feat(coding-agent): wire the filesystem tools into the demo
Load dsh-fs-local + dsh-fs-policy + dsh-tool-fs after tool-todo (mirroring the acp-agent wiring), and steer the system prompt to prefer read/write/edit for file ops with bash for shell/tests/search. Update the welcome line and the FIXME(config-comments) bash note. Doc sweep now that both demos ship the fs tools and the seam resolves per-session cwd: architecture.md and the event-gate RFC no longer say the demos do file ops through bash / that no config wires the tools; the coding-agent + examples READMEs and the AGENTS.md layout blurb list the fs tools; the acp-agent README drops the launch-dir caveat (per-session cwd now works, so the server can launch anywhere). (stdio-agent is single-session, so fs-local's cwd = process.cwd() is the workspace. Keyless boot smoke is blocked locally by an unrelated inotify watcher-limit ENOSPC that also hits demo:echo; the config parses and the same fs stack boots green in the acp-agent snapshot tier.)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ provider seam dsh-fs ctx.fs: text IO + ATOMIC mutation primitives who
|
||||
provider dsh-fs-local local implementation of ctx.fs
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The model is **additive, not subtractive**: `ctx.fs` on its own is a complete, unconstrained text-storage seam — `read` reads, `write` unconditionally creates-or-overwrites, `edit` unconditionally replaces literal text in the current content. There is no "先读后写", no version check, nothing to remove; the bare provider just does the I/O atomically. `dsh-fs-policy` is a plugin that *adds* constraints on top: observed-state, read-before-edit, and "write/edit must be based on the version you read". So removing `dsh-fs-policy` does not break `dsh-tool-fs` at the service-injection boundary; it removes the policy gate and leaves the bare provider behavior. The intended deployment stance is that a config loading the fs tools also loads `dsh-fs-policy`, so the user-facing behavior and prompt discipline are read-before-write/edit (no default/example config wires the fs tools yet — the demo agents do file ops through bash). The bare-provider mode exists because the tool should not be method-coupled to the policy plugin, not because an unconstrained filesystem is the normal product stance.
|
||||
The model is **additive, not subtractive**: `ctx.fs` on its own is a complete, unconstrained text-storage seam — `read` reads, `write` unconditionally creates-or-overwrites, `edit` unconditionally replaces literal text in the current content. There is no "先读后写", no version check, nothing to remove; the bare provider just does the I/O atomically. `dsh-fs-policy` is a plugin that *adds* constraints on top: observed-state, read-before-edit, and "write/edit must be based on the version you read". So removing `dsh-fs-policy` does not break `dsh-tool-fs` at the service-injection boundary; it removes the policy gate and leaves the bare provider behavior. The intended deployment stance is that a config loading the fs tools also loads `dsh-fs-policy`, so the user-facing behavior and prompt discipline are read-before-write/edit (the `coding-agent` and `acp-agent` demos wire the full stack). The bare-provider mode exists because the tool should not be method-coupled to the policy plugin, not because an unconstrained filesystem is the normal product stance.
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh-tool-fs` no longer injects `fileContext`. It injects `fs` and `tools`/`systemPrompt`.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user