Coder/deepseek-harness
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix(i18n): make unlisted terms target-aware

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-07-23 21:55:07 +08:00
parent 6046a13a29
commit 89ae483af9
2 changed files with 5 additions and 2 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
docs/i18n/translation-prompt.md
View File

@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ A terminology table is provided below. Follow it strictly:
- When the target language is English, use the "English" column without a Chinese gloss; do not copy the "中文" or "首次出现" value into English prose.
- If a term has already been glossed as part of a compound term, do not gloss it again when it appears alone later.
- NEVER use translations listed in the "不要译作" column.
- For technical terms not in the table: keep them in the source language. Do not invent a translation. This rule applies to terminology only; for general prose, freely restructure and paraphrase for natural expression.
- For technical terms not in the table, follow the target language: for a Chinese target, use an established Chinese rendering from a major Chinese-language OSS or vendor source, or keep the source term and flag it as pending when no such precedent exists; for an English target, use the established English technical term, or preserve an ambiguous source term with a short English gloss and flag it as pending. Do not invent a translation. This rule applies to terminology only; for general prose, freely restructure and paraphrase for natural expression.
{{terminology}}
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ After writing `<translation>`, re-read it in the target language only, without l
**Terminology**
- For a Chinese target, are first-occurrence glosses correctly applied (not missing, not repeated)? For an English target, are Chinese glosses absent?
- Are any "不要译作" forbidden translations present?
- Are unlisted terms correctly kept in the source language?
- For unlisted terms, does a Chinese target use established Chinese precedent or retain the source term as pending, and does an English target use established English terminology or preserve only an ambiguous source term with a short English gloss?
**Punctuation** (when target is Chinese)
- Are there em-dashes that should be replaced with colons, periods, or commas?