Coder/deepseek-harness
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into worktree/web-theme-settings-integration-fde706

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Yichen Jiang
2026-08-10 17:05:18 +08:00
parent 2e55964865 d2321d210a
commit 94f4183afd
488 changed files with 1747 additions and 1433 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.i18n.yaml
View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md
2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md: 705b0df5feb5fedaae4d198aed71758b54586e93
2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.zh.md: b28b08b4b9da058e01af62e610d4e226d794151f
2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md: f9c95176321496e965a95b6358d6feaa8466fe89
2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.zh.md: 7d20c5a2662c9036382b30a96bc9973c8f0349bd

40
.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.md
View File

@@ -8,12 +8,12 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.zh.md)
## Problem
We need a UI integration layer. Beyond the existing ACP/stdio baseline, more product UI shapes are coming — Web (server), Electron, and others. We call these shapes Clients, uniformly, and want the following capabilities:
We need a UI integration layer. Beyond the existing ACP/stdio baseline, more product clients are coming — Web (server), Electron, and others. We call them Clients and want the following capabilities:
- One `dsh` process supporting both `dsh web` (serve) and `dsh run` (headless) — one process, two modes (a design reservation)
- Launching inside Electron with the same Web technology shape as `dsh web`
- Launching inside Electron with the same Web technologies as `dsh web`
That demands a stable layered responsibility model in the engineering codebase, so future client shapes plug in cleanly.
That demands a stable layered responsibility model in the engineering codebase, so future clients plug in cleanly.
At the same time the physical channels differ per consumer (browser HTTP/WebSocket, in-process fetch/SSE, IPC later), so we also need a channel-independent message model and a single contract source of truth — "adding a method" and "swapping a carrier" must not entangle each other, and every message on the wire must be type-validatable, observable, and reconcilable.
@@ -29,19 +29,19 @@ Directories layer as follows:
- **Pure libraries** (`ui-slots`, `web-react`, `ui-primitives`, plus the `loader` kernel package): ordinary root-index packages, statically bundled into the shell; the first three are seeded into the module table.
- **Static-arrival entry packages** (`connection`, `runtime`, `ui-theme`, `i18n`, `hmr`): no `dshClient` key and no browser bundle — the shell bundles their `src/client/` half and registers it with `ctx.modules`; they are governed as entries of the host-authored graph like everything else.
- **Fetch-arrival plugin packages** (`ui-layout`, `ui-sidebar`, `ui-conversation`, `ui-trajectory`): dual-entry — the root index is the node half (an empty `apply`, existing so the host Loader governs lifecycle and the web plugin registry discovers the package.json `dshClient` declaration); the implementation lives under `src/client/`, shipped as the `./client` subpath (a tsdown closure-factory bundle). Cross-plugin consumption of `/client` is type-only; value cooperation goes through cordis services.
- `apps/` holds the externally exported application shapes, assembled from Client / Host mixtures.
- `apps/` holds the externally exported applications, assembled from Client / Host mixtures.
- `apps/web` (`dsh-frontend`) is the vite application: a thin `main.ts` over the shell surface exported by `dsh-client-web`.
- `apps/cli` (`@deepseek-ai/dsh`) dispatches shapes: `dsh web` = Host + webserver + the built `dsh-frontend` dist; `dsh run` = [a direct core Agent/Session entry point](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md), with zero Host, HTTP, or browser layer.
- A future Electron shape reuses the same web client packages over an IPC fetch carrier.
- `apps/cli` (`@deepseek-ai/dsh`) dispatches commands: `dsh web` = Host + webserver + the built `dsh-frontend` dist; `dsh run` = [a direct core Agent/Session entry point](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md), with zero Host, HTTP, or browser layer.
- A future Electron application reuses the same web client packages over an IPC fetch carrier.
```
apps/* (application shapes: apps/web = vite app, apps/cli = bin dispatch)
apps/* (applications: apps/web = vite app, apps/cli = bin dispatch)
│ consume
▼
packages/host/* packages/client/*
apiproxy front layer: protocol pure libs: ui-slots / web-react / ui-primitives
runtime assembly / host entity dshClient plugins ×8 (node half = empty apply,
webserver web-shape HTTP carriage client half = src/client/)
webserver Web HTTP carriage client half = src/client/)
│ ctx.plugin(...) ▲ import only apiproxy's /api /client subpaths
▼ │ (type-only + the client base class)
harness core packages ──────────────────┘ (types reach the browser via import type)
@@ -51,12 +51,12 @@ Direction discipline (every rule auditable from package deps):
- `runtime → apiproxy` is one-way; apiproxy depends only on type definitions.
- Client-side packages **never import** host-side package runtime (they consume only the two browser-safe subpaths `/api` and `/client`).
- `webserver` does not depend on `runtime`: it provides a `{ fetch }`-shaped implementation — "webserver ← runtime" is a runtime injection relationship, not a package dependency.
- `webserver` does not depend on `runtime`: it provides an implementation of the `{ fetch }` interface — "webserver ← runtime" is a runtime injection relationship, not a package dependency.
- Cross-package client imports use the `/client` subpath for plugin packages, and between plugin packages they are type-only — a cross-plugin value import is a build error at the tsdown purity gate (value cooperation goes through cordis services; the [client plugin loading note](2026-07-23-client-plugin-loading-model.md) owns the edge rules).
TypeScript checks in **two aggregate programs** referenced by a solution root (`tsconfig.json` = solution; `tsconfig.host.json` = host side + tests, excluding `packages/client`; `tsconfig.client.json` = client packages and their tests): both sides merge the cordis `Context` interface under the same keys (`sessions`, `loader`) with different services, so one program would see both declaration merges and report a collision. Shared leaves (session/llm/tools/apiproxy…) build once and are referenced by both programs ([topology](../process/2026-07-22-tsconfig-solution-root-two-aggregates.md)).
On the protocol side: TS interfaces (`packages/host/apiproxy/src/api/`, zero Node dependencies, browser-importable); wire messages unify under a **bidirectional model** — each logical message is shaped by "who initiates × request/response" (two axes, four cells, called the four quadrants below), decoupled from the physical channel; clients all inherit `AbstractApiClient` (protocol invariants live entirely in the base class, platform differences are just the `doFetch` transport aspect).
On the protocol side: TS interfaces (`packages/host/apiproxy/src/api/`, zero Node dependencies, browser-importable); wire messages unify under a **bidirectional model** — each logical message is classified by "who initiates × request/response" (two axes, four cells, called the four quadrants below), decoupled from the physical channel; clients all inherit `AbstractApiClient` (protocol invariants live entirely in the base class, platform differences are just the `doFetch` transport aspect).
#### Layer roles
@@ -64,22 +64,22 @@ On the protocol side: TS interfaces (`packages/host/apiproxy/src/api/`, zero Nod
|---|---|---|---|
| Front layer | `dsh-host-apiproxy` | TS/zod definitions (api/) + the fetch abstraction (fetch/: handler + client base class) | Keep it simple — every consumer needs it; importable from Node and browser alike; protocol content in the "Message protocol" sections below; clients must not bypass api through ctx |
| Assembly layer | `dsh-host-runtime` | Plugin composition + ApiProxy integration + the web UI plugin mount (in-memory Loader tree over the eight dshClient packages); home of host-level configuration (defaults/persistenceRoot, future user profile) | Which plugins mount and with what defaults is decided only here; shells must not alter the assembly |
| Carrier layer | `dsh-host-webserver` | Web-shape HTTP and upgrade: static serving + `/api/*`→handler forwarding + WebSocket upgrade route + close semantics; plugin bundle endpoint + `__DSH_BOOT__` manifest injection (fed by the web plugin registry) | Web (browser access) only; zero workspace dependencies (the registry arrives by structural injection); Electron does not reuse it |
| Carrier layer | `dsh-host-webserver` | Web HTTP and upgrade: static serving + `/api/*`→handler forwarding + WebSocket upgrade route + close semantics; plugin bundle endpoint + `__DSH_BOOT__` manifest injection (fed by the web plugin registry) | Web (browser access) only; zero workspace dependencies (the registry arrives by structural injection); Electron does not reuse it |
| Client libraries | `dsh-client-ui-slots` / `dsh-client-web-react` / `dsh-client-ui-primitives` | Slot registry core / ctx↔React glue / pure React atoms | Zero cordis runtime dependency in components; seeded into the loader module table by the shell |
| Client plugins | `dsh-client-connection` / `dsh-client-runtime` / `dsh-client-ui-theme` / `dsh-client-i18n` / `dsh-client-ui-layout` / `dsh-client-ui-sidebar` / `dsh-client-ui-conversation` / `dsh-client-ui-trajectory` | Browser-side cordis plugin tree (wire consumer, core services, theme, i18n, layout, sidebar, conversation, trajectory) — see the web client architecture note | Dual entry (node half = empty apply; implementation in `src/client/`); the consumption face goes exclusively through ApiProxy |
| Application shape | `@deepseek-ai/dsh` (apps/cli) + `dsh-frontend` (apps/web, the vite application) | Coarse bin dispatch + one assembly module per shape (web.ts / headless.ts); the vite app is a thin main over the `dsh-client-web` shell surface | Shapes dynamic-import so they never load each other; workspace knowledge like dist location stays in the app |
| Application | `@deepseek-ai/dsh` (apps/cli) + `dsh-frontend` (apps/web, the vite application) | Coarse bin dispatch + one assembly module per application (web.ts / headless.ts); the vite app is a thin main over the `dsh-client-web` shell surface | Applications use dynamic imports so they never load each other; workspace knowledge like dist location stays in the app |
#### Naming rule
Packages under `packages/host/*` and `packages/client/*` **must carry the directory-group prefix in the package name**: host/runtime → `dsh-host-runtime`, client/runtime → `dsh-client-runtime`. The directory name does not repeat the group prefix (host/ already expresses it). The package-name tail therefore ≠ the directory name, so the `dsh-*` wildcard in tsconfig.base.json (which resolves by directory name) misses them — **each package in these two groups needs an explicit paths entry**, including separate entries for the client packages' `/client` subpaths so source-level resolution matches the exports map.
#### How to integrate a new shape (operational checklist)
#### How to integrate a new application (operational checklist)
1. **Pick a fetch impersonation**: browser same-origin HTTP / in-process `host.handler.fetch` injection / your own transport-aspect subclass (e.g. future Electron IPC, see the "Subclass table" below).
2. **Write an assembly module under `apps/`**: `startHost()` + a client subclass + the shape's private signal/print/exit semantics; a mixture never becomes a package — assembly is written in the app.
2. **Write an assembly module under `apps/`**: `startHost()` + a client subclass + the application's private signal/print/exit semantics; a mixture never becomes a package — assembly is written in the app.
3. **Import `dsh-host-webserver` only if you need HTTP carriage**, otherwise zero ports.
The two existing shapes preserve the boundary: the Web shape mounts Host, carrier, and browser composition, while `dsh run` mounts a direct core runner with zero Host, HTTP, or ports. ACP-class protocol bridges do not follow the client-carrier checklist: they expose core to the external ecosystem, mount via `ctx.plugin(entry-point plugin)` directly, and wear no fetch.
The two existing applications preserve the division: the Web application mounts Host, carrier, and browser composition, while `dsh run` mounts a direct core runner with zero Host, HTTP, or ports. ACP-class protocol bridges do not follow the client-carrier checklist: they expose core to the external ecosystem and mount directly via `ctx.plugin(entry-point plugin)` without fetch.
## Message protocol
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ The remaining methods (`session.create`/`session.history`/`session.rename`/`sess
### Frames (server→client, named unions)
Two logical streams: the mux stream (`/api/events.mux`, all-session aggregate) and the host stream (`/api/events.host`, host-level events). The browser consumes one downlink WebSocket per stream, while the in-process fetch carrier retains SSE to preserve the same shape; see the [WebSocket downlink carrier](2026-08-04-websocket-downlink-carrier.md) for the physical boundary. One example frame row:
Two logical streams: the mux stream (`/api/events.mux`, all-session aggregate) and the host stream (`/api/events.host`, host-level events). The browser consumes one downlink WebSocket per stream, while the in-process fetch carrier retains SSE with the same event framing; see the [WebSocket downlink carrier](2026-08-04-websocket-downlink-carrier.md) for the physical boundary. One example frame row:
| frame type | payload | when |
|---|---|---|
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ All four quadrant full forms pass through `onEnvelope`; the base implementation
| Subclass | Package | doFetch | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| `InProcessApiClient` | apiproxy itself | the injected `{ fetch }` handler | **The isomorphic point**: `new InProcessApiClient(toFetchHandler(api))` never touches the network yet runs the real wire serialization/zod/SSE framing; carrier tests and callers can exercise the protocol without opening a port, while product `dsh run` drives core directly |
| `WebApiClient` | dsh-client-connection | `globalThis.fetch` uplink + one same-origin WebSocket downlink per logical stream | the browser shape; physical boundary in the [WebSocket downlink carrier](2026-08-04-websocket-downlink-carrier.md) |
| `WebApiClient` | dsh-client-connection | `globalThis.fetch` uplink + one same-origin WebSocket downlink per logical stream | the browser client; physical boundary in the [WebSocket downlink carrier](2026-08-04-websocket-downlink-carrier.md) |
| `FixtureApiClient` | dsh-client-connection | unused (protocol-layer override) | serverless UI development (`?fixture`): overrides the `callUnary`/`openMux`/`openHost`/`respond` virtuals and is itself the fake server (frame rpcIds minted by it, semantics self-consistent) |
| IPC bridge subclass (hypothetical example — no such shell exists) | an Electron shell | IPC serialization round trip | would swap only doFetch; contract and base class unchanged |
@@ -234,15 +234,15 @@ All four quadrant full forms pass through `onEnvelope`; the base implementation
## Consequences
Every client shape consumes one contract: adding a unary method is a five-step mechanical change radiating from a single signature, swapping a carrier touches only a `doFetch` subclass, and every wire message is zod-validated, observable through the envelope tap, and reconcilable by rpcId. Ordinary unary calls remain bounded, while `host.pickDirectory` and `command.execute` may stay pending until the operation finishes or caller/connection cancellation arrives; this accepts that a non-cooperative user-paced operation can hang its request rather than treating valid operation duration as transport failure. The other accepted costs: two groups of packages need explicit tsconfig paths entries, and the reserved methods (fork/inject/task.list/listModels/hostInstanceId) stay dormant until a real consumer arrives.
Every client consumes one contract: adding a unary method is a five-step mechanical change from a single signature, swapping a carrier touches only a `doFetch` subclass, and every wire message is zod-validated, observable through the envelope tap, and reconcilable by rpcId. Ordinary unary calls remain bounded, while `host.pickDirectory` and `command.execute` may stay pending until the operation finishes or caller/connection cancellation arrives; this accepts that a non-cooperative user-paced operation can hang its request rather than treating valid operation duration as transport failure. The other accepted costs: two groups of packages need explicit tsconfig paths entries, and the reserved methods (fork/inject/task.list/listModels/hostInstanceId) stay dormant until a real consumer arrives.
## Alternatives considered
| Rejected | One-line reason |
|---|---|
| Packaging by "product shape" (a web family, an electron family) | What shapes share is host/client capability, not the shape itself; capability-provider layering means a new shape needs zero new packages |
| Packaging by product (a web family, an electron family) | Products share host/client capabilities rather than an application implementation; capability-provider layering means a new application needs zero new packages |
| A package per mixture (e.g. a standalone headless package) | A mixture has exactly one consumer (its own app); packaging it is ownerless abstraction, while assembly in the app is readable and disposable |
| Consuming clients connecting to ctx directly (skipping the apiproxy layer) | Client shapes require wire validation, observability, and multi-client consistency. Direct headless is a local entry point with no client boundary and uses the public Agent/Session seams rather than a client command plane |
| Consuming clients connecting to ctx directly (skipping the apiproxy layer) | Clients require wire validation, observability, and multi-client consistency. Direct headless is a local entry point with no client boundary and uses the public Agent/Session seams rather than a client command plane |
| webserver depending on runtime (saving the handler injection) | Structural-typing injection keeps webserver reusable by sidecars/tests with zero workspace deps; a package dependency would drag assembly knowledge into the carrier layer |
| Package names without the group prefix (continuing dsh-<tail>) | `dsh-runtime`/`dsh-web-ui` lose their belonging in the flat npm namespace; the cost is one explicit paths entry per package |
| Reusing the in-repo JSON-RPC 2.0 (dsh-jsonrpc) | Numeric error codes degrade to a single fallback code, contracts get aligned by hand in two copies, and naming drifts without a convention |

36
.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-19-gui-layering-and-rpc-protocol.zh.md
View File

@@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ Status: implemented
## Problem
需要提供 UI 对接层，除已有 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）/stdio 基线外，还需要 Web（server）、Electron 等其他产品 UI 形态。我们把这些形态统一称为 Client。希望具备以下能力：
需要提供 UI 对接层，除已有 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）/stdio 基线外，还需要 Web（server）、Electron 等其他产品客户端。我们把它们统一称为 Client。希望具备以下能力：
- 一个 `dsh` 进程同时支持 `dsh web`（启动）和 `dsh run`（headless），一个进程两种模式（设计预留）
- 以与 `dsh web` 同构的 Web 技术形态，在 Electron 中启动
- 在 Electron 中使用与 `dsh web` 相同的 Web 技术启动
那么当前的工程代码需要稳定的分层职责模型，便于以后接入各类 client 形态。
那么当前的工程代码需要稳定的分层职责模型，便于以后接入各类 client。
同时各消费端的物理通道不同（浏览器 HTTP／WebSocket、进程内 fetch/SSE、将来 IPC），还需要一个通道无关的消息模型和单一约定事实源，让「加一个方法」「换一种载体」互不牵连，且 wire 上的每条消息可类型校验、可观测、可对账。
@@ -27,19 +27,19 @@ Status: implemented
- **纯库**（`ui-slots`、`web-react`、`ui-primitives`，外加内核包 `loader`）：普通根入口包，静态打包进壳；前三者播种进模块表。
- **静态到达 entry 包**（`connection`、`runtime`、`ui-theme`、`i18n`、`hmr`）：无 `dshClient` 键、无浏览器 bundle——壳把它们的 `src/client/` 半边打进自己的 bundle 并向 `ctx.modules` 登记；它们与其余单元一样，作为 host 独家撰写的图里的 entry 受治理。
- **fetch 到达插件包**（`ui-layout`、`ui-sidebar`、`ui-conversation`、`ui-trajectory`）：双入口——根入口是 node 半边（空 `apply`，其存在是为了让 host Loader 管辖生命周期、让 web 插件注册表发现 package.json 的 `dshClient` 声明）；实现住在 `src/client/` 下，经 `./client` 子路径发布（tsdown 闭包工厂 bundle）。跨插件消费 `/client` 只限类型；值层面的协作走 cordis 服务。
- `apps/` 作为对外导出的应用形态入口，可以由 Client / Host 混合组装。
- `apps/` 作为对外导出的应用入口，可以由 Client / Host 混合组装。
- `apps/web`（`dsh-frontend`）是 vite 应用：`dsh-client-web` 导出的壳表面之上的一层薄 `main.ts`。
- `apps/cli`（`@deepseek-ai/dsh`）做形态分发：`dsh web` = Host + webserver + 构建出的 `dsh-frontend` dist；`dsh run` = [直接使用核心 Agent／Session 的入口](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md)，不含 Host、HTTP 或浏览器层。
- 将来的 Electron 形态经由 IPC fetch 载体复用同一套 web client 包。
- `apps/cli`（`@deepseek-ai/dsh`）分发命令：`dsh web` = Host + webserver + 构建出的 `dsh-frontend` dist；`dsh run` = [直接使用核心 Agent／Session 的入口](2026-08-09-headless-direct-core-entry-point.md)，不含 Host、HTTP 或浏览器层。
- 将来的 Electron 应用经由 IPC fetch 载体复用同一套 web client 包。
```
apps/* (application shapes: apps/web = vite app, apps/cli = bin dispatch)
apps/* (applications: apps/web = vite app, apps/cli = bin dispatch)
│ consume
▼
packages/host/* packages/client/*
apiproxy front layer: protocol pure libs: ui-slots / web-react / ui-primitives
runtime assembly / host entity dshClient plugins ×8 (node half = empty apply,
webserver web-shape HTTP carriage client half = src/client/)
webserver Web HTTP carriage client half = src/client/)
│ ctx.plugin(...) ▲ import only apiproxy's /api /client subpaths
▼ │ (type-only + the client base class)
harness core packages ──────────────────┘ (types reach the browser via import type)
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ harness core packages ──────────────────┘
TypeScript 以 solution 根引用的**两个聚合 program** 检查（`tsconfig.json` = solution；`tsconfig.host.json` = host 侧 + 测试，排除 `packages/client`；`tsconfig.client.json` = client 各包及其测试）：两侧在相同键（`sessions`、`loader`）下以不同服务合并 cordis `Context` 接口，单一 program 会同时看到两份声明合并而报冲突。共享叶子包（session/llm/tools/apiproxy 等）只构建一次，由两个 program 共同引用（[拓扑](../process/2026-07-22-tsconfig-solution-root-two-aggregates.md)）。
协议侧：TS interface（`packages/host/apiproxy/src/api/`，零 Node 依赖，浏览器可 import）；wire 消息统一为**双向模型**——每条逻辑消息由「谁发起 × request/response」定形（两轴四格，后文称四象限），与物理通道解耦；客户端统一继承 `AbstractApiClient`（协议不变量全在基类，平台差异只是 `doFetch` 传输切面）。
协议侧：TS interface（`packages/host/apiproxy/src/api/`，零 Node 依赖，浏览器可 import）；wire 消息统一为**双向模型**——每条逻辑消息按「谁发起 × request/response」分类（两轴四格，后文称四象限），与物理通道解耦；客户端统一继承 `AbstractApiClient`（协议不变量全在基类，平台差异只是 `doFetch` 传输切面）。
#### 分层角色
@@ -62,22 +62,22 @@ TypeScript 以 solution 根引用的**两个聚合 program** 检查（`tsconfig.
|---|---|---|---|
| 前置层 | `dsh-host-apiproxy` | TS/zod 定义 (api/)+ fetch 抽象 (fetch/：handler + 客户端基类) | 做简单、所有接入方都要；Node/浏览器皆可 import；协议内容见下文「消息协议」起各节；client 不得经 ctx 绕开 api |
| 装配层 | `dsh-host-runtime` | 插件组合 + ApiProxy 集成 + web UI 插件挂载（覆盖八个 dshClient 包的内存 Loader 树）；host 级配置归属地（defaults/persistenceRoot，将来用户 profile） | 装什么插件、给什么默认值只在这里定；壳不得改装配 |
| 承载层 | `dsh-host-webserver` | Web 形态 HTTP 与 upgrade：静态服务 + `/api/*`→handler 转发 + WebSocket upgrade route + close 语义；插件 bundle 端点 + `__DSH_BOOT__` manifest（元数据清单）注入（由 web 插件注册表供给） | Web（浏览器访问）专用；零 workspace 依赖（注册表经结构注入到达）；Electron 不复用它 |
| 承载层 | `dsh-host-webserver` | Web HTTP 与 upgrade：静态服务 + `/api/*`→handler 转发 + WebSocket upgrade route + close 语义；插件 bundle 端点 + `__DSH_BOOT__` manifest（元数据清单）注入（由 web 插件注册表供给） | Web（浏览器访问）专用；零 workspace 依赖（注册表经结构注入到达）；Electron 不复用它 |
| client 库 | `dsh-client-ui-slots` / `dsh-client-web-react` / `dsh-client-ui-primitives` | slot 注册表核心 / ctx↔React 胶合 / 纯 React 原子组件 | 组件零 cordis 运行时依赖；由壳播种进 loader 模块表 |
| client 插件 | `dsh-client-connection` / `dsh-client-runtime` / `dsh-client-ui-theme` / `dsh-client-i18n` / `dsh-client-ui-layout` / `dsh-client-ui-sidebar` / `dsh-client-ui-conversation` / `dsh-client-ui-trajectory` | 浏览器侧 cordis 插件树（wire 消费者、核心服务、主题、i18n、布局、侧栏、对话、轨迹）——见 Web 客户端架构笔记 | 双入口（node 半边=空 apply；实现在 `src/client/`）；消费面唯一经 ApiProxy |
| 应用态 | `@deepseek-ai/dsh`（apps/cli）+ `dsh-frontend`（apps/web，vite 应用） | bin 粗分发 + 每形态一个拼装模块（web.ts / headless.ts）；vite 应用是 `dsh-client-web` 壳表面之上的薄 main | 形态间动态 import 互不加载；dist 定位等 workspace 知识留在 app |
| 应用 | `@deepseek-ai/dsh`（apps/cli）+ `dsh-frontend`（apps/web，vite 应用） | bin 粗分发 + 每个应用一个拼装模块（web.ts / headless.ts）；vite 应用是 `dsh-client-web` 壳表面之上的薄 main | 各应用使用动态 import，因此不会互相加载；dist 定位等 workspace 知识留在 app |
#### 命名规则
`packages/host/*` 与 `packages/client/*` 下的包名**必须含目录组前缀**：host/runtime → `dsh-host-runtime`、client/runtime → `dsh-client-runtime`。目录名不重复组前缀（host/ 已表达）。因此包名尾段 ≠ 目录名，tsconfig.base.json 的 `dsh-*` 通配（按目录名解析）命不中——**这两组的每包需显式 paths 条目**，且 client 各包的 `/client` 子路径要单列条目，使源码级解析与 exports map 一致。
#### 怎么接入一个新形态（操作清单）
#### 怎么接入一个新应用（操作清单）
1. **选 fetch 伪造方式**：浏览器同源 HTTP / 进程内 `host.handler.fetch` 注入 / 自写传输切面子类（如将来 Electron IPC，见下文「子类表」）。
2. **在 `apps/` 下写拼装模块**：`startHost()` + 客户端子类 + 该形态私有的信号/打印/退出语义；混合体不建包，拼装写在 app 里。
2. **在 `apps/` 下写拼装模块**：`startHost()` + 客户端子类 + 该应用私有的信号/打印/退出语义；混合体不建包，拼装写在 app 里。
3. **需要 HTTP 承载才 import `dsh-host-webserver`**，否则零端口。
现有两种形态保持这一边界：Web 形态挂载 Host、载体与浏览器组合，而 `dsh run` 挂载直接使用核心服务的 runner，不包含 Host、HTTP 或端口。ACP 类协议桥不遵循 client 载体清单：它把 core 暴露给外部生态，直接通过 `ctx.plugin(入口插件)` 挂载，不套 fetch。
现有两个应用保持这一区分：Web 应用挂载 Host、载体与浏览器组合，而 `dsh run` 挂载直接使用核心服务的 runner，不包含 Host、HTTP 或端口。ACP 类协议桥不遵循 client 载体清单：它把 core 暴露给外部生态，直接通过 `ctx.plugin(入口插件)` 挂载，不使用 fetch。
## 消息协议
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ export type ResponseValue<K> =
| 子类 | 所在包 | doFetch | 用途 |
|---|---|---|---|
| `InProcessApiClient` | apiproxy 本包 | 注入的 `{ fetch }` handler | **同构点**：`new InProcessApiClient(toFetchHandler(api))` 全程不过网络但真跑 wire 序列化/zod/SSE 帧；载体测试与调用方可以在不打开端口的情况下运行这套协议，而产品 `dsh run` 直接驱动 core |
| `WebApiClient` | dsh-client-connection | `globalThis.fetch` 上行 + 每逻辑流一条同源 WebSocket 下行 | 浏览器形态；物理边界见 [WebSocket 下行载体](2026-08-04-websocket-downlink-carrier.md) |
| `WebApiClient` | dsh-client-connection | `globalThis.fetch` 上行 + 每逻辑流一条同源 WebSocket 下行 | 浏览器客户端；物理边界见 [WebSocket 下行载体](2026-08-04-websocket-downlink-carrier.md) |
| `FixtureApiClient` | dsh-client-connection | 不用（协议层覆写） | 无 server 的 UI 开发（`?fixture`）：覆写 `callUnary`/`openMux`/`openHost`/`respond` 虚方法，自己就是假 server（帧 rpcId 由它 mint，语义自洽） |
| IPC 桥子类（假想示例——尚无此形态） | Electron 壳 | IPC 序列化往返 | 只需换 doFetch，约定/基类零改 |
@@ -232,15 +232,15 @@ export type ResponseValue<K> =
## Consequences
所有 client 形态消费同一约定：加一个 unary 方法是从单一签名辐射的五步机械改动，换载体只动一个 `doFetch` 子类，wire 上每条消息可 zod 校验、可经 envelope tap 观测、可按 rpcId 对账。普通 unary 调用仍受时限约束，而 `host.pickDirectory` 与 `command.execute` 可保持挂起，直到操作完成或调用方／连接取消到来；若由用户掌控节奏的操作不自行结束，请求可能一直挂起，这是为避免把合理的操作时长视为传输失败而接受的代价。其余接受的代价：两组包需要显式 tsconfig paths 条目；预留方法（fork/inject/task.list/listModels/hostInstanceId）在真实消费者出现前保持休眠。
所有 client 使用同一约定：加一个 unary 方法是从单一签名出发的五步机械改动，换载体只动一个 `doFetch` 子类，wire 上每条消息可 zod 校验、可经 envelope tap 观测、可按 rpcId 对账。普通 unary 调用仍受时限约束，而 `host.pickDirectory` 与 `command.execute` 可保持挂起，直到操作完成或调用方／连接取消到来；若由用户掌控节奏的操作不自行结束，请求可能一直挂起，这是为避免把合理的操作时长视为传输失败而接受的代价。其余接受的代价：两组包需要显式 tsconfig paths 条目；预留方法（fork/inject/task.list/listModels/hostInstanceId）在真实消费者出现前保持休眠。
## Alternatives considered
| 放弃项 | 一句话理由 |
|---|---|
| 按「产品形态」分包（web 一族、electron 一族） | 形态间共享的是 host/client 两侧能力而非形态本身；能力支持方分层让新形态零新包 |
| 按产品分包（web 一族、electron 一族） | 产品共享的是 host/client 两侧能力，而不是某个应用实现；能力支持方分层让新应用零新包 |
| 混合体建包（如 headless 独立包） | 混合体只有一个消费者（它自己的 app），建包是无主抽象；拼装写在 app 里可读可弃 |
| 消费型 client 直连 ctx（省 apiproxy 一层） | client 形态需要 wire 校验、观测与多 client 一致性。直接 headless 是没有 client 边界的本地入口，使用公开的 Agent／Session seam，而不是 client 命令面 |
| 消费型 client 直连 ctx（省 apiproxy 一层） | client 需要 wire 校验、观测与多 client 一致性。直接 headless 是没有 client 边界的本地入口，使用公开的 Agent／Session seam，而不是 client 命令面 |
| webserver 依赖 runtime（省 handler 注入） | 结构 typing 注入让 webserver 可被 sidecar/测试复用且零 workspace 依赖；包依赖会把装配知识拖进承载层 |
| 包名不带组前缀（沿用 dsh-<尾段>） | `dsh-runtime`/`dsh-web-ui` 在扁平 npm 命名空间里失去归属信息；代价只是每包一条显式 paths |
| 复用仓内 JSON-RPC 2.0（dsh-jsonrpc） | 数字错误码退化成单码兜底、约定双份人肉对齐、命名无 convention 自然漂移 |

4
.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.i18n.yaml
View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md
2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md: 45801505f1729ec6094900acf94b4c17ed92c3b1
2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.zh.md: 8dd90b34d2da1d22caba13fe8c388dab4a29be0d
2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md: 4487bd9c53595fa8b4eed588b294ceafe3ab58dc
2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.zh.md: 6195dc809e84852c7e0f63ac101ba0ed6a46853e

2
.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md
View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ The [background-task runtime](2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md) s
`tasks/` is now a three-package capability family in the bash-trio shape:
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks` (Service Definition)** — the abstract `TaskService extends Service` owning `ctx.tasks`, the eight-method contract (`start`, `list`, `get`, `read`, `kill`, `wait`, `onTaskDone`, `attachSurface`), all vocabulary types (`TaskId`, `TaskKindMap`, `TaskStart`, `TaskHooks`, `TaskOutcome`, `TaskSnapshot`, `TaskRead`, `TaskDoneListener`), and the snapshot invariant companion. The class-level JSDoc states the semantics every Service provider owes: registrations outlive producer and surface fibers, owned access is session-fenced, settlement is first-wins with contained listeners, and `start` refuses work while no control surface is attached.
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks` (Service Definition)** — the abstract `TaskService extends Service` owning `ctx.tasks`, the eight-method contract (`start`, `list`, `get`, `read`, `kill`, `wait`, `onTaskDone`, `attachSurface`), all vocabulary types (`TaskId`, `TaskKindMap`, `TaskStart`, `TaskHooks`, `TaskOutcome`, `TaskSnapshot`, `TaskRead`, `TaskDoneListener`), and the snapshot invariant companion. The class-level JSDoc states the semantics every Service provider owes: registrations outlive producer and surface fibers, owned access is session-fenced, settlement is first-wins with contained listeners, and `start` refuses work while no attached control surface serves the spec's owner (surfaces and listeners are scope-layered, so one process-wide registry answers both questions per owner).
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local` (Service provider)** — `LocalTaskService`, the process-local registry moved verbatim: the in-memory store, per-kind counters, waiter bookkeeping, `TASK_WAIT_TIMEOUT` deadline code, owner-cleanup effects, and force-fail teardown. The `dsh-timeout` dependency moves here with it; the Service Definition package has no provider dependencies.
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks` (Consumer)** — unchanged; it injects `'tasks'` and never imports provider types.

2
.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.zh.md
View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Status: implemented
`tasks/` 如今是一个 bash 三件套形态的三包能力家族：
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks`（Service Definition）**——抽象的 `TaskService extends Service`，拥有 `ctx.tasks`、八个方法的约定（`start`、`list`、`get`、`read`、`kill`、`wait`、`onTaskDone`、`attachSurface`）、全部词汇类型（`TaskId`、`TaskKindMap`、`TaskStart`、`TaskHooks`、`TaskOutcome`、`TaskSnapshot`、`TaskRead`、`TaskDoneListener`），以及快照不变式配套插件。类级 JSDoc 陈述了每个 Service provider 都必须兑现的语义：注册的存续期长于生产方与控制接口的 fiber，有所有者的访问以会话为界，结算遵循首次结果优先且监听器错误被隔离，并且在没有附加任何控制接口时 `start` 拒绝启动工作。
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks`（Service Definition）**——抽象的 `TaskService extends Service`，拥有 `ctx.tasks`、八个方法的约定（`start`、`list`、`get`、`read`、`kill`、`wait`、`onTaskDone`、`attachSurface`）、全部词汇类型（`TaskId`、`TaskKindMap`、`TaskStart`、`TaskHooks`、`TaskOutcome`、`TaskSnapshot`、`TaskRead`、`TaskDoneListener`），以及快照不变式配套插件。类级 JSDoc 陈述了每个 Service provider 都必须兑现的语义：注册的存续期长于生产方与控制接口的 fiber，有所有者的访问以会话为界，结算遵循首次结果优先且监听器错误被隔离，并且当没有任何已附加的控制接口服务于 spec 的所有者时 `start` 拒绝启动工作（控制接口与监听器按 scope 分层，因此一个进程级注册表能逐所有者地回答这两个问题）。
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local`（Service provider）**——`LocalTaskService`，即原样迁移的进程内注册表：内存存储、按 kind 划分的计数器、等待方簿记、`TASK_WAIT_TIMEOUT` deadline 代码、所有者清理 effect，以及强制失败的拆除。`dsh-timeout` 依赖随之迁入此包；Service Definition 包不含任何提供方依赖。
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks`（Consumer）**——保持不变；它注入 `'tasks'`，从不导入提供方类型。

4
.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-04-configuration-source-ownership.i18n.yaml
View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-04-configuration-source-ownership.md
2026-08-04-configuration-source-ownership.md: d656d329cbc5b3dfbae2561775ed1afc878cebd0
2026-08-04-configuration-source-ownership.zh.md: 29ef3b83d18d8836b28e4c151ad44c52542b0a11
2026-08-04-configuration-source-ownership.md: 8ec750de2efaf148fe44a58b415d7da44b87bdc6
2026-08-04-configuration-source-ownership.zh.md: 64daa54843d55c6f4bde5a8fdece66dbbe835479

2
.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-04-configuration-source-ownership.md
View File

@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ The line is that these take effect with no user action, before any turn, outside
## Alternatives considered
**Unify credentials into the non-secret ordering, by who authored each source.** Attempted and abandoned: it reads well, but the settings seam already fixes composition *below* the user section, so "authored by deployment" is not a tier the seam can express — and moving `.credentials.yaml` above the launching environment would take away the one override CI, containers, and a per-run `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY=…` depend on. Two orderings that each say why they are shaped that way beat one that describes neither accurately.
**Unify credentials into the non-secret ordering, by who authored each source.** Attempted and abandoned: it reads well, but the settings seam already fixes composition *below* the user section, so "authored by deployment" is not a tier the seam can express — and moving `.credentials.yaml` above the launching environment would take away the one override CI, containers, and a per-run `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY=…` depend on. Two orderings that each explain their precedence beat one that describes neither accurately.
**Withhold routing and credentials from the invoking project until it is explicitly trusted.** Rejected as the product's stance: a checkout is trusted by default, with no prompt and no stored trust record. The residual is real and worth naming — cloning a repository that carries a `.env` naming another endpoint or key routes that session through it — and a later project-trust gate is where that gets addressed, not a rule that makes the common case require ceremony.

2
.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-04-configuration-source-ownership.zh.md
View File

@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ inherited process environment (read-only, wins)
## Alternatives considered
**按「来源由谁书写」把凭据并入非机密顺序。** 尝试过并放弃：它读起来很顺，但 settings seam 已经把 composition 固定在用户 section *之下*，因此「由部署方写入」根本不是该 seam 能表达的一层；而把 `.credentials.yaml` 抬到启动环境之上，会夺走 CI、容器和一次性 `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY=…` 所依赖的那唯一一种覆盖。两条各自说清自身形状成因的顺序，好过一条两边都描述不准的顺序。
**按「来源由谁书写」把凭据并入非机密顺序。** 尝试过并放弃：它读起来很顺，但 settings seam 已经把 composition 固定在用户 section *之下*，因此「由部署方写入」根本不是该 seam 能表达的一层；而把 `.credentials.yaml` 抬到启动环境之上，会夺走 CI、容器和一次性 `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY=…` 所依赖的那唯一一种覆盖。两条各自说明优先顺序的规则，好过一条两边都描述不准的规则。
**在项目被显式信任之前，不给它路由与凭据能力。** 作为产品立场被否决：checkout 默认可信，不询问，也不存储信任记录。残留风险是真实的、值得写明——克隆一个携带 `.env`、其中指定了另一个 endpoint 或密钥的仓库，会让该会话经由它——处理它的地方是日后的 project trust 门禁，而不是一条让常见情形都要走仪式的规则。

4
.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-08-per-preset-standing-mounts.i18n.yaml
View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-08-per-preset-standing-mounts.md
2026-08-08-per-preset-standing-mounts.md: 834d645f5f293a2e137b8faf662e301f1e8bb971
2026-08-08-per-preset-standing-mounts.zh.md: 45ce0f4e7dec28e5bf807898dc9cdbf32b8e4eb5
2026-08-08-per-preset-standing-mounts.md: c2792454f90a88cd6fba36eed8e36104e5fffea4
2026-08-08-per-preset-standing-mounts.zh.md: 47668c8c2c424eb188aa14bf55986d27bcfb8ee0

2
.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-08-per-preset-standing-mounts.md
View File

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ A preset is one composition per PROCESS, not one per session. The roster mounts
Standing mounts fix the class, not the instances: the registrations a reader needs exist for the process lifetime, keyed by preset id, no agent required. What made it cheap
- The stateful preset plugins (`plan-mode`, `token-meter`, `compact-basic`, `tasks-local`) already key state by `Session`/`Agent` — they predate presets. Sharing one instance is a return to their design, not a rewrite.
- The stateful preset plugins (`plan-mode`, `token-meter`, `compact-basic`) already key state by `Session`/`Agent` — they predate presets. Sharing one instance is a return to their design, not a rewrite. `tasks-local` shared that property and has since left the preset plane entirely: producers outside its realm (`tool-bash`, `tool-pty`, a non-continuable `tool-subagent`) resolve the registry with `ctx.get`, which an entry-local realm hides from them, so it is composed on the host plane and only the model-facing `tool-tasks` row stays per preset.
- Preset ymls are unchanged: one mount per preset = one Entry per preset, whose entry-local realms (`isolate: <name>: true`) keep two presets' same-named services apart exactly as they kept two sessions' apart.
- A shared realm label was NOT an option: `provide()` throws on a second registration under the same realm symbol, so labels pool the REALM, never the instance — a per-session world sharing a label crashes the second mount.

2
.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-08-per-preset-standing-mounts.zh.md
View File

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Status: implemented
常驻挂载修的是这一类问题而非其中的个例：读取方需要的注册在进程生命周期内始终存在，按 preset id 索引，不需要任何 agent。让它便宜的原因：
- 有状态的 preset 插件（`plan-mode`、`token-meter`、`compact-basic`、`tasks-local`）本就按 `Session`/`Agent` 分键存状态——它们早于 preset 存在。共享一份实例是回归其设计，不是改写。
- 有状态的 preset 插件（`plan-mode`、`token-meter`、`compact-basic`）本就按 `Session`/`Agent` 分键存状态——它们早于 preset 存在。共享一份实例是回归其设计，不是改写。`tasks-local` 同样具备该性质，且此后已完全离开 preset 平面：realm 之外的生产方（`tool-bash`、`tool-pty`、非 continuable 的 `tool-subagent`）以 `ctx.get` 解析该注册表，而 entry-local realm 对它们不可见，因此它组合在宿主平面，只有面向模型的 `tool-tasks` 行仍留在各 preset 中。
- preset 的 yml 不变：每 preset 挂一次 = 每 preset 一个 Entry，其 entry 本地 realm（`isolate: <name>: true`）让两个 preset 的同名服务互不相干，正如它从前隔开两个会话。
- 共享 realm label **不是**选项：`provide()` 对同一 realm 符号下的第二次注册直接抛错，label 池化的是 REALM 而非实例——按会话挂载的世界里共享 label 会让第二次挂载崩溃。