feat(llm): send DeepSeek user identity header

This commit is contained in:
kingwl
2026-08-11 12:39:04 +08:00
parent ac266ed2de
commit 93b0451ed5
36 changed files with 216 additions and 62 deletions

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.md
2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.md: 39050a53ec76e8c5a6cac4d8e31fa15b992c406e
2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.zh.md: bfd6aa2540022f68cf9f69ccc2c12b3bc0978960
2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.md: c90b136a556da81e1c15828926f18b865cea4ece
2026-06-21-mandatory-app-attribution-headers.zh.md: f68cad7e9f642319dc508de9261e33180bfe5748

View File

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ The immediate prompt came from OpenRouter's [App Attribution](https://openrouter
## Decision
Provider request attribution is mandatory at the LLM adapter boundary, using the standard `User-Agent` header only. The rule: every product LLM adapter sends a static, non-secret application identity on every provider HTTP request, and every adapter has tests proving that `User-Agent` reaches the wire (a mock server asserting received headers; for a library-backed adapter, the library's header hook feeding the same mock-server assertion).
Provider-neutral app attribution is mandatory at the LLM adapter boundary, using the standard `User-Agent` header only. The rule: every product LLM adapter sends a static, non-secret application identity on every provider HTTP request, and every adapter has tests proving that `User-Agent` reaches the wire (a mock server asserting received headers; for a library-backed adapter, the library's header hook feeding the same mock-server assertion). This rule governs app attribution, not provider-specific request identity: [the DeepSeek request-identity decision](../feature/2026-08-11-deepseek-request-user-id-header.md) separately owns its user and session headers.
OpenRouter app attribution is deliberately not implemented. `HTTP-Referer`, `X-OpenRouter-Title`, `X-Title`, and `X-OpenRouter-Categories` are OpenRouter-specific product-surface headers, not provider-neutral model-request attribution. They can be proposed later by an OpenRouter adapter or explicit OpenRouter mode, with its own privacy/product decision, tests, and docs. Until then, even requests pointed at OpenRouter send only the shared `User-Agent` attribution from this decision.
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Wire mapping (`attributionHeaders`; header names lowercase in code - HTTP field
| Target | Mapping |
|---|---|
| All HTTP-based adapters | `User-Agent: {product}/{version} (+{url})` - the parenthesized `+url` comment stays within RFC 9110's conservative product/comment syntax. |
| Direct DeepSeek endpoint | `User-Agent`; do not send OpenRouter-only headers unless DeepSeek documents an equivalent contract. |
| Direct DeepSeek endpoint | `User-Agent` for app attribution; `x-deepseek-harness-user-id` and conditional `x-deepseek-harness-session-id` are separate request identity under the DeepSeek-specific decision. Do not send OpenRouter-only headers unless DeepSeek documents an equivalent contract. |
| OpenRouter endpoints | `User-Agent` only for now. Do not send `HTTP-Referer`, `X-OpenRouter-Title`, `X-Title`, or `X-OpenRouter-Categories` under this decision. |
| Future providers | `User-Agent` only unless a later provider-specific Agent Note accepts additional headers. Do not reuse `HTTP-Referer` by analogy. |

View File

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ LLM(大语言模型)提供方请求应当标识发出请求的产品。这
## 决策
在 LLM 适配器边界,提供方请求归属是强制的,且仅使用标准 `User-Agent` 头部。规则:每个产品级 LLM 适配器在每个提供方 HTTP 请求上发送一个静态、非机密的应用身份,且每个适配器都有测试证明 `User-Agent` 到达了线路(mock 服务器断言收到的头部;对于基于库的适配器,通过库的头部钩子馈入同一个 mock 服务器断言)。
在 LLM 适配器边界,提供方无关的应用归属是强制的,且仅使用标准 `User-Agent` 头部。规则:每个产品级 LLM 适配器在每个提供方 HTTP 请求上发送一个静态、非机密的应用身份,且每个适配器都有测试证明 `User-Agent` 到达了线路(mock 服务器断言收到的头部;对于基于库的适配器,通过库的头部钩子馈入同一个 mock 服务器断言)。这条规则约束应用归属,不约束提供方特有的请求身份;[DeepSeek 请求身份决策](../feature/2026-08-11-deepseek-request-user-id-header.md)另行负责其用户与会话头部。
OpenRouter 应用归属刻意未实现。`HTTP-Referer`、`X-OpenRouter-Title`、`X-Title` 和 `X-OpenRouter-Categories` 是 OpenRouter 特有的产品展示头部,不是提供方无关的模型请求归属。它们可以后续由 OpenRouter 适配器或显式 OpenRouter 模式提出,附带自己的隐私/产品决策、测试和文档。在此之前,即使请求指向 OpenRouter,也只发送本决策定义的共享 `User-Agent` 归属。
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ OpenRouter 应用归属刻意未实现。`HTTP-Referer`、`X-OpenRouter-Title`
| 目标 | 映射 |
|---|---|
| 所有基于 HTTP 的适配器 | `User-Agent: {product}/{version} (+{url})`——括号中的 `+url` 注释符合 RFC 9110 保守的 product/comment 语法。 |
| 直连 DeepSeek 端点 | `User-Agent`;除非 DeepSeek 文档化了等效约定,否则不发送 OpenRouter 特有头部。 |
| 直连 DeepSeek 端点 | `User-Agent` 用于应用归属;`x-deepseek-harness-user-id` 与条件性的 `x-deepseek-harness-session-id` 由 DeepSeek 特有决策作为独立请求身份管理。除非 DeepSeek 文档化了等效约定,否则不发送 OpenRouter 特有头部。 |
| OpenRouter 端点 | 目前仅 `User-Agent`。本决策下不发送 `HTTP-Referer`、`X-OpenRouter-Title`、`X-Title` 或 `X-OpenRouter-Categories`。 |
| 未来提供方 | 仅 `User-Agent`,除非后续提供方特有的 Agent Note 接受额外头部。不要类比复用 `HTTP-Referer`。 |

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.md
2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.md: 5ef487646c94808177e1263b94b8c23a9a045d97
2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.zh.md: 1ee433396f83a8caf5e35c9cfd1b4f3c04d6c59f
2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.md: 9e4bd02d78b11858163c36376dbb438fca8aef73
2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.zh.md: ecc451718812eb0a8b7e50bc949137fe8571ea09

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# Agent Note: Shared feedback and telemetry anonymous user id
# Agent Note: Shared anonymous user id across telemetry, feedback, and DeepSeek requests
Status: implemented
@@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ English | [中文](2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.zh.md)
The OpenTelemetry backend already persisted one anonymous UUID in `$DSH_HOME/.userid`. `/feedback` now needs to report both the receiving session id and a user id so an operator can correlate the acknowledgement with exported records. Duplicating or independently generating that identity would make the reported user meaningless, while importing it from `session-telemetry-otel` would make a direct command depend on an exporter backend and create a dependency cycle when feedback export is mounted by telemetry.
The earlier [anonymous-user-id decision](../feature/2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.md) deliberately kept the helper inside the OTel backend until a second real consumer existed. Feedback is that consumer.
The earlier [anonymous-user-id decision](../feature/2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.md) deliberately kept the helper inside the OTel backend until a second real consumer existed. Feedback became that second consumer. [Direct DeepSeek request identity](../feature/2026-08-11-deepseek-request-user-id-header.md) is the third.
## Decision
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-user-id` owns `getOrCreateAnonymousUserId()` and the `$DSH_HOME/.userid` storage contract. `session-telemetry-otel` uses the returned id as OpenTelemetry Resource `user.id`; the `/feedback` success acknowledgement reports `Feedback recorded for session {sessionId}` followed by `User: {userId}` on a second line, which keeps both identifiers available through the generic command row's expandable body. Invalid feedback is rejected before resolving the id, so an empty command does not create `.userid`.
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-user-id` owns `getOrCreateAnonymousUserId()` and the `$DSH_HOME/.userid` storage contract. `session-telemetry-otel` uses the returned id as OpenTelemetry Resource `user.id`; the `/feedback` success acknowledgement reports `Feedback recorded for session {sessionId}` followed by `User: {userId}` on a second line; and direct DeepSeek requests carry it as `x-deepseek-harness-user-id`. Invalid feedback is rejected before resolving the id, and the DeepSeek adapter resolves it only after credentials succeed, so neither an empty command nor a credential failure creates `.userid`.
The extraction preserves the existing random UUID, home resolution, process memo, exclusive-create concurrency, corruption replacement, and best-effort write semantics.
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ The extraction preserves the existing random UUID, home resolution, process memo
## Consequences
- One harness home now has one anonymous id shared by feedback acknowledgements and session telemetry exports.
- One harness home has one anonymous id shared by feedback acknowledgements, session telemetry exports, and direct DeepSeek requests.
- The feedback package depends only on the identity capability, not the telemetry seam or OTel SDK.
- The new package is a justified shared seam with two consumers; its empty invariant companion explains why reading the private file is not a useful runtime relationship check.
- The package is a justified shared library with three consumers; its empty invariant companion explains why reading the private file is not a useful runtime relationship check.
- The original anonymous-user-id Note remains authoritative for storage and privacy semantics, while this Note supersedes only its OTel-local ownership decision.

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# Agent Note: 反馈与遥测共享匿名用户 id
# Agent Note: 遥测、反馈与 DeepSeek 请求共享匿名用户 id
Status: implemented
@@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ Status: implemented
OpenTelemetry 后端已在 `$DSH_HOME/.userid` 中持久化一个匿名 UUID。`/feedback` 需要同时报告接收反馈的会话 id 与用户 id,以便运维人员将确认文本与导出的记录相关联。复制该身份或单独生成身份会使报告的用户失去意义;从 `session-telemetry-otel` 导入身份则会让直接命令依赖导出后端,并在遥测侧挂载反馈导出时形成依赖环。
早先的[匿名用户 id 决策](../feature/2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.md)刻意将辅助函数留在 OTel 后端内,直至出现第二个真实消费方。反馈就是这个消费方。
早先的[匿名用户 id 决策](../feature/2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.md)刻意将辅助函数留在 OTel 后端内,直至出现第二个真实消费方。反馈成为第二个消费方,[直连 DeepSeek 请求身份](../feature/2026-08-11-deepseek-request-user-id-header.md)则是第三个。
## 决策
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-user-id` 负责 `getOrCreateAnonymousUserId()` 和 `$DSH_HOME/.userid` 存储契约。`session-telemetry-otel` 将返回的 id 用作 OpenTelemetry Resource 的 `user.id`;`/feedback` 的成功确认先报告 `Feedback recorded for session {sessionId}`,再在第二行显示 `User: {userId}`,使两个标识符都可通过通用命令行的可展开正文查看。系统在获取 id 前拒绝无效反馈,因此空命令不会创建 `.userid`。
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-user-id` 负责 `getOrCreateAnonymousUserId()` 和 `$DSH_HOME/.userid` 存储契约。`session-telemetry-otel` 将返回的 id 用作 OpenTelemetry Resource 的 `user.id`;`/feedback` 的成功确认先报告 `Feedback recorded for session {sessionId}`,再在第二行显示 `User: {userId}`;直连 DeepSeek 请求则通过 `x-deepseek-harness-user-id` 携带它。系统在获取 id 前拒绝无效反馈,DeepSeek 适配器也仅在凭据解析成功后获取 id,因此空命令和凭据失败都不会创建 `.userid`。
此次抽取保留既有的随机 UUID、home 解析、进程内缓存、独占创建并发、损坏文件替换与 best-effort 写入语义。
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ OpenTelemetry 后端已在 `$DSH_HOME/.userid` 中持久化一个匿名 UUID。`
## 后果
- 一个 harness home 只有一个匿名 id,由反馈确认与会话遥测导出共享。
- 一个 harness home 只有一个匿名 id,由反馈确认、会话遥测导出与直连 DeepSeek 请求共享。
- 反馈包只依赖身份能力,不依赖遥测 seam 或 OTel SDK。
- 新包由两个消费方使用,成为有充分依据的共享 seam;其空不变式伴生插件解释了为何读取私有文件并非有用的运行时关系检查。
- 该包由三个消费方使用,成为有充分依据的共享库;其空不变式伴生插件解释了为何读取私有文件并非有用的运行时关系检查。
- 原始匿名用户 id Note 仍是存储与隐私语义的权威记录;本 Note 仅取代其中由 OTel 本地拥有身份的决策。