cleanup: remove private repository references
This commit is contained in:
Tianyi Cui
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md
|
||||
2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md: efb37482270a7952f6af6596f9afd12f17048bcc
|
||||
2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.zh.md: 214832923c4e24835e7b25a5bbf2b1bcd62dff42
|
||||
2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.md: 8dcbe74429a620027a570124383442b969c12196
|
||||
2026-06-18-compaction-capability-seam.zh.md: 27b63f29c2e6f35637185b47c882ae42e5d41088
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -131,4 +131,4 @@ The lifecycle boundary makes crash state unambiguous:
|
||||
- **Loop:** Tests pin pre-step after the preceding `step/end` and before the next `step/start`, actual `agent/request` routing, closed failed steps, fresh retry numbering, and complete thrown/in-band overflow → compaction → reconstructed retry composition.
|
||||
- **Manual:** Maintenance serialization, marker ordering, injection retention, live/stale orphan classification, cancellation, close/flush failures, command mapping, and the queued TUI journey are pinned without a model key.
|
||||
- **With-key e2e:** A real model and bash session with lowered limits triggers compaction, records a complete `compact/start…end` pair, shrinks the surface, and finishes the task.
|
||||
- **Snapshot gap:** The summarization call is session-associated and logs `compact/summary`, but ordinary transcript replay does not derive its auxiliary response. [#1971](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/issues/1971) tracks a keyless assembled scenario with an explicit replay override.
|
||||
- **Snapshot gap:** The summarization call is session-associated and logs `compact/summary`, but ordinary transcript replay does not derive its auxiliary response; keyless assembled coverage therefore needs an explicit replay override.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -131,4 +131,4 @@ compact/end → log-only. Releases the lock (carries `error` on a recoverab
|
||||
- **循环测试：** 测试固定 pre-step 发生在前一个 `step/end` 之后、下一个 `step/start` 之前，使用实际 `agent/request` 路由，关闭失败步骤，分配新的重试编号，并覆盖完整的抛出/带内溢出 → 压缩 → 重建重试组合。
|
||||
- **手动测试：** 无需模型密钥即可固定 maintenance 串行化、标记顺序、注入保留、活动／陈旧未匹配标记分类、取消、闭合／flush 失败、命令映射以及排队 TUI 流程。
|
||||
- **带密钥 e2e：** 真实模型和 bash 会话在降低的限制下触发压缩，记录完整的 `compact/start…end` 对，缩小 surface，并完成任务。
|
||||
- **快照缺口：** 摘要调用与会话关联并记录 `compact/summary`，但普通 transcript（文本记录）回放不会派生其辅助响应。[#1971](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/issues/1971) 跟踪一个带显式回放 override 的无密钥组装场景。
|
||||
- **快照缺口：** 摘要调用与会话关联并记录 `compact/summary`，但普通 transcript（文本记录）回放不会派生其辅助响应；因此，要实现无密钥的组装态覆盖，就必须显式提供回放 override。
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.md
|
||||
2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.md: 2805ef894050d1b1cffe06fce59a4984d463f8d1
|
||||
2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.zh.md: 16b32daa05b10f24eacde4cec9622b2159cdef09
|
||||
2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.md: 8d047f33ab1aebd8c0de2a0a5e90e7efb1b28154
|
||||
2026-07-26-todo-parallel-in-progress.zh.md: 26b7081e7b4e3688a46a2857da91ba45328532a9
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ The durable-log invariant deliberately does NOT follow the flag. A log written w
|
||||
|
||||
## The display surfaces are part of the change
|
||||
|
||||
Lifting the cap makes a list shape reachable that no renderer had ever received, so this branch stacks on the [web todo display](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md) rather than landing beside it: both change `tool-todo`, and the GUI is where a parallel plan becomes visible. Two web sites derived their one-line summary with `todos.find(t => t.status === 'in_progress')` — the collapsed plan-strip header and the `todo_write` row — and under the old cap that `find` was total, since at most one item could match. With several active it silently dropped every active item but the first: a four-item plan with three running tasks collapsed to the name of one, and the row read `1/4 已完成 · <one task>` while two others were in flight. The expanded list was always correct (it maps every item), which is why neither PR's tests caught it — only the collapsed header and the row lost information. The panel redesign in [#740](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/pull/740) has since replaced the collapsed header's named hint with `·`-joined per-status counts (localized, `1 completed · 2 in progress · 1 pending`, zero-count segments omitted), which reports parallel work correctly and needs no name to truncate; the row is the one site this branch still had to fix.
|
||||
Lifting the cap makes a list shape reachable that no renderer had ever received, so this branch stacks on the [web todo display](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md) rather than landing beside it: both change `tool-todo`, and the GUI is where a parallel plan becomes visible. Two web sites derived their one-line summary with `todos.find(t => t.status === 'in_progress')` — the collapsed plan-strip header and the `todo_write` row — and under the old cap that `find` was total, since at most one item could match. With several active it silently dropped every active item but the first: a four-item plan with three running tasks collapsed to the name of one, and the row read `1/4 已完成 · <one task>` while two others were in flight. The expanded list was always correct (it maps every item), which is why neither PR's tests caught it — only the collapsed header and the row lost information. The panel redesign replaced the collapsed header's named hint with `·`-joined per-status counts (localized, `1 completed · 2 in progress · 1 pending`, zero-count segments omitted), which reports parallel work correctly and needs no name to truncate; the row is the one site this branch still had to fix.
|
||||
|
||||
The row takes `planSummary` in `toolviews/plan-summary.ts`. It names the first active item and counts the rest, so the row reports how many tasks are running instead of implying one. Naming every active item was rejected: the row is a single line, and an unbounded join would overflow it — the count degrades predictably where a list does not. The derivation sits inside the toolviews domain rather than in `contract/`, the inter-domain face: the panel computes its own counts inline and shares nothing with the row, so a contract module would declare a sharing relationship that no longer exists.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## 展示面是本次改动的一部分
|
||||
|
||||
解除上限使一种此前任何渲染器都不曾收到的列表形状变得可达，因此本分支 stack（栈叠）在 [web todo 展示](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)之上，而不是与之并行落地：两者都改 `tool-todo`，而 GUI 正是并行计划变得可见的地方。web 有两处用 `todos.find(t => t.status === 'in_progress')` 推导单行摘要——折叠态的计划横条表头与 `todo_write` 工具行——在旧上限下这个 `find` 是完备的，因为最多只能有一个条目匹配。一旦有多个活跃项，它会静默丢掉除第一个之外的全部活跃条目：一个四条目、三个任务在跑的计划折叠后只显示其中一个的名字，工具行读作 `1/4 已完成 · <一个任务>`，而另外两个仍在进行。展开态的列表始终正确（它遍历每个条目），这也是两个 PR 的测试都没抓到它的原因——只有折叠表头与工具行丢失了信息。其后 [#740](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/pull/740) 的面板重做已把折叠表头的具名提示换成以 `·` 连接的各状态计数（本地化后形如 `1 已完成 · 2 进行中 · 1 待处理`，计数为零的段落省略），它能正确报告并行工作，且不需要任何可被截断的名字；工具行才是本分支仍需修的那一处。
|
||||
解除上限使一种此前任何渲染器都不曾收到的列表形状变得可达，因此本分支 stack（栈叠）在 [web todo 展示](2026-07-23-web-todo-display.md)之上，而不是与之并行落地：两者都改 `tool-todo`，而 GUI 正是并行计划变得可见的地方。web 有两处用 `todos.find(t => t.status === 'in_progress')` 推导单行摘要——折叠态的计划横条表头与 `todo_write` 工具行——在旧上限下这个 `find` 是完备的，因为最多只能有一个条目匹配。一旦有多个活跃项，它会静默丢掉除第一个之外的全部活跃条目：一个四条目、三个任务在跑的计划折叠后只显示其中一个的名字，工具行读作 `1/4 已完成 · <一个任务>`，而另外两个仍在进行。展开态的列表始终正确（它遍历每个条目），这也是两个 PR 的测试都没抓到它的原因——只有折叠表头与工具行丢失了信息。面板重做把折叠表头的具名提示换成以 `·` 连接的各状态计数（本地化后形如 `1 已完成 · 2 进行中 · 1 待处理`，计数为零的段落省略），它能正确报告并行工作，且不需要任何可被截断的名字；工具行才是本分支仍需修的那一处。
|
||||
|
||||
工具行改用 `toolviews/plan-summary.ts` 中的 `planSummary`。它给出第一个活跃条目，并计数其余活跃项，因此工具行报告的是有多少任务在跑，而不是暗示只有一个。列出全部活跃条目被否决了：工具行是单行，无上界的拼接会溢出——在列表做不到的地方，计数能够可预测地降级。该推导放在 toolviews 域内而非 `contract/`（域间共享面）：面板自行内联计算其计数，与工具行不共享任何东西，因此放进 contract 会声明一种已不存在的共享关系。
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-30-queued-manual-compaction.md
|
||||
2026-07-30-queued-manual-compaction.md: 4b7a905712a01948146b8830dfc037185162eefc
|
||||
2026-07-30-queued-manual-compaction.zh.md: 15a42de3536f2da5304e77ce3cb282029856ba6d
|
||||
2026-07-30-queued-manual-compaction.md: 5100808ada4b7b284228113584e577d46ff91101
|
||||
2026-07-30-queued-manual-compaction.zh.md: 29c3b921d0d59527aa1d8af1c91d085b52045377
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ Once a transaction has appended its start, every later failure makes one closing
|
||||
|
||||
### Reference implementation boundaries
|
||||
|
||||
[PR #835](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/pull/835) was used as a reference implementation for the command, reservation, tests, and snapshot shape, but was not merged. Its process-local `WeakSet` lock and locked/unlocked method splits were considered and not adopted because the durable bracket is the single reachable lock.
|
||||
An unmerged reference implementation informed the command, reservation, tests, and snapshot shape. Its process-local `WeakSet` lock and locked/unlocked method splits were considered and not adopted because the durable bracket is the single reachable lock.
|
||||
|
||||
That reference also carried client-side replacement-anchor machinery to preserve transcript placement. The log-ordered transcript projection already consumes compaction from event order and does not consult mutable surface positions, so those anchors were considered and not adopted.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ DSH 有意在调用摘要器前记录 `compact/start`。缓慢或崩溃的尝试
|
||||
|
||||
### 参考实现边界
|
||||
|
||||
[PR #835](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/pull/835) 用作命令、预留、测试与快照结构的参考实现，但未被合并。它的进程本地 `WeakSet` 锁与 locked／unlocked 方法拆分经过评估后未被采用，因为持久标记对是唯一可达的锁。
|
||||
一个未合并的参考实现为命令、预留、测试与快照结构提供了参考。它的进程本地 `WeakSet` 锁与 locked／unlocked 方法拆分经过评估后未被采用，因为持久标记对是唯一可达的锁。
|
||||
|
||||
该参考实现还包含客户端侧替换锚点机制，用于保留 transcript（文本记录）位置。按日志顺序排列的 transcript 投影已经从事件顺序消费压缩，并且不会查询可变 surface 位置，因此这些锚点经过评估后未被采用。
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
|
||||
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
|
||||
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
|
||||
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-08-05-pwsh-ui-bash-parity.md
|
||||
2026-08-05-pwsh-ui-bash-parity.md: 6bbdb0e6bc69ef1af03a6a9146f83b84754cb2a6
|
||||
2026-08-05-pwsh-ui-bash-parity.zh.md: 75f3a3ddec002acaa1755c81114b0f122ab80593
|
||||
2026-08-05-pwsh-ui-bash-parity.md: 815b448b894e9c53b4c4a2076f6b94fdd316dd35
|
||||
2026-08-05-pwsh-ui-bash-parity.zh.md: 967c5a9e1409028043dc5028fdca640ddfeb1acc
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ English | [中文](2026-08-05-pwsh-ui-bash-parity.zh.md)
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
The [pwsh tool bash parity decision](../../implemented/feature/2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.md) made `dsh-tool-pwsh` behaviorally interchangeable with `dsh-tool-bash` for execution, markers, and background tasks, but explicitly deferred the human-visible half: a completed pwsh foreground call presented as a generic `console`-fenced card while the bash tool's completed call presented as a terminal card with a parsed exit-status pill. The roadmap that owned this gap ([Windows defaults to pwsh](../../proposed/feature/2026-08-01-windows-pwsh-default.md)) named "pwsh TUI/GUI rendering" as stage 2 — but the TUI package was removed ([`ed30088adb`](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/commit/ed30088adb)), leaving the Web surface as the only UI the gap affects.
|
||||
The [pwsh tool bash parity decision](../../implemented/feature/2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.md) made `dsh-tool-pwsh` behaviorally interchangeable with `dsh-tool-bash` for execution, markers, and background tasks, but explicitly deferred the human-visible half: a completed pwsh foreground call presented as a generic `console`-fenced card while the bash tool's completed call presented as a terminal card with a parsed exit-status pill. The roadmap that owned this gap ([Windows defaults to pwsh](../../proposed/feature/2026-08-01-windows-pwsh-default.md)) named "pwsh TUI/GUI rendering" as stage 2, but the TUI package was removed, leaving the Web surface as the only UI the gap affects.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Status: implemented
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem
|
||||
|
||||
[pwsh 工具与 bash 对齐决策](../../implemented/feature/2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.md) 让 `dsh-tool-pwsh` 在执行、marker 与后台任务上行为可互换，但明确推迟了面向人类的一半：完成的 pwsh 前台调用呈现为通用 `console` 围栏卡片，而 bash 工具的完成调用呈现为带解析退出状态 pill 的 terminal 卡。拥有此缺口的路线图（[Windows 默认改用 pwsh](../../proposed/feature/2026-08-01-windows-pwsh-default.md)）把 "pwsh TUI/GUI 渲染" 列为阶段 2——但 TUI 包已被移除（[`ed30088adb`](https://github.com/deepseek-harness/deepseek-harness/commit/ed30088adb)），Web 表面成为该缺口唯一影响的 UI。
|
||||
[pwsh 工具与 bash 对齐决策](../../implemented/feature/2026-08-02-pwsh-tool-bash-parity.md) 让 `dsh-tool-pwsh` 在执行、marker 与后台任务上行为可互换，但明确推迟了面向人类的一半：完成的 pwsh 前台调用呈现为通用 `console` 围栏卡片，而 bash 工具的完成调用呈现为带解析退出状态 pill 的 terminal 卡。拥有此缺口的路线图（[Windows 默认改用 pwsh](../../proposed/feature/2026-08-01-windows-pwsh-default.md)）把 "pwsh TUI/GUI 渲染" 列为阶段 2，但 TUI 包已被移除，使 Web 表面成为该缺口唯一影响的 UI。
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user