Coder/deepseek-harness
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix(host): preserve subagent continuation ownership

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Dudu-0223
2026-07-31 22:48:30 +08:00
committed by Tianyi Cui
parent 1aedb23ca6
commit 9a7be21b7f
29 changed files with 514 additions and 101 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
.agents/notes/proposed/architecture/2026-07-29-durable-last-activity-index.i18n.yaml
View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/proposed/architecture/2026-07-29-durable-last-activity-index.md
2026-07-29-durable-last-activity-index.md: 0938e7ea2aa817818ed552fd8b702795840b547a
2026-07-29-durable-last-activity-index.zh.md: 647bce817444c77ac3cd6f51385472fff745212f
2026-07-29-durable-last-activity-index.md: 0e441f54a719b29a1a450c133e08cdf7d2c82e9e
2026-07-29-durable-last-activity-index.zh.md: 9557da0a186084499dfb0f3e8d36016d5b216ae7

2
.agents/notes/proposed/architecture/2026-07-29-durable-last-activity-index.md
View File

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-29-durable-last-activity-index.zh.md)
A cold (persisted, unattached) session has no stored answer to "when was this last worked in". `dsh-host-apiproxy`'s `summarizeCold()` therefore approximates it with the log file's mtime where one exists — `locate()` resolves a per-session artifact for JSONL and `undefined` for SQLite, whose cold sessions fall back to `createdAt` — and the web client sorts its session tree by the resulting `updatedAt`. The two backends are wrong in opposite directions: JSONL reads too new, SQLite too old.
mtime answers a different question: when the artifact was last written. Every durable write refreshes it, including writes that are not activity — a truncate-repair of a torn tail, the synthetic closers that balance an interrupted turn, and the [`session/end-seed` boundary](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-session-end-seed-log-boundary.md) a seeded session appends. (A `flush` with nothing pending is not among them: the coordinator returns without reaching the backend.) The visible consequence is stable and wrong in one direction: a session touched without being worked in promotes itself above sessions the user actually worked in afterwards, and each touch re-promotes it. "Touched" is broader than "resumed" — `dsh-host-apiproxy`'s `agentFor()` resumes a cold session on first touch, and `sessions.history` reaches it when the web client merely opens one, so ordinary browsing is enough.
mtime answers a different question: when the artifact was last written. Every durable write refreshes it, including writes that are not activity — a truncate-repair of a torn tail, the synthetic closers that balance an interrupted turn, and the [`session/end-seed` boundary](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-session-end-seed-log-boundary.md) a seeded session appends. (A `flush` with nothing pending is not among them: the coordinator returns without reaching the backend.) The visible consequence is stable and wrong in one direction: a session touched without being worked in promotes itself above sessions the user actually worked in afterwards, and each touch re-promotes it. `dsh-host-apiproxy` keeps `session.history` inspection-only, but any Agent-bound ordinary-session control resumes through `agentFor()` and is enough to promote the cold artifact.
The attached projection has a real fix — `lastActivityTime()` skips boundaries — but it needs the event log, and the cold path deliberately does not read one. Reading the log to compute `updatedAt` would defeat the header-only listing that keeps `list()` scaling with session count rather than log size.

2
.agents/notes/proposed/architecture/2026-07-29-durable-last-activity-index.zh.md
View File

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Status: proposed
一个冷会话（已持久化、未附加）对「上次是什么时候在这里面工作过」没有任何已存储的答案。因此 `dsh-host-apiproxy` 的 `summarizeCold()` 在存在日志文件时用它的 mtime 来近似它——`locate()` 为 JSONL 解析出一个逐会话产物，为 SQLite 解析出 `undefined`，而 SQLite 的冷会话会回退到 `createdAt`——而 web 客户端就按由此得到的 `updatedAt` 为自己的会话树排序。这两个后端错的方向正好相反：JSONL 读出来偏新，SQLite 偏旧。
mtime 回答的是另一个问题：这份产物上次是什么时候被写入的。每一次持久写入都会刷新它，包括那些并不是活动的写入：一次对撕裂尾部的截断修复、用来平衡被中断的轮次的那些合成 closer，以及带种子的会话会追加的 [`session/end-seed` 边界](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-session-end-seed-log-boundary.md)。（没有待处理内容的 `flush` 不在其中：协调器在到达后端之前就返回了。）用户可见的后果是稳定的，而且只朝一个方向错：一个被触碰过却没有在里面工作过的会话，会把自己排到用户此后真正工作过的那些会话之前，而且每次触碰都会重新把它排上去一次。「触碰」比「恢复」的范围更宽——`dsh-host-apiproxy` 的 `agentFor()` 会在首次触碰时恢复一个冷会话，而 web 客户端仅仅打开一个会话时 `sessions.history` 就会到达它，因此普通的浏览就够了。
mtime 回答的是另一个问题：这份产物上次是什么时候被写入的。每一次持久写入都会刷新它，包括那些并不是活动的写入：一次对撕裂尾部的截断修复、用来平衡被中断的轮次的那些合成 closer，以及带种子的会话会追加的 [`session/end-seed` 边界](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-session-end-seed-log-boundary.md)。（没有待处理内容的 `flush` 不在其中：协调器在到达后端之前就返回了。）用户可见的后果是稳定的，而且只朝一个方向错：一个被触碰过却没有在里面工作过的会话，会把自己排到用户此后真正工作过的那些会话之前，而且每次触碰都会重新把它排上去一次。`dsh-host-apiproxy` 让 `session.history` 保持只执行检查，但任何绑定到 Agent 的普通会话控件都会通过 `agentFor()` 恢复会话，足以把冷态产物排到前面。
已附加会话的那个投影有真正的修复办法（`lastActivityTime()` 会跳过边界），但它需要事件日志，而冷路径有意不去读日志。为计算 `updatedAt` 而读取日志，会让只读 header 的列举失去意义，而正是它让 `list()` 的开销随会话数量而非日志体量增长。