Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into worktree/multimodal-ui

This commit is contained in:
creatixchu
2026-08-11 18:04:23 +08:00
318 changed files with 1408 additions and 15137 deletions

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-12-subagent-persona-tool-filter-and-depth.md
2026-07-12-subagent-persona-tool-filter-and-depth.md: 2c5eaf8829e01536a2de34cc190573ff35e4ab77
2026-07-12-subagent-persona-tool-filter-and-depth.zh.md: ae64e26d95e42ca6c933892348e22d3cbf0dc722
2026-07-12-subagent-persona-tool-filter-and-depth.md: b5b38836b987ab2ef2ceebf3a1efa7b6211b1b0e
2026-07-12-subagent-persona-tool-filter-and-depth.zh.md: 1dd5725309159a70dab0f3cd669a79460c3b1cd2

View File

@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ The depth limit bounds recursive delegation independently of tool visibility. A
The effective parent depth is the greater of durable `SessionHeader.delegationDepth` and runtime `AgentOptions.subagentDepth`. An in-process child records its derived depth in the session header, and resume restores that header, so a restart cannot lower the recursion count.
Every public entry validates the domain rather than relying on one model-facing configuration path. Negative values, fractions, negative zero, non-finite values, unsafe integers, malformed stored parent depth, and derived overflow all reject. A direct `SubagentStartRequest` may omit the cap to leave depth unbounded; loader-resolved `dsh-tool-subagent` configuration instead defaults to `3`, accepts a numeric override, and uses explicit `'provider-managed'` to omit the cap for an out-of-process provider whose deployment owns its recursion budget. Three is a small finite default that still permits a root plus three descendant generations: the [SDK helper's generated subagent entries](../../../../packages/scaffold/helper/src/features/builtin/index.ts) and [JSON-RPC example](../../../../examples/jsonrpc-agent/cordis.yml) use that general policy, while the shipped interactive ACP, headless, and REPL examples pin one. A numeric tool cap fails at provider mount when the provider lacks `depthLimit`.
Every public entry validates the domain rather than relying on one model-facing configuration path. Negative values, fractions, negative zero, non-finite values, unsafe integers, malformed stored parent depth, and derived overflow all reject. A direct `SubagentStartRequest` may omit the cap to leave depth unbounded; loader-resolved `dsh-tool-subagent` configuration instead defaults to `3`, accepts a numeric override, and uses explicit `'provider-managed'` to omit the cap for an out-of-process provider whose deployment owns its recursion budget. Three is a small finite default that still permits a root plus three descendant generations: the [JSON-RPC example](../../../../examples/jsonrpc-agent/cordis.yml) uses that general policy, while the ACP and headless examples pin one. A numeric tool cap fails at provider mount when the provider lacks `depthLimit`.
A deployment can combine depth and filtering, but the numeric cap does not synthesize a filter. The delegation tool stays visible at the cap because authorization may depend on runtime state; every attempted start checks the calling agent's current durable and runtime depth, and a rejected start returns an errored tool result without publishing a child. A deployment may separately deny delegation tools in children when its visibility policy is static. Neither choice changes the provider's conversation-history behavior.

View File

@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ subagent 启动有三个独立的组合控制:`persona`、`toolFilter` 和 `ma
有效父级深度取持久 `SessionHeader.delegationDepth` 与运行时 `AgentOptions.subagentDepth` 中的较大值。进程内子 agent 把推导出的深度记录在会话 header 中,恢复时会重新载入该 header,因此重启无法降低递归计数。
每个公开入口都自行验证值域,而非依赖单一的面向模型配置路径。负值、小数、负零、非有限值、不安全整数、格式错误的存储父级深度以及推导溢出均被拒绝。直接的 `SubagentStartRequest` 可以省略上限,让此机制不约束深度;经 loader 解析的 `dsh-tool-subagent` 配置则默认值为 `3`、接受数值覆盖,并使用显式的 `'provider-managed'` 来省略由进程外提供方部署拥有递归预算时的上限。三是一个较小的有限默认值,仍允许 root 加三代后代:[SDK 辅助函数生成的 subagent 条目](../../../../packages/scaffold/helper/src/features/builtin/index.ts)和 [JSON-RPC 示例](../../../../examples/jsonrpc-agent/cordis.yml)采用这项通用策略,而已交付的交互式 ACP、headless 和 REPL 示例固定为一。提供方缺少 `depthLimit` 时,数值工具上限会在提供方挂载阶段失败。
每个公开入口都自行验证值域,而非依赖单一的面向模型配置路径。负值、小数、负零、非有限值、不安全整数、格式错误的存储父级深度以及推导溢出均被拒绝。直接的 `SubagentStartRequest` 可以省略上限,让此机制不约束深度;经 loader 解析的 `dsh-tool-subagent` 配置则默认值为 `3`、接受数值覆盖,并使用显式的 `'provider-managed'` 来省略由进程外提供方部署拥有递归预算时的上限。三是一个较小的有限默认值,仍允许 root 加三代后代:[JSON-RPC 示例](../../../../examples/jsonrpc-agent/cordis.yml)采用这项通用策略,而 ACP 与 headless 示例固定为一。提供方缺少 `depthLimit` 时,数值工具上限会在提供方挂载阶段失败。
部署可以组合深度与过滤,但数值上限不会合成过滤器。委派工具在上限处仍然可见,因为授权可能依赖运行时状态;每次尝试启动都会检查调用方 agent 当前的持久与运行时深度,被拒绝的启动返回错误工具结果,且不发布子 agent。可见性策略固定的部署可以另外在子 agent 中 deny 委派工具。两种选择都不改变提供方的对话历史行为。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-continuable-background-subagents.md
2026-07-21-continuable-background-subagents.md: 470b2328fd5c27e85ac2ca08b53f353f41b54fc9
2026-07-21-continuable-background-subagents.zh.md: 7288fbdf916700f054451ce6a40eca2bd90f0866
2026-07-21-continuable-background-subagents.md: 06095e644f8c7e33ce262e2cb62c7f8622b4f405
2026-07-21-continuable-background-subagents.zh.md: bcdfb67553ef7452e25fe56246f854092f720092

View File

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Every later turn creates another Task. Its producer resources cover only that ac
Opening a child session in a human-facing adapter reads its persisted transcript and does not resume an Agent merely to display it. Human input starts or joins the same Task-backed activation used by parent input through the continuation manager. A human-started Task retains the exact currently loaded parent Agent as its notification target, and `task_output` remains the single result path. The existing completion listener injects at most one unsolicited notice while the Task is unreported; `kill`, a terminal read, or a terminal wait may mark it reported and suppress that notice. Human interaction is therefore permitted only while that parent instance remains live. A user-owned conversation that may outlive the parent and explicitly merge a conclusion back belongs to [interactive side sessions](../../proposed/feature/2026-07-08-interactive-side-sessions.md), not this Task-owned lifecycle.
`TaskService.start()` rejects producers when no task controller is attached. A human-facing adapter that accepts child input must therefore attach a task controller, or run in a deployment that loads `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks`; loading the Task service alone is insufficient. SDK-generated spawn and fork compositions mount `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local` and `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks` with the subagent tools. This dependency is the cost of using the same Task result, cancellation, and notification path for parent- and human-started activations.
`TaskService.start()` rejects producers when no task controller is attached. A human-facing adapter that accepts child input must therefore attach a task controller, or run in a deployment that loads `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks`; loading the Task service alone is insufficient. This dependency is the cost of using the same Task result, cancellation, and notification path for parent- and human-started activations.
Cancellation always targets the whole current activation. If human and parent messages have joined one turn, either caller's cancellation aborts that turn, disposes its run, and settles its Task as `killed`; the messages do not have independent results or cancellation rights. `followup()` requires the caller's signal, and abort while live steering awaits request admission aborts the activation-owned controller so the provider discards the pending message and the call settles only after the child reaches quiescence. Independent cancellation requires a later message to start a separate turn instead of steering the current one.
@@ -111,8 +111,7 @@ Task records and active-run associations are process-local. Persistence makes th
- `packages/subagent/subagent-inprocess/tests/subagent-inprocess.spec.ts` pins the continuable durability boundary: an absent or detached flush listener and a permanent listener failure reject with `DURABILITY_FAILED`, a transient loop-checkpoint failure can succeed on the final confirmation, cancellation owns either final-checkpoint outcome, resume also confirms durability, and foreground runs remain best-effort. `packages/subagent/subagent/tests/continuation.spec.ts` drives the real stack (agent loop, JSONL persistence, spawn/fork providers, Task service, and `ctx.subagents`) keylessly: initial and resumed activations create fresh Tasks and dispose their runs before terminal; the descriptor event is pre-turn, model-hidden, versioned, durable under the service-allocated child id, and survives blocked or throwing initial prompt admission; cancellation, steering, cold follow-up, authorization, ownership conflicts, and resume races retain the contracts described above.
- `packages/subagent/tool-subagent-control/tests/tool-subagent-control.spec.ts` pins the `send_message` schema, coordinator attribution, both route renderings, the not-delivered failure, the no-agent rejection, and HMR disposal.
- `packages/subagent/tool-subagent/tests/tool-subagent.spec.ts` covers the configured background route: continuable mode requires a resumable provider and returns both ids without requiring `send_message`, while one-shot mode keeps the plain Task acknowledgement even when the provider can resume.
- `packages/scaffold/helper/tests/project.spec.ts` pins the Task service and model-facing Task controls in generated spawn and fork compositions.
- `packages/subagent/tool-subagent/tests/tool-subagent.spec.ts` covers the configured background route: continuable mode requires a resumable provider and returns both ids without requiring `send_message`, while one-shot mode keeps the plain Task acknowledgement even when the provider can resume; it also pins Task service integration and the model-facing Task controls.
- The keyless ACP snapshot scenario `subagent-continuable` (examples/acp-agent) pins the model-visible transcript: the two-id acknowledgement, a final durability-confirmation failure rendered through `task_output` without unconfirmed child output, and a `send_message` follow-up whose started Task fails with the id unavailable.
## Consequences

View File

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ durable child Session
用户界面适配器打开 child 会话时,只读取持久化 transcript,不会仅为展示而恢复 agent。用户输入通过继续执行管理器,启动或加入与 parent 输入相同的 Task 激活。由用户启动的 Task 会保留当前加载的精确 parent Agent 作为通知目标,`task_output` 仍是唯一结果路径。只要 Task 尚未标记为已报告,现有完成监听器最多注入一条主动通知;`kill`、终态读取或终态等待都可能将其标记为已报告,并抑制这条通知。因此,仅允许在该 parent 实例保持存活时进行用户交互。可以比 parent 存活更久、并将结论显式合并回去的用户自有会话属于[交互式 side session](../../proposed/feature/2026-07-08-interactive-side-sessions.md),不属于这一由 Task 持有的生命周期。
如果没有附加任务控制器,`TaskService.start()` 会拒绝 producer。因此,接受 child 输入的用户界面适配器必须附加任务控制器,或运行于加载了 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks` 的部署中;仅加载 Task 服务并不足够。SDK 生成的 spawn 与 fork 组合在挂载 subagent 工具时,也会挂载 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local` 与 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks`。这项依赖是 parent 和用户启动的激活共用 Task 结果、取消和通知路径所付出的代价。
如果没有附加任务控制器,`TaskService.start()` 会拒绝 producer。因此,接受 child 输入的用户界面适配器必须附加任务控制器,或运行于加载了 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks` 的部署中;仅加载 Task 服务并不足够。这项依赖是 parent 和用户启动的激活共用 Task 结果、取消和通知路径所付出的代价。
取消始终作用于当前完整激活。如果用户消息和 parent 消息已经加入同一个轮次,任一调用方发起取消都会中止该轮次、dispose 其 run,并将对应 Task 结算为 `killed`;这些消息没有独立的结果或取消权。`followup()` 要求调用方提供信号;若在线 steering 正在等待请求准入时该信号被中止,激活自有的 controller 会被中止,以便提供方丢弃待处理消息,并且该调用仅在子 agent 完全停稳后结算。若需要独立取消,后续消息必须另起轮次,而不能加入当前轮次。
@@ -111,8 +111,7 @@ Task 记录和活跃 run 关联都位于进程内。持久化使 child 会话可
- `packages/subagent/subagent-inprocess/tests/subagent-inprocess.spec.ts` 固定可继续执行的持久性边界:缺少 flush 监听器、flush 监听器已脱离或监听器持续失败时,均会以 `DURABILITY_FAILED` 拒绝;循环检查点的瞬时失败可在最终确认成功后继续完成,发生取消时最终检查点无论成功还是失败都由取消优先决定结果,resume 同样会确认持久性,而前台运行仍采用尽力而为策略。`packages/subagent/subagent/tests/continuation.spec.ts` 以无密钥方式驱动真实栈(agent loop、JSONL 持久化、spawn/fork 提供方、Task 服务和 `ctx.subagents`):初始及恢复后的激活都会创建新 Task,并在进入终态前 dispose 各自的 run;描述符事件位于轮次前、对模型隐藏、带版本、在服务分配的 child id 下持久化,并在初始 prompt admission 阻止请求或抛出异常时仍保留;取消、steering、cold follow-up、授权、所有权冲突与 resume 竞态保留上述约定。
- `packages/subagent/tool-subagent-control/tests/tool-subagent-control.spec.ts` 固定 `send_message` 的 schema、coordinator 来源标记、两种路由渲染、未送达失败、无 agent 时的拒绝,以及 HMR(热模块替换)dispose。
- `packages/subagent/tool-subagent/tests/tool-subagent.spec.ts` 覆盖配置的后台路由:可继续模式要求提供方可恢复,并在不要求 `send_message` 的情况下返回两个 id;即使提供方可以恢复,一次性模式仍保持普通的 Task 确认消息。
- `packages/scaffold/helper/tests/project.spec.ts` 固定生成的 spawn 与 fork 组合中的 Task 服务及面向模型的 Task 控制工具。
- `packages/subagent/tool-subagent/tests/tool-subagent.spec.ts` 覆盖配置的后台路由:可继续模式要求提供方可恢复,并在不要求 `send_message` 的情况下返回两个 id;即使提供方可以恢复,一次性模式仍保持普通的 Task 确认消息;它还固定 Task 服务集成及面向模型的 Task 控制工具。
- 无密钥 ACP 快照场景 `subagent-continuable`(examples/acp-agent)固定模型可见的 transcript:双 id 确认消息、最终持久性确认失败(该失败通过 `task_output` 呈现,且不包含未经确认的 child 输出),以及一次 `send_message` 后续操作——其已启动的 Task 会带着「id 不可用」失败。
## 影响

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-27-typescript-sdk-and-sdk-subagent-backend.md
2026-07-27-typescript-sdk-and-sdk-subagent-backend.md: e4ceeb6b1bc0b9e10fb5383454cbac1b404d4ad8
2026-07-27-typescript-sdk-and-sdk-subagent-backend.zh.md: 18e5c891f5810135b1ed5e6cfc27b94ad452c575
2026-07-27-typescript-sdk-and-sdk-subagent-backend.md: e5014689bd52992b4897b6f288d4b87dca54898b
2026-07-27-typescript-sdk-and-sdk-subagent-backend.zh.md: 78a7c23ee5bd34ce11004b49a63765a2ccf25bc4

View File

@@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ The stdio JSON-RPC serving surface (`@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc`, the [single-exe
Three packages, layered exactly like the existing Python stack, plus one Service provider registration:
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-protocol`** (`packages/scaffold/protocol/`) — the wire made shared and nominal. `JsonRpcLineTransport` moves here verbatim from `dsh-jsonrpc` (which now imports it), and `types.ts` names every payload the server speaks: `InitializeParams/Result`, `SessionPromptParams/Result`, the four notification payloads, and the `HarnessSdkRequestMap`/`HarnessSdkNotificationMap` indexes. The package root explicitly exports that complete interface and provides no source-module deep imports. The server's `notify()` call sites are typed against these named payloads, so server drift breaks compilation, not clients. One behavioral change: an error response now rejects with `JsonRpcResponseError` carrying the wire `code`/`data` (the Python client already preserved these; the old transport threw a bare `Error` with only the message).
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-client`** (`packages/scaffold/client/`) — the TypeScript twin of `python/sdk`: `HarnessClient` (spawn, frame, fan out notifications, typed error surfaces, close-to-quiescence via the shared dispose ladder) under `DeepSeekHarness`/`HarnessSession` (lazy start, memoized `initialize`, `run()` pairing one `session/prompt` with its `session.finished`). Its package-root consumer interface explicitly exports both client layers, caller-facing types, and the protocol-owned `JsonRpcResponseError`; source modules, normalization helpers, and the notification producer stay internal. `TurnResult.events` contains only the root session's typed events, while `notifications` retains session ids across the root and descendants discovered from `subagent.started`; session-tree scoping is client-side, mirroring `client.py`. Deliberate asymmetries with Python: the launch spec is explicit `command`/`args` (no bundled-runtime resolution — that is a distribution concern with no TS consumer yet); `env` replaces rather than merges (callers own credential policy; `scrubbedParentEnv` from the subprocess seam is one import away); `TurnResult` carries the structured `reason` (Python exposes only `status`); teardown walks a private stdin-EOF → SIGTERM → SIGKILL ladder to actual exit (the client runs outside any harness context, so it cannot ride `ctx.subprocess`).
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-protocol`** (`packages/sdk/protocol/`) — the wire made shared and nominal. `JsonRpcLineTransport` moves here verbatim from `dsh-jsonrpc` (which now imports it), and `types.ts` names every payload the server speaks: `InitializeParams/Result`, `SessionPromptParams/Result`, the four notification payloads, and the `HarnessSdkRequestMap`/`HarnessSdkNotificationMap` indexes. The package root explicitly exports that complete interface and provides no source-module deep imports. The server's `notify()` call sites are typed against these named payloads, so server drift breaks compilation, not clients. One behavioral change: an error response now rejects with `JsonRpcResponseError` carrying the wire `code`/`data` (the Python client already preserved these; the old transport threw a bare `Error` with only the message).
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-client`** (`packages/sdk/client/`) — the TypeScript twin of `python/sdk`: `HarnessClient` (spawn, frame, fan out notifications, typed error surfaces, close-to-quiescence via the shared dispose ladder) under `DeepSeekHarness`/`HarnessSession` (lazy start, memoized `initialize`, `run()` pairing one `session/prompt` with its `session.finished`). Its package-root consumer interface explicitly exports both client layers, caller-facing types, and the protocol-owned `JsonRpcResponseError`; source modules, normalization helpers, and the notification producer stay internal. `TurnResult.events` contains only the root session's typed events, while `notifications` retains session ids across the root and descendants discovered from `subagent.started`; session-tree scoping is client-side, mirroring `client.py`. Deliberate asymmetries with Python: the launch spec is explicit `command`/`args` (no bundled-runtime resolution — that is a distribution concern with no TS consumer yet); `env` replaces rather than merges (callers own credential policy; `scrubbedParentEnv` from the subprocess seam is one import away); `TurnResult` carries the structured `reason` (Python exposes only `status`); teardown walks a private stdin-EOF → SIGTERM → SIGKILL ladder to actual exit (the client runs outside any harness context, so it cannot ride `ctx.subprocess`).
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subagent-dsh-sdk`** (`packages/subagent/subagent-dsh-sdk/`) — the second out-of-process `SubagentProvider`, structured as `subagent-acp`'s sibling: same all-false capabilities and `inheritsParentContext: false`, same publish-after-handshake ownership transaction, same result-never-rejects flattening through an `onError` sink, same parent-namespace run id. The child answer is read from streamed `session.event`s — the last complete `assistant/message`, else accumulated `text-delta` chunks, so partial answers survive cancellation. Stop reasons map from the child's structured `TurnEndReason` (`completed`/`max-tokens`/`aborted` pass through; everything else, including a settled-without-turn child, is `error`). Its `provider`/`model` config feeds the child's `initialize`; `env` is where deployments pass the child's own key and `DSH_CORDIS_CONFIG`.
- **The subagent seam grows `out-of-process.ts`**: the provider-side vocabulary both out-of-process backends share — `NO_START_CAPABILITIES`, timing-bound validation, child cwd resolution (config override, else the delegating parent session's workspace), the never-reject `settleRunResult`, and the `subprocessRunHandle` publication. Process mechanics (spawn, env scrub, tree-scoped teardown) live in the `dsh-subprocess` seam; `subagent-acp` spawns through `ctx.subprocess`, while this backend spawns through the SDK client (the subprocess README's documented exception for SDK-managed transports) and applies the seam's `scrubbedParentEnv()` itself.

View File

@@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ stdio JSON-RPC 对外服务接口(`@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc`,见[单文件
三个包,分层与既有 Python 栈完全一致,外加一个 Service provider 注册:
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-protocol`**(`packages/scaffold/protocol/`)—— 把线协议做成共享且具名。`JsonRpcLineTransport` 从 `dsh-jsonrpc` 原样移入(后者现在导入它),`types.ts` 为服务器所说的每个载荷命名:`InitializeParams/Result`、`SessionPromptParams/Result`、四个通知载荷,以及 `HarnessSdkRequestMap`/`HarnessSdkNotificationMap` 索引。该包根显式导出这一完整接口,且不提供指向源模块的深层导入。服务器的 `notify()` 调用点以这些具名载荷标注类型,服务器漂移会先破坏编译而不是破坏客户端。一处行为变化:错误响应现在以携带线上 `code`/`data` 的 `JsonRpcResponseError` 拒绝(Python 客户端本就保留这些;旧传输只抛携带消息的裸 `Error`)。
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-client`**(`packages/scaffold/client/`)—— `python/sdk` 的 TypeScript 孪生:`HarnessClient`(spawn、分帧、通知扇出、有类型的错误表面、经共享 dispose(资源释放)阶梯关闭至完全停稳)之上是 `DeepSeekHarness`/`HarnessSession`(惰性启动、记忆化 `initialize`、`run()` 把一个 `session/prompt` 与其 `session.finished` 配对)。其包根消费方接口显式导出两层客户端、面向调用方的类型,以及协议包所拥有的 `JsonRpcResponseError`;源模块、规范化辅助函数和通知投递端都保留为内部实现。`TurnResult.events` 只包含根会话的类型化事件,而 `notifications` 则保留根会话及从 `subagent.started` 发现的后代各自的会话 id;基于 `subagent.started` 血缘边的会话树范围限定在客户端完成,镜像 `client.py`。与 Python 的刻意不对称:启动规格是显式 `command`/`args`(无捆绑运行时解析——那是尚无 TS 消费方的发行问题);`env` 整体替换而非合并(凭据策略归调用方;subprocess seam 的 `scrubbedParentEnv` 一个 import 即得);`TurnResult` 携带结构化 `reason`(Python 只暴露 `status`);拆除走私有的 stdin-EOF → SIGTERM → SIGKILL 阶梯直到真正退出(客户端运行在任何 harness 上下文之外,无法搭乘 `ctx.subprocess`)。
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-protocol`**(`packages/sdk/protocol/`)—— 把线协议做成共享且具名。`JsonRpcLineTransport` 从 `dsh-jsonrpc` 原样移入(后者现在导入它),`types.ts` 为服务器所说的每个载荷命名:`InitializeParams/Result`、`SessionPromptParams/Result`、四个通知载荷,以及 `HarnessSdkRequestMap`/`HarnessSdkNotificationMap` 索引。该包根显式导出这一完整接口,且不提供指向源模块的深层导入。服务器的 `notify()` 调用点以这些具名载荷标注类型,服务器漂移会先破坏编译而不是破坏客户端。一处行为变化:错误响应现在以携带线上 `code`/`data` 的 `JsonRpcResponseError` 拒绝(Python 客户端本就保留这些;旧传输只抛携带消息的裸 `Error`)。
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-client`**(`packages/sdk/client/`)—— `python/sdk` 的 TypeScript 孪生:`HarnessClient`(spawn、分帧、通知扇出、有类型的错误表面、经共享 dispose(资源释放)阶梯关闭至完全停稳)之上是 `DeepSeekHarness`/`HarnessSession`(惰性启动、记忆化 `initialize`、`run()` 把一个 `session/prompt` 与其 `session.finished` 配对)。其包根消费方接口显式导出两层客户端、面向调用方的类型,以及协议包所拥有的 `JsonRpcResponseError`;源模块、规范化辅助函数和通知投递端都保留为内部实现。`TurnResult.events` 只包含根会话的类型化事件,而 `notifications` 则保留根会话及从 `subagent.started` 发现的后代各自的会话 id;基于 `subagent.started` 血缘边的会话树范围限定在客户端完成,镜像 `client.py`。与 Python 的刻意不对称:启动规格是显式 `command`/`args`(无捆绑运行时解析——那是尚无 TS 消费方的发行问题);`env` 整体替换而非合并(凭据策略归调用方;subprocess seam 的 `scrubbedParentEnv` 一个 import 即得);`TurnResult` 携带结构化 `reason`(Python 只暴露 `status`);拆除走私有的 stdin-EOF → SIGTERM → SIGKILL 阶梯直到真正退出(客户端运行在任何 harness 上下文之外,无法搭乘 `ctx.subprocess`)。
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subagent-dsh-sdk`**(`packages/subagent/subagent-dsh-sdk/`)—— 第二个进程外 `SubagentProvider`,采用与 `subagent-acp` 对等的结构:同样的全 false 能力与 `inheritsParentContext: false`,同样的握手后发布所有权事务,同样通过 `onError` sink 将结果归一为绝不拒绝,同样的父命名空间 run id。子答案从流式 `session.event` 读取——最后一条完整 `assistant/message`,否则累积的 `text-delta` 块,部分答案在取消时得以保留。停止原因由子进程的结构化 `TurnEndReason` 映射(`completed`/`max-tokens`/`aborted` 直通;其余一切、包括未运行任何轮次便已结束的子进程,都是 `error`)。其 `provider`/`model` 配置喂给子进程的 `initialize`;`env` 是部署传入子进程自有密钥与 `DSH_CORDIS_CONFIG` 的地方。
- **subagent seam 新增 `out-of-process.ts`**:两个进程外后端共享的 provider 侧词汇——`NO_START_CAPABILITIES`、时限校验、子进程 cwd 解析(配置覆盖、否则发起委托的父会话工作区)、绝不拒绝的 `settleRunResult`、以及 `subprocessRunHandle` 发布。进程机制(spawn、环境清理、进程树清理)属于 `dsh-subprocess` seam;`subagent-acp` 经 `ctx.subprocess` spawn 子进程,本后端则经 SDK 客户端 spawn 子进程(subprocess README 记载的 SDK 托管传输例外)并自行应用该 seam 的 `scrubbedParentEnv()`。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.md
2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.md: 75b65e9fd477d19afb3a3a25e424a7f7620099a3
2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.zh.md: 3db5b665f9cbbe6f884a9717afa758f22a419658
2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.md: 4d5d14cb63ebbf9d9f71c729da998ad9804e56bf
2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.zh.md: 69c48076ceb97a4bbc3cc35a2aaa3e632b1b1b06

View File

@@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.zh.md)
## Problem
Session telemetry is mounted by default ([default-mount Note](2026-07-31-web-telemetry-default-mount.md)), but the OTel Resource carried only `service.name`/`service.version` — no user-level identity at all, so the collector could neither aggregate per user nor count active users. The only prior ruling on point was an unimplemented one to derive a user id by hashing the hostname/local IP; the dsh-sdk toolchain keeps its own anonymous id (`$DSH_HOME/telemetry.json`), but that is the launcher feed's private fact, unrelated to the OTel feed. The OTel feed needed an anonymous user identity with clean semantics.
Session telemetry is mounted by default ([default-mount Note](2026-07-31-web-telemetry-default-mount.md)), but the OTel Resource carried only `service.name`/`service.version` — no user-level identity at all, so the collector could neither aggregate per user nor count active users. The only prior ruling on point was an unimplemented one to derive a user id by hashing the hostname/local IP. The OTel feed needed an anonymous user identity with clean semantics.
## Decision
`getOrCreateAnonymousUserId()` returns the bare UUID line in `$DSH_HOME/.userid` (resolved by `resolveDshHome`, `$DSH_HOME` > `~/.dsh`), minting and persisting a random UUID v4 on first use; the backend constructor carries it as the Resource's `user.id` (the OTel semconv user attribute), once per export batch. The original implementation lived inside `session-telemetry-otel` because no second real consumer existed. `/feedback` later became that consumer, so [the shared-id decision](../architecture/2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.md) moves ownership to `@deepseek-ai/dsh-user-id` without changing the storage, anonymity, concurrency, or loss semantics recorded here. The dsh-sdk launcher telemetry keeps its own anonymous-id store (`telemetry.json`) and remains unrelated.
`getOrCreateAnonymousUserId()` returns the bare UUID line in `$DSH_HOME/.userid` (resolved by `resolveDshHome`, `$DSH_HOME` > `~/.dsh`), minting and persisting a random UUID v4 on first use; the backend constructor carries it as the Resource's `user.id` (the OTel semconv user attribute), once per export batch. The original implementation lived inside `session-telemetry-otel` because no second real consumer existed. `/feedback` later became that consumer, so [the shared-id decision](../architecture/2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.md) moves ownership to `@deepseek-ai/dsh-user-id` without changing the storage, anonymity, concurrency, or loss semantics recorded here.
| Ruling | Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
@@ -32,13 +32,12 @@ Session telemetry is mounted by default ([default-mount Note](2026-07-31-web-tel
| Hostname/IP-hash-derived id (the prior ruling) | Reversible means not anonymous; the random UUID is semantically clean — the user ruled to supersede |
| user.id on every record's attributes (Claude Code's shape) | Touches the session-telemetry seam contract or injects per record, growing the wire; once per batch on the Resource already aggregates |
| A shared package before `/feedback` needed the id (the first cut) | At that time the only real consumer was the OTel backend; extraction became justified only when direct feedback needed the same correlation id |
| Reusing telemetry.json instead of a new file | The file name/JSON format files the identity under the launcher feed's naming; the OTel feed's identity is a standalone fact |
| AppCLIEntry reading the id and injecting via config patch | Every surface entry needs wiring; a runtime fact inside deployment config conflates the two |
| Housing it in `@deepseek-ai/dsh-paths` | paths is pure path computation with zero IO; a persisting identity capability would pollute the package boundary |
## Consequences
- One `$DSH_HOME` is one stable user in the OTel feed; separate homes are separate users by construction, with no cross-home linking mechanism.
- The OTel feed and `/feedback` share `.userid`; the launcher feed still uses `telemetry.json` and cannot be correlated with them.
- The OTel feed and `/feedback` share `.userid`.
- Deleting `.userid` resets the identity (effective next launch); on an unwritable home each process holds its own in-memory id until the home becomes writable.
- The [default-mount Note](2026-07-31-web-telemetry-default-mount.md)'s identity follow-up is closed for the anonymous-user-id part by this decision; hostname/surface dimensions, the redaction rule, and the usage-metrics track remain open.

View File

@@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ Status: implemented
## Problem
session telemetry 已默认挂载([默认挂载 Note](2026-07-31-web-telemetry-default-mount.md)),但 OTel Resource 只有 `service.name`/`service.version`,没有任何用户级标识——接收端无法按用户聚合、无法数活跃用户。此前唯一相关口径是一条未实现的「hostname/本机 IP 哈希派生 user.id」裁定;dsh-sdk 工具链另有自用的匿名 id(`$DSH_HOME/telemetry.json`),但那是 launcher 回流的私有事实,与 OTel 回流无关。需要给 OTel 回流一个语义干净的匿名用户身份。
session telemetry 已默认挂载([默认挂载 Note](2026-07-31-web-telemetry-default-mount.md)),但 OTel Resource 只有 `service.name`/`service.version`,没有任何用户级标识——接收端无法按用户聚合、无法数活跃用户。此前唯一相关口径是一条未实现的「hostname/本机 IP 哈希派生 user.id」裁定。需要给 OTel 回流一个语义干净的匿名用户身份。
## Decision
`getOrCreateAnonymousUserId()` 返回 `$DSH_HOME/.userid`(`resolveDshHome` 解析,`$DSH_HOME` > `~/.dsh`)中的裸 UUID 行,首用生成随机 UUID v4 并落盘;后端构造时把它作为 Resource 的 `user.id`(OTel semconv 标准用户属性)随每批导出携带一次。原始实现位于 `session-telemetry-otel`,因为当时不存在第二个真实消费方。`/feedback` 后来成为该消费方,因此[共享 id 决策](../architecture/2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.md)将所有权移交给 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-user-id`,但不改变本 Note 记录的存储、匿名、并发与丢失语义。dsh-sdk launcher telemetry 继续使用自己独立的匿名 id 存储(`telemetry.json`),与此身份无关。
`getOrCreateAnonymousUserId()` 返回 `$DSH_HOME/.userid`(`resolveDshHome` 解析,`$DSH_HOME` > `~/.dsh`)中的裸 UUID 行,首用生成随机 UUID v4 并落盘;后端构造时把它作为 Resource 的 `user.id`(OTel semconv 标准用户属性)随每批导出携带一次。原始实现位于 `session-telemetry-otel`,因为当时不存在第二个真实消费方。`/feedback` 后来成为该消费方,因此[共享 id 决策](../architecture/2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.md)将所有权移交给 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-user-id`,但不改变本 Note 记录的存储、匿名、并发与丢失语义。
| 裁定 | 取值 | 理由 |
|---|---|---|
@@ -32,13 +32,12 @@ session telemetry 已默认挂载([默认挂载 Note](2026-07-31-web-telemetry
| hostname/IP 哈希派生 id(此前口径) | 可反查即非匿名;随机 UUID 语义干净,用户裁决取代 |
| user.id 放每条 record 的 attributes(Claude Code 形态) | 要动 session-telemetry seam 约定或逐条注入,wire 体积涨;Resource 每批一次已满足聚合 |
| 在 `/feedback` 需要该 id 之前抽取共享包(初版实现) | 当时唯一的真实消费方是 OTel 后端;只有直接反馈需要同一个关联 id 后,抽取才具备依据 |
| 复用 telemetry.json 不新建文件 | 文件名/JSON 格式把身份挂在 launcher 链路命名下;OTel 回流身份是独立事实 |
| AppCLIEntry 读好 id 经 config patch 注入 | 每个 surface 入口都要接线;config 里传运行时事实与部署配置混淆 |
| 挂进 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-paths` | paths 是纯路径计算零 IO;带持久化的身份能力会污染包边界 |
## Consequences
- 一个 `$DSH_HOME` 在 OTel 回流中是一个稳定用户;不同 home 在构造上就是不同用户,无跨 home 关联机制。
- OTel 回流与 `/feedback` 共享 `.userid`;launcher 回流仍使用 `telemetry.json`,无法与前两者关联。
- OTel 回流与 `/feedback` 共享 `.userid`。
- 删除 `.userid` 即重置身份(下次启动生效);home 不可写时每进程各自持有一个内存 id 直至恢复可写。
- [默认挂载 Note](2026-07-31-web-telemetry-default-mount.md) 的身份 follow-up 中「匿名用户 id」项由本决定关闭;hostname/surface 维度与脱敏规则、usage-metrics track 仍是待办。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-01-goal-command-input-projection.md
2026-08-01-goal-command-input-projection.md: 02836de7ea2d79122d7650d1b37406802ee1489f
2026-08-01-goal-command-input-projection.zh.md: 8c28ba1c90be5942aa526fb9d8d2d8b1f014742e

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
# Agent Note: Goal command input projection
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-08-01-goal-command-input-projection.zh.md)
## Problem
Human commands execute outside the model turn and persist as `command/run` plus `command/done`. The Web transcript rendered only their result row. On a fresh session, `/goal` therefore cleared the composer and completed successfully while the page stayed on the empty hero; its result became visible only after later conversation content activated Chat. Appending an ordinary `user/message` from the handler would change model-visible history and command semantics.
## Decision
The command registry and durable command lifecycle remain unchanged. `command/run` records the parser-owned name, optional verbatim arguments, source, and invocation id; `command/done` records settlement. Neither event carries browser presentation intent.
The `ui-goal` client plugin registers a Goal-owned Conversation Definition beside the generic command Definition. Both match the same `/goal` `command/run`: the generic Definition retains the durable result row, while the Goal Definition builds a separate `command-input` Chat Node at an earlier fractional anchor. The Goal plugin also registers the keyed React renderer for that Node. Its local component copies only the user bubble's right-aligned geometry and semantic tokens, uses 14px/22px monospace text, and mounts no timestamp, copy, or branch actions.
`Session.composerPhase` treats visible non-command Chat Nodes as conversation content, so `command-input` activates the current conversation while a generic command row alone does not. The Host `summary.blank` bit remains turn-based, so list hiding and blank-session reuse do not change.
The Goal Definition derives `/<name><args.trimEnd()>` from the structured run: separator and internal multiline input survive, while the claimed bare form whose arguments contain one space displays `/goal`. A history window containing only `command/done` has no matching Goal Context, so it keeps the generic result row without inventing an input bubble; loading the older run restores both Nodes.
The model boundary is unchanged. The Goal projection creates no `user/message`, `turn/start`, `step/start`, or `request/header`. Accepted goal mutations reach the model only through the goal domain's existing `<goal_state>` snapshot or clear tombstone, independently of the command-input Node.
## Verification
Goal client tests pin the dual Definition output, ordering, other-command exclusion, bare and multiline text, done-only cuts, renderer semantics, disposal, and fresh-session phase selection. The keyless assembled Web scenario submits bare `/goal` in a fresh session with no model adapter, verifies both rows and the absence of model-surface events, then reloads and verifies the persisted transcript.
## Alternatives considered
**Append `user/message` in the `/goal` handler.** Rejected because the command would become model input and could trigger or alter a later request.
**Add presentation intent to the command registry and durable event.** Rejected because one Goal view would widen the generic command interface and make Session, Chat, and every command fixture carry browser presentation state. The existing `command/run` name and arguments already let the composed Goal client reconstruct its own view.
**Teach the generic command renderer about `/goal`.** Rejected because command-specific view construction belongs to the Goal client plugin. Composing that plugin out must remove the bubble without changing command execution or the generic result row.
**Render every command input as a user bubble.** Rejected because existing control commands deliberately leave a fresh session on the hero; changing them would broaden interaction semantics without a feature-owned Conversation Definition.
## Consequences
One durable `/goal` run feeds two independently owned view Contexts without changing the command capability. Composing `ui-goal` out leaves ordinary command execution and its result row intact. Live tabs and cold reloads agree because both views derive from the same run. A page cut that retains only `command/done` temporarily shows only the result row; if that command is the session's only content, the hero hides the row until an older page restores the run. The session remains list-hidden and reusable until a model turn starts because Host blank semantics remain turn-based.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
# Agent Note: Goal 命令输入投影
Status: implemented
[English](2026-08-01-goal-command-input-projection.md) | 中文
## 问题
面向用户的命令在模型轮次之外执行,并持久化为 `command/run` 与 `command/done`。Web transcript(文本记录)此前只渲染结果行。因此,在新会话中,`/goal` 会清空编辑器并成功完成,但页面仍停留在空白 Hero;只有后续对话内容激活 Chat 后,结果才会显示。若处理器追加普通 `user/message`,将改变模型可见历史与命令语义。
## 决策
命令注册表与持久命令生命周期保持不变。`command/run` 记录由解析器提供的名称、可选的原样参数、来源和调用 id;`command/done` 记录结算。两条事件都不携带浏览器呈现意图。
`ui-goal` 客户端插件会在通用命令 Definition 之外注册一个归 Goal 所有的 Conversation Definition。两者都匹配同一条 `/goal` `command/run`:通用 Definition 保留持久结果行,Goal Definition 则在更早的分数锚点构建独立的 `command-input` Chat Node。Goal 插件还为该 Node 注册 keyed React renderer。它的本地组件只复用用户气泡的右对齐几何形态和语义 token,使用 14px/22px 等宽字体文本,并且不挂载时间戳、复制或分支操作。
`Session.composerPhase` 把可见的非命令 Chat Node 视为对话内容,因此 `command-input` 会激活当前对话,而仅有通用命令行时不会。Host 的 `summary.blank` 位仍以轮次为基础,因此列表隐藏和空白会话复用保持不变。
Goal Definition 根据结构化 run 派生 `/<name><args.trimEnd()>`:分隔符与内部多行输入保持不变;在已认领的裸命令形式中,参数只有一个空格时显示 `/goal`。仅包含 `command/done` 的历史窗口没有匹配的 Goal Context,因此会保留通用结果行,而不会虚构输入气泡;加载包含更早 run 的页面后,两个 Node 都会恢复。
模型边界保持不变。Goal 投影不会创建 `user/message`、`turn/start`、`step/start` 或 `request/header`。已接受的 goal 变更只会通过 goal 领域现有的 `<goal_state>` 快照或 clear tombstone 到达模型,与 `command-input` Node 无关。
## 验证
Goal 客户端测试固定双 Definition 输出、顺序、排除其他命令、裸命令与多行文本、仅含 done 的切分窗口、renderer 语义、资源释放和新会话 phase 选择。无密钥的完整组装 Web 场景在不含模型适配器的新会话中提交裸 `/goal`,验证两行都显示且不存在面向模型的事件,然后重新加载并验证持久化后的 transcript。
## 备选方案
**在 `/goal` 处理器中追加 `user/message`。**不予采纳,因为该命令会变成模型输入,并可能触发或改变后续请求。
**向命令注册表与持久事件添加呈现意图。**不予采纳,因为一个 Goal 视图会扩大通用命令接口,并要求 Session、Chat 和每个命令 fixture(测试前置数据)都携带浏览器呈现状态。现有 `command/run` 的名称和参数已足以让组合后的 Goal 客户端重建自有视图。
**让通用命令 renderer 识别 `/goal`。**不予采纳,因为命令专用视图的构建归 Goal 客户端插件所有。在组合中移除该插件后,气泡必须随之消失,且命令执行和通用结果行不能改变。
**把每条命令输入都渲染为用户气泡。**不予采纳,因为现有控制命令会有意让新会话停留在 Hero;这样修改会在没有功能自有 Conversation Definition 的情况下扩大交互语义。
## 后果
一条持久 `/goal` run 会向两个各自独立归属的视图 Context 提供数据,而不改变命令能力。在组合中移除 `ui-goal` 后,普通命令执行及其结果行保持不变。实时标签页与冷重载会得到一致结果,因为两个视图都派生自同一条 run。页面切分只保留 `command/done` 时,会暂时只显示结果行;如果该命令是会话中的唯一内容,Hero 会隐藏该行,直到加载更早页面恢复 run。由于 Host 的 blank 语义仍以轮次为基础,会话在模型轮次开始前仍从列表中隐藏,并且可以复用。