feat(subagent): sibling delegations are concurrency-safe
One assistant message carrying several subagent calls now overlaps them under the rolling pool (maxParallelToolCalls) instead of serializing each foreground delegation behind an exclusive barrier; results still commit in model order. tool-subagent declares isConcurrencySafe: () => true for every call form: children work in their own sessions, a run never mutates the parent session, and sibling workspace coordination already belongs to the model for background, continuable, and workflow children. The former serial-execution pin flips to a parallel pin plus a gated genuine-overlap test, and the authored subagent-parallel snapshot pins the assembled transcript (tool/call, tool/call, tool/result, tool/result) with interchangeable twin children, which replay race-free under the existing first-call binding and createdAt harvest ordering. The provider seam now requires concurrent starts and continuable preparations for distinct children to isolate operation-local state, cancellation, settlement, and cleanup; a continuable gate test proves a cancelled preparation leaves no Agent or durable Session while its sibling persists independently. Closes deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness#1489
This commit is contained in:
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ Every in-process child is composed by one call, `applyChildComposition(childCtx,
|
||||
|
||||
`childSessionMeta()` records the joined preset id on the child's durable header for the same reason a top-level session records its own: the preset decides the tool schemas and prompt sections the model saw, so a cold read of the child's history has to rebuild that composition rather than the deployment default. It is read from the parent's live scope chain, not from the parent header, because a parent that switched preset while blank runs on the newer composition while its header still names the older one.
|
||||
|
||||
Continuable creation is the optional `SubagentProvider.prepareContinuable?()` method: its presence is the capability check, so the service rejects a configured continuable start on a provider without it, while a provider that has it may still serve ordinary one-shot delegations. The method returns only a detached `ContinuableCreateSpec` (`{ seed? }`) — data, never a capability: it carries no Agent, `AgentHandle`, prompt delivery, result, disposal, or resume operation, because the continuation manager owns identity reservation, composition, Agent creation, prompt delivery, cold resume, ownership, and disposal after preparation. A one-shot `SubagentRun` represents one disposable foreground delegation with one result and no cold-resume operation.
|
||||
Continuable creation is the optional `SubagentProvider.prepareContinuable?()` method: its presence is the capability check, so the service rejects a configured continuable start on a provider without it, while a provider that has it may still serve ordinary one-shot delegations. The method returns only a detached `ContinuableCreateSpec` (`{ seed? }`) — data, never a capability: it carries no Agent, `AgentHandle`, prompt delivery, result, disposal, or resume operation, because the continuation manager owns identity reservation, composition, Agent creation, prompt delivery, cold resume, ownership, and disposal after preparation. A one-shot `SubagentRun` represents one disposable foreground delegation with one result and no cold-resume operation. The service may invoke one provider concurrently for distinct siblings: each start or preparation owns its mutable state and cancellation path, and one operation's failure, result, or cleanup must not settle or release another. A provider may queue its own capacity internally without changing that independence contract.
|
||||
|
||||
## The durable descriptor
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user