Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into worktree/pr628-merge-20260727

# Conflicts:
#	.agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-06-21-bounded-llm-request-recovery.md
#	docs/architecture.i18n.yaml
#	docs/config-catalog.md
#	docs/cordis-catalog/events.md
#	docs/cordis-catalog/services.md
#	docs/core-data-structures/llm-streaming.i18n.yaml
#	docs/core-data-structures/llm-streaming.md
#	docs/core-data-structures/llm-streaming.zh.md
#	docs/event-producer-consumer.md
#	docs/module-graph.md
#	examples/headless-agent/tests/headless.snapshot.ts
#	packages/compact/compact-basic/tests/compact-loop-repro.spec.ts
#	packages/cordis/tool-cordis/src/api-catalog.ts
#	packages/core/agent-loop/README.md
#	packages/core/agent-loop/src/loop.ts
#	packages/examples/agent-spine-demo/README.md
#	packages/llm/README.md
#	packages/llm/llm-deepseek/src/adapter.ts
#	packages/llm/llm-pi-ai/src/adapter.ts
#	packages/llm/llm-retry/README.md
#	packages/llm/llm/README.md
#	packages/llm/llm/src/index.ts
#	packages/llm/llm/tests/service.spec.ts
#	packages/support/llm-replay/src/index.ts
#	packages/support/llm-replay/tests/llm-replay.spec.ts
This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-07-27 22:44:43 +08:00
2019 changed files with 66577 additions and 16794 deletions

View File

@@ -1,61 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Agent Client Protocol (ACP) support — drive the coding agent from external editors
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.zh.md)
> Superseded by [ACP as an automation-only protocol](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md). This note records the retired editor-facing bridge design.
## Problem
The harness originally exposed agents only through a readline loop. That surface could carry text, but it gave an editor no structured way to create or resume sessions, correlate prompt completion, stream reasoning and tool activity, render tool-specific UI, ask for permission, or cancel one conversation without disturbing another. ACP defines those interactions as JSON-RPC over stdio, and Zed is the target client used to make concrete compatibility decisions.
The bridge must preserve the harness's existing ownership boundaries. It cannot depend on the concrete agent loop, bypass the tool registry, execute shell commands in the editor, or invent a second source of session truth. stdout is also the protocol transport, so any accidental log output corrupts the connection.
## Decision
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-acp` was a UI/client-driver plugin in the `ui` package group (it now lives in `acp`). It used `@agentclientprotocol/sdk`'s `AgentSideConnection` over stdin/stdout and programmed only interface services: the agent create/resume factory, session persistence, tool registry, user interaction, and optional approval/bash capabilities. It did not change the agent loop and was not a capability-seam implementation.
The bridge implements the following stable session path:
- `initialize` negotiates the protocol version, advertises text plus `resource_link` prompts, and advertises `loadSession`.
- `session/new` validates an absolute `cwd`, stores it in `SessionHeader`, creates an agent through `ctx.agents`, and returns any composition-backed config options.
- `session/load` validates the requested cwd against persisted metadata before constructing an agent, reserves the id across the asynchronous resume, replays user/assistant/tool events as ACP updates, and reports the resumed config-option fold.
- `session/prompt` accepts text and resource links, rejects unsupported or empty content, allows one in-flight prompt per session, and settles against that prompt's owning `turn/end`. An error turn rejects the RPC; other closed turn reasons map through a total ACP stop-reason codec.
- `session/cancel` calls the queue-aware agent cancel path and settles only the addressed session's prompt.
Tool-call presentation remains tool-owned. A tool's `presentCall` and `presentResult` return the `generic`, `terminal`, or `diff` render-intent variants; the bridge switches on that union and maps it to ACP. Presenter-less tools receive a generic fallback. Bash terminal cards use Zed's capability-gated `_meta.terminal_info`, `_meta.terminal_output`, and `_meta.terminal_exit` convention; the harness still executes the command through `ctx.bash`, preserving sandbox, environment scrub, ownership, and cwd. Clients without that extension receive ordinary text content. Filesystem tools provide diff cards and file locations without hard-coded tool-name branches in the bridge.
Permission handling is an answerer on the [user-approval seam](2026-07-06-approval-seam.md), not an ask-every-tool policy in ACP. An `approval/request` for a bridge-owned agent with a call id becomes `session/request_permission` on that agent's editor session, with one-shot allow/reject choices. Foreign or call-less requests delegate; a missing or failed answerer remains fail-closed. The plugin that asks—such as a pre-execute policy or bash escalation—owns the decision to ask.
When `ctx.permission` is composed, the bridge exposes one `permission` select from the deployment's preset table. The shipped `workspace-write` and `danger-full-access` presets each bundle a sandbox mode with an approval policy; unmatched effective knobs produce the switch-away-only `custom` state. `session/set_config_option` validates through `PermissionService.set()` and writes both owning knob events. A switch during an open turn appends immediately; an idle switch is overlaid in responses and anchored at the next `agent/prompt-submit`, before request assembly. Until then it is memory-only, so a crash restores the durable fold. ACP session modes are not modeled because config options are the forward protocol surface; `AcpConfig.model` remains connection-wide.
The bridge also provides the ACP-backed `UserInteractionProvider`: `ask_user_question` requests become form elicitations on the owning session. Select, multi-select, option descriptions, and custom-answer override semantics are preserved.
Lifecycle ownership is explicit. The bridge holds an `AgentHandle` per live session. Disconnect and Cordis disposal cancel pending prompts, dispose every handle in parallel, await loop quiescence and persistence flush, and then remove the records. Stream notification failures are contained so a vanished client cannot corrupt an agent turn. The ACP app composition loads no stdout logger; a test guards stdout as framed JSON-RPC only.
The current protocol contract lives in the [`dsh-acp` package README](../../../../packages/acp/acp/README.md).
## Alternatives considered
**A prepended `tools/execute` listener that asks on every ACP-owned call** — rejected. It would hard-code permission policy into the UI bridge, ask even when no policy requires it, and could not serve approval requests that arise after execution begins. The shared user-approval seam keeps mechanism, asking policy, and UI answerer separate.
**Inject the concrete `agentLoop`** — rejected. Agent creation, resume, idle observation, and disposal are interface-level ownership operations on `dsh-agent`; a UI plugin does not need a dependency-rule exception.
**Execute bash through ACP `terminal/*`** — rejected. That would move execution outside the harness and bypass its sandbox, credential scrub, task ownership, cwd resolution, and session log. Terminal metadata is presentation only.
**Represent permission presets as ACP session modes** — rejected. The deployment-defined preset is already one config-option select, while session modes are the legacy surface slated for removal in ACP v2.
**Hijack stdout defensively** — rejected. Process-wide monkey-patching is outside Cordis effect ownership and races the protocol transport. The app composition owns stdout purity.
## Consequences
Editors can create, load, prompt, cancel, render, ask, and reconfigure multiple harness sessions over one ACP connection without a loop-specific dependency. The session event log remains the durable source for replay, prompt settlement, cwd, and per-session configuration. Tool presentation and human-answer channels remain extensible plugin contracts instead of ACP-specific behavior.
The bridge deliberately does not implement session list/delete/resume/close capabilities, MCP passthrough, additional directories, image/audio/embedded-resource prompts, plans, slash commands, usage updates, editor filesystem delegation, or the ACP terminal execution sub-protocol. Runtime model selection was added later through standard session config options by the [LLM catalog and ACP selection Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-15-llm-model-catalog-and-acp-selection.md).
An idle config selection is truthful in the live response but not durable until the next `agent/prompt-submit` anchors it inside the open turn. Crashing before that boundary loses the pending selection; this is the cost of keeping session events turn-enclosed and replay-safe.
## Verification
The ACP suites cover the in-memory protocol codec, create/load replay, exact prompt settlement, cancellation races, unsupported content, tool presentation, terminal capability fallback, permission outcome mapping, config-option validation and persistence, multi-session isolation, disconnect/disposal quiescence, and HMR cleanup. Snapshot and built-bin tests exercise the app composition, while the real-API e2e self-skips without a key.

View File

@@ -1,61 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Agent Client Protocol(ACP)支持——从外部编辑器驱动编码 agent
Status: implemented
[English](2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.md) | 中文
> 已被 [ACP 作为仅面向自动化的协议](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md)取代。本 Agent Note 记录已退役的面向编辑器的桥接层设计。
## 问题
harness 最初仅通过 readline 循环暴露 agent。该接口能传输文本,但编辑器无法以结构化方式创建或恢复会话、关联提示词完成、流式输出推理(reasoning)与工具活动、渲染工具专属 UI、请求权限,或在不干扰其他对话的前提下取消某个对话。ACP(Agent Client Protocol)将这些交互定义为基于 stdio 的 JSON-RPC,Zed 是用于做出具体兼容性决策的目标客户端。
桥接层必须保持 harness 既有的所有权边界。它不能依赖具体的 agent loop(智能体循环),不能绕过工具注册表,不能在编辑器中执行 shell 命令,也不能发明第二个会话真源。stdout 同时也是协议传输通道,因此任何意外的日志输出都会破坏连接。
## 决策
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-acp` 曾是 `ui` 包组中的 UI/客户端驱动插件(现位于 `acp`)。它使用 `@agentclientprotocol/sdk` 的 `AgentSideConnection`(基于 stdin/stdout),仅编排接口服务:agent 创建/恢复工厂、会话持久化、工具注册表、用户交互,以及可选的审批/bash 能力。它不修改 agent loop,也不是能力 seam 的实现。
桥接层实现以下稳定的会话路径:
- `initialize` 协商协议版本,声明支持 text 与 `resource_link` 类型的提示词,并声明 `loadSession` 能力。
- `session/new` 校验绝对路径 `cwd`,将其存入 `SessionHeader`,通过 `ctx.agents` 创建 agent,并返回由组合层支持的配置选项。
- `session/load` 在构造 agent 之前校验请求的 cwd 与持久化元数据是否一致,在异步恢复期间保留 id,将用户/助手/工具事件作为 ACP update 回放,并报告恢复后的 config-option 折叠结果。
- `session/prompt` 接受文本和 resource link,拒绝不支持的或空的内容,每个会话同时只允许一个 in-flight 提示词,并在该提示词所属的 `turn/end` 时结算。错误轮次拒绝 RPC;其他关闭轮次的原因通过一个全覆盖的 ACP stop-reason 编解码器映射。
- `session/cancel` 调用队列感知的 agent 取消路径,仅结算被寻址会话的提示词。
工具调用的展示仍由工具自身负责。工具的 `presentCall` 和 `presentResult` 返回 `generic`、`terminal` 或 `diff` 渲染意图变体;桥接层对该联合类型做 switch 并映射到 ACP。没有 presenter 的工具获得通用回退。Bash 终端卡片使用 Zed 的能力门控约定 `_meta.terminal_info`、`_meta.terminal_output` 和 `_meta.terminal_exit`;harness 仍通过 `ctx.bash` 执行命令,保留沙箱、环境清洗、所有权和 cwd。不支持该扩展的客户端收到普通文本内容。文件系统工具提供 diff 卡片和文件位置,桥接层中无需硬编码工具名分支。
权限处理是[用户审批 seam](2026-07-06-approval-seam.md)上的一个 answerer,而非 ACP 中的「每次工具调用都询问」策略。对桥接层所属 agent 且带有 call id 的 `approval/request`,会变为该 agent 编辑器会话上的 `session/request_permission`,提供一次性允许/拒绝选项。外部请求或无 call id 的请求委托给下游;缺失或失败的 answerer 会在故障时保持拒绝。发起询问的插件(如预执行策略或 bash 升级)拥有「是否询问」的决策权。
当 `ctx.permission` 被组合时,桥接层从部署的预设表中暴露一个 `permission` select。已发布的 `workspace-write` 和 `danger-full-access` 预设各自捆绑一个沙箱模式与一条审批策略;无法匹配的有效旋钮组合产生只能切走的 `custom` 状态。`session/set_config_option` 通过 `PermissionService.set()` 校验并写入两个所属旋钮事件。在开放轮次中的切换立即追加;空闲时的切换叠加在响应中,并在下一次 `agent/prompt-submit` 时锚定到开放轮次之前的请求组装阶段。在此之前它仅存于内存,因此崩溃后恢复的是持久化的折叠结果。ACP session mode 不被建模,因为 config option 是面向未来的协议表面;`AcpConfig.model` 保持连接级别。
桥接层还提供基于 ACP 的 `UserInteractionProvider`:`ask_user_question` 请求变为所属会话上的表单引导。select、multi-select、选项描述与自定义回答覆盖语义均被保留。
生命周期所有权是显式的。桥接层为每个活跃会话持有一个 `AgentHandle`。断连和 Cordis dispose(资源释放)会取消待处理的提示词,并行 dispose 所有 handle,等待循环完全停稳与持久化刷写,然后移除记录。流通知失败被隔离,因此消失的客户端不会破坏 agent 轮次。ACP 应用组合不加载 stdout logger;一个测试守卫 stdout 仅包含帧化的 JSON-RPC。
当前的协议契约见 [`dsh-acp` 包 README](../../../../packages/acp/acp/README.md)。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**在 `tools/execute` 监听器前置一层,对每个 ACP 所属调用都询问权限**:否决。这会将权限策略硬编码到 UI 桥接层,即使没有策略要求也会询问,且无法服务于执行开始后才产生的审批请求。共享的 user-approval seam 将机制、询问策略和 UI answerer 分离。
**注入具体的 `agentLoop`**:否决。agent 的创建、恢复、空闲观察与释放是 `dsh-agent` 上的接口级所有权操作;UI 插件不需要依赖规则例外。
**通过 ACP `terminal/*` 执行 bash**:否决。这会将执行移到 harness 之外,绕过其沙箱、凭证清洗、任务所有权、cwd 解析与会话日志。终端元数据仅用于展示。
**将权限预设表示为 ACP session mode**:否决。部署定义的预设已经是一个 config-option select,而 session mode 是 ACP v2 计划移除的遗留接口。
**防御性劫持 stdout**:否决。进程级 monkey-patching 超出 Cordis 副作用所有权范围,且与协议传输存在竞争。应用组合拥有 stdout 纯净性。
## 后果
编辑器可以通过一条 ACP 连接创建、加载、提交提示词、取消、渲染、询问和重新配置多个 harness 会话,无需依赖特定的循环实现。会话事件日志仍是回放、提示词结算、cwd 与每会话配置的持久真源。工具展示与人工回答通道仍是可扩展的插件契约,而非 ACP 专属行为。
桥接层有意不实现会话列表/删除/恢复/关闭能力、MCP 透传、附加目录、图片/音频/嵌入资源提示词、plan、斜杠命令、用量更新、编辑器文件系统委托或 ACP 终端执行子协议。后续已通过标准会话配置选项加入运行时模型选择,见 [LLM 目录与 ACP 选择 Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-15-llm-model-catalog-and-acp-selection.md)。
空闲时的配置选择在实时响应中是真实的,但在下一次 `agent/prompt-submit` 将其锚定到开放轮次之前不具持久性。在该边界之前崩溃会丢失待定选择;这是保持会话事件封闭于轮次内且回放安全的代价。
## 验证
ACP 测试套件覆盖内存协议编解码器、创建/加载回放、精确的提示词结算、取消竞争、不支持的内容、工具展示、终端能力回退、权限结果映射、config-option 校验与持久化、多会话隔离、断连/释放后的完全停稳,以及 HMR(热模块替换)清理。快照测试与 built-bin 测试验证应用组合,真实 API 的 e2e 测试在无 key 时自动跳过。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-15-code-mode.md: 8e964eeb36e430b58312427e45cf8e4a99582457
2026-06-15-code-mode.zh.md: 3de1adfcf287b69ca8307244bde35f286ce4b99d
2026-06-15-code-mode.md: 38d1ebdda089f1cfa1c5f3192fa2399b3a00102b
2026-06-15-code-mode.zh.md: 2ddccb005b806fee0b1f4d6f79d6473f492a117d

View File

@@ -40,9 +40,9 @@ This note owns Code Mode's presentation, composition, isolation, and settlement
### The run_code tool and the dispatch bridge
Under `'code'` and `'both'` the registry owns `run_code` as a reserved presentation transport with one required parameter, `{ code: string }`. It is represented by a normal `ToolDefinition` for dispatch but stays outside the filterable capability layers, so restrictions cannot accidentally remove Code Mode's only entry point. Calls traverse the complete tool pipeline — `tools/pre-execute` → monotonic guards → `tools/execute` around dispatch → `tools/post-execute` → optional definition-owned `finalizeContent` → immutable `tools/result` notification — exactly like native calls; a permission plugin can inspect the program text before it runs, and final-result observers see the normalized outer outcome. Its `execute(args, exec)`:
Under `'code'` and `'both'` the registry owns `run_code` as a reserved presentation transport with two required parameters, `{ code: string; description: string }` (the description labels the call in UIs, the bash precedent). It is represented by a normal `ToolDefinition` for dispatch but stays outside the filterable capability layers, so restrictions cannot accidentally remove Code Mode's only entry point. Calls traverse the complete tool pipeline — `tools/pre-execute` → monotonic guards → `tools/execute` around dispatch → `tools/post-execute` → optional definition-owned `finalizeContent` → immutable `tools/result` notification — exactly like native calls; a permission plugin can inspect the program text before it runs, and final-result observers see the normalized outer outcome. Its `execute(args, exec)`:
1. **Build bindings.** One run-scoped signal follows outer cancellation and is aborted whenever the run settles. Each visible tool binding snapshots lossless-JSON arguments, waits on the serialization queue, executes with a deterministic call id and the outer token as `parent`, defers returned contexts through the outer execution, and logs `tool/code-dispatch`. Success returns the tool's final canonical JSON value; failure becomes the program-visible `ToolCallError`. Every sub-call retains its own immutable execution identity and traverses the full tool pipeline.
1. **Build bindings.** One run-scoped signal follows outer cancellation and is aborted whenever the run settles. Each visible tool binding snapshots lossless-JSON arguments, enters the native-contract dispatch pool (the [live-parallel note](2026-07-26-code-mode-live-parallel-dispatch.md) owns the scheduling design), executes with a deterministic call id and the outer token as `parent`, defers returned contexts through the outer execution, and logs the `tool/code-dispatch-start`/`tool/code-dispatch` pair, the settle side carrying the full rendered result content. Success returns the tool's final canonical JSON value; failure becomes the program-visible `ToolCallError`. Every sub-call retains its own immutable execution identity and traverses the full tool pipeline.
2. **Runs the program**: `ctx.codeRuntime.run({ program: args.code, bindings: [{ global: 'tools', functions }], signal: runController.signal })`. The runtime receives the run-scoped signal, not only the caller's outer signal, so any way the outer run settles also aborts work inside the runtime.
3. **Settle after quiescence.** When the runtime settles, the bridge aborts outstanding work and drains the dispatch queue before returning. Success returns captured logs and the completion value as canonical output; the registry renders that value into durable `tool/result.content`, which the result card reads directly. A runtime failure becomes `CodeRunFailedError`; backend rejection uses the registry's normal error boundary. Both produce structured error results, and no sub-call can append after `run_code` settles.
@@ -50,11 +50,11 @@ Under `'code'` and `'both'` the registry owns `run_code` as a reserved presentat
**Concurrency is serialized.** Each run owns a dispatch queue, so even `Promise.all` executes tool calls in submission order. Settlement abandons queued calls that have not started. Parallelism requires per-tool concurrency-safety metadata.
**Presentation.** `run_code`'s render intent is decided here per the [render-intent Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md): `presentCall` creates a `generic` card with `kind: 'execute'`, the program text as its title, and the same program text as `rawInput`; `run_code` intentionally declares no `presentResult`, so the TUI and host/client runtime (Web) complete that card through their generic raw-content fallback using the final durable `tool/result.content`, including captured logs plus the returned value, failure, or post-policy spill preview. This is not a `terminal` card: that card's semantics are "a shell command in a working directory", which a program is not. See the [result-card completeness note](../bug-fix/2026-07-20-code-mode-result-card-completeness.md).
**Presentation.** `run_code`'s render intent is decided here per the [render-intent Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md): `presentCall` creates a `generic` card with `kind: 'execute'`, the program text as its title, and the same program text as `rawInput`; `run_code` intentionally declares no `presentResult`, so the TUI and host/client runtime (Web) complete that card through their generic raw-content fallback using the final durable `tool/result.content`, including captured logs plus the returned value, failure, or post-policy spill preview. This is not a `terminal` card: that card's semantics are "a shell command in a working directory", which a program is not. See the [result-card completeness note](../../archived/bug-fix/2026-07-20-code-mode-result-card-completeness.md).
### Observability: `tool/code-dispatch`
Each sub-dispatch appends a log-only `tool/code-dispatch` event containing parent and child call ids, tool identity, normalized arguments, and result summary. It remains outside model history but available to persistence and UIs. Appends occur inside the open `run_code` turn. Direct executions without an agent still run but cannot log the event.
Each sub-dispatch appends a log-only `tool/code-dispatch-start` event at pool entry and a `tool/code-dispatch` settle event containing parent and child call ids, tool identity, normalized arguments, and the complete rendered `content`/`isError` outcome. It remains outside model history but available to persistence and UIs. Appends occur inside the open `run_code` turn. Direct executions without an agent still run but cannot log the event.
### The code-runtime seam

View File

@@ -40,9 +40,9 @@ Cloudflare 的 [Code Mode](https://blog.cloudflare.com/code-mode/) 提出了一
### run_code 工具与分发桥
在 `'code'` 和 `'both'` 下,注册表拥有 `run_code` 作为保留的呈现传输通道,带一个必需参数 `{ code: string }`。它由一个正常的 `ToolDefinition` 表示以供分发,但位于可过滤的能力层之外,因此限制规则不会意外移除 Code Mode 的唯一入口。调用遍历完整的工具流水线——`tools/pre-execute` → 单调守卫 → `tools/execute` 包裹分发 → `tools/post-execute` → 由定义拥有的可选 `finalizeContent` → 不可变的 `tools/result` 通知——与原生调用完全一致;权限插件可以在程序运行前检查程序文本,最终结果观察者看到的是规范化的外层结果。其 `execute(args, exec)`:
在 `'code'` 和 `'both'` 下,注册表拥有 `run_code` 作为保留的呈现传输通道,带两个必需参数 `{ code: string; description: string }`(description 为 UI 标注该调用,沿用 bash 的先例)。它由一个正常的 `ToolDefinition` 表示以供分发,但位于可过滤的能力层之外,因此限制规则不会意外移除 Code Mode 的唯一入口。调用遍历完整的工具流水线——`tools/pre-execute` → 单调守卫 → `tools/execute` 包裹分发 → `tools/post-execute` → 由定义拥有的可选 `finalizeContent` → 不可变的 `tools/result` 通知——与原生调用完全一致;权限插件可以在程序运行前检查程序文本,最终结果观察者看到的是规范化的外层结果。其 `execute(args, exec)`:
1. **构建绑定。** 一个 run 级别的 signal 跟随外层取消,并在 run 结算时被 abort。每个可见工具绑定都会对无损 JSON 参数创建快照,等待序列化队列,以确定性的 call id 和外层 token 作为 `parent` 执行,通过外层 execution 延后返回的上下文,并记录 `tool/code-dispatch`。成功时返回工具最终的规范 JSON 值;失败则变为程序可见的 `ToolCallError`。每个子调用保留自己不可变的执行标识,并遍历完整的工具流水线。
1. **构建绑定。** 一个 run 级别的 signal 跟随外层取消,并在 run 结算时被 abort。每个可见工具绑定都会对无损 JSON 参数创建快照,进入原生契约的分发池(调度设计由[实时并行 Agent Note](2026-07-26-code-mode-live-parallel-dispatch.md) 负责),以确定性的 call id 和外层 token 作为 `parent` 执行,通过外层 execution 延后返回的上下文,并记录 `tool/code-dispatch-start`/`tool/code-dispatch` 事件对,其中结算侧携带完整渲染后的结果内容。成功时返回工具最终的规范 JSON 值;失败则变为程序可见的 `ToolCallError`。每个子调用保留自己不可变的执行标识,并遍历完整的工具流水线。
2. **运行程序**:`ctx.codeRuntime.run({ program: args.code, bindings: [{ global: 'tools', functions }], signal: runController.signal })`。运行时接收的是 run 级别的 signal 而非仅调用方的外层 signal,因此外层 run 以任何方式结算都会同时 abort 运行时内部的工作。
3. **完全停稳后结算。** 运行时结算后,桥 abort 未完成的工作并排空分发队列后再返回。成功时返回捕获的日志和完成值,将其作为规范输出;注册表再把该值渲染为持久化的 `tool/result.content`,供结果卡片直接读取。运行时失败变为 `CodeRunFailedError`;后端拒绝使用注册表的正常错误边界。两者都产生结构化的错误结果,且 `run_code` 结算后不允许子调用追加。
@@ -50,11 +50,11 @@ Cloudflare 的 [Code Mode](https://blog.cloudflare.com/code-mode/) 提出了一
**并发被序列化。** 每次 run 拥有一个分发队列,因此即使 `Promise.all` 也按提交顺序执行工具调用。结算时放弃尚未开始的排队调用。并行化需要每个工具的并发安全元数据。
**呈现。** `run_code` 的 render intent 按[呈现意图 Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md)在此决定:`presentCall` 创建一个 `generic` 卡片,`kind: 'execute'`,以程序文本作为标题,并将同一程序文本作为 `rawInput`;`run_code` 有意不声明 `presentResult`,因此 TUI 和宿主/客户端运行时(Web)会通过通用原始内容回退机制,使用最终持久化的 `tool/result.content` 补全该卡片,其中包括捕获的日志,以及返回值、失败信息或 post-policy 输出落盘预览。这不是 `terminal` 卡片:该卡片的语义是「工作目录中的 shell 命令」,程序不是。参见[结果卡片完整性说明](../bug-fix/2026-07-20-code-mode-result-card-completeness.md)。
**呈现。** `run_code` 的 render intent 按[呈现意图 Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md)在此决定:`presentCall` 创建一个 `generic` 卡片,`kind: 'execute'`,以程序文本作为标题,并将同一程序文本作为 `rawInput`;`run_code` 有意不声明 `presentResult`,因此 TUI 和宿主/客户端运行时(Web)会通过通用原始内容回退机制,使用最终持久化的 `tool/result.content` 补全该卡片,其中包括捕获的日志,以及返回值、失败信息或 post-policy 输出落盘预览。这不是 `terminal` 卡片:该卡片的语义是「工作目录中的 shell 命令」,程序不是。参见[结果卡片完整性说明](../../archived/bug-fix/2026-07-20-code-mode-result-card-completeness.md)。
### 可观测性:`tool/code-dispatch`
每次子分发追加一个仅日志的 `tool/code-dispatch` 事件,包含父子 call id、工具标识、规范化参数和结果摘要。它不进入模型历史,但可供持久化和 UI 使用。追加发生在开放的 `run_code` 轮次内。没有 agent 的直接执行仍然运行,但无法记录该事件。
每次子分发在进入分发池时追加一个仅日志的 `tool/code-dispatch-start` 事件,并以一个 `tool/code-dispatch` 结算事件收尾,后者包含父子 call id、工具标识、规范化参数以及完整渲染后的 `content`/`isError` 结果。它不进入模型历史,但可供持久化和 UI 使用。追加发生在开放的 `run_code` 轮次内。没有 agent 的直接执行仍然运行,但无法记录该事件。
### code-runtime seam

View File

@@ -1,50 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Rich ACP bash rendering — the terminal card via the `_meta` convention
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-06-18-acp-terminal-and-tool-rendering.zh.md)
> Superseded for ACP by [ACP as an automation-only protocol](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md). Tool render intents remain available to UI transports, but ACP no longer projects them into terminal cards.
## Problem
The ACP bridge lets each tool own its call rendering via `presentCall`/`presentResult` (see [tool-call UI presentation](2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.md) and `packages/core/tools`). For `bash` we surface the exact command as the `tool_call` title, the model's `description` as a content text block, `kind: 'execute'`, and the completed output wrapped in a fenced ` ```console ` text block.
Reference editors render terminal metadata as a dedicated card with cwd, command, live-style output, and exit status; plain text loses that structure. The command is the title because execute cards hide raw input, while the human-readable description remains a separate block above the card.
## Key finding: agent-executed terminals use a `_meta` convention, NOT `terminal/create`
The ACP spec has a *client-side* terminal sub-protocol — the agent calls the client's `terminal/create` with `{ command, args, cwd, env }` and the **editor** executes the process, then the agent reads `terminal/output` / `wait_for_exit`. That model is wrong for us: our harness executes bash itself through `dsh-bash` (sandboxed env-scrub, background-task ownership, per-session cwd). Routing execution to the editor would bypass all of that and fork execution into two backends.
Studying the two reference agents (2026-06-18) shows neither uses `terminal/create` for their own shell tool — **both keep agent-side execution and emit a `_meta` convention** that Zed special-cases:
- **`claude-agent-acp`** (`tools.ts`, `acp-agent.ts`): gated on `clientCapabilities._meta.terminal_output`. The `tool_call` carries `content: [{ type: 'terminal', terminalId }]` and `_meta.terminal_info.{ terminal_id, cwd }`; output/exit arrive on the `tool_call_update`'s `_meta.terminal_output.{ terminal_id, data }` and `_meta.terminal_exit.{ terminal_id, exit_code, signal }`.
- **`codex-acp`** (`CodexToolCallMapper.ts`, `TerminalOutputMode.ts`): same `terminal_info` on the call; output via `_meta.terminal_output` (full) or `_meta.terminal_output_delta` (incremental), selected from the same `_meta.terminal_output` capability.
Zed's side (`crates/agent_servers/src/acp.rs`, verified): on a `ToolCall` whose `_meta.terminal_info.terminal_id` is set, it registers a **display-only** terminal (header = `terminal_info.cwd`, label = `tool_call.title`); on a `ToolCallUpdate`, `_meta.terminal_output.data` writes to that terminal and `_meta.terminal_exit.{exit_code,signal}` sets the status. It advertises the capability as `clientCapabilities._meta.terminal_output = true`. `_meta` itself is a spec-blessed ACP extensibility point (typed `{[k]: unknown} | null` on `ToolCall`/`ToolCallUpdate`); the *specific keys* here (`terminal_info`/`terminal_output`/`terminal_exit`) are a Zed convention, not part of the ACP spec — but they are the de-facto contract for the Zed integration and the only way to get the terminal card while keeping execution agent-side.
## Decision
Keep `dsh-bash` agent-side execution; render the terminal card via the `_meta` convention, capability-gated, with the ` ```console ` text block as the guaranteed fallback.
1. **Capability.** `initialize` reads `clientCapabilities._meta.terminal_output` and the bridge remembers it per connection.
2. **Neutral presentation vocabulary.** `dsh-tools` gains a terminal-shaped presentation a tool can return — provider-neutral (`cwd`, the output `data`, an `exitCode`/`signal`), NO ACP types. `dsh-tool-bash` returns it for `bash` (cwd from the resolved workdir; output + exit parsed from the run result).
3. **Bridge mapping.** When the client advertised the capability, the bridge maps that presentation to: on `tool_call`, `content:[…, {type:'terminal', terminalId}]` (any tool `content`, e.g. the description, rendered BEFORE the terminal block) + `_meta.terminal_info.{terminal_id,cwd}`; on `tool_call_update`, `_meta.terminal_output.{terminal_id,data}` (the captured output) + `_meta.terminal_exit.{terminal_id, exit_code|signal}` (the parsed exit), with the update's text `content` OMITTED (an ACP `tool_call_update.content` REPLACES the call's content collection, so re-sending the fenced block would clobber the terminal content block). `terminalId` is derived from the harness `callId` (stable, unique per call). When the capability is absent, the bridge sends the description content block on the call and the existing ` ```console ` text content on the update — unchanged.
4. **The exit pill is parsed from the rendered output; no new execution path, no live streaming.** Output is attached at completion (from the agent's own `tool/result`), not streamed token-by-token. The exit-status pill (`_meta.terminal_exit.{exit_code,signal}`) IS emitted: the pure `presentResult(args, result)` seam sees only content blocks, so `dsh-tool-bash` recovers the structured exit by parsing the status markers (`[exit code: N]` / `[killed by signal: …]`) that `renderResult` appended — the parse is the exact inverse of the marker emission, the two co-evolve in one file, and a round-trip test guards the pair. Disposal is unaffected: nothing new to tear down, since the bridge never creates a client-side terminal.
## Alternatives considered
- **The ACP client-side terminal sub-protocol (`terminal/create`)** — explicitly rejected: the editor would execute the process, bypassing `dsh-bash`'s env scrub, background-task ownership, and per-session cwd, and forking execution into two backends. Both reference agents reject it the same way (the key finding above); agent-side execution plus the `_meta` convention is the only shape that yields the terminal card while keeping the harness's execution policy.
- **Threading a structured exit through the event schema** — rejected in favor of the marker round-trip: the pure `presentResult(args, result)` seam sees only content blocks, and the parse is the exact inverse of the marker emission, co-evolving in one file under a round-trip test.
## Consequences
- **Zed-convention `_meta` keys.** The terminal card rides on Zed-specific keys (`terminal_info`/`terminal_output`/`terminal_exit`) inside ACP's spec-blessed `_meta` extensibility point, NOT on the ACP terminal sub-protocol. A client that doesn't recognize the keys still gets the text fallback (the capability gate ensures we only emit them when the client opted in via `_meta.terminal_output`), so a non-Zed client is never worse off. If ACP later standardizes agent-executed terminals, migrate to that and drop the convention keys.
- **Capability honesty.** Emit terminal metadata ONLY when the client advertised `_meta.terminal_output`; the text fallback is the contract for everyone else and must never regress. Covered by a no-capability test asserting the ` ```console ` path.
- **terminalId collisions.** Deriving it from the per-call `callId` keeps it unique within a session and stable across the call/result pair; never reuse one across calls.
- **Exit parsed from rendered text.** The exit pill recovers `exit_code`/`signal` by parsing `renderResult`'s status markers rather than threading a structured exit through the event schema (which the pure `presentResult` seam never sees). The parse is the exact inverse of the marker emission and lives in the same file; a round-trip test pins the pair so a marker-format change that breaks the parse fails the suite. If the markers ever need to diverge from what the pill wants, surface a structured exit on the result event instead.
- **Provider-neutral vocabulary creep.** The terminal presentation widens the `dsh-tools` surface; keep it neutral (no ACP types leak into `dsh-tools`) and only as rich as a second UI consumer would also want.
## Out of scope / non-goals
The text-block baseline stays the no-capability default. Two follow-ups are deliberately NOT built here and would each warrant their own Agent Note when someone takes them on: **live incremental streaming** (`_meta.terminal_output_delta` as chunks arrive, which needs an incremental-output seam on `dsh-bash`), and **command classification** (parsing a `cat`/`sed` as a `read` card with a file location, a `grep` as a `search`, etc., falling back to the terminal card — display-only, must never change what executes).

View File

@@ -1,50 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 富 ACP bash 渲染——通过 `_meta` 约定实现终端卡片
Status: implemented
[English](2026-06-18-acp-terminal-and-tool-rendering.md) | 中文
> 就 ACP 而言已被 [ACP 作为仅面向自动化的协议](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md)取代。工具渲染意图对 UI 传输层仍然可用,但 ACP 不再将其投影为终端卡片。
## 问题
ACP(Agent Client Protocol)桥接层允许每个工具通过 `presentCall`/`presentResult` 自行控制调用渲染(见[工具调用 UI 呈现](2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.md)与 `packages/core/tools`)。对于 `bash`,我们将确切命令作为 `tool_call` 标题呈现,模型的 `description` 作为一个内容文本块,`kind: 'execute'`,完成后的输出包裹在 ` ```console ` 围栏文本块中。
参考编辑器将终端元数据渲染为一张专用卡片,包含 cwd、命令、实时风格的输出和退出状态;纯文本则丢失了这些结构。命令之所以作为标题,是因为执行卡片隐藏原始输入,而人类可读的描述保留为卡片上方的独立块。
## 关键发现:agent 执行的终端使用 `_meta` 约定,而非 `terminal/create`
ACP 规范有一个*客户端侧*终端子协议:agent(智能体)调用客户端的 `terminal/create`(传入 `{ command, args, cwd, env }`),由**编辑器**执行进程,然后 agent 读取 `terminal/output` / `wait_for_exit`。这个模型不适合我们:我们的 harness 通过 `dsh-bash` 自行执行 bash(沙箱化的环境清理、后台任务所有权、按会话的 cwd)。将执行路由到编辑器会绕过所有这些机制,并将执行分叉到两个后端。
研究两个参考 agent(2026-06-18)发现,二者都没有为自己的 shell 工具使用 `terminal/create`——**两者都保持 agent 侧执行,并发出一套 `_meta` 约定**,由 Zed 特殊处理:
- **`claude-agent-acp`**(`tools.ts`、`acp-agent.ts`):以 `clientCapabilities._meta.terminal_output` 为门控。`tool_call` 携带 `content: [{ type: 'terminal', terminalId }]` 与 `_meta.terminal_info.{ terminal_id, cwd }`;输出和退出通过 `tool_call_update` 的 `_meta.terminal_output.{ terminal_id, data }` 与 `_meta.terminal_exit.{ terminal_id, exit_code, signal }` 到达。
- **`codex-acp`**(`CodexToolCallMapper.ts`、`TerminalOutputMode.ts`):调用上同样携带 `terminal_info`;输出通过 `_meta.terminal_output`(完整)或 `_meta.terminal_output_delta`(增量),由同一个 `_meta.terminal_output` 能力选择。
Zed 侧(`crates/agent_servers/src/acp.rs`,已验证):收到 `ToolCall` 且其 `_meta.terminal_info.terminal_id` 已设置时,注册一个**仅展示**的终端(header = `terminal_info.cwd`,label = `tool_call.title`);收到 `ToolCallUpdate` 时,`_meta.terminal_output.data` 写入该终端,`_meta.terminal_exit.{exit_code,signal}` 设置状态。客户端通过 `clientCapabilities._meta.terminal_output = true` 声明此能力。`_meta` 本身是 ACP 规范认可的扩展点(在 `ToolCall`/`ToolCallUpdate` 上类型为 `{[k]: unknown} | null`);这里的*具体键*(`terminal_info`/`terminal_output`/`terminal_exit`)是 Zed 约定,不属于 ACP 规范,但它们是 Zed 集成的事实契约,也是在保持 agent 侧执行的前提下获得终端卡片的唯一方式。
## 决策
保持 `dsh-bash` 的 agent 侧执行;通过 `_meta` 约定渲染终端卡片,以能力声明为门控,以 ` ```console ` 文本块作为保底回退。
1. **能力声明。** `initialize` 读取 `clientCapabilities._meta.terminal_output`,桥接层按连接记住它。
2. **提供方无关的展示词汇。** `dsh-tools` 新增一种终端形态的展示结构,工具可返回它——提供方无关(`cwd`、输出 `data`、`exitCode`/`signal`),不含 ACP 类型。`dsh-tool-bash` 为 `bash` 返回该结构(cwd 来自解析后的工作目录;输出与退出从运行结果解析)。
3. **桥接映射。** 当客户端声明了该能力时,桥接层将展示结构映射为:在 `tool_call` 上,`content:[…, {type:'terminal', terminalId}]`(工具的任何 `content`,如描述,渲染在终端块之前)+ `_meta.terminal_info.{terminal_id,cwd}`;在 `tool_call_update` 上,`_meta.terminal_output.{terminal_id,data}`(捕获的输出)+ `_meta.terminal_exit.{terminal_id, exit_code|signal}`(解析后的退出),且 update 的文本 `content` 被省略(ACP 的 `tool_call_update.content` 会替换调用的 content 集合,因此重新发送围栏块会覆盖终端内容块)。`terminalId` 由 harness 的 `callId` 派生(稳定、每次调用唯一)。当能力未声明时,桥接层在调用上发送描述内容块,在 update 上发送既有的 ` ```console ` 文本内容——行为不变。
4. **退出信息从渲染输出中解析;无新执行路径,无实时流式传输。** 输出在完成时附加(来自 agent 自身的 `tool/result`),不逐 token 流式传输。退出状态(`_meta.terminal_exit.{exit_code,signal}`)确实会发出:纯 `presentResult(args, result)` seam 只能看到内容块,因此 `dsh-tool-bash` 通过解析 `renderResult` 追加的状态标记(`[exit code: N]` / `[killed by signal: …]`)来恢复结构化退出信息——解析是标记发出的精确逆操作,二者在同一文件中共同演进,一个往返测试守护这对关系。资源释放不受影响:无需新增拆除逻辑,因为桥接层从未创建客户端侧终端。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
- **ACP 客户端侧终端子协议(`terminal/create`)**:明确否决。编辑器将执行进程,绕过 `dsh-bash` 的环境清理、后台任务所有权和按会话的 cwd,并将执行分叉到两个后端。两个参考 agent 以同样的方式否决了它(见上述关键发现);agent 侧执行加 `_meta` 约定是在保持 harness 执行策略的同时获得终端卡片的唯一形态。
- **通过事件 schema 传递结构化退出信息**:否决,改用标记往返方案。纯 `presentResult(args, result)` seam 只能看到内容块,而解析是标记发出的精确逆操作,二者在同一文件中共同演进,由往返测试守护。
## 后果
- **Zed 约定的 `_meta` 键。** 终端卡片依赖 Zed 特有的键(`terminal_info`/`terminal_output`/`terminal_exit`),位于 ACP 规范认可的 `_meta` 扩展点内,而非 ACP 终端子协议。不识别这些键的客户端仍然获得文本回退(能力门控确保我们仅在客户端通过 `_meta.terminal_output` 声明支持时才发出这些键),因此非 Zed 客户端不会变差。如果 ACP 日后标准化了 agent 执行的终端,则迁移到该标准并移除约定键。
- **能力诚实。** 仅在客户端声明了 `_meta.terminal_output` 时才发出终端元数据;文本回退是对其他所有客户端的契约,绝不可退化。由一个无能力测试覆盖,断言 ` ```console ` 路径。
- **terminalId 冲突。** 从每次调用的 `callId` 派生,保证在会话内唯一且在 call/result 对之间稳定;绝不跨调用复用。
- **退出信息从渲染文本解析。** 退出信息通过解析 `renderResult` 的状态标记恢复 `exit_code`/`signal`,而非通过事件 schema 传递结构化退出(纯 `presentResult` seam 看不到后者)。解析是标记发出的精确逆操作,且位于同一文件中;往返测试固定了这对关系,标记格式变更若破坏解析则测试套件失败。如果标记格式日后需要与退出信息分道扬镳,则改为在 result 事件上暴露结构化退出。
- **提供方无关词汇的蔓延。** 终端展示结构扩大了 `dsh-tools` 的接口面;保持其中立性(不让 ACP 类型泄漏到 `dsh-tools`),且只提供第二个 UI 消费方同样需要的丰富度。
## 超出范围 / 非目标
文本块基线仍为无能力声明时的默认行为。以下两项后续工作有意不在此处构建,各自需要单独的 Agent Note:**实时增量流式传输**(在分片到达时发出 `_meta.terminal_output_delta`,需要在 `dsh-bash` 上新增增量输出 seam);**命令分类**(将 `cat`/`sed` 解析为带文件位置的 `read` 卡片,将 `grep` 解析为 `search`,回退到终端卡片——仅展示,绝不改变实际执行内容)。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md: a6e0956f289cfc810da766fd0cae94b97baf5280
2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.zh.md: acc5614727cf67881832af1685be557d675696e7
2026-06-24-workspace-context.md: 6acdb6241bcc57250e217cfc8856e8b0598d4622
2026-06-24-workspace-context.zh.md: f165d08108931df21697c7895523f10ef816297f

View File

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-06-24-workspace-context.zh.md)
## Problem
Repository guidance such as `AGENTS.md` belongs in a coding session's effective context so project conventions, build commands, and review rules arrive without repeated user pasting. The stdio and ACP products need the same behavior, isolated by session cwd: a global system-prompt section leaks one workspace's files into another live ACP session.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
# Agent Note: 工作区上下文指令文件
Status: implemented
[English](2026-06-24-workspace-context.md) | 中文
## 问题
`AGENTS.md` 等仓库指引应当进入编码会话的有效上下文,使项目约定、构建命令和评审规则无需由用户反复粘贴即可生效。stdio 与 ACP(Agent Client Protocol)产品需要具备相同行为,并按会话 cwd 隔离:全局系统提示词章节会把一个工作区的文件泄漏到另一个仍在运行的 ACP 会话中。
相邻产品形成了值得借鉴的约定,但具体做法各不相同。Codex 原生使用 `AGENTS.md`;Claude Code 使用 `CLAUDE.md`,并采用熟悉的 system-reminder 风格用户上下文;opencode 同时支持这两个名称,每个目录只选一个胜出者,并延迟发现嵌套文件。harness 需要跨工具兼容,同时避免从同一作用域加载重复或互相矛盾的文件。
生命周期中有两类截然不同的内容。初始适用文件链足够稳定,可以放入请求前缀并受益于提供方前缀缓存。嵌套文件、编辑、候选项切换和移除都发生在会话启动后,应进入持久的仅追加历史,而不是被冻结的前缀。
## 决策
该实现在 `packages/context/workspace-context` 中,包(package)名为 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-workspace-context`。它是请求上下文扩展,不是核心服务或文件系统后端。共享 demo 主干与 Host Runtime 根据显式的 `{ maxBytes } | false` 部署选择挂载它;`dsh web` 启用 65,536 字节预算,Host Runtime 的 headless 消费方则禁用它。该插件使用 `agent/session-prefix`、`tools/post-execute` 和可选的 `ctx.fs` 功能。
插件不会静态注入 `fs`。因此,不带提供方的产品树仍能正常启动;在文件系统提供方出现之前,插件保持无操作。所有生产读取都通过该提供方完成。候选项探测会解析每个路径并对结果执行 stat,因此会跟随最终路径组件的符号链接至其目标:指向普通文件的链接会被加载,缺失路径或非文件目标则确认为不存在。允许仓库拥有的链接跨越信任边界,是对最初不跟随探测方式的刻意反转;[跟随指令符号链接记录](2026-07-21-follow-instruction-symlinks.md)负责说明该决策及其残余风险。会话前缀信号与动态工具执行信号会贯穿解析、元数据探测和流式读取,因此取消不会等待无关的文件系统扫描。解析或 stat 异常归类为不可用:它只跳过该候选项,绝不被解释为已经加载的作用域被删除。
### 文件名与优先级
默认的逐目录候选列表是 `['AGENTS.md', 'CLAUDE.md']`。该列表可通过 `instructionFileCandidates` 配置;`AGENTS.md` 是普通的第一候选项,而不是隐藏优先级。一个目录中只加载第一个存在的普通文件候选项。使用默认值时,`AGENTS.md` 是原生文件,`CLAUDE.md` 是兼容性回退。第二个列表 `localInstructionFileCandidates`(默认为 `['AGENTS.local.md', 'CLAUDE.local.md']`)会在同一目录的基础文件后加载叠加式本地覆盖层;[默认本地覆盖层记录](2026-07-21-local-instruction-overlay.md)负责说明该决策。
候选条目必须是同一目录中的文件名。空条目、`.`/`..`,以及包含 `/` 或 `\` 的条目会被忽略。其他同目录名称可以显式选择加入;规则目录和导入语义不属于本契约。
用户全局文件固定为 `$DSH_HOME/AGENTS.md`,不受任一候选列表影响,也没有本地覆盖层。`$DSH_HOME` 默认为 `~/.dsh`,与 `~/.codex` 或 `~/.claude` 在 harness 层的 home 角色一致,而不会引入插件专用 home。波浪号展开与默认值位于 `dsh-paths` 中,以便未来的 harness 功能共享同一约定。
### 基线前缀
agent loop(智能体循环)实例的第一次请求会让插件通过 `agent/session-prefix` 提供一条 user 角色消息。它先加载用户全局文件,再从 `agent.session.header.cwd` 向上遍历至配置的根标记(默认为 `.git`)以确定项目根目录,随后从根目录至 cwd 的每级目录各加载一个候选项。`.git` 文件与 `.git` 目录都是有效标记,因而能覆盖链接 worktree 和 submodule。找不到标记时,cwd 本身就是根目录。
插件会在 `await next()` 返回前前置其贡献,因此会话前缀贡献按插件注册顺序出现。在产品主干中,工作区指令的注册先于 skill 目录,所以它排在前面。循环会深度冻结组合后的前缀,将其记录在 `EpochHeader.messagePrefix` 中,并在该实例内逐字复用。它是请求状态,不是 `Session.deriveMessages()` 历史。
恢复 agent 会创建新的循环实例,并使用当前文件重新组合基线;新的前缀由恢复请求 header 锚定。这样,恢复时可以使用当前基线内容,而无需修改先前实例已经使用过的前缀。
基线是一条 user 角色的 `<system-reminder>`,包含 `Instructions from: <path>` 章节,以及明确的权威性与优先级说明。这种熟悉的模型可见框架避免引入 harness 专用的 XML 词汇。项目路径相对于根目录;使用默认 home 时,用户全局路径为 `~/.dsh/AGENTS.md`,使用已配置 home 时则为 `$DSH_HOME/AGENTS.md`。文件内容中的字面量 `</system-reminder>` 会被转义。包 README 负责规定当前准确的[提示词形态](../../../../packages/context/workspace-context/README.md#prompt-shape)。
### 动态发现与刷新
第一方 `read`、`write` 或 `edit` 调用成功后,`tools/post-execute` 监听器会协调被触及的后代路径链,以及该会话已经知道的每个作用域。新到达的作用域通过 `additionalContexts` 返回,并在下一次请求中使用 `Additional instructions from: <path>` system-reminder。在 Code Mode 下,`run_code` 会把子分发上下文延后至其外层结果,因此同一更新只会在父结果之后追加,而不会在调用中途注入。
内容编辑会追加 `Updated instructions from: <path>`,说明新内容取代先前内容,并包含当前的完整文件。如果优先级从一个候选项变为另一个,消息还会指出先前路径并说明它不再适用。如果没有候选项保留,插件会追加 `Instructions removed: <path>`,并说明先前加载的指令不再适用。
动态消息在 `content` 中携带完整的 system-reminder 框架;每个 `context/message` 都作为 user 角色消息逐字抵达模型,核心层不会再添加可选择退出的包装。`context/message.meta` 携带不透明 JSON 状态,该状态会持久化,但绝不会渲染给模型。
shell 命令不会触发发现。本地 bash 调用会启动全新的 shell,而从任意命令字符串推断已到达路径,需要实现提示词插件并不拥有的 shell 语义。
### 重复抑制与变更检测
每个动态工作区上下文事件都会存储带版本的元数据,其形态为 `{ action, scope, path, digest? }`;`digest` 是对已加载内容计算的 SHA-1。模型可见提示词中没有 HTML 注释、隐藏标记,也没有会被解析回状态的标题。
协调时,插件扫描自身拥有的 `context/message` 事件,并派生每个可见作用域的最新状态。一个简短的逐会话待处理映射只会在不可变的顶层 `tools/result` 证明某个 `additionalContexts` 条目经过所有 post-execute 监听器后仍然保留时开始记录;随后,它覆盖循环将该上下文追加到日志之前的间隔。每个条目记录开启状态的 `{ turn, step }`:如果相同的持久 `context/message` 出现在其序列边界或之后,该条目得到确认并被移除;如果匹配的 `step/end` 先到达,则说明循环丢弃了上下文缓冲区,插件会同时移除待处理条目及其版本缓存快速路径。嵌套的 Code Mode 结果会把变更暂存在父级的不透明执行 token 下,确保一次运行中的重复子分发不会产生重复项;父级结果会回滚这份临时状态,并且只提交外层策略保留的上下文。
路径和 digest 均未变化时会被抑制。日志中的移除操作是一条墓碑记录,因此重新出现的候选项会成为新的 `set`。恢复操作从持久化元数据继续工作。如果压缩(compaction)从可见表面移除某条指令事件,该状态不再抑制后续加载,这与模型已经无法看见它的事实一致。只有真正纳入字节预算的变更才会进入元数据或待处理状态,因此被省略的文件在之后的触碰中仍有资格加载。
被冻结的基线会保留一个内存中的 path/digest map 以供比较。后续成功的文件系统触碰会把基线编辑或移除操作追加为动态消息,绝不重写前缀。恢复时重新组合前缀的过程中,插件还会协调可见的动态作用域,因此 agent 离线期间发生的嵌套变更可以在第一次恢复请求前追加更新。
系统刻意不使用文件监视器。检测发生在下一次成功的结构化文件系统触碰或恢复时的前缀组合。提供方失败不会产生移除;只有该作用域中的全部已配置候选项都成功完成探测后,系统才接受「不存在」这一结论。
### 字节预算与有界读取
`maxBytes` 是必填项,分别作用于渲染后的基线或单个动态协调批次;系统不存在隐式或无界的渲染预算。非正数或非有限值会禁用加载。内容超过预算时,系统会先省略较宽泛的文件,再截断最具体的文件。可见的 `Workspace instruction budget ...` 提示会指出被省略和截断的路径与字节数,并且输出绝不超过配置字节数。
`maxSourceBytes` 是正数的逐文件上限,默认为 1 MiB。loader 会在读取前检查报告的大小,同时仍通过 `streamText()` 消费内容并持续统计 UTF-8 字节数,因此缺失/陈旧的元数据无法迫使其进行无界分配。过大的胜出候选项会被视为不可用,而不是改为同目录中的下一个名称。插件刻意不保留进程级缓存,也绝不保留指令正文。它只为每个有效作用域保存 `{ path, version, digest }`,并将这些状态放在 `WeakMap<Session, Map<scope, state>>` 中:提供方 `FsVersion` 与有效提示词状态同时匹配时跳过读取;版本变化则触发有界读取和 SHA-1 确认。SHA-1 仍是持久化在可见结构化元数据中的跨提供方内容标识;提供方版本只作为内存中的失效快速路径。模型可见变更的缓存转换只有在相应上下文通过完整的工具结果策略链后才会提交;如果该已接受上下文随后与中止步骤一起被丢弃、未能进入日志,缓存转换就会失效。
## 考虑过的替代方案
**使用全局 `ctx.systemPrompt.section()`。** 不予采纳,因为同一个 Cordis 上下文可以承载 cwd 不同的多个会话,而仓库所有的文本属于低权威用户上下文,不是最高权威的提供方系统内容。
**在每次 `agent/pre-step` 时注入基线。** 不予采纳,因为重复注入历史会浪费 token、使重复状态复杂化,并妨碍提供方前缀保持结构稳定。前缀组合提供冻结、已记录且逐实例的基线,动态仅追加消息则负责变更。
**在一个目录中同时加载 `AGENTS.md` 和 `CLAUDE.md`。** 不予采纳,因为正在迁移的仓库通常会在两个文件中重复指引。按顺序排列的候选项让优先级显式且可配置。
**解析渲染后的标题或隐藏注释以恢复已加载状态。** 不予采纳,因为指令正文可能包含相同文本,导致无提示的误报。持久化 JSON 元数据提供明确且对模型不可见的状态通道。
**使用模型总结文件。** 不予采纳,因为指令文件本身已经是经过整理的摘要;再执行一次模型调用既不确定,也可能抹掉边界情况要求。使用带字节预算的确定性全文更简单。
## 影响
工作区指引按会话隔离,并由 demo 前端、Web Host 与每一种工具展示模式共享。初始指令受益于稳定的前缀缓存,嵌套与变更内容则保持持久且可回放。通用的 session/agent 上下文契约通过 prompt-submit 与工具执行后的 `additionalContexts` 数组携带 JSON 元数据,而不会把条目展平。
仓库文本仍是不受信任的输入。低权威 user 角色框架、显式优先级说明和分隔符转义可以降低风险,但无法消除提示词注入。跟随候选符号链接到目标,会把该接口扩大至树外内容;因此,把 `ctx.fs` 限制在可信根目录内的权限与沙箱层才是真正的边界,它们让系统把工作区文件当作数据而不是权威([跟随指令符号链接记录](2026-07-21-follow-instruction-symlinks.md)负责说明残余风险)。
系统由事件驱动,而不是文件监视器驱动。除非文件系统变更通过结构化工具完成,否则编辑不会在确切的文件系统变更时刻可见;外部文件变更会在下一次成功的结构化触碰或恢复时被发现。这使设计保持确定性并且与提供方无关。
## 延后事项
从 bash 派生路径报告、递归启动扫描、文件监视器、小写默认名称、`.claude/CLAUDE.md`、`.claude/rules/*.md`、导入指令、ACP `additionalDirectories`、信任确认和模型生成摘要均延后处理。项目目录中的 `.local.` 覆盖层现已默认加载([默认本地覆盖层记录](2026-07-21-local-instruction-overlay.md)负责说明该决策);用户全局覆盖层、目录规则系统和导入仍需要各自的优先级与信任设计。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.md: df1bee2801b0e01b290b63f6edbe2e5b1be80cb7
2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.zh.md: 7fa5cb2aad2b32ef0662df04ff6576be14a3a8e7
2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.md: 760373d64f462e3717a174d5793e6d47ab76b0b4
2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.zh.md: fd29e6049e6a729c2c7e78860ad7c065422da60e

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ The harness gives the model bash and subagent tools but no way to record a struc
## Decision
Add a model-facing `todo_write(todos: [{ content, status }])` tool whose whole-list state lives on the event-sourced session log as a new `todo/write` `SessionEventMap` variant. Interactive hosts render from the durable event; the TUI folds it directly, while the [automation-only ACP bridge](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md) deliberately omits todo presentation.
Add a model-facing `todo_write(todos: [{ content, status }])` tool whose whole-list state lives on the event-sourced session log as a new `todo/write` `SessionEventMap` variant. Interactive hosts render from the durable event: the TUI folds it directly, the web client projects it into `ConversationSnapshot.todos` ([web todo display](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)), while the [automation-only ACP bridge](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md) deliberately omits todo presentation.
### Whole-list replace, three-state status
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ The model sends the entire list every call; the new list replaces the old (last-
### State on the session log, not a service
The list is appended as a `todo/write` event carrying the full `{ todos }` snapshot. The harness is event-sourced — the LLM history, tool calls, and turn structure all live on the log — so the todo list lives there too. This buys durability, replay, and resume reconstruction for free: a reopened session re-derives the current list from the latest `todo/write`, with no separate persistence backend, in-memory service to rehydrate, or extra wiring. An in-memory `ctx.todos` service would have to reinvent all of that.
The list is appended as a `todo/write` event carrying the full `{ todos }` snapshot. The harness is event-sourced — the LLM history, tool calls, and turn structure all live on the log — so the todo list lives there too. This buys durability, replay, and resume reconstruction for free: a reopened session re-derives the current list from the latest `todo/write`, with no separate persistence backend, in-memory service to rehydrate, or extra wiring. An in-memory `ctx.todos` service would have to reinvent all of that. (Full-log consumers get this reconstruction outright; the web client's paged window gets it from the tail history page's host-computed projection — see the [web todo display note](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md).)
### NOT a surface event

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ harness 为模型提供了 bash 和 subagent 工具,却没有办法记录结
## 决策
新增一个面向模型的 `todo_write(todos: [{ content, status }])` 工具,其整列表状态作为新的 `todo/write` `SessionEventMap` 变体存储在事件溯源的会话日志上。交互式宿主从持久事件渲染;TUI 直接折叠它,而[仅面向自动化的 ACP(Agent Client Protocol)桥接层](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md)有意省略 todo 展示。
新增一个面向模型的 `todo_write(todos: [{ content, status }])` 工具,其整列表状态作为新的 `todo/write` `SessionEventMap` 变体存储在事件溯源的会话日志上。交互式宿主从持久事件渲染:TUI 直接折叠它,web 客户端将其投影进 `ConversationSnapshot.todos`([web todo 展示](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)),而[仅面向自动化的 ACP(Agent Client Protocol)桥接层](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md)有意省略 todo 展示。
### 整列表替换,三态 status
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ harness 为模型提供了 bash 和 subagent 工具,却没有办法记录结
### 状态在会话日志上,而非服务
列表作为 `todo/write` 事件追加到日志,携带完整的 `{ todos }` 快照。harness 是事件溯源的——LLM(大语言模型)历史、工具调用和轮次结构都在日志上——所以 todo 列表也在那里。这免费获得了持久性、回放和恢复重建:重新打开的会话从最新的 `todo/write` 重新推导当前列表,无需独立的持久化后端、无需重新注水的内存服务、无需额外接线。一个内存中的 `ctx.todos` 服务需要重新发明以上所有。
列表作为 `todo/write` 事件追加到日志,携带完整的 `{ todos }` 快照。harness 是事件溯源的——LLM(大语言模型)历史、工具调用和轮次结构都在日志上——所以 todo 列表也在那里。这免费获得了持久性、回放和恢复重建:重新打开的会话从最新的 `todo/write` 重新推导当前列表,无需独立的持久化后端、无需重新注水的内存服务、无需额外接线。一个内存中的 `ctx.todos` 服务需要重新发明以上所有。(全量 log 消费者直接获得这份重建;web 客户端的分页窗口则从尾页 history 携带的 host 计算投影获得——见 [web todo 展示 Note](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)。)
### 不是 surface 事件

View File

@@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Subagent lifecycle enrichment — lastAssistantMessage (observe-only)
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-06-30-subagent-observe-enrich.zh.md)
## Problem
The hooks subsystem ([interception seams Agent Note](2026-06-30-interception-seams.md)) lets a plugin observe and gate the agent at lifecycle points. Claude Code and Codex both expose **SubagentStart / SubagentStop** hooks, and CC's carry the subagent's final message. The harness already emits `subagent/start` and `subagent/end` lifecycle events ([the subagent capability-seam](2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md)), but their payloads were minimal (`provider`, `id`, and on end `stopReason`) — not enough for a hooks bridge to report WHAT a subagent produced without separately reaching for the live run.
This Agent Note enriches the end payload. It is deliberately **observe-only**: no control-flow change and no waterfall. A run-affecting subagent-stop decision (continuation, injection that changes the run) is a separate, larger redesign and stays out of scope.
## Decision
**Add `lastAssistantMessage` — the child's final output — to `SubagentRunEndInfo`.** On the settle path it is the readonly typed `SubagentResult.output`, so an observer sees what the child produced without holding the run. On an infrastructure rejection where no `SubagentResult` exists, it is absent and the event reports `stopReason: 'error'`. Providers and listeners are trusted same-process collaborators and honor the borrowed immutable payload contract.
Both events stay plain **`emit`s**. Async `SubagentService.start()` attaches result observation to the ready provider run, emits `subagent/start`, and then returns the run; an in-process listener can therefore reach the published child via `ctx.agents.get(info.id)`, while a remote provider need not have a local registry entry. A rejected provider start emits neither event. The callbacks remain observe-only and per-listener containment keeps one bad subscriber from stranding a live run or starving later listeners.
## Alternatives considered
**An `agentType` subagent-kind label** (the harness analogue of CC's `subagent_type`) on the request + both lifecycle payloads — an earlier draft shipped it; dropped in review because it is a Claude-Code concept that does not fit our own seam (nothing here interprets it, and the only consumer was a CC-dialect bridge). The CC bridge instead feeds Claude Code's own default matcher value `"general-purpose"` for its SubagentStart/Stop `agent_type` matcher, so this Agent Note ships ONE enrichment: `lastAssistantMessage`.
**A control-flow `subagent/end`** — deferred; see below.
## Why observe-only, and what is deferred
A control-flow `subagent/end` (an awaited waterfall returning a stop/continue decision, like the other interception seams) would require: reshaping `subagent/end` from emit to waterfall, restructuring `SubagentService.start` to await listeners before settling, and implementing the `resume` capability in the in-process provider so a "continue" can actually re-run the child. That belongs to the background/steering subagent redesign the [capability-seam Agent Note](2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md) already defers (the same redesign that unifies long-running-tool handling across subagents and bash). This Agent Note ships the observe-only enrichment a hooks bridge needs today; `FIXME(subagent-continuation)` / `TODO` anchors mark where the control-flow version would land if and when that redesign happens.
## Consequences
A hooks bridge (or a native plugin) can now forward the child's `lastAssistantMessage` to a SubagentStop handler by subscribing to the existing emits — no new control-flow surface. The vocabulary addition is documented in [docs/core-data-structures/subagent.md](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/subagent.md) (the events prose) and the two subagent READMEs; the catalog is regenerated. No production behavior changes — the events fire exactly as before, with one more (optional) field on the end payload — so no snapshot or e2e change is needed.

View File

@@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Subagent 生命周期丰富化——lastAssistantMessage(仅观察)
Status: implemented
[English](2026-06-30-subagent-observe-enrich.md) | 中文
## 问题
钩子子系统([拦截 seam Agent Note](2026-06-30-interception-seams.md))允许插件在生命周期节点观察和拦截 agent(智能体)。Claude Code 和 Codex 都暴露了 **SubagentStart / SubagentStop** 钩子,且 CC 的钩子携带 subagent 的最终消息。harness 已经发出 `subagent/start` 和 `subagent/end` 生命周期事件([subagent 能力 seam](2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md)),但其载荷极为精简(`provider`、`id`,以及 end 时的 `stopReason`),不足以让钩子桥接层在不单独访问活跃 run 的情况下报告 subagent 产出了什么。
本 Agent Note 丰富 end 载荷。它刻意限定为**仅观察**:不改变控制流,不引入 waterfall(瀑布式事件)。影响 run 的 subagent-stop 决策(续行、改变 run 的注入)属于另一个更大的重设计,不在本 Agent Note 范围内。
## 决策
**在 `SubagentRunEndInfo` 中添加 `lastAssistantMessage`——子 agent 的最终输出。** 在正常结束路径上,它是只读的类型化 `SubagentResult.output`,观察者无需持有 run 即可看到子 agent 产出了什么。在基础设施拒绝(不存在 `SubagentResult`)的情况下,该字段缺失,事件报告 `stopReason: 'error'`。提供方与监听方是受信任的同进程协作者,遵守借用不可变载荷的契约。
两个事件仍为普通 **`emit`**。异步的 `SubagentService.start()` 将结果观察附加到就绪的提供方 run 上,发出 `subagent/start`,然后返回该 run;进程内监听方因此可以通过 `ctx.agents.get(info.id)` 访问已发布的子 agent,而远程提供方无需在本地注册表中有对应条目。提供方启动被拒绝时不发出任何事件。回调保持仅观察,且逐监听方隔离确保一个异常订阅者不会阻塞活跃 run 或饿死后续监听方。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**`agentType` subagent 类别标签**(CC 的 `subagent_type` 在 harness 中的对应物),放在请求与两个生命周期载荷上。早期草案曾包含它;评审中移除,因为它是 Claude Code 的概念,不适合我们自己的 seam(此处没有任何逻辑解释它,唯一消费方是 CC 方言桥接层)。CC 桥接层改为直接为其 SubagentStart/Stop 的 `agent_type` matcher 填入 Claude Code 自身的默认值 `"general-purpose"`,因此本 Agent Note 只交付**一项**丰富化:`lastAssistantMessage`。
**控制流式 `subagent/end`**:推迟;见下文。
## 为何仅观察,以及推迟了什么
控制流式 `subagent/end`(一个被 await 的 waterfall,返回停止/继续决策,与其他拦截 seam 一致)需要:将 `subagent/end` 从 emit 改为 waterfall、重构 `SubagentService.start` 使其在结算前 await 监听方、在进程内提供方中实现 `resume` 能力以便「继续」能真正重新运行子 agent。这属于[能力 seam Agent Note](2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md) 已推迟的后台/steering(中途引导)subagent 重设计(同一个重设计还将统一 subagent 与 bash 之间的长时间运行工具处理)。本 Agent Note 交付钩子桥接层当前所需的仅观察丰富化;`FIXME(subagent-continuation)` / `TODO` 锚点标记了控制流版本在重设计发生时的落点。
## 后果
钩子桥接层(或原生插件)现在可以通过订阅既有 emit 将子 agent 的 `lastAssistantMessage` 转发给 SubagentStop 处理器,无需新的控制流接口。词汇新增记录在 [docs/core-data-structures/subagent.md](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/subagent.md)(事件行文部分)与两个 subagent README 中;catalog 已重新生成。生产行为无变化——事件触发方式与之前完全一致,end 载荷上多了一个可选字段——因此无需更新快照或 e2e 测试。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-06-approval-seam.md: 852108f22be22eeba4578032924adb546ee10985
2026-07-06-approval-seam.zh.md: 9a08f333e0859e6d71f40b039f4b441028c38dc3
2026-07-06-approval-seam.md: 70ccd4d486ad6e0126fa2eb638a064e9fc89bba6
2026-07-06-approval-seam.zh.md: d218f79888957735305db14cd97cc74480297d29

View File

@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ The seam also owns the session-scoped `'ask' | 'never'` policy described by [the
The ACP bridge answers only for an exact agent object owned by its session map. It sends `session/request_permission` with the existing `callId`, advertises one-shot allow/reject options, maps cancellation separately, and never grants an unknown option. Foreign or call-less requests delegate; a failed client RPC becomes `unavailable`. Hooks and `tools/pre-execute` decide whether a call asks at all. This channel is machine policy between an automated client and its agent, not ACP presentation.
The answerer routes through the bridge's exact-agent ownership check described by [the ACP support Agent Note](2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.md), preserving the per-session permission ownership required by [the multi-session Agent Note](2026-06-14-acp-multi-session.md).
The answerer routes through the bridge's exact-agent ownership check described by [the automation-only ACP Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md), preserving the per-session permission ownership required by [the multi-session Agent Note](2026-06-14-acp-multi-session.md).
#### Audit, and what the model sees
@@ -135,5 +135,5 @@ In-repo precedents this design copies or contrasts with:
- The `fs/write-intent` gate (`packages/fs/fs/`) — the documented single-occupancy decision-slot waterfall semantics (first answer wins, delegate via `next()`) the answerer contract reuses.
- `hook/invoked`/`hook/result` — the log-only audit-pair precedent `approval/asked`/`approval/decided` follows; [the hook-bridges Agent Note](2026-06-30-hook-bridges.md) ships `permissionDecision: ask`, the first producer.
- [The interception-seams Agent Note](2026-06-30-interception-seams.md) — the `tools/pre-execute` `allow`/`deny`/`ask` vocabulary whose `ask` this seam services.
- [The ACP support Agent Note](2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.md) — the exact-agent ownership check against the session map that the answerer routes through; [the multi-session Agent Note](2026-06-14-acp-multi-session.md) — the per-session permission-ownership blocker this implements.
- [The automation-only ACP Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md) — the exact-agent ownership check against the session map that the answerer routes through; [the multi-session Agent Note](2026-06-14-acp-multi-session.md) — the per-session permission-ownership blocker this implements.
- The opportunistic `ctx.get()` consumption pattern (`tool-bash`'s owner-token lookup, the loop's persistence probe) — how `dsh-tools` consumes the seam without gating its fiber on it.

View File

@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ seam 还拥有[沙箱 Agent Note](2026-07-06-sandbox.md) 所描述的会话级 `
ACP 桥只应答其会话映射所拥有的精确 agent 对象。它携带既有 `callId` 发送 `session/request_permission`,声明一次性的 allow/reject 选项,单独映射取消,并且绝不批准未知选项。外部或无调用标识的请求会委派;客户端 RPC 失败变为 `unavailable`。钩子和 `tools/pre-execute` 决定一次调用是否需要询问。该通道是自动化客户端与其 agent 之间的机器策略,不是 ACP 展示层。
应答者通过 [ACP 支持 Agent Note](2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.md) 描述的桥精确 agent 归属检查进行路由,保留了[多会话 Agent Note](2026-06-14-acp-multi-session.md) 要求的每会话权限归属。
应答者通过[仅面向自动化的 ACP Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md)描述的桥精确 agent 归属检查进行路由,保留了[多会话 Agent Note](2026-06-14-acp-multi-session.md) 要求的每会话权限归属。
#### 审计,以及模型看到什么
@@ -135,5 +135,5 @@ ACP 桥只应答其会话映射所拥有的精确 agent 对象。它携带既有
- `fs/write-intent` 门禁(`packages/fs/fs/`)——文档化的单占用决策槽 waterfall 语义(先到先得,通过 `next()` 委派),应答者契约复用了它。
- `hook/invoked`/`hook/result`——仅日志审计对先例,`approval/asked`/`approval/decided` 沿用了它;[钩子桥 Agent Note](2026-06-30-hook-bridges.md) 交付了 `permissionDecision: ask`,即第一个生产者。
- [拦截 seam Agent Note](2026-06-30-interception-seams.md)——`tools/pre-execute` 的 `allow`/`deny`/`ask` 词汇,本 seam 服务其中的 `ask`。
- [ACP 支持 Agent Note](2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.md)——应答者路由时对会话映射执行的精确 agent 归属检查;[多会话 Agent Note](2026-06-14-acp-multi-session.md)——本设计实现的每会话权限归属阻塞项。
- [仅面向自动化的 ACP Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md)——应答者路由时对会话映射执行的精确 agent 归属检查;[多会话 Agent Note](2026-06-14-acp-multi-session.md)——本设计实现的每会话权限归属阻塞项。
- 机会性 `ctx.get()` 消费模式(`tool-bash` 的 owner-token 查找、loop 的持久化探测)——`dsh-tools` 消费该 seam 而不阻塞其 fiber 的方式。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-06-sandbox.md: 723ef170188dc11da24e049a1e2838fb240d0a17
2026-07-06-sandbox.zh.md: a8c7743bb3d499fb58f507ea2c202b44efe2311d
2026-07-06-sandbox.md: c6883873192f15ba2982436e156d8795396c0148
2026-07-06-sandbox.zh.md: d84df9b06b15dd296801073d381603f34cfd2878

View File

@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ Each phase gets its full design when picked up, validated against the code at th
- **Second consumer** — `subagent-acp` optionally confines child agents (per-call policy; unconfined default — a child agent must write its own persistence).
- **More environments** — an environment-coherent capability group example (e.g. bash+fs against one container).
- **Windows chain** — `PLATFORM_CHAINS.win32` is reserved and empty (fail-closed); filling it means a confinement runner from the AppContainer/restricted-token family, shipped from its own repository on the `node-addon-landlock-run` template, plus its profile dialect and denial/runner-failure signatures.
- **Windows chain** — `PLATFORM_CHAINS.win32` is reserved and empty (fail-closed); filling it means a confinement runner from the AppContainer/restricted-token family, shipped from its own repository on the `node-addon-landlock-run` template, plus its profile dialect and denial/runner-failure signatures. Wrapping the third-party landstrip runner instead was [considered and rejected](../../rejected/feature/2026-07-26-evaluate-landstrip-for-windows-sandbox-rung.md) — not battle-tested enough for a security invariant.
## Alternatives considered

View File

@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ fs/web/todo 在进程内执行,因此它们的沙箱语义是各自 seam 层
- **第二个消费方**——`subagent-acp` 可选地约束子 agent(按调用策略;默认无约束——子 agent 必须写入自己的持久化)。
- **更多环境**——环境一致的能力组示例(如 bash+fs 对一个容器)。
- **Windows 链**——`PLATFORM_CHAINS.win32` 保留为空(失败关闭);填充它意味着来自 AppContainer/restricted-token 家族的约束 runner,从其自己的仓库按 `node-addon-landlock-run` 模板交付,加上其 profile 方言和拒绝/runner 失败签名。
- **Windows 链**——`PLATFORM_CHAINS.win32` 保留为空(失败关闭);填充它意味着来自 AppContainer/restricted-token 家族的约束 runner,从其自己的仓库按 `node-addon-landlock-run` 模板交付,加上其 profile 方言和拒绝/runner 失败签名。改为包装第三方 landstrip runner 的方案[经考虑后已驳回](../../rejected/feature/2026-07-26-evaluate-landstrip-for-windows-sandbox-rung.md)——对安全不变式而言,它还远未经过实战检验。
## 曾考虑的替代方案

View File

@@ -1,194 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Plan mode — a logged per-agent session mode
Status: implemented
> **Superseded vocabulary (2026-07-22):** [Collapse named session modes into plan mode](../simplification/2026-07-22-plan-specific-collaboration-state.md) replaces this note's generic `dsh-mode`, `mode/set`, definition map, and `ctx.modes` design with the current plan-specific `dsh-plan-mode`, `plan/mode`, `{ section }`, and `ctx.planMode` contract. The review, boundary, reconstructability, and sandbox-orthogonality decisions below remain in force; generic API examples are retained as the historical design this simplification removed.
> **Superseded ACP mapping:** [ACP as an automation-only protocol](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md) removes the picker, config-option, and elicitation mappings described below. Plan mode remains available to human-facing interfaces.
## Problem
Before this change, the harness had no durable way to put one agent into a distinct working stance. Plan mode needs the agent to explore and design under planning guidance, produce a reviewable artifact, cross an explicit approval boundary, and restore that state across resume and fork without making the model-visible request diverge from the session log.
The extension seams already supplied the surrounding pieces: [`system-prompt/assemble`](../../../../packages/core/system-prompt/README.md) shapes guidance per step and the shipped request is logged in `request/header*` events ([reconstructability](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.md)); [`ctx.userInteraction`](../../../../packages/ui/user-interaction/README.md) carries the approval question and corrective feedback ([ask-user precedent](../../implemented/feature/2026-06-25-ask-user-question.md)); `SessionEventMap` carries durable per-agent facts ([the `todo/write` precedent](../../implemented/feature/2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.md)). The missing piece was the named session state that joins those seams while leaving execution enforcement on the independent sandbox and approval axes.
## Decision
The deliverable is **plan mode**. It ships as the first **session mode** — a named, logged, per-agent COLLABORATION state: a mode definition is deployment-configured guidance the model sees, while the mode IN FORCE for an agent is session state folded from its log. Modes are one axis and the enforcement knobs — the sandbox mode, the approval policy — are others: they never read or write each other, matching how Codex keeps its Plan/Default collaboration presets separate from its sandbox and approval settings. One new product package, `@deepseek-ai/dsh-mode` at `packages/mode/mode/`, owns the event vocabulary, a thin `ctx.modes` service, and every listener; the loop does not change. `plan` is the only required definition — the mode-shaped vocabulary exists so a second mode never renames durable event types, not because more modes ship now.
The state is one `SessionEventMap` member: **`mode/set`**, a log-only, non-surface event carrying `{ mode: string }` with whole-value-replace semantics, plus a pure `foldMode(events)` that returns the mode in force — the last `mode/set`, or the default mode when none exists. Because [the log is the fact channel](../../implemented/architecture/2026-06-30-event-domain-semantics.md), resume, fork, and compaction restore the mode with no extra machinery, and UIs read flips off `session/event`. The default mode is the absence of mode guidance — no section, filtering, or gate. Loading `dsh-mode` still contributes one stable `exit_plan_mode` schema in every mode; that fixed cost avoids tool-catalog churn at mode boundaries.
A mode's whole surface is soft: a `mode:policy` prompt section renders the active definition's guidance, while `exit_plan_mode` remains in the registered tool catalog across every mode and rejects at execution unless the folded mode is `plan`. A transition therefore changes only the system-prompt portion of the attributable `request/header` on the next step, keeping [reconstructability](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.md) green without changing native schemas or Code Mode's SDK. A mode deliberately enforces NOTHING: no execution gate, no tool filtering, no reach into the sandbox or approval knobs — a user who wants a hard read-only floor while planning switches the sandbox-mode option beside the mode picker, in either order, and neither axis disturbs the other. There is likewise NO per-mode tool allow/deny list — which tools a mode admits is an effects question, parked until tool definitions declare their effects ([Deferred](#deferred)); a mode's restraint is its section's guidance plus the exit review.
The model leaves plan mode through the **`exit_plan_mode`** tool: its single argument is the plan text, which makes the plan reconstructable from the log, and the tool conducts the review itself through the user-interaction seam — a question whose supporting detail carries the exact plan, with options and a free-text channel, not a bare permission — so an approval flips the logged mode back to the default, and a rejection becomes the corrective error carrying the user's feedback verbatim, which keeps the model planning with direction. A user flips the mode from any surface through `ctx.modes.set()`; the flip is applied at the next turn boundary (session events are turn-enclosed) and narrated to the model once, only when the model-visible state actually changed.
## High-level API
### A plan-mode session end to end
The user switches the session to plan mode through the ACP mode picker or `/plan [message]` in a terminal front door, and from the next step every request ships the configured plan guidance section. When the optional message is present, that same command submits it into the affected step. The `exit_plan_mode` schema was already present in default and remains byte-identical.
The model explores and designs; the section's guidance is what defers changes into the plan. The sandbox and approval knobs keep whatever the user set them to — a deployment (or user) that wants kernel-enforced read-only during planning pairs plan mode with the independent sandbox-mode option.
When ready, the model calls `exit_plan_mode` with the plan markdown as its argument; the review question carries that exact markdown as supporting detail — approve, or keep planning, with free-text feedback welcome. A native call also renders the plan card; a Code Mode nested dispatch has no native card, so the review detail is the common presentation surface.
On approve, the tool flips the logged mode back to the default: the next step drops the plan section while retaining the same tool catalog (the changed header is in the log), and execution tracking from there is already `todo_write`'s job. On keep-planning, the model receives a corrective error carrying the user's feedback text, revises, and re-presents.
### Deployment configuration
Mode definitions are validated plugin Config — per repo convention, changeable from `cordis.yml` with no code edit. The deployment must provide the complete `plan` section; the package embeds no model instructions. Additional modes use the same config map:
```yaml
- id: mode
name: '@deepseek-ai/dsh-mode'
config:
modes:
plan:
section: |
You are in plan mode: explore and design, then present the
plan for approval through exit_plan_mode.
```
A definition is exactly `{ section }` — there is deliberately no per-mode tool list and no enforcement field ([FAQ](#faq)). Definition names use the lowercase slash-command subset `/^[a-z][a-z0-9_-]*$/u`; `default` is reserved (the absence of policy) and rejected as a key. An invalid name or unknown definition key — a `tools` list or an `access` cap included — fails validation at load; an unknown mode name fails loudly at `set()` time.
### In the terminal
Terminal front doors get one entry command per configured definition through the plugin-owned command registry (`@deepseek-ai/dsh-commands`): `dsh-mode` registers `/plan [message]` for the required definition and, for example, `/review [message]` when `review` is configured. Each command records its named switch; a non-empty optional message is trimmed and passed to `agent.steer()`, which places it in a running agent's next step or delegates to `send()` for a new idle turn. The command name and result stay out of model history, while that explicit message is logged as an ordinary user message under the selected mode. The synthetic `default` entry contributes no command. The exit review prompts right in the terminal with no new machinery: it is an ordinary user-interaction question, so it rides the composed user-interaction provider's prompt queue that `ask_user_question` already uses.
### Over ACP
The mode PICKER is this package's surface: `session/new`/`session/load` advertise `availableModes`/`currentModeId` from `ctx.modes` (consumed opportunistically via `ctx.get`, the `tool-bash` pattern), `session/set_mode` calls `set()` and notifies `current_mode_update` optimistically (the pending mode IS the user's selection; the logged `mode/set` follows at the boundary), and a `session/event` listener re-notifies on each logged flip that differs from the last sent. The exit tool reuses the user-interaction ACP provider's elicitation flow; its ACP mapping carries the review `detail` because Code Mode nested dispatches have no native plan card, while native calls may additionally stream the plan card. Individual environment knobs — sandbox mode, approval policy, the model — are NOT modes and belong to `session/set_config_option` ([FAQ](#faq)).
### For agent creators
`ctx.modes` is the whole programmatic surface: `list()` returns the configured definitions plus the synthetic `default` entry (for pickers), `get(agent)` returns the folded mode plus any pending intent, and `set(agent, mode)` validates the name against `list()`'s vocabulary and records the boundary-applied intent — `default` is always a valid target, so exiting a mode is the same call as entering one. There is no creation-time mode option — a caller selects through `set()` before the first turn, which flushes identically. There is no live `agent/*` mirror to subscribe: UIs read `mode/set` off `session/event`, per [event-domain semantics](../../implemented/architecture/2026-06-30-event-domain-semantics.md).
## Detailed design
### Vocabulary
```text
'mode/set': { mode: string } // SessionEventMap merge in dsh-mode: log-only, non-surface,
// whole-value replace — the last one in the log wins
DEFAULT_MODE = 'default' // the fold of a log with no mode/set; reserved, not definable
```
The payload carries no reason/provenance field: a tool-driven flip sits next to its `tool/call` in the log and a user flip sits at its turn boundary, so the cause is log-adjacent — the same "narrative fields are derivable" call the [reconstructability Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.md) made for request-header facts (the in-flight `env/state` event carries a `source` precisely because its drift variant has NO log-adjacent cause — a contrast, not a conflict). Mode names are config-declared vocabulary, not opaque cross-boundary ids, so they stay bare strings (no `Branded<B>`).
### Config and the resolve step
```text
interface ModeDefinition { section: string } // prompt text — a mode's whole vocabulary
interface ModeConfig { modes: Record<string, ModeDefinition> } // plan is required and owns its complete prompt
resolveConfig(config): ResolvedModes // explicit resolve (the dsh-bash template), fail-loud:
// missing plan, 'default', blank sections, and unknown keys rejected
```
The one-field shape is deliberate minimalism, not the final vocabulary: a per-tool policy dimension returns as effects metadata on tool definitions ([Deferred](#deferred)), read here rather than re-declared per mode — the config shape must not need a migration when it arrives.
### The fold, the service, and the flush
`foldMode(events)` is pure (exported for reconstructors and tests) and folds the append-only session log directly; `mode/set` is not a surface node, so compaction cannot shadow it. `set(agent, mode)` validates the name against `list()`'s vocabulary — the configured definitions plus the reserved `default`, which is rejected as a config KEY but always accepted as a `set()` TARGET — drops a no-op (target equals pending, else current), and otherwise records `{ mode, narrate }` in a `WeakMap` pending-intent slot. It cannot append immediately because [every session event is turn-enclosed](../../implemented/architecture/2026-06-15-turn-enclosure-invariant.md) and an idle agent has no open turn.
Contained listeners on the loop's interception seams ([defensive patterns](../../../../docs/defensive-patterns.md): a policy plugin must not block a prompt or a turn) flush the pending intent as a `mode/set` append — `agent/prompt-submit` fires inside the just-opened turn before its first assembly, and `agent/turn-continuation` fires after an ordinary step closes before its successor. Automatic request recovery bypasses continuation, so a prepended `agent/request-error` wrapper delegates through the composed policy and asynchronous backoff, then flushes only a `retry` decision before the waterfall returns to the loop; an effect-scoped lifetime guard suppresses a captured wrapper that resumes after plugin disposal. All three paths sit outside tool execution and log publication (post-commit `session/event` observers are observe-only), so every step runs under the mode its assembly folded. When the flushed mode differs from the fold at the last `request/header`, the flush appends one coalesced `context/message` notice in the same frame ("The user switched this session to plan mode."); the user-visible narration cases are enumerated in the [FAQ](#faq).
### The soft layer: a computed section and a stable exit schema
The registered prompt section reads the calling agent's mode from `AssembleContext.agent` and resolves to the active definition's guidance or `''`. The loop renders per step and logs a complete `request/header` whenever the rendered header changes, so entering or leaving a mode is attributable. The section is static per mode and the plan itself stays in the conversation as messages and tool arguments; re-injecting separate plan state on every request ([Prior art](#prior-art)'s compaction-survival hack) is unnecessary prompt churn.
The guidance contribution is `{ name: 'mode:policy', order: 50, text: context => … }`: after persona (0), before tool guidance (100–199), and empty for default or agent-less assembly. `exit_plan_mode` is registered once through `ctx.tools` and never filtered, so native schemas and Code Mode's generated SDK remain byte-identical across mode switches; a deployment without `dsh-mode` lacks that one binding. There is NO `tools/pre-execute` listener: a mode gates nothing, while the exit tool's own folded-mode check rejects out-of-plan calls. The exit review is a question with options and feedback, not a permission, so it lives inside the tool's execution over the user-interaction seam.
### `exit_plan_mode`
`defineTool` has one required `plan: string` argument. Native execution records it in the ordinary `tool/call`; Code Mode records the outer `run_code` source before execution and appends the normalized nested arguments in `tool/code-dispatch` after the dispatch settles. `execute` rejects an agent-less call (the [`todo_write` precedent](../../implemented/feature/2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.md)), rejects any folded mode other than `plan`, rejects an empty or heading-less plan before asking the reviewer, then conducts one single-select `ctx.userInteraction.ask()` review whose `detail` is the exact plan — approve or keep planning — with free-text feedback open. Only exactly one `Approve` selection consents; every other shape fails closed. Approval records a SILENT boundary-applied intent to switch to `default` and returns a short confirmation. The deployment guidance tells the model to make this the only and final tool call in its response; if a model violates that rule, the runtime still holds plan guidance for the rest of the batch, and the next step logs a changed header with the guidance removed and tool schemas unchanged. Every non-approval outcome returns a corrective `isError` and leaves the mode in `plan`.
Its [render intent](../../implemented/architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md), decided up front: `presentCall` is a `generic` card titled by the plan's first heading with the plan markdown as content, plus a `generic` result card. Native front doors show that card before the question; Code Mode nested dispatches do not produce native call-card events, so the user-interaction `detail` independently carries the same plan on every provider. The seam is consumed opportunistically (`ctx.get('userInteraction')`), so `dsh-mode` composes without it and degrades to the manual exit pinned in the [FAQ](#faq).
### Dependencies and surfaces
`dsh-mode` is one product package, not a capability-seam trio ([Alternatives considered](#alternatives-considered)): it peers on `cordis`, `dsh-session`, `dsh-agent`, `dsh-tools`, and `dsh-system-prompt`, injects `['tools', 'systemPrompt']`, and reads `ctx.userInteraction` opportunistically at execute time (a type-only peer edge on `dsh-user-interaction`); its only UI-facing edges are optional type-only peers (`dsh-commands` for the per-definition entry commands). Beyond the `ctx.modes` call surface everything participates through listeners, so dropping the package gracefully removes modes rather than breaking a consumer. Terminal front doors need no mode-specific code: `dsh-mode` itself registers each definition's command on the command registry when one is composed (an optional type-only peer edge on `dsh-commands`), and the exit review rides the composed user-interaction provider's prompt queue. The ACP wire mapping is pinned in [High-level API](#over-acp); package-wise the bridge takes a type-only peer edge on `dsh-mode` and reads the service opportunistically, so a bridge without the plugin behaves exactly as today.
### The recorded scenario and the harness op
`input.json` gains one step op, `{ "op": "setMode", "modeId": "plan" }`, driven through the real `session/set_mode` RPC, and a scripted `elicitationAnswers` queue. The `plan-mode` scenario enters plan before turn 1, runs a real `cat` under the independently configured sandbox, presents a plan through `exit_plan_mode`, receives scripted approval, then edits on the next step. The first `request/header` contains the full stable toolset plus the configured mode section; the post-approval changed header retains byte-identical tool schemas and removes only that section. `plan-mode-reject` pins corrective free-text feedback and the unchanged plan state. Both recordings replay host commands under Seatbelt or bwrap; backend-specific sandbox denial stays at the bash-tool unit tier.
### The mechanical tail
No new cordis event is declared (`mode/set` rides `session/event`; the listeners attach to existing waterfalls), so the events catalog is untouched. Regenerated in the same change: the persistence log catalog (`mode/set`), the services catalog (`ctx.modes`, JSDoc-complete), the config catalog (`ModeConfig`), the tool catalog (`exit_plan_mode`), the producer/consumer map and doc graphs, and the module graph. Repo plumbing: a root tsconfig `paths` entry, the new group's README plus a [packages map](../../../../packages/README.md) row (a new top-level group is the deliberate act that table names), an `architecture.md` capability-services row for `ctx.modes` (budget-checked), and the cookbook row upgrade.
## Deferred
Each behind its own decision: subagent mode inheritance via a forwarded creation-time mode option (removed as unconsumed; it returns with its first consumer), preset modes beyond `plan` (read-only, accept-edits), the idle-record primitive if pending-intent loss proves real, and — the big one — **effects self-declaration on tool definitions**: a per-tool read-only/mutating classification (the MCP `ToolAnnotations` vocabulary — `readOnlyHint`/`destructiveHint` — is the natural template, with its untrusted-hint caveat implying trust tiers). That item is what a general per-mode tool policy waits on: this Agent Note first shipped an interim per-mode name allowlist and removed it before release — a hand-maintained list mislabels the effects question, must track every tool a deployment composes, and rots silently as tools arrive — so mode-scoped tool availability (and per-tool `ask` policies) returns as a CONSUMER of declared effects, which is its restart trigger.
The ACP automation composition does not mount plan mode or the question tool. Human-facing compositions own plan selection and review; focused plan-mode tests and interactive-interface snapshots pin its logged state, guidance, review, and stable tool schemas.
## FAQ
Behavioral clarifications of the chosen design; rejected designs live in [Alternatives considered](#alternatives-considered), accepted costs in [Consequences](#consequences).
**When does a user's mode flip take effect?** At the next pre-assembly boundary: `agent/prompt-submit` covers the first step, `agent/turn-continuation` covers a normal successor, and the post-composed `agent/request-error` retry decision covers automatic recovery. A mode selected while a request or retry backoff is in flight therefore shapes the following model request. This is the "applies to subsequent requests" semantics every product in [Prior art](#prior-art) ships.
**When is a mode change narrated to the model?** Only when the model-visible state actually changed: the flush compares the flushed mode against the fold at the last `request/header` and narrates once, coalesced. A net-zero flip sequence (plan then back, all before the boundary) narrates nothing; a tool-driven exit narrates through its own tool result instead; a mode set before the first turn narrates nothing — the section is the state statement. The principle is the in-flight env-state proposal's boundary narration: a silently flipped prompt surface leaves the transcript arguing from a state the header no longer has.
**What happens on resume when the config no longer defines the folded mode?** A folded mode name the current config no longer defines behaves as the default mode without a notice, so the session neither gains a substitute restriction nor becomes unusable. `set()`'s loud validation covers only the write path; a resumed log answers to the config it finds.
**What if a deployment composes no user-interaction provider?** Plan mode stays safe but manual: `ctx.userInteraction.ask()` throws `NO_PROVIDER` (and an absent seam never resolves at all), the tool returns the corrective `isError`, and the exit degrades to the user toggling modes — never to an unreviewed exit. The mode section tells the model to present its plan through `exit_plan_mode` — and to ask the user in prose if that fails — so it keeps presenting instead of stalling.
**Why is there no per-mode tool allowlist?** Because "which tools are safe in a planning mode" is a property of each TOOL (its effects), not of the mode — a per-mode name list re-declares that fact in the wrong home, must enumerate every tool the deployment composes (MCP servers included), and rots silently as tools arrive. Until tool definitions declare their effects ([Deferred](#deferred), where the removed interim allowlist is archived with its restart trigger), a mode restrains by its section and the exit review; the exposure is an accepted cost ([Consequences](#consequences)).
**Do subagents inherit the parent's mode?** A fork child inherits for free — the parent's `mode/set` is inside the seeded prefix. A spawn child starts in the default mode; a creation-time mode option and automatic forwarding by subagent providers are deferred together ([Deferred](#deferred)).
**How does plan mode relate to the sandbox's read-only mode?** They are separate axes that never touch: the mode is the collaboration stance (a `mode/set` fold), the sandbox mode is an enforcement knob (a `bash/sandbox-mode` fold, [the sandbox Agent Note](2026-07-06-sandbox.md)) — plan mode neither reads nor caps it, exactly as Codex keeps its Plan/Default presets separate from its sandbox and approval settings. A user who wants kernel-enforced read-only while planning sets both: flip the mode picker AND the sandbox-mode option, in either order; each switch changes only its own fold, so there is no interference and no restore step to crash out of. The log attributes each axis to its own event — the stance to `mode/set`, the confinement to `bash/sandbox-mode`.
**Why aren't sandbox mode, approval policy, or the model themselves modes?** They are individual environment knobs independent of collaboration state. The retired ACP mapping is recorded by the [automation-only protocol decision](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md). A mode definition may later bundle env facts (applied through `ctx.envState` where mounted) so a Codex-style preset stays a single mode; fusing approval policy into the mode CONCEPT itself is rejected in [Alternatives considered](#alternatives-considered).
## Prior art
A survey of shipped plan modes (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, OpenCode, Gemini CLI, Cline, Windsurf, Codex) shows the same five parts everywhere — the low-authority tool policy, plan artifact, approval moment, execution-state switch, and durable state that [Problem](#problem) builds on.
The mode surface is a LIST everywhere it is advertised, never a boolean: Claude Code's picker offers `plan` beside `acceptEdits` (plus an auto-mode entry into plan), and Codex exposes `Plan` beside `Default` as collaboration-mode presets while keeping approval and sandbox settings separate. The ACP transport does not advertise this human-facing control.
The deployment-owned example prompt borrows the instrumental behavior, not product-specific mechanics. From Codex: remain in plan mode despite imperative implementation language, explore before asking, distinguish repository facts from user-owned choices, and make the plan decision-complete across APIs, data flow, failures, tests, and assumptions. From Claude Code: prohibit mutations and commits, prefer existing patterns, use questions only for requirements or approach choices, and finish through the exit tool rather than a prose approval request. It deliberately omits Codex protocol tags and Claude's plan-file or phased-subagent machinery because those belong to their runtimes, not this plugin contract.
The ecosystems that leave modes to convention show the failure shapes to avoid. Pi-style mode extensions fight over a last-wins global active-tool list, enforce "read-only" by prompt text alone (a hallucinated call to a still-registered tool executes), and re-inject plan state into every request to survive compaction. The contested global list and the re-injection hack close structurally here — per-agent folded state, and a log-only non-surface event compaction cannot shadow. The prompt-only shape, by contrast, is deliberately KEPT — it is what Codex ships for Plan, and it is why the mode axis composes freely with the enforcement axes: a deployment that wants a hard floor pairs the mode with the independent sandbox knob instead of the mode carrying its own enforcement ([FAQ](#faq)).
## Alternatives considered
**Permission modes as the concept (the Claude Code shape).** One `permissionMode` fusing approval policy and tool policy. Here those are two axes with two owners: the approval seam owns "who answers this question", modes own "what surface does the model get". ACP models them as related but distinct (a mode may select an approval policy later — a mode definition gains a field, not a merger).
**A capability-seam trio.** Interface/implementation/consumer fits a swappable backend; a mode's variable parts are config values, not implementations. Splitting would manufacture an empty implementation package — the same "don't split preemptively" call the approval seam and [`todo/`](../../implemented/feature/2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.md) made.
**Loop-owned mode state.** Rejected on the standing rule (plugins, not loop changes): every hook the feature needs — assemble, pre-execute, turn boundaries, session events — is already a documented seam, so a loop edit would buy nothing but coupling.
**A per-mode tool allowlist with a deny-by-default gate (the first shipped shape).** Removed before release. A hand-maintained name list re-declares a per-TOOL fact (its effects) per MODE: it must enumerate every tool the deployment composes — MCP servers and future registrations included — and it rots silently as tools arrive (a new read-only tool is blocked until someone edits every mode; the author burden lands on whoever knows the mode, not whoever knows the tool). It also over-promises: the list looks like a security boundary while the real boundary for anything non-shell does not exist. The general dimension is parked on effects self-declaration ([Deferred](#deferred)); the consequence — plan mode is guidance-only, the very Pi hole the gate once closed — is accepted deliberately, priced in [Consequences](#consequences).
**An `access` sandbox cap on the mode (the second shipped shape).** Also removed before release. `ModeDefinition.access` clamped the bash seam's per-call sandbox resolution to a mode-declared ceiling (a `bash/resolve-mode` waterfall + ladder-min listener, with guards withholding bash under an unconfinable executor and denying escalation mid-mode). The state stayed orthogonal — the clamp never wrote the sandbox knob — but the AXES did not: entering plan changed what the sandbox enforced, fusing the collaboration stance with an enforcement level and contradicting the Codex-shaped separation the review converged on (Plan/Default presets never touch sandbox or approval settings). One user-visible symptom of the fusion: flipping the sandbox option to `workspace-write` while planning silently did nothing. The cap, the waterfall, and the mode→bash dependency edge were removed together; a deployment gets kernel-enforced read-only planning by pairing the mode with the independent sandbox-mode option, and a mode-triggered PRESET (a mode definition bundling suggested knob values, applied as ordinary knob switches) can return later without re-fusing the axes.
**Runtime-only mode (UI- or bridge-local, unlogged).** Resume and fork would silently drop the mode, and the header deltas a mode causes would have no attributable cause in the log. Logged state is what makes the mode auditable and restorable for free.
**Mode flips as `context/message` via `agent.inject()`.** Reuses an existing turn-enclosure path, but puts policy state into the model transcript — the model does not need to be told twice (the section already tells it), and a log-only fact should not occupy surface.
**A plan-file store (`.plans/` directory).** A second durable home for what the log already carries replayably; a deployment wanting files can add a tool that writes them. One home per fact.
**A boolean `planMode` instead of named modes.** Too narrow for the surface the repo already tracks: ACP advertises a mode LIST and the shipped pickers fill it with more than plan ([Prior art](#prior-art)); generalizing later would rename durable event vocabulary. The string-shaped mechanism costs nothing extra now; only `plan` ships as a definition.
**A tool-policy-stack service (the Pi-critique remedy).** A dedicated composition service for tool policies is premature: this implementation performs no mode-scoped tool filtering, and future effect policies can compose through the existing guarded execution seams. Formalize only when declared tool effects create a concrete composition requirement.
**Exit approval through the approval seam (a `{ kind: 'ask' }` gate decision).** The original sketch, natural while the approval seam was the only asking machinery in flight — but it seats a review in a permission chair: the seam's outcome vocabulary is deliberately closed and one-shot (`allowed-once`/`rejected`), so a rejection carries no feedback and an approval can never grow options (approve-and-accept-edits). The exit moment is a question, not a permission — the user-interaction seam gives it options plus the free-text channel, and the rejection feedback reaches the model verbatim. The approval seam remains the right seat for genuine permission gates (the sandbox escalation), and the registry's `ask` vocabulary stays available to deployments that want one there.
**Exit by prose or steering instead of a tool.** No artifact and no approval moment — the tool's argument IS the reviewable plan, and its review question is what gives the human a structured yes/no attached to the exact transition.
## Consequences
What holds now, pinned by the unit, protocol, snapshot, and real-API tiers:
- The mode in force is a pure function of the session log: resume and fork restore it with no extra machinery, and a `mode/set` is followed by a matching complete `request/header` on the next changed step.
- A user-driven flip narrates exactly once at the next boundary and a net-zero flip sequence narrates nothing; a tool-driven exit narrates only through its tool result.
- In default mode the plugin contributes no mode section but does contribute the stable `exit_plan_mode` schema; a deployment without `dsh-mode` lacks that binding.
- Native tool schemas and Code Mode's SDK stay byte-identical across default, plan, and custom-mode transitions; only the configured guidance section changes.
- Plan mode changes nothing on the enforcement axes: the toolset, the sandbox mode, escalation, and the approval policy behave identically in plan and default — pairing the mode with the independent sandbox/approval knobs is how a deployment hardens planning.
- Mode definitions are changeable from `cordis.yml` with no code edit; the complete plan instructions are required there, while missing plan config, malformed definitions, and unknown keys fail at load and unknown mode names fail at `set()`.
- `exit_plan_mode` is always advertised, rejects outside plan, drops only plan guidance after approval, and carries keep-planning feedback in a corrective `isError`; each human-facing surface's user-interaction provider carries the review.
- The docs tail shipped with the landing: READMEs, regenerated catalogs (persistence log, config, cordis services, tools), the packages map and architecture rows, and the cookbook row.
The accepted costs: a pending user flip set while idle is lost if the process dies before the next turn (the UI re-applies; the idle-record primitive is the escape hatch if this bites in practice). A mode transition changes the system prompt at order 50, so the cache path from that point onward changes, but the tool schemas and Code Mode SDK no longer churn. **A mode restrains by guidance alone**: a model that ignores the section CAN mutate during plan — the review moment, the session log, and independent sandbox, approval, and filesystem policies are the containment surface. Hardening planning means setting those knobs, not widening the mode; the removed enforcement shapes and their effects-declaration restart trigger remain in [Alternatives considered](#alternatives-considered) and [Deferred](#deferred). Human-facing interfaces own the plan picker and review interaction; the ACP automation transport carries neither.

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-07-session-prefix.md: 322413f541706244a8a9a9113c0b79693fe54ccd
2026-07-07-session-prefix.zh.md: 710cfbd2656d132640d39b1d62374ef2d16be612
2026-07-07-session-prefix.md: 75113952fc5f3df8da1580d42ed2a385b6135fe8
2026-07-07-session-prefix.zh.md: e38bf09298296203b275d6d66a62ef17be7c045d

View File

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Because composition runs before the boundary snapshot, a composing listener's se
## Testing
[Interception tests](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/tests/interception.spec.ts) pin compose-once reuse without changed headers, prepend order, empty-prefix omission, immutability, composition before pre-step, and the prefix on the routed header; [cancellation tests](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/tests/cancel.spec.ts) pin discard and recomposition. Session, invariant, token-meter, and compaction tests cover header round trips, request reconstruction, and durable prefix-aware pressure accounting. Snapshot normalization preserves prefix counts, while the [pinned-header scenario](../testing/2026-07-06-pin-request-header-content-in-one-scenario.md) owns content and the default example remains prefix-free. The provider-independent seam needs no dedicated e2e; the with-key [request-cache e2e](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/tests/request-cache.e2e.ts) covers its cache economics.
[Interception tests](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/tests/interception.spec.ts) pin compose-once reuse without changed headers, prepend order, empty-prefix omission, immutability, composition before pre-step, and the prefix on the routed header; [cancellation tests](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/tests/cancel.spec.ts) pin discard and recomposition. Session, invariant, token-meter, and compaction tests cover header round trips, request reconstruction, and durable prefix-aware pressure accounting. Snapshot normalization preserves prefix counts, while the [pinned-header scenario](../../archived/testing/2026-07-06-pin-request-header-content-in-one-scenario.md) owns content and the default example remains prefix-free. The provider-independent seam needs no dedicated e2e; the with-key [request-cache e2e](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/tests/request-cache.e2e.ts) covers its cache economics.
## Alternatives considered

View File

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Status: implemented
## 测试
[拦截测试](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/tests/interception.spec.ts)固定了以下行为:没有变更 header 时的组合一次复用、前置插入顺序、空前缀省略、不可变性、组合在步骤前检查点之前完成,以及已路由 header 上的前缀;[取消测试](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/tests/cancel.spec.ts)固定了丢弃与重新组合。Session、不变式、token-meter 和压缩测试覆盖 header 往返、请求重建与持久前缀感知的压力核算。快照归一化保留前缀计数,[固定 header 场景](../testing/2026-07-06-pin-request-header-content-in-one-scenario.md)拥有内容,默认示例保持无前缀。与提供方无关的 seam 无需专门 e2e;带密钥的 [request-cache e2e](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/tests/request-cache.e2e.ts) 覆盖了其缓存经济性。
[拦截测试](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/tests/interception.spec.ts)固定了以下行为:没有变更 header 时的组合一次复用、前置插入顺序、空前缀省略、不可变性、组合在步骤前检查点之前完成,以及已路由 header 上的前缀;[取消测试](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/tests/cancel.spec.ts)固定了丢弃与重新组合。Session、不变式、token-meter 和压缩测试覆盖 header 往返、请求重建与持久前缀感知的压力核算。快照归一化保留前缀计数,[固定 header 场景](../../archived/testing/2026-07-06-pin-request-header-content-in-one-scenario.md)拥有内容,默认示例保持无前缀。与提供方无关的 seam 无需专门 e2e;带密钥的 [request-cache e2e](../../../../packages/core/agent-loop/tests/request-cache.e2e.ts) 覆盖了其缓存经济性。
## 曾考虑的替代方案

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.md: da23bbfa247bc2423072477cc4b6277485df1c9c
2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.zh.md: ec55922e0aee57169d8bbf44c3d91b18ea83041e
2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.md: 12b34f2a28cfa311a48904cd5396ec16d9123641
2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.zh.md: 58f035a14d55bc0b4e7f670111909074c3f53b2b

View File

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.zh.md)
## Problem
The [subagent seam](2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md) returns a `SubagentRun`, but the model-facing tool originally collected every run synchronously. Independent, slow delegations therefore held the parent call open or ran serially.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
# Agent Note: 后台 subagent 任务
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-08-background-subagent-tasks.md) | 中文
## 问题
[subagent seam](2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md) 会返回 `SubagentRun`,但原先面向模型的工具会同步收集每一次运行。因此,各自独立的慢速委派要么一直占用父调用,要么按串行方式运行。
subagent 需要与其他长时间运行的工具相同的启动、收集、列出、停止、归属、通知和清理行为,但不应采用进程流语义。子会话仍是详细记录;父级只需最终答案和任务状态。后台子级的存活时间还会超过启动它的工具调用,因此必须明确其取消和拥有者资源释放契约。
## 决策
每个 `dsh-tool-subagent` 实例都可以公开 `run_in_background`,由 `enableRunInBackground` 控制,且默认启用。禁用该功能的实例不包含此参数,并会在执行时拒绝强制传入的后台参数。提供方选择仍属于部署配置,因此一个实例仍然只为一个提供方注册一个名称可区分的工具。
后台 subagent 使用[通用后台任务运行时](../architecture/2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md)。`task_output`、`task_list` 和 `task_kill` 负责收集、列出、取消、完成通知和提示词引导;系统不提供 subagent 专用的配套工具。
前台调用保留其同步契约:等待提供方启动和 `run.result`;仅当状态为 `completed` 时返回最终文本;将其他终止原因映射为出错的工具结果;并且始终在返回前释放该运行。
对于后台调用,工具会验证父级,并在调用 `ctx.tasks.start()` 前拒绝已中止的执行信号。任务运行时会在调用生产者启动器前,预检控制接口和拥有者清理。该启动器创建独立的 `AbortController` 并启动 `ctx.subagents.start()`;返回 id 之后,工具调用的信号不再拥有该子级。
任务注册按以下方式映射 subagent seam:
- `kind` 为 `subagent`,`label` 为模型提供的描述,`owner` 为父 agent(智能体)。
- `cancel(reason?)` 中止任务自有的控制器。同一个信号同时覆盖尚未完成的提供方启动和已就绪的子级。
- `done` 等待提供方启动、子级结果和 `run.dispose()`。已完成的运行返回最终文本,已中止的运行变为 `killed`,其他停止原因变为 `failed`。启动、结果和资源释放失败会转换为失败结果,而不是被拒绝的任务 Promise。
- `readOutput` 不存在。任务存活期间,`task_output` 只返回状态;结算后,它以幂等方式返回最终输出。中间的子级活动仍保留在子会话中。
## 生命周期
后台 subagent 归属于其父 agent,不会在拥有者关闭后持久存续。任务运行时将清理附加到对应拥有者的确切作用域。agent 资源释放会取消任务,并在 `AgentHandle.dispose()` 完成前等待启动回滚或子级资源释放,避免泄漏子 agent 和会话。
完成通知会发送给启动时捕获的确切拥有者。如果拥有者清理过程已经释放了注入目标,该通知将被丢弃;生命周期保证是清理,而不是通知。
## 模型引导
通用任务提示词教会模型一套共享的做法:保留 id;继续独立工作,而不是忙等轮询;在回答前收集相关任务;终止无关工作。subagent schema 只补充说明:后台模式返回 task id,且 `task_output` 用于收集结果。无论模型是否遵循提示词,授权和拥有者清理都会强制执行运行时边界。
## 备选方案
### subagent 专用的等待、输出和停止工具
能力专用工具会重复任务协议,再教一套收集与停止习惯,并增加多个提供方实例的复杂度。通用运行时在不改变工具「每个实例对应一个提供方」形态的前提下,提供了所需行为。
### 在拥有者关闭后存续
该方案需要持久化的任务状态、子会话恢复、延迟结果交付通道,以及对被遗弃拥有者的处理策略。以拥有者为作用域的清理为进程内工作界定了明确生命周期。持久作业需要单独设计。
### 隔离客户端不做拥有者检查
agent 和日志可能以会话为作用域,但任务注册表和可预测 id 属于运行时全局范围。因此,通用拥有者防线同样适用于 subagent 和所有其他生产者。
### 增量子 transcript 输出
将子级历史以流式方式写入父级,会模糊日志边界,并使提供方行为分化。此接口只公开最终输出;更丰富的观察应由会话或 UI 工具承担。
## 测试
单元测试覆盖固定了停止原因映射、在报告前释放资源、启动与结果失败、对预中止的拒绝、从启动调用信号分离、在提供方就绪前后取消、通过真实任务工具收集、无控制接口的预检防线、运行时缺失失败,以及每实例 schema 开关。快照覆盖固定了面向模型的 schema。
## 影响
父级可以并行分派慢速委派任务,并通过与 bash 共用的任务控制来收集结果。子级工作不再占用启动它的工具调用,但在收集、终止或拥有者释放之前可以继续消耗资源。提示词引导鼓励收集;拥有者清理则提供硬性生命周期边界。需要同步委派的部署可以按工具实例禁用后台模式。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-06-18-acp-terminal-and-tool-rendering.md: e8426dbf1a0e3e4f9d9857baa19945cee6eee4b3
2026-06-18-acp-terminal-and-tool-rendering.zh.md: ff269e002a0ecea8c0bacf53fe85e553a6b9b9d5
2026-07-09-bash-backed-grep-glob-discovery.md: 9c25afb44885ca2519c5d74a3d721b34fe3561de
2026-07-09-bash-backed-grep-glob-discovery.zh.md: d0dee8e49e0a500c87afbd59423fb65416c1dcc8

View File

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-09-bash-backed-grep-glob-discovery.zh.md)
## Problem
The harness needs model-facing `glob` and `grep` tools, but making them `ctx.fs` provider methods turns a local product convenience into a universal filesystem backend contract. Local workspace discovery is naturally a process-backed `rg` workflow; remote or virtual filesystem backends may expose their own search API, may not share a local `ripgrep` view, or may not support discovery at all. The v1 should not require every filesystem backend to implement search before the file read/write/edit seam has proven that need.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
# Agent Note: 由 Bash 支持的 grep 与 glob 发现工具
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-09-bash-backed-grep-glob-discovery.md) | 中文
## 问题
harness 需要面向模型的 `glob` 和 `grep` 工具,但如果将它们实现为 `ctx.fs` 提供方的方法,就会把本地产品便利功能变成所有文件系统后端都必须实现的契约。本地工作区发现天然适合由进程支持的 `rg` 工作流;远程或虚拟文件系统后端可能公开自己的搜索 API,可能无法共享本地 `ripgrep` 视图,也可能完全不支持发现。文件读取/写入/编辑 seam 尚未证明此需求前,v1 不应要求每个文件系统后端都实现搜索。
搜索输出还受到两层不同的预算约束。工具需要足够多的原始 `rg` 输出,才能计算稳定的逻辑结果;模型则只能收到有界预览,并在格式化结果超出内联预算时获得恢复路径。通用落盘策略只能看到最终工具结果,因此无法恢复搜索工具已经省略的匹配项。搜索工具必须自行负责保留,并尽力落盘格式化结果。
## 决策
`glob` 和 `grep` 是 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-fs-search` 中的条件式面向模型工具,由 bash seam 支持,不会成为新的 `ctx.fs` 提供方方法。加载插件时,该包(package)执行 `command -v rg >/dev/null 2>&1`:先通过 `ctx.bash.resolve(request)` 解析请求,再通过 `ctx.bash.run(spec)` 运行;如果命令以非零状态退出,该包会记录警告,并且既不注册工具,也不注册提示词章节。如果探针无法启动、超时、中止、被终止,或没有产生退出码,插件加载会明确失败,因为这意味着 bash 执行器损坏,而不是可选二进制文件缺失。注册后,执行流程同样依次调用 `ctx.bash.resolve(request)` 与 `ctx.bash.run(spec)`,并使用工具组装的固定 `rg` 命令模板。工具层负责 schema、参数验证、shell 引用、结果解析、结果格式化、保留、格式化结果落盘交接,以及超时声明。bash 执行器负责请求默认值解析与上限控制、子进程执行、进程组终止、环境清理、原始输出捕获,以及在本地、沙箱或远程 bash 实现之间替换后端。
这些工具不使用 `ctx.bash.start()`,也不创建模型可见的后台任务。从 agent loop(智能体循环)的视角看,它们是普通前台工具:只有当 `rg` 命令退出、超时、中止或失败后,工具调用才返回。`defineTool({ timeoutMs })` 声明协作式工具调用预算,`@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout-policy` 通过 `exec.signal` 强制执行;工具会在 `resolve()`/`run()` 前将该信号转发给 bash 请求。bash 后端自身的超时仍作为第二层安全上限;先触发的中止生效。
这些工具使 `path` 与 Claude Code 的搜索工具保持一致,但将解析绑定到 bash workdir,而不是 `ctx.fs`。工具从 `exec.agent?.session.header.cwd` 派生 bash 请求 workdir,与 `dsh-tool-bash` 和 `dsh-tool-fs` 一致;如果会话没有 cwd,它会省略 `request.workdir`,由 bash 实现通过 `resolve()` 应用其配置的 cwd 或进程 cwd。对于 `grep`,`path` 是可选的 ripgrep 目标,可以是文件或目录;省略时使用已解析的 bash workdir。对于 `glob`,`path` 是可选的目录搜索根;省略时同样使用已解析的 bash workdir。相对 `path` 值基于该 workdir 解析。只要可行,返回路径就会显示为相对于已解析 bash workdir 的形式;只有在共置部署中,bash workdir 与文件系统 `read` 根指向同一个工作区时,这些路径才保证可以继续读取。v1 会记录这项部署要求,但不执行跨服务运行时验证。在形成共享工作区/根契约或提供方专用搜索后端之前,远程或虚拟文件系统搜索保持暂缓。
该包不注入 `fs`,而是注入 `tools`、`systemPrompt` 和 `bash`;它有意读取 `spillStore` 时使用 `ctx.get('spillStore')`,而不使用静态注入,因为格式化结果落盘是可选功能。现有 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-fs` 部署若只需要 `read`/`write`/`edit`,则无需加载 bash。加载搜索功能的部署则必须让 bash 执行器环境可以使用 `rg`,这些工具才会进入模型可见 schema。
### 包结构
v1 包保持精简。`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-fs-search` 内部的源代码布局如下:
```text
src/index.ts
src/glob.ts
src/grep.ts
src/search-core.ts
src/shell-quote.ts
```
`glob.ts` 和 `grep.ts` 各自负责参数验证、命令构造、结果解析、格式化和注册。`shell-quote.ts` 是一个共享辅助模块,因为 shell 引用是两个工具都必须经过的安全边界;`search-core.ts` 是另一个共享模块(实现时对原四文件方案所作的修订):`SEARCH_*` 错误词汇、bash 运行与原始输出获取、格式化结果落盘交接,以及 workdir 相对显示,在两个工具中完全相同。若在每个工具中重复这套精细管道,正是对称性约定所指出的漏提取问题。命令构造器禁止自行拼凑引用,也不能把未经引用、由模型控制的值直接连接到 shell 命令中。
### Schema 与配置
`glob` 公开精简的发现形状:
```ts
interface GlobArgs {
pattern: string
path?: string
}
```
`grep` 公开 OpenCode 风格的最小形状:
```ts
interface GrepArgs {
pattern: string
path?: string
include?: string
}
```
常规预算不会进入面向模型的 schema。`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-fs-search` 拥有以下带默认值并经过验证的配置字段:
| 字段 | 默认值 | 作用 |
|---|---:|---|
| `globMaxResults` | `100` | 内联保留的最大路径数;与 Claude Code 的默认 `GlobTool` 结果上限一致。 |
| `grepMaxMatches` | `250` | 内联保留的最大扁平匹配数;与 Claude Code 的默认 `GrepTool` `head_limit` 一致。 |
| `grepMaxLineBytes` | `2000` | 每条匹配行预览保留的最大字节数,通过 `TextRetainer({ kind: 'head', maxBytes: grepMaxLineBytes })` 应用。 |
| `rawOutputMaxBytes` | `20000000` | 工具会解析的完整原始 `rg` stdout 最大字节数;与 Claude Code 的 ripgrep 原始缓冲区一致。 |
| `timeoutMs` | `30000` | 附加到两个工具定义并由 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout-policy` 强制执行的工具调用超时。 |
`globMaxResults` 和 `grepMaxMatches` 使用 `ItemRetainer({ kind: 'head' })`。`grepMaxLineBytes` 针对每条匹配行使用 `TextRetainer({ kind: 'head', maxBytes: grepMaxLineBytes })`,使预览截断保留 UTF-8 边界。这遵循[工具结果保留库](../architecture/2026-07-06-tool-result-retention-library.md)对发现条目的映射:收集完整结果,在内联结果中保留头部条目,并将路径映射、分组和逐行预览放在保留器外部。v1 的 `grep` 不公开 `case_insensitive`、`head_limit`、`offset`、`count`、多行、上下文行、输出模式或文件类型过滤器。模型如需周边上下文,可使用 `read` 读取匹配文件;如需后续结果,则遵循返回的落盘定位符所给出的检索提示。
Claude Code 的数值只是两层预算的参考点,并非面向模型 schema 的先例。其专用搜索工具会缓冲最多 20 MB 的原始 ripgrep 输出用于内部处理;在非 WSL 平台上使用 20 秒 ripgrep 超时,在 WSL 上使用 60 秒,之后才在模型看到结果前应用搜索专用上限:`GrepTool` 默认 `head_limit = 250`,并持久化超过 20,000 个字符的格式化结果;`GlobTool` 默认最多 100 条路径,并持久化超过 100,000 个字符的格式化结果。此 Agent Note 采用同样的原始缓冲区和内联数量默认值,将默认搜索超时设为 30 秒,并通过本 harness 的 `ctx.spillStore.saveText()` 路径恢复格式化结果。
`path` 字段沿用与 Claude Code 相同的区分方式:`grep.path` 是文件或目录形式的 ripgrep 目标,`glob.path` 则是目录搜索根。v1 不为这些工具公开单独的 cwd/workdir 参数。
`include` 是一个正向 glob 过滤器,不是列表,也不是排除语法。系统会预先拒绝逗号分隔或取反的 include 模式,并返回结构化参数错误。shell 命令中使用的每个模型控制值,包括 `pattern`、`path` 和 `include`,都必须经过包私有的 shell 引用辅助模块。
### 执行
`glob` 构建固定的 `rg --files` 命令,并以解析后的目录搜索根为根(提供 `path` 时使用该值,否则使用 bash workdir):`rg --files --glob <pattern> --sort=modified --no-ignore --hidden`,另加针对 `.git`、`.svn`、`.hg`、`.bzr`、`.jj` 和 `.sl` 的 VCS 元数据排除项。这样既与 Claude Code 的隐藏/忽略文件发现和修改时间排序保持一致,也避免宽泛搜索包含 VCS 内部文件。工具逐行解析路径,只要可行就将结果映射为相对于 bash workdir 的路径,将每条路径推入 `ItemRetainer({ kind: 'head', maxItems: globMaxResults })`;当保留结果达到上限时,它会格式化完整的已排序路径列表,作为落盘产物。
`grep` 构建固定的逐行 `rg --json` 命令,作用于所提供的文件/目录目标(提供 `path` 时使用该值,否则使用 bash workdir),从而无需按冒号拆分,就能解析文件路径、行号和行文本。它消费 `match` 记录,将格式错误的 JSON 或匹配记录视为 `SEARCH_FAILED`;只要可行,就将结果路径映射为相对于 bash workdir 的路径;通过 `grepMaxLineBytes` 应用逐行预览保留,将每个匹配推入 `ItemRetainer({ kind: 'head', maxItems: grepMaxMatches })`,然后只按文件分组内联输出中保留的预览匹配。落盘产物保存完整的格式化匹配列表,而不是只保存省略的尾部,因此检索提示指向模型已经看到的同一逻辑结果。
原始 `rg` stdout 是内部传输细节。工具请求 `stdoutMaxBytes: rawOutputMaxBytes`,并通过 `ctx.bash.resolve()` 解析;只有当执行器在该上限内返回未截断的 stdout 时,工具才解析 `stdout.text`。如果 stdout 超过 `rawOutputMaxBytes`,或者执行器仍返回 `stdout.truncated`,工具会以明确的搜索错误失败,要求模型缩小 `pattern`、`path` 或 `include`。工具绝不向模型公开原始 `rg` 输出或 bash 原始落盘路径。
只有 stdout 是解析源。对于无效模式、注册后运行时 `rg` 消失,以及搜索失败,stderr 作为诊断文本;如果 bash 截断 stderr,工具会使用保留的 stderr 尾部并附加截断说明,不会读取 `stderr.spillPath`。
如果 `ctx.bash.run()` 因工具超时或调用方取消触发而报告 `aborted`,工具会返回结构化失败,而不是假装没有匹配项。如果 bash 自身的超时先触发,工具同样会以明确的超时消息失败。非零 ripgrep 退出语义由工具负责:退出码 0 表示存在匹配并成功;退出码 1 表示没有匹配但成功;无效模式、运行时 `rg` 消失或无法访问搜索 workdir 则表示失败。
搜索失败使用包自有的 `HarnessError` 子类与 `SEARCH_*` 代码,而不使用 `FsErrorCode`,因为这些工具不是 `ctx.fs` 提供方操作。v1 的词汇包括 `SEARCH_INVALID_PATTERN`、`SEARCH_FAILED`、`SEARCH_RAW_OUTPUT_OVERFLOW` 和 `SEARCH_ABORTED`。缺少必填字段、空字符串或不支持的取反/列表式 `include` 值等模型参数验证失败,仍作为普通工具参数错误处理。
### 格式化结果落盘
`ctx.spillStore` 是可选服务,仅用于面向模型的格式化结果。这是代码库中首个工具自有落盘调用模式;此设计有意为之,因为搜索保留属于条目级策略:`globMaxResults` 限制路径数,`grepMaxMatches` 限制匹配数,而工具此时仍持有完整逻辑结果。通用 `dsh-spill-policy` 会在 `tools/post-execute` 阶段限制最终文本字节数;到那时搜索工具已经省略后续路径或匹配,策略无法恢复它们。
当搜索产生的逻辑结果数超过内联上限,且 `ctx.spillStore` 存在时,工具会通过 `saveText()` 保存完整的格式化结果。落盘所有者是调用 agent 的会话头 id(`exec.agent?.session.header.id`);缺少该所有者时,搜索会保留内联结果,并报告完整结果无法保存。落盘来源是工具执行身份:`{ toolName: exec.name, callId: exec.callId, label: 'result' }`。建议文件名为 `grep-results.txt` 和 `glob-results.txt`;落盘后端仍将它们视为提示,而不是路径。
如果落盘存储不存在、调用没有会话所有者,或保存失败,工具仍返回内联页和页脚,说明完整结果无法保存。格式化结果落盘存储不可用本身绝不能把搜索成功变为 `isError` 结果。
bash 原始输出流与格式化搜索落盘产物是两个不同的产物。原始 `rg` stdout 只会在所请求的 bash stdout 上限内于内存中解析;格式化落盘产物则是 `ctx.spillStore.saveText()` 生成的稳定、面向模型的恢复定位符。
### 结果形状
带有成功格式化落盘的受限 `glob` 结果会返回内联页与落盘通知:
```text
<first N paths>
(Showing N of M paths. Full sorted result stored at: /.../session-abc123/9f8e7d-glob-results.txt. Use read with offset/limit, or grep this path to search within it.)
```
带有成功格式化落盘的受限 `grep` 结果会返回分组后的预览匹配与落盘通知:
```text
Found N of M matches
<file>
Line 12: ...
(Full grep result stored at: /.../session-abc123/9f8e7d-grep-results.txt. Use read with offset/limit, or grep this path to search within it.)
```
如果完整逻辑结果未超过内联上限,系统不会创建格式化落盘产物。如果完整逻辑结果过大但无法格式化落盘,页脚会说明结果已受限,完整结果无法保存。`truncated`/省略计数是预算事实,并不表示搜索不完整;超时、无效正则表达式、运行时 `rg` 消失、无法访问 workdir、原始输出溢出、跳过二进制文件和解析失败,仍属于工具领域的错误或不完整字段。
## 考虑过的替代方案
**将 `glob`/`grep` 放在 `ctx.fs` 上。** v1 不采用:这会迫使每个文件系统后端增加搜索 API,并使本地 ripgrep 行为成为提供方 seam 的一部分。搜索是有用的产品行为,但不像 `readText` 或 `writeText` 那样属于通用文本存储原语。
**直接从 `dsh-fs-local` spawn ripgrep。** 此 Agent Note 的 v1 不采用:直接 spawn 提供最简洁的 argv 边界、stdout/stderr 控制与提前停止控制,但会重复 bash seam 已负责的进程执行事项,包括环境清理、进程组终止、超时传播、沙箱/远程执行器替换,以及有界输出捕获。如果 bash 支持的搜索被证明过于依赖 shell 字符串,或必须支持前台流式输出,该方案仍是合理优化。
**通过 `ctx.bash.start()` 实现流式提前停止。** 不采用:`start()` 会创建模型可见的后台任务语义,包括 task id、所有者 token、`bash_output`、`bash_kill`、完成通知,并且没有内置超时。`grep` 需要前台工具结果,而不是后台 bash 工作流。如果将来必须流式搜索,正确的抽象是在 bash/进程 seam 上增加前台流式进程句柄,而不是借用公开后台任务 API。
**向模型公开 bash 原始落盘路径。** 不采用:bash 原始落盘路径包含原始 `rg` stdout(对于 grep 即 `rg --json` 记录),并非稳定的格式化搜索结果。搜索只把原始 stdout 当作内部传输;模型恢复使用通过 `ctx.spillStore.saveText()` 保存的格式化结果。
**先为 bash 输出规范化增加 `spillStore.saveFile()`。** 此 Agent Note 的 v1 不采用:未来规范化 bash 时,`saveFile()` 可以帮助将现有执行器落盘文件移动到会话范围的落盘存储,但搜索只需在生成面向模型的产物前,在内存中获取有界的原始 `rg` stdout。`saveText()` 足以保存格式化搜索结果。
**依赖通用 `dsh-spill-policy`。** 不采用:通用 post-execute 落盘只能看到最终工具结果。如果 `grep`/`glob` 内联返回第一页,通用策略无法恢复省略的结果。搜索工具必须在返回有界的面向模型文本前,自行保存完整的格式化结果。
**公开 Claude Code 的完整 `GrepTool` schema。** v1 不采用:`output_mode`、上下文标志、多行、`head_limit`、`offset`、`case_insensitive` 和类型过滤器会使面向模型的接口变成 ripgrep 包装层。本 harness 将常规预算与续传机制保留在部署策略和落盘产物中。
**保留提前停止搜索,并省略格式化落盘产物。** 此提案不采用:提前停止效率更高,却不给模型检查后续结果的路径。所选 v1 优先保证结果可恢复性与实现简洁性,并以 `timeoutMs`、`rawOutputMaxBytes`、bash 后端上限和格式化落盘产物作为安全后备。
**先扩展 bash seam,增加原始输出读取器。** 不采用:可移植的 `readRawOutput(ref, maxBytes)` API 会增加引用生命周期、权限和后端存储语义。逐次运行的 `stdoutMaxBytes` 请求是更窄的 seam:搜索要么在 `rawOutputMaxBytes` 内收到完整 stdout,要么明确失败。
**始终注册,只有执行时才报告缺少 `rg`。** 不采用:模型可见工具 schema 是部署能够尝试该能力的承诺。如果 bash 执行器在加载时找不到 ripgrep,更安全的接口是完全没有 `glob`/`grep` 工具或提示词指引。对于注册后发生环境变化的情况,执行时的 `rg` 缺失分类仍作为防御性回退。
## 测试
- 测试覆盖注册时 `rg` 探测(探测成功会注册两个工具和提示词章节;非零探测会跳过工具与提示词章节并发出警告;基础设施探测失败会拒绝插件加载),证明中止的 `exec.signal` 会到达 bash 后端(通过同一引用的 spec 断言和 `SEARCH_ABORTED` 结果),并覆盖命令构造/引用(恶意模式、带空格路径、以短横线开头的值、引号、换行、glob 元字符:既有单元断言,也针对每个恶意值执行真实 `bash -c` 往返)、将 `grep.path` 用作文件与目录目标、将 `glob.path` 用作目录搜索根、无效模式处理、无匹配、格式错误的 `rg --json` 输出、匹配行预览截断、原始输出溢出、超时/中止、格式化落盘成功/失败、包自有 `SEARCH_*` 错误代码,以及无后台任务不变量。
- 直接覆盖第一方工具自有落盘先例:落盘后端存在、落盘后端缺失、`saveText()` 失败,以及缺少落盘所有者。
- 该包通过真实 Loader 路径覆盖命名空间插件的导出形状(`name`、`inject`、`Config` 和 `apply`,且没有默认导出)。
- 真实执行器集成测试(`dsh-bash-local` + 真实 `rg`)验证外部世界:恶意模式保持惰性、逐会话 cwd 解析、VCS 元数据排除、按修改时间排序,以及真实 ripgrep stderr 分类。如果测试进程的 PATH 中没有 `rg`,该测试会自行跳过(这是与无密钥 e2e 跳过相似的 CI 兼容措施);伪执行器测试覆盖注册和执行时缺少 `rg`,并由逐文件 100% 覆盖率门禁兜底。
- transcript 可见落盘通知仍有快照缺口:此功能合入时记录了缺口说明,没有快照。快照层会回放 acp-agent 树;在其中加入搜索插件会改变组装的系统提示词,必须使用真实密钥重新录制每一份预期输出,而实现环境没有密钥。落盘通知的确切 transcript 文本由单元测试固定(`formatGlobOutput`/`formatGrepOutput` 以及通过注册表执行的落盘测试);下一次拥有密钥的会话应把插件接入 acp-agent 树,并运行一次 `test:snapshot:record`。
## 后果
- `glob` 和 `grep` 是 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-fs-search` 中的条件式面向模型工具,不是 `ctx.fs` 提供方方法,也不属于现有 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-fs` 根插件。只有 bash 执行器能找到 `rg` 时才会注册;该包注入 `tools`、`systemPrompt` 和 `bash`,不注入 `fs`,并使 `ctx.spillStore` 保持可选,读取时使用 `ctx.get('spillStore')`。
- Schema 严格为 `glob(pattern, path?)` 和 `grep(pattern, path?, include?)`;搜索上限与超时是带默认值并经过验证的 Config 字段(`globMaxResults`、`grepMaxMatches`、`grepMaxLineBytes`、`rawOutputMaxBytes`、`timeoutMs`)。
- 工具通过 `ctx.bash.resolve(request)` → `ctx.bash.run(spec)` 执行,转发 `exec.signal`,绝不调用 `ctx.bash.start()`,也绝不公开 bash task id。如果存在 `exec.agent?.session.header.cwd`,bash 请求 workdir 来自该值;解析后的 `spec.workdir` 决定执行与相对路径显示。
- 工具向 bash seam 请求 `stdoutMaxBytes: rawOutputMaxBytes`,只解析上限内未截断的 stdout,并将超限或仍被截断的原始输出视为明确的搜索失败;绝不向模型公开原始 `rg` 输出。
- 只要可用,过大的完整格式化结果会通过 `ctx.spillStore.saveText()` 保存,而内联结果保持有界;落盘失败、后端缺失或所有者缺失时,系统保留内联结果并报告未保存的剩余内容,绝不会返回 `isError`。
- 包 README、生成的配置目录与导出 JSDoc 会记录 Config 字段和 `SEARCH_*` 代码;tui-agent 示例会提供条件式工具插件(acp-agent 树等待完成上述快照重新录制);fs 组 README 会记录 `rg` 可用性以及 bash/文件系统共置部署要求。
## 风险
在宽泛模式下,完整运行的 `grep` 可能比提前停止搜索更慢。v1 为了简化实现并恢复完整结果而接受这项成本,同时通过工具超时、bash 超时、`rawOutputMaxBytes` 和输出上限加以约束。如果实际运行过慢,仍可采用直接 ripgrep 或前台流式替代方案。
Shell 命令构造是最尖锐的安全边界。`ctx.bash` 接受命令字符串而不是 argv 向量,因此实现必须集中处理 shell 引用,并测试恶意模式、带空格路径、以短横线开头的模式、引号、换行和 glob 元字符。
v1 假设 bash 与文件系统共置部署。如果 bash 搜索一个工作区,而 `read` 工具基于另一个根解析路径,返回路径可能无法继续读取。该包会记录这项要求,但不在运行时验证。
落盘定位符由后端负责。当前本地后端返回本地文件系统路径,适用于 `read`/`grep` 能打开这些文件的部署;远程或工作区受限部署可以使用另一种后端,让其定位符和检索提示指向受支持的检索机制。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-10-agent-session-identity-and-log-location.md: 7b51ae41ac00c12a496940c891092580003646fa
2026-07-10-agent-session-identity-and-log-location.zh.md: 2574e1327f424069cdff68ef9b8de20c490077f0

View File

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-10-agent-session-identity-and-log-location.zh.md)
## Problem
An agent can identify its workspace through `session.header.cwd`, but a model using bash cannot reliably identify the session that owns the call or the durable transcript that records it. Searching `./.sessions` guesses deployment config and JSONL layout; custom roots, alternate persistence backends, resume, forks, and concurrent parent/child agents make that guess unreliable. Hooks have the same need for transcript location, while future plugins may need to expose other harness-owned environment facts to shell commands.
@@ -38,7 +40,7 @@ The registry rebuilds a trusted overlay for every foreground and background bash
Session persistence remains the fact owner: JSONL does not depend on tool-bash or register shell variables itself, and hooks continue to consume `locate()` directly. Tool-bash is the translation layer from the persistence fact into a shell convention. Other plugins that need shell-visible facts depend on the registry and register their own keys; they do not modify `process.env`.
The bash seam exports `DSH_ENV_PREFIX` as the single namespace source and derives `DshEnvironmentKey` from its `typeof`. Tool-bash derives built-in names and model guidance from that constant, while executors use it for filtering and channel validation. The seam carries the managed overlay separately as `BashExecRequest.dshEnv` / `BashExecSpec.dshEnv`. Ordinary `env` remains the general in-process plugin surface used by hooks, but cannot contain managed keys; symmetrically, `dshEnv` cannot contain ordinary keys. The local executor rejects either wrong channel before spawn, removes every inherited ambient managed key, applies its ordinary scrub/terminal environment/explicit `env`, and finally merges the trusted `dshEnv` snapshot. This guarantees that a missing value means absent now rather than inherited from an outer or previous harness. The model-facing tool still ignores model-supplied `env`/`stdin` arguments.
The bash seam exports `DSH_ENV_PREFIX` as the single namespace source and derives `DshEnvironmentKey` from its `typeof`. Tool-bash derives built-in names and model guidance from that constant, while executors use it for ambient filtering. The seam carries the managed overlay separately as `BashExecRequest.dshEnv` / `BashExecSpec.dshEnv`: ordinary `env` remains the general in-process plugin surface used by hooks, while `dshEnv` is typed to managed keys. The local executor removes every inherited ambient managed key, applies its ordinary scrub/terminal environment/explicit `env`, and finally merges the trusted `dshEnv` snapshot, so an `env` entry can never displace a managed value. This guarantees that a missing value means absent now rather than inherited from an outer or previous harness. The model-facing tool still ignores model-supplied `env`/`stdin` arguments.
The bash tool description teaches only the durable convention: current harness environment facts are available through managed `$DSH_*` variables and may be inspected when needed. It does not enumerate persistence-specific keys or add a permanent system-prompt section. Tool schemas are already logged in request headers and tool output is logged as `tool/result`, so no new session event is required.
@@ -80,6 +82,6 @@ A keyless full-loop integration drives the real agent loop, JSONL persistence, t
## Consequences
Every model bash child receives current Harness home and shell identity, and agent calls additionally receive stable session identity. JSONL-backed calls get an optional target path; non-file persistence omits it honestly. The complete `DSH_*` namespace inside these children is managed by the harness: ambient values are removed, current trusted values are re-added, and ordinary callers cannot use `env` to bypass ownership checks.
Every model bash child receives current Harness home and shell identity, and agent calls additionally receive stable session identity. JSONL-backed calls get an optional target path; non-file persistence omits it honestly. The managed `DSH_*` facts inside these children come from the harness: ambient values are removed, current trusted values are re-added last, and an ordinary caller's `env` entry cannot displace them.
The namespace is discoverable but not secret. Paths can reveal configured roots, lazy targets can be absent or stale, and a command can override variables inside its own shell syntax. Consumers treat them as correlation and environment facts, verify transcript metadata when attribution matters, and rely on sandbox/filesystem policy rather than variable secrecy for authorization.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
# Agent Note: 向工具与钩子公开 agent(智能体)会话标识和 JSONL 位置
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-10-agent-session-identity-and-log-location.md) | 中文
## 问题
agent 可以通过 `session.header.cwd` 识别其工作区,但使用 bash 的模型无法可靠识别当前调用所属的会话,也无法找到记录该调用的持久 transcript(文本记录)。搜索 `./.sessions` 等同于猜测部署配置和 JSONL 布局;自定义根目录、替代持久化后端、恢复、fork,以及并发运行的父子 agent,都会让这种猜测失效。钩子同样需要 transcript 位置,而未来的插件也可能需要向 shell 命令公开其他由 harness 所有的环境事实。
这项边界必须维持两个属性:事实的所有者决定如何解析该事实;每个子进程接收每次执行的快照,而不是进程级可变全局状态。尤其是嵌套 harness 不能把环境中的 `DSH_*` 值泄漏给当前 agent、持久化后端或配置均可能不同的子进程。
## 决策
在 [`SessionPersistence`](../architecture/2026-06-14-session-persistence.md) seam 上增加同步、无副作用的位置查询:
```ts
import type { SessionHeader } from '@deepseek-ai/dsh-session'
interface SessionLocation {
readonly kind: string
readonly path: string
}
interface SessionPersistence {
locate(meta: SessionHeader): SessionLocation | undefined
}
```
`path` 是指向该后端为 `meta` 保留的专用日志的绝对本地路径;`kind` 标识其表示形式。JSONL 使用解析后的根目录和路径辅助函数返回 `{ kind: 'jsonl', path }`。SQLite 以及任何无法诚实提供逐会话本地产物的后端均返回 `undefined`。该查询不会创建或刷写任何内容,因此即使文件尚不存在,也可以报告延迟创建的目标路径。
面向模型的 bash 包(package)拥有一个 `ctx.bashEnv` 注册表。贡献方声明稳定名称、它可能返回的每个 `DSH_*` 键、每个键的说明,以及 `resolve(execution: ToolExecution)`。贡献方名称重复、键所有权重复、使用保留键、声明格式错误、运行时输出未声明或输出不是字符串时,系统都会明确失败。注册属于 Cordis effect,并随贡献插件的 fiber 一同移除。`list()` 无需运行解析器即可公开声明,从而让环境接口可供诊断工具和未来的提示词/UI 消费方枚举。
注册表会为每次前台和后台 bash `ToolExecution` 重新构建受信任的覆盖层:
- `DSH_HOME` 始终是配置的 Harness home 绝对路径。独立的 [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-paths`](../../../../packages/util/paths/README.md) 工具库规定其优先级:显式 `dshHome`,其次是环境中的 `$DSH_HOME`,最后是 `~/.dsh`。
- `DSH_SHELL=1` 始终存在,用于标识由 DeepSeek Harness 管理、面向模型的 bash 子进程。
- 执行具有关联 agent 时,`DSH_SESSION_ID` 存在并等于 `agent.session.header.id`。
- 内置的持久化转换层提供 `DSH_SESSION_JSONL` 的条件是 `ctx.sessionPersistence.locate(header)` 返回 `kind: 'jsonl'`。
会话持久化仍然是事实所有者:JSONL 不依赖 tool-bash,也不会自行注册 shell 变量;钩子继续直接使用 `locate()`。tool-bash 是把持久化事实转换为 shell 约定的转换层。其他需要向 shell 公开事实的插件依赖该注册表,并注册各自的键;它们不修改 `process.env`。
bash seam 导出 `DSH_ENV_PREFIX` 作为唯一的命名空间来源,并派生 `DshEnvironmentKey`,其来源是该常量的 `typeof`。tool-bash 从该常量派生内置名称与模型指引,执行器则使用该常量过滤环境中已有的值。seam 通过 `BashExecRequest.dshEnv`/`BashExecSpec.dshEnv` 单独传递受管理的覆盖层:普通 `env` 仍是钩子所用的通用进程内插件接口,`dshEnv` 则以类型约束为受管理键。本地执行器移除环境中继承的全部受管理键,依次应用普通清理、终端环境和显式 `env`,最后合并受信任的 `dshEnv` 快照,因此 `env` 条目永远无法顶掉受管理的值。这保证了值缺失表示它当前确实不存在,而不是从外层或先前的 harness 继承而来。面向模型的工具仍忽略模型提供的 `env`/`stdin` 参数。
bash 工具说明只讲解持久约定:当前 harness 环境事实通过受管理的 `$DSH_*` 变量提供,可以在需要时查看。它不会枚举持久化专用键,也不会添加永久的系统提示词章节。工具 schema 已记录在请求 header 中,工具输出则记录为 `tool/result`,因此无需新增会话事件。
[Claude Code 和 Codex 钩子桥接层](2026-06-30-hook-bridges.md)在构造 payload 时,从同一持久化 seam 解析 transcript 位置。Codex 使用 `transcript_path: string | null`;Claude Code 保留其字符串字段,并回退为 `''`。钩子查询不会物化或刷写会话。
## 同类产品调研
同类产品把稳定标识与物理存储分开处理。Codex 向 spawn 的 shell 注入稳定的 `CODEX_THREAD_ID`,而 recorder 和钩子接口负责提供 transcript 路径。Claude Code 通过结构化的钩子/状态输入提供 `session_id` 和 `transcript_path`。OpenCode 在结构化工具上下文中携带标识;Kimi Code 展开会话占位符;Reasonix 则把活动会话路径保存在控制器上。可移植的规则是:在调用边界注入标识,由存储层解析位置,绝不在并发 harness 中使用进程级的当前会话全局变量。
## 生命周期与持久化语义
新会话在第一个轮次之前获得 id,因此它的首次 bash 调用即可读取 `DSH_SESSION_ID` 和 JSONL 目标。JSONL 文件可能要等到第一次成功的轮次结束检查点后才存在,而且在一个轮次仍未结束时,它只包含上次刷写的前缀。`DSH_SESSION_JSONL` 是位置提示,不是授权凭据或新鲜度保证。
恢复操作复用已加载的 header,因此 id 和位置不变。fork 和 spawn 会创建新的会话 id 与位置。父子调用分别从自己的 `ToolExecution.agent` 解析事实;即使调用重叠,每条命令也会收到不可变快照。替换持久化服务会影响后续收集,因为转换层在执行时查询 `ctx.get('sessionPersistence')`;注册表本身受 effect 作用域约束,并且可安全用于 HMR(热模块替换)。
`dshHome` 是与会话无关的部署上下文。agent-core 通过 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-paths` 解析出一个值,并将其同时传给 tool-bash 和本地 skill(技能)发现;独立消费方调用同一解析器。如果顶层 `dshHome` 与 `skills.local.dshHome` 均已提供但解析结果不同,组合会失败,而不会公开互相矛盾的 home。持久化可以独立变更,无需把其事实冻结到会话前缀中。
## 测试
单元测试覆盖注册表声明校验、effect 释放、逐次执行收集、`dshHome` 优先级,以及本地执行器清理并重建 `DSH_*` 的顺序。请求录制测试覆盖前台/后台快照、无 agent 调用、持久化不存在或为 JSONL、忽略模型 `env`,以及父子隔离。JSONL/SQLite 定位器契约测试与两套钩子桥接测试均锁定 transcript 可用和不可用两种方言。
一项无密钥的完整循环集成测试会在第一个轮次驱动真实的 agent loop、JSONL 持久化、tool-bash 与 bash-local。子进程打印 `DSH_HOME`、`DSH_SHELL`、会话 id、JSONL 目标和继承的陈旧哨兵值;测试校验当前值、陈旧变量不存在、刷写前文件不存在,并最终检查持久化 header。快照覆盖会锁定录制请求 header 中的通用 bash 说明。该契约属于确定性的本地执行,不涉及模型选择,因此无需带密钥测试。
## 考虑过的替代方案
**只提供 id,再用 `find`。** 搜索无法得知自定义根目录或后端布局,并且在多会话环境下存在竞态。
**只提供绝对路径。** 路径可能不可用、延迟创建或取决于表示形式,不能作为稳定的会话标识。
**使用全局 `process.env`。** 并发 agent 会互相覆盖,嵌套 harness 也会继承陈旧的当前会话值。
**把持久化说明放入会话前缀。** 活动服务可以在 HMR 或未来的后端切换中改变,而会话前缀保持冻结;持久化专用指引会因此变得陈旧。
**使用类型化 waterfall 事件。** 监听器不运行就无法声明所有权,而后续监听器可以无提示地覆盖键。注册表能在注册时检测键冲突,并且保持可枚举。
**让每个持久化后端直接注册 bash 环境。** 这会反转依赖方向,让存储层依赖某一个消费方,并迫使未使用 bash 的部署也引入它。钩子仍然需要 `locate()`。
**增加面向模型的 `session_info` 工具。** bash 已经提供查询接口,新增工具只会多出 schema 和一次调用;注册表可以扩展至未来的环境事实,无需为每项事实增加一个工具。
## 影响
每个面向模型的 bash 子进程都会收到当前 Harness home 和 shell 标识,关联 agent 的调用还会收到稳定的会话标识。使用 JSONL 后端的调用可以获得可选的目标路径;非文件持久化会如实省略该值。这些子进程中受管理的 `DSH_*` 事实来自 harness:系统移除环境中已有的受管理值、在最后重新加入当前受信任的值,普通调用方的 `env` 条目无法顶掉它们。
该命名空间可被发现,但并非秘密。路径可能泄露配置的根目录,延迟创建的目标也可能不存在或处于陈旧状态,而且命令可以在自己的 shell 语法中覆盖变量。消费方应把这些值视为关联信息和环境事实,在归属关系重要时校验 transcript 元数据,并依靠沙箱/文件系统策略而不是变量保密性来完成授权。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-10-parallel-tool-call-execution.md: c67ae61939a3e7974f9bf729058a57f5576308a1
2026-07-10-parallel-tool-call-execution.zh.md: a80317aa951cbf3a9cae0651348c99712a4193d5

View File

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-10-parallel-tool-call-execution.zh.md)
## Problem
An assistant message may contain several sibling `tool-call` blocks. Running them serially adds the latency of independent reads and web requests even though the model has already requested them together.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
# Agent Note: 按单次调用安全性并行执行工具调用
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-10-parallel-tool-call-execution.md) | 中文
## 问题
一条 assistant 消息可以包含多个并列的 `tool-call` 块。尽管模型已经同时请求了这些调用,串行执行仍会叠加各个独立读取和 Web 请求的延迟。
并发属于宿主调度范畴,不是面向模型的工具元数据。循环需要在不硬编码工具名称、不向 JSON Schema 暴露调度策略的前提下,判断哪些调用可以重叠执行。
会话日志仍是权威记录:每个已启动的调用都有审计事件,都会获得结果;无论完成顺序如何,模型历史都按原始调用顺序观察结果。
## 决策
每个工具都可以提供可选的 `isConcurrencySafe(args)` 分类器。该分类器必须是同步纯函数:它只检查当前调用已解析的参数,不执行 I/O 或任何变更。只有显式返回 `true` 才表示选择并行;分类器缺失、参数无效、分类器抛错或返回任何其他值,都会使该调用按独占方式执行。规范类型契约见[工具数据结构](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/tools.md)。
分类器有意设计为一元函数。返回 `true` 表示工具承诺:此调用可以与任何同样返回 `true` 的并列调用重叠执行。调度器不会比较调用,也不会证明它们的资源访问相容。
这个一元分类器仍然可以感知输入。工具可以将只读操作分类为并行,将变更操作分类为独占。该接口无法表达「仅当路径不同时,这些写入才安全」之类的关系规则,因此,安全性依赖并列调用的调用仍按独占方式执行。
`defineTool()` 先验证参数,再调用类型化分类器。无效参数会被归为独占,且只有该调用真正执行时才会产生常规参数错误。`ctx.tools.executionMode(exec)` 会解析当前有效的工具定义,并返回带标签的 `parallel` 或 `exclusive` 模式;未知工具将以安全方式退化为独占。
使用带标签的模式,而不是公开布尔型调度器 API,使得以后可以表达感知资源的变体,无需改变分类器契约。
## 调度与顺序
循环会等待完整的 assistant 消息,对每个调用只解析一次,为每个调用创建独立的 `ToolExecution`,再按模型顺序扫描。连续的并行调用组成一组;每个独占调用单独组成一组,并构成顺序屏障。各组按顺序执行。分类采用惰性方式:每经过一个屏障,调度器都会解析下一个调用;补充并行池之前,还会重新分类每个后续调用。如果注册表变更使该调用变为独占,当前池会先完全排空,然后该调用才作为下一个屏障启动。
例如:
```text
[parallel read(A), parallel read(B), exclusive write(A), parallel read(C)]
→ [read(A), read(B)]
→ [write(A)]
→ [read(C)]
```
`read(A)` 和 `read(B)` 可以重叠执行。`write(A)` 要等两者都完成后才启动,`read(C)` 则要等写入完成后才启动。
每组都使用一个由 `maxParallelToolCalls` 限制上限的滚动池:循环先按模型顺序启动调用,直到达到上限;每有一个调用结算,就再启动一个。独占组是容量为 1 的池。将上限设为 `1` 可保持串行执行。
只有派发和工具主体会重叠执行。`tools/pre-execute` 和 `tools/post-execute` 按模型顺序运行,因为中间件可能维护对顺序敏感的状态。`tools/execute` 包装层会环绕并发派发运行,因此必须能在不同执行之间重入。
每个已启动的调用都会在进入 pre-execute 门禁之前立即追加 `tool/call`。已完成的派发占据模型顺序的槽位;提交游标只有在下一个槽位就绪时,才会追加 `tool/result` 并收集 `additionalContexts`。实时界面可以显示多个待处理调用,但结果和工具执行后的上下文仍按模型顺序排列。
如果在一组启动前中止,系统不会记录该组的任何调用。如果在一组执行期间中止,系统会停止补充池,等待已启动的调用,按顺序提交其结果,在这些结果之后排空已接受的批次上下文,然后通过现有中止路径结束该步骤。从未启动的调用没有审计事件。
Code Mode 仍不使用此调度器,因为模型只会发出一个原生 `run_code` 调用。`run_code` 及其内部派发队列仍按串行方式执行;`mode: 'both'` 中的原生并列调用使用常规调度器。
## 安全契约
工具返回 `true` 即承诺:其主体可以与其他并行调用同时运行。它不得直接变更父会话或其他由父级拥有的状态;它将输出返回给循环,由循环按模型顺序提交。
执行期间触及的任何共享状态都必须支持并发。这也包括工具包装层和提供方:它们可以在内部串行化,也可以实施自身容量限制,但必须在并发派发时不破坏状态。
## 配置与声明
`maxParallelToolCalls` 是 AgentLoop 的正整数部署上限,由工厂创建的所有 agent(智能体)共享。默认值为 `10`;`1` 保持串行执行。字段和默认值的精确定义见生成的[配置目录](../../../../docs/config-catalog.md)。
当前实现中的声明保持保守。Web 搜索、Web 获取和文件系统读取选择并行。文件系统写入与编辑、bash 工具、subagent 委派、工作流、用户交互、todo 变更、Code Mode 以及 Cordis 变更工具仍按独占方式执行。subagent 可能共享父级的工作区或外部资源,而一元分类器无法证明并列委派的作用互不重叠。Bash 没有已证明的输入敏感分类器,因此仍按独占方式执行。
文件系统读取依赖一个范围很窄的记录器例外:其同步观察更新可以不按顺序结算,但写入和编辑在变更前会重新检查已观察的版本,因此陈旧状态只会导致 `FS_STALE_VERSION`。
## 验证
单元测试覆盖固定了安全退化的分类、类型化参数验证、分组、屏障、替换注册表后的实时重新分类、滚动上限、独立执行对象、中间件顺序、有序结果与上下文,以及中止排空。第一方测试固定每项并行声明。
快照覆盖固定了可见的多调用 transcript(文本记录):待处理调用可以重叠执行,已完成结果仍按模型顺序排列。Code Mode 覆盖固定其串行边界。此调度属于确定性循环行为,因此无需依赖提供方的 e2e 测试。
## 备选方案
**保持串行执行。** 这可以避免新的顺序和中止情形,但会保留独立并列调用所产生的不必要延迟。
**使用一个工具级布尔值。** 固定的 `supportsParallelToolCalls` 标志更小,但无法区分同一工具的只读操作和变更操作。感知参数的分类器保留了这项区分。
**使用有状态的分类。** 向分类器提供实时 agent、注册表或 I/O 访问,会使决策依赖分类器的运行时机,并在分类与派发之间留下缺口。可变授权和陈旧状态检查仍属于执行时职责。
**使用感知并列调用或感知资源的分类。** 调度器可以成对比较调用,或让每个调用声明资源读写要求。这样可以并行化不冲突的写入,却要求不相关工具共享资源标识和冲突语义。一元契约选择放弃这部分并发性,并在安全性取决于关系时安全退化。
**并行执行完整的工具流水线。** 这样可以让循环继续使用公开的单调用 API,但会并发运行 pre-execute 和 post-execute 中间件。现有防护和钩子桥可能承载有序状态,因此只允许派发重叠。
**公开分阶段方法或调度 waterfall。** 公开的 `prepare` / `dispatch` / `finalize` 方法或 `tools/execution-mode` 事件,会在出现另一个消费方之前扩大扩展接口。循环使用内部调度器视图,而 `executionMode(exec)` 为策略 seam 保留了插入点。
**在模型流式输出时启动调用。** 这可能进一步降低延迟,但会改变 assistant 消息的权威性、回放以及调用/结果配对。调度器只在 assistant 消息完成后才启动。
**使用固定大小的窗口。** 如果在启动下一个窗口前等待当前窗口的每个调用,一个缓慢调用就会使容量闲置。滚动池在保持上限的同时避免了这项延迟。
**向模型暴露并发元数据。** 模型已可以发出并列调用。宿主调度元数据会扩大请求,却无助于工具选择。
## 影响
该设计以安全退化为原则,对工具作者而言也很简单,但无法利用必须通过比较并列调用才能确认安全的并发性。工具过于宽泛地选择并行,可能暴露潜在的共享状态竞态。
在某些情形下,并行调用会先行启动,而串行执行原本会在轮到这些调用之前中止。因此,调度器只记录已启动的调用,在中止时将其排空,且取消后绝不启动替换调用。
有序提交可能会让快速结果等待较慢的早期并列调用。这保留了回放和模型历史顺序,同时实时界面仍可显示待处理进度。
并发外部调用可能会争用配额或进程容量。提供方负责自身容量控制;循环上限只限制一个 agent 步骤中的调用数量。
工具注册是调度边界。调度器会在每个屏障之后以及每次补充池之前重新分类,因此注册表变更会影响尚未启动的调用。已启动的调用保留它们进入池时所依据的调度决策。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-10-session-query-service.md: 722f6bf6163278719c3bbb598ed2a2a9d042fb8e
2026-07-10-session-query-service.zh.md: ae6fcb78e18afe83784560c493ea93b7ee0bd68c
2026-07-10-session-query-service.md: 42d12fe2c5e34e71a6166816857b9ced52a61a95
2026-07-10-session-query-service.zh.md: 2c8d322ca6099db1c8ddbb8a02efbc8729e83dbf

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Full-text search is related but materially larger. Putting provider coordination
## Decision
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-query` owns the single abstract `ctx.sessionQuery` service over one logical corpus. It concretely implements `listSessions()`, provider-independent `filterSessions(filters)`, `listEvents(sessionId)`, `filterEvents(sessionId, filters)`, bounded `readEvent(request)`, `traceSession(sessionId)`, and `traceEvent(request)`, while concrete backends implement its two full-text methods. The [unified service decision](../architecture/2026-07-23-unified-session-query-service.md) owns that topology, the [SQLite search decision](2026-07-10-sqlite-session-query-provider.md) owns search behavior, and the [tracing decision](2026-07-13-session-query-tracing.md) owns lineage and event-relationship semantics.
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-query` owns the single abstract `ctx.sessionQuery` service over one logical corpus. It concretely implements `listSessions()`, provider-independent `filterSessions(filters)`, `listEvents(sessionId)`, `filterEvents(sessionId, filters)`, bounded `readEvent(request)`, `traceSession(sessionId)`, and `traceEvent(request)`, while concrete backends implement its two full-text methods. The [unified service decision](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-23-unified-session-query-service.md) owns that topology, the [SQLite search decision](2026-07-10-sqlite-session-query-provider.md) owns search behavior, and the [tracing decision](2026-07-13-session-query-tracing.md) owns lineage and event-relationship semantics.
The service observes the optional `ctx.sessionPersistence` binding dynamically but retains no persisted cache or invalidation listener. Each cross-corpus list asks the active backend for authoritative metadata, then overlays a fresh live-store list. Matching ids become one `SessionRecord`: the live header wins and `live`/`persisted` independently report source availability. Immutable header disagreement is `SESSION_QUERY_SOURCE_CONFLICT`.

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Status: implemented
## 决策
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-query` 拥有面向单一逻辑语料库的唯一抽象 `ctx.sessionQuery` 服务。它具体实现 `listSessions()`、提供方无关的 `filterSessions(filters)`、`listEvents(sessionId)`、`filterEvents(sessionId, filters)`、有界的 `readEvent(request)`、`traceSession(sessionId)` 和 `traceEvent(request)`,而具体后端实现其两个全文搜索方法。[统一服务决策](../architecture/2026-07-23-unified-session-query-service.md)拥有这一拓扑,[SQLite 搜索决策](2026-07-10-sqlite-session-query-provider.md)拥有搜索行为,[追踪决策](2026-07-13-session-query-tracing.md)拥有血缘与事件关系语义。
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-query` 拥有面向单一逻辑语料库的唯一抽象 `ctx.sessionQuery` 服务。它具体实现 `listSessions()`、提供方无关的 `filterSessions(filters)`、`listEvents(sessionId)`、`filterEvents(sessionId, filters)`、有界的 `readEvent(request)`、`traceSession(sessionId)` 和 `traceEvent(request)`,而具体后端实现其两个全文搜索方法。[统一服务决策](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-23-unified-session-query-service.md)拥有这一拓扑,[SQLite 搜索决策](2026-07-10-sqlite-session-query-provider.md)拥有搜索行为,[追踪决策](2026-07-13-session-query-tracing.md)拥有血缘与事件关系语义。
该服务动态观察可选的 `ctx.sessionPersistence` 绑定,但不保留持久化缓存或失效监听器。每次跨语料库列表操作向活跃后端请求权威元数据,然后叠加一份新鲜的活跃 store 列表。id 匹配的条目合并为一条 `SessionRecord`:活跃 header 优先,`live`/`persisted` 各自独立报告来源可用性。不可变 header 不一致时产生 `SESSION_QUERY_SOURCE_CONFLICT`。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-10-sqlite-session-query-provider.md: 98618a7eb572ce59c5fa5984675c9dc57b3f4289
2026-07-10-sqlite-session-query-provider.zh.md: bb3650da907cf86a853f748fa0ee40d5c2168709
2026-07-10-sqlite-session-query-provider.md: 372c21241f9ae5d7300165f016db9b36e6b52855
2026-07-10-sqlite-session-query-provider.zh.md: dc10a6e6a609809aa6f2b194f262e2642d9545bc

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Splitting those concerns across a provider coordinator and a database implementa
## Decision
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-query` declares one abstract `ctx.sessionQuery` service whose exact reads, filters, and traces are concrete and whose two full-text methods are abstract. `searchSessions(request, exec?)` returns cursor-paginated `SessionSearchHit`s grouped by each session's strongest matching event; `searchEvents(request, exec?)` returns `SessionEventSearchHit`s within one logical session. Both requests require `query`, accept `limit` and an owned branded `SessionSearchCursor`, and support an optional abort signal. Session search accepts `sessionFilters` plus event metadata filters; event search accepts event metadata filters. Results expose bounded plain-text snippets but no provider identifier or numeric relevance score. The [unified service decision](../architecture/2026-07-23-unified-session-query-service.md) owns the single-key topology.
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-query` declares one abstract `ctx.sessionQuery` service whose exact reads, filters, and traces are concrete and whose two full-text methods are abstract. `searchSessions(request, exec?)` returns cursor-paginated `SessionSearchHit`s grouped by each session's strongest matching event; `searchEvents(request, exec?)` returns `SessionEventSearchHit`s within one logical session. Both requests require `query`, accept `limit` and an owned branded `SessionSearchCursor`, and support an optional abort signal. Session search accepts `sessionFilters` plus event metadata filters; event search accepts event metadata filters. Results expose bounded plain-text snippets but no provider identifier or numeric relevance score. The [unified service decision](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-23-unified-session-query-service.md) owns the single-key topology.
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-query-sqlite` extends the interface service and is the sole concrete owner of `ctx.sessionQuery`. It depends on live `ctx.sessions`, observes optional `ctx.sessionPersistence` dynamically, and owns a dedicated derived SQLite database. There is no search-provider registry, coordinator, persistence event, or agent-loop integration.

View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Status: implemented
## 决策
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-query` 声明一个抽象的 `ctx.sessionQuery` 服务,其精确读取、过滤与追踪均有具体实现,仅有两项全文方法为抽象方法。`searchSessions(request, exec?)` 返回按游标分页的 `SessionSearchHit`,并按每个会话中匹配度最强的事件分组;`searchEvents(request, exec?)` 返回一个逻辑会话内的 `SessionEventSearchHit`。两种请求都必须提供 `query`,可以接受 `limit` 和由服务拥有的品牌化 `SessionSearchCursor`,并支持可选的中止信号。会话搜索接受 `sessionFilters` 与事件元数据过滤器,事件搜索接受事件元数据过滤器。结果会公开有界的纯文本摘要片段,但不公开提供方标识符或数值相关性分数。单一键拓扑由[统一服务决策](../architecture/2026-07-23-unified-session-query-service.md)定义。
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-query` 声明一个抽象的 `ctx.sessionQuery` 服务,其精确读取、过滤与追踪均有具体实现,仅有两项全文方法为抽象方法。`searchSessions(request, exec?)` 返回按游标分页的 `SessionSearchHit`,并按每个会话中匹配度最强的事件分组;`searchEvents(request, exec?)` 返回一个逻辑会话内的 `SessionEventSearchHit`。两种请求都必须提供 `query`,可以接受 `limit` 和由服务拥有的品牌化 `SessionSearchCursor`,并支持可选的中止信号。会话搜索接受 `sessionFilters` 与事件元数据过滤器,事件搜索接受事件元数据过滤器。结果会公开有界的纯文本摘要片段,但不公开提供方标识符或数值相关性分数。单一键拓扑由[统一服务决策](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-23-unified-session-query-service.md)定义。
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-query-sqlite` 扩展接口服务,并且是 `ctx.sessionQuery` 唯一的具体所有者。它依赖实时的 `ctx.sessions`,动态观察可选的 `ctx.sessionPersistence`,并拥有一个专用的派生 SQLite 数据库。系统没有搜索提供方注册表、协调器、持久化事件或 agent loop(智能体循环)集成。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-21-tui-auto-pane-title.md: 069fd33a8874d9ad3d4472dd13f5130b2df65f08
2026-07-21-tui-auto-pane-title.zh.md: 580f36b2563e21231a22cab3f0c1689c6f3e8d9d
2026-07-13-session-query-tracing.md: 47c12824a331546676d3bc79920f861afe648431
2026-07-13-session-query-tracing.zh.md: 485060f9e57b5644f7b364e2120bfe30607b1945

View File

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-13-session-query-tracing.zh.md)
## Problem
Session relationships are encoded across immutable headers, positional surface operations, and logged provenance arrays. A consumer reconstructing those relationships directly would need to duplicate corpus precedence, surface folding, malformed-log handling, deterministic lineage ordering, and cloning. Positional replacement and provenance are different graphs, so collapsing them into one generic edge type would also lose meaning.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
# Agent Note: 会话查询关系追踪
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-13-session-query-tracing.md) | 中文
## 问题
会话关系分散编码在不可变 header、位置式表面操作和已记录的来源数组中。消费方如果直接重建这些关系,就必须重复实现语料优先级、表面折叠、格式错误日志的处理、确定性的谱系顺序和克隆。位置替换与来源属于不同的图,因此把两者合并为一种通用边类型也会丢失含义。
## 决策
`ctx.sessionQuery` 除精确读取外,还公开 `traceSession(sessionId)` 和 `traceEvent({ sessionId, seq })`。两者都是基于现有「实时数据优先」语料的一次性视图:会话追踪读取一次完整语料列表,事件追踪读取一份逻辑日志并执行一次规范表面折叠。服务在调用结束后不会保留谱系、反向索引或替换状态。
`SessionLineageTrace` 返回目标、按从直接父级到外层父级排序的已知父级,以及递归的后代树;同级节点先按创建时间排序,再按 session id 排序。`complete: true` 会携带已知根节点;`complete: false` 会携带第一个无法解析的父级 id。与目标相连的循环会以 `SESSION_QUERY_INVALID_LINEAGE` 失败。
`SessionEventTrace` 将位置关系与来源关系分开保留。`replacedBy` 是直接的位置替换者,`replacementChain` 沿替换者追踪至最终节点,`replacedEventSeqs` 则列出目标直接移除的真实表面节点。`sourceEventSeqs` 保留日志中直接来源的顺序,而 `derivedEventSeqs` 按日志顺序列出后续的直接反向引用。来源关系不会传递展开。
## 校验边界
事件追踪会在分析表面之前检查目标是否存在。随后,事件列表与追踪都会使用 `dsh-session` 的单遍表面折叠,对加载的日志整体进行接受或拒绝:事件 seq 从零开始且连续;表面标记符合事件类型的适用范围;只有表面事件类型可以携带来源;存在的数组必须非空且没有重复项;每个来源必须是更早的 seq;每次位置替换必须指明并引用它所移除的全部表面节点。任何契约违例都使用 `SESSION_QUERY_INVALID_SURFACE`;系统不存在只用于分类、要求更弱的表面标准。
所有返回的记录与数组都与内部状态分离。已知的实时事件追踪绝不查询持久化;持久化事件追踪保留精确读取所要求的列表/加载一致性检查。会话谱系必然属于跨语料操作,因此也保留跨语料的持久化失败语义。
## 考虑过的替代方案
- **公开独立的追踪辅助函数**:不予采纳,因为源优先级与状态分离边界属于 `ctx.sessionQuery`;公开辅助函数会诱使调用方绕过该边界。
- **合并替换边与来源边**:不予采纳,因为位置替换可以遮蔽表面节点,同时引用不在表面上的构造输入,而消费方需要区分这两种含义。
- **返回传递来源闭包**:不予采纳,因为这会掩盖日志中直接记录的证据、增大结果,并让一条遥远的格式错误边改变原本局部的输出。
- **在格式错误的来源关系上返回尽力而为的追踪结果**:不予采纳,因为结构上看似合理的局部图会显得具有权威性。当规范的关系契约损坏时,精确检查必须快速失败。
## 影响
消费方无需缓存或引入第二份语料,即可获得确定性的关系视图。事件追踪每次调用都会执行全日志校验和分配,而谱系追踪每次调用都会列出完整的逻辑语料。这些成本让真源保持明确,并且与承载内容的全文搜索及过滤 API 相互独立。
该功能具备单元测试和服务层覆盖率,但没有快照或端到端 fixture(测试前置数据),因为它没有引入面向模型的消费方、transcript(文本记录)变更或跨进程协议。

View File

@@ -1,59 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Optional time-context plugin
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-14-time-context-plugin.zh.md)
## Problem
The dynamic system-prompt storage and refresh decision in this record is superseded by [Durable per-step time context](2026-07-16-durable-per-step-time-context.md). The opt-in package, zoned formatting, and validation remain; the follow-up owns the current model-visible and durability contract.
An agent request has no live clock unless a deployment puts one in prompt text or gives the model a query tool. Static text becomes stale, while a tool call adds overhead to ordinary reasoning about dates, deadlines, or idle time. Without elapsed time, the model cannot distinguish an immediate follow-up from one sent hours after the preceding message.
Prompt assembly can derive both facts per step from durable session timestamps, and request-header logging can record the exact rendered value. Accumulating stale readings in conversation history or waking idle agents would violate the existing request lifecycle.
## Decision
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-time-context` is an opt-in function plugin at `packages/context/time-context/`. The `context/` product group holds bounded request-context enrichments that define neither a tool nor a service. `dsh-agent-spine-demo` and shipped examples do not load the package; deployments mount it explicitly when its token and disclosure costs are acceptable.
The plugin registers the global `context:time` system-prompt section at order 10, after the deployment persona and before tool guidance. For an active turn it emits an ISO-shaped timestamp with numeric UTC offset and IANA zone, plus a compact whole-second duration since the last model-visible message before the turn opened. Bare and idle assemblies receive an empty section.
### Previous-message baseline
At a turn's first assembly, the provider scans before `turn/start` for the latest `user/message`, `assistant/message`, `tool/result`, `context/message`, or `steering/message`. It excludes the current prompt so the duration expresses the inter-turn gap instead of approximately zero. Every refresh in that turn keeps the same baseline, and the first turn reports `unavailable (no earlier message in this session)`.
The baseline is the session event's append time, not an unlogged client timestamp. Resume and fork behavior are therefore deterministic from the durable log, and the model-visible value remains reconstructable without a new event. A backward wall-clock adjustment clamps the duration to zero.
### Refresh policy
`refreshIntervalMs` defaults to 60,000 and must be a non-negative safe integer. Every turn's first request refreshes. Later assemblies in that turn reuse the block until its age reaches the interval; `0` refreshes every step. No timer creates work during model calls, tools, or idle time because refresh is request-bound.
When `timeZone` is omitted, `Intl.DateTimeFormat` resolves the Node process's system zone once at plugin load. Node honors `TZ`; without that override, the host or container supplies the zone. An explicit value must be an IANA identifier and is validated at load. The captured zone remains stable until plugin reload, and the ISO-shaped local timestamp includes its current numeric offset so daylight-saving changes stay explicit. This is the deployment process's zone, not a remote user's zone.
### Logging and token shape
The loop records the temporal block in full `request/header` snapshots before transmission, satisfying the [reconstructable-requests contract](../architecture/2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.md). Each request carries one current block; earlier readings do not remain in conversation history. The plugin owns the fact and contributes it through the prompt registry, following the [prompt-variables Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-05-prompt-variables-and-tool-guidance-ownership.md) without a loop special case.
## Testing
Unit tests pin formatting, baselines, refresh policy, validation, per-agent state, disposal, and load-time system-zone capture. A real agent-loop test pins the transmitted prompt and full `request/header` snapshots. A keyless subprocess e2e boots a test-only `cordis.yml` through the real Loader and stdio app, omits `timeZone` under a controlled `TZ`, drives two turns, and verifies the persisted request headers externally. Default snapshot compositions omit the plugin, so their transcript fixtures contain no temporal block.
## Alternatives considered
- **Append a `context/message` on every turn or refresh** — rejected because readings and token cost would accumulate in history. Replacing a prior surface node would preserve its old position, while replacing the tail would hide intervening conversation.
- **Use `agent/session-prefix`** — rejected because the session-stable prefix cannot represent a per-turn or per-step clock.
- **Mutate requests in `agent/request`** — rejected because that seam shapes call config after the message boundary; inserted model content would bypass prompt-pressure accounting and request-header logging.
- **Register separate `{{current_time}}` and `{{elapsed}}` variables** — rejected because independent providers can sample different instants and require shared caching. One section records the pair atomically without a deployment-authored template.
- **Refresh from a background timer** — rejected because a new value has no consumer outside request assembly. Timer-driven `agent.inject()` would create turns and wake idle sessions merely to report time passing.
- **Keep UTC as the omitted default** — rejected because an explicitly enabled clock should follow its deployment environment unless the operator chooses UTC. `timeZone: UTC` remains available when a deployment requires it.
- **Add a time-zone detection library** — rejected because Node's `Intl` runtime already exposes the process's IANA zone. Another dependency cannot infer a remote user's zone either.
- **Mount the plugin in `dsh-agent-spine-demo`** — rejected because time zone, disclosure, token budget, and freshness are deployment policy. Opt-in keeps default context stable.
- **Place the package in `core/`** — rejected because `core/` owns the product API spine, while this plugin is an optional leaf with no service key.
## Consequences
- Opted-in models receive a zoned clock and inter-turn duration without a tool call. The system-prompt cost is fixed per request instead of growing with the session.
- An omitted `timeZone` follows the process's `TZ`, host, or container zone as observed at plugin load. Operators must configure an explicit zone when the deployment environment does not represent the intended user.
- A refresh changes the request header and can add a full `request/header` snapshot with reason `change`. `refreshIntervalMs` trades freshness against the number and size of durable full snapshots; `0` records a new value on every step whose whole-second rendering changes.
- No request exists solely to refresh time. A long-running tool leaves the prior reading until the next step assembles.
- Duration reflects harness processing time at durable append boundaries, not client-network latency before logging. Preserving a client-origin timestamp requires a separate durable input contract.

View File

@@ -1,59 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note:可选时间上下文插件
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-14-time-context-plugin.md) | 中文
## 问题
本记录中的动态系统提示词存储和刷新决策已由[持久的逐步骤时间上下文](2026-07-16-durable-per-step-time-context.md)取代。需要显式启用的包(package)、分区时间格式和校验仍然保留;后续 Agent Note 负责当前的模型可见与持久性契约。
如果部署方既未在提示词中提供时钟,也未给模型提供查询工具,agent(智能体)请求就无法获得实时准确的时间。静态文本会变得陈旧,而对于日期、截止时间或闲置时长等常规推理,调用工具会增加开销。缺少已经过去的时长时,模型无法区分紧接着发送的消息与上一条消息几小时后才发送的消息。
提示词组装流程可以在每个步骤中根据持久会话时间戳派生这两项信息,请求头日志则可以记录实际渲染的确切值。在会话历史中累积陈旧读数或唤醒空闲 agent 都会违反现有请求生命周期。
## 决策
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-time-context` 是位于 `packages/context/time-context/`、需要显式启用的函数插件。`context/` 产品分组用于容纳既不定义工具、也不定义服务的有界请求上下文增强。`dsh-agent-spine-demo` 和仓库提供的示例都不会加载该包;只有当 token 与信息披露成本可接受时,部署方才显式挂载它。
该插件注册顺序值为 10 的全局系统提示词区段 `context:time`,位置在部署方角色设定之后、工具指导之前。对于活跃轮次,它会输出带数字 UTC 偏移和 IANA 时区、形似 ISO 的时间戳,以及从轮次开始前最后一条模型可见消息起算的紧凑整秒时长。未绑定 agent 或 agent 处于空闲状态时,该区段为空。
### 上一条消息基线
在轮次首次组装时,提供方会在 `turn/start` 之前查找最近的 `user/message`、`assistant/message`、`tool/result`、`context/message` 或 `steering/message`。它会排除当前提示词,使时长表达轮次间隔,而不是接近零。同一轮次中的每次刷新都保留这条基线;首个轮次报告 `unavailable (no earlier message in this session)`。
基线采用会话事件的追加时间,而不是日志中不存在的客户端时间戳。因此,恢复和 fork 行为可以从持久日志中确定性重现,模型可见值也无需新增事件即可重建。系统挂钟向后调整时,插件会将时长钳制为零。
### 刷新策略
`refreshIntervalMs` 默认值为 60,000,并且必须是非负安全整数。每个轮次的首次请求都会刷新。同一轮次中的后续组装会复用该区块,直至其存在时间达到该间隔;设为 `0` 时每个步骤都刷新。刷新仅由请求驱动,因此在模型调用、工具运行或空闲期间,计时器不会创建任务。
省略 `timeZone` 时,`Intl.DateTimeFormat` 会在插件加载时解析一次 Node 进程的系统时区。Node 会遵循 `TZ`;没有该覆盖值时,时区由主机或容器提供。显式值必须是 IANA 标识符,并在加载时接受校验。捕获的时区在插件重新加载前保持稳定,形似 ISO 的本地时间戳包含其当前数字偏移,使夏令时变化保持显式可见。该默认值代表部署进程的时区,而不是远程用户的时区。
### 日志与 token 形态
agent loop(智能体循环)会在发送前通过完整的 `request/header` 快照记录时间区块,从而满足[可重建请求契约](../architecture/2026-07-05-reconstructable-requests.md)。每个请求只携带一个当前区块;先前的读数不会保留在会话历史中。该插件拥有时间信息,并按照[提示词变量 Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-05-prompt-variables-and-tool-guidance-ownership.md)通过提示词注册表贡献该信息,无需为循环添加特殊分支。
## 测试
单元测试固定格式化、基线、刷新策略、校验、逐 agent 状态、资源释放行为,以及系统时区在加载时的捕获行为。使用真实 agent loop 的测试固定实际发送的提示词和完整的 `request/header` 快照。无密钥子进程端到端测试通过真实 Loader 和 stdio 应用启动测试专用 `cordis.yml`,在受控 `TZ` 下省略 `timeZone`,驱动两个轮次,并从外部校验持久请求头。默认快照组合不包含该插件,因此其中的 transcript(文本记录)fixture(测试前置数据)不包含时间区块。
## 考虑过的替代方案
- **每个轮次或每次刷新都追加一条 `context/message`**——不予采纳,因为读数和 token 成本会在历史中累积。替换先前的表层节点会保留其旧位置,而替换尾部节点会隐藏中间的会话内容。
- **使用 `agent/session-prefix`**——不予采纳,因为会话期间保持稳定的前缀无法表示逐轮次或逐步骤变化的时钟。
- **在 `agent/request` 中修改请求**——不予采纳,因为该边界在消息边界之后塑造调用配置;插入模型可见内容会绕过提示词压力核算和请求头日志。
- **注册独立的 `{{current_time}}` 和 `{{elapsed}}` 变量**——不予采纳,因为独立提供方可能在不同时间点采样,并且需要共享缓存。单个区段会以原子方式记录两项信息,也不需要部署方编写时间模板。
- **通过后台计时器刷新**——不予采纳,因为请求组装之外没有消费新值的对象。由计时器驱动 `agent.inject()` 会创建轮次,并且只为报告时间流逝就唤醒空闲会话。
- **省略配置时仍默认使用 UTC**——不予采纳,因为显式启用的时钟应跟随部署环境,除非运维方选择 UTC。需要 UTC 的部署仍可配置 `timeZone: UTC`。
- **引入时区探测库**——不予采纳,因为 Node 的 `Intl` 运行时已经能够提供进程的 IANA 时区,而且额外依赖同样无法推断远程用户的时区。
- **在 `dsh-agent-spine-demo` 中挂载插件**——不予采纳,因为时区、信息披露、token 预算和新鲜度都属于部署策略。选择加入能保持默认上下文稳定。
- **将包放入 `core/`**——不予采纳,因为 `core/` 负责产品 API 主干,而该插件是没有服务键的可选叶节点。
## 后果
- 选择加入的模型无需调用工具,即可获得分区时钟和轮次间隔时长。每个请求的系统提示词成本固定,不会随会话增长。
- 省略 `timeZone` 时,插件采用加载时观察到的进程 `TZ`、主机或容器时区。当部署环境不能代表目标用户时,运维方必须显式配置时区。
- 刷新会改变请求头,并可能新增一份 reason 为 `change` 的完整 `request/header` 快照。`refreshIntervalMs` 用新鲜度换取完整持久快照的数量与大小;设为 `0` 时,每个整秒渲染结果发生变化的步骤都会记录新值。
- 系统不会仅为刷新时间而创建请求。长时间运行的工具会保留先前读数,直至下一步骤开始组装。
- 时长反映持久追加边界处的 harness 处理时间,不包含消息进入日志之前的客户端网络延迟。若要保留客户端来源时间戳,需要单独的持久输入契约。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-16-durable-per-step-time-context.md: 2d7076d51dbe1a64e5042230bddc6844141ff265
2026-07-16-durable-per-step-time-context.zh.md: 432e0305cf44dcce1053c6580c9f0039309a7af4
2026-07-16-durable-per-step-time-context.md: 4bc17b3c08707fcaa4f0f431e71ddbe567a03c9e
2026-07-16-durable-per-step-time-context.zh.md: 836c0f83fbe9d6120741a261cf25ce7d8c227bdf

View File

@@ -12,13 +12,13 @@ A process-local refresh cache makes displayed time depend on state that cannot s
## Decision
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-time-context` is an opt-in function plugin in `packages/context/time-context/`. It registers a prepended `agent/pre-step` listener and, when an injection is due, calls `agent.inject()` for a pre-step attempt whose signal is not already aborted. The injected `context/message` carries source `{ kind: 'plugin', plugin: 'time-context' }` and append surface metadata; a suppressed attempt appends nothing.
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-time-context` is an opt-in function plugin in `packages/context/time-context/`. The `context/` group holds bounded request-context enrichments that define neither a tool nor a service, and shipped examples do not mount this plugin because its time-zone disclosure and token cost are deployment policy. It registers a prepended `agent/pre-step` listener and, when an injection is due, calls `agent.inject()` for a pre-step attempt whose signal is not already aborted. The injected `user/message` carries source `{ kind: 'plugin', plugin: 'time-context' }` and append surface metadata; a suppressed attempt appends nothing.
The listener records preparation context before a possible `step/start`. Its prepended registration runs before ordinary automatic compaction listeners, so pressure estimation and any resulting surface rewrite observe a newly appended reading. A later pre-step listener can cancel or fail the attempt before the step opens; the reading remains because the durable log is append-only and this plugin performs no rollback.
The optional `timeZone` config resolves the Node process's IANA zone once at plugin load when omitted; an explicit value is validated by `Intl.DateTimeFormat`. The timestamp includes the numeric UTC offset and resolved IANA zone.
The optional `refreshIntervalMs` config is manually validated at plugin load as a non-negative safe integer. Omission or `0` injects on every eligible preparation attempt. A positive value scans the raw session events for the most recent `context/message` with this plugin's source and injects when none exists, wall time moved backward, or the event is at least the configured age. The raw event timestamp governs even after compaction shadows the message, so scheduling persists across turns and process resume without a timer or process-local cache.
The optional `refreshIntervalMs` config is manually validated at plugin load as a non-negative safe integer. Omission or `0` injects on every eligible preparation attempt. A positive value scans the raw session events for the most recent `user/message` with this plugin's source and injects when none exists, wall time moved backward, or the event is at least the configured age. The raw event timestamp governs even after compaction shadows the message, so scheduling persists across turns and process resume without a timer or process-local cache.
### Text and elapsed baselines
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Time sampled while preparing turn <turn>, step 1: <timestamp>
Elapsed since the preceding model-visible message: <duration-or-unavailable>.
```
The baseline is the latest preceding user, assistant, tool-result, context, or steering message. This includes the accepted prompt that opened an ordinary message turn. If no model-visible message exists, the duration is `unavailable`.
The baseline is the latest preceding user, assistant, tool-result, or steering message. This includes the accepted prompt that opened an ordinary message turn. If no model-visible message exists, the duration is `unavailable`.
An injected later-step reading is:
@@ -48,11 +48,7 @@ The plugin contributes nothing to system-prompt assembly. `request/header` conta
## Testing
Unit and real-loop tests pin formatting, both elapsed baselines, interval omission and zero, threshold boundaries, cross-turn and per-session scheduling, backward-clock behavior, invalid config, resumed raw-event lookup after compaction, aborted-signal behavior, later-listener cancellation and failure, listener disposal, source and surface metadata, cumulative multi-step visibility, and absence from request headers. A keyless subprocess e2e boots the real Loader and stdio app, drives two turns, and verifies the persisted context events externally.
## Supersedes
This decision supersedes the dynamic system-prompt storage and refresh policy in [Optional time-context plugin](2026-07-14-time-context-plugin.md). It keeps the package location, opt-in deployment stance, timestamp formatting, process-zone default, and load-time validation. Durable history replaces the `context:time` prompt section, process-local refresh cache, and request-header deltas; `refreshIntervalMs` controls durable append frequency instead of prompt replacement.
Unit and real-loop tests pin formatting, both elapsed baselines, interval omission and zero, threshold boundaries, cross-turn and per-session scheduling, backward-clock behavior, invalid config, resumed raw-event lookup after compaction, aborted-signal behavior, later-listener cancellation and failure, listener disposal, source and surface metadata, cumulative multi-step visibility, and absence from request headers. A keyless subprocess e2e boots the real Loader with the Headless composition, drives two ordered one-shot turns, and verifies the persisted plugin-attributed messages externally.
## Alternatives considered
@@ -61,10 +57,13 @@ This decision supersedes the dynamic system-prompt storage and refresh policy in
- **Inject from a background timer** — rejected because idle time has no pending request to consume the value, and timer-driven injection would create durable turns solely to report time passing.
- **Expose time only through a tool** — rejected because ordinary temporal reasoning would require an avoidable tool round trip and would not guarantee a reading before every step.
- **Use `agent/session-prefix`** — rejected because one loop-instance prefix cannot represent distinct step timestamps and does not accumulate historically attributable readings.
- **Mutate assembled requests or register independent prompt variables** — rejected because request-local insertion bypasses the durable surface and separate providers can sample different instants. One attributed context message records the timestamp and elapsed baseline atomically.
- **Default to UTC or add a time-zone detection dependency** — rejected because an explicitly mounted plugin follows its process environment unless the operator selects an IANA zone, while no server-side library can infer a remote user's zone.
- **Mount the plugin in shipped compositions or place it in `core/`** — rejected because disclosure, time zone, freshness, and history cost are deployment choices for an optional context leaf, not product-spine policy.
## Consequences
- Omission or `0` records every eligible preparation attempt; a positive interval reduces append frequency and history growth while preserving durable scheduling across resume.
- Timing context remains append-only until compaction shadows older surface nodes, including a preparation reading left by a later cancellation or failure.
- The first-step duration normally measures from the prompt that opened the turn, while later-step durations measure model and tool processing since the preceding step context.
- An omitted `timeZone` still reflects the deployment process rather than a remote user, and elapsed time still uses durable harness append boundaries rather than client-origin timestamps.
- An omitted `timeZone` still reflects the deployment process rather than a remote user, and elapsed time still uses durable harness append boundaries rather than client-origin timestamps. Supporting client-origin time requires a separate durable input contract.

View File

@@ -12,13 +12,13 @@ Status: implemented
## 决策
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-time-context` 是位于 `packages/context/time-context/`、需要显式启用的函数插件。它注册一个前置的 `agent/pre-step` 监听器,并在需要注入时,为信号尚未取消的预步骤尝试调用 `agent.inject()`。注入的 `context/message` 携带来源 `{ kind: 'plugin', plugin: 'time-context' }` 和追加表层元数据;受间隔抑制的尝试不会追加任何内容。
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-time-context` 是位于 `packages/context/time-context/`、需要显式启用的函数插件。`context/` 分组容纳有界的请求上下文增强,这些增强既不定义工具也不定义服务;已交付示例不挂载此插件,因为时区披露与 token 成本属于部署策略。它注册一个前置的 `agent/pre-step` 监听器,并在需要注入时,为信号尚未取消的预步骤尝试调用 `agent.inject()`。注入的 `user/message` 携带来源 `{ kind: 'plugin', plugin: 'time-context' }` 和追加表层元数据;受间隔抑制的尝试不会追加任何内容。
监听器在可能出现的 `step/start` 之前记录准备上下文。它采用前置注册,因此先于普通自动压缩监听器运行,使压力估算和由此产生的表层重写都能观察到新追加的读数。后续预步骤监听器可能在步骤开启前取消尝试或使其失败;持久日志仅追加,且本插件不执行回滚,因此该读数会保留下来。
省略可选配置 `timeZone` 时,插件在加载时解析一次 Node 进程的 IANA 时区;显式值由 `Intl.DateTimeFormat` 校验。时间戳包含数字 UTC 偏移和解析后的 IANA 时区。
插件在加载时手动校验可选配置 `refreshIntervalMs`,其值必须为非负安全整数。省略或设为 `0` 时,每次符合条件的准备尝试都会注入。设为正数时,插件扫描原始会话事件,查找来源属于本插件的最新 `context/message`;不存在此类事件、系统挂钟向后移动,或该事件已达到配置时长时,插件执行注入。即使压缩已隐藏消息,调度仍以原始事件时间戳为准,因此该机制无需计时器或进程本地缓存,也能跨轮次和进程恢复持续生效。
插件在加载时手动校验可选配置 `refreshIntervalMs`,其值必须为非负安全整数。省略或设为 `0` 时,每次符合条件的准备尝试都会注入。设为正数时,插件扫描原始会话事件,查找来源属于本插件的最新 `user/message`;不存在此类事件、系统挂钟向后移动,或该事件已达到配置时长时,插件执行注入。即使压缩已隐藏消息,调度仍以原始事件时间戳为准,因此该机制无需计时器或进程本地缓存,也能跨轮次和进程恢复持续生效。
### 文本与时长基线
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Time sampled while preparing turn <turn>, step 1: <timestamp>
Elapsed since the preceding model-visible message: <duration-or-unavailable>.
```
基线是前一条用户消息、助手消息、工具结果、上下文消息或 steering(中途引导)消息。对于普通消息轮次,这包括开启轮次的已接受提示词。如果不存在模型可见消息,时长为 `unavailable`。
基线是前一条用户消息、助手消息、工具结果或 steering(中途引导)消息。对于普通消息轮次,这包括开启轮次的已接受提示词。如果不存在模型可见消息,时长为 `unavailable`。
后续步骤的注入读数为:
@@ -48,11 +48,7 @@ Elapsed since the preceding step context: <duration-or-unavailable>.
## 测试
单元测试和真实 agent loop(智能体循环)测试固定格式化、两种时长基线、间隔省略和零值、阈值边界、跨轮次和各会话独立调度、挂钟后退行为、无效配置、压缩后基于恢复会话的原始事件查找、已取消信号行为、后续监听器取消和失败、监听器 dispose(资源释放)、来源与表层元数据、多步骤累计可见性,以及请求头中不存在时间上下文。无密钥子进程 e2e 测试通过真实 Loader 和 stdio 应用启动,驱动两个轮次,并从外部校验持久化的上下文事件。
## 取代的决策
本决策取代[可选时间上下文插件](2026-07-14-time-context-plugin.md)中的动态系统提示词存储和刷新策略。它保留包位置、选择加入式部署、时间戳格式、进程时区默认值和加载时校验。持久历史取代 `context:time` 提示词区段、进程本地刷新缓存和请求头增量;`refreshIntervalMs` 用于控制持久追加频率,而非提示词替换。
单元测试和真实 agent loop(智能体循环)测试固定格式化、两种时长基线、间隔省略和零值、阈值边界、跨轮次和各会话独立调度、挂钟后退行为、无效配置、压缩后基于恢复会话的原始事件查找、已取消信号行为、后续监听器取消和失败、监听器 dispose(资源释放)、来源与表层元数据、多步骤累计可见性,以及请求头中不存在时间上下文。无密钥子进程 e2e 测试使用 Headless 组合启动真实 Loader,依次驱动两个单次任务轮次,并从外部校验持久化且来源归属于插件的消息。
## 考虑过的替代方案
@@ -61,10 +57,13 @@ Elapsed since the preceding step context: <duration-or-unavailable>.
- **通过后台计时器注入**——不予采纳,因为空闲期间没有待处理请求消费该值,而且计时器驱动的注入会仅为报告时间流逝而创建持久轮次。
- **只通过工具提供时间**——不予采纳,因为普通时间推理会产生本可避免的工具往返,也不能保证每个步骤之前都有读数。
- **使用 `agent/session-prefix`**——不予采纳,因为一个 loop 实例前缀无法表示不同的步骤时间戳,也不会累计具有历史归属的读数。
- **修改已组装的请求或注册独立提示词变量**——不予采纳,因为请求内插入会绕过持久表层,不同提供方也可能在不同时间采样。一条带来源归属的上下文消息会原子地记录时间戳和时长基线。
- **默认使用 UTC 或增加时区检测依赖**——不予采纳,因为显式挂载的插件默认遵循其进程环境,除非操作方选择 IANA 时区,而任何服务端库都无法推断远程用户的时区。
- **在已交付组合中挂载插件,或把它放进 `core/`**——不予采纳,因为披露内容、时区、新鲜度和历史成本是可选上下文叶节点的部署选择,不是产品主干策略。
## 后果
- 省略 `refreshIntervalMs` 或设为 `0` 时,每次符合条件的准备尝试都会留下记录;正数间隔会减少追加频率和历史增长,同时使持久调度在恢复后继续生效。
- 时间上下文仅追加并保留到压缩隐藏旧表层节点为止,其中也包括后续取消或失败所留下的准备读数。
- 第一个步骤的时长通常从开启轮次的提示词起算,后续步骤的时长则反映自上一条步骤上下文以来的模型与工具处理时间。
- 省略 `timeZone` 时仍采用部署进程而非远程用户的时区,时长仍采用 harness 的持久追加边界而非客户端来源时间戳。
- 省略 `timeZone` 时仍采用部署进程而非远程用户的时区,时长仍采用 harness 的持久追加边界而非客户端来源时间戳。若要支持客户端来源的时间,需要另行建立持久输入契约。

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.md: 148d4a2f47689e38a3ec83a7a41e4f75c4b73d95
2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.zh.md: 9a9d9cd4b0f61e8abaf011996ecd8739d13851f8
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.md
2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.md: 4fff1742721fa13ea11f1b8ec833e5e5b7e68df8
2026-07-16-persistent-pty-sessions.zh.md: 88e7a0bc4b8af21dc51b6a654a1c9f93760b3e81

View File

@@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ On macOS there is no exact syscall tier. Output silence returns `inferred_idle`
Tier 2 returns `inferred_idle` after `idleSilenceMs` without output. A sleeping or network-blocked command can therefore look ready. Tier 3 returns `timeout` after `timeoutMs` so a foreground tool call cannot hold the agent indefinitely. The result preserves the distinction; callers may wait through `ctx.tasks`, signal the foreground group, or inspect from another session.
Once a send settles under any tier, `PtySendOperation.append` stops accepting output, so later child output no longer reaches that settled operation; it still reaches the scrollback, and any send that is active when it arrives. A test that waits for a marker on the operation it started must therefore set `idleSilenceMs` and `timeoutMs` above the child's own startup latency; interpreter startup on a loaded macOS runner otherwise ends the send before the marker is printed.
`node-pty` data notifications feed one terminal parser. Parser carry state handles control sequences and a trailing carriage return split across callbacks, so a divided CRLF produces one newline rather than a pagination-changing blank line. The implementation normalizes line-oriented output, but it does not promise correct interaction with a full-screen application.
### Model-visible output and durability
@@ -154,7 +156,7 @@ The package ships concise tool guidance explaining persistent state, owner isola
- Per-file coverage pins owner fencing, concurrent reservations, unpublished-spawn cancellation and awaited teardown, sandbox-mode change rejection, retriable lifecycle cleanup, readiness tiers, sanitizer carry state, complete UTF-8 bounds, task integration, schemas, and exact render intents.
- Linux process fixtures cover non-leader and non-main-thread stdin waits, zombie quiescence, unreadable process state, supported syscall tables, unsupported architectures, and false-positive rejection; macOS inspector logic is injected into the same unit suite.
- Real `node-pty` tests exercise shell state, shared sandbox policy, environment scrubbing, raw-mode foreground `SIGINT`, a TERM-ignoring descendant, and immediate post-disposal quiescence on supported hosts.
- Real `node-pty` tests exercise shell state, shared sandbox policy, environment scrubbing, raw-mode foreground `SIGINT` after deliberately delayed child readiness under scenario-owned timing bounds, a TERM-ignoring descendant, and immediate post-disposal quiescence on supported hosts.
- A Loader-driven `cordis.yml` test mounts the real three-package composition. ACP and headless snapshots pin the six schemas, bounded results, and errors through opt-in overlays; TUI snapshots pin terminal and generic card presentation.
- Package contracts, the architecture map, core data structures, generated catalogs, and the website API describe the same shipped surface.
- The repository CI-equivalent sequence owns type, lint, coverage, snapshot, documentation, build, hygiene, demo, and built-entry verification.

View File

@@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ macOS 没有精确 syscall 层。任何前台进程组输出静默都会返回 `
Tier 2 在持续 `idleSilenceMs` 没有输出后返回 `inferred_idle`,因此 sleep 或网络阻塞的命令可能看似 ready。Tier 3 在 `timeoutMs` 后返回 `timeout`,避免前台工具调用无限占住 agent。结果保留这些区别;调用方可以通过 `ctx.tasks` 等待、向前台组发信号,或从另一个会话排查。
一次 send 在任一层级 settle 之后,`PtySendOperation.append` 就不再接受输出,此后子进程的输出不会再进入那个已 settle 的 operation;它仍然会进入 scrollback,以及此时恰好处于活跃状态的任何 send。因此,等待自己所启动的 operation 上出现标记的测试,必须把 `idleSilenceMs` 与 `timeoutMs` 设得高于子进程自身的启动耗时;否则在负载较高的 macOS runner 上,解释器启动会在标记打印之前就结束这次 send。
`node-pty` data 通知进入同一个终端 parser。parser 的 carry state 会处理跨 callback 的控制序列和位于 callback 末尾的回车;因此,即使 CRLF 被拆开,也只会生成一个换行,而不会产生改变分页的空行。实现会规范化行式输出,但不承诺正确操作全屏应用。
### 模型可见输出与持久性
@@ -154,7 +156,7 @@ plugins:
- 每文件覆盖率固定 owner 隔离、并发预留、未发布 spawn 的取消与等待式 teardown、沙箱模式变更拒绝、可重试的生命周期清理、就绪层级、sanitizer carry state、完整 UTF-8 结果上限、task 集成、schema 和精确 render intent。
- Linux 进程 fixture 覆盖非 leader 与非主线程的 stdin 等待、僵尸进程静止性、不可读进程状态、受支持的 syscall 表、不支持的架构和误报拒绝;同一单元测试套件通过注入覆盖 macOS 检查器逻辑。
- 真实 `node-pty` 测试在受支持宿主上覆盖 shell 状态、共享沙箱策略、环境清洗、raw mode 下的前台 `SIGINT`、忽略 `SIGTERM` 的子进程,以及 dispose 返回后立即静默。
- 真实 `node-pty` 测试在受支持宿主上覆盖 shell 状态、共享沙箱策略、环境清洗、在由场景掌控的时间界限内先有意延迟子进程就绪,再对 raw mode 前台进程发送 `SIGINT`、忽略 `SIGTERM` 的子进程,以及 dispose 返回后立即完全停稳。
- Loader 驱动的 `cordis.yml` 测试挂载真实三包组合。ACP 与 headless 快照通过 opt-in overlay 固定 6 个 schema、有界结果和错误;TUI 快照固定 terminal 与 generic 卡片展示。
- 包契约、架构图、核心数据结构、生成目录和 website API 描述同一个已发布接口。
- 仓库 CI 等价序列负责类型、lint、覆盖率、快照、文档、构建、hygiene、demo 和 built-entry 验证。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.md: aac67ffec89606d04d5abfd233d0469e2241b102
2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.zh.md: 0f64e2ce14b18d315f75913b82c731e77758e377
2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.md: 8d7c7b00c8d9b15ea3f2419ed44ca88209e60dad
2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.zh.md: 49e9541c9f98c9f3beba11945ff452fc38bd9ede

View File

@@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ The selected front door receives the exact generated or resumed `SessionId` used
The TUI rebuilds the transcript from the active `session.surface` and reprojects it whenever an event carries a `surfaceOp`, so resumed and compacted history matches the model-visible conversation. It renders Markdown text and reasoning, token totals, the latest `todo/write` plan, and tool cards produced through each tool definition's `presentCall` and `presentResult` methods. Long card bodies retain a configurable head/tail preview with the hidden-line count; one terminal control expands or collapses every card. Pending chunks and tool calls update the same components that completed events settle.
Editor input calls `agent.send()` while idle and `agent.steer()` while a turn is running. Cancellation, reasoning visibility, tool-card expansion, redraw, transcript clearing, and exit are terminal-only controls. The idle footer derives context occupancy from `tokenMeter` and shows the selected model; during a run, elapsed activity and the Escape interrupt hint replace that summary. `/status` remains available in either state and appends a detailed terminal-only snapshot: session identity and timestamps, selected model and reasoning visibility, lifecycle counts folded from the event log, the same deduplicated usage buckets and KV-cache rate as the footer, and context use from `tokenMeter` plus the selected model's advertised capacity. The plugin registers the shared `userInteraction` provider and presents queued questions in a wide bottom-left keyboard panel with batch progress, numbered options, and aligned descriptions; agent behavior and answer logging remain owned by their existing services.
Editor input calls `agent.send()` while idle and `agent.steer()` while a turn is running. Cancellation, reasoning visibility, tool-card expansion, redraw, transcript clearing, and exit are terminal-only controls. The idle footer derives context occupancy from `tokenMeter` and shows the selected model and explicit reasoning effort; during a run, elapsed activity and the Escape interrupt hint replace that summary. `/status` remains available in either state and appends a detailed terminal-only snapshot: session identity and timestamps, selected model, reasoning effort/default state and reasoning visibility, lifecycle counts folded from the event log, the same deduplicated usage buckets and KV-cache rate as the footer, and context use from `tokenMeter` plus the selected model's advertised capacity. The plugin registers the shared `userInteraction` provider and presents queued questions in a wide bottom-left keyboard panel with batch progress, numbered options, and aligned descriptions; agent behavior and answer logging remain owned by their existing services.
The `/model` command presents the advisory `ctx.llm` catalog as a keyboard selector and changes only this TUI session's target; argument forms remain available for direct selection. Agent-scoped prompt-assembly and request waterfalls snapshot one provider/model pair per step, so `{{provider}}` / `{{model}}` interpolation and request routing cannot split when a command arrives during assembly. The latest logged request header restores a used target; a selection that never reaches a request remains process-local.
The `/model` command presents the advisory `ctx.llm` catalog as a keyboard selector and changes only this TUI session's target; argument forms remain available for direct selection. Each model row owns the adapter-advertised reasoning-effort order and default: Shift+Tab cycles that row's efforts, includes provider-default behavior when the adapter advertises no default, and leaves models without selectable metadata unchanged. Agent-scoped prompt-assembly and request waterfalls snapshot one provider/model/reasoning-effort target per step, so `{{provider}}` / `{{model}}` interpolation and request routing cannot split when a command arrives during assembly. The latest logged request header restores a used target; a selection that never reaches a request remains process-local.
### Terminal ownership
@@ -49,4 +49,4 @@ The implemented [TUI terminal-state snapshot Agent Note](../testing/2026-07-18-t
- The TUI carries a pi-tui dependency and a strict TTY requirement; non-TTY deployments use the Headless app or a structured protocol.
- Session projection makes resume and compaction consistent with the durable conversation, but one configured session owns the transcript and editor.
- Tool packages extend terminal cards through their existing presentation methods without adding tool-specific branches to the TUI.
- Model selection uses adapter-advertised metadata without turning catalog membership into request validation; unused selections are not durable state.
- Model and reasoning-effort selection use adapter-advertised metadata without turning catalog membership into request validation; unused selections are not durable state.

View File

@@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ DeepSeek Harness 将 [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui`](../../../../packages/ui/tui/README
TUI 从活跃的 `session.surface` 重建 transcript(文本记录),并在事件携带 `surfaceOp` 时重新投影,因此恢复或压缩后的历史与模型可见会话保持一致。TUI 渲染 Markdown 文本与推理、token 用量、最新 `todo/write` 计划,以及各工具定义通过 `presentCall` 和 `presentResult` 方法生成的工具卡片。较长的工具卡片正文会保留可配置的头尾预览,并显示隐藏行数;一个终端控制可以展开或收起全部卡片。进行中的分片与工具调用会更新同一组组件,随后由完成事件收束状态。
agent 空闲时,编辑器输入调用 `agent.send()`;轮次运行中则调用 `agent.steer()`。取消、推理显隐、工具卡片展开、重绘、清空 transcript 和退出都只是终端控制。空闲态页脚根据 `tokenMeter` 得出上下文占用率,并显示所选模型;agent 运行期间,该摘要会替换为带已用时长的活动指示和 Escape 中断提示。`/status` 在这两种状态下均可用,并会追加一份仅在终端显示的详细快照,其中包括会话标识与时间戳、所选模型及推理显隐状态、从事件日志归并得出的生命周期计数、与页脚一致的去重用量分项和 KV 缓存命中率,以及 `tokenMeter` 给出的上下文用量和所选模型公布的容量。插件注册共享的 `userInteraction` 提供方,在左下角宽幅键盘操作面板中呈现排队的问题,面板显示批次进度、带编号的选项和对齐的描述;agent 行为和答案日志仍由既有服务负责。
agent 空闲时,编辑器输入调用 `agent.send()`;轮次运行中则调用 `agent.steer()`。取消、推理显隐、工具卡片展开、重绘、清空 transcript 和退出都只是终端控制。空闲态页脚根据 `tokenMeter` 得出上下文占用率,并显示所选模型和显式选定的推理强度;agent 运行期间,该摘要会替换为带已用时长的活动指示和 Escape 中断提示。`/status` 在这两种状态下均可用,并会追加一份仅在终端显示的详细快照,其中包括会话标识与时间戳、所选模型、推理强度(或默认状态)及推理显隐状态、从事件日志归并得出的生命周期计数、与页脚一致的去重用量分项和 KV 缓存命中率,以及 `tokenMeter` 给出的上下文用量和所选模型公布的容量。插件注册共享的 `userInteraction` 提供方,在左下角宽幅键盘操作面板中呈现排队的问题,面板显示批次进度、带编号的选项和对齐的描述;agent 行为和答案日志仍由既有服务负责。
`/model` 命令将建议性的 `ctx.llm` 目录呈现为键盘选择器,并且只更改当前 TUI 会话的目标;带参数的形式仍可直接选择目标。agent 作用域内的 prompt 组装和请求两条 waterfall(瀑布式事件)会为每个 step 快照一次同一个提供方/模型字段组合,因此即使命令在组装期间到达,`{{provider}}` / `{{model}}` 插值与请求路由也不会分裂。系统通过日志中最新的请求头恢复已经使用过的目标;未被请求使用的选择只保留在当前进程中。
`/model` 命令将建议性的 `ctx.llm` 目录呈现为键盘选择器,并且只更改当前 TUI 会话的目标;带参数的形式仍可直接选择目标。每个模型行都持有适配器公布的推理强度顺序和默认值:按 Shift+Tab 可循环切换该行的推理强度;如果适配器没有公布默认值,循环中还会包含提供方默认行为;没有可选元数据的模型则保持不变。agent 作用域内的 prompt 组装和请求两条 waterfall(瀑布式事件)会为每个步骤快照一次同一个提供方/模型/推理强度目标,因此即使命令在组装期间到达,`{{provider}}` / `{{model}}` 插值与请求路由也不会分裂。系统通过日志中最新的请求头恢复已经使用过的目标;未被请求使用的选择只保留在当前进程中。
### 终端所有权
@@ -49,4 +49,4 @@ agent 空闲时,编辑器输入调用 `agent.send()`;轮次运行中则调
- TUI 会引入 pi-tui 依赖并严格要求 TTY;非 TTY 部署使用 Headless app 或结构化协议。
- 会话投影使恢复和压缩与持久会话保持一致,但只有一个已配置会话拥有 transcript 和编辑器。
- 工具包通过既有呈现方法扩展终端卡片,无需在 TUI 中增加工具专用分支。
- 模型选择使用适配器提供的目录元数据,但不会把目录成员关系变成请求校验;未使用的选择不属于持久化状态。
- 模型和推理强度选择使用适配器公布的元数据,但不会把目录成员关系变成请求校验;未使用的选择不属于持久化状态。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-20-code-mode-typed-tool-returns.md: 1b5cbb9f4664c371a03cfefd079d5dc531711b51
2026-07-20-code-mode-typed-tool-returns.zh.md: 70fd9ee72803c5cd2fa228a1d38ddf7ae47a4814
2026-07-20-code-mode-typed-tool-returns.md: 3d8642d66baf521f22dfb1ea0ef3e64683f918d4
2026-07-20-code-mode-typed-tool-returns.zh.md: fea1be3e236c0ccba729e449ab9714ed497d900a

View File

@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ Dynamic Cordis mounting follows the same rule: `cordis_mount` returns `{ id, plu
### Persistence, metadata, and spill
Nested dispatch keeps the existing bounded `tool/code-dispatch.resultSummary` for diagnostics but does not persist canonical values. `tool/result` continues to persist only rendered content, error, and optional metadata. This is deliberately not a session-format change, so `SESSION_FORMAT_VERSION` remains unchanged and replay cannot recreate intermediate program values.
Nested dispatch logs the sub-call's full rendered `content`/`isError` on `tool/code-dispatch` but does not persist canonical values. `tool/result` continues to persist only rendered content, error, and optional metadata. `SESSION_FORMAT_VERSION` remains unchanged (pre-release shape churn does not bump it) and replay cannot recreate intermediate canonical program values.
The opaque `exec.parent` token marks nested calls. Presentation metadata and generic or tool-owned spill projections skip those calls because they have no direct result card and their canonical values never enter context. The outer `run_code` call alone produces one card and may spill its final post-policy presentation; `run_code` intentionally declares neither a result presenter nor presentation metadata, so UI adapters complete the card through their generic raw-content fallback using durable `tool/result.content`.

View File

@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ Code Mode 通过运行时请求中的 `{ name: "ToolCallError", memberNameProper
### 持久化、元数据与输出落盘
嵌套分发会为诊断保留既有的有界 `tool/code-dispatch.resultSummary`,但不会持久化规范值。`tool/result` 继续只持久化渲染后的内容、错误和可选元数据。这并非会话格式变更,因此 `SESSION_FORMAT_VERSION` 保持不变,回放也无法重建程序的中间值。
嵌套分发在 `tool/code-dispatch` 上记录子调用完整渲染后的 `content`/`isError`,但不会持久化规范值。`tool/result` 继续只持久化渲染后的内容、错误和可选元数据。`SESSION_FORMAT_VERSION` 保持不变(预发布阶段的形状变动不递增版本号),回放也无法重建程序的规范中间值。
不透明的 `exec.parent` token 用于标识嵌套调用。由于这些调用没有直接对应的结果卡片,而且其规范值永远不会进入上下文,展示元数据以及通用或工具自有的输出落盘投影都会跳过它们。只有外层 `run_code` 调用会生成一张卡片,并且可能将 post-policy 处理后的最终展示写入落盘文件;`run_code` 有意既不声明结果展示器,也不声明展示元数据,因此 UI 适配器会通过通用的原始内容回退机制,使用持久化的 `tool/result.content` 补全该卡片。

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Startup slogans replace the configured TUI welcome line
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-20-tui-startup-slogans.zh.md)
> **Superseded** for the slogan/animation half by the [banner sweep Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md): the slogan bank and typewriter reveal shipped, read as weird in use, and were replaced by a subtitle-free banner with a whole-banner sweep. The removal of the configured demo welcome and the animation-lifecycle groundwork (start after `ui.start()`, clear through `detachListeners`) stand.
## Problem
The TUI header subtitle came from a `welcome` config the demo leaf set to "TUI agent ready. Give it a coding task." — instructional filler that told a returning user nothing, restated what the product is on every boot, and had a hardcoded twin (`'ready.'`) as the schema default in two packages. The product wanted a startup moment with some character instead of a static banner caption.
## Decision
- `examples/tui-agent/cordis.yml` no longer configures `welcome`; the config key stays for deployments and fixtures that need a fixed, deterministic subtitle (the Code Mode overlay and every snapshot/scripted fixture keep theirs).
- When `welcome` is unset, `dsh-tui` picks one member of an exported `STARTUP_SLOGANS` bank per boot (`pickStartupSlogan`, injectable random source) and reveals it with a typewriter animation: one character per 40 ms frame, a `▌` block cursor trailing until complete. The reveal starts only after `ui.start()` succeeds and its interval is cleared on dispose alongside the other listeners.
- The slogan bank is presentation copy, deliberately not config: deployments that want controlled wording already have `welcome`. Slogans are ASCII-only by contract because the reveal slices per character.
- `dsh-tui-demo` forwards `welcome` only when configured instead of defaulting it, so the app no longer decides the TUI's idle subtitle.
- The keyless PTY boot scenario now waits for the reveal cursor (`▌` — the only source of that glyph in an empty transcript) instead of the removed welcome text.
The same change restores `packages/ui/tui/src/index.ts` to 100 % per-file coverage, which the color-scheme merge had broken on the integration branch: the editor border-color reassignment inside `applyColorScheme` was dead (the `setStatus` call right after re-derives it) and is removed, and the color-scheme query's `.then`/`.catch` arrows became named, tested handlers (`applyReportedScheme`, `ignoreSchemeQueryFailure` — the latter pinned by a test whose terminal throws on the DSR query write).
## Alternatives considered
**A fixed cooler slogan.** Rejected: one string re-read on every boot decays into wallpaper exactly like the line it replaces; a small rotating bank keeps the moment alive at no complexity cost.
**Making the bank and reveal speed configurable.** Rejected: that is two new knobs for presentation copy; `welcome` is already the escape hatch for deployments with an opinion, and the no-hardcoded-tunables rule targets deployment-varying behavior, not brand copy.
**Animating in `HeaderComponent` itself.** Rejected: the component would need a TUI handle and its own lifecycle; the chat already owns a render loop, timers, and a disposal path, so the reveal lives beside the other `createTuiChat` effects and `detachListeners` clears it.
## Consequences
- Boot output is no longer byte-deterministic when `welcome` is unset (random slogan, timed frames). Every recorded or snapshot surface pins `welcome` explicitly, so no snapshot changed; the PTY smoke anchors on the reveal cursor and the session-id line instead.
- The `welcome` schema default disappeared from both `dsh-tui` and `dsh-tui-demo`; a direct caller passing no welcome now gets a slogan, not `'ready.'`.
- Adding a slogan is a one-line bank edit; tests assert membership, not specific text.
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` pins deterministic bank selection with an injected random source, the reveal (a bank member fully rendered, cursor frames observed), the configured-welcome path rendering verbatim with no cursor, and dispose stopping a mid-reveal animation. `examples/tui-agent/tests/tui-keyless-smoke.e2e.ts` boots the real tree in a PTY and waits on the reveal cursor. Verified live in tmux (mid-reveal frame `no map below▌` then the full slogan).

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 启动 slogan 取代配置化的 TUI 欢迎语
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-20-tui-startup-slogans.md) | 中文
> **已被取代**:slogan/动画的那一半由[横幅扫入 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md)取代:slogan 库和打字机动画上线后实际使用中显得怪异,已替换为无副标题的横幅加整体扫入。移除示例配置中欢迎语的决定与动画生命周期基础设施(`ui.start()` 后启动、经 `detachListeners` 清除)保持不变。
## Problem
TUI 头部副标题来自一个 `welcome` 配置,示例叶子配置把它设为 "TUI agent ready. Give it a coding task."——一句说明书式的填充语,对老用户毫无信息量,每次启动都在复述产品是什么,而且它还有一个硬编码的孪生兄弟(`'ready.'`)作为两个包里的 schema 默认值。产品需要的是一个有性格的启动时刻,而不是一条静态横幅说明。
## Decision
- `examples/tui-agent/cordis.yml` 不再配置 `welcome`;该配置键保留给需要固定、确定性副标题的部署与 fixture(Code Mode overlay 和所有快照/脚本化 fixture 都保留各自的欢迎语)。
- `welcome` 未设置时,`dsh-tui` 每次启动从导出的 `STARTUP_SLOGANS` 库里挑选一条(`pickStartupSlogan`,随机源可注入),并以打字机动画逐字显示:每帧 40 ms 一个字符,完成前尾随一个 `▌` 块状光标。动画只在 `ui.start()` 成功后启动,其定时器与其他监听器一起在 dispose 时清除。
- slogan 库是展示文案,刻意不做成配置:想控制措辞的部署已经有 `welcome` 这个出口。按契约 slogan 只含 ASCII,因为逐字显示按字符切片。
- `dsh-tui-demo` 只在配置了 `welcome` 时才转发它,不再填默认值,应用不再替 TUI 决定空闲副标题。
- 无 key 的 PTY 启动场景改为等待逐字显示的光标(`▌`——空 transcript 里该字形的唯一来源),不再等待已删除的欢迎文本。
同一变更把 `packages/ui/tui/src/index.ts` 恢复到 100% 的单文件覆盖率(颜色方案合并曾在集成分支上破坏它):`applyColorScheme` 里对编辑器边框颜色的重新赋值是死代码(紧随其后的 `setStatus` 调用会重新推导它),已删除;颜色方案查询的 `.then`/`.catch` 箭头函数改为具名、有测试的处理器(`applyReportedScheme`、`ignoreSchemeQueryFailure`——后者由一个让终端在 DSR 查询写入时抛错的测试固定)。
## Alternatives considered
**换一条更酷的固定 slogan。** 否决:一条每次启动都重读的字符串会和它取代的那行一样退化成墙纸;一个小的轮换库以零复杂度代价让这个时刻保持新鲜。
**把 slogan 库和显示速度做成配置。** 否决:那是为展示文案新增两个旋钮;对措辞有主张的部署已经有 `welcome` 这个出口,而「插件里不许硬编码可调参数」规则针对的是随部署变化的行为,不是品牌文案。
**在 `HeaderComponent` 内部做动画。** 否决:组件将需要持有 TUI 句柄和自己的生命周期;聊天层已经拥有渲染循环、定时器和释放路径,所以逐字显示与 `createTuiChat` 的其他资源放在一起,由 `detachListeners` 清除。
## Consequences
- `welcome` 未设置时启动输出不再字节级确定(随机 slogan、定时帧)。所有录制或快照表面都显式固定 `welcome`,因此没有快照变化;PTY 冒烟测试改为锚定逐字显示光标和会话 id 行。
- `welcome` 的 schema 默认值从 `dsh-tui` 和 `dsh-tui-demo` 中消失;不传 welcome 的直接调用方现在得到的是 slogan,而不是 `'ready.'`。
- 新增一条 slogan 只需在库里加一行;测试断言成员归属,不断言具体文本。
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` 固定以下行为:注入随机源后的确定性选取、逐字显示(库中某条完整渲染、观察到光标帧)、配置了 welcome 时逐字动画不启动且原文渲染、以及 dispose 停止进行中的动画。`examples/tui-agent/tests/tui-keyless-smoke.e2e.ts` 在 PTY 里启动真实配置树并等待显示光标。已在 tmux 中实机验证(中途帧 `no map below▌`,随后是完整 slogan)。

View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-21-dsh-system-prompt-source-path.md: 4cb89e8124840bba6633235d195e95957245137c
2026-07-21-dsh-system-prompt-source-path.zh.md: 90c23bed4a3f95155e323c63a68fe2da09543ea6

View File

@@ -1,37 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: dsh tells the agent where its own source lives
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-21-dsh-system-prompt-source-path.zh.md)
## Problem
The `dsh` CLI is the self-referential surface: its `cordis` toolset lets the agent inspect and modify the very harness runtime it runs in. But the agent had no way to learn where that source lives on disk. `dsh` is normally symlinked onto PATH and launched from an arbitrary working directory — the project under work — so neither the cwd nor `argv` reliably points at the harness checkout. Without the path, "read your own source" is guesswork.
## Decision
The `dsh` launcher (`apps/cli/src/tui.ts`) computes the harness checkout root from its own module URL — `fileURLToPath(new URL('../../..', import.meta.url))`, three hops up from `apps/cli/{src,lib}` — so it resolves to the real source location however `dsh` is launched (a PATH symlink, an arbitrary cwd). After `boot()` settles the tree, the launcher calls the new `addHarnessSourceSection(ctx, sourceRoot)` helper from `dsh-app-boot`, which registers a global `harness:source` prompt section reading `Your own source code is the checkout at <path>; you can read it there to learn how dsh works and how to extend it.` The section orders at `-99`, just after the harness identity opener (`-100`) and before the deployment persona (`0`).
The testable logic lives in `dsh-app-boot`, not in `apps/cli`, because `apps/*` are not coverage-gated and `packages/*` are. Resolving the optional `systemPrompt` service, registering the section, and returning the disposer belong where per-file 100% coverage applies; the launcher keeps only the thin glue — compute the path, call the helper — covered by the CLI's PTY e2e. When the booted tree has no `systemPrompt` service the helper is a no-op returning `undefined`.
## Scope
Only the `dsh` CLI adds this. The demo bins (`dsh-cli-demo`, `dsh-acp-demo`) boot their committed trees verbatim and gain no source section: they are not the self-modification surface, and their checkout root is not a fact the model needs.
## HMR
The section is registered against the booted `systemPrompt` service's own fiber (through `ctx.get('systemPrompt')`), so a dev HMR reload of the system-prompt plugin drops it until the next boot. Production HMR watches the config, not the built lib, so this is a dev-only wrinkle and acceptable.
## Alternatives considered
**Register the section inside the system-prompt service constructor.** It would then appear in every deployment, not just the self-referential CLI, and the source root would have to be threaded through config to reach the constructor. The path is a launcher fact, so the launcher owns injecting it.
**Keep the whole thing in `apps/cli/src/tui.ts`.** Apps are not coverage-gated, so the registration and absent-service branches would ship untested. Extracting the tested helper into `dsh-app-boot` keeps the gate meaningful; the launcher glue is exercised by the CLI's keyless PTY smoke.
**Add a cordis.yml config field for the path.** The path is not a deployment choice — it is mechanically the launcher's own location. A config field invites a stale hand-entered path and adds a knob with no legitimate variation.
**Resolve from `process.cwd()` or `process.argv[1]`.** The cwd is the user's project, and a PATH symlink makes `argv[1]` the symlink path; `import.meta.url` is the only handle on the real source location.
## Consequences
The agent's system prompt now names its own checkout, so the `cordis` toolset can read and edit harness source with no discovery step. `dsh-app-boot` gains a type-only dependency on `dsh-system-prompt` (peer + dev, matching the acp package's side-effect type import) for the `ctx.get('systemPrompt')` declaration merge; there is no runtime dependency. The section is model-visible text, pinned verbatim in an app-boot unit test and asserted end to end through the CLI's keyless PTY smoke — which boots `dsh` against the scripted config, runs a turn, and reads the path back out of the persisted `request/header` system prompt. The line sits before per-request content, so it does not perturb the KV cache across turns.

View File

@@ -1,37 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: dsh 告知 agent 其自身源码所在位置
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-21-dsh-system-prompt-source-path.md) | 中文
## Problem
`dsh` CLI 是自我引用的接口:其 `cordis` 工具包让 agent(智能体)得以查看并修改它自身运行其上的 harness(智能体框架)运行时。但 agent 此前无从得知这份源码在磁盘上的位置。`dsh` 通常以符号链接的形式挂到 PATH 上,并从任意工作目录(正在处理的项目)启动,因此无论是 cwd 还是 `argv` 都无法可靠地指向 harness 检出目录。缺了这个路径,"读取你自己的源码"便只能靠猜。
## Decision
`dsh` 启动器(`apps/cli/src/tui.ts`)从它自身的模块 URL 计算 harness 检出根目录——`fileURLToPath(new URL('../../..', import.meta.url))`,从 `apps/cli/{src,lib}` 向上三级——因此无论 `dsh` 以何种方式启动(PATH 符号链接、任意 cwd),它都能解析到真实的源码位置。在 `boot()` 使插件树就位之后,启动器调用来自 `dsh-app-boot` 的新辅助函数 `addHarnessSourceSection(ctx, sourceRoot)`,它注册一个全局 `harness:source` 提示词段,内容为 `Your own source code is the checkout at <path>; you can read it there to learn how dsh works and how to extend it.`。该段的 order 为 `-99`,恰在 harness 身份开场(`-100`)之后、部署 persona(`0`)之前。
可测试的逻辑放在 `dsh-app-boot` 而非 `apps/cli` 中,因为 `apps/*` 不受覆盖率门禁约束,而 `packages/*` 受约束。解析可选的 `systemPrompt` 服务、注册该段、返回 dispose(资源释放)器,这些都属于按文件 100% 覆盖率生效的地方;启动器只保留那层薄薄的黏合——计算路径、调用辅助函数——由 CLI 的 PTY e2e 覆盖。当就位的插件树没有 `systemPrompt` 服务时,该辅助函数是一个返回 `undefined` 的空操作。
## Scope
只有 `dsh` CLI 会加入这一段。demo bin(`dsh-cli-demo`、`dsh-acp-demo`)原样引导它们已提交的插件树,不会获得 source 段:它们不是自我修改的接口,其检出根目录也不是模型需要知道的事实。
## HMR
该段是针对就位后的 `systemPrompt` 服务自身的 fiber 注册的(通过 `ctx.get('systemPrompt')`),因此对 system-prompt 插件做一次开发态 HMR(热模块替换)重载会丢弃它,直到下一次引导为止。生产环境的 HMR 监视的是配置而非构建产物 lib,所以这只是一个仅限开发态的小瑕疵,可以接受。
## Alternatives considered
**在 system-prompt 服务的构造函数内注册该段。** 那样它会出现在每一个部署中,而不只是自我引用的 CLI,而且源码根目录还得穿过配置才能到达构造函数。这个路径是启动器的事实,所以由启动器负责注入它。
**把整件事都留在 `apps/cli/src/tui.ts` 里。** apps 不受覆盖率门禁约束,因此注册逻辑与服务缺失分支会以未受测的形式发布。把受测的辅助函数抽取到 `dsh-app-boot` 让门禁保持有效;启动器的黏合部分由 CLI 的无密钥 PTY 冒烟测试演练。
**为该路径新增一个 cordis.yml 配置键。** 这个路径不是一项部署选择——它在机制上就是启动器自身的位置。配置键会招致手工填入的路径变陈旧,并新增一个没有合理变化空间的旋钮。
**从 `process.cwd()` 或 `process.argv[1]` 解析。** cwd 是用户的项目,而 PATH 符号链接会使 `argv[1]` 成为符号链接自身的路径;`import.meta.url` 是唯一能抓住真实源码位置的把手。
## Consequences
agent 的系统提示词现在会写明它自己的检出目录,因此 `cordis` 工具包无需一个发现步骤就能读取并编辑 harness 源码。`dsh-app-boot` 为 `ctx.get('systemPrompt')` 的声明合并新增了一个对 `dsh-system-prompt` 的仅类型依赖(peer dependency(对等依赖)+ dev,与 acp 包的副作用型类型 import 模式一致);不存在运行时依赖。该段是模型可见文本,在 app-boot 单元测试中逐字锁定,并通过 CLI 的无密钥 PTY 冒烟测试端到端断言——该测试以脚本化配置引导 `dsh`、运行一个轮次,再从持久化的 `request/header` 系统提示词中把路径读回来。这一行位于按请求变化的内容之前,所以它不会在多个轮次间扰动 KV Cache。

View File

@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Auto-titled terminal from the first message
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-21-tui-auto-pane-title.zh.md)
> **Superseded** by the [session-title consolidation Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-22-tui-titles-from-session-title-service.md): the TUI-local `autoTitle` generation is removed; titles come from the log-backed session-title service, and the terminal rename consumes `session/title` events.
> **Superseded** for the default and the resume behavior by the [auto-title default-on Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-auto-title-default-on.md): `autoTitle` now defaults on, and a resumed session re-derives its title from the stored first message instead of keeping the static one. The OSC 0 path, the one-shot latch, the model-summary shape, the fire-and-forget call, and every failure fallback below stand.
## Problem
The TUI's terminal title is a single static string (`title`, default `DeepSeek Harness`) shared by every session. A user who runs one agent per tmux pane or terminal tab sees the same label on all of them, so panes are indistinguishable at a glance and the tab bar carries no signal about what each session is doing.
## Decision
- `TuiConfig` gains an `autoTitle` boolean (default `false`). When it is on, the TUI issues one background model call after the first user message of a fresh session and replaces the terminal title with a short, model-generated label; the static `title` is the pre-title and the fallback.
- The label is a model summary, not a truncation of the prompt. The request carries a fixed task instruction (summarize the request as a short title of two to five lowercase words, no punctuation) plus the user's first message and no tools; the TUI takes the first non-empty line of the reply and caps it at 40 characters (39 plus an ellipsis).
- The title is set through `runtime.terminal.setTitle`, the same OSC 0 path the static `title` already uses. No new terminal-control surface is introduced, and pi-tui keeps ownership of terminal writes.
- The call is fire-and-forget and one-shot per session. A `titleSettled` latch guards it: with `autoTitle` off it is pre-settled and never runs; on a resumed session whose first `user/message` is already logged it is pre-settled so the static title stands; a whitespace-only first message is skipped without consuming the slot. Any failure, an empty reply, a missing `llm` service, or a missing agent provider/model leaves the static title untouched. A dedicated `AbortController` cancels an in-flight request on shutdown.
- The title call reaches `ctx.llm.stream` directly rather than through `agent.send`, so it never appends to the session or transcript and cannot perturb the agent loop.
- The feature defaults off and is enabled only in the interactive product config (`examples/tui-agent/cordis.yml`) and the scripted PTY fixture. Enabling it in the shared `dsh-tui-demo` schema default would fire an extra model call in keyless replay and boot scenarios that send no user message.
## Alternatives considered
**Truncate the first user message instead of a model title.** Rejected: the user chose a short model-made label; a truncated raw prompt is noisy, often begins with boilerplate, and rarely reads as a title.
**Rename the window (OSC 2) or the tmux window.** Rejected: OSC 0 sets only `pane_title`, so it labels the pane without renaming or leaking into the user's window title; the user confirmed OSC is the right lever.
**Default the feature on.** Rejected: enabling it in the shared demo schema perturbs keyless replay and boot snapshots and spends a model call on every fresh session; opt-in per deployment keeps the default surface inert.
**Fold this into the log-backed session-title work (PR #451).** Rejected: that change is session metadata persisted to the log; this is a terminal label with no persistence. Keeping them independent leaves each self-contained and avoids a shared dependency.
**Block the first turn until the title resolves.** Rejected: awaiting the title before sending the user's message adds latency to the actual request; fire-and-forget makes the rename invisible to the turn.
## Consequences
- When enabled, a fresh session spends one extra, tool-less model call with a single short user message and a few output tokens; off by default, it costs nothing.
- Because the title call stamps `sessionId`, it shares the session's `llm-replay` cursor: enabling `autoTitle` in a replay-backed snapshot scenario would consume a recorded script entry. This is why the default is off and the scripted PTY fixture answers the call with a tool-branching adapter rather than replay.
- `packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` pins the behavior with a mock `llm` adapter: a generated title replaces the static one, over-long output is truncated with an ellipsis, a whitespace-only first message keeps the one-shot slot, empty or failing replies leave the title, a resumed session never fires, and the feature-off / no-service / missing-provider / missing-model paths keep the static title. A shutdown test asserts the in-flight request is aborted.
- `examples/tui-agent/tests/tui-keyless-smoke.e2e.ts` proves the real Loader-booted path: the scripted adapter answers the tool-less title call with a fixed string, and the conversation scenario asserts the OSC 0 sequence reaches the PTY. Boot scenarios send no user message, so they never fire the call.

View File

@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 从首条消息自动命名终端
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-21-tui-auto-pane-title.md) | 中文
> **已被取代**:见[标题归一 Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-22-tui-titles-from-session-title-service.md)。TUI 本地的 `autoTitle` 生成已移除;标题来自日志承载的 session-title 服务,终端重命名消费 `session/title` 事件。
> **已被取代**(就默认值与恢复行为而言),见[自动标题默认开启 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-auto-title-default-on.md):`autoTitle` 现默认开启,恢复会话会从已存储的首条消息重新推导标题,而非保留静态标题。下文的 OSC 0 路径、一次性门闩、模型概括形态、发出后不等待其返回的调用,以及每一条失败兜底,均仍然成立。
## Problem
TUI 的终端标题是一个所有会话共用的静态字符串(`title`,默认 `DeepSeek Harness`)。在 tmux 每个窗格或每个终端标签页各跑一个 agent(智能体)的用户看来,它们的标签全都一样,因此窗格一眼看去无从区分,标签栏也不携带任何关于各会话正在做什么的信号。
## Decision
- `TuiConfig` 新增布尔字段 `autoTitle`(默认 `false`)。开启后,TUI 会在全新会话的首条用户消息之后发起一次后台模型调用,并用一个简短的、模型生成的标签替换终端标题;静态 `title` 是替换前的初值,也是兜底。
- 该标签是模型概括,而非对提示词的截断。请求携带一段固定的任务指令(将该请求概括为两到五个小写单词、不含标点的简短标题)加上用户的首条消息,且不带工具;TUI 取回复的首个非空行并截断到 40 个字符(39 个字符加一个省略号)。
- 标题通过 `runtime.terminal.setTitle` 设置——静态 `title` 已经在用的同一条 OSC 0 路径。不引入任何新的终端控制面,终端写入仍归 pi-tui 所有。
- 该调用发出后不等待其返回,且每会话仅一次。一个 `titleSettled` 门闩守护它:`autoTitle` 关闭时它预先置为已结算、从不运行;在首条 `user/message` 已入日志的恢复会话中它预先结算,因此静态标题得以保留;仅含空白的首条消息被跳过且不消耗名额。任何失败、空回复、缺少 `llm` 服务、或缺少 agent 的 `provider` 或 `model`,都会让静态标题保持不动。一个专用的 `AbortController` 在关闭时取消尚在进行的请求。
- 标题调用直接抵达 `ctx.llm.stream`,而非经由 `agent.send`,因此它从不追加进会话或 transcript(文本记录),也无法扰动 agent loop(智能体循环)。
- 该功能默认关闭,仅在交互式产品配置(`examples/tui-agent/cordis.yml`)与脚本化 PTY fixture(测试前置数据)中开启。若在共享的 `dsh-tui-demo` schema 默认值里开启,会在不发送任何用户消息的无密钥回放与启动场景中多发一次模型调用。
## Alternatives considered
**截断首条用户消息,而非用模型生成标题。** 否决:用户选择的是简短的、模型制作的标签;截断后的原始提示词嘈杂、常以样板文字开头,且很少读起来像标题。
**重命名窗口(OSC 2)或 tmux 窗口。** 否决:OSC 0 只设置 `pane_title`,因此它标记窗格而不重命名、也不泄漏进用户的窗口标题;用户确认 OSC 是正确的手段。
**让该功能默认开启。** 否决:在共享的 demo schema 里开启会扰动无密钥回放与启动快照,并在每个全新会话上花掉一次模型调用;按部署选择性开启可让默认面保持惰性。
**并入日志支撑的会话标题工作(PR #451)。** 否决:那项改动是持久化到日志的会话元数据;本项是不做持久化的终端标签。让二者相互独立可使各自自成一体,并避免共享依赖。
**阻塞首轮直到标题就绪。** 否决:在发送用户消息前先等待标题,会给实际请求增加延迟;发出后不等待其返回可让重命名对该轮次不可见。
## Consequences
- 开启时,全新会话会多花一次无工具的模型调用,只带单条简短的用户消息和少量输出 token;默认关闭时它不产生任何开销。
- 由于标题调用会打上 `sessionId`,它与会话的 `llm-replay` 游标共享:在以回放支撑的快照场景中开启 `autoTitle` 会消耗一条录制脚本条目。这正是它默认关闭、且脚本化 PTY fixture 用按工具分支的适配器而非回放来回答该调用的原因。
- `packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` 用一个 mock `llm` 适配器固定该行为:生成的标题替换静态标题、过长输出以省略号截断、仅含空白的首条消息保留一次性名额、空回复或失败回复保留标题、恢复的会话从不触发,以及功能关闭 / 无服务 / 缺提供方 / 缺模型各路径都保留静态标题。一项关闭测试断言尚在进行的请求被中止。
- `examples/tui-agent/tests/tui-keyless-smoke.e2e.ts` 证明真实的经 Loader 启动的路径:脚本化适配器以固定字符串回答无工具的标题调用,对话场景断言 OSC 0 序列抵达 PTY。启动场景不发送用户消息,因此它们从不触发该调用。

View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-21-tui-auto-title-default-on.md: 35809e1ef6bade3e09c34b17608eff5f8fb5bd22
2026-07-21-tui-auto-title-default-on.zh.md: aa20cfde1359605f2ac5a8f0427f4518c611ecd1

View File

@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Auto-title on by default, re-derived on resume
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-21-tui-auto-title-default-on.zh.md)
> **Superseded** by the [session-title consolidation Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-22-tui-titles-from-session-title-service.md): the TUI-local `autoTitle` generation is removed; titles come from the log-backed session-title service, and the terminal rename consumes `session/title` events.
## Problem
The [auto-title Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-auto-pane-title.md) shipped `autoTitle` off by default and, on a resumed session, kept the static title because the first `user/message` was already logged. In use both choices defeated the feature's purpose. A per-session descriptive pane title is what makes one tmux pane or terminal tab distinguishable from the next; leaving it off by default means the product ships an inert feature that almost no user turns on, and skipping re-derivation on resume means a resumed session — exactly the long-lived session most worth labelling — falls back to the shared static string. The user asked for a descriptive per-session name to be the normal experience.
## Decision
- `autoTitle` defaults **on** (`z.boolean().default(true)`, mirrored by `resolveTuiConfig`'s `?? true`). A deployment with an `llm` service and an agent provider/model gets a model-made pane title on every session without opting in; one without them keeps the static title, so default-on is inert where the call cannot run.
- A **resumed** session re-derives the title on mount from its already-logged first `user/message`: `createTuiChat` scans `agent.session.events` for the first such event and feeds its text to the same one-shot `generateTitle`. The title is never persisted (the session header carries no title field), so it is always derived, never restored.
- The one-shot latch is now simply `titleSettled = !resolved.autoTitle`. The prior pre-settle-on-resume clause is gone: on resume `generateTitle` runs once from the stored first message and then latches, so a message that arrives *after* the resume does not re-title. A fresh session has no stored `user/message` at mount, so the resume scan is a no-op and the live `session/event` listener titles the first message instead.
- Everything else from the [auto-title Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-auto-pane-title.md) stands unchanged: the OSC 0 `runtime.terminal.setTitle` path, the model-summary shape (two-to-five lowercase words, first non-empty line, 40-char cap), the fire-and-forget `ctx.llm.stream` call that never touches the session or transcript, the shutdown `AbortController`, and every failure fallback (empty reply, missing `llm`, missing provider/model, whitespace-only prompt).
## Alternatives considered
**Keep the feature off by default.** Rejected: this is a direct reversal of the [auto-title Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-auto-pane-title.md)'s "default off" decision at the user's request. Off-by-default ships an inert feature; the descriptive name is only useful if it is the normal experience. The keyless-replay concern that motivated off-by-default is addressed by pinning `autoTitle: false` in the replay-backed snapshot scenarios rather than by suppressing it for every deployment.
**Persist the derived title in the session header.** Rejected: the header has no title field and adding one would make a terminal label into session metadata — the boundary the [auto-title Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-auto-pane-title.md) already drew against the log-backed session-title work. Re-deriving from the stored first message costs one tool-less call on resume and keeps the label a pure function of the conversation.
**Re-derive on resume from the latest message instead of the first.** Rejected: the title summarises what the session is *about*, which its opening request captures; a mid-conversation message would make the pane label drift as the work moves on.
## Consequences
- A fresh session with a working `llm` now spends one extra tool-less model call by default (previously only when opted in); a resumed session spends one on mount. Deployments without an `llm` or provider/model are unaffected.
- The replay-backed `examples/tui-agent/tests/tui.snapshot.ts` must opt **out**: it pins `autoTitle: false`, because a default-on title request is not among the recorded turns and `installLlmReplay` fails loud on an unrecorded request. The unit `packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.snapshot.ts` needs no opt-out — it mounts no `llm` service, so `generateTitle` short-circuits and the default flip is inert there. The interactive `examples/tui-agent/cordis.yml` and the scripted PTY fixture already set `autoTitle: true`, so the keyless smoke's OSC 0 assertion is unchanged.
- `packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` pins the new defaults: the config-default test expects `autoTitle: true`; the disabled-path test now sets `autoTitle: false` explicitly; and the former "resumed session never fires" test is rewritten to assert re-derivation from the stored first message and that a later live message does not re-title. `docs/config-catalog.md` regenerates to "On by default".

View File

@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 自动标题默认开启,恢复时重新推导
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-21-tui-auto-title-default-on.md) | 中文
> **已被取代**:见[标题归一 Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-22-tui-titles-from-session-title-service.md)。TUI 本地的 `autoTitle` 生成已移除;标题来自日志承载的 session-title 服务,终端重命名消费 `session/title` 事件。
## Problem
[自动标题 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-auto-pane-title.md) 交付时 `autoTitle` 默认关闭,并且在恢复会话中因首条 `user/message` 已入日志而保留静态标题。实际使用中这两个选择都违背了该功能的初衷。让一个 tmux 窗格或终端标签页区别于下一个的,正是每会话各异的描述性窗格标题;默认关闭意味着产品交付了一个几乎无人开启的惰性功能,而恢复时不重新推导,则意味着恢复会话——恰恰是最值得标记的长命会话——退回到共用的静态字符串。用户要求把每会话的描述性名称做成常态体验。
## Decision
- `autoTitle` 默认**开启**(`z.boolean().default(true)`,`resolveTuiConfig` 以 `?? true` 与之对齐)。带有 `llm` 服务与 agent 提供方/模型的部署无需选择性开启即可在每个会话获得模型制作的窗格标题;不具备它们的部署保留静态标题,因此在调用无法运行处,默认开启是惰性的。
- **恢复**会话在挂载时从其已入日志的首条 `user/message` 重新推导标题:`createTuiChat` 在 `agent.session.events` 中扫描首个此类事件,并把其文本喂给同一个一次性的 `generateTitle`。标题从不持久化(会话头不携带标题字段),因此它始终是推导得来,而非恢复而来。
- 一次性门闩现在只是 `titleSettled = !resolved.autoTitle`。此前"恢复即预先结算"的分句已删除:恢复时 `generateTitle` 从已存储的首条消息运行一次随后上闩,因此恢复*之后*到达的消息不会再改标题。全新会话在挂载时没有已存储的 `user/message`,因此恢复扫描是空操作,改由实时的 `session/event` 监听器为首条消息命名。
- [自动标题 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-auto-pane-title.md) 的其余一切保持不变:OSC 0 的 `runtime.terminal.setTitle` 路径、模型概括形态(两到五个小写单词、首个非空行、40 字符上限)、从不触碰会话或 transcript(文本记录)的发出后不等待其返回的 `ctx.llm.stream` 调用、关闭时的 `AbortController`,以及每一条失败兜底(空回复、缺 `llm`、缺提供方/模型、仅含空白的提示词)。
## Alternatives considered
**让该功能保持默认关闭。** 否决:这是应用户要求,对[自动标题 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-auto-pane-title.md)"默认关闭"决策的直接反转。默认关闭交付的是惰性功能;只有当描述性名称成为常态体验时它才有用。当初促成默认关闭的无密钥回放顾虑,改由在以回放支撑的快照场景中固定 `autoTitle: false` 来处理,而非为每个部署都压制该功能。
**把推导出的标题持久化进会话头。** 否决:会话头没有标题字段,加一个会把终端标签变成会话元数据——正是[自动标题 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-auto-pane-title.md)已经对日志支撑的会话标题工作划出的边界。从已存储的首条消息重新推导,代价是恢复时一次无工具调用,并让标签保持为对话的纯函数。
**恢复时从最新消息而非首条消息重新推导。** 否决:标题概括的是会话*关于什么*,而这由其开场请求捕获;一条对话中途的消息会让窗格标签随工作推进而漂移。
## Consequences
- 带可用 `llm` 的全新会话现在默认多花一次无工具的模型调用(此前只在选择性开启时才有);恢复会话在挂载时花掉一次。不具备 `llm` 或提供方/模型的部署不受影响。
- 以回放支撑的 `examples/tui-agent/tests/tui.snapshot.ts` 必须选择**关闭**:它固定 `autoTitle: false`,因为默认开启的标题请求不在录制轮次之列,而 `installLlmReplay` 对未录制的请求会显式报错。单元 `packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.snapshot.ts` 无需选择关闭——它不挂载 `llm` 服务,因此 `generateTitle` 提前短路,默认值的翻转在那里是惰性的。交互式的 `examples/tui-agent/cordis.yml` 与脚本化 PTY fixture(测试前置数据)已设 `autoTitle: true`,因此无密钥冒烟测试的 OSC 0 断言保持不变。
- `packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` 固定新的默认值:config 默认测试期望 `autoTitle: true`;关闭路径测试现在显式设 `autoTitle: false`;此前的"恢复会话从不触发"测试改写为断言从已存储首条消息重新推导,并断言之后的实时消息不会再改标题。`docs/config-catalog.md` 重新生成为"On by default"。

View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-21-tui-banner-brand-gradient.md: 41edf5d0bcf856bc7695af6bf651ff04c11adc01
2026-07-21-tui-banner-brand-gradient.zh.md: 9253c001e8df2a4d0f79f69f32d65c11afd13e22

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: TUI banner brand gradient
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-21-tui-banner-brand-gradient.zh.md)
## Problem
The TUI startup banner rendered the product name `DEEPSEEK` in the palette's flat accent color, which carries no brand identity and does not resemble the wordmark on deepseek.com. The request was to make the banner match the site logo's blue gradient specifically — not to recolor the rest of the coding harness.
The banner is the one surface where that matters, and it conflicts with a load-bearing invariant: the TUI palette is deliberately theme-agnostic. It uses only standard 16-color ANSI (SGR) codes and attributes so a user's terminal scheme remaps every color; the `themeViolations()` snapshot gate rejects any RGB, extended-palette, or explicit-background cell. A smooth logo-matching gradient cannot be built from 16 palette colors, so reproducing it requires 24-bit truecolor, which the gate flags by design.
## Decision
The banner paints `DEEPSEEK` with a per-letter 24-bit truecolor foreground sweeping the deepseek.com brand gradient — `#4D6BFE` → `#3982FF` → `#2498FF` — via piecewise-linear interpolation across those three stops; `HARNESS` stays bold with the default foreground. The gradient is foreground-only, so it stays legible on any terminal background, and it is confined to the banner's product name. This is the sole sanctioned exception to the theme-agnostic palette; every other surface remains standard-ANSI and theme-adaptive.
The gradient is gated on `resolved.color && resolved.truecolor`. When truecolor is unavailable the banner falls back to the existing flat bright-blue accent, so nothing about the theme-agnostic guarantee or the recorded snapshots changes unless truecolor is explicitly in play.
`truecolor` is a validated `Config` field with no schema default. When it is unset, `apply()` auto-detects it at the process boundary from `COLORTERM` (`truecolor` or `24bit`); an explicit config value always wins. Detection reads `process.env` only in `apply()` — never in the pure `resolveTuiConfig` resolver — keeping the resolver a pure function of its input.
The gradient stops are fixed brand identity, treated like a protocol constant, so they are hardcoded in the plugin rather than exposed as a tunable. Whether truecolor is *enabled* is terminal- and deployment-varying, so that is the validated `Config` field. The banner text is UI-only and never reaches a model request, so no session event is required.
## Testing
A dedicated `banner-gradient` terminal snapshot pins the real per-letter RGB output in an xterm emulator (`fg=#4d6bfe`…`#2498ff`, each letter bold). The shared `checkpoint()` helper takes a `bannerGradient` flag: for that one checkpoint it asserts the theme violations are non-empty and that every violation ends in `rgb-fg` — i.e. truecolor is present but confined to the banner foreground, with no background or extended-palette leak. Every other checkpoint keeps the strict `themeViolations()` `.toEqual([])` assertion, so the fence is mechanically enforced. A `tui.spec.ts` unit test mounts with `color`+`truecolor` enabled to cover the header's gradient branch and the `gradientText`/`brandColorAt` helpers.
## Alternatives considered
**A theme-safe stepped gradient built from the 16-color palette.** Approximating the sweep with bright-blue palette variants would keep the banner fully theme-agnostic and avoid touching the gate. It was rejected by the requester: 16 fixed colors cannot reproduce the smooth logo gradient, and the request was explicitly to match the site wordmark.
**Recoloring the whole harness palette blue.** The original phrasing was "update the harness color to blue." That was narrowed to the banner only; a global blue palette would break theme-agnosticism everywhere, not just on one brand surface.
**Always emitting truecolor.** Many terminals lack 24-bit support and would render the raw or degraded codes. Gating on detection with an ANSI fallback keeps the banner correct everywhere while still showing the gradient where it works.
**Detecting truecolor inside `resolveTuiConfig`.** The resolver is a pure defaulting step and must not read `process.env`. Environment probing belongs at the process boundary in `apply()`, so `mountTui`/`createTuiChat` stay driven purely by their config input and remain fully testable with a fake terminal.
## Consequences
The banner now carries the DeepSeek brand identity on truecolor terminals while the theme-agnostic guarantee holds everywhere else — and even on the banner itself when truecolor is unavailable. The cost is one narrow, documented crack in the theme-agnostic invariant: a fixed-color surface that will not adapt to a user's terminal scheme, accepted because it is brand identity and foreground-only, so it stays legible on both light and dark backgrounds. The crack is fenced by the `banner-gradient` snapshot assertion, which confines truecolor to the banner foreground and fails if any other RGB, extended-palette, or background color ever appears.

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: TUI 启动横幅品牌渐变
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-21-tui-banner-brand-gradient.md) | 中文
## 问题
TUI 启动横幅原本用调色板的扁平强调色渲染产品名 `DEEPSEEK`,它不承载任何品牌标识,也不像 deepseek.com 上的字标。需求明确是让横幅匹配站点 logo 的蓝色渐变——而不是给整个 coding harness 重新上色。
横幅是唯一在意这件事的界面,而它与一条承重不变量冲突:TUI 调色板刻意做到主题无关。它只使用标准 16 色 ANSI(SGR)代码与属性,好让用户的终端配色方案能够重映射每一种颜色;`themeViolations()` 快照门禁会拒绝任何 RGB、扩展调色板或显式背景色的单元格。用 16 种调色板颜色无法拼出平滑的、与 logo 一致的渐变,因此复现它需要 24 位真彩色(truecolor),而门禁按设计会将其标记出来。
## 决策
横幅用逐字母的 24 位真彩色前景色渲染 `DEEPSEEK`,沿 deepseek.com 品牌渐变——`#4D6BFE` → `#3982FF` → `#2498FF`——在这三个色标之间做分段线性插值;`HARNESS` 保持加粗并使用默认前景色。渐变仅作用于前景色,因此在任何终端背景上都保持可读,并且被限制在横幅的产品名内。这是主题无关调色板唯一获准的例外;其余每个界面都保持标准 ANSI 且随主题自适应。
渐变以 `resolved.color && resolved.truecolor` 为开关。当真彩色不可用时,横幅回退到既有的扁平亮蓝强调色,因此除非显式启用真彩色,主题无关保证与已录制的快照都不会改变。
`truecolor` 是一个经校验的 `Config` 字段,schema 不设默认值。当它未设置时,`apply()` 会在进程边界从 `COLORTERM`(`truecolor` 或 `24bit`)自动探测;显式的配置值始终优先。探测只在 `apply()` 中读取 `process.env`——绝不在纯粹的 `resolveTuiConfig` 解析器中——从而让解析器保持为其输入的纯函数。
渐变色标是固定的品牌标识,被当作协议常量对待,因此硬编码在插件里,而不作为可调项暴露。是否*启用*真彩色则随终端与部署而变,所以那才是经校验的 `Config` 字段。横幅文本仅面向界面,永不进入任何模型请求,因此不需要会话事件。
## 测试
一个专门的 `banner-gradient` 终端快照在 xterm 模拟器中固定了真实的逐字母 RGB 输出(`fg=#4d6bfe`…`#2498ff`,每个字母加粗)。共享的 `checkpoint()` 辅助函数接受一个 `bannerGradient` 标志:仅对该 checkpoint,它断言主题违规项非空,且每一项都以 `rgb-fg` 结尾——即真彩色确实存在,但被限制在横幅前景色,没有背景色或扩展调色板的泄漏。其余每个 checkpoint 都保持严格的 `themeViolations()` `.toEqual([])` 断言,因此这道围栏是机械强制的。一个 `tui.spec.ts` 单元测试在同时启用 `color` 与 `truecolor` 时挂载,以覆盖 header 的渐变分支以及 `gradientText`/`brandColorAt` 辅助函数。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**用 16 色调色板拼出的主题安全阶梯渐变。** 用亮蓝的调色板变体近似这段渐变可以让横幅完全保持主题无关,并避免触碰门禁。它被需求方否决了:16 种固定颜色无法复现平滑的 logo 渐变,而需求明确是匹配站点字标。
**给整个 harness 调色板重新上蓝色。** 最初的说法是"把 harness 颜色改成蓝色"。它被收窄到只改横幅;全局蓝色调色板会在各处而非仅一个品牌界面上破坏主题无关性。
**始终发射真彩色。** 许多终端不支持 24 位,会渲染出原始或降级的代码。以探测为开关并配以 ANSI 回退,能让横幅在各处都正确,同时仍在支持的地方展示渐变。
**在 `resolveTuiConfig` 内探测真彩色。** 该解析器是纯粹的默认值填充步骤,绝不能读取 `process.env`。环境探测属于 `apply()` 中的进程边界,从而让 `mountTui`/`createTuiChat` 完全由其配置输入驱动,并在使用假终端时保持完全可测。
## 后果
现在横幅会在真彩色终端上承载 DeepSeek 品牌标识,而主题无关保证在其余各处依然成立——甚至当真彩色不可用时在横幅自身上也成立。代价是主题无关不变量上一道狭窄且有记录的裂缝:一个不会随用户终端配色方案自适应的固定颜色界面,之所以接受,是因为它是品牌标识且仅作用于前景色,从而在浅色与深色背景上都保持可读。这道裂缝由 `banner-gradient` 快照断言把守,它将真彩色限制在横幅前景色,一旦其他任何 RGB、扩展调色板或背景色出现就会失败。

View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md: c146424d53e75a72b63e346f87a5bbd206d67350
2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.zh.md: 01cc153e88f067b7b8d2eb6317648f3892fe8a5a

View File

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: The banner sweeps in; the subtitle line is gone
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.zh.md)
> **Superseded** by the [no-banner Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md): the banner itself was removed, taking the sweep with it.
## Problem
The [startup-slogans Agent Note](2026-07-20-tui-startup-slogans.md) replaced the instructional welcome line with a random slogan bank revealed by a per-character typewriter. In use the quotes read as weird — random flavor text in a tool's header — and the animation was slow (40 ms/char over a full sentence) while animating only one line of a four-line banner. This note supersedes that decision's slogan half; the removal of the configured demo welcome and the animation-lifecycle groundwork stand.
## Decision
- The slogan bank, `pickStartupSlogan`, and the typewriter reveal are deleted. When `welcome` is unset the banner simply has **no subtitle line** — title and model/session detail only. The `welcome` config remains for deployments and fixtures that want a fixed subtitle, rendered frame-deterministically with no animation.
- The startup animation is now the **whole banner**: `HeaderComponent` gains a `revealWidth` clip, and the header box wipes in left-to-right over ~24 frames at 15 ms (~360 ms total, ~60 fps), started after `ui.start()` succeeds and cleared through the same `detachListeners` path the typewriter used. `stopBannerReveal` also resets the clip so a disposed-mid-sweep header re-renders whole.
- The PTY smoke's boot marker changes from the typewriter cursor (`▌`) to the banner's top-right corner (`╮`), which only renders once the sweep completes.
## Alternatives considered
**Keep the animation as-is and only change the copy.** Rejected: any fixed or rotating phrase re-read on every boot decays into wallpaper; the user's judgment was that the quotes themselves, not just their content, were wrong for the surface.
**Animate per banner line (top-down) instead of a left-right sweep.** Rejected: with only four lines the animation would have four visible steps — closer to a flicker than a reveal; the horizontal sweep uses the full terminal width for a smooth motion at the same total duration.
**Character-level clipping via `revealWidth` on styled text.** Adopted with `truncateToWidth` from pi-tui, the same ANSI-aware clipper the header already uses for width overflow, so the sweep cannot tear escape sequences.
## Consequences
- Boot output with `welcome` unset is again animation-dependent but no longer random: every boot sweeps the same banner. Configured welcomes (all snapshot/scripted fixtures, the Code Mode overlay) stay frame-deterministic and unchanged.
- The `STARTUP_SLOGANS`/`pickStartupSlogan` exports are gone; no consumer outside the deleted tests referenced them.
- The default banner is one line shorter (no subtitle), so PTY assertions anchored on banner geometry use the corner glyph rather than any subtitle text.
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` pins: the sweep completes to a full banner (both corners + title) and produced at least one clipped mid-sweep frame; a configured welcome renders verbatim with no clipped frames; the unset-welcome banner has no subtitle; and dispose clears the sweep's own interval handle. The PTY smoke boots on the `╮` completion marker across the tui-demo bin, the dsh CLI, and the personal-overlay scenarios. Verified live in tmux.

View File

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 横幅整体扫入;副标题行移除
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md) | 中文
> **已被取代**:由[移除启动横幅 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md)取代:横幅本身已移除,扫入动画随之移除。
## Problem
[启动 slogan Agent Note](2026-07-20-tui-startup-slogans.md) 用随机 slogan 库加逐字打字机动画取代了说明书式的欢迎行。实际使用中这些引语显得怪异——工具头部出现随机的风味文案——而且动画很慢(每字符 40 ms,扫完一整句),却只动画四行横幅中的一行。本 note 取代该决定中 slogan 的那一半;移除示例配置中欢迎语的决定与动画生命周期的基础设施保持不变。
## Decision
- 删除 slogan 库、`pickStartupSlogan` 和打字机动画。`welcome` 未设置时横幅直接**没有副标题行**——只有标题和模型/会话详情。`welcome` 配置保留给想要固定副标题的部署与 fixture,无动画、逐帧确定地渲染。
- 启动动画现在作用于**整个横幅**:`HeaderComponent` 增加 `revealWidth` 裁剪,头部盒子以约 24 帧、每帧 15 ms(总计约 360 ms、约 60 fps)从左到右扫入,在 `ui.start()` 成功后启动,经打字机动画用过的同一条 `detachListeners` 路径清除。`stopBannerReveal` 同时重置裁剪,因此扫入中途被 dispose 的头部会重新完整渲染。
- PTY 冒烟测试的启动标记从打字机光标(`▌`)改为横幅右上角(`╮`),它只在扫入完成后才渲染。
## Alternatives considered
**保留动画原样、只改文案。** 否决:任何每次启动都被重读的固定或轮换语句都会退化成墙纸;用户的判断是引语本身——而不只是内容——对这个表面来说就是错的。
**按横幅行逐行(自上而下)动画而非左右扫入。** 否决:只有四行时动画只有四个可见步骤——更像闪烁而不是展开;水平扫入用满终端宽度,在相同总时长内动作更平滑。
**用 `revealWidth` 对带样式文本做字符级裁剪。** 采用 pi-tui 的 `truncateToWidth`——头部处理宽度溢出时已在使用的同一个 ANSI 感知裁剪器——因此扫入不可能撕裂转义序列。
## Consequences
- `welcome` 未设置时启动输出再次依赖动画但不再随机:每次启动扫入同一幅横幅。配置了欢迎语的场景(全部快照/脚本化 fixture、Code Mode overlay)保持逐帧确定且不变。
- `STARTUP_SLOGANS`/`pickStartupSlogan` 导出移除;除被删除的测试外没有消费者引用它们。
- 默认横幅少一行(无副标题),因此锚定横幅几何的 PTY 断言使用角落字形而非任何副标题文本。
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` 固定:扫入完成为完整横幅(两个角 + 标题)且产生了至少一个裁剪的中途帧;配置的欢迎语原文渲染且无裁剪帧;未设置欢迎语的横幅没有副标题;dispose 清除扫入自己的定时器句柄。PTY 冒烟测试在 tui-demo bin、dsh CLI 和个人 overlay 场景中以 `╮` 完成标记启动。已在 tmux 中实机验证。

View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.md: 37263854b6cc77283215c3c1378f9908ff966611
2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.zh.md: ca796e49cb9d3a9abc0acd64a39448bc3f9ad50e

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: The banner returns, borderless
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.zh.md)
## Problem
The [no-banner Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md) removed the boxed startup banner: it deleted `HeaderComponent` and its sweep, moved the model into the footer, dropped the session id, and rendered `welcome` as the transcript's first line. The user's verdict reversed that: bring the banner back — "just remove the border". The four-row box frame was the objectionable chrome, not the identifying facts it carried (model, session id) nor the sweep-in motion.
## Decision
- `HeaderComponent` and its left-to-right sweep return, but render **borderless**: no `╭─╮`/`╰─╯` corners and no `│` side bars. Each line is a single leading space plus `truncateToWidth`-clipped content, so the sweep's width clip can never tear an escape sequence and no fixed frame is drawn.
- The header carries the title (`DEEPSEEK HARNESS`), a `<model> • <session-id>` detail line, and — when `welcome` is set — a muted subtitle. With `welcome` unset the header is title + detail only.
- The model **also** stays in the footer's left segment. The no-banner note's footer model prefix is kept, not reverted, so the driving model stays glanceable after the transient banner scrolls out of view.
- `welcome` reverts to a banner subtitle; the transcript-first-line notice is removed from `rebuildTranscript`.
- The sweep animates only when `welcome` is unset. A configured `welcome` renders the whole banner immediately, keeping fixtures and snapshots frame-deterministic. The sweep starts after `ui.start()` succeeds and is cleared through the same `detachListeners` path via `stopBannerReveal`, which also resets the clip so a header disposed mid-sweep re-renders whole.
This supersedes the [no-banner Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md) (which superseded the [banner-sweep Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md)): the banner and its sweep return borderless, while the model's footer home the no-banner note added stays.
## Alternatives considered
**Keep the box but thin it or use lighter glyphs.** Rejected: the instruction was "just remove the border"; any surrounding glyph is the frame chrome the user objected to.
**Drop the model from the footer now that the banner shows it again.** Rejected: the banner is transient and scrolls away with the transcript, while the footer keeps the model visible for the whole session — the reason the no-banner note put it there, deliberately preserved.
**Leave the session id out, as the no-banner note decided.** Rejected: with the box gone the detail line costs one row, and the user asked for the banner "as before", which carried `model • session-id`.
## Consequences
- Boot output with `welcome` unset is animation-dependent again (the sweep); configured welcomes stay frame-deterministic, so every snapshot and scripted fixture keeps a fixed subtitle.
- The model now appears twice at boot — banner detail and footer — intended redundancy: the banner is transient, the footer persistent.
- `/clear` empties the transcript but not the header, so the banner and its configured subtitle survive `/clear`, unlike the no-banner welcome line that `/clear` wiped.
- All pi-tui terminal snapshots and the examples/tui-agent replay snapshots re-recorded (`test:snapshot:refresh`): banner rows return with no box glyphs; footer rows keep the model prefix.
- Anything that anchored on banner absence re-anchors on its presence: the PTY smoke boots on the detail line's `main-session-` id (revealed late in the sweep) and asserts `DEEPSEEK`/`HARNESS` present with no box corners.
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` pins: the borderless banner sweeps to natural completion — no box corners, title and `main-session` detail present — with at least one clipped mid-sweep frame; a configured `welcome` renders the whole banner with no clipped frame; the unset-welcome banner has no subtitle; and dispose clears the sweep interval mid-sweep. The tui-agent and dsh-CLI PTY smokes boot on the `main-session-` detail marker and assert no box corners. Snapshots verify the full frames.

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 横幅回归,无边框
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.md) | 中文
## Problem
[移除横幅 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md) 删掉了带框的启动横幅:它删除了 `HeaderComponent` 及其扫入动画,把模型移入页脚,丢弃了会话 id,并把 `welcome` 渲染为 transcript 的第一行。用户的裁决把这一切反转:把横幅拿回来——"just remove the border"。令人反感的装饰是那四行盒子边框,而不是它承载的识别信息(模型、会话 id),也不是扫入动效。
## Decision
- `HeaderComponent` 及其从左到右的扫入动画回归,但以**无边框**方式渲染:没有 `╭─╮`/`╰─╯` 边角,也没有 `│` 侧边。每一行都是一个前导空格加上经 `truncateToWidth` 裁剪的内容,因此扫入的宽度裁剪永远不会撕裂转义序列,也不绘制任何固定边框。
- 头部承载标题(`DEEPSEEK HARNESS`)、一条 `<model> • <session-id>` 详情行,以及——当设置了 `welcome` 时——一条弱化的副标题。`welcome` 未设置时头部只有标题加详情。
- 模型**同时**保留在页脚的左段。移除横幅那版 note 加入的页脚模型前缀被保留而非回退,因此在短暂的横幅滚出视野后,会话使用的模型仍可一瞥可见。
- `welcome` 恢复为横幅副标题;transcript 第一行的通知从 `rebuildTranscript` 中移除。
- 仅当 `welcome` 未设置时才播放扫入动画。配置了 `welcome` 会立即渲染整个横幅,使 fixture 和快照保持帧确定性。扫入在 `ui.start()` 成功后启动,并经与之前相同的 `detachListeners` 路径通过 `stopBannerReveal` 清理;后者还会重置裁剪,使扫入中途被销毁的头部重新完整渲染。
本 note 取代[移除横幅 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md)(后者取代了[横幅扫入 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md)):横幅及其扫入动画以无边框方式回归,而移除横幅那版 note 为模型设立的页脚归宿得以保留。
## Alternatives considered
**保留盒子但做细或改用更轻的字符。** 否决:指令是 "just remove the border";任何环绕的字符都是用户所反对的边框装饰。
**既然横幅重新显示模型,就把模型从页脚移除。** 否决:横幅是短暂的,会随 transcript 滚走,而页脚在整个会话中保持模型可见——这正是移除横幅那版 note 把它放在那里的原因,此处刻意保留。
**像移除横幅那版 note 那样,把会话 id 留在外面。** 否决:盒子去掉后详情行只占一行,且用户要求横幅"和以前一样",而以前它承载 `model • session-id`。
## Consequences
- `welcome` 未设置时的启动输出再次依赖动画(扫入);配置了欢迎语则保持帧确定性,因此每个快照和脚本 fixture 都保留一个固定副标题。
- 模型现在在启动时出现两次——横幅详情与页脚——这是有意的冗余:横幅短暂,页脚常驻。
- `/clear` 清空 transcript 但不清头部,因此横幅及其配置的副标题在 `/clear` 后存活,不同于被 `/clear` 清掉的移除横幅那版的欢迎行。
- 全部 pi-tui 终端快照与 examples/tui-agent 回放快照重新录制(`test:snapshot:refresh`):横幅行以无盒子字符方式回归;页脚行保留模型前缀。
- 一切锚定横幅缺失的内容改为锚定其存在:PTY 冒烟测试以详情行的 `main-session-` id 为启动标记(它在扫入后段才被揭示),并断言 `DEEPSEEK`/`HARNESS` 出现且无盒子角。
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` 固定:无边框横幅扫入至自然完成——无盒子角、标题与 `main-session` 详情出现——且至少有一帧扫入中途被裁剪;配置的 `welcome` 完整渲染横幅且无裁剪帧;未设置 `welcome` 的横幅无副标题;销毁会在扫入中途清掉扫入定时器。tui-agent 与 dsh CLI 的 PTY 冒烟测试以 `main-session-` 详情标记为启动标记并断言无盒子角。快照验证完整帧。

View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-21-tui-footer-cache-hit-rate.md: aaee8ed31ff8f20370f490d3ce27c8705cda3e16
2026-07-21-tui-footer-cache-hit-rate.zh.md: 67a7aa474d98878a5bc0bc0a76a8c2ccad004e9b

View File

@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: TUI footer shows the session cache hit rate
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-21-tui-footer-cache-hit-rate.zh.md)
## Problem
The footer summed the session's token usage as `↑<input> ↓<output>`, where `↑` is the uncached input reported by the model. `TokenUsage` counts are disjoint: billed prompt tokens are `inputTokens` (uncached) plus `cacheReadTokens` and `cacheWriteTokens`. With only the uncached number visible, a user could not tell how much of each turn's prompt the provider cache served — the signal that most directly reflects whether the reused request prefix is paying off. On a long session dominated by cache reads the `↑` figure stays small and hides that the prompt is large but cheap.
## Decision
The footer appends `cache <rate>%` after `↑<input> ↓<output>`, where the rate is the share of billed prompt tokens served from the provider cache.
- `TokenTotals` accumulates the four disjoint buckets (`input`, `output`, `cacheRead`, `cacheWrite`). `addUsage` folds one call's `TokenUsage` into the totals, treating a missing `cacheReadTokens`/`cacheWriteTokens` as zero.
- `cacheHitRate(totals)` is `round(cacheRead / (input + cacheRead + cacheWrite) * 100)`, and `undefined` before any input is billed. `FooterComponent` omits the whole ` cache N%` segment while the rate is `undefined`, so an empty session shows no meaningless zero.
- `↑` keeps meaning uncached input, not billed input: the disjoint-bucket convention holds across the footer, and the cache percent supplies the reuse signal the raw counts cannot.
- Totals are rebuilt on mount by `sessionTokens`, which sums usage over `assistant/message` events (never `assistant/chunk`, to avoid double counting), and updated live from each `assistant/message` event that carries usage.
## Alternatives considered
**Show billed input (`input + cacheRead + cacheWrite`) as `↑` instead of a separate percent.** Rejected: it would redefine `↑` away from the disjoint `inputTokens` bucket the rest of the harness reports, and it would still hide the reuse share the user actually wants; a derived percent adds the signal without overloading the count.
**Compute the rate against all tokens (`input + output + cache`).** Rejected: output tokens are never cache-served, so folding them into the denominator understates the rate for no meaning; cache hit rate is a property of the prompt.
**Drop `cacheWrite` from the denominator.** Rejected: cache writes are billed input the provider spent to populate the cache, so excluding them overstates the hit rate on a writing turn. DeepSeek reports no cache-write metric today, but the formula stays general and the write path is covered.
**Render `cache 0%` on an empty session.** Rejected: the billed input is `0`, the ratio is `0/0`, and a `0%` badge on a fresh session is a lie about a value that does not exist yet; the segment stays hidden until input is billed.
**Give the metric its own right-aligned footer element beside `tools:`.** Rejected: it derives from the adjacent token counts and reads best in the `input → output → cache` order; grouping it left also keeps the lower-priority `tools:` indicator as the element that clips first under width pressure, matching the footer's existing layout priority.
## Consequences
- The left group grew by ` cache N%`, so on a narrow footer the right-side `tools:` state clips sooner. This follows the footer's pre-existing left-priority truncation and is an accepted trade-off.
- The metric is best-effort live UI state derived from `assistant/message` usage: rebuilt from the session on mount, updated live, and never persisted.
- `packages/ui/tui/src/index.ts` stays at 100 % per-file coverage.
- The `examples/tui-agent` terminal snapshots carry the segment: a turn with cache reads renders e.g. `cache 49%`, and a first cold turn renders `cache 0%`.
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` drives the footer through the real `createTuiChat`: an empty session renders `↑0 ↓0` with no cache segment (the hidden path), a cold turn (`inputTokens` only) renders `cache 0%`, and a live warm turn carrying `cacheReadTokens` and `cacheWriteTokens` updates it to `cache 60%` while no longer showing `cache 0%`. The `examples/tui-agent` snapshot suite replays green against the recorded expected output.

View File

@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: TUI 页脚展示会话缓存命中率
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-21-tui-footer-cache-hit-rate.md) | 中文
## Problem
页脚原本把会话的 token 用量汇总为 `↑<input> ↓<output>`,其中 `↑` 是模型上报的未缓存输入。`TokenUsage` 的各项计数互不重叠:计费的输入 token 由 `inputTokens`(未缓存)加上 `cacheReadTokens` 与 `cacheWriteTokens` 构成。只暴露未缓存的那个数字,用户就无从判断每轮提示词有多少由提供方缓存承接——而这恰是最能反映复用的请求前缀是否奏效的信号。在以缓存读取为主的长会话里,`↑` 始终很小,掩盖了提示词其实很大但很便宜的事实。
## Decision
页脚在 `↑<input> ↓<output>` 之后追加 `cache <rate>%`,该比率是计费输入 token 中由提供方缓存承接的占比。
- `TokenTotals` 累加四个互不重叠的桶(`input`、`output`、`cacheRead`、`cacheWrite`)。`addUsage` 把单次调用的 `TokenUsage` 折入总量,缺失的 `cacheReadTokens`/`cacheWriteTokens` 视为零。
- `cacheHitRate(totals)` 为 `round(cacheRead / (input + cacheRead + cacheWrite) * 100)`,在尚无输入计费前返回 `undefined`。比率为 `undefined` 时 `FooterComponent` 整段略去 ` cache N%`,因此空会话不会显示无意义的零。
- `↑` 仍表示未缓存输入,而非计费输入:页脚全程遵守互不重叠的桶约定,缺失的复用信号由缓存百分比补足。
- 挂载时由 `sessionTokens` 重建总量,它对带 usage 的 `assistant/message` 事件求和(绝不用 `assistant/chunk`,以免重复计数);此后每条携带 usage 的 `assistant/message` 事件都会实时更新。
## Alternatives considered
**把计费输入(`input + cacheRead + cacheWrite`)作为 `↑`,不单列百分比。** 否决:这会让 `↑` 偏离 harness 其余部分上报的互不重叠 `inputTokens` 桶,且仍旧藏住用户真正想要的复用占比;派生一个百分比既补上信号,又不给计数加载额外含义。
**用全部 token(`input + output + cache`)作分母计算比率。** 否决:输出 token 从不由缓存承接,把它折进分母只会无意义地拉低比率;缓存命中率是提示词的属性。
**从分母里去掉 `cacheWrite`。** 否决:缓存写入是提供方为填充缓存而付费的计费输入,剔除它会在写入的那一轮高估命中率。DeepSeek 目前不上报缓存写入指标,但公式保持通用,写入路径也有覆盖。
**在空会话上渲染 `cache 0%`。** 否决:此时计费输入为 `0`,比值是 `0/0`,在全新会话上打出 `0%` 是对一个尚不存在的值撒谎;在输入计费之前该段一直隐藏。
**给该指标单独一个右对齐的页脚元素,紧挨 `tools:`。** 否决:它派生自相邻的 token 计数,按 `input → output → cache` 的顺序阅读最顺;左置分组还让优先级更低的 `tools:` 指示成为宽度紧张时最先被裁剪的元素,与页脚既有的布局优先级一致。
## Consequences
- 左段增加了 ` cache N%`,因此窄终端上右侧的 `tools:` 状态更早被裁剪。这沿用页脚既有的左段优先裁剪策略,是可接受的取舍。
- 该指标是从 `assistant/message` 的 usage 派生的尽力而为实时 UI 状态:挂载时从会话重建、随后实时更新、从不持久化。
- `packages/ui/tui/src/index.ts` 保持 100% 单文件覆盖率。
- `examples/tui-agent` 终端快照带有该段:有缓存读取的一轮渲染为如 `cache 49%`,首个冷启动轮次渲染为 `cache 0%`。
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` 通过真实的 `createTuiChat` 驱动页脚:空会话渲染 `↑0 ↓0` 且无缓存段(隐藏路径),冷启动一轮(仅 `inputTokens`)渲染 `cache 0%`,随后实时的热轮次携带 `cacheReadTokens` 与 `cacheWriteTokens`,把它更新为 `cache 60%` 且不再显示 `cache 0%`。`examples/tui-agent` 快照套件对已录制的预期输出回放通过。

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: No startup banner
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.zh.md)
> **Superseded** by the [borderless-banner Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.md): the banner and its sweep return without the box. The model's footer home this note added stays.
## Problem
The TUI opened with a boxed product banner ("DEEPSEEK HARNESS" + model/session detail), most recently with a sweep-in animation ([banner sweep Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md)). The user's verdict: remove it. A product title re-read on every boot is chrome, the box spends four rows before any content, and the identifying facts it carried (model, session) have better homes.
## Decision
- `HeaderComponent`, the sweep animation, and its lifecycle wiring are deleted. The TUI mounts straight into the transcript; startup renders nothing above the separator.
- The model name moves into the footer status line's left segment (`<model> <cwd> ↑tokens ↓tokens`), so the session's driving model stays visible at all times, not just at boot. The session id is no longer displayed — it lives in the session log and `./.sessions` filenames, where `dsh --resume <id>` and the `/resume` selector retrieve it.
- `welcome`, when configured, renders as the transcript's first line (a muted notice) inside `rebuildTranscript`, so palette swaps preserve it. Unset renders nothing. Fixtures keep their configured welcomes; the PTY smoke's boot marker becomes the footer's model name, the only mounted-TUI text guaranteed to render regardless of cwd length.
This supersedes the [banner sweep Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md) entirely: both the sweep and the banner it animated are gone.
## Alternatives considered
**Keep a one-line header (no box).** Rejected: the only load-bearing fact was the model name, and the footer already aggregates session status; a dedicated header row for one fact is the same chrome, smaller.
**Show the session id in the footer too.** Rejected: a 36-char UUID dominates the 100-column footer and clips the status segment; it identifies the session for resume, which is a log/filesystem concern, not a glanceable one.
**Print the welcome outside the transcript (above the separator).** Rejected: any fixed region above the transcript is a banner again; as a transcript line it scrolls away naturally and survives rebuilds through the same path as every other transcript element.
## Consequences
- Startup output is fully deterministic again — no animation frames at all; the interval-lifecycle machinery from the two animation iterations is gone.
- All 26 pi-tui terminal snapshots re-recorded (`test:snapshot:refresh`): banner rows gone, footer rows gain the model prefix.
- Anything that anchored on banner text (`DEEPSEEK`, box corners) re-anchors on the footer model name; `main-session-` no longer appears in boot output.
- `/clear` now wipes the welcome line too: it is an ordinary transcript line, and `/clear` empties the transcript (the old banner survived `/clear` only by sitting outside it).
- The footer's left segment is wider; on narrow terminals the right status segment clips earlier.
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` pins: no box corners/product title and an empty transcript when `welcome` is unset, with the model in the footer; a configured welcome as the first transcript line without a banner; and the welcome surviving a palette-swap transcript rebuild. The PTY smoke boots on the footer model name and asserts `DEEPSEEK HARNESS` is absent. Snapshots verify the full frames.

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 移除启动横幅
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-21-tui-no-banner.md) | 中文
> **已被取代**,见[无边框横幅 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-borderless-banner.md):横幅及其扫入动画回归,只是去掉了盒子。本 note 为模型设立的页脚归宿得以保留。
## Problem
TUI 启动时展示一个带框的产品横幅("DEEPSEEK HARNESS" + 模型/会话详情),最近一版还带扫入动画([横幅扫入 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md))。用户的裁决:删掉它。每次启动都被重读的产品标题是装饰,盒子在任何内容之前先占掉四行,而它承载的识别信息(模型、会话)有更好的去处。
## Decision
- 删除 `HeaderComponent`、扫入动画及其生命周期接线。TUI 直接挂载进 transcript;启动时分隔线之上不渲染任何东西。
- 模型名移入页脚状态行的左段(`<model> <cwd> ↑tokens ↓tokens`),会话使用的模型因此始终可见,而不只是启动时。会话 id 不再显示——它存在于会话日志和 `./.sessions` 文件名中,`dsh --resume <id>` 和 `/resume` 选择器会从中获取该 id。
- 配置了 `welcome` 时,它作为 transcript 的第一行(一条弱化的通知)在 `rebuildTranscript` 内渲染,因此调色板切换会保留它。未设置则什么也不渲染。fixture 保留各自配置的欢迎语;PTY 冒烟测试的启动标记改为页脚的模型名——无论 cwd 多长都保证渲染的唯一挂载后文本。
本 note 完全取代[横幅扫入 Agent Note](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md):扫入动画和它所动画的横幅都已移除。
## Alternatives considered
**保留单行头部(去掉盒子)。** 否决:唯一有承载价值的信息是模型名,而页脚已经聚合会话状态;为一条信息保留专用头部行仍是同一种装饰,只是小一点。
**把会话 id 也放进页脚。** 否决:36 字符的 UUID 会占满 100 列页脚并裁掉状态段;它的用途是恢复会话的标识,属于日志/文件系统关注点,不是需要一瞥可见的信息。
**把欢迎语渲染在 transcript 之外(分隔线上方)。** 否决:transcript 上方任何固定区域都会再次变成横幅;作为 transcript 行它自然滚走,并通过与其他 transcript 元素相同的路径在重建后保留。
## Consequences
- 启动输出再次完全确定——没有任何动画帧;两轮动画迭代留下的定时器生命周期机制全部移除。
- 全部 26 个 pi-tui 终端快照重新录制(`test:snapshot:refresh`):横幅行消失,页脚行增加模型前缀。
- 锚定横幅文本(`DEEPSEEK`、盒子角)的内容改为锚定页脚模型名;启动输出中不再出现 `main-session-`。
- `/clear` 现在也会清掉欢迎行:它是普通的 transcript 行,而 `/clear` 清空 transcript(旧横幅能在 `/clear` 后存活只因为它在 transcript 之外)。
- 页脚左段变宽;窄终端上右侧状态段更早被裁剪。
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` 固定:`welcome` 未设置时无盒子角/产品标题、transcript 为空、模型在页脚;配置的欢迎语作为 transcript 第一行且无横幅;欢迎语在调色板切换的 transcript 重建后保留。PTY 冒烟测试以页脚模型名为启动标记并断言 `DEEPSEEK HARNESS` 不出现。快照验证完整帧。

View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-21-tui-reload-command.md: 89bf2f7bb482d7f3889136c1a6ac9918ba0c4919
2026-07-21-tui-reload-command.zh.md: cfea10690af49f2cf484938a3f9f12d954766a71

View File

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: The /reload command re-reads loader configs on demand
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-21-tui-reload-command.zh.md)
## Problem
HMR's file watcher only reacts to in-place `change` events under its configured roots (the config leaf's directory in the shipped demos). Editors that replace files by rename (BSD `sed -i`, `git checkout`) produce no event, and runtimes without the HMR entry have no config reload path at all. During development that means restarting the TUI to apply a config edit the watcher missed. Widening the watch roots to the whole repo was considered and rejected in discussion: dense package sharing makes module-level HMR a remount-most-of-the-tree operation with unpredictable externals boundaries.
## Decision
`dsh-tui` gains an **experimental, dev-only** `/reload` slash command: it walks `ctx.loader.entries()` and calls `refresh()` on every file-backed subtree (`Include`), i.e. the exact code path the HMR watcher's config-change branch drives, invoked manually and watcher-independent. Unchanged files are no-ops (content comparison in `Include.read`); invalid files warn and keep the running tree (the hot-reload-resilience contract); include `patches` — including the dsh CLI's personal overlay — re-apply on every re-read.
The TUI reaches the Loader **structurally** (`ctx.loader` via a local type, not `inject`): tests and embedders run the TUI without a Loader, where `/reload` degrades to a warning notice instead of failing the mount. Module-source hot reload stays watcher-owned; `/reload` refreshes configs only.
## Alternatives considered
**Widening the HMR watch roots to `packages/`/`apps/`.** Rejected for now: plugin-source changes reload every dependent plugin's fiber, and the repo's dense shared packages (`dsh-session`, `dsh-llm`, `dsh-tools`) make that a teardown of the spine and the UI mid-session — a restart in disguise with partial-reload hazards. A manual config-scope command captures the safe, predictable subset.
**Declaring `loader` in `inject`.** Rejected: it would make the Loader a hard dependency of the TUI, breaking every Loader-less composition (unit harness, embedders) for a dev convenience.
**A `cordis_reload` model-facing tool in dsh-tool-cordis.** Rejected: this is an operator action for the human at the terminal, not a capability the model should trigger; the cordis toolset's mount/unmount surface already covers the model's runtime-modification story.
## Consequences
- `/reload` appears in the help line, autocomplete (marked EXPERIMENTAL (dev)), and the two help-rendering snapshots (re-recorded).
- The command reports tree count and completion as transcript notices; per-file failures surface only in loader logs, which the TUI does not display — acceptable for a dev-only surface, noted in the completion message.
- A re-entrancy guard serializes reloads: `/reload` while one is in flight is refused with a warning, keeping the loader's unmutexed tree-update pass single-writer; the guard releases on completion or failure.
- `/reload` runs only while the agent is idle: a reload can dispose and re-mount entries, which under an active turn could tear tools or the adapter out from under in-flight calls. The check is advisory (a send can race in after it) but removes the common footgun.
- If `refresh()`'s never-reject contract ever changes, the command reports the failure instead of leaving an unhandled rejection.
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` pins: `/reload` refreshes every file-backed subtree and skips plain entries (structural fake Loader), reports completion, refuses re-entry while a gated refresh is in flight and runs again after release, releases the guard on the failure arm, refuses a running agent and runs again at idle, reports a rejecting refresh, and degrades to a warning without a Loader — including mounted as a real plugin fiber, where a throwing service lookup would escape. Verified live in tmux against the real tree: probe edit → reload applies; invalid edit → reload keeps the running tree.

View File

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: /reload 命令按需重读 loader 配置
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-21-tui-reload-command.md) | 中文
## Problem
HMR 的文件监听器只对其配置根目录(示例中即配置叶子所在目录)下的就地 `change` 事件起反应。以重命名方式替换文件的编辑器(BSD `sed -i`、`git checkout`)不产生事件,而没有挂载 HMR 配置项的运行时则完全没有配置重载路径。开发时这意味着监听器漏掉一次配置编辑就得重启 TUI。曾考虑把监听根目录扩大到整个仓库,讨论后否决:包之间的密集共享使模块级 HMR 变成「重挂大半棵树」的操作,externals 边界也不可预测。
## Decision
`dsh-tui` 增加一个**实验性、仅供开发**的 `/reload` 斜杠命令:遍历 `ctx.loader.entries()`,对每个文件后端的子树(`Include`)调用 `refresh()`——即 HMR 监听器配置变更分支所走的同一条代码路径,改为手动触发、不依赖监听器。未变化的文件是无操作(`Include.read` 做内容比较);无效文件记录警告并保留运行中的树(热重载韧性契约);include 的 `patches`——包括 dsh CLI 的个人 overlay——在每次重读时重新应用。
TUI 以**结构方式**访问 Loader(通过局部类型访问 `ctx.loader`,而非 `inject`):测试和嵌入方在没有 Loader 的情况下运行 TUI,此时 `/reload` 退化为一条警告通知而不是挂载失败。模块源码热重载仍由监听器负责;`/reload` 只刷新配置。
## Alternatives considered
**把 HMR 监听根目录扩大到 `packages/`/`apps/`。** 暂缓否决:插件源码变更会重载每个依赖插件的 fiber,而仓库中密集共享的包(`dsh-session`、`dsh-llm`、`dsh-tools`)使其等同于会话中途拆掉主干和 UI——伪装成热重载的重启,还带部分重载的隐患。手动的、只覆盖配置范围的命令抓住了安全、可预测的那个子集。
**在 `inject` 中声明 `loader`。** 否决:那会让 Loader 成为 TUI 的硬依赖,为了一个开发便利破坏所有无 Loader 的组合(单元测试 harness、嵌入方)。
**在 dsh-tool-cordis 里做一个面向模型的 `cordis_reload` 工具。** 否决:这是终端前人类操作者的动作,不是模型应当触发的能力;cordis 工具集的 mount/unmount 表面已经覆盖模型的运行时修改需求。
## Consequences
- `/reload` 出现在帮助行、自动补全(标注 EXPERIMENTAL (dev))和两个渲染帮助的快照中(已重新录制)。
- 命令以 transcript 通知报告树数量与完成;单文件失败只出现在 loader 日志里,TUI 不显示——对仅供开发的表面可以接受,完成消息中已注明。
- 重入保护串行化重载:前一次进行中时 `/reload` 会被拒绝并提示警告,使 loader 无互斥的树更新过程保持单写者;保护在完成或失败时释放。
- `/reload` 只在 agent 空闲时运行:重载可能卸载并重新挂载配置项,在活跃轮次下这会把工具或适配器从进行中的调用脚下抽掉。检查是建议性的(检查后仍可能有 send 竞争进来),但消除了常见的坑。
- 若 `refresh()` 的永不 reject 契约将来改变,命令会报告失败而不是留下未处理的 rejection。
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` 固定:`/reload` 刷新每个文件后端子树并跳过普通配置项(结构化的假 Loader)、报告完成、在门控的刷新进行中拒绝重入并在释放后可再次运行、失败分支同样释放保护、拒绝运行中的 agent 并在空闲后可再次运行、报告 reject 的 refresh、无 Loader 时退化为警告——包括作为真实插件 fiber 挂载的情形,在那里会抛出的服务查找会泄露出去。已在 tmux 中对真实配置树实机验证:探针编辑 → reload 生效;无效编辑 → reload 保留运行中的树。

View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-21-tui-steering-queue-badge.md: b29a4667e778e65b0678f946fcaa34b79c4d7da0
2026-07-21-tui-steering-queue-badge.zh.md: 4bfce461e11bce1773d6e0b15aabecf6a6a6144c

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: TUI status line badges queued steering messages
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-21-tui-steering-queue-badge.zh.md)
## Problem
While a turn runs, an editor submission calls `agent.steer()` and joins the steering queue behind the running turn ([front-door Agent Note](2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.md)). The running status line ended only with the `Enter sends steering, Esc cancels` hint, so pressing Enter gave no feedback that the message landed or how many were waiting to reach the model. A user steering several times could not tell the queue from a dropped keystroke.
## Decision
The agent's inbox is the authoritative steering queue but is not observable from the TUI, so the badge is a live count reconstructed from the public `agent/queued` and `steering/message` events rather than a projection of the queue itself.
- The running status line composes through `formatTurnStatus`, which inserts a `${queued} queued · ` badge before the `Enter sends steering, Esc cancels` hint when `queued > 0` and shows the plain hint at zero; the phase label and elapsed timing before it are the [verbose status line](2026-07-21-tui-verbose-status-line.md)'s.
- `createTuiChat` owns a `pendingSteering` counter: `+1` on each `agent/queued` for this agent whose `info.steering` is set, `-1` (floored at zero) on each `steering/message` session event as the loop drains one, and reset to zero whenever the agent leaves `running`.
- The count refreshes onto the live `Loader` through `setMessage`; the refresh is a no-op while idle because the loader exists only during a running turn.
- The reset lives in the `agent/status` transition, not in `setStatus`, because `setStatus` also runs on mid-turn palette changes and must not clear a live count.
## Alternatives considered
**Derive the count from the session log alone** (enqueued minus drained, recomputed on replay). Rejected: a cancellation clears the inbox without logging a drain, so the log cannot distinguish a drained message from a discarded one; the reset-on-non-running anchor is simpler and self-correcting each turn.
**Reset inside `setStatus`.** Rejected: `setStatus` re-runs on `applyColorScheme` mid-turn, which would wrongly zero a live count; the status transition is the only place a turn actually ends.
**Drop the decrement clamp.** Rejected: loop-authored steering (e.g. continuation reasons) logs `steering/message` with no matching user-queued increment, which would drive the count negative; the zero floor keeps the badge a lower bound rather than a lie.
**Make the wording or a threshold configurable.** Rejected: the no-hardcoded-tunables rule targets deployment-varying behavior, not brand copy; the `welcome`/hint strings are already fixed presentation.
## Consequences
- The badge is best-effort live UI state, not a logged surface: it is rebuilt from events and reset each turn, never persisted, so a resumed running turn starts its badge from zero.
- A cancellation mid-queue clears the badge cleanly through the non-running reset, and a drain past zero is a no-op — neither can strand a stale count.
- A loop continuation that keeps the agent `running` while re-enqueuing undrained late steering can transiently over-count until the next idle reset; the badge is advisory, so the window is acceptable.
- `packages/ui/tui/src/index.ts` stays at 100 % per-file coverage.
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` drives the running status frame through the real `createTuiChat`: the plain hint at zero, a foreign-agent queue ignored, the increment to `2 queued`, a non-steering queue left untouched, the decrement as each message drains, the clamp on a drain past zero, and the reset when the turn ends. Verified live in tmux — the badge showed `3 queued` after three `agent.steer()` calls, then `1 queued` as two drained.

View File

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: TUI 状态行标示排队中的 steering 消息
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-21-tui-steering-queue-badge.md) | 中文
## Problem
轮次运行期间,编辑器提交会调用 `agent.steer()`,在运行中的轮次后面加入 steering(中途引导)队列([前门 Agent Note](2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.md))。运行时的状态行只以 `Enter sends steering, Esc cancels` 提示收尾,因此按下 Enter 后没有任何反馈表明消息已入队、也看不出有多少条正在等待送达模型。连续 steering 多次的用户无法把队列和被吞掉的按键区分开。
## Decision
agent(智能体)的收件箱(inbox)才是权威的 steering 队列,但 TUI 无法观测它,因此徽标是从公开的 `agent/queued` 与 `steering/message` 事件重建出的实时计数,而非对队列本身的投影。
- 运行时的状态行经 `formatTurnStatus` 组装:`queued > 0` 时在 `Enter sends steering, Esc cancels` 提示前插入 `${queued} queued · ` 徽标,为零时是纯提示文本;其前的阶段标签与耗时归[详细状态行](2026-07-21-tui-verbose-status-line.md)所有。
- `createTuiChat` 持有一个 `pendingSteering` 计数器:每收到一个针对本 agent 且 `info.steering` 为真的 `agent/queued` 就 `+1`,agent loop(智能体循环)每排空一条时随对应的 `steering/message` 会话事件 `-1`(下限为零),agent 一旦离开 `running` 状态即重置为零。
- 计数通过 `setMessage` 刷新到实时的 `Loader` 上;空闲时刷新是空操作,因为 loader 只在运行中的轮次期间存在。
- 重置放在 `agent/status` 状态切换里,而非 `setStatus` 中,因为 `setStatus` 在轮次中途的颜色方案变化时也会运行,绝不能清掉一个实时计数。
## Alternatives considered
**仅从会话日志推导计数**(入队数减去排空数,回放时重算)。否决:取消会清空 inbox 而不记录排空,因此日志无法区分一条消息是被排空还是被丢弃;「离开运行态即重置」这个锚点更简单,且每轮自我校正。
**在 `setStatus` 内重置。** 否决:`setStatus` 会在轮次中途的 `applyColorScheme` 时重新运行,会错误地把实时计数清零;状态切换才是轮次真正结束的唯一位置。
**去掉递减的下限钳制。** 否决:agent loop 自行产生的 steering(如 continuation 续跑原因)会记录 `steering/message`,却没有对应的用户入队递增,这会把计数压到负数;零下限让徽标成为下界,而非谎报。
**把措辞或某个阈值做成配置。** 否决:「插件里不许硬编码可调参数」规则针对的是随部署变化的行为,不是品牌文案;`welcome`/提示字符串本就是固定的展示文案。
## Consequences
- 徽标是尽力而为的实时 UI 状态,不写入日志:它由事件重建、每轮重置、从不持久化,因此恢复(resume)出的运行中轮次徽标从零开始。
- 队列中途取消会经由「离开运行态即重置」干净地清掉徽标,排空到零以下则是空操作——两者都不会残留一个陈旧计数。
- 如果 agent loop 续跑时让 agent 保持 `running`、同时把未排空的迟到 steering 重新入队,则可能短暂多计,直到下一次空闲重置;徽标只作参考,因此这个窗口可以接受。
- `packages/ui/tui/src/index.ts` 保持 100% 的单文件覆盖率。
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` 通过真实的 `createTuiChat` 驱动运行时状态帧:为零时的纯提示、忽略他方 agent 的入队、递增到 `2 queued`、非 steering 的入队保持不变、每条消息排空时的递减、排空到零以下时的钳制、以及轮次结束时的重置。已在 tmux 中实机验证——三次 `agent.steer()` 调用后徽标显示 `3 queued`,随后两条排空时显示 `1 queued`。

View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-21-tui-verbose-status-line.md: f277afd3a874b30a29dc0ef193740f636d22290b
2026-07-21-tui-verbose-status-line.zh.md: 9fa7cf29c67245382bbee6b72f2710c5550d7f54

View File

@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: The running status line shows the turn phase and elapsed time
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-21-tui-verbose-status-line.zh.md)
## Problem
While a turn ran, the [full-screen TUI](2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.md) showed a single static "Working" spinner. It conveyed neither how long the current step had taken nor what the agent was doing — waiting on the model, thinking, streaming a response, or running tools — so a slow or stalled turn was indistinguishable from a fast one.
## Decision
- While a turn runs, the status line above the editor shows a derived phase label with elapsed time, keeping the trailing `— Enter sends steering, Esc cancels` hint. The four phases and their labels are `waiting` → "Waiting for the first token", `thinking` → "Thinking", `responding` → "Responding", and `executing` → "Executing tools".
- The phase is presentation state the TUI derives from live session events, not a session event or agent status of its own. `step/start` enters `waiting`; an `assistant/chunk` reasoning delta or reasoning block-start enters `thinking`; a text delta or text block-start enters `responding`; a `tool/call` enters `executing`. The event map is merge-extensible, so every other event kind falls through a default and leaves the phase unchanged.
- The label reports two clocks — `<phase> <phase-elapsed> · total <step-elapsed>` — except `waiting`, which shows only the step total. The phase clock resets on a genuine phase change or a new step; the step clock resets on `step/start`. Durations format as `8s` below a minute and `1m05s` at or above one. Tool time between `step/end` and the next `step/start` accrues to the finishing step's total.
- A single `RunningStatus` controller — the loader, the phase, the two baselines, and a refresh timer — exists only while a turn runs. A one-second `setInterval` refreshes the elapsed time; a phase event refreshes it immediately. `clearStatus` clears the interval, stops the loader, and drops the controller, so any transition to idle or disposed leaves no live timer, matching the [banner sweep](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md)'s timer hygiene. A mid-turn palette rebuild (`setStatus` re-derives the editor border on a terminal color-scheme change) carries the phase and both baselines across, so a running status never snaps back to `waiting`.
## Alternatives considered
**Emit the phase as a session event or agent status.** Rejected: the phase is a presentation detail the TUI reconstructs from events already logged. A durable, model-visible phase would demand a new session event under the model-visible ⟺ logged rule, for no model benefit.
**Reuse pi-tui's `Loader` animation timer to refresh the elapsed text.** Not available: the vendored `Loader` animates only its spinner glyph, and its dist is not ours to change. The TUI owns a separate one-second interval, cleared on teardown.
**Infer the phase from tool-drain or streaming-component state.** Rejected: the `step/start`, `assistant/chunk`, and `tool/call` lifecycle events are cleaner signals, already handled in the same live listener, and avoid coupling the status line to other components.
**Show only elapsed time, or only the phase.** Rejected: both are wanted — the per-phase time answers what the agent is doing, the per-step total answers how long the step has taken.
## Consequences
- The status line reads, for example, `Thinking 4s · total 8s — Enter sends steering, Esc cancels`, so the agent's current activity and step duration are legible and a stall is visible.
- Phase detection is best-effort presentation: an unhandled future chunk or event kind leaves the last phase in place and never throws.
- Exactly one `setInterval` runs per active turn, cleared with the controller on every idle or disposed transition and on shutdown.
## Testing
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` pins each phase label against its triggering event (`step/start`, reasoning and text deltas and block-starts, `tool/call`), that a new step reopens the wait window, that the elapsed time advances on the controller's own timer past one second, that a step beyond a minute renders `1m…`, that a mid-turn color-scheme change preserves the phase and elapsed time, and that a live event arriving before the turn runs moves no status. Verified live in tmux.

View File

@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: 运行状态行展示轮次阶段与已用时长
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-21-tui-verbose-status-line.md) | 中文
## 问题
在轮次运行期间,[全屏 TUI](2026-07-17-dedicated-full-screen-tui-front-door.md) 只显示一个静态的 "Working" loader 动画。它既不表明当前步骤已耗时多久,也不表明 agent(智能体)正在做什么——等待模型、思考、流式输出回复,还是运行工具——因此运行缓慢或卡住的轮次与运行很快的轮次无从区分。
## 决策
- 轮次运行期间,编辑器上方的状态行显示一个派生的阶段标签及已用时长,并保留末尾的 `— Enter sends steering, Esc cancels` 提示。四个阶段及其标签为 `waiting` → "Waiting for the first token"、`thinking` → "Thinking"、`responding` → "Responding"、`executing` → "Executing tools"。
- 阶段是 TUI 从实时会话事件派生出的呈现状态,而非它自有的会话事件或 agent 状态。`step/start` 进入 `waiting`;`assistant/chunk` 的 reasoning 分片或 reasoning 块开始(`block-start`)进入 `thinking`;text 分片或 text 块开始进入 `responding`;`tool/call` 进入 `executing`。该事件映射可合并扩展,因此其余任何事件类型都落入默认分支,保持阶段不变。
- 标签汇报两个时钟——`<phase> <phase-elapsed> · total <step-elapsed>`——但 `waiting` 只显示步骤总时长。阶段时钟在真正发生阶段切换或进入新步骤时重置;步骤时钟在 `step/start` 时重置。时长在不足一分钟时格式化为 `8s`,达到或超过一分钟时格式化为 `1m05s`。`step/end` 与下一个 `step/start` 之间的工具时间计入结束步骤的总时长。
- 单一的 `RunningStatus` 控制器——loader、阶段、两个基准时刻以及一个刷新定时器——仅在轮次运行期间存在。一个每秒触发的 `setInterval` 刷新已用时长;阶段事件则立即刷新。`clearStatus` 清除该 interval、停止 loader 并丢弃控制器,因此任何向 idle 或 disposed 的转变都不会遗留活动定时器,与 [banner 扫入动画](2026-07-21-tui-banner-sweep.md)的定时器清理保持一致。轮次进行中的调色板重建(终端颜色方案变化时 `setStatus` 会重新派生编辑器边框)会将阶段与两个基准时刻一并沿用过来,因此运行中的状态绝不会退回 `waiting`。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
**将阶段作为会话事件或 agent 状态发出。** 已否决:阶段是 TUI 从已记录事件重建出的呈现细节。一个持久、模型可见的阶段会依据 model-visible ⟺ logged 规则要求新增一个会话事件,而对模型没有任何好处。
**复用 pi-tui 的 `Loader` 动画定时器来刷新已用时长文本。** 不可行:`Loader` 是 vendored 依赖,只驱动其加载动画字形,其 dist 不归我们改动。TUI 自持一个独立的每秒 interval,并在拆卸时清除。
**从工具耗尽或流式组件状态推断阶段。** 已否决:`step/start`、`assistant/chunk` 和 `tool/call` 这些生命周期事件是更干净的信号,已在同一个实时监听器中处理,且避免让状态行与其他组件耦合。
**只显示已用时长,或只显示阶段。** 已否决:两者都需要——按阶段的时长回答 agent 在做什么,按步骤的总时长回答该步骤已耗时多久。
## 后果
- 状态行例如显示 `Thinking 4s · total 8s — Enter sends steering, Esc cancels`,从而 agent 的当前活动与步骤时长一目了然,卡顿也随之可见。
- 阶段检测是尽力而为的呈现:未处理的未来分片或事件类型会保持上一个阶段不变,绝不抛错。
- 每个活动轮次恰好运行一个 `setInterval`,在每次向 idle 或 disposed 的转变以及关停时随控制器一并清除。
## 测试
`packages/ui/tui/tests/tui.spec.ts` 针对触发事件锁定每个阶段标签(`step/start`、reasoning 与 text 的分片及块开始、`tool/call`),并锁定新步骤会重新开启等待窗口、已用时长在控制器自有定时器上超过一秒后递增、超过一分钟的步骤渲染为 `1m…`、轮次进行中的颜色方案变化会保留阶段与已用时长,以及轮次开始前到达的实时事件不移动任何状态。已在 tmux 中实机验证。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-23-session-telemetry-otel-revival.md
2026-07-23-session-telemetry-otel-revival.md: a58598d8a956d47cb0cf6aa3e659f38314bc4b17
2026-07-23-session-telemetry-otel-revival.zh.md: cc09717e349d5ae2ab5157bf46de30b1823c775f

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
# Agent Note: Session telemetry seam with mandatory redaction and the OTel backend
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-23-session-telemetry-otel-revival.zh.md)
## Problem
Every deployment that wants harness sessions in an observability stack must hand-roll a session-log consumer: subscription, lifecycle handoff, and — hardest — redaction, since the raw log carries file contents and command output that may embed credentials. A telemetry seam and OTel backend shipped once on the `session-telemetry-otlp-rfc` branch (PR #222/#231) but never reached master: the proposal exported raw session events verbatim, which legal review declined. The capture-side design (backend contract, coordinator, handoff cursor, chunk projection) was sound and reviewed; the export-side stance was the blocker.
## Decision
`packages/telemetry/` revives the two reviewed packages under the SDK stance — the harness provides the capability, the deployment configures where records go and owns what leaves in them:
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-telemetry`** — the seam. `TelemetryBackend` (`emit`/`flush?`/`shutdown`), the service-registered `Telemetry` form, and `TelemetryCoordinator` owning capture: adoption with cursor read-back, the per-append firehose (project → `structuredClone` → redact → `emit`, zero I/O), the fixed first-chunk-per-(turn, step) projection, the `agent/error` relay, and dispose-time `shutdown` records.
- **The `telemetry/record` waterfall** — the delta over the branch version and the seam's redaction extension point. Every record passes it before reaching any backend; the seam ships NO rules of its own — the innermost `next()` is a pass-through, deployments mount their rules as listeners (stacking by transforming `next()`'s return value), and a throwing rule withholds the record fail-closed. Redaction applies to the exported copy only; the canonical log is never rewritten.
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-telemetry-otel`** — the reference backend: OTel JS SDK log pipeline (`LoggerProvider` → `BatchLogRecordProcessor` → OTLP/HTTP exporter), configured verbatim through `exporter`/`processor` passthroughs. `exporter.url` is required and validated at load; unmounted or unconfigured, nothing leaves the process.
The boundary axiom holds: the harness's aspect ends at `emit()`. Batching, retry, queueing, and loss policy are the reporting SDK's, configured through passthroughs — delivery is best-effort (at-most-once across a crash), which the READMEs state plainly.
## Alternatives considered
**Implement the runtime-telemetry RFC's outbox (durable spool, per-sink cursors, at-least-once, a `readCommitted` persistence-seam method).** Deferred, not rejected: the SDK stance makes delivery semantics the reporting SDK's territory, and the OTel SDK's own batch pipeline is the honest default. The outbox is a pure additive layer (the `emit()` contract does not move); revive it when a deployment states a crash-loss requirement telemetry must satisfy.
**No in-process redaction point, delegating to receiver-side collector processors.** Rejected — receiver-side redaction ships the secret first and scrubs it second. The waterfall puts an auditable, stackable scrubbing point before bytes leave the process; where the branch version (what PR #222 shipped) had no redaction point at all, every record now passes one.
**A built-in conservative rule set as the waterfall's innermost `next()`.** Rejected: as an SDK we cannot know which patterns are secrets in a given deployment, a shipped list invites false confidence ("redaction is on") while catching only known shapes, and false positives would corrupt exported bodies for consumers who never asked. The seam owns the mechanism; the deployment owns the policy — the innermost `next()` is a pass-through, and rules mount as listeners.
**Map onto OTel spans (GenAI semantic conventions) instead of logs.** Rejected for this revival: the branch implementation's log mapping is reviewed and shipped-shaped; the span model is lossy for forkable, interruptible sessions and belongs to a future consumer with real span queries to serve.
**Full-log replay when no handoff cursor survived (re-export constructor seeds).** Shipped in the first revival round, then narrowed: adoption now replays from the session's construction boundary (`Session.firstLiveSeq`, the constructor-seed length — a fact the session already validated but did not expose; `header.seedLength` cannot serve, it is the durable fork-lineage value and a resumed session's constructor seed is its full stored log). A resumed session's history already shipped from the previous process under the same id, and a fork's inherited prefix already shipped in the parent's stream — re-exporting either re-billed every resume for its full history and doubled query-time counts on OTLP backends with no native ingest dedupe. Receivers stitch fork lineage via `session.parent_id` + `session.seed_length`. What the narrowing gives up, consistently with the at-most-once stance: a resume no longer backfills records the previous process failed to deliver (telemetry unmounted then, or queued at crash) — the full replay's only real benefit, bought at the common case's expense. A deployment that states a backfill requirement needs the deferred outbox above, not replay. The boundary also swallows the synthetic turn closers `SessionPersistence.load()` writes when repairing a crash-interrupted log (they sit below `firstLiveSeq` despite never existing in the previous process) — deliberate, not incidental: exporting a synthetic closer cannot complete the remote turn whose real tail records died in the crashed process's queue, it can only make an incomplete turn look closed. The wire stream stays faithful to what the crashed process actually shipped; receivers read a never-closed turn on a resumed stream as "the previous process died inside it" (the OTel README states the rule), and a later clean `shutdown` marker attests only to the resumed process's exit. Threading the pre-repair boundary through load/prepare so repairs export as live events would couple three packages to un-ship that signal.
**Forwarding the seam's turn-boundary `flush()` hint to the OTel provider's `forceFlush()`.** Shipped in the first revival round, then removed after three review rounds each found a new silent-loss path in the same wrapper state: a dispose racing an in-flight flush (the SDK's concurrent-flush guard makes shutdown's internal drain skip), overlapping hints displacing the retained promise, and the provider's fixed 30-second flush timeout rejecting while the processor still drains. Every path exists only because the forwarding made this backend the process's second flusher against undocumented SDK internals from the upstream experimental tree; with no `flush()` implemented, the batch processor is the only flusher, its `scheduledDelayMillis` (already deployment-tunable through the `processor` passthrough) governs export cadence, and `shutdown()`'s drain is complete by construction. Reinstate only if a deployment states a turn-boundary latency requirement `scheduledDelayMillis` cannot meet — and then by calling the retained `BatchLogRecordProcessor`'s own `forceFlush()`, never the provider's timeout-wrapped one.
## Consequences
A deployment adds one `cordis.yml` entry with an OTLP endpoint and gets its session stream in any OTel-compatible stack; removing the entry is the opt-out, with no residual state. A rule-free deployment exports records exactly as captured — including any credentials embedded in file contents or command output — so a deployment crossing a trust boundary must mount `telemetry/record` listeners, and both READMEs state this plainly. Where rules are mounted, exported bodies can differ from canonical log bytes, so receivers must not treat telemetry as a byte-exact replica; the log remains the source of truth. Crash durability is explicitly out of scope until the outbox decision above is revisited.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
# Agent Note: Session telemetry seam with mandatory redaction and the OTel backend
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-23-session-telemetry-otel-revival.md) | 中文
## Problem
每个想把 harness 会话接入可观测性体系的部署方都得手写一套会话日志消费端:订阅、生命周期交接、以及最难的脱敏——原始日志携带文件内容与命令输出,可能内嵌凭据。遥测 seam 和 OTel backend 曾在 `session-telemetry-otlp-rfc` 分支(PR #222/#231)上完成过一版,但从未进入 master:该提案将原始会话事件原样导出,法务评审未予通过。捕获侧设计(backend 契约、coordinator、handoff 游标、chunk 投影)本身合理且经过评审;导出侧的立场才是阻塞点。
## Decision
`packages/telemetry/` 以 SDK 立场复活这两个经过评审的包——harness 提供能力,部署方配置上报去向并对导出内容负责:
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-telemetry`** —— seam 本体。`TelemetryBackend`(`emit`/`flush?`/`shutdown`)、服务注册形态的 `Telemetry`、以及拥有捕获侧的 `TelemetryCoordinator`:带游标回读的收养、逐 append 的 firehose(投影 → `structuredClone` → 脱敏 → `emit`,零 I/O)、固定的每 (turn, step) 首 chunk 投影、`agent/error` 转发、以及 dispose 时的 `shutdown` 记录。
- **`telemetry/record` waterfall** —— 相对分支版本的增量,也是该 seam 的脱敏扩展点。每条记录抵达任何 backend 前必经此处;seam 自身不带任何规则——最内层 `next()` 原样透传,部署方以监听器挂载自己的规则(通过变换 `next()` 的返回值堆叠),抛异常的规则将该记录 fail-closed 扣下。脱敏只作用于导出副本;canonical log 永不改写。
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-session-telemetry-otel`** —— 参考 backend:OTel JS SDK 日志管线(`LoggerProvider` → `BatchLogRecordProcessor` → OTLP/HTTP exporter),经 `exporter`/`processor` passthrough 原样配置。`exporter.url` 必填且加载时校验;未挂载或未配置时,任何数据都不会离开进程。
边界公理保持不变:harness 的职责止于 `emit()`。批处理、重试、排队与丢失策略属于 reporting SDK,经 passthrough 配置——投递是尽力而为(崩溃时至多一次),README 对此如实陈述。
## Alternatives considered
**实现 runtime-telemetry RFC 的 outbox(落盘 spool、每 sink 游标、at-least-once、persistence seam 的 `readCommitted` 方法)。** 推迟而非否决:SDK 立场使投递语义归属 reporting SDK,OTel SDK 自身的批处理管线是诚实的默认。outbox 是纯增量层(`emit()` 契约不动);待某个部署提出遥测必须满足的崩溃丢失要求时再复活。
**不设进程内脱敏点,交给接收端 collector processor。** 否决——接收端脱敏是先把秘密发出去再擦除。waterfall 在字节离开进程前提供一个可审计、可堆叠的擦除点;分支版本(PR #222 交付的形态)完全没有脱敏点,如今每条记录都必经其一。
**在 waterfall 最内层 `next()` 内置一套保守规则集。** 否决:作为 SDK 我们无法预知某个部署里什么模式算秘密,内置列表只覆盖已知形状却会带来"脱敏已开启"的虚假信心,且误报会替从未要求过的消费者破坏导出 body。seam 拥有机制,部署方拥有策略——最内层 `next()` 原样透传,规则以监听器挂载。
**映射到 OTel span(GenAI 语义约定)而非日志。** 本次复活否决:分支实现的日志映射已经过评审、形态可交付;span 模型对可 fork、可中断的会话有损,留给将来真正有 span 查询需求的消费者。
**handoff 游标未存活时全量回放日志(重新导出构造函数种子)。** 首轮复活曾交付此方案,其后收窄:收养现在从会话的构造边界起回放(`Session.firstLiveSeq`,即构造函数种子长度,这一事实会话早已校验过却未曾暴露;`header.seedLength` 不能胜任:它是持久保存的 fork 谱系(lineage)值,而恢复会话的构造函数种子是其完整的已存储日志)。恢复会话的历史已由上一个进程以同一 id 发出,fork 继承的前缀也已在父会话的流中发出;再次导出任何一者,都会让每次恢复为其完整历史重复付费,并在没有原生摄取去重的 OTLP 后端上使查询时的计数翻倍。接收端基于 `session.parent_id` + `session.seed_length` 拼接 fork 谱系。此次收窄放弃的内容与至多一次立场一致:恢复不再回填上一个进程未能投递的记录(彼时遥测未挂载,或崩溃时仍在队列中)——这本是全量回放唯一的真实收益,代价却由常见情形承担。提出回填要求的部署需要的是上文已推迟的 outbox,而不是回放。该边界同样吞掉 `SessionPersistence.load()` 修复被崩溃打断的日志时写入的合成轮次关闭事件(它们落在 `firstLiveSeq` 之前,尽管在上一个进程中从未存在过)。这是有意为之,而非附带效果:远端轮次的真实尾部记录已随崩溃进程的队列一同消亡,导出合成关闭事件无法补全该轮次,只会让一个未完成的轮次看起来已经关闭。导出的流忠实于崩溃进程实际发出的内容;接收端会把恢复后的流中一个从未关闭的轮次读作「上一个进程死在了该轮次之内」(OTel README 陈述了这条规则),其后干净的 `shutdown` 标记也只证明恢复后进程自身的退出。若为让修复以实时事件的身份导出而将修复前边界贯穿 load/prepare 传递,将使三个包相互耦合,只为抹除这一信号。
**将 seam 的轮次边界 `flush()` 提示转发到 OTel provider 的 `forceFlush()`。** 首轮复活曾交付此转发,其后移除:三轮评审在同一份包装层状态中各发现一条新的静默丢失路径——dispose 与进行中的 flush 之间的竞态(SDK 的并发 flush 防护会令 shutdown 的内部排空被跳过)、相互重叠的提示顶掉留存的 promise、以及 provider 固定的 30 秒 flush 超时在批处理器仍在排空时便 reject。这些路径存在的唯一原因,是该转发让这个后端成为进程内第二个执行 flush 的组件,面对的还是上游实验性(experimental)源码树中未见诸文档的 SDK 内部行为;不实现 `flush()` 时,批处理器就是唯一执行 flush 的组件,其 `scheduledDelayMillis`(已可由部署方经 `processor` passthrough 调优)决定导出节奏,`shutdown()` 的排空从构造上就是完整的。仅当某个部署提出 `scheduledDelayMillis` 无法满足的轮次边界延迟要求时才恢复此转发——且届时应调用留存的 `BatchLogRecordProcessor` 自身的 `forceFlush()`,绝不调用 provider 那个带超时包装的版本。
## Consequences
部署方在 `cordis.yml` 加一个带 OTLP endpoint 的条目即可把会话流接入任何 OTel 兼容体系;删除条目即退出,无残留状态。未挂载规则的部署导出的记录与捕获时完全一致——包括文件内容与命令输出中内嵌的任何凭据——因此跨信任边界的部署必须挂载 `telemetry/record` 监听器,两个 README 对此如实陈述。挂载规则后,导出的 body 可能与 canonical log 字节不同,接收端不得把遥测当作字节精确副本;日志仍是唯一事实源。崩溃持久性在上述 outbox 决定重启前明确不在范围内。

View File

@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-23-trajectory-step-cell.md: 414c3aac856fb5e60f0e4cf42f8e7b410cdf3413
2026-07-23-trajectory-step-cell.zh.md: aa76b422f165ebf6918b3781fdfe38797a34ba51

View File

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Trajectory step cell and turn list chrome
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-07-23-trajectory-step-cell.zh.md)
## Problem
The trajectory tab needs a reusable step row and turn-list chrome that can show expanded assistant blocks, own-duration times, Message token columns, and in-flight work. Without folding session event times into conversation nodes and expanding blocks into cells, the UI cannot match the product chrome.
## Decision
[`@deepseek-ai/dsh-client-ui-trajectory`](../../../../packages/client/ui-trajectory/README.md) owns the presentational trajectory list chrome:
- [`TrajectoryCell`](../../../../packages/client/ui-trajectory/src/client/TrajectoryCell.tsx) — 38px step row with kinds User / Message / Tool (no Think, Call, or Result rows). Reasoning blocks are skipped (no block-level clock). Each `tool-call` + paired `tool-result` folds into one Tool row (`name ·` truncated args) whose Time is `result.time − callTime` when both are known. Message rows carry Input/Output/Think token columns from `assistant.usage`. Own-duration Time uses `+Ns` / `+N.1s`, or `—` when absent. Selected state draws a 2px inset `--dsw-alias-brand-primary-new-colorprimary-new-color` ring (`selected` prop) and is not wired to chat selection.
- [`TrajectoryTurn`](../../../../packages/client/ui-trajectory/src/client/TrajectoryTurn.tsx) / header / group header — sticky Turn bar paints full-bleed `ghost-active-fill`; title/columns and the Message/Step body sit in a centered `max-width: 880px` lane. Cell trailing columns share the Turn header geometry (`320 = 4×71 + 3×12`); cells use pad 20/8.
- [`deriveTrajectoryLayout`](../../../../packages/client/ui-trajectory/src/client/layout.ts) expands assistant `blocks[]` into cells, pairs tool-calls with `tool-result` by `callId` into Tool, folds `partial` and `runningCalls` (deduped), hangs usage on Message only (including the empty fallback when there is no text block), and builds group descriptions as wall-span + tool histogram (`1.5s bash×6`). `user/message` has no wire turn, so each User row is enclosed in the next assistant/steering turn, else the in-flight `partial` turn, else `lastAssistantTurn + 1` (or `1`). Context nodes emit no cell but still advance the Message duration cursor.
[`ConversationNode`](../../../../packages/client/runtime/src/client/sessions/conversation.ts) carries `time` from `SessionEvent.time`; `ToolResultNode.callTime` and `RunningToolCall.time` come from the paired `tool/call`. Duration rules: User `+0s`; Message = assistant.time − previous surface time (including skipped context); Tool = result.time − callTime when both known; in-flight Tool = `—`. Group header duration is earliest→latest absolute time in the group (wall span; Tool contributes start and start+duration).
## Alternatives considered
**Keep a Think cell for reasoning blocks.** Rejected: a single `assistant/message.time` cannot yield Think own-duration without chunk-level clocks; omit the row rather than show `—`.
**Keep separate Call and Result rows.** Rejected: Result had no own duration to show; one Tool row carries the call→result interval.
**Cumulative elapsed from session/turn start.** Rejected; the Time column is each row's own duration.
**Hang usage on the first expanded row.** Rejected; usage attaches to Message only.
**Show in-flight tool durations via Date.now().** Deferred; in-flight Time stays `—`.
## Consequences
The Trajectory tab can render expanded finalized and in-flight rows with own-duration times once fold emits `time`. Behavior-shaped coverage lives in `packages/client/ui-trajectory/tests/{cell,layout,views}.spec.tsx`. Chat selection deep-links and finer block-level clocks remain deferred.

View File

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
# Agent Note: Trajectory 步骤单元格与轮次列表 chrome
Status: implemented
[English](2026-07-23-trajectory-step-cell.md) | 中文
## Problem
trajectory 标签页需要可复用的步骤行与轮次列表 chrome,以展示展开后的 assistant 块、自身耗时、Message token 列,以及进行中的工作。若不将会话事件时间折叠进会话节点,并将块展开为单元格,UI 就无法对齐产品 chrome。
## Decision
[`@deepseek-ai/dsh-client-ui-trajectory`](../../../../packages/client/ui-trajectory/README.md) 拥有展示型 trajectory 列表 chrome:
- [`TrajectoryCell`](../../../../packages/client/ui-trajectory/src/client/TrajectoryCell.tsx) — 高 38px 的步骤行,类型为 User / Message / Tool(无 Think、Call、Result 行)。reasoning 块跳过(无块级时钟)。每对 `tool-call` + `tool-result` 折成一行 Tool(`name ·` 加截断参数),Time 在两端皆知时为 `result.time − callTime`。Message 行携带来自 `assistant.usage` 的 Input/Output/Think token 列。自身耗时 Time 使用 `+Ns` / `+N.1s`,缺失时为 `—`。选中态绘制 2px 内嵌的 `--dsw-alias-brand-primary-new-colorprimary-new-color` 环(`selected` prop),且未接线到 chat 选中。
- [`TrajectoryTurn`](../../../../packages/client/ui-trajectory/src/client/TrajectoryTurn.tsx) / header / group header — 粘性 Turn 条背景通栏铺 `ghost-active-fill`;标题/列标与 Message/Step 主体落在居中的 `max-width: 880px` 内容道。单元格右侧列与 Turn 标头共用几何(`320 = 4×71 + 3×12`);cell pad 20/8。
- [`deriveTrajectoryLayout`](../../../../packages/client/ui-trajectory/src/client/layout.ts) 将 assistant `blocks[]` 展开为单元格,按 `callId` 将 tool-call 与 tool-result 配对为 Tool,折叠 `partial` 与 `runningCalls`(去重),仅将用量挂在 Message 上(含无 text 块时的空回退行),并以墙钟跨度 + 工具直方图构建分组描述(`1.5s bash×6`)。`user/message` 无线上 turn,故每条 User 行归入下一 assistant/steering 的 turn,否则归入进行中的 `partial` turn,否则为 `lastAssistantTurn + 1`(或 `1`)。context 节点不产出单元格,但仍推进 Message 耗时游标。
[`ConversationNode`](../../../../packages/client/runtime/src/client/sessions/conversation.ts) 携带来自 `SessionEvent.time` 的 `time`;`ToolResultNode.callTime` 与 `RunningToolCall.time` 来自配对的 `tool/call`。耗时规则:User 为 `+0s`;Message = assistant.time − 上一表面时间(含跳过的 context);Tool = 在两者皆知时 result.time − callTime;进行中 Tool = `—`。分组标头耗时为组内最早→最晚绝对时间(墙钟跨度;Tool 贡献起点与起点+自身耗时)。
## Alternatives considered
**为 reasoning 块保留 Think 单元格。** 否决:单条 `assistant/message.time` 无法给出 Think 自身耗时(除非上 chunk 级时钟);与其显示 `—`,不如省略该行。
**保留分开的 Call 与 Result 行。** 否决:Result 没有可展示的自身耗时;一行 Tool 承载 call→result 区间。
**自会话/轮次起点累计耗时。** 否决;Time 列是每行自身的耗时。
**将用量挂在展开后的第一行。** 否决;用量仅附着于 Message。
**用 Date.now() 显示进行中工具的耗时。** 延后;进行中的 Time 保持为 `—`。
## Consequences
一旦 fold 发出 `time`,Trajectory 标签页即可渲染带自身耗时的已定稿与进行中展开行。行为导向的覆盖位于 `packages/client/ui-trajectory/tests/{cell,layout,views}.spec.tsx`。chat 选中深链与更细的块级时钟仍延后。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
2026-07-23-web-assistant-markdown.md: ce98a16fa43e2743c18826ee7f2344c38e7c70e7
2026-07-23-web-assistant-markdown.zh.md: 0d6fd2f9e6b91f76830586ecf4c29774e5d6978a
2026-07-23-web-assistant-markdown.md: 38d193271d88b3a8f32ba1b191e8a6d432176281
2026-07-23-web-assistant-markdown.zh.md: be3cd041c6012af142fc27934fda125dfc4cf6de

Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More