Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into codex/pr48-repo-hardening-rfcs

# Conflicts:
#	docs/adr/README.md
#	docs/rfc/009-session-persistence-and-resumability.md
#	docs/rfc/README.md
#	docs/rfc/implemented/2026-06-11-doc-sync-enforcement.md
#	docs/rfc/proposed/2026-06-14-acp-agent-client-protocol.md
#	examples/acp-agent/tests/acp.e2e.ts
#	packages/acp/README.md
#	packages/acp/src/index.ts
#	packages/acp/tests/stream-update.spec.ts
#	packages/agent-loop/src/loop.ts
#	packages/tools/src/index.ts
This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
2026-06-18 23:41:14 +08:00
104 changed files with 2586 additions and 590 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
# RFC: Shared persistence write coordinator
Status: proposed
## Problem
`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl` and `dsh-session-persistence-sqlite` intentionally prove the same `SessionPersistence` contract over different storage media, but their write-path orchestration is now duplicated: per-session state, `session/created` adoption, seed-prefix collision checks, write-behind buffers, serialized flush chains, HMR seeding, and dispose drains. That code is correctness-heavy and already receives the same fixes twice.
## Proposal
Extract a backend-agnostic coordinator into `dsh-session-persistence`. The coordinator owns live-session adoption, buffering, cursor filtering, per-id serialization, and disposal quiescence. Concrete backends provide small hooks for durable operations: create lazy state, find/load stored prefix, append a contiguous batch, update summary, delete, and list.
The public `SessionPersistence` service shape can stay the same. The coordinator can be an internal exported helper or protected base class used by first-party backends; third-party backends may still implement the abstract service directly if their write path is different.
## Acceptance Criteria
- JSONL and SQLite keep passing the existing shared `runPersistenceContract`.
- HMR/adoption/collision tests move to a shared coordinator test suite and run once for each backend through hook-driven fixtures.
- Backend-specific tests focus on storage mechanics only: JSONL path safety/fsync/sidecar behavior and SQLite schema/WAL/transaction behavior.
- A future backend does not need to copy the current `session/event` → buffer → flush orchestration.
## Risks
The current duplication is verbose but explicit. A coordinator must not hide storage-specific durability semantics or make unusual backends fight an inheritance hierarchy. Prefer narrow hooks and contract tests over a large framework.