fix(vendor/include): config hot-reload keeps the last good tree and its patches

This commit is contained in:
Turtle
2026-07-22 10:55:17 +08:00
parent a409f8b4ba
commit a2f17d71ed
6 changed files with 260 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-20-config-hot-reload-resilience.md: 1a8e29c603ede50b60199e9151fca58dadcc3d40
2026-07-20-config-hot-reload-resilience.zh.md: 6c7a421bfa84504a36d5329e13a485bf72cc6b6c

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
# Agent Note: A config hot-reload must not kill or degrade a live app
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-20-config-hot-reload-resilience.zh.md)
## Problem
The demo apps mount `@cordisjs/plugin-hmr` as a leaf so a running agent picks up `cordis.yml` edits. One bad edit killed the process: `Include.refresh()` rethrew the YAML parse error, the HMR watcher awaits `refresh()` inside an async chokidar callback nobody catches, and the resulting unhandled rejection tripped `dsh-app-boot`'s fail-loud handler — `exit(1)` mid-session, losing the live TUI. Two adjacent defects made even *valid* reloads wrong: a file that parses to `undefined` (empty or mid-write truncated — editors and `sed -i` routinely produce these states) crashed the entry walk instead of reading as invalid, and a re-read never re-applied the include's `config.patches`, so any hot-reload of an overlay-based tree (Code Mode, personal overlays) silently reverted patched entries and removed inserted ones.
## Decision
Harden the vendored `@cordisjs/plugin-include` (logged as local modification 8 in [vendor/README.md](../../../../vendor/README.md)) rather than the callers:
- `refresh()` awaits the whole read-and-update and catches failures, logs a warning, and keeps the last good entry tree. A hot-reload is advisory; the invariant is that no file state reachable by an editor may take the process down.
- `read()` rejects a non-array parse result with a `TypeError`, folding the `undefined`-parse case into the same "invalid file" signal, and commits `content`/`data` only after a successful parse — so reverting an edit to the exact last good content correctly reads as "unchanged".
- `refresh()` and the `internal/update` listener apply `this.applyPatches(...)` before `root.update()`, restoring parity with `[Service.init]`. `applyPatches` deep-copies the cached parse (`structuredClone`) instead of mutating it, so repeated application converges and removing a patch reverts to the file's own values. The listener uses the incoming config's `patches` and persists that config itself: it vetoes the fiber restart (children update in place), and `Fiber.update` only assigns `this.config` behind `next()`, so without the explicit assignment the next re-read would re-apply the old overlay.
Boot-time behavior stays fail-loud and gets a sharper diagnostic: `[Service.init]` falls back to `initial` (or "config file not found") only on `ENOENT`; an existing-but-invalid file now fails with its real parse error instead of being mislabelled as absent or silently overwritten by `initial`.
## Alternatives considered
**Catch in the HMR watcher callback instead of `refresh()`.** Rejected: it would leave `refresh()` a trap for every other caller (the `internal/update` path shares the same tree-update logic), and it cannot fix the `undefined`-parse or patch-loss defects, which live inside the include.
**Filter config-file rejections in `installFailLoud`.** Rejected: the fail-loud handler exists to make late load failures visible; teaching it to classify exceptions by origin would silently swallow genuine boot failures and leave the stale-`data` crash in place.
**A PTY e2e proving the TUI survives a bad edit.** Rejected as the primary gate: the PTY smoke reads the repo's committed `cordis.yml`, so corrupting it in-place is not test-safe, and a temp copy cannot resolve the tree's bare package specifiers. The unit spec drives the exact `refresh()` entry point the watcher calls; the fix was additionally verified manually against the live TUI (bad YAML, empty file, restored file).
## Consequences
- A bad `cordis.yml` edit now logs `ignoring config reload at <file>` and the agent keeps running on the last good tree; the next valid edit applies normally. With no logger exporter mounted in the TUI demos the warning is currently invisible on screen — surfacing loader warnings in the TUI is deferred.
- Overlay trees survive base-file reloads with patches intact instead of silently reverting to the unpatched base.
- The vendored include diverges further from upstream; the divergence is logged in the vendor manifest and re-applies on the next sync.
- Known gap, out of scope here: the HMR watcher only handles chokidar `change` events, so editors that replace the file by rename (BSD `sed -i`, `git checkout`) do not trigger a config reload at all; and a reloaded app-entry config does not visibly restart the running TUI (pre-existing on the unmodified tree).
## Testing
`packages/ui/app-boot/tests/config-reload.spec.ts` boots real Loader trees against temp configs and pins: an invalid-YAML edit and an empty-file edit both resolve `refresh()` without rejection and keep the previous entry config; a subsequent valid edit applies; an overlay tree re-applies both entry patches and inserted entries on re-read; a hot-update of the include entry's own `patches` applies immediately, survives the next file re-read, and reverts cleanly when the patches are removed. The assertions fail on the unpatched vendored include.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
# Agent Note: 配置热重载不得杀死或降级正在运行的应用
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-20-config-hot-reload-resilience.md) | 中文
## Problem
各示例应用把 `@cordisjs/plugin-hmr` 挂载为叶子配置项,让运行中的 agent 能感知 `cordis.yml` 的编辑。一次错误的编辑就会杀死进程:`Include.refresh()` 把 YAML 解析错误原样抛出HMR 的文件监听器在一个无人捕获的异步 chokidar 回调里 await `refresh()`,产生的未处理 rejection 触发 `dsh-app-boot` 的快速失败处理器——会话中途 `exit(1)`,正在运行的 TUI 就此丢失。另有两个相邻缺陷让*合法*的重载也出错:解析结果为 `undefined` 的文件(空文件或写入中途被截断的文件——编辑器和 `sed -i` 常态性地产生这类中间状态)会让配置项遍历直接崩溃,而不是被判定为无效文件;并且重新读取时从不重新应用 include 的 `config.patches`,因此对基于 overlay 的配置树Code Mode、个人 overlay做任何热重载都会悄悄把打过补丁的配置项回退、并把插入的配置项移除。
## Decision
加固 vendor 的 `@cordisjs/plugin-include`(在 [vendor/README.md](../../../../vendor/README.md) 中记录为本地修改第 8 条),而不是修改调用方:
- `refresh()` await 整个「读取并更新」过程并捕获失败,记录一条警告,并保留上一份完好的配置树。热重载是尽力而为的;不变式是编辑器可能产生的任何文件状态都不得导致进程退出。
- `read()` 对非数组的解析结果抛出 `TypeError`,把 `undefined` 解析结果并入同一个「无效文件」信号,并且只在解析成功后才提交 `content`/`data`——因此把编辑撤销回与上一份完好内容完全一致时,会正确地判定为「无变化」。
- `refresh()``internal/update` 监听器在 `root.update()` 之前调用 `this.applyPatches(...)`,与 `[Service.init]` 保持一致。`applyPatches` 对缓存的解析结果做深拷贝(`structuredClone`)而不是就地修改,因此重复应用会收敛,移除补丁会回退到文件自身的值。监听器使用传入配置中的 `patches` 并自行持久化该配置:它否决 fiber 重启(子配置项就地更新),而 `Fiber.update` 只在 `next()` 之后才赋值 `this.config`,若不显式赋值,下一次重新读取会重新应用旧的 overlay。
启动期行为保持快速失败并获得更准确的诊断:`[Service.init]` 只在 `ENOENT` 时回退到 `initial`或「config file not found」存在但无效的文件现在会以真实的解析错误失败而不是被误标为文件缺失、或被 `initial` 静默覆盖。
## Alternatives considered
**在 HMR 监听回调里捕获,而不是在 `refresh()` 里。** 否决:这会让 `refresh()` 继续成为其他所有调用方的陷阱(`internal/update` 路径共享同一套树更新逻辑),而且无法修复 `undefined` 解析结果与补丁丢失这两个位于 include 内部的缺陷。
**在 `installFailLoud` 里过滤配置文件相关的 rejection。** 否决:快速失败处理器的存在意义就是让延迟出现的加载失败可见;教它按来源给异常分类会悄悄吞掉真正的启动失败,并且原样保留陈旧 `data` 导致的崩溃。
**用 PTY e2e 证明 TUI 能在错误编辑后存活。** 否决其作为主要门禁PTY 冒烟测试读取仓库中已提交的 `cordis.yml`,就地破坏它对测试不安全,而临时副本无法解析该配置树的裸包说明符。单元测试直接驱动监听器所调用的 `refresh()` 入口;此外还对运行中的 TUI 做了人工验证(错误 YAML、空文件、恢复文件
## Consequences
- 现在错误的 `cordis.yml` 编辑会记录 `ignoring config reload at <file>`agent 继续运行在上一份完好的配置树上下一次合法编辑正常生效。TUI 示例没有挂载任何日志导出器,这条警告目前不会显示在屏幕上——在 TUI 中呈现 loader 警告的工作暂缓。
- overlay 配置树在基础文件重载后补丁保持完整,不再悄悄回退到未打补丁的基础配置。
- vendor 的 include 与上游进一步分叉;该分叉已记录在 vendor 的 manifest 里,下次同步时重新应用。
- 已知缺口不在本次范围内HMR 监听器只处理 chokidar 的 `change` 事件因此通过重命名替换文件的编辑方式BSD `sed -i``git checkout`)完全不会触发配置重载;应用配置项重载后也不会可见地重启运行中的 TUI未修改的代码树上即已如此
## Testing
`packages/ui/app-boot/tests/config-reload.spec.ts` 用真实 Loader 树加载临时配置并固定以下行为:无效 YAML 编辑和空文件编辑都让 `refresh()` 正常 resolve 而不产生 rejection并保留之前的配置项配置随后的合法编辑正常生效overlay 配置树在重新读取时重新应用配置项补丁和插入的配置项;对 include 配置项自身 `patches` 的热更新立即生效、在下一次文件重读后依然保持、并在补丁移除后干净地回退。这些断言在未打补丁的 vendor include 上会失败。