feat(subagent): sibling delegations are concurrency-safe

One assistant message carrying several subagent calls now overlaps them
under the rolling pool (maxParallelToolCalls) instead of serializing each
foreground delegation behind an exclusive barrier; results still commit
in model order.

tool-subagent declares isConcurrencySafe: () => true for every call form:
children work in their own sessions, a run never mutates the parent
session, and sibling workspace coordination already belongs to the model
for background, continuable, and workflow children. The former
serial-execution pin flips to a parallel pin plus a gated genuine-overlap
test, and the authored subagent-parallel snapshot pins the assembled
transcript (tool/call, tool/call, tool/result, tool/result) with
interchangeable twin children, which replay race-free under the existing
first-call binding and createdAt harvest ordering.

The provider seam now requires concurrent starts and continuable
preparations for distinct children to isolate operation-local state,
cancellation, settlement, and cleanup; a continuable gate test proves a
cancelled preparation leaves no Agent or durable Session while its
sibling persists independently.

Closes deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness#1489
This commit is contained in:
Hypatia May
2026-08-11 11:54:21 +08:00
parent 6d3cabf295
commit a26d03960a
25 changed files with 325 additions and 25 deletions

View File

@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ Every in-process child is composed by one call, `applyChildComposition(childCtx,
`childSessionMeta()` records the joined preset id on the child's durable header for the same reason a top-level session records its own: the preset decides the tool schemas and prompt sections the model saw, so a cold read of the child's history has to rebuild that composition rather than the deployment default. It is read from the parent's live scope chain, not from the parent header, because a parent that switched preset while blank runs on the newer composition while its header still names the older one.
Continuable creation is the optional `SubagentProvider.prepareContinuable?()` method: its presence is the capability check, so the service rejects a configured continuable start on a provider without it, while a provider that has it may still serve ordinary one-shot delegations. The method returns only a detached `ContinuableCreateSpec` (`{ seed? }`) — data, never a capability: it carries no Agent, `AgentHandle`, prompt delivery, result, disposal, or resume operation, because the continuation manager owns identity reservation, composition, Agent creation, prompt delivery, cold resume, ownership, and disposal after preparation. A one-shot `SubagentRun` represents one disposable foreground delegation with one result and no cold-resume operation.
Continuable creation is the optional `SubagentProvider.prepareContinuable?()` method: its presence is the capability check, so the service rejects a configured continuable start on a provider without it, while a provider that has it may still serve ordinary one-shot delegations. The method returns only a detached `ContinuableCreateSpec` (`{ seed? }`) — data, never a capability: it carries no Agent, `AgentHandle`, prompt delivery, result, disposal, or resume operation, because the continuation manager owns identity reservation, composition, Agent creation, prompt delivery, cold resume, ownership, and disposal after preparation. A one-shot `SubagentRun` represents one disposable foreground delegation with one result and no cold-resume operation. The service may invoke one provider concurrently for distinct siblings: each start or preparation owns its mutable state and cancellation path, and one operation's failure, result, or cleanup must not settle or release another. A provider may queue its own capacity internally without changing that independence contract.
## The durable descriptor