该交互没有可见胶囊。
|
||||
@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-31-capability-neutral-sandbox-policy-context.md
|
||||
2026-07-31-capability-neutral-sandbox-policy-context.md: d45c6c652fb7a061c2f92b7e03c41cce39da2a30
|
||||
2026-07-31-capability-neutral-sandbox-policy-context.zh.md: 9a1bb7a13d934826dddf89b409b25ba892a31ea3
|
||||
2026-07-31-capability-neutral-sandbox-policy-context.zh.md: fb030e8cd77ceb9935dd9d8f9bd9de2ce2c0fdbc
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
当前策略上下文最初通过受强制执行家族与可升权家族两个独立注册表来映射运行时组合。后端、工具与示例中的六个调用点会贡献 `filesystem`、`bash` 或 `terminal`；策略服务保留 token 集合，以便独立释放各项注册，对两个注册表的内容求交集并排序，在每次生命周期变化时使提示词组装失效，并且需要测试覆盖所有家族组合。
|
||||
|
||||
这份清单既不是说明文件策略所必需的，也不能作为模型可见能力的权威依据。后端贡献可能声明某个家族，而该家族面向模型的工具并不存在，或被请求作用域隐藏；工具 schema 已经向模型准确说明哪些操作可用。因此，为了维护一句近似的英文说明，注册表扩大了公开服务与生命周期契约。
|
||||
这份清单既不是说明文件策略所必需的，也不能作为模型可见能力的权威依据。后端贡献可能声明某个家族，而该家族面向模型的工具并不存在，或被请求作用域隐藏；工具 schema 已经向模型准确说明哪些操作可用。因此，为了维护一句近似的英文说明，注册表扩大了公开服务与生命周期约定。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
哪些操作可用仍以工具 schema 为准。针对具体操作的拒绝以及获批后的更宽松模式重试，仍以工具结果为准。文件系统、一次性 bash 与终端实现继续解析并强制执行相同的逐调用策略；移除的只有面向模型的冗余能力清单。
|
||||
|
||||
本决策取代了[当前沙箱策略上下文决策](../feature/2026-07-30-current-sandbox-policy-context.md)中关于家族注册与按组合条件化措辞的部分内容。缓存安全的上下文交付、持久快照具体化、措辞证据，以及引导与强制执行之间的边界，仍以该 Agent Note 为归属文档。
|
||||
本决策取代了[当前沙箱策略上下文决策](../feature/2026-07-30-current-sandbox-policy-context.md)中关于家族注册与按组合条件化措辞的部分内容。缓存安全的上下文交付、持久快照物化、措辞证据，以及引导与强制执行之间的边界，仍以该 Agent Note 为归属文档。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-31-drop-user-message-edit-stub.md
|
||||
2026-07-31-drop-user-message-edit-stub.md: 5a34be1dd285f4aced9e6cfb2e324b20ec734bed
|
||||
2026-07-31-drop-user-message-edit-stub.zh.md: 768cb4618b4a85f61e6348f8c6fb6a93d686e7d3
|
||||
2026-07-31-drop-user-message-edit-stub.zh.md: 288f2bda5d41cf0a331f69f134c8cf1e61a801ef
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ user 气泡的 IconActions 行在复制和分支旁边还有一个编辑按钮
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
`MessageIconActions` 只渲染时钟／复制／分支，其 `edit` prop 随按钮一并删除；`MessageItem` 不再传入该 prop。现在 user 气泡与 assistant chrome 只在时钟位置上不同。包 README 在 Known Limitations 中记录这项缺失的能力，web 的 message-actions 金样固定了不含该控件的动作行。
|
||||
`MessageIconActions` 只渲染时钟／复制／分支，其 `edit` prop 随按钮一并删除；`MessageItem` 不再传入该 prop。现在 user 气泡与 assistant chrome 只在时钟位置上不同。包 README 在 Known Limitations 中记录这项缺失的能力，web 的 message-actions 预期输出固定了不含该控件的动作行。
|
||||
|
||||
公共 locale 保留通用的 `edit` 词条：它是共享词汇，而非本组件的文案。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ user 气泡的 IconActions 行在复制和分支旁边还有一个编辑按钮
|
||||
|
||||
**把按钮置灰并加提示。** 一个可见但无效的控件仍在宣告可以编辑，解释成本相同；直接移除才是诚实的状态。
|
||||
|
||||
**接到队列编辑器上。** 队列编辑的是尚未发送的消息。已定稿的 user 消息已经进入转录和模型上下文，复用该编辑器会让同一个动作悄悄变成另一件事。
|
||||
**接到队列编辑器上。** 队列编辑的是尚未发送的消息。已定稿的 user 消息已经进入 transcript（文本记录）和模型上下文，复用该编辑器会让同一个动作悄悄变成另一件事。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
Web 没有任何途径修正已发送的消息；从该消息分支是最接近的现有手势。由于动作行的内容完全由 props 组合而来，能力就绪后重新引入只是一次纯 UI 改动。
|
||||
Web 没有任何途径修正已发送的消息；从该消息分支是最接近的现有手势。由于动作行的内容完全由 props 组合而来，client 变更就绪后重新引入只是一次纯 UI 改动。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-31-one-route-to-add-a-workspace.md
|
||||
2026-07-31-one-route-to-add-a-workspace.md: d0a1a820a8eb0a47245d99635b5e1e0448d7eca5
|
||||
2026-07-31-one-route-to-add-a-workspace.zh.md: 3486fcdae24a77d3ba82234355ba52d5f43e22d0
|
||||
2026-07-31-one-route-to-add-a-workspace.md: 4de79b7db30853a13319aa016d4eb5fb5d9ec1f1
|
||||
2026-07-31-one-route-to-add-a-workspace.zh.md: 2b305494c5d61db11f9ecf247c323040e6a549bf
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-31-one-route-to-add-a-workspace.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
Both Workspace surfaces — the sidebar region header's `+` and the conversation hero's chip — offered two ways to get a Workspace: **Open local folder…**, which raised the composed directory flow, and **Create a new workspace**, which took a name and created `<workspaceRoot>/<name>`. The two overlapped: the browse occupant carries its own **New folder** affordance, so picking a directory already covered creating one. Two entries meant two vocabularies for one outcome, a name dialog with its own duplicate-name rule, and a create target the operator could neither see nor choose.
|
||||
|
||||
Removing the weaker entry leaves the sidebar header with exactly one action, which raised the presentation question this Note also settles: what a popover with a single row should look like.
|
||||
Removing the weaker entry leaves the sidebar header with exactly one action, which raised the presentation question this decision also settles: what a popover with a single row should look like.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -25,9 +25,9 @@ The direct-open path carries the busy rule the menu entry states: while a pick i
|
||||
|
||||
`WorkspaceCreateFlow` is now `WorkspacePickFlow` and its `createOnly` prop is `addOnly`; the injected `createWorkspace` narrows from `{ name } | { path }` to `{ path }`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Wire and CLI follow-up (shipped)
|
||||
## Wire and CLI surface
|
||||
|
||||
Deleted in the follow-up change this section used to scope: `workspace.create` accepts only `{ path }` (the `name` member left the wire schema and `WorkspaceApi`), the gateway lost its `workspaceRoot` config and default, the client seam narrowed to the path spelling (`WorkspaceCreateInput`, `WorkspacesService.create`, `intentName`), and the `dsh web --workspace-root` flag is gone together with its `apps/cli` reference lines. `workspace-name-conflict` remains on the wire as `workspace.rename`'s duplicate-title error.
|
||||
`workspace.create` accepts only `{ path }`; the wire schema and `WorkspaceApi` have no `name` member. The gateway has no `workspaceRoot` config, the client contract exposes only path adoption through `WorkspaceCreateInput`, `WorkspacesService.create`, and `intentName`, and `dsh web` has no `--workspace-root` flag. `workspace-name-conflict` remains on the wire as `workspace.rename`'s duplicate-title error.
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -39,19 +39,19 @@ Deleted in the follow-up change this section used to scope: `workspace.create` a
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep `Open local folder…` as the label.** Rejected: after the merge the entry both opens and creates, and naming it after the mechanism hides the creation half from exactly the users whose entry we removed. The counter-argument — "本地" usefully disambiguates the browser's machine from the harness's — is answered one step later by the dialog's own title and breadcrumbs.
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep the two-entry menu and make `Create a new workspace` open the same flow.** Rejected: two labels for one action is the confusion we were asked to remove, not a smaller version of it.
|
||||
**Keep the two-entry menu and make `Create a new workspace` open the same flow.** Rejected: two labels for one action is the confusion this change removes, not a smaller version of it.
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep a one-row popover for consistency with the hero's menu.** Rejected: a popover that offers no choice is a wasted click and reads as unfinished. Consistency here is the *rule* (menu ⇔ a choice exists), not the widget.
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep the menu shell for entries we might add later (clone a repo, remote directory).** Rejected under "require a current owner and need": no such entry exists, and restoring a menu when one arrives is a smaller change than shipping an empty frame now.
|
||||
|
||||
**Delete the wire's create-by-name branch in the same change.** Rejected for the UI PR: it was backend/CLI surface with a different reviewer and a wider test fallout, and the urgent decision was the UI. The deletion shipped as its own follow-up change; the follow-up section above records what it removed.
|
||||
**Delete the wire's create-by-name branch in the same change.** Rejected because the UI decision did not depend on the backend and CLI deletion, whose separate contracts and tests formed an independently reviewable change.
|
||||
|
||||
**Register the workspace through the host in the e2e scaffold instead of driving the dialog.** Rejected: it would have decoupled all 15 scenarios from the picker, so nothing in the lane would prove the surviving route reaches a live composer. Every scenario now walks the real dialog to adopt its directory; only the create-a-folder half is concentrated in one scenario, because repeating it everywhere makes the shared helper non-idempotent for no extra signal.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
- Creating a Workspace outside the operator's chosen directory is no longer possible from the UI; the server-controlled `--workspace-root` target was the one way to constrain where new workspace folders land, and nothing replaces it. A deployment that needs that constraint has to re-introduce it deliberately.
|
||||
- The one remaining route browses the host filesystem, so the picker's reach is now the whole host rather than one configured parent. That is already the browse occupant's contract; this change makes it the only contract.
|
||||
- A composition that mounts `ui-workspace` without any directory-picker package can no longer add a Workspace at all, and now says so by omitting the button instead of offering a create-by-name fallback.
|
||||
- The UI creates Workspace folders only under a directory the operator chooses. No server-controlled configuration constrains that location; a deployment that needs such a constraint must add it deliberately.
|
||||
- The picker's configured reach defines the host filesystem available to the remaining route; there is no separate configured parent.
|
||||
- A composition that mounts `ui-workspace` without a directory-picker package cannot add a Workspace and omits the button.
|
||||
- The hero chip still announces `aria-haspopup="menu"` while the direct-open path raises a dialog instead. Making that truthful means routing the flow's presentation choice up through the `conversation.hero.workspace` owner contract — the flow owns the decision, the chip owns the announcement, and they sit in different packages — so it is a named follow-up rather than a silent inconsistency. The sidebar button this change added makes no popup claim at all.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
两处 Workspace 表层——侧边栏区头的 `+` 与会话主视觉区的 chip——都提供了两条获得 Workspace 的路径：**打开本地文件夹…** 拉起组合的目录流程，**新建工作区** 接收一个名称并创建 `<workspaceRoot>/<name>`。两者重叠：浏览占用者自带 **新建文件夹** 能力，因此"选一个目录"本就覆盖了"建一个目录"。两个入口意味着同一结果有两套词汇、一个自带重名规则的名称对话框，以及一个操作者既看不到也选不了的创建位置。
|
||||
|
||||
删掉较弱的那个入口后，侧边栏区头只剩一个动作，于是引出了本 Note 一并裁定的展示问题：只有一行的浮层应该长什么样。
|
||||
删掉较弱的那个入口后，侧边栏区头只剩一个动作，于是引出了本决策一并裁定的展示问题：只有一行的浮层应该长什么样。
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -25,9 +25,9 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
`WorkspaceCreateFlow` 现更名为 `WorkspacePickFlow`，其 `createOnly` prop 更名为 `addOnly`；注入的 `createWorkspace` 从 `{ name } | { path }` 收窄为 `{ path }`。
|
||||
|
||||
## Wire and CLI follow-up (shipped)
|
||||
## Wire 与 CLI 表层
|
||||
|
||||
本节曾划定的后续删除已经落地：`workspace.create` 只接受 `{ path }`（`name` 成员已从 wire schema 与 `WorkspaceApi` 移除），网关失去了 `workspaceRoot` 配置及其默认值，客户端 seam 收窄为 path 写法（`WorkspaceCreateInput`、`WorkspacesService.create`、`intentName`），`dsh web --workspace-root` flag 连同其 `apps/cli` reference 文档行一并删除。`workspace-name-conflict` 仍留在 wire 上，作为 `workspace.rename` 的重名错误。
|
||||
`workspace.create` 只接受 `{ path }`；wire schema 与 `WorkspaceApi` 没有 `name` 成员。网关没有 `workspaceRoot` 配置；客户端约定只通过 `WorkspaceCreateInput`、`WorkspacesService.create` 与 `intentName` 提供按路径接纳，`dsh web` 没有 `--workspace-root` flag。`workspace-name-conflict` 仍保留在 wire 上，作为 `workspace.rename` 的标题重名错误。
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -39,19 +39,19 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
**保留 `打开本地文件夹…` 作为标签。** 否决：合并后该入口既能打开也能创建，用机制命名会恰好对那些入口被我们删掉的用户隐藏创建这一半。反方理由——"本地"二字有效区分了浏览器所在机器与 harness 所在机器——在下一步就由对话框自身的标题和面包屑回答了。
|
||||
|
||||
**保留双入口菜单，让 `新建工作区` 也打开同一个流程。** 否决：同一动作两个标签正是我们被要求消除的混淆，而不是它的缩小版。
|
||||
**保留双入口菜单，让 `新建工作区` 也打开同一个流程。** 否决：同一动作两个标签正是本次改动所消除的混淆，而不是它的缩小版。
|
||||
|
||||
**为了与主视觉区菜单保持一致而保留只有一行的浮层。** 否决：不提供选择的浮层是一次浪费的点击，读起来像半成品。这里要一致的是*规则*（有菜单 ⇔ 存在选择），不是控件。
|
||||
|
||||
**为将来可能新增的入口（克隆仓库、远程目录）保留菜单壳。** 否决，依据"require a current owner and need"：这样的入口目前并不存在，而等它到来时再恢复菜单，比现在就发一个空壳的改动更小。
|
||||
|
||||
**在同一改动中删除 wire 的按名称创建分支。** UI PR 否决：那是 backend/CLI 面，reviewer 不同、测试波及面更广，而当时紧急的决定是 UI。删除随后作为独立的后续改动落地，上文 follow-up 一节记录了它移除的内容。
|
||||
**在同一改动中删除 wire 的按名称创建分支。** 否决，因为 UI 决定不依赖后端与 CLI 删除，后两者各自的约定和测试构成一项可独立评审的改动。
|
||||
|
||||
**在 e2e scaffold 中经 host 注册 workspace，而不驱动对话框。** 否决：那会让全部 15 个场景与选择器解耦，整条 lane 将无法证明幸存的这条路径能走到可用的 composer。现在每个场景都会走真实对话框来接纳自己的目录；只有"新建文件夹"那一半集中在一个场景里，因为处处重复只会让共享辅助函数失去幂等性，却换不来额外信号。
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
- 从 UI 已无法在操作者选定目录之外创建 Workspace；服务端控制的 `--workspace-root` 目标曾是约束新 workspace 文件夹落点的唯一手段，现在没有替代品。需要该约束的部署必须有意识地重新引入它。
|
||||
- 仅存的这条路径会浏览宿主机文件系统，因此选择器的可达范围现在是整台宿主机，而非一个配置好的父目录。这本就是浏览占用者的契约，本改动使它成为唯一的契约。
|
||||
- 挂载了 `ui-workspace` 但未挂任何 directory-picker 包的组合，已完全无法添加 Workspace；现在它通过不渲染按钮来说明这一点，而不是提供一个按名称创建的兜底。
|
||||
- 主视觉区的 chip 仍声明 `aria-haspopup="menu"`，而直接拉起的路径实际弹出的是对话框。要让它如实，需要把流程的展示方式经 `conversation.hero.workspace` 的 owner 契约上报——决定权在流程，播报权在 chip，两者分属不同的包——因此这被列为一项具名的后续工作，而不是一处无声的不一致。本次新增的侧边栏按钮完全不作任何 popup 声明。
|
||||
- UI 只在操作者选择的目录下创建 Workspace 文件夹。没有服务端控制的配置约束其位置；需要该约束的部署必须明确加入该约束。
|
||||
- picker 配置的可达范围决定剩余路径可用的 Host 文件系统；不存在另一个配置好的父目录。
|
||||
- 挂载 `ui-workspace` 但没有 directory-picker 包的组合无法添加 Workspace，也不渲染按钮。
|
||||
- 主视觉区的 chip 仍声明 `aria-haspopup="menu"`，而直接拉起的路径实际弹出的是对话框。要让它如实，需要把流程的展示方式经 `conversation.hero.workspace` 的 owner 约定上报——决定权在流程，播报权在 chip，两者分属不同的包——因此这被列为一项具名的后续工作，而不是一处无声的不一致。本次新增的侧边栏按钮完全不作任何 popup 声明。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-31-web-ui-no-steer-entry-or-interjection-chrome.md
|
||||
2026-07-31-web-ui-no-steer-entry-or-interjection-chrome.md: e2d821f3951af472ef1a13b7b6df88a3aa96a318
|
||||
2026-07-31-web-ui-no-steer-entry-or-interjection-chrome.zh.md: b55d4a271e0c5f2729222f4652fb0cb43e5cc9f9
|
||||
@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Web UI drops steer entry and interjection chrome
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-31-web-ui-no-steer-entry-or-interjection-chrome.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
Mid-turn steering is a host/agent-loop capability (`mode:'steer'`, a durable `user/message`). The Web product already locked the composer while a turn runs and never shipped a queue/steer menu, yet the client still threaded `'queue' | 'steer'` through the input machine, `conversation.send`, and locale keys, and rendered consumed steering as a badged 「插话」/「Interjection」 bubble. That left a half-built UI surface: an unused submit mode, a product label for a gesture users cannot perform, and e2e goldens that pinned chrome the product does not own.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
Keep host and runtime steering intact. Remove only the Web UI entry and chrome:
|
||||
|
||||
- `InputMachine` / `SessionInput` / `InputActions.submit` / hub `defaultSink` are queue-only; they always call `session.prompt(..., 'queue')`.
|
||||
- `ConversationService.send(text)` drops its mode argument and always queues.
|
||||
- Durable steer content renders as a plain right-aligned bubble (no badge, no user IconActions) so external/host steers stay visible on replay.
|
||||
- Delete `message.steering` locale strings and the unused badge CSS.
|
||||
- The web steering e2e still POSTs `mode:'steer'` over `/api/session.prompt` and asserts durable + model-visible obedience; it no longer expects interjection chrome. Update [web input machine note](../architecture/2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.md) fact lines to match.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**Delete host steering entirely.** Out of scope; the user asked only for Web UI display and entry. Agent-loop drain, session events, and the wire mode remain load-bearing for ACP/TUI/automation.
|
||||
|
||||
**Hide durable steer `user/message` content from the transcript.** Would lie on replay when an external client steers; rejected in favor of a plain bubble.
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep the mode parameter but only ever pass `'queue'`.** Leaves dead API surface and tests that invent `'steer'` paths the composer cannot reach.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
- **Superseded in part.** Decision bullets 1 and 3 through 5 no longer describe master: composer steering shipped later, and the [context-source and steer marks decision](../feature/2026-08-04-web-context-source-and-steer-marks.md) owns its caption. The current facts follow.
|
||||
- Host steering ownership is unchanged: agent-loop drain, session events, and the wire mode remain load-bearing for ACP, automation, and non-Web clients.
|
||||
- `ConversationService.send(text)` still takes no mode and always queues; the composer's Steer gesture uses `session.prompt(mode: 'steer')` instead.
|
||||
- Durable steer `user/message` content still folds into the transcript, so an externally submitted steer stays truthful on replay. It now carries the interjection caption instead of rendering as a bare bubble.
|
||||
- Non-user next-step items (`agent.inject` context: approval notices, task completion, attached snapshots) broadcast with the `context` placement and never render as pending steering bubbles; they stay invisible until claimed as durable `user/message` context cards.
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing
|
||||
|
||||
- `packages/client/ui-conversation` unit/jsdom coverage: input machine enter/sink, ConversationService routing, the MessageItem steering arm, InputBar submit.
|
||||
- `apps/web/tests/steering.e2e.ts` keyless replay plus its goldens, which pin the caption.
|
||||
- `packages/host/apiproxy` `session/queue` projection test asserts user-origin next-step items stay `steering` while plugin-origin items land as `context`.
|
||||
@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Web UI 去掉 steer 入口与插话 chrome
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-31-web-ui-no-steer-entry-or-interjection-chrome.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
中途 steering 是 host／agent-loop 能力（`mode:'steer'`、持久 `user/message`）。Web 产品已在 turn 运行中锁定 composer，且从未交付排队／steer 菜单，但客户端仍把 `'queue' | 'steer'` 穿进 input machine、`conversation.send` 与 locale 键，并把已消费的 steering 渲染成带「插话」／「Interjection」徽章的气泡。这留下半成品 UI：用不到的提交 mode、用户做不到的手势却有产品文案，以及把产品并不拥有的 chrome 钉死在 e2e golden 上。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
保留 host 与 runtime 的 steering。只去掉 Web UI 入口与 chrome：
|
||||
|
||||
- `InputMachine`／`SessionInput`／`InputActions.submit`／hub `defaultSink` 仅 queue；始终调用 `session.prompt(..., 'queue')`。
|
||||
- `ConversationService.send(text)` 去掉 mode 参数，始终排队。
|
||||
- 持久 steer 内容渲染为右对齐普通气泡（无徽章、无用户 IconActions），以便外部／host steer 在回放时仍可见。
|
||||
- 删除 `message.steering` locale 字符串与未使用的徽章 CSS。
|
||||
- web steering e2e 仍通过 `/api/session.prompt` POST `mode:'steer'`，并断言持久化与模型可见服从；不再期望插话 chrome。同步更新 [web input machine note](../architecture/2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.md) 中的事实行。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
**整段删除 host steering。** 超出范围；用户只要求清 Web UI 展示与入口。agent-loop 排空、session 事件与线缆 mode 对 ACP／TUI／自动化仍是承重能力。
|
||||
|
||||
**在 transcript 中隐藏持久 steer `user/message` 内容。** 外部客户端 steer 时回放会失真，因此改为普通气泡。
|
||||
|
||||
**保留 mode 参数但永远只传 `'queue'`。** 留下死 API 面与只会虚构 composer 到不了的 `'steer'` 路径的测试。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
- **部分被取代。** 决策中的第 1 条和第 3 至 5 条已经不再描述 master：composer steering 后来已经交付，[上下文来源与 steer 标识决策](../feature/2026-08-04-web-context-source-and-steer-marks.md)负责定义其标注。下面列出当前事实。
|
||||
- host 侧 steering 的归属未变：agent-loop 排空、session 事件与线缆 mode 对 ACP、自动化和非 Web 客户端仍然必要。
|
||||
- `ConversationService.send(text)` 仍然不接 mode，始终排队；composer 的 Steer 手势改走 `session.prompt(mode: 'steer')`。
|
||||
- 持久 steer `user/message` 内容仍然折叠进 transcript，因此外部提交的 steer 会如实出现在回放中。它现在带有插话标注，而不是无标识气泡。
|
||||
- 非用户来源的 next-step 项（`agent.inject` 上下文：审批通知、任务完成、附加快照）以 `context` placement 广播，绝不渲染为待处理 steering 气泡；领取为持久 `user/message` context card 前保持不可见。
|
||||
|
||||
## 测试
|
||||
|
||||
- `packages/client/ui-conversation` unit／jsdom 覆盖：input machine enter／sink、ConversationService 路由、MessageItem steering 分支、InputBar submit。
|
||||
- `apps/web/tests/steering.e2e.ts` 无密钥回放及其黄金基线，后者会检查插话标注。
|
||||
- `packages/host/apiproxy` 的 `session/queue` 投影测试断言用户来源的 next-step 项保持 `steering`，而插件来源的项落入 `context`。
|
||||
@@ -1,45 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Explicit-config dsh entrypoint
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-08-03-explicit-config-dsh-entrypoint.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
Bare `dsh` selected a product TUI implicitly. That made one command own terminal lifecycle, session identity and resume handoff, onboarding, source-workspace shortcuts, guided upgrade sessions, personal config watching, and a large app-level PTY and transcript snapshot suite. The default also hid the actual composition boundary: `--config` was an optional third layer over a TUI overlay rather than the deployment definition a raw launcher needs.
|
||||
|
||||
The shared base is intentionally neutral: it provides capabilities but creates no startup agent or interaction front door. A neutral base paired with an implicit application made raw config composition less explicit and kept product policy in the CLI rather than in the caller-selected overlay.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
Raw executable use is `dsh --config <path>`. The named file must be an Include patch list and is applied directly over `apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml` at the same include level. It is required for boot, is not a complete replacement tree, and does not inherit `apps/cli/config/web.cordis.yml` or `$DSH_HOME/config.yaml`. Relative paths resolve from the invoking directory. Boot errors fail loud; SIGINT and SIGTERM dispose the root before exit.
|
||||
|
||||
The raw diagnostic forms remain boot-free: `dsh --dump-default-config` prints the base, while `dsh --config <path> --dump-config` prints base plus the required overlay. The dump uses the Include implementation's patch algorithm and YAML dialect.
|
||||
|
||||
The CLI no longer ships a TUI application. Its TUI overlay, launcher, first-run onboarding assets, app-level TUI fixtures, PTY harness, terminal journeys, and snapshots are deleted. The `meta` and `upgrade` subcommands, their experimental gate, default-surface resume, and full-tree `--config-replace` path are deleted with that application. The installer builds and launches Web without an interface selector.
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh web` retains the shared base plus Web overlay and personal-or-explicit user layer. `dsh -p` retains the one-shot Web/headless composition. The reusable TUI package initially remained after this entrypoint change, then [the package-wide removal decision](2026-08-04-remove-tui-package.md) deleted it and its SDK interface.
|
||||
|
||||
This decision supersedes the `dsh`-specific parts of the [dedicated TUI front door](../../archived/feature/2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.md), [personal config](../feature/2026-07-20-dsh-cli-personal-config.md), [guided skill commands](../../archived/feature/2026-07-28-dsh-guided-skill-session-commands.md), [meta workspace](../../archived/feature/2026-07-28-dsh-meta-source-workspace.md), [shared config overlays](2026-07-29-shared-base-config-overlays.md), [config dump](../feature/2026-07-30-dsh-dump-config.md), [first-run welcome](../../archived/feature/2026-07-30-versioned-tui-first-run-welcome.md), and [experimental subcommand gate](../../archived/feature/2026-07-31-experimental-subcommand-gate.md) notes. The later [package-wide removal decision](2026-08-04-remove-tui-package.md) supersedes their reusable-package decisions and consolidates the deleted launcher-identity record.
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification
|
||||
|
||||
Parser tests require `--config` for raw boot and reject the removed command names and incompatible option combinations. Built-bin acceptance runs the published JavaScript entry without tsx, checks base-only and base-plus-overlay dumps, and drives an invalid raw provider overlay to prove a boot failure settles and exits rather than hanging. Source-launch compatibility checks the same required-config diagnostic through `bin/dsh`. No `apps/cli` TUI demo or test remains.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep bare `dsh` as a TUI and add an explicit config subcommand.** Rejected because the CLI would still own two unrelated application policies and retain the TUI-only launcher, onboarding, and test infrastructure.
|
||||
|
||||
**Allow bare `dsh` to boot the neutral base.** Rejected because the base creates no agent or interaction front door. A process that settles successfully but has no usable entry point hides a missing deployment decision.
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep `--config-replace` for complete trees.** Rejected because raw execution now has one composition contract: a required overlay over the product base. Complete-tree deployments can use the generic Cordis loader or a dedicated application bin without adding a second meaning to `dsh --config`.
|
||||
|
||||
**Delete the TUI package with the product entrypoint.** Initially rejected because removing one shipped application did not by itself require removing a reusable UI implementation. Once no shipped composition or independent consumer remained, [the package-wide removal decision](2026-08-04-remove-tui-package.md) accepted this alternative.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
Invoking `dsh` without a mode or raw config is a usage error. Existing TUI startup, `meta`, `upgrade`, resume, and full-tree replacement invocations stop working without compatibility aliases. This is acceptable under the pre-release compatibility stance and keeps the supported grammar small.
|
||||
|
||||
Raw deployments must state their agent and front-door rows in an overlay, which makes the application boundary reviewable and keeps base updates available underneath. They do not receive personal config implicitly; deployments that want that policy must compose it themselves. Web remains the installed interactive product surface, while headless and automation entries remain separate.
|
||||
|
||||
Reintroducing a shipped terminal application requires a concrete product need, a named entry mode rather than an implicit raw default, and its own current snapshot and lifecycle acceptance surface.
|
||||
@@ -1,45 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note：显式配置的 dsh 入口
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-08-03-explicit-config-dsh-entrypoint.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
裸 `dsh` 会隐式选择产品 TUI。这使一条命令负责终端生命周期、会话身份与恢复移交、onboarding、源码 workspace 快捷入口、引导式升级会话、个人配置监听，以及一整套规模庞大的应用级 PTY 和 transcript（文本记录）快照测试。该默认行为还隐藏了真实的组合边界：`--config` 是 TUI overlay 之上的可选第三层，而不是 raw 启动器所需的部署定义。
|
||||
|
||||
共享 base 有意保持中性：它提供各项能力，但不会创建启动 agent（智能体）或交互入口。将中性 base 与隐式应用配对，使 raw 配置组合缺乏明确边界，也使产品政策留在 CLI（命令行界面）中，而不是由调用方选定的 overlay 持有。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
raw 执行方式为 `dsh --config <path>`。指定文件必须是一份 Include 补丁列表，并在同一 include 层级直接应用到 `apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml` 之上。启动时必须提供该文件；它不是完整的替换配置树，也不会继承 `apps/cli/config/web.cordis.yml` 或 `$DSH_HOME/config.yaml`。相对路径从调用目录解析。启动错误会明确报错；SIGINT 和 SIGTERM 会先对根上下文执行 dispose（资源释放），再退出。
|
||||
|
||||
raw 诊断形式仍然无需启动：`dsh --dump-default-config` 打印 base，`dsh --config <path> --dump-config` 则打印 base 与必需 overlay 的合成结果。转储过程使用 Include 实现的补丁算法和 YAML 方言。
|
||||
|
||||
CLI 不再交付 TUI 应用。TUI overlay、启动器、首次运行 onboarding 资产、应用级 TUI fixture（测试前置数据）、PTY harness、终端流程和快照均已删除。`meta` 与 `upgrade` 子命令、对应的实验功能门禁、默认 surface 恢复入口，以及整棵配置树的 `--config-replace` 路径也随该应用一并删除。安装器不再提供界面选择器，只构建并启动 Web。
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh web` 保留共享 base、Web overlay 与个人或显式用户层。`dsh -p` 保留一次性 Web/headless 组合。可复用 TUI 包（package）在本入口变更后起初保留，随后[全包移除决策](2026-08-04-remove-tui-package.md)将其及 SDK 接口删除。
|
||||
|
||||
本决策取代以下记录中专用于 `dsh` 的部分：[独立 TUI 入口](../../archived/feature/2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.md)、[个人配置](../feature/2026-07-20-dsh-cli-personal-config.md)、[引导式 skill 命令](../../archived/feature/2026-07-28-dsh-guided-skill-session-commands.md)、[meta workspace](../../archived/feature/2026-07-28-dsh-meta-source-workspace.md)、[共享配置 overlay](2026-07-29-shared-base-config-overlays.md)、[配置转储](../feature/2026-07-30-dsh-dump-config.md)、[首次运行欢迎页](../../archived/feature/2026-07-30-versioned-tui-first-run-welcome.md)和[实验性子命令门禁](../../archived/feature/2026-07-31-experimental-subcommand-gate.md)。后续的[全包移除决策](2026-08-04-remove-tui-package.md)取代了其中关于可复用包的决策，并整合了已删除的启动器身份记录。
|
||||
|
||||
## 验证
|
||||
|
||||
解析器测试要求 raw 启动提供 `--config`，并拒绝已删除的命令名和不兼容的选项组合。构建后二进制验收测试在不使用 tsx 的情况下运行已发布的 JavaScript 入口，检查仅含 base 及 base 加 overlay 的转储，并传入无效的 raw 提供方 overlay，以证明启动失败能够结束并退出，而不会挂起。源码启动兼容性测试通过 `bin/dsh` 检查同一条缺少必需配置的诊断。`apps/cli` 不再包含任何 TUI demo 或测试。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
**保留裸 `dsh` 作为 TUI，并新增显式配置子命令。** 不予采纳，因为 CLI 仍需持有两套互不相关的应用政策，并保留仅供 TUI 使用的启动器、onboarding 和测试基础设施。
|
||||
|
||||
**允许裸 `dsh` 启动中性 base。** 不予采纳，因为 base 不会创建 agent 或交互入口。进程成功结束启动但没有可用入口，会掩盖缺失的部署决策。
|
||||
|
||||
**保留 `--config-replace` 以支持完整配置树。** 不予采纳，因为 raw 执行现在只有一份组合契约：在产品 base 之上施加一份必需的 overlay。完整配置树部署可以使用通用 Cordis loader 或专用应用二进制文件，无需为 `dsh --config` 增加第二种含义。
|
||||
|
||||
**随产品入口一并删除 TUI 包。** 最初不予采纳，因为仅移除一项已交付应用本身并不要求移除可复用 UI 实现。当已交付组合与独立消费方均不复存在后，[全包移除决策](2026-08-04-remove-tui-package.md)采纳了这一方案。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
调用 `dsh` 时如果既不指定模式，也不提供 raw 配置，将产生用法错误。既有的 TUI 启动、`meta`、`upgrade`、恢复和整棵配置树替换调用会停止工作，且不提供兼容别名。根据发布前兼容性立场，这是可以接受的，并能使支持的命令语法保持精简。
|
||||
|
||||
raw 部署必须在 overlay 中声明 agent 和入口配置项，使应用边界可供评审，并能继续吸收底层 base 的更新。它们不会隐式接收个人配置；需要该政策的部署必须自行组合。Web 仍是安装后提供的交互式产品 surface，headless 与自动化入口仍保持独立。
|
||||
|
||||
重新引入已交付的终端应用，需要有具体产品需求，采用具名入口模式而非隐式 raw 默认值，并建立自身当前有效的快照与生命周期验收面。
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-08-03-omit-invariants-from-shipped-config.md
|
||||
2026-08-03-omit-invariants-from-shipped-config.md: ff9a3b0ab2b4797ca4e96bea9e6b961b2e38501f
|
||||
2026-08-03-omit-invariants-from-shipped-config.zh.md: 526ce0756e69b36b6f54b46b23e1814322d6a1fd
|
||||
2026-08-03-omit-invariants-from-shipped-config.md: a691a0949806a752203a41bd6c66a50e97d8f1d7
|
||||
2026-08-03-omit-invariants-from-shipped-config.zh.md: aa1f775804de1bee7b69f355fc4afddf48c63a61
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-08-03-omit-invariants-from-shipped-config.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
The shipped `dsh` configuration trees under `apps/cli/config/` mount neither `@deepseek-ai/dsh-invariants` nor any package-owned `./invariant` companion. The CLI package therefore carries no direct dependency on the invariant service.
|
||||
|
||||
Invariant support remains available for focused tests, example bundles, generated SDK compositions, and custom deployments that opt into diagnostics explicitly. Session validation, snapshotting, freezing, and provenance remain always on and do not depend on the optional service, as defined by the [source-owned immutability decision](../architecture/2026-06-11-dev-invariants-over-deep-readonly.md).
|
||||
Invariant support remains available for focused tests, example bundles, generated SDK compositions, and custom deployments that opt into diagnostics explicitly. Session validation, snapshotting, freezing, and cited source-event validation remain always on and do not depend on the optional service, as defined by the [source-owned immutability decision](../architecture/2026-06-11-dev-invariants-over-deep-readonly.md).
|
||||
|
||||
The built CLI config-dump test checks both shipped surfaces and rejects either the service entry or any `@deepseek-ai/dsh-*/invariant` entry.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -6,13 +6,13 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-invariants` 与各包（package）拥有的 `./invariant` 伴随插件是可选的开发诊断。交付的 TUI 挂载了该服务和四个有状态伴随插件，而交付的 Web 配置树省略了这些条目，导致两个产品 surface 的诊断成本和失败行为不同。即使始终启用的产品边界仍负责会话验证与不可变历史，关系断言失败也可能终止普通的 TUI 运行。
|
||||
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-invariants` 与各包拥有的 `./invariant` 伴随插件是可选的开发诊断。交付的 TUI 挂载了该服务和四个有状态伴随插件，而交付的 Web 配置树省略了这些条目，导致两个产品 surface 的诊断成本和失败行为不同。即使始终启用的产品边界仍负责会话验证与不可变历史，关系断言失败也可能终止普通的 TUI 运行。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
`apps/cli/config/` 下交付的 `dsh` 配置树既不挂载 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-invariants`，也不挂载任何包拥有的 `./invariant` 伴随插件。因此，CLI 包不再直接依赖不变式服务。
|
||||
|
||||
不变式支持仍可供聚焦测试、示例组合包、生成的 SDK 组合，以及显式选择诊断的自定义部署使用。会话验证、快照、冻结和 provenance 始终启用，且不依赖可选服务，具体由[源端拥有的不可变性决策](../architecture/2026-06-11-dev-invariants-over-deep-readonly.md)规定。
|
||||
不变式支持仍可供聚焦测试、示例组合包、生成的 SDK 组合，以及显式选择诊断的自定义部署使用。会话验证、快照、冻结和来源事件引用验证始终启用，且不依赖可选服务，具体由[源端拥有的不可变性决策](../architecture/2026-06-11-dev-invariants-over-deep-readonly.md)规定。
|
||||
|
||||
构建后 CLI 的配置转储测试会检查两个交付的 surface，并拒绝服务条目或任何 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-*/invariant` 条目。
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-08-04-drop-windows-powershell-picker-fallback.md
|
||||
2026-08-04-drop-windows-powershell-picker-fallback.md: 619afd31d9ec78cdb8565e29fa942b7db8749365
|
||||
2026-08-04-drop-windows-powershell-picker-fallback.zh.md: e14904db46a955d4cf40da195a39bf62cbef96ff
|
||||
2026-08-04-drop-windows-powershell-picker-fallback.zh.md: 14716f405e98385b7277ce0814adf32190be36b7
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,38 +1,38 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note：删除 Windows PowerShell 选择器回退
|
||||
# Agent Note: 删除 Windows PowerShell 选择器回退
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-08-04-drop-windows-powershell-picker-fallback.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
原生目录选择器的 win32 分支在 koffi `IFileOpenDialog` 子进程之下保留了一条两级 PowerShell 回退：先 `pwsh.exe`，再 `powershell.exe`（Windows PowerShell 5.1），两者运行同一个带 `SetProcessDPIAware` 开关的 WinForms 脚本。该链的存在是为了在 koffi 层"不可用"时仍能给出一个可用的选择器，但它可能保护的每一个触发条件都是我们自己打包或部署的失败，而不是操作系统的：
|
||||
原生目录选择器的 win32 分支在 koffi `IFileOpenDialog` 子进程之下保留了一条两级 PowerShell 回退：先 `pwsh.exe`，再 `powershell.exe`（Windows PowerShell 5.1），两者运行同一个主动启用 `SetProcessDPIAware` 的 WinForms 脚本。该链的存在是为了在 koffi 层「不可用」时仍能给出一个可用的选择器，但它可能保护的每一个触发条件都是我们自己打包或部署的失败，而不是操作系统的：
|
||||
|
||||
- koffi 的原生二进制作为普通 optional 依赖（`@koromix/koffi-win32-x64`，无 install script）分发；能装上该包的宿主就一定有二进制，装不上的宿主会在安装期大声失败——回退代码同样不会加载。
|
||||
- "上古 Windows"不可能出现：本仓库支持的 Node 版本运行在远比 Vista 时代 `IFileOpenDialog` ABI 新的 Windows 世代上。
|
||||
- koffi 的原生二进制作为普通的可选 NPM 依赖（`@koromix/koffi-win32-x64`，无 install script）分发；能装上该包的宿主就一定有二进制，装不上的宿主会在安装期明确报错——回退代码也根本不会得到加载。
|
||||
- 「上古 Windows」不可能出现：本仓库支持的 Node 版本运行在远比 Vista 时代 `IFileOpenDialog` ABI 新的 Windows 世代上。
|
||||
- koffi/COM 缺陷只崩对话框子进程（crash isolation）；对我们自己 bug 的正确反应是上报失败，而不是静默降级到旧版对话框。
|
||||
|
||||
这条链还付出了真实的复杂度：两个 spawn 层运行同一脚本、把回退触发从 `ENOENT` 拓宽为 pwsh 的任何失败以关闭 PowerShell 6（无 WinForms）回归、携带全部三个原因的三连败 `AggregateError`，以及每层的 abort 重检。seam 早已拥有唯一重要的回退——组合层面的 `browse` 后端，由 `directory-picker-auto` 在启动时选择一次。
|
||||
这条链还付出了真实的复杂度：两个 spawn 层运行同一脚本、把回退触发从 `ENOENT` 拓宽为 pwsh 的任何失败以修复 PowerShell 6（无 WinForms）回归问题、携带全部三个原因的三连败 `AggregateError`，以及每层的 abort 重检。seam 早已拥有唯一重要的回退——组合层面的 `browse` 后端，由 `directory-picker-auto` 在启动时选择一次。
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
win32 层恰好就是 koffi `IFileOpenDialog` 子进程；任何失败原样上报，无回退。PowerShell 链——`pwsh` → Windows PowerShell 5.1 级联、DPI 修正的 WinForms 脚本、`AggregateError` 聚合——被删除，`pickNativeDirectory` 的 win32 分支成为单次调用。`dsh-native-command` 仍为 POSIX 层保留依赖。
|
||||
|
||||
本包其余部分早已遵循的回退判据现在统一适用：回退层只存在于操作系统/桌面环境提供且可能缺失的工具（Linux 的 `zenity` → `kdialog`，启动探针同样采样它们）；我们自己打包的工具（`koffi`）失败即大声报错。macOS `osascript` 与之前一样保持无回退。
|
||||
本包其余部分早已遵循的回退判据现在统一适用：回退层只存在于操作系统/桌面环境提供且可能缺失的工具（Linux 的 `zenity` → `kdialog`，启动探针同样采样它们）；我们自己打包的工具（`koffi`）失败即明确报错。macOS `osascript` 与之前一样保持无回退。
|
||||
|
||||
本次变更合并并删除了 pwsh 优先的 DPI 选择器修复 Note：其决策在此被完全反转，其保留的 rationale 对只含 koffi 的层不再指导未来工作。其中真实的部分：PowerShell 7 呈现基于 `IFileDialog` 的现代文件夹选择器，而 5.1 的 `FolderBrowserDialog` 被硬连到旧版 `SHBrowseForFolder` 树；脚本的 `SetProcessDPIAware` 修正了 spawn 的系统 DPI 上限；pwsh→5.1 的跳转存在是因为可解析的 PowerShell 6 没有 WinForms（退出码 1，而非 `ENOENT`）。其被拒绝的替代方案（要求 PowerShell 7、导入 `resolvePwshPath`、在 harness 进程设置 DPI 感知）随链删除而失去意义。
|
||||
本次变更合并并删除了 pwsh 优先的 DPI 选择器修复 Agent Note：其决策在此被完全反转，其保留的理由对只含 koffi 的层不再指导未来工作。其中真实的部分：PowerShell 7 呈现基于 `IFileDialog` 的现代文件夹选择器，而 5.1 的 `FolderBrowserDialog` 被硬连到旧版 `SHBrowseForFolder` 树；脚本的 `SetProcessDPIAware` 修正了 spawn 的系统 DPI 上限；pwsh→5.1 的跳转存在是因为可解析的 PowerShell 6 没有 WinForms（退出码 1，而非 `ENOENT`）。其被拒绝的替代方案（要求 PowerShell 7、导入 `resolvePwshPath`、在 harness 进程设置 DPI 感知）随链删除而失去意义。
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
## 考虑过的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
**保留链但去掉 pwsh 质量层（`koffi` → Windows PowerShell 5.1）。** 拒绝：剩下的层仍在为我们自己打包的依赖辩护，仍要付出脚本、拓宽的触发与聚合的代价，仍会把我们自己的 vtable/COM 缺陷藏到旧版对话框后面。"仅对外部提供的工具回退"的判据不接受任何 Windows 层。
|
||||
**保留链但去掉 pwsh 质量层（`koffi` → Windows PowerShell 5.1）。**拒绝：剩下的层仍在防范我们自己打包的依赖发生故障，仍要付出脚本、拓宽的触发与聚合的代价，仍会把我们自己的 vtable/COM 缺陷藏到旧版对话框后面。「仅对外部提供的工具回退」的判据不接受任何 Windows 层。
|
||||
|
||||
**原样保留链。** 拒绝：它是选择器面上唯一的二级运行时回退，其触发条件是本就大声失败的部署侧失败，并且它把失败的 pick 降级成一个最具可操作性的条目是 PowerShell 宿主的 `AggregateError`。
|
||||
**原样保留链。**拒绝：它是选择器中唯一的二级运行时回退，其触发条件是本就会明确报错的部署侧失败，并且它把一次失败的选择操作降级为 `AggregateError`，其中最具可操作性的条目却指向 PowerShell 宿主。
|
||||
|
||||
**原生 pick 失败时在运行时回退到 `browse`。** 拒绝：seam 的流程洞是 `single` kind，`-auto` 组合已在启动时选择一个后端；运行时跨 kind 跳转会双挂两个后端并模糊能力边界。
|
||||
**原生 pick 失败时在运行时回退到 `browse`。**拒绝：seam 的流程洞属于 `single` 类型，`-auto` 组合已在启动时选择一个后端；运行时跨类型跳转会同时挂载两个后端并模糊能力边界。
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
- win32 选择器的失败面是来自单一层的一个错误；调用方看到真实原因（koffi 加载失败、COM 拒绝、对话框崩溃），而不是链式聚合的错误。
|
||||
- 本包不再调用 `pwsh`/`powershell.exe`；WinForms 脚本、其 `SetProcessDPIAware` 修正与 `-STA` 标志随之消失。
|
||||
- 测试相应缩减：pwsh/5.1 级联与三连败用例被一个"失败原样上报、无回退"用例取代；默认适配器测试改驱动 Linux 层。
|
||||
- 测试相应缩减：pwsh/5.1 级联与三连败用例被一个「失败原样上报、无回退」用例取代；默认适配器测试改驱动 Linux 层。
|
||||
- 重新引入条件：未来出现在我们打包链之外的 win32 机制（我们不随包分发的系统提供的对话框宿主）才值得在同一判据下保留一层回退。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-08-04-remove-tui-package.md
|
||||
2026-08-04-remove-tui-package.md: 7f7a0dd86ddd36e940ed8b7d6154185d9740341c
|
||||
2026-08-04-remove-tui-package.zh.md: 36cb4b6a5e4eddd152eccee92c913bcca5b7fbae
|
||||
2026-08-04-remove-tui-package.md: 19cc7d1a89a55bb57a69b9fce301f48f89384acd
|
||||
2026-08-04-remove-tui-package.zh.md: be18cbd33cd4a2bb592de4e7986b2786da272d0f
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,15 +8,15 @@ English | [中文](2026-08-04-remove-tui-package.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
Removing the implicit `dsh` terminal application left `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui` without a shipped composition. The package still carried a terminal renderer, interactive command and question adapters, extension overlays, snapshot fixtures, a patched `pi-tui` dependency, and SDK scaffolding that advertised TUI as a supported application interface. Keeping that surface required maintaining a product-sized frontend whose only remaining consumer was the project generator itself.
|
||||
|
||||
The package also made the repository's supported application inventory misleading. Current runnable products use Web, ACP, JSON-RPC, or one-shot CLI front doors, while the SDK continued to offer a terminal choice that no example or product command exercised.
|
||||
The package also made the repository's supported application inventory misleading. Current runnable products use Web, ACP, JSON-RPC, or one-shot CLI entry points, while the SDK continued to offer a terminal choice that no example or product command exercised.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
The `packages/ui/tui` package is deleted without a compatibility package or alias. Its source, package tests, terminal snapshots, dependency declarations, patched `pi-tui` artifact, workspace references, generated service catalog entry, and documentation are removed together. Generic host and agent-loop capabilities remain unchanged.
|
||||
|
||||
The SDK run-interface union now contains only `acp` and `embed`. `create-sdk` defaults to ACP, generated templates contain no terminal startup, resume, session-environment, or model-argument branch, and the builtin `ask-user` feature is removed because neither remaining generated interface supplies a `UserInteractionProvider`. Host applications may still mount the provider-neutral `dsh-user-interaction`, `dsh-commands`, and presentation seams directly.
|
||||
The SDK run-interface union now contains only `acp` and `embed`. `create-sdk` defaults to ACP, generated templates contain no terminal startup, resume, session-environment, or model-argument branch, and the builtin `ask-user` feature is removed because neither remaining generated interface supplies a `UserInteractionProvider`. Host applications may still mount the provider-neutral `dsh-user-interaction`, `dsh-commands`, and presentation services directly.
|
||||
|
||||
This decision supersedes the reusable-package retention in [the explicit-config `dsh` entrypoint decision](2026-08-03-explicit-config-dsh-entrypoint.md) and the current applicability of the archived TUI implementation notes. Their historical records remain frozen, but they are not authority for the supported package or application inventory.
|
||||
This decision supersedes the reusable-package retention in [the explicit-config `dsh` entrypoint decision](../../archived/simplification/2026-08-03-explicit-config-dsh-entrypoint.md) and the current applicability of the archived TUI implementation notes. Their historical records remain frozen, but they are not authority for the supported package or application inventory.
|
||||
|
||||
This note consolidates the deleted package-only records that could not remain current after removal. The terminal UI had kept session identity visible during long conversations, removed duplicate model labels, attached elapsed timing and phase status to messages, showed workspace and branch context beside the prompt, and conservatively parsed complete XML wrappers for human-readable fallback output. Those choices improved one terminal frontend but do not justify retaining it without a deployment. A future XML fallback must still use a real parser rather than regular expressions.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -34,6 +34,6 @@ Repository searches and generated catalogs contain no TUI package, dependency pa
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
DeepSeek Harness has no terminal UI package or generated TUI application. Existing imports, `cordis.yml` rows, SDK `--interface=tui` requests, and projects that depend on the package fail instead of being translated. Web remains the shipped interactive surface; ACP, JSON-RPC, and one-shot CLI remain the non-Web front doors.
|
||||
DeepSeek Harness has no terminal UI package or generated TUI application. Existing imports, `cordis.yml` rows, SDK `--interface=tui` requests, and projects that depend on the package fail instead of being translated. Web remains the shipped interactive surface; ACP, JSON-RPC, and one-shot CLI remain the non-Web entry points.
|
||||
|
||||
The provider-neutral command, user-interaction, approval, tool-presentation, PTY, and session-projection capabilities remain available to other hosts. Reintroducing a terminal frontend requires a named product or deployment, an explicit package boundary, a concrete interaction provider, and assembled lifecycle and transcript acceptance for that frontend.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: 移除 TUI 包（package）
|
||||
# Agent Note: 移除 TUI 包
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,17 +12,17 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
删除 `packages/ui/tui` 包，不提供兼容包或别名。其源码、包测试、终端快照、依赖声明、已打补丁的 `pi-tui` 产物、workspace 引用、生成的服务目录条目和文档会一并移除。通用宿主能力与 agent-loop 能力保持不变。
|
||||
删除 `packages/ui/tui` 包，不提供兼容包或别名。其源码、包测试、终端快照、依赖声明、已打补丁的 `pi-tui` 产物、workspace 引用、生成的服务目录条目和文档会一并移除。通用宿主能力与 agent loop（智能体循环）能力保持不变。
|
||||
|
||||
SDK 的运行接口联合类型现在只包含 `acp` 与 `embed`。`create-sdk` 默认使用 ACP，生成的模板不再包含终端启动、恢复、会话环境或模型参数分支；内置的 `ask-user` 功能也被移除，因为剩余两个生成接口都不提供 `UserInteractionProvider`。宿主应用仍可直接挂载提供方无关的 `dsh-user-interaction`、`dsh-commands` 和呈现 seam。
|
||||
SDK 的运行接口联合类型现在只包含 `acp` 与 `embed`。`create-sdk` 默认使用 ACP，生成的模板不再包含终端启动、恢复、会话环境或模型参数分支；内置的 `ask-user` 功能也被移除，因为剩余两个生成接口都不提供 `UserInteractionProvider`。宿主应用仍可直接挂载提供方无关的 `dsh-user-interaction`、`dsh-commands` 和呈现服务。
|
||||
|
||||
本决策取代[显式配置 `dsh` 入口决策](2026-08-03-explicit-config-dsh-entrypoint.md)中保留可复用包的决定，也使已归档 TUI 实现记录不再适用于当前状态。这些历史记录继续保持冻结，但不再作为受支持包或应用清单的依据。
|
||||
本决策取代[显式配置 `dsh` 入口决策](../../archived/simplification/2026-08-03-explicit-config-dsh-entrypoint.md)中保留可复用包的决定，也使已归档 TUI 实现记录不再适用于当前状态。这些历史记录继续保持冻结，但不再作为受支持包或应用清单的依据。
|
||||
|
||||
本记录汇总了删除后无法继续保持当前状态的仅限包记录。终端 UI 曾在长对话期间保持会话身份可见、移除重复模型标签、为消息附加耗时与阶段状态、在提示词旁显示 workspace 与分支上下文，并保守地解析完整 XML 包装层，以生成人类可读的回退输出。这些选择改善了一个终端前端，但没有部署时不足以证明应保留它。未来的 XML 回退仍必须使用真实解析器而非正则表达式。
|
||||
本记录汇总了因移除该包而无法继续保持现行有效、现已删除的仅涉及该包的记录。终端 UI 曾在长对话期间保持会话身份可见、移除重复模型标签、为消息附加耗时与阶段状态、在提示词旁显示 workspace 与分支上下文，并保守地解析完整 XML 包装层，以生成人类可读的回退输出。这些选择改善了一个终端前端，但在没有部署的情况下，并不足以证明应保留它。未来的 XML 回退仍必须使用真正的解析器而非正则表达式。
|
||||
|
||||
## 验证
|
||||
|
||||
仓库搜索结果与生成目录中不再包含 TUI 包、依赖补丁、SDK 接口选项、服务键或包链接。聚焦的 SDK 测试覆盖 ACP 与嵌入式创建、配置、模板和快照。常规源码构建、类型检查、lint、hygiene、文档门禁以及其余组装快照测试套件均可在没有已删除 workspace 的情况下运行。
|
||||
仓库搜索结果与生成的服务目录中不再包含 TUI 包、依赖补丁、SDK 接口选项、服务键或包链接。专项 SDK 测试覆盖 ACP 和嵌入式两种模式的创建、配置、模板与快照。常规源码构建、类型检查、lint、hygiene、文档门禁以及其余组装快照测试套件均可在没有已删除 workspace 的情况下运行。
|
||||
|
||||
## 考虑过的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-08-03-explicit-config-dsh-entrypoint.md
|
||||
2026-08-03-explicit-config-dsh-entrypoint.md: bbb40babf8abca726126678f4bccb40a63160568
|
||||
2026-08-03-explicit-config-dsh-entrypoint.zh.md: a97221a73bab0b181562ddfb7ddab1211f87f168
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-08-06-buffer-free-feedback-telemetry.md
|
||||
2026-08-06-buffer-free-feedback-telemetry.md: 008bebdcb59f7ef4fe49f8e731aad77861368d5c
|
||||
2026-08-06-buffer-free-feedback-telemetry.zh.md: 7052e075921f4470864f5ea1c4aed5cf6201becf
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Buffer-free feedback telemetry
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-08-06-buffer-free-feedback-telemetry.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
Feedback-only telemetry must upload the session-log prefix only after recorded feedback. Retaining a deep-copied, redacted record for every projected event until that trigger duplicates the canonical session log and grows without a bound for a long-lived session that never records feedback.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
The telemetry coordinator provides `live` and `on-demand` capture. On-demand capture registers no session, flush, or operational-event listeners and retains no projected records. `captureSession(session, throughSeq?)` reads the canonical session log after the handoff cursor through an optional inclusive sequence boundary, applies the fixed projection, deep-copies each accepted event, runs the current `telemetry/record` waterfall, and hands the result to the backend.
|
||||
|
||||
`FEEDBACK_ONLY` invokes that method with the `feedback/record` event's sequence. The append is already committed when `session/event` listeners run, so the replay contains the feedback event and cannot include a later suffix. The existing handoff cursor distinguishes later replays without another pending-record index.
|
||||
|
||||
Because on-demand capture reads only the canonical log, it emits no `agent-error` or `shutdown` operational records. Redaction is evaluated at feedback time rather than append time. The [feedback mode decision](../feature/2026-08-05-feedback-gated-session-telemetry.md) owns the public sharing behavior; this note owns its buffer-free realization.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**Retain capture-time redacted records.** This preserves the exact redaction policy and operational records observed when each event occurs, but duplicates the unbounded session prefix. The mode promises feedback-triggered session-log upload, not capture-time policy snapshots or pre-feedback operational telemetry.
|
||||
|
||||
**Retain session event references or sequence numbers.** Rejected because the canonical log already supplies both order and identity. A second index saves payload copies but adds lifecycle state without enabling any required behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
**Write a durable pre-feedback spool.** Deferred until a deployment requires crash recovery before feedback. It adds storage, cleanup, and confidentiality policy to a mode whose intended behavior is to upload nothing when the process exits before feedback.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
A no-feedback session consumes no telemetry-owned memory proportional to its event count; the canonical session log remains the only pre-feedback copy. Feedback handling performs projection, cloning, and redaction synchronously before the backend's non-blocking enqueue, so its cost scales with the unreleased prefix. A redaction-policy change before feedback affects that replay, and a crash before feedback uploads nothing. Later feedback processes only events beyond the handoff cursor.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: 无缓冲反馈遥测
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-08-06-buffer-free-feedback-telemetry.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
仅反馈遥测必须只在记录反馈后上传会话日志前缀。若在触发前为每个已投影事件保留一份已深拷贝、已脱敏的记录，就会复制权威会话日志；对于长期运行但从不记录反馈的会话，这份副本会无限增长。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
遥测协调器提供 `live` 与 `on-demand` 捕获。按需捕获不注册会话、flush 或运维事件监听器，也不保留投影记录。`captureSession(session, throughSeq?)` 从 handoff 游标之后读取权威会话日志，直至可选的序列号边界（含边界），应用固定投影、深拷贝每个已接受事件、运行当前的 `telemetry/record` waterfall（瀑布式事件），并将结果交给后端。
|
||||
|
||||
`FEEDBACK_ONLY` 以 `feedback/record` 事件的序列号调用该方法。`session/event` 监听器运行时，追加已经提交，因此回放包含该反馈事件，且无法包含后续后缀。现有 handoff 游标可区分后续回放，无需另一个待处理记录索引。
|
||||
|
||||
按需捕获只读取权威日志，因此不会发出 `agent-error` 或 `shutdown` 运维记录。脱敏在反馈时而非追加时求值。[反馈模式决策](../feature/2026-08-05-feedback-gated-session-telemetry.md)规定公开的共享行为；本记录规定其无缓冲实现。
|
||||
|
||||
## 考虑过的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
**保留捕获时的已脱敏记录。** 该方案会保留每个事件发生时观察到的确切脱敏策略与运维记录，但也会复制无上限的会话前缀。该模式承诺在反馈触发后上传会话日志，而非保留捕获时策略快照或反馈前运维遥测。
|
||||
|
||||
**保留会话事件引用或序列号。** 已否决，因为权威日志已同时提供顺序与身份。第二个索引可以省去载荷副本，但会增加生命周期状态，且无法实现任何必需行为。
|
||||
|
||||
**写入持久化的反馈前 spool。** 推迟到有部署要求反馈前的崩溃恢复时再实现。该方案会为一个预期在进程于反馈前退出时不上传任何内容的模式增加存储、清理与保密策略。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
没有反馈的会话不会消耗随事件数量增长的遥测自有内存；权威会话日志仍是反馈前的唯一副本。反馈处理会在后端非阻塞入队前同步执行投影、深拷贝与脱敏，因此其开销随未释放前缀增长。反馈前的脱敏策略变更会影响该次回放，而反馈前发生崩溃时什么都不上传。后续反馈只处理 handoff 游标之后的事件。
|
||||
@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-08-06-user-bubbles-drop-the-branch-action.md
|
||||
2026-08-06-user-bubbles-drop-the-branch-action.md: 817b5e72b7e18b03ddb3a160e6f7a86b04f02764
|
||||
2026-08-06-user-bubbles-drop-the-branch-action.zh.md: dab3890818d872d7bbb3ac9bcab014ce9b829a61
|
||||
2026-08-06-user-bubbles-drop-the-branch-action.zh.md: a80f723242383cc9a35b9933dcc9c63ebeacd9d8
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note：user 与 steering 气泡移除分支操作
|
||||
# Agent Note: user 与 steering 气泡移除分支操作
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
每个 user 气泡和已消费的 steering（中途引导）气泡都渲染分支控件，受[已完成轮次尾部决策](../bug-fix/2026-08-02-message-fork-actions-require-completed-turn-tail.md)的门禁约束。在这些气泡上，该门禁实际上是永久性的：开轮的 user 消息后面必然跟着本轮自己的节点，已消费的 steering 消息按构造就处在轮次中间，因此只有当轮次结束时该消息之后一个节点都没有——即在第一个模型事件之前就取消——控件才可能启用。读者因此看到一个永远不会启用的控件，tooltip 许诺的是这个按钮到达不了的状态。这个操作入口本身也有误导：在消息 seq 处 fork 会切在所在轮次的 `turn/end`，"在我的消息处分支"实际会把下方的回答一并带走，与在自己气泡上看到分支时"分叉重问"的直觉预期恰好相反。
|
||||
每个 user 气泡和已消费的 steering（中途引导）气泡都渲染分支控件，受[已完成轮次尾部决策](../bug-fix/2026-08-02-message-fork-actions-require-completed-turn-tail.md)的门禁约束。在这些气泡上，该门禁实际上是永久性的：开轮的 user 消息后面必然跟着本轮自己的节点，已消费的 steering 消息按构造就处在轮次中间，因此只有当轮次结束时该消息之后一个节点都没有——即在第一个模型事件之前就取消——控件才可能启用。读者因此看到一个永远不会启用的控件，tooltip 许诺的是这个按钮到达不了的状态。这个操作入口本身也有误导：在消息 seq 处 fork 会切在所在轮次的 `turn/end`，「在我的消息处分支」实际会把下方的回答一并带走，与在自己气泡上看到分支时「分叉重问」的直觉预期恰好相反。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
user 与 steering 气泡不再渲染分支操作。`MessageItem` 移除其 fork props，`PendingSteeringBubble` 移除其 `showBranch` 特例，`messageBranchSeqs` 收窄为 `assistantBranchSeqs`：只有已完成轮次的 transcript 尾部、且该尾部是本轮自己的带 text 内容 assistant 节点才可 fork。分支入口只存在于已定稿的回答之下。
|
||||
user 与 steering 气泡不再渲染分支操作。`MessageItem` 移除其 fork props，`PendingSteeringBubble` 移除其 `showBranch` 特例，`messageBranchSeqs` 收窄为 `assistantBranchSeqs`：只有已完成轮次的 transcript（文本记录）尾部、且该尾部是本轮自己的带 text 内容 assistant 节点才可 fork。分支入口只存在于已定稿的回答之下。
|
||||
|
||||
含有 steer 的轮次的 fork 点保持不变：fork 是切在 `turn/end` 上的日志前缀，steer 是子会话必须继承的模型可见历史，因此被引导过的轮次的已定稿回答与其他轮次一样可以 fork。assistant 侧的门禁及其可见但不可用的呈现也保持不变——在回答之下，不可用是一个短暂且可到达的状态（当前尾部被后续工具行或错误行占据），这正是 tooltip 的用武之地。
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-26-eventsource-parser-for-deepseek-sse.md
|
||||
2026-07-26-eventsource-parser-for-deepseek-sse.md: e7835bc738b3dec5aefd6011848525f6604e852e
|
||||
2026-07-26-eventsource-parser-for-deepseek-sse.zh.md: 7c746079aa7012115bea05ec0191d665c8f860d2
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-08-08-copy-only-preset-authoring.md
|
||||
2026-08-08-copy-only-preset-authoring.md: c16518b087c7acedbee3d89ce5cc8dbcaa0a0cde
|
||||
2026-08-08-copy-only-preset-authoring.zh.md: dc2d7924cb0fd9363efa9387bc8ba68bf11af5d7
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Copy-only preset authoring, and the way into a preset's files
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-08-08-copy-only-preset-authoring.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
The agent-preset settings page carried a web YAML editor: `agentPreset.write` accepted arbitrary composition text, the page held a textarea with no completion, highlighting, or diff, and the shape check leaned on the Loader's own `entryListSchema` — whose dialect includes `!!js`, so "shape-checked text" was still arbitrary code on the next mount. Weak as an editor, wide as a capability, and the source of the editor-vs-roster races the section had to defend against.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
Authoring is a host-side copy, and files are the editor. `agentPreset.write` became `agentPreset.copy { from, agentPreset, name? }`: two ids the host resolves against its own roots plus an optional display name, whole-directory `cp` (symlinks dereferenced, modes re-tightened to owner-only with owner-execute kept), metadata rewritten to keep the source's description but never its name or `order`. The page becomes: read-only viewer over shipped compositions, copy dialog as the only create entry (no blank "new preset" — writing YAML from nothing is not a thing people do), delete for custom rows, and a location action that leads to the files — `agentPreset.openDocument { agentPreset }` resolves the directory host-side and opens it natively, or answers `{ opened: false, path }` for the row to show as text where the deployment has no desktop (`hasDocument` on `list`, pinned by the gateway's `nativeOpen` config where `canOpenNativePath` platform detection would mislead, e.g. e2e and containers).
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
- No composition text and no path crosses the browser wire in either authoring direction; the `entryListSchema`/`!!js` concern dissolves with `assertComposition` itself (deleted). The privileged set is now `read`/`copy`/`openDocument`/`remove` — none accepts a filesystem target.
|
||||
- With the editor gone, hand-editing `agent.cordis.yml` is the ONLY composition edit, so the standing-mount layer grew stamp-keyed generations: `ensureStanding` compares the file's mtime+size and starts the next generation for later sessions ([standing-mounts note](../architecture/2026-08-08-per-preset-standing-mounts.md), updated in place). Without this, an edited file would serve stale compositions until process restart.
|
||||
- A copy is a full snapshot that drifts from an upgraded shipped source — accepted; the preset layer has no patch semantics (that is the bundle layer's `cordis.patch.yml`), and the shipped set itself pays the same cost (`cordis`/`code` are full copies of `standard`) for one-file readability.
|
||||
- `read` dropped `writable` (no editor to gate) and builtin directories are never opened (`openDocument` refuses non-`user` trust like `remove`): the install is overwritten by upgrades, and pointing an editor into it invites edits an upgrade silently discards.
|
||||
|
||||
## Load-bearing details
|
||||
|
||||
- **Copy target refusal is two checks on purpose.** The roster check refuses any id a root supplies — a user directory named like a shipped preset would be shadowed, so "create" would land a file nothing ever lists; the disk check (`PresetExistsError` before `cp` with `errorOnExist` as the race backstop) refuses a directory occupying the name without being a preset, which discovery cannot see.
|
||||
- **The revealed path is response-direction disclosure, loopback-pinned.** The invariant "no browser payload can select an arbitrary filesystem target" is about the request direction; showing the resolved directory to the loopback user is the fallback the plan requires. It never rides the unprivileged `list`.
|
||||
- **The e2e lane pins `nativeOpen: false`** (`agent-preset-authoring.overlay.yml`) — both so goldens render the same branch on macOS dev and headless Linux CI, and so test runs never pop a real file manager. The revealed directory is tokenized as `{{presetRoot}}` by the lane itself, since `normalizeAria` only knows the workspace cwd.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
Keeping write with a better editor (CodeMirror etc.): still arbitrary capability over the wire, still the race source, and still a worse editor than the user's own. Patch-semantics copies ("standard plus this diff"): no such layer exists below the bundle plane, and the repo's own shipped presets chose full copies deliberately. Browser-side `host.openPath` with a returned path: breaks the README's no-arbitrary-target invariant the moment the path is a request parameter.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: 仅复制的 preset 创作，与通往 preset 文件的入口
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-08-08-copy-only-preset-authoring.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
agent-preset 设置页带着一个网页 YAML 编辑器：`agentPreset.write` 接收任意组装文本，页面是一个没有补全、高亮或 diff 的文本域，形状检查依赖 Loader 自己的 `entryListSchema`——其方言含 `!!js`，所以「过了形状检查的文本」在下一次挂载时仍是任意代码。作为编辑器很弱，作为能力很宽，还是该分区不得不防御的「编辑器 vs 名单」竞态的来源。
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
创作改为宿主端复制，文件就是编辑器。`agentPreset.write` 变为 `agentPreset.copy { from, agentPreset, name? }`：两个由宿主对照自身根目录解析的 id 加一个可选显示名，整目录 `cp`（符号链接解引用，权限收紧为仅属主并保留属主执行位），元数据重写为保留来源描述、但绝不保留其名称与 `order`。页面变为：随附组装的只读查看器、作为唯一创建入口的复制对话框（不再有空白「新建预设」——从零手写 YAML 不是人会做的事）、自定义行的删除，以及通向文件的位置操作——`agentPreset.openDocument { agentPreset }` 在宿主端解析目录并原生打开，部署没有桌面时回答 `{ opened: false, path }` 供卡片以文本展示（`list` 上的 `hasDocument`；在 `canOpenNativePath` 平台探测会失真处由网关的 `nativeOpen` 配置钉死，例如 e2e 与容器）。
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
- 创作两个方向都不再有组装文本或路径跨越浏览器传输层；`entryListSchema`/`!!js` 的顾虑随 `assertComposition` 本身（已删除）一并消解。特权集现为 `read`/`copy`/`openDocument`/`remove`——没有一个接收文件系统目标。
|
||||
- 编辑器移除后，手改 `agent.cordis.yml` 成为**唯一**的组装编辑方式，因此常驻挂载层增加了以 stamp 为键的代际：`ensureStanding` 比对文件的 mtime+大小，为后续会话开启下一代际（[常驻挂载 note](../architecture/2026-08-08-per-preset-standing-mounts.md)，已就地更新）。没有它，改过的文件要等进程重启才生效。
|
||||
- 副本是完整快照，会随随附来源升级而漂移——接受；preset 层没有 patch 语义（那是 bundle 层 `cordis.patch.yml` 的能力），随附集合自己也为「一个文件读完整份组装」付了同样的代价（`cordis`/`code` 就是 `standard` 的完整副本）。
|
||||
- `read` 去掉了 `writable`（没有编辑器可门控），内置目录绝不被打开（`openDocument` 与 `remove` 一样拒绝非 `user` 信任）：安装目录会被升级覆盖，把编辑器指向它等于招揽会被升级悄悄丢弃的编辑。
|
||||
|
||||
## Load-bearing details
|
||||
|
||||
- **复制目标的拒绝刻意分两道检查。** roster 检查拒绝任一根目录提供的 id——与随附 preset 同名的用户目录会被遮蔽，「创建」只会落下一个永远不被列出的文件；磁盘检查（`cp` 之前的 `PresetExistsError`，`errorOnExist` 作竞态兜底）拒绝占着名字却不是 preset 的目录，那是 discovery 看不见的。
|
||||
- **展示的路径是响应方向的披露，且钉在环回。**「没有任何浏览器载荷能选中任意文件系统目标」这条不变量说的是请求方向；把解析出的目录展示给环回用户正是方案要求的降级。它绝不搭乘非特权的 `list`。
|
||||
- **e2e lane 钉死 `nativeOpen: false`**（`agent-preset-authoring.overlay.yml`）——既让 golden 在 macOS 开发机与无头 Linux CI 上渲染同一分支，也让测试运行永不弹出真实文件管理器。揭示的目录由 lane 自己 token 化为 `{{presetRoot}}`，因为 `normalizeAria` 只认识 workspace cwd。
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
保留 write 换个更好的编辑器（CodeMirror 等）：传输层上仍是任意能力，仍是竞态来源，而且仍不如用户自己的编辑器。带 patch 语义的副本（「standard 加这点 diff」）：bundle 面之下没有这样的层，仓库自己的随附 preset 也刻意选了完整副本。浏览器端拿返回路径调 `host.openPath`：路径一旦成为请求参数，就打破了 README 的「不可选中任意目标」不变量。
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-30-sidebar-resize-without-visible-pill.md
|
||||
2026-07-30-sidebar-resize-without-visible-pill.md: cc41898990fa23ff2937140186a8324217911d2e
|
||||
2026-07-30-sidebar-resize-without-visible-pill.zh.md: 9f1f521df2848b15f5015719bfa6f0e0e9b7be0c
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-08-08-remove-cli-demo.md
|
||||
2026-08-08-remove-cli-demo.md: 403e01f94c976d2d17eb391830721b31675cd6a9
|
||||
2026-08-08-remove-cli-demo.zh.md: 7f11e0c17a15454b99b32d14ea6eda177f4b01f6
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Remove the separate CLI demo
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-08-08-remove-cli-demo.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
After [`dsh run`](../feature/2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.md) became the product one-shot command, `@deepseek-ai/dsh-cli-demo` remained a second application package for the same job. It carried another executable, argument grammar, app composition, cancellation lifecycle, text/JSON/stream-JSON output contract, built artifact, documentation surface, and test suite. The two entry points also assembled different trees, so a successful demo did not prove the shipped `headless` profile and users had to choose between overlapping commands.
|
||||
|
||||
The replay suites still need canonical session events to pin assembled backend behavior. That testing need does not require a published command or compatibility contract.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
Delete `@deepseek-ai/dsh-cli-demo` completely: its package, bin, parser, app plugin, output formats, tests, workspace references, generated-catalog entries, and active documentation. No alias or compatibility package remains. The root `demo:headless` script is retained only as a direct alias of `dsh run`; the product command owns final-text stdout, the observation URL on stderr, persistence, exit status, and shutdown.
|
||||
|
||||
`examples/headless-agent` becomes an explicit test composition. Its Loader configs mount `@deepseek-ai/dsh-agent-spine-demo`, one root agent, JSONL persistence, and checkpoint policy as separate rows instead of hiding them behind an app bundle. The support-tier `@deepseek-ai/dsh-loader-smoke` package owns the shared direct-agent turn helper; unexported example-local drivers select their Loader configuration and render canonical events as JSONL. They are launched only by tests, have no bin, and do not define a supported product output format.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
- **Keep `dsh-cli-demo` as an alias or wrapper around `dsh run`.** Rejected because a second bin and package would preserve two discoverable owners without adding capability.
|
||||
- **Move JSON and stream-JSON flags onto `dsh run`.** Rejected because no current product consumer requires them; adopting the old demo protocol would enlarge the canonical CLI contract solely to save test machinery.
|
||||
- **Delete the canonical-event snapshots with the package.** Rejected because they pin model-visible assembled behavior that final-text product acceptance cannot observe.
|
||||
- **Keep the app plugin but delete only its bin.** Rejected because the hidden composition would still duplicate the explicit headless profile and conceal which services the test leaf mounts.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
This is intentionally breaking. `dsh-cli-demo`, its `--output-format` choices, and imports from `@deepseek-ai/dsh-cli-demo/src/cli.ts` no longer resolve. There is no public event-stream replacement in this change; callers use `dsh run` for one-shot execution and must choose an existing protocol surface when they need structured automation.
|
||||
|
||||
The repository retains backend replay coverage through test-only infrastructure, while product smoke and built-bin acceptance exercise `dsh run`. A separate one-shot package may return only if it owns a genuinely independent, versioned protocol that cannot belong to the product launcher; a second spelling or output shim is not enough.
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification
|
||||
|
||||
Focused Loader smokes cover the explicit composition in source and plain-Node built modes, snapshot tests diff its canonical JSONL and persisted logs, product acceptance covers `dsh run`, and documentation plus generated graph/catalog gates reject live references to the removed package. The frozen Agent Note archive remains historical evidence and is not rewritten.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: 移除独立的 CLI demo
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-08-08-remove-cli-demo.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
在 [`dsh run`](../feature/2026-08-08-dsh-run-headless-command.md) 成为产品的一次性命令后，`@deepseek-ai/dsh-cli-demo` 仍是承担同一工作的第二个应用包。它另行拥有一套可执行文件、参数语法、应用组装、取消生命周期、文本／JSON／stream-JSON 输出约定、构建产物、配套文档和测试套件。两个入口组装的树也不相同，因此 demo 成功不能证明已交付的 `headless` profile 可用，用户还必须在功能重叠的命令之间作出选择。
|
||||
|
||||
回放套件仍需要规范会话事件来固定组装后的后端行为。这一测试需求不需要已发布命令或兼容性约定。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
彻底删除 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-cli-demo`：包括它的包、bin、解析器、应用插件、输出格式、测试、workspace 引用、生成目录条目和现行文档。不保留别名或兼容包。根目录的 `demo:headless` 脚本仅作为 `dsh run` 的直接别名保留；stdout 上的最终文本、stderr 上的观察 URL、持久化、退出状态和关闭行为均由产品命令负责。
|
||||
|
||||
`examples/headless-agent` 成为显式测试组装。其 Loader 配置把 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-agent-spine-demo`、一个根 agent（智能体）、JSONL 持久化和检查点策略挂载为独立配置行，不再将其隐藏在应用组合包之后。支持层的 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-loader-smoke` 包负责共享的直接 agent 轮次 helper；未导出的示例本地 driver 选择各自的 Loader 配置，并将规范事件渲染为 JSONL。这些 driver 只由测试启动，不提供 bin，也不定义受支持的产品输出格式。
|
||||
|
||||
## 考虑过的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
- **保留 `dsh-cli-demo` 作为 `dsh run` 的别名或包装层。** 不予采纳：第二个 bin 和包会让同一功能继续存在两个可发现的归属方，却没有增加任何能力。
|
||||
- **把 JSON 和 stream-JSON 标志移到 `dsh run`。** 不予采纳：当前没有产品消费方需要这些标志；沿用旧 demo 协议，只会为了保留测试机制而扩大规范 CLI（命令行界面）约定。
|
||||
- **随包一并删除规范事件快照。** 不予采纳：这些快照固定了模型可见的组装行为，而只检查最终文本的产品验收无法观察这些行为。
|
||||
- **保留应用插件，只删除它的 bin。** 不予采纳：隐藏的组装仍会重复显式的 headless profile，并掩盖测试叶节点挂载了哪些服务。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
这是有意为之的破坏性变更。`dsh-cli-demo`、它的 `--output-format` 选项以及对 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-cli-demo/src/cli.ts` 的导入都不再可解析。本变更不提供公开的事件流替代接口；调用方使用 `dsh run` 执行一次性任务，需要结构化自动化时则必须选择现有的协议接口。
|
||||
|
||||
仓库通过仅供测试的基础设施保留后端回放覆盖，产品冒烟测试和 built-bin 验收则运行 `dsh run`。只有当独立的一次性包负责一套真正独立、带版本且不能归产品启动器所有的协议时，它才可以重新引入；第二种命令写法或输出 shim 并不足以构成理由。
|
||||
|
||||
## 验证
|
||||
|
||||
聚焦的 Loader 冒烟测试在源码模式和由普通 Node 启动的构建模式下覆盖显式组装，快照测试对比其规范 JSONL 和持久化日志，产品验收覆盖 `dsh run`，文档检查及生成图谱／目录门禁则拒绝对已移除包的活跃引用。冻结的 Agent Note 归档保留为历史证据，不会被重写。
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user