docs: replace vague provenance prose with recorded facts

This commit is contained in:
Turtle
2026-08-09 15:35:02 +08:00
parent 8c124f84b6
commit 9704749b01
380 changed files with 946 additions and 874 deletions

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md
2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md: 390d091fd6e6f7fa1694ba78b90522b70948fe92
2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.zh.md: 297b9adda4f13f6fd4da9e73bf2bcf3d8d6ead0c
2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md: fa9325d08fa73dd1654216d211abb03cdf1a0940
2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.zh.md: d8522f3714211f23bafb201e7354e8b0fc2f5fb1

View File

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.zh.md)
A long-running agent conversation grows without bound. As the event log accumulates turns, the derived message history eventually approaches the model's context window — the model then truncates mid-response (`max-tokens`) or degrades. **Compaction** is the mitigation: replace a run of older history with a concise summary, keeping recent context intact.
The [session surface](../architecture/2026-06-18-session-surface.md) was built as the foundation for exactly this — an ordered projection over the event log with a `surfaceOp: { op: 'replace', start, end }` operation purpose-built to shadow a range of entries and insert a replacement, with `sourceEventSeqs` recording provenance so the decision replays deterministically. What remained was the plugin that *decides what to compact and produces the summary*.
The [session surface](../architecture/2026-06-18-session-surface.md) was built as the foundation for exactly this — an ordered projection over the event log with a `surfaceOp: { op: 'replace', start, end }` operation purpose-built to shadow a range of entries and insert a replacement, with `sourceEventSeqs` listing every source event so replay can validate that the replacement cites every event it removes. What remained was the plugin that *decides what to compact and produces the summary*.
Two forces shape the design. First, compaction policy and reusable token measurement vary independently: measurement belongs to the LLM-family [`ctx.tokenMeter` service](../architecture/2026-07-15-replay-token-meter-service.md), while summarization can be a model call, a template, or a remote service. Second, `SurfaceEventType` is closed to the message-producing event types (`user/message`, `assistant/message`, `tool/result`); only those may carry `surfaceOp`. A bespoke `compaction/*` event therefore **cannot** itself appear on the surface — the compiler and Session's always-on append/seed boundary reject `surfaceOp` on it.
@@ -71,12 +71,12 @@ Auto-compaction always starts at the surface head, merging the prior checkpoint
### Surface replacement: `compact/*` events are log-only; one `user/message` carries the summary
Because `SurfaceEventType` is closed, the summary cannot ride on a `compact/*` event. The backend instead appends a **single `user/message`** with `source: COMPACT_CHECKPOINT_SOURCE` and `surfaceOp: { op: 'replace', start, end }` whose `content` is the (framed) summary and whose `sourceEventSeqs` covers the shadowed entries *and* the bookkeeping events. The interface exports that source and `isCompactCheckpointSource()` so consumers recognize a persisted or cloned checkpoint without depending on backend package identity. The `compact/*` events are pure log records (lock + provenance). The surface mutation sits **inside** the lock — `compact/end` is the last event appended:
Because `SurfaceEventType` is closed, the summary cannot ride on a `compact/*` event. The backend instead appends a **single `user/message`** with `source: COMPACT_CHECKPOINT_SOURCE` and `surfaceOp: { op: 'replace', start, end }` whose `content` is the (framed) summary and whose `sourceEventSeqs` covers the shadowed entries *and* the bookkeeping events. The interface exports that source and `isCompactCheckpointSource()` so consumers recognize a persisted or cloned checkpoint without depending on backend package identity. The `compact/*` events record the lock, summary, selected range, shadowed seqs, token count, and model call without joining the surface. The surface mutation sits **inside** the lock — `compact/end` is the last event appended:
```
compact/start → log-only. Acquires the lock.
[summarize older range via the backend]
compact/summary → log-only. Provenance: raw summary, local-call marker, range, shadowed seqs, token count.
compact/summary → log-only. Records the raw summary, local-call marker, range, shadowed seqs, and token count.
user/message → canonical checkpoint source + surfaceOp { op:'replace', start, end }.
THE surface mutation (framed summary).
deriveMessages() renders it as a user-role message.
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ The basic backend wraps the summary as established checkpoint context and tags i
The `compact/start … compact/end` bracket is justified by two roles:
1. **Crash-detectable orphan + provenance** (primary). Summarization is a slow model call persisted *after* `compact/start`. A crash mid-summarization leaves a `compact/start` with no matching `compact/end` — a detectable orphan. Releasing the lock last (rather than first) converts the crash window from *silent corruption* into that detectable orphan.
1. **Crash-detectable orphan plus recorded summary inputs** (primary). Summarization is a slow model call persisted *after* `compact/start`. A crash mid-summarization leaves a `compact/start` with no matching `compact/end` — a detectable orphan. Releasing the lock last (rather than first) converts the crash window from *silent corruption* into that detectable orphan.
2. **Prevents concurrent compaction.** Every automatic, manual, and explicit-range entry point refuses a live unmatched `compact/start`. The bracket is the single lock; no process-local mutex duplicates it.
The lock excludes another compaction, not unrelated facts. Its markers are time points rather than an exclusive container, so durable inbox splices may appear between a standalone manual start and end. Automatic work requires whole-surface stability inside its turn. Manual work revalidates only the selected positional span, letting append-only context outside it remain visible after replacement.
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ The lifecycle boundary makes crash state unambiguous:
- **Automatic seams**: `agent/pre-step` (`@mode waterfall`) handles pressure before request derivation and `agent/request-error` (`@mode waterfall`) handles final request failures after the failed step closes. The pre-step payload carries the claimed batch, turn, step, and signal (see the [payload-object events decision](../architecture/2026-08-06-agent-event-payload-objects.md)), with no compaction-only prompt/prefix payload.
- **`SessionEventMap`** gains `compact/start` / `compact/summary` / `compact/end` by declaration merging (merge-extensible); `SurfaceEventType` is **not** touched. These are session events, not cordis `Events`, so the event-taxonomy gate needs no entry.
- **`dsh-compact`** owns `COMPACT_CHECKPOINT_SOURCE`, `isCompactCheckpointSource(source)`, `toolPairingBalancedBefore(session, seq)`, and `toolPairingBalancedAfter(session, seq)`. The marker identifies replacement summaries across backend implementations. The cached surface-edge checks prevent `compactRegion` and `compactIfNeeded` from splitting a tool-call/result pair, validate current membership by seq, answer both edges from one per-cut balance sequence, and reject stale or missing seqs and orphan results.
- **`dsh-session`** validates positional replacement, complete provenance, and content-only single-node `tool/result` rewrites through its one surface manager. Its invariant companion treats fresh appended tool results as executions that require an open step and pending call, while the compaction companion owns numeric-turn versus standalone-null bracket relations.
- **`dsh-session`** validates positional replacement, complete cited source-event coverage, and content-only single-node `tool/result` rewrites through its one surface manager. Its invariant companion treats fresh appended tool results as executions that require an open step and pending call, while the compaction companion owns numeric-turn versus standalone-null bracket relations.
- **Wiring**: `examples/tui-agent/cordis.yml` loads zero-config `dsh-token-meter`, `dsh-compact-tool-result-prune`, `dsh-compact-basic`, then `dsh-command-compact`; service-wide defaults make the composition usable without repeated numeric policy.
## Testing

View File

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Status: implemented
长时间运行的 agent(智能体)对话会无限增长。随着事件日志不断累积轮次,派生出的消息历史最终逼近模型的上下文窗口,模型随即截断响应(`max-tokens`)或性能退化。**上下文压缩(context compaction)** 是对此的缓解手段:用一段简洁的摘要替换一批较早的历史,保持近期上下文完整。
[会话接口面](../architecture/2026-06-18-session-surface.md)正是为此而构建的基础设施:一份建立在事件日志之上的有序投影,带有专门设计的 `surfaceOp: { op: 'replace', start, end }` 操作,用于遮蔽一段条目并插入替换内容,`sourceEventSeqs` 记录溯源信息以便决策可确定性地回放。剩下的是那个*决定压缩什么、并产出摘要*的插件。
[会话接口面](../architecture/2026-06-18-session-surface.md)正是为此而构建的基础设施:一份建立在事件日志之上的有序投影,带有专门设计的 `surfaceOp: { op: 'replace', start, end }` 操作,用于遮蔽一段条目并插入替换内容,`sourceEventSeqs` 列出每个来源事件,使回放可以验证替换是否引用了它移除的每个事件。剩下的是那个*决定压缩什么、并产出摘要*的插件。
两股力量塑造了设计。第一,压缩策略与可复用的 token 测量独立变化:测量归 LLM 系列的 [`ctx.tokenMeter` 服务](../architecture/2026-07-15-replay-token-meter-service.md)所有,摘要生成则可以使用模型调用、模板或远程服务。第二,`SurfaceEventType` 封闭为产生消息的事件类型(`user/message`、`assistant/message`、`tool/result`);只有这些类型可以携带 `surfaceOp`。因此一个专用的 `compaction/*` 事件**不能**出现在 surface 上,编译器与 Session 始终启用的 append/seed 边界都会拒绝在其上附加 `surfaceOp`。
@@ -71,12 +71,12 @@ retry → next numbered step/start ⟵ derives from the replacement surface
### Surface 替换:`compact/*` 事件仅存在于日志;一条 `user/message` 承载摘要
由于 `SurfaceEventType` 是封闭的,摘要不能搭载在 `compact/*` 事件上。后端改为追加一条**单独的 `user/message`**,带有 `source: COMPACT_CHECKPOINT_SOURCE` 和 `surfaceOp: { op: 'replace', start, end }`;其 `content` 是(带框架的)摘要,`sourceEventSeqs` 覆盖被遮蔽的条目*和*簿记事件。接口导出该来源和 `isCompactCheckpointSource()`,使消费方无需依赖后端包身份,即可识别持久化或克隆得到的检查点。`compact/*` 事件是纯日志记录(锁 + 溯源信息)。surface 变更位于锁**内部**,`compact/end` 是最后追加的事件:
由于 `SurfaceEventType` 是封闭的,摘要不能搭载在 `compact/*` 事件上。后端改为追加一条**单独的 `user/message`**,带有 `source: COMPACT_CHECKPOINT_SOURCE` 和 `surfaceOp: { op: 'replace', start, end }`;其 `content` 是(带框架的)摘要,`sourceEventSeqs` 覆盖被遮蔽的条目*和*簿记事件。接口导出该来源和 `isCompactCheckpointSource()`,使消费方无需依赖后端包身份,即可识别持久化或克隆得到的检查点。`compact/*` 事件记录锁、摘要、选中区间、被遮蔽的 seq、token 数和模型调用,但不加入 surface。surface 变更位于锁**内部**,`compact/end` 是最后追加的事件:
```
compact/start → log-only. Acquires the lock.
[summarize older range via the backend]
compact/summary → log-only. Provenance: raw summary, local-call marker, range, shadowed seqs, token count.
compact/summary → log-only. Records the raw summary, local-call marker, range, shadowed seqs, and token count.
user/message → canonical checkpoint source + surfaceOp { op:'replace', start, end }.
THE surface mutation (framed summary).
deriveMessages() renders it as a user-role message.
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ compact/end → log-only. Releases the lock (carries `error` on a recoverab
`compact/start … compact/end` 标记对承担两项职责:
1. **可检测的崩溃孤儿 + 来源追溯**(首要)。摘要生成是一次慢速模型调用,持久化在 `compact/start` *之后*。摘要生成中途崩溃会留下一个没有匹配 `compact/end` 的 `compact/start`——一个可检测的孤儿。最后释放锁(而非最先)将崩溃窗口从*静默损坏*转变为可检测的孤儿。
1. **可检测的崩溃孤儿 + 已记录的摘要输入**(首要)。摘要生成是一次慢速模型调用,持久化在 `compact/start` *之后*。摘要生成中途崩溃会留下一个没有匹配 `compact/end` 的 `compact/start`——一个可检测的孤儿。最后释放锁(而非最先)将崩溃窗口从*静默损坏*转变为可检测的孤儿。
2. **防止并发压缩。** 每个自动、手动和显式范围入口点都会拒绝活动的未匹配 `compact/start`。该标记对就是唯一的锁;没有进程本地 mutex 重复承担同一职责。
该锁只排除另一项压缩,不排除无关事实。其标记是时间点,而不是排他的容器,因此持久 inbox splice 可以出现在独立手动 start 与 end 之间。自动工作要求其轮次内的整个 surface 保持稳定。手动工作只重新验证所选位置 span,使其外部的仅追加上下文在替换后保持可见。
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ compact/end → log-only. Releases the lock (carries `error` on a recoverab
- **自动 seam**:`agent/pre-step`(`@mode waterfall`)在请求派生前处理压力,`agent/request-error`(`@mode waterfall`)处理失败步骤关闭后的最终请求失败。pre-step 的 payload 携带已领取批次、轮次、步骤与 signal(参见 [payload-object 事件决策](../architecture/2026-08-06-agent-event-payload-objects.md)),不携带压缩专属的提示词/前缀 payload。
- **`SessionEventMap`** 通过可合并扩展的声明合并获得 `compact/start` / `compact/summary` / `compact/end`;`SurfaceEventType` **未被**触及。这些是会话事件,不是 cordis `Events`,因此事件分类门禁无需新增条目。
- **`dsh-compact`** 拥有 `COMPACT_CHECKPOINT_SOURCE`、`isCompactCheckpointSource(source)`、`toolPairingBalancedBefore(session, seq)` 与 `toolPairingBalancedAfter(session, seq)`。该标记用于跨后端实现识别替换摘要。带缓存的 surface 边缘检查会防止 `compactRegion` 和 `compactIfNeeded` 拆分工具调用/结果对,按 seq 校验当前成员关系,从每个切割点的一条平衡序列回答两侧边缘,并拒绝陈旧或缺失的 seq 与孤立结果。
- **`dsh-session`** 通过唯一的 surface 管理器校验位置替换、完整溯源信息和仅内容的单节点 `tool/result` 重写。其不变式配套插件将新追加的工具结果视为执行,要求存在已打开的步骤与待处理调用,而压缩配套组件拥有数字轮次归属与独立 `null` 归属标记对之间的关系。
- **`dsh-session`** 通过唯一的 surface 管理器校验位置替换、引用的来源事件是否覆盖完整,以及仅内容的单节点 `tool/result` 重写。其不变式配套插件将新追加的工具结果视为执行,要求存在已打开的步骤与待处理调用,而压缩配套组件拥有数字轮次归属与独立 `null` 归属标记对之间的关系。
- **接线**:`examples/tui-agent/cordis.yml` 依次加载零配置的 `dsh-token-meter`、`dsh-compact-tool-result-prune`、`dsh-compact-basic`,然后加载 `dsh-command-compact`;服务级默认值使组合无需重复数值策略即可使用。
## 测试

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-06-sandbox.md
2026-07-06-sandbox.md: 06c5590454a6947030d828f087b92f44207dad6e
2026-07-06-sandbox.zh.md: 85b9b6a65b6468b19c6044b4837abc4fab1cee1a
2026-07-06-sandbox.md: d73bb5520ffba43142c70e3197ae033db1af67d9
2026-07-06-sandbox.zh.md: 5fc2ee7c4a53df22fab93c358824a10dca89989e

View File

@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ Backend profiles share the mode contract but differ in necessary host grants. La
#### The bash consumer
`dsh-bash-sandbox` extends `LocalBashExecutor`, hands `ctx.sandbox` the exact `['bash', '-c', command]` argv, and directly spawns the provider result. This leaves shell semantics and `BASH_ENV` on the inner Bash after the shipped native runner establishes confinement. A provider error propagates unchanged. A pre-process rejection is runner-owned only when the caller-owned workdir is independently usable and Node reports `ENOENT` or `EACCES` with positive provenance for provider argv[0]; a bare `syscall: 'spawn'` without an exact error path, other codes, invalid workdirs, resource failures, unrelated syscalls, and unstructured rejections retain local command-start semantics. Foreground execution converts runner-owned rejections to `SANDBOX_UNAVAILABLE` with the original detail; an asynchronous background rejection stamps `runnerFailed: true`, `denied: false`. A `SubprocessService` that synchronously throws the same provenanced shape makes background start throw `SANDBOX_UNAVAILABLE`, while other synchronous errors propagate unchanged. After a process starts, foreground and background use one runner-failure classifier that requires the rule's exit-code gate and a remaining fatal line after informational exclusions. A match outranks denial: foreground execution throws `SANDBOX_UNAVAILABLE` with that fatal line as detail; a settled `BashProcess` stamps `sandbox.runnerFailed`, and the bash producer renders it through generic `task_output`.
`dsh-bash-sandbox` extends `LocalBashExecutor`, hands `ctx.sandbox` the exact `['bash', '-c', command]` argv, and directly spawns the provider result. This leaves shell semantics and `BASH_ENV` on the inner Bash after the shipped native runner establishes confinement. A provider error propagates unchanged. A pre-process rejection is runner-owned only when the caller-owned workdir is independently usable and Node reports `ENOENT` or `EACCES` whose error path equals provider argv[0]; a bare `syscall: 'spawn'` without an exact error path, other codes, invalid workdirs, resource failures, unrelated syscalls, and unstructured rejections retain local command-start semantics. Foreground execution converts runner-owned rejections to `SANDBOX_UNAVAILABLE` with the original detail; an asynchronous background rejection stamps `runnerFailed: true`, `denied: false`. A `SubprocessService` that synchronously throws the same shape with the runner path makes background start throw `SANDBOX_UNAVAILABLE`, while other synchronous errors propagate unchanged. After a process starts, foreground and background use one runner-failure classifier that requires the rule's exit-code gate and a remaining fatal line after informational exclusions. A match outranks denial: foreground execution throws `SANDBOX_UNAVAILABLE` with that fatal line as detail; a settled `BashProcess` stamps `sandbox.runnerFailed`, and the bash producer renders it through generic `task_output`.
The model sees the current effective file policy in the owner-derived `sandbox:policy` context, while the static tool description explains the denial marker (`[sandbox: file access denied under <mode> mode]`), encourages attempting commands that may be denied, and forbids retrying around a denial; when the escalation fields are advertised, a denied result additionally carries the escalation hint itself, so the sanctioned same-turn retry is prompted at the decision point rather than depending on the model recalling the description (§ Escalation). [The current-policy decision](2026-07-30-current-sandbox-policy-context.md) owns the context's rationale and boundaries.
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ Costs and accepted limits:
## FAQ
- **A command came back with `[sandbox: file access denied under read-only mode]` — did it fail?** It RAN, and the kernel refused a file effect: the denial is a result fact orthogonal to exit code. The teaching forbids retrying around it; the one sanctioned move is the same command retried once with an escalation request.
- **How is a BROKEN sandbox told apart from a failing command?** Any provider-argv spawn rejection proves the confined launch never started, but it identifies a broken runner only when the caller-owned workdir is usable and Node reports attributable `ENOENT` or `EACCES` for that argv[0]. A bare `syscall: 'spawn'` without an exact error path and all other rejections remain ordinary command-start errors. After a process starts, runner failure outranks denial only when one `runnerFailureRules` entry matches both its optional exit-code gate and a fatal stderr line after exact informational exclusions. Foreground failures throw structured `SANDBOX_UNAVAILABLE` with spawn or matched-line detail; an asynchronously rejected or settled background task stamps `sandbox.runnerFailed` and renders its own marker. A `SubprocessService` that synchronously throws the same provenanced `ENOENT`/`EACCES` shape makes background start throw the structured error; other synchronous errors propagate unchanged. A Landlock partial-enforcement notice plus an ordinary child failure remains a command result.
- **How is a BROKEN sandbox told apart from a failing command?** Any provider-argv spawn rejection proves the confined launch never started, but it identifies a broken runner only when the caller-owned workdir is usable and Node reports attributable `ENOENT` or `EACCES` for that argv[0]. A bare `syscall: 'spawn'` without an exact error path and all other rejections remain ordinary command-start errors. After a process starts, runner failure outranks denial only when one `runnerFailureRules` entry matches both its optional exit-code gate and a fatal stderr line after exact informational exclusions. Foreground failures throw structured `SANDBOX_UNAVAILABLE` with spawn or matched-line detail; an asynchronously rejected or settled background task stamps `sandbox.runnerFailed` and renders its own marker. A `SubprocessService` that synchronously throws the same `ENOENT`/`EACCES` shape with the runner path makes background start throw the structured error; other synchronous errors propagate unchanged. A Landlock partial-enforcement notice plus an ordinary child failure remains a command result.
- **What happens on a platform with no backend — Windows today?** `confine()` throws the fail-closed `SANDBOX_UNAVAILABLE` and the command never spawns; `win32` is a reserved EMPTY chain, pinned by test to fail closed identically until a Windows runner fills it (§ Deferred phases).
- **`bwrap` is installed on my host but unusable (disabled unprivileged userns, an LSM denying `mount`) — what happens?** The chain probe is functional — it builds and enforces a real profile rather than checking `--version` — so a present-but-unusable `bwrap` fails its probe, selection falls to the packaged Landlock launcher, and the verdict is cached for the provider's lifetime.
- **Does the sandbox restrict network or process visibility?** No — `SandboxMode` claims FILE effects only; the bwrap profile deliberately does not unshare pid, and no backend claims network. Whether network restriction becomes its own knob is left open in § The seam.

View File

@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ Landlock launcher 源码和包家族位于 `native/landlock-run`,与 harness
#### bash 消费方
`dsh-bash-sandbox` 扩展 `LocalBashExecutor`,把精确的 `['bash', '-c', command]` argv 交给 `ctx.sandbox`,并直接 spawn 提供方返回的 argv。这样,随附的原生 runner 建立约束后,shell 语义与 `BASH_ENV` 仍由内层 Bash 处理。提供方错误原样传播。进程启动前,只有当调用方拥有的 workdir 经独立验证可用,并且 Node 报告 `ENOENT` 或 `EACCES`,且带有明确指向提供方 argv[0] 的来源信息时,拒绝才会归因于 runner;没有精确错误路径的裸 `syscall: 'spawn'`、其他错误码、无效 workdir、资源失败、无关 syscall 与无结构拒绝保留本地命令启动语义。前台执行会将可归因于 runner 的拒绝转为 `SANDBOX_UNAVAILABLE` 并附上原始详细信息;异步后台拒绝则盖章 `runnerFailed: true`、`denied: false`。如果 `SubprocessService` 同步抛出同样带有来源信息的 `ENOENT`/`EACCES` 形态,后台启动会抛出 `SANDBOX_UNAVAILABLE`;其他同步错误原样传播。进程启动后,前台与后台共用一个 runner 失败分类器:先排除信息性行,再要求规则的退出码门控与余下的一行致命诊断同时匹配。匹配结果优先于拒绝:前台执行抛出 `SANDBOX_UNAVAILABLE`,并以该致命行作为详细信息;结算后的 `BashProcess` 会盖章 `sandbox.runnerFailed`,bash 生产者再通过通用 `task_output` 渲染它。
`dsh-bash-sandbox` 扩展 `LocalBashExecutor`,把精确的 `['bash', '-c', command]` argv 交给 `ctx.sandbox`,并直接 spawn 提供方返回的 argv。这样,随附的原生 runner 建立约束后,shell 语义与 `BASH_ENV` 仍由内层 Bash 处理。提供方错误原样传播。进程启动前,只有当调用方拥有的 workdir 经独立验证可用,并且 Node 报告 `ENOENT` 或 `EACCES`,且错误对象的 `path` 字段等于提供方返回的 `argv[0]` 时,拒绝才会归因于 runner;没有精确错误路径的裸 `syscall: 'spawn'`、其他错误码、无效 workdir、资源失败、无关 syscall 与无结构拒绝保留本地命令启动语义。前台执行会将可归因于 runner 的拒绝转为 `SANDBOX_UNAVAILABLE` 并附上原始详细信息;异步后台拒绝则盖章 `runnerFailed: true`、`denied: false`。如果 `SubprocessService` 同步抛出同样带有 runner 路径的形态,后台启动会抛出 `SANDBOX_UNAVAILABLE`;其他同步错误原样传播。进程启动后,前台与后台共用一个 runner 失败分类器:先排除信息性行,再要求规则的退出码门控与余下的一行致命诊断同时匹配。匹配结果优先于拒绝:前台执行抛出 `SANDBOX_UNAVAILABLE`,并以该致命行作为详细信息;结算后的 `BashProcess` 会盖章 `sandbox.runnerFailed`,bash 生产者再通过通用 `task_output` 渲染它。
模型会在归属方派生的 `sandbox:policy` 上下文中看到当前有效的文件策略;静态工具描述则解释拒绝标记(`[sandbox: file access denied under <mode> mode]`),鼓励尝试可能被拒绝的命令,并禁止绕过拒绝重试。当升级字段被公布时,被拒绝的结果还会携带升级提示本身,使被认可的同轮次重试在决策点获得提示,而非依赖模型回忆描述(§ 升级机制)。[当前策略决策](2026-07-30-current-sandbox-policy-context.md)负责该上下文的理由与边界。
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ fs/web/todo 在进程内执行,因此它们的沙箱语义是各自 seam 层
## FAQ
- **一个命令返回了 `[sandbox: file access denied under read-only mode]`——它失败了吗?** 它运行了,内核拒绝了一个文件操作:拒绝是与退出码正交的结果事实。相关指令禁止通过绕过限制来重试;唯一被认可的动作是以升级请求重试同一命令一次。
- **如何区分损坏的沙箱与失败的命令?** 提供方 argv 的任何 spawn 拒绝都能证明受限启动从未开始,但只有在调用方拥有的 workdir 可用,且 Node 为该 argv[0] 报告可归因的 `ENOENT` 或 `EACCES` 时,才能据此判定 runner 损坏。没有精确错误路径的裸 `syscall: 'spawn'` 和其他所有拒绝仍是普通的命令启动错误。进程启动后,只有当 `runnerFailureRules` 中某一条目同时匹配其可选退出码门控,以及排除整行精确信息性行后的一行致命 stderr 诊断时,runner 失败才会优先于拒绝。前台失败会抛出结构化的 `SANDBOX_UNAVAILABLE`,并附带 spawn 错误或匹配行作为详细信息;遭异步拒绝或已结算的后台任务则盖章 `sandbox.runnerFailed` 并渲染自己的标记。如果 `SubprocessService` 同步抛出同样带有来源信息的 `ENOENT`/`EACCES` 形态,后台启动会抛出该结构化错误;其他同步错误原样传播。Landlock 部分强制执行通知加上普通子进程失败时,仍返回命令结果。
- **如何区分损坏的沙箱与失败的命令?** 提供方 argv 的任何 spawn 拒绝都能证明受限启动从未开始,但只有在调用方拥有的 workdir 可用,且 Node 为该 argv[0] 报告可归因的 `ENOENT` 或 `EACCES` 时,才能据此判定 runner 损坏。没有精确错误路径的裸 `syscall: 'spawn'` 和其他所有拒绝仍是普通的命令启动错误。进程启动后,只有当 `runnerFailureRules` 中某一条目同时匹配其可选退出码门控,以及排除整行精确信息性行后的一行致命 stderr 诊断时,runner 失败才会优先于拒绝。前台失败会抛出结构化的 `SANDBOX_UNAVAILABLE`,并附带 spawn 错误或匹配行作为详细信息;遭异步拒绝或已结算的后台任务则盖章 `sandbox.runnerFailed` 并渲染自己的标记。如果 `SubprocessService` 同步抛出同样带有 runner 路径的 `ENOENT`/`EACCES` 形态,后台启动会抛出该结构化错误;其他同步错误原样传播。Landlock 部分强制执行通知加上普通子进程失败时,仍返回命令结果。
- **在没有后端的平台上会发生什么——今天的 Windows?** `confine()` 抛出失败关闭的 `SANDBOX_UNAVAILABLE`,命令永不 spawn;`win32` 是保留的空链,由测试固定为同样失败关闭,直到 Windows runner 填充它(§ 延迟阶段)。
- **`bwrap` 已安装在我的主机上但不可用(禁用了非特权 userns、LSM 拒绝 `mount`)——会发生什么?** 链探测是功能性的——它构建并强制一个真实 profile 而非检查 `--version`——因此存在但不可用的 `bwrap` 探测失败,选择落到已打包的 Landlock launcher,结论在提供方生命周期内缓存。
- **沙箱限制网络或进程可见性吗?** 不——`SandboxMode` 仅声称文件操作;bwrap profile 刻意不 unshare pid,没有后端声称网络。网络限制是否成为自己的旋钮留在 § seam 中开放。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-08-self-referential-cordis-toolset.md
2026-07-08-self-referential-cordis-toolset.md: a2f614cc5a236e45622eae2b30f518181331cc79
2026-07-08-self-referential-cordis-toolset.zh.md: 6c56c2bf0c8cc8d175f451290620d9386bb69a23
2026-07-08-self-referential-cordis-toolset.md: 5fc2fb07fcd0b00bf72c818d3806b298312cdc31
2026-07-08-self-referential-cordis-toolset.zh.md: 8f34c97d94cad9b79a0e823406c07cdcfb38793f

View File

@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ The correctness investment therefore goes where it pays for every capability at
**A hand-maintained service/event reference in the tool.** The first cut of the inspect tool carried a hand-written table of service method signatures. It was replaced by the generated `api-catalog.ts` because a hand table drifts from the JSDoc the moment a signature changes and nothing gates the drift, whereas the generated artifact is freshness-checked against the same AST the docs use.
**A new `cordis/mount` session event.** A durable provenance event recording each mount (source, name) has clear precedent (`hook/invoked`, `compact/start`). It was declined for v1: mount and unmount are already visible as `tool/call` / `tool/result` pairs and the tool-set change is already logged as a full changed request header, so a dedicated event would only duplicate the record. It remains addable if an audit use case needs mount provenance separable from the tool call.
**A new `cordis/mount` session event.** A durable event recording each mount's source and name has clear precedent (`hook/invoked`, `compact/start`). It was declined for v1: mount and unmount are already visible as `tool/call` / `tool/result` pairs and the tool-set change is already logged as a full changed request header, so a dedicated event would only duplicate the record. It remains addable if an audit use case needs the mount source and name outside the tool call.
**A hardened / capability-restricted sandbox.** Trapping Node built-ins and handing mount code a whitelist façade rather than the raw context might suggest an intent to sandbox for safety. It is explicitly not that: the traps and the façade narrow the *surface* mount code sees — steering it onto cordis services and away from leak-prone Node built-ins and framework internals — for correctness and to close the unguarded-context escape, but the capabilities the façade exposes (`ctx.bash`, `ctx.fs`, `ctx.web`) reach the real runtime, so it is not a security boundary. A real one (separate process, permission prompts) was out of scope for a dev/opt-in toolset and would fight the entire point — handing the model the live runtime.

View File

@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ vm 隔离了意外的全局污染,上下文门面隐藏了框架内部细节
**在工具中手工维护服务/事件参考。** inspect 工具的第一版携带了一份手写的服务方法签名表。它被生成的 `api-catalog.ts` 取代,因为手写表在签名变化的瞬间就会与 JSDoc 脱节且没有门禁约束这种漂移,而生成产物的新鲜度由文档使用的同一套 AST 检查。
**新增 `cordis/mount` 会话事件。** 一个持久的溯源事件记录每次挂载(源码、名称)有明确先例(`hook/invoked`、`compact/start`)。v1 中予以否决:挂载和卸载已经作为 `tool/call` / `tool/result` 对可见,工具集变化已经作为完整的变更 request header 被记录,因此专用事件只会重复记录。如果审计用例需要将挂载溯源从工具调用中分离出来,日后仍可添加。
**新增 `cordis/mount` 会话事件。** 一个持久事件记录每次挂载的源码和名称,有明确先例(`hook/invoked`、`compact/start`)。v1 中予以否决:挂载和卸载已经作为 `tool/call` / `tool/result` 对可见,工具集变化已经作为完整的变更 request header 被记录,因此专用事件只会重复记录。如果审计用例需要在工具调用之外取得挂载的源码和名称,日后仍可添加。
**加固的/能力受限的沙箱。** 对 Node 内置模块设陷阱并向挂载代码提供白名单门面而非原始上下文,可能暗示意图是为安全而沙箱化。这里明确不是:陷阱和门面收窄的是挂载代码所见的*接口面*——将其引导至 cordis 服务、远离易泄漏的 Node 内置模块和框架内部——目的是正确性和封堵未受保护的上下文逃逸,但门面暴露的能力(`ctx.bash`、`ctx.fs`、`ctx.web`)触及真实运行时,因此它不是安全边界。真正的安全边界(独立进程、权限提示)超出了一个开发/显式启用工具集的范围,且会与其核心目的——将活跃运行时交给模型——相冲突。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-13-session-query-tracing.md
2026-07-13-session-query-tracing.md: 47c12824a331546676d3bc79920f861afe648431
2026-07-13-session-query-tracing.zh.md: f578a69a3004722395d5b731f82482b8ebd548e5
2026-07-13-session-query-tracing.md: 66ec68cff116c973c723ee086cdb273f9375842b
2026-07-13-session-query-tracing.zh.md: 6a39a9857d30ea7911a313bff5504d4f5ae04562

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-13-session-query-tracing.zh.md)
## Problem
Session relationships are encoded across immutable headers, positional surface operations, and logged provenance arrays. A consumer reconstructing those relationships directly would need to duplicate corpus precedence, surface folding, malformed-log handling, deterministic lineage ordering, and cloning. Positional replacement and provenance are different graphs, so collapsing them into one generic edge type would also lose meaning.
Session relationships are encoded across immutable headers, positional surface operations, and logged arrays of cited source-event seqs. A consumer reconstructing those relationships directly would need to duplicate corpus precedence, surface folding, malformed-log handling, deterministic lineage ordering, and cloning. Positional replacement and cited-source relationships mean different things, so collapsing them into one generic edge type would also lose meaning.
## Decision
@@ -14,20 +14,20 @@ Session relationships are encoded across immutable headers, positional surface o
`SessionLineageTrace` returns the target, known parents in immediate-to-outward order, and recursive descendant trees whose siblings sort by creation time and then session id. `complete: true` carries the known root; `complete: false` carries the first unresolved parent id. A cycle connected to the target fails with `SESSION_QUERY_INVALID_LINEAGE`.
`SessionEventTrace` keeps positional and provenance relationships separate. `replacedBy` is the immediate positional replacer, `replacementChain` follows replacers to the final node, and `replacedEventSeqs` lists the actual surface nodes directly removed by the target. `sourceEventSeqs` preserves direct logged source order, while `derivedEventSeqs` lists later direct reverse references in log order. Provenance is not expanded transitively.
`SessionEventTrace` keeps positional replacements separate from cited source-event relationships. `replacedBy` is the immediate positional replacer, `replacementChain` follows replacers to the final node, and `replacedEventSeqs` lists the actual surface nodes directly removed by the target. `sourceEventSeqs` preserves direct logged source order, while `derivedEventSeqs` lists later direct reverse references in log order. The query does not follow cited source events transitively.
## Validation boundary
Event tracing checks target existence before surface analysis. Both event listing and tracing then use `dsh-session`'s one-pass surface fold, which accepts or rejects the loaded log as a whole: event seqs are zero-based and contiguous, surface markers obey event-type eligibility, provenance belongs only to surface event types, present arrays are nonempty and duplicate-free, every source is an earlier seq, and every positional replacement names and cites all surface nodes it removes. Every contract failure uses `SESSION_QUERY_INVALID_SURFACE`; there is no weaker classification-only surface standard.
Event tracing checks target existence before surface analysis. Both event listing and tracing then use `dsh-session`'s one-pass surface fold, which accepts or rejects the loaded log as a whole: event seqs are zero-based and contiguous, surface markers obey event-type eligibility, only surface event types may cite source-event seqs, present arrays are nonempty and duplicate-free, every source is an earlier seq, and every positional replacement names and cites all surface nodes it removes. Every contract failure uses `SESSION_QUERY_INVALID_SURFACE`; there is no weaker classification-only surface standard.
All returned records and arrays are detached. A known live event trace never consults persistence; persisted event traces preserve the exact-read list/load consistency check. Session lineage is necessarily a cross-corpus operation and therefore preserves cross-corpus persistence failure semantics.
## Alternatives considered
- **Expose standalone tracing helpers** — rejected because the source-precedence and detachment boundary belongs to `ctx.sessionQuery`; public helpers would invite callers to bypass it.
- **Combine replacement and provenance edges** — rejected because a positional replacement can shadow surface nodes while also citing non-surface construction inputs, and consumers need to distinguish those meanings.
- **Return transitive provenance closure** — rejected because it obscures logged direct evidence, increases result size, and lets one malformed distant edge alter otherwise local output.
- **Best-effort traces over malformed provenance** — rejected because a structurally plausible partial graph would look authoritative. Exact inspection fails loudly when the canonical relationship contract is broken.
- **Combine replacement and cited-source edges** — rejected because a positional replacement can shadow surface nodes while also citing non-surface construction inputs, and consumers need to distinguish those meanings.
- **Return all transitively cited source events** — rejected because it obscures logged direct evidence, increases result size, and lets one malformed distant edge alter otherwise local output.
- **Best-effort traces over malformed source-event lists** — rejected because a structurally plausible partial result would look authoritative. Exact inspection fails loudly when the canonical relationship contract is broken.
## Consequences

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Status: implemented
## 问题
会话关系分散编码在不可变 header、位置式表面操作和已记录的来源数组中。消费方如果直接重建这些关系,就必须重复实现语料优先级、表面折叠、格式错误日志的处理、确定性的谱系顺序和克隆。位置替换与来源属于不同的图,因此把两者合并为一种通用边类型也会丢失含义。
会话关系分散编码在不可变 header、位置式表面操作和已记录的来源事件 seq 引用数组中。消费方如果直接重建这些关系,就必须重复实现语料优先级、表面折叠、格式错误日志的处理、确定性的谱系顺序和克隆。位置替换关系与来源事件引用关系表示不同含义,因此把两者合并为一种通用边类型也会丢失含义。
## 决策
@@ -14,20 +14,20 @@ Status: implemented
`SessionLineageTrace` 返回目标、按从直接父级到外层父级排序的已知父级,以及递归的后代树;同级节点先按创建时间排序,再按 session id 排序。`complete: true` 会携带已知根节点;`complete: false` 会携带第一个无法解析的父级 id。与目标相连的循环会以 `SESSION_QUERY_INVALID_LINEAGE` 失败。
`SessionEventTrace` 将位置关系与来源关系分开保留。`replacedBy` 是直接的位置替换者,`replacementChain` 沿替换者追踪至最终节点,`replacedEventSeqs` 则列出目标直接移除的真实表面节点。`sourceEventSeqs` 保留日志中直接来源的顺序,而 `derivedEventSeqs` 按日志顺序列出后续的直接反向引用。来源关系不会传递展开。
`SessionEventTrace` 将位置替换与来源事件引用关系分开保留。`replacedBy` 是直接的位置替换者,`replacementChain` 沿替换者追踪至最终节点,`replacedEventSeqs` 则列出目标直接移除的真实表面节点。`sourceEventSeqs` 保留日志中直接来源的顺序,而 `derivedEventSeqs` 按日志顺序列出后续的直接反向引用。查询不会继续传递追踪被引用的来源事件。
## 校验边界
事件追踪会在分析表面之前检查目标是否存在。随后,事件列表与追踪都会使用 `dsh-session` 的单遍表面折叠,对加载的日志整体进行接受或拒绝:事件 seq 从零开始且连续;表面标记符合事件类型的适用范围;只有表面事件类型可以携带来源;存在的数组必须非空且没有重复项;每个来源必须是更早的 seq;每次位置替换必须指明并引用它所移除的全部表面节点。任何约定违例都使用 `SESSION_QUERY_INVALID_SURFACE`;系统不存在只用于分类、要求更弱的表面标准。
事件追踪会在分析表面之前检查目标是否存在。随后,事件列表与追踪都会使用 `dsh-session` 的单遍表面折叠,对加载的日志整体进行接受或拒绝:事件 seq 从零开始且连续;表面标记符合事件类型的适用范围;只有表面事件类型可以引用来源事件 seq;存在的数组必须非空且没有重复项;每个来源必须是更早的 seq;每次位置替换必须指明并引用它所移除的全部表面节点。任何约定违例都使用 `SESSION_QUERY_INVALID_SURFACE`;系统不存在只用于分类、要求更弱的表面标准。
所有返回的记录与数组都与内部状态分离。已知的实时事件追踪绝不查询持久化;持久化事件追踪保留精确读取所要求的列表/加载一致性检查。会话谱系必然属于跨语料操作,因此也保留跨语料的持久化失败语义。
## 考虑过的替代方案
- **公开独立的追踪辅助函数**:不予采纳,因为源优先级与状态分离边界属于 `ctx.sessionQuery`;公开辅助函数会诱使调用方绕过该边界。
- **合并替换边与来源边**:不予采纳,因为位置替换可以遮蔽表面节点,同时引用不在表面上的构造输入,而消费方需要区分这两种含义。
- **返回传递来源闭包**:不予采纳,因为这会掩盖日志中直接记录的证据、增大结果,并让一条遥远的格式错误边改变原本局部的输出。
- **在格式错误的来源关系上返回尽力而为的追踪结果**:不予采纳,因为结构上看似合理的局部图会显得具有权威性。当规范的关系约定损坏时,精确检查会明确报错。
- **合并替换边与来源事件引用边**:不予采纳,因为位置替换可以遮蔽表面节点,同时引用不在表面上的构造输入,而消费方需要区分这两种含义。
- **返回所有传递引用的来源事件**:不予采纳,因为这会掩盖日志中直接记录的证据、增大结果,并让一条遥远的格式错误边改变原本局部的输出。
- **对格式错误的来源事件列表返回尽力而为的追踪结果**:不予采纳,因为结构上看似合理的局部结果会显得具有权威性。当规范的关系约定损坏时,精确检查会明确报错。
## 后果

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-16-harness-level-loop.md
2026-07-16-harness-level-loop.md: f37bea0842b3f40bf07c6660ad758d84ece23f1b
2026-07-16-harness-level-loop.zh.md: 8d61c36915c7a3b5e0fde94c4c0ba52ec48eddd1
2026-07-16-harness-level-loop.md: bc375621c5bf71ae6e3fbcd754d3b62e43353ae9
2026-07-16-harness-level-loop.zh.md: fd74fbf85a63cb2f35fbcf7f694f738a07fe0cee

View File

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Time-based `/loop` or scheduled execution is a third policy and is not implement
| Package | Repository category | Owned structures and verbs |
|---|---|---|
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-goal` | `packages/goal/goal/`, domain service | Owns `GoalId`, compare-and-set `GoalRef`, `GoalSnapshot`, four-state `GoalPhase`, structured `GoalBlockReason`, process-local `GoalActivation`, replay folding, and `get`, `create`, `edit`, `pause`, `resume`, `complete`, `block`, `clear`, and `disarm` verbs. |
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-goal` | `packages/goal/tool-goal/`, model-facing consumer | Registers exclusive `get_goal`, `create_goal`, and `update_goal`; authenticates live turn provenance and narrows autonomous-round authority to completion or blocking reports with machine-routable reason codes. |
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-goal` | `packages/goal/tool-goal/`, model-facing consumer | Registers exclusive `get_goal`, `create_goal`, and `update_goal`; requires a direct human message in a live root-agent turn and narrows autonomous-round authority to completion or blocking reports with machine-routable reason codes. |
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-goal-session` | `packages/goal/goal-session/`, continuation policy | Reserves, fences, admits, attributes, settles, cancels, and quiescently drains same-session goal rounds without importing the concrete loop. |
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-commands` | `packages/interaction/commands/`, UI registry | Owns `CommandDefinition`, discovery, scoped registration, direct dispatch, `CommandResult`, and request cancellation for human-only commands. |
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-command-goal` | `packages/goal/command-goal/`, human-command producer | Registers `/goal` status, creation, edit, pause, resume, and clear over the goal domain for TUI. |
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Normal turn completion schedules another round only while the goal remains activ
The human UX follows the compact Codex shape in the [public OpenAI Codex TUI dispatcher at commit `678157a`](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/678157acaa819d5510adfe359abb5d0392cfe461/codex-rs/tui/src/chatwidget/slash_dispatch.rs#L750-L805): `/goal` shows status, `/goal <objective>` creates, and `edit`, `pause`, `resume`, or `clear` perform direct lifecycle actions. The commit permalink keeps the researched grammar verifiable as Codex evolves. Status includes durable phase, admitted/capped rounds, and live armed/disarmed activation. Direct status and command output do not enter model history; accepted domain mutations remain reconstructable because the goal service records them.
The model receives only `get_goal`, `create_goal`, and `update_goal`. It may create a goal when a direct human request clearly asks for substantial multi-round work, and it may infer that intent in any language. It must not turn routine one-turn work into a goal. Direct-human provenance is enforced in code; semantic interpretation remains model judgment. An autonomous goal round may report `complete` or `blocked` for the exact current goal round but cannot edit, pause, resume, or replace the human objective.
The model receives only `get_goal`, `create_goal`, and `update_goal`. It may create a goal when a direct human request clearly asks for substantial multi-round work, and it may infer that intent in any language. It must not turn routine one-turn work into a goal. Code requires a direct human message in the current live root-agent turn; semantic interpretation remains model judgment. An autonomous goal round may report `complete` or `blocked` for the exact current goal round but cannot edit, pause, resume, or replace the human objective.
TUI mounts the shared command registry and complete goal stack by default and exposes `/goal` through one producer. ACP mounts the goal domain, model tools, and same-session driver but deliberately omits the human command plane. Every effective registered command is discoverable and invocable through every composed command adapter; a plugin incompatible with an application omits its command producer from that composition rather than relying on registry-level surface masks. The UI-less agent spine is opt-in so one-shot callers do not silently become multi-round operations. The headless CLI and JSON-RPC front doors do not consume the command plane; ordinary human text can still authorize model goal tools when that stack is composed.
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ The six owning Agent Notes record unit, integration, process, snapshot, cancella
- Goal-based execution ships without one overloaded “loop” object: same-session continuation and fresh-agent iteration have explicit, separately testable contracts.
- Durable goal history is replayable and forkable, while process-local activation prevents accidental work on resume.
- Humans receive a small Codex-shaped UX; models receive a compact provenance-checked tool surface; deployments can remove either independently.
- Humans receive a small Codex-shaped UX; models receive a compact tool set whose mutating calls require a direct human message in the current live root-agent turn; deployments can remove either independently.
- Ralph demonstrates a nontrivial fixed policy entirely as a plugin over existing workflow and subagent primitives.
- Round limits are generous by default but remain deployment-controlled. They bound iterations, not tokens, price, elapsed time, or external side effects.
- The original proposal's evaluator, budget, reflector, background-task, CLI, and generic loop-session architecture is intentionally not part of the implemented public surface.

View File

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Status: implemented
| 包 | 仓库类别 | 所属结构与动词 |
|---|---|---|
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-goal` | `packages/goal/goal/`,领域服务 | 拥有 `GoalId`、比较并交换 `GoalRef`、`GoalSnapshot`、四状态 `GoalPhase`、结构化 `GoalBlockReason`、进程本地 `GoalActivation`、重放折叠,以及 `get`、`create`、`edit`、`pause`、`resume`、`complete`、`block`、`clear` 与 `disarm` 动词。 |
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-goal` | `packages/goal/tool-goal/`,面向模型消费方 | 注册互斥的 `get_goal`、`create_goal` 与 `update_goal`;认证实时 Turn 来源,并把自治 Round 权限收窄到带机器可路由原因代码的完成或阻塞报告。 |
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-goal` | `packages/goal/tool-goal/`,面向模型消费方 | 注册互斥的 `get_goal`、`create_goal` 与 `update_goal`;要求实时根 agent Turn 中有一条人类直接发送的消息,并把自治 Round 权限收窄到带机器可路由原因代码的完成或阻塞报告。 |
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-goal-session` | `packages/goal/goal-session/`,续行策略 | 在不导入具体 loop 的情况下,预留、设围栏、接纳、归属、结算、取消并排空同会话 Goal Round,直至完全停稳。 |
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-commands` | `packages/interaction/commands/`,UI 注册表 | 拥有面向人类专用命令的 `CommandDefinition`、发现、作用域注册、直接分发、`CommandResult` 与请求取消。 |
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-command-goal` | `packages/goal/command-goal/`,人类命令生产方 | 为 TUI 注册构建在目标领域之上的 `/goal` 状态、创建、编辑、暂停、恢复与清除。 |
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Goal Round 驱动器为每个特定的实时 agent 至多拥有一个待定预
人类 UX 遵循 [OpenAI Codex 在提交 `678157a` 时的公开 TUI 分发器](https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/678157acaa819d5510adfe359abb5d0392cfe461/codex-rs/tui/src/chatwidget/slash_dispatch.rs#L750-L805)中的紧凑形态:`/goal` 显示状态,`/goal <objective>` 创建目标,而 `edit`、`pause`、`resume` 或 `clear` 执行直接生命周期操作。该提交永久链接让研究所得语法在 Codex 演进时仍可验证。状态包含持久阶段、已接纳/上限 Round 数以及实时已激活/未激活状态。直接状态与命令输出不会进入模型历史;已接受领域变更仍可重建,因为目标服务会记录它们。
模型只接收 `get_goal`、`create_goal` 和 `update_goal`。当直接人类请求清楚要求大量多 Round 工作时,模型可以创建目标,并且可以从任何语言推断该意图。它不得把日常单 Turn 工作变成目标。直接人类来源由代码强制执行;语义解释仍是模型判断。自治目标 Round 可以为确切的当前 Goal Round 报告 `complete` 或 `blocked`,但不能编辑、暂停、恢复或替换人类目标。
模型只接收 `get_goal`、`create_goal` 和 `update_goal`。当直接人类请求清楚要求大量多 Round 工作时,模型可以创建目标,并且可以从任何语言推断该意图。它不得把日常单 Turn 工作变成目标。代码要求当前实时根 agent Turn 中有一条人类直接发送的消息;语义解释仍是模型判断。自治目标 Round 可以为确切的当前 Goal Round 报告 `complete` 或 `blocked`,但不能编辑、暂停、恢复或替换人类目标。
TUI 默认挂载共享命令注册表和完整目标栈,并通过一个生产方暴露 `/goal`。ACP(Agent Client Protocol)挂载目标领域、模型工具和同会话驱动器,但有意省略人类命令平面。每条有效已注册命令都能被每个已组合的命令适配器发现和调用;若插件与某应用不兼容,该应用组合会省略其命令生产方,而不是依赖注册表层面的表面掩码。无 UI 的 agent 主干要求显式选择加入,以免单次调用方静默变成多 Round 操作。无头 CLI(命令行界面)与 JSON-RPC 前端不消费命令平面;挂载目标栈后,普通人类文本仍可授权模型目标工具。
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ Codex 提供了这里采用的最小可观察目标 UX:一个附着于聊天
- 目标式执行在没有单个过载「loop」对象的情况下交付:同会话续行与全新 agent 迭代拥有显式、可独立测试的约定。
- 持久目标历史可以重放和 fork,而进程本地激活态会防止恢复时意外开始工作。
- 人类获得小型 Codex 形态 UX;模型获得紧凑、带来源检查的工具表面;部署可以独立移除任一能力。
- 人类获得小型 Codex 形态 UX;模型获得一组紧凑工具,其中的修改操作要求当前实时根 agent Turn 中有一条人类直接发送的消息;部署可以独立移除任一能力。
- Ralph 展示了非平凡固定策略可以完全作为现有 workflow 与 subagent 原语之上的插件实现。
- Round 上限默认宽裕,但仍由部署控制。它限制迭代次数,不限制 token、价格、耗时或外部副作用。
- 原始提案中的评估器、预算、反思器、后台任务、CLI 与通用 loop-session 架构有意不进入已实现公开表面。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-19-model-facing-goal-tools.md
2026-07-19-model-facing-goal-tools.md: 0271194a38503711de77290c915010c26a9de74b
2026-07-19-model-facing-goal-tools.zh.md: 097aaa3b160a394ff3d13681be04dd19c7856ebc
2026-07-19-model-facing-goal-tools.md: abed410c7fd71b18c2cc0d0db745e76d98352546
2026-07-19-model-facing-goal-tools.zh.md: a51ad417ff0928583ccddddafe65d23bc86bd24d

View File

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ An autonomous goal round that successfully reports completion or blocking defers
Every call requires an `exec.agent` that is the exact running object in `AgentRegistry`, is the current inherited driver initiator, and has an open turn. These are execution-time checks and cannot be bypassed by prompt injection or hand-authored tool arguments.
Create, edit, pause, and resume additionally require an accepted user message or user steering event in the current turn of a runtime-root agent. Root ownership is derived from the live agent graph rather than durable fork ancestry: a resumed fork can receive direct human authority, while a live child remains a subagent and cannot mutate these states. User source is a host attestation: every `Agent.followup()` or `steer()` input requires an explicit source, so the host labels direct human content `{ kind: 'user' }` and non-human producers label their own provenance. The runtime proves provenance, not whether the human's wording semantically warrants creation or resumption; that interpretation remains with the model.
Create, edit, pause, and resume additionally require an accepted user message or user steering event in the current turn of a runtime-root agent. Root ownership is derived from the live agent graph rather than durable fork ancestry: a resumed fork can receive direct human authority, while a live child remains a subagent and cannot mutate these states. User source is a host attestation: every `Agent.followup()` or `steer()` input requires an explicit source, so the host labels direct human content `{ kind: 'user' }` and non-human producers identify themselves in their source fields. The runtime proves that the current turn contains a direct human message, not whether the human's wording semantically warrants creation or resumption; that interpretation remains with the model.
Complete and blocked accept either direct-human authority or the exact current goal round. Goal-round authority requires a goal-sourced `user/message` whose goal id, revision, and round all equal the folded current goal. It grants only the two terminal reports. Direct human authority may stop a goal immediately.
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ Unit coverage pins registration and disposal, exclusive scheduling, generated pr
- **Rely on prompt instructions for authority** — rejected because text can guide model judgment but cannot authenticate the live caller, turn, or source event.
- **Expose every goal-service verb as a separate tool** — rejected because a compact read/create/update surface reduces schema cost and keeps compare-and-set behavior uniform.
- **Require exact command phrases** — rejected because natural-language intent, including languages other than English, should be interpreted by the model; execution authority depends on provenance rather than spelling.
- **Require exact command phrases** — rejected because natural-language intent, including languages other than English, should be interpreted by the model; execution authority depends on a direct human message in the current turn rather than spelling.
- **Authorize from persisted root or fork metadata** — rejected because a fork that becomes an independently resumed top-level session should accept new human authority, while a currently owned child should not.
- **Let autonomous rounds edit or resume the goal** — rejected because continuation authority is narrower than authority to redefine or restart the human objective.
- **Treat the blocked threshold as an evaluator** — rejected because event counts cannot prove that an obstacle is semantically unchanged or truly terminal.
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ Unit coverage pins registration and disposal, exclusive scheduling, generated pr
## Consequences
- Models receive a stable, compact lifecycle surface without direct access to the goal service.
- State-changing calls are constrained by live runtime provenance as well as durable compare-and-set references.
- State-changing calls require a live runtime-root agent and a direct human message in the current turn, as well as durable compare-and-set references.
- Human requests can create and rearm goals through ordinary natural language, while restored sessions remain inert until such input arrives.
- Goal rounds can finish or report a repeated blocker but cannot broaden their own mandate.
- Deployment policy selects the blocking lower bound; the same resolved value controls enforcement and prompt guidance.

View File

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Status: implemented
每次调用都要求存在 `exec.agent`,且它必须是 `AgentRegistry` 中完全相同的运行中对象、当前继承的驱动发起者,并处于开放轮次内。这些检查在执行时进行,不能通过提示词注入或手写工具参数绕过。
创建、编辑、暂停与恢复还要求运行时根 agent 的当前轮次已经接纳一条用户消息或用户 steering 事件。根所有权来自实时 agent 图,而非持久的 fork 祖先关系:恢复后的派生会话可以接收新的直接人类权限,实时子级则仍是 subagent,不能改变这些状态。用户来源是宿主的证明:每个 `Agent.followup()` 或 `steer()` 输入都必须显式提供来源,因此宿主把直接人类内容标为 `{ kind: 'user' }`,非人类生产者则标注自己的来源信息。运行时证明来源,而不判断人类措辞在语义上是否足以创建或恢复目标;该解释仍由模型完成。
创建、编辑、暂停与恢复还要求运行时根 agent 的当前轮次已经接纳一条用户消息或用户 steering 事件。根所有权来自实时 agent 图,而非持久的 fork 祖先关系:恢复后的派生会话可以接收新的直接人类权限,实时子级则仍是 subagent,不能改变这些状态。用户来源是宿主的证明:每个 `Agent.followup()` 或 `steer()` 输入都必须显式提供来源,因此宿主把直接人类内容标为 `{ kind: 'user' }`,非人类生产者则在来源字段中注明自己。运行时证明当前轮次包含人类直接发送的消息,而不判断人类措辞在语义上是否足以创建或恢复目标;该解释仍由模型完成。
完成与阻塞既接受直接人类权限,也接受准确的当前 Goal Round。Goal Round 权限要求存在一条来源为目标的 `user/message`,其中目标 id、修订号和 Round 都与折叠后的当前目标相等。它只授予这两种终止报告权限。直接人类权限可以立即停止目标。
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ Status: implemented
- **依赖提示词指令实施权限**——不予采纳,因为文本可以指导模型判断,却不能认证实时调用者、轮次或来源事件。
- **把每个目标服务动词分别暴露为工具**——不予采纳,因为紧凑的读取/创建/更新表面可以降低模式成本,并保持统一的比较并交换行为。
- **要求精确命令短语**——不予采纳,因为自然语言意图(包括英语以外的语言)应由模型解释;执行权限取决于来源,而不是拼写。
- **要求精确命令短语**——不予采纳,因为自然语言意图(包括英语以外的语言)应由模型解释;执行权限取决于当前轮次中人类直接发送的消息,而不是拼写。
- **根据持久的根或派生元数据授权**——不予采纳,因为成为独立恢复顶层会话的派生应接受新的人类权限,而当前仍受所有权约束的子智能体则不应接受。
- **允许自主回合编辑或恢复目标**——不予采纳,因为继续执行权限比重新定义或重启人类目标的权限更窄。
- **把阻塞阈值当作评估器**——不予采纳,因为事件计数无法证明障碍在语义上未改变或确实不可继续。
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ Status: implemented
## 后果
- 模型获得稳定而紧凑的生命周期表面,无需直接访问目标服务。
- 改变状态的调用同时受到实时运行时来源与持久比较并交换引用的约束。
- 改变状态的调用要求实时运行时根 agent、当前轮次中人类直接发送的消息,以及持久比较并交换引用。
- 人类可以通过普通自然语言请求创建和重新激活目标,而恢复后的会话在收到此类输入前保持静止。
- Goal Round 可以完成或报告重复阻塞,但不能自行扩大任务权限。
- 部署策略选择阻塞下限;同一个解析后的值同时控制执行与提示词指导。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-cross-session-references.md
2026-07-21-cross-session-references.md: b2d428e0937fdd881720720401948a1c3e7ef1f6
2026-07-21-cross-session-references.zh.md: ef89fd76c864c430f7b730d250e6511c2709f97e
2026-07-21-cross-session-references.md: 46424e12949697054da2f920fbe55ca9dcbaf075
2026-07-21-cross-session-references.zh.md: 7956dbef79aa77ab9d2be810420ae8c1b4e82a8d

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-21-cross-session-references.zh.md)
## Problem
TUI users need to bring relevant work from another conversation into one new message without resuming, forking, or granting the source transcript authority over the current session. The harness already exposes exact session enumeration and raw event inspection, but every host independently parsing logs would duplicate compaction folding, provenance filtering, size limits, error behavior, and persistence. Encoding host markup directly into the agent message contract would also bind the core loop to one UI syntax.
TUI users need to bring relevant work from another conversation into one new message without resuming, forking, or granting the source transcript authority over the current session. The harness already exposes exact session enumeration and raw event inspection, but every host independently parsing logs would duplicate compaction folding, filtering by cited source-event seqs, size limits, error behavior, and persistence. Encoding host markup directly into the agent message contract would also bind the core loop to one UI syntax.
## Decision

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Status: implemented
## 问题
TUI 用户需要把另一场对话中的相关工作带入一条新消息,但不恢复、不 fork,也不让源 transcript(文本记录)对当前会话拥有权威性。harness 已经提供准确的会话枚举与原始事件检查,但若每个宿主都独立解析日志,就会重复实现压缩(compaction)折叠、来源过滤、大小限制、错误行为和持久化。把宿主标记直接编码进 agent(智能体)消息约定,还会让核心循环绑定某一种 UI 语法。
TUI 用户需要把另一场对话中的相关工作带入一条新消息,但不恢复、不 fork,也不让源 transcript(文本记录)对当前会话拥有权威性。harness 已经提供准确的会话枚举与原始事件检查,但若每个宿主都独立解析日志,就会重复实现压缩(compaction)折叠、按被引用来源事件 seq 过滤、大小限制、错误行为和持久化。把宿主标记直接编码进 agent(智能体)消息约定,还会让核心循环绑定某一种 UI 语法。
## 决策

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-log-backed-session-titles.md
2026-07-21-log-backed-session-titles.md: 89e6e67fb9ece4c087ba7b1bc52e61b78b94586c
2026-07-21-log-backed-session-titles.zh.md: 21a0ec5dc9cc90726dda502ba46a52d717c39df5
2026-07-21-log-backed-session-titles.md: 47025ba7e72ea6746d6f4428a81d6d754a8dcd03
2026-07-21-log-backed-session-titles.zh.md: d7e12875354ca1fc66f0035020c7ffe2ddaa9354

View File

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ The [`session-title` capability family](../../../../packages/session/README.md)
### Event ownership and folding
Every accepted revision is a log-only `session/title` event. Its payload contains normalized non-empty text, the exact eligible human `user/message` seqs used to derive it, and either fallback provenance or the registered provider id plus optional provider/model route. Before an auxiliary title-model dispatch, the shared helper appends a log-only `session/title-llm-request` event containing the title-provider id, exact source seqs, route, system prompt, messages, and output-token cap; a later generation failure leaves the request auditable. The dispatched envelope is deep-frozen to preserve exact agreement with that record but carries no process-local agent-loop request identity, so loop-only reconstruction checks do not compare it with the main conversation header. Validation failures that never reach dispatch create no request event. `foldSessionTitle()` selects the latest title event and adds that event's seq and timestamp as `SessionTitleSnapshot`. Neither event enters `session.surface` or `deriveMessages()`.
Every accepted revision is a log-only `session/title` event. Its payload contains normalized non-empty text, the exact eligible human `user/message` seqs used to derive it, and either the fallback source kind or the registered provider id plus optional provider/model route. Before an auxiliary title-model dispatch, the shared helper appends a log-only `session/title-llm-request` event containing the title-provider id, exact source seqs, route, system prompt, messages, and output-token cap; a later generation failure leaves the request auditable. The dispatched envelope is deep-frozen to preserve exact agreement with that record but carries no process-local agent-loop request identity, so loop-only reconstruction checks do not compare it with the main conversation header. Validation failures that never reach dispatch create no request event. `foldSessionTitle()` selects the latest title event and adds that event's seq and timestamp as `SessionTitleSnapshot`. Neither event enters `session.surface` or `deriveMessages()`.
The title service appends `session/title` directly after checking its current revision and exact live session; the bundled model helper likewise appends its literal `session/title-llm-request` record before dispatch. Both records may sit between turns without inventing an execution boundary. Persistence admits them to bounded background batches and drains through ordinary checkpoints and lifecycle teardown; title publication does not force a per-event flush. No generic marker, cast, or settlement queue sits between the event owner and `Session.append()`. This is the domain-specific application of the [standalone log-only event decision](../simplification/2026-07-28-remove-synthetic-log-only-turns.md).
@@ -51,8 +51,8 @@ A fork inherits seed title events unchanged, like the rest of its source log —
- **Mutable `SessionHeader` or side metadata** — rejected because it creates a second persistence mutation protocol, weakens immutable identity metadata, makes crash atomicity backend-specific, and gives forks ambiguous copy-versus-reference behavior. The append-only log already owns replayable latest-wins state.
- **Await title generation before returning the agent response** — rejected because auxiliary provider latency and failure would sit on the main interaction's critical path. The deterministic fallback gives immediate useful state while a better title may arrive later.
- **Put titles in derived history or the request prefix** — rejected because UI metadata would consume tokens, change cache identity, and make the main model observe its own label. A log-only event remains reconstructable without becoming model-visible.
- **Permit multiple registered providers and resolve precedence after completion** — rejected because completion order is not product precedence and would make retries, HMR, and provenance nondeterministic. A deployment that needs a composite policy can register one provider that owns that policy.
- **Silently truncate oversized auxiliary input** — rejected because the provider result would claim exact source-message provenance while receiving only partial text. Keeping the prior title and warning preserves truthful attribution.
- **Permit multiple registered providers and resolve precedence after completion** — rejected because completion order is not product precedence and would make retries, HMR, and the recorded provider nondeterministic. A deployment that needs a composite policy can register one provider that owns that policy.
- **Silently truncate oversized auxiliary input** — rejected because the provider result would cite source-message seqs whose complete text it did not receive. Keeping the prior title and warning preserves the exact input record.
- **Index titles in `listSessions()` immediately** — rejected because the existing lightweight metadata list would need per-backend derived-index synchronization. Exact `readTitle()` establishes the read contract without precommitting search or indexing policy.
- **Keep the Web host fallback-only** — rejected because the UI would expose durable titles but never improve them beyond the first-prompt prefix. The first-message provider keeps its latency off the main response path while making model summaries the default Web outcome.

View File

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Status: implemented
### 事件归属与折叠
每个已接受的修订都是纯日志 `session/title` 事件。其载荷包含规范化后的非空文本、用于派生标题的所有合格且来源为人类的 `user/message` 的准确 seq,以及回退来源信息,或已注册的提供方 id 加可选的提供方和模型路由。辅助标题模型发起调用前,共享辅助组件会追加一个纯日志 `session/title-llm-request` 事件,其载荷包含标题提供方 id、准确的源 seq、路由、系统提示词、消息和输出 token 上限;即使后续生成失败,这次请求仍可审计。发送的请求信封经过深度冻结,以确保其与该记录精确一致,但它有意不携带进程本地的 agent loop(智能体循环)请求身份,因此仅针对 agent loop 的重建检查不会将它与主对话请求头进行比较。未进入调用阶段的验证失败不会创建请求事件。`foldSessionTitle()` 选择最新的标题事件,并将该事件的 seq 和时间戳加入 `SessionTitleSnapshot`。这两类事件都不会进入 `session.surface` 或 `deriveMessages()`。
每个已接受的修订都是纯日志 `session/title` 事件。其载荷包含规范化后的非空文本、用于派生标题的所有合格且来源为人类的 `user/message` 的准确 seq,以及回退来源 kind,或已注册的提供方 id 加可选的提供方和模型路由。辅助标题模型发起调用前,共享辅助组件会追加一个纯日志 `session/title-llm-request` 事件,其载荷包含标题提供方 id、准确的源 seq、路由、系统提示词、消息和输出 token 上限;即使后续生成失败,这次请求仍可审计。发送的请求信封经过深度冻结,以确保其与该记录精确一致,但它有意不携带进程本地的 agent loop(智能体循环)请求身份,因此仅针对 agent loop 的重建检查不会将它与主对话请求头进行比较。未进入调用阶段的验证失败不会创建请求事件。`foldSessionTitle()` 选择最新的标题事件,并将该事件的 seq 和时间戳加入 `SessionTitleSnapshot`。这两类事件都不会进入 `session.surface` 或 `deriveMessages()`。
标题服务会在检查当前修订和确切的实时会话后,直接追加 `session/title`;随附模型辅助函数同样会在发起调用前追加其字面量 `session/title-llm-request` 记录。两类记录都可以位于轮次之间,而无需虚构执行边界。持久化会将它们接纳到有界后台批次中,并通过常规检查点和生命周期 teardown 排空;标题发布不会强制逐事件 flush。事件所有方与 `Session.append()` 之间不存在通用标记、类型断言或结算队列。这是[独立纯日志事件决策](../simplification/2026-07-28-remove-synthetic-log-only-turns.md)在特定领域中的应用。
@@ -51,8 +51,8 @@ Status: implemented
- **可变 `SessionHeader` 或独立元数据**:不予采纳,因为这会创建第二套持久化变更协议,削弱不可变身份元数据,让崩溃原子性因后端而异,并使 fork 的复制或引用行为产生歧义。仅追加日志已经负责可回放的后写覆盖状态。
- **返回 agent 响应前等待标题生成**:不予采纳,因为辅助提供方的延迟和故障会进入主交互的关键路径。确定性回退方案可以立即提供可用状态,质量更高的标题则可稍后到达。
- **将标题放入派生历史记录或请求前缀**:不予采纳,因为 UI 元数据会消耗 token、改变缓存标识,并让主模型观察到自己的标签。纯日志事件既保持可重建,又不会变得对模型可见。
- **允许注册多个提供方,并在完成后解析优先级**:不予采纳,因为完成顺序并不等于产品优先级,而且会让重试、HMR 和来源信息变得不确定。需要组合策略的部署可以注册一个自行负责该策略的提供方。
- **静默截断过大的辅助输入**:不予采纳,因为提供方结果会声明准确的源消息来源信息,实际却只接收了部分文本。保留原有标题并发出警告,可以保持归因真实。
- **允许注册多个提供方,并在完成后解析优先级**:不予采纳,因为完成顺序并不等于产品优先级,而且会让重试、HMR 和已记录的提供方变得不确定。需要组合策略的部署可以注册一个自行负责该策略的提供方。
- **静默截断过大的辅助输入**:不予采纳,因为提供方结果会引用源消息 seq,却没有收到这些消息的完整文本。保留原有标题并发出警告,可以保留准确的输入记录。
- **立即在 `listSessions()` 中索引标题**:不予采纳,因为现有的轻量元数据列表将需要逐后端同步派生索引。精确的 `readTitle()` 建立了读取约定,而没有提前锁定搜索或索引策略。
- **让 Web host 只使用回退标题**:不予采纳,因为 UI 虽会显示持久标题,却始终无法将第一条提示词的前缀改进为更好的标题。首消息提供方在主响应路径之外运行,并让模型摘要成为 Web 的默认结果。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-24-model-facing-session-query-tools.md
2026-07-24-model-facing-session-query-tools.md: 863f557f11f89ff8dfc121b7da0b653852528394
2026-07-24-model-facing-session-query-tools.zh.md: 2acbf44b42aafd2eac37903e1acbefc5ba098377
2026-07-24-model-facing-session-query-tools.md: 7dcb25fc4205442bd0b0743a6228427fa66ead1c
2026-07-24-model-facing-session-query-tools.zh.md: 29582ec498119ee5956f7a3fe9bcefaabf13b122

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ The unified `ctx.sessionQuery` service exposes exact reads, filters, relationshi
The package entrypoint is only the public composition root for configuration, prompt registration, and tool registration. Its internal modules follow the execution boundary: `input.ts` owns model schemas, normalization, and filter construction; `service-boundary.ts` contains provider calls and model-safe error translation; `workspace-access.ts` owns caller identity, workspace authorization, title access, and lineage projection; `operations.ts` orchestrates the five service workflows; and `presentation.ts` renders tool results and call cards. This keeps policy in its owning layer without changing the package contract.
`session_search` groups full-text matches by session and exposes typed session and event metadata filters. `session_event_search` searches one session, defaulting to the caller's current session. `session_trace` returns the complete authorized ancestor chain and recursive descendant trees. `session_event_trace` returns every known positional replacement and direct provenance relationship for one event. `session_event_read` returns the exact target event as unabridged JSON and optionally summarizes a bounded raw-event window; omitted `before` and `after` values mean target-only.
`session_search` groups full-text matches by session and exposes typed session and event metadata filters. `session_event_search` searches one session, defaulting to the caller's current session. `session_trace` returns the complete authorized ancestor chain and recursive descendant trees. `session_event_trace` returns every known positional replacement and direct cited source-event relationship for one event. `session_event_read` returns the exact target event as unabridged JSON and optionally summarizes a bounded raw-event window; omitted `before` and `after` values mean target-only.
Model-facing filters use flat snake-case fields. Timestamps are timezone-qualified ISO 8601 strings at the tool boundary, convert to inclusive epoch-millisecond ranges for the service, and render as UTC ISO 8601. List values are ORed inside one filter while separate filters are ANDed. Requested parent ids are deduplicated and authority-filtered before FTS, so only parents in the caller workspace enter the provider clause; missing and cross-workspace guesses behave identically, while the root-session marker remains independently ORed into that clause. Event type strings remain open because `SessionEventMap` is merge-extensible; availability and event surface use closed values.

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Status: implemented
该包入口仅作为配置、提示词注册与工具注册的公开组合根。内部模块沿执行边界划分:`input.ts` 负责模型 schema、规范化与过滤条件构造;`service-boundary.ts` 包含提供方调用与面向模型的安全错误转换;`workspace-access.ts` 负责调用者身份、工作区授权、标题访问与谱系投影;`operations.ts` 编排五个服务工作流;`presentation.ts` 渲染工具结果与调用卡片。这样可让策略留在其所属层,同时不改变包约定。
`session_search` 按会话聚合全文匹配,并公开带类型的会话与事件元数据过滤条件。`session_event_search` 搜索一个会话,默认目标为调用者的当前会话。`session_trace` 返回完整的已授权祖先链与递归后代树。`session_event_trace` 返回一个事件所有已知的位置替换关系与直接来源关系。`session_event_read` 以未删节 JSON 返回准确的目标事件,并可选择汇总一个有界的原始事件窗口;省略 `before` 与 `after` 时只返回目标。
`session_search` 按会话聚合全文匹配,并公开带类型的会话与事件元数据过滤条件。`session_event_search` 搜索一个会话,默认目标为调用者的当前会话。`session_trace` 返回完整的已授权祖先链与递归后代树。`session_event_trace` 返回一个事件所有已知的位置替换关系与直接引用来源事件的关系。`session_event_read` 以未删节 JSON 返回准确的目标事件,并可选择汇总一个有界的原始事件窗口;省略 `before` 与 `after` 时只返回目标。
面向模型的过滤条件使用扁平的 snake-case 字段。工具边界上的时间戳采用带时区的 ISO 8601 字符串,转换为服务使用的闭区间毫秒时间戳,并以 UTC ISO 8601 渲染。同一个过滤条件中的列表值按 OR 组合,不同过滤条件按 AND 组合。请求的父会话 id 会在 FTS 之前去重并按权限过滤,因此只有调用者工作区中的父会话会进入提供方条件;缺失与跨工作区的猜测具有相同行为,而根会话标记仍会独立按 OR 加入该条件。由于 `SessionEventMap` 可通过声明合并扩展,事件类型字符串保持开放;可用状态与事件表层使用封闭取值。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-27-trajectory-inspection-ledger.md
2026-07-27-trajectory-inspection-ledger.md: e3fc22234c1df449c99eac90af27de7da0b6f202
2026-07-27-trajectory-inspection-ledger.zh.md: f167d818281c39a06e658c294f45e47d3ba40642
2026-07-27-trajectory-inspection-ledger.md: a905e65942365c17b7513028b275288c82428221
2026-07-27-trajectory-inspection-ledger.zh.md: 70fcdcdb0d2f26d120325a76a3e1f49ae6350c57

View File

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Trajectory has to make prose, machine payloads, token usage, timing, and nested
- The client runtime exposes a read-only history source independent from Session and SessionManager. Each activated source owns its raw entries, paging, live gap repair, and reconnect rebuild; the ordinary conversation snapshot remains the folded Chat projection. Trajectory opens the source's tail while mounted and requests one older page when the user reaches the loaded range's top, then lazily derives event order, context lineage, schema index, and Requests instead of imposing those structures on every conversation consumer.
- Ordinary generation and compaction calls form one chronological Request projection, distinguished by purpose rather than separate collections. Effective prompt state and its change ride the Request that introduced them; compaction and prompt changes are not independent inspection entities. Request numbering and cumulative usage cover the loaded history window and expand as older pages arrive.
- Call schemas come from the active recorded Request header. Keyless snapshot fixtures deliberately replace that catalog with the non-array `{{tools}}` token, which the durable inspection boundary treats as unavailable instead of attempting to project or fabricate schemas.
- Selecting a record or Request opens an inspector inside Trajectory. Tabs and Summary sections follow the selected entity: Markdown messages expose rendered, source, provenance, and hierarchy views; tools add JSON payload/result and schema views; Requests add options, usage, timing, and result navigation. Scrollable Summary regions keep their scrollbar thumbs transparent until hover or `focus-within`, while retaining the scrollbar reservation and scroll behavior. Images render as media rather than serialized data.
- Selecting a record or Request opens an inspector inside Trajectory. Tabs and Summary sections follow the selected entity: Markdown messages expose rendered content, source fields, provider/model fields, and hierarchy views; tools add JSON payload/result and schema views; Requests add options, usage, timing, and result navigation. Scrollable Summary regions keep their scrollbar thumbs transparent until hover or `focus-within`, while retaining the scrollbar reservation and scroll behavior. Images render as media rather than serialized data.
- Turn folding removes all rows after its first record and replaces them with a compact step/tool-call count; Assistant folding applies the same interaction to its tool-call descendants. Global controls fold or expand both levels.
- A long ledger initially positions the loaded tail at the bottom and mounts only the viewport's row window plus bounded overscan. Request-only separators join the next measurable virtual item, with a terminal separator retaining its own fixed clearance, so the virtualizer never owns a zero-height item. Semantic DOM-safe row keys and ARIA indexes expose identity independently from mount position. A tail with known older history virtualizes immediately even when its loaded projection is below the ordinary row threshold. Stable-key virtualizer anchoring preserves the visible item across prepends and appends; the manual scroll-height fallback applies only when completing pagination disables virtualization. Selection, timeline focus, folding, search, and bottom following address records by stable event or tool-call identity rather than requiring their DOM rows to exist. An explicit loading row covers records until initial positioning finishes and while an older page is pending. The raw window base sequence detects a prepend even when a page adds no surface-visible node.
- The separate Waterfall tab is removed. A fixed Overview above the ledger projects every loaded record with known `startedAt` onto three semantic timing lanes using its own duration. While an older prefix remains unloaded and the viewport includes the loaded domain's start, a neutral ellipsis control covers the truncated edge and loads one earlier page without assigning unknown history a fabricated duration; hovering that control suppresses the ordinary timeline cursor. Finalized Assistant spans divide the recorded interval at the first non-empty token delta, so distinct TTFT and decoding colors retain their actual ratio; incomplete timing falls back to one Assistant color. Hovering for 500 ms exposes exact start/end, total duration, TTFT, and decoding time without relying on the browser's native tooltip delay. Dragging left or right commits an inclusive interval filter: any record whose active interval overlaps either boundary remains visible, records without known timing leave the focused ledger, and clearing the selection restores the full branch. Wheel gestures zoom the time domain. A right-button click clears the interval selection; dragging instead pans an already zoomed viewport without mutating it. The Overview keeps the full time domain while focused so the selection can be resized or cleared without losing orientation.
@@ -53,4 +53,4 @@ Trajectory has to make prose, machine payloads, token usage, timing, and nested
## Consequences
Trajectory shows more useful records per viewport while retaining Turn and Request orientation. Context rewrites and compactions remain inline with their surrounding history, while a rewind begins a successor branch that inherits only the retained prefix. The floating composer leaves the ledger visible to the viewport edge without covering its final rows or hiding horizontal controls. The main ledger omits token usage and duration so content receives the available width; the local inspector exposes those facts together with full payloads, provenance, schemas, and request timing. The Overview uses recorded start/duration and token-boundary facts without fabricating live elapsed time, and its inclusive focus behavior matches the interaction users already know from Chrome DevTools Network. Tail-first paging bounds initial transport and projection work, virtualization bounds mounted row elements, incremental partial projection removes loaded-history length from ordinary token-frame work, and completed-step chunk compaction makes structural rebuilds proportional to inspection-relevant entries rather than the raw token count. Focused component tests pin tail-first paging, prepend anchoring and identity retention, the virtual window, tail following, content-only streaming without repeated scroll writes, streaming structural sharing, high-sequence window folding, timing projection, delayed detail disclosure, folding, record and interval selection, entity-specific tabs, and running/error semantics. A real-browser long-ledger contract pins stable prepend geometry, bounded mounting, top/middle/bottom reachability, and bounded scroll writes across a paced stream; the assembled Web snapshot pins the ledger, Overview timing details, composer overlay geometry, and inspector through the real client composition.
Trajectory shows more useful records per viewport while retaining Turn and Request orientation. Context rewrites and compactions remain inline with their surrounding history, while a rewind begins a successor branch that inherits only the retained prefix. The floating composer leaves the ledger visible to the viewport edge without covering its final rows or hiding horizontal controls. The main ledger omits token usage and duration so content receives the available width; the local inspector exposes those facts together with full payloads, provider/model and source fields, schemas, and request timing. The Overview uses recorded start/duration and token-boundary facts without fabricating live elapsed time, and its inclusive focus behavior matches the interaction users already know from Chrome DevTools Network. Tail-first paging bounds initial transport and projection work, virtualization bounds mounted row elements, incremental partial projection removes loaded-history length from ordinary token-frame work, and completed-step chunk compaction makes structural rebuilds proportional to inspection-relevant entries rather than the raw token count. Focused component tests pin tail-first paging, prepend anchoring and identity retention, the virtual window, tail following, content-only streaming without repeated scroll writes, streaming structural sharing, high-sequence window folding, timing projection, delayed detail disclosure, folding, record and interval selection, entity-specific tabs, and running/error semantics. A real-browser long-ledger contract pins stable prepend geometry, bounded mounting, top/middle/bottom reachability, and bounded scroll writes across a paced stream; the assembled Web snapshot pins the ledger, Overview timing details, composer overlay geometry, and inspector through the real client composition.

View File

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Status: implemented
- 客户端 runtime 提供独立于 Session 和 SessionManager 的只读历史数据源。每个已激活的数据源自行拥有原始条目、分页、实时缺口修复和重连重建;普通会话快照仍然只是 Chat 所需的折叠投影。Trajectory 在挂载期间打开该数据源的尾部,当用户到达已加载范围顶部时请求一页更早的历史,再按需派生事件顺序、上下文谱系、schema 索引和请求,避免让所有会话消费者承担这些结构。
- 普通生成调用与压缩调用形成一条按时间排序的请求投影,以 purpose 区分而不是放入不同集合。生效的提示词状态及其变化附着在引入它们的请求上;压缩和提示词变化都不是独立检查实体。请求编号和累计用量覆盖已加载的历史窗口,并随更早页面到达而扩展。
- 调用 schema 来自当前生效且已记录的请求头。无密钥快照 fixture(测试前置数据)有意将该目录替换为非数组 token `{{tools}}`,持久化检查边界会将其视为不可用,而不是尝试投影或虚构 schema。
- 选择记录或请求后,轨迹视图内部会打开检查器,其标签页和概览区域随实体类型变化:Markdown 消息提供渲染、源码、来源和层级视图;工具提供 JSON 载荷/结果和 schema 视图;请求提供选项、用量、计时和结果跳转。可滚动的概述区域默认保持滚动条滑块透明,直到悬停或 `focus-within` 时才显示,同时保留滚动条预留空间和滚动行为。图片以媒体形式渲染,而不是显示为序列化数据。
- 选择记录或请求后,轨迹视图内部会打开检查器,其标签页和概览区域随实体类型变化:Markdown 消息提供渲染内容、来源字段、提供方/模型字段和层级视图;工具提供 JSON 载荷/结果和 schema 视图;请求提供选项、用量、计时和结果跳转。可滚动的概述区域默认保持滚动条滑块透明,直到悬停或 `focus-within` 时才显示,同时保留滚动条预留空间和滚动行为。图片以媒体形式渲染,而不是显示为序列化数据。
- 折叠轮次时保留其第一条记录,将后续行替换为紧凑的步骤和工具调用数量;折叠助手时对其工具调用后代应用相同交互。全局控件可以分别折叠或展开这两个层级。
- 长记录表初始时将已加载尾部置于底部,只挂载视口对应的行窗口及有界的额外缓冲行。仅含请求的分隔行并入下一个具备可测高度的虚拟项,末尾分隔行则保留固定留白,因此虚拟化器不会管理零高度项。可安全用于 DOM 的语义行键与 ARIA 索引使标识不依赖挂载位置。只要已知尾部之前仍有更早历史,即使当前已加载投影低于常规行数阈值,也会立即启用虚拟化。基于稳定键的虚拟化器锚定会在向前补页和尾部追加时保留当前可见项;只有分页完成导致虚拟化停用时,才使用手动滚动高度兜底。选择、时间线聚焦、折叠、搜索和末尾跟随均按稳定的事件或工具调用标识定位,不要求对应 DOM 行已存在。初始定位完成前以及更早页面仍在等待时,明确的加载行会遮住真实记录。原始窗口的基准序号即使在一页未增加任何 surface 可见节点时,也能检测到这次向前补页。
- 移除独立的 waterfall(瀑布式事件)标签页。固定在记录表上方的 Overview 区域将所有 `startedAt` 已知的已加载记录按各自耗时投影到三条语义计时轨道。仍有更早前缀尚未加载且 viewport 包含已加载时间域起点时,中性的省略号控件会遮住截断边缘并加载一页更早历史,而不会为未知历史虚构耗时;悬停在该控件上会隐藏普通的时间线光标。已完成的助手时间条以首个非空 token 增量为分界,用不同颜色按真实比例表示 TTFT 与解码时间;计时不完整时退化为单一助手色。悬停 500 ms 后会显示精确起止时刻、总耗时、TTFT 和解码时间,而不依赖浏览器原生 tooltip 的延迟。向左或向右拖动会提交包含边界的区间筛选:任何活动区间与所选区间相交的记录都会保留,计时未知的记录会从聚焦后的记录表中移除,清除选择则恢复完整分支。滚轮手势用于缩放时间域。右键单击会清除区间选择;右键拖动则只会平移已放大的 viewport,不会改变该选区。聚焦后,Overview 区域仍保留完整时间范围,以便在不失去方位的情况下调整或清除选择。
@@ -53,4 +53,4 @@ Status: implemented
## 后果
轨迹视图在保留轮次与请求定位的同时,每个视口可以显示更多有效记录。上下文 `rewrite` 与压缩保持在周边历史中的原始位置,`rewind` 则建立仅继承保留前缀的后继分支。浮动 composer 让记录表一直显示到视口边缘,同时不会遮住最后几行,也不会隐藏横向控件。主记录表省略 token 用量和耗时,让内容获得可用宽度;局部检查器展示这些数据以及完整载荷、来源、schema 和请求计时。Overview 区域使用记录的开始时间、耗时与 token 边界数据,而不虚构实时流逝时间,其包含边界的聚焦行为与用户熟悉的 Chrome DevTools Network 交互一致。尾部优先分页限制初始传输和投影工作量,虚拟化限制已挂载的行元素数量,未完成部分的增量投影让普通 token 帧的工作量不再随已加载历史长度增长,而已完成步骤的分片压缩则让结构重建的工作量与检查所需条目数量成正比,而非与原始 token 数量成正比。针对性组件测试锁定尾部优先分页、向前补页锚定与标识保持、虚拟窗口、末尾跟随、仅含内容的流式输出不会重复写入滚动位置、流式输出的结构共享、高序号窗口折叠、计时投影、延迟展示详情、折叠、记录与区间选择、实体特定标签页和运行/错误语义。真实浏览器中的长记录表约定锁定向前补页时稳定的几何位置、有界挂载、顶部/中部/底部可达性,以及按节奏进行的流式输出中有界的滚动写入;组装后的 Web 快照则通过真实客户端组合锁定记录表、Overview 计时详情、composer 浮层几何形状与检查器。
轨迹视图在保留轮次与请求定位的同时,每个视口可以显示更多有效记录。上下文 `rewrite` 与压缩保持在周边历史中的原始位置,`rewind` 则建立仅继承保留前缀的后继分支。浮动 composer 让记录表一直显示到视口边缘,同时不会遮住最后几行,也不会隐藏横向控件。主记录表省略 token 用量和耗时,让内容获得可用宽度;局部检查器展示这些数据以及完整载荷、提供方/模型字段、来源字段、schema 和请求计时。Overview 区域使用记录的开始时间、耗时与 token 边界数据,而不虚构实时流逝时间,其包含边界的聚焦行为与用户熟悉的 Chrome DevTools Network 交互一致。尾部优先分页限制初始传输和投影工作量,虚拟化限制已挂载的行元素数量,未完成部分的增量投影让普通 token 帧的工作量不再随已加载历史长度增长,而已完成步骤的分片压缩则让结构重建的工作量与检查所需条目数量成正比,而非与原始 token 数量成正比。针对性组件测试锁定尾部优先分页、向前补页锚定与标识保持、虚拟窗口、末尾跟随、仅含内容的流式输出不会重复写入滚动位置、流式输出的结构共享、高序号窗口折叠、计时投影、延迟展示详情、折叠、记录与区间选择、实体特定标签页和运行/错误语义。真实浏览器中的长记录表约定锁定向前补页时稳定的几何位置、有界挂载、顶部/中部/底部可达性,以及按节奏进行的流式输出中有界的滚动写入;组装后的 Web 快照则通过真实客户端组合锁定记录表、Overview 计时详情、composer 浮层几何形状与检查器。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.md
2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.md: ae12b09979f20385336eef8d805173dd9c08d887
2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.zh.md: 85f399142bb0faf4b4bbf438ef2892d957814fab
2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.md: ef8a7fb9ae13c23e04a5760cd443c4a744ec4f19
2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.zh.md: 21c378b5c6d738bc6b9a00856691a56d65217586

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-27-workspace-registration-deletion.zh.md)
## Problem
A Workspace registers an existing code directory so the GUI can name it and order its Sessions. That record has no reliable provenance proving that Harness created or owns the directory, and the Session log is an independent persistence object. Treating the row's Delete action as recursive source deletion or Session deletion would destroy data outside the record's ownership boundary.
A Workspace registers an existing code directory so the GUI can name it and order its Sessions. That record does not say that Harness created or owns the directory, and the Session log is an independent persistence object. Treating the row's Delete action as recursive source deletion or Session deletion would destroy data outside the record's ownership boundary.
The existing visual-only menu row also left deletion semantics undefined across durable order, the Workspace table, Host streams, concurrent browser tabs, reconnect baselines, and a list request racing the mutation.
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Registry operations serialize create and delete. Deletion first writes the Works
The Host stream keeps its committed-id set through the preceding global-order write and removes the id only on the table deletion. Create rollback therefore emits no false removal, while every connected tab receives exactly the id needed to delete its projection.
Create and delete write a durable `pendingMutation` before their record/order pair can diverge. Startup completes only the named create or delete and clears the marker; it never infers crash provenance from an orphan row alone. Unmarked order/table divergence therefore retains the registry's fail-loud corruption behavior. A deletion whose table write committed but marker cleanup failed still reports success—the requested state and removal frame are already committed—and the next startup clears that marker idempotently.
Create and delete write a durable `pendingMutation` before their record/order pair can diverge. Startup completes only the operation named by that marker and clears it; an orphan row alone does not identify which operation was interrupted. Unmarked order/table divergence therefore retains the registry's fail-loud corruption behavior. A deletion whose table write committed but marker cleanup failed still reports success—the requested state and removal frame are already committed—and the next startup clears that marker idempotently.
## Client convergence

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Status: implemented
## 问题
Workspace 注册已有代码目录,使 GUI 能够为目录命名,并对其会话排序。该记录没有可靠的来源信息来证明 Harness 创建或拥有该目录,会话日志也是独立的持久化对象。若将行内 Delete 操作视为递归删除源码或删除会话,就会破坏该记录所有权边界之外的数据。
Workspace 注册已有代码目录,使 GUI 能够为目录命名,并对其会话排序。该记录没有说 Harness 创建或拥有该目录,会话日志也是独立的持久化对象。若将行内 Delete 操作视为递归删除源码或删除会话,就会破坏该记录所有权边界之外的数据。
现有菜单行只有视觉呈现,没有实际功能,因此持久化顺序、Workspace 表、Host 流、并发浏览器标签页、重连基线,以及列表请求与变更并发时的删除语义也没有定义。
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Workspace 注册已有代码目录,使 GUI 能够为目录命名,并对其
Host 流在前一笔全局顺序写入期间继续保留其已提交 id 集合,只在删除表行时移除该 id。因此,创建回滚不会发出错误的移除帧,而每个已连接标签页都能收到从自身投影中删除该记录所需的准确 id。
Create 与 delete 会在记录/顺序对可能分叉之前写入持久化的 `pendingMutation`。启动时只补全其中明确命名的 create 或 delete,并清除该标记;系统绝不会仅凭孤立表行的形状推断崩溃来源。因此,没有标记的顺序/表分叉仍会保持注册表原有的损坏直接失败语义。如果删除的表写入已经提交、但标记清理失败,操作仍会报告成功——请求状态和移除帧都已经提交——下一次启动会以幂等方式清除该标记。
Create 与 delete 会在记录/顺序对可能分叉之前写入持久化的 `pendingMutation`。启动时只补全该标记明确命名的操作,并清除标记;仅有一行孤立记录无法确定哪个操作被中断。因此,没有标记的顺序/表分叉仍会保持注册表原有的损坏直接失败语义。如果删除的表写入已经提交、但标记清理失败,操作仍会报告成功——请求状态和移除帧都已经提交——下一次启动会以幂等方式清除该标记。
## 客户端收敛

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-28-continuable-subagent-conversations.md
2026-07-28-continuable-subagent-conversations.md: 56d9abb2b09577b2fba14b9a655a941417e0c493
2026-07-28-continuable-subagent-conversations.zh.md: cd73d9a3b5ff1b9671a7b08ed1482fa1ad45f48e
2026-07-28-continuable-subagent-conversations.md: 632de8c9f7a6d2c71dcca6d817a827f788645b4e
2026-07-28-continuable-subagent-conversations.zh.md: 9752dab97684d7249418c1a6d19905ab48ac82ca

View File

@@ -40,17 +40,17 @@ Any failure before inbox acceptance rejects without returning either id. Agent c
`backgroundMode: 'one-shot' | 'continuable'` remains deployment policy. Configured continuable mode requires `prepareContinuable`; method presence replaces `SubagentProvider.resume?()` as the capability check, while a capable provider may still run one-shot work.
Cold resume does not dispatch through a subagent provider. The continuation manager folds the generic in-process descriptor, calls `ctx.agents.resume()` through the same activation-owner scope, installs the returned `AgentHandle`, and submits the waiting `next-turn`. `SubagentProvider.resume?()` and `SubagentProviderResumeRequest` are absent. The initial provider name remains lifecycle provenance after that provider unregisters; it is not a recovery capability or a requirement for later residency. Remote providers require a separate design.
Cold resume does not dispatch through a subagent provider. The continuation manager folds the generic in-process descriptor, calls `ctx.agents.resume()` through the same activation-owner scope, installs the returned `AgentHandle`, and submits the waiting `next-turn`. `SubagentProvider.resume?()` and `SubagentProviderResumeRequest` are absent. The descriptor retains the initial provider name after that provider unregisters; the name does not grant a recovery capability or require the provider for later residency. Remote providers require a separate design.
`SubagentProvider.start()` and `SubagentRun` remain exclusively on the unchanged one-shot path. A continuable Activation directly owns its `AgentHandle` and never creates, wraps, or retains a `SubagentRun`; `SubagentRun.steer?()` is therefore absent.
`ctx.subagents.followup(parent, childId, content, { source, signal })` remains the sole parent-to-child continuation-message operation. The exact live parent Agent authorizes delivery; cold resume checks that authority before reconstruction and every path checks it again in the final no-await inbox-admission span, so a parent unregistered or replaced during materialization cannot authorize delivery. `source` remains durable provenance and grants no authority. The model-facing `send_message` tool keeps only its stable `subagent_id` and `message` fields and always submits a follow-up turn. Both start and follow-up return the accepted `MessageId`, and neither reports how the manager materialized the Activation.
`ctx.subagents.followup(parent, childId, content, { source, signal })` remains the sole parent-to-child continuation-message operation. The exact live parent Agent authorizes delivery; cold resume checks that authority before reconstruction and every path checks it again in the final no-await inbox-admission span, so a parent unregistered or replaced during materialization cannot authorize delivery. `source` records who supplied the admitted message and grants no authority. The model-facing `send_message` tool keeps only its stable `subagent_id` and `message` fields and always submits a follow-up turn. Both start and follow-up return the accepted `MessageId`, and neither reports how the manager materialized the Activation.
For start and follow-up, the caller signal owns lookup, materialization, and admission only until inbox acceptance. After the operation returns its `MessageId`, the manager owns the Activation independently; later caller cancellation does not cancel the accepted turn or dispose the child.
### Durable Session and live Activation
The Session owns the stable child identity, transcript, direct-parent lineage, delegation depth, and versioned continuation descriptor. `SessionHeader.parentSession` is durable provenance and an authorization input; it is not a live routing capability and does not imply that the historical parent is resident.
The Session owns the stable child identity, transcript, direct-parent lineage, delegation depth, and versioned continuation descriptor. `SessionHeader.parentSession` records the direct parent and is an authorization input; it is not a live routing capability and does not imply that the recorded parent is resident.
An idle historical Session has no `AgentHandle`. The first authorized `next-turn` delivery resumes an Activation from the persisted Session and submits the message to its inbox. Cold resume uses the exact live parent Agent for authorization and, when that parent has an Activation, ownership; it never uses the parent for reconstruction.
@@ -121,9 +121,9 @@ This version exposes no subagent steering operation. Parent continuation message
A later host UI may expose separate **Steer** and **Follow up** actions. Host steering would be strict and live-only: it may call the existing Agent steering path only while the Activation accepts a next step, must reject otherwise, and must never fall back to queueing or cold resume. Exposing parent steering to a model-facing tool remains a separate design.
### Authority and provenance
### Authority and recorded sender identity
Authority is supplied by an exact live Agent tool context. `MessageSource` and `senderSessionId` are durable provenance after admission, not caller-controlled authority.
Authority is supplied by an exact live Agent tool context. After admission, `MessageSource` and `senderSessionId` record who supplied the message; callers cannot use those fields as authority.
This version authorizes only the durable child's direct parent. The manager checks `SessionHeader.parentSession` against the exact live parent Agent at the final no-await inbox-admission boundary before registering the child in that parent's `ownedChildren`; cold resume also performs an earlier check before reconstruction for fail-fast rejection. Other Agents, ancestors, hosts, teams, and workflows remain rejected until a concrete consumer justifies another authority protocol.
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ Host and manager teardown remains the lifecycle stop path. Manager unload applie
Each turn requests the Session durability checkpoint, while final Activation settlement additionally awaits `ctx.sessions.flush()` as a best-effort barrier. The manager deliberately ignores the boolean result because listener participation cannot identify a persistence backend. A rejection is logged without changing the lifecycle result or host-drain outcome; the manager still disposes the handle and releases ownership, and the persisted child state may be missing or stale on a later resume.
Only messages written to the child Session log are reconstructable with their admitted provenance; inbox acceptance alone provides no restart guarantee.
Only messages written to the child Session log are reconstructable with the source that supplied them; inbox acceptance alone provides no restart guarantee.
Session and descriptor persistence survive restart. Activation state, Agent inbox contents, and the ownership graph are process-local. A process crash may lose an accepted initial prompt or follow-up that remained in the inbox without reaching the Session log. The Session and descriptor may survive so a later authorized message can cold-resume the child, but the lost message is not replayed automatically. Recovering accepted unfinished or unlogged messages requires a durable inbox protocol and is not implied here.
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ It adds no host-user continuation, subagent steering operation, durable mailbox,
**Make report delivery part of the base lifecycle.** Repeatable child-to-parent reporting is compatible with this lifecycle, but quiet versus waking delivery, acknowledgement, durability, and retry behavior are independent product choices. The later report package remains optional and consumes an explicit child-setup seam, so continuable residency does not silently grant a return channel.
**Treat `SessionHeader.parentSession` as live ownership.** Durable lineage does not prove that the historical parent currently owns the child. Membership in the live parent's `ownedChildren` records the process-local relationship without changing durable provenance.
**Treat `SessionHeader.parentSession` as live ownership.** Durable lineage does not prove that the recorded parent currently owns the child. Membership in the live parent's `ownedChildren` records the process-local relationship without changing the durable parent id.
**Retain the exact parent Agent in a separate link.** The parent Activation already owns its `AgentHandle`, and `ownedChildren` prevents that Activation from disposing while the child remains live. Resolving the parent by Session id is therefore sufficient and avoids a redundant runtime reference.
@@ -181,9 +181,9 @@ The implementation pins these behaviors:
- `SubagentProvider.prepareContinuable?()` returns only a detached `ContinuableCreateSpec`; configured continuable mode requires that capability, while `backgroundMode` remains an independent policy choice.
- The manager calls `ctx.agents.create()` through its private activation-owner scope, installs the returned `AgentHandle` and parent ownership, calls `Agent.followup(initialPrompt)`, and returns `{ childId, messageId }` when inbox acceptance yields the `MessageId`, without waiting for turn start or a Session-log write.
- Every failure before initial-prompt inbox acceptance rejects without ids and rolls back any created handle, Activation, and parent `ownedChildren` membership through a closing transaction visible to concurrent delivery and drain; lifecycle publication failure emits no unmatched terminal edge.
- Cold resume calls `ctx.agents.resume()` from the continuation manager and never dispatches through or requires the initial subagent provider; the persisted provider name remains lifecycle provenance after provider removal, while `SubagentProvider.resume?()` and `SubagentProviderResumeRequest` are absent.
- Cold resume calls `ctx.agents.resume()` from the continuation manager and never dispatches through or requires the initial subagent provider; the descriptor retains the initial provider name after provider removal, while `SubagentProvider.resume?()` and `SubagentProviderResumeRequest` are absent.
- A continuable Activation directly owns `AgentHandle` and never creates, wraps, or retains `SubagentRun`; `SubagentProvider.start()` and `SubagentRun` remain one-shot-only, without `SubagentRun.steer?()`.
- `followup()` accepts only the exact live direct parent and rechecks that identity at the final no-await inbox-admission boundary after any materialization; durable message provenance cannot authorize delivery.
- `followup()` accepts only the exact live direct parent and rechecks that identity at the final no-await inbox-admission boundary after any materialization; durable message source fields cannot authorize delivery.
- Continuation messages always use `Agent.followup()` and share its inbox FIFO, including when the child already has an open turn.
- `ctx.subagents.followup()` and its `send_message` adapter return only the accepted `MessageId`; the continuation layer accepts no delivery target and defines no subagent-specific route result.
- Caller signals stop start and follow-up only before inbox acceptance, while host-scoped and manager-global teardown retain child-first cleanup; the [current-turn interrupt](2026-08-06-continuable-subagent-interrupt.md) is the one public stop and does not enter teardown.
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ The implementation pins these behaviors:
- Final Activation settlement awaits `ctx.sessions.flush(child.session)` as a best-effort barrier, logs rejection without interpreting listener participation as durability proof, then disposes the child handle and releases parent ownership so a flush failure cannot leak a `waiting` Activation.
- Manager teardown closes admission globally; a host owning selected top-level Agents instead closes admission only below their exact identities until those roots leave the registry. Both track admitted materializations by exact ancestry, install one memoized disposal cutoff per selected visible Activation, propagate cancellation top-down, release handles child-first, await every selected branch despite individual failures, and only then dispose the corresponding top-level Agents or manager scope.
- The base lifecycle has no implicit report behavior; the optional report package contributes an explicit child-scoped tool through the setup seam.
- Session logs reconstruct only messages that were actually written, with their admitted provenance; inbox-accepted but unlogged messages have no restart guarantee.
- Session logs reconstruct only messages that were actually written, with the source that supplied each message; inbox-accepted but unlogged messages have no restart guarantee.
- No continuable-subagent path creates or depends on a Task, `TaskId`, Task completion notice, Task cancellation, or intermediate result-bearing execution wrapper.
- Unit coverage pins the `startContinuable()` inbox-acceptance return boundary, complete rollback for each pre-acceptance and lifecycle-publication failure, global and parent-scoped drain quiescence for materialization caught between Agent publication and Activation registration, sibling-forest isolation, exact ancestry after an intermediate Agent leaves the registry, provider-independent cold resume, final exact-parent reauthorization after cold-resume materialization, caller-signal and teardown ownership on both sides of acceptance, and the absence of automatic replay for accepted-but-unlogged messages.
- Unit coverage pins the residency-only routing table, single-inbox ordering, `MessageId` correlation through inbox events, follow-up during an open turn, waiting wakeup, cold resume, ownership registration and release, child-first disposal, send-versus-dispose races, best-effort final flush with absent and failing listeners, and the absence of public subagent cancellation and steering.

View File

@@ -40,17 +40,17 @@ inbox 接受消息前发生任何失败,操作都会在不返回任何 id 的
`backgroundMode: 'one-shot' | 'continuable'` 仍是部署策略。配置为 continuable 时要求存在 `prepareContinuable`;该方法是否存在会取代 `SubagentProvider.resume?()` 成为能力检查,而具备该能力的提供方仍可运行 one-shot 工作。
冷恢复不会通过 subagent 提供方分发。继续执行管理器会归并通用的进程内描述符,通过同一个 activation-owner 作用域调用 `ctx.agents.resume()`,安装返回的 `AgentHandle`,并提交等待中的 `next-turn`。`SubagentProvider.resume?()` 和 `SubagentProviderResumeRequest` 均不存在。初始提供方注销后,其名称仍作为生命周期来源信息保留;它不是恢复能力,也不是后续驻留的必要条件。远程提供方需要单独设计。
冷恢复不会通过 subagent 提供方分发。继续执行管理器会归并通用的进程内描述符,通过同一个 activation-owner 作用域调用 `ctx.agents.resume()`,安装返回的 `AgentHandle`,并提交等待中的 `next-turn`。`SubagentProvider.resume?()` 和 `SubagentProviderResumeRequest` 均不存在。初始提供方注销后,描述符仍保留其名称;该名称不赋予恢复能力,也不要求后续驻留时该提供方存在。远程提供方需要单独设计。
`SubagentProvider.start()` 和 `SubagentRun` 只保留在不变的 one-shot 路径上。可继续激活直接持有自身的 `AgentHandle`,绝不创建、包装或保留 `SubagentRun`;因此,`SubagentRun.steer?()` 不存在。
`ctx.subagents.followup(parent, childId, content, { source, signal })` 仍是唯一的从 parent 到 child 的继续执行消息操作。确切的在线 parent Agent 授权投递;冷恢复会在重建前检查该权限,每条路径还会在最终无 await 的 inbox 准入区间再次检查,因此在物化期间被注销或替换的 parent 无法授权投递。`source` 仍是持久化来源信息,不赋予任何权限。面向模型的 `send_message` 工具只保留稳定的 `subagent_id` 和 `message` 字段,并始终提交一个 follow-up 轮次。start 和 follow-up 都返回已接受的 `MessageId`,两者都不报告管理器如何物化激活。
`ctx.subagents.followup(parent, childId, content, { source, signal })` 仍是唯一的从 parent 到 child 的继续执行消息操作。确切的在线 parent Agent 授权投递;冷恢复会在重建前检查该权限,每条路径还会在最终无 await 的 inbox 准入区间再次检查,因此在物化期间被注销或替换的 parent 无法授权投递。`source` 记录谁提供了获准消息,不赋予任何权限。面向模型的 `send_message` 工具只保留稳定的 `subagent_id` 和 `message` 字段,并始终提交一个 follow-up 轮次。start 和 follow-up 都返回已接受的 `MessageId`,两者都不报告管理器如何物化激活。
对于 start 和 follow-up,调用方 signal 只在 inbox 接受消息前持有查找、物化和准入。操作返回 `MessageId` 后,管理器会独立持有该激活;调用方之后的取消不会取消已接受的轮次,也不会 dispose child。
### 持久化会话与在线激活
会话持有稳定的 child 身份、transcript(文本记录)、直接 parent 谱系、委派深度和带版本的继续执行描述符。`SessionHeader.parentSession` 是持久化来源信息和鉴权输入;它不是在线路由能力,也不表示历史 parent 仍然驻留。
会话持有稳定的 child 身份、transcript(文本记录)、直接 parent 谱系、委派深度和带版本的继续执行描述符。`SessionHeader.parentSession` 记录直接 parent,并作为鉴权输入;它不是在线路由能力,也不表示记录的 parent 仍然驻留。
空闲的历史会话没有 `AgentHandle`。第一条通过鉴权的 `next-turn` 投递会根据持久化会话恢复激活,并将消息提交到其 inbox。冷恢复使用经过身份认证的确切在线 parent Agent 执行鉴权;当该 parent 有激活时,还使用它建立所有权,但绝不使用 parent 执行重建。
@@ -121,9 +121,9 @@ activation-owner 作用域之所以存在,是因为普通 Cordis owner effect
后续宿主 UI 可以分别暴露 **Steer** 和 **Follow up** 操作。宿主 steering 必须严格且仅限在线使用:只有当激活接受下一步骤时,它才能调用现有的 Agent steering 路径;其他情况必须拒绝,而且绝不能转为排队或冷恢复。是否通过面向模型的工具暴露 parent steering 仍需单独设计。
### 权限与来源
### 权限与已记录的发送方身份
权限来自确切的在线 Agent 工具上下文。`MessageSource` 和 `senderSessionId` 是准入后的持久化来源信息,不是由调用方控制的权限。
权限来自确切的在线 Agent 工具上下文。准入后,`MessageSource` 和 `senderSessionId` 记录谁提供了消息;调用方不能用这些字段取得权限。
本版本只授权持久化 child 的直接 parent。管理器会在将 child 注册到该 parent 的 `ownedChildren` 之前,于最终无 await 的 inbox 准入边界根据确切的在线 parent Agent 检查 `SessionHeader.parentSession`;冷恢复还会在重建前执行一次更早的检查,以便快速失败。其他 Agent、祖先、宿主、团队和工作流仍被拒绝,直至有具体消费方证明另一种权限协议合理。
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ activation-owner 作用域之所以存在,是因为普通 Cordis owner effect
每个轮次都会请求执行会话持久性检查点,而 Activation 最终结算还会等待 `ctx.sessions.flush()`,将其作为 best-effort 屏障。管理器特意忽略布尔结果,因为 listener 是否参与无法标识持久化后端。rejection 会被记录,但不会改变生命周期结果或宿主 drain 的结果;管理器仍会 dispose handle 并释放所有权,后续恢复时持久化 child 状态可能缺失或陈旧。
只有实际写入 child 会话日志的消息,才能根据其准入来源重建;仅被 inbox 接受并不提供重启保证。
只有实际写入 child 会话日志的消息,才能在重建时保留提供它的来源;仅被 inbox 接受并不提供重启保证。
会话和描述符的持久化状态可在重启后保留。激活状态、Agent inbox 内容和所有权图都是进程内状态。进程崩溃可能丢失已被接受但仍留在 inbox、尚未写入会话日志的初始提示词或 follow-up。会话和描述符可能保留,因此后续获得授权的消息仍可冷恢复 child,但丢失的消息不会自动回放。恢复已接受但未完成或未写入日志的消息需要持久化 inbox 协议,本提案不隐含该能力。
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ activation-owner 作用域之所以存在,是因为普通 Cordis owner effect
**将报告投递纳入基础生命周期。** 可重复的 child 到 parent 报告与该生命周期兼容,但静默投递还是唤醒投递、确认、持久性和重试行为都是独立的产品决策。后续的 report 包保持可选,并消费一条显式 child 设置 seam,因此可继续驻留不会默认授予返回通道。
**将 `SessionHeader.parentSession` 视为在线所有权。** 持久化谱系不能证明历史 parent 当前持有 child。在线 parent 的 `ownedChildren` 成员关系会记录进程内关系,而不改变持久化来源。
**将 `SessionHeader.parentSession` 视为在线所有权。** 持久化谱系不能证明已记录的 parent 当前持有 child。在线 parent 的 `ownedChildren` 成员关系会记录进程内关系,而不改变持久化 parent id。
**在单独的 link 中保留确切的 parent Agent。** parent 激活已经持有自身 `AgentHandle`,而且 `ownedChildren` 会在 child 仍然在线时阻止该激活 dispose。因此,通过会话 id 解析 parent 已经足够,也可以避免冗余的运行时引用。
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ activation-owner 作用域之所以存在,是因为普通 Cordis owner effect
- `SubagentProvider.prepareContinuable?()` 只返回分离式 `ContinuableCreateSpec`;配置为 continuable 时要求具备该能力,而 `backgroundMode` 仍是独立的策略选择。
- 管理器通过私有 activation-owner 作用域调用 `ctx.agents.create()`,安装返回的 `AgentHandle` 并建立 parent 所有权,调用 `Agent.followup(initialPrompt)`,然后在 inbox 接受消息并产生 `MessageId` 时返回 `{ childId, messageId }`,而不等待轮次开始或消息写入会话日志。
- 初始提示词被 inbox 接受前的每条失败路径都会导致操作被拒绝且不返回 id,并通过一个对并发投递和 drain 可见的关闭事务回滚已创建的任何 handle、激活和 parent `ownedChildren` 成员关系;生命周期发布失败不会产生无配对的终止事件。
- 冷恢复由继续执行管理器调用 `ctx.agents.resume()`,绝不通过或依赖初始 subagent 提供方;提供方移除后,持久化的提供方名称仍作为生命周期来源信息保留,且 `SubagentProvider.resume?()` 和 `SubagentProviderResumeRequest` 均不存在。
- 冷恢复由继续执行管理器调用 `ctx.agents.resume()`,绝不通过或依赖初始 subagent 提供方;提供方移除后,描述符仍保留初始提供方名称,且 `SubagentProvider.resume?()` 和 `SubagentProviderResumeRequest` 均不存在。
- 可继续激活直接持有 `AgentHandle`,绝不创建、包装或保留 `SubagentRun`;`SubagentProvider.start()` 和 `SubagentRun` 只用于 one-shot,且没有 `SubagentRun.steer?()`。
- `followup()` 只接受确切的在线直接 parent,并在任何物化之后的最终无 await 的 inbox 准入边界再次检查该身份;持久化消息来源信息不能授权投递。
- 继续执行消息始终使用 `Agent.followup()` 并共享其 inbox FIFO,包括 child 已有开放轮次的情况。
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ activation-owner 作用域之所以存在,是因为普通 Cordis owner effect
- Activation 最终结算会等待 `ctx.sessions.flush(child.session)`,将其作为 best-effort 屏障;它会记录 rejection,但不会把 listener 参与解释为持久性证明,然后 dispose child handle 并释放 parent 所有权,使 flush 失败不会泄漏 `waiting` Activation。
- 管理器拆卸会全局关闭准入;拥有选定顶层 Agent 的宿主则只关闭这些确切身份之下的准入,直到这些根离开注册表。两者都会按确切祖先关系跟踪已获准的物化过程,为每个选中的可见 Activation 安装一个记忆化 dispose 截止点,自顶向下传播取消,按 child-first 顺序释放 handle,即使个别分支失败也会等待所有选中分支,之后才 dispose 对应的顶层 Agent 或管理器作用域。
- 基础生命周期不暴露隐式报告行为;可选的 report 包通过 setup seam 贡献一个显式的 child 作用域工具。
- 会话日志只能根据准入来源重建实际写入的消息;已被 inbox 接受但未写入日志的消息没有重启保证。
- 会话日志只会重建实际写入的消息,并保留每条消息的提供来源;已被 inbox 接受但未写入日志的消息没有重启保证。
- 可继续 subagent 路径不创建或依赖 Task、`TaskId`、Task 完成通知、Task 取消或中间的带结果执行包装层。
- 单元覆盖固定 `startContinuable()` 在 inbox 接受消息时的返回边界、每条接受前和生命周期发布失败路径的完整回滚、全局和限定到 parent 作用域的 drain 都会等待夹在 Agent 发布与 Activation 注册之间的物化过程完全停稳、同级森林隔离、中间 Agent 离开注册表后的确切祖先关系、不依赖提供方的冷恢复、冷恢复物化后的最终确切 parent 再授权、接受前后两个阶段的调用方 signal 与拆卸所有权,以及已接受但未写入日志的消息不会自动回放。
- 单元覆盖固定仅由驻留状态决定的路由表、单 inbox 顺序、通过 inbox 事件关联 `MessageId`、在开放轮次期间 follow-up、等待唤醒、冷恢复、所有权注册与释放、child-first dispose、发送与 dispose 的竞争、没有 listener 和 listener 失败时的 best-effort 最终 flush,以及不存在公开 subagent 取消和 steering。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-continuable-subagent-report-tool.md
2026-07-30-continuable-subagent-report-tool.md: 8324f1fa08f7dace6153712575e7e70a07ee9344
2026-07-30-continuable-subagent-report-tool.zh.md: 6b7472717e724af9bf598fada6d7e82070d06f3c
2026-07-30-continuable-subagent-report-tool.md: 6a607f1da48fdfde36b2d9351f131dd3ef67ba7f
2026-07-30-continuable-subagent-report-tool.zh.md: 6dd408aff755ef7d4e27a62b347ffc839616c702

View File

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ The tool uses generic rendering with no locations. Its acknowledgement includes
### Service authority
The subagent seam exposes `ctx.subagents.reportFrom(child, content, { delivery, signal }): Promise<MessageId>`. The exact live child Agent is the sender credential. The continuation manager accepts only an Activation whose `handle.agent === child`, derives its direct parent from the child's durable header, and requires that id to resolve to a live parent Agent in the final synchronous authorization-and-send span. The API accepts no caller-selected recipient, ancestor, or provenance.
The subagent seam exposes `ctx.subagents.reportFrom(child, content, { delivery, signal }): Promise<MessageId>`. The exact live child Agent is the sender credential. The continuation manager accepts only an Activation whose `handle.agent === child`, derives its direct parent from the child's durable header, and requires that id to resolve to a live parent Agent in the final synchronous authorization-and-send span. The API accepts no caller-selected recipient, ancestor, or sender fields.
Roots, one-shot children, forged objects, stale Agents, and same-id replacements fail with `UNAUTHORIZED`. A closing child Activation fails with `ACTIVATION_CLOSING`; manager drain and pre-acceptance cancellation retain their existing lifecycle errors. A missing or send-rejecting direct parent fails with `PARENT_UNAVAILABLE` and `direct parent is not live; report was not delivered`. Failure returns no id, cold-resumes no parent, writes no offline mailbox, and mutates no absent-parent Session.
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Quiet delivery calls `parent.inject()`. It adds model-visible context without st
Waking delivery calls `parent.followup()`. It creates one ordinary FIFO parent turn, wakes a parked parent driver, and never steers an open turn. When that parent is itself a continuable Activation, the send uses the manager's existing admission accounting so the parent cannot settle between synchronous enqueue and the admission microtask.
Both modes frame one user-role message as `Background subagent <child-id> reported:` followed by the exact `output`. Durable provenance is `{ kind: 'subagent-report', senderSessionId: child.id }`. Normal Agent ordering governs concurrent sends; the subagent layer creates no second queue.
Both modes frame one user-role message as `Background subagent <child-id> reported:` followed by the exact `output`. The durable message source is `{ kind: 'subagent-report', senderSessionId: child.id }`. Normal Agent ordering governs concurrent sends; the subagent layer creates no second queue.
### Acknowledgement and recovery
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ A post-creation revocation check can reject the Activation only after the Agent
- Quiet delivery is the validated default and never starts a parent request. Wakeup creates exactly one later FIFO turn and never steers an open turn.
- Child cancellation or disposal after parent acceptance does not retract the report. Before acceptance, child disposal, drain, parent loss, or caller cancellation rejects the operation.
- Fresh and resumed Activations compose current setup contributions before publication. Grants wait for the next Activation; revocation is immediate for resident children.
- Unit coverage pins visibility, allow-list behavior, both delivery modes, stable identity and provenance, nested routing, invalid senders, absent parents, cancellation, drain, revocation races, and the absence of Tasks or implicit final reporting.
- Unit coverage pins visibility, allow-list behavior, both delivery modes, stable message and sender identities, nested routing, invalid senders, absent parents, cancellation, drain, revocation races, and the absence of Tasks or implicit final reporting.
- The keyless assembled snapshot proves the real child tool, quiet non-wakeup behavior, durable parent framing, and later parent consumption.
### Accepted risks

View File

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Status: implemented
### 服务权限
subagent seam 暴露 `ctx.subagents.reportFrom(child, content, { delivery, signal }): Promise<MessageId>`。确切的在线 child Agent 是发送方凭据。继续执行管理器只接受 `handle.agent === child` 的 Activation,从 child 的持久化 header 中推导其直接 parent,并要求该 id 在最终的同步授权与发送区间解析为一个在线 parent Agent。该 API 不接受由调用方选择的接收方、祖先或来源信息。
subagent seam 暴露 `ctx.subagents.reportFrom(child, content, { delivery, signal }): Promise<MessageId>`。确切的在线 child Agent 是发送方凭据。继续执行管理器只接受 `handle.agent === child` 的 Activation,从 child 的持久化 header 中推导其直接 parent,并要求该 id 在最终的同步授权与发送区间解析为一个在线 parent Agent。该 API 不接受由调用方选择的接收方、祖先或发送方字段。
root、one-shot child、伪造对象、陈旧 Agent 和同 id 替换对象都以 `UNAUTHORIZED` 失败。正在关闭的 child Activation 以 `ACTIVATION_CLOSING` 失败;管理器 drain 和接受前取消保留既有的生命周期错误。直接 parent 不存在或拒绝接受时,以 `PARENT_UNAVAILABLE` 和 `direct parent is not live; report was not delivered` 失败。失败不返回 id,不冷恢复 parent,不写入离线邮箱,也不会修改缺失 parent 的会话。
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ root、one-shot child、伪造对象、陈旧 Agent 和同 id 替换对象都以
唤醒投递调用 `parent.followup()`。它会创建一个普通的 FIFO parent 轮次,唤醒已驻留的 parent driver,且绝不 steering 已开始的轮次。当该 parent 本身也是可继续 Activation 时,发送会使用管理器现有的准入计数,防止 parent 在同步入队与准入微任务之间结算。
两种模式都会将一条用户角色消息封装为 `Background subagent <child-id> reported:`,后面跟随完全原样的 `output`。持久化来源信息为 `{ kind: 'subagent-report', senderSessionId: child.id }`。并发发送的顺序由 Agent 的常规规则决定;subagent 层不会创建第二条队列。
两种模式都会将一条用户角色消息封装为 `Background subagent <child-id> reported:`,后面跟随完全原样的 `output`。持久化消息来源为 `{ kind: 'subagent-report', senderSessionId: child.id }`。并发发送的顺序由 Agent 的常规规则决定;subagent 层不会创建第二条队列。
### 确认与恢复
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ ACP(Agent Client Protocol)快照 harness 新增 `waitForSubagentTurnEnd`,
- 静默投递是校验后的默认模式,绝不会启动 parent 请求。wakeup 会恰好创建一个后续 FIFO 轮次,绝不 steering 已开始的轮次。
- parent 接受后取消或 dispose child 不会撤回报告。接受前,child dispose、drain、parent 丢失或调用方取消都会拒绝操作。
- 新建和恢复的 Activation 都会在发布前组合当前设置贡献。新授权等待下一个 Activation 才生效,而已驻留 child 的授权撤销立即生效。
- 单元覆盖固定可见性、allow-list 行为、两种投递模式、稳定身份与来源信息、嵌套路由、无效发送方、缺失的 parent、取消、drain、撤销竞争,以及不存在 Task 或隐式最终报告。
- 单元覆盖固定可见性、allow-list 行为、两种投递模式、稳定的消息与发送方身份、嵌套路由、无效发送方、缺失的 parent、取消、drain、撤销竞争,以及不存在 Task 或隐式最终报告。
- 无密钥整体组装快照证明真实 child 工具、静默且不唤醒的行为、持久化 parent 封装,以及 parent 后续消费。
### 已接受的风险

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-queued-manual-compaction.md
2026-07-30-queued-manual-compaction.md: 5100808ada4b7b284228113584e577d46ff91101
2026-07-30-queued-manual-compaction.zh.md: fe3b0ff5e6b8cab7cb332f958adc6ab8d94f23b8
2026-07-30-queued-manual-compaction.md: 94afdd84dfe573ee2b60eb3dbfdae2dd5b6beb1e
2026-07-30-queued-manual-compaction.zh.md: 96eaa667eaee8adb42ec63e35beb0b32912c83a0

View File

@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ That reference also carried client-side replacement-anchor machinery to preserve
**Hold injection with waking prompts.** Rejected because idle injection is non-waking durable context by contract; delaying it would make plugin ordering depend on a UI command.
**Require the marker interval to contain only compaction events.** Rejected because markers represent lock time points. Provenance names the selected and shadowed seqs exactly; exclusivity would add no correctness and would reject valid injection.
**Require the marker interval to contain only compaction events.** Rejected because markers represent lock time points. `compact/summary` names the selected range and shadowed seqs exactly; exclusivity would add no correctness and would reject valid injection.
**Treat every unmatched marker as permanently busy.** Rejected because a crash-recovered or forked session would remain wedged. `session/end-seed` is the explicit lifecycle evidence that distinguishes stale history from a live process-local attempt.
@@ -105,6 +105,6 @@ The command package pins registration, Loader composition, argument rejection, e
Interactive users can compact useful history without spending a conversation-model turn. A prompt accepted before the command wins; one submitted during the command waits with its original queue identity. Manual compaction consumes session seqs but no turn number.
The log exposes slow, failed, crashed, and successful attempts through the same bracket. A stale pre-boundary orphan no longer wedges a new lifecycle, while a current unmatched start remains a hard busy signal. Marker intervals may contain unrelated events, so consumers use provenance and relative ordering rather than assuming a contiguous compaction-only slice.
The log exposes slow, failed, crashed, and successful attempts through the same bracket. A stale pre-boundary orphan no longer wedges a new lifecycle, while a current unmatched start remains a hard busy signal. Marker intervals may contain unrelated events, so consumers use the seqs recorded in `compact/summary` and relative ordering rather than assuming a contiguous compaction-only slice.
The shared transaction keeps one ordering and one lock across every entry point. Failure reporting is precise about whether only the log changed, the surface may have partially changed, or the in-memory commit could not be persisted.

View File

@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ DSH 有意在调用摘要器前记录 `compact/start`。缓慢或崩溃的尝试
**与唤醒提示词一起阻塞注入。** 不予采用,因为按约定,空闲注入是不会唤醒的持久上下文;延迟注入会使插件排序依赖某个 UI 命令。
**要求标记区间只包含压缩事件。** 不予采用,因为标记表示锁的时间点。溯源信息会精确指明所选 seq 与被遮蔽 seq;排他性不会增加正确性,只会拒绝有效注入。
**要求标记区间只包含压缩事件。** 不予采用,因为标记表示锁的时间点。`compact/summary` 会精确指明所选区间与被遮蔽 seq;排他性不会增加正确性,只会拒绝有效注入。
**把每个未匹配标记都永久视为 busy。** 不予采用,因为崩溃恢复或 fork 后的会话会永久卡住。`session/end-seed` 是区分陈旧历史与当前进程活动尝试的显式生命周期证据。
@@ -105,6 +105,6 @@ Agent loop 测试覆盖同一 tick 内的优先权、保留 ID 与 FIFO 生命
交互用户无需消耗会话模型轮次即可压缩有效历史。在命令前获接纳的提示词胜出;命令期间提交的提示词会以原有队列身份等待。手动压缩会消耗会话 seq,但不消耗轮次编号。
日志通过同一对标记暴露缓慢、失败、崩溃与成功的尝试。边界前的陈旧未匹配标记不会再卡住新的生命周期,而当前未匹配 start 仍是严格的 busy 信号。标记区间可以包含不相关事件,因此消费方使用溯源信息与相对顺序,而不假定存在连续且仅含压缩事件的切片。
日志通过同一对标记暴露缓慢、失败、崩溃与成功的尝试。边界前的陈旧未匹配标记不会再卡住新的生命周期,而当前未匹配 start 仍是严格的 busy 信号。标记区间可以包含不相关事件,因此消费方使用 `compact/summary` 记录的 seq 与相对顺序,而不假定存在连续且仅含压缩事件的切片。
共享事务让每个入口点保持同一种顺序并使用同一把锁。失败报告会精确区分只有日志发生变化、surface 可能部分改变,以及内存 commit 无法持久化这三种情况。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-04-web-context-source-and-steer-marks.md
2026-08-04-web-context-source-and-steer-marks.md: ca44702cf637c4250d141396ac22d206a16acc15
2026-08-04-web-context-source-and-steer-marks.zh.md: 09cefd07e3b417b63f05ce430cfed7b30597452f
2026-08-04-web-context-source-and-steer-marks.md: d74badedaa9623014dbba10ae68ca680daf75de1
2026-08-04-web-context-source-and-steer-marks.zh.md: f7a84db9d53a2f270ad47828c7aead2fd5ce8a68

View File

@@ -8,13 +8,13 @@ English | [中文](2026-08-04-web-context-source-and-steer-marks.zh.md)
Everything a producer adds to the model-facing conversation reached the Web transcript as one of two anonymous shapes. Every logged non-user `user/message` — the skill catalog, the runtime snapshot, reconciled `AGENTS.md` instructions, a guard notice, a subagent report, a cross-session snapshot — collapsed into one identical `上下文注入` row, so a reader could not tell what had been added without expanding each row and reading raw JSON. Mid-turn steering was worse: it rendered in exactly the bubble a turn-opening prompt uses, leaving the transcript unable to say which message interrupted a running turn.
The distinctions are already durable. `user/message.source` is the merge-extensible provenance every producer must supply, while `agent/inbox/spliced` records whether an identified message entered and left `next-turn` or `next-step`; only the presentation discarded them. The terminal transcript this Web UI replaced did name each card's producer, so the Web surface was a regression for the same log.
The distinctions are already durable. Every producer must supply a merge-extensible `user/message.source` that identifies itself, while `agent/inbox/spliced` records whether an identified message entered and left `next-turn` or `next-step`; only the presentation discarded them. The terminal transcript this Web UI replaced did name each card's producer, so the Web surface was a regression for the same log.
## Decision
The transcript names all three roles a non-prompt message can play — injected context, recalled session, and steering.
`TranscriptAdapter` and the history fold attach a `provenance` view to every `ContextMessageNode`, computed by `contextProvenance()` from the durable source alone. It returns a `role` (`inject`, or `recall` for a cross-session snapshot) and a `label` naming the producer. `ContextInjectionRow` titles itself from the role and shows the label beside that title in `ToolRow`'s summary geometry, so the collapsed row already answers what was added and by whom; the 141px scrollport and truncation bound are unchanged from the [archived disclosure decision](../../archived/feature/2026-07-30-web-context-injection-disclosure.md). What renders inside that scrollport is chosen by the independent form axis added in the [context form decision](2026-08-05-context-form-vocabulary.md).
`TranscriptAdapter` and the history fold attach a `provenance` view containing the producer role and label to every `ContextMessageNode`; `contextProvenance()` computes it from the durable source alone. It returns a `role` (`inject`, or `recall` for a cross-session snapshot) and a `label` naming the producer. `ContextInjectionRow` titles itself from the role and shows the label beside that title in `ToolRow`'s summary geometry, so the collapsed row already answers what was added and by whom; the 141px scrollport and truncation bound are unchanged from the [archived disclosure decision](../../archived/feature/2026-07-30-web-context-injection-disclosure.md). What renders inside that scrollport is chosen by the independent form axis added in the [context form decision](2026-08-05-context-form-vocabulary.md).
**The label is read out of the log, never from a client-side table of producer names.** `workspace-instructions` is named by the distinct instruction paths it reconciled, `session-reference` by the titles of the sessions it read, a plugin source by its logged plugin id, and any other source by its own `kind` — the documented default arm for a merge-extensible union. A source carrying no readable kind degrades to an unnamed injection. A new or renamed producer is therefore identifiable without a client release, no label can go stale against the code, and a resumed, forked, or foreign log projects exactly like a live session.
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ The transcript names all three roles a non-prompt message can play — injected
## Alternatives considered
**Localize producer names in the client.** A dictionary keyed by plugin id would read better than `@deepseek-ai/dsh-system-prompt`, but it drifts silently on every rename, needs a client change per new producer, and cannot name a producer from a foreign log at all. Provenance the log already carries is worth more than prose the client invents.
**Localize producer names in the client.** A dictionary keyed by plugin id would read better than `@deepseek-ai/dsh-system-prompt`, but it drifts silently on every rename, needs a client change per new producer, and cannot name a producer from a foreign log at all. The producer name already recorded in the log is more reliable than a label the client invents.
**Register presentations per source kind.** The disclosure decision deferred a keyed context-view slot until source-owned presentations emerged. Naming a row is not a distinct presentation, and a registry keyed on mounted producers would fail exactly where it matters — a resumed log whose producer is no longer mounted still has to render.
@@ -36,14 +36,14 @@ The transcript names all three roles a non-prompt message can play — injected
## Testing
- `packages/client/runtime` unit coverage pins each provenance arm, the label fallbacks when a name field is missing, empty, or wrongly typed, the unnamed degradation for a source with no readable kind, and steering reconstruction on reset and live append paths.
- `packages/client/runtime` unit coverage pins each source kind, the label fallbacks when a name field is missing, empty, or wrongly typed, the unnamed degradation for a source with no readable kind, and steering reconstruction on reset and live append paths.
- `packages/client/ui-conversation` jsdom coverage pins the role title, the producer label beside it, the label's survival while expanded, the roleless header, and the steering caption on both durable and pending bubbles.
- The keyless assembled-Web goldens carry the named header and the steering caption, so the assembled transcript — not only component tests — proves the marks.
## Consequences
- A reader can attribute every non-prompt message in the transcript at a glance, and the header stays honest for logs this client version has never seen a producer for.
- Producer names in the UI are package-shaped (`dsh-tool-skill`, `@deepseek-ai/dsh-system-prompt`) wherever the source carries only a plugin id. That is the cost of refusing a client-side name table; a producer that wants a better name records better provenance.
- Producer names in the UI are package-shaped (`dsh-tool-skill`, `@deepseek-ai/dsh-system-prompt`) wherever the source carries only a plugin id. That is the cost of refusing a client-side name table; a producer that wants a better label must record one in its source fields.
- `ContextMessageNode` gains a required field, so every constructed node — including test fixtures — must supply it.
- `SteeringMessageNode` remains a distinct presentation node even though the agent loop now records admitted steering as `user/message`; its identity comes from the durable inbox history rather than a separate message event.
- The `recall` arm has no producer in a shipped Web leaf until a host mounts `dsh-session-reference`; it is reachable only through logs written elsewhere.

View File

@@ -8,13 +8,13 @@ Status: implemented
生产方向模型侧对话补充的一切内容,进入 Web transcript(文本记录)后只剩两种匿名形态。每一条已记录的非用户 `user/message`——skill 目录、运行时快照、经过对账的 `AGENTS.md` 指令、guard 提示、子 agent 汇报、跨会话快照——都塌缩成同一行 `上下文注入`,读者不逐行展开去读原始 JSON 就无从知道究竟注入了什么。steering(中途引导)的情况更糟:它渲染成与开轮提示完全相同的气泡,于是 transcript 无法说明哪一条消息打断了正在运行的轮次。
这些区分本来就是持久事实。`user/message.source` 是每个生产方都必须提供的可合并扩展来源,`agent/inbox/spliced` 则记录有身份的消息是从 `next-turn` 还是 `next-step` 进入和离开;把这些事实丢掉的只有呈现层。被这套 Web UI 取代的终端 transcript 本来会写出每张卡片的生产者,因此面对同一份日志,Web 侧是一次倒退。
这些区分本来就是持久事实。每个生产方都必须提供可合并扩展的 `user/message.source` 并在其中注明自己,`agent/inbox/spliced` 则记录有身份的消息是从 `next-turn` 还是 `next-step` 进入和离开;把这些事实丢掉的只有呈现层。被这套 Web UI 取代的终端 transcript 本来会写出每张卡片的生产者,因此面对同一份日志,Web 侧是一次倒退。
## Decision
transcript 为非提示消息可能承担的三种角色分别命名:注入上下文、召回会话、steering。
`TranscriptAdapter` 与历史折叠为每个 `ContextMessageNode` 附加一份 `provenance` 视图,由 `contextProvenance()` 仅依据持久来源计算得出。它返回 `role`(`inject`,跨会话快照则为 `recall`)与命名生产者的 `label`。`ContextInjectionRow` 以角色作为标题,并按 `ToolRow` 摘要的几何在标题旁展示该名称,因此折叠态就已经回答了「注入了什么、由谁注入」;141px 滚动视口与截断上限沿用[已归档的展开项决策](../../archived/feature/2026-07-30-web-context-injection-disclosure.md),未作改动。视口里渲染什么,则由[上下文形态决策](2026-08-05-context-form-vocabulary.md)引入的、相互独立的形态轴决定。
`TranscriptAdapter` 与历史折叠为每个 `ContextMessageNode` 附加一份包含生产者角色和名称的 `provenance` 视图;`contextProvenance()` 仅依据持久来源计算该视图。它返回 `role`(`inject`,跨会话快照则为 `recall`)与命名生产者的 `label`。`ContextInjectionRow` 以角色作为标题,并按 `ToolRow` 摘要的几何在标题旁展示该名称,因此折叠态就已经回答了「注入了什么、由谁注入」;141px 滚动视口与截断上限沿用[已归档的展开项决策](../../archived/feature/2026-07-30-web-context-injection-disclosure.md),未作改动。视口里渲染什么,则由[上下文形态决策](2026-08-05-context-form-vocabulary.md)引入的、相互独立的形态轴决定。
**名称从日志中读出,绝不来自客户端维护的生产者名称表。** `workspace-instructions` 以它对账过的去重指令文件路径命名,`session-reference` 以它读取的会话标题命名,插件来源以其记录的插件 id 命名,其余来源则以自身的 `kind` 命名——这正是可合并扩展联合类型有文档记载的默认分支。没有可读 kind 的来源降级为无名注入。于是新增或重命名的生产者无需客户端发版即可辨识,任何名称都不会相对代码变味,恢复、fork 或来自外部的日志与实时会话的投影结果完全一致。
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ transcript 为非提示消息可能承担的三种角色分别命名:注入上
## Alternatives considered
**在客户端本地化生产者名称。** 以插件 id 为键的字典读起来确实比 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-system-prompt` 好,但它会在每次重命名时悄悄失准,每新增一个生产者都要改客户端,而且对来自外部的日志根本无法命名。日志已经承载的来源,比客户端自己编出来的措辞更有价值。
**在客户端本地化生产者名称。** 以插件 id 为键的字典读起来确实比 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-system-prompt` 好,但它会在每次重命名时悄悄失准,每新增一个生产者都要改客户端,而且对来自外部的日志根本无法命名。日志已经记录的生产者名称,比客户端自己编造的标签更可靠。
**按来源 kind 注册呈现。** 展开项决策把键控的 context-view 槽位推迟到出现由来源自有的呈现需求为止。为一行命名并不构成独立呈现,而以「已挂载的生产者」为键的注册表恰恰会在最要紧的地方失效——生产者已不再挂载的恢复日志同样必须渲染出来。
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ transcript 为非提示消息可能承担的三种角色分别命名:注入上
## Consequences
- 读者一眼即可归因 transcript 中每一条非提示消息;即便面对本客户端版本从未见过其生产者的日志,标题栏依然如实。
- 只要来源仅携带插件 id,UI 中的生产者名称就呈现为包名形态(`dsh-tool-skill`、`@deepseek-ai/dsh-system-prompt`)。这是拒绝客户端名称表的代价;想要更好名称的生产者应当记录更好的来源。
- 只要来源仅携带插件 id,UI 中的生产者名称就呈现为包名形态(`dsh-tool-skill`、`@deepseek-ai/dsh-system-prompt`)。这是拒绝客户端名称表的代价;想要更好标签的生产者必须在来源字段中记录该标签。
- `ContextMessageNode` 增加了一个必填字段,因此每一处构造该节点的代码——包括测试 fixture——都必须提供它。
- 即使 agent loop 现在把已经接纳的 steering 记录为 `user/message`,`SteeringMessageNode` 仍是独立的呈现节点;它的身份来自持久 inbox 历史,而不是独立消息事件。
- 在某个宿主挂载 `dsh-session-reference` 之前,`recall` 分支在已发布的 Web 叶子中没有生产者,只能通过别处写入的日志抵达。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-05-context-form-vocabulary.md
2026-08-05-context-form-vocabulary.md: 618c11b925208d09a62d10101656e3358e327ddb
2026-08-05-context-form-vocabulary.zh.md: 66278b261f23601461c96f08e87ea58766b2bfc2
2026-08-05-context-form-vocabulary.md: 7750523b89ebdda125a7bae8a853ab28a20eeb3f
2026-08-05-context-form-vocabulary.zh.md: 8a6ced60b254ddf5e9075d199be98b3fbe442e2b

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-08-05-context-form-vocabulary.zh.md)
## Problem
Every logged non-user `user/message` rendered through one body: the whole message serialized as inline JSON. A reader opening a row met `{ "content": [ { "type": "text", "text": "…\n\n…" } ], "source": { … } }`, where the escaping had collapsed the only thing worth reading — the model-facing prose — into a single line, and the provenance sat inside the same blob.
Every logged non-user `user/message` rendered through one body: the whole message serialized as inline JSON. A reader opening a row met `{ "content": [ { "type": "text", "text": "…\n\n…" } ], "source": { … } }`, where the escaping had collapsed the only thing worth reading — the model-facing prose — into a single line, and the producer fields sat inside the same blob.
Naming the producer in the header (the [source and steer marks decision](2026-08-04-web-context-source-and-steer-marks.md)) fixed *who added this*. It could not fix *what kind of thing was added*, because nothing in the log said so. Injected context is not one shape: a reconciled `AGENTS.md`, a catalog of available skills, a runtime policy snapshot, and a subagent's report are as different from each other as a terminal card is from a diff card, yet all four presented as the same wall of escaped JSON.
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ The tool surface already solved this shape. `ToolCallView` has three cards, not
`MessageSource` gains an optional producer-declared `form: ContextForm` — a small tagged vocabulary of information *shapes*, independent of `kind`:
- `kind` answers **who produced this** and remains pure provenance.
- `kind` answers **who produced this** and carries no presentation choice.
- `form` answers **what shape of information it is**. Several producers may share one form, and one producer may emit more than one over a session.
The vocabulary is semantic, never visual. A value states that the content is a file's instructions or a catalog of available items; colors, icons, ordering, and collapse defaults are the consumer's business and must not enter the union. It grows one value at a time, as producers gain the structured fields their form needs. This release declares two:
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Both readers are **all-or-nothing**: one unreadable entry disqualifies the recor
The producer side validates the same durable data with the same posture. `catalogHistory` reads `source.entries` out of `agent.session.events`, which on resume or fork is a JSONL/SQLite seed whose validation only guarantees a source object with a non-empty `kind` — no per-kind field is checked. An unreadable catalog is therefore skipped as "not this plugin's record", the posture the replaced content digest had; throwing there would fail every later step of that session at the latest, least diagnosable point.
Everything else — including a form this UI version does not present, a form absent from the source, and a `catalog` whose entries are unusable — renders the **opaque** body: the model-facing text with its real line breaks, then the remaining provenance as fields. Opaque is the documented default, not a leftover bin. A resumed, forked, or foreign log must render whether or not its producer is mounted here, which is also why the classification lives in the durable source rather than in a client-side table keyed by producer.
Everything else — including a form this UI version does not present, a form absent from the source, and a `catalog` whose entries are unusable — renders the **opaque** body: the model-facing text with its real line breaks, then the remaining source data as fields. Opaque is the documented default; the contract assigns these unsupported cases to it. A resumed, forked, or foreign log must render whether or not its producer is mounted here, which is also why the classification lives in the durable source rather than in a client-side table keyed by producer.
## Why not a presenter registry
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ The tool seam pairs its vocabulary with `presentCall(args)`, a host-side pure fu
**Map source kinds to renderers in the client.** Cheapest to write and requires no format change, but it puts producer knowledge back in the client: every new kind then needs a client release to render as anything but opaque, and a foreign log cannot be classified at all. It also reintroduces exactly the coupling the [source and steer marks decision](2026-08-04-web-context-source-and-steer-marks.md) removed for labels.
**Reuse `kind` as the form.** One discriminant is simpler, and `workspace-instructions` is already 1:1 with its form. It breaks on the shared shapes: three producers emit runtime snapshots today, and folding them into one kind would erase their provenance. Two axes keep provenance exact while letting presentations be shared.
**Reuse `kind` as the form.** One discriminant is simpler, and `workspace-instructions` is already 1:1 with its form. It breaks on the shared shapes: three producers emit runtime snapshots today, and folding them into one kind would erase which producer supplied each message. Two axes keep the producer exact while letting presentations be shared.
**Let the client parse the model-facing prose.** The entries and file sections are visibly structured in the text. Parsing them couples the presentation to prompt wording, so every reword silently breaks a card — the same reason catalog identity moved off the text.
@@ -60,14 +60,14 @@ The tool seam pairs its vocabulary with `presentCall(args)`, a host-side pure fu
## Testing
- `packages/client/runtime` pins the form projection, including the unknown, empty, wrongly-typed, and absent values that must degrade to opaque.
- `packages/client/ui-conversation` pins each body: the opaque body's preserved line breaks and provenance fields, the instructions body's file list and verbatim framing, the catalog body's entry list, and a catalog with unusable entries falling back to opaque.
- `packages/client/ui-conversation` pins each body: the opaque body's preserved line breaks and source fields, the instructions body's file list and verbatim framing, the catalog body's entry list, and a catalog with unusable entries falling back to opaque.
- `packages/skill/tool-skill` pins the new source on first publication and replacement, republish behavior driven by the durable entries, and a malformed durable catalog leaving step observation intact.
- The keyless assembled-Web seeded-history scenario expands a real `instructions` context in Chromium and asserts its file list, verbatim framing, and the unchanged disclosure geometry. `catalog` has no assembled coverage: the hermetic scaffold publishes no skills, so no catalog reaches a browser scenario.
## Consequences
- A reader can tell what was added without expanding, and reading it no longer means reading escaped JSON.
- The durable `MessageSource` now carries a semantic classification beside provenance. The boundary is load-bearing: facts and shape only, never presentation. A producer that wants a better card records better facts.
- The durable `MessageSource` now records content shape beside the producer kind and its fields. The boundary is load-bearing: facts and shape only, never presentation. A producer that wants a better card records better facts.
- Catalog identity no longer depends on the model-facing prose, deleting the text-slicing path that could mistake a reworded catalog for a changed one.
- Every shipped producer except the two hook bridges now declares a form. The bridges stay opaque by design: their content is whatever an external program printed, so no shape can be promised for it. Unknown kinds and unreadable records land there too.
- `ContextFormed` is discriminated by `form`, so a producer cannot declare a shape without the facts that shape is presented from — a `notice` without its summary, or a `snapshot` without its sections, fails to compile.

View File

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Status: implemented
## Problem
每一条已记录的非用户 `user/message` 都通过同一个内容区渲染:把整条消息序列化成内联 JSON。读者展开一行,看到的是 `{ "content": [ { "type": "text", "text": "…\n\n…" } ], "source": { … } }`——转义把唯一值得读的东西(面向模型的散文)压成了一行,而来源信息又和它挤在同一坨里。
每一条已记录的非用户 `user/message` 都通过同一个内容区渲染:把整条消息序列化成内联 JSON。读者展开一行,看到的是 `{ "content": [ { "type": "text", "text": "…\n\n…" } ], "source": { … } }`——转义把唯一值得读的东西(面向模型的散文)压成了一行,生产者字段也放在同一个 JSON 对象中。
在标题栏写出生产者([来源与 steer 标识决策](2026-08-04-web-context-source-and-steer-marks.md))解决了「这是谁加的」。它解决不了「加进来的是什么东西」,因为日志里根本没有这句话。注入上下文不是一种形状:对账后的 `AGENTS.md`、可用 skill 的目录、运行时策略快照、子 agent 的汇报,彼此之间的差别不亚于终端卡片与 diff 卡片,然而这四者呈现出来是同一堵转义 JSON 的墙。
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Status: implemented
`MessageSource` 新增一个可选、由生产方声明的 `form: ContextForm`——一份关于信息**形状**的小型 tagged 词汇表,与 `kind` 相互独立:
- `kind` 回答**由谁产生**,保持纯粹的溯源语义。
- `kind` 回答**由谁产生**,不携带呈现选择。
- `form` 回答**这是何种形态的信息**。多个生产方可以共用一种形态,一个生产方在一次会话中也可以发出多种。
该词汇表是语义的,绝不涉及视觉。取值只陈述「内容是某个文件的指令」或「是一份可用项目录」;颜色、图标、排序、默认折叠状态归消费方管,不得进入这个联合类型。它随生产方补齐各自形态所需的结构化字段而逐个增长。本次声明两个:
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Status: implemented
生产方一侧对同一份持久数据采取同样的姿态。`catalogHistory` 从 `agent.session.events` 读 `source.entries`,而恢复或 fork 时它来自 JSONL/SQLite 种子,种子验证只保证来源是带非空 `kind` 的对象,不校验任何 kind 特有字段。因此不可读的目录被当作「不是本插件的记录」跳过——正是被替换掉的内容 digest 原有的姿态;在那里抛错会让该会话此后每一步都在最晚、最难定位的点失败。
其余一切——包括本 UI 版本不呈现的形态、来源未声明形态、以及条目不可用的 `catalog`——一律渲染 **opaque** 内容区:按真实换行展示面向模型的文本,其后把剩余来源信息列成字段。opaque 是有文档的默认,不是兜底垃圾桶。恢复的、fork 的、外部写入的日志,无论其生产方是否挂载在此处都必须渲染得出来——这同样是分类信息必须落在持久来源里、而不是落在客户端以生产方为键的表里的原因。
其余一切——包括本 UI 版本不呈现的形态、来源未声明形态、以及条目不可用的 `catalog`——一律渲染 **opaque** 内容区:按真实换行展示面向模型的文本,其后把剩余来源数据列成字段。opaque 是文档规定的默认;约定要求这些不支持的情况使用它。恢复的、fork 的、外部写入的日志,无论其生产方是否挂载在此处都必须渲染得出来——这同样是分类信息必须落在持久来源里、而不是落在客户端以生产方为键的表里的原因。
## 为什么不做 presenter 注册表
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ Status: implemented
**在客户端把来源 kind 映射到渲染器。** 写起来最省,也不用改格式,但它把生产方知识放回了客户端:此后每新增一个 kind 都要客户端发版才能渲染成 opaque 以外的东西,而外部日志根本无法分类。它还会重新引入[来源与 steer 标识决策](2026-08-04-web-context-source-and-steer-marks.md)刚为名称去掉的那种耦合。
**复用 `kind` 充当形态。** 单一判别式更简单,`workspace-instructions` 本来也与它的形态一一对应。但它在共享形状上就崩了:今天有三个生产方发出运行时快照,把它们并成一个 kind 会抹掉各自的溯源。两根轴既保住溯源的精确,又让呈现可以共享。
**复用 `kind` 充当形态。** 单一判别式更简单,`workspace-instructions` 本来也与它的形态一一对应。但它在共享形状上就崩了:今天有三个生产方发出运行时快照,把它们并成一个 kind 会删除每条消息中标明其生产方的 `source` 字段。两根轴会保留准确的生产方,同时让呈现方式可以共享。
**让客户端解析面向模型的散文。** 条目与文件分节在文本里确实有可见结构。解析它们会把呈现耦合到 prompt 措辞上,于是每改一次文案就静默碎掉一张卡——这也正是目录身份从文本上迁走的原因。
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ Status: implemented
## Consequences
- 读者不展开就能知道加进来的是什么,展开之后读到的也不再是转义 JSON。
- 持久 `MessageSource` 现在在溯源之外还承载一个语义分类。这条边界是承重的:只放事实与形状,绝不放呈现。想要更好卡片的生产方应当记录更好的事实。
- 持久 `MessageSource` 现在会在生产者 kind 及其字段之外记录内容形状。这条边界是承重的:只放事实与形状,绝不放呈现。想要更好卡片的生产方应当记录更好的事实。
- 目录身份不再依赖面向模型的散文,删掉了那条可能把「改了措辞」误判为「改了内容」的文本切分路径。
- 除两个 hook 桥接外,每个已发布的生产方现在都声明了形态。桥接按设计保持 opaque:其内容是外部程序打印出来的任意文本,无法承诺任何形状。未知 kind 与不可读记录同样落在这里。
- `ContextFormed` 按 `form` 判别,因此生产方无法在缺少该形态所需事实的情况下声明它——没有 summary 的 `notice`、没有 sections 的 `snapshot`,都会编译失败。