Merge branch 'master' into worktree/command-row-copy
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-29-request-level-llm-config-credentials.md
|
||||
2026-07-29-request-level-llm-config-credentials.md: f12a2496a767decc3ce2b065f6be03009aec8992
|
||||
2026-07-29-request-level-llm-config-credentials.zh.md: 99fd90013a24746962ca02a5f4f18cdccd53f71a
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: request-level LLM configuration and the credential seam
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-29-request-level-llm-config-credentials.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
> Scope: the first production consumers of `ctx.settings` (the two LLM adapter plugins), the new `packages/credentials/` capability family, and the `packages/util/atomic-write` extraction. The follow-up wire surface (`settings.*`/`credentials.*` RPC, secret-role masking, the web settings form) is a separate PR and not part of this note's shipped scope.
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
The [settings seam](2026-07-28-user-settings-seam.md) shipped without a production consumer, and the LLM adapters were the motivating one: both froze `apiKey`/`baseURL`/catalog into adapter instances at plugin load, so a changed key or endpoint needed a process restart, and a missing key failed plugin load — the worst possible first-run posture for a personal config page ("store a key, then restart"). Secrets were also headed the wrong way: the natural move (put `apiKey` in the settings document) would have forced masking, server-side backfill on `replace`, and dotfiles-sync warnings, a mitigation stack for a problem peer products simply do not have — Codex (`env_key` + auth.json), Reasonix (`api_key_env` + home `.env`), OpenCode/Pi (`auth.json`), Claude Code (`apiKeyHelper`) all keep secrets out of configuration files.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
**Per-request resolution, not fiber rebuilds.** The adapters take an options thunk (and a per-stream credential resolver) instead of frozen construction facts, resolving once per operation — the Pi pattern, with its tested semantics: two requests straddling a change see two configurations, one request resolves exactly once, and an in-flight stream keeps the facts it started with. This deletes the entire swap machinery a rebuild design needs (`DUPLICATE_ADAPTER` ordering, `NO_ADAPTER` windows, a deferred-activation state machine) and makes a missing key a *request-time* actionable failure (`MISSING_CREDENTIAL` naming every entry point) while the route stays registered and the catalog stays browsable. The one registration-captured fact — the retry policy the `ctx.llm` registry snapshots at `registerAdapter` (plus pi-ai's route *set*) — re-registers the same adapter instance in one synchronous section when it changes.
|
||||
|
||||
**Secrets are references, values live behind `ctx.credentials`.** Configuration (both planes) carries `apiKeyEnv: DEEPSEEK_API_KEY`; the three-package credential seam resolves it per operation. `credentials-local` layers the live process environment (read-only, wins — a launch-time override is operator intent and must be *visibly* read-only, so shadowed writes reject instead of appearing to succeed) over `$DSH_HOME/.env` (writable, byte-preserving line edits, a quoting ladder dotenv reads back verbatim, wholesale snapshot replacement on reload so a deleted entry never lingers — the Claude Code additive-reapply lesson). Resolution order in the adapters is literal `apiKey` first (preserving the historical `config.apiKey ?? env` observable semantics), then the seam, then — only without a mounted seam — the raw environment variable.
|
||||
|
||||
**Per-plugin namespaces, schema ≡ `Config`.** Each adapter registers its own namespace (`llm-deepseek`, `llm-pi-ai`) with its plugin `Config` schema and its `cordis.yml` entry as the composition `base` — a settings section is the same YAML shape as the entry config, and `resolveAdapterOptions`/`resolveProfiles` stay the one explicit resolve step for both. A live snapshot failing a beyond-schema bound keeps the last good facts (the seam's last-good philosophy extended one level up); the entry config itself still fails load. pi-ai's `providers` became a dict keyed by route so base and user layers merge per provider and the route set is structural; the array shape fails loud with migration directions, and an empty dict is the valid dormant posture — a composition ships the adapter bare and every route stays a user-plane decision.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
- **A bridge plugin (`dsh-llm-models`) owning one unified `models` dict** — with per-plugin namespaces there is nothing left to bridge, and the adapter-mapping rules it needed were pure invented indirection.
|
||||
- **Secrets in settings.yaml under `role('secret')` masking** — deleting the problem (references) beats mitigating it (mask + backfill + sync warnings); the coding-agent cohort is unanimous.
|
||||
- **Registry-level live retry policy** — making `providerRetryPolicy` re-read per call would silently change the `ctx.llm` capture contract every registration relies on; re-registering the route in place keeps that contract and stays observable.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
Onboarding is restart-free end to end (pinned by the `missing-credential` headless snapshot and the credentials-rotation composition tests): boot keyless, browse the catalog, store the key, prompt again. The demos mount `settings-local` + `credentials-local` by default and inline no `!!js` key plumbing. `runLoaderSmoke` gained `expectedExitCode` so a designed failure surface can be pinned rather than masked. Deferred: the wire/UI surface must redact `role('secret')` fields before any RPC exposes `describe()`, settings-layer arrays still replace wholesale (the deepseek `models` list), and a settings section cannot remove a composition-provided pi-ai route (only override or extend). Review of this seam later reworked where the store lives and who may read it, made one request resolve one configuration generation, and made route replacement atomic ([credential boundaries note](2026-07-30-credential-boundaries-and-atomic-registration.md)).
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note:请求级 LLM 配置与凭据 seam
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-29-request-level-llm-config-credentials.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
> 范围:`ctx.settings` 的第一批生产消费方(两个 LLM 适配器插件)、新增的 `packages/credentials/` 能力族,以及 `packages/util/atomic-write` 的抽取。后续的 wire 面(`settings.*`/`credentials.*` RPC、secret 角色脱敏、web 设置表单)是单独的 PR,不在本 note 已交付范围内。
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
[settings seam](2026-07-28-user-settings-seam.md) 落地时没有生产消费方,而 LLM 适配器正是当初驱动该 seam 的那个消费方:两个适配器都在插件加载时把 `apiKey`/`baseURL`/catalog 冻结进适配器实例,改密钥或端点就要重启进程,密钥缺失则直接使插件加载失败——对个人配置页而言,这是最糟糕的首次运行姿态(「先存密钥,再重启」)。机密的走向也不对:顺理成章的做法(把 `apiKey` 放进设置文档)会被迫引入脱敏、`replace` 时的服务端回填与 dotfiles 同步告警,为一个同类产品根本没有的问题堆起一整摞缓解措施——Codex(`env_key` + auth.json)、Reasonix(`api_key_env` + 家目录 `.env`)、OpenCode/Pi(`auth.json`)、Claude Code(`apiKeyHelper`)全都把机密挡在配置文件之外。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
**按请求解析,而非重建 fiber。**适配器改为接收一个 options thunk(外加按流调用的凭据解析器),不再持有冻结的构造期事实,每个操作解析一次——即 Pi 的模式,连同其经测试固定的语义:跨越一次变更的两个请求看到两份配置,一个请求恰好解析一次,进行中的流保持其起始事实。这删掉了重建式设计所需的整套切换机制(`DUPLICATE_ADAPTER` 顺序问题、`NO_ADAPTER` 窗口、延迟激活状态机),并把密钥缺失变成*请求时*可行动的失败(`MISSING_CREDENTIAL` 点名每个配置入口),同时路由保持注册、catalog 保持可浏览。唯一在注册期捕获的事实——`ctx.llm` 注册表在 `registerAdapter` 时快照的重试策略(外加 pi-ai 的路由*集合*)——在其变化时于一个同步区段内原地重新注册同一适配器实例。
|
||||
|
||||
**机密是引用,值藏在 `ctx.credentials` 背后。**配置(两个面)携带 `apiKeyEnv: DEEPSEEK_API_KEY`;三包凭据 seam 按操作解析它。`credentials-local` 把活跃进程环境(只读、优先——启动时覆盖是操作者意图,必须*可见地*只读,因此被遮蔽的写入直接拒绝而不是表面成功)叠加在 `$DSH_HOME/.env` 之上(可写、保字节行级编辑、dotenv 能逐字读回的引号阶梯、重载时整体替换快照使删除的条目绝不滞留——来自 Claude Code 增量重放(additive reapply)的教训)。适配器内的解析顺序为:字面 `apiKey` 优先(保留历史 `config.apiKey ?? env` 的可观察语义),然后是 seam,最后——仅在未挂载 seam 时——原始环境变量。
|
||||
|
||||
**按插件划分 namespace,schema ≡ `Config`。**每个适配器注册自己的 namespace(`llm-deepseek`、`llm-pi-ai`),schema 用其插件 `Config` schema,组合 `base` 用其 `cordis.yml` 条目——settings 分节与 entry 配置是同一种 YAML 形状,`resolveAdapterOptions`/`resolveProfiles` 对两者仍是唯一的显式 resolve 步骤。存活快照若违反 schema 之外的约束,则保留最后可用事实(seam 的最后可用值哲学向上延伸一层);entry 配置本身仍会加载失败。pi-ai 的 `providers` 改为以路由为键的字典,base 层与用户层因此按提供方合并,路由集合也由结构直接表达;数组形状响亮失败并给出迁移指引,而空字典是合法的休眠姿态——组合可以裸挂该适配器,把每一条路由都留给用户面决定。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
- **由桥接插件(`dsh-llm-models`)持有统一的 `models` 字典**——有了按插件划分的 namespace,就没有什么可桥接的了;它所需的适配器映射规则纯属凭空发明的间接层。
|
||||
- **把机密放进 settings.yaml 并靠 `role('secret')` 脱敏**——删除问题本身(引用)胜过缓解问题(脱敏 + 回填 + 同步告警);编码 agent 同类产品在这一点上口径一致。
|
||||
- **注册表级的实时重试策略**——让 `providerRetryPolicy` 每次调用都重读,会静默改变所有注册都依赖的 `ctx.llm` 捕获契约;原地重新注册路由既保住该契约,又保持可观察。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
上手流程端到端免重启(由 `missing-credential` headless 快照与凭据轮换组合测试固定):无密钥启动、浏览 catalog、存入密钥、再次发起提示。demo 默认挂载 `settings-local` + `credentials-local`,不再内联任何 `!!js` 密钥接线。`runLoaderSmoke` 新增 `expectedExitCode`,使按设计出现的失败面可以被固定而非被掩盖。延后事项:wire/UI 面在任何 RPC 暴露 `describe()` 之前必须对 `role('secret')` 字段脱敏;settings 层的数组仍整体替换(deepseek 的 `models` 列表);settings 分节无法移除组合提供的 pi-ai 路由(只能覆盖或扩展)。对该 seam 的评审随后改造了存储的所在位置与谁可以读取它,让一个请求解析出一个配置世代,并使路由替换成为原子操作([credential boundaries note](2026-07-30-credential-boundaries-and-atomic-registration.md))。
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-credential-boundaries-and-atomic-registration.md
|
||||
2026-07-30-credential-boundaries-and-atomic-registration.md: 6fe5f554acbfd804db9625fcaa794d513c8799c4
|
||||
2026-07-30-credential-boundaries-and-atomic-registration.zh.md: 3eb3b022064124aad2a389abba3063af4e2110fa
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: credential boundaries, whole-snapshot requests, and atomic route registration
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-30-credential-boundaries-and-atomic-registration.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
> Scope: the third review round over the [request-level LLM configuration seam](2026-07-29-request-level-llm-config-credentials.md) — where a stored credential lives and who can read it, how one request's facts stay one generation, and how a route set changes without a window. Companion to the [settings write-path note](2026-07-30-settings-write-path-integrity.md), whose provider fixes this round applies to `credentials-local` and whose writer lock it promotes into `dsh-atomic-write`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
Review found the credential path leaking across boundaries it had drawn. The shipped surfaces hoisted `$DSH_HOME/.env` into `process.env` before cordis booted, so on the next run `credentials-local` classified every key it had stored itself as a read-only ambient launch override: `describe()` reported `source: 'env'` with `writable: false`, `set`/`unset` rejected as shadowed, and a key stored from the web page or TUI became unrotatable and undeletable while the adapter kept using the value captured at launch. The store's own write path repeated the settings-local defects that same review round fixed (two independent chains, whole-file render from a stale cache), plus editor bugs of its own: a physical line inside another key's quoted multi-line value read as an assignment, CRLF endings degraded to LF, a multi-line entry reported `writable: true` while `set` always threw, and `credentials/updated` was emitted bare after the commit, so one broken observer made a durable write look failed. On the read side, the file's `0600` mode stops other OS users but not the model, whose bash and filesystem tools run as the same user.
|
||||
|
||||
Two request-path defects sat beside them. DeepSeek's per-request resolution kept connection facts in a last-good snapshot but re-read the literal `apiKey` from the raw configuration, so a settings generation the resolver rejected could still put its key on the previous generation's endpoint. pi-ai handed the SDK `undefined` when a configured `apiKeyEnv` resolved to nothing, letting pi-ai's own environment discovery authenticate with an unrelated provider key — another tenant, silently billed. And its route swap disposed the old registration before creating the new one: a route another adapter owned dropped every existing route, after which the facts cache could equal the registry's, so restoring the working configuration never re-applied.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
**`$DSH_HOME/.env` belongs to the credential provider alone.** No surface loads it into `process.env`. The genuine launch environment and the invoking directory's `.env` (loaded by the bin) stay the read-only ambient layer, so a composition without the provider resolves keys exactly as before, while a stored key stays file-sourced and writable across restarts — proven by a real restart in the loader composition rather than by a unit assertion about `describe()`.
|
||||
|
||||
**The stored credential has no boundary against the model, and the READMEs say so.** `0600` under a `0700` directory stops other OS users; the model's bash and filesystem tools run as that same user, and the shipped default confines nothing. What the harness does hold to is narrower and stated as exactly that: no surface hoists the document into `process.env`, and the model is never handed a resolved path to it, so reaching the value takes a deliberate read of a path it was not given. An OS-keychain provider — a store the model's processes cannot read at all — is recorded as the real answer rather than implied by a partial one.
|
||||
|
||||
**One request, one generation.** DeepSeek's resolved snapshot carries the credential facts (literal key and reference) beside the endpoint, and `resolveApiKey` receives that snapshot instead of re-reading configuration. A rejected generation now contributes nothing at all. pi-ai defers to provider-native discovery only for a profile naming no credential; a configured reference that misses fails with `MISSING_CREDENTIAL` naming the route and the reference. The boot-time credential probe is deleted: it could run before the credentials service mounted and reported every failure as a missing key, while the first request already gives the accurate error.
|
||||
|
||||
**Route replacement is a registry operation, not a caller sequence.** `registerAdapter` returns a handle carrying `replace(providers)`: the candidate set is validated in full first (conflicts, names, provider metadata), then swapped in one synchronous section. A refused replacement leaves the previous routes registered and serving, and the caller's facts cache only advances after the registry actually holds the new set, so reverting to a working configuration re-applies. pi-ai's registration facts are sorted by provider, so a settings document that merely reorders its keys is no longer a route change.
|
||||
|
||||
**Contained publication for committed credential writes.** `Credentials.notifyUpdated` fans `credentials/updated` out one listener at a time; sync throws and async rejections are logged without changing the committed operation's outcome, and `INVARIANT`-coded failures rethrow after every listener ran — the same shape the settings seam uses for `settings/updated`. `installSettingsSection`'s cleanup now distinguishes its two triggers: a provider detaching still falls back to the composition entry and re-derives, while the consumer's own unload returns immediately instead of re-registering routes during teardown.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
- **A sandbox read-denial naming `$DSH_HOME/.env`** — implemented as a `readDenyPaths` policy field (a trailing SBPL `deny file-read* file-write*`, a `/dev/null` bwrap bind) and withdrawn on its own evidence. bwrap must create that bind's mount point inside a tree its profile has already made read-only, so it refuses the entire confinement whenever the parent directory is absent — every host that has not stored a credential yet, including a fresh install; Landlock cannot subtract from its own `/` read grant, so every confined call would report `partial` for a file it never hid. A protection that breaks confinement where it works and misreports it where it does not is worse than a documented absence. Denying the whole harness home was rejected earlier for a separate reason: it also covers `sessions/`, and `DSH_SESSION_JSONL` is a documented model-visible capability.
|
||||
- **Removing `DSH_HOME` from the model's bash environment** — considered as defense in depth and rejected as theater with a real cost: the default home is a documented convention the agent can reconstruct, while the variable is how legitimate tooling finds harness state. There is no boundary here for it to complement; hiding the pointer would only make the absence harder to see.
|
||||
- **Shipping the OS-keychain provider in this round** — it is the only design where the model's processes genuinely cannot read the secret, and it is a sibling package with three platform backends. Sizing it against the rest of this review round would have delayed every other fix; it is recorded as the deferred answer, not as a maybe.
|
||||
- **A `replaceRegistration(previous, next)` service method** — the review's shape, but it makes the caller carry the previous handle and lets it pass a mismatched one. Hanging `replace` on the registration handle makes ownership structural: only the registration that holds routes can replace them.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
`update()`-adjacent behavior gained documented failure modes: a credential write can now fail on the lock deadline or on an unparsable on-disk document, and `describe()` reports `writable: false` for multi-line entries it will not rewrite. `LlmAdapter` registrants keep working unchanged (the handle is still callable as the disposer), and `DeepSeekConnectionOptions` gained credential fields, so a programmatic constructor of the adapter must supply `apiKeyEnv`. Deferred: the OS-keychain credential provider, and per-value revision checks for two writers editing one reference (last-write-wins remains the documented resolution).
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: 凭据边界、按整份快照发起的请求与原子路由注册
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-30-credential-boundaries-and-atomic-registration.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
> 范围:对[请求级 LLM(大语言模型)配置 seam](2026-07-29-request-level-llm-config-credentials.md)的第三轮评审——存下来的凭据落在哪里、谁能读到它,一次请求的事实如何保持为同一代,以及一组路由如何在不留空窗的前提下更换。本 note 与 [settings 写路径 note](2026-07-30-settings-write-path-integrity.md) 配套:本轮把那篇 note 的提供方修复套用到 `credentials-local`,并把其中的写锁提升进 `dsh-atomic-write`。
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
评审发现,凭据路径正在越过它自己划下的边界泄漏。已交付的各个面在 Cordis 启动之前就把 `$DSH_HOME/.env` 提升进了 `process.env`,于是下一次运行时,`credentials-local` 会把它自己存下的每个键都判成来自环境的只读启动覆盖:`describe()` 报告 `source: 'env'` 且 `writable: false`,`set`/`unset` 以被遮蔽为由拒绝,从 web 页面或 TUI 存入的密钥既无法轮换也无法删除,而适配器还在继续使用启动时捕获的那个值。
|
||||
|
||||
存储自身的写路径重演了同一轮评审在 settings-local 修掉的那些缺陷(两条相互独立的链、从陈旧缓存渲染整份文件),还叠加了编辑器自己的缺陷:另一个键的带引号多行值内部的一条物理行会被读成赋值,CRLF 行尾会退化成 LF,多行条目报告 `writable: true` 而 `set` 总是抛错,`credentials/updated` 又在提交之后裸发,于是一个出错的观察者就能让一次已经落盘的写入看起来失败。
|
||||
|
||||
在读取一侧,文件的 `0600` 权限挡得住其他 OS 用户,却挡不住模型:它的 bash 与文件系统工具就以同一个用户身份运行。
|
||||
|
||||
与之并排的还有两个请求路径缺陷。DeepSeek 的按请求解析把连接事实保存在最后可用快照里,却仍从原始配置重新读取字面 `apiKey`,于是被 resolver 拒绝的那一代设置,照样能把自己的密钥送到上一代的端点上。配置了 `apiKeyEnv` 却解析不到值时,pi-ai 会把 `undefined` 交给 SDK,让 pi-ai 自己的环境发现拿一个毫不相干的提供方密钥完成鉴权——那是另一个租户,账单还悄悄记在它头上。而且它的路由替换是先释放旧注册、再创建新注册:只要有一条路由已被别的适配器占有,现有路由就会被全部丢掉,此后事实缓存可能与注册表中的事实相等,于是把配置改回可用状态也不会重新生效。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
**`$DSH_HOME/.env` 只归凭据提供方所有。**没有任何一个面会把它加载进 `process.env`。真正的启动环境,以及调用目录中由 bin 加载的 `.env`,仍然是那一层只读的环境来源,因此不挂载该提供方的组合,解析密钥的方式与从前完全一致,而存下的密钥跨重启仍然来源于文件、仍然可写——这一点由 Loader 组合中的一次真实重启来证明,而不是靠对 `describe()` 的单元断言。
|
||||
|
||||
**存下的凭据对模型没有边界,而 README 就是这么写的。**`0700` 目录下的 `0600` 挡得住其他 OS 用户;模型的 bash 与文件系统工具正是以同一用户身份运行,而已交付的默认值不约束任何东西。harness 真正守住的更窄,也就照这个宽度写下来:没有任何一个面会把该文档提升进 `process.env`,模型也从不会拿到它的解析后路径,因此要拿到这个值,需要刻意去读一条并未交给它的路径。OS 钥匙串(keychain)提供方——一个模型的进程根本读不到的存储——被记录为真正的答案,而不是靠一个残缺的方案去暗示它。
|
||||
|
||||
**一次请求,一代设置。**DeepSeek 解析出的快照在端点旁一并携带凭据事实(字面密钥与引用),`resolveApiKey` 接收这份快照,而不再重新读取配置。被拒绝的那一代如今完全不再贡献任何东西。只有当一个 profile 完全没有点名凭据时,pi-ai 才交给提供方原生的发现流程;配置了引用却解析不到,就以 `MISSING_CREDENTIAL` 失败,并点名该路由与该引用。启动时的凭据探测被删除:它可能在凭据服务挂载之前就运行,并把每一种失败都报成密钥缺失,而第一次请求本就会给出准确的错误。
|
||||
|
||||
**路由替换是注册表的操作,不是调用方的一串步骤。**`registerAdapter` 返回一个携带 `replace(providers)` 的句柄:候选集合先被完整校验(冲突、名称、提供方元数据),再在一个同步区段内完成替换。被拒绝的替换会让先前的路由保持注册并继续服务,而调用方的事实缓存只有在注册表确实持有新集合之后才会推进,因此改回可用配置时会重新生效。pi-ai 的注册事实按提供方排序,因此仅仅调换键顺序的设置文档不再算作路由变更。
|
||||
|
||||
**已提交的凭据写入采用收容式发布。**`Credentials.notifyUpdated` 逐个监听器扇出 `credentials/updated`;同步抛错与异步 rejection 都只记日志,不改变已提交操作的结果,而带 `INVARIANT` 代码的失败会在每个监听器都运行完之后重抛——与 settings seam 处理 `settings/updated` 的形状相同。`installSettingsSection` 的清理现在会区分它的两个触发来源:提供方脱离时仍回退到组合的 entry 配置并重新推导,而消费方自身卸载时立即返回,不再在拆卸过程中重新注册路由。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
- **用沙箱点名拒读 `$DSH_HOME/.env`**——已按 `readDenyPaths` 策略字段实现过(末尾一条 SBPL `deny file-read* file-write*`、一条 `/dev/null` 的 bwrap bind),又被它自己的证据推翻。bwrap 必须在自己 profile 已经置为只读的目录树内部创建该 bind 的挂载点,因此只要父目录不存在,它就会拒绝整次约束——那是每一台还没有存过凭据的主机,包括全新安装;Landlock 无法从它自己对 `/` 的读取授权中减去任何东西,于是每一次受限调用都会为一个它其实从未藏起的文件报 `partial`。一项在生效之处破坏约束、在不生效之处误报的保护,比一条写明的「没有保护」更糟。至于拒掉整个 harness home,早先另有理由被否:它同时覆盖 `sessions/`,而 `DSH_SESSION_JSONL` 是一项成文的、模型可见的能力。
|
||||
- **把 `DSH_HOME` 从模型的 bash 环境中移除**——作为纵深防御考虑过,最终按「有真实代价的表演」不予采纳:默认 home 是 agent(智能体)能自行重建的成文约定,而这个变量正是正当工具链定位 harness 状态的途径。这里并不存在一条需要它来补强的边界,藏起指针只会让这份缺席更难被看见。
|
||||
- **本轮就交付 OS 钥匙串提供方**——只有这个设计能让模型的进程真正读不到机密,而它是一个带三种平台后端的兄弟包(package)。把它与本轮评审的其余工作放在一起评估体量,会拖慢其他每一项修复;它被记录为那个延后的答案,而不是一个「也许」。
|
||||
- **做成 `replaceRegistration(previous, next)` 服务方法**——这是评审给出的形状,但它要求调用方自行携带上一个句柄,也允许它传入一个不匹配的句柄。把 `replace` 挂在注册句柄上,让归属关系变成结构性的:只有持有路由的那一项注册才能替换它们。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
`update()` 邻近的行为多了成文的失败模式:凭据写入现在可能因锁截止时间到期、或磁盘文档无法解析而失败,`describe()` 对它不会改写的多行条目报告 `writable: false`。`LlmAdapter` 的注册方无需改动即可继续工作(句柄本身仍可当作释放器调用),`DeepSeekConnectionOptions` 则新增了凭据字段,因此以编程方式构造该适配器必须提供 `apiKeyEnv`。延后事项:OS 钥匙串凭据提供方,以及针对两个写方编辑同一引用的逐值修订号检查(后写胜出仍是成文的解决方式)。
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user