Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into feat/web-message-feedback-ui

This commit is contained in:
Chinesezjc
2026-08-11 17:14:28 +08:00
292 changed files with 828 additions and 15122 deletions

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-10-single-file-executable-sdk-runtime-distribution.md
2026-07-10-single-file-executable-sdk-runtime-distribution.md: fd39d8c10d7f76003c93b6fa45a3b0211cead23e
2026-07-10-single-file-executable-sdk-runtime-distribution.zh.md: d7758a77083e07b1d2cac99ae2be3f15e6edd2dc
2026-07-10-single-file-executable-sdk-runtime-distribution.md: 01081f1e0b8027420fedbc599f99c67e67a4639b
2026-07-10-single-file-executable-sdk-runtime-distribution.zh.md: fadfc8cdcb0651665b965126ab0b25ed4218a533

View File

@@ -23,11 +23,11 @@ The exe is packaged with the **`--sea` (enhanced SEA) mode** of [@yao-pkg/pkg](h
Terminology reminder: pkg's `/snapshot` VFS has nothing to do with this repo's testing-system "snapshot" (ACP replay expected outputs, `$DSH_SNAPSHOT`); this document says "VFS" for the former.
### The serving interface is a plugin: the two packages ui/jsonrpc + examples/jsonrpc-demo
### The serving interface is a plugin: the two packages sdk/server + examples/jsonrpc-demo
The deterministic protocol implementation (`server.ts` / `transport.ts`) lands as two packages on the existing `acp/acp` + `examples/acp-demo` pattern — the serving surface is itself a plugin:
- [`packages/scaffold/server`](../../../../packages/scaffold/server/README.md) (`@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc`): the pure protocol plugin; on apply it mounts `HarnessSdkServer` plus a line-delimited JSON-RPC transport on the process stdio, with disposal through `ctx.effect()`. Whether to serve is decided by `cordis.yml`; a yml that does not mount it is a legitimate process that does not serve. Protocol-level exit belongs to the plugin (after answering and flushing the `shutdown` response it disposes the root runtime so persistence drains, then `exit(0)`; an HMR-style unload only stops the service without exiting the process).
- [`packages/sdk/server`](../../../../packages/sdk/server/README.md) (`@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc`): the pure protocol plugin; on apply it mounts `HarnessSdkServer` plus a line-delimited JSON-RPC transport on the process stdio, with disposal through `ctx.effect()`. Whether to serve is decided by `cordis.yml`; a yml that does not mount it is a legitimate process that does not serve. Protocol-level exit belongs to the plugin (after answering and flushing the `shutdown` response it disposes the root runtime so persistence drains, then `exit(0)`; an HMR-style unload only stops the service without exiting the process).
- [`packages/examples/jsonrpc-demo`](../../../../packages/examples/jsonrpc-demo/README.md) (`@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc-demo`): a thin app bin — `installFailLoud` + `loadEnv` + config discovery + `boot()` from [`dsh-app-boot`](../../../../packages/boot/app-boot/src/index.ts), done once boot completes; the server is brought up by the `dsh-jsonrpc` entry in the yml. Its only dependency is app-boot. Process-level exit belongs to the bin (stdin EOF/SIGTERM → dispose then 0, SIGINT → 130).
Config discovery has two channels and fails loudly when both are missing: the `DSH_CORDIS_CONFIG` environment variable first (the SDK client convention), then an argv positional argument; no default path and no built-in fallback whatsoever — "the plugins actually booted are decided by an external cordis.yml" is a hard semantic.

View File

@@ -23,11 +23,11 @@ exe 使用 [@yao-pkg/pkg](https://github.com/yao-pkg/pkg)(vercel/pkg 归档后
术语提醒:pkg 的 `/snapshot` VFS 与本仓库测试体系的「快照」(ACP 回放预期输出、`$DSH_SNAPSHOT`)无关,本文用「VFS」指前者。
### 对外服务接口也是插件:ui/jsonrpc + examples/jsonrpc-demo 两个包
### 对外服务接口也是插件:sdk/server + examples/jsonrpc-demo 两个包
确定性协议实现(`server.ts` / `transport.ts`)按 `acp/acp` + `examples/acp-demo` 的既有模式落为两包——对外服务接口本身也是插件:
- [`packages/scaffold/server`](../../../../packages/scaffold/server/README.md)(`@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc`):纯协议插件;执行 `apply` 时,在进程 stdio 上挂载 `HarnessSdkServer` 与按行传输的 JSON-RPC 层,资源释放走 `ctx.effect()`。是否提供服务由 `cordis.yml` 决定;未挂载该插件的配置会启动一个不提供此服务的合法进程。协议级退出归插件所有(应答并确保 `shutdown` 响应发送完毕后,对根运行时执行 dispose(资源释放),让待处理的持久化操作完成,再调用 `exit(0)`;HMR 式卸载只停止服务,不退出进程)。
- [`packages/sdk/server`](../../../../packages/sdk/server/README.md)(`@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc`):纯协议插件;执行 `apply` 时,在进程 stdio 上挂载 `HarnessSdkServer` 与按行传输的 JSON-RPC 层,资源释放走 `ctx.effect()`。是否提供服务由 `cordis.yml` 决定;未挂载该插件的配置会启动一个不提供此服务的合法进程。协议级退出归插件所有(应答并确保 `shutdown` 响应发送完毕后,对根运行时执行 dispose(资源释放),让待处理的持久化操作完成,再调用 `exit(0)`;HMR 式卸载只停止服务,不退出进程)。
- [`packages/examples/jsonrpc-demo`](../../../../packages/examples/jsonrpc-demo/README.md)(`@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc-demo`):轻量应用入口——`installFailLoud` + `loadEnv` + 配置发现 + [`dsh-app-boot`](../../../../packages/boot/app-boot/src/index.ts) 的 `boot()`;`boot()` 完成后入口即完成,服务器由 `cordis.yml` 中的 `dsh-jsonrpc` 条目启动。它只依赖 `app-boot`。进程级退出归 `bin` 所有(stdin EOF/SIGTERM → dispose 后返回 0,SIGINT → 130)。
配置发现有两个通道,均缺失时立即报错:优先使用 `DSH_CORDIS_CONFIG` 环境变量(SDK 客户端约定),其次使用 argv 位置参数;没有默认路径或内置回退——「实际启动的插件由外部 `cordis.yml` 决定」是硬语义。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-24-single-harness-home-resolver.md
2026-07-24-single-harness-home-resolver.md: 1e128911dce0b50dc95722c6edd82cb322d18f3d
2026-07-24-single-harness-home-resolver.zh.md: 258a16e6ca139da191db564aae40d23d05ca46b7
2026-07-24-single-harness-home-resolver.md: 27db7e23b1ae3d2c9a05259bfb3047591589627d
2026-07-24-single-harness-home-resolver.zh.md: 5eec850c9c7ecc70b2327eacca422662ec39a9cc

View File

@@ -6,13 +6,12 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-24-single-harness-home-resolver.zh.md)
## Problem
The harness had three inconsistent conventions for "where does DeepSeek Harness user data live":
The harness had two inconsistent conventions for "where does DeepSeek Harness user data live":
- `@deepseek-ai/dsh-home` resolved `configured ?? $DSH_HOME ?? ~/.dsh`.
- `@deepseek-ai/dsh-paths` shipped a **second** `resolveDshHome` with the same precedence plus tilde expansion — a near-duplicate of `dsh-home` that no gate flagged because the two lived in different packages and had already drifted (only one expanded tildes).
- `@deepseek-ai/dsh-telemetry`'s `globalConfigDir` used a *different* policy entirely: `DSH_CONFIG_HOME > $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/deepseek-harness > %APPDATA%/deepseek-harness > ~/.config/deepseek-harness`.
So most of the product parked everything under one `~/.dsh` root while telemetry alone stored its anonymous id elsewhere, under a `deepseek-harness` namespace that contradicts the repo-wide `dsh` shorthand (`DSH_HOME`, `@deepseek-ai/dsh-*`, `~/.dsh`). Two resolvers plus a divergent third policy means no single home fact.
Two resolvers for the same cross-cutting fact meant there was no single home policy.
## Decision
@@ -22,20 +21,18 @@ One resolver owns the harness home, in `@deepseek-ai/dsh-paths`, single-root:
explicit configured path > $DSH_HOME > ~/.dsh
```
An empty or whitespace-only `$DSH_HOME` is treated as unset, matching the guard telemetry's old resolver carried: without it `resolve('')` would silently place the home at the current working directory. The harness keeps all user data under one root; there is no XDG config/data/cache split. `dshHomePath(...segments)` joins deployment-owned children onto that root, and `dsh-app-boot` exposes it to Loader `!!js` config expressions before mounting entries, so shipped compositions derive `sessions` and `storages` without copying the resolver. `dshHomeDisplay()` names a resolved root symbolically for user-facing paths — `~/.dsh` for the default home, `$DSH_HOME` for any configured home — so the user-global `AGENTS.md` label never leaks an absolute machine path. It replaces workspace-context's bespoke default-vs-`$DSH_HOME` check.
An empty or whitespace-only `$DSH_HOME` is treated as unset; otherwise `resolve('')` would silently place the home at the current working directory. The harness keeps all user data under one root; there is no XDG config/data/cache split. `dshHomePath(...segments)` joins deployment-owned children onto that root, and `dsh-app-boot` exposes it to Loader `!!js` config expressions before mounting entries, so shipped compositions derive `sessions` and `storages` without copying the resolver. `dshHomeDisplay()` names a resolved root symbolically for user-facing paths — `~/.dsh` for the default home, `$DSH_HOME` for any configured home — so the user-global `AGENTS.md` label never leaks an absolute machine path. It replaces workspace-context's bespoke default-vs-`$DSH_HOME` check.
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-home` is deleted. Its three importers (`dsh-tool-bash`, `dsh-skill-local`, `dsh-agent-spine-demo`) now import `resolveDshHome` from `dsh-paths`. `dsh-telemetry`'s `globalConfigDir` delegates to `resolveDshHome`, dropping its second resolver, the `DSH_CONFIG_HOME` override, the XDG/`%APPDATA%` branches, and the `deepseek-harness` namespace; the anonymous id now lives directly under the harness home.
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-home` is deleted. Its three importers (`dsh-tool-bash`, `dsh-skill-local`, `dsh-agent-spine-demo`) import `resolveDshHome` from `dsh-paths`.
`dsh-telemetry` and its separate home policy are absent under the [SDK project toolchain removal](../simplification/2026-08-11-remove-sdk-project-toolchain.md), leaving this resolver as the sole home policy.
## Alternatives considered
**Leave the two `resolveDshHome` copies in place.** They had already drifted (one expands tildes, one didn't) and encode the same cross-cutting fact twice. Consolidation is the point of the `util/` layer; a duplicate resolver is a latent divergence bug.
**Adopt XDG (honor `$XDG_CONFIG_HOME`, or split config/data/cache into separate trees).** Considered and dropped in favor of one obvious root. A single `$DSH_HOME || ~/.dsh` ground truth matches `~/.claude` / `~/.aws`, needs no per-kind reclassification of every `~/.dsh` consumer, and leaves no resolver asymmetry to reconcile. Telemetry aligning onto the same root — rather than keeping its own XDG path — is precisely the divergence this removes.
**Keep telemetry's own config dir.** Its `deepseek-harness` namespace and separate XDG policy were the lone exception to the `dsh`/`~/.dsh` convention. Folding it onto the shared resolver is what makes "one home fact" true. The cost is that the anonymous id becomes scoped to `$DSH_HOME` rather than the machine: a project that points `DSH_HOME` at a repo-local path (or a command that loads a project `.env` before telemetry) gets a home-local id, so the id counts harness homes, not machines. This is accepted as the intended meaning of single-root — a relocated `$DSH_HOME` moves *all* harness state, telemetry identity included — and the module contract is stated as per-harness-home rather than per-machine. A machine-global identity that ignored `$DSH_HOME` would reintroduce exactly the second home policy this decision removes.
**Adopt XDG (honor `$XDG_CONFIG_HOME`, or split config/data/cache into separate trees).** Considered and dropped in favor of one obvious root. A single `$DSH_HOME || ~/.dsh` ground truth matches `~/.claude` / `~/.aws`, needs no per-kind reclassification of every `~/.dsh` consumer, and leaves no resolver asymmetry to reconcile.
## Consequences
- One home fact, one resolver. `dsh-paths` is the sole owner; the `util/` group loses the `home` package.
- Telemetry's anonymous id moves from `~/.config/deepseek-harness/telemetry.json` to the harness home (`~/.dsh/telemetry.json` by default). Under the pre-release "backends reject old formats" stance this needs no migration: an orphaned old id simply regenerates once, and the id is anonymous by construction.
- Telemetry drops Windows `%APPDATA%` handling. `resolveDshHome` uses `os.homedir()`, which is correct on Windows; the harness does not special-case `%APPDATA%` for its single root.

View File

@@ -6,13 +6,12 @@ Status: implemented
## 问题
对于"DeepSeek Harness 用户数据存放在哪里",harness 里存在三套互不一致的约定:
对于"DeepSeek Harness 用户数据存放在哪里",harness 里存在两套互不一致的约定:
- `@deepseek-ai/dsh-home` 按 `configured ?? $DSH_HOME ?? ~/.dsh` 解析。
- `@deepseek-ai/dsh-paths` 又提供了**第二个** `resolveDshHome`,优先级相同但额外做了波浪号展开——它几乎是 `dsh-home` 的重复实现,却没有任何门禁发现,因为两者分属不同的包,而且早已漂移(只有一个会展开波浪号)。
- `@deepseek-ai/dsh-telemetry` 的 `globalConfigDir` 采用了*完全不同*的策略:`DSH_CONFIG_HOME > $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/deepseek-harness > %APPDATA%/deepseek-harness > ~/.config/deepseek-harness`。
于是产品的大部分内容都停放在同一个 `~/.dsh` 根目录下,唯独 telemetry 把匿名 id 存到别处,落在一个 `deepseek-harness` 命名空间里,这与全仓库通行的 `dsh` 简写(`DSH_HOME`、`@deepseek-ai/dsh-*`、`~/.dsh`)相冲突。两个解析器再加上一个各行其是的第三套策略,意味着不存在单一的 home 事实。
同一条横切事实有两个解析器,意味着不存在单一的 home 策略。
## 决策
@@ -22,20 +21,18 @@ Status: implemented
explicit configured path > $DSH_HOME > ~/.dsh
```
空或仅含空白的 `$DSH_HOME` 被当作未设置处理,这与 telemetry 旧解析器所带的保护一致:若无此保护,`resolve('')` 会悄悄把 home 落在当前工作目录。harness 把所有用户数据都放在同一个根目录下;不存在 XDG 的 config/data/cache 拆分。`dshHomePath(...segments)` 将部署负责的子路径拼接到该根目录下,`dsh-app-boot` 在挂载条目前向 Loader `!!js` 配置表达式暴露它,因此出厂组合无需复制解析器即可派生 `sessions` 和 `storages`。`dshHomeDisplay()` 为面向用户的路径以符号形式命名已解析的根目录——默认 home 显示为 `~/.dsh`,任何已配置的 home 显示为 `$DSH_HOME`——这样面向用户全局的 `AGENTS.md` 标签就绝不会泄露机器上的绝对路径。它取代了 workspace-context 中自定义的"默认值 vs `$DSH_HOME`"判断。
空或仅含空白的 `$DSH_HOME` 被当作未设置处理;否则,`resolve('')` 会悄悄把 home 落在当前工作目录。harness 把所有用户数据都放在同一个根目录下;不存在 XDG 的 config/data/cache 拆分。`dshHomePath(...segments)` 将部署负责的子路径拼接到该根目录下,`dsh-app-boot` 在挂载条目前向 Loader `!!js` 配置表达式暴露它,因此出厂组合无需复制解析器即可派生 `sessions` 和 `storages`。`dshHomeDisplay()` 为面向用户的路径以符号形式命名已解析的根目录——默认 home 显示为 `~/.dsh`,任何已配置的 home 显示为 `$DSH_HOME`——这样面向用户全局的 `AGENTS.md` 标签就绝不会泄露机器上的绝对路径。它取代了 workspace-context 中自定义的"默认值 vs `$DSH_HOME`"判断。
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-home` 被删除。它的三个引用方(`dsh-tool-bash`、`dsh-skill-local`、`dsh-agent-spine-demo`)现在从 `dsh-paths` 导入 `resolveDshHome`。`dsh-telemetry` 的 `globalConfigDir` 转而委托给 `resolveDshHome`,去掉了它的第二个解析器、`DSH_CONFIG_HOME` 覆盖项、XDG/`%APPDATA%` 分支以及 `deepseek-harness` 命名空间;匿名 id 现在直接存放在 harness home 之下。
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-home` 被删除。它的三个引用方(`dsh-tool-bash`、`dsh-skill-local`、`dsh-agent-spine-demo`)从 `dsh-paths` 导入 `resolveDshHome`。
`dsh-telemetry` 及其独立 home 策略已随 [SDK 项目工具链移除](../simplification/2026-08-11-remove-sdk-project-toolchain.md)一并消失,因此该解析器是唯一的 home 策略。
## 备选方案
**保留两份 `resolveDshHome` 副本。** 它们早已漂移(一个展开波浪号,一个不展开),并把同一条横切事实编码了两遍。`util/` 层的意义正是在于合并,重复的解析器是一个潜在的分歧 bug。
**采用 XDG(遵从 `$XDG_CONFIG_HOME`,或把 config/data/cache 拆分到各自的目录树)。** 经过考虑后放弃,转而采用一个显而易见的根目录。单一的 `$DSH_HOME || ~/.dsh` 基准事实与 `~/.claude` / `~/.aws` 一致,无需对每个 `~/.dsh` 消费方按类别重新归类,也不留下任何需要协调的解析器不对称。telemetry 对齐到同一根目录——而不是保留自己的 XDG 路径——正是本决策所要消除的那种分歧。
**保留 telemetry 自己的 config 目录。** 它的 `deepseek-harness` 命名空间和独立的 XDG 策略是唯一违背 `dsh`/`~/.dsh` 约定的例外。把它折叠到共享解析器上,才让"单一 home 事实"成真。代价是匿名 id 的作用域从机器变成了 `$DSH_HOME`:若某个项目把 `DSH_HOME` 指向仓库本地路径(或某条命令在 telemetry 之前加载了项目的 `.env`),得到的就是 home 本地的 id,因此该 id 统计的是 harness home,而非机器。这被接受为单一根目录的应有含义——重定位 `$DSH_HOME` 会移动*全部* harness 状态,telemetry 身份也在其中——模块约定据此表述为 per-harness-home 而非 per-machine。一个忽略 `$DSH_HOME` 的机器级全局身份,恰恰会重新引入本决策所要消除的那第二套 home 策略。
**采用 XDG(遵从 `$XDG_CONFIG_HOME`,或把 config/data/cache 拆分到各自的目录树)。** 经过考虑后放弃,转而采用一个显而易见的根目录。单一的 `$DSH_HOME || ~/.dsh` 基准事实与 `~/.claude` / `~/.aws` 一致,无需对每个 `~/.dsh` 消费方按类别重新归类,也不留下任何需要协调的解析器不对称。
## 影响
- 单一 home 事实,单一解析器。`dsh-paths` 是唯一归属方;`util/` 组失去了 `home` 包。
- telemetry 的匿名 id 从 `~/.config/deepseek-harness/telemetry.json` 移到 harness home(默认为 `~/.dsh/telemetry.json`)。在预发布的"后端拒绝旧格式"立场下,这无需迁移:一个遗留的旧 id 只会重新生成一次,而且该 id 本就是匿名构造的。
- telemetry 去掉了 Windows `%APPDATA%` 处理。`resolveDshHome` 使用 `os.homedir()`,这在 Windows 上是正确的;harness 不会为它的单一根目录对 `%APPDATA%` 做特殊处理。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-26-subprocess-seam.md
2026-07-26-subprocess-seam.md: 7899af56259d39a4e3f924bcba673c8efa99c682
2026-07-26-subprocess-seam.zh.md: d9cbc0ebf33bc785984b0a9bd58fa8ebc6aab436
2026-07-26-subprocess-seam.md: f43b55b0b760c2aabe317abacdb800b755de059b
2026-07-26-subprocess-seam.zh.md: df8c3ddab80933882bf3587a9f01e019eb721a87

View File

@@ -17,11 +17,11 @@ A new `subprocess/` capability family owns "run and manage a process"; the bash
- **`dsh-bash-local` (Consumer)** — `inject: ['subprocess']`; maps each resolved `BashExecSpec` onto a `SubprocessSpawnSpec` (`['bash', '-c', command]`), keeps its config, `resolve()` defaulting, fused-deadline `timedOut`/`aborted` classification, the `[stderr]`-marked background read merge with its consuming cursor, and the `onProcessDone` subclass hook. `dsh-bash-sandbox` is unchanged apart from redeclaring the inherited inject; it still wraps at the command-string level and re-enters the inherited spawn path.
- **`dsh-bash` (Service Definition)** — re-exports the moved vocabulary from `dsh-subprocess`, so no bash Consumer changes an import; `BashExecRequest`/`BashExecSpec`/`BashProcess` and the sandbox facts remain bash-owned.
Every composition that loads a bash executor now also loads `@deepseek-ai/dsh-subprocess-local` (CLI, examples, python bundled runtime, create-sdk's bash feature resources, inline test configs).
Every composition that loads a bash executor also loads `@deepseek-ai/dsh-subprocess-local` (CLI, examples, the Python bundled runtime, and inline test configs).
Background-process lifetime moved from the executor to the subprocess service: the executor no longer retains a live-process set, so an executor reload leaves background work running and readable, and composition teardown (the service's disposal) remains the kill-and-join boundary. One behavioral contract shifted with it: a background spawn failure can no longer be buffered as fake stderr inside the plumbing (the service rejects `done` and buffers nothing for a process that never ran), so the executor injects the `spawn failed: …` note into exactly one `readOutput()` delta.
Observed stream and lifecycle needs then moved the eligible process consumers onto the seam: LSP uses piped protocol streams plus a collected stderr tail; the ACP backend uses piped ndjson, inherited stderr, and a consumer-owned stdin-EOF disposal ladder; PTY uses `spawnTerminal()` while keeping readiness and terminal policy. `dsh-subagent-subprocess` and the private LSP tree helpers were deleted. MCP transport spawning, the SDK package-manager runner, synchronous TUI Git probing, and dependency-light test-support launchers remain outside by ownership or execution shape; their production callers share the scrub where applicable.
Observed stream and lifecycle needs then moved the eligible process consumers onto the seam: LSP uses piped protocol streams plus a collected stderr tail; the ACP backend uses piped ndjson, inherited stderr, and a consumer-owned stdin-EOF disposal ladder; PTY uses `spawnTerminal()` while keeping readiness and terminal policy. `dsh-subagent-subprocess` and the private LSP tree helpers were deleted. MCP transport spawning and dependency-light test-support launchers remain outside by ownership or execution shape; their production callers share the scrub where applicable.
## Alternatives considered
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Observed stream and lifecycle needs then moved the eligible process consumers on
**Use one `stdio: 'pipe' | 'inherit' | 'collect'` mode for all streams.** Rejected because real consumers mix modes per stream: LSP uses pipe/pipe/collect, ACP uses pipe/pipe/inherit, and Bash uses data/collect/collect.
**Route every process launch through `ctx.subprocess`.** Rejected because the MCP SDK owns its transport spawn, the SDK wizard has no Cordis context and needs inherited redirection, the TUI probe is synchronous, and support launchers deliberately stay independent of product seams. PTY allocation did move behind `spawnTerminal()` because the provider, not the consumer, owns that substrate-specific primitive.
**Route every process launch through `ctx.subprocess`.** Rejected because the MCP SDK owns its transport spawn and support launchers deliberately stay independent of product seams. PTY allocation did move behind `spawnTerminal()` because the provider, not the consumer, owns that substrate-specific primitive.
**Put `run_in_background`/task semantics into the subprocess capability seam instead.** Rejected: that boundary already exists — `ctx.tasks` owns ids, ownership, and notices, and the bash tool adapts a `BashProcess` into task hooks. The subprocess seam sits *below* the bash executor, not beside the task registry.

View File

@@ -17,11 +17,11 @@ Status: implemented
- **`dsh-bash-local`(Consumer)**——`inject: ['subprocess']`;把每个解析后的 `BashExecSpec` 映射为一个 `SubprocessSpawnSpec`(`['bash', '-c', command]`),并保留自身配置、`resolve()` 默认值补全、基于融合 deadline 的 `timedOut`/`aborted` 分类、带 `[stderr]` 标记的后台读取合并及其消费游标,以及 `onProcessDone` 子类钩子。`dsh-bash-sandbox` 除了重新声明继承来的 inject 之外没有变化;它仍在命令字符串层面做包装,并重新进入继承的 spawn 路径。
- **`dsh-bash`(Service Definition)**——把迁走的词汇从 `dsh-subprocess` 重导出,因此没有任何 bash Consumer 需要改动导入;`BashExecRequest`/`BashExecSpec`/`BashProcess` 与沙箱事实仍归 bash 所有。
如今,每个加载 bash 执行器的组合都同时加载 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-subprocess-local`:CLI(命令行界面)、各示例、Python 捆绑运行时、create-sdk 的 bash 功能资源,以及各内联测试配置。
每个加载 bash 执行器的组合都同时加载 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-subprocess-local`:CLI(命令行界面)、各示例、Python 捆绑运行时以及各内联测试配置。
后台进程的存续期从执行器移到了管理器:执行器不再保有存活进程集合,于是重载执行器后,后台工作会继续运行且仍可读取,而组合拆除(管理器的 dispose)仍是先终止再等待退出的边界。一条行为约定随之挪动:后台 spawn 失败不再能在管道内部被缓冲成伪造的 stderr(对一个从未真正运行的进程,管理器会 reject `done`,且不缓冲任何内容),因此执行器把 `spawn failed: …` 提示注入恰好一个 `readOutput()` 增量。
基于已观察到的流与生命周期需求,具备条件的进程消费方随后迁到该 seam:LSP 使用管道化协议流加收集式 stderr 尾部;ACP(Agent Client Protocol)后端使用管道化 ndjson、继承式 stderr 和消费方拥有的 stdin-EOF dispose 阶梯;PTY 使用 `spawnTerminal()`,同时保留就绪与终端策略。`dsh-subagent-subprocess` 与 LSP 私有进程树辅助函数均被删除。MCP 传输 spawn、SDK 包管理器运行器、同步 TUI Git 探测和刻意保持轻依赖的 test-support 启动器因所有权或执行形状仍留在外部;适用的生产调用方共享凭据清除。
基于已观察到的流与生命周期需求,具备条件的进程消费方随后迁到该 seam:LSP 使用管道化协议流加收集式 stderr 尾部;ACP(Agent Client Protocol)后端使用管道化 ndjson、继承式 stderr 和消费方拥有的 stdin-EOF dispose 阶梯;PTY 使用 `spawnTerminal()`,同时保留就绪与终端策略。`dsh-subagent-subprocess` 与 LSP 私有进程树辅助函数均被删除。MCP 传输 spawn 和刻意保持轻依赖的 test-support 启动器因所有权或执行形状仍留在外部;适用的生产调用方共享凭据清除。
## 曾考虑的替代方案
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Status: implemented
**用单个 `stdio: 'pipe' | 'inherit' | 'collect'` 模式统一全部流。**否决:真实消费方按流混用模式——LSP 使用 pipe/pipe/collect,ACP 使用 pipe/pipe/inherit,Bash 使用 data/collect/collect。
**把每一次进程启动都路由到 `ctx.subprocess`。**否决:MCP SDK 拥有其传输 spawn,SDK 向导没有 Cordis 上下文且需要继承式重定向,TUI 探测是同步的,support 启动器则刻意独立于产品 seam。PTY 分配迁到 `spawnTerminal()`,因为这项底层专用原语归提供方而非消费方所有。
**把每一次进程启动都路由到 `ctx.subprocess`。**否决:MCP SDK 拥有其传输 spawn,support 启动器则刻意独立于产品 seam。PTY 分配迁到 `spawnTerminal()`,因为这项底层专用原语归提供方而非消费方所有。
**改把 `run_in_background`/任务语义放进 subprocess 能力 seam。**否决:那条边界已经存在。`ctx.tasks` 拥有 id、所有权与通知,bash 工具则把 `BashProcess` 适配成任务钩子。subprocess seam 位于 bash 执行器*之下*,而不是与任务注册表并列。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-29-package-regrouping.md
2026-07-29-package-regrouping.md: 30fc45a122263350b4a2ad1998850f631c20f9b8
2026-07-29-package-regrouping.zh.md: a3a9a11ec71b7f894dcea7c733eb39a80b71ac50
2026-07-29-package-regrouping.md: 6b85fafaebd75b051d239966a30bb81bdaf5522f
2026-07-29-package-regrouping.zh.md: 06eb210e318833d9651af2c4f0e4d792799a2018

View File

@@ -10,29 +10,26 @@ The two-level `packages/<group>/<pkg>` hierarchy ([original decision](../../arch
- `ui/` mixed four unrelated planes: the human terminal channel (`tui`), the SDK's JSON-RPC server half (`jsonrpc`, whose peer dependency on `dsh-sdk-protocol` binds it to the SDK wire stack), the human-interaction seams (`user-interaction`, `user-approval`, `permission`, `tool-ask-user`, `commands`), and channel-neutral boot glue (`app-boot`). Its own README narrated the mixture instead of stating a role.
- The session family was fragmented across five groups — `session-persistence/`, `session-projection/`, `session-query/`, `session-title/`, and `telemetry/` — although the measured dependency edges tie them together (query → persistence, title → projection, projection → persistence; see [docs/module-graph.md](../../../../docs/module-graph.md)).
- Two group names collided with unrelated packages: `telemetry/` (session reporting) vs `dsh-telemetry` (launcher-side SDK telemetry), and `timeout/` (a tool-call guard) vs `util/timeout` (the generic promise utility).
- The `timeout/` group for a tool-call guard collided with `util/timeout`, the generic promise utility.
- `cordis/` named its group after the framework every package is built on, so the name discriminated nothing; its single package `tool-cordis` is the runtime self-modification toolset.
- The old `sdk/` folder names were inconsistent: `sdk/sdk-client` and `sdk/sdk-protocol` repeated the group name while `sdk/telemetry`, `sdk/helper`, and `sdk/scripts` did not.
The north star for the regrouping: **closely clustered packages share a group.** A cluster is measured — peer-dependency edges and co-change — not thematic. An isolated seam family may stand alone as a small group; the failure mode to avoid is the grab-bag whose name describes no single role.
## Decision
Six groups are recomposed; every other group keeps its prior boundary and contents (the dependency analysis confirmed the capability families — `bash/`, `pty/`, `code-runtime/`, `sandbox/`, `subprocess/`, `fs/`, `lsp/`, `web/`, `skill/`, and the rest — were already drawn correctly). npm package names did not change; the folder tree carries the whole change.
Five regrouping decisions remain current; every other group keeps its prior boundary and contents (the dependency analysis confirmed the capability families — `bash/`, `pty/`, `code-runtime/`, `sandbox/`, `subprocess/`, `fs/`, `lsp/`, `web/`, `skill/`, and the rest — were already drawn correctly). The original sixth decision collected the SDK project initializer, launcher tooling, and runtime JSON-RPC packages under `scaffold/`; [removing that unreleased toolchain](../simplification/2026-08-11-remove-sdk-project-toolchain.md) superseded it by deleting the project tooling and moving the surviving runtime trio to `sdk/`.
| Group | Members (folder names) | From |
|---|---|---|
| `session/` | session-persistence, session-persistence-jsonl, session-persistence-sqlite, session-checkpoint-policy, session-projection, session-projection-cache, session-title, session-title-llm, session-title-first-message-llm, session-title-all-messages-llm, session-telemetry, session-telemetry-otel | `session-persistence/` + `session-projection/` + `session-title/` + `telemetry/` |
| `interaction/` | user-interaction, user-approval, permission, tool-ask-user, commands, tui | `ui/` |
| `boot/` | app-boot | `ui/` |
| `scaffold/` | helper, scripts, create-sdk, protocol, client, server, telemetry | `sdk/` + `ui/jsonrpc` |
| `guard/` | repeat-tool-guard, timeout-policy | `guard/` + `timeout/` |
| `self-modification/` | tool-cordis | `cordis/` |
- **`session/`** is the durable session data plane: the persistence seam with its backends and checkpoint policy, the projection fold that serves whole values from that log, log-backed titles, and OTel reporting. The title fold is itself load-bearing for the read side (`session-query` peer-depends on `dsh-session-title`), so titles belong with the data plane, not in a derived-services annex. The plain name is deliberate (prefer names a human would say); the nearby `core/session` package remains the live in-memory service, while this group is the durable family around it. `session-query/` stays a standalone group — the read/tool surface has its own model tools and SQLite FTS backend and is consumed independently of persistence internals. Absorbing `telemetry/` ended the group-name collision with `dsh-telemetry`.
- **`session/`** is the durable session data plane: the persistence seam with its backends and checkpoint policy, the projection fold that serves whole values from that log, log-backed titles, and OTel reporting. The title fold is itself load-bearing for the read side (`session-query` peer-depends on `dsh-session-title`), so titles belong with the data plane, not in a derived-services annex. The plain name is deliberate (prefer names a human would say); the nearby `core/session` package remains the live in-memory service, while this group is the durable family around it. `session-query/` stays a standalone group — the read/tool surface has its own model tools and SQLite FTS backend and is consumed independently of persistence internals.
- **`interaction/`** is the human-collaboration plane plus the terminal channel that answers it: the question/approval seams, the permission preset, the model-facing `ask_user_question` tool, the human-command registry (`plan-mode` and `command-goal` already consume `commands` together with the interaction seams), and `tui` — the interactive channel is the plane's richest provider and consumer (peer edges to `commands` and `user-interaction`), and a one-package `tui/` group would spend a top-level name on one plugin.
- **`boot/`** is a role-complete single-package group: the shared bin boot glue that belongs to no channel and no assembly (consumed by `apps/cli`, the `scaffold/` launcher, and the `examples/` demo bins).
- **`scaffold/`** is the developer-tooling family: project helper, launcher, initializer, wire protocol with both ends (`server` is the former `ui/jsonrpc`), and launcher telemetry. Renamed from `sdk/`: the whole `packages/` tree *is* the SDK, so a group named `sdk/` inside it said nothing; `scaffold/` names the create/launch/drive-a-project role. Folders drop the legacy `sdk-` prefix (`protocol`, `client`, `server`), matching the `client/`/`host/` role-named folder style; the three affected npm names are mapped explicitly beside the group wildcard in `tsconfig.base.json` until the deferred renames land.
- **`boot/`** is a role-complete single-package group: the shared bin boot glue that belongs to no channel and no assembly (consumed by `apps/cli` and the `examples/` demo bins).
- **`guard/`** keeps its documented role, loop-hygiene guards, and gains the tool-call timeout enforcer, dissolving the one-package `timeout/` group whose name collided with `util/timeout`.
- **`self-modification/`** names the role `cordis/` obscured: the toolset with which the agent inspects and mounts plugins in its own live runtime, and the landing zone for future self-modification packages.
@@ -40,21 +37,16 @@ Six groups are recomposed; every other group keeps its prior boundary and conten
## Deferred renames (FIXME markers)
Five npm names should eventually change, but renaming inside the reorganization would have turned a pure-move PR into an import-churn PR. Instead, each affected package's module JSDoc carries a `FIXME` naming the intended new name. `FIXME` blocks a tagged release ([marker semantics](../../../../docs/development.md)), which is the wanted forcing function: these renames are only free while nothing external consumes the packages.
Two npm names should eventually change, but renaming inside the reorganization would have turned a pure-move PR into an import-churn PR. Each affected package's module JSDoc carries a `FIXME` naming the intended new name. `FIXME` blocks a tagged release ([marker semantics](../../../../docs/development.md)), which is the wanted forcing function: these renames are only free while nothing external consumes the packages. Removing the unreleased SDK project toolchain deleted the other three packages and their rename markers instead of preserving names for code that no longer exists.
| Current npm name | Intended name | Why |
|---|---|---|
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc` | `@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-server` | Names the wire encoding, not the role; it is the server half of the SDK protocol |
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-telemetry` | `@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-telemetry` | Collides with the `dsh-session-telemetry` family; it is launcher-side SDK telemetry |
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-helper` | `@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-helper` | Indefensibly generic as a published name |
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-scripts` | `@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-scripts` | Same |
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout-policy` | `@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout-guard` | Suggestion, not settled: aligns the name with its `guard/` home; decide at resolution time |
The first four are settled intent; resolving them converges the SDK wire stack's npm names on `dsh-sdk-*` (the npm prefix names the product stack; the `scaffold/` folder names the role). `@deepseek-ai/create-sdk` keeps its documented npm-initializer exception.
## What the move touched
The moves landed as pure `git mv` moves, so rename detection carries the history. A group move touched: the moved package's `tsconfig.json` relative `references` and every dependent's entry (including the `apps/cli` project references), the tsconfig aggregate and path maps, group READMEs (five new bilingual triplets, deletions for dissolved groups, the [packages/README.md](../../../../packages/README.md) hierarchy table, the root `AGENTS.md` layout map), regenerated artifacts (`docs/module-graph.md`, path-embedding catalogs, the lockfile's importer keys), and root-relative `packages/...` citations in prose and gate scripts. Remaining group-path referents (workspace configs, test globs, lint keys) were found mechanically by the acceptance gates failing loud — the repository's own misconfiguration rule.
The moves landed as pure `git mv` moves, so rename detection carries the history. A group move touched: the moved package's `tsconfig.json` relative `references` and every dependent's entry (including the `apps/cli` project references), the tsconfig aggregate and path maps, group READMEs, the [packages/README.md](../../../../packages/README.md) hierarchy table, the root `AGENTS.md` layout map, regenerated artifacts (`docs/module-graph.md`, path-embedding catalogs, and the lockfile's importer keys), and root-relative `packages/...` citations in prose and gate scripts. Remaining group-path referents (workspace configs, test globs, lint keys) were found mechanically by the acceptance gates failing loud — the repository's own misconfiguration rule.
A group move did not touch: npm names, imports, `cordis.yml` configs, snapshot fixtures, the `pnpm-workspace.yaml`/`tsdown` globs (both `packages/*/*`), or the Python runtime manifest — all reference packages by npm name.
@@ -62,13 +54,13 @@ A group move did not touch: npm names, imports, `cordis.yml` configs, snapshot f
## Alternatives considered
**Coarse domain buckets** (`exec/` = subprocess+sandbox+bash+pty+code-runtime, `workspace/` = fs+lsp+workspace, `orchestration/` = subagent+workflow+tasks, `knowledge/` = web+skill, `collab/` = plan+todo+goal; ~16 groups). Rejected: the measured graph contradicts the merges. `sandbox` and `subprocess` are shared infrastructure consumed across families (bash ×5, fs ×5, pty, lsp, mcp, subagent, scaffold edges), `web` ↔ `skill` have zero edges, and a large bucket reproduces the `ui/` grab-bag at a larger scale.
**Coarse domain buckets** (`exec/` = subprocess+sandbox+bash+pty+code-runtime, `workspace/` = fs+lsp+workspace, `orchestration/` = subagent+workflow+tasks, `knowledge/` = web+skill, `collab/` = plan+todo+goal; ~16 groups). Rejected: the measured graph contradicts the merges. `sandbox` and `subprocess` are shared infrastructure consumed across families (bash ×5, fs ×5, pty, lsp, mcp, and subagent edges), `web` ↔ `skill` have zero edges, and a large bucket reproduces the `ui/` grab-bag at a larger scale.
**Abstract layer names** (`capability/`, `policy/`, `extension/`, `provider/`). Rejected: they describe every plugin equally badly, and a `capability/` bucket would hold ~50 packages.
**A full npm rename sweep** (`dsh-<group>-<pkg>` for every package). Rejected: npm names are flat, so group-prefixing adds churn across imports, configs, and fixtures with no disambiguation gain; targeted FIXME-tracked renames cover the actual collisions.
**Performing the five renames inside the reorganization.** Rejected: renames multiply open-PR conflicts and destroy the pure-move review property. The FIXME markers keep them visible release blockers to resolve as small follow-up PRs.
**Performing the deferred renames inside the reorganization.** Rejected: renames multiply open-PR conflicts and destroy the pure-move review property. The remaining FIXME markers keep them visible release blockers to resolve as small follow-up PRs.
**A two-way session split** (`session-core/` + `session-utils/`). Rejected: query belongs to neither side cleanly, and `session-core` invites confusion with `core/session` (`dsh-session`, the live in-memory service, which stays in `core/`).
@@ -78,9 +70,7 @@ A group move did not touch: npm names, imports, `cordis.yml` configs, snapshot f
**A standalone one-package `tui/` group.** Rejected: `tui` is the interaction plane's primary provider/consumer (peer edges to `commands`, `user-interaction`), and a top-level name spent on one plugin adds a group without adding information; it folds into `interaction/`.
**Keeping the group name `sdk/`.** Rejected: the whole `packages/` tree is the SDK, so an `sdk/` group inside it discriminates nothing — the same disease as `cordis/`. `scaffold/` names the actual role (create, launch, and drive projects from outside).
**Moving `app-boot` to `apps/`.** Rejected: `apps/` is the assembly tier over the package tier, and `dsh-app-boot` is a library that package-tier code imports (`scaffold/scripts`' launcher peer-depends on it) — placing it in `apps/` would invert the tiers and put a workspace library outside the `packages/*/*` build globs. It stays a package; `boot/` is its role-complete home.
**Moving `app-boot` to `apps/`.** Rejected: `apps/` is the assembly tier over the package tier, and `dsh-app-boot` is a package-tier library — placing it in `apps/` would invert the tiers and put a workspace library outside the `packages/*/*` build globs. It stays a package; `boot/` is its role-complete home.
**Moving `tool-cordis` into `core/`.** Rejected: self-modification is its own product seam, expected to grow; the spine stays minimal. The group was first named `self-evolve/`; the name settled on `self-modification/` as the plainer term.
@@ -88,9 +78,9 @@ A group move did not touch: npm names, imports, `cordis.yml` configs, snapshot f
## Consequences
- The tree matches the map: the six recomposed groups hold exactly the listed members; the groups `ui/`, `sdk/`, `telemetry/`, `timeout/`, `cordis/`, `session-persistence/`, `session-projection/`, and `session-title/` no longer exist; every other group's contents are unchanged. The workspace package-name set is identical before and after (zero npm renames), and the five FIXME markers pin the deferred ones. A FIXME that later proves wrong must be removed explicitly with rationale, never silently dropped.
- The five still-current regrouped families hold the listed members; the groups `ui/`, `telemetry/`, `timeout/`, `cordis/`, `session-persistence/`, `session-projection/`, and `session-title/` no longer exist. The regrouping itself changed no npm names. The later SDK toolchain removal intentionally changed the package set and restored `sdk/` as the precise home of the runtime SDK trio. Two FIXME markers pin the remaining deferred renames; a FIXME that later proves wrong must be removed explicitly with rationale, never silently dropped.
- What pins the result: `pnpm run typecheck`, the unit suites of every moved group, `verify-package-paths`, `verify-md-links`, and the corpus-wide translation pairing all pass on the moved tree; the group-scoped test globs in `vitest.snapshot.config.ts` were rewritten with the moves so the suites collect the same test files as before (a fail-open glob would silently drop coverage).
- Every open PR touching a moved file rebases across the move once; rename detection resolves most hunks mechanically.
- Single-package groups remain (`boot/`, `self-modification/`, and existing ones such as `acp/`). Accepted deliberately: each is role-complete rather than a fragment of a family, and a truthful small group beats a nominal merge.
- The `scaffold/` folders diverge from their npm names until the deferred renames land — the one transitional asymmetry, carried by three explicit `paths` entries in `tsconfig.base.json` and resolved by the FIXME renames.
- The `sdk/` role folders map explicitly to their npm names in `tsconfig.base.json`; the `server/` mapping remains transitional until `dsh-jsonrpc` is renamed.
- What this gave up: nothing functional — the change is navigational. Muscle memory and external links to old GitHub paths break, which is acceptable pre-release with no external consumers.

View File

@@ -10,29 +10,26 @@ Status: implemented
- `ui/` 混杂了四个互不相关的平面:人类终端通道(`tui`)、SDK 的 JSON-RPC 服务端一半(`jsonrpc`,它对 `dsh-sdk-protocol` 的对等依赖(peer dependency)把它绑在 SDK 通信栈上)、人机交互 seam(`user-interaction`、`user-approval`、`permission`、`tool-ask-user`、`commands`),以及与通道无关的 boot 胶水(`app-boot`)。它自己的 README 只能逐一叙述这堆混杂,说不出一个统一职责。
- 会话家族被割裂在五个组里——`session-persistence/`、`session-projection/`、`session-query/`、`session-title/` 与 `telemetry/`——而实测依赖边明明把它们连成一体(query → persistence、title → projection、projection → persistence;见 [docs/module-graph.md](../../../../docs/module-graph.md))。
- 两个组名与不相干的包撞名:`telemetry/`(会话上报)撞上 `dsh-telemetry`(启动器侧 SDK telemetry),`timeout/`(一个工具调用守卫)撞上 `util/timeout`(通用 promise 工具)。
- 用于工具调用守卫的 `timeout/` 组与通用 promise 工具 `util/timeout` 撞名。
- `cordis/` 拿所有包共同依托的框架给自己的组命名,这个名字因此毫无区分度;组里唯一的包 `tool-cordis` 是运行时自我修改工具集。
- 旧 `sdk/` 的目录命名不一致:`sdk/sdk-client` 和 `sdk/sdk-protocol` 重复了组名,而 `sdk/telemetry`、`sdk/helper`、`sdk/scripts` 没有。
这次重新分组的指导准则:**聚类紧密的包同处一组。**聚类以实测为准(对等依赖边与 co-change),而非按主题归类。孤立的 seam 家族可以自成一个小组;要避免的失败形态,是名字概括不出单一职责的大杂烩组。
## Decision
重组六个组;其余每个组都保持先前的边界与内容不变(依赖分析确认各能力家族——`bash/`、`pty/`、`code-runtime/`、`sandbox/`、`subprocess/`、`fs/`、`lsp/`、`web/`、`skill/` 及其余——本来就划得正确)。npm 包名一个未改;整个变更全部由目录树承载。
五项重组决策仍然有效;其余每个组都保持先前的边界与内容不变(依赖分析确认各能力家族——`bash/`、`pty/`、`code-runtime/`、`sandbox/`、`subprocess/`、`fs/`、`lsp/`、`web/`、`skill/` 及其余——本来就划得正确)。原本的第六项决策把 SDK 项目初始化器、启动器工具与运行时 JSON-RPC 包汇集到 `scaffold/`;[移除这套未发布工具链](../simplification/2026-08-11-remove-sdk-project-toolchain.md)的决策删除了项目工具,并将存留的运行时三包移到 `sdk/`,从而取代了该项决策。
| 组 | 成员(目录名) | 来源 |
|---|---|---|
| `session/` | session-persistence、session-persistence-jsonl、session-persistence-sqlite、session-checkpoint-policy、session-projection、session-projection-cache、session-title、session-title-llm、session-title-first-message-llm、session-title-all-messages-llm、session-telemetry、session-telemetry-otel | `session-persistence/` + `session-projection/` + `session-title/` + `telemetry/` |
| `interaction/` | user-interaction、user-approval、permission、tool-ask-user、commands、tui | `ui/` |
| `boot/` | app-boot | `ui/` |
| `scaffold/` | helper、scripts、create-sdk、protocol、client、server、telemetry | `sdk/` + `ui/jsonrpc` |
| `guard/` | repeat-tool-guard、timeout-policy | `guard/` + `timeout/` |
| `self-modification/` | tool-cordis | `cordis/` |
- **`session/`** 是持久会话数据平面:持久化 seam 连同其各后端与检查点策略、从该日志折叠(fold)出全量值对外供值的投影、日志兜底的标题,以及 OTel 上报。标题折叠本身就是读取侧的承重构件(`session-query` 对 `dsh-session-title` 声明对等依赖),所以标题属于数据平面,而非某个「派生服务」附属区。用这个朴素的名字是有意为之(名字要像人起的);旁边的 `core/session` 包仍是常驻内存的实时服务,本组则是围绕它的持久家族。`session-query/` 保持独立成组:这个读取/工具面自带模型工具和 SQLite FTS 后端,其消费不依赖持久化内部实现。吸收 `telemetry/` 之后,与 `dsh-telemetry` 的组名冲突就此终结。
- **`session/`** 是持久会话数据平面:持久化 seam 连同其各后端与检查点策略、从该日志折叠(fold)出全量值对外供值的投影、日志兜底的标题,以及 OTel 上报。标题折叠本身就是读取侧的承重构件(`session-query` 对 `dsh-session-title` 声明对等依赖),所以标题属于数据平面,而非某个「派生服务」附属区。用这个朴素的名字是有意为之(名字要像人起的);旁边的 `core/session` 包仍是常驻内存的实时服务,本组则是围绕它的持久家族。`session-query/` 保持独立成组:这个读取/工具面自带模型工具和 SQLite FTS 后端,其消费不依赖持久化内部实现。
- **`interaction/`** 是人机协作平面加上应答它的终端通道:提问/批准 seam、权限预设、面向模型的 `ask_user_question` 工具、人类命令注册表(`plan-mode` 与 `command-goal` 已经把 `commands` 和各交互 seam 放在一起消费),以及 `tui`——这个交互通道是该平面最重的提供方与消费方(对 `commands` 与 `user-interaction` 均有对等依赖边),而一个单包 `tui/` 组会把一个顶层名字花在一个插件上。
- **`boot/`** 是角色完备的单包组:不归属任何通道也不归属任何组装的共享 bin boot 胶水(被 `apps/cli`、`scaffold/` 的启动器和 `examples/` 各演示 bin 消费)。
- **`scaffold/`** 是开发者工具家族:项目 helper、启动器、初始化器、连同两端的通信协议(`server` 即原先的 `ui/jsonrpc`),以及启动器侧 telemetry。从 `sdk/` 改名:整个 `packages/` 树本身就是 SDK,树里再放一个叫 `sdk/` 的组等于什么都没说;`scaffold/` 说出了「创建/启动/驱动项目」这一实际角色。目录去掉遗留的 `sdk-` 前缀(`protocol`、`client`、`server`),与 `client/`/`host/` 的角色命名风格一致;在推迟的改名落地之前,受影响的三个 npm 名在 `tsconfig.base.json` 里于组通配符旁显式映射。
- **`boot/`** 是角色完备的单包组:不归属任何通道也不归属任何组装的共享 bin boot 胶水(被 `apps/cli` 与 `examples/` 各演示 bin 消费)。
- **`guard/`** 保留其文档记载的角色(循环卫生守卫),并新纳入强制执行工具调用超时的包;那个与 `util/timeout` 撞名的单包组 `timeout/` 随之解散。
- **`self-modification/`** 把 `cordis/` 遮蔽掉的角色说了出来:它是 agent(智能体)检查并挂载自身实时运行时中插件所用的工具集,也是未来自我修改类包的落点。
@@ -40,21 +37,16 @@ Status: implemented
## Deferred renames (FIXME markers)
五个 npm 名最终应当改掉,但在这次重组内部改名,会把一个纯移动的 PR(Pull Request)变成大量翻改 import 的 PR。因此每个受影响包的模块 JSDoc 里带有一条 `FIXME`,写明意图中的新名字。`FIXME` 会阻塞打 tag 的发布([标记语义](../../../../docs/development.md)),这正是想要的倒逼机制:只有趁还没有外部消费方使用这些包时,这些改名才是零成本的。
两个 npm 名最终应当改掉,但在这次重组内部改名,会把一个纯移动的 PR(Pull Request)变成大量翻改 import 的 PR。每个受影响包的模块 JSDoc 里带有一条 `FIXME`,写明意图中的新名字。`FIXME` 会阻塞打 tag 的发布([标记语义](../../../../docs/development.md)),这正是想要的倒逼机制:只有趁还没有外部消费方使用这些包时,这些改名才是零成本的。移除未发布的 SDK 项目工具链时,另外三个包及其改名标记一并删除,没有为已经不存在的代码保留包名。
| 当前 npm 名 | 目标名 | 原因 |
|---|---|---|
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc` | `@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-server` | 名字说的是协议编码而非角色;它是 SDK 协议的服务端一半 |
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-telemetry` | `@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-telemetry` | 与 `dsh-session-telemetry` 家族撞名;它是启动器侧 SDK telemetry |
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-helper` | `@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-helper` | 作为公开发布名空泛得站不住脚 |
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-scripts` | `@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-scripts` | 同上 |
| `@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout-policy` | `@deepseek-ai/dsh-timeout-guard` | 仅为建议、尚未定案:使名字与其 `guard/` 归属对齐;到解决时再定 |
前四个是已定的意图;兑现之后,SDK 通信栈的 npm 名随之收敛为 `dsh-sdk-*`(npm 前缀指产品栈,`scaffold/` 目录名指角色)。`@deepseek-ai/create-sdk` 保留其文档记载的 npm 初始化器特例。
## What the move touched
移动以纯 `git mv` 形式落地,历史由重命名检测承载。组移动触及了:被移动包的 `tsconfig.json` 相对 `references` 及每个依赖方的对应条目(含 `apps/cli` 的 project references);tsconfig 聚合与路径映射;各组 README(五组新的双语三文件配对、被解散组的 README 删除、[packages/README.md](../../../../packages/README.md) 的层级结构表、根 `AGENTS.md` 的布局图);重新生成的产物(`docs/module-graph.md`、内嵌路径的目录、锁文件的 importer 键);以及散文与门禁脚本中以仓库根为基准的 `packages/...` 引用。其余每一处组路径引用(workspace 配置、测试 glob、lint 键)都由验收门禁的响亮失败机械地找了出来——这正是本仓库自己的「配置错误必须响亮失败」规则。
移动以纯 `git mv` 形式落地,历史由重命名检测承载。组移动触及了:被移动包的 `tsconfig.json` 相对 `references` 及每个依赖方的对应条目(含 `apps/cli` 的 project references);tsconfig 聚合与路径映射;各组 README;[packages/README.md](../../../../packages/README.md) 的层级结构表;根 `AGENTS.md` 的布局图;重新生成的产物(`docs/module-graph.md`、内嵌路径的目录以及锁文件的 importer 键);以及散文与门禁脚本中以仓库根为基准的 `packages/...` 引用。其余每一处组路径引用(workspace 配置、测试 glob、lint 键)都由验收门禁的响亮失败机械地找了出来——这正是本仓库自己的「配置错误必须响亮失败」规则。
组移动未触及:npm 包名、import、`cordis.yml` 配置、快照 fixture(测试前置数据)、`pnpm-workspace.yaml` 与 `tsdown` 的 glob(都是 `packages/*/*`),以及 Python 运行时 manifest(元数据清单)——它们全部按 npm 包名引用包。
@@ -62,13 +54,13 @@ Status: implemented
## Alternatives considered
**粗粒度领域桶**(`exec/` = subprocess+sandbox+bash+pty+code-runtime,`workspace/` = fs+lsp+workspace,`orchestration/` = subagent+workflow+tasks,`knowledge/` = web+skill,`collab/` = plan+todo+goal;约 16 个组)。不予采纳:实测依赖图与这些合并相矛盾。`sandbox` 和 `subprocess` 是被各家族跨界消费的共享基础设施(与 bash ×5、fs ×5、pty、lsp、mcp、subagent、scaffold 均有依赖边),`web` ↔ `skill` 之间零依赖边,而大桶只会在更大尺度上复现 `ui/` 式大杂烩。
**粗粒度领域桶**(`exec/` = subprocess+sandbox+bash+pty+code-runtime,`workspace/` = fs+lsp+workspace,`orchestration/` = subagent+workflow+tasks,`knowledge/` = web+skill,`collab/` = plan+todo+goal;约 16 个组)。不予采纳:实测依赖图与这些合并相矛盾。`sandbox` 和 `subprocess` 是被各家族跨界消费的共享基础设施(与 bash ×5、fs ×5、pty、lsp、mcp 及 subagent 均有依赖边),`web` ↔ `skill` 之间零依赖边,而大桶只会在更大尺度上复现 `ui/` 式大杂烩。
**抽象分层名**(`capability/`、`policy/`、`extension/`、`provider/`)。不予采纳:这些名字对每个插件都同样地不达意,而且一个 `capability/` 桶会装下约 50 个包。
**一轮全量 npm 重命名**(每个包都改为 `dsh-<group>-<pkg>`)。不予采纳:npm 包名是扁平的,加组前缀只会在 import、配置和 fixture 之间制造改动,却换不来任何消歧收益;用 FIXME 跟踪的定点改名足以覆盖真正的撞名。
**在重组内部一并完成那五个改名。** 不予采纳:改名会成倍放大开放 PR 的冲突,并破坏纯移动的评审属性。FIXME 标记让这些改名保持为可见的发布阻塞项,留待以小型后续 PR 逐一解决。
**在重组内部一并完成推迟的改名。** 不予采纳:改名会成倍放大开放 PR 的冲突,并破坏纯移动的评审属性。剩余的 FIXME 标记让这些改名保持为可见的发布阻塞项,留待以小型后续 PR 逐一解决。
**会话两分法**(`session-core/` + `session-utils/`)。不予采纳:query 放哪一侧都不干净,而且 `session-core` 容易与 `core/session` 混淆(后者是 `dsh-session`,常驻内存的实时服务,留在 `core/` 不动)。
@@ -78,9 +70,7 @@ Status: implemented
**独立的单包 `tui/` 组。** 不予采纳:`tui` 是交互平面最重的提供方/消费方(对 `commands`、`user-interaction` 有对等依赖边),把一个顶层名字花在一个插件上只添组不添信息;它折入 `interaction/`。
**保留组名 `sdk/`。** 不予采纳:整个 `packages/` 树本身就是 SDK,树里的 `sdk/` 组毫无区分度——与 `cordis/` 同病。`scaffold/` 说出了实际角色(从外部创建、启动、驱动项目)。
**把 `app-boot` 挪到 `apps/`。** 不予采纳:`apps/` 是包层之上的组装层,而 `dsh-app-boot` 是被包层代码 import 的库(`scaffold/scripts` 的启动器对它声明对等依赖)——放进 `apps/` 会颠倒层级,并把一个 workspace 库放到 `packages/*/*` 构建 glob 之外。它仍是一个包;`boot/` 是它角色完备的家。
**把 `app-boot` 挪到 `apps/`。** 不予采纳:`apps/` 是包层之上的组装层,而 `dsh-app-boot` 是包层的库——放进 `apps/` 会颠倒层级,并把一个 workspace 库放到 `packages/*/*` 构建 glob 之外。它仍是一个包;`boot/` 是它角色完备的家。
**把 `tool-cordis` 挪进 `core/`。** 不予采纳:自我修改是独立的产品 seam,预期还会生长;主干保持精简。该组最初命名为 `self-evolve/`;名字最终定为更朴素的 `self-modification/`。
@@ -88,9 +78,9 @@ Status: implemented
## Consequences
- 目录树与映射表一致:重组的六个组恰好持有所列成员;`ui/`、`sdk/`、`telemetry/`、`timeout/`、`cordis/`、`session-persistence/`、`session-projection/`、`session-title/` 这些组不复存在;其余每个组的内容不变。workspace 的包名集合在前后完全相同(npm 改名为零),五条 FIXME 标记钉住推迟的改名。日后若某条 FIXME 被证明不对,必须连同理由显式移除,绝不允许无声消失。
- 五个仍然有效的重组家族持有所列成员;`ui/`、`telemetry/`、`timeout/`、`cordis/`、`session-persistence/`、`session-projection/`、`session-title/` 这些组不复存在。重组本身没有更改 npm 名。后续移除 SDK 工具链的决策有意改变包集合,并恢复 `sdk/` 作为运行时 SDK 三包的精确归属。两条 FIXME 标记钉住剩余的推迟改名;日后若某条 FIXME 被证明不对,必须连同理由显式移除,绝不允许无声消失。
- 结果由以下检查钉住:`pnpm run typecheck`、每个被移动组的单元测试套件、`verify-package-paths`、`verify-md-links` 与全语料翻译配对在移动后的树上全部通过;`vitest.snapshot.config.ts` 中按组划定的测试 glob 随移动一并改写,套件收集到与移动前相同的测试文件(glob 匹配为空会无声地丢失覆盖)。
- 每个触碰被移动文件的开放 PR 都跨过这次移动做一次变基;重命名检测可机械化解决大多数改动块。
- 单包组依然存在(`boot/`、`self-modification/`,以及 `acp/` 等既有单包组)。这是有意接受的:每个都是角色完备的整体而非某个家族的碎片,一个名实相符的小组胜过一次徒有其名的合并。
- 在推迟的改名落地之前,`scaffold/` 的目录名与其 npm 名并不一致——这是唯一的过渡性不对称,由 `tsconfig.base.json` 里三条显式 `paths` 映射承载,并由 FIXME 改名最终消除。
- `sdk/` 的角色目录在 `tsconfig.base.json` 中显式映射到各自的 npm 名;在 `dsh-jsonrpc` 完成改名之前,`server/` 的映射仍是过渡性的。
- **这次变更放弃了什么:** 功能上一无所失——变更只关乎导航。肌肉记忆和指向旧 GitHub 路径的外部链接会失效;在 pre-release、尚无外部消费者的前提下,这可以接受。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-07-30-followup-enqueue-and-owned-runs.md
2026-07-30-followup-enqueue-and-owned-runs.md: e0561f8cfc975dd60e69307b160070c292efff8e
2026-07-30-followup-enqueue-and-owned-runs.zh.md: a807b3ebe47399cae95c38bc2232e20e00e839f5
2026-07-30-followup-enqueue-and-owned-runs.md: 9978b3a8ab8678fe98e000476505cee9dcaa1bc6
2026-07-30-followup-enqueue-and-owned-runs.zh.md: 6501266d32b5ae884a478bfae9e4f1e3d5d85575

View File

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Keep `Agent.followup(message): void` as an enqueue-only operation. `Agent.whenId
The low-level SDK protocol answers `session/prompt` as soon as enqueue succeeds with `{ messageId }`. It streams durable facts through `session.event`, publishes whole-agent transitions through `session.status`, and has no `session.finished`. A low-level client may observe that receipt and later idleness, but receives no prompt result.
High-level automation APIs return a `RunResult` only when they explicitly own an activity interval. The TypeScript and Python SDK `run()` methods collect from the submitted message's durable inbox receipt through the next whole-agent `idle`; their `finalResponse` is the last committed assistant message in that interval, not a response causally attributed to the submitted prompt. The one-shot CLI owns the analogous idle-to-idle interval. An isolated child-agent run may report a result because its caller owns the complete child lifecycle and any steering belongs to that run.
High-level automation APIs return a `RunResult` only when they explicitly own an activity interval. The TypeScript and Python SDK `run()` methods collect from the submitted message's durable inbox receipt through the next whole-agent `idle`; their final response is the last committed assistant message in that interval, not a response causally attributed to the submitted prompt. The Python SDK also reports the last root turn's reason kind as the run-level [`finish_reason`](../bug-fix/2026-08-11-owned-run-finish-reason.md), without attributing it to the submitted prompt. The one-shot CLI owns the analogous idle-to-idle interval. An isolated child-agent run may report a result because its caller owns the complete child lifecycle and any steering belongs to that run.
ACP must return a protocol `stopReason`. Its bridge serializes one in-flight prompt per ACP session, waits for whole-agent idle, and otherwise reports the generic `end_turn`. Token-limit endings are not attributed to the prompt: they settle as `end_turn`. A model error on the prompt's correlated turn does reject the prompt immediately (the error is attributed by its owning turn), and a turnless slot (admission discarded the prompt) settles as `cancelled` at idle alongside explicit ACP cancellation or disposal.
@@ -33,10 +33,10 @@ Goal continuation retains `MessageId` only to recognize its durable queued and a
## Verification
- Agent and inbox tests pin enqueue-only follow-up, durable admission or cancellation, and whole-agent idle observation.
- SDK protocol, TypeScript SDK, and Python SDK tests pin the `{ messageId }` receipt, `session.status`, the absence of `session.finished`, and receipt-to-idle `RunResult` collection without prompt-level `status` or `reason`.
- SDK protocol, TypeScript SDK, and Python SDK tests pin the `{ messageId }` receipt, `session.status`, the absence of `session.finished`, and receipt-to-idle `RunResult` collection without prompt-level `status` or `reason`; Python SDK tests separately pin its run-level `finish_reason` observation.
- ACP, one-shot CLI, goal continuation, and subagent tests pin the distinct activity ownership each integration possesses.
- Consumer tests pin that no production integration derives a follow-up result by correlating `MessageId` with `turn/end`.
## Consequences
An owned activity interval can include steering, injected context, or other work submitted before idleness, so its final response and events are deliberately broader than the initiating message. Prompt-level model error and token-limit classifications disappear from SDK and ACP results; callers that need those facts must inspect the durable event stream without claiming causal attribution. Concurrent automation on one session requires an explicit serialization or ownership policy rather than an implicit per-prompt result.
An owned activity interval can include steering, injected context, or other work submitted before idleness, so its final response, finish reason, and events are deliberately broader than the initiating message. Prompt-level model error and token-limit classifications remain absent from SDK and ACP results; callers may inspect run-level or durable event facts without claiming causal attribution. Concurrent automation on one session requires an explicit serialization or ownership policy rather than an implicit per-prompt result.

View File

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Status: implemented
底层 SDK 协议在入队成功后立即以 `{ messageId }` 响应 `session/prompt`。它通过 `session.event` 流式传输持久事实,通过 `session.status` 发布整个 agent 的状态转换,且不包含 `session.finished`。底层客户端可以观察该回执和之后的 idle,但不会收到提示词结果。
只有明确拥有一个活动区间时,高层自动化 API 才返回 `RunResult`。TypeScript 和 Python SDK 的 `run()` 方法从已提交消息的持久 inbox 回执开始收集,直至整个 agent 下一次进入 `idle`;其 `finalResponse` 是该区间内最后一条已提交的 assistant 消息,而不是按因果关系归属于已提交提示词的响应。单次 CLI(命令行界面)拥有相应的 idle 到 idle 区间。隔离的子 agent 运行可以报告结果,因为调用方拥有完整的子级生命周期,任何 steering 都属于该运行。
只有明确拥有一个活动区间时,高层自动化 API 才返回 `RunResult`。TypeScript 和 Python SDK 的 `run()` 方法从已提交消息的持久 inbox 回执开始收集,直至整个 agent 下一次进入 `idle`;其最终响应是该区间内最后一条已提交的 assistant 消息,而不是按因果关系归属于已提交提示词的响应。Python SDK 还把根会话最后一个轮次的结束原因 kind 作为运行级 [`finish_reason`](../bug-fix/2026-08-11-owned-run-finish-reason.md) 返回,但不会将其归因于已提交的提示词。单次 CLI(命令行界面)拥有相应的 idle 到 idle 区间。隔离的子 agent 运行可以报告结果,因为调用方拥有完整的子级生命周期,任何 steering 都属于该运行。
ACP(Agent Client Protocol)必须返回协议规定的 `stopReason`。其桥接层串行处理每个 ACP 会话中唯一一个正在处理的提示词,等待整个 agent 进入 idle,其他情况均报告通用的 `end_turn`。token 上限的轮次结束不归因于提示词:它们以 `end_turn` 结算。与该提示词关联的轮次上的模型错误会立即以该错误拒绝提示词(错误按其所属轮次归因),而 turnless 槽位(准入已丢弃提示词)会在 idle 时以 `cancelled` 结算,与显式 ACP 取消或 dispose(资源释放)并列。
@@ -33,10 +33,10 @@ Goal 续行只保留 `MessageId`,用于识别持久排队和已准入的 goal
## 验证
- Agent 与 inbox 测试固定 follow-up 仅入队、持久准入或取消以及整个 agent 的 idle 观测。
- SDK 协议、TypeScript SDK 和 Python SDK 测试固定 `{ messageId }` 回执、`session.status`、不存在 `session.finished`,以及不含提示词级 `status` 或 `reason` 的回执到 idle `RunResult` 收集。
- SDK 协议、TypeScript SDK 和 Python SDK 测试固定 `{ messageId }` 回执、`session.status`、不存在 `session.finished`,以及不含提示词级 `status` 或 `reason` 的回执到 idle `RunResult` 收集;Python SDK 测试另行固定其运行级 `finish_reason` 观测。
- ACP、单次 CLI、goal 续行和 subagent 测试固定各集成实际拥有的不同活动边界。
- 消费方测试固定生产集成都不会通过关联 `MessageId` 与 `turn/end` 来推导 follow-up 结果。
## 后果
自有活动区间可以包含进入 idle 前提交的 steering、注入上下文或其他工作,因此其最终响应和事件有意比初始消息涵盖更广。SDK 和 ACP 结果不再包含提示词级模型错误和 token 上限分类;需要这些事实的调用方必须检查持久事件流,但不能声称这些事实具有因果归属。在同一会话上并发执行自动化操作时,必须采用显式串行或所有权策略,不能依赖隐式的按提示词结果。
自有活动区间可以包含进入 idle 前提交的 steering、注入上下文或其他工作,因此其最终响应、结束原因和事件有意比初始消息涵盖更广。SDK 和 ACP 结果仍不包含提示词级模型错误和 token 上限分类;调用方可以检查运行级或持久事件事实,但不能声称这些事实具有因果归属。在同一会话上并发执行自动化操作时,必须采用显式串行或所有权策略,不能依赖隐式的按提示词结果。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/architecture/2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.md
2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.md: 6d4020828cb1f2ab3de0328c8959a18a0fcfe6c4
2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.zh.md: 892fa0f848d656609885d008ab36e3ebbe09b992
2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.md: 5ef487646c94808177e1263b94b8c23a9a045d97
2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.zh.md: 1ee433396f83a8caf5e35c9cfd1b4f3c04d6c59f

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ The earlier [anonymous-user-id decision](../feature/2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymo
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-user-id` owns `getOrCreateAnonymousUserId()` and the `$DSH_HOME/.userid` storage contract. `session-telemetry-otel` uses the returned id as OpenTelemetry Resource `user.id`; the `/feedback` success acknowledgement reports `Feedback recorded for session {sessionId}` followed by `User: {userId}` on a second line, which keeps both identifiers available through the generic command row's expandable body. Invalid feedback is rejected before resolving the id, so an empty command does not create `.userid`.
The extraction preserves the existing random UUID, home resolution, process memo, exclusive-create concurrency, corruption replacement, and best-effort write semantics. It does not unify the dsh-sdk launcher's separate `telemetry.json` identity.
The extraction preserves the existing random UUID, home resolution, process memo, exclusive-create concurrency, corruption replacement, and best-effort write semantics.
## Alternatives considered
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ The extraction preserves the existing random UUID, home resolution, process memo
| Import the helper from `session-telemetry-otel` | Couples feedback to an optional exporter backend and forms a reverse dependency cycle once telemetry exports feedback |
| Duplicate the persistence helper in feedback | Two implementations of one file contract can drift and race with different validation or failure semantics |
| Generate a separate feedback user id | The acknowledgement could not correlate with the OTel Resource and would not satisfy the reporting purpose |
| Move the launcher telemetry id too | The launcher feed is not a consumer of `.userid`; unifying unrelated stores remains out of scope |
## Consequences

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ OpenTelemetry 后端已在 `$DSH_HOME/.userid` 中持久化一个匿名 UUID。`
`@deepseek-ai/dsh-user-id` 负责 `getOrCreateAnonymousUserId()` 和 `$DSH_HOME/.userid` 存储契约。`session-telemetry-otel` 将返回的 id 用作 OpenTelemetry Resource 的 `user.id`;`/feedback` 的成功确认先报告 `Feedback recorded for session {sessionId}`,再在第二行显示 `User: {userId}`,使两个标识符都可通过通用命令行的可展开正文查看。系统在获取 id 前拒绝无效反馈,因此空命令不会创建 `.userid`。
此次抽取保留既有的随机 UUID、home 解析、进程内缓存、独占创建并发、损坏文件替换与 best-effort 写入语义。它不会统一 dsh-sdk launcher 独立的 `telemetry.json` 身份。
此次抽取保留既有的随机 UUID、home 解析、进程内缓存、独占创建并发、损坏文件替换与 best-effort 写入语义。
## 考虑过的替代方案
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ OpenTelemetry 后端已在 `$DSH_HOME/.userid` 中持久化一个匿名 UUID。`
| 从 `session-telemetry-otel` 导入辅助函数 | 使反馈耦合到可选的导出后端,并在遥测导出反馈后形成反向依赖环 |
| 在反馈中复制持久化辅助函数 | 同一文件契约的两份实现可能发生偏差,并因校验或失败语义不同而产生竞态 |
| 生成独立的反馈用户 id | 确认文本无法与 OTel Resource 相关联,因而不能达到报告目的 |
| 同时移动 launcher telemetry id | launcher 回流不是 `.userid` 的消费方;统一无关存储仍不在范围内 |
## 后果

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-08-10-pre-plugin-theme-bootstrap.md
2026-08-10-pre-plugin-theme-bootstrap.md: 276d564dcef60e5130b4b2d0ef7cbc12eeb8b6d6
2026-08-10-pre-plugin-theme-bootstrap.zh.md: 7162b2d851b50f75b3af6320ad9348383933e50f

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
# Agent Note: Pre-Plugin Theme Bootstrap
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-08-10-pre-plugin-theme-bootstrap.zh.md)
## Problem
The web shell renders `Loading plugins…` before the browser-side plugin tree activates. The theme tokens are already loaded with the shell styles, but `color-scheme` and `body[data-ds-dark-theme]` are not written until ui-theme's ThemeService and ui-layout's ThemePresenter activate; with a persisted dark preference, the loading page therefore renders first with the light palette and then switches to dark.
`dshClient.immediately` only includes the bundle in first-stage prefetching; it does not cause the plugin to execute before HTML parsing or the shell's initial render. Changing only the client plugin's loading tier cannot close this window.
## Decision
ui-theme's host half transforms each index HTML document through `ctx.httpServer.tapIndex()`, inserting a synchronous inline script immediately after the opening `<body>` tag. The transform registers under an optional `httpServer` injection, so compositions without that service still activate ui-theme and install no transform. When the HTML parser executes the script, the body exists, but the shell's module script and React root have not yet run.
The host half registers the [`ui-theme.preference` settings section](2026-08-06-host-backed-web-preferences.md) when a settings provider exists. For each index response, it embeds that schema-validated built-in preference in the inline script; without a settings provider or active registration, it embeds the `system` default. The browser resolves `system` through `prefers-color-scheme`, falling back to light when `matchMedia` is unavailable. It writes only the two pieces of DOM state that ThemePresenter later owns: `document.documentElement.style.colorScheme` and `body[data-ds-dark-theme]`.
The bootstrap logic recognizes only the built-in `light`, `dark`, and `system` semantics. It registers no listeners and does not resolve third-party themes or token overrides. After the browser-side plugin tree activates, ThemeService remains authoritative for theme state, and ThemePresenter writes the complete resolved result back to the same DOM state and owns subsequent updates and disposal.
## Verification
ui-theme's unit tests cover activation without either optional Host service, the script position, Host-setting precedence, the OS preference, missing `matchMedia`, input without a body, live settings reads, and disposal of the Host registrations with the plugin fiber. A Chromium scenario for the real web composition selects the durable dark preference, holds the plugin bundle request open to keep the loading page observable, then asserts that the index response produces a dark background, the body attribute, and the root element's `color-scheme`. The change does not alter the accessibility tree, so it produces no new page golden.
## Alternatives considered
**Hard-code the logic in `apps/web/index.html`.** This would run at the same point, but static HTML cannot embed the current Host setting and would duplicate the preference resolution and DOM fields owned by ui-theme. The Host transform follows the theme plugin's lifecycle and keeps the application shell unaware of the theme domain.
**Make the ui-theme client bundle synchronous or activate it earlier.** `immediately` controls only prefetching; plugin instantiation still occurs after the shell starts running. Blocking the initial render until ThemeService activates would delay the visible loading and error screens and make the shell depend on the plugin tree it monitors to render failures.
**Rely only on CSS `prefers-color-scheme`.** Media queries cannot read an explicit persisted choice, so a user who selects dark while the operating system uses light would still see a flash.
**Run in `<head>` and add a temporary class to html.** The body does not exist yet, and this would require a set of temporary selectors separate from the final palette attributes. Immediately after `<body>` is the earliest parse position that can write the final DOM fields directly.
## Consequences
The loading page's first frame matches the durable built-in preference and defaults to the OS preference when no settings provider is composed. The index transform reads Host settings for every response, while the inline script contains only the selected built-in value and `system` resolution. Changes to the built-in preference semantics or ThemePresenter DOM fields must update both the script and ThemeService. A custom theme still applies fully only after the browser plugins activate; during the loading interval, the page uses the light or dark base palette to which that theme resolves.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
# Agent Note: 插件激活前的主题引导
Status: implemented
[English](2026-08-10-pre-plugin-theme-bootstrap.md) | 中文
## Problem
Web 壳在浏览器侧插件树激活前呈现 `Loading plugins…`。主题 token 已随壳样式加载,但 `color-scheme` 和 `body[data-ds-dark-theme]` 要等 ui-theme 的 ThemeService 与 ui-layout 的 ThemePresenter 激活后才写入;持久化偏好为深色时,加载页因此先按浅色调色板绘制,再切为深色。
`dshClient.immediately` 只把 bundle 纳入第一阶段预取,不会让插件在 HTML 解析或壳首次渲染前执行。仅调整客户端插件的加载档位无法关闭这段时间窗口。
## Decision
ui-theme 的主机侧通过 `ctx.httpServer.tapIndex()` 转换每份 index HTML,在 `<body>` 起始标签后紧接一段同步内联脚本。该转换通过可选的 `httpServer` 注入注册,因此不含该服务的组合仍会激活 ui-theme,但不会安装转换。HTML 解析器执行该脚本时,body 已存在,而壳的模块脚本与 React 根节点尚未运行。
settings provider 存在时,主机侧会注册 [`ui-theme.preference` settings 分节](2026-08-06-host-backed-web-preferences.md)。它为每份 index 响应把经过 schema 校验的内建偏好嵌入内联脚本;不存在 settings provider 或有效注册时则嵌入默认值 `system`。浏览器通过 `prefers-color-scheme` 解析 `system`,不支持 `matchMedia` 时回退为浅色。脚本只写 ThemePresenter 后续拥有的两项 DOM 状态:`document.documentElement.style.colorScheme` 与 `body[data-ds-dark-theme]`。
引导逻辑只认识内建的 `light`、`dark`、`system` 语义,不注册监听器,也不解析第三方主题或 token 覆盖。浏览器侧插件树激活后,ThemeService 仍是主题状态的权威来源,ThemePresenter 会把完整解析结果重新写入同一组 DOM 状态并负责后续更新与释放。
## Verification
ui-theme 的单元测试覆盖不含任一可选 Host 服务时的激活、脚本位置、Host 设置优先级、系统偏好、缺少 `matchMedia`、不含 body 的输入、实时读取 settings,以及 Host 注册随插件 fiber 一同释放。真实 Web 组合的 Chromium 场景会选择持久化深色偏好并拦住插件 bundle 请求,使加载页保持可观察,再断言 index 响应产生了深色背景、body 属性和根元素 `color-scheme`。该变化不改变可访问性树,因此不产生新的页面 golden。
## Alternatives considered
**把逻辑固定写进 `apps/web/index.html`。** 这样能在相同时机执行,但静态 HTML 无法嵌入当前 Host 设置,还会复制 ui-theme 拥有的偏好解析和 DOM 字段;Host 转换会跟随主题插件的生命周期,并让应用壳无需了解主题领域。
**让 ui-theme 客户端 bundle 同步或更早激活。** `immediately` 只控制预取,插件实例化仍发生在壳开始运行之后;把首次渲染阻塞到 ThemeService 激活会延后可见的加载与报错界面,也会让壳的故障呈现依赖被它监测的插件树。
**只依赖 `prefers-color-scheme` 的 CSS。** 媒体查询无法读取显式持久化选择,因此操作系统为浅色而用户选择深色时仍会闪烁。
**在 `<head>` 中执行并给 html 添加临时类。** body 此时尚不存在,还需要一套与正式调色板属性不同的临时选择器。紧接 `<body>` 是能够直接写正式 DOM 字段的最早解析位置。
## Consequences
加载页首帧与持久化内建偏好一致;未组合 settings provider 时则默认采用系统偏好。index 转换会为每份响应读取 Host settings,而内联脚本只包含选定的内建值与 `system` 解析逻辑。内建偏好语义或 ThemePresenter DOM 字段变化时,必须同时更新脚本与 ThemeService。自定义主题仍会在浏览器插件激活后才完整应用;加载期间,页面使用该主题解析后的浅色或深色基础调色板。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/bug-fix/2026-08-11-owned-run-finish-reason.md
2026-08-11-owned-run-finish-reason.md: 87a158c7fedc8c6447306c489ba9f969d95dc412
2026-08-11-owned-run-finish-reason.zh.md: d75b7d4f0c932ec2d3665b8911835e3b081af129

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
# Agent Note: Owned-run finish reason reporting
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-08-11-owned-run-finish-reason.zh.md)
## Problem
Python SDK consumers need a concise classification of how an owned activity interval reached idle. Requiring each consumer to scan raw `turn/end` events duplicates protocol knowledge, while a generic success status loses token-limit and model-error distinctions.
## Decision
`RunResult.finish_reason` is the string `kind` from the last root-session `turn/end` collected between the submitted message's durable inbox receipt and the next whole-agent idle. It is `None` when the interval contains no `turn/end`. A `turn/end` without a string `data.reason.kind` raises `SdkProtocolError` instead of being reported as an interval without a turn ending. The field describes the owned run interval; it does not assign that ending to the submitted prompt. The [owned-run boundary decision](../architecture/2026-07-30-followup-enqueue-and-owned-runs.md) continues to prohibit prompt-level result attribution.
The field exposes only the kind because callers need a stable classification and the complete structured reason remains available in `RunResult.events`. Transport loss, timeout, and protocol failures still raise instead of producing a finish reason.
## Alternatives considered
**Restore `status`.** A deployment-mapped `ok` or `error` status conflates distinct durable endings and resembles transport success, so it does not answer why the interval finished.
**Expose a model `FinishReason`.** A run may contain multiple model steps, and intermediate `tool-calls` endings do not finish the run. The agent's last `turn/end` is the relevant run-level observation.
**Call the field `stop_reason`.** ACP and subagent seams map turn-ending reasons into their own `stopReason` value sets. The Python field preserves the raw agent reason kind, so sharing their name would imply a mapping this interface does not perform.
**Expose the complete structured turn reason.** The raw event stream already preserves error and cancellation details. Duplicating that object on `RunResult` would create two representations that Python callers must reconcile.
## Verification
Python SDK tests cover selection of the last turn ending, an interval without a turn ending, and rejection of a malformed turn-ending reason. The SDK README documents the field's values, `None` case, failure behavior, and run-level scope.
## Consequences
Callers can branch on `completed`, `max-tokens`, `error`, and future reason kinds without parsing the event list. The field may describe steering, injected context, or queued work that joined the interval, so it must not be presented as the initiating prompt's causal outcome. The in-repo TypeScript SDK exposes the finish-reason observation only through its typed events; its callers can read it directly from `SessionEvent[]`.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
# Agent Note: 自有运行的结束原因报告
Status: implemented
[English](2026-08-11-owned-run-finish-reason.md) | 中文
## 问题
Python SDK 消费方需要简洁地判断自有活动区间如何进入 idle。要求每个消费方扫描原始 `turn/end` 事件会重复协议知识,而通用的成功状态会丢失 token 上限与模型错误之间的区别。
## 决策
`RunResult.finish_reason` 是从已提交消息进入持久 inbox 的回执开始、到整个 agent 下一次进入 idle 为止所收集的根会话最后一个 `turn/end` 的字符串 `kind`。如果该区间没有 `turn/end`,字段为 `None`。缺少字符串 `data.reason.kind` 的 `turn/end` 会抛出 `SdkProtocolError`,而不会报告为区间内没有轮次结束。该字段描述自有运行区间;它不会把这个结束原因归属于已提交的提示词。[自有运行边界决策](../architecture/2026-07-30-followup-enqueue-and-owned-runs.md)仍禁止提示词级结果归因。
该字段只公开 kind,因为调用方需要稳定的分类,完整的结构化原因仍可从 `RunResult.events` 取得。传输丢失、超时和协议故障仍会抛出异常,而不会生成结束原因。
## 考虑过的替代方案
**恢复 `status`。** 由部署映射的 `ok` 或 `error` 状态会混淆不同的持久结束情况,而且看起来像传输成功状态,因此无法回答区间为何结束。
**公开模型 `FinishReason`。** 一次运行可能包含多个模型步骤,中间的 `tool-calls` 结束并不代表运行结束。agent 最后一个 `turn/end` 才是相关的运行级观测。
**将字段命名为 `stop_reason`。** ACP 和 subagent seam 会把轮次结束原因映射到各自的 `stopReason` 取值集合。Python 字段保留原始的 agent 原因 kind,因此沿用它们的名称会让人误以为该接口也执行了这种映射。
**公开完整的结构化轮次原因。** 原始事件流已经保留错误与取消的详细信息。在 `RunResult` 上复制这个对象会产生两种需要 Python 调用方协调的表示。
## 验证
Python SDK 测试覆盖选择最后一个轮次结束、区间内没有轮次结束,以及拒绝畸形轮次结束原因。SDK README 记录字段取值、`None` 情况、失败行为和运行级范围。
## 后果
调用方无需解析事件列表,即可按 `completed`、`max-tokens`、`error` 和未来的原因 kind 分支。该字段可能描述区间内加入的 steering、注入上下文或排队工作,因此不能将其表述为初始提示词的因果结果。仓库内的 TypeScript SDK 只通过类型化事件提供结束原因观测;其调用方可以直接从 `SessionEvent[]` 读取该观测。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-12-subagent-persona-tool-filter-and-depth.md
2026-07-12-subagent-persona-tool-filter-and-depth.md: 2c5eaf8829e01536a2de34cc190573ff35e4ab77
2026-07-12-subagent-persona-tool-filter-and-depth.zh.md: ae64e26d95e42ca6c933892348e22d3cbf0dc722
2026-07-12-subagent-persona-tool-filter-and-depth.md: b5b38836b987ab2ef2ceebf3a1efa7b6211b1b0e
2026-07-12-subagent-persona-tool-filter-and-depth.zh.md: 1dd5725309159a70dab0f3cd669a79460c3b1cd2

View File

@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ The depth limit bounds recursive delegation independently of tool visibility. A
The effective parent depth is the greater of durable `SessionHeader.delegationDepth` and runtime `AgentOptions.subagentDepth`. An in-process child records its derived depth in the session header, and resume restores that header, so a restart cannot lower the recursion count.
Every public entry validates the domain rather than relying on one model-facing configuration path. Negative values, fractions, negative zero, non-finite values, unsafe integers, malformed stored parent depth, and derived overflow all reject. A direct `SubagentStartRequest` may omit the cap to leave depth unbounded; loader-resolved `dsh-tool-subagent` configuration instead defaults to `3`, accepts a numeric override, and uses explicit `'provider-managed'` to omit the cap for an out-of-process provider whose deployment owns its recursion budget. Three is a small finite default that still permits a root plus three descendant generations: the [SDK helper's generated subagent entries](../../../../packages/scaffold/helper/src/features/builtin/index.ts) and [JSON-RPC example](../../../../examples/jsonrpc-agent/cordis.yml) use that general policy, while the shipped interactive ACP, headless, and REPL examples pin one. A numeric tool cap fails at provider mount when the provider lacks `depthLimit`.
Every public entry validates the domain rather than relying on one model-facing configuration path. Negative values, fractions, negative zero, non-finite values, unsafe integers, malformed stored parent depth, and derived overflow all reject. A direct `SubagentStartRequest` may omit the cap to leave depth unbounded; loader-resolved `dsh-tool-subagent` configuration instead defaults to `3`, accepts a numeric override, and uses explicit `'provider-managed'` to omit the cap for an out-of-process provider whose deployment owns its recursion budget. Three is a small finite default that still permits a root plus three descendant generations: the [JSON-RPC example](../../../../examples/jsonrpc-agent/cordis.yml) uses that general policy, while the ACP and headless examples pin one. A numeric tool cap fails at provider mount when the provider lacks `depthLimit`.
A deployment can combine depth and filtering, but the numeric cap does not synthesize a filter. The delegation tool stays visible at the cap because authorization may depend on runtime state; every attempted start checks the calling agent's current durable and runtime depth, and a rejected start returns an errored tool result without publishing a child. A deployment may separately deny delegation tools in children when its visibility policy is static. Neither choice changes the provider's conversation-history behavior.

View File

@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ subagent 启动有三个独立的组合控制:`persona`、`toolFilter` 和 `ma
有效父级深度取持久 `SessionHeader.delegationDepth` 与运行时 `AgentOptions.subagentDepth` 中的较大值。进程内子 agent 把推导出的深度记录在会话 header 中,恢复时会重新载入该 header,因此重启无法降低递归计数。
每个公开入口都自行验证值域,而非依赖单一的面向模型配置路径。负值、小数、负零、非有限值、不安全整数、格式错误的存储父级深度以及推导溢出均被拒绝。直接的 `SubagentStartRequest` 可以省略上限,让此机制不约束深度;经 loader 解析的 `dsh-tool-subagent` 配置则默认值为 `3`、接受数值覆盖,并使用显式的 `'provider-managed'` 来省略由进程外提供方部署拥有递归预算时的上限。三是一个较小的有限默认值,仍允许 root 加三代后代:[SDK 辅助函数生成的 subagent 条目](../../../../packages/scaffold/helper/src/features/builtin/index.ts)和 [JSON-RPC 示例](../../../../examples/jsonrpc-agent/cordis.yml)采用这项通用策略,而已交付的交互式 ACP、headless 和 REPL 示例固定为一。提供方缺少 `depthLimit` 时,数值工具上限会在提供方挂载阶段失败。
每个公开入口都自行验证值域,而非依赖单一的面向模型配置路径。负值、小数、负零、非有限值、不安全整数、格式错误的存储父级深度以及推导溢出均被拒绝。直接的 `SubagentStartRequest` 可以省略上限,让此机制不约束深度;经 loader 解析的 `dsh-tool-subagent` 配置则默认值为 `3`、接受数值覆盖,并使用显式的 `'provider-managed'` 来省略由进程外提供方部署拥有递归预算时的上限。三是一个较小的有限默认值,仍允许 root 加三代后代:[JSON-RPC 示例](../../../../examples/jsonrpc-agent/cordis.yml)采用这项通用策略,而 ACP 与 headless 示例固定为一。提供方缺少 `depthLimit` 时,数值工具上限会在提供方挂载阶段失败。
部署可以组合深度与过滤,但数值上限不会合成过滤器。委派工具在上限处仍然可见,因为授权可能依赖运行时状态;每次尝试启动都会检查调用方 agent 当前的持久与运行时深度,被拒绝的启动返回错误工具结果,且不发布子 agent。可见性策略固定的部署可以另外在子 agent 中 deny 委派工具。两种选择都不改变提供方的对话历史行为。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-21-continuable-background-subagents.md
2026-07-21-continuable-background-subagents.md: 470b2328fd5c27e85ac2ca08b53f353f41b54fc9
2026-07-21-continuable-background-subagents.zh.md: 7288fbdf916700f054451ce6a40eca2bd90f0866
2026-07-21-continuable-background-subagents.md: 06095e644f8c7e33ce262e2cb62c7f8622b4f405
2026-07-21-continuable-background-subagents.zh.md: bcdfb67553ef7452e25fe56246f854092f720092

View File

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Every later turn creates another Task. Its producer resources cover only that ac
Opening a child session in a human-facing adapter reads its persisted transcript and does not resume an Agent merely to display it. Human input starts or joins the same Task-backed activation used by parent input through the continuation manager. A human-started Task retains the exact currently loaded parent Agent as its notification target, and `task_output` remains the single result path. The existing completion listener injects at most one unsolicited notice while the Task is unreported; `kill`, a terminal read, or a terminal wait may mark it reported and suppress that notice. Human interaction is therefore permitted only while that parent instance remains live. A user-owned conversation that may outlive the parent and explicitly merge a conclusion back belongs to [interactive side sessions](../../proposed/feature/2026-07-08-interactive-side-sessions.md), not this Task-owned lifecycle.
`TaskService.start()` rejects producers when no task controller is attached. A human-facing adapter that accepts child input must therefore attach a task controller, or run in a deployment that loads `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks`; loading the Task service alone is insufficient. SDK-generated spawn and fork compositions mount `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local` and `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks` with the subagent tools. This dependency is the cost of using the same Task result, cancellation, and notification path for parent- and human-started activations.
`TaskService.start()` rejects producers when no task controller is attached. A human-facing adapter that accepts child input must therefore attach a task controller, or run in a deployment that loads `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks`; loading the Task service alone is insufficient. This dependency is the cost of using the same Task result, cancellation, and notification path for parent- and human-started activations.
Cancellation always targets the whole current activation. If human and parent messages have joined one turn, either caller's cancellation aborts that turn, disposes its run, and settles its Task as `killed`; the messages do not have independent results or cancellation rights. `followup()` requires the caller's signal, and abort while live steering awaits request admission aborts the activation-owned controller so the provider discards the pending message and the call settles only after the child reaches quiescence. Independent cancellation requires a later message to start a separate turn instead of steering the current one.
@@ -111,8 +111,7 @@ Task records and active-run associations are process-local. Persistence makes th
- `packages/subagent/subagent-inprocess/tests/subagent-inprocess.spec.ts` pins the continuable durability boundary: an absent or detached flush listener and a permanent listener failure reject with `DURABILITY_FAILED`, a transient loop-checkpoint failure can succeed on the final confirmation, cancellation owns either final-checkpoint outcome, resume also confirms durability, and foreground runs remain best-effort. `packages/subagent/subagent/tests/continuation.spec.ts` drives the real stack (agent loop, JSONL persistence, spawn/fork providers, Task service, and `ctx.subagents`) keylessly: initial and resumed activations create fresh Tasks and dispose their runs before terminal; the descriptor event is pre-turn, model-hidden, versioned, durable under the service-allocated child id, and survives blocked or throwing initial prompt admission; cancellation, steering, cold follow-up, authorization, ownership conflicts, and resume races retain the contracts described above.
- `packages/subagent/tool-subagent-control/tests/tool-subagent-control.spec.ts` pins the `send_message` schema, coordinator attribution, both route renderings, the not-delivered failure, the no-agent rejection, and HMR disposal.
- `packages/subagent/tool-subagent/tests/tool-subagent.spec.ts` covers the configured background route: continuable mode requires a resumable provider and returns both ids without requiring `send_message`, while one-shot mode keeps the plain Task acknowledgement even when the provider can resume.
- `packages/scaffold/helper/tests/project.spec.ts` pins the Task service and model-facing Task controls in generated spawn and fork compositions.
- `packages/subagent/tool-subagent/tests/tool-subagent.spec.ts` covers the configured background route: continuable mode requires a resumable provider and returns both ids without requiring `send_message`, while one-shot mode keeps the plain Task acknowledgement even when the provider can resume; it also pins Task service integration and the model-facing Task controls.
- The keyless ACP snapshot scenario `subagent-continuable` (examples/acp-agent) pins the model-visible transcript: the two-id acknowledgement, a final durability-confirmation failure rendered through `task_output` without unconfirmed child output, and a `send_message` follow-up whose started Task fails with the id unavailable.
## Consequences

View File

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ durable child Session
用户界面适配器打开 child 会话时,只读取持久化 transcript,不会仅为展示而恢复 agent。用户输入通过继续执行管理器,启动或加入与 parent 输入相同的 Task 激活。由用户启动的 Task 会保留当前加载的精确 parent Agent 作为通知目标,`task_output` 仍是唯一结果路径。只要 Task 尚未标记为已报告,现有完成监听器最多注入一条主动通知;`kill`、终态读取或终态等待都可能将其标记为已报告,并抑制这条通知。因此,仅允许在该 parent 实例保持存活时进行用户交互。可以比 parent 存活更久、并将结论显式合并回去的用户自有会话属于[交互式 side session](../../proposed/feature/2026-07-08-interactive-side-sessions.md),不属于这一由 Task 持有的生命周期。
如果没有附加任务控制器,`TaskService.start()` 会拒绝 producer。因此,接受 child 输入的用户界面适配器必须附加任务控制器,或运行于加载了 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks` 的部署中;仅加载 Task 服务并不足够。SDK 生成的 spawn 与 fork 组合在挂载 subagent 工具时,也会挂载 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tasks-local` 与 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks`。这项依赖是 parent 和用户启动的激活共用 Task 结果、取消和通知路径所付出的代价。
如果没有附加任务控制器,`TaskService.start()` 会拒绝 producer。因此,接受 child 输入的用户界面适配器必须附加任务控制器,或运行于加载了 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-tasks` 的部署中;仅加载 Task 服务并不足够。这项依赖是 parent 和用户启动的激活共用 Task 结果、取消和通知路径所付出的代价。
取消始终作用于当前完整激活。如果用户消息和 parent 消息已经加入同一个轮次,任一调用方发起取消都会中止该轮次、dispose 其 run,并将对应 Task 结算为 `killed`;这些消息没有独立的结果或取消权。`followup()` 要求调用方提供信号;若在线 steering 正在等待请求准入时该信号被中止,激活自有的 controller 会被中止,以便提供方丢弃待处理消息,并且该调用仅在子 agent 完全停稳后结算。若需要独立取消,后续消息必须另起轮次,而不能加入当前轮次。
@@ -111,8 +111,7 @@ Task 记录和活跃 run 关联都位于进程内。持久化使 child 会话可
- `packages/subagent/subagent-inprocess/tests/subagent-inprocess.spec.ts` 固定可继续执行的持久性边界:缺少 flush 监听器、flush 监听器已脱离或监听器持续失败时,均会以 `DURABILITY_FAILED` 拒绝;循环检查点的瞬时失败可在最终确认成功后继续完成,发生取消时最终检查点无论成功还是失败都由取消优先决定结果,resume 同样会确认持久性,而前台运行仍采用尽力而为策略。`packages/subagent/subagent/tests/continuation.spec.ts` 以无密钥方式驱动真实栈(agent loop、JSONL 持久化、spawn/fork 提供方、Task 服务和 `ctx.subagents`):初始及恢复后的激活都会创建新 Task,并在进入终态前 dispose 各自的 run;描述符事件位于轮次前、对模型隐藏、带版本、在服务分配的 child id 下持久化,并在初始 prompt admission 阻止请求或抛出异常时仍保留;取消、steering、cold follow-up、授权、所有权冲突与 resume 竞态保留上述约定。
- `packages/subagent/tool-subagent-control/tests/tool-subagent-control.spec.ts` 固定 `send_message` 的 schema、coordinator 来源标记、两种路由渲染、未送达失败、无 agent 时的拒绝,以及 HMR(热模块替换)dispose。
- `packages/subagent/tool-subagent/tests/tool-subagent.spec.ts` 覆盖配置的后台路由:可继续模式要求提供方可恢复,并在不要求 `send_message` 的情况下返回两个 id;即使提供方可以恢复,一次性模式仍保持普通的 Task 确认消息。
- `packages/scaffold/helper/tests/project.spec.ts` 固定生成的 spawn 与 fork 组合中的 Task 服务及面向模型的 Task 控制工具。
- `packages/subagent/tool-subagent/tests/tool-subagent.spec.ts` 覆盖配置的后台路由:可继续模式要求提供方可恢复,并在不要求 `send_message` 的情况下返回两个 id;即使提供方可以恢复,一次性模式仍保持普通的 Task 确认消息;它还固定 Task 服务集成及面向模型的 Task 控制工具。
- 无密钥 ACP 快照场景 `subagent-continuable`(examples/acp-agent)固定模型可见的 transcript:双 id 确认消息、最终持久性确认失败(该失败通过 `task_output` 呈现,且不包含未经确认的 child 输出),以及一次 `send_message` 后续操作——其已启动的 Task 会带着「id 不可用」失败。
## 影响

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-27-typescript-sdk-and-sdk-subagent-backend.md
2026-07-27-typescript-sdk-and-sdk-subagent-backend.md: e4ceeb6b1bc0b9e10fb5383454cbac1b404d4ad8
2026-07-27-typescript-sdk-and-sdk-subagent-backend.zh.md: 18e5c891f5810135b1ed5e6cfc27b94ad452c575
2026-07-27-typescript-sdk-and-sdk-subagent-backend.md: e5014689bd52992b4897b6f288d4b87dca54898b
2026-07-27-typescript-sdk-and-sdk-subagent-backend.zh.md: 78a7c23ee5bd34ce11004b49a63765a2ccf25bc4

View File

@@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ The stdio JSON-RPC serving surface (`@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc`, the [single-exe
Three packages, layered exactly like the existing Python stack, plus one Service provider registration:
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-protocol`** (`packages/scaffold/protocol/`) — the wire made shared and nominal. `JsonRpcLineTransport` moves here verbatim from `dsh-jsonrpc` (which now imports it), and `types.ts` names every payload the server speaks: `InitializeParams/Result`, `SessionPromptParams/Result`, the four notification payloads, and the `HarnessSdkRequestMap`/`HarnessSdkNotificationMap` indexes. The package root explicitly exports that complete interface and provides no source-module deep imports. The server's `notify()` call sites are typed against these named payloads, so server drift breaks compilation, not clients. One behavioral change: an error response now rejects with `JsonRpcResponseError` carrying the wire `code`/`data` (the Python client already preserved these; the old transport threw a bare `Error` with only the message).
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-client`** (`packages/scaffold/client/`) — the TypeScript twin of `python/sdk`: `HarnessClient` (spawn, frame, fan out notifications, typed error surfaces, close-to-quiescence via the shared dispose ladder) under `DeepSeekHarness`/`HarnessSession` (lazy start, memoized `initialize`, `run()` pairing one `session/prompt` with its `session.finished`). Its package-root consumer interface explicitly exports both client layers, caller-facing types, and the protocol-owned `JsonRpcResponseError`; source modules, normalization helpers, and the notification producer stay internal. `TurnResult.events` contains only the root session's typed events, while `notifications` retains session ids across the root and descendants discovered from `subagent.started`; session-tree scoping is client-side, mirroring `client.py`. Deliberate asymmetries with Python: the launch spec is explicit `command`/`args` (no bundled-runtime resolution — that is a distribution concern with no TS consumer yet); `env` replaces rather than merges (callers own credential policy; `scrubbedParentEnv` from the subprocess seam is one import away); `TurnResult` carries the structured `reason` (Python exposes only `status`); teardown walks a private stdin-EOF → SIGTERM → SIGKILL ladder to actual exit (the client runs outside any harness context, so it cannot ride `ctx.subprocess`).
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-protocol`** (`packages/sdk/protocol/`) — the wire made shared and nominal. `JsonRpcLineTransport` moves here verbatim from `dsh-jsonrpc` (which now imports it), and `types.ts` names every payload the server speaks: `InitializeParams/Result`, `SessionPromptParams/Result`, the four notification payloads, and the `HarnessSdkRequestMap`/`HarnessSdkNotificationMap` indexes. The package root explicitly exports that complete interface and provides no source-module deep imports. The server's `notify()` call sites are typed against these named payloads, so server drift breaks compilation, not clients. One behavioral change: an error response now rejects with `JsonRpcResponseError` carrying the wire `code`/`data` (the Python client already preserved these; the old transport threw a bare `Error` with only the message).
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-client`** (`packages/sdk/client/`) — the TypeScript twin of `python/sdk`: `HarnessClient` (spawn, frame, fan out notifications, typed error surfaces, close-to-quiescence via the shared dispose ladder) under `DeepSeekHarness`/`HarnessSession` (lazy start, memoized `initialize`, `run()` pairing one `session/prompt` with its `session.finished`). Its package-root consumer interface explicitly exports both client layers, caller-facing types, and the protocol-owned `JsonRpcResponseError`; source modules, normalization helpers, and the notification producer stay internal. `TurnResult.events` contains only the root session's typed events, while `notifications` retains session ids across the root and descendants discovered from `subagent.started`; session-tree scoping is client-side, mirroring `client.py`. Deliberate asymmetries with Python: the launch spec is explicit `command`/`args` (no bundled-runtime resolution — that is a distribution concern with no TS consumer yet); `env` replaces rather than merges (callers own credential policy; `scrubbedParentEnv` from the subprocess seam is one import away); `TurnResult` carries the structured `reason` (Python exposes only `status`); teardown walks a private stdin-EOF → SIGTERM → SIGKILL ladder to actual exit (the client runs outside any harness context, so it cannot ride `ctx.subprocess`).
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subagent-dsh-sdk`** (`packages/subagent/subagent-dsh-sdk/`) — the second out-of-process `SubagentProvider`, structured as `subagent-acp`'s sibling: same all-false capabilities and `inheritsParentContext: false`, same publish-after-handshake ownership transaction, same result-never-rejects flattening through an `onError` sink, same parent-namespace run id. The child answer is read from streamed `session.event`s — the last complete `assistant/message`, else accumulated `text-delta` chunks, so partial answers survive cancellation. Stop reasons map from the child's structured `TurnEndReason` (`completed`/`max-tokens`/`aborted` pass through; everything else, including a settled-without-turn child, is `error`). Its `provider`/`model` config feeds the child's `initialize`; `env` is where deployments pass the child's own key and `DSH_CORDIS_CONFIG`.
- **The subagent seam grows `out-of-process.ts`**: the provider-side vocabulary both out-of-process backends share — `NO_START_CAPABILITIES`, timing-bound validation, child cwd resolution (config override, else the delegating parent session's workspace), the never-reject `settleRunResult`, and the `subprocessRunHandle` publication. Process mechanics (spawn, env scrub, tree-scoped teardown) live in the `dsh-subprocess` seam; `subagent-acp` spawns through `ctx.subprocess`, while this backend spawns through the SDK client (the subprocess README's documented exception for SDK-managed transports) and applies the seam's `scrubbedParentEnv()` itself.

View File

@@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ stdio JSON-RPC 对外服务接口(`@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc`,见[单文件
三个包,分层与既有 Python 栈完全一致,外加一个 Service provider 注册:
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-protocol`**(`packages/scaffold/protocol/`)—— 把线协议做成共享且具名。`JsonRpcLineTransport` 从 `dsh-jsonrpc` 原样移入(后者现在导入它),`types.ts` 为服务器所说的每个载荷命名:`InitializeParams/Result`、`SessionPromptParams/Result`、四个通知载荷,以及 `HarnessSdkRequestMap`/`HarnessSdkNotificationMap` 索引。该包根显式导出这一完整接口,且不提供指向源模块的深层导入。服务器的 `notify()` 调用点以这些具名载荷标注类型,服务器漂移会先破坏编译而不是破坏客户端。一处行为变化:错误响应现在以携带线上 `code`/`data` 的 `JsonRpcResponseError` 拒绝(Python 客户端本就保留这些;旧传输只抛携带消息的裸 `Error`)。
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-client`**(`packages/scaffold/client/`)—— `python/sdk` 的 TypeScript 孪生:`HarnessClient`(spawn、分帧、通知扇出、有类型的错误表面、经共享 dispose(资源释放)阶梯关闭至完全停稳)之上是 `DeepSeekHarness`/`HarnessSession`(惰性启动、记忆化 `initialize`、`run()` 把一个 `session/prompt` 与其 `session.finished` 配对)。其包根消费方接口显式导出两层客户端、面向调用方的类型,以及协议包所拥有的 `JsonRpcResponseError`;源模块、规范化辅助函数和通知投递端都保留为内部实现。`TurnResult.events` 只包含根会话的类型化事件,而 `notifications` 则保留根会话及从 `subagent.started` 发现的后代各自的会话 id;基于 `subagent.started` 血缘边的会话树范围限定在客户端完成,镜像 `client.py`。与 Python 的刻意不对称:启动规格是显式 `command`/`args`(无捆绑运行时解析——那是尚无 TS 消费方的发行问题);`env` 整体替换而非合并(凭据策略归调用方;subprocess seam 的 `scrubbedParentEnv` 一个 import 即得);`TurnResult` 携带结构化 `reason`(Python 只暴露 `status`);拆除走私有的 stdin-EOF → SIGTERM → SIGKILL 阶梯直到真正退出(客户端运行在任何 harness 上下文之外,无法搭乘 `ctx.subprocess`)。
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-protocol`**(`packages/sdk/protocol/`)—— 把线协议做成共享且具名。`JsonRpcLineTransport` 从 `dsh-jsonrpc` 原样移入(后者现在导入它),`types.ts` 为服务器所说的每个载荷命名:`InitializeParams/Result`、`SessionPromptParams/Result`、四个通知载荷,以及 `HarnessSdkRequestMap`/`HarnessSdkNotificationMap` 索引。该包根显式导出这一完整接口,且不提供指向源模块的深层导入。服务器的 `notify()` 调用点以这些具名载荷标注类型,服务器漂移会先破坏编译而不是破坏客户端。一处行为变化:错误响应现在以携带线上 `code`/`data` 的 `JsonRpcResponseError` 拒绝(Python 客户端本就保留这些;旧传输只抛携带消息的裸 `Error`)。
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-client`**(`packages/sdk/client/`)—— `python/sdk` 的 TypeScript 孪生:`HarnessClient`(spawn、分帧、通知扇出、有类型的错误表面、经共享 dispose(资源释放)阶梯关闭至完全停稳)之上是 `DeepSeekHarness`/`HarnessSession`(惰性启动、记忆化 `initialize`、`run()` 把一个 `session/prompt` 与其 `session.finished` 配对)。其包根消费方接口显式导出两层客户端、面向调用方的类型,以及协议包所拥有的 `JsonRpcResponseError`;源模块、规范化辅助函数和通知投递端都保留为内部实现。`TurnResult.events` 只包含根会话的类型化事件,而 `notifications` 则保留根会话及从 `subagent.started` 发现的后代各自的会话 id;基于 `subagent.started` 血缘边的会话树范围限定在客户端完成,镜像 `client.py`。与 Python 的刻意不对称:启动规格是显式 `command`/`args`(无捆绑运行时解析——那是尚无 TS 消费方的发行问题);`env` 整体替换而非合并(凭据策略归调用方;subprocess seam 的 `scrubbedParentEnv` 一个 import 即得);`TurnResult` 携带结构化 `reason`(Python 只暴露 `status`);拆除走私有的 stdin-EOF → SIGTERM → SIGKILL 阶梯直到真正退出(客户端运行在任何 harness 上下文之外,无法搭乘 `ctx.subprocess`)。
- **`@deepseek-ai/dsh-subagent-dsh-sdk`**(`packages/subagent/subagent-dsh-sdk/`)—— 第二个进程外 `SubagentProvider`,采用与 `subagent-acp` 对等的结构:同样的全 false 能力与 `inheritsParentContext: false`,同样的握手后发布所有权事务,同样通过 `onError` sink 将结果归一为绝不拒绝,同样的父命名空间 run id。子答案从流式 `session.event` 读取——最后一条完整 `assistant/message`,否则累积的 `text-delta` 块,部分答案在取消时得以保留。停止原因由子进程的结构化 `TurnEndReason` 映射(`completed`/`max-tokens`/`aborted` 直通;其余一切、包括未运行任何轮次便已结束的子进程,都是 `error`)。其 `provider`/`model` 配置喂给子进程的 `initialize`;`env` 是部署传入子进程自有密钥与 `DSH_CORDIS_CONFIG` 的地方。
- **subagent seam 新增 `out-of-process.ts`**:两个进程外后端共享的 provider 侧词汇——`NO_START_CAPABILITIES`、时限校验、子进程 cwd 解析(配置覆盖、否则发起委托的父会话工作区)、绝不拒绝的 `settleRunResult`、以及 `subprocessRunHandle` 发布。进程机制(spawn、环境清理、进程树清理)属于 `dsh-subprocess` seam;`subagent-acp` 经 `ctx.subprocess` spawn 子进程,本后端则经 SDK 客户端 spawn 子进程(subprocess README 记载的 SDK 托管传输例外)并自行应用该 seam 的 `scrubbedParentEnv()`。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/feature/2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.md
2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.md: 75b65e9fd477d19afb3a3a25e424a7f7620099a3
2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.zh.md: 3db5b665f9cbbe6f884a9717afa758f22a419658
2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.md: 4d5d14cb63ebbf9d9f71c729da998ad9804e56bf
2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.zh.md: 69c48076ceb97a4bbc3cc35a2aaa3e632b1b1b06

View File

@@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ English | [中文](2026-07-31-telemetry-anonymous-user-id.zh.md)
## Problem
Session telemetry is mounted by default ([default-mount Note](2026-07-31-web-telemetry-default-mount.md)), but the OTel Resource carried only `service.name`/`service.version` — no user-level identity at all, so the collector could neither aggregate per user nor count active users. The only prior ruling on point was an unimplemented one to derive a user id by hashing the hostname/local IP; the dsh-sdk toolchain keeps its own anonymous id (`$DSH_HOME/telemetry.json`), but that is the launcher feed's private fact, unrelated to the OTel feed. The OTel feed needed an anonymous user identity with clean semantics.
Session telemetry is mounted by default ([default-mount Note](2026-07-31-web-telemetry-default-mount.md)), but the OTel Resource carried only `service.name`/`service.version` — no user-level identity at all, so the collector could neither aggregate per user nor count active users. The only prior ruling on point was an unimplemented one to derive a user id by hashing the hostname/local IP. The OTel feed needed an anonymous user identity with clean semantics.
## Decision
`getOrCreateAnonymousUserId()` returns the bare UUID line in `$DSH_HOME/.userid` (resolved by `resolveDshHome`, `$DSH_HOME` > `~/.dsh`), minting and persisting a random UUID v4 on first use; the backend constructor carries it as the Resource's `user.id` (the OTel semconv user attribute), once per export batch. The original implementation lived inside `session-telemetry-otel` because no second real consumer existed. `/feedback` later became that consumer, so [the shared-id decision](../architecture/2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.md) moves ownership to `@deepseek-ai/dsh-user-id` without changing the storage, anonymity, concurrency, or loss semantics recorded here. The dsh-sdk launcher telemetry keeps its own anonymous-id store (`telemetry.json`) and remains unrelated.
`getOrCreateAnonymousUserId()` returns the bare UUID line in `$DSH_HOME/.userid` (resolved by `resolveDshHome`, `$DSH_HOME` > `~/.dsh`), minting and persisting a random UUID v4 on first use; the backend constructor carries it as the Resource's `user.id` (the OTel semconv user attribute), once per export batch. The original implementation lived inside `session-telemetry-otel` because no second real consumer existed. `/feedback` later became that consumer, so [the shared-id decision](../architecture/2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.md) moves ownership to `@deepseek-ai/dsh-user-id` without changing the storage, anonymity, concurrency, or loss semantics recorded here.
| Ruling | Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
@@ -32,13 +32,12 @@ Session telemetry is mounted by default ([default-mount Note](2026-07-31-web-tel
| Hostname/IP-hash-derived id (the prior ruling) | Reversible means not anonymous; the random UUID is semantically clean — the user ruled to supersede |
| user.id on every record's attributes (Claude Code's shape) | Touches the session-telemetry seam contract or injects per record, growing the wire; once per batch on the Resource already aggregates |
| A shared package before `/feedback` needed the id (the first cut) | At that time the only real consumer was the OTel backend; extraction became justified only when direct feedback needed the same correlation id |
| Reusing telemetry.json instead of a new file | The file name/JSON format files the identity under the launcher feed's naming; the OTel feed's identity is a standalone fact |
| AppCLIEntry reading the id and injecting via config patch | Every surface entry needs wiring; a runtime fact inside deployment config conflates the two |
| Housing it in `@deepseek-ai/dsh-paths` | paths is pure path computation with zero IO; a persisting identity capability would pollute the package boundary |
## Consequences
- One `$DSH_HOME` is one stable user in the OTel feed; separate homes are separate users by construction, with no cross-home linking mechanism.
- The OTel feed and `/feedback` share `.userid`; the launcher feed still uses `telemetry.json` and cannot be correlated with them.
- The OTel feed and `/feedback` share `.userid`.
- Deleting `.userid` resets the identity (effective next launch); on an unwritable home each process holds its own in-memory id until the home becomes writable.
- The [default-mount Note](2026-07-31-web-telemetry-default-mount.md)'s identity follow-up is closed for the anonymous-user-id part by this decision; hostname/surface dimensions, the redaction rule, and the usage-metrics track remain open.

View File

@@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ Status: implemented
## Problem
session telemetry 已默认挂载([默认挂载 Note](2026-07-31-web-telemetry-default-mount.md)),但 OTel Resource 只有 `service.name`/`service.version`,没有任何用户级标识——接收端无法按用户聚合、无法数活跃用户。此前唯一相关口径是一条未实现的「hostname/本机 IP 哈希派生 user.id」裁定;dsh-sdk 工具链另有自用的匿名 id(`$DSH_HOME/telemetry.json`),但那是 launcher 回流的私有事实,与 OTel 回流无关。需要给 OTel 回流一个语义干净的匿名用户身份。
session telemetry 已默认挂载([默认挂载 Note](2026-07-31-web-telemetry-default-mount.md)),但 OTel Resource 只有 `service.name`/`service.version`,没有任何用户级标识——接收端无法按用户聚合、无法数活跃用户。此前唯一相关口径是一条未实现的「hostname/本机 IP 哈希派生 user.id」裁定。需要给 OTel 回流一个语义干净的匿名用户身份。
## Decision
`getOrCreateAnonymousUserId()` 返回 `$DSH_HOME/.userid`(`resolveDshHome` 解析,`$DSH_HOME` > `~/.dsh`)中的裸 UUID 行,首用生成随机 UUID v4 并落盘;后端构造时把它作为 Resource 的 `user.id`(OTel semconv 标准用户属性)随每批导出携带一次。原始实现位于 `session-telemetry-otel`,因为当时不存在第二个真实消费方。`/feedback` 后来成为该消费方,因此[共享 id 决策](../architecture/2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.md)将所有权移交给 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-user-id`,但不改变本 Note 记录的存储、匿名、并发与丢失语义。dsh-sdk launcher telemetry 继续使用自己独立的匿名 id 存储(`telemetry.json`),与此身份无关。
`getOrCreateAnonymousUserId()` 返回 `$DSH_HOME/.userid`(`resolveDshHome` 解析,`$DSH_HOME` > `~/.dsh`)中的裸 UUID 行,首用生成随机 UUID v4 并落盘;后端构造时把它作为 Resource 的 `user.id`(OTel semconv 标准用户属性)随每批导出携带一次。原始实现位于 `session-telemetry-otel`,因为当时不存在第二个真实消费方。`/feedback` 后来成为该消费方,因此[共享 id 决策](../architecture/2026-08-07-shared-feedback-telemetry-user-id.md)将所有权移交给 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-user-id`,但不改变本 Note 记录的存储、匿名、并发与丢失语义。
| 裁定 | 取值 | 理由 |
|---|---|---|
@@ -32,13 +32,12 @@ session telemetry 已默认挂载([默认挂载 Note](2026-07-31-web-telemetry
| hostname/IP 哈希派生 id(此前口径) | 可反查即非匿名;随机 UUID 语义干净,用户裁决取代 |
| user.id 放每条 record 的 attributes(Claude Code 形态) | 要动 session-telemetry seam 约定或逐条注入,wire 体积涨;Resource 每批一次已满足聚合 |
| 在 `/feedback` 需要该 id 之前抽取共享包(初版实现) | 当时唯一的真实消费方是 OTel 后端;只有直接反馈需要同一个关联 id 后,抽取才具备依据 |
| 复用 telemetry.json 不新建文件 | 文件名/JSON 格式把身份挂在 launcher 链路命名下;OTel 回流身份是独立事实 |
| AppCLIEntry 读好 id 经 config patch 注入 | 每个 surface 入口都要接线;config 里传运行时事实与部署配置混淆 |
| 挂进 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-paths` | paths 是纯路径计算零 IO;带持久化的身份能力会污染包边界 |
## Consequences
- 一个 `$DSH_HOME` 在 OTel 回流中是一个稳定用户;不同 home 在构造上就是不同用户,无跨 home 关联机制。
- OTel 回流与 `/feedback` 共享 `.userid`;launcher 回流仍使用 `telemetry.json`,无法与前两者关联。
- OTel 回流与 `/feedback` 共享 `.userid`。
- 删除 `.userid` 即重置身份(下次启动生效);home 不可写时每进程各自持有一个内存 id 直至恢复可写。
- [默认挂载 Note](2026-07-31-web-telemetry-default-mount.md) 的身份 follow-up 中「匿名用户 id」项由本决定关闭;hostname/surface 维度与脱敏规则、usage-metrics track 仍是待办。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/process/2026-08-10-vendor-package-rescope.md
2026-08-10-vendor-package-rescope.md: f2a142cec4e3c28fae54af8063cd730931fa738b
2026-08-10-vendor-package-rescope.zh.md: 994064fc869e1ccd95609ec67010eae794ed1c48
2026-08-10-vendor-package-rescope.md: 3ad442a681229b7b9df8feb1c487a925b6123f23
2026-08-10-vendor-package-rescope.zh.md: d45fd3c389204e832917f0749c7d5bc360dea3a1

View File

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ All nine packages move into the `@deepseek-ai` scope. Directory names, upstream
The rewrite touches only **delimited, complete package-name tokens**: quoted or backticked specifiers (optionally with a `/subpath`), `package.json` names and dependency keys, `cordis.yml` `name:` values, and `tsconfig.base.json` `paths` keys. Identically spelled strings that are not package names therefore stayed as they were: the `cordis.yml` config-file family, the Loader's literal `cordis:` builtin prefix (`cordis:include`, `cordis:group` — see `vendor/loader/src/config/tree.ts`), kind strings like `cordis-config-entry`, `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-cordis`, Schemastery's upstream `Symbol.for('schemastery')` and `vendor:` metadata field, the `packages/<group>/` directory names in `GROUP_ORDER` (`scripts/gen-module-graph.ts`, `scripts/gen-doc-graphs.ts`), and the upstream install instructions in `vendor/*/README.md`.
Two classes are invisible to a token rule and were renamed site by site. First, property access and unquoted object keys — `manifest.peerDependencies?.cordis`, and the manifest keys the scaffold generates in `npm-dependency-policy.ts` and `local-plugin-blueprint.ts` — where TypeScript cannot catch a stale `Record<string, string>` key. Second, constants that carry the name as data: the vendored set in `check-workspace-constraints.ts`, the group/include names in `verify-cordis-config.ts`, the `declare module` target strings in `cordis-walk.ts`, `gen-scoped-events.ts`, and typert's `analyzer.ts`, and `alwaysBundle` in `app-boot/tsdown.config.ts`.
Two classes are invisible to a token rule and were renamed site by site. First, property access — `manifest.peerDependencies?.cordis` — where TypeScript cannot catch a stale `Record<string, string>` key. Second, constants that carry the name as data: the vendored set in `check-workspace-constraints.ts`, the group/include names in `verify-cordis-config.ts`, the `declare module` target strings in `cordis-walk.ts`, `gen-scoped-events.ts`, and typert's `analyzer.ts`, and `alwaysBundle` in `app-boot/tsdown.config.ts`.
Markdown splits along what a reader does with it. Every fence follows the rename regardless of its info string, because a fence is code they copy or configuration they mount — the `yaml` fences naming Loader plugins and the `ts ignore-check` fences beside compiled ones included. Prose follows it under `docs/`, where a tutorial sentence quoting a name teaches something this repository no longer resolves. Prose elsewhere — `vendor/*/README.md`, package READMEs, and `.agents/notes/` — keeps the names it was written with, both because it records what was true then and because the same spelling can mean something else: the Python SDK's `cordis` option, the unvendored `@cordisjs/plugin-http`, or an agent-preset id.

View File

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Status: implemented
改写只落在**带定界符的完整包名 token** 上:引号或反引号包裹的 specifier(可带 `/子路径`)、`package.json` 的 `name` 与依赖键、`cordis.yml` 的 `name:` 值、`tsconfig.base.json` 的 `paths` 键。因此以下同形串一律未改,它们不是包名:`cordis.yml` 及其家族文件名、Loader 的 `cordis:` 内建前缀(`cordis:include`、`cordis:group`,见 `vendor/loader/src/config/tree.ts`)、`cordis-config-entry` 这类 kind 串、`@deepseek-ai/dsh-tool-cordis`、Schemastery 上游的 `Symbol.for('schemastery')` 与 `vendor:` 元数据、`scripts/gen-module-graph.ts` 与 `gen-doc-graphs.ts` 里 `GROUP_ORDER` 的 `packages/<group>/` 目录名,以及 `vendor/*/README.md` 里的上游安装指引。
Token 规则看不见两类点位,它们按名字逐处改:一是属性访问与未加引号的对象键(`manifest.peerDependencies?.cordis`、脚手架 `npm-dependency-policy.ts` 与 `local-plugin-blueprint.ts` 生成的清单键)——TypeScript 抓不到过期的 `Record<string, string>` 键;二是把名字当数据的常量(`check-workspace-constraints.ts` 的 vendored 集合、`verify-cordis-config.ts` 的 group/include 名、`cordis-walk.ts` 与 `gen-scoped-events.ts` 与 typert `analyzer.ts` 里识别 `declare module` 目标的字符串、`app-boot/tsdown.config.ts` 的 `alwaysBundle`)。
Token 规则看不见两类点位,它们按名字逐处改:一是属性访问 `manifest.peerDependencies?.cordis`——TypeScript 抓不到过期的 `Record<string, string>` 键;二是把名字当数据的常量(`check-workspace-constraints.ts` 的 vendored 集合、`verify-cordis-config.ts` 的 group/include 名、`cordis-walk.ts` 与 `gen-scoped-events.ts` 与 typert `analyzer.ts` 里识别 `declare module` 目标的字符串、`app-boot/tsdown.config.ts` 的 `alwaysBundle`)。
Markdown 按「读者拿它做什么」一分为二。围栏一律跟着改,不看 info string——围栏里是读者要照抄的代码或要挂载的配置,包括写着 Loader 插件名的 `yaml` 围栏和紧邻编译围栏的 `ts ignore-check` 围栏。散文只在 `docs/` 下跟着改:教程里引用某个名字的句子,教的是本仓已不解析的东西。`docs/` 之外的散文——`vendor/*/README.md`、各包 README、`.agents/notes/`——保留写作当时的名字:既因为它记录的是当时的事实,也因为同一个拼写可能指别的东西,比如 Python SDK 的 `cordis` 选项、我们没 vendor 的 `@cordisjs/plugin-http`,或某个 agent-preset 的 id。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.md
2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.md: 23fcb90599c2ff96cd7ac0e6f7ee8fd508a6d1ad
2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.zh.md: 7aabf5612a54245327da9af804f745237472cb88
2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.md: fcfd0399bc6cf040287a057c56339690c8d92d8a
2026-07-20-remove-stdio-and-echo-agents.zh.md: 6f31d11885aad43b5f2ea236efb95c950290033a

View File

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ The remaining application roles are explicit:
- [`dsh --profile headless`](../../../../apps/cli/README.md) owns non-interactive execution. Its `headless` profile is the product composition; `examples/headless-agent` owns replay snapshots, generic real-agent suites, and an unexported keyless Loader driver.
- [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-acp-demo`](../../../../packages/examples/acp-demo/README.md) and `@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc` own their framed protocol integrations.
The SDK project model and create/config workflows replace the `stdio` run-interface option with `tui`; generated TUI projects compose `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui` and create or resume one exact session. Repository-facing demo documentation requires a DeepSeek API key and leads with the real Headless or TUI agents.
The SDK project model that carried the `stdio` run-interface option is deleted by the [SDK project toolchain removal](2026-08-11-remove-sdk-project-toolchain.md). Repository-facing demo documentation requires a DeepSeek API key and leads with a current runnable product.
Keyless validation is test-owned. The Headless Loader smoke uses a fixture adapter to exercise a real tool round trip, the `dsh` built-bin suite pins the published one-shot entry and output, the product Headless snapshot pins persistence, and the Headless PTY shutdown e2e pins signal escalation. Package-specific Loader tests keep deterministic adapters beside their scenarios. None is exposed as a runnable mock agent.
@@ -45,5 +45,5 @@ The built `dsh` bin rejects a piped TUI launch before Loader boot and points at
- Interactive and non-interactive product execution each have one owner and one runnable coding leaf.
- The repository has no keyless user-facing agent demo; local agent demos require `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY`.
- CI retains keyless real-entry coverage through test fixtures rather than a product command.
- Existing stdio-agent configurations, Echo commands, and SDK `--interface=stdio` invocations fail instead of being translated.
- Existing stdio-agent configurations and Echo commands fail instead of being translated.
- Piped multi-turn interaction in one process and the readline provider for non-TTY `ask_user_question` are intentionally gone; resume covers durable multi-turn work, and a non-TTY composition must supply its own interaction provider.

View File

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ DeepSeek Harness 在 TUI 和 Headless coding agent 之外,还提供了两个
- [`dsh --profile headless`](../../../../apps/cli/README.md) 负责非交互式执行。其 `headless` profile 是产品组装;`examples/headless-agent` 负责回放快照、通用真实 agent 测试套件和未导出的无密钥 Loader driver。
- [`@deepseek-ai/dsh-acp-demo`](../../../../packages/examples/acp-demo/README.md) 和 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc` 负责各自的分帧协议集成。
SDK 工程模型与 create/config 工作流将 `stdio` 运行接口选项替换为 `tui`;生成的 TUI 工程组合 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-tui`,并创建或恢复一个确切会话。仓库中的演示文档要求 DeepSeek API key,并优先引导到真实的 Headless 或 TUI agent。
承载 `stdio` 运行接口选项的 SDK 项目模型已由 [SDK 项目工具链移除决策](2026-08-11-remove-sdk-project-toolchain.md)删除。仓库中的演示文档要求 DeepSeek API key,并优先引导到当前可运行的产品。
无密钥验证由测试负责。Headless Loader 冒烟测试使用 fixture 适配器验证真实工具往返;`dsh` built-bin 测试套件固定已发布的一次性入口和输出;产品 Headless 快照固定持久化;Headless PTY 关闭 e2e 固定信号升级。各包专属的 Loader 测试则将确定性适配器放在对应场景旁。其中任何一项都不会作为可运行的 mock agent 对外暴露。
@@ -45,5 +45,5 @@ TUI 与 Headless 的 Loader 覆盖以源码和构建产物两种模式运行真
- 交互式与非交互式产品执行分别只有一个归属方和一个可运行的 coding 叶节点。
- 仓库没有面向用户的无密钥 agent 演示;本地 agent 演示需要 `DEEPSEEK_API_KEY`。
- CI 通过测试 fixture 保留针对真实入口的无密钥覆盖,而不是依赖产品命令。
- 既有 stdio agent 配置、Echo 命令和 SDK `--interface=stdio` 调用会直接失败,不会被转换。
- 既有 stdio agent 配置和 Echo 命令会直接失败,不会被转换。
- 有意移除了单进程内基于管道的多轮交互,以及面向非 TTY `ask_user_question` 的 readline 提供方;恢复会话可以满足持久多轮工作,非 TTY 组装则必须自行提供交互提供方。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md
2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md: 56c433acf59d3a0c4b5c8b6605e422d3c4efede2
2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.zh.md: bf326ce9f6fea8c55b842bc61e3d8521032ea4d1
2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.md: 56dcaf8b4327a008f26b884264958cac02d6541a
2026-07-23-acp-automation-only-protocol.zh.md: a34e179a1d38c1867ea8165b149a9ec7716c1c0e

View File

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ The bridge emits only committed `assistant/message` text. Reasoning, raw chunks,
One-shot `session/request_permission` remains. It is a machine policy channel for bridge-owned agents, not a human approval UI: the answerer accepts only an exact agent object in the bridge's live session map, delegates foreign or call-less requests, and maps failed RPCs to the fail-closed unavailable outcome. The client chooses allow once, reject once, or cancel, and the bridge never turns that response into a durable grant. Asking policy stays in the approval seam and its producers; [`dsh-subagent-acp`](../../../../packages/subagent/subagent-acp/README.md) uses this channel programmatically.
The app composition contains the agent spine, persistence, checkpoint policy, and ACP transport. It does not mount command, session-query, session-reference, plan-mode, permission-picker, or user-interaction services for ACP. SDK scaffolding likewise treats `ask_user_question` as TUI-only.
The app composition contains the agent spine, persistence, checkpoint policy, and ACP transport. It does not mount command, session-query, session-reference, plan-mode, permission-picker, or user-interaction services for ACP.
The transport programs interface-level agent, session, and approval services rather than the concrete agent loop. Tool execution stays inside the harness; ACP never delegates shell execution to an editor. stdout carries framed JSON-RPC only, so the app mounts no stdout logger and the bridge does not monkey-patch process output.

View File

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ ACP 仍有一个有用的职责:另一个 agent(智能体)或自动化控
保留一次性 `session/request_permission`。它是为桥接层拥有的 agent 提供的机器策略通道,而不是面向人类的审批 UI:应答者只接受桥接层当前会话映射中登记的同一 agent 对象;外部请求或缺少调用标识的请求会继续委派;RPC 失败则映射为拒绝请求的 `unavailable` 结果。客户端可选择允许一次、拒绝一次或取消,桥接层绝不会将该响应转换为持久授权。询问策略仍归审批 seam 及其生产者所有;[`dsh-subagent-acp`](../../../../packages/subagent/subagent-acp/README.md) 会以程序化方式使用该通道。
应用组装包含 agent 主干、持久化、检查点策略和 ACP 传输层。它不会为 ACP 挂载命令、会话查询、会话引用、plan mode、权限选择器或用户交互服务。SDK 脚手架同样将 `ask_user_question` 视为 TUI 专属功能。
应用组装包含 agent 主干、持久化、检查点策略和 ACP 传输层。它不会为 ACP 挂载命令、会话查询、会话引用、plan mode、权限选择器或用户交互服务。
传输层调用 agent、会话和审批的接口服务,而不依赖具体的 agent loop。工具执行仍留在 harness 内;ACP 绝不会把 shell 执行委派给编辑器。stdout 只承载分帧 JSON-RPC,因此 app 不挂载 stdout logger,桥接层也不会 monkey-patch 进程输出。

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,5 @@
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-08-04-remove-tui-package.md
2026-08-04-remove-tui-package.md: 19cc7d1a89a55bb57a69b9fce301f48f89384acd
2026-08-04-remove-tui-package.zh.md: be18cbd33cd4a2bb592de4e7986b2786da272d0f
2026-08-04-remove-tui-package.md: 4b89e45f009c2b240f88db40875d77d1a809e721
2026-08-04-remove-tui-package.zh.md: 0ff7fa0b4fd48f51b12e407000ee98fb6a28f476

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ The package also made the repository's supported application inventory misleadin
The `packages/ui/tui` package is deleted without a compatibility package or alias. Its source, package tests, terminal snapshots, dependency declarations, patched `pi-tui` artifact, workspace references, generated service catalog entry, and documentation are removed together. Generic host and agent-loop capabilities remain unchanged.
The SDK run-interface union now contains only `acp` and `embed`. `create-sdk` defaults to ACP, generated templates contain no terminal startup, resume, session-environment, or model-argument branch, and the builtin `ask-user` feature is removed because neither remaining generated interface supplies a `UserInteractionProvider`. Host applications may still mount the provider-neutral `dsh-user-interaction`, `dsh-commands`, and presentation services directly.
The SDK project toolchain that remained as the TUI package's final consumer is deleted by the [toolchain removal decision](2026-08-11-remove-sdk-project-toolchain.md). Host applications may still mount the provider-neutral `dsh-user-interaction`, `dsh-commands`, and presentation services directly.
This decision supersedes the reusable-package retention in [the explicit-config `dsh` entrypoint decision](../../archived/simplification/2026-08-03-explicit-config-dsh-entrypoint.md) and the current applicability of the archived TUI implementation notes. Their historical records remain frozen, but they are not authority for the supported package or application inventory.
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ This note consolidates the deleted package-only records that could not remain cu
## Verification
Repository searches and generated catalogs contain no TUI package, dependency patch, SDK interface option, service key, or package link. Focused SDK tests cover ACP and embedded creation, configuration, templates, and snapshots. The ordinary source build, typecheck, lint, hygiene, documentation gates, and remaining assembled snapshot suites run without the deleted workspace.
Repository searches and generated catalogs contain no TUI package, dependency patch, service key, or package link. The ordinary source build, typecheck, lint, hygiene, documentation gates, and remaining assembled snapshot suites run without the deleted workspace.
## Alternatives considered
@@ -34,6 +34,6 @@ Repository searches and generated catalogs contain no TUI package, dependency pa
## Consequences
DeepSeek Harness has no terminal UI package or generated TUI application. Existing imports, `cordis.yml` rows, SDK `--interface=tui` requests, and projects that depend on the package fail instead of being translated. Web remains the shipped interactive surface; ACP, JSON-RPC, and one-shot CLI remain the non-Web entry points.
DeepSeek Harness has no terminal UI package. Existing imports and `cordis.yml` rows that depend on the package fail instead of being translated. Web remains the shipped interactive surface; ACP, JSON-RPC, and one-shot CLI remain the non-Web entry points.
The provider-neutral command, user-interaction, approval, tool-presentation, PTY, and session-projection capabilities remain available to other hosts. Reintroducing a terminal frontend requires a named product or deployment, an explicit package boundary, a concrete interaction provider, and assembled lifecycle and transcript acceptance for that frontend.

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Status: implemented
删除 `packages/ui/tui` 包,不提供兼容包或别名。其源码、包测试、终端快照、依赖声明、已打补丁的 `pi-tui` 产物、workspace 引用、生成的服务目录条目和文档会一并移除。通用宿主能力与 agent loop(智能体循环)能力保持不变。
SDK 的运行接口联合类型现在只包含 `acp` 与 `embed`。`create-sdk` 默认使用 ACP,生成的模板不再包含终端启动、恢复、会话环境或模型参数分支;内置的 `ask-user` 功能也被移除,因为剩余两个生成接口都不提供 `UserInteractionProvider`。宿主应用仍可直接挂载提供方无关的 `dsh-user-interaction`、`dsh-commands` 和呈现服务。
作为 TUI 包最后消费方的 SDK 项目工具链已由[工具链移除决策](2026-08-11-remove-sdk-project-toolchain.md)删除。宿主应用仍可直接挂载提供方无关的 `dsh-user-interaction`、`dsh-commands` 和呈现服务。
本决策取代[显式配置 `dsh` 入口决策](../../archived/simplification/2026-08-03-explicit-config-dsh-entrypoint.md)中保留可复用包的决定,也使已归档 TUI 实现记录不再适用于当前状态。这些历史记录继续保持冻结,但不再作为受支持包或应用清单的依据。
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ SDK 的运行接口联合类型现在只包含 `acp` 与 `embed`。`create-sdk`
## 验证
仓库搜索结果与生成的服务目录中不再包含 TUI 包、依赖补丁、SDK 接口选项、服务键或包链接。专项 SDK 测试覆盖 ACP 和嵌入式两种模式的创建、配置、模板与快照。常规源码构建、类型检查、lint、hygiene、文档门禁以及其余组装快照测试套件均可在没有已删除 workspace 的情况下运行。
仓库搜索结果与生成的服务目录中不再包含 TUI 包、依赖补丁、服务键或包链接。常规源码构建、类型检查、lint、hygiene、文档门禁以及其余组装快照测试套件均可在没有已删除 workspace 的情况下运行。
## 考虑过的替代方案
@@ -34,6 +34,6 @@ SDK 的运行接口联合类型现在只包含 `acp` 与 `embed`。`create-sdk`
## 后果
DeepSeek Harness 不再提供终端 UI 包或生成的 TUI 应用。现有 import、`cordis.yml` 条目、SDK `--interface=tui` 请求以及依赖该包的项目会直接失败,不会得到兼容转换。Web 仍是已交付的交互表面;ACP、JSON-RPC 与一次性 CLI 仍是 Web 之外的入口。
DeepSeek Harness 不再提供终端 UI 包。现有 import 和依赖该包的 `cordis.yml` 条目会直接失败,不会得到兼容转换。Web 仍是已交付的交互表面;ACP、JSON-RPC 与一次性 CLI 仍是 Web 之外的入口。
提供方无关的命令、用户交互、审批、工具呈现、PTY 与会话投影能力仍可供其他宿主使用。重新引入终端前端时,必须为其提供具名产品或部署、显式包边界、具体交互提供方,以及组装后的生命周期与 transcript(文本记录)验收。

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
# Bilingual-pair consistency record (docs/i18n/README.md): the git blob hash of each
# side as of the last confirmed-consistent state. Both languages carry equal authority;
# after editing either side, bring the other along and re-record with:
# pnpm run verify-translation-pairing --write .agents/notes/implemented/simplification/2026-08-11-remove-sdk-project-toolchain.md
2026-08-11-remove-sdk-project-toolchain.md: 5c147560a2a9a796d6ca98d1acaf648049ae6a9f
2026-08-11-remove-sdk-project-toolchain.zh.md: 07624052e936d8705958e826c68f39f34dcd146a

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
# Agent Note: Remove the SDK project toolchain
Status: implemented
English | [中文](2026-08-11-remove-sdk-project-toolchain.zh.md)
## Problem
The repository carried an unreleased developer-project product with no consumers. `@deepseek-ai/create-sdk` generated an editable Cordis project, `@deepseek-ai/dsh-scripts` supplied its `dsh-sdk` development, build, start, configuration, and plugin-install commands, `@deepseek-ai/dsh-helper` coordinated feature definitions and multi-file project edits, and `@deepseek-ai/dsh-telemetry` reported launcher activity. The design aimed to keep generated projects editable while giving creation and later configuration one definition of dependencies, Cordis entries, environment placeholders, and owned files.
No project was created through a public release, and no current repository or external consumer requires that lifecycle. Keeping it meant maintaining four packages, two interactive command products, project templates, package-manager adapters, configuration reconciliation, launcher telemetry, a repository skill, and their tests and documentation without evidence that the product boundary should exist.
The same `scaffold/` group also contained the independently used SDK protocol, TypeScript client, and JSON-RPC server. Those packages serve the Python SDK, the `dsh-sdk` subagent provider, and the JSON-RPC example; their runtime protocol does not depend on generated projects or the removed launcher.
## Decision
The SDK project toolchain is deleted. The `@deepseek-ai/create-sdk`, `@deepseek-ai/dsh-scripts`, `@deepseek-ai/dsh-helper`, and `@deepseek-ai/dsh-telemetry` packages, their binaries, tests, templates, feature catalog, project-editing model, package-manager support, launcher telemetry, and repository creation skill have no replacement or compatibility layer. Their workspace, build, test, packaging, documentation-generator, vendoring-rescope, and dependency records are removed with them.
The runtime SDK remains. `@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-client`, `@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-protocol`, and `@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc` move unchanged from `packages/scaffold/` to `packages/sdk/`; their npm names and wire behavior do not change. Consumers continue to provide an executable plus an external `cordis.yml`, and the JSON-RPC server remains an ordinary plugin selected by that configuration.
The canceled developer-project, project-editing, and follow-up-capabilities proposals are deleted rather than retained as active or rejected records. This note preserves the motivation they shared, the decision not to ship that product, the capability given up, and the condition for reconsideration. Frozen archived Agent Notes remain historical snapshots and are not edited.
## Verification
The workspace contains none of the four deleted package names or either removed command product. Package aggregates, source path maps, package metadata, test collection, publication constraints, generated catalogs, dependency notices, and the lockfile resolve only the three runtime SDK packages under `packages/sdk/`. The runtime SDK package tests, its built server smoke, TypeScript consumers, repository documentation gates, build, and hygiene checks pin the surviving behavior and the absence of stale package paths.
## Alternatives considered
**Delete only the initializer.** Rejected because `dsh-sdk`, the shared project model, and launcher telemetry existed to operate projects created by that initializer, and there are no existing projects that need them.
**Keep error-only packages or command aliases.** Rejected because none of the commands shipped publicly. A tombstone would preserve package and executable surface area without a compatibility obligation.
**Delete the runtime SDK stack too.** Rejected because the Python SDK, the out-of-process Harness subagent provider, and the JSON-RPC example are current consumers of the protocol, client, and server.
**Leave the runtime stack under `packages/scaffold/`.** Rejected because nothing left in that group scaffolds a project. `packages/sdk/` states the surviving role directly even though the repository as a whole is also an SDK.
## Consequences
DeepSeek Harness no longer creates or manages standalone developer SDK projects. Automatic project generation, feature-tree configuration, local-plugin scaffolding, project-local development/build/start commands, and developer-cycle launcher telemetry are intentionally unavailable; ordinary applications and runtime distributions continue to compose plugins through their owning packages and `cordis.yml` files.
The repository loses the complete support graph rather than carrying dormant abstractions. Reintroducing a project toolchain requires a real consumer and a new proposal grounded in that consumer's workflow; it does not revive these packages or their deleted compatibility-free formats by default.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
# Agent Note: 移除 SDK 项目工具链
Status: implemented
[English](2026-08-11-remove-sdk-project-toolchain.md) | 中文
## 问题
仓库曾包含一套从未发布且没有消费方的开发者项目产品。`@deepseek-ai/create-sdk` 用于生成可编辑的 Cordis 项目;`@deepseek-ai/dsh-scripts` 提供 `dsh-sdk` 的开发、构建、启动、配置和插件安装命令;`@deepseek-ai/dsh-helper` 协调功能定义与多文件项目编辑;`@deepseek-ai/dsh-telemetry` 上报启动器活动。该设计旨在让生成的项目保持可编辑,并使项目创建与后续配置对依赖、Cordis 配置项、环境变量占位符和归属文件采用同一套定义。
没有任何项目是通过公开发布版创建的,当前仓库和外部消费方也都不需要这套生命周期。保留它就意味着继续维护 4 个包、2 套交互式命令产品、项目模板、包管理器适配器、配置调和、启动器遥测、1 个仓库 skill(技能)及其测试和文档,却没有证据表明这项产品边界应当存在。
同一 `scaffold/` 分组还包含各自独立使用的 SDK 协议、TypeScript 客户端和 JSON-RPC 服务器。这些包为 Python SDK、`dsh-sdk` subagent 提供方和 JSON-RPC 示例提供支持;其运行时协议不依赖生成的项目或被移除的启动器。
## 决策
删除 SDK 项目工具链。`@deepseek-ai/create-sdk`、`@deepseek-ai/dsh-scripts`、`@deepseek-ai/dsh-helper` 和 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-telemetry` 包及其二进制文件、测试、模板、功能目录、项目编辑模型、包管理器支持、启动器遥测和仓库项目创建 skill 均不提供替代实现或兼容层。与其对应的 workspace、构建、测试、打包、文档生成器、vendor scope 重写和依赖记录也一并移除。
保留运行时 SDK。`@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-client`、`@deepseek-ai/dsh-sdk-protocol` 和 `@deepseek-ai/dsh-jsonrpc` 保持原样,从 `packages/scaffold/` 移至 `packages/sdk/`;其 npm 名称和协议交互行为保持不变。消费方继续提供一个可执行文件和一份外置 `cordis.yml`,JSON-RPC 服务器仍是由该配置选择的普通插件。
被取消的开发者项目、项目编辑和后续能力提案予以删除,而不是保留为活跃或已否决记录。本 Agent Note 保留这些提案共有的动机、不交付该产品的决策、放弃的能力,以及重新考虑这一决定的条件。已冻结的归档 Agent Note 仍是历史快照,不作修改。
## 验证
workspace 中不再存在上述 4 个已删除包名或 2 套已移除的命令产品。包聚合配置、源码路径映射、包元数据、测试收集配置、发布约束、生成目录、依赖声明文件和锁文件都只解析 `packages/sdk/` 下的 3 个运行时 SDK 包。运行时 SDK 包测试、已构建服务器的冒烟测试、TypeScript 消费方、仓库文档门禁、构建和 hygiene 检查共同固定了保留的行为,并确保不存在陈旧的包路径。
## 考虑过的替代方案
**只删除初始化器。** 不予采纳,因为 `dsh-sdk`、共享项目模型和启动器遥测都是为了操作该初始化器创建的项目,而现有项目均不需要这些能力。
**保留仅用于报错的包或命令别名。** 不予采纳,因为这些命令都从未公开发布。墓碑会在不存在兼容义务的情况下保留包与可执行文件的接口范围。
**同时删除运行时 SDK 栈。** 不予采纳,因为 Python SDK、进程外 Harness subagent 提供方和 JSON-RPC 示例目前仍是协议、客户端和服务器的消费方。
**将运行时栈继续留在 `packages/scaffold/` 下。** 不予采纳,因为该分组剩余内容均不再负责搭建项目。尽管整个仓库同样是一套 SDK,`packages/sdk/` 仍直接说明了保留内容的职责。
## 后果
DeepSeek Harness 不再创建或管理独立的开发者 SDK 项目。自动项目生成、功能树配置、本地插件脚手架、项目本地的开发、构建和启动命令,以及面向开发周期的启动器遥测均有意不再提供;普通应用和运行时分发仍通过各自归属的包和 `cordis.yml` 文件组合插件。
仓库删除完整的支持图,而不是继续保留休眠抽象。重新引入项目工具链必须先有真实消费方,并基于该消费方的工作流提出新提案;默认情况下,不会复活这些包或已删除且不承诺兼容的格式。