refactor: apply repository naming contract
Apply the accepted pre-release package, service, type, directory, and role renames as one repository-wide change.
This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/testing/2026-06-19-acp-snapshot-tests.md
|
||||
2026-06-19-acp-snapshot-tests.md: b34770fb448062d997197c60c4b557a574cbbd62
|
||||
2026-06-19-acp-snapshot-tests.zh.md: 22ee8ee75682e60171560d928796d27e936bb685
|
||||
2026-06-19-acp-snapshot-tests.md: bee59901eed7bb068dc93699aa2bb5e55216b8ff
|
||||
2026-06-19-acp-snapshot-tests.zh.md: 2c34408d97e017e44feccbbf64fe5a15e6e172b7
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Every committed session-format fixture uses the canonical packed physical layout
|
||||
|
||||
### Replay derives the model script from the log
|
||||
|
||||
`llm-replay` short-circuits the provider-agnostic `llm/stream` waterfall. `deriveReplayScript()` splits recorded `assistant/chunk` events at terminal `finish` chunks and uses `(turn, step)` changes to reject an unterminated prior call. A `compact/summary` with `llmStreamCall: true` contributes one call at its durable log position: replay reconstructs canonical block boundaries from `rawOutput`, retains recorded usage when present, and supplies a terminal `stop`. The marker distinguishes that local call from template or remote summaries whose retained `rawOutput` did not consume this context's adapter.
|
||||
`llm-replay` short-circuits the provider-agnostic `llm/stream` waterfall. `deriveReplayScript()` splits recorded `assistant/chunk` events at terminal `finish` chunks and uses `(turn, step)` changes to reject an unterminated prior call. A `compaction/summary` with `llmStreamCall: true` contributes one call at its durable log position: replay reconstructs canonical block boundaries from `rawOutput`, retains recorded usage when present, and supplies a terminal `stop`. The marker distinguishes that local call from template or remote summaries whose retained `rawOutput` did not consume this context's adapter.
|
||||
|
||||
### The in-memory replay entry honors the full LLM contract
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
### 回放从日志推导模型脚本
|
||||
|
||||
`llm-replay` 短路了提供方无关的 `llm/stream` waterfall（瀑布式事件）。`deriveReplayScript()` 在终止的 `finish` 分片处切分已记录的 `assistant/chunk` 事件，并用 `(turn, step)` 变化拒绝前一条未终止的调用。携带 `llmStreamCall: true` 的 `compact/summary` 会在其持久日志位置贡献一次调用：回放根据 `rawOutput` 重建规范块边界，保留已记录的 usage（如有），并提供终止的 `stop`。该标记将这次本地调用与模板摘要或远程摘要区分开；后两者即使保留了 `rawOutput`，也未使用此上下文的适配器。
|
||||
`llm-replay` 短路了提供方无关的 `llm/stream` waterfall（瀑布式事件）。`deriveReplayScript()` 在终止的 `finish` 分片处切分已记录的 `assistant/chunk` 事件，并用 `(turn, step)` 变化拒绝前一条未终止的调用。携带 `llmStreamCall: true` 的 `compaction/summary` 会在其持久日志位置贡献一次调用：回放根据 `rawOutput` 重建规范块边界，保留已记录的 usage（如有），并提供终止的 `stop`。该标记将这次本地调用与模板摘要或远程摘要区分开；后两者即使保留了 `rawOutput`，也未使用此上下文的适配器。
|
||||
|
||||
### 内存中的回放条目遵守完整的 LLM 约定
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/testing/2026-06-22-fork-child-replay-seed-boundary.md
|
||||
2026-06-22-fork-child-replay-seed-boundary.md: bcbbd279771a2ebe7eee643958ecf09cbd7ca7be
|
||||
2026-06-22-fork-child-replay-seed-boundary.zh.md: 19652ace20f8f2d90fa115a5be0039f7876cd259
|
||||
2026-06-22-fork-child-replay-seed-boundary.md: 2768f32adff2badf2d4b18d14ce7eebcb87fda09
|
||||
2026-06-22-fork-child-replay-seed-boundary.zh.md: e97dae4eefa35147225fc7dca3973ce5e6df9f4f
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ English | [中文](2026-06-22-fork-child-replay-seed-boundary.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
The [per-session snapshot replay Agent Note](2026-06-22-subagent-snapshot-replay.md) made the snapshot tier express a nested-agent shape: a parent plus one recorded log per in-process subagent, each replayed as its own script keyed by calling session. It noted (§ Scope, final bullet) that a fork snapshot was "a trivial future addition, not a gap in the keying." That was wrong about a fork child specifically — not the keying, but the *script derivation*.
|
||||
|
||||
A subagent script is derived from a recorded session log by [`deriveReplayScript`](../../../../packages/support/llm-replay): it groups the log's `assistant/chunk` events by `(turn, step)` into one replay entry per `stream()` call. This is correct for a **spawn** child, whose log contains only its own model calls.
|
||||
A subagent script is derived from a recorded session log by [`deriveReplayScript`](../../../../packages/test-support/llm-replay): it groups the log's `assistant/chunk` events by `(turn, step)` into one replay entry per `stream()` call. This is correct for a **spawn** child, whose log contains only its own model calls.
|
||||
|
||||
A **fork** child is different. The fork backend seeds the child session with a *balanced completed-turn prefix of the parent's log* ([`dsh-subagent-inprocess`](../../../../packages/subagent/subagent-inprocess)), and that seed becomes the child session's persisted `log` (`Session`'s constructor copies the seed into `this.log`). So a fork child's `.jsonl` begins with the **parent's** events — including the parent's `assistant/chunk` events — and only then carries the child's own turn.
|
||||
A **fork** child is different. The fork backend seeds the child session with a *balanced completed-turn prefix of the parent's log* ([`dsh-subagent-in-process-driver`](../../../../packages/subagent/subagent-in-process-driver)), and that seed becomes the child session's persisted `log` (`Session`'s constructor copies the seed into `this.log`). So a fork child's `.jsonl` begins with the **parent's** events — including the parent's `assistant/chunk` events — and only then carries the child's own turn.
|
||||
|
||||
Deriving the child script from the whole fork-child log therefore replays the **parent's** recorded responses as the **child's** model calls: the live fork child's first `stream()` would receive the parent's first recorded chunk sequence instead of its own. The recorded scenarios are all spawn today, so this never fired — but a fork snapshot would have mis-routed silently, exactly the class of bug the snapshot tier exists to catch.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[逐会话快照回放 Agent Note](2026-06-22-subagent-snapshot-replay.md)使快照层能够表达嵌套 agent（智能体）形状：一个父项加上每个进程内 subagent 的一份记录日志，每份日志都按调用会话作为键，以独立脚本回放。它曾指出（§ 范围，最后一个项目符号），fork 快照「只是未来很容易添加的一项，并非键控缺口」。这一判断对 fork 子会话而言是错误的——问题不在键控，而在*脚本派生*。
|
||||
|
||||
subagent 脚本由 [`deriveReplayScript`](../../../../packages/support/llm-replay) 从已录制的会话日志推导：它按 `(turn, step)` 对日志中的 `assistant/chunk` 事件分组，每次 `stream()` 调用对应一条回放条目。对 **spawn** 子会话而言这是正确的，因为其日志只包含自身的模型调用。
|
||||
subagent 脚本由 [`deriveReplayScript`](../../../../packages/test-support/llm-replay) 从已录制的会话日志推导：它按 `(turn, step)` 对日志中的 `assistant/chunk` 事件分组，每次 `stream()` 调用对应一条回放条目。对 **spawn** 子会话而言这是正确的，因为其日志只包含自身的模型调用。
|
||||
|
||||
**fork** 子会话不同。fork 后端用*父日志的一段平衡的已完成轮次前缀*（[`dsh-subagent-inprocess`](../../../../packages/subagent/subagent-inprocess)）来播种子会话，而该 seed 会成为子会话持久化的 `log`（`Session` 构造函数将 seed 复制进 `this.log`）。因此 fork 子会话的 `.jsonl` 以**父会话**的事件开头——包括父会话的 `assistant/chunk` 事件——之后才是子会话自身的轮次。
|
||||
**fork** 子会话不同。fork 后端用*父日志的一段平衡的已完成轮次前缀*（[`dsh-subagent-in-process-driver`](../../../../packages/subagent/subagent-in-process-driver)）来播种子会话，而该 seed 会成为子会话持久化的 `log`（`Session` 构造函数将 seed 复制进 `this.log`）。因此 fork 子会话的 `.jsonl` 以**父会话**的事件开头——包括父会话的 `assistant/chunk` 事件——之后才是子会话自身的轮次。
|
||||
|
||||
从 fork 子会话的完整日志推导脚本，会把**父会话**的已录制响应当作**子会话**的模型调用来回放：实际运行的 fork 子会话第一次调用 `stream()` 时，会收到父会话的第一段分片序列而非自身的。当时已录制的场景全部是 spawn，所以这从未触发——但 fork 快照会静默地错误路由，恰好属于快照层存在的意义所要捕获的那类 bug。
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/testing/2026-06-22-subagent-snapshot-replay.md
|
||||
2026-06-22-subagent-snapshot-replay.md: 187831b2d3c2f08b32289983afbbe0bc03484c82
|
||||
2026-06-22-subagent-snapshot-replay.zh.md: d54ebece4dcbeb0bbc4667e83d766f1bbcbe71af
|
||||
2026-06-22-subagent-snapshot-replay.md: bdd4e93ea185c5483c2ff81eba617baaf8cc40b2
|
||||
2026-06-22-subagent-snapshot-replay.zh.md: 3b40464f37990176cded2a6ea4f64e15caee6a06
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-06-22-subagent-snapshot-replay.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
The snapshot tier (`pnpm run test:snapshot`) boots the real `acp-agent` subprocess, replays a recorded session through [`dsh-llm-replay`](../../../../packages/support/llm-replay), and diffs the normalized automation wire + re-persisted session log against committed expected outputs. Most scenarios exercise assembled backend behavior through that real process boundary.
|
||||
The snapshot tier (`pnpm run test:snapshot`) boots the real `acp-agent` subprocess, replays a recorded session through [`dsh-llm-replay`](../../../../packages/test-support/llm-replay), and diffs the normalized automation wire + re-persisted session log against committed expected outputs. Most scenarios exercise assembled backend behavior through that real process boundary.
|
||||
|
||||
It was built for ONE session per process, and that assumption is wired into two places:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ The alternative considered and rejected was a **call-ordered merge of the parent
|
||||
|
||||
Two nested scenarios were added and recorded against the real API:
|
||||
|
||||
- **`subagent-spawn`** — the parent delegates one subtask via the `subagent` tool to a fresh spawn child (2 sessions).
|
||||
- **`subagent-spawn-in-process`** — the parent delegates one subtask via the `subagent` tool to a fresh spawn child (2 sessions).
|
||||
- **`subagent-multi`** — the parent delegates two subtasks, each to its own spawn child (3 sessions), stressing the per-session keying with three concurrent scripts and the `createdAt` ordering of two children under one parent.
|
||||
|
||||
Both replay keyless in the default gate.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
快照层（`pnpm run test:snapshot`）会启动真实 `acp-agent` 子进程，通过 [`dsh-llm-replay`](../../../../packages/support/llm-replay) 回放已记录会话，并将规范化后的自动化协议输出 + 重新持久化的会话日志与已提交预期输出进行 diff。大多数场景通过这条真实进程边界测试组装后的后端行为。
|
||||
快照层（`pnpm run test:snapshot`）会启动真实 `acp-agent` 子进程，通过 [`dsh-llm-replay`](../../../../packages/test-support/llm-replay) 回放已记录会话，并将规范化后的自动化协议输出 + 重新持久化的会话日志与已提交预期输出进行 diff。大多数场景通过这条真实进程边界测试组装后的后端行为。
|
||||
|
||||
该层最初为每个进程只有一个会话而构建，这一假设硬编码在两处：
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
新增两个嵌套场景，均对真实 API 录制：
|
||||
|
||||
- **`subagent-spawn`**：父 agent 通过 `subagent` 工具将一个子任务委派给一个新 spawn 的子 agent（2 个会话）。
|
||||
- **`subagent-spawn-in-process`**：父 agent 通过 `subagent` 工具将一个子任务委派给一个新 spawn 的子 agent（2 个会话）。
|
||||
- **`subagent-multi`**：父 agent 委派两个子任务，各自交给自己的 spawn 子 agent（3 个会话），以三份独立的逐会话脚本和同一父 agent 下两个子会话的 `createdAt` 排序来压测逐会话键控。
|
||||
|
||||
两者均在默认门禁中以 keyless 方式回放。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/testing/2026-07-24-web-gui-browser-e2e-lane.md
|
||||
2026-07-24-web-gui-browser-e2e-lane.md: 6e52d96a8adb5486e8666d65a3425bf5a0aad4a9
|
||||
2026-07-24-web-gui-browser-e2e-lane.zh.md: b25f96f78126b9df0fe14b8d5eb53df2f288ba0d
|
||||
2026-07-24-web-gui-browser-e2e-lane.md: afe3c937a733ed50073ada5c9c6f40c6c93c6641
|
||||
2026-07-24-web-gui-browser-e2e-lane.zh.md: 57a4d3ae5fba7c10211587e36ce9e41e7e985d7e
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ The web GUI ships as a real assembled chain — chromium page → client plugin
|
||||
|
||||
A plain shared-fixture module (the [testing-policy sanctioned shape](../../../../docs/testing.md)), not a package: the gate-worthy logic — replay derivation, session parsing, log scrubbing, persistence — lives in the gated packages `dsh-llm-replay`, `dsh-acp-snapshot`, and `dsh-session-persistence-jsonl`; what remains is boot wiring and browser glue, and chromium-driving code cannot hold per-file 100% coverage on the browserless coverage runners.
|
||||
|
||||
`launchWebScaffold()` boots the real web composition from the shipped `apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml` plus `apps/cli/config/web.cordis.yml` through the vendored Loader's include mechanism — the same tree and mechanism `AppCLIEntry` drives for `dsh web`. Divergences ride include patches over that tree, the ACP `cordis.snapshot.yml` pattern expressed in-process: temp `persistenceRoot`; every host-level `skill-local` root (`dshHome`, `agentsHome`, and `bundledSkillDir`) pinned beneath the temp workspace with watching disabled, because ambient skill catalogs are model-visible input; `workspace-context` disabled (recorded fixtures must not embed this repo's AGENTS.md); `session-title-llm` disabled (its fire-and-forget title call would race the loop for the session's replay cursor); the webserver row pinned to port 0 with the built dist; and in keyless modes `llm-deepseek` disabled. A patch id that stops matching a row fails the boot sweep loudly instead of drifting. The boot runs `chdir`'d to the temp workspace so the api-gateway's `process.cwd()` session default, tool cwds, and fixtures agree; the `dsh web` bin's own glue (argv, profile json, AppCLIEntry) stays held by the keyless CLI smokes in `smoke-real.e2e.ts`. Setup rollback and ordinary close both dispose the Cordis tree before removing the two owned temp roots, attempt every cleanup independently, and report cleanup failures without masking the setup failure.
|
||||
`launchWebScaffold()` boots the real web composition from the shipped `apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml` plus `apps/cli/config/web.cordis.yml` through the vendored Loader's include mechanism — the same tree and mechanism `AppCLIEntry` drives for `dsh web`. Divergences ride include patches over that tree, the ACP `cordis.snapshot.yml` pattern expressed in-process: temp `persistenceRoot`; every host-level `skill-filesystem` root (`dshHome`, `agentsHome`, and `bundledSkillDir`) pinned beneath the temp workspace with watching disabled, because ambient skill catalogs are model-visible input; `agent-instructions` disabled (recorded fixtures must not embed this repo's AGENTS.md); `session-title-llm` disabled (its fire-and-forget title call would race the loop for the session's replay cursor); the webserver row pinned to port 0 with the built dist; and in keyless modes `llm-deepseek` disabled. A patch id that stops matching a row fails the boot sweep loudly instead of drifting. The boot runs `chdir`'d to the temp workspace so the api-gateway's `process.cwd()` session default, tool cwds, and fixtures agree; the `dsh web` bin's own glue (argv, profile json, AppCLIEntry) stays held by the keyless CLI smokes in `smoke-real.e2e.ts`. Setup rollback and ordinary close both dispose the Cordis tree before removing the two owned temp roots, attempt every cleanup independently, and report cleanup failures without masking the setup failure.
|
||||
|
||||
Keyless model displacement is the disabled adapter row plus `installLlmReplay` filling the empty adapter registry on the settled root ctx in providers-catalog mode — never catch-all: with the adapter row disabled no adapter exists, so catch-all would leave `resolveModelInfo` unroutable and `compact-basic`'s post-step pressure check would warn every step instead of being provably inert (the published 128k `contextWindow` keeps it inert for small fixtures). The direct install rather than an inserted replay plugin row is deliberate: it returns the `ReplayHandle` the teardown consumption check needs. A scenario with no fixture leaves the registry empty, so a stray stream fails loud with NO_ADAPTER.
|
||||
Keyless model displacement is the disabled adapter row plus `installLlmReplay` filling the empty adapter registry on the settled root ctx in providers-catalog mode — never catch-all: with the adapter row disabled no adapter exists, so catch-all would leave `resolveModelInfo` unroutable and `compaction-basic`'s post-step pressure check would warn every step instead of being provably inert (the published 128k `contextWindow` keeps it inert for small fixtures). The direct install rather than an inserted replay plugin row is deliberate: it returns the `ReplayHandle` the teardown consumption check needs. A scenario with no fixture leaves the registry empty, so a stray stream fails loud with NO_ADAPTER.
|
||||
|
||||
`seedSession()` seeds cold sessions through the real persistence API — a throwaway `Context` mounting `SessionStore` + `SessionPersistenceJsonl` against the host's root, `create()` + `append()`, one `utimes` backdate for deterministic sidebar order (the `semantic-checkpoint.snapshot.ts` precedent) — never raw file writes, so the seeder knows nothing of bucket hashing, filename encoding, or compression, and the host's zstd default needs no boot knob. Seeds are validated at seed time (parseable, ending in `turn/end` — an open final turn would be mutated by resume's crash repair).
|
||||
`seedSession()` seeds cold sessions through the real persistence API — a throwaway `Context` mounting `SessionStore` + `JsonlSessionPersistence` against the host's root, `create()` + `append()`, one `utimes` backdate for deterministic sidebar order (the `semantic-checkpoint.snapshot.ts` precedent) — never raw file writes, so the seeder knows nothing of bucket hashing, filename encoding, or compression, and the host's zstd default needs no boot knob. Seeds are validated at seed time (parseable, ending in `turn/end` — an open final turn would be mutated by resume's crash repair).
|
||||
|
||||
### Determinism rules
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ Surveyed AI-chat/agent web UIs and mocking layers (LibreChat, vercel/ai-chatbot
|
||||
|
||||
**Placeholder `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY` + replay interception instead of disabling the adapter row.** Rejected despite zero composition change and two in-tree precedents: it satisfies `llm-deepseek`'s fail-loud key check with a lie and leaves a dead adapter mounted-but-intercepted; the disabled row (the ACP overlay's move) is honest keylessness and fails loud at the earliest resolvable point.
|
||||
|
||||
**A `packages/support/web-snapshot` package with a `defineWebSnapshotSuite` factory.** Rejected: chromium-driving source cannot honestly hold per-file 100% coverage on browserless coverage runners, and the scenario-specific interactions have not produced a stable browser-free contract beyond the helpers already exported from gated packages and the local scaffold. Reconsider when a second web-shaped consumer or demonstrably repeated lifecycle code establishes that contract.
|
||||
**A `packages/test-support/web-snapshot` package with a `defineWebSnapshotSuite` factory.** Rejected: chromium-driving source cannot honestly hold per-file 100% coverage on browserless coverage runners, and the scenario-specific interactions have not produced a stable browser-free contract beyond the helpers already exported from gated packages and the local scaffold. Reconsider when a second web-shaped consumer or demonstrably repeated lifecycle code establishes that contract.
|
||||
|
||||
**A committed normalized-session-log golden as a second expected surface.** Rejected: the log surface is pinned by the ACP/headless/TUI suites through the same loop and persistence; here it would double refresh cost and re-test lower tiers. Inline world-state assertions on root-context events keep the world-verification duty.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -92,4 +92,4 @@ Surveyed AI-chat/agent web UIs and mocking layers (LibreChat, vercel/ai-chatbot
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
The web surface gains its record-once/replay-forever tier: the real chromium → SSE → apiproxy → loop → tools → persistence chain runs keylessly in ~10-30s, deterministic across repeat runs, with fixtures owned and re-recordable by the lane itself. Costs accepted: every intentional conversation-UI change ends with a keyless `DSH_SNAPSHOT=refresh` (golden churn is reviewed diff, anchors keep semantic green); the aria format is Playwright-owned — the one committed snapshot format the repo does not control — so playwright version bumps must be deliberate bump-and-refresh commits (the dependency floats `^1.49.0` in `apps/web/package.json`; pin exactly if churn bites); replay's first-call-order binding constrains scenarios to one prompting session each, with the consumption assertion as the tripwire; `compact-basic` shares the session's replay cursor and stays inert only under the published 128k catalog window; and the required consumer job pays for Chromium provisioning and one browser run so the PR that changes the assembled UI owns its expected-output diff. The opt-in performance lane preserves a repeatable diagnostic workload without adding host-sensitive duration or memory expectations to CI; performance regressions remain a manually interpreted signal until the repository owns a calibrated benchmark environment.
|
||||
The web surface gains its record-once/replay-forever tier: the real chromium → SSE → apiproxy → loop → tools → persistence chain runs keylessly in ~10-30s, deterministic across repeat runs, with fixtures owned and re-recordable by the lane itself. Costs accepted: every intentional conversation-UI change ends with a keyless `DSH_SNAPSHOT=refresh` (golden churn is reviewed diff, anchors keep semantic green); the aria format is Playwright-owned — the one committed snapshot format the repo does not control — so playwright version bumps must be deliberate bump-and-refresh commits (the dependency floats `^1.49.0` in `apps/web/package.json`; pin exactly if churn bites); replay's first-call-order binding constrains scenarios to one prompting session each, with the consumption assertion as the tripwire; `compaction-basic` shares the session's replay cursor and stays inert only under the published 128k catalog window; and the required consumer job pays for Chromium provisioning and one browser run so the PR that changes the assembled UI owns its expected-output diff. The opt-in performance lane preserves a repeatable diagnostic workload without adding host-sensitive duration or memory expectations to CI; performance regressions remain a manually interpreted signal until the repository owns a calibrated benchmark environment.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ Web GUI 以一条真实组装链交付——chromium 页面 → client 插件 bu
|
||||
|
||||
一个普通的共享 fixture 模块（[测试政策认可的形态](../../../../docs/testing.md)），不是包：值得门禁把守的逻辑——回放推导、会话解析、日志脱敏、持久化——都在已受门禁的包 `dsh-llm-replay`、`dsh-acp-snapshot`、`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl` 中；剩下的只是启动接线和浏览器胶水，而驱动 chromium 的源码在无浏览器的覆盖率 runner 上无法诚实保持逐文件 100% 覆盖率。
|
||||
|
||||
`launchWebScaffold()` 通过 vendored Loader 的 include 机制，从交付的 `apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml` 与 `apps/cli/config/web.cordis.yml` 启动真实 web 组合——与 `AppCLIEntry` 为 `dsh web` 驱动的是同一棵树、同一套机制。差异全部经 include patch 覆盖在这棵树上，即 ACP `cordis.snapshot.yml` 模式的进程内表达：临时 `persistenceRoot`；每个主机级 `skill-local` 根目录（`dshHome`、`agentsHome` 和 `bundledSkillDir`）都钉在临时工作区下并禁用监听，因为环境 skill（技能）目录是模型可见输入；禁用 `workspace-context`（录制的 fixture 不得嵌入本仓库的 AGENTS.md）；禁用 `session-title-llm`（其发后不管的标题调用会与循环争抢会话的回放游标）；webserver 行钉到端口 0，并使用已构建的 dist；无密钥模式下禁用 `llm-deepseek`。patch 的 id 一旦不再匹配任何行，boot 扫描会大声失败而不是漂移。boot 在临时工作区 `chdir` 下运行，使 api-gateway 的 `process.cwd()` 会话默认值、工具 cwd 与 fixture 一致；`dsh web` bin 自身的胶水（argv、profile json、AppCLIEntry）仍由 `smoke-real.e2e.ts` 中的无密钥 CLI（命令行界面）冒烟把守。初始化回滚和正常关闭都会先对 Cordis 树执行 dispose（资源释放），再删除 scaffold 持有的两个临时根目录；每项清理都会独立尝试，并会报告清理失败而不掩盖初始化失败。
|
||||
`launchWebScaffold()` 通过 vendored Loader 的 include 机制，从交付的 `apps/cli/config/base.cordis.yml` 与 `apps/cli/config/web.cordis.yml` 启动真实 web 组合——与 `AppCLIEntry` 为 `dsh web` 驱动的是同一棵树、同一套机制。差异全部经 include patch 覆盖在这棵树上，即 ACP `cordis.snapshot.yml` 模式的进程内表达：临时 `persistenceRoot`；每个主机级 `skill-filesystem` 根目录（`dshHome`、`agentsHome` 和 `bundledSkillDir`）都钉在临时工作区下并禁用监听，因为环境 skill（技能）目录是模型可见输入；禁用 `agent-instructions`（录制的 fixture 不得嵌入本仓库的 AGENTS.md）；禁用 `session-title-llm`（其发后不管的标题调用会与循环争抢会话的回放游标）；webserver 行钉到端口 0，并使用已构建的 dist；无密钥模式下禁用 `llm-deepseek`。patch 的 id 一旦不再匹配任何行，boot 扫描会大声失败而不是漂移。boot 在临时工作区 `chdir` 下运行，使 api-gateway 的 `process.cwd()` 会话默认值、工具 cwd 与 fixture 一致；`dsh web` bin 自身的胶水（argv、profile json、AppCLIEntry）仍由 `smoke-real.e2e.ts` 中的无密钥 CLI（命令行界面）冒烟把守。初始化回滚和正常关闭都会先对 Cordis 树执行 dispose（资源释放），再删除 scaffold 持有的两个临时根目录；每项清理都会独立尝试，并会报告清理失败而不掩盖初始化失败。
|
||||
|
||||
无密钥的模型替换 = 禁用适配器行的 patch 加 `installLlmReplay` 在停稳的根 ctx 上以提供方目录（providers-catalog）模式填充空的适配器注册表——绝不用 catch-all：适配器行被禁用后不存在任何适配器，catch-all 会让 `resolveModelInfo` 无路由可走，`compact-basic` 的步后压力检查将步步告警，而不是被可证明地闲置（发布的 128k `contextWindow` 使该路径对小 fixture 保持闲置）。选择直接安装而非插入回放插件行是刻意的：直接安装返回收尾消费检查所需的 `ReplayHandle`。没有 fixture 的场景让注册表保持空置，任何意外的流式调用都会以 NO_ADAPTER 大声失败。
|
||||
无密钥的模型替换 = 禁用适配器行的 patch 加 `installLlmReplay` 在停稳的根 ctx 上以提供方目录（providers-catalog）模式填充空的适配器注册表——绝不用 catch-all：适配器行被禁用后不存在任何适配器，catch-all 会让 `resolveModelInfo` 无路由可走，`compaction-basic` 的步后压力检查将步步告警，而不是被可证明地闲置（发布的 128k `contextWindow` 使该路径对小 fixture 保持闲置）。选择直接安装而非插入回放插件行是刻意的：直接安装返回收尾消费检查所需的 `ReplayHandle`。没有 fixture 的场景让注册表保持空置，任何意外的流式调用都会以 NO_ADAPTER 大声失败。
|
||||
|
||||
`seedSession()` 通过真实持久化 API 播种冷会话——一次性 `Context` 挂载 `SessionStore` + `SessionPersistenceJsonl` 到 host 的根上下文，`create()` + `append()`，一次 `utimes` 回拨保证侧栏顺序确定（`semantic-checkpoint.snapshot.ts` 先例）——绝不裸写文件，因此播种器对桶哈希、文件名编码、压缩一无所知，host 的 zstd 默认值也无需任何启动开关。种子在播种时即校验（可解析、以 `turn/end` 结尾——未闭合的最终轮次会被恢复（resume）的崩溃修复改写）。
|
||||
`seedSession()` 通过真实持久化 API 播种冷会话——一次性 `Context` 挂载 `SessionStore` + `JsonlSessionPersistence` 到 host 的根上下文，`create()` + `append()`，一次 `utimes` 回拨保证侧栏顺序确定（`semantic-checkpoint.snapshot.ts` 先例）——绝不裸写文件，因此播种器对桶哈希、文件名编码、压缩一无所知，host 的 zstd 默认值也无需任何启动开关。种子在播种时即校验（可解析、以 `turn/end` 结尾——未闭合的最终轮次会被恢复（resume）的崩溃修复改写）。
|
||||
|
||||
### 确定性规则
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ Web GUI 以一条真实组装链交付——chromium 页面 → client 插件 bu
|
||||
|
||||
**用占位 `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY` + 回放拦截替代禁用适配器行。** 尽管零组合改动且树内有两处先例仍被否决：它用谎言满足 `llm-deepseek` 的快速失败密钥检查，还留下一个挂载却被拦截的死适配器；禁用行（ACP overlay 的同款做法）是诚实的无密钥，并在最早可解析点快速失败。
|
||||
|
||||
**`packages/support/web-snapshot` 包 + `defineWebSnapshotSuite` 工厂。** 已否决：驱动 chromium 的源码在无浏览器的覆盖率 runner 上无法诚实保持逐文件 100%，且除受门禁的包已导出的辅助工具与本地 scaffold 外，这些场景专用交互尚未形成稳定的无浏览器约定。出现第二个 web 形态消费方，或被证实重复的生命周期代码确立该约定后，再重新考虑。
|
||||
**`packages/test-support/web-snapshot` 包 + `defineWebSnapshotSuite` 工厂。** 已否决：驱动 chromium 的源码在无浏览器的覆盖率 runner 上无法诚实保持逐文件 100%，且除受门禁的包已导出的辅助工具与本地 scaffold 外，这些场景专用交互尚未形成稳定的无浏览器约定。出现第二个 web 形态消费方，或被证实重复的生命周期代码确立该约定后，再重新考虑。
|
||||
|
||||
**第二份提交的规范化会话日志预期输出。** 已否决：日志表面已由 ACP/headless/TUI 套件经同一循环与持久化钉住；在此只会翻倍刷新成本并重复测试下层。内联在根上下文事件上的世界状态断言保住了验证世界的义务。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -92,4 +92,4 @@ Web GUI 以一条真实组装链交付——chromium 页面 → client 插件 bu
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
Web 表面获得了录制一次/永久回放的层级：真实 chromium → SSE → apiproxy → 循环 → 工具 → 持久化的链路以约 10-30 秒无密钥运行，重复运行结果确定，fixture 由车道自身持有并可重录。接受的成本：每次有意的会话 UI 变更都以一次无密钥 `DSH_SNAPSHOT=refresh` 收尾（预期输出变动是受评审的 diff，锚断言保住语义绿色）；aria 格式归 Playwright 所有——仓库唯一不受自己控制的提交快照格式——因此 playwright 版本升级必须是刻意的升级加刷新提交（依赖在 `apps/web/package.json` 中浮动为 `^1.49.0`；若变动伤人则改为精确锁定）；回放的首次调用顺序绑定把每个场景限制为至多一个发起提示的会话，消费断言是绊线；`compact-basic` 与会话共享回放游标，仅在目录中发布的 128k 上下文窗口下保持闲置；必需的消费方任务承担 Chromium 供给与一次浏览器运行的成本，使改动组装后 UI 的 PR（Pull Request）持有相应的预期输出 diff。按需启用的性能车道保留了可重复的诊断工作负载，又不会向 CI 添加受 host 差异影响的时长或内存预期；在仓库拥有经校准的基准测试环境之前，性能回归仍是需要人工解读的信号。
|
||||
Web 表面获得了录制一次/永久回放的层级：真实 chromium → SSE → apiproxy → 循环 → 工具 → 持久化的链路以约 10-30 秒无密钥运行，重复运行结果确定，fixture 由车道自身持有并可重录。接受的成本：每次有意的会话 UI 变更都以一次无密钥 `DSH_SNAPSHOT=refresh` 收尾（预期输出变动是受评审的 diff，锚断言保住语义绿色）；aria 格式归 Playwright 所有——仓库唯一不受自己控制的提交快照格式——因此 playwright 版本升级必须是刻意的升级加刷新提交（依赖在 `apps/web/package.json` 中浮动为 `^1.49.0`；若变动伤人则改为精确锁定）；回放的首次调用顺序绑定把每个场景限制为至多一个发起提示的会话，消费断言是绊线；`compaction-basic` 与会话共享回放游标，仅在目录中发布的 128k 上下文窗口下保持闲置；必需的消费方任务承担 Chromium 供给与一次浏览器运行的成本，使改动组装后 UI 的 PR（Pull Request）持有相应的预期输出 diff。按需启用的性能车道保留了可重复的诊断工作负载，又不会向 CI 添加受 host 差异影响的时长或内存预期；在仓库拥有经校准的基准测试环境之前，性能回归仍是需要人工解读的信号。
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user