Honor an already-aborted request signal in the subagent driver (Codex review round 2)
A request signal aborted BEFORE the run starts never fires an `abort` event (`addEventListener` only fires on the transition), so the backend-level bridge missed it and ran the child to `completed`. The driver now checks `request.signal?.aborted` at the top of the result path and settles `aborted` without running the child. Regression test proven red on the pre-fix code. Also refresh two stale RFC prose blocks the round-1 fix left behind: the subagent RFC's Problem statement (cited the removed `TODO(sub-agents)` markers and claimed nothing existed yet) and the unify-id RFC's fork/spawn risk bullet (described the seam as "explicitly deferred" via `AgentLoop.create`'s old TODO), now pointing at the realized seam.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Status: proposed
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
The harness has a long-deferred seam for **subagents** — an agent delegating work to another agent. The intent is sketched in two `TODO(sub-agents)` markers ([packages/core/agent/src/types.ts](../../../../packages/core/agent/src/types.ts), [packages/core/agent-loop/src/index.ts](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/src/index.ts)): a creation option referencing a parent agent (fork = seed the child session with the parent's event log; spawn = fresh session), with the child returned as an `Agent` handle so steering and event subscription work uniformly. No service, vocabulary, or implementation exists yet.
|
||||
The harness has a long-deferred seam for **subagents** — an agent delegating work to another agent. The intent was sketched in the `Agent`/`AgentLoop` interfaces ([packages/core/agent/src/types.ts](../../../../packages/core/agent/src/types.ts), [packages/core/agent-loop/src/index.ts](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/src/index.ts)): a creation option referencing a parent agent (fork = seed the child session with the parent's event log; spawn = fresh session), with the child returned as an `Agent` handle so steering and event subscription work uniformly. This RFC realizes that seam (see the implementation-status banner above for what has landed); the design below is the proposal it was argued from, when no service, vocabulary, or implementation yet existed.
|
||||
|
||||
The distinctive requirement — the one that shapes the whole design — is that **multiple subagent implementations must coexist at runtime**. A parent may want a cheap in-process child for a scoped subtask AND an isolated out-of-process child (over ACP) in the same session. The transports we foresee:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user