fix(tasks-local): layer control surfaces and listeners by registering scope

One host registry serves every composition in the process, so its two
service-wide collections answered per-owner questions process-wide. `start()`
asked only whether SOME surface was attached, so an agent whose own composition
loads no `tool-tasks` could start work it has no tool to collect or stop as soon
as any other preset attached one — and the answer changed depending on which
sessions happened to be open. `settle()` walked every registered listener, so a
task settling without a waiter injected one completion notice per mounted
preset into the same owner.

Both collections now sit in `ScopedLayers`, the layered-registry primitive
`tools` and `skills` already use: a registration files into its registering
context's scope, and a read unions the global layer with the owner's scope
chain. A surface or listener registered from an unscoped context lands in the
global layer and serves every owner, which is exactly the host-plane
composition's own controls, so the TUI path is unchanged without a special
case.

This supersedes the consumer-side filter in the previous commit. That filter
produced the right notices but sat in the wrong layer: it left the `start()`
gate process-wide, it could not be enforced against a producer that resolves
the registry directly, and it made a Consumer carry scope knowledge that the
other layered registries keep in the registry. `tool-tasks` is scope-agnostic
again and the `dsh-scope` edge moves to `tasks-local`.

`start()`'s refusal is now owner-relative, so its model-visible text names the
agent rather than the process. The shipped `minimal` preset keeps
`enableRunInBackground: false`, no longer as the safety boundary — the registry
owns that now — but so an agent that could never collect a task is not offered
the parameter at all.

Refs #2141
This commit is contained in:
Yichen Jiang
2026-08-10 16:12:41 +08:00
parent 37ebe87087
commit 59e759ce13
36 changed files with 232 additions and 97 deletions

View File

@@ -1027,7 +1027,7 @@ describe('background preflight failure (no orphaned child, by construction)', ()
agent: parent,
})
expect(result.isError).toBe(true)
expect(text(result)).toContain('no control surface is attached')
expect(text(result)).toContain('no control surface serves this agent')
// Declare-then-execute: the failed preflight means no child ever existed.
expect(starts).toBe(0)
})