Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into feat/telemetry-otel-plugin
Resolutions: regenerate the conflicted generated docs (cordis services catalog, event-producer-consumer, module-graph); take master's packages/README pair and re-insert the telemetry row on both sides; re-record the README and session-doc translation pairs.
This commit is contained in:
kingwl
@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ These Agent Notes describe shipped decisions. Follow the [root instructions](../
|
||||
|
||||
Keep paths, symbols, defaults, and mechanisms current in the same change that alters them. Rewrite stale facts in place; do not append change history.
|
||||
|
||||
When a shipped note is unlikely to guide future work, archive its complete triplet through [`dsh-archive-agent-notes`](../../skills/dsh-archive-agent-notes/SKILL.md) instead of continuing to maintain it.
|
||||
|
||||
### This is not a license to rewrite the *decision*
|
||||
|
||||
Update factual realization in place. A reversal of the decision or its rationale requires a new Agent Note and cross-link; a fully superseded old note may be deleted only through the consolidation rule in the [Agent Note contract](../README.md).
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-06-11-content-block-vocabulary.md: 9aad01cee6083b1f380be66869af3137a07d9f1f
|
||||
2026-06-11-content-block-vocabulary.zh.md: 5720f0742a0729a3f98e4b05ab37acf97ae78db5
|
||||
2026-06-11-content-block-vocabulary.md: d926c28e7e197aff28c7b1c09d085febf866832b
|
||||
2026-06-11-content-block-vocabulary.zh.md: 6361f00abe109bffdb5bd3ff5652df67d6b3c8a1
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -23,6 +23,6 @@ In-session context injection (`context/message`) and mid-turn steering (`steerin
|
||||
|
||||
- Reasoning has a core home without provider-specific shapes.
|
||||
- Multimodal blocks return only with coordinated adapter, UI, and compaction support; see [the drop-image Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-04-drop-image-content-block.md).
|
||||
- Cache hints and assistant prefill remain absent until a shipping adapter can honor them; see the [producer-less variants](../simplification/2026-07-04-prune-producerless-vocabulary-variants.md) and [inert request knobs](../simplification/2026-07-04-drop-inert-request-knobs.md) Agent Notes.
|
||||
- Cache hints and assistant prefill remain absent until a shipping adapter can honor them; see the [producer-less variants](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-prune-producerless-vocabulary-variants.md) and [inert request knobs](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-drop-inert-request-knobs.md) Agent Notes.
|
||||
- Every adapter pays a translation cost; the first real adapters have since validated the streaming protocol, and new adapters should continue proving their provider-specific mapping in adapter-local tests.
|
||||
- IDs that cross package boundaries are branded (`CallId`, the shared agent/session `SessionId`) — nominal typing at zero runtime cost.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -23,6 +23,6 @@ harness 需要一套统一的内部消息语言，供 agent loop（智能体循
|
||||
|
||||
- 推理（reasoning）在核心层有了归属，无需依赖提供方特有的结构。
|
||||
- 多模态块只有在适配器、UI 和上下文压缩（context compaction）三方协同支持后才会回归；见 [drop-image Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-04-drop-image-content-block.md)。
|
||||
- 缓存提示与 assistant prefill 在有实际适配器能兑现之前保持缺席；见[无生产者的词汇变体](../simplification/2026-07-04-prune-producerless-vocabulary-variants.md)与[无端到端可用路径的请求旋钮](../simplification/2026-07-04-drop-inert-request-knobs.md) Agent Note。
|
||||
- 缓存提示与 assistant prefill 在有实际适配器能兑现之前保持缺席；见[无生产者的词汇变体](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-prune-producerless-vocabulary-variants.md)与[无端到端可用路径的请求旋钮](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-drop-inert-request-knobs.md) Agent Note。
|
||||
- 每个适配器都需承担翻译成本；首批真实适配器已验证了流式输出协议，新适配器应继续在适配器本地测试中验证其提供方特有的映射。
|
||||
- 跨包（package）边界的 ID 使用品牌类型（`CallId`、agent 与会话共享的 `SessionId`）——零运行时开销的名义类型。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-06-13-twin-llm-adapters.md: 5c3308b281ce71407002e95dd6e794da2a421fa8
|
||||
2026-06-13-twin-llm-adapters.zh.md: 93b084973bccaeb802508e4e939a259c281f2608
|
||||
2026-06-13-twin-llm-adapters.md: b922891d4438553fd96a7f4f4226f378e66e8ad2
|
||||
2026-06-13-twin-llm-adapters.zh.md: d98b57a0a2e7c92453046022e8cb50aa52994c0f
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,10 +12,10 @@ English | [中文](2026-06-13-twin-llm-adapters.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
Ship **two** adapters against the one contract from the start, deliberately built on different internals:
|
||||
|
||||
- `dsh-llm-deepseek` — hand-rolled `fetch` + SSE parsing against the DeepSeek API.
|
||||
- `dsh-llm-deepseek` — direct `fetch` + in-repo translation against the DeepSeek API; SSE framing is delegated to `eventsource-parser` ([the SSE-parser swap](../simplification/2026-07-26-eventsource-parser-for-deepseek-sse.md)). The twin identity is owning the fetch/translate internals rather than delegating to a full provider SDK, not hand-rolling transport plumbing.
|
||||
- `dsh-llm-pi-ai` — the same endpoint through the `@earendil-works/pi-ai` library (its own event vocabulary).
|
||||
|
||||
The rule they enforce: **anything the StreamChunk vocabulary cannot express for BOTH implementations is a core-vocabulary bug**, caught immediately rather than at the next provider. The pair pinned down conventions now documented on `StreamChunk` in `dsh-llm/src/types.ts`: usage emitted before finish, nothing after finish, tool-call `arguments` as raw JSON strings end-to-end, and the two sanctioned error paths (throw from `stream()` *or* end with `finish {kind:'error'|'aborted'}`) that a consumer must handle on both sides — a divergence the library-backed adapter surfaced that a single hand-rolled adapter would have hidden.
|
||||
The rule they enforce: **anything the StreamChunk vocabulary cannot express for BOTH implementations is a core-vocabulary bug**, caught immediately rather than at the next provider. The pair pinned down conventions now documented on `StreamChunk` in `dsh-llm/src/types.ts`: usage emitted before finish, nothing after finish, tool-call `arguments` as raw JSON strings end-to-end, and the two sanctioned error paths (throw from `stream()` *or* end with `finish {kind:'error'|'aborted'}`) that a consumer must handle on both sides — a divergence the library-backed adapter surfaced that a single direct-fetch adapter would have hidden.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -24,4 +24,4 @@ The rule they enforce: **anything the StreamChunk vocabulary cannot express for
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
The twin doubles adapter and key-gated e2e maintenance—both cover V4 Flash and Pro across representative reasoning modes—in exchange for continuous seam-neutrality validation and a second implementation example. Both use `apiKey`, `baseURL`, and `models`; the hand-rolled adapter exposes `thinking`/`reasoningEffort`, while pi-ai exposes one `reasoning` level. A future conformance suite could justify retiring one adapter through a superseding Agent Note.
|
||||
The twin doubles adapter and key-gated e2e maintenance—both cover V4 Flash and Pro across representative reasoning modes—in exchange for continuous seam-neutrality validation and a second implementation example. Both use `apiKey`, `baseURL`, and `models`; the direct-fetch adapter exposes `thinking`/`reasoningEffort`, while pi-ai exposes one `reasoning` level. A future conformance suite could justify retiring one adapter through a superseding Agent Note.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -12,10 +12,10 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
从一开始就针对同一份契约交付**两个**适配器，刻意基于不同的内部实现构建：
|
||||
|
||||
- `dsh-llm-deepseek`：手写 `fetch` + SSE（Server-Sent Events）解析，直接对接 DeepSeek API。
|
||||
- `dsh-llm-deepseek`：直接 `fetch` + 仓库内翻译逻辑对接 DeepSeek API；SSE（Server-Sent Events）分帧委托给 `eventsource-parser`（[SSE 解析器替换](../simplification/2026-07-26-eventsource-parser-for-deepseek-sse.md)）。孪生身份在于自行持有 fetch/translate 内部实现而非委托给完整的提供方 SDK，不在于手写传输层管道。
|
||||
- `dsh-llm-pi-ai`：通过 `@earendil-works/pi-ai` 库访问同一端点（该库有自己的事件词汇）。
|
||||
|
||||
二者共同执行的规则是：**凡 StreamChunk 词汇无法为两个实现同时表达的内容，都是核心词汇的缺陷**——立即暴露，而非等到下一个提供方接入时才发现。这对孪生体确定了现已记录在 `dsh-llm/src/types.ts` 中 `StreamChunk` 上的约定：usage 在 finish 之前发出、finish 之后不再有任何事件、工具调用的 `arguments` 全程以原始 JSON 字符串传递，以及消费方必须在两侧都处理的两条合法错误路径（`stream()` 抛异常，*或者*以 `finish {kind:'error'|'aborted'}` 结束）。后一项分歧正是由基于库的适配器暴露出来的，单一手写适配器会将其隐藏。
|
||||
二者共同执行的规则是：**凡 StreamChunk 词汇无法为两个实现同时表达的内容，都是核心词汇的缺陷**——立即暴露，而非等到下一个提供方接入时才发现。这对孪生体确定了现已记录在 `dsh-llm/src/types.ts` 中 `StreamChunk` 上的约定：usage 在 finish 之前发出、finish 之后不再有任何事件、工具调用的 `arguments` 全程以原始 JSON 字符串传递，以及消费方必须在两侧都处理的两条合法错误路径（`stream()` 抛异常，*或者*以 `finish {kind:'error'|'aborted'}` 结束）。后一项分歧正是由基于库的适配器暴露出来的，单一直接 fetch 适配器会将其隐藏。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -24,4 +24,4 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
孪生体使适配器和需要密钥的 e2e 维护量翻倍——两者都覆盖 V4 Flash 和 Pro 在各代表性推理（reasoning）模式下的行为——换来的是持续的 seam 中立性验证和第二份实现示例。两个适配器均使用 `apiKey`、`baseURL` 和 `models`；手写适配器暴露 `thinking`/`reasoningEffort`，pi-ai 适配器暴露一个 `reasoning` 级别。未来如果有一致性测试套件，可以通过后续 Agent Note 论证退役其中一个适配器。
|
||||
孪生体使适配器和需要密钥的 e2e 维护量翻倍——两者都覆盖 V4 Flash 和 Pro 在各代表性推理（reasoning）模式下的行为——换来的是持续的 seam 中立性验证和第二份实现示例。两个适配器均使用 `apiKey`、`baseURL` 和 `models`；直接 fetch 适配器暴露 `thinking`/`reasoningEffort`，pi-ai 适配器暴露一个 `reasoning` 级别。未来如果有一致性测试套件，可以通过后续 Agent Note 论证退役其中一个适配器。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-06-14-session-persistence.md: 52434930bb662b0c97e61f7c2f69b67c309b6317
|
||||
2026-06-14-session-persistence.zh.md: 143b58d32191108d7ba24b489bd4f898b1547aab
|
||||
2026-06-14-session-persistence.md: 75e13b860f621ed407849b3b4c62ff7287ab4812
|
||||
2026-06-14-session-persistence.zh.md: a6bd400a053779c742940236737447d1687622de
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -15,11 +15,11 @@ The [event-sourced model](2026-06-11-event-sourced-sessions.md) makes the append
|
||||
Persistence is an abstract **capability seam** ([capability seams](2026-06-13-capability-seams.md), the `dsh-bash` template), not loop or core logic:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Interface** (`dsh-session-persistence`, `ctx.sessionPersistence`) — an abstract `SessionPersistence` service: `create`/`append`/`load`/`list`. Its persisted unit IS the existing `SessionEvent` (`{ type, seq, time, data }`), reused verbatim — no conversion type.
|
||||
2. **Implementation** (`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl`) — an append-only logical JSONL log per session (a `SessionHeader` line then one `SessionEvent` per line, verbatim **including `assistant/chunk`**), encoded as [checksummed Zstandard frames by default](2026-07-19-zstandard-jsonl-session-logs.md) or raw lines by configuration.
|
||||
2. **Implementation** (`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl`) — an append-only logical JSONL log per session: a `SessionHeader` line followed by storage records that losslessly represent the contiguous `SessionEvent` stream. Eligible `assistant/chunk` delta runs use packed rows by default; [checksummed Zstandard frames](2026-07-19-zstandard-jsonl-session-logs.md) are the default physical encoding, with raw lines configurable.
|
||||
|
||||
Key choices recorded here because they are durable, contested, and surprising:
|
||||
|
||||
- **The canonical durable log persists every `SessionEvent` verbatim, including `assistant/chunk`.** `deriveMessages()` skips chunks, and a chunk-filtered rollout (Codex's `policy.rs`) is tempting — but `seq = log.length` and the load-validation `events[i].seq === i` require a *contiguous* log; filtering chunks out would leave holes and break both the contract and resume. A chunk-filtered projection is possible later as a derived view with its own renumbering, but it is NOT the canonical log.
|
||||
- **The canonical durable log persists every `SessionEvent` losslessly, including `assistant/chunk`.** JSONL storage may encode a consecutive delta run as one packed row, but `load` reconstructs the exact event boundaries, sequence numbers, and timestamps. `deriveMessages()` skips chunks, and a chunk-filtered rollout (Codex's `policy.rs`) is tempting — but `seq = log.length` and the load-validation `events[i].seq === i` require a *contiguous* logical log; filtering chunks out would leave holes and break both the contract and resume. A chunk-filtered projection is possible later as a derived view with its own renumbering, but it is NOT the canonical log.
|
||||
- **Append-only; a crashed turn is closed, never truncated.** Flushed events are never rewritten. The [semantic checkpoint policy](../bug-fix/2026-07-21-semantic-session-checkpoints.md) drains the request before model dispatch, a recorded top-level call before tool dispatch, and the complete response/result batch after a step; the loop drains the final turn boundary. Because one interrupted turn may contain substantial valid work, `load` preserves its contiguous, parseable events and appends risk-classified error results for unanswered assistant calls, a missing `step/end`, and `turn/end` with `{ kind: 'interrupted' }`. The synthetic results keep resumed provider transcripts valid. Only an incomplete final record is discarded; a parse error or sequence gap at or before the last real `turn/end` is corruption and makes the session unloadable.
|
||||
- **File backend canonical, DB backend a proven drop-in.** `SessionEvent` maps 1:1 onto a row `(session_id, seq, type, time, data)` — `append` is INSERT (in a transaction asserting the contiguous-seq contract), `load` is SELECT … ORDER BY seq. `dsh-session-persistence-sqlite` is exactly this: a `SessionPersistence` subclass with no interface change (opencode runs this exact shape on SQLite/WAL), and it passes the same `runPersistenceContract` suite as the JSONL backend — so the contract holds both backends to identical semantics (lazy materialization, interrupted-turn close on load, contiguous-seq), expressed once over file bytes and once over rows. Its database carries a dedicated application id and monotonic schema version. A pristine file creates all tables and stamps both header values in one transaction; an unversioned file with any user-defined schema object or application identity, a foreign current-version identity, and every non-current version reject before journal-mode mutation.
|
||||
- **Metadata is out-of-log.** Format version, cwd, and lineage are storage concerns, not replayable conversation state, so they live in a `SessionHeader` owned by `dsh-session` and attached to a `Session` via a new readonly `session.header` — never in `SessionEventMap`, never reaching `deriveMessages()`. `createdAt` is non-negative safe-integer Unix epoch milliseconds: live creation and persistence registration reject fractional values, JSONL validates the decoded header, and SQLite stores it in a strict `INTEGER` column. The alternative (a merge-extensible `session/meta` event as log line 0) was rejected: an in-log event would ride along with a seeded/forked session for free, but metadata is not replayable state, so the explicit out-of-log header seam is the cleaner cost. (The header was originally split into an immutable `SessionHeader` plus a mutable `SessionSummary` whose union was `SessionMeta`; the mutable summary was later removed as dead state — see [Drop the mutable session summary](../simplification/2026-06-19-drop-mutable-session-summary.md).)
|
||||
@@ -33,4 +33,4 @@ Format versioning: the header carries a `version`; `load` rejects any non-curren
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
Two new packages and the metadata seam in `dsh-session` (`session.header`, the `create(id?, options?)` signature). Bought: durable resume/fork, a read/replay path, crash tolerance, and host-side session access over the existing event-sourced log, with the backend swappable behind one interface. The reusable `runPersistenceContract` suite holds every backend to the same append-only, contiguous-seq, lazy-materialization, integer-metadata, and serializability semantics. Persisting the full log also settles event fidelity: `assistant/chunk` remains verbatim. SQLite initialization either commits its complete owned schema and header identity or leaves no partial schema to strand on the next open.
|
||||
Two new packages and the metadata seam in `dsh-session` (`session.header`, the `create(id?, options?)` signature). Bought: durable resume/fork, a read/replay path, crash tolerance, and host-side session access over the existing event-sourced log, with the backend swappable behind one interface. The reusable `runPersistenceContract` suite holds every backend to the same append-only, contiguous-seq, lazy-materialization, integer-metadata, and serializability semantics. Persisting the full logical log also settles event fidelity: every `assistant/chunk` survives exactly even when JSONL packs several into one storage row. SQLite initialization either commits its complete owned schema and header identity or leaves no partial schema to strand on the next open.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -15,11 +15,11 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
持久化是一个抽象的**能力 seam**（[能力 seam](2026-06-13-capability-seams.md)，`dsh-bash` 模板），而非循环或核心逻辑：
|
||||
|
||||
1. **接口**（`dsh-session-persistence`，`ctx.sessionPersistence`）：一个抽象的 `SessionPersistence` 服务，提供 `create`/`append`/`load`/`list`。其持久化单元就是现有的 `SessionEvent`（`{ type, seq, time, data }`），原样复用，无转换类型。
|
||||
2. **实现**（`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl`）：每个会话一个仅追加的逻辑 JSONL 日志（一行 `SessionHeader`，之后每行一个 `SessionEvent`，逐字节保留，**包括 `assistant/chunk`**），默认编码为[带校验和的 Zstandard 帧](2026-07-19-zstandard-jsonl-session-logs.md)，也可通过配置使用原始行。
|
||||
2. **实现**（`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl`）：每个会话一个仅追加的逻辑 JSONL 日志：先是一行 `SessionHeader`，随后是无损表示连续 `SessionEvent` 流的存储记录。符合条件的 `assistant/chunk` 增量连续段默认使用打包行；[带校验和的 Zstandard 帧](2026-07-19-zstandard-jsonl-session-logs.md)是默认物理编码，也可通过配置使用原始行。
|
||||
|
||||
以下关键选择记录于此，因为它们是持久性的、有争议的、且出人意料的：
|
||||
|
||||
- **规范的持久日志逐字节保留每个 `SessionEvent`，包括 `assistant/chunk`。** `deriveMessages()` 跳过分片，而过滤分片的方案（Codex 的 `policy.rs`）很有吸引力，但 `seq = log.length` 以及加载验证 `events[i].seq === i` 要求日志是*连续*的；过滤掉分片会留下空洞，同时破坏契约和恢复功能。基于分片过滤的投影可以作为派生视图在后续实现（带有自己的重新编号），但它不是规范日志。
|
||||
- **规范的持久日志无损保留每个 `SessionEvent`，包括 `assistant/chunk`。** JSONL 存储可以将一段连续的增量事件编码为一条打包行，但 `load` 会重建精确的事件边界、序号与时间戳。`deriveMessages()` 跳过分片，而过滤分片的方案（Codex 的 `policy.rs`）很有吸引力，但 `seq = log.length` 以及加载验证 `events[i].seq === i` 要求*连续*的逻辑日志；过滤掉分片会留下空洞，同时破坏契约和恢复功能。基于分片过滤的投影可以作为派生视图在后续实现（带有自己的重新编号），但它不是规范日志。
|
||||
- **仅追加；崩溃的轮次被关闭，而非截断。** 已刷写的事件永不被重写。[语义检查点策略](../bug-fix/2026-07-21-semantic-session-checkpoints.md)会在模型分发前排空请求、在工具分发前排空已记录的顶层调用，并在步骤结束后排空完整的响应/结果批次；循环则排空最终轮次边界。由于一个被中断的轮次可能包含大量有效工作，`load` 保留其连续、可解析的事件，并为未应答的 assistant 调用追加按风险分类的错误结果、补一个缺失的 `step/end`，以及带 `{ kind: 'interrupted' }` 的 `turn/end`。合成的结果保证恢复后的提供方 transcript（文本记录）仍然有效。只有不完整的最后一条记录会被丢弃；在最后一个真实 `turn/end` 处或之前出现解析错误或序号间隙，属于数据损坏，会使该会话不可加载。
|
||||
- **文件后端为规范实现，数据库后端为经过验证的直接替换。** `SessionEvent` 1:1 映射到一行 `(session_id, seq, type, time, data)`：`append` 是 INSERT（在一个断言连续 seq 契约的事务中），`load` 是 SELECT … ORDER BY seq。`dsh-session-persistence-sqlite` 正是如此：一个 `SessionPersistence` 子类，接口无变化（opencode 在 SQLite/WAL 上运行的正是这个形状），且通过与 JSONL 后端相同的 `runPersistenceContract` 测试套件。该契约以相同的语义约束两个后端（惰性物化、加载时关闭中断轮次、连续 seq），一次表达在文件字节上，一次表达在数据库行上。其数据库拥有专用的 application id 与单调递增的 schema 版本。系统会在一个事务中为全新文件创建所有表并写入这两个 header 值；未版本化文件若带有任何用户定义的 schema 对象或应用标识、当前版本文件若带有外部应用标识，以及任何非当前版本文件，都会在修改日志模式之前被拒绝。
|
||||
- **元数据在日志之外。** 格式版本、cwd 和谱系是存储关注点，不是可回放的对话状态，因此它们存放在 `dsh-session` 拥有的 `SessionHeader` 中，并通过新的只读属性 `session.header` 附加到 `Session` 上——永远不进入 `SessionEventMap`，永远不到达 `deriveMessages()`。`createdAt` 是以 Unix epoch 毫秒表示的非负安全整数：运行时创建和持久化注册会拒绝小数值，JSONL 会验证解码后的 header，SQLite 则将其存入严格的 `INTEGER` 列。替代方案（一个可合并扩展的 `session/meta` 事件作为日志第 0 行）被否决：日志内事件会随 seed/fork 的会话免费携带，但元数据不是可回放状态，因此显式的日志外 header seam 是更干净的代价。（header 最初被拆分为不可变的 `SessionHeader` 加可变的 `SessionSummary`，二者的联合类型为 `SessionMeta`；可变 summary 后来因属于死状态而被移除——见 [移除可变会话摘要](../simplification/2026-06-19-drop-mutable-session-summary.md)。）
|
||||
@@ -33,4 +33,4 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
新增两个包（package），以及 `dsh-session` 中的元数据 seam（`session.header`，`create(id?, options?)` 签名）。收益：持久恢复/fork、读取/回放路径、崩溃容忍，以及基于现有事件溯源日志的宿主侧会话访问，后端在一个接口之后可替换。可复用的 `runPersistenceContract` 测试套件以相同的仅追加、连续 seq、惰性物化、整数元数据与可序列化语义约束每个后端。持久化完整日志还确定了事件保真度：`assistant/chunk` 保持逐字节不变。SQLite 初始化要么提交完整的自有 schema 与 header 标识，要么不留下任何会使下次打开受阻的部分 schema。
|
||||
新增两个包（package），以及 `dsh-session` 中的元数据 seam（`session.header`，`create(id?, options?)` 签名）。收益：持久恢复/fork、读取/回放路径、崩溃容忍，以及基于现有事件溯源日志的宿主侧会话访问，后端在一个接口之后可替换。可复用的 `runPersistenceContract` 测试套件以相同的仅追加、连续 seq、惰性物化、整数元数据与可序列化语义约束每个后端。持久化完整的逻辑日志还确定了事件保真度：即使 JSONL 将多个 `assistant/chunk` 打包到一条存储行中，每个事件也会精确保留。SQLite 初始化要么提交完整的自有 schema 与 header 标识，要么不留下任何会使下次打开受阻的部分 schema。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-06-17-filesystem-capability-seam.md: 08e8d52b314eb10e2c7ec444dd61a96d8621e032
|
||||
2026-06-17-filesystem-capability-seam.zh.md: 6f4889234516ee134c9873781a874b5f1a3644ac
|
||||
2026-06-17-filesystem-capability-seam.md: fee0161e5e8397ac1d1c0e2850efad840c65d971
|
||||
2026-06-17-filesystem-capability-seam.zh.md: ee50b36d25315c3d8daed4502bc248977f9e6011
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ The read-before-write/edit and observed-state policy is a fourth package, `@deep
|
||||
|
||||
The first backend is deliberately local-only: `dsh-fs-local` implements `ctx.fs` against the host filesystem. Future sibling backends can provide sandboxed, remote, virtual, or project-scoped filesystems behind the same interface.
|
||||
|
||||
The first consumer is deliberately text-file-only: `dsh-tool-fs` exposes model-facing `read`, `write`, and `edit` tools for UTF-8 text files. Future consumers can add directory listing, search/glob, binary-safe operations, file watching, or higher-level project operations without changing the local backend package, as long as the needed capability exists on `ctx.fs`. Direct directory listing was later added by [Add direct directory listing to the filesystem seam](2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md).
|
||||
The first consumer is deliberately text-file-only: `dsh-tool-fs` exposes model-facing `read`, `write`, and `edit` tools for UTF-8 text files. Future consumers can add directory listing, search/glob, binary-safe operations, file watching, or higher-level project operations without changing the local backend package, as long as the needed capability exists on `ctx.fs`. Direct directory listing was later added by [Add direct directory listing to the filesystem seam](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md).
|
||||
|
||||
Filesystem permissions and sandboxing are not implied by this split. The local backend resolves relative paths from its configured base directory, but containment policy is a separate decision: either a stricter `ctx.fs` implementation enforces it, or a permission/sandbox plugin wraps `tools/execute` and vetoes calls before they reach the consumer.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ Literal edit is a provider primitive (`editText`), not composed in `tool-fs` fro
|
||||
|
||||
The policy plugin, not `ctx.fs`, gates on prior observation: an `edit` requires a prior observation by the owner (else `FS_NOT_OBSERVED`), and the recorded version is passed to `editText` as the CAS basis. With the policy plugin absent, `ctx.fs` alone is a complete unconstrained seam (unconditional write/edit); the tool is never method-coupled to the policy.
|
||||
|
||||
Filesystem contract failures are thrown as `FsError extends HarnessError`, and the tool registry converts them into `isError` tool results with structured `{ name, code }` metadata. `dsh-fs` owns this vocabulary rather than each tool inventing messages. The codes are `FS_NOT_FOUND`, `FS_NOT_TEXT`, `FS_STALE_VERSION`, `FS_NOT_OBSERVED`, `FS_NOT_REGULAR_FILE`, `FS_AMBIGUOUS_EDIT`, `FS_EDIT_NOT_FOUND`, and `FS_ABORTED`. (An earlier draft included `FS_PARTIAL_OBSERVATION`; freshness-based authorization has no partial/full distinction, so it was dropped. Directory-listing-specific codes were added later by [Add direct directory listing to the filesystem seam](2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md).)
|
||||
Filesystem contract failures are thrown as `FsError extends HarnessError`, and the tool registry converts them into `isError` tool results with structured `{ name, code }` metadata. `dsh-fs` owns this vocabulary rather than each tool inventing messages. The codes are `FS_NOT_FOUND`, `FS_NOT_TEXT`, `FS_STALE_VERSION`, `FS_NOT_OBSERVED`, `FS_NOT_REGULAR_FILE`, `FS_AMBIGUOUS_EDIT`, `FS_EDIT_NOT_FOUND`, and `FS_ABORTED`. (An earlier draft included `FS_PARTIAL_OBSERVATION`; freshness-based authorization has no partial/full distinction, so it was dropped. Directory-listing-specific codes were added later by [Add direct directory listing to the filesystem seam](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md).)
|
||||
|
||||
## Tool consumer behavior
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ harness 已有一个具体的 `bash` 能力 seam（`dsh-bash` / `dsh-bash-local`
|
||||
|
||||
第一个后端有意仅限本地：`dsh-fs-local` 基于宿主文件系统实现 `ctx.fs`。未来的兄弟后端可在同一接口之后提供沙箱、远程、虚拟或项目作用域的文件系统。
|
||||
|
||||
第一个消费方有意仅限文本文件：`dsh-tool-fs` 暴露面向模型的 `read`、`write` 和 `edit` 工具，处理 UTF-8 文本文件。未来的消费方可以添加目录列表、搜索/glob、二进制安全操作、文件监视或更高层的项目操作，只要 `ctx.fs` 上存在所需能力，就无需改动本地后端包。直接目录列表后来由[为文件系统 seam 添加直接目录列举能力](2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md)添加。
|
||||
第一个消费方有意仅限文本文件：`dsh-tool-fs` 暴露面向模型的 `read`、`write` 和 `edit` 工具，处理 UTF-8 文本文件。未来的消费方可以添加目录列表、搜索/glob、二进制安全操作、文件监视或更高层的项目操作，只要 `ctx.fs` 上存在所需能力，就无需改动本地后端包。直接目录列表后来由[为文件系统 seam 添加直接目录列举能力](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md)添加。
|
||||
|
||||
文件系统权限和沙箱并非此拆分所隐含。本地后端从其配置的基目录解析相对路径，但隔离策略是独立的决策：要么由更严格的 `ctx.fs` 实现强制执行，要么由权限/沙箱插件包装 `tools/execute` 并在调用到达消费方之前否决。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ harness 已有一个具体的 `bash` 能力 seam（`dsh-bash` / `dsh-bash-local`
|
||||
|
||||
策略插件（而非 `ctx.fs`）对先前观测进行门控：`edit` 要求 owner 有先前观测（否则报 `FS_NOT_OBSERVED`），记录的版本作为 CAS 基础传给 `editText`。在策略插件缺席时，`ctx.fs` 本身是一个完整的无约束 seam（无条件写入/编辑）；工具从不与策略方法耦合。
|
||||
|
||||
文件系统契约失败以 `FsError extends HarnessError` 抛出，工具注册表将其转换为带结构化 `{ name, code }` 元数据的 `isError` 工具结果。`dsh-fs` 拥有此词汇，而非由每个工具各自发明消息。错误码包括 `FS_NOT_FOUND`、`FS_NOT_TEXT`、`FS_STALE_VERSION`、`FS_NOT_OBSERVED`、`FS_NOT_REGULAR_FILE`、`FS_AMBIGUOUS_EDIT`、`FS_EDIT_NOT_FOUND` 和 `FS_ABORTED`。（早期草案包含 `FS_PARTIAL_OBSERVATION`；基于新鲜度的授权没有 partial/full 区分，因此已删除。目录列表相关的错误码后来由[为文件系统 seam 添加直接目录列举能力](2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md)添加。）
|
||||
文件系统契约失败以 `FsError extends HarnessError` 抛出，工具注册表将其转换为带结构化 `{ name, code }` 元数据的 `isError` 工具结果。`dsh-fs` 拥有此词汇，而非由每个工具各自发明消息。错误码包括 `FS_NOT_FOUND`、`FS_NOT_TEXT`、`FS_STALE_VERSION`、`FS_NOT_OBSERVED`、`FS_NOT_REGULAR_FILE`、`FS_AMBIGUOUS_EDIT`、`FS_EDIT_NOT_FOUND` 和 `FS_ABORTED`。（早期草案包含 `FS_PARTIAL_OBSERVATION`；基于新鲜度的授权没有 partial/full 区分，因此已删除。目录列表相关的错误码后来由[为文件系统 seam 添加直接目录列举能力](../../archived/architecture/2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md)添加。）
|
||||
|
||||
## 工具消费方行为
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,57 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Extract example apps into packages
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-06-20-extract-example-app-packages.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
An example folder is supposed to be *thin* — the variable wiring of a demo, not the demo's machinery. Before this change it was thick. Each example carried a hand-rolled `start.ts` boot bootstrap, an infra preamble (`timer`, and — for the stdio demos — `logger` + `hmr`), nested includes of three shared YAML fragments (`base.yml` / `base-core.yml` / `acp-agent/acp-tail.yml`), and per-example `agent-loop`/persistence/system-prompt config. The actual app — the spine of services every agent needs — was spread across the leaf and those includes.
|
||||
|
||||
The leaf configs also owned coupled front doors. ACP requires stdout purity and creates agents through `session/new`; terminal and Headless apps pre-create `main` but have different process I/O contracts. Prose warnings were the only guard against combining these incorrectly, while three `start.ts` files duplicated the Loader bootstrap and lifecycle code.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
Each example is now **mostly an invocation of an app package**, splitting the wiring along the existing [interface / implementation / consumer seam](2026-06-13-capability-seams.md): the **app package owns the composition**, the leaf `cordis.yml` owns only the **swappable choices** (which LLM adapter, which bash executor, model, prompt, persistence root).
|
||||
|
||||
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-agent-spine-demo`** ([packages/examples/agent-spine-demo](../../../../packages/examples/agent-spine-demo)) composes the providerless, executor-less, UI-less spine and forwards the loop's agent-list config. Its dependency on the concrete loop is intentional because this package composes the spine rather than extending it; swapping the loop means supplying another bundle.
|
||||
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui-demo`**, **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-cli-demo`**, and **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-acp-demo`** bake in their process roles. TUI includes the full-screen UI and a pre-created `main`; Headless includes the one-shot driver and a pre-created `main`; ACP includes the bridge and no pre-created agent. All three include JSONL persistence and omit stdout loggers.
|
||||
- **`start.ts` is gone.** Each app package exposes a bin; the `demo:*` scripts invoke it. Loader boot, `.env` loading, and fail-loud guards live in the shared [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-app-boot`](../../../../packages/ui/app-boot) package (unit-tested under the per-file coverage gate — see [share the app bins' boot glue](../simplification/2026-07-04-share-app-bin-boot-glue.md)); the thin self-executing entries are driven by keyless Loader-path tests.
|
||||
- **Each leaf `cordis.yml` collapses** to backends, optional product tools, and one app entry carrying the app config. TUI and Headless route model/session choices onto a pre-created agent; ACP routes the initial provider/model onto its bridge.
|
||||
- **`base.yml`, `base-core.yml`, and `acp-agent/acp-tail.yml` are retired** — the spine they shared now lives in `dsh-agent-spine-demo`.
|
||||
|
||||
`bash-local` and the LLM adapter stay **leaf choices**: the bundle ships `tool-bash` (the consumer schema), the leaf picks the executor implementation, so a sandboxed executor or replay adapter swaps in without touching the app.
|
||||
|
||||
### Amendment on implementation: `hmr` stays a leaf entry
|
||||
|
||||
The proposal listed `hmr` among the interactive app's baked-in front-door cluster. Validating against the code, baking `hmr` into the app package fights Cordis in two ways, so it ships as a **leaf `cordis.yml` entry** instead:
|
||||
|
||||
1. `@cordisjs/plugin-hmr` is a Loader-only, subprocess-only dev plugin — it requires the live `loader` service and its internal module access, so it can only run in the real `demo:*`/bin subprocess, never in the in-process unit/coverage tier.
|
||||
2. The in-process test tier (vitest) cannot even *import* the vendored `hmr` module (its class-decorator `@Inject` form fails under Vite's transform), so a package whose `apply` statically imported it could never satisfy the per-file 100% coverage gate on its headline function.
|
||||
|
||||
Crucially, `hmr` is not a stdout-purity footgun: a stray entry in the ACP config does not corrupt JSON-RPC frames. Every shipped app omits a stdout console logger; the app or protocol driver alone owns stdout.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
### Why not keep the wiring in shared YAML includes?
|
||||
|
||||
The old `base*.yml`/`acp-tail.yml` includes already deduped the *config*, but a YAML include cannot **encapsulate** the front-door coupling — it can only describe it in a comment and trust every leaf to obey. It also cannot own a `bin`, so the boot glue stayed copied across three `start.ts` files. A package turns "the ACP app never logs to stdout" from a prose warning into a property of the artifact: there is no logger entry in the leaf to get wrong.
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification
|
||||
|
||||
- Example directories contain only their config, README, and tests: `start.ts`, the infrastructure preamble, and the shared YAML includes are gone.
|
||||
- `demo:tui`, `demo:headless`, and `demo:acp` invoke the app-package bins.
|
||||
- Each new package has a README and per-file 100% coverage; each app package also has a keyless real-Loader-path bin smoke that catches export-shape failures described in [postmortem 0001](../../../../docs/postmortem/0001-acp-default-export-drops-inject.md).
|
||||
- The ACP replay suite boots through the app-package bin, so protocol wiring and assembled backend behavior cross the real Loader boundary.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
- **The bare-plugin-tree pedagogy.** The spine lives behind a bundle, so seeing the whole tree means opening `dsh-agent-spine-demo`. The app package's README carries that teaching weight.
|
||||
- **A layer of indirection.** "What does this demo load?" becomes a package read, not a single YAML scan.
|
||||
|
||||
## Related
|
||||
|
||||
- Supersedes [Make the shared example base providerless](../../rejected/architecture/2026-06-20-providerless-example-base.md): renaming `base.yml` to the providerless core is moot once the spine moves into `dsh-agent-spine-demo` and the `base*.yml` files are deleted.
|
||||
- Builds on the [capability-seams](2026-06-13-capability-seams.md) interface/implementation/consumer split — backends and presentation stay leaf choices; the spine is the shared bundle.
|
||||
- Complements [Reorganize packages into a modular hierarchy](2026-06-20-package-hierarchy.md): the new app/core packages slot into existing groups under that hierarchy (`core` for the reusable spine bundle, `ui` for the app-specific front doors).
|
||||
- The later [redundant-agent removal](../simplification/2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.md) owns the final TUI/Headless split and removes the line-oriented and mock-only leaves.
|
||||
@@ -1,57 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: 将示例应用提取为独立包
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-06-20-extract-example-app-packages.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
示例目录本应是*精简的*——只包含演示的可变接线，而非演示的基础设施。在此次变更之前，它是臃肿的。每个示例都携带一份手写的 `start.ts` 启动引导、一段基础设施前导（`timer`，以及 stdio 演示所需的 `logger` + `hmr`（热模块替换））、三个共享 YAML 片段的嵌套引用（`base.yml` / `base-core.yml` / `acp-agent/acp-tail.yml`），还有各示例自身的 `agent-loop`/持久化/系统提示词配置。真正的应用——每个 agent（智能体）都需要的服务主干——散落在叶子配置和那些 include 中。
|
||||
|
||||
叶子配置还拥有耦合的前门。ACP（Agent Client Protocol）要求 stdout 纯净，并通过 `session/new` 创建 agent；终端应用和 Headless 应用则预创建 `main`，但进程 I/O 契约不同。防止错误组合的唯一屏障是文档中的文字警告，而三个 `start.ts` 文件重复着 Loader 引导和生命周期代码。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
每个示例现在**主要是对一个应用包（package）的调用**，沿着既有的[接口 / 实现 / 消费方 seam](2026-06-13-capability-seams.md) 拆分接线：**应用包拥有组合**，叶子 `cordis.yml` 只拥有**可替换的选择**（哪个 LLM（大语言模型）适配器、哪个 bash 执行器、模型、提示词、持久化根目录）。
|
||||
|
||||
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-agent-spine-demo`**（[packages/examples/agent-spine-demo](../../../../packages/examples/agent-spine-demo)）组合了不含提供方、不含执行器、不含 UI 的主干，并转发 agent loop（智能体循环）的 agent 列表配置。它对具体 loop 的依赖是有意为之，因为该包组合的是主干而非扩展主干；替换 loop 意味着提供另一个 bundle。
|
||||
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui-demo`**、**`@deepseek-ai/dsh-cli-demo`** 和 **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-acp-demo`** 各自内置其进程角色。TUI 包含全屏 UI 和预创建的 `main`；Headless 包含 one-shot driver 和预创建的 `main`；ACP 包含 bridge 且不预创建 agent。三者都包含 JSONL 持久化，并省略 stdout logger。
|
||||
- **`start.ts` 已移除。** 每个应用包都暴露一个 bin；`demo:*` 脚本调用它。Loader 引导、`.env` 加载和快速失败守卫位于共享的 [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-app-boot`](../../../../packages/ui/app-boot) 包（在逐文件覆盖率门禁下有单元测试——见[共享应用 bin 的启动胶水](../simplification/2026-07-04-share-app-bin-boot-glue.md)）；精简的自执行入口由 keyless 的 Loader 路径测试驱动。
|
||||
- **每个叶子 `cordis.yml` 精简为**后端、可选产品工具，以及一个承载应用配置的 app 条目。TUI 和 Headless 把模型/会话选择路由到预创建的 agent；ACP 把初始提供方/模型路由到 bridge。
|
||||
- **`base.yml`、`base-core.yml` 和 `acp-agent/acp-tail.yml` 已退役**——它们共享的主干现在位于 `dsh-agent-spine-demo` 中。
|
||||
|
||||
`bash-local` 和 LLM 适配器仍然是**叶子选择**：bundle 提供 `tool-bash`（消费方 schema），叶子选择执行器实现，因此沙箱执行器或回放适配器无需触碰应用即可替换。
|
||||
|
||||
### 实现修正：`hmr` 保留为叶子条目
|
||||
|
||||
提案最初将 `hmr` 列入交互式应用内置的前门集群。对照代码验证后发现，将 `hmr` 内置到应用包中会在两个方面与 Cordis 冲突，因此改为作为**叶子 `cordis.yml` 条目**交付：
|
||||
|
||||
1. `@cordisjs/plugin-hmr` 是一个仅限 Loader、仅限子进程的开发插件——它需要活跃的 `loader` 服务及其内部模块访问权限，因此只能在真实的 `demo:*`/bin 子进程中运行，不能在进程内的单元/覆盖率测试层运行。
|
||||
2. 进程内测试层（vitest）甚至无法*导入* vendor 的 `hmr` 模块（其 class-decorator `@Inject` 形式在 Vite 的 transform 下会失败），因此一个 `apply` 静态导入了它的包永远无法满足其主函数的逐文件 100% 覆盖率门禁。
|
||||
|
||||
关键在于，`hmr` 不是 stdout 纯净隐患：ACP 配置中误加该条目不会破坏 JSON-RPC 帧。所有已交付应用都省略 stdout 控制台 logger；stdout 只归应用或协议 driver 所有。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
### 为什么不继续用共享 YAML include 来管理接线？
|
||||
|
||||
旧的 `base*.yml`/`acp-tail.yml` include 已经去重了*配置*，但 YAML include 无法**封装**前门耦合——它只能在注释中描述，并信任每个叶子遵守。它也无法拥有 `bin`，因此启动胶水一直在三个 `start.ts` 文件中重复。包将「ACP 应用绝不向 stdout 输出日志」从文字警告变成了产物的属性：叶子中不存在可以写错的 logger 条目。
|
||||
|
||||
## 验证
|
||||
|
||||
- 示例目录只包含配置、README 和测试：`start.ts`、基础设施前导和共享 YAML include 已移除。
|
||||
- `demo:tui`、`demo:headless` 和 `demo:acp` 调用应用包的 bin。
|
||||
- 每个新包都有 README 和逐文件 100% 覆盖率；每个应用包还有一个 keyless 的真实 Loader 路径 bin 冒烟测试，用于捕获[事后分析 0001](../../../../docs/postmortem/0001-acp-default-export-drops-inject.md) 中描述的导出形状故障。
|
||||
- ACP 回放套件通过应用包的 bin 启动，因此协议接线与组装后的后端行为都跨越真实的 Loader 边界。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
- **裸插件树的教学性。** 主干现在隐藏在 bundle 之后，查看完整树意味着打开 `dsh-agent-spine-demo`。应用包的 README 承担了这份教学职责。
|
||||
- **多了一层间接。**「这个演示加载了什么？」从扫描单个 YAML 变成了阅读一个包。
|
||||
|
||||
## 相关
|
||||
|
||||
- 取代[使共享示例基础配置与提供方无关](../../rejected/architecture/2026-06-20-providerless-example-base.md)：一旦主干移入 `dsh-agent-spine-demo` 且 `base*.yml` 文件被删除，将 `base.yml` 重命名为无提供方核心便不再有意义。
|
||||
- 基于[能力 seam](2026-06-13-capability-seams.md)的接口/实现/消费方拆分——后端和展示层保持为叶子选择；主干是共享 bundle。
|
||||
- 与[将包重组为模块化层级结构](2026-06-20-package-hierarchy.md)互补：新的 app/core 包按该层级结构归入既有分组（`core` 放可复用的主干 bundle，`ui` 放应用特有的前门）。
|
||||
- 后续的[冗余 agent 移除](../simplification/2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.md)拥有最终的 TUI/Headless 拆分，并移除行式与仅 mock 的叶子。
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md: 0b901fcf928b900bd3a32f911e6e54a6a98076e2
|
||||
2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.zh.md: e2860e3a91c06ec5110cd671b288e35c5d117f5d
|
||||
2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md: 313d687b49da0d08b0ec321bcb655b642f7a5af3
|
||||
2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.zh.md: 6be129b7b16ff01d73dc94f7ce6d299ee2c10e55
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ The `tasks/` package group owns background-task semantics:
|
||||
|
||||
Long-running tools are producers. `dsh-tool-bash` adapts a `BashProcess` into incremental output and process cancellation; `dsh-tool-subagent` adapts a child run into final output and child disposal. The execution seams remain independent of sessions and the task registry.
|
||||
|
||||
`TaskService` is a concrete, process-local service. TODO(task-service-backend): separate its public contract from the implementation when a second backend defines the required lifecycle; a systemd-backed runtime is one plausible driver, but this PR does not speculate about its durability, reconnect, ownership, or observation semantics.
|
||||
`TaskService` is the abstract seam in `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks`; the process-local registry is `LocalTaskService` in `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local` (the [task-registry seam Agent Note](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md) records that split).
|
||||
|
||||
## Runtime contract
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ Separate bash and subagent output/stop tools duplicate ids, isolation, cleanup,
|
||||
|
||||
### An immediate abstract task-runtime backend
|
||||
|
||||
The current `TaskStart.run()` contract passes in-process callbacks and exact `Agent` objects. A durable backend changes identity, restart, ownership, and observation semantics, so extracting an interface before a second implementation exists would freeze the wrong boundary.
|
||||
The current `TaskStart.run()` contract passes in-process callbacks and exact `Agent` objects. A durable backend changes identity, restart, ownership, and observation semantics, so at introduction time the registry stayed one concrete service rather than freezing the wrong boundary. The [task-registry seam Agent Note](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md) later separated the contract from the process-local implementation without changing these in-process semantics.
|
||||
|
||||
### Consumer-owned authorization or cleanup events
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
长时间运行工具是生产方。`dsh-tool-bash` 将 `BashProcess` 适配为增量输出与进程取消；`dsh-tool-subagent` 将子运行适配为最终输出与子运行释放。执行 seam 保持独立，不依赖会话或任务注册表。
|
||||
|
||||
`TaskService` 是一个具体的进程内服务。TODO(task-service-backend)：当第二个后端明确所需生命周期后，将其公共契约与实现分离；systemd 驱动的运行时是一种可能方案，但本 PR（Pull Request）不臆测其持久性、重连、所有权或观察语义。
|
||||
`TaskService` 是 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks` 中的抽象 seam；进程内注册表是 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local` 中的 `LocalTaskService`（该拆分记录在[任务注册表 seam Agent Note](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md)中）。
|
||||
|
||||
## 运行时契约
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ bash seam 暴露 `resolve`、`run` 和 `start`。`start(spec)` 返回一个 `Bas
|
||||
|
||||
### 立即抽象任务运行时后端
|
||||
|
||||
当前 `TaskStart.run()` 契约传入进程内回调与确切的 `Agent` 对象。持久化后端会改变身份、重启、所有权与观察语义，因此在第二种实现出现前抽取接口，会固化错误的边界。
|
||||
当前 `TaskStart.run()` 契约传入进程内回调与确切的 `Agent` 对象。持久化后端会改变身份、重启、所有权与观察语义，因此在引入之时注册表保持为单一具体服务，而非固化错误的边界。[任务注册表 seam Agent Note](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md)后来在不改变这些进程内语义的前提下，将契约与进程内实现分离。
|
||||
|
||||
### 由消费方负责授权或清理事件
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-06-24-web-capability-seam.md: 4f4e821fec9494fe9ea96894267707d9dd202e4d
|
||||
2026-06-24-web-capability-seam.zh.md: d7c07a8ae0365c321120102a0af401d85d7e2eae
|
||||
2026-06-24-web-capability-seam.md: b705236690859961ed69b307dbb59ebefcbd65ac
|
||||
2026-06-24-web-capability-seam.zh.md: 9b6899c922524350d2eee62140480fd76a450baa
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Search and fetch are separate tools but one web-access seam. `ctx.web` owns prov
|
||||
|
||||
This keeps the model schema stable without making plugin load order, credential state, or HMR timing part of the model-facing contract. If web search is enabled but no usable search provider exists, `web_search` remains visible and execution fails with a structured `WebError` such as `WEB_PROVIDER_UNAVAILABLE` or `WEB_PROVIDER_CONFIGURED_UNAVAILABLE`. If a provider appears after `dsh-tool-web`, the next execution can use it without changing the schema. If a provider disappears mid-call, execution fails with a structured `WebError` instead of silently choosing another provider or falling through to `UNKNOWN_TOOL`.
|
||||
|
||||
The seam deliberately exposes no observation surface — no registry-change event and no aggregated capability-status query. Unavailability is a fact a caller observes by executing: `search()`/`fetch()` resolve the provider at call time and throw the structured `WebError` that names what failed. [The observation-surface Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-04-drop-unconsumed-web-observation-surface.md) records that judgment: derived-on-call selection and enablement-based registration leave no consumer that needs a change signal or an availability probe distinct from executing and routing the error, and a future provider-status panel reintroduces the smallest signal or query it actually consumes.
|
||||
The seam deliberately exposes no observation surface — no registry-change event and no aggregated capability-status query. Unavailability is a fact a caller observes by executing: `search()`/`fetch()` resolve the provider at call time and throw the structured `WebError` that names what failed. [The observation-surface Agent Note](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-drop-unconsumed-web-observation-surface.md) records that judgment: derived-on-call selection and enablement-based registration leave no consumer that needs a change signal or an availability probe distinct from executing and routing the error, and a future provider-status panel reintroduces the smallest signal or query it actually consumes.
|
||||
|
||||
## Package topology
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Web 访问是一个一等能力 seam，遵循[能力 seam Agent Note](2026-06-13
|
||||
|
||||
这使模型 schema 保持稳定，而不将插件加载顺序、凭证状态或 HMR（热模块替换）时序纳入面向模型的契约。如果 web 搜索已启用但不存在可用的搜索提供方，`web_search` 仍然可见，执行时以结构化的 `WebError`（如 `WEB_PROVIDER_UNAVAILABLE` 或 `WEB_PROVIDER_CONFIGURED_UNAVAILABLE`）失败。如果某个提供方在 `dsh-tool-web` 之后出现，下一次执行即可使用它而无需更改 schema。如果某个提供方在调用过程中消失，执行以结构化的 `WebError` 失败，而不是静默选择另一个提供方或回退到 `UNKNOWN_TOOL`。
|
||||
|
||||
该 seam 刻意不暴露任何观察面——没有注册表变更事件，也没有聚合的能力状态查询。不可用性是调用方通过执行观察到的事实：`search()`/`fetch()` 在调用时解析提供方，并抛出命名了失败原因的结构化 `WebError`。[观察面 Agent Note](../simplification/2026-07-04-drop-unconsumed-web-observation-surface.md) 记录了这一判断：基于调用的派生选择与基于启用的注册使得没有消费方需要变更信号或独立于执行和错误路由的可用性探测；未来的提供方状态面板会重新引入它实际消费的最小信号或查询。
|
||||
该 seam 刻意不暴露任何观察面——没有注册表变更事件，也没有聚合的能力状态查询。不可用性是调用方通过执行观察到的事实：`search()`/`fetch()` 在调用时解析提供方，并抛出命名了失败原因的结构化 `WebError`。[观察面 Agent Note](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-drop-unconsumed-web-observation-surface.md) 记录了这一判断：基于调用的派生选择与基于启用的注册使得没有消费方需要变更信号或独立于执行和错误路由的可用性探测；未来的提供方状态面板会重新引入它实际消费的最小信号或查询。
|
||||
|
||||
## 包拓扑
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-06-30-bash-stdin-env-trusted-plugin-surface.md: 284cd45a66294dbc9e8207a1e00e9642d32d4e58
|
||||
2026-06-30-bash-stdin-env-trusted-plugin-surface.zh.md: 9486f8c35c5060150b072fb673acca5d4167ec1a
|
||||
2026-06-30-bash-stdin-env-trusted-plugin-surface.md: 556d5dd86dfcc92c4628e68c19390f0033560d25
|
||||
2026-06-30-bash-stdin-env-trusted-plugin-surface.zh.md: 9d67797f86903e70e7bdcd6f80f19d17c41ac18e
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Three deliberate choices:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **The model-facing tool omits `stdin` and `env`.** Shell syntax already covers those needs, so duplicate parameters would add surface without authority separation. The tool builds requests only from declared model arguments, signal, and owner; trusted in-process callers may set the seam fields directly. Harness-owned variables use the separate `dshEnv` channel from the [managed environment decision](../feature/2026-07-10-agent-session-identity-and-log-location.md), so ordinary `env` cannot replace them.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **`env` merges AFTER the credential scrub, so an explicit caller entry wins even on a credential-shaped name.** The later managed-namespace decision reserves `DSH_*`: ambient entries are removed, ordinary `env` cannot set them, and trusted `dshEnv` merges last. The complete order is `scrub(process.env, including DSH_*)` → `ENV_OVERRIDES` → ordinary `env` → `dshEnv`.
|
||||
2. **`env` merges AFTER the credential scrub, so an explicit caller entry wins even on a credential-shaped name.** The later managed-namespace decision manages `DSH_*`: ambient entries are removed, and trusted `dshEnv` merges last, so an ordinary `env` entry can never displace a managed value. The complete order is `scrub(process.env, including DSH_*)` → `ENV_OVERRIDES` → ordinary `env` → `dshEnv`.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **`stdin`/`env` are required-absent-OK (plain optional) on the resolved spec, NOT required-but-nullable like `owner`.** `owner` is required-but-nullable because a *silently* missing owner yields an unowned, cross-session-readable task — a security footgun that a visible `undefined` guards against. `stdin`/`env` have no such hazard: a missing one means "no stdin / no extra env", which is the safe, ordinary case (every model-driven call). So they stay plain optionals, matching `signal`.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
1. **模型侧工具不暴露 `stdin` 和 `env`。** Shell 语法已覆盖这些需求，重复参数只会增加接口面而不带来权限隔离。工具仅从声明的模型参数、signal 和 owner 构建请求；受信的进程内调用方可以直接设置 seam 字段。harness 自有变量使用[托管环境决策](../feature/2026-07-10-agent-session-identity-and-log-location.md)规定的独立 `dshEnv` 通道，因此普通 `env` 无法替换它们。
|
||||
|
||||
2. **`env` 在凭证擦除之后合并，因此调用方显式设置的条目即使具有凭证形态的名称也会胜出。** 后续的托管命名空间决策保留 `DSH_*`：环境条目会被移除，普通 `env` 无法设置它们，受信的 `dshEnv` 最后合并。完整顺序为 `scrub(process.env, including DSH_*)` → `ENV_OVERRIDES` → 普通 `env` → `dshEnv`。
|
||||
2. **`env` 在凭证擦除之后合并，因此调用方显式设置的条目即使具有凭证形态的名称也会胜出。** 后续的托管命名空间决策托管 `DSH_*`：环境条目会被移除，受信的 `dshEnv` 最后合并，因此普通 `env` 条目永远无法顶掉托管值。完整顺序为 `scrub(process.env, including DSH_*)` → `ENV_OVERRIDES` → 普通 `env` → `dshEnv`。
|
||||
|
||||
3. **`stdin`/`env` 在已解析 spec 上是 required-absent-OK（普通 optional），而非像 `owner` 那样 required-but-nullable。** `owner` 之所以是 required-but-nullable，是因为*静默*缺失的 owner 会产生一个无主、跨会话可读的任务——一个安全隐患，显式的 `undefined` 可以防范。`stdin`/`env` 没有这种风险：缺失意味着「无 stdin / 无额外 env」，这是安全的常规情况（所有模型驱动的调用都如此）。因此它们保持普通 optional，与 `signal` 一致。
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-06-30-event-domain-semantics.md: 1f3452cce0235718c35d71577d7013f3e647648c
|
||||
2026-06-30-event-domain-semantics.zh.md: ec2da7786e80fb6a0df9ff338d77a50e7b3ef569
|
||||
2026-06-30-event-domain-semantics.md: 75c1cac11d1bfc9aa7fba9c523eab8c0475027e8
|
||||
2026-06-30-event-domain-semantics.zh.md: a412b8735b72274252473f3218e0d57d4f814bde
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ This vocabulary is the foundation for interception decisions, the durable `hook/
|
||||
- The loop no longer emits any boundary mirror; `closeStep` appends `step/end` only and `closeTurn` appends `turn/end` only. `Session.append` owns post-commit observer containment, so a throwing boundary observer cannot change the turn outcome or starve later consumers; an acceptance or internal validation failure still escapes before the boundary enters the log.
|
||||
- Tests that observed boundaries via the removed emits now observe the durable `turn/start`/`turn/end`/`step/start`/`step/end` session events — the behavior they pin (boundary ordering, step counting) is unchanged; only the feed they read moved to the canonical one. The tests that exercised a *throwing turn-boundary emit listener* were deleted, because that code path no longer exists (there is no emit to throw from). Per [AGENTS.md "tests document behavior, not golden truth"](../../../../AGENTS.md), the behavior and its test moved (or died) together.
|
||||
- The loop marks the step open (`stepOpen = true`) only after `append('step/start')` returns. Internal dispatch validation runs before the log push and may reject without opening a step; post-commit `session/event` observer failures are contained inside `Session.append`. The marker therefore represents exactly the committed boundary that owes a later `step/end`.
|
||||
- The full realization of this is [the simplification Agent Note "Stop mirroring durable boundaries as agent events"](../simplification/2026-06-20-remove-agent-boundary-mirror-events.md): all four boundary mirrors are removed and every consumer reads boundaries off `session/event`. `agent/steering` (not a boundary mirror) stayed outside that Agent Note's scope and was removed by its own follow-up, [Remove the `agent/steering` mirror emit](../simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md) — it mirrored the durable `steering/message`.
|
||||
- The full realization of this is [the simplification Agent Note "Stop mirroring durable boundaries as agent events"](../simplification/2026-06-20-remove-agent-boundary-mirror-events.md): all four boundary mirrors are removed and every consumer reads boundaries off `session/event`. `agent/steering` (not a boundary mirror) stayed outside that Agent Note's scope and was removed by its own follow-up, [Remove the `agent/steering` mirror emit](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md) — it mirrored the durable `steering/message`.
|
||||
- The cordis events catalog (`docs/cordis-catalog/events.md`) is regenerated to drop the mirror events.
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- agent-note-format: alternatives-not-recorded (pre-format Agent Note) -->
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ harness 通过 Cordis 事件分类体系扩展 agent loop（智能体循环）
|
||||
- 循环不再 emit 任何边界镜像；`closeStep` 仅追加 `step/end`，`closeTurn` 仅追加 `turn/end`。`Session.append` 负责 post-commit observer 隔离，因此抛出异常的边界 observer 无法改变轮次结果或饿死后续消费方；接受或内部校验失败仍会在边界进入日志之前逃逸。
|
||||
- 之前通过已移除 emit 观察边界的测试，现在观察持久的 `turn/start`/`turn/end`/`step/start`/`step/end` 会话事件——它们固定的行为（边界顺序、步骤计数）不变；只是读取的源移到了规范源。那些测试*抛出异常的轮次边界 emit 监听器*的用例被删除，因为该代码路径不再存在（没有 emit 可供抛出）。按照 [AGENTS.md「测试记录行为，而非黄金真相」](../../../../AGENTS.md)，行为与其测试一同迁移（或一同消亡）。
|
||||
- 循环仅在 `append('step/start')` 返回后才标记步骤已打开（`stepOpen = true`）。内部分发校验在日志推入之前运行，可能在不打开步骤的情况下拒绝；post-commit `session/event` observer 的失败被隔离在 `Session.append` 内部。因此该标记精确表示已提交的、欠一个后续 `step/end` 的边界。
|
||||
- 完整实现见[简化 Agent Note「停止将持久边界镜像为 agent 事件」](../simplification/2026-06-20-remove-agent-boundary-mirror-events.md)：全部四个边界镜像被移除，所有消费方从 `session/event` 读取边界。`agent/steering`（不是边界镜像）不在该 Agent Note 范围内，由其后续 Agent Note [移除 `agent/steering` 镜像 emit](../simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md) 单独移除——它镜像的是持久的 `steering/message`。
|
||||
- 完整实现见[简化 Agent Note「停止将持久边界镜像为 agent 事件」](../simplification/2026-06-20-remove-agent-boundary-mirror-events.md)：全部四个边界镜像被移除，所有消费方从 `session/event` 读取边界。`agent/steering`（不是边界镜像）不在该 Agent Note 范围内，由其后续 Agent Note [移除 `agent/steering` 镜像 emit](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md) 单独移除——它镜像的是持久的 `steering/message`。
|
||||
- Cordis 事件目录（`docs/cordis-catalog/events.md`）重新生成以移除镜像事件。
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- agent-note-format: alternatives-not-recorded (pre-format Agent Note) -->
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,53 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Add direct directory listing to the filesystem seam
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs` is the provider seam for filesystem access, with local and future non-local backends behind the same `ctx.fs` contract. Before this change it could resolve paths, stat targets, read text, stream text, write text, and edit text. That was enough for model-facing file tools, but not for non-model-facing consumers that need to enumerate directories without importing `node:fs`.
|
||||
|
||||
The immediate pressure came from skill loading: reading an individual `SKILL.md` can already go through `ctx.get('fs')`, but discovering which skill roots contain `<name>/SKILL.md` or `<name>.md` still needs directory enumeration. Adding directory listing only in `dsh-skill` would either keep a direct Node dependency there or invent a one-off local helper outside the filesystem provider stack.
|
||||
|
||||
This decision adds the provider capability without a model-facing `ls`/`list` tool or skill-discovery change. Those consumers require separate UX, prompt, and policy decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
Add `FileSystem.listDir(target, signal?)` to `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs`.
|
||||
|
||||
`listDir` lists one directory level only. It returns direct children in stable name order and includes:
|
||||
|
||||
- `name`: the child basename.
|
||||
- `type`: `file`, `directory`, or `other`.
|
||||
- `target`: the resolved child `FsTarget`.
|
||||
- `version`: cheap metadata when available.
|
||||
- `size`: regular-file size when available.
|
||||
|
||||
It never reads file contents. Recursive traversal, globbing, pagination, search, file watching, and model-facing rendering are intentionally out of scope.
|
||||
|
||||
The local backend implements this through `readdir({ withFileTypes: true })`, `resolveLocalTarget`, and metadata `stat`/`realpath` probes. The result order is deterministic (`name.localeCompare`) to keep prompt/listing output stable for future consumers and improve prefix-cache reuse.
|
||||
|
||||
Broken or disappeared children may be represented as `type: 'other'` without `version`/`size`; they do not abort the whole listing. Permission or backend I/O failures while listing the directory or resolving/probing child metadata fail the whole listing with structured `FsError` codes:
|
||||
|
||||
- `FS_NOT_FOUND` for missing targets.
|
||||
- `FS_NOT_DIRECTORY` for existing non-directory targets.
|
||||
- `FS_PERMISSION_DENIED` for permission failures.
|
||||
- `FS_IO_ERROR` for other backend I/O failures.
|
||||
- `FS_ABORTED` for aborted calls.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**Add a model-facing list tool with the seam.** Rejected because its prompt, schema, and rendering contracts are independent of the provider primitive.
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep directory enumeration in each consumer.** Rejected. That would bind product packages such as `dsh-skill` to Node/local filesystem behavior and bypass policy/remote/sandboxed backends.
|
||||
|
||||
**Make `listDir` recursive or glob-shaped.** Rejected for now. Skill-root discovery only needs direct children, and a simple direct listing is the smallest backend contract future consumers can safely compose.
|
||||
|
||||
**Skip children that fail metadata resolution.** Rejected. The API promises resolved child targets, so permission/IO failures while resolving a child are contract failures. Broken or disappeared children are the exception because they can still be represented without claiming a live resolved file.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
Every filesystem backend must now implement one additional provider primitive. That is deliberate foundation work while the harness is still unreleased, but it does mean future sandboxed/remote backends need to define equivalent direct-child listing behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
The capability remains provider-facing. Until a consumer lands, ACP/model sessions will still need existing tools such as `bash` for directory listing. The absence of a model-facing `listdir` tool is expected, not a wiring failure.
|
||||
@@ -1,53 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: 为文件系统 seam 添加直接目录列举能力
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs` 是文件系统访问的提供方 seam，本地后端与未来的非本地后端共享同一个 `ctx.fs` 契约。在本次变更之前，它能解析路径、stat 目标、读取文本、流式读取文本、写入文本和编辑文本。这对面向模型的文件工具已经足够，但对于需要枚举目录而又不想直接导入 `node:fs` 的非模型侧消费方来说还不够。
|
||||
|
||||
直接的压力来自 skill（技能）加载：读取单个 `SKILL.md` 已经可以走 `ctx.get('fs')`，但发现哪些 skill 根目录包含 `<name>/SKILL.md` 或 `<name>.md` 仍需要目录枚举。如果仅在 `dsh-skill` 中添加目录列举，要么保留对 Node 的直接依赖，要么在文件系统提供方栈之外发明一个一次性的本地辅助函数。
|
||||
|
||||
本决策只添加提供方能力，不涉及面向模型的 `ls`/`list` 工具或 skill 发现机制的变更。那些消费方需要独立的 UX、提示词与策略决策。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
在 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-fs` 中添加 `FileSystem.listDir(target, signal?)`。
|
||||
|
||||
`listDir` 仅列举一层目录。它以稳定的名称顺序返回直接子项，包含以下字段：
|
||||
|
||||
- `name`：子项的 basename；
|
||||
- `type`：`file`、`directory` 或 `other`；
|
||||
- `target`：已解析的子项 `FsTarget`；
|
||||
- `version`：可用时返回的轻量元数据；
|
||||
- `size`：可用时返回的常规文件大小。
|
||||
|
||||
它从不读取文件内容。递归遍历、glob 匹配、分页、搜索、文件监听和面向模型的渲染均有意不在范围内。
|
||||
|
||||
本地后端通过 `readdir({ withFileTypes: true })`、`resolveLocalTarget` 以及元数据 `stat`/`realpath` 探测来实现。结果顺序是确定性的（`name.localeCompare`），以保持未来消费方的提示词/列表输出稳定，并提高前缀缓存复用率。
|
||||
|
||||
损坏或已消失的子项可以表示为 `type: 'other'`（不带 `version`/`size`）；它们不会中止整个列举。在列举目录或解析/探测子项元数据时遇到权限或后端 I/O 故障，则以结构化的 `FsError` 错误码使整个列举失败：
|
||||
|
||||
- `FS_NOT_FOUND`：目标不存在；
|
||||
- `FS_NOT_DIRECTORY`：目标存在但不是目录；
|
||||
- `FS_PERMISSION_DENIED`：权限不足；
|
||||
- `FS_IO_ERROR`：其他后端 I/O 故障；
|
||||
- `FS_ABORTED`：调用被中止。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
**在添加 seam 的同时添加面向模型的 list 工具。** 否决。其提示词、schema 和渲染契约与提供方原语相互独立。
|
||||
|
||||
**让每个消费方自行枚举目录。** 否决。这会将 `dsh-skill` 等产品包绑定到 Node/本地文件系统行为上，绕过策略/远程/沙箱后端。
|
||||
|
||||
**让 `listDir` 支持递归或 glob 形式。** 暂时否决。skill 根发现只需要直接子项，而简单的单层列举是未来消费方可以安全组合的最小后端契约。
|
||||
|
||||
**跳过元数据解析失败的子项。** 否决。API 承诺返回已解析的子项 target，因此解析子项时的权限/IO 故障属于契约失败。损坏或已消失的子项是例外，因为它们仍可在不声称拥有一个活跃已解析文件的前提下被表示。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
每个文件系统后端现在必须多实现一个提供方原语。这是 harness 尚未发布时有意为之的基础工作，但也意味着未来的沙箱/远程后端需要定义等价的直接子项列举行为。
|
||||
|
||||
该能力仍停留在提供方层面。在消费方落地之前，ACP（Agent Client Protocol）/模型会话仍需使用 `bash` 等既有工具来列举目录。缺少面向模型的 `listdir` 工具是预期行为，而非接线错误。
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-07-06-timeout-deadline-library.md: 11d4b8cd48dd345d2324b63e01bd726f12d846b4
|
||||
2026-07-06-timeout-deadline-library.zh.md: 334914c689adf54a654c5907395c29ceeeb50891
|
||||
2026-07-06-timeout-deadline-library.md: 63463a76a65743436d4e78479800c19e257a42de
|
||||
2026-07-06-timeout-deadline-library.zh.md: c3d3cdf1c63813fc24c10727e42d326142f3f4de
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-06-timeout-deadline-library.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
Timeout handling was drifting apart across the tool-bearing capabilities, and the divergence was not superficial — it was the same logic re-implemented three ways, each with its own subtle correctness burden.
|
||||
|
||||
- **bash** ([packages/bash/bash-local/src/run.ts](../../../../packages/bash/bash-local/src/run.ts)) had a full, correct timeout inside the process plumbing: a config-clamped `timeoutMs`, two independent triggers — a `killTimer` for the timeout and an `onAbort` listener for upstream cancellation — each calling one `kill()` closure that escalates SIGTERM→grace→SIGKILL on the process group, and two orthogonal outcome booleans (`timedOut`, `aborted`) latched independently.
|
||||
- **bash** (then in the bash-local implementation's `run.ts`) had a full, correct timeout inside the process plumbing: a config-clamped `timeoutMs`, two independent triggers — a `killTimer` for the timeout and an `onAbort` listener for upstream cancellation — each calling one `kill()` closure that escalates SIGTERM→grace→SIGKILL on the process group, and two orthogonal outcome booleans (`timedOut`, `aborted`) latched independently. After this consolidation, the plumbing — today [packages/subprocess/subprocess-local/src/spawn.ts](../../../../packages/subprocess/subprocess-local/src/spawn.ts) — only reacts to aborts; [packages/bash/bash-local/src/index.ts](../../../../packages/bash/bash-local/src/index.ts) owns the fused deadline and the `timedOut`/`aborted` classification.
|
||||
- **web_fetch** ([packages/web/web-fetch-local/src/provider.ts](../../../../packages/web/web-fetch-local/src/provider.ts)) had a correct but *hand-rolled* timeout: it constructed an `AbortController`, wired `setTimeout(() => controller.abort(new WebError(…, 'WEB_FETCH_TIMEOUT')))`, manually added and removed the upstream-signal listener, cleared the timer in a `finally`, and recovered the timeout reason from `signal.reason` in a `translateAbortOrNetwork` helper because the reader surfaces a bare `AbortError`.
|
||||
- **web_search** ([packages/web/tool-web/src/search.ts](../../../../packages/web/tool-web/src/search.ts)) had **no timeout at all**: `WebSearchRequest` ([packages/web/web/src/types.ts](../../../../packages/web/web/src/types.ts)) carries no `timeoutMs` field, and each provider's `search()` only forwards `exec.signal`. (web_search stays untimed here — see Consequences.)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
超时处理在各个承载工具的能力之间逐渐分化，而且这种分化并非表面的：同一套逻辑被以三种方式重新实现，各自带有微妙的正确性负担。
|
||||
|
||||
- **bash**（[packages/bash/bash-local/src/run.ts](../../../../packages/bash/bash-local/src/run.ts)）在进程管道内部有一套完整、正确的超时实现：一个经配置钳位的 `timeoutMs`，两个独立触发器（用于超时的 `killTimer` 和用于上游取消的 `onAbort` 监听器），各自调用同一个 `kill()` 闭包对进程组执行 SIGTERM→宽限期→SIGKILL 升级，以及两个正交的结果布尔值（`timedOut`、`aborted`）独立锁存。
|
||||
- **bash**（当时位于 bash-local 实现的 `run.ts`）在进程管道内部有一套完整、正确的超时实现：一个经配置钳位的 `timeoutMs`，两个独立触发器（用于超时的 `killTimer` 和用于上游取消的 `onAbort` 监听器），各自调用同一个 `kill()` 闭包对进程组执行 SIGTERM→宽限期→SIGKILL 升级，以及两个正交的结果布尔值（`timedOut`、`aborted`）独立锁存。经此次整合之后，这套管道——今天位于 [packages/subprocess/subprocess-local/src/spawn.ts](../../../../packages/subprocess/subprocess-local/src/spawn.ts)——只响应中止；[packages/bash/bash-local/src/index.ts](../../../../packages/bash/bash-local/src/index.ts) 拥有融合的 deadline 以及 `timedOut`/`aborted` 分类。
|
||||
- **web_fetch**（[packages/web/web-fetch-local/src/provider.ts](../../../../packages/web/web-fetch-local/src/provider.ts)）有一套正确但*手写*的超时：构造一个 `AbortController`，连接 `setTimeout(() => controller.abort(new WebError(…, 'WEB_FETCH_TIMEOUT')))`，手动添加和移除上游信号监听器，在 `finally` 中清除定时器，并在 `translateAbortOrNetwork` 辅助函数中从 `signal.reason` 恢复超时原因（因为 reader 只抛出裸 `AbortError`）。
|
||||
- **web_search**（[packages/web/tool-web/src/search.ts](../../../../packages/web/tool-web/src/search.ts)）**完全没有超时**：`WebSearchRequest`（[packages/web/web/src/types.ts](../../../../packages/web/web/src/types.ts)）不携带 `timeoutMs` 字段，各提供方的 `search()` 只转发 `exec.signal`。（web_search 在本次设计中保持无超时——见「后果」。）
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.md: 8cd7df98758d6d4ac240fea21e7bbe0c89f26d1b
|
||||
2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.zh.md: 0920e0c2c331a247ecd9a039a05c19c9dd2871bc
|
||||
2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.md: 6b5cd089fcf206e659c7b67b8a996bfe81d0c333
|
||||
2026-07-20-canonical-tool-output-contract.zh.md: 61b25b14ca6f048b73a51788f112165745ae7106
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ type ToolExecutionResult =
|
||||
|
||||
`tools/post-execute` has two mutually exclusive successful projections. Replacing `content` changes only Native/model presentation and preserves the canonical value and metadata. Replacing `value` revalidates the replacement and recomputes both presentation projections. A block removes the value and becomes a failure. Content replacement is therefore not a confidentiality mechanism: policy that must prevent programmatic access blocks the call or replaces the value.
|
||||
|
||||
Canonical values are execution-local. The agent loop persists `tool/result` with only `content`, `error`, and optional `meta`; Code Mode's `tool/code-dispatch` persists only its bounded summary. Neither event stores the intermediate value, so replay reproduces presentation but cannot reconstruct the programmatic result. When a tool declares `presentationMeta`, it is computed only for a direct surface call; a nested Code dispatch gets no metadata or result card. The outer `run_code` card instead reads final post-policy content and declares no presentation metadata. Generic and tool-owned spill projections similarly skip nested dispatches, whose canonical value never enters model context.
|
||||
Canonical values are execution-local. The agent loop persists `tool/result` with only `content`, `error`, and optional `meta`; Code Mode's `tool/code-dispatch` persists the sub-call's rendered `content` and `isError`. Neither event stores the canonical intermediate value, so replay reproduces presentation but cannot reconstruct the programmatic result. When a tool declares `presentationMeta`, it is computed only for a direct surface call; a nested Code dispatch gets no metadata or result card. The outer `run_code` card instead reads final post-policy content and declares no presentation metadata. Generic and tool-owned spill projections similarly skip nested dispatches, whose canonical value never enters model context.
|
||||
|
||||
The first-party tools preserve their existing Native text while returning domain DTOs:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ type ToolExecutionResult =
|
||||
|
||||
`tools/post-execute` 为成功结果提供两种互斥的投影方式。替换 `content` 只改变 Native／模型展示，并保留规范值和元数据。替换 `value` 会重新校验替代值，并重新计算两份展示投影。阻止操作会移除值并转为失败。因此，替换内容并不是保密机制：必须阻止程序化访问的策略，应当阻止调用或替换值。
|
||||
|
||||
规范值仅存在于执行期间。agent loop（智能体循环）持久化的 `tool/result` 只包含 `content`、`error` 和可选的 `meta`；Code Mode 的 `tool/code-dispatch` 只持久化其有界摘要。两个事件都不存储中间值，因此回放可以重现展示，却无法重建程序化结果。当工具声明 `presentationMeta` 时，系统只会为直接的外层调用计算它；嵌套 Code 分发没有元数据或结果卡片。外层 `run_code` 卡片则读取最终的 post-policy 内容，并且不声明展示元数据。通用以及工具自有的输出落盘投影同样跳过嵌套分发，因为它们的规范值永远不会进入模型上下文。
|
||||
规范值仅存在于执行期间。agent loop（智能体循环）持久化的 `tool/result` 只包含 `content`、`error` 和可选的 `meta`；Code Mode 的 `tool/code-dispatch` 持久化子调用渲染后的 `content` 与 `isError`。两个事件都不存储规范中间值，因此回放可以重现展示，却无法重建程序化结果。当工具声明 `presentationMeta` 时，系统只会为直接的外层调用计算它；嵌套 Code 分发没有元数据或结果卡片。外层 `run_code` 卡片则读取最终的 post-policy 内容，并且不声明展示元数据。通用以及工具自有的输出落盘投影同样跳过嵌套分发，因为它们的规范值永远不会进入模型上下文。
|
||||
|
||||
第一方工具在保持现有 Native 文本不变的同时返回领域 DTO：
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-07-20-routed-model-context-and-compaction-policy.md: b637ba24d4ba5fc25c8cdd515a821ee97883a326
|
||||
2026-07-20-routed-model-context-and-compaction-policy.zh.md: 084e762ec29ddc0aecb0bf422c147b9d3122726b
|
||||
2026-07-20-routed-model-context-and-compaction-policy.md: b00c744e4ac79983a1f492d710e7b1542278c4f4
|
||||
2026-07-20-routed-model-context-and-compaction-policy.zh.md: 88e26aa7a99e8deb434d9a8fd80784be410a999a
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ Neither obvious configuration owner is sufficient. Compact-basic is optional and
|
||||
|
||||
### Adapters own exact-route capacity
|
||||
|
||||
`LlmAdapter.resolveModelContext(provider, model)` optionally returns `LlmModelContext` for one exact route. `LlmService.resolveModelContext()` selects the registered route owner, validates a positive integer `contextWindow`, and returns a detached value. The query is independent of `listModels()`: an unlisted dynamic model may have capacity metadata, and `undefined` means only that the adapter cannot describe capacity.
|
||||
`LlmAdapter.resolveModel(provider, model, signal?)` returns aggregate metadata for one exact route, with optional `LlmModelContext` under its `context` field. `LlmService.resolveModelInfo()` selects the registered route owner, validates a positive integer `contextWindow`, and returns detached metadata. The query is independent of `listModels()`: an unlisted dynamic model may have capacity metadata, and an absent `context` means only that the adapter cannot describe capacity.
|
||||
|
||||
The hand-rolled DeepSeek adapter accepts optional `contextWindow` on each configured model plus an adapter-wide `defaultContextWindow`. Exact model capacity wins; an entry without capacity and an unlisted pass-through id inherit the adapter default, or return `undefined` when it is absent. The two built-in model entries each publish an exact 128,000-token capacity. The pi-ai adapter resolves capacity from the same catalog descriptor that authoritatively resolves the request model.
|
||||
The hand-rolled DeepSeek adapter accepts optional `contextWindow` on each configured model plus an adapter-wide `defaultContextWindow`. Exact model capacity wins; an entry without capacity and an unlisted pass-through id inherit the adapter default, or omit `context` when it is absent. The two built-in model entries each publish an exact 128,000-token capacity. The pi-ai adapter resolves capacity from the same catalog descriptor that authoritatively resolves the request model.
|
||||
|
||||
### Token measurement remains model-agnostic
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
### 适配器拥有精确路由容量
|
||||
|
||||
`LlmAdapter.resolveModelContext(provider, model)` 可以为一条精确路由返回 `LlmModelContext`。`LlmService.resolveModelContext()` 选择已注册的路由所属方，验证 `contextWindow` 为正整数，并返回分离值。该查询独立于 `listModels()`：不在目录中的动态模型也可以拥有容量元数据，而 `undefined` 只表示适配器无法描述容量。
|
||||
`LlmAdapter.resolveModel(provider, model, signal?)` 返回一条精确路由的聚合元数据，其中可选的 `LlmModelContext` 位于 `context` 字段下。`LlmService.resolveModelInfo()` 选择已注册的路由所属方，验证 `contextWindow` 为正整数，并返回分离的元数据。该查询独立于 `listModels()`：不在目录中的动态模型也可以拥有容量元数据，而缺少 `context` 只表示适配器无法描述容量。
|
||||
|
||||
手写 DeepSeek 适配器允许每个已配置模型提供可选 `contextWindow`，并支持适配器级 `defaultContextWindow`。精确模型容量优先；未提供容量的模型项与未列出的透传 id 会继承适配器默认值，若默认值也不存在则返回 `undefined`。两个内置模型项都公开精确的 128,000 token 容量。pi-ai 适配器从同一个目录描述符解析容量，该描述符也用于权威解析请求模型。
|
||||
手写 DeepSeek 适配器允许每个已配置模型提供可选 `contextWindow`，并支持适配器级 `defaultContextWindow`。精确模型容量优先；未提供容量的模型项与未列出的透传 id 会继承适配器默认值，若默认值也不存在则省略 `context`。两个内置模型项都公开精确的 128,000 token 容量。pi-ai 适配器从同一个目录描述符解析容量，该描述符也用于权威解析请求模型。
|
||||
|
||||
### Token 计量保持模型无关
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md: bf0ae468c4783b73e2dbd0e1bc50b9bd2f50cb3f
|
||||
2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.zh.md: 17913d2636e3ee5e5ae69f9c554935ba861d14d9
|
||||
2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.md: 12128d9e57601d0b85d20d1cb4240bb08eadc3cb
|
||||
2026-07-22-unified-send-and-coalesced-user-messages.zh.md: 177d90f7116f7451b8e3c4ccf7d1577ff12ae701
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -41,6 +41,6 @@ Internally, `wakeup` is the “should the model run” signal, so the inbox dist
|
||||
## Related
|
||||
|
||||
- [one-send-one-turn](../simplification/2026-07-17-one-send-one-turn.md) — the one-claimed-message-per-turn rule this builds on.
|
||||
- [remove-agent-steering-mirror](../simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md) — the precedent for collapsing a mirrored live event.
|
||||
- [remove-agent-steering-mirror](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md) — the precedent for collapsing a mirrored live event.
|
||||
- [explicit-turn-cancellation](2026-07-16-explicit-turn-cancellation.md) — the cancel-cause signal `keepInbox` extends.
|
||||
- [intent-named-agent-delivery](2026-07-24-intent-named-agent-delivery.md) — the public helpers and fully resolved acceptance interface.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -41,6 +41,6 @@ agent 的对外驱动接口逐渐长出三个近乎平行的动词——`send`
|
||||
## 相关
|
||||
|
||||
- [one-send-one-turn](../simplification/2026-07-17-one-send-one-turn.md)——本决策所依托的“每轮次只认领一条消息”规则。
|
||||
- [remove-agent-steering-mirror](../simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md)——折叠镜像实时事件的先例。
|
||||
- [remove-agent-steering-mirror](../../archived/simplification/2026-07-04-remove-agent-steering-mirror.md)——折叠镜像实时事件的先例。
|
||||
- [explicit-turn-cancellation](2026-07-16-explicit-turn-cancellation.md)——`keepInbox` 所扩展的取消原因信号。
|
||||
- [intent-named-agent-delivery](2026-07-24-intent-named-agent-delivery.md)——公开辅助方法以及接受完全解析输入的接口。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-07-23-toolview-dissolution.md: a420c5945d0272cf8087d5f623e9c383c286d7c2
|
||||
2026-07-23-toolview-dissolution.zh.md: 47c1f392f5f7ddbf4e6c686b2574faa7987e6126
|
||||
2026-07-23-toolview-dissolution.md: 80c2688b152d1afe1236d4815633a5bf024db1d2
|
||||
2026-07-23-toolview-dissolution.zh.md: 928c5f445d601b2246d3ae2f9360232643814468
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ After the view ring dissolved into the slot system, the client kept exactly one
|
||||
|
||||
The tool ring is gone as independent infrastructure: a tool row is a **keyed child slot each view declares for itself**, and the client has exactly one registration model. The justification above was hollow — a keyed slot's *key space* is already runtime-open (SlotMap declares slots, never keys; the ask-user composer's `key: 'question'` was the precedent), so the open tool-name set fits `entryKey` dispatch natively.
|
||||
|
||||
Shipped shape (current-state narrative also in the [architecture note](2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.md)): the chat entry's `children` table declares `'conversation.chat.toolview'` (keyed/session); the render site dispatches per row via `entryKey: toolName` with `GenericToolCard` as the call-site `fallback` (the default card is domain property; the fallback option is ordinary renderSlot grammar). The owner payload is the uniform `ToolRowOwnerProps` (`callId`/`toolName`/`block`/`openDetails` — details being a session-level facility, not chat-private), and `ToolRowProps` pre-composes it with the session standard kit for registrant components. A registrant is a plain plugin: `ctx.slots.register({ name: 'conversation.chat.toolview', key: '<tool>', inject? }, Row)` with `inject: ['slots', 'conversation']` as the load-order seam — apply mounts `ConversationService` *after* the chat registration, so the service being present guarantees the slot is declared, by construction. Session-dimension differentiation happens inside the component (`useSessions` reading `parentId` — the decision sits where all the information already is); the bash sample is the third-party-posture exemplar. Trajectory/waterfall toolview slots share this exact shape (names fixed by the slot-naming discipline `<domain>.<entry>.<hole>`, one shared owner type) and land with their own row render sites — RendersCheck rejects a declaration nobody renders, so the type system, not convention, blocks early empty declarations.
|
||||
Shipped shape (current-state narrative also in the [architecture note](2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.md)): the chat entry's `children` table declares `'conversation.chat.toolview'` (keyed/session); the render site dispatches per row via `entryKey: toolName` with `GenericToolCard` as the call-site `fallback` (the default card is domain property; the fallback option is ordinary renderSlot grammar). The owner payload is the uniform `ToolRowOwnerProps` (`callId`/`toolName`/`block`/`openDetails` — details being a session-level facility, not chat-private), and `ToolRowProps` pre-composes it with the session standard kit for registrant components. A registrant is a plain plugin: `ctx.slots.register({ name: 'conversation.chat.toolview', key: '<tool>', inject? }, Row)` with `inject: ['slots', 'conversation']` as the load-order seam — apply mounts `ConversationService` *after* the chat registration, so the service being present guarantees the slot is declared, by construction. Session-dimension differentiation happens inside the component (`useSessions` reading `parentId` — the decision sits where all the information already is); the bash sample is the third-party-posture exemplar and paints the same ToolRow chrome as Think (`Bash · {description}`, with a scoped badge only in child sessions). Trajectory/waterfall toolview slots share this exact shape (names fixed by the slot-naming discipline `<domain>.<entry>.<hole>`, one shared owner type) and land with their own row render sites — RendersCheck rejects a declaration nobody renders, so the type system, not convention, blocks early empty declarations.
|
||||
|
||||
Registry-era responsibilities all have successor homes: inject caching and row error isolation ride the framework renderer (entry×scope cache, per-entry `SlotErrorBoundary`); subscribe/getVersion ride the slot core's per-key version machinery; the future "store seat" is the ordinary store seat keyed slots already have (interaction-draft durability is its first named consumer); miss fallback is the call-site `fallback` option.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
工具环作为独立基础设施已消失：工具行是**各视图为自己声明的 keyed 子槽**，client 全域只剩一种注册模型。上述理由是空的——keyed slot 的 *key 空间*本就运行时开放（SlotMap 声明槽、从不声明 key；ask-user composer 的 `key: 'question'` 即先例），开放的 tool 名集合天然适配 `entryKey` 分发。
|
||||
|
||||
落地形态（现状叙述同见[架构注](2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.md)）：chat 条目的 `children` 表声明 `'conversation.chat.toolview'`（keyed/session）；渲染点逐行以 `entryKey: toolName` 分发、以 `GenericToolCard` 作调用点 `fallback`（默认卡片是域产权；fallback 选项就是普通 renderSlot 文法）。owner 载荷是统一的 `ToolRowOwnerProps`（`callId`/`toolName`/`block`/`openDetails`——details 是会话级设施，非 chat 私货），`ToolRowProps` 把它与 session 标配 kit 预组合供注册方组件取用。注册方就是普通插件：`ctx.slots.register({ name: 'conversation.chat.toolview', key: '<tool>', inject? }, Row)`，以 `inject: ['slots', 'conversation']` 作加载序缝——apply 把 `ConversationService` 挂在 chat 注册*之后*，故服务在场即保证槽已声明，构造使然。会话维差异化在组件内完成（`useSessions` 读 `parentId`——决策放在已有全部信息的地方）；bash 样例即第三方姿态的样板。trajectory/waterfall 的 toolview 槽共用这套形状（槽名按槽名纪律 `<域>.<条目>.<孔位>` 定死，共用一张 owner 类型），随各自的行渲染点落地——RendersCheck 拒绝无人渲染的声明，挡住提前空声明的是类型系统而非约定。
|
||||
落地形态（现状叙述同见[架构注](2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.md)）：chat 条目的 `children` 表声明 `'conversation.chat.toolview'`（keyed/session）；渲染点逐行以 `entryKey: toolName` 分发、以 `GenericToolCard` 作调用点 `fallback`（默认卡片是域产权；fallback 选项就是普通 renderSlot 文法）。owner 载荷是统一的 `ToolRowOwnerProps`（`callId`/`toolName`/`block`/`openDetails`——details 是会话级设施，非 chat 私货），`ToolRowProps` 把它与 session 标配 kit 预组合供注册方组件取用。注册方就是普通插件：`ctx.slots.register({ name: 'conversation.chat.toolview', key: '<tool>', inject? }, Row)`，以 `inject: ['slots', 'conversation']` 作加载序缝——apply 把 `ConversationService` 挂在 chat 注册*之后*，故服务在场即保证槽已声明，构造使然。会话维差异化在组件内完成（`useSessions` 读 `parentId`——决策放在已有全部信息的地方）；bash 样例即第三方姿态的样板，并与 Think 绘制同一套 ToolRow chrome（`Bash · {description}`，scoped badge 仅出现在子会话）。trajectory/waterfall 的 toolview 槽共用这套形状（槽名按槽名纪律 `<域>.<条目>.<孔位>` 定死，共用一张 owner 类型），随各自的行渲染点落地——RendersCheck 拒绝无人渲染的声明，挡住提前空声明的是类型系统而非约定。
|
||||
|
||||
registry 时代的职责各有后继居所：inject 缓存与行错误隔离乘框架渲染器（entry×scope 缓存、per-entry `SlotErrorBoundary`）；subscribe/getVersion 乘 slot core 的 per-key 版本机；将来的「store 席位」就是 keyed slot 本就拥有的普通 store 席位（交互草稿耐久性是其首个具名消费者）；miss 兜底即调用点 `fallback` 选项。
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Unified session query service
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-23-unified-session-query-service.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
Exact reads, semantic filters, relationship traces, and full-text search operate on the same live-preferred session corpus. Exposing full-text search under a second context key makes consumers and app compositions treat one capability as two services, even though the SQLite implementation is the only backend-specific part.
|
||||
|
||||
The interface package already owns the shared record, filter, trace, search-request, cursor, and error contracts. A provider registry or coordinator would add runtime selection semantics unsupported by any current consumer.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
`SessionQueryService` is the single abstract service registered as `ctx.sessionQuery`. It concretely implements listing, title and event reads, surface reads, filtering, and relationship tracing through its backend-independent `SessionCorpus`. Its only abstract methods are `searchSessions()` and `searchEvents()`.
|
||||
|
||||
`SessionQuerySqlite` extends that service and is the sole concrete backend. One mounted instance therefore exposes every operation through `ctx.sessionQuery`; its inherited exact operations use the shared corpus implementation, while its SQLite-owned lifecycle observes sources, reconciles the derived FTS index, ranks matches, and owns cursor generations. The interface package has no standalone concrete plugin, search-provider registry, or second context key.
|
||||
|
||||
SQLite reconciliation is one quiescent serialized state machine. It passes the caller's exact abort signal into durable snapshot listing and inspection, awaits each started backend operation itself, and checks cancellation after every await and before starting the next source or index operation. Cancellation therefore cannot release the serializer while an ignored or cooperative backend call is still cleaning up, and it cannot start a subsequent listing, inspection, reconciliation, or query after the signal is observed.
|
||||
|
||||
Backend configuration includes the inherited `readWindowMax` setting alongside its own index path, journal mode, page limits, and snippet limit. First-party apps that need session queries mount the SQLite backend and place its disposable index beside their configured persistence root.
|
||||
|
||||
This service topology supersedes the separate-key portion of the [exact query decision](../feature/2026-07-10-session-query-service.md) and [SQLite search decision](../feature/2026-07-10-sqlite-session-query-provider.md); their corpus, query, tokenizer, reconciliation, and safety decisions remain in force.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
- **Keep `ctx.sessionQuery` and `ctx.sessionSearch` separate** — rejected because both expose operations over one logical corpus, force consumers to discover two keys, and let apps accidentally mount only a partial query surface.
|
||||
- **Keep a concrete base service and let the SQLite plugin register or mutate two search methods** — rejected because method availability would depend on plugin order and teardown, and the service would need a provider registration protocol for one implementation.
|
||||
- **Move every query implementation into the SQLite package** — rejected because exact reads, filters, and traces require no index and are shared behavior that belongs with their provider-independent contracts.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
Consumers inject one service and can combine exact and full-text operations without a second capability lookup. A production composition must choose a concrete backend even when one consumer currently calls only inherited exact methods; tests may use a minimal subclass when backend behavior is outside their scope.
|
||||
|
||||
The unified object deliberately retains two internal observation strategies: exact operations read authoritative live/persisted sources per call, while full-text operations reconcile a disposable index. Sharing the context key does not make the derived index authoritative or couple exact-read availability to an FTS query.
|
||||
|
||||
Queued cancellation remains prompt. Cancellation during active asynchronous source observation waits for that started operation to settle, which makes rejection a quiescence boundary and preserves single-file execution for a following search. Synchronous SQLite statements remain non-preemptible and are bracketed by signal checks.
|
||||
|
||||
Unit coverage pins inherited and abstract behavior on one key, SQLite coverage exercises both operation families on the concrete backend, and the real Loader path verifies that one exported plugin registers the combined service.
|
||||
@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: 统一会话查询服务
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-23-unified-session-query-service.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
精确读取、语义过滤、关系追踪与全文搜索都作用于同一个实时源优先的会话语料库。将全文搜索暴露在第二个上下文键下，会让消费方与应用组合把同一项查询功能视为两个服务，尽管只有 SQLite 实现是后端特有的部分。
|
||||
|
||||
接口包已经拥有共享的记录、过滤、追踪、搜索请求、游标与错误契约。提供方注册表或协调器会引入运行时选择语义，而目前没有任何消费方支持这种语义。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
`SessionQueryService` 是注册为 `ctx.sessionQuery` 的唯一抽象服务。它通过后端无关的 `SessionCorpus` 具体实现列表查询、标题与事件读取、表层读取、过滤和关系追踪。仅有 `searchSessions()` 与 `searchEvents()` 两个方法为抽象方法。
|
||||
|
||||
`SessionQuerySqlite` 扩展该服务，并且是唯一的具体后端。因此，一个挂载实例便可通过 `ctx.sessionQuery` 暴露全部操作；其继承的精确操作使用共享的语料库实现，而由 SQLite 管理的生命周期负责观察数据源、对齐派生 FTS 索引、对匹配项排序并管理游标代际。接口包不提供独立的具体插件、搜索提供方注册表或第二个上下文键。
|
||||
|
||||
SQLite 的对齐过程是一个具备静止性保证的串行状态机。它将调用方的原始中止信号传给持久化快照列表与检查操作，直接等待每个已经启动的后端操作，并在每次等待后以及启动下一个数据源或索引操作前检查是否已取消。因此，即使后端忽略取消或正在配合清理，串行器也不会提前释放；观察到中止信号后，也不会再启动后续的列表、检查、对齐或查询操作。
|
||||
|
||||
后端配置除了自身的索引路径、日志模式、分页限制与文本片段长度上限外，还包含继承的 `readWindowMax` 设置。需要会话查询的第一方应用挂载 SQLite 后端，并将其可丢弃索引放在已配置的持久化根目录旁。
|
||||
|
||||
这一服务拓扑取代了[精确查询决策](../feature/2026-07-10-session-query-service.md)和 [SQLite 搜索决策](../feature/2026-07-10-sqlite-session-query-provider.md)中关于分离上下文键的部分；其中关于语料库、查询、分词器、对齐与安全性的决策仍然有效。
|
||||
|
||||
## 已考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
- **保留相互独立的 `ctx.sessionQuery` 与 `ctx.sessionSearch`**：不予采纳，因为二者都针对同一逻辑语料库提供操作，迫使消费方识别两个键，还可能让应用误挂载一组不完整的查询接口。
|
||||
- **保留具体的基础服务，再由 SQLite 插件注册或修改两个搜索方法**：不予采纳，因为方法是否可用将取决于插件顺序与资源释放时机，而且该服务需要为唯一的实现定义一套提供方注册协议。
|
||||
- **将所有查询实现移入 SQLite 包**：不予采纳，因为精确读取、过滤与追踪不需要索引，并且都属于应与提供方无关契约放在一起的共享行为。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
消费方只需注入一个服务，无需再次查找其他功能，便可组合精确操作与全文操作。生产环境的组合必须选择一个具体后端，即使当前某个消费方只调用继承的精确方法；如果后端行为不在测试范围内，测试可以使用最小子类。
|
||||
|
||||
统一后的对象有意保留两种内部观察策略：精确操作在每次调用时读取权威的实时源或持久化源，全文操作则使可丢弃索引与数据源对齐。共用上下文键不会让派生索引成为权威来源，也不会使精确读取的可用性依赖 FTS 查询。
|
||||
|
||||
排队阶段的取消仍会及时生效。在异步数据源观察已经开始后取消时，调用方会等待该操作完成清理后才收到拒绝；因此拒绝本身构成静止边界，并保证后续搜索仍按单一串行流程执行。同步 SQLite 语句无法在执行中被抢占，服务会在其前后检查中止信号。
|
||||
|
||||
单元测试在同一个键上同时固定继承实现与抽象方法的契约，SQLite 测试在具体后端上覆盖两类操作，真实 Loader 路径则验证单个导出的插件能够注册组合后的服务。
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-07-24-adapter-owned-reasoning-effort-capabilities.md: cc66e4ec151fcc04445a91f4a3527cbddd130c33
|
||||
2026-07-24-adapter-owned-reasoning-effort-capabilities.zh.md: e0d28e1aca370068478e8fb1704defeaac3ab351
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Adapter-owned reasoning effort capabilities
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-24-adapter-owned-reasoning-effort-capabilities.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
Reasoning strength was adapter configuration only, so a conversation could not discover or change the selected model's supported levels between requests. Promoting one adapter's level union into `dsh-llm` would make every provider and model adopt names it may not support, while a provider-specific options bag would make the loop unable to validate or durably reconstruct the effective request.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh-llm` represents a reasoning effort as the opaque branded `ReasoningEffortId`. One adapter-owned `resolveModel(provider, model, signal?)` query returns `LlmResolvedModelInfo`: exact model identity plus optional context and reasoning metadata. `LlmService.resolveModelInfo()` validates and detaches that aggregate. When present, `reasoning.efforts` is a non-empty ordered list of ids with display metadata and may name one configured default. The core requires an explicit or configured effort to appear exactly in that list and never clamps or aliases a value.
|
||||
|
||||
`LlmCallConfig` and `GenerateOptions` carry the optional effort. The agent loop prepares the post-`agent/request` config under the active turn signal before writing `request/header`, so defaults and dynamic changes are model-visible only after becoming durable facts. The prepared call retains the exact adapter registration across asynchronous exact-model resolution, durable header logging, and dispatch; direct `LlmService.stream()` calls likewise capture their final registration before awaiting resolution. A route with no registered adapter retains its proposed config so an `llm/stream` middleware can own and short-circuit it; terminal dispatch still rejects an unhandled route. A resumed loop retains the logged effort only when its initial provider/model route is unchanged; a route change discards the previous model's opaque id.
|
||||
|
||||
The native DeepSeek adapter advertises `off`, `high`, and `max` when deployment policy permits thinking, and defaults to the configured effort or `high`. Its adapter-owned `off` maps to `thinking.type: disabled` with no `reasoning_effort`; `high` and `max` enable thinking and carry their official wire effort. A `thinking: disabled` deployment publishes only `off` and rejects attempts to enable thinking before provider I/O. The pi-ai adapter publishes each exact model's `getSupportedThinkingLevels()` result unchanged, including `off`, preserves an absent profile default as a provider default, and leaves provider wire-value mapping inside pi-ai. Its common stream options represent `off` by omitting `reasoning`, as required by pi-ai's own API.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**Define the pi-ai `ThinkingLevel` union in core.** Rejected because current pi-ai canonical names are an adapter implementation detail; a future provider can expose a different identifier without requiring a core release.
|
||||
|
||||
**Carry an untyped provider options object.** Rejected because the loop could neither validate a selected value nor put a stable provider-neutral fact in the request header.
|
||||
|
||||
**Clamp unsupported levels.** Rejected because a silent substitution makes the user's selected control differ from the logged request intent and hides stale deployment configuration.
|
||||
|
||||
**Normalize every adapter to a core-owned level list or remove `off`.** Rejected because the selectable vocabulary belongs to the exact model capability. A client can render an adapter's `off` option without requiring every adapter to expose it.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
Clients can query one exact route once and render its identity, context capacity, and adapter-owned reasoning choices without knowing a global enum or synthesizing `off`. Adapter configuration remains the deployment-default and policy owner, while `agent/request` can replace the effective effort on each step within that policy. Invalid exact identity, context, or reasoning metadata fails with `INVALID_MODEL_INFO`, `INVALID_MODEL_CONTEXT`, or `INVALID_MODEL_REASONING`; unsupported explicit or configured values fail with `UNSUPPORTED_REASONING_EFFORT` before provider I/O.
|
||||
|
||||
The aggregate exact-model query is asynchronous and may fail for adapters backed by authoritative catalogs. Its optional signal is the caller's cancellation boundary; an asynchronous adapter must settle promptly after abort so loop disposal can reach quiescence. Keyless service, adapter, loop, session, and request-header tests pin validation, defaulting, dynamic changes, logging, resume behavior, HMR registration ownership, and cancellation; runnable snapshots pin the resolved effort in real assembled request headers, while key-gated adapter tests exercise provider serialization.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note：适配器持有的推理强度能力
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-24-adapter-owned-reasoning-effort-capabilities.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
推理强度过去只能在适配器中配置，因此对话无法在多次请求之间发现或更改所选模型支持的等级。若将某个适配器的等级联合类型提升到 `dsh-llm`，所有提供方和模型都必须采用一套自身可能并不支持的名称；若改用提供方特有的 options 对象，主循环又无法校验最终生效的请求，也无法通过持久化记录准确重建该请求。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh-llm` 使用不透明的品牌类型 `ReasoningEffortId` 表示推理强度。由适配器持有的单次 `resolveModel(provider, model, signal?)` 查询返回 `LlmResolvedModelInfo`，其中包含确切模型身份以及可选的上下文和推理元数据。`LlmService.resolveModelInfo()` 会校验该聚合结果并返回分离值。`reasoning.efforts` 存在时，是包含展示元数据的非空有序 ID 列表，并可指定一个由配置确定的默认值。核心要求显式指定或配置指定的推理强度与列表中的某个 ID 完全一致，且绝不自动调整或为值提供别名。
|
||||
|
||||
`LlmCallConfig` 和 `GenerateOptions` 携带可选的推理强度。agent loop（智能体循环）在活跃轮次信号的控制下准备 `agent/request` 处理完成后的配置，再写入 `request/header`，因此默认值和动态变更只有成为持久化事实后才对模型可见。准备完成的调用在异步确切模型解析、请求头持久记录和分派全程保留同一项确切的适配器注册；直接调用 `LlmService.stream()` 时，也会在等待解析前捕获最终的适配器注册。没有已注册适配器的路由会保留原定配置，使 `llm/stream` 中间件可以接管并短路该请求；若仍未得到处理，最终分发会拒绝该路由。恢复后的主循环仅在初始提供方/模型路由未变时保留日志中记录的推理强度；如果路由发生变化，则丢弃上一模型的不透明 ID。
|
||||
|
||||
当部署策略允许思考时，原生 DeepSeek 适配器声明 `off`、`high` 和 `max`，默认使用配置指定的推理强度，若未配置则使用 `high`。由适配器持有的 `off` 映射为 `thinking.type: disabled`，且不带 `reasoning_effort`；`high` 和 `max` 会启用思考并携带各自的官方协议强度值。配置为 `thinking: disabled` 的部署仅声明 `off`，并会在提供方 I/O 前拒绝启用思考的尝试。pi-ai 适配器原样发布每个确切模型的 `getSupportedThinkingLevels()` 结果，其中包括 `off`；profile 未指定默认值时保留提供方默认行为，并将提供方协议值的映射留在 pi-ai 内部。按照 pi-ai 自身 API 的要求，其通用流选项通过省略 `reasoning` 来表示 `off`。
|
||||
|
||||
## 备选方案
|
||||
|
||||
**在核心中定义 pi-ai 的 `ThinkingLevel` 联合类型。** 不予采纳：pi-ai 当前的规范名称属于适配器实现细节；未来的提供方可以暴露不同的标识符，而无需为此发布新的核心版本。
|
||||
|
||||
**携带无类型约束的提供方 options 对象。** 不予采纳：主循环既无法校验选定值，也无法在请求头中写入稳定且与提供方无关的事实。
|
||||
|
||||
**自动调整不支持的等级。** 不予采纳：静默替换会导致用户选定的控制项与日志记录的请求意图不一致，还会掩盖陈旧的部署配置。
|
||||
|
||||
**将每个适配器规范化为核心持有的等级列表，或移除 `off`。** 不予采纳：可选值集合属于确切模型的能力。客户端可以渲染某个适配器的 `off` 选项，而无需要求所有适配器都暴露该选项。
|
||||
|
||||
## 影响
|
||||
|
||||
客户端只需查询一次确切路由，即可渲染其身份、上下文容量和由适配器持有的推理选项，而无需了解全局枚举或自行合成 `off`。适配器配置仍是部署默认值和策略的归属方，`agent/request` 则可以在该策略范围内为每个步骤替换实际生效的推理强度。确切身份、上下文或推理元数据无效时，分别抛出 `INVALID_MODEL_INFO`、`INVALID_MODEL_CONTEXT` 或 `INVALID_MODEL_REASONING`；显式指定或配置指定的值不受支持时，会在提供方 I/O 前抛出 `UNSUPPORTED_REASONING_EFFORT`。
|
||||
|
||||
确切模型元数据的聚合查询采用异步方式，并且对于由权威目录支持的适配器可能失败。可选信号构成调用方的取消边界；异步适配器必须在信号中止后迅速完成结算，使主循环的资源释放达到完全停稳。无密钥的服务、适配器、主循环、会话和请求头测试为校验、默认值解析、动态变更、日志记录、恢复行为、HMR（热模块替换）期间的注册所有权和取消提供回归保障；可运行快照锁定实际组装请求头中的已解析推理强度，仅在有密钥时运行的适配器测试则覆盖提供方序列化。
|
||||
@@ -1,53 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Parse `dsh` argv through one Commander adapter
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-24-dsh-commander-argument-adapter.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
The `dsh` CLI entry (`apps/cli`) parsed argv in three hand-rolled idioms that did not compose and gave no `--help`/`--version`. `bin.ts` dispatched by raw inspection — `argv[0] === 'web'`, then `argv.includes('-p') || argv.includes('--prompt')`, else TUI — which is positional-blind: a prompt flag or a config path in the wrong position could misroute the mode, and `argv.includes('-p')` could not tell a real flag from an incidental token. `headless.ts` and `web.ts` each ran their own `node:util` `parseArgs` with inline host/port validation, and `dsh-app-boot` carried `parseResumeArg`, a ~30-line bespoke scanner reimplementing flag/`=`-form/value/repeat handling for `--resume`. Usage was a single hardcoded `usage: dsh -p "task"` line; there was no version flag and no rendered help.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
Argv is parsed once, in `apps/cli/src/args.ts`, through a Commander adapter (the same parser the SDK bins — `create-sdk`, `dsh-scripts` — already standardize on). `parseDshArgs(argv, version)` returns a discriminated `DshInvocation` union of the three real modes: `{ mode: 'tui', config?, resume? }`, `{ mode: 'headless', prompt }`, or `{ mode: 'web', host?, port?, dev }`. It does **not** model help/version/errors as data: Commander owns those, printing usage or the diagnostic and exiting at the point of failure. `exitOverride()` turns each into a thrown `CommanderError` carrying the intended code (0 for help/version, 1 for a parse or domain error), which one `try/catch` in `parseDshArgs` turns into `process.exit`.
|
||||
|
||||
`bin.ts` calls the adapter once and switches on `mode` (closed union, `satisfies never` default), dynamic-importing only the chosen mode's module; only a valid, non-help invocation reaches the switch, so it has no help/version/error cases. Each mode module consumes already-parsed values: `runTui(config, resume)`, `runHeadless(task)`, `runWeb(host, port, dev, workspaceRoot)` — none re-reads argv. It is **one Commander program**: the default surface (no subcommand) carries option-only flags — `--config <path>`, `-p/--prompt <task>`, `--resume <id>` — and `web` is a real `program.command('web')` subcommand. The default surface takes no positional argument, which is what lets `web` be a real subcommand without a positional collision, so `dsh --help` lists `web` natively (no hand-pasted command text). The default action and the `web` action set the resolved mode, then bail via `command.error(...)` (print + exit 1) on the domain checks Commander cannot express: `--prompt` selects headless and rejects an empty task or a `--config`/`--resume` alongside it rather than silently dropping a TUI input; an empty `--resume=` id fails loud (agent-loop treats `''` as no-resume). Commander parses the default-surface options on either side of the `web` token into `program.opts()`; since `web` shares none of them, the `web` action rejects a leaked `--config`/`-p`/`--resume` (`dsh web -p x`, `dsh --config c.yml web`) rather than silently serving and dropping it. `dsh web`'s `--host`/`--port` are unvalidated pass-through overrides: the adapter assigns no default and does no validation, only `Number`-coercing the port string (the schema wants a number). The `dsh-host-webserver` schemastery `Config` (`host` a `127.0.0.1`/`0.0.0.0` literal union, `port` a natural ≤ 65535) is the single source of both the default (the shipped `apps/cli/cordis.yml` `webserver` row stands when a flag is absent) and validity — `AppCLIEntry` patches an explicit flag straight into that row, so a bad host/port fails loud at the schema on boot, not at parse. `--dev` mounts the client HMR driver and bundle watch, and `--workspace-root <path>` is a plain pass-through to `AppCLIEntry` (the parent directory for name-created workspaces). A repeated `--resume`, or a following flag captured as a `--resume`/`--prompt` value, is Commander's standard behavior (last-wins / next-token) and is left alone; a bad id fails loud downstream when the session cannot load. `--version` reads this app's `package.json`.
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh` takes no positional argument. `--config <path>` names an alternate cordis tree to boot instead of the shipped default; it exists only so the demo/test call sites (`demo:cordis`, `demo:code-mode`, the keyless PTY smokes) can point the shipped bin at an example tree. A bare `dsh` boots the shipped tree plus the `~/.dsh/config.yaml` personal overlay; a real user never passes `--config`.
|
||||
|
||||
CLI parsing lives entirely in `apps/cli`. `dsh-app-boot` holds the boot/env/config/personal-overlay helpers and no argv scanner.
|
||||
|
||||
## Session resume through the boot context
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh --resume <id>` is the one way to resume a persisted session, with no environment variable. `runTui` provides the parsed id on the boot context through `boot`'s `prepare(ctx)` hook — `ctx.provide(RESUME_SESSION_ID_KEY, id)` (a `dsh-app-boot` export, value `'resumeSessionId'`) — and the shipped tui-agent/cordis configs read it as a bare identifier: `resumeSessionId: !!js "typeof resumeSessionId === 'string' ? resumeSessionId : undefined"`. The expression is quoted because YAML otherwise parses the `?`/`:` as a mapping; the `typeof` guard tolerates a launcher that never provides the slot. The `/resume` in-place handoff (`process.execve`) rebuilds its re-exec argv from the parsed values as `dsh --resume=<id> [--config <path>]`.
|
||||
|
||||
## One terminal front door: `dsh`
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh` is the only terminal entry point; the `dsh-tui-demo` package ships the TUI app bundle plugin the shipped config mounts, and no bin of its own. `demo:cordis`, `demo:code-mode`, and both the tui-agent and cordis-agent keyless PTY smokes launch through `apps/cli/src/bin.ts` with `--config <path>`. `dsh`'s TTY guard (refuse piped stdio before booting, pointing at `dsh -p` for automation) is pinned by `apps/cli/tests/built-bin.e2e.ts`, which runs the built `lib/bin.js` under plain Node with piped stdio (`apps/cli/tests` is in the e2e vitest include). `cli-demo`, `acp-demo`, and `jsonrpc-demo` keep their own bins because each is a distinct surface (headless, ACP, JSON-RPC) `dsh` does not provide.
|
||||
|
||||
## Package topology
|
||||
|
||||
The argument surface stays inside `apps/cli`, the assembly tier, not a `packages/*` library: it is this one app's routing, not a reusable seam. `dsh-app-boot` shrinks to boot glue with no CLI-parsing responsibility. `commander@^15` is added to `apps/cli/package.json`, matching the SDK bins' pin.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep `node:util` `parseArgs` and only unify the dispatch** — rejected: `parseArgs` has no subcommand model, no rendered help, and no version flag, so `web` routing and `--help`/`--version` would stay hand-rolled. The repo already chose Commander for its other CLIs; a second parser idiom for `dsh` alone is the fragmentation this change removes.
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep `parseResumeArg` as a shared helper and feed it Commander's residual args** — rejected: the whole point is to retire the bespoke scanner. Commander parses `--resume` (space and `=` forms, missing-value, position-independence) natively; keeping a parallel hand-written path for the one flag would preserve the duplication the change exists to end.
|
||||
|
||||
**A bare `dsh <config>` positional for the alternate tree** — rejected: a root positional and a real `web` subcommand cannot coexist in one Commander program (the subcommand claims the first positional). A positional would force `web` into a reserved-first-token dispatch to a separate parser and a hand-maintained `web` line in `--help`. Only the demo/test sites ever need to name an alternate tree, so a `--config` flag serves them while leaving the default surface positional-free — `web` is then a normal subcommand in one program with native `--help`.
|
||||
|
||||
**Make the argument surface a `packages/*` seam** — rejected: nothing outside `dsh` consumes it, and capability seams are not split preemptively. The Commander adapter is `apps/cli`'s own concern.
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep `RESUME_SESSION_ID` as the resume bridge** — rejected: with `--resume` parsed into a value the bin already holds, threading it through an environment variable the config re-reads is indirection with no benefit, and it left the demo bin a second, env-only resume path. Providing the id on the boot context is the same channel `boot`'s `prepare` hook already uses for `tuiResumeHost`.
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep the `dsh-tui-demo` bin** — rejected: it duplicated `dsh --config <path>` exactly, and keeping it forced the demo-only `RESUME_SESSION_ID` fallback to stay alive. Its plugin is what the configs actually mount; only the front-door bin was redundant, and `dsh` is the one terminal entry point.
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing
|
||||
|
||||
`apps/cli/tests/args.spec.ts` (new; `apps/*/tests` added to the vitest include and `apps/cli/tests` to `tsconfig.host.json`) covers the adapter at the level that matters: mode routing by shape (including `web --dev` and the host/port pass-through), the exit-code behavior for the adapter's fail-loud checks (empty resume/prompt, `--prompt` mixed with a config/`--resume`, unknown option, stray positional), and `--help`/`--version`, captured through a `process.exit` spy. Host/port validity is the webserver schema's job, exercised on boot by the web smoke, not the adapter spec. Both PTY smoke groups in `examples/tui-agent/tests/tui-keyless-smoke.e2e.ts` now drive the real `apps/cli/src/bin.ts`: the `tui-agent` group boots an example tree through `--config`, and the `dsh CLI` group covers default boot, personal overlay, invalid config, the `--resume` config intake, the `process.execve` in-place resume handoff, and the source-path prompt. `examples/cordis-agent/tests/keyless-smoke.e2e.ts` likewise launches through `dsh`. `packages/ui/app-boot/tests/app-boot.spec.ts` drops its `parseResumeArg`/`replaceResumeArg` blocks; the TUI unit and snapshot fixtures use the `dsh --resume {session}` resume command.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh` has rendered `--help`/`--version` and consistent fail-loud parse errors, and mode routing does not depend on flag position. Argv parsing lives in one place with one parser idiom shared with the SDK bins, at the cost of a `commander` dependency on `apps/cli` and Commander's parse semantics (its error strings, its `exitOverride` contract) sitting on the CLI's front door. `dsh-app-boot` owns no CLI-parsing surface; a consumer needing `--resume`-style parsing composes Commander. Session resume rides the boot context rather than an environment variable, and `dsh` is the single terminal front door — the `dsh-tui-demo` package is a plugin bundle a config mounts.
|
||||
@@ -1,53 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: 通过单个 Commander 适配器解析 `dsh` 的 argv
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-24-dsh-commander-argument-adapter.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh` 的 CLI（命令行界面）入口（`apps/cli`）以三种手写方式解析 argv，这些方式无法组合，也不提供 `--help`/`--version`。`bin.ts` 通过原始检查进行分发：先判断 `argv[0] === 'web'`，再判断 `argv.includes('-p') || argv.includes('--prompt')`，否则走 TUI。这种方式对位置不敏感：位置错误的 prompt 标志或配置路径可能把模式路由错，而 `argv.includes('-p')` 无法区分真正的标志和偶然出现的 token。`headless.ts` 和 `web.ts` 各自运行自己的 `node:util` `parseArgs`，并内联校验 host/port，而 `dsh-app-boot` 携带 `parseResumeArg`——一个约 30 行的定制扫描器，为 `--resume` 重新实现了标志、`=` 形式、取值和重复的处理。用法说明只有一行硬编码的 `usage: dsh -p "task"`；既没有版本标志，也没有渲染出的帮助信息。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
argv 只在 `apps/cli/src/args.ts` 中解析一次，并使用 Commander 适配器（SDK bin `create-sdk`、`dsh-scripts` 已经统一采用的同一解析器）。`parseDshArgs(argv, version)` 返回仅包含三种实际模式的判别式 `DshInvocation` 联合类型：`{ mode: 'tui', config?, resume? }`、`{ mode: 'headless', prompt }` 或 `{ mode: 'web', host?, port?, dev }`。它**不会**将帮助、版本信息或错误建模为数据：这些情况由 Commander 处理，在触发处打印用法或诊断信息并退出。`exitOverride()` 会将每种情况转为抛出的 `CommanderError`，并携带预期退出码（帮助或版本为 0，解析错误或领域错误为 1）；唯一一处 `try/catch` 位于 `parseDshArgs` 中，捕获错误后调用 `process.exit`。
|
||||
|
||||
`bin.ts` 只调用适配器一次，并对 `mode` 做分支切换（封闭联合类型，默认分支为 `satisfies never`），仅动态导入所选模式对应的模块；只有合法的非帮助请求才会进入这段分支逻辑，因此其中没有帮助、版本或错误分支。每个模式模块只消费已解析好的值：`runTui(config, resume)`、`runHeadless(task)`、`runWeb(host, port, dev, workspaceRoot)`，都不会再次读取 argv。整个 CLI 由**单个 Commander 程序**实现：默认接口（不使用子命令时）只包含选项标志——`--config <path>`、`-p/--prompt <task>`、`--resume <id>`——而 `web` 是通过 `program.command('web')` 定义的真正子命令。默认接口不接受位置参数，因此 `web` 可以成为真正的子命令且不会发生位置参数冲突，`dsh --help` 也会原生列出 `web`，无需手工拼接命令文本。默认命令和 `web` 子命令的处理函数会设置解析得到的模式，随后对 Commander 无法表达的领域校验调用 `command.error(...)` 立即终止（打印信息并以退出码 1 退出）：`--prompt` 选择 headless 模式；如果任务为空，或调用中还包含 `--config` 或 `--resume`，它会拒绝调用，而不会静默丢弃 TUI 输入；空的 `--resume=` id 会显式失败（agent-loop 把 `''` 视为不恢复）。Commander 会将 `web` token 前后的默认接口选项都解析进 `program.opts()`；由于 `web` 不与默认接口共用任何选项，`web` 子命令的处理函数会拒绝误入的 `--config`/`-p`/`--resume`（`dsh web -p x`、`dsh --config c.yml web`），而不是静默启动服务并丢弃这些选项。`dsh web` 的 `--host`/`--port` 是未经校验、直接透传的覆盖值：适配器既不设置默认值，也不执行校验，只使用 `Number` 将端口字符串转换为数字（schema 要求该值为数字）。`dsh-host-webserver` 的 schemastery `Config`（`host` 是 `127.0.0.1`/`0.0.0.0` 字面量联合类型，`port` 是不大于 65535 的自然数）是默认值与有效性的唯一真源：未提供标志时，随产品提供的 `apps/cli/cordis.yml` 中 `webserver` 配置项保持原值；`AppCLIEntry` 将显式标志的值直接写入该配置项，因此无效的 host/port 会在启动时触发 schema 校验并显式失败，而不是在参数解析阶段失败。`--dev` 会挂载客户端 HMR（热模块替换）驱动，并启用构建产物监视，`--workspace-root <path>` 则是直接透传给 `AppCLIEntry` 的选项（按名称创建 workspace 时使用的父目录）。重复提供 `--resume`，或后续标志被捕获为 `--resume` 或 `--prompt` 的值，都是 Commander 的标准行为（最后一次取值生效／将下一 token 作为值），本适配器不作干预；无效 id 会在下游无法加载会话时显式失败。`--version` 读取本应用的 `package.json`。
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh` 不接受位置参数。`--config <path>` 指定一份替代 Cordis 配置树，系统启动该配置树而不是随产品提供的默认配置树；该标志仅用于让演示和测试调用点（`demo:cordis`、`demo:code-mode`、无密钥 PTY 冒烟测试）通过随产品提供的 bin 启动一份示例树。直接运行 `dsh` 会启动随产品提供的配置树，并叠加 `~/.dsh/config.yaml` 个人覆盖；实际用户从不传入 `--config`。
|
||||
|
||||
CLI 解析完全位于 `apps/cli` 中。`dsh-app-boot` 提供启动、环境变量、配置和个人覆盖辅助函数，不包含 argv 扫描器。
|
||||
|
||||
## 通过启动上下文恢复会话
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh --resume <id>` 是恢复持久化会话的唯一方式，无需环境变量。`runTui` 通过 `boot` 的 `prepare(ctx)` 钩子，在启动上下文中提供已解析的 id：`ctx.provide(RESUME_SESSION_ID_KEY, id)`（`dsh-app-boot` 的一项导出，值为 `'resumeSessionId'`）；随产品提供的 tui-agent/cordis 配置将该值作为裸标识符读取：`resumeSessionId: !!js "typeof resumeSessionId === 'string' ? resumeSessionId : undefined"`。这个表达式需要加引号，否则 YAML 会把 `?` 和 `:` 解析为映射；`typeof` 守卫使从未提供该槽位的启动器也能正常运行。`/resume` 原地交接（`process.execve`）根据已解析的值将重新执行时的 argv 构造成 `dsh --resume=<id> [--config <path>]`。
|
||||
|
||||
## 唯一的终端入口：`dsh`
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh` 是唯一的终端入口；`dsh-tui-demo` 包（package）提供 TUI 应用组合插件，随产品提供的配置会挂载该插件，而该包不提供自己的 bin。`demo:cordis`、`demo:code-mode` 以及 tui-agent 和 cordis-agent 的无密钥 PTY 冒烟测试都通过 `apps/cli/src/bin.ts` 启动，并传入 `--config <path>`。`dsh` 的 TTY 守卫会在启动前拒绝标准输入输出接入管道的调用，并提示自动化场景使用 `dsh -p`；`apps/cli/tests/built-bin.e2e.ts` 锁定了这一行为：该测试将标准输入输出接入管道，并通过普通 Node 运行构建后的 `lib/bin.js`（e2e Vitest 的 include 包含 `apps/cli/tests`）。`cli-demo`、`acp-demo` 和 `jsonrpc-demo` 保留各自的 bin，因为它们分别提供 `dsh` 所没有的独立接口（headless、ACP（Agent Client Protocol）、JSON-RPC）。
|
||||
|
||||
## 包拓扑
|
||||
|
||||
参数解析留在 `apps/cli`（组装层）内，而不是 `packages/*` 库中：它是这一个应用自身的路由，而非可复用的 seam。`dsh-app-boot` 收缩为纯粹的 boot 胶水代码，不再承担 CLI 解析职责。`commander@^15` 被加入 `apps/cli/package.json`，与 SDK bin 锁定的版本一致。
|
||||
|
||||
## 考虑过的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
**保留 `node:util` `parseArgs`，只统一分发。** 已否决：`parseArgs` 没有子命令模型、没有渲染出的帮助、也没有版本标志，因此 `web` 路由和 `--help`/`--version` 仍将保持手写。本仓库其他 CLI 已经选择了 Commander；单独为 `dsh` 引入第二套解析器方式，正是这次变更要消除的碎片化。
|
||||
|
||||
**保留 `parseResumeArg` 作为共享辅助函数，并向它喂入 Commander 的残余参数。** 已否决：整件事的核心就是要退役这个定制扫描器。Commander 原生解析 `--resume`（空格和 `=` 形式、缺值、位置无关性）；为这一个标志保留一条平行的手写路径，只会保留这次变更要终结的重复。
|
||||
|
||||
**使用裸 `dsh <config>` 位置参数指定替代配置树。** 已否决：根级位置参数与真正的 `web` 子命令无法在同一个 Commander 程序中共存（子命令会占用第一个位置参数）。位置参数会迫使系统把位于首位的 `web` 作为保留 token 分发给另一个解析器，并手工维护一行 `web` 文本，供 `--help` 显示。只有演示和测试调用点需要指定替代配置树，因此 `--config` 标志既能满足这些调用点，又能让默认接口不包含位置参数；这样，`web` 就能在单个程序中成为普通子命令，并由原生 `--help` 展示。
|
||||
|
||||
**把参数解析做成 `packages/*` 的 seam。** 已否决：`dsh` 之外没有任何消费方使用它，而能力 seam 不应被提前拆分。这个 Commander 适配器是 `apps/cli` 自身的事务。
|
||||
|
||||
**保留 `RESUME_SESSION_ID` 作为恢复通道**：不予采纳。`--resume` 已被解析成 bin 当前持有的值；若再通过环境变量传递并由配置重新读取，只会引入无益的间接层，还会使演示 bin 保留第二条仅依赖环境变量的恢复路径。在启动上下文中提供 id，与 `boot` 的 `prepare` 钩子为 `tuiResumeHost` 提供值所采用的是同一通道。
|
||||
|
||||
**保留 `dsh-tui-demo` bin**：不予采纳。它与 `dsh --config <path>` 的功能完全重复；保留它还会迫使演示专用的 `RESUME_SESSION_ID` 回退路径继续存在。配置实际挂载的是该包的插件；冗余的只有作为终端入口的 bin，而 `dsh` 是唯一的终端入口。
|
||||
|
||||
## 测试
|
||||
|
||||
`apps/cli/tests/args.spec.ts`（新增；`apps/*/tests` 加入 vitest include，`apps/cli/tests` 加入 `tsconfig.host.json`）覆盖适配器的关键行为：根据参数形态进行模式路由（包括 `web --dev` 和 host/port 透传），并通过 `process.exit` spy 捕获适配器的显式报错检查（恢复 id 或提示词为空、`--prompt` 与配置或 `--resume` 混用、未知选项、多余的位置参数）以及 `--help`/`--version` 的退出码。host/port 的有效性由 webserver schema 负责，并由 web 冒烟测试在启动时验证，不属于适配器测试的覆盖范围。`examples/tui-agent/tests/tui-keyless-smoke.e2e.ts` 中的两组 PTY 冒烟测试现在都驱动真实的 `apps/cli/src/bin.ts`：`tui-agent` 组通过 `--config` 启动示例树，`dsh CLI` 组覆盖默认启动、个人覆盖、无效配置、配置对 `--resume` 的接收、通过 `process.execve` 原地恢复交接，以及包含源码路径的系统提示词。`examples/cordis-agent/tests/keyless-smoke.e2e.ts` 同样通过 `dsh` 启动。`packages/ui/app-boot/tests/app-boot.spec.ts` 移除其 `parseResumeArg` 和 `replaceResumeArg` 测试块；TUI 单元测试和快照 fixture（测试前置数据）使用 `dsh --resume {session}` 恢复命令。
|
||||
|
||||
## 影响
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh` 会渲染 `--help`/`--version`，并以一致方式显式报告解析错误；模式路由不依赖标志位置。argv 解析集中在一处，并与 SDK bin 共用一套解析器方式，代价是 `apps/cli` 依赖 `commander`，且 Commander 的解析语义（错误字符串和 `exitOverride` 契约）成为 CLI 入口的一部分。`dsh-app-boot` 不提供任何 CLI 解析接口；需要 `--resume` 式解析的消费方通过组合 Commander 来实现。会话恢复通过启动上下文完成，而不使用环境变量；`dsh` 是唯一的终端入口；`dsh-tui-demo` 包是由配置挂载的插件组合包。
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.md: 063494b56461593015d6de4c2b55a2d1d6a3c676
|
||||
2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.zh.md: cd5d29dfbcd9356a9ea15852d5d27a3660084abf
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Web client Agent-scope parity model and the provisioning channel (agents/scope / blank reuse / provide)
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
> Scope: the client Agent scope (actx) and targeted events, the client/host materialization parity model, the blank-session bit and reuse (`connectWorkspace`), the per-session provisioning channel (`sessions.provide`), the read-only queue mirror (`session/queued`), and the host wire smalls that carry these capabilities (the summary `blank` column, the `host/session-added` frame field, and the `host/commands-changed` frame). The input state machine and the slash pipeline live in the [input machine note](2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.md); the command business surfaces live in the [command surfaces note](2026-07-25-web-command-surfaces-and-assembly.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
The web client had a single global session surface: slots all rendered from the root context, so plugins had no notion of "which agent/session is current"; the draft's true copy was buried inside the Session object, leaving any plugin that wanted to participate in input with nowhere to hook in. To support a command/input system, the platform layer first had to answer:
|
||||
|
||||
- Who owns session interaction state (menus, popups, drafts, in-flight requests), and how two sessions are structurally isolated;
|
||||
- What a "new session" is before the host entity exists — whether the client must forge an independent life for it;
|
||||
- How session-scope components fetch their own session data, instead of props passed down layer by layer;
|
||||
- What a user-abandoned new session leaves behind on the host side, and who collects it.
|
||||
|
||||
Hard constraints: the host is the single source of truth; every registration goes through a `ctx.effect` disposer; the scope mechanism matches the host's Agent scope architecture; model-visible ⟺ already in the session log.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
### The parity model: client and host share one root state axis
|
||||
|
||||
Host-side `session.create(workspaceId)` produces Session + Agent + cwd in one piece (an atomic bundle, never split); the client side is the mirror of that birth — the instant a session row enters the list mirror, the client mints its Agent scope (actx + provide + the full input surface mounted):
|
||||
|
||||
- Session identity is the host's true form from birth: the sessionId arrives via the `session.create` response / the `host/session-added` frame, and every client-side address (the scope tag, slot store keys, RPC addressing) uses that same id.
|
||||
- The materialization moment = the instant the user picks a Workspace (cwd settled): the client calls `session.create({workspaceId})` on the spot and receives the complete entity.
|
||||
- "New Session with no workspace picked" is a **pure view state** (a navigation position) corresponding to no session/scope entity; until the pick, the composer is locked whole (no slash, no plain text).
|
||||
- A "blank session" is just an ordinary materialized session whose log is still empty; to every Agent-scope plugin on the host (goal/plan/skill/…) it is indistinguishable from any session, so slash/plan are all naturally live.
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent scope: the actx is the sole session carrier in the client-side cordis world
|
||||
|
||||
The runtime's `agents/scope.ts` matches the host's `dsh-scope` at the mechanism layer (fiber + tag + filter; no value import: the host package carries the scoped-events `Events` merge, which would collide with the Context merge inside the client program):
|
||||
|
||||
- `createScope(ctx, key)`: a no-op plugin fiber plus `extend({[kScope]: key, [Context.filter]: …})` — the filter lives directly on the actx: untagged listeners receive globally, tagged ones receive only their own scope.
|
||||
- Dispatch is the cordis primitives with thisArg = the actx itself: `actx.bail(actx, event, req)` / `actx.emit(actx, event, payload)`.
|
||||
- `Session.bindScope(actx)`: paired exactly once when resolve mints the scope (rebinding throws; dropScope unbinds), mirroring the host's `Agent.loopCtx` — the Session uses it to dispatch its own scoped events. The reverse actx→Session direction is one hop through `sessions.sessionOf(actx)` (mirroring host plugins' `agent.session` usage).
|
||||
|
||||
Three deliberate divergences from the host dsh-scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- The filter lives on the actx itself rather than a separate carrier: the host wrapper layer guards the business Agent subject against drifting from the scope key (host events inject the Agent itself as the first argument), while client event payloads carry only an id — there is no subject to protect.
|
||||
- Keys compare by branded `SessionId` value rather than object identity: on the host, agent.id === session id (1:1 on the same axis), agent identity directly reuses the `SessionId` brand, and a client scope's identity is its wire id.
|
||||
- The client scope is an **Agent identity** scope, not a live-object scope: during a cold session the host Agent object is already disposed while the client actx stays alive (in view) — the identity axis is in strict parity while object hot/cold is deliberately unsynchronized.
|
||||
|
||||
id→ctx handoff is allowed in only three kinds of places (business providers never hand off):
|
||||
|
||||
- Slot inject factories: the ctx never enters the render layer; the identity the slot framework hands a component is the sessionId, exchanged back into objects/controllers through service maps.
|
||||
- Root coordination services self-addressing: from a projection's sessionId back to the actx via `sessions.scope(id)`.
|
||||
- Root untagged listeners: looking up their own store by the payload's sessionId.
|
||||
|
||||
### Scope lifecycle: anchored to the list mirror — birth is entering view, death is prune
|
||||
|
||||
Session instances share the scope's lifecycle; liveness eligibility = host-listed (one criterion, shared by mint and prune):
|
||||
|
||||
- Birth = a session row entering client view (the list baseline pull / the local `create()` echo / the `host/session-added` frame); a lazy first resolve mints the scope (resolution is a pure function, render-safe).
|
||||
- One prune tears down three things together: the Session instance, the scope fiber (cascading through every consumer hung on the actx), and the session-keyed slot store. The staged session (= `list.current`) is the exception: removed while still on stage, it keeps a frozen read-only view, torn down only once the stage moves away.
|
||||
- Reopening = lazily rebuilding the instance + `open()` pulling history (the host session log is the durable truth).
|
||||
- Remaining TODO: approval/question frames never enter history and cannot be recovered across a prune (the manager-level pendingBuffers cover only the never-instantiated window).
|
||||
|
||||
### The blank bit: the empty session's visible projection, conversion, and reuse
|
||||
|
||||
A session "materialized but with no first prompt" is governed by the summary-derived bit `blank` (a derived column, not a header field; SessionHeader stays immutable):
|
||||
|
||||
- The host criterion: `session.events.length === 0` (zero log events = no user message yet). A live session reads `summarize()` straight from memory; a cold session is always `false` — the lazy-create contract guarantees a never-appended session never enters `persistence.list()` at all (both the JSONL and SQLite backends are verified truly lazy), so blank never touches disk.
|
||||
- The wire carries it in two places: the required `SessionSummary.blank` column, and the required `blank` field on the `host/session-added` frame (always true at creation, letting other tabs enter the same blank-session state into their mirrors).
|
||||
- The client mirror only lowers, never raises (monotonic), flipped from three sources, all reusing existing wire signals:
|
||||
- The sender's own tab: the **successful response** to the first `prompt()` flips false (acceptance proves the user/message is already in the host log — this flip is confirmation, not optimism; `onEngaged` synchronously updates the list mirror, converting the current `New Session` row in place to an ordinary title, adding no list row). A rejected first prompt keeps the session blank: aligned with host authority, still shown as `New Session`, keeping its connectWorkspace reuse eligibility.
|
||||
- Other tabs: the `host/session-status (running:true)` frame flips it — a blank session never runs, so the first running necessarily means no longer blank;
|
||||
- Reconnect alignment: `session.list`'s summary.blank is authoritative, so a tab that missed frames aligns naturally on its next pull; a stale blank:true can never mark a converted session back to blank.
|
||||
- List discipline: the store retains every row; the Workspace browser's grouping, flat view, search, and counts share one visible projection — every non-blank session shows, while blank sessions show only the one with `session.id === sessions.current`, its title forced to `New Session`. After a Workspace switch, the old blank entity stays in the mirror but is hidden from the list while the target Workspace's current blank shows; the user-visible surface therefore holds at most one blank row globally.
|
||||
- The residue ledger takes zero GC: after a refresh, blank sessions come back with the bit intact and are reused on the next same-workspace connect, so the ordinary single-tab path keeps at most one per workspace; after a host restart, blanks leave no disk trace and simply evaporate; the extra empty shells from multi-tab races only become non-current hidden rows, digested by later reuse, with no coordination.
|
||||
|
||||
### connectWorkspace: the sole entry point of New Session
|
||||
|
||||
`workspaces.connectWorkspace(workspaceId): Promise<SessionId>` (owned by WorkspacesService — it holds both the workspace canonical path and the sessions reference):
|
||||
|
||||
- The reuse arm: the list mirror is searched for `blank && cwd == workspace.path` (direct equality on the host realpath canonical form); a hit returns that id directly, creating nothing.
|
||||
- The create arm: on a miss, `session.create({workspaceId})` returns the new id.
|
||||
- An unknown workspaceId fails loud (never silently creating somewhere else).
|
||||
- The resolution guarantee (one contract for both arms): when the promise resolves, the returned id is already in the list store and `sessions.binding(id)` resolves synchronously — `SessionsService.create` projects the list synchronously after RPC success before resolving, so a draft mover can write text into the new scope's machine before open, without waiting for a notifier flush.
|
||||
- The caller takes the id and does its own `sessions.open`; sending the first prompt is an ordinary `session.prompt` — the session already exists, a failure is an ordinary prompt failure, the draft text is still in the machine, and a retry is simply sending again.
|
||||
- The global New Session button defaults to `recentWorkspaceId`: first comparing each Workspace's newest Session `updatedAt`, falling back to the Workspace `createdAt` when it has no Sessions, and keeping host order on ties; only with no Workspace at all does it `sessions.clear()` into the no-session view. Create actions inside a Workspace group still hit that Workspace explicitly.
|
||||
- At startup the runtime subscribes to the first complete baseline: a successfully restored current session is kept in place; otherwise it automatically calls `connectWorkspace(recentWorkspaceId)` and opens the returned blank session. The policy settles only once; a later user-initiated clear is never overridden by auto-selection again, and a connect failure waits for the next baseline projection to retry.
|
||||
- Re-picking the Workspace in the blank Hero also goes through `connectWorkspace`; when the target id differs from the current one, the current input machine's non-empty draft moves to the target scope first, then `sessions.open(nextId)`. The old blank entity is not deleted — it merely leaves the list by no longer being current.
|
||||
|
||||
### Per-session provisioning: the `sessions.provide` standard-kit channel
|
||||
|
||||
The sole provisioning path by which session slot components fetch their own session data. Plugins declare a fixed key map through the static descriptor `sessions.provide({hooks, props, resolve})` (a duplicate key throws at registration); `resolve(binding)` materializes values for a specific session and tears them down with the scope. Web-react's `standardKit` single loop binds the hooks compartment into `use<Name>` selector hooks (`observableHook`→uSES, anti-tearing) and passes the props compartment through as-is.
|
||||
|
||||
Slot scope is the closed set `root | session-maybe | session`:
|
||||
|
||||
- `root` receives only the global standard kit, with no session identity or provisioning.
|
||||
- `session-maybe` follows the current session, but the component instance does not change key when the id appears, disappears, or changes; with no session, `sessionId`, the results of `useSession`/`useInput`, and `inputActions` may all be absent. The unkeyed root `SessionMaybeProvider` drives these updates, while `SessionMaybeProvideInfo` uses the static key map to retain the complete hook/prop shape even with no session.
|
||||
- `session` guarantees that `sessionId`, every hook source, and every prop exist; each strict entry's error boundary is keyed by `sessionId`, so switching sessions recreates that entry and its session store.
|
||||
|
||||
`conversation` is the resident `session-maybe` shell: `ConversationRoot`, HeroShell, the Workspace picker, the composer stack, and the overlay chain's fallback frame retain their React instances across the no-session → blank-session switch; `conversation.session` carries only the strict-session header/view, while the composer and every input slot also stay strict `session`. With no session, the composer stack places the presentation-only `DisabledInputBar` directly; once a session appears, the input body is swapped for the strictly bound InputBar; the textarea may be rebuilt, while the Hero and the layout skeleton are not. The blank → engaging/active transition stays inside the same strict-session subtree, and the InputBar is never rebuilt on a phase flip.
|
||||
|
||||
- The runtime's first built-in entry: the `'session'` hook — `useSession` itself rides the same mechanism, no special-casing.
|
||||
- Concurrent discipline: the render plane reads only from the hooks compartment (uSES consistency guarantee); props-compartment callbacks are used only in event-handler space; descriptor resolution is render-safe (idempotent caching, with prune reaping residue from abandoned renders).
|
||||
- Third-party components take zero value dependencies; types are a one-line type-only import (declaration merging into `SessionStandardProps` / `SessionMaybeStandardProps`).
|
||||
|
||||
### The read-only queue mirror
|
||||
|
||||
- The MuxFrame `session/queued`: the Session holds a read-only inbox mirror (previews truncated; steering retired by source match); queue frames never enter history — pure stream state, cleared on reconnect and refilled from the new baseline; the never-instantiated window is buffered and replayed through the manager pendingBuffers.
|
||||
- Queue semantics: running does not lock input; ordinary messages queue through `session.prompt {mode:'queue'}`, and commands never queue.
|
||||
|
||||
### Host wire smalls
|
||||
|
||||
- The summary `blank` column and the `host/session-added` frame's `blank` field (see the blank bit above).
|
||||
- The SSE frame `host/commands-changed` (a pure invalidation signal); the client routes it into the typed events `commands/changed` and `connection/reset` (broadcast after each connection generation is established; wire-derived caches uniformly treat prior state as stale).
|
||||
- `command.list/execute` and `skill.list` are uniformly single-addressed by `sessionId` (a session always has an Agent; `agentFor`'s resume semantics come ready-made); the command-surface narrative lives in the [command surfaces note](2026-07-25-web-command-surfaces-and-assembly.md).
|
||||
- The `session.create` request shape: workspaceId/cwd as either-or, plus an optional caller-preallocated sessionId (a same-id same-cwd retry is idempotent; a different cwd reports `session-conflict`).
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
| Rejected | One-line reason |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| A client-local Intent + materialize (published CAS / the pendingPrompt attach transaction / the before-create chain) | The client is forced to simulate the first half-life the host lacks, breeding a pile of state machinery — published CAS, the attach transaction, partial publication |
|
||||
| Host-reserved IDs (a draft Map) | The host merely acknowledges a number; the state machine stays on the client untouched |
|
||||
| A host draft Session (a Session without an Agent) | Every host surface that looks up the Agent must fork for drafts; core would need an attachAgent seam plus late-written header cwd |
|
||||
| Binding an Agent before cwd (ungrouped) | Overturns the readonly header.cwd "created in" invariant, plus the launch-dir side-effect product trap |
|
||||
| Passing session context down through React Context | Plugins should hold one mental model across host and client; the scope mechanism is isomorphic to the host dsh-scope |
|
||||
| A `scopeTarget` carrier + fused dispatcher (mirroring the host `agentEvents`) | The host wrapper layer guards the business Agent subject against drifting from the scope key; client events have no subject to guard — the filter on the actx plus cordis primitives covers every need |
|
||||
| Sessions not holding a ctx (a cordis-free object layer) | A red line born only so the filtering unit tests avoid importing cordis, at the cost of two-hop contribute callbacks plus mutable public fields; the host Agent already holds loopCtx |
|
||||
| Resident Session instances (resident-instance) | The host session log is the durable truth; residency is mere identity convenience, and its misalignment with the scope lifecycle is a source of complexity |
|
||||
| Components receiving wiring-callback bundles (two-layer inject→props pass-down) | The standard-kit channel lets components fetch their own; the public surface converges to hooks + stable props |
|
||||
| Swapping the no-session Hero view for the entire session Conversation | Even with the outer layout unchanged, the Hero, picker, and composer subtrees would remount together, making the whole UI region jump |
|
||||
| Making InputBar itself `session-maybe` | The input state machine, keyboard command surface, and actions would all have to accept absent values; replacing only the disabled input body keeps optionality at the shell boundary |
|
||||
| A dedicated conversion frame | `session-status(running:true)` semantically implies conversion (a blank session never runs); adding a frame buys zero information for one more wire type |
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
- Plugins gain session context isomorphic to the host's: per-session state hangs on the actx and mounts/tears down in one piece with the scope fiber, making leaks structurally impossible; two-session isolation is structurally guaranteed by the scope filter.
|
||||
- The client object layer converges to a wire mirror: session identity, lifecycle, and capability adjudication all defer to the host entity — the input system (the next layer) always faces a session with a real Agent, and providers like slash/skill uniformly address by sessionId directly.
|
||||
- Blank-session governance takes zero dedicated mechanisms: state rides one derived bit, visibility rides the unified list projection (only the current blank shows, as `New Session`), reclamation rides lazy persistence's existing contract (evaporation on restart), and the ordinary ceiling rides same-Workspace reuse.
|
||||
- The cost: the id→ctx handoff discipline and provide's Concurrent discipline are conventions rather than type-enforced, pinned by review and tests; fully disabled input while no workspace is picked is an experience cost the product surface accepts (the price of the single state axis).
|
||||
- Known gaps: approval/question recovery across prune (TODO); model selection returns in live-mutation shape (the host `selectModel` trio is ready-made, awaiting its own branch).
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Web client Agent-scope 对等模型与供数通道（agents/scope / blank 复用 / provide）
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
> 范围：client Agent scope（actx）与定向事件、client/host 实体化对等模型、空会话 blank 位与复用（`connectWorkspace`）、per-session 供数通道（`sessions.provide`）、队列只读镜像（`session/queued`），以及承载这些能力的 host wire 小件（summary `blank` 列、`host/session-added` 帧字段、`host/commands-changed` 帧）。输入状态机与 slash 管线见[输入状态机 note](2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.md)；命令业务面见[命令业务面 note](2026-07-25-web-command-surfaces-and-assembly.md)。
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
web client 只有一张全局会话面：slot 全部从根 context 渲染，插件拿不到「当前是哪个 agent/session」的语境；draft 真身埋在 Session 对象里，任何要参与输入的插件都无处下手。要支撑命令/输入体系，平台层必须先回答：
|
||||
|
||||
- 会话交互态（菜单、popup、草稿、在途请求）归谁持有，双会话如何结构性隔离；
|
||||
- 「新会话」在 host 实体存在之前是什么——client 要不要为它造一段独立生命；
|
||||
- session-scope 组件如何「自己拿会话数据」，而不是层层下传 props；
|
||||
- 用户放弃的新会话在 host 侧留下什么，谁来收。
|
||||
|
||||
硬约束：host 是唯一真源；一切注册走 `ctx.effect` disposer；scope 机制与 host 的 Agent scope 架构一致；模型可见 ⟺ 已入 session log。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
### 对等模型：client 与 host 同一根状态轴
|
||||
|
||||
host 侧 `session.create(workspaceId)` 一体产出 Session + Agent + cwd（原子大礼包，不拆）；client 侧就是这次出生的镜像——会话行进入 list mirror 的瞬间，client 为它铸 Agent scope（actx + provide + 输入面全套挂上）：
|
||||
|
||||
- 会话身份自出生即为 host 真身：sessionId 由 `session.create` 响应 / `host/session-added` 帧带来，client 侧一切寻址（scope tag、slot store 键、RPC 地址）用的都是同一个 id。
|
||||
- 实体化时点 = 用户选定 Workspace（cwd 确定）的瞬间：client 当场调 `session.create({workspaceId})`，拿到完整实体。
|
||||
- 「New Session 且未选 workspace」是**纯视图态**（一个导航位置），不对应任何 session/scope 实体；选定之前 composer 整体锁死（无 slash、无纯文本）。
|
||||
- 「空会话」就是一个日志还空着的普通实体化会话；对 host 上所有 Agent-scope 插件（goal/plan/skill/…）它与任何会话无异，slash/plan 天然全活。
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent scope：actx 是 client 侧 cordis 世界的唯一会话载体
|
||||
|
||||
runtime `agents/scope.ts` 与 host `dsh-scope` 机制层一致（fiber + tag + filter 过滤；不 value-import：host 包携带 scoped-events 的 `Events` merge，进 client program 撞 Context merge）：
|
||||
|
||||
- `createScope(ctx, key)`：no-op plugin fiber + `extend({[kScope]: key, [Context.filter]: …})`——filter 直接住 actx：untagged listener 全局可收，tagged 只收本 scope。
|
||||
- 派发就是 cordis 原语，thisArg = actx 本身：`actx.bail(actx, event, req)` / `actx.emit(actx, event, payload)`。
|
||||
- `Session.bindScope(actx)`：resolve 铸 scope 时单次配对（重复绑 throw；dropScope unbind），镜像 host `Agent.loopCtx`——Session 用它自行派发 scoped 事件。actx→Session 反向走 `sessions.sessionOf(actx)` 一跳（镜像 host 插件 `agent.session` 用法）。
|
||||
|
||||
与 host dsh-scope 的有意分歧三条：
|
||||
|
||||
- filter 住 actx 自身而非独立 carrier：host 包装层护的是「业务 Agent subject 与 scope key 不漂移」（host 事件首参注入 Agent 本体），client 事件 payload 只带 id、无 subject 可护。
|
||||
- key 用品牌 `SessionId` 值比较而非对象身份：host 里 agent.id === session id（1:1 同轴），agent 身份直接复用 `SessionId` 品牌，client scope 的身份即 wire id。
|
||||
- client 是 **Agent 身份** scope 而非活对象 scope：cold 会话期 host Agent 对象已 dispose 而 client actx 存活（视野内）——身份轴严格对等、对象冷热有意不同步。
|
||||
|
||||
id→ctx 换乘只许三类位置（业务 provider 永不换乘）：
|
||||
|
||||
- slot inject 工厂：ctx 不进渲染层，slot 框架交给组件的身份就是 sessionId，经服务 map 换回对象/controller。
|
||||
- root 协调服务自寻址：从投影的 sessionId 经 `sessions.scope(id)` 找回 actx。
|
||||
- root untagged listener：按 payload 的 sessionId 查自有 store。
|
||||
|
||||
### scope 生命周期：挂靠 list mirror，出生即视野、死亡即 prune
|
||||
|
||||
Session 实例与 scope 同生命周期，存活资格 = host listed（一个判据，mint 与 prune 共用）：
|
||||
|
||||
- 出生 = 会话行进入 client 视野（list 基线拉取 / `create()` 本地回声 / `host/session-added` 帧），lazy 首次 resolve 铸 scope（resolution 纯函数、渲染安全）。
|
||||
- prune 一次同拆三样：Session 实例、scope fiber（级联挂在 actx 上的一切消费者）、session-keyed slot store。staged session（= `list.current`）例外：被移除仍在台上时保留冻结只读视图，stage 移走才拆。
|
||||
- 重开 = lazy 重建实例 + `open()` 拉 history（host session log 是持久真相）。
|
||||
- 遗留 TODO：approval/question 帧不进 history，跨 prune 不可恢复（manager 级 pendingBuffers 只覆盖「从未实例化」窗口）。
|
||||
|
||||
### blank 位：空会话的可见投影、转正与复用
|
||||
|
||||
「实体化但无首讯」的会话经 summary 派生位 `blank` 治理（派生列而非 header 字段，SessionHeader 保持不可变）：
|
||||
|
||||
- host 判据：`session.events.length === 0`（零日志事件 = 尚无用户消息）。live 会话 `summarize()` 内存直读；cold 会话恒 `false`——lazy-create 契约保证 never-appended 会话根本不进 `persistence.list()`（JSONL/SQLite 两后端均已实证真 lazy），blank 从不落盘。
|
||||
- wire 承载两处：`SessionSummary.blank` 必填列；`host/session-added` 帧必填 `blank` 字段（创建时恒 true，供别的 tab 按同一空会话状态入镜像）。
|
||||
- client 镜像只降不升（单调），三来源翻转，全部复用既有 wire 信号：
|
||||
- 发送方本地：首次 `prompt()` 的**成功响应**翻 false（受理即证明 user/message 已入 host 日志——此点翻转是确证而非乐观；`onEngaged` 同步更新列表镜像，当前 `New Session` 行原地转为普通标题，不新增列表行）。首讯被拒则会话保持 blank：与 host 权威对齐、继续显示为 `New Session`、保持 connectWorkspace 复用资格。
|
||||
- 其他端：`host/session-status (running:true)` 帧翻转——blank 会话从不 running，首次 running 必然已非 blank；
|
||||
- 重连对齐：`session.list` 的 summary.blank 是权威，错过帧的端下次拉取自然对齐；陈旧的 blank:true 不能把已转正的会话重新标回 blank。
|
||||
- 列表纪律：store 保留全部行；Workspace browser 的分组、平铺、搜索和计数共用同一可见投影——所有非 blank 会话都显示，blank 会话只显示 `session.id === sessions.current` 的一条，并强制标题为 `New Session`。切换 Workspace 后，旧 blank 实体仍在镜像中但从列表隐藏，目标 Workspace 的 current blank 显示；因此用户可见面全局至多一条 blank 行。
|
||||
- 残留账零 GC：刷新后 blank 会话带位回来，下次同 workspace 复用，普通单端路径使每个 workspace 至多保留一个；host 重启后 blank 无盘痕自然蒸发；多 tab 竞态多出的空壳只会成为非 current 隐藏行，后续复用消化，不做协调。
|
||||
|
||||
### connectWorkspace：New Session 的唯一入口
|
||||
|
||||
`workspaces.connectWorkspace(workspaceId): Promise<SessionId>`（归属 WorkspacesService——它同时持有 workspace 规范 path 与 sessions 引用）：
|
||||
|
||||
- 复用臂：list mirror 中找 `blank && cwd == workspace.path`（host realpath 规范 canon 直等比较），命中直接返回该 id，不新建。
|
||||
- 新建臂：未命中则 `session.create({workspaceId})`，返回新 id。
|
||||
- 未知 workspaceId fail loud（不静默创建到别处）。
|
||||
- 解析保证（两臂同契约）：promise resolve 时返回的 id 已在 list store 且 `sessions.binding(id)` 同步可解析——`SessionsService.create` 在 RPC 成功后同步投影列表再 resolve，使 draft 搬运方可以在 open 之前往新 scope 的 machine 写文本，不等 notifier flush。
|
||||
- 调用方拿 id 自行 `sessions.open`；首讯发送就是普通 `session.prompt`——会话本来就在，失败即普通 prompt 失败，draft 文本还在 machine 里，重试即再次发送。
|
||||
- 全局 New Session 按钮默认取 `recentWorkspaceId`：先比较各 Workspace 内 Session 的最新 `updatedAt`，无 Session 时回退 Workspace `createdAt`，同值保持 Host 顺序；只有完全没有 Workspace 时才 `sessions.clear()` 进入无 session 视图。Workspace 分组内的创建动作仍显式命中该 Workspace。
|
||||
- runtime 启动时订阅首次完整基线：若已有恢复成功的 current session 则保持不动，否则自动 `connectWorkspace(recentWorkspaceId)` 并 open 返回的 blank session。该策略只结算一次；之后用户主动 clear 不会再次被自动选择覆盖，连接失败则等下一次基线投影重试。
|
||||
- blank Hero 中改选 Workspace 也走 `connectWorkspace`；若目标 id 与当前 id 不同，先把当前 input machine 的非空 draft 搬到目标 scope，再 `sessions.open(nextId)`。旧 blank 实体不删除，只因不再 current 而从列表隐藏。
|
||||
|
||||
### per-session 供数：`sessions.provide` 标准件通道
|
||||
|
||||
session slot 组件「自己拿 session 数据」的唯一供数路径。插件以静态描述符 `sessions.provide({hooks, props, resolve})` 声明固定键表（重名 key 注册时 throw），`resolve(binding)` 在确定 session 下物化值并随 scope 拆；web-react `standardKit` 统一循环把 hooks 格绑成 `use<Name>` 选择器 hook（`observableHook`→uSES，防 tearing）、props 格原样透传。
|
||||
|
||||
slot scope 是闭集 `root | session-maybe | session`：
|
||||
|
||||
- `root` 只拿全局标准件，不接收 session 身份或供数。
|
||||
- `session-maybe` 跟随 current session，但组件实例不因 id 有无或切换而换 key；无 session 时 `sessionId`、`useSession`/`useInput` 的选择结果及 `inputActions` 均可缺省。根部无 key 的 `SessionMaybeProvider` 驱动这条更新，`SessionMaybeProvideInfo` 靠静态键表在无 session 时仍保留完整 hook/prop 形状。
|
||||
- `session` 保证 `sessionId`、所有 hook source 与 props 均存在；每个严格 entry 的错误边界以 `sessionId` 为 key，切换 session 会重建该 entry 及其 session store。
|
||||
|
||||
`conversation` 是 `session-maybe` 的常驻外壳：`ConversationRoot`、HeroShell、Workspace picker、composer stack 与 overlay chain 的 fallback 外框在无 session → blank session 的切换中保持 React 实例；`conversation.session` 只承载严格 session 的 header/view，composer 与各输入 slot 也保持严格 `session`。无 session 时 composer stack 直接放纯展示的 `DisabledInputBar`，session 出现后把输入体换成严格绑定的 InputBar；textarea 允许重建，Hero 与布局骨架不重建。blank → engaging/active 仍在同一严格 session subtree 内，InputBar 不因 phase 翻转而重建。
|
||||
|
||||
- runtime 内建第一条：`'session'` hook——`useSession` 本身走同一机制，无特判。
|
||||
- Concurrent 纪律：渲染平面只从 hooks 格读（uSES 一致性保证）；props 格回调只在事件 handler 空间用；描述符解析 render-safe（幂等缓存、废弃渲染残留由 prune 收尸）。
|
||||
- 第三方组件值零依赖，类型一行 type-only import（declaration merging 进 `SessionStandardProps` / `SessionMaybeStandardProps`）。
|
||||
|
||||
### 队列只读镜像
|
||||
|
||||
- MuxFrame `session/queued`：Session 持只读 inbox 镜像（预览截断、steering 按 source 匹配退休）；queue 帧不进 history，纯 stream 态——重连清空、新基线重灌；未实例化窗口经 manager pendingBuffers 缓冲重放。
|
||||
- 队列语义：running 不锁输入；普通消息经 `session.prompt {mode:'queue'}` 排队，命令永不排队。
|
||||
|
||||
### host wire 小件
|
||||
|
||||
- summary `blank` 列与 `host/session-added` 帧 `blank` 字段（见上文 blank 位）。
|
||||
- SSE 帧 `host/commands-changed`（纯失效信号）；client 路由为类型事件 `commands/changed` 与 `connection/reset`（连接代建立后广播，wire 派生缓存一律视旧态为 stale）。
|
||||
- `command.list/execute`、`skill.list` 一律 `sessionId` 单址（会话恒有 Agent，`agentFor` 的 resume 语义现成）；命令面叙述见[命令业务面 note](2026-07-25-web-command-surfaces-and-assembly.md)。
|
||||
- `session.create` 请求形状：workspaceId/cwd 二选一 + 可选调用方预分配 sessionId（同 id 同 cwd 重试幂等，异 cwd 报 `session-conflict`）。
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
| 弃案 | 一行理由 |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| client-local Intent + materialize（published CAS / pendingPrompt attach 事务 / before-create 链） | client 被迫模拟 host 缺失的前半段生命，养出 published CAS、attach 事务、部分发布一坨状态机 |
|
||||
| host 预留 ID（draft Map） | host 只认了个号，状态机原封留在 client |
|
||||
| host draft Session（有 Session 无 Agent） | 每个查 Agent 的 host 面都要为 draft 分叉；core 要开 attachAgent 缝 + header cwd 后写 |
|
||||
| 无 cwd 先绑 Agent（ungrouped） | header.cwd readonly "created in" 不变性被推翻 + launch-dir 副作用产品坑 |
|
||||
| React Context 层层传会话语境 | 插件在 host/client 两侧应是一个心智模型；scope 机制与 host dsh-scope 同构 |
|
||||
| `scopeTarget` carrier + 融合派发器（镜像 host `agentEvents`） | host 包装层护的是「业务 Agent subject 与 scope key 不漂移」，client 事件无 subject 可护；filter 住 actx + cordis 原语覆盖全部需求 |
|
||||
| Session 不持 ctx（对象层 cordis-free） | 只为筛选单测不引 cordis 而生的红线，代价是 contribute 两跳回调 + 可变公有字段；host Agent 本就持 loopCtx |
|
||||
| Session 实例常驻（resident-instance） | host session log 即持久真相；常驻仅为身份便利，与 scope 生命周期错位是复杂度之源 |
|
||||
| 组件收 wiring 回调包（inject→props 两层下传） | 标准件通道让组件自取；公共面收敛为 hooks + 稳定 props |
|
||||
| Hero 无 session 视图与 session Conversation 整支互换 | 即使外层 layout 不变，Hero、picker 与 composer 子树仍会一起重建，界面产生整块抖动 |
|
||||
| 让 InputBar 自身变成 `session-maybe` | 输入状态机、键盘命令面与动作都被迫接受缺省值；只替换 disabled 输入体能把可选性留在外壳边界 |
|
||||
| 专用「转正」帧 | `session-status(running:true)` 语义蕴含转正（blank 会话从不 running），加帧是 wire 多一型换零信息 |
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
- 插件获得与 host 同构的会话语境：per-session 状态挂 actx、随 scope fiber 一次拆装，泄漏结构性不可能；双会话隔离由 scope filter 结构性保证。
|
||||
- client 对象层收敛为 wire 镜像：会话身份、生命周期、能力判别全部以 host 实体为准——输入体系（下一层）面对的永远是「有真 Agent 的会话」，slash/skill 等 provider 一律以 sessionId 直接寻址。
|
||||
- 空会话治理零专用机制：状态靠一个派生位，可见性靠统一列表投影（仅 current blank 以 `New Session` 展示），回收靠 lazy persistence 的既有契约（重启蒸发），常规上限靠同 Workspace 复用。
|
||||
- 代价：id→ctx 换乘纪律、provide 的 Concurrent 纪律都是约定而非类型强制，靠 review 与测试钉住；「未选 workspace」期间输入全禁是产品面接受的体验代价（单一状态轴换来的）。
|
||||
- 已知欠账：approval/question 跨 prune 恢复（TODO）；模型选择以 live-mutation 形状回归（host `selectModel` 三件套现成，等独立分支）。
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.md: c7db576ff3c7a56622f90a4400bd9297c9591bef
|
||||
2026-07-03-filesystem-directory-listing-seam.zh.md: 75ee6851127ca6d8c3fc60a66115d521d4627cdc
|
||||
2026-07-25-web-command-surfaces-and-assembly.md: 5188e8c17b31157b1c03203a8d7ba2d8e6a1496b
|
||||
2026-07-25-web-command-surfaces-and-assembly.zh.md: 0134cc10cf4f49b7719d6a0dacb239389776d6ed
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Web command business surfaces and assembly (ui-command / ui-skill / ui-subagent)
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-25-web-command-surfaces-and-assembly.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
> Scope: the command directory cache and three-kind dispatch (ui-command), the popup selection flow, the two skill / subagent reference sources, and fixture command routing plus assembly acceptance (the slash-flow snapshot). The carrying wire lives in the [session scope note](2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.md); triggers, the menu, and the input machine live in the [input machine note](2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
The pipeline was ready but command knowledge had no landing spot: host-side `ctx.commands` and `ctx.skills` were complete while the web channel had no command capability. The business layer had to answer:
|
||||
|
||||
- Command UI takes more than one shape (execute on the spot, pop a select box, backfill and keep typing arguments) — how do business packages ship with zero skeleton changes;
|
||||
- When is the directory fetched: pulling on every menu open is too slow, while a resident cache needs invalidation and reconnect stories;
|
||||
- Sessions are always agent-backed (Session + Agent born in the same instant) — by what address does the client command surface honor the host's per-agent effective directory;
|
||||
- Assembly-level acceptance: with the layers split apart, how the user-visible main chain is pinned once they come together.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
### ui-command: a `CommandService` + a session-keyed `CommandDirectory` + a per-session `PopupSelectController`
|
||||
|
||||
- The `ClientSessionContext { sessionId }` projection is self-held in the ui-slash contract (types.ts): sessions are always agent-backed, so session identity is the entire projection of command capability; the wire addresses by `{sessionId}` (both `command.list` and `command.execute`; the host resolves the Agent from the session header).
|
||||
- The directory is compartmented by `SessionId`, with per-key single-flight + an epoch guard (an old pull never overwrites newer state); `commands/changed` soft-invalidates every key (the old snapshot keeps serving while the repull runs in the background), `connection/reset` hard-invalidates every key and rewarms, Enter strong-waits on the current key, and a failure keeps the draft with no downgrade. Prewarming hangs on the source's `warm` hook — once over the full roster at scope birth, which covers the entire session lifecycle (session capability is constant from birth).
|
||||
- `register(contribution)` registers client commands (a descriptor + `available(projection)` + a popupSelect spec); candidate synthesis = the host directory + contribution availability filtering, then the query/position pass, and a host/contribution name clash fails loud.
|
||||
- The three command kinds derive from the registration surfaces; developers never declare positions: a host descriptor with `input` = **leadingInput** (backfill `/name ␣` + claim, keep typing arguments, leading position only); a client-registered popupSelect spec = **popupSelect** (the official select-box shell, business ships zero components); neither = **execute** (run on selection, zero UI).
|
||||
- The dispatch decision table: the menu can trigger all three kinds; Space recognizes only leadingInput (the misfire defense: irreversible side effects keep explicit entry points only); Enter runs execute / opens the shell only on a bare token, while leadingInput tolerates trailing arguments.
|
||||
- The popup from `popupFor(actx)`: search filters locally, select is single-flight, the projection is captured at open, onSelect consumes the token through the consume-token event only on success, a failure is retained for retry, and a session switch merely hides it. The popup shell is a transient layer (never in the state machine): the box holds focus, Enter/↑↓/Escape belong to it, and clicking outside the box dismisses (clicking the textarea also returns focus).
|
||||
|
||||
### Reference sources (seeing only projections plus their own apply closures, on the root ctx)
|
||||
|
||||
- **ui-skill**: `skill.list({sessionId})` addresses by session (the host resolves the project root from the session header); the directory cache is single-flight keyed by sessionId, prewarmed at birth by the `warm` hook and fully cleared by `connection/reset`. A pick produces a text outcome (the literal `/name ` text, Decision 21); `lexicon` supplies the roster from CatalogFetch's settled snapshot (`undefined` while not warm). No match hook (references never enter command adjudication). Skill references ride ordinary prompts as literal text (outside the command plane; tool-skill unchanged, with the session-prefix directory providing the cooperative association).
|
||||
- **ui-subagent**: candidates are zero-RPC (the sessions.list snapshot filtered by parentId/running); a pick produces a text outcome (the literal `@name ` text); `lexicon` derives from the same snapshot (the model-side representation awaits its business workstream).
|
||||
|
||||
### Fixture command routing and assembly
|
||||
|
||||
- The connection fixture adds command routing (fixture + fake-api): the keyless rig can run the complete command flow (directory, execution, popup selection).
|
||||
- The apps/cli assembly mounts all the new packages; the tsconfig path map / reference sets are filled in; catalogs/docs are regenerated with the wire and events.
|
||||
|
||||
### Assembly-level acceptance: the slash-flow snapshot
|
||||
|
||||
`apps/web/tests/slash-flow.snapshot.ts` pins the user-visible main chain (assembled keyless; package mocks are no substitute for the assembled transcript): the composer disabled with no session → creating a Workspace and entering an already-materialized blank session → picking the `/echo` leadingInput from the `/` menu → the command executes but the blank bit does not flip and the list still shows `New Session` → the first ordinary prompt's successful acceptance converts that same row; the same session-bound textarea holds across blank → active. `workspace-flow.snapshot.ts` separately pins blank-row creation/reuse, first-prompt rejection backfill, and — on a Workspace switch before the first prompt — the draft moving across input machines with the old blank row hidden.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
| Rejected | One-line reason |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Inline prompt dispatch (command text riding the message into the host for parsing) | Conflates the command and message planes; command execution being independent of the message queue is existing host semantics |
|
||||
| A bridge materializing skills as commands | Skills have their own directory; N registrations would be a detour; the tag form naturally avoids the command plane |
|
||||
| A `skill.invoke` RPC | The host has no such operation; skill references are plain text riding prompts |
|
||||
| A new ContentBlock reference type | Full-chain cost (adapters/UI/compaction); text-as-truth plus structured occurrence records suffices |
|
||||
| Client packages self-reporting command directories | The host is the single source of truth; the client only reads descriptors, with `commands-changed` pushing invalidation |
|
||||
| The `requires: 'none' \| 'agent'` discriminant axis (an agentless directory + dual-addressed queries) | With sessions always agent-backed, the amphibious command has no owner; the whole axis reverts to master's shape, to be reopened on real demand |
|
||||
| Dedicated commandresult / commandpanel slots | Results go through notices; the popup shell is a skeleton-internal overlay; rich result cards sit in the ledger |
|
||||
| An agent-type directory as the `@` source | No type registry exists; the live-session snapshot already covers it |
|
||||
| A PickAction/EnterCommand class family (class-inheritance pick products) | Cross-package runtime values break client bundle purity; pure data interfaces plus closure methods are equivalent |
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
- Shipping a business command = a host registration plus one client `command.register` (popupSelect) or zero registration (execute/leadingInput derive automatically), with zero skeleton changes; the cost is that the three-kind semantics concentrate in ui-command, and a hypothetical fourth kind means changing it.
|
||||
- The resident directory cache plus push invalidation buys zero-latency menus and reliable enter adjudication; the cost is three invalidation paths (the change frame, reconnect, the epoch guard) that all need tests pinning them.
|
||||
- sessionId addressing puts the host's per-agent effective directory (global + scoped shadows) straight on the wire, with the client presenting it as-is.
|
||||
- Known gaps: the popupSelect shell has no shipped business consumer yet (model selection and its kin return with #600's host `selectModel` in live-mutation shape, serving as the onboarding template then); the queue's second cut (per-item Inbox operations), rich result cards, and roster configurability sit in the ledger awaiting their triggers.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Web 命令业务面与装配（ui-command / ui-skill / ui-subagent）
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-25-web-command-surfaces-and-assembly.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
> 范围：命令目录缓存与三型判定（ui-command）、popup 选择流、skill / subagent 两个引用源、fixture 命令路由与装配验收（slash-flow 快照）。承载 wire 见[会话作用域 note](2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.md)；触发/菜单/输入机器见[输入状态机 note](2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.md)。
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
管线就绪但没有命令知识的落点：host 侧 `ctx.commands` 与 `ctx.skills` 完整而 web 通道无命令能力。业务层要回答：
|
||||
|
||||
- 命令 UI 不止一种形态（当场执行、弹选择框、回填后继续打参数）——业务包如何零骨架改动上架；
|
||||
- 目录何时拉取：每次开菜单现拉太慢，常驻缓存就要有失效与重连故事；
|
||||
- 会话恒 agent-backed（Session+Agent 同瞬出生），client 命令面以什么地址兑现 host 的 per-agent 有效目录；
|
||||
- 装配级验收：拆开的各层合起来，用户可见主链如何钉住。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
### ui-command：`CommandService` + session 键控 `CommandDirectory` + per-session `PopupSelectController`
|
||||
|
||||
- 投影 `ClientSessionContext { sessionId }` 自持于 ui-slash 契约（types.ts）：会话恒 agent-backed，会话身份即命令能力的全部投影；wire 以 `{sessionId}` 寻址（`command.list` / `command.execute` 均是；host 从会话 header 解析 Agent）。
|
||||
- 目录按 `SessionId` 分格，per-key single-flight + epoch guard（旧拉取永不覆盖新态），`commands/changed` 全 key 软失效（旧快照继续服务、后台重拉）、`connection/reset` 全 key 硬失效并预热，Enter 强等当前 key、失败留草稿不降级。预热挂 source 的 `warm` 钩子——scope 出生时对全 roster 一次，即覆盖整个会话生命周期（会话能力自出生恒定）。
|
||||
- `register(contribution)` 注册 client 命令（descriptor + `available(projection)` + popupSelect spec）；候选合成 = host 目录 + contribution 可用性过滤，再过 query/position，host/contribution 重名 fail loud。
|
||||
- 命令三型按注册面派生，开发者不声明位置：host descriptor 带 `input` = **leadingInput**（回填 `/name ␣` + claim，继续打参数，仅限行首）；client 注册 popupSelect spec = **popupSelect**（官方选择框壳，业务零组件）；两者皆无 = **execute**（选中即执行，零 UI）。
|
||||
- 判定决策表：菜单可触发三型；Space 只认 leadingInput（误触发防线：不可逆副作用只留显式入口）；Enter 裸 token 才 execute/开壳、leadingInput 容忍尾随参数。
|
||||
- `popupFor(actx)` 的 popup：search 本地过滤、select single-flight、open 时捕获投影、onSelect 成功才经 consume-token 事件消 token、失败保留可重试、session 切换只隐藏。popup 壳是瞬态层（不进状态机）：框持焦点、Enter/↑↓/Escape 归它、点框外即 dismiss（点 textarea 同时归还焦点）。
|
||||
|
||||
### 引用源（只见投影 + 自家 apply 闭包的 root ctx）
|
||||
|
||||
- **ui-skill**：`skill.list({sessionId})` 按会话寻址（host 从会话 header 解析项目根）；目录缓存按 sessionId 键控 single-flight，`warm` 钩子出生预热、`connection/reset` 全清。pick 产出 text outcome（`/name ` 原文，决策 21）；`lexicon` 从 CatalogFetch 的 settled 快照给名录（未热 `undefined`）。无 match 钩子（引用不进命令裁决）。skill 引用以原文随普通 prompt 走（命令平面之外；tool-skill 不变，session-prefix 目录提供协作关联）。
|
||||
- **ui-subagent**：候选零 RPC（sessions.list 快照按 parentId/running 过滤）；pick 产出 text outcome（`@name ` 原文）；`lexicon` 同快照派生（模型侧表示待业务立项）。
|
||||
|
||||
### fixture 命令路由与装配
|
||||
|
||||
- connection fixture 补命令路由（fixture + fake-api）：keyless 台架可跑完整命令流（目录、执行、popup 选择）。
|
||||
- apps/cli 装配挂全部新包；tsconfig path map / reference 集补齐；catalog/docs 随 wire 与事件再生成。
|
||||
|
||||
### 装配级验收：slash-flow 快照
|
||||
|
||||
`apps/web/tests/slash-flow.snapshot.ts` 钉住用户可见主链（assembled keyless，包 mock 不替代装配转录）：无 session 时 composer 禁用 → 创建 Workspace 并进入已实体化的 blank session → `/` 菜单选 `/echo` leadingInput → 命令执行但 blank 位不翻转、列表仍显示 `New Session` → 首条普通 prompt 成功受理后同一行转正；同一 session-bound textarea 跨 blank → active 保持。`workspace-flow.snapshot.ts` 另钉住 blank 行创建/复用、首讯拒绝回填，以及首讯前切换 Workspace 时 draft 跨 input machine 搬运且旧 blank 行隐藏。
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
| 弃案 | 一行理由 |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| prompt 内联派发（命令文本随消息进 host 解析） | 混淆命令/消息平面；命令执行独立于消息队列是既有 host 语义 |
|
||||
| skill 物化为 command 的桥 | skill 自有目录；N 笔注册是绕路；标签形式天然避开命令平面 |
|
||||
| `skill.invoke` RPC | host 无此操作；skill 引用是随 prompt 的普通文本 |
|
||||
| 新 ContentBlock 引用类型 | 全链路成本（adapter/UI/compaction）；文本即真身 + 结构化 occurrence 记录已足够 |
|
||||
| client 各包自报命令目录 | host 是唯一真源；client 只读 descriptor，`commands-changed` 推失效 |
|
||||
| `requires: 'none' \| 'agent'` 判别轴（agentless 目录 + 双址查询） | 会话恒 agent-backed 后两栖命令无 owner；整轴回退 master 形状，待真需求重开 |
|
||||
| 专用 commandresult / commandpanel 坑位 | 结果走 notice；popup 壳是骨架内浮层；富结果卡入台账 |
|
||||
| agent-type 目录做 `@` 源 | 无类型注册表；live-session 快照已覆盖 |
|
||||
| PickAction/EnterCommand 类族（类继承 pick 产物） | 跨包运行时值破坏 client bundle 纯度；纯数据接口 + 闭包方法等价 |
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
- 业务命令上架 = host 注册 + client 一笔 `command.register`（popupSelect）或零注册（execute/leadingInput 自动派生），零骨架改动；代价是三型语义集中在 ui-command，假想的第四型意味着改它。
|
||||
- 常驻目录缓存 + 推失效换来菜单零延迟与回车裁决可靠；代价是三条失效路径（change 帧、重连、epoch guard）都需测试钉住。
|
||||
- sessionId 寻址让 host 的 per-agent 有效目录（全局 + scoped shadows）直接上 wire，client 原样呈现。
|
||||
- 已知欠账：popupSelect 壳暂无已上架业务消费者（模型选择等 #600 的 host `selectModel` 以 live-mutation 形态回归，届时作接入样板）；队列第二刀（逐项 Inbox 操作）、富结果卡、roster 可配置性入台账待触发。
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.md: acbd132a5fdb97a4098064aae689dfca604ad4b7
|
||||
2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.zh.md: 158650a41b47f98037a1b3e610d9294694c55a8c
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Web input state machine, composer slots, and the slash pipeline (ui-conversation input / ui-slash)
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
> Scope: the input state machine (the occurrence table + claim watch + the submit transaction), the hub/facade and send orchestration, the three scoped bail events for cross-plugin input rewrites, `/` and `@` trigger detection and the menu pipeline (ui-slash), and the slot system around the composer. It depends on the [session scope note](2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.md)'s sctx / provide / session-maybe and blank entity model; command knowledge (the three kinds, the directory, popups) is untouched here — that is the [command surfaces note](2026-07-25-web-command-surfaces-and-assembly.md)'s territory.
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
Two composers, each a law unto itself: hero (EmptyState, the controlled chain writing straight into the Session) and the in-conversation InputBar (a plain controlled textarea) — behavior, draft ownership, and send path all inconsistent. To bring the three trigger families — `/` commands, skill references, `@` references — onto the input surface, these had to be answered:
|
||||
|
||||
- How the three trigger families layer, and who holds knowledge of "commands" versus who stays zero-knowledge;
|
||||
- How the input box expresses "command mode" — derived from the draft text or explicit state? What do backspace, enter, space, and pasting a whole line each mean;
|
||||
- Submission is an asynchronous transaction (an RPC round trip) — how are stale-result backwash, session switching, and React concurrent replay defended;
|
||||
- How reference chips are represented on a plain textarea, and who owns undo / clipboard / paste matching / model serialization;
|
||||
- How cross-plugin input rewrites (menu backfill, reference insertion, token consumption) achieve dependency inversion;
|
||||
- Which React shells must be reused across no session → blank session, and which strict-session input bodies may be replaced.
|
||||
|
||||
Hard constraints: components mount through slots only; presentation artifacts never enter the session log; the keyboard path is IME-safe throughout.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
### The input state machine (`InputMachine`)
|
||||
|
||||
A pure state machine, events in / effects out, clock injected. Four phases (plain / adjudicating / claimed / submitting). Command mode is **never derived from the draft**; the pick paths establish it explicitly at discrete moments; the claim is watched by `draft.startsWith(token)`, with a backspace break releasing automatically; the claim shape is `{token, hint?}` (hint feeds ghost text).
|
||||
|
||||
The event surface (`dispatch(ev)` is the single write entry; one transaction per event):
|
||||
|
||||
- `draft-changed {draft, editRange?}` — the textarea's full draft; editRange narrows the occurrence-shift computation, defaulting to a shared prefix/suffix scan.
|
||||
- `newline {selection}` — the Ctrl+Enter line break (not via the browser's execCommand: under self-managed undo a browser write forks two histories).
|
||||
- `begin-command {claim, span}` / `insert-ref {reference, span}` / `consume-token {guard}` — the machine side of the three bail events; span CAS = draftRev equality.
|
||||
- `set-invalid {invalidIds}` — the style bit for owner-resolution results (not a transaction).
|
||||
- `undo` / `redo` — the self-managed transaction log (a ring of 100; single-character typing merges within injected-clock windows; a successful submit clears the log).
|
||||
- `paste-begin {text, selection, components?, generation?}` — the paste plus hot-snapshot synchronously matched components in one transaction (one Undo returns to before the paste); opens a PasteMatchAttempt.
|
||||
- `paste-upgrade {attemptId, span, reference}` — an asynchronous match upgrade as its own transaction (Undo in two steps); the attempt stays current, and insertedRange shrinks with each upgrade.
|
||||
- `invalidate-paste` — attempt-ending gestures observed at the DOM layer (caret/selection operations and the like).
|
||||
- `enter {mode}` / `adjudicated` / `adjudication-failed` / `submit-settled` / `release` — the submit-transaction plane: a SubmitAttempt (seq + AbortSignal) blocks backwash; success commits and clears the draft; failure rolls back under the drift guard (the enter-time snapshot is backfilled only while the live draft still equals it; if the user has typed again, only a notice fires).
|
||||
|
||||
The effect surface (executed by the shell): `adjudicate` (calls SlashController.adjudicate), `begin-submit` (the claim.submit transaction), `default-sink` (ordinary messages, hub-orchestrated), `notice`.
|
||||
|
||||
The occurrence table and the chip's three projections:
|
||||
|
||||
- Each reference occupies one `U+FFFC` in the draft; a table entry is `{occurrenceId, source, ref, offset, label, clipboardText, invalid?}`; same-named chips stay independent through occurrenceId.
|
||||
- Every edit updates the draft and the table in one transaction: ranges shift; a deletion/replacement intersecting a placeholder acts on the whole chip.
|
||||
- The single-character placeholder makes keyboard atomicity mostly hold natively (the caret has no interior position; Backspace / arrow keys / Shift extension natively take the whole chip); a mouse click on a chip goes backdrop hit → whole-chip setSelectionRange.
|
||||
- The visual projection = label: the backdrop renders the chip at the placeholder offset (the textarea glyph is invisible), with invalid taking the invalid style.
|
||||
- The clipboard/persistence projection = clipboardText: copy/cut expands placeholders inside the selection; the draft-persistence mirror writes the same projection (the chat store always holds plain text; the refresh seed semantics = select-all copy → reopen → paste, with chips degrading to text across a refresh).
|
||||
- The model projection = generated per chip at submit through the source's `codec.serialize` (owned by the submit attempt's signal and stale guard; a missing owner / failure / cancel means no send, never a downgrade to `/name`).
|
||||
|
||||
### Cross-plugin input rewrites: three scoped bail events
|
||||
|
||||
The contract is declared in ui-slash (the bottom of the dependency chain); producers dispatch via `sctx.bail(sctx, ...)`, and the only consuming side is the three listeners the hub hangs on the sctx when building the shell; returning `true` ⟺ the machine passed the phase and CAS guards and actually rewrote (emitting the event ≠ a successful modification; whether Space gets `preventDefault` follows the return value):
|
||||
|
||||
- `slash/input-begin-command` `{claim, span}` — backfill of the command claim adjudicated from a menu pick / Space (dispatched by the SlashController).
|
||||
- `slash/input-insert-reference` `{reference, span}` — reference chip insertion (dispatched by the SlashController).
|
||||
- `slash/input-consume-token` `{guard: span | bare-token}` — consuming the command token after business success (dispatched by the downstream command surfaces).
|
||||
|
||||
Calls that stay un-evented (registry registration → explicit call → await): Input's own draft/submit, asynchronous Enter adjudication, the reference serializer, the asynchronous paste matcher. `@mode bail` has entered the JSDoc parser and the cordis catalog gate (scripts/jsdoc.ts).
|
||||
|
||||
### The slash pipeline (ui-slash: a root `SlashService` + a per-session `SlashController`)
|
||||
|
||||
A trigger/menu/pick pipeline with zero knowledge of "commands":
|
||||
|
||||
- The service holds only the source registry (`SlashSource{trigger: '/'|'@', name, candidates, onPick, matchSpace?, matchEnter?}`; (trigger,name) unique, registration order = group order = polling order) and `sessionOf(sctx)`. Implementing a match hook IS the declaration of participation in space/enter adjudication; the pipeline polls in registration order, the first non-undefined answer wins, and no claimant means the default sink. matchSpace is synchronous (space fires mid-keystroke; hot cache only); matchEnter is asynchronous (it may await the source's own warmup, and a warmup failure rejects).
|
||||
- The controller holds the single authoritative hit (span included; retained for Space after the menu closes), the per-session menu store, the candidate-fetch generation, keyboard arbitration (combobox mode: focus stays in the textarea, ↑↓/Enter/Escape are intercepted and all pass the IME composition guard, with the single exception Shift+Enter unconditionally going first), and pick orchestration (outcome → self-dispatched bail events); at each session scope's birth it runs `warm(projection)` once over the source roster — within that scope the projection holds only the stable sessionId, with no published/capability transitions; the scope disposer tears down the controller.
|
||||
- Trigger-detection word boundaries (`user@host` and URL `/` never trigger) and the guard tiers (plain: `/` everywhere + `@` inline / claimed: `/` suppressed, `@` live / frozen: none) are the frozen pure core.
|
||||
|
||||
### hub / facade: the resident shell and the strict-session input body
|
||||
|
||||
- The hub (trigger/decoration registries + send orchestration) takes the slash/command services as optional `ctx.get()` dependencies: without ui-slash or the command surfaces, input still sends and receives normally — graceful degradation.
|
||||
- Each materialized Session has exactly one `SessionInputShell` (the facade), created and torn down with the session scope; with no session, no input machine is built. `ConversationRoot` is itself the `session-maybe` resident shell, holding HeroShell, the Workspace picker, the composer stack, and the chain-fallback frame.
|
||||
- With no session the shell renders the presentation-only `DisabledInputBar`; once `connectWorkspace` returns a blank session, only the input body is swapped for the strict-session InputBar. The textarea may be rebuilt here, while `ConversationRoot`, the Hero, and the layout skeleton hold; blank → engaging/active stays the same session-bound InputBar, with the textarea never rebuilt on a phase flip.
|
||||
- ConversationRoot's Hero criterion is `sessionId === undefined || (composerPhase === 'blank' && (openState === 'open' || openState === 'loading'))`. The first submit enters engaging synchronously, and a failure keeps the composer and the error context rather than falling back to the blank Hero; the sidebar's blank bit flips false only after a prompt is successfully accepted.
|
||||
- Sending unifies in the hub defaultSink: after an optimistic draft clear it goes only through `session.prompt {mode:'queue'|'steer'}`; backfill happens only when it fails and the live draft is still empty — a user who has kept typing is never overwritten. No Draft materialize or attach transaction exists.
|
||||
- When the blank Hero re-picks the Workspace, the shell calls `connectWorkspace`; if the target session differs, the non-empty draft moves from the current shell to the target shell before the new id is opened, and the old blank session survives but is no longer current.
|
||||
- The Notifier's two-bit contract: `dirty` (snapshot freshness, clearable by an `ensureFresh` pull) and `notifyPending` (notification debt, cleared only by a flush) are mutually independent — a pull must not swallow a push, and object-layer push subscribers (watchTransaction) depend on this guarantee.
|
||||
|
||||
### Plain-text references (Decision 21): text outcomes and lexicon decoration
|
||||
|
||||
skill/@subagent references skip the placeholder + occurrence identity chain — a pick inserts the literal `/name ` `@name ` text straight into the draft, with the chip visual purely derived:
|
||||
|
||||
- PickOutcome gains a `{text}` arm; the new scoped bail event `slash/input-insert-text` `{text, span}` (the same contract as the other three: draftRev CAS, returning true ⟺ an actual rewrite); facade.insertText goes through setDraft concatenation — zero machine changes.
|
||||
- Sources get an optional `lexicon?(session)` hook: a synchronous hot-snapshot name roster, with `undefined` = data not warm — zero decoration, never triggering a fetch (the render path stays synchronous and side-effect-free); the controller aggregates it into the `lexicon()` public surface.
|
||||
- `decorations.scanTextRefs`: a word-boundary scan of the draft (`/name`, `@name` at line start / after whitespace; `x/name` never hits) against the roster; a hit gets the `.textRef` mark (a pure range highlight on the backdrop, same as hlToken); an edit breaking the match shape simply disappears on the next scan.
|
||||
- Sending is the literal text (no more `<skill>` serialization); on the bubble side MessageItem decorates both shapes (the legacy `<skill>` tag + plain-text tokens).
|
||||
- The old occurrence/paste/serialize chain stays on disk in full, undeleted (additive; deletion is a separate future cut). Known limitation kept as-is: with the lexicon not warm at paste / cold start there is no decoration — it lights up only after typing `/` opens the menu once.
|
||||
|
||||
### Per-session provide contributions and the private keyboard surface
|
||||
|
||||
- ui-conversation (the hub doubling as a contributor) supplies through `sessions.provide` the `'input'` hook (machine state + the queue overlay) plus the `inputActions` prop (`setDraft`/`submit`, stable void callbacks).
|
||||
- The public/private boundary: the public provide carries only React-vocabulary members; the keyboard/DOM command surface (track/arbitrate/space/undo/redo/paste/dismissPopup/bindMirror — synchronous return values, disposer semantics) is InputBar-exclusive, passed privately in-package through the InputBar entry's own inject, never leaving the plugin boundary.
|
||||
|
||||
### The slot system
|
||||
|
||||
`conversation` is itself session-maybe; its session content and the composer input slots are strict session, while the Hero Workspace picker stays root. The child slots are all declared by ui-conversation's conversation registration:
|
||||
|
||||
- `conversation.session` (single) — the strict-session header, view ring, and chat store; rebuilt when the session id switches.
|
||||
- `conversation.composer.bar` (single) — the slot for the InputBar itself: the InputBar is a true slot entry (self-registered into its own slot) and the content of the composer chain's fallback; it is not a chain entry — the chain's single election would unmount it on a takeover, breaking textarea DOM survival.
|
||||
- `conversation.input.overlay` — the floating-overlay anchor inside the input card; registrants' inject resolves each one's own per-session controller by the slot sessionId.
|
||||
- `conversation.input.dock` — the stacked strip above the input (QueueDock's read-only queue list lands here), ordered by `order`.
|
||||
- `conversation.composer.dock` — the stats band on the composer's top edge.
|
||||
- `conversation.input.left` / `conversation.input.right` — the tool-row left and right regions.
|
||||
- `conversation.input.plan` / `conversation.input.model` (single) — the tool row's two named control seats; the bar passes only `locked` (owner props), each stays empty until its owning plugin registers, no placeholder fallback.
|
||||
- `conversation.hero.workspace` (root scope) — the Workspace picker shared by the no-session and blank Hero; a pick reuses or creates the target blank session through `connectWorkspace`, moving the draft where necessary before switching current.
|
||||
|
||||
### Testing discipline
|
||||
|
||||
The state machine's entire behavior is covered by pure-JS unit tests (event sequences in, asserting state and effects, zero browser DOM); the interaction matrix is projection-tested row by row. This requirement is precisely what forced the pure-core + service-shell layering.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
| Rejected | One-line reason |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| An ActiveCommand intermediate state / a registerMode mode registry / deriving command mode from the draft | Claims are established explicitly by the pick paths — no table, no derivation |
|
||||
| Direct bindTarget/bindDraft object wiring | Reverse coupling plus root-singleton cross-session mispairing; scoped bail events preserve dependency inversion with structurally correct routing |
|
||||
| A unified slash/input-apply, or eventing everything | Three independent payloads cover the cross-plugin rewrites; asynchronous paths stay registry-based explicit calls |
|
||||
| contenteditable / a rich-text tree | Poor compatibility; textarea + U+FFFC + the occurrence table covers the full interaction contract |
|
||||
| Dual draft persistence {text, occurrences} | The mirror writing the clipboard projection adds zero new concepts; chip degradation across refresh is acceptable |
|
||||
| The native textarea undo stack | Unreliable under controlled + programmatic writes; the paste two-step undo semantics can only be self-managed |
|
||||
| The InputBar receiving a 16-member wiring-callback bundle | The consumption matrix proved 11 members InputBar-exclusive and 1 a dead member; the standard-kit channel lets components fetch their own, with the keyboard surface passed privately in-package |
|
||||
| Space adjudication also claiming execute-kind commands | The misfire defense: after a space the whole line is an ordinary prompt; irreversible side effects keep explicit entry points only |
|
||||
| A generic tokenPattern decoration mechanism | Structured occurrence records replace pattern scanning |
|
||||
| A placeholder select resident in the tool row | Named seats stay empty until registration; a placeholder clashing with the real implementation is two sources of truth |
|
||||
| All references through U+FFFC chips (the pre-Decision-21 line) | Plain text + derived decoration carries zero identity state; the literal text IS the model projection, sparing undo/clipboard any special cases; the chip chain is kept for scenarios needing indivisible atomicity |
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
- One resident conversation shell carries no-session/blank/active: no session → blank guarantees only the outer frame's React identity, allowing the disabled textarea to be replaced by the strict InputBar; the same blank session → engaging/active keeps the InputBar and the textarea. EmptyState and the controlled intent chain (`sessions.updateIntent`/`updatePendingPrompt`/`workspaces.sendSession`) are deleted along with their last consumer.
|
||||
- The input surface's zero knowledge of commands plus optional dependencies: pure input works without the command packages; `@` references and skill references get free reuse of the same menu/pick pipeline. The cost is that space/enter adjudication is a per-source polling protocol whose answer semantics (sync/async, the meaning of undefined) are a frozen contract.
|
||||
- Transactionalized submission (attempt seq + the drift guard) makes the three defect classes — stale-result backwash, session switching, concurrent replay — structurally impossible, pinned by the matrix tests.
|
||||
- Known gaps: chip fidelity across refresh (paste matching is reusable for it) has no workstream yet; the subagent reference's model representation awaits its business workstream.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Web 输入状态机、composer 坑位与 slash 管线（ui-conversation input / ui-slash）
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-25-web-input-machine-and-slash-pipeline.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
> 范围：输入状态机（occurrence 表 + claim 看护 + 提交事务）、hub/facade 与发送编排、跨插件输入改写的三个 scoped bail 事件、`/` 与 `@` 触发检测与菜单管线（ui-slash）、composer 周边坑位体系。依赖[会话作用域 note](2026-07-25-web-client-session-scope-and-provide-channel.md)的 sctx / provide / session-maybe 与 blank 实体模型；命令知识（三型、目录、popup）零涉——那是[命令业务面 note](2026-07-25-web-command-surfaces-and-assembly.md)的领地。
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
两个各自为政的 composer：hero（EmptyState，受控链直写 Session）与会话内 InputBar（普通受控 textarea），行为、draft 所有权、发送路径全不一致。要让 `/` 命令、skill 引用、`@` 引用三类触发进入输入面，必须回答：
|
||||
|
||||
- 三类触发如何分层，谁对"命令"有知识、谁零知识；
|
||||
- 输入框如何表达"命令态"——从 draft 文本推导还是显式状态？退格、回车、空格、整行粘贴各是什么语义；
|
||||
- 提交是异步事务（RPC 往返）——晚到结果回灌、会话切换、React concurrent 重放如何防御；
|
||||
- 引用 chip 在纯 textarea 上如何表示，undo/剪贴板/粘贴匹配/模型序列化各归谁；
|
||||
- 跨插件的输入改写（菜单回填、引用插入、token 消费）如何做到依赖倒置；
|
||||
- 无 session → blank session 时哪些 React 外壳必须复用，哪些严格 session 输入体允许替换。
|
||||
|
||||
硬约束：组件一律经 slots 挂载；呈现物不进 session log；键盘路径全程 IME 安全。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
### 输入状态机（`InputMachine`）
|
||||
|
||||
纯状态机，事件进/效果出，注入时钟。四相 phase（plain / adjudicating / claimed / submitting）。命令态**永不从 draft 推导**，由 pick 路径在离散时刻显式建立；claim 由 `draft.startsWith(token)` 看护、退格破坏自动 release；claim 形状 `{token, hint?}`（hint 供 ghost text）。
|
||||
|
||||
事件面（`dispatch(ev)` 单写入口，每个事件一个 transaction）：
|
||||
|
||||
- `draft-changed {draft, editRange?}`——textarea 全量草稿；editRange 缩小 occurrence 平移计算，缺省前后缀共扫。
|
||||
- `newline {selection}`——Ctrl+Enter 换行（不经浏览器 execCommand：自管 undo 下浏览器写入会分叉双历史）。
|
||||
- `begin-command {claim, span}` / `insert-ref {reference, span}` / `consume-token {guard}`——三个 bail 事件的机器侧；span CAS = draftRev 相等。
|
||||
- `set-invalid {invalidIds}`——owner resolution 结果的样式位（非 transaction）。
|
||||
- `undo` / `redo`——自管 transaction log（环形 100；单字符打字按注入时钟窗合并；提交成功清 log）。
|
||||
- `paste-begin {text, selection, components?, generation?}`——粘贴 + 热快照同步匹配组件同 transaction（Undo 一次回粘贴前）；打开 PasteMatchAttempt。
|
||||
- `paste-upgrade {attemptId, span, reference}`——异步匹配升级为独立 transaction（Undo 两段）；attempt 保持 current，insertedRange 随升级收缩。
|
||||
- `invalidate-paste`——DOM 层观察到的 attempt 终结手势（caret/selection 操作等）。
|
||||
- `enter {mode}` / `adjudicated` / `adjudication-failed` / `submit-settled` / `release`——提交事务平面：SubmitAttempt（seq + AbortSignal）防回灌，成功 commit 清稿，失败带漂移守卫 rollback（回车时快照仅当 live draft 仍等于它才回填；用户已再输入则只发 notice）。
|
||||
|
||||
效果面（shell 执行）：`adjudicate`（调 SlashController.adjudicate）、`begin-submit`（claim.submit 事务）、`default-sink`（普通消息，hub 编排）、`notice`。
|
||||
|
||||
occurrence 表与 chip 三投影：
|
||||
|
||||
- 每颗引用在 draft 中占一个 `U+FFFC`；表项 `{occurrenceId, source, ref, offset, label, clipboardText, invalid?}`；同名 chip 因 occurrenceId 独立。
|
||||
- 一切编辑同 transaction 更新 draft 与表：区间平移；与占位符相交的删除/替换作用于整颗。
|
||||
- 单字符占位使键盘原子性大半原生成立（caret 无内部位；Backspace/方向键/Shift 扩选原生即整颗）；鼠标点 chip 由 backdrop 命中 → 整颗 setSelectionRange。
|
||||
- 视觉投影 = label：backdrop 在占位符 offset 渲染 chip（textarea 字形不可见），invalid 走失效样式。
|
||||
- 剪贴板/持久化投影 = clipboardText：copy/cut 把选区内占位符展开；draft 持久化 mirror 写同一投影（chat store 里永远是普通文本，刷新 seed 语义 = 全选复制→重开→粘贴，chip 跨刷新降级为文本）。
|
||||
- 模型投影 = submit 时经 source `codec.serialize` 逐颗生成（归 submit attempt 的 signal 与 stale guard；owner 缺失/失败/取消则不发送，不降级为 `/name`）。
|
||||
|
||||
### 跨插件输入改写：三个 scoped bail 事件
|
||||
|
||||
契约声明在 ui-slash（依赖最底层），生产者经 `sctx.bail(sctx, ...)` 派发，唯一消费侧是 hub 建 shell 时挂在 sctx 上的三个 listener；返回 `true` ⟺ 机器过 phase + CAS 守卫并实际改写（发出事件 ≠ 修改成功，Space 是否 `preventDefault` 以返回值为准）：
|
||||
|
||||
- `slash/input-begin-command` `{claim, span}`——菜单 pick / Space 裁决出的命令 claim 回填（SlashController 派发）。
|
||||
- `slash/input-insert-reference` `{reference, span}`——引用 chip 插入（SlashController 派发）。
|
||||
- `slash/input-consume-token` `{guard: span | bare-token}`——业务成功后消费命令 token（下游命令面派发）。
|
||||
|
||||
不事件化的调用（registry 注册 → 显式调用 → await）：Input 自身的 draft/submit、Enter 异步裁决、reference serializer、异步 paste matcher。`@mode bail` 已入 JSDoc parser 与 cordis catalog 门禁（scripts/jsdoc.ts）。
|
||||
|
||||
### slash 管线（ui-slash：root `SlashService` + per-session `SlashController`）
|
||||
|
||||
对"命令"零知识的触发/菜单/pick 管线：
|
||||
|
||||
- service 只有 source 注册表（`SlashSource{trigger: '/'|'@', name, candidates, onPick, matchSpace?, matchEnter?}`；(trigger,name) 唯一、注册序 = 组序 = 轮询序）与 `sessionOf(sctx)`。实现 match 钩子即参与空格/回车裁决的声明；管线按注册序轮询，首个非 undefined 应答胜出，无人认领落 default sink。matchSpace 同步（空格在击键中触发，只许热缓存）；matchEnter 异步（可 await 源自身预热，预热失败即 reject）。
|
||||
- controller 持有唯一权威 hit（含 span；菜单关闭后为 Space 保留）、per-session menu store、候选 fetch generation、键盘仲裁（combobox 模式：焦点始终在 textarea，↑↓/Enter/Escape 拦截且全程过 IME composition 守卫，唯一例外 Shift+Enter 无条件先行）、pick 编排（outcome → 自派 bail 事件）；每个 session scope 出生时对 source roster 做一次 `warm(projection)`，projection 在该 scope 内只有稳定的 sessionId，无 published/能力跃迁；scope disposer 拆除 controller。
|
||||
- 触发检测词边界（`user@host`、URL `/` 永不触发）、守卫分档（plain：`/` 到处 + `@` 行内 / claimed：`/` 抑制、`@` 活 / frozen：全无）为冻结纯核。
|
||||
|
||||
### hub / facade：常驻外壳与严格 session 输入体
|
||||
|
||||
- hub（trigger/decoration 注册表 + 发送编排）对 slash/command 服务是可选 `ctx.get()` 依赖：无 ui-slash/命令面时输入正常收发，优雅降级。
|
||||
- 每个实体 Session 只有一个 `SessionInputShell`（facade），随 session scope 创建和拆除；无 session 时不造 input machine。`ConversationRoot` 自身是 `session-maybe` 常驻外壳，持有 HeroShell、Workspace picker、composer stack 与 chain fallback 外框。
|
||||
- 无 session 时外壳渲染纯展示的 `DisabledInputBar`；`connectWorkspace` 返回 blank session 后，仅输入体换成严格 session 的 InputBar。这里允许 textarea 重建，`ConversationRoot`、Hero 与布局骨架保持；blank → engaging/active 仍是同一 session-bound InputBar，textarea 不因 phase 翻转而重建。
|
||||
- ConversationRoot 的 Hero 判据是 `sessionId === undefined || (composerPhase === 'blank' && (openState === 'open' || openState === 'loading'))`。首次 submit 同步进入 engaging，失败也保留 composer 与错误上下文，不退回 blank Hero；sidebar 的 blank 位只在 prompt 成功受理后翻 false。
|
||||
- 发送统一在 hub defaultSink：乐观清稿后只走 `session.prompt {mode:'queue'|'steer'}`；失败且 live draft 仍为空才回填，用户已经继续输入则不覆盖。不存在 Draft materialize 或 attach 事务。
|
||||
- blank Hero 改选 Workspace 时，外壳调用 `connectWorkspace`；目标 session 不同时把非空 draft 从当前 shell 搬到目标 shell，再 open 新 id，旧 blank session 留存但不再 current。
|
||||
- Notifier 双位契约：`dirty`（快照新鲜度，`ensureFresh` 拉取可清）与 `notifyPending`（通知欠账，只有 flush 清）各自独立——拉取不得吞推送，对象层推订阅者（watchTransaction）依赖这一保证。
|
||||
|
||||
### 纯文本引用（决策 21）：text outcome 与 lexicon 装饰
|
||||
|
||||
skill/@subagent 引用不走占位符 + occurrence 身份链——pick 直接把 `/name ` `@name ` 原文插进 draft，chip 视觉纯派生：
|
||||
|
||||
- PickOutcome 增 `{text}` arm；新 scoped bail 事件 `slash/input-insert-text` `{text, span}`（与另三个同契约：draftRev CAS、返回 true ⟺ 实际改写）；facade.insertText 走 setDraft 拼接，机器零改动。
|
||||
- source 可选 `lexicon?(session)` 钩子：同步热快照名录，`undefined` = 数据未热——零装饰、永不触发 fetch（渲染路径保持同步无副作用）；controller 聚合为 `lexicon()` 公面。
|
||||
- `decorations.scanTextRefs`：词边界扫描 draft（行首/空白后的 `/name`、`@name`，`x/name` 永不命中）对照名录，命中即 `.textRef` mark（backdrop 纯 range 高亮，同 hlToken）；编辑破坏匹配形状下次扫描自然消失。
|
||||
- 发送即原文（不再 `<skill>` 序列化）；气泡侧 MessageItem 双形状装饰（legacy `<skill>` 标签 + 纯文本 token）。
|
||||
- 旧 occurrence/paste/serialize 链全部保留在盘未删（additive；删除另成将来一刀）。已知局限维持现状：粘贴/冷启动时 lexicon 未热不装饰，输 `/` 开一次菜单后才亮。
|
||||
|
||||
### per-session 供数贡献与键盘私面
|
||||
|
||||
- ui-conversation（hub 兼贡献者）经 `sessions.provide` 供 `'input'` hook（机器状态 + queue overlay）+ `inputActions` prop（`setDraft`/`submit`，稳定 void 回调）。
|
||||
- 公私分界：公共 provide 只放 React 语汇成员；键盘/DOM 命令面（track/arbitrate/space/undo/redo/paste/dismissPopup/bindMirror——同步返回值、disposer 语义）是 InputBar 独占，走 InputBar entry 自己的 inject 包内私递，不出插件边界。
|
||||
|
||||
### 坑位体系
|
||||
|
||||
`conversation` 本身是 session-maybe；其会话内容与 composer 输入坑位严格 session，Hero Workspace picker 保持 root。子坑均由 ui-conversation 的 conversation 注册声明：
|
||||
|
||||
- `conversation.session`（single）——严格 session 的 header、view ring 与 chat store；session id 切换时重建。
|
||||
- `conversation.composer.bar`（single）——InputBar 本体的坑位：InputBar 是真 slot entry（自家坑自注册），composer chain fallback 的内容；不做 chain entry——chain 单选举会在 takeover 时卸载它，破坏 textarea DOM 存活。
|
||||
- `conversation.input.overlay`——输入卡内浮层锚点；注册者 inject 按 slot sessionId 解析各自 per-session controller。
|
||||
- `conversation.input.dock`——输入上方堆叠条（QueueDock 的队列只读列表落此），order 定序。
|
||||
- `conversation.composer.dock`——composer 上沿统计带。
|
||||
- `conversation.input.left` / `conversation.input.right`——工具行左右区。
|
||||
- `conversation.input.plan` / `conversation.input.model`（single）——工具行两具名控制位；bar 只传 `locked`（owner props），空到 owning 插件注册为止，无占位 fallback。
|
||||
- `conversation.hero.workspace`（root scope）——无 session / blank Hero 共用的 Workspace picker；pick 经 `connectWorkspace` 复用或创建目标 blank session，必要时搬运 draft 后切 current。
|
||||
|
||||
### 测试纪律
|
||||
|
||||
状态机全部行为由纯 JS 单测覆盖（事件序列进、断言状态与效果，零浏览器 DOM）；交互矩阵逐行投影测试。这一要求正是纯核 + 服务壳分层的成因。
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
| 弃案 | 一行理由 |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| ActiveCommand 中间态 / registerMode 模式注册表 / 从 draft 推导命令态 | claim 由 pick 路径显式建立——无表、无推导 |
|
||||
| bindTarget/bindDraft 对象直连 | 反向耦合 + root 单例跨会话误配；scoped bail 事件保依赖倒置且路由结构性正确 |
|
||||
| 统一 slash/input-apply 或全事件化 | 三个独立 payload 覆盖跨插件改写；异步链路保持 registry 显式调用 |
|
||||
| contenteditable / 富文本树 | 兼容性差；textarea + U+FFFC + occurrence 表覆盖全部交互契约 |
|
||||
| draft 双持久化 {text, occurrences} | mirror 写剪贴板投影零新概念；chip 跨刷新降级可接受 |
|
||||
| 原生 textarea undo 栈 | 受控 + 程序化写入下不可靠；粘贴两段 undo 语义只能自管 |
|
||||
| InputBar 收 16 员 wiring 回调包 | 消费矩阵实证 11 员 InputBar 独占、1 员死成员；标准件通道让组件自取，键盘面包内私递 |
|
||||
| 空格裁决也认领即执行型命令 | 误触发防线：空格后整行是普通 prompt；不可逆副作用只留显式入口 |
|
||||
| 通用 tokenPattern 装饰机制 | 结构化 occurrence 记录取代模式扫描 |
|
||||
| 占位 select 常驻工具行 | 具名坑位空到注册为止；占位件与真实现冲突时是双真相源 |
|
||||
| 引用一律走 U+FFFC chip（决策 21 前旧线） | 纯文本 + 派生装饰零身份状态；原文即模型投影，undo/剪贴板免特判；chip 链保留给需要不可分原子性的场景 |
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
- 一个常驻 conversation 外壳承接 no-session/blank/active：无 session → blank 只保证大框架 React identity，允许 disabled textarea 替换为严格 InputBar；同一 blank session → engaging/active 保持 InputBar 与 textarea。EmptyState 与受控 intent 链（`sessions.updateIntent`/`updatePendingPrompt`/`workspaces.sendSession`）随最后消费者一并删除。
|
||||
- 输入面对命令零知识 + 可选依赖：无命令包时纯输入可用；`@` 引用与 skill 引用免费复用同一菜单/pick 管线。代价是空格/回车裁决是逐 source 轮询协议，其应答语义（同步/异步、undefined 含义）为冻结契约。
|
||||
- 提交事务化（attempt seq + 漂移守卫）使晚到结果回灌、会话切换、concurrent 重放三类缺陷结构性不可能，由矩阵测试钉住。
|
||||
- 已知欠账：chip 跨刷新保真（可复用粘贴匹配）未立项；subagent 引用的模型表示待业务立项。
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-06-20-extract-example-app-packages.md: f2853db3f454d71572be003cfbf4f6dfd8377cdd
|
||||
2026-06-20-extract-example-app-packages.zh.md: 58d3d95996b1dacbc12178b46524374429df71ed
|
||||
2026-07-26-packed-chunk-rows-by-default.md: d6a044676604e4a4512a7a6674edb80e120b2f3c
|
||||
2026-07-26-packed-chunk-rows-by-default.zh.md: 184d462d70dcc666a0b38497ead307ce6861382d
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Make packed chunk rows the default JSONL layout
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-26-packed-chunk-rows-by-default.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
Provider streams produce many token-sized `assistant/chunk` delta events whose repeated JSON envelopes can outweigh their payloads. The session log must retain each chunk as a distinct logical event: live `session/event` delivery, sequence numbers, `sourceEventSeqs`, replay, cancellation evidence, and UI streaming all depend on those boundaries.
|
||||
|
||||
The JSONL storage seam can reduce that envelope cost without changing the logical log. A run of at least three consecutive same-block delta events fits in one `text-chunks`, `reasoning-chunks`, or `tool-call-chunks` storage row, and decoding reconstructs every original event, timestamp, and sequence number. A credible default must cover runtime writers, app-level config, snapshot producers, and committed fixtures together; otherwise tests avoid the layout that deployments write.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl` resolves an omitted `packChunks` to `true`. The ACP demo wrapper exposes the same default, and every composition that omits the field inherits packed writes. `packChunks: false` remains an explicit write-side diagnostic mode that stores one event per line.
|
||||
|
||||
Reading is unconditional and layout-blind. Packed, unpacked, and mixed files load into the same contiguous `SessionEvent[]`, so the default does not require a session-format version change or an on-disk runtime migration. The option controls newly appended batches only; it never selects a reader mode.
|
||||
|
||||
### Logical events and physical rows
|
||||
|
||||
Packing stays at the `dsh-session` storage seam through `packChunkRuns()` and `decodeStorageRecord()`. The encoder recognizes exact delta-event shapes, preserves unrecognized events verbatim, and packs only runs of at least three. A packed row is storage vocabulary, not a `SessionEventMap` member: it never enters `Session.events` or fires `session/event`.
|
||||
|
||||
The JSONL backend packs each durable append batch. Raw `compression: 'none'` and default Zstandard framing carry the same logical storage records; selecting raw mode for reviewable fixtures does not disable packing. Repository replay readers and normalizers decode the shared row format instead of maintaining snapshot-specific codecs.
|
||||
|
||||
### Canonical snapshot fixtures
|
||||
|
||||
Every committed session-format JSONL fixture uses the canonical packed representation. `scripts/session-fixture-layout.snapshot.ts` discovers tracked `*.jsonl` files and unignored untracked additions repository-wide, selects those whose first record is a `session` header, decodes all body records, and rejects content that differs from `packChunkRuns()` output. The inventory therefore includes ACP, headless, TUI, `apps/web`, parent sessions, child sessions, and future fixture names without a maintained path list.
|
||||
|
||||
ACP and headless snapshot runs harvest the default JSONL backend output. TUI and web record-mode writers apply `packChunkRuns()` to their in-memory events before writing fixtures. The authored `packed-chunks` ACP scenario runs under the ordinary config and retains all three packed row kinds; its contract decodes both its independent source fixture and target fixture before asserting event-for-event equality.
|
||||
|
||||
Focused package tests keep unpacked and mixed-layout inputs for reader compatibility. They do not opt the default snapshot corpus out of the canonical layout.
|
||||
|
||||
### In-flight branch convergence
|
||||
|
||||
The temporary [`scripts/migrate-packed-session-fixtures.ts`](../../../../scripts/migrate-packed-session-fixtures.ts) command lets in-flight branches converge after merging current `master`: `pnpm run migrate:packed-session-fixtures` discovers the same repository-wide fixture set as the permanent gate, preserves each header line, decodes existing mixed records, writes the canonical packed body, proves decoded equality, and proves idempotence. It never calls a model or regenerates transcript and presentation outputs.
|
||||
|
||||
The command remains linked from the testing policy and ACP snapshot README while older branches may carry fixture edits. The [removal proposal](../../proposed/process/2026-07-26-remove-packed-session-fixture-migrator.md) deletes the CLI, package command, this transitional section, and the documentation links, then replaces the permanent gate's command-specific remediation text once a live open-PR inventory shows that every affected branch is merged, closed, or canonical. The shared canonicalizer and snapshot gate remain permanent.
|
||||
|
||||
### Verification contract
|
||||
|
||||
JSONL persistence tests prove that omission writes a packed row, explicit `false` writes one event per line, and both forms load identical events. Canonicalizer unit tests cover header preservation, unpacked conversion, non-session JSONL, already-packed idempotence, and malformed input. The keyless snapshot gate covers every committed fixture and assembled replay path; documentation gates keep config defaults and bilingual contracts aligned.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**Flip only the backend schema default.** This leaves wrapper defaults, direct TUI/web serializers, existing fixtures, and future fixture policy inconsistent. A default is meaningful only when shipping compositions and the tests representing them share it.
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep snapshots unpacked for readability.** Packed rows retain every fragment and timestamp explicitly, while the shared decoder and normalizer provide logical inspection. Keeping the largest committed consumer on a different layout would make snapshot coverage avoid the shipping write path.
|
||||
|
||||
**Remove `packChunks` and always pack.** One writer is simpler, but one-event-per-line output remains useful for diagnostics and for focused mixed-layout compatibility tests. The explicit opt-out preserves those current consumers without weakening the default.
|
||||
|
||||
**Batch chunks as logical session events.** This reduces event count, but it delays or reshapes live delivery, renumbers provenance, and requires every UI and replay consumer to understand another streaming unit. Physical packing obtains the storage benefit behind the existing persistence interface.
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep the branch migrator permanently.** The read-only canonicalizer and snapshot gate own continuing enforcement. A mutation command has value only while in-flight branches still carry the former fixture layout, so its lifetime is explicitly bounded by the removal proposal.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
Ordinary JSONL writes and committed fixtures use fewer physical rows while preserving the exact logical event stream. Runtime readers accept every existing layout, and operators retain a deliberate unpacked diagnostic mode. Raw files are less convenient for per-token line processing, and external tools that incorrectly treat every post-header row as a `SessionEvent` encounter storage tags more often; supported readers call `decodeStorageRecord()`.
|
||||
|
||||
The repository carries a large mechanical fixture diff, reviewed through decoded equality and the canonical-layout gate rather than token-by-token line inspection. It also temporarily carries one branch migration command and its links; the separate removal proposal prevents that transition aid from becoming permanent process surface.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: 将打包分片行设为默认 JSONL 布局
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-26-packed-chunk-rows-by-default.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
提供方流会产生大量 token 大小的 `assistant/chunk` 增量事件，其重复 JSON 封装可能比载荷本身更大。会话日志必须将每个分片保留为独立的逻辑事件：实时 `session/event` 传递、序号、`sourceEventSeqs`、回放、取消证据和 UI 流式输出都依赖这些边界。
|
||||
|
||||
JSONL 存储 seam 可以在不改变逻辑日志的情况下减少这部分封装开销。一段至少包含 3 个连续、同属一个块的增量事件可以编码为一条 `text-chunks`、`reasoning-chunks` 或 `tool-call-chunks` 存储行，解码则会重建每个原始事件、时间戳和序号。一个可信的默认值必须同时覆盖运行时写入器、应用级配置、快照生成器和签入仓库的 fixture（测试前置数据）；否则测试会绕开部署实际写入的布局。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh-session-persistence-jsonl` 会将省略的 `packChunks` 解析为 `true`。ACP（Agent Client Protocol）演示包装层公开相同的默认值，所有省略该字段的组合都会继承打包写入。`packChunks: false` 仍是写入侧显式诊断模式，以每事件一行的形式存储。
|
||||
|
||||
读取始终不受选项控制且与布局无关。打包、非打包和混合文件都会加载为相同且连续的 `SessionEvent[]`，因此更改默认值不需要变更会话格式版本，也不需要对磁盘数据执行运行时迁移。该选项只控制新追加的批次，绝不会选择读取器模式。
|
||||
|
||||
### 逻辑事件与物理行
|
||||
|
||||
打包保留在 `dsh-session` 的存储 seam，并通过 `packChunkRuns()` 和 `decodeStorageRecord()` 实现。编码器识别精确的增量事件形态，原样保留无法识别的事件，并且只打包至少包含 3 个事件的连续段。打包行属于存储词汇，不是 `SessionEventMap` 成员：它绝不会进入 `Session.events`，也不会触发 `session/event`。
|
||||
|
||||
JSONL 后端会打包每个持久追加批次。原始模式 `compression: 'none'` 与默认 Zstandard 帧承载相同的逻辑存储记录；为使 fixture 便于评审而选择原始模式，不会禁用打包。仓库中的回放读取器和规范化器会解码共享行格式，而不维护快照专用编解码器。
|
||||
|
||||
### 规范快照 fixture
|
||||
|
||||
每个签入仓库的会话格式 JSONL fixture 都使用规范打包表示。`scripts/session-fixture-layout.snapshot.ts` 会在整个仓库中发现已跟踪的 `*.jsonl` 文件，以及未被忽略的新增未跟踪 JSONL 文件，选择首条记录为 `session` header 的文件，解码所有正文记录，并拒绝与 `packChunkRuns()` 输出不同的内容。因此，该清单无需维护路径列表即可覆盖 ACP、headless、TUI、`apps/web`、父会话、子会话以及未来的 fixture 名称。
|
||||
|
||||
ACP 和 headless 快照运行会采集默认 JSONL 后端的输出。TUI 和 web 的记录模式写入器会在写入 fixture 前，对内存事件应用 `packChunkRuns()`。人工编写的 `packed-chunks` ACP 场景在普通配置下运行，并保留全部 3 种打包行类型；其契约先解码独立的源 fixture 和目标 fixture，再断言二者逐事件相等。
|
||||
|
||||
聚焦的包（package）测试保留非打包和混合布局输入，以验证读取器兼容性。这些测试不会让默认快照语料库豁免规范布局要求。
|
||||
|
||||
### 在途分支收敛
|
||||
|
||||
临时命令 [`scripts/migrate-packed-session-fixtures.ts`](../../../../scripts/migrate-packed-session-fixtures.ts) 让在途分支合并当前 `master` 后可以完成收敛：`pnpm run migrate:packed-session-fixtures` 会发现与永久门禁相同的仓库级 fixture 集合，保留各文件的 header 行，解码现有混合记录，写入规范打包正文，并证明解码结果相等且操作具有幂等性。该命令绝不会调用模型，也不会重新生成 transcript（文本记录）与呈现输出。
|
||||
|
||||
只要较旧分支仍可能携带 fixture 改动，测试政策和 ACP 快照 README 就会继续链接该命令。最新的开放 PR（Pull Request）清单确认每个受影响分支均已合并、关闭或符合规范后，[移除提案](../../proposed/process/2026-07-26-remove-packed-session-fixture-migrator.md)会删除该 CLI、包命令、本过渡章节和文档链接，并替换永久门禁中仅适用于该命令的修复指引。共享规范布局转换器与快照门禁保持永久存在。
|
||||
|
||||
### 验证契约
|
||||
|
||||
JSONL 持久化测试证明：省略选项时会写入打包行，显式传入 `false` 时会按每事件一行的形式写入，两种形式都会加载为完全相同的事件。规范布局转换器单元测试覆盖 header 保留、非打包转换、非会话 JSONL、已打包输入的幂等性和畸形输入。无密钥快照门禁覆盖每个签入仓库的 fixture 和组装后的回放路径；文档门禁则确保配置默认值与双语契约保持一致。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
**仅翻转后端 schema 默认值。** 这会让包装层默认值、TUI/web 直接序列化器、现有 fixture 与未来 fixture 政策仍然彼此不一致。只有已交付组合及代表这些组合的测试采用相同默认值时，该默认值才有意义。
|
||||
|
||||
**快照继续使用非打包格式以便阅读。** 打包行仍会显式保留每个片段和时间戳，共享解码器与规范化器则提供逻辑检查。如果让规模最大的签入仓库消费方采用不同布局，快照覆盖就会绕开已交付的写入路径。
|
||||
|
||||
**删除 `packChunks` 并始终打包。** 只保留一个写入器更简单，但每事件一行的输出仍适用于诊断和聚焦的混合布局兼容性测试。显式停用选项在不削弱默认值的同时，保留了这些现有消费方。
|
||||
|
||||
**把分片批量合并为逻辑会话事件。** 这会减少事件数量，但也会延迟或重塑实时传递，改变溯源信息所引用的序号，并要求每个 UI 和回放消费方理解另一种流式单位。物理打包通过现有持久化接口获得存储收益。
|
||||
|
||||
**永久保留分支迁移器。** 只读的规范布局转换器与快照门禁负责持续强制执行。只有在途分支仍携带旧 fixture 布局时，会修改仓库内容的命令才有价值，因此移除提案明确限定了其生命周期。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
常规 JSONL 写入与签入仓库的 fixture 使用更少的物理行，同时精确保留逻辑事件流。运行时读取器接受所有现有布局，操作方也保留有意提供的非打包诊断模式。按 token 逐行处理原始文件较为不便；错误地将 header 后每一行都视为 `SessionEvent` 的外部工具会更频繁地遇到存储 tag，受支持的读取器则会调用 `decodeStorageRecord()`。
|
||||
|
||||
仓库会产生大规模机械 fixture diff；评审应依据解码结果相等这一事实和规范布局门禁，而不是逐行、逐 token 检查。仓库还会暂时保留一个分支迁移命令及其链接；单独的移除提案会防止这项过渡辅助机制成为永久的流程接口。
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-07-23-unified-session-query-service.md: 676a42017ca42f9e649f6529f84787e7162faac0
|
||||
2026-07-23-unified-session-query-service.zh.md: d4449a415840d61cbb10f88def1062a13e556749
|
||||
2026-07-26-subprocess-consumer-migration.md: b31f69f1251a7219e168ed7800ba16ff7d6b328c
|
||||
2026-07-26-subprocess-consumer-migration.zh.md: 47e7519a72f5482f255d15d87b483e9295f6cd2c
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: The subprocess seam goes Node-shaped and every eligible spawner rides it
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-26-subprocess-consumer-migration.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
The [subprocess seam](2026-07-26-subprocess-seam.md) shipped shaped for exactly one consumer family: batch-collected stdout/stderr, batch stdin, a single escalating `kill()`. That was deliberate scope control, and its own note records "migrate the other spawn sites" as rejected-for-now. Review on the introducing PR reversed that deferral: the stacked follow-up should reshape the interface toward Node's API and move the remaining process-running places onto the service. The remaining spawners each carried a private copy of some slice of the same mechanics — lsp-local had its own detached-tree signalling (POSIX group + Windows taskkill + liveness polling), subagent-subprocess had the dispose ladder and its own scrub, mcp-client and pty-local and the SDK helper each had a third/fourth/fifth copy of the credential scrub — and none of it was swappable or centrally testable.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
The seam's vocabulary is now Node-shaped, and every spawner that can ride the service does:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Per-stream stdio dispositions** on `SubprocessSpawnSpec`: `'pipe'` (the raw `Readable`/`Writable`, for consumer-owned protocol framing), `'inherit'` (diagnostics to the parent's stream), and collect mode `{ maxBytes, spill? }` — the original bounded tail-keep shape, with the spill file now optional so a diagnostic tail (a language server's stderr) buffers without touching disk. stdin is `'ignore'`, `'pipe'`, or `{ data }` (write-and-close batch).
|
||||
- **`SubprocessOutcome` carries exit facts only** (Node's close-event vocabulary); collected output stays readable through `handle.collected` after settlement (spill fds seal at the settle boundary), so batch and streaming callers share one access path and nothing is copied into the outcome.
|
||||
- **Tree-scoped termination behind one verb**: `terminate()` owns the SIGTERM→grace→SIGKILL escalation (serves the spec's abort signal too, and is a no-op once the tree is gone) — the handle exposes no single-signal `kill(signal?)`, so a consumer cannot skip the grace window; `waitForExit()` polls tree liveness (POSIX group probe; direct-child boundary on Windows); Windows tree termination (`taskkill /T`, injectable) moved in from lsp-local, so tree semantics are platform-correct for every consumer. (The stdin-EOF-first dispose ladder initially absorbed from `subagent-subprocess` later moved back out to its one consumer — see the [ladder-ownership Agent Note](2026-07-27-dispose-ladder-to-consumer.md).)
|
||||
- **One scrub definition**: `scrubbedParentEnv()`/`SENSITIVE_ENV_PATTERN` live on the seam. Spawners that cannot route the spawn itself through the service — pty-local (node-pty owns the fork) and mcp-client (the MCP SDK owns the transport spawn) — import the function, so environment policy is single-sourced even where process ownership is not; the SDK helper's `scrubEnvironment()` defaults through it as well.
|
||||
|
||||
Migrations landed with the reshape: **bash-local/bash-sandbox** (collect modes + batch stdin; the bash `kill()` maps to `terminate()` so `task_kill` keeps escalation semantics), **lsp-local** (piped protocol streams + a no-spill collected stderr tail; `LspConnection` takes the seam's spawn function; its private tree-op helpers deleted), **subagent-acp** (piped ndjson streams + inherited stderr; spawn failure surfaces through `done` rejection into the same startup race; disposal is the backend-owned `disposeAcpChild` ladder over the seam's verbs, with the plugin's configured graces). **`dsh-subagent-subprocess` is deleted** — the dispose ladder and scrub are the seam's; the unused isolated-config-dir helper died with it (no consumer existed).
|
||||
|
||||
Compositions mounting lsp-local or subagent-acp now load `dsh-subprocess-local` (the plugins inject `'subprocess'`); the acp/lsp test fixtures gained the row.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep the batch-only seam and let stream consumers stay bespoke.** The introducing note's position, rejected by review: it leaves three private copies of tree signalling and five of the scrub, and any future runner (containerized executor, remote process host) would have to pick which private copy to fork. The Node-shaped dispositions cover all three observed stream shapes without widening the outcome type or buffering piped streams.
|
||||
|
||||
**A single `stdio: 'pipe' | 'inherit' | 'collect'` mode for all three streams at once.** Rejected: real consumers mix modes per stream (lsp: pipe/pipe/collect; acp: pipe/pipe/inherit; bash: data/collect/collect). Per-stream dispositions are exactly Node's shape and avoid a second spawn call for the mixed cases.
|
||||
|
||||
**Migrate pty-local and mcp-client spawns too.** Rejected on ownership grounds, not scope: node-pty's `fork()` allocates the terminal itself, and the MCP SDK's `StdioClientTransport` spawns internally — neither call site is ours to route. They adopt the shared scrub (the part that is policy), and their READMEs say why the spawn stays put.
|
||||
|
||||
**Migrate the test-support launchers (acp-snapshot, loader-smoke) and the SDK package-manager runner.** Rejected: the support packages are deliberately dependency-light test infrastructure that must not depend on product seams, and the SDK wizard's `stdio: 'inherit'`-with-redirect semantics plus its out-of-composition lifecycle (no cordis context at all) make the service a poor fit; it shares the scrub instead.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
Bought: one implementation of tree signalling, escalation, bounded collection, and the scrub, tested once in `dsh-subprocess-local`'s suites (including injected-platform Windows coverage that lsp-local's private copy never had); lsp-local and subagent-acp shed their process plumbing and their children now survive plugin reloads and die with composition teardown like bash's; a whole package (`dsh-subagent-subprocess`) is gone. The seam README's "one consumer family" limitation is retired.
|
||||
|
||||
Cost: the seam is wider — three stdio modes and the terminate/waitForExit/dispose lifecycle surface instead of one mode and one verb — so a future backend implements more surface; the compositions for lsp-local/subagent-acp each carry the subprocess row now; and `SubprocessOutcome` no longer carries output, a breaking shape change inside the still-unreleased stack (the PR2 layer was updated in place rather than shimmed, per the pre-release stance). pty-local/mcp-client/SDK/test-support spawns remain outside the service by ownership, with the scrub as the shared floor.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: 进程 seam 转向 Node 形状，所有具备条件的 spawn 调用点一并迁入
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-26-subprocess-consumer-migration.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
[进程 seam](2026-07-26-subprocess-seam.md) 交付时恰好只为一个消费方家族塑形：批量收集的 stdout/stderr、批量 stdin、单一的升级式 `kill()`。那是有意的范围控制，其自身的 Agent Note 也把「迁移其余 spawn 调用点」记为暂缓否决项。引入该 seam 的 PR（Pull Request）上的评审推翻了这一暂缓决定：堆叠其上的后续变更应当把接口向 Node 的 API 方向重塑，并把其余运行进程之处迁到该服务上。其余各 spawn 调用点此前各自持有同一套机制中某个切片的私有副本——lsp-local 自带 detached 进程树信号发送（POSIX 进程组 + Windows taskkill + 存活轮询），subagent-subprocess 自带 dispose（资源释放）阶梯和自己的凭据清除，mcp-client、pty-local 与 SDK helper 则各自持有凭据清除的第三、第四、第五份副本——而这一切既不可替换，也无法集中测试。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
这道 seam 的词汇如今已是 Node 形状，凡能接入该服务的 spawn 调用点均已迁入：
|
||||
|
||||
- **按流划分的 stdio 处置方式（disposition）**，位于 `SubprocessSpawnSpec` 上：`'pipe'`（原始的 `Readable`/`Writable`，供消费方自有的协议分帧使用）、`'inherit'`（诊断输出直通父进程的流），以及收集模式（collect）`{ maxBytes, spill? }`——即最初的有界尾部保留形状，只是 spill 文件改为可选，使诊断尾部（例如语言服务器的 stderr）无需落盘即可缓冲。stdin 则为 `'ignore'`、`'pipe'` 或 `{ data }`（写完即关闭的批量形式）。
|
||||
- **`SubprocessOutcome` 只承载退出事实**（Node close 事件的词汇）；收集到的输出在结算后仍可经 `handle.collected` 读取（spill 文件描述符在结算边界封存），因此批量与流式调用方共用一条访问路径，也没有任何内容被复制进这份结果。
|
||||
- **以进程树为范围的终止，集中在一个动词后面**：`terminate()` 拥有 SIGTERM→宽限期→SIGKILL 升级（也承接 spec 的 abort 信号，进程树消亡后为空操作）——句柄不暴露单信号的 `kill(signal?)`，因此消费方无法跳过宽限窗口；`waitForExit()` 轮询进程树存活状态（POSIX 进程组探测；Windows 上以直接子进程为界）。Windows 进程树终止（`taskkill /T`，可注入）自 lsp-local 迁入，因此每个消费方拿到的进程树语义在各平台上都正确。（最初从 `subagent-subprocess` 吸收的以 stdin EOF 打头的 dispose 阶梯，后来又移回其唯一消费方——见[阶梯归属 Agent Note](2026-07-27-dispose-ladder-to-consumer.md)。）
|
||||
- **凭据清除只有一份定义**：`scrubbedParentEnv()`/`SENSITIVE_ENV_PATTERN` 定义在 seam 上。无法把 spawn 本身路由到该服务的调用点——pty-local（node-pty 拥有 fork）与 mcp-client（MCP SDK 拥有传输层的 spawn）——改为导入该函数，因此即便进程所有权无法统一，环境策略仍是单一来源；SDK helper 的 `scrubEnvironment()` 默认同样委托给它。
|
||||
|
||||
各项迁移随这次重塑一并落地：**bash-local/bash-sandbox**（收集模式 + 批量 stdin；bash 的 `kill()` 映射到 `terminate()`，因此 `task_kill` 保有升级语义），**lsp-local**（管道化的协议流 + 无 spill 的 stderr 收集尾部；`LspConnection` 改为接收 seam 的 spawn 函数；其私有的进程树操作辅助函数已删除），**subagent-acp**（管道化的 ndjson 流 + inherit 的 stderr；spawn 失败经 `done` 的 reject 汇入同一个启动竞态；dispose 是后端自有的 `disposeAcpChild` 阶梯，经由 seam 的动词运行，携带插件所配置的宽限期）。**`dsh-subagent-subprocess` 已删除**——dispose 阶梯与凭据清除归 seam 所有；无人使用的隔离配置目录辅助函数随之消亡（其消费方本就不存在）。
|
||||
|
||||
挂载 lsp-local 或 subagent-acp 的组合如今都加载 `dsh-subprocess-local`（这两个插件注入 `'subprocess'`）；acp/lsp 测试 fixture（测试前置数据）补上了这一行组合配置。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
**保持只支持批量的 seam，让流式消费方继续各自为政。**这正是引入该 seam 的 Agent Note 当初的立场，评审将其否决：这样会留下三份进程树信号发送的私有副本和五份凭据清除的私有副本，而未来任何运行器（容器化执行器、远程进程宿主）都得挑选去 fork 哪一份私有副本。Node 形状的处置方式覆盖已观察到的全部三种流形状，既不拓宽结果类型，也不缓冲管道化的流。
|
||||
|
||||
**用单个 `stdio: 'pipe' | 'inherit' | 'collect'` 模式一次性统辖全部三条流。**否决：真实消费方按流混用模式（lsp：pipe/pipe/collect；acp：pipe/pipe/inherit；bash：data/collect/collect）。按流划分的处置方式恰好就是 Node 的形状，也免去了混用场景的第二个 spawn 调用。
|
||||
|
||||
**把 pty-local 与 mcp-client 的 spawn 也一并迁移。**基于所有权而非范围否决：node-pty 的 `fork()` 自行分配终端，MCP SDK 的 `StdioClientTransport` 在内部完成 spawn——这两处调用点都不归我们路由。它们采纳共享的凭据清除（那正是属于策略的部分），并在各自的 README 中说明 spawn 为何留在原地。
|
||||
|
||||
**迁移 test-support 启动器（acp-snapshot、loader-smoke）与 SDK package-manager 运行器。**否决：support 各包（package）是刻意保持轻依赖的测试基础设施，不得依赖产品 seam；而 SDK 向导那套附带重定向的 `stdio: 'inherit'` 语义，加上其完全脱离组合的生命周期（根本没有 cordis 上下文），使该服务并不合用；它改为共享凭据清除。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
换来的是：进程树信号发送、升级、有界收集与凭据清除各自只剩一份实现，且只在 `dsh-subprocess-local` 的测试套件中测试一次（其中包括 lsp-local 的私有副本从未有过的、以注入平台方式实现的 Windows 覆盖）；lsp-local 与 subagent-acp 卸下了自己的进程管道，其子进程如今像 bash 的一样，在插件重载后存活、随组合拆除而终止；一个完整的包（`dsh-subagent-subprocess`）就此消失。seam README 中「只有一个消费方家族」的限制说明也随之退役。
|
||||
|
||||
代价是：这道 seam 变宽了（stdio 模式从一种变为三种、终止动词换成 terminate/waitForExit/dispose 这组生命周期表面），未来的后端因此要实现更宽的表面；lsp-local/subagent-acp 的各组合如今都多出 subprocess 这一行组合配置；`SubprocessOutcome` 也不再承载输出，这是仍未发布的堆叠变更内部的一次破坏性形状变更（依照预发布立场，PR2 那一层被就地更新，而非加 shim）。pty-local/mcp-client/SDK/test-support 的 spawn 因所有权归属留在该服务之外，以凭据清除作为共享底线。
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-07-21-tui-reload-command.md: 89bf2f7bb482d7f3889136c1a6ac9918ba0c4919
|
||||
2026-07-21-tui-reload-command.zh.md: cfea10690af49f2cf484938a3f9f12d954766a71
|
||||
2026-07-26-subprocess-seam.md: ad2f8522be51ba16b0df155aeb334a88f493890f
|
||||
2026-07-26-subprocess-seam.zh.md: d9a0fb56b57b545dd1f94fde0cfb436d58fe00d4
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: The subprocess service is its own seam under the bash executors (`dsh-subprocess` / `dsh-subprocess-local`)
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-26-subprocess-seam.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh-bash-local` bundled two capabilities that change for different reasons: *running a bash command* (command defaulting, timeout classification, model-friendly terminal environment, the stdout/stderr merge the bash tool renders) and *running and managing a child process* (detached process groups, bounded tail-keep output with spill files, the credential scrub and `DSH_*` merge order, SIGTERM→grace→SIGKILL escalation, kill-and-join disposal). The process half — `run.ts`, roughly half the package — had no seam of its own: a future non-shell runner (a direct-argv executor, a worker supervisor) would have to re-implement or reach into bash internals, and the shared `DSH_*`/`CollectedOutput` vocabulary lived in a package whose name promises shell semantics. The bundling also tied background-process lifetime to the executor's fiber: reloading the bash executor killed every live background process, unlike the sibling [task registry](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md), whose registrations deliberately outlive producer fibers.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
A new `subprocess/` capability family owns "run and manage a process"; the bash family keeps "run a bash command" and consumes it:
|
||||
|
||||
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subprocess` (interface)** — the abstract `SubprocessService` owning `ctx.subprocess` with one method, `spawn(spec): SubprocessHandle`, and the shared vocabulary: the fully-explicit `SubprocessSpawnSpec` (argv, cwd, per-stream stdio dispositions, grace — no defaults; deployment-varying knobs stay with the calling seam's config, per the `dsh-bash` request/spec template and the no-hidden-defaults rule), `SubprocessHandle` with non-consuming offset-based readers, `SubprocessOutcome` with deliberately no timeout/cancel classification, and the shared scrub plus `DSH_ENV_PREFIX`/`DshEnvironment`/`CollectedOutput` types. `argv` is never shell-interpreted. (The [consumer-migration Agent Note](2026-07-26-subprocess-consumer-migration.md) later widened the stdio and termination vocabulary Node-ward.)
|
||||
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subprocess-local` (implementation)** — `LocalSubprocessService` over the former `run.ts` plumbing (`spawn.ts`): detached groups, tail-keep truncation with private bounded spill files, credential scrub with the explicit-env merge after it, group kill escalation, and disposal that kills and joins every still-running managed process. It has no config; every limit arrives on the spec. The terminal `ENV_OVERRIDES` (`TERM=dumb` etc.) did NOT move — that is bash-tool presentation policy and stays in `dsh-bash-local`, merged through the ordinary env channel.
|
||||
- **`dsh-bash-local` (consumer)** — `inject: ['subprocess']`; maps each resolved `BashExecSpec` onto a `SubprocessSpawnSpec` (`['bash', '-c', command]`), keeps its config, `resolve()` defaulting, fused-deadline `timedOut`/`aborted` classification, the `[stderr]`-marked background read merge with its consuming cursor, and the `onProcessDone` subclass hook. `dsh-bash-sandbox` is unchanged apart from redeclaring the inherited inject; it still wraps at the command-string level and re-enters the inherited spawn path.
|
||||
- **`dsh-bash` (seam)** — re-exports the moved vocabulary from `dsh-subprocess`, so no bash consumer changes an import; `BashExecRequest`/`BashExecSpec`/`BashProcess` and the sandbox facts remain bash-owned.
|
||||
|
||||
Every composition that loads a bash executor now also loads `@deepseek-ai/dsh-subprocess-local` (CLI, examples, python bundled runtime, create-sdk's bash feature resources, inline test configs).
|
||||
|
||||
Background-process lifetime moved from the executor to the subprocess service: the executor no longer retains a live-process set, so an executor reload leaves background work running and readable, and composition teardown (the service's disposal) remains the kill-and-join boundary. One behavioral seam shifted with it: a background spawn failure can no longer be buffered as fake stderr inside the plumbing (the service rejects `done` and buffers nothing for a process that never ran), so the executor injects the `spawn failed: …` note into exactly one `readOutput()` delta.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**Leave the process plumbing inside `dsh-bash-local` (status quo).** Rejected for the same reason the [task registry split](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md) landed: the boundary is stable and already documented in-code (`run.ts`'s module doc said "this layer reacts to an abort signal; the executor owns deadlines and classifies causes"), and keeping it private makes every future non-shell runner either fork the mechanics or depend on a bash-named package for non-bash work. The user-visible driver for this stack was exactly this split.
|
||||
|
||||
**Migrate the repo's other spawn sites (lsp-local, pty-local, subagent-subprocess, sdk package-manager, test-support launchers) onto `ctx.subprocess` in the same change.** Rejected as scope creep with real design risk at this PR's scale: those sites have materially different stream and lifecycle needs — node-pty ownership (pty), LSP framing over long-lived stdio with tree-kill fallbacks (lsp), stdin-EOF-first disposal ladders and no output buffering (subagent transports) — and forcing them under a handle shaped for bounded batch output would either bloat the seam or misfit the consumers. The seam shipped proven against its one real consumer family, per the shape-interfaces-around-current-consumers rule. Review then asked for exactly that follow-up as a stacked PR; the [consumer-migration Agent Note](2026-07-26-subprocess-consumer-migration.md) records the Node-ward reshape and which sites moved (and which stayed, by ownership).
|
||||
|
||||
**Put `run_in_background`/task semantics into the process seam instead.** Rejected: that boundary already exists — `ctx.tasks` owns ids, ownership, and notices, and the bash tool adapts a `BashProcess` into task hooks. The process seam sits *below* the bash executor, not beside the task registry.
|
||||
|
||||
**Move `ENV_OVERRIDES` (TERM=dumb, PAGER=cat …) into the subprocess service.** Rejected: a generic subprocess service must not impose terminal presentation policy on non-terminal consumers; the ambient scrub (credential-shaped and `DSH_*` names) is a security/identity invariant and stays, but terminal friendliness is the bash tool's choice, expressed through the spec's explicit env where a caller's own entry still wins.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
Bought: "run and manage a process" is a swappable capability with the standard three-package shape (consumer count starts at two: `bash-local`, `bash-sandbox`); a containerized or remote process backend slots in without touching bash semantics; the shared `DSH_*`/output vocabulary has a non-shell home; and background processes survive executor reloads, matching the task registry's lifetime model. The spawn plumbing suite moved wholesale to `dsh-subprocess-local` (argv-based, plus argv-validation and service lifecycle/disposal suites); the executor suite now pins the bash-owned layers (classification, merge, spawn-failure note, service-owned lifetime) against the real service.
|
||||
|
||||
Cost: one more package pair and one more composition row everywhere a bash executor loads — a boot that loads an executor without the subprocess service leaves `ctx.bash` pending on `ctx.subprocess` (standard missing-service behavior). The moved-vocabulary re-exports keep `dsh-bash` imports working but mean two packages now name the same types; the subprocess seam is the owner and the bash seam documents the re-export. The spawn-failure note became single-delivery through the read path where the old plumbing retained it in the stderr buffer for repeated `readFrom(0)` reads — acceptable because the bash background read path was already a consuming cursor, and the note reaches the one reader that exists.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: 进程管理器是 bash 执行器之下的独立 seam（`dsh-subprocess` / `dsh-subprocess-local`）
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-26-subprocess-seam.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh-bash-local` 原先把两项因不同原因而变化的能力捆绑在一起：*运行一条 bash 命令*（命令默认值补全、超时分类、对模型友好的终端环境、bash 工具所渲染的 stdout/stderr 合并）与*运行并管理一个子进程*（detached 进程组、附带 spill 文件的有界尾部保留输出、凭据清除与 `DSH_*` 合并次序、SIGTERM→宽限期→SIGKILL 升级、先终止再等待退出的 dispose（资源释放））。进程这一半（`run.ts`）约占整个包（package）的一半，却没有属于自己的 seam：未来的非 shell 运行器（直接执行 argv 的执行器、worker supervisor）将不得不重新实现这套机制，或者探入 bash 内部；而共享的 `DSH_*`/`CollectedOutput` 词汇则存放在一个名字承诺 shell 语义的包里。这种捆绑还把后台进程的存续期系在执行器的 fiber 上：重载 bash 执行器会杀死每一个存活的后台进程。这一点不同于兄弟的[任务注册表](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md)：后者的注册存续期刻意长于生产方 fiber。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
新的 `subprocess/` 能力家族拥有「运行并管理一个进程」；bash 家族保留「运行一条 bash 命令」，并成为前者的消费方：
|
||||
|
||||
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subprocess`（接口）**——拥有 `ctx.subprocess` 的抽象 `SubprocessService`（仅一个方法：`spawn(spec): SubprocessHandle`），以及共享词汇：完全显式的 `SubprocessSpawnSpec`（argv、cwd、按流划分的 stdio 处置方式（disposition）、宽限期，一律不设默认值；随部署变化的旋钮依照 `dsh-bash` 的 request/spec 模板与无隐藏默认值规则，留在调用方 seam 的配置里）、携带基于偏移量的非消费式读取器的 `SubprocessHandle`、刻意不含超时/取消分类的 `SubprocessOutcome`，以及共享的凭据清除与 `DSH_ENV_PREFIX`/`DshEnvironment`/`CollectedOutput` 类型。`argv` 绝不经过 shell 解释。（[消费方迁移 Agent Note](2026-07-26-subprocess-consumer-migration.md) 其后将 stdio 与终止词汇拓宽为 Node 形状。）
|
||||
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subprocess-local`（实现）**——`LocalSubprocessService`，构建在原 `run.ts` 管道（现为 `spawn.ts`）之上：detached 进程组、带私有有界 spill 文件的尾部保留截断、清除之后合并显式 env 的凭据清除、进程组 kill 升级，以及会终止每个仍在运行的受管进程并等待其退出的 dispose。该实现没有任何配置；每项限制都随 spec 到达。终端相关的 `ENV_OVERRIDES`（`TERM=dumb` 等）并未迁移：那是 bash 工具的呈现策略，留在 `dsh-bash-local` 里，经普通 env 通道合并。
|
||||
- **`dsh-bash-local`（消费方）**——`inject: ['subprocess']`；把每个解析后的 `BashExecSpec` 映射为一个 `SubprocessSpawnSpec`（`['bash', '-c', command]`），并保留自身配置、`resolve()` 默认值补全、基于融合 deadline 的 `timedOut`/`aborted` 分类、带 `[stderr]` 标记的后台读取合并及其消费游标，以及 `onProcessDone` 子类钩子。`dsh-bash-sandbox` 除了重新声明继承来的 inject 之外没有变化；它仍在命令字符串层面做包装，并重新进入继承的 spawn 路径。
|
||||
- **`dsh-bash`（seam）**——把迁走的词汇从 `dsh-subprocess` 重导出，因此没有任何 bash 消费方需要改动导入；`BashExecRequest`/`BashExecSpec`/`BashProcess` 与沙箱事实仍归 bash 所有。
|
||||
|
||||
如今，每个加载 bash 执行器的组合都同时加载 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-subprocess-local`：CLI（命令行界面）、各示例、Python 捆绑运行时、create-sdk 的 bash 功能资源，以及各内联测试配置。
|
||||
|
||||
后台进程的存续期从执行器移到了管理器：执行器不再保有存活进程集合，于是重载执行器后，后台工作会继续运行且仍可读取，而组合拆除（管理器的 dispose）仍是先终止再等待退出的边界。一条行为 seam 随之挪动：后台 spawn 失败不再能在管道内部被缓冲成伪造的 stderr（对一个从未真正运行的进程，管理器会 reject `done`，且不缓冲任何内容），因此执行器把 `spawn failed: …` 提示注入恰好一个 `readOutput()` 增量。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
**把进程管道留在 `dsh-bash-local` 里（维持现状）。**否决的理由与[任务注册表拆分](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md)得以落地的理由相同：这条边界既稳定，也早已记录在代码里（`run.ts` 的模块文档曾写明「this layer reacts to an abort signal; the executor owns deadlines and classifies causes」），而若继续将它保持私有，未来每个非 shell 运行器就只能要么 fork 这套机制，要么为非 bash 工作去依赖一个以 bash 命名的包。这组堆叠变更对用户可见的动因正是这一拆分。
|
||||
|
||||
**在同一变更中把仓库其余 spawn 调用点（lsp-local、pty-local、subagent-subprocess、sdk package-manager、test-support 各启动器）迁到 `ctx.subprocess` 上。**在本 PR（Pull Request）的规模下，作为带有真实设计风险的范围蔓延否决。这些调用点在流与生命周期上的需求存在实质差异：node-pty 所有权（pty）、长生命周期 stdio 上的 LSP 分帧加进程树终止回退（lsp）、以 stdin EOF 打头的 dispose 阶梯和完全不缓冲输出（subagent 传输层）。把它们强行纳入一个按有界批量输出塑形的句柄之下，要么会让这道 seam 膨胀，要么会让句柄与消费方错配。依照「接口围绕当前消费方塑形」的规则，该 seam 当时在其唯一真实的消费方家族上得到验证后交付。评审随后恰恰要求以堆叠 PR 的形式完成这项后续工作；[消费方迁移 Agent Note](2026-07-26-subprocess-consumer-migration.md) 记录了向 Node 形状的重塑，以及哪些调用点迁入（哪些因所有权归属而留在原地）。
|
||||
|
||||
**改把 `run_in_background`/任务语义放进进程 seam。**否决：那条边界已经存在。`ctx.tasks` 拥有 id、所有权与通知，bash 工具则把 `BashProcess` 适配成任务钩子。进程 seam 位于 bash 执行器*之下*，而不是与任务注册表并列。
|
||||
|
||||
**把 `ENV_OVERRIDES`（TERM=dumb、PAGER=cat 等）移入管理器。**否决：通用进程管理器不得把终端呈现策略强加给非终端消费方；对环境中凭据形态名称与 `DSH_*` 名称的清除是安全与身份不变式，予以保留，但终端友好性是 bash 工具自己的选择，经 spec 的显式 env 表达，而调用方自己的条目依旧优先。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
换来的是：「运行并管理一个进程」成为一项具备标准三包形态的可替换能力（消费方起步就有两个：`bash-local`、`bash-sandbox`）；容器化或远程进程后端可以直接接入，而不触碰 bash 语义；共享的 `DSH_*`/输出词汇有了一个不带 shell 含义的归属；后台进程也能在执行器重载后存活，与任务注册表的存续期模型一致。spawn 管道测试套件整体迁至 `dsh-subprocess-local`（现以 argv 为基础，外加 argv 校验与管理器生命周期/dispose 套件）；执行器测试套件如今对着真实管理器固定 bash 所有的各层（分类、合并、spawn 失败提示、归管理器所有的存续期）。
|
||||
|
||||
代价是：多出一对包，而且凡加载 bash 执行器之处都多一行组合配置。若某次启动加载了执行器却没有加载管理器，`ctx.bash` 会因等待 `ctx.subprocess` 而保持挂起（标准的服务缺失行为）。迁移词汇的重导出让 `dsh-bash` 的导入继续可用，但也意味着两个包如今命名同一批类型；进程 seam 是所有者，bash seam 则记录这层重导出。spawn 失败提示经由读取路径变为单次交付，而旧管道曾把它保留在 stderr 缓冲区里，供重复的 `readFrom(0)` 读取；这一点可以接受，因为 bash 的后台读取路径本就是消费游标，该提示能到达唯一存在的那个读取方。
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-07-04-hook-snapshot-matrix.md: 98f9db27fd8afaaa99c9985dff4d148ef4eb926b
|
||||
2026-07-04-hook-snapshot-matrix.zh.md: 40b9ee84ad7232ac806096375e8da42bd02bfddf
|
||||
2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md: 57ac176cf6d2b0a50fcbcfacd77f6a26b462b582
|
||||
2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.zh.md: 252382ac39ebf1e5077fad87fcee2537ae8a9ab3
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: The task registry is a capability seam (`dsh-tasks` / `dsh-tasks-local`)
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
The [background-task runtime](2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md) shipped `TaskService` as one concrete package: `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks` owned both the `ctx.tasks` contract every producer and control surface programs against and the process-local implementation (the in-memory store, settlement bookkeeping, owner-cleanup effects, teardown). That bundling recouples the two rates of change the repository's [capability-seam rule](2026-06-13-capability-seams.md) separates: swapping the registry's storage or lifecycle backend would churn the same package whose types and `ctx.tasks` surface producers (`dsh-tool-bash`, `dsh-tool-pty`, `dsh-tool-subagent`), the control surface (`dsh-tool-tasks`), and `TaskKindMap` extenders import. Every other swappable capability in the harness — bash, pty, fs, skill, subagent, web, session persistence — already carries the interface / implementation / consumer split; the task registry was the remaining `core`-mode exception, guarded only by a `TODO(task-service-backend)` comment.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
`tasks/` is now a three-package capability family in the bash-trio shape:
|
||||
|
||||
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks` (interface)** — the abstract `TaskService extends Service` owning `ctx.tasks`, the eight-method contract (`start`, `list`, `get`, `read`, `kill`, `wait`, `onTaskDone`, `attachSurface`), all vocabulary types (`TaskId`, `TaskKindMap`, `TaskStart`, `TaskHooks`, `TaskOutcome`, `TaskSnapshot`, `TaskRead`, `TaskDoneListener`), and the snapshot invariant companion. The class-level JSDoc states the semantics every implementation owes: registrations outlive producer and surface fibers, owned access is session-fenced, settlement is first-wins with contained listeners, and `start` refuses work while no control surface is attached.
|
||||
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local` (implementation)** — `LocalTaskService`, the process-local registry moved verbatim: the in-memory store, per-kind counters, waiter bookkeeping, `TASK_WAIT_TIMEOUT` deadline code, owner-cleanup effects, and force-fail teardown. The `dsh-timeout` dependency moves here with it; the seam has no implementation dependencies.
|
||||
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks` (consumer)** — unchanged; it injects `'tasks'` and never imports implementation types.
|
||||
|
||||
Compositions load `dsh-tasks-local` where they previously loaded `dsh-tasks` (the CLI cordis.yml row, `agent-spine-demo`, test harnesses, the tool-catalog generator boot). Producer misconfiguration diagnostics ("background tasks unavailable: load …") name `dsh-tasks` — the seam that defines the absent `ctx.tasks` service — and the seam's own surfaces (its README and the direct-mount fence) point at implementations, so the producer message stays correct when another backend becomes the recommended default. Producers, `TaskKindMap` declaration merges, and the control surface keep importing `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks` only.
|
||||
|
||||
The seam keeps the in-process contract semantics unchanged: `TaskStart.run()` still passes callbacks and exact `Agent` objects, so a durable or cross-process backend still has design work to do before it can implement this interface (identity, restart, ownership, observation). The split moves that future work out of every consumer's dependency graph; it does not pre-design the backend.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep the concrete service until a second backend exists (status quo).** This was the original runtime note's position: extracting an interface before a second implementation risks freezing the wrong boundary. It lost because the boundary is no longer speculative — the eight service methods and their semantics have been stable across every producer integration since introduction, they are exactly the surface `dsh-tool-tasks` and the producers already program against, and the repository convention treats swappable capabilities as three packages by default. The residual risk (a durable backend needing contract changes) is unchanged by the split: those changes would land in the seam package either way, and today they would also churn every consumer's implementation dependency.
|
||||
|
||||
**Interface-only extraction inside one package (export an abstract class beside the concrete one).** Rejected because it separates nothing operationally: consumers still depend on the package that carries the implementation and its dependencies, and a replacement backend still cannot ship without the local one in its graph. The package boundary is the unit of independent evolution here.
|
||||
|
||||
**Splitting `types.ts` out but leaving the service concrete.** Rejected for the same reason — the types are not the seam; `ctx.tasks` and its method contract are. Producers need the service key and semantics, not just the shapes.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
Bought: the task registry now matches the repository-wide seam shape; a durable, remote, or instrumented registry is a sibling package implementing eight abstract methods, and no producer, control surface, or `TaskKindMap` extender changes when one lands. The seam README states the contract; the implementation README owns the lifecycle bookkeeping facts. The registry behavior suite (owner cleanup, settlement, waits, teardown) lives with `dsh-tasks-local`; the seam keeps a stub-subclass test pinning registration under `ctx.tasks` and single-service duplication behavior, plus the probe-based invariant suite.
|
||||
|
||||
Cost: one more package (manifest, tsconfig, README, invariant companion), and compositions must name the implementation package. `abstract` erases at runtime and this package name used to be the mountable registry, so the seam constructor fails loudly when mounted directly — a stale composition row gets "load an implementation such as @deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local" at load time instead of a half-registered `ctx.tasks` failing far from the misconfiguration.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: 任务注册表是一个能力 seam（`dsh-tasks` / `dsh-tasks-local`）
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-26-task-registry-seam.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
[后台任务运行时](2026-06-20-generic-long-running-tool-runtime.md)交付时把 `TaskService` 做成了单个具体包（package）：`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks` 既拥有每个生产方和控制接口面向编程的 `ctx.tasks` 契约，也拥有进程内实现（内存存储、结算簿记、所有者清理 effect、拆除）。这种捆绑重新耦合了仓库[能力 seam 规则](2026-06-13-capability-seams.md)本要分离的两种变化速率：一旦替换注册表的存储或生命周期后端，被搅动的就是同一个包，而生产方（`dsh-tool-bash`、`dsh-tool-pty`、`dsh-tool-subagent`）、控制接口（`dsh-tool-tasks`）和 `TaskKindMap` 扩展方正是从这个包导入类型与 `ctx.tasks` 接口。harness 中其余每项可替换能力——bash、pty、fs、skill（技能）、subagent、web、会话持久化——都已具备接口／实现／消费方三分；任务注册表曾是仅剩的 `core` 模式例外，仅由一条 `TODO(task-service-backend)` 注释把守。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
`tasks/` 如今是一个 bash 三件套形态的三包能力家族：
|
||||
|
||||
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks`（接口）**——抽象的 `TaskService extends Service`，拥有 `ctx.tasks`、八个方法的契约（`start`、`list`、`get`、`read`、`kill`、`wait`、`onTaskDone`、`attachSurface`）、全部词汇类型（`TaskId`、`TaskKindMap`、`TaskStart`、`TaskHooks`、`TaskOutcome`、`TaskSnapshot`、`TaskRead`、`TaskDoneListener`），以及快照不变式配套插件。类级 JSDoc 陈述了每个实现都必须兑现的语义：注册的存续期长于生产方与控制接口的 fiber，有所有者的访问以会话为界，结算遵循首次结果优先且监听器错误被隔离，并且在没有附加任何控制接口时 `start` 拒绝启动工作。
|
||||
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local`（实现）**——`LocalTaskService`，即原样迁移的进程内注册表：内存存储、按 kind 划分的计数器、等待方簿记、`TASK_WAIT_TIMEOUT` deadline 代码、所有者清理 effect，以及强制失败的拆除。`dsh-timeout` 依赖随之迁入此包；seam 包不含任何实现依赖。
|
||||
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks`（消费方）**——保持不变；它注入 `'tasks'`，从不导入实现类型。
|
||||
|
||||
各组合在原先加载 `dsh-tasks` 的位置改为加载 `dsh-tasks-local`：CLI（命令行界面）的 cordis.yml 配置项、`agent-spine-demo`、各测试 harness，以及工具目录生成器的启动流程。生产方的配置错误诊断信息（「background tasks unavailable: load …」）点名 `dsh-tasks`——即定义缺失的 `ctx.tasks` 服务的 seam 包；seam 自身的表面（其 README 与直接挂载防线）会指向各实现，因此当另一个后端日后成为推荐默认时，生产方的消息依旧正确。生产方、`TaskKindMap` 声明合并和控制接口仍然只导入 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks`。
|
||||
|
||||
该 seam 保持进程内契约语义不变：`TaskStart.run()` 仍然传入回调和确切的 `Agent` 对象，因此持久化或跨进程后端在能实现此接口之前仍有设计工作要做（身份、重启、所有权、观察）。这次拆分把该项未来工作移出了每个消费方的依赖图；它并不预先设计后端。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
**在第二个后端出现之前保持具体服务（维持现状）。**这正是运行时 Agent Note 当初的立场：在第二种实现出现前抽取接口，可能固化错误的边界。该方案落选，因为这条边界已不再是臆测：八个服务方法及其语义自引入以来在每一次生产方集成中都保持稳定，它们正是 `dsh-tool-tasks` 与各生产方已经面向编程的那套接口，而且仓库约定默认将可替换能力拆成三个包。剩余风险（持久化后端可能需要变更契约）不因这次拆分而改变：无论拆分与否，这类变更都会落在 seam 包里；而若维持现状，它们今天还会连带搅动每个消费方的实现依赖。
|
||||
|
||||
**在单个包内仅抽取接口（在具体类旁导出一个抽象类）。**否决，因为它在运作层面并未分离任何东西：消费方依然依赖携带实现及其依赖项的那个包，而替换后端若不把本地实现纳入自身依赖图，就仍然无法发布。在这里，包边界才是独立演进的单位。
|
||||
|
||||
**拆出 `types.ts` 但让服务保持具体。**基于同样的理由否决：类型并不是 seam，`ctx.tasks` 及其方法契约才是。生产方需要的是服务键和语义，而不只是类型形状。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
换来的是：任务注册表如今与全仓库通行的 seam 形态一致；持久化、远程或带插桩的注册表将是一个实现八个抽象方法的兄弟包，这样的注册表落地时，任何生产方、控制接口或 `TaskKindMap` 扩展方都无需改动。seam 包的 README 陈述契约；生命周期簿记方面的事实归实现包的 README 所有。注册表行为测试套件（所有者清理、结算、等待、拆除）随 `dsh-tasks-local` 存放；seam 包保留一个桩子类（stub subclass）测试，固定 `ctx.tasks` 下的注册行为与单一服务的重复注册行为，外加基于探针的不变式测试套件。
|
||||
|
||||
代价是：多出一个包，即多一份 manifest（元数据清单）、tsconfig、README 与不变式配套插件；同时各组合必须点名实现包。`abstract` 在运行时会被擦除，而这个包名过去正是可挂载的具体注册表，因此 seam 的构造函数在被直接挂载时会响亮失败——一条过期的组合配置行会在加载时得到「load an implementation such as @deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local」，而不是一个方法残缺的 `ctx.tasks` 在远离错误配置处才失败。
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-06-30-subagent-observe-enrich.md: a07cef95630689d1ca8cacd3eb7c50e691cb304a
|
||||
2026-06-30-subagent-observe-enrich.zh.md: 578aae0a7273defcc1f88fb2a50c83ef454e3c16
|
||||
2026-07-27-dispose-ladder-to-consumer.md: 97b551ff509e3b424f6bf5725939cf54acc961a7
|
||||
2026-07-27-dispose-ladder-to-consumer.zh.md: b6849ad393737f2fef06e2007991583b12a04d7a
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: The dispose ladder belongs to its consumer, not the subprocess seam
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-27-dispose-ladder-to-consumer.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
`SubprocessHandle.dispose(graces)` and `SubprocessDisposeGraces` put a full teardown *policy* — stdin-EOF wait, then SIGTERM, then SIGKILL, each tier bounded by a caller-supplied window — on a seam whose other verbs are single mechanisms. Only one consumer ever called it (the ACP subagent backend); bash rides `terminate()` and service teardown, and the LSP host runs its own protocol-first shutdown. Every future backend nonetheless had to implement the ladder to satisfy the interface, and the implementation carried a `dsh-timeout` dependency solely for the ladder's tier bounds.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
The ladder moves to its one consumer. `dsh-subagent-acp` owns `disposeAcpChild(child, eofGraceMs, graceMs)`, built entirely on the seam's public verbs: close `stdin`, bound a `waitForExit` on `eofGraceMs`, then `terminate()` (whose SIGTERM→spec-grace→SIGKILL escalation already encodes the signal tiers), then a final bounded whole-tree wait that throws if survivors remain. The seam keeps `kill`/`terminate`/`waitForExit` — mechanisms, not policy — and `waitForExit(signal?)` is exactly the quiescence probe a consumer ladder needs to hold each tier on real tree exit. `dsh-subprocess-local` drops its `dsh-timeout` dependency; the seam's handle loses one method and one exported interface.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep the ladder on the handle as a convenience.** Rejected: a seam method every implementation must provide is not a convenience, it is contract surface — and this one encodes one consumer's cooperation shape (stdin-EOF-first) as if it were process vocabulary. The seam's own README already had to caveat that children quiescing on other signals need "their own tier-1", which is the admission that the ladder is policy.
|
||||
|
||||
**Move the ladder to a shared helper package.** Rejected: one consumer. A second out-of-process backend with the same stdin-EOF cooperation shape can lift `disposeAcpChild` to shared code when it exists; extracting now would recreate `dsh-subagent-subprocess`, the single-purpose library this stack just deleted.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
Bought: the seam is one method and one type smaller; implementations owe four verbs and no teardown policy; `dsh-subprocess-local` loses a dependency; the ladder's tier windows live beside the config fields that tune them. Cost: a future backend wanting EOF-first teardown writes ~20 lines against the verbs (or lifts the ACP helper); the ladder's tier-tier tests moved from the seam suite to the ACP suite, and the seam suite pins the verbs the ladder composes (bounded `waitForExit` false-then-true across an escalation) instead of the composed policy.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: dispose 阶梯归其消费方所有，而非 subprocess seam
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-27-dispose-ladder-to-consumer.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
`SubprocessHandle.dispose(graces)` 与 `SubprocessDisposeGraces` 把一整套拆卸*策略*——等待 stdin EOF、再 SIGTERM、再 SIGKILL，每一层由调用方提供的时间窗约束——放在了一个其余动词均为单一机制的 seam 上。它始终只有一个调用方（ACP subagent 后端）；bash 走 `terminate()` 与服务拆卸，LSP 主机运行自己的协议优先关闭流程。然而每个未来后端都必须实现该阶梯才能满足接口，实现包也仅为阶梯的层级时限背上了 `dsh-timeout` 依赖。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
阶梯移入其唯一消费方。`dsh-subagent-acp` 拥有 `disposeAcpChild(child, eofGraceMs, graceMs)`，完全构建在 seam 的公开动词之上：关闭 `stdin`，以 `eofGraceMs` 约束一次 `waitForExit`，随后 `terminate()`（其 SIGTERM→spec 宽限期→SIGKILL 升级已编码了信号层级），最后进行有界的整树等待，若仍有存活进程则抛出。seam 保留 `kill`／`terminate`／`waitForExit`——机制而非策略——而 `waitForExit(signal?)` 恰是消费方阶梯在每一层确认进程树真正退出所需的停稳探针。`dsh-subprocess-local` 卸下 `dsh-timeout` 依赖；seam 的句柄少了一个方法和一个导出接口。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
**把阶梯作为便利方法留在句柄上。**否决：一个每个实现都必须提供的 seam 方法不是便利，而是契约表面——而这一个把某一消费方的配合形状（stdin EOF 打头）当作进程词汇来编码。seam 自己的 README 早已不得不加注「依赖其他信号停稳的子进程需要自己的第一阶」，这本身就是承认该阶梯是策略。
|
||||
|
||||
**把阶梯移到共享辅助包。**否决：只有一个消费方。当第二个具有相同 stdin EOF 配合形状的进程外后端出现时，可以再把 `disposeAcpChild` 提升为共享代码；现在抽取只会重造 `dsh-subagent-subprocess`——这组堆叠变更刚刚删掉的那个单一用途库。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
买到的：seam 少了一个方法和一个类型；实现只欠四个动词，不欠拆卸策略；`dsh-subprocess-local` 少了一个依赖；阶梯的层级时间窗与调节它们的配置字段住在一起。代价：未来想要 EOF 打头拆卸的后端需针对这些动词写约 20 行（或直接搬 ACP 的辅助函数）；阶梯的层级测试从 seam 套件移入 ACP 套件，seam 套件转而钉住阶梯所组合的动词（升级前后有界 `waitForExit` 先假后真），而非组合后的策略。
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-07-20-code-mode-result-card-completeness.md: 97cd9d722e8252b956e16da03c3b8418451350f3
|
||||
2026-07-20-code-mode-result-card-completeness.zh.md: fea162b073e3473f7a07d4bf054408d28851fea9
|
||||
@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Keep the Code Mode result card complete
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-20-code-mode-result-card-completeness.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
The outer `run_code` tool persisted complete rendered content, but its UI presenter ignored that content and rebuilt the card body from a logs-only `presentationMeta` projection. A result-only run appeared correct because an empty presenter body let consumers fall back to `tool/result.content`. Once the program emitted a log, the presenter supplied non-empty content, that fallback stopped, and the returned value disappeared from the completed card. A spill policy's final head/tail preview was vulnerable to the same split ownership whenever captured logs made the stale projection non-empty.
|
||||
|
||||
Nested Code calls never owned cards, so producing metadata for the outer call solely to reconstruct one incomplete card also obscured the intended one-card boundary.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
The canonical tool registry pipeline owns the final model-facing outer content. On success, the `run_code` output renderer renders captured logs followed by the return value or the explicit no-output marker. Runtime failures and pre-execution policy denials are normalized into error content by `ToolRegistry` without invoking that renderer. A post-execute block runs after successful rendering and replaces the result with error content; other post-execute policy and spill decisions may replace content before persistence.
|
||||
|
||||
`run_code` omits `presentResult`. The established generic result fallback keeps the pending program title and renders the raw final `tool/result.content`; that durable, replayable, post-policy projection is the card's only result-content source. The host API proxy therefore omits a separate result view instead of serializing the same content in both `event.data.content` and `view.view.content`. The redundant logs-only `presentationMeta` projection remains removed.
|
||||
|
||||
Nested dispatch remains unchanged. Calls marked by `exec.parent` emit bounded `tool/code-dispatch` diagnostics but no `tool/call` or `tool/result` surface cards, so one outer `run_code` invocation still produces exactly one card.
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing
|
||||
|
||||
Tool unit coverage drives logs-only, result-only, logs-plus-result, no-output, spilled-result, and failure outcomes through the canonical registry, then pins the durable content and absence of a result presenter. A host-mux regression uses a call-only presenter to prove the result frame carries raw content exactly once and no view. These cases prove stale metadata cannot replace final content without making the host duplicate that content.
|
||||
|
||||
The keyless ACP backend and TUI Code Mode snapshots execute one outer program that performs two nested bash calls, logs `captured output`, and returns `CODE_ONE+CODE_TWO`. The persisted ACP log pins the complete result; the TUI surface shows one completed outer card containing both lines and no nested cards.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**Append the return value to logs metadata.** Rejected because metadata would duplicate the renderer, need a second stable formatting contract for every JSON root, and still miss post-policy content replacement or spill previews.
|
||||
|
||||
**Merge presenter metadata with `result.content`.** Rejected because the rendered content already contains the logs; merging would duplicate them and require brittle deduplication.
|
||||
|
||||
**Forward `result.content` through a generic result presenter.** Rejected because the durable event already carries that content and UI consumers already have a generic raw-content fallback. The host mux serializes a tool-owned result view beside the event, so forwarding would duplicate the rendered content in one frame merely to recreate the fallback; the default worker alone admits a 64 MiB variable-payload budget before rendering.
|
||||
|
||||
**Create one card per nested dispatch.** Rejected because intermediate values are intentionally execution-local and never model-facing. Multiple cards would expose an implementation trace instead of the single Code Mode operation the model and user invoked.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
TUI and JSON-RPC/Web display the same complete content the model receives and replay persists, including post-policy spill previews, through their generic result fallback. The host API retains the pending program title without duplicating the raw result in a separate view payload. New `run_code` results no longer carry the optional logs metadata, but this requires no session-format bump: existing records remain valid because presentation reads their durable rendered content.
|
||||
@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: 保证 Code Mode 结果卡片内容完整
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-20-code-mode-result-card-completeness.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
外层 `run_code` 工具会持久化完整的渲染内容，但其 UI 展示器忽略了这些内容，转而根据仅含日志的 `presentationMeta` 投影重新构建卡片正文。仅有结果的运行看似正确，是因为展示器正文为空时，消费方会回退到 `tool/result.content`。只要程序输出一条日志，展示器就会提供非空内容，回退随即停止，返回值便会从完成态卡片中消失。当已捕获的日志使陈旧投影变为非空时，输出落盘策略最终生成的头尾预览也会受到同一职责拆分的影响。
|
||||
|
||||
嵌套 Code 调用从不生成自己的卡片。因此，仅仅为了重建这一张不完整卡片而给外层调用生成元数据，还掩盖了每次外层调用只生成一张卡片的预期边界。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
规范的工具注册表流水线负责最终面向模型的外层内容。成功时，`run_code` 输出渲染器先渲染已捕获的日志，然后渲染返回值或显式的无输出标记。运行时失败和执行前策略拒绝由 `ToolRegistry` 归一化为错误内容，过程中不会调用该渲染器。Post-execute 阻断发生在成功渲染之后，并把结果替换为错误内容；其他 post-execute 策略与输出落盘决策可以在持久化之前替换内容。
|
||||
|
||||
`run_code` 不提供 `presentResult`。既有的通用结果回退机制会保留待完成的程序标题，并渲染原始的最终 `tool/result.content`；这一持久、可回放且经过 post-policy 处理的投影是卡片中结果内容的唯一来源。宿主 API 代理因此不提供单独的结果视图，而不会在 `event.data.content` 与 `view.view.content` 中重复序列化同一内容。冗余的仅含日志的 `presentationMeta` 投影继续保持移除状态。
|
||||
|
||||
嵌套分发保持不变。带有 `exec.parent` 标记的调用会发出有界的 `tool/code-dispatch` 诊断，但不会生成与 `tool/call` 或 `tool/result` 对应的界面卡片，因此一次外层 `run_code` 调用仍然只会生成一张卡片。
|
||||
|
||||
## 测试
|
||||
|
||||
工具单元测试通过规范注册表覆盖仅有日志、仅有结果、日志与结果并存、无输出、结果落盘和失败的结果，然后固定持久内容以及结果展示器不存在这一事实。宿主 mux 回归测试使用仅有调用的展示器，证明结果帧恰好携带一次原始内容，且不含视图。这些案例证明陈旧元数据无法替换最终内容，同时不会让宿主重复该内容。
|
||||
|
||||
无密钥的 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）后端快照与 TUI Code Mode 快照会执行一个外层程序：程序进行两次嵌套 bash 调用，记录 `captured output`，并返回 `CODE_ONE+CODE_TWO`。ACP 持久化日志固定完整结果；TUI 界面只显示一张完成态外层卡片，其中包含这两行内容，且没有嵌套卡片。
|
||||
|
||||
## 备选方案
|
||||
|
||||
**把返回值追加到日志元数据：**不予采纳。元数据会与渲染器重复，并且需要为每一种 JSON 根另行维护稳定的格式化契约；post-policy 内容替换或输出落盘预览仍然会被遗漏。
|
||||
|
||||
**把展示元数据与 `result.content` 合并：**不予采纳。渲染内容已经包含日志；合并会造成重复，还需要依赖脆弱的去重逻辑。
|
||||
|
||||
**通过通用结果展示器转发 `result.content`：**不予采纳。持久事件已经携带该内容，UI 消费方也已有通用的原始内容回退机制。宿主 mux 会在事件旁序列化工具拥有的结果视图，因此转发仅仅是为了重建该回退机制，却会在一个帧中重复渲染内容；仅默认 worker 在渲染前允许 64 MiB 的可变载荷预算。
|
||||
|
||||
**为每次嵌套分发创建一张卡片：**不予采纳。中间值有意只存在于执行期间，永远不面向模型。多张卡片会暴露实现轨迹，而不是模型与用户调用的单次 Code Mode 操作。
|
||||
|
||||
## 影响
|
||||
|
||||
TUI 与 JSON-RPC／Web 通过通用结果回退机制显示与模型接收及回放持久化相同的完整内容，其中包括 post-policy 输出落盘预览。宿主 API 保留待完成的程序标题，同时不在单独的视图负载中重复原始结果。新的 `run_code` 结果不再携带可选的日志元数据，但无需提升会话格式版本：现有记录仍然有效，因为展示逻辑会读取其中持久化的渲染内容。
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-07-21-semantic-session-checkpoints.md: 4bca02fe3893ac39621ed79a000ca8f86db4ff67
|
||||
2026-07-21-semantic-session-checkpoints.zh.md: 1f187eb6448a3c9ca6784ec2bddd7295be2706d7
|
||||
2026-07-21-semantic-session-checkpoints.md: 0034cde40e5b07bda1573ca39fb7d51816006140
|
||||
2026-07-21-semantic-session-checkpoints.zh.md: 3351221d7eeaf1353b4adb0fa4c4dc324ec33da5
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -26,4 +26,4 @@ Flushing every event or streaming chunk minimizes loss but turns local append an
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
Hard-crash recovery retains the complete model request, durable tool intent, and complete settled step at the nearest semantic boundary while allowing partial streaming chunks since the previous boundary to remain lossy. Default CLI, TUI, ACP, Python SDK runtime, headless persistence tests, and JSON-RPC compositions mount the policy with their persistence backend. Unit tests cover ordering, cancellation during a checkpoint, fail-closed behavior, nested dispatch, disposal, and Loader shape; a real child process killed with `SIGKILL` proves request and tool-intent recovery through JSONL, and the shared persistence contract proves both recovery classifications across backends. Keyless ACP snapshots prove both that retry-risk guidance reaches resumed history and the next model turn and that graceful cancellation persists the loop's real closing boundaries.
|
||||
Hard-crash recovery retains the complete model request, durable tool intent, and complete settled step at the nearest semantic boundary while allowing partial streaming chunks since the previous boundary to remain lossy. Default CLI, TUI, ACP, Python SDK runtime, headless persistence tests, and JSON-RPC compositions mount the policy with their persistence backend. Unit tests cover ordering, cancellation during a checkpoint, fail-closed behavior, nested dispatch, disposal, and Loader shape; a real child process killed with `SIGKILL` proves request and tool-intent recovery through JSONL, and the shared persistence contract proves both recovery classifications across backends. The crash harness waits for the expected marker contents rather than path existence, so open-before-write visibility cannot trigger the kill early. Keyless ACP snapshots prove both that retry-risk guidance reaches resumed history and the next model turn and that graceful cancellation persists the loop's real closing boundaries.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -26,4 +26,4 @@ ACP（Agent Client Protocol）应用在一个有序 Cordis effect 中统一持
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
发生硬崩溃时，崩溃恢复会在最近的语义边界保留完整的模型请求、持久化的工具意图与完整且已结束的步骤，但允许上一个边界之后的部分流式分片仍可能丢失。默认的 CLI（命令行界面）、TUI、ACP、Python SDK 运行时、headless 持久化测试与 JSON-RPC 组合都会在持久化后端旁加载该策略。单元测试覆盖顺序、检查点期间的取消、失败关闭行为、嵌套分发、dispose（资源释放）与 Loader 形状；一个被 `SIGKILL` 终止的真实子进程通过 JSONL 证明系统可以恢复请求与工具意图，共享持久化契约则证明各后端都支持这两种恢复分类。无密钥 ACP 快照既证明重试风险指引会进入恢复后的历史记录与下一个模型轮次，也证明取消流程正常收尾时，系统会持久化由循环实际生成的闭合边界。
|
||||
发生硬崩溃时，崩溃恢复会在最近的语义边界保留完整的模型请求、持久化的工具意图与完整且已结束的步骤，但允许上一个边界之后的部分流式分片仍可能丢失。默认的 CLI（命令行界面）、TUI、ACP、Python SDK 运行时、headless 持久化测试与 JSON-RPC 组合都会在持久化后端旁加载该策略。单元测试覆盖顺序、检查点期间的取消、失败关闭行为、嵌套分发、dispose（资源释放）与 Loader 形状；一个被 `SIGKILL` 终止的真实子进程通过 JSONL 证明系统可以恢复请求与工具意图，共享持久化契约则证明各后端都支持这两种恢复分类。崩溃 harness 会等待预期的标记内容，而不是仅等待路径存在，因此文件在写入前因打开而可见时，不会导致该 harness 提前终止子进程。无密钥 ACP 快照既证明重试风险指引会进入恢复后的历史记录与下一个模型轮次，也证明取消流程正常收尾时，系统会持久化由循环实际生成的闭合边界。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: A collapsed sidebar retains its control rail
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-22-collapsed-sidebar-control-rail.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
The sidebar close action persisted a zero width preference, and the layout mapped that preference to a zero-width grid track. The only sidebar toggle and the settings entry both lived inside that clipped track, so closing the sidebar removed every visible recovery control. Reloading preserved the closed preference and reproduced the lockout.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
The layout maps a closed sidebar (persisted width `0`) to the fixed `SIDEBAR_COLLAPSED` width of 56px: a 24px icon column between the sidebar's 16px horizontal paddings. The sidebar track is fixed-width in the solver — open or collapsed it never concedes to viewport pressure (only details shrinks, then auto-closes) — and the rail retains its right border while the stored expanded width remains untouched.
|
||||
|
||||
`AppFrame` marks the sidebar collapsed from the persisted width preference rather than from the resolved track width, removes the resize handle while collapsed, and passes `collapsed` to the sidebar slot as owner props from the render site. Collapse and expand animate: the frame transitions `grid-template-columns` (and the remaining handle its `left`) on the deepsuite sider curve — `--ds-ease-in-out` over `--ds-transition-duration-slow`, both supplied by ui-theme's base sheet; transitions pause during drags and under `prefers-reduced-motion`.
|
||||
|
||||
`SidebarRoot` reads the owner `collapsed` prop and transitions as a slide + crossfade: the expanded content freezes at its width (inline style) and fades out in place over 150ms while the sliding grid column clips it — nothing reflows mid-slide. At settle the wide-only content (brand, labels, input, session tree) unmounts — dropping the sessions subscription and leaving the rendered and accessibility trees — and the control rows snap to the rail (open toggle, new session, new workspace, search, the same top-down order as their expanded rows) fading in as the slide ends. Each rail control keeps its expanded counterpart's behavior (the search icon expands the sidebar and focuses the search box after the slide), carries a tooltip, and the toggle rests as the whale mark with the panel icon on hover. The search query lives with the root and survives the round trip.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
- **Render an expand button over the center column** — rejected because it recovers only the toggle, not the persistent settings area, and splits sidebar chrome across two package owners.
|
||||
- **Keep a zero-width grid track and let the rail overflow it** — rejected because the rail would overlap the center column and leave hit testing and responsive geometry disconnected from the grid.
|
||||
- **Keep the complete sidebar tree mounted and hide it with clipping** — rejected because hidden controls remain in the semantic tree and continue subscribing and rendering even though only two controls belong in the collapsed state.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
- A collapsed sidebar reserves 56px instead of yielding the entire width to the center column. Expanding restores the persisted width and drag behavior.
|
||||
- The settings entry remains visible but retains its existing placeholder behavior; this change does not introduce an account or settings screen.
|
||||
- Layout solver tests pin the compact width, sidebar component tests pin the visible controls, and the keyless real-bundle web smoke test pins collapse and recovery through the assembled client.
|
||||
@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: 侧边栏折叠后保留控制栏
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-22-collapsed-sidebar-control-rail.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
侧边栏关闭操作会持久化宽度偏好 `0`，布局再将该偏好映射为宽度为零的网格轨道。侧边栏唯一的开关与设置入口都位于这个被裁切的轨道内，因此关闭侧边栏会移除所有可见的恢复控件。页面重新加载时仍会读取关闭偏好，从而再次陷入无法恢复的状态。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
布局将关闭的侧边栏（持久化宽度为 `0`）映射为固定的 `SIDEBAR_COLLAPSED` 宽度 56px：在侧边栏两侧各 16px 的水平内边距之间放置一列 24px 的图标控件。侧边栏轨道在求解器中是定宽的——无论展开还是折叠都不向视口压力让步（只有 details 会收缩、继而自动关闭）；控制栏保留右侧边框，已存储的展开宽度保持不变。
|
||||
|
||||
`AppFrame` 根据持久化的宽度偏好标记侧边栏是否折叠，而不是根据求解后的轨道宽度来判断；折叠时移除尺寸调整手柄，并在渲染点把 `collapsed` 作为 owner props 传给侧边栏插槽。折叠与展开带动画：frame 对 `grid-template-columns`（以及余下手柄的 `left`）应用 deepsuite 侧栏曲线过渡——`--ds-ease-in-out` 配 `--ds-transition-duration-slow`，两个变量由 ui-theme 的 base 表提供；拖拽期间和 `prefers-reduced-motion` 下过渡暂停。
|
||||
|
||||
`SidebarRoot` 读取 owner 的 `collapsed` 属性，过渡是滑动 + 交叉淡变：展开内容以内联样式冻结在原宽度、150ms 原地淡出，滑动中的网格列裁切它——滑动途中不发生任何重排。settle 时宽态专属内容（品牌标识、文字标签、输入框、会话树）卸载——随之退订会话列表并离开渲染树与可访问性树——控件行落位到控制栏（打开开关、新建会话、新建工作区、搜索，自上而下与展开态各行顺序一致），随滑动结束淡入。每个控制栏控件保持与展开态对应控件一致的行为（搜索图标展开侧边栏并在滑动结束后聚焦搜索框）并带 tooltip；开关静止时显示鲸鱼标，悬停切换为面板图标。搜索关键词由根组件持有，折叠往返后保留。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
- **在中心列上方渲染展开按钮**：不予采纳，因为这只能恢复开关，无法保留常驻设置区域，同时还会让侧边栏 UI 由两个包（package）分别持有。
|
||||
- **保留宽度为零的网格轨道，让控制栏溢出显示**：不予采纳，因为控制栏会与中心列重叠，还会使命中测试和响应式几何关系脱离网格布局。
|
||||
- **保持完整侧边栏树挂载，并通过裁切将其隐藏**：不予采纳，因为隐藏控件仍留在语义树中，而且会继续订阅和渲染，尽管折叠状态下只需要两个控件。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
- 折叠的侧边栏占用 56px，而不是把全部宽度让给中心列。展开时恢复持久化宽度与拖动行为。
|
||||
- 设置入口持续可见，但保留既有占位行为；本次改动不提供账户或设置页面。
|
||||
- 布局求解器测试固定紧凑宽度，侧边栏组件测试固定可见控件，基于真实构建产物的无密钥 Web 冒烟测试则通过组装后的客户端固定折叠与恢复行为。
|
||||
@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: demo:web builds the client plugin bundles
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-23-demo-web-builds-client-bundles.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh web` serves each web-client plugin's bundle from `GET /plugins/<id>/client.js`, resolving the path from the package's `exports["./client"]` (`lib/client.js`). Those bundles are produced only by the root `pnpm run build` (`tsc -b` then the per-package `tsdown.client.ts` configs); the Vite `build:web` step builds the frontend shell alone. `demo:web` and the README's Web UI instructions ran only `build:web`, so on a checkout without a prior full build every plugin bundle 404s, the client loader marks every plugin failed, and the boot screen shows "Failed to load plugins". The frontend shell built fine, hiding the missing artifact behind a runtime browser failure.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
`demo:web` runs `npm run build` before `npm run build:web`, so the plugin `lib/client.js` bundles exist before `dsh web` serves them. The README's Web UI section runs `pnpm run build && pnpm run build:web` for the installed `~/.dsh/source` checkout, which the installer never builds.
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification
|
||||
|
||||
After the full build, all eight `/plugins/<id>/client.js` endpoints return 200 and a headless Chromium load of `http://127.0.0.1:3080` renders the shell with no "Failed to load plugins" state.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**Build the bundles inside `dsh web` at startup.** The app runs from source via tsx and owns no build step; folding an artifact build into the server boot crosses the source/artifact separation and slows every launch.
|
||||
|
||||
**Widen the tsdown root config to emit client bundles from `pnpm run build:web`.** `build:web` is the Vite frontend build; the client bundles are a separate tsdown pass over `lib/types`. Merging the two conflates the shell build with the package build and still leaves the root `build` as the only producer.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
`demo:web` now pays the full `tsc -b && tsdown` cost on every invocation instead of only the Vite build. That is the price of a runnable web demo from a clean tree; a caller who already built can invoke `dsh web` directly.
|
||||
@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: demo:web 构建客户端插件的打包产物
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-23-demo-web-builds-client-bundles.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
`dsh web` 通过 `GET /plugins/<id>/client.js` 提供每个 web 客户端插件的打包产物，其路径由包的 `exports["./client"]`（`lib/client.js`）解析得到。这些打包产物只由根目录的 `pnpm run build`（先 `tsc -b`，再执行各包的 `tsdown.client.ts` 配置）生成；Vite 的 `build:web` 步骤只构建前端外壳。`demo:web` 与 README 的 Web UI 说明只运行了 `build:web`，因此在未预先完整构建的检出上，每个插件的打包产物都返回 404，客户端 loader 将所有插件标记为失败，启动界面显示 "Failed to load plugins"。前端外壳能正常构建，把缺失的产物掩藏在浏览器运行时的失败背后。
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
`demo:web` 在 `npm run build:web` 之前先运行 `npm run build`，使插件的 `lib/client.js` 打包产物在 `dsh web` 提供它们之前已经存在。README 的 Web UI 小节针对已安装的 `~/.dsh/source` 检出运行 `pnpm run build && pnpm run build:web`，因为安装器从不构建它。
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification
|
||||
|
||||
完整构建后，全部八个 `/plugins/<id>/client.js` 端点均返回 200，无头 Chromium 加载 `http://127.0.0.1:3080` 能渲染出外壳，不再出现 "Failed to load plugins" 状态。
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**在 `dsh web` 启动时构建打包产物。** 该应用通过 tsx 从源码运行，本身没有构建步骤；把产物构建塞进服务器启动流程会越过源码与产物的分离，并拖慢每次启动。
|
||||
|
||||
**扩大 tsdown 根配置，使 `pnpm run build:web` 也产出客户端打包产物。** `build:web` 是 Vite 前端构建；客户端打包产物是对 `lib/types` 的另一趟独立 tsdown 处理。把两者合并会混淆外壳构建与包构建，而且根目录的 `build` 仍是唯一的产出者。
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
`demo:web` 现在每次调用都要付出完整的 `tsc -b && tsdown` 代价，而不再只是 Vite 构建。这是从干净的代码树运行 web 演示所要付出的代价；已经完成构建的调用方可以直接调用 `dsh web`。
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-07-23-thinking-row-disclosure-target.md: f698c3cb0b73bf5c65b5d4b5b3f29de3080e0af6
|
||||
2026-07-23-thinking-row-disclosure-target.zh.md: 0fba5c1d8f7beec7300dcd51e118a08d57d0e74f
|
||||
@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Thinking rows use one disclosure target
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-23-thinking-row-disclosure-target.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
A collapsed reasoning entry presents `Think` and its one-line reasoning summary as one visual row, but an icon-only disclosure control leaves both visible labels inert. Applying title expansion to every tool row would instead break the generic tool-row contract, where the row opens details and only the leading control expands arguments.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
`ToolRow` exposes the opt-in `expandOnRowClick` policy. `ThinkRow` enables it so the title and reasoning summary form one accessible disclosure target; pointer clicks, Enter, and Space toggle the same component-local expanded state. Tool rows that do not opt in retain row-to-details selection and leading-control argument expansion.
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification
|
||||
|
||||
The component spec pins both Think click targets and the unchanged generic tool-row handoff. The keyless browser fixture loads the real sidebar and conversation bundles, opens an authored reasoning session, clicks the summary and title, and checks the disclosure state and expanded body.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**Expand every tool row from its title.** Generic tool rows use row clicks for details selection, so sharing this behavior would conflate two controls.
|
||||
|
||||
**Keep icon-only disclosure.** The smallest hit target remains disconnected from the labels that describe the hidden content.
|
||||
|
||||
**Render separate title and summary buttons.** Two controls for one expanded state add duplicate focus stops and ambiguous semantics.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
Thinking rows gain a larger pointer target and keyboard disclosure semantics without changing other tool interactions. The generic row component carries one optional policy because disclosure ownership differs between reasoning and tool calls.
|
||||
@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: thinking 行使用单一展开目标
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-23-thinking-row-disclosure-target.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
折叠的推理（reasoning）条目在同一视觉行中呈现 `Think` 和单行推理摘要，但仅图标可展开会让两个可见标签都无法交互。若让所有工具行均可通过标题展开，又会破坏通用工具行的契约：整行负责打开详情，只有前导控件负责展开参数。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
`ToolRow` 提供显式启用的 `expandOnRowClick` 策略。`ThinkRow` 启用该策略，让标题和推理摘要组成单一且无障碍的展开目标；鼠标点击、Enter 和 Space 都切换同一个组件本地展开状态。未启用该策略的工具行仍由整行完成详情选择，由前导控件展开参数。
|
||||
|
||||
## 验证
|
||||
|
||||
组件测试固定两个 Think 点击目标以及未改变的通用工具行交接行为。无密钥浏览器 fixture（测试前置数据）加载真实的侧边栏与会话 bundle，打开包含推理内容的既定会话，点击摘要与标题，并检查展开状态和展开后的正文。
|
||||
|
||||
## 考虑过的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
**让每个工具行都可通过标题展开。** 通用工具行将整行点击用于详情选择，共享这一行为会混淆两个控件。
|
||||
|
||||
**保留仅图标展开。** 最小的点击目标仍与描述隐藏内容的标签脱节。
|
||||
|
||||
**把标题和摘要分别渲染为按钮。** 两个控件共享一个展开状态，会增加重复的焦点停靠点并产生含糊语义。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
thinking 行获得更大的鼠标点击目标和键盘展开语义，同时不改变其他工具交互。通用行组件承担一个可选策略，因为推理与工具调用的展开所有权不同。
|
||||
@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Intent draft echoes in the same tick
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-07-26-intent-draft-same-tick-echo.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
The hero composer ("Let's start building") is a controlled textarea whose value is the frontend Session Intent's retained prompt, read from the sessions **list** snapshot (`EmptyState` binds `intent.prompt` via `useSessions`). Typing routed through `SessionManager.updateIntent → Session.updatePendingPrompt`, which flushes the **Session's own** notifier synchronously — but the list snapshot the composer actually renders from only heard about the change through the intent watch subscription in `startIntent`, which calls `markDirty()`, a microtask-deferred flush.
|
||||
|
||||
A deferred echo violates the controlled-input contract documented on the Notifier (see the [web client architecture note](../architecture/2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.md)): React compares the DOM value against the still-stale snapshot during the same tick as `onChange` and rolls the textarea back. With plain typing this shows as caret jumps; with an IME it corrupts input — every composition update gets rolled back and re-applied against a stale value, so typing Pinyin "nihao" commits fragments like "nnini hni hani hao你好". The resident composer (`ConversationRoot`) was not affected: its draft lives in the chat store (sync flush) or comes from `updateSessionPrompt`, which reads the Session snapshot directly rather than the list projection.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
`SessionManager.updateIntent` calls `this.notifier.notifyNow()` after `updatePendingPrompt`, flushing the list snapshot in the same tick as the change event. This matches the Notifier's channel rule: a direct echo of a user gesture whose controlled input renders from this snapshot uses `notifyNow`; the intent watch keeps `markDirty` for every other (async) intent transition.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**Change the intent watch callback in `startIntent` to `notifyNow`.** Wrong channel for that seam: the watch also fires on frame-driven Session changes (publication, send phases), and the architecture note bans `notifyNow` for frame-driven sources because it collapses batching.
|
||||
|
||||
**Have `EmptyState` read the prompt from the Session snapshot instead of the list.** Restructures the slot contract (EmptyState is deliberately bound to the standard `useSessions` feed and has no session scope yet — the frontend Session is page-local) for no gain over flushing the projection it already reads.
|
||||
|
||||
**Suppress the rollback in `InputBar` with local uncontrolled state.** Hides the symptom, forfeits the single-source-of-truth draft (the retained prompt must survive workspace retargeting and send/retry), and leaves every other list-snapshot-controlled input exposed.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
Typing in the hero composer, IME composition included, echoes synchronously. `updateIntent` on a no-intent state stays a no-op with no notification. The web workspace-flow snapshot's composer helper now asserts the same-tick echo instead of waiting for it, so a regression to a deferred echo fails the keyless snapshot gate; a runtime unit test pins the same contract at the manager seam.
|
||||
@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Intent draft echoes in the same tick
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-07-26-intent-draft-same-tick-echo.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
hero composer（「Let's start building」）是一个受控（controlled）的 textarea，它的值取自前端 Session Intent 保留下来的提示词，读自会话**列表**快照（`EmptyState` 通过 `useSessions` 绑定 `intent.prompt`）。输入经由 `SessionManager.updateIntent → Session.updatePendingPrompt`，后者会同步刷新 **Session 自身的** notifier——但 composer 实际渲染所依据的那份列表快照，只能通过 `startIntent` 中的 intent watch 订阅得知这次变更，而该订阅调用的是 `markDirty()`，即一次延迟到微任务的刷新。
|
||||
|
||||
延迟的回显违反了 Notifier 上所记录的受控输入契约（见 [web 客户端架构笔记](../architecture/2026-07-19-gui-web-client-architecture.md)）：React 在与 `onChange` 相同的 tick 内，把 DOM 值与仍然陈旧的快照相比对，随后把 textarea 回滚。普通输入时，这表现为光标跳动；使用输入法（IME）时，它会损坏输入——每一次 composition 更新都会被回滚，并针对陈旧的值重新应用，因此输入拼音「nihao」会提交出类似「nnini hni hani hao你好」这样的片段。resident composer（`ConversationRoot`）不受影响：它的草稿存放在 chat store 中（同步刷新），或来自 `updateSessionPrompt`，后者直接读取 Session 快照，而不是列表投影。
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
`SessionManager.updateIntent` 在 `updatePendingPrompt` 之后调用 `this.notifier.notifyNow()`，从而在与变更事件相同的 tick 内刷新列表快照。这符合 Notifier 的通道规则：当某个用户手势的受控输入正是从该快照渲染时，对它的直接回显使用 `notifyNow`；而 intent watch 对其余所有（异步的）intent 状态转换仍保留 `markDirty`。
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**把 `startIntent` 中的 intent watch 回调改为 `notifyNow`。** 对那个 seam 而言是错误的通道：该 watch 也会在帧驱动的 Session 变更（发布、发送阶段）时触发，而架构笔记禁止对帧驱动的来源使用 `notifyNow`，因为那会瓦解批处理。
|
||||
|
||||
**让 `EmptyState` 从 Session 快照而非列表读取提示词。** 这会重构槽位契约（EmptyState 有意绑定到标准的 `useSessions` 数据源，且尚无 session 作用域——前端 Session 是页面本地的），相比刷新它本就读取的那份投影并无收益。
|
||||
|
||||
**在 `InputBar` 中用本地的非受控状态抑制回滚。** 这只是掩盖症状，放弃了单一真源的草稿（保留下来的提示词必须在工作区重定向以及发送／重试后依然存在），并让其余每一个由列表快照控制的输入都暴露在同一问题之下。
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
在 hero composer 中输入（包括输入法 composition 在内）会同步回显。在无 intent 的状态上调用 `updateIntent` 仍是一次空操作，不发出任何通知。web workspace-flow 快照的 composer 辅助函数现在断言的是同一 tick 内的回显，而不是等待它，因此一旦回退成延迟回显，就会让无密钥快照门禁失败；一个运行时单元测试在 manager 这一 seam 处钉住了同一份契约。
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-06-15-code-mode.md: 8e964eeb36e430b58312427e45cf8e4a99582457
|
||||
2026-06-15-code-mode.zh.md: 3de1adfcf287b69ca8307244bde35f286ce4b99d
|
||||
2026-06-15-code-mode.md: 38d1ebdda089f1cfa1c5f3192fa2399b3a00102b
|
||||
2026-06-15-code-mode.zh.md: 2ddccb005b806fee0b1f4d6f79d6473f492a117d
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -40,9 +40,9 @@ This note owns Code Mode's presentation, composition, isolation, and settlement
|
||||
|
||||
### The run_code tool and the dispatch bridge
|
||||
|
||||
Under `'code'` and `'both'` the registry owns `run_code` as a reserved presentation transport with one required parameter, `{ code: string }`. It is represented by a normal `ToolDefinition` for dispatch but stays outside the filterable capability layers, so restrictions cannot accidentally remove Code Mode's only entry point. Calls traverse the complete tool pipeline — `tools/pre-execute` → monotonic guards → `tools/execute` around dispatch → `tools/post-execute` → optional definition-owned `finalizeContent` → immutable `tools/result` notification — exactly like native calls; a permission plugin can inspect the program text before it runs, and final-result observers see the normalized outer outcome. Its `execute(args, exec)`:
|
||||
Under `'code'` and `'both'` the registry owns `run_code` as a reserved presentation transport with two required parameters, `{ code: string; description: string }` (the description labels the call in UIs, the bash precedent). It is represented by a normal `ToolDefinition` for dispatch but stays outside the filterable capability layers, so restrictions cannot accidentally remove Code Mode's only entry point. Calls traverse the complete tool pipeline — `tools/pre-execute` → monotonic guards → `tools/execute` around dispatch → `tools/post-execute` → optional definition-owned `finalizeContent` → immutable `tools/result` notification — exactly like native calls; a permission plugin can inspect the program text before it runs, and final-result observers see the normalized outer outcome. Its `execute(args, exec)`:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Build bindings.** One run-scoped signal follows outer cancellation and is aborted whenever the run settles. Each visible tool binding snapshots lossless-JSON arguments, waits on the serialization queue, executes with a deterministic call id and the outer token as `parent`, defers returned contexts through the outer execution, and logs `tool/code-dispatch`. Success returns the tool's final canonical JSON value; failure becomes the program-visible `ToolCallError`. Every sub-call retains its own immutable execution identity and traverses the full tool pipeline.
|
||||
1. **Build bindings.** One run-scoped signal follows outer cancellation and is aborted whenever the run settles. Each visible tool binding snapshots lossless-JSON arguments, enters the native-contract dispatch pool (the [live-parallel note](2026-07-26-code-mode-live-parallel-dispatch.md) owns the scheduling design), executes with a deterministic call id and the outer token as `parent`, defers returned contexts through the outer execution, and logs the `tool/code-dispatch-start`/`tool/code-dispatch` pair, the settle side carrying the full rendered result content. Success returns the tool's final canonical JSON value; failure becomes the program-visible `ToolCallError`. Every sub-call retains its own immutable execution identity and traverses the full tool pipeline.
|
||||
2. **Runs the program**: `ctx.codeRuntime.run({ program: args.code, bindings: [{ global: 'tools', functions }], signal: runController.signal })`. The runtime receives the run-scoped signal, not only the caller's outer signal, so any way the outer run settles also aborts work inside the runtime.
|
||||
3. **Settle after quiescence.** When the runtime settles, the bridge aborts outstanding work and drains the dispatch queue before returning. Success returns captured logs and the completion value as canonical output; the registry renders that value into durable `tool/result.content`, which the result card reads directly. A runtime failure becomes `CodeRunFailedError`; backend rejection uses the registry's normal error boundary. Both produce structured error results, and no sub-call can append after `run_code` settles.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -50,11 +50,11 @@ Under `'code'` and `'both'` the registry owns `run_code` as a reserved presentat
|
||||
|
||||
**Concurrency is serialized.** Each run owns a dispatch queue, so even `Promise.all` executes tool calls in submission order. Settlement abandons queued calls that have not started. Parallelism requires per-tool concurrency-safety metadata.
|
||||
|
||||
**Presentation.** `run_code`'s render intent is decided here per the [render-intent Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md): `presentCall` creates a `generic` card with `kind: 'execute'`, the program text as its title, and the same program text as `rawInput`; `run_code` intentionally declares no `presentResult`, so the TUI and host/client runtime (Web) complete that card through their generic raw-content fallback using the final durable `tool/result.content`, including captured logs plus the returned value, failure, or post-policy spill preview. This is not a `terminal` card: that card's semantics are "a shell command in a working directory", which a program is not. See the [result-card completeness note](../bug-fix/2026-07-20-code-mode-result-card-completeness.md).
|
||||
**Presentation.** `run_code`'s render intent is decided here per the [render-intent Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md): `presentCall` creates a `generic` card with `kind: 'execute'`, the program text as its title, and the same program text as `rawInput`; `run_code` intentionally declares no `presentResult`, so the TUI and host/client runtime (Web) complete that card through their generic raw-content fallback using the final durable `tool/result.content`, including captured logs plus the returned value, failure, or post-policy spill preview. This is not a `terminal` card: that card's semantics are "a shell command in a working directory", which a program is not. See the [result-card completeness note](../../archived/bug-fix/2026-07-20-code-mode-result-card-completeness.md).
|
||||
|
||||
### Observability: `tool/code-dispatch`
|
||||
|
||||
Each sub-dispatch appends a log-only `tool/code-dispatch` event containing parent and child call ids, tool identity, normalized arguments, and result summary. It remains outside model history but available to persistence and UIs. Appends occur inside the open `run_code` turn. Direct executions without an agent still run but cannot log the event.
|
||||
Each sub-dispatch appends a log-only `tool/code-dispatch-start` event at pool entry and a `tool/code-dispatch` settle event containing parent and child call ids, tool identity, normalized arguments, and the complete rendered `content`/`isError` outcome. It remains outside model history but available to persistence and UIs. Appends occur inside the open `run_code` turn. Direct executions without an agent still run but cannot log the event.
|
||||
|
||||
### The code-runtime seam
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -40,9 +40,9 @@ Cloudflare 的 [Code Mode](https://blog.cloudflare.com/code-mode/) 提出了一
|
||||
|
||||
### run_code 工具与分发桥
|
||||
|
||||
在 `'code'` 和 `'both'` 下，注册表拥有 `run_code` 作为保留的呈现传输通道，带一个必需参数 `{ code: string }`。它由一个正常的 `ToolDefinition` 表示以供分发，但位于可过滤的能力层之外，因此限制规则不会意外移除 Code Mode 的唯一入口。调用遍历完整的工具流水线——`tools/pre-execute` → 单调守卫 → `tools/execute` 包裹分发 → `tools/post-execute` → 由定义拥有的可选 `finalizeContent` → 不可变的 `tools/result` 通知——与原生调用完全一致；权限插件可以在程序运行前检查程序文本，最终结果观察者看到的是规范化的外层结果。其 `execute(args, exec)`：
|
||||
在 `'code'` 和 `'both'` 下，注册表拥有 `run_code` 作为保留的呈现传输通道，带两个必需参数 `{ code: string; description: string }`（description 为 UI 标注该调用，沿用 bash 的先例）。它由一个正常的 `ToolDefinition` 表示以供分发，但位于可过滤的能力层之外，因此限制规则不会意外移除 Code Mode 的唯一入口。调用遍历完整的工具流水线——`tools/pre-execute` → 单调守卫 → `tools/execute` 包裹分发 → `tools/post-execute` → 由定义拥有的可选 `finalizeContent` → 不可变的 `tools/result` 通知——与原生调用完全一致；权限插件可以在程序运行前检查程序文本，最终结果观察者看到的是规范化的外层结果。其 `execute(args, exec)`：
|
||||
|
||||
1. **构建绑定。** 一个 run 级别的 signal 跟随外层取消，并在 run 结算时被 abort。每个可见工具绑定都会对无损 JSON 参数创建快照，等待序列化队列，以确定性的 call id 和外层 token 作为 `parent` 执行，通过外层 execution 延后返回的上下文，并记录 `tool/code-dispatch`。成功时返回工具最终的规范 JSON 值；失败则变为程序可见的 `ToolCallError`。每个子调用保留自己不可变的执行标识，并遍历完整的工具流水线。
|
||||
1. **构建绑定。** 一个 run 级别的 signal 跟随外层取消，并在 run 结算时被 abort。每个可见工具绑定都会对无损 JSON 参数创建快照，进入原生契约的分发池（调度设计由[实时并行 Agent Note](2026-07-26-code-mode-live-parallel-dispatch.md) 负责），以确定性的 call id 和外层 token 作为 `parent` 执行，通过外层 execution 延后返回的上下文，并记录 `tool/code-dispatch-start`/`tool/code-dispatch` 事件对，其中结算侧携带完整渲染后的结果内容。成功时返回工具最终的规范 JSON 值；失败则变为程序可见的 `ToolCallError`。每个子调用保留自己不可变的执行标识，并遍历完整的工具流水线。
|
||||
2. **运行程序**：`ctx.codeRuntime.run({ program: args.code, bindings: [{ global: 'tools', functions }], signal: runController.signal })`。运行时接收的是 run 级别的 signal 而非仅调用方的外层 signal，因此外层 run 以任何方式结算都会同时 abort 运行时内部的工作。
|
||||
3. **完全停稳后结算。** 运行时结算后，桥 abort 未完成的工作并排空分发队列后再返回。成功时返回捕获的日志和完成值，将其作为规范输出；注册表再把该值渲染为持久化的 `tool/result.content`，供结果卡片直接读取。运行时失败变为 `CodeRunFailedError`；后端拒绝使用注册表的正常错误边界。两者都产生结构化的错误结果，且 `run_code` 结算后不允许子调用追加。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -50,11 +50,11 @@ Cloudflare 的 [Code Mode](https://blog.cloudflare.com/code-mode/) 提出了一
|
||||
|
||||
**并发被序列化。** 每次 run 拥有一个分发队列，因此即使 `Promise.all` 也按提交顺序执行工具调用。结算时放弃尚未开始的排队调用。并行化需要每个工具的并发安全元数据。
|
||||
|
||||
**呈现。** `run_code` 的 render intent 按[呈现意图 Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md)在此决定：`presentCall` 创建一个 `generic` 卡片，`kind: 'execute'`，以程序文本作为标题，并将同一程序文本作为 `rawInput`；`run_code` 有意不声明 `presentResult`，因此 TUI 和宿主/客户端运行时（Web）会通过通用原始内容回退机制，使用最终持久化的 `tool/result.content` 补全该卡片，其中包括捕获的日志，以及返回值、失败信息或 post-policy 输出落盘预览。这不是 `terminal` 卡片：该卡片的语义是「工作目录中的 shell 命令」，程序不是。参见[结果卡片完整性说明](../bug-fix/2026-07-20-code-mode-result-card-completeness.md)。
|
||||
**呈现。** `run_code` 的 render intent 按[呈现意图 Agent Note](../architecture/2026-07-02-tool-render-intent-union.md)在此决定：`presentCall` 创建一个 `generic` 卡片，`kind: 'execute'`，以程序文本作为标题，并将同一程序文本作为 `rawInput`；`run_code` 有意不声明 `presentResult`，因此 TUI 和宿主/客户端运行时（Web）会通过通用原始内容回退机制，使用最终持久化的 `tool/result.content` 补全该卡片，其中包括捕获的日志，以及返回值、失败信息或 post-policy 输出落盘预览。这不是 `terminal` 卡片：该卡片的语义是「工作目录中的 shell 命令」，程序不是。参见[结果卡片完整性说明](../../archived/bug-fix/2026-07-20-code-mode-result-card-completeness.md)。
|
||||
|
||||
### 可观测性：`tool/code-dispatch`
|
||||
|
||||
每次子分发追加一个仅日志的 `tool/code-dispatch` 事件，包含父子 call id、工具标识、规范化参数和结果摘要。它不进入模型历史，但可供持久化和 UI 使用。追加发生在开放的 `run_code` 轮次内。没有 agent 的直接执行仍然运行，但无法记录该事件。
|
||||
每次子分发在进入分发池时追加一个仅日志的 `tool/code-dispatch-start` 事件，并以一个 `tool/code-dispatch` 结算事件收尾，后者包含父子 call id、工具标识、规范化参数以及完整渲染后的 `content`/`isError` 结果。它不进入模型历史，但可供持久化和 UI 使用。追加发生在开放的 `run_code` 轮次内。没有 agent 的直接执行仍然运行，但无法记录该事件。
|
||||
|
||||
### code-runtime seam
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.md: df1bee2801b0e01b290b63f6edbe2e5b1be80cb7
|
||||
2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.zh.md: 7fa5cb2aad2b32ef0662df04ff6576be14a3a8e7
|
||||
2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.md: 760373d64f462e3717a174d5793e6d47ab76b0b4
|
||||
2026-06-29-todo-write-tool.zh.md: fd29e6049e6a729c2c7e78860ad7c065422da60e
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ The harness gives the model bash and subagent tools but no way to record a struc
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
Add a model-facing `todo_write(todos: [{ content, status }])` tool whose whole-list state lives on the event-sourced session log as a new `todo/write` `SessionEventMap` variant. Interactive hosts render from the durable event; the TUI folds it directly, while the [automation-only ACP bridge](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md) deliberately omits todo presentation.
|
||||
Add a model-facing `todo_write(todos: [{ content, status }])` tool whose whole-list state lives on the event-sourced session log as a new `todo/write` `SessionEventMap` variant. Interactive hosts render from the durable event: the TUI folds it directly, the web client projects it into `ConversationSnapshot.todos` ([web todo display](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)), while the [automation-only ACP bridge](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md) deliberately omits todo presentation.
|
||||
|
||||
### Whole-list replace, three-state status
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ The model sends the entire list every call; the new list replaces the old (last-
|
||||
|
||||
### State on the session log, not a service
|
||||
|
||||
The list is appended as a `todo/write` event carrying the full `{ todos }` snapshot. The harness is event-sourced — the LLM history, tool calls, and turn structure all live on the log — so the todo list lives there too. This buys durability, replay, and resume reconstruction for free: a reopened session re-derives the current list from the latest `todo/write`, with no separate persistence backend, in-memory service to rehydrate, or extra wiring. An in-memory `ctx.todos` service would have to reinvent all of that.
|
||||
The list is appended as a `todo/write` event carrying the full `{ todos }` snapshot. The harness is event-sourced — the LLM history, tool calls, and turn structure all live on the log — so the todo list lives there too. This buys durability, replay, and resume reconstruction for free: a reopened session re-derives the current list from the latest `todo/write`, with no separate persistence backend, in-memory service to rehydrate, or extra wiring. An in-memory `ctx.todos` service would have to reinvent all of that. (Full-log consumers get this reconstruction outright; the web client's paged window gets it from the tail history page's host-computed projection — see the [web todo display note](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md).)
|
||||
|
||||
### NOT a surface event
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ harness 为模型提供了 bash 和 subagent 工具，却没有办法记录结
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
新增一个面向模型的 `todo_write(todos: [{ content, status }])` 工具，其整列表状态作为新的 `todo/write` `SessionEventMap` 变体存储在事件溯源的会话日志上。交互式宿主从持久事件渲染；TUI 直接折叠它，而[仅面向自动化的 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）桥接层](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md)有意省略 todo 展示。
|
||||
新增一个面向模型的 `todo_write(todos: [{ content, status }])` 工具，其整列表状态作为新的 `todo/write` `SessionEventMap` 变体存储在事件溯源的会话日志上。交互式宿主从持久事件渲染：TUI 直接折叠它，web 客户端将其投影进 `ConversationSnapshot.todos`（[web todo 展示](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)），而[仅面向自动化的 ACP（Agent Client Protocol）桥接层](../simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md)有意省略 todo 展示。
|
||||
|
||||
### 整列表替换，三态 status
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ harness 为模型提供了 bash 和 subagent 工具，却没有办法记录结
|
||||
|
||||
### 状态在会话日志上，而非服务
|
||||
|
||||
列表作为 `todo/write` 事件追加到日志，携带完整的 `{ todos }` 快照。harness 是事件溯源的——LLM（大语言模型）历史、工具调用和轮次结构都在日志上——所以 todo 列表也在那里。这免费获得了持久性、回放和恢复重建：重新打开的会话从最新的 `todo/write` 重新推导当前列表，无需独立的持久化后端、无需重新注水的内存服务、无需额外接线。一个内存中的 `ctx.todos` 服务需要重新发明以上所有。
|
||||
列表作为 `todo/write` 事件追加到日志，携带完整的 `{ todos }` 快照。harness 是事件溯源的——LLM（大语言模型）历史、工具调用和轮次结构都在日志上——所以 todo 列表也在那里。这免费获得了持久性、回放和恢复重建：重新打开的会话从最新的 `todo/write` 重新推导当前列表，无需独立的持久化后端、无需重新注水的内存服务、无需额外接线。一个内存中的 `ctx.todos` 服务需要重新发明以上所有。（全量 log 消费者直接获得这份重建；web 客户端的分页窗口则从尾页 history 携带的 host 计算投影获得——见 [web todo 展示 Note](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)。）
|
||||
|
||||
### 不是 surface 事件
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Subagent lifecycle enrichment — lastAssistantMessage (observe-only)
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
English | [中文](2026-06-30-subagent-observe-enrich.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
The hooks subsystem ([interception seams Agent Note](2026-06-30-interception-seams.md)) lets a plugin observe and gate the agent at lifecycle points. Claude Code and Codex both expose **SubagentStart / SubagentStop** hooks, and CC's carry the subagent's final message. The harness already emits `subagent/start` and `subagent/end` lifecycle events ([the subagent capability-seam](2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md)), but their payloads were minimal (`provider`, `id`, and on end `stopReason`) — not enough for a hooks bridge to report WHAT a subagent produced without separately reaching for the live run.
|
||||
|
||||
This Agent Note enriches the end payload. It is deliberately **observe-only**: no control-flow change and no waterfall. A run-affecting subagent-stop decision (continuation, injection that changes the run) is a separate, larger redesign and stays out of scope.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
**Add `lastAssistantMessage` — the child's final output — to `SubagentRunEndInfo`.** On the settle path it is the readonly typed `SubagentResult.output`, so an observer sees what the child produced without holding the run. On an infrastructure rejection where no `SubagentResult` exists, it is absent and the event reports `stopReason: 'error'`. Providers and listeners are trusted same-process collaborators and honor the borrowed immutable payload contract.
|
||||
|
||||
Both events stay plain **`emit`s**. Async `SubagentService.start()` attaches result observation to the ready provider run, emits `subagent/start`, and then returns the run; an in-process listener can therefore reach the published child via `ctx.agents.get(info.id)`, while a remote provider need not have a local registry entry. A rejected provider start emits neither event. The callbacks remain observe-only and per-listener containment keeps one bad subscriber from stranding a live run or starving later listeners.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
**An `agentType` subagent-kind label** (the harness analogue of CC's `subagent_type`) on the request + both lifecycle payloads — an earlier draft shipped it; dropped in review because it is a Claude-Code concept that does not fit our own seam (nothing here interprets it, and the only consumer was a CC-dialect bridge). The CC bridge instead feeds Claude Code's own default matcher value `"general-purpose"` for its SubagentStart/Stop `agent_type` matcher, so this Agent Note ships ONE enrichment: `lastAssistantMessage`.
|
||||
|
||||
**A control-flow `subagent/end`** — deferred; see below.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why observe-only, and what is deferred
|
||||
|
||||
A control-flow `subagent/end` (an awaited waterfall returning a stop/continue decision, like the other interception seams) would require: reshaping `subagent/end` from emit to waterfall, restructuring `SubagentService.start` to await listeners before settling, and implementing the `resume` capability in the in-process provider so a "continue" can actually re-run the child. That belongs to the background/steering subagent redesign the [capability-seam Agent Note](2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md) already defers (the same redesign that unifies long-running-tool handling across subagents and bash). This Agent Note ships the observe-only enrichment a hooks bridge needs today; `FIXME(subagent-continuation)` / `TODO` anchors mark where the control-flow version would land if and when that redesign happens.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
A hooks bridge (or a native plugin) can now forward the child's `lastAssistantMessage` to a SubagentStop handler by subscribing to the existing emits — no new control-flow surface. The vocabulary addition is documented in [docs/core-data-structures/subagent.md](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/subagent.md) (the events prose) and the two subagent READMEs; the catalog is regenerated. No production behavior changes — the events fire exactly as before, with one more (optional) field on the end payload — so no snapshot or e2e change is needed.
|
||||
@@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Agent Note: Subagent 生命周期丰富化——lastAssistantMessage（仅观察）
|
||||
|
||||
Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
[English](2026-06-30-subagent-observe-enrich.md) | 中文
|
||||
|
||||
## 问题
|
||||
|
||||
钩子子系统（[拦截 seam Agent Note](2026-06-30-interception-seams.md)）允许插件在生命周期节点观察和拦截 agent（智能体）。Claude Code 和 Codex 都暴露了 **SubagentStart / SubagentStop** 钩子，且 CC 的钩子携带 subagent 的最终消息。harness 已经发出 `subagent/start` 和 `subagent/end` 生命周期事件（[subagent 能力 seam](2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md)），但其载荷极为精简（`provider`、`id`，以及 end 时的 `stopReason`），不足以让钩子桥接层在不单独访问活跃 run 的情况下报告 subagent 产出了什么。
|
||||
|
||||
本 Agent Note 丰富 end 载荷。它刻意限定为**仅观察**：不改变控制流，不引入 waterfall（瀑布式事件）。影响 run 的 subagent-stop 决策（续行、改变 run 的注入）属于另一个更大的重设计，不在本 Agent Note 范围内。
|
||||
|
||||
## 决策
|
||||
|
||||
**在 `SubagentRunEndInfo` 中添加 `lastAssistantMessage`——子 agent 的最终输出。** 在正常结束路径上，它是只读的类型化 `SubagentResult.output`，观察者无需持有 run 即可看到子 agent 产出了什么。在基础设施拒绝（不存在 `SubagentResult`）的情况下，该字段缺失，事件报告 `stopReason: 'error'`。提供方与监听方是受信任的同进程协作者，遵守借用不可变载荷的契约。
|
||||
|
||||
两个事件仍为普通 **`emit`**。异步的 `SubagentService.start()` 将结果观察附加到就绪的提供方 run 上，发出 `subagent/start`，然后返回该 run；进程内监听方因此可以通过 `ctx.agents.get(info.id)` 访问已发布的子 agent，而远程提供方无需在本地注册表中有对应条目。提供方启动被拒绝时不发出任何事件。回调保持仅观察，且逐监听方隔离确保一个异常订阅者不会阻塞活跃 run 或饿死后续监听方。
|
||||
|
||||
## 曾考虑的替代方案
|
||||
|
||||
**`agentType` subagent 类别标签**（CC 的 `subagent_type` 在 harness 中的对应物），放在请求与两个生命周期载荷上。早期草案曾包含它；评审中移除，因为它是 Claude Code 的概念，不适合我们自己的 seam（此处没有任何逻辑解释它，唯一消费方是 CC 方言桥接层）。CC 桥接层改为直接为其 SubagentStart/Stop 的 `agent_type` matcher 填入 Claude Code 自身的默认值 `"general-purpose"`，因此本 Agent Note 只交付**一项**丰富化：`lastAssistantMessage`。
|
||||
|
||||
**控制流式 `subagent/end`**：推迟；见下文。
|
||||
|
||||
## 为何仅观察，以及推迟了什么
|
||||
|
||||
控制流式 `subagent/end`（一个被 await 的 waterfall，返回停止/继续决策，与其他拦截 seam 一致）需要：将 `subagent/end` 从 emit 改为 waterfall、重构 `SubagentService.start` 使其在结算前 await 监听方、在进程内提供方中实现 `resume` 能力以便「继续」能真正重新运行子 agent。这属于[能力 seam Agent Note](2026-06-21-subagent-capability-seam.md) 已推迟的后台/steering（中途引导）subagent 重设计（同一个重设计还将统一 subagent 与 bash 之间的长时间运行工具处理）。本 Agent Note 交付钩子桥接层当前所需的仅观察丰富化；`FIXME(subagent-continuation)` / `TODO` 锚点标记了控制流版本在重设计发生时的落点。
|
||||
|
||||
## 后果
|
||||
|
||||
钩子桥接层（或原生插件）现在可以通过订阅既有 emit 将子 agent 的 `lastAssistantMessage` 转发给 SubagentStop 处理器，无需新的控制流接口。词汇新增记录在 [docs/core-data-structures/subagent.md](../../../../docs/core-data-structures/subagent.md)（事件行文部分）与两个 subagent README 中；catalog 已重新生成。生产行为无变化——事件触发方式与之前完全一致，end 载荷上多了一个可选字段——因此无需更新快照或 e2e 测试。
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write
|
||||
2026-07-06-sandbox.md: 723ef170188dc11da24e049a1e2838fb240d0a17
|
||||
2026-07-06-sandbox.zh.md: a8c7743bb3d499fb58f507ea2c202b44efe2311d
|
||||
2026-07-06-sandbox.md: c6883873192f15ba2982436e156d8795396c0148
|
||||
2026-07-06-sandbox.zh.md: d84df9b06b15dd296801073d381603f34cfd2878
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ Each phase gets its full design when picked up, validated against the code at th
|
||||
|
||||
- **Second consumer** — `subagent-acp` optionally confines child agents (per-call policy; unconfined default — a child agent must write its own persistence).
|
||||
- **More environments** — an environment-coherent capability group example (e.g. bash+fs against one container).
|
||||
- **Windows chain** — `PLATFORM_CHAINS.win32` is reserved and empty (fail-closed); filling it means a confinement runner from the AppContainer/restricted-token family, shipped from its own repository on the `node-addon-landlock-run` template, plus its profile dialect and denial/runner-failure signatures.
|
||||
- **Windows chain** — `PLATFORM_CHAINS.win32` is reserved and empty (fail-closed); filling it means a confinement runner from the AppContainer/restricted-token family, shipped from its own repository on the `node-addon-landlock-run` template, plus its profile dialect and denial/runner-failure signatures. Wrapping the third-party landstrip runner instead was [considered and rejected](../../rejected/feature/2026-07-26-evaluate-landstrip-for-windows-sandbox-rung.md) — not battle-tested enough for a security invariant.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives considered
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More
Reference in New Issue
Block a user