refactor: apply repository naming contract

Apply the accepted pre-release package, service, type, directory, and role renames as one repository-wide change.

.agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-31-code-mode-language-dispatch.zh.md)
 
 ## Problem
 
-Code Mode generated one SDK flavor: TypeScript. `ToolRegistry` hard-coded `renderToolsSdk` for the `tools:sdk` section and `requireCodeRuntime` rejected any `ctx.codeRuntime.language !== 'typescript'`. Adding a CPython backend means a program's source language is no longer fixed: the same visible tool registry must project a Python SDK when a Python runtime is loaded, and the model-facing `run_code` schema strings ("Execute a Python program …") must match the SDK section's language so the model never sees a TypeScript instruction over a Python runtime.
+Code Mode generated one SDK flavor: TypeScript. `ToolRuntime` hard-coded `renderToolsSdk` for the `tools:sdk` section and `requireCodeRuntime` rejected any `ctx.codeRuntime.language !== 'typescript'`. Adding a CPython backend means a program's source language is no longer fixed: the same visible tool registry must project a Python SDK when a Python runtime is loaded, and the model-facing `run_code` schema strings ("Execute a Python program …") must match the SDK section's language so the model never sees a TypeScript instruction over a Python runtime.
 
 This is the tool-facing half of the multi-language Code Mode split; the [code-runtime seam](../../../../packages/code-runtime/code-runtime/README.md) already carries `CodeRuntime.language`. This note owns only how `dsh-tools` dispatches on that field. The backend that implements `language: 'python'` is owned by its own note, delivered separately.
 
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ The standard that cap serves is grammatical validity, and the boundary is delibe
 
 ## Alternatives considered
 
-- **A `language` config field on `ToolRegistry`.** Deployment would then have two places to name the language (the loaded runtime and the tools config) that can disagree; the loaded runtime is the single source of truth, so the registry reads it rather than duplicating it.
+- **A `language` config field on `ToolRuntime`.** Deployment would then have two places to name the language (the loaded runtime and the tools config) that can disagree; the loaded runtime is the single source of truth, so the registry reads it rather than duplicating it.
 - **Importing the Python backend into `code-mode.ts` to detect it.** That would couple the tool layer to a concrete backend and force the protocol/backend PRs to land first. Runtime dispatch on `language` keeps the layer backend-agnostic and independently shippable.
 - **A default renderer for an unknown language.** A silent fallback would emit a TypeScript SDK over, e.g., a Ruby runtime — the model would see instructions in the wrong language. Failing loud at assembly is the repository's misconfiguration stance.
 
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ The standard that cap serves is grammatical validity, and the boundary is delibe
 
 Adding a backend language is three parallel edits — a `CodeSdkLanguage` member, an `SDK_RENDERERS` entry, and a `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS` entry — plus the renderer function the second points at, with no change to `agent-loop` or the registry structure. The two tables (`SDK_RENDERERS`, `RUN_CODE_FLAVORS`) must stay in step, and that invariant is checked statically rather than left to review: both are `satisfies`-checked against that one union, so a language added to one and not the other fails `typecheck`. This is the mechanical form the drift risk deserves — the runtime `Object.hasOwn` guards would catch it too, but only once a backend reporting that language ships: at the Consumer's integration point rather than where the drift was introduced — and never while no second backend exists. The tables keep their `Record<string, …>` declared type because `CodeRuntime.language` is an unconstrained `string`; the union pins what the harness ships, the guards reject what a runtime reports. What stays outside that check is the prose that names the well-known values instead of deriving them: `dsh-code-runtime`'s README pair, its `CodeRuntime.language` JSDoc, and the `docs/subsystems/code-runtime.md` pair at the seam, plus this package's own README pair and its `Config.mode` JSDoc. Earlier notes name the values as they stood at the time and are not on that list. Two separate reasons keep it ungated. Prose is not type-checked at all, wherever the union lives. And no type-level pin can stand in for it here: the Service Definition package must not import its Consumer's table, and `CodeRuntime.language` stays an unconstrained `string` by design, so moving the union into the Service Definition would not apply it either. A unit test pinning the two key sets equal was rejected in favor of this: it would buy the same check at the cost of a test-only export of two private tables, and would run later than the compiler does. Which of the two runtime failures surfaces depends on the entry point, for a language absent from both tables: assembly reports the missing renderer, because `wireSchemas` calls `requireCodeRuntime` before projecting, while the public `schemas()` reaches `run_code`'s language-aware getters first and reports the missing flavor. The tool layer stays free of any concrete backend dependency, so it ships and is testable ahead of the Python protocol and backend.
 
-The cost is that the Python branch of both tables is unreachable in the shipped tree: `CodeRuntime.language` is set by the loaded backend, the only published backend is `dsh-code-runtime-worker` (`'typescript'`), and the registry reads the loaded runtime rather than a config field, so no assembled application can select `renderToolsSdkPy` or `PYTHON_FLAVOR`. The model-visible surface is therefore unchanged by this note's work until a backend reporting `'python'` is published, and this change's coverage is unit-level — the renderer output plus the dispatch and rejection paths. The keyless snapshot for the Python model interface belongs to the change that publishes that backend, because only there does a real `cordis.yml` over published plugins produce a Python assembly; a snapshot example that mounted a fixture runtime here would assert against a test double, which [docs/testing.md](../../../../docs/testing.md) rejects as a substitute for the assembled application transcript.
+The cost is that the Python branch of both tables is unreachable in the shipped tree: `CodeRuntime.language` is set by the loaded backend, the only published backend is `dsh-code-runtime-worker-thread` (`'typescript'`), and the registry reads the loaded runtime rather than a config field, so no assembled application can select `renderToolsSdkPy` or `PYTHON_FLAVOR`. The model-visible surface is therefore unchanged by this note's work until a backend reporting `'python'` is published, and this change's coverage is unit-level — the renderer output plus the dispatch and rejection paths. The keyless snapshot for the Python model interface belongs to the change that publishes that backend, because only there does a real `cordis.yml` over published plugins produce a Python assembly; a snapshot example that mounted a fixture runtime here would assert against a test double, which [docs/testing.md](../../../../docs/testing.md) rejects as a substitute for the assembled application transcript.
 
 Two runtime contracts the Python SDK text asserts are owed by that same backend PR. First, the instructions tell the model that exactly `tools` and `ToolCallError` are bound and that the declared `TypedDict` classes are not, so the backend must inject those two names — with `ToolCallError.toolName` populated per the seam's `errorClass` contract — and must NOT bind the declared class names into the program's globals; injecting them "helpfully" would make the SDK text false. Second, the language has to be bound to the request: `requireCodeRuntime` resolves `ctx.codeRuntime` separately at assembly and at `run_code` execution, so a reload that swapped the runtime between those two points would hand a program written against one flavor to the other. The split is finer than those two points — `run_code`'s `description` and `parameters` getters each call `resolveFlavor(peekRuntime())`, and `schemaOf` destructures both, so one projection reads the runtime twice; both reads are for `run_code`'s own schema, since the getters are installed on that one definition and every other definition carries plain data properties. A reload between those two reads yields a single schema whose two halves name different languages. Neither is reachable here — one published backend means both reads return the same flavor and no program ever runs against this renderer's output — and the cross-language rejection is not testable until a second language exists.